Question: What's another name for the appropriation bill-introducing house of the body providing oversight for the commission that issued the report in 1958?

<P0-S0> The United States House of Representatives is the lower chamber of the United States Congress, the Senate being the upper chamber. <P0-S1> Together they compose the legislature of the United States. <SEP> <P1-S0> while the united states of america is not a parliamentary democracy, the origination clause of the u.s. constitution requires that all bills raising revenue originate in the house of representatives, consistent with british constitutional practice; by convention, appropriation bills (bills that spend money) also originate in the house. <P1-S1> unlike in most westminster systems, there are no limits on the senate's ability to amend revenue bills or any requirement for the senate to approve such bills within a certain timeframe. <P1-S2> both appropriations and revenue bills are often referred to as money bills to contrast them with authorization bills. <P1-S3> the u.s. supreme court in united states v. munoz - flores (1990) held that: ``a law passed in violation of the origination clause would thus be no more immune from judicial scrutiny because it was passed by both houses and signed by the president than would be a law passed in violation of the first amendment ''. <SEP> <P2-S0> A Federal Trade Commission report issued in 1958 attempted to quantify the effect of antibiotic development on American public health. <P2-S1> The report found that over the period 1946-1955, there was a 42% drop in the incidence of diseases for which antibiotics were effective and only a 20% drop in those for which antibiotics were not effective. <P2-S2> The report concluded that "it appears that the use of antibiotics, early diagnosis, and other factors have limited the epidemic spread and thus the number of these diseases which have occurred". <P2-S3> The study further examined mortality rates for eight common diseases for which antibiotics offered effective therapy (syphilis, tuberculosis, dysentery, scarlet fever, whooping cough, meningococcal infections, and pneumonia), and found a 56% decline over the same period. <P2-S4> Notable among these was a 75% decline in deaths due to tuberculosis. <SEP> <P3-S0> Executive power is vested, with exceptions and qualifications, in the President. <P3-S1> By law (Section 2.) <P3-S2> the president becomes the Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy, Militia of several states when called into service, has power to make treaties and appointments to office "with the Advice and Consent of the Senate," receive Ambassadors and Public Ministers, and "take care that the laws be faithfully executed" (Section 3.) <P3-S3> By using these words, the Constitution does not require the president to personally enforce the law; rather, officers subordinate to the president may perform such duties. <P3-S4> The Constitution empowers the president to ensure the faithful execution of the laws made by Congress and approved by the President. <P3-S5> Congress may itself terminate such appointments, by impeachment, and restrict the president. <P3-S6> Bodies such as the War Claims Commission, the Interstate Commerce Commission and the Federal Trade Commission—all quasi-judicial—often have direct Congressional oversight. <SEP> <P4-S0> According to the Origination Clause of the United States Constitution, all bills for raising revenue, generally tax bills, must originate in the House of Representatives, similar to the Westminster system requirement that all money bills originate in the lower house. <P4-S1> Traditionally, though, appropriation bills also originate in the House of Representatives. <P4-S2> House appropriations bills begin with ``H.R. <P4-S3> '', meaning`` House of Representatives''. <P4-S4> In reference to revenue bills, the Constitution also states that the ``Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills. <P4-S5> ''As with revenue bills, the Senate and House each drafts and considers its own appropriation bill. <P4-S6> The Senate then`` cuts - and - pastes,'' substituting the language of its version of a particular appropriation bill for the language of the House bill, then agrees to the bill as amended. <SEP> <P5-S0> the 1956 flag was adopted in an era when the georgia general assembly ``was entirely devoted to passing legislation that would preserve segregation and white supremacy '', according to a 2000 research report by the georgia senate. <P5-S1> there are few, if any, written records of what was said on the georgia house and senate floors when the 1956 flag bill was being introduced and passed by the georgia legislature, nor does georgia law provide for a statement of legislative intent when a bill is introduced, although former u.s. congressman james mackay, one of the 32 house members who opposed the change, later stated,`` there was only one reason for putting the flag on there: like the gun rack in the back of a pickup truck, it telegraphs a message.'' <P5-S2> additionally, the 2000 report concluded that the ``1956 general assembly changed the state flag ''during`` an atmosphere of preserving segregation and resentment'' to the u.s. government's rulings on integration.