Question: Who was the professor from the private Ph.D.-granting research university in Chicago that founded a website that is a multimedia archive of the United States Supreme court?

<P0-S0> Illinois Institute of Technology, commonly called Illinois Tech or IIT, is a private Ph.D.-granting research university located in Chicago, in the U.S. state of Illinois, with programs in engineering, science, psychology, architecture, business, communications, industrial technology, information technology, design and law. <P0-S1>  It traces its history to several 19th century engineering and professional education institutions in the United States. <SEP> <P1-S0> The Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology), commonly known as ITAM, is a private Ph.D.-granting research university located in Mexico City. <P1-S1>  It is one of the nation's most important institutions of higher learning; the best undergraduate Accounting, Business, Economics, International Relations, Law, and Political Science school in Mexico City; and the best business school in Latin America. <P1-S2>  Also, it is considered one of Mexico's think tanks and has the highest rank of admission to the Mexican Foreign Service. <SEP> <P2-S0> The Oyez Project at the Illinois Institute of Technology's Chicago-Kent College of Law is an unofficial online multimedia archive of the Supreme Court of the United States, especially audio of oral arguments. <P2-S1>  The website "aims to be a complete and authoritative source for all audio recorded in the Court since <nowiki>[...]</nowiki> October 1955." <P2-S2>  The website also includes biographical information of both incumbent and historical justices of the Court and advocates who have argued before the court. <P2-S3>  The website was founded by Jerry Goldman, a research professor of law at the Chicago-Kent College of Law at Illinois Institute of Technology. <SEP> <P3-S0> United States v. Hamilton, 3 U.S. 17 (1795) , was a United States Supreme Court case in which a defendant committed on a charge of treason was released on bail, despite having been imprisoned upon a warrant of committal by a district court judge. <P3-S1>  The Judiciary Act of 1789 stated that "upon all arrests in criminal cases, bail shall be admitted, except where the punishment may be death, in which cases it shall not be admitted but by the supreme or a circuit court, or by a justice of the supreme court, or a judge of a district court, who shall exercise their discretion therein, regarding the nature and circumstances of the offence, and of the evidence, and the usages of law." <P3-S2>  Ordinarily, habeas corpus was used to release prisoners held by the judgment of the executive, but not for those who commitment had been authorized by a court order. <P3-S3>  Hamilton's attorney argued that the district court judge did not hold a hearing before issuing a warrant for his commitment to jail and that the affidavits alleging treasonous activity were weak, while the government urged that the Judiciary Act did not give the Supreme Court the jurisdiction to review the district court's decision unless there was new information or misconduct. <P3-S4>  The Supreme Court set bail, but without addressing either attorney's arguments.