Question: Why did the country that russia was called after the Russian Revolution complain about the action of the US to the organization that excludes countries lacking strategic and hard power?

<P0-S0> In the resulting Battle of Pusan Perimeter (August–September 1950), the U.S. Army withstood KPA attacks meant to capture the city at the Naktong Bulge, P'ohang-dong, and Taegu. <P0-S1> The United States Air Force (USAF) interrupted KPA logistics with 40 daily ground support sorties that destroyed 32 bridges, halting most daytime road and rail traffic. <P0-S2> KPA forces were forced to hide in tunnels by day and move only at night. <P0-S3> To deny matériel to the KPA, the USAF destroyed logistics depots, petroleum refineries, and harbors, while the U.S. Navy air forces attacked transport hubs. <P0-S4> Consequently, the over-extended KPA could not be supplied throughout the south. <P0-S5> On 27 August, 67th Fighter Squadron aircraft mistakenly attacked facilities in Chinese territory and the Soviet Union called the UN Security Council's attention to China's complaint about the incident. <P0-S6> The US proposed that a commission of India and Sweden determine what the US should pay in compensation but the Soviets vetoed the US proposal. <SEP> <P1-S0> The Russian Revolution was a pair of revolutions in Russia in 1917 which dismantled the Tsarist autocracy and led to the rise of the Soviet Union. <P1-S1> The Russian Empire collapsed with the abdication of Emperor Nicholas II and the old regime was replaced by a provisional government during the first revolution of February 1917 (March in the Gregorian calendar; the older Julian calendar was in use in Russia at the time). <P1-S2> Alongside it arose grassroots community assemblies (called 'soviets') which contended for authority. <P1-S3> In the second revolution that October, the Provisional Government was toppled and all power was given to the soviets. <SEP> <P2-S0> trotsky, and others, believed that the revolution could only succeed in russia as part of a world revolution. <P2-S1> lenin wrote extensively on the matter and famously declared that imperialism was the highest stage of capitalism. <P2-S2> however, after lenin's death, joseph stalin established 'socialism in one country' for the soviet union, creating the model for subsequent inward looking stalinist states and purging the early internationalist elements. <P2-S3> the internationalist tendencies of the early revolution would be abandoned until they returned in the framework of a client state in competition with the americans during the cold war. <P2-S4> with the beginning of the new era, the after stalin period called the "thaw", in the late 1950s, the new political leader nikita khrushchev put even more pressure on the soviet-american relations starting a new wave of anti-imperialist propaganda. <P2-S5> in his speech on the un conference in 1960, he announced the continuation of the war on imperialism, stating that soon the people of different countries will come together and overthrow their imperialist leaders. <P2-S6> although the soviet union declared itself anti-imperialist, critics argue that it exhibited tendencies common to historic empires. <P2-S7> some scholars hold that the soviet union was a hybrid entity containing elements common to both multinational empires and nation states. <P2-S8> it has also been argued that the ussr practiced colonialism as did other imperial powers and was carrying on the old russian tradition of expansion and control. <P2-S9> mao zedong once argued that the soviet union had itself become an imperialist power while maintaining a socialist façade. <P2-S10> moreover, the ideas of imperialism were widely spread in action on the higher levels of government. <P2-S11> non russian marxists within the russian federation and later the ussr, like sultan galiev and vasyl shakhrai, considered the soviet regime a renewed version of the russian imperialism and colonialism. <SEP> <P3-S0> Japan and Germany are great powers too, though due to their large advanced economies (having the third and fourth largest economies respectively) rather than their strategic and hard power capabilities (i.e., the lack of permanent seats and veto power on the UN Security Council or strategic military reach). <P3-S1> Germany has been a member together with the five permanent Security Council members in the P5+1 grouping of world powers. <P3-S2> Like China, France, Russia and the United Kingdom; Germany and Japan have also been referred to as middle powers. <SEP> <P4-S0> linux was, at that time, specifically built for the intel 386, a significantly more powerful (and expensive) processor. <P4-S1> tanenbaum also specifically states "... as of about 1 year ago, there were two versions [of minix], one for the pc (360k diskettes) and one for the 286/386 (1.2m). <P4-S2> the pc version was outselling the 286/386 version by 2 to 1." <P4-S3> he noted that even though linux was free, it wouldn't be a viable choice for his students, as they would not be able to afford the expensive hardware required to run it, and that minix could be used on "a regular 4.77 mhz pc with no hard disk." <P4-S4> to this, kevin brown, another user of the usenet group, replied that tanenbaum should not complain about linux's ties to the 386 architecture, as it was the result of a conscious choice rather than lack of knowledge about operating system design, stating "... an explicit design goal of linux was to take advantage of the special features of the 386 architecture. <P4-S5> so what exactly is your point? <P4-S6> different design goals get you different designs."