Question: Who wants the border between the country that buildings where Quran copies where kept for those who could not afford their own commissioned by the Ottoman dynasty and Armenia opened?

<P0-S0> The Ertuğrul Tekke Mosque, (), is an Ottoman imperial mosque located in Yıldız neighbourhood, Serencebey rise of Beşiktaş district in Istanbul, Turkey. <P0-S1> A late Ottoman period mosque, it is constructed as a külliye consisting of a tekke, guest house, türbe, fountain, and library in addition to the mosque. <SEP> <P1-S0> Turkey also has a long history of poor relations with Armenia over its refusal to acknowledge the Armenian Genocide. <P1-S1> Turkey was one of the first countries to recognize the Republic of Armenia (the 3rd republic) after its independence from the USSR in 1991. <P1-S2> Despite this, for most of the 20th century and early 21st century, relations remain tense and there are no formal diplomatic relations between the two countries due to Turkey's refusal to establish them for numerous reasons. <P1-S3> During the Nagorno-Karabakh War and citing it as the reason, Turkey illegally closed its land border with Armenia in 1993. <P1-S4> It has not lifted its blockade despite pressure from the powerful Turkish business lobby interested in Armenian markets. <SEP> <P2-S0> modern ottoman studies think that the change in relations between the ottoman turks and central europe was caused by the opening of the new sea routes. <P2-S1> it is possible to see the decline in the significance of the land routes to the east as western europe opened the ocean routes that bypassed the middle east and mediterranean as parallel to the decline of the ottoman empire itself. <P2-S2> the anglo-ottoman treaty, also known as the treaty of balta liman that opened the ottoman markets directly to english and french competitors, would be seen as one of the staging posts along this development. <SEP> <P3-S0> based on earlier transmitted reports, in the year 632, after the demise of muhammad a number of his companions who knew the quran by heart were killed in a battle by musaylimah, the first caliph abu bakr (d. 634) decided to collect the book in one volume so that it could be preserved. <P3-S1> zayd ibn thabit (d. 655) was the person to collect the quran since "he used to write the divine inspiration for allah's apostle". <P3-S2> thus, a group of scribes, most importantly zayd, collected the verses and produced a hand-written manuscript of the complete book. <P3-S3> the manuscript according to zayd remained with abu bakr until he died. <P3-S4> zayd's reaction to the task and the difficulties in collecting the quranic material from parchments, palm-leaf stalks, thin stones and from men who knew it by heart is recorded in earlier narratives. <P3-S5> after abu bakr, hafsa bint umar, muhammad's widow, was entrusted with the manuscript. <P3-S6> in about 650, the third caliph uthman ibn affan (d. 656) began noticing slight differences in pronunciation of the quran as islam expanded beyond the arabian peninsula into persia, the levant, and north africa. <P3-S7> in order to preserve the sanctity of the text, he ordered a committee headed by zayd to use abu bakr's copy and prepare a standard copy of the quran. <P3-S8> thus, within 20 years of muhammad's death, the quran was committed to written form. <P3-S9> that text became the model from which copies were made and promulgated throughout the urban centers of the muslim world, and other versions are believed to have been destroyed. <P3-S10> the present form of the quran text is accepted by muslim scholars to be the original version compiled by abu bakr. <SEP> <P4-S0> In the beginning, the Quran did not have vocalization markings. <P4-S1> The system of vocalization, as we know it today, seems to have been introduced towards the end of the ninth century. <P4-S2> Since it would have been too costly for most Muslims to purchase a manuscript, copies of the Quran were held in mosques in order to make them accessible to people. <P4-S3> These copies frequently took the form of a series of 30 parts or juzʼ. <P4-S4> In terms of productivity, the Ottoman copyists provide the best example. <P4-S5> This was in response to widespread demand, unpopularity of printing methods and for aesthetic reasons.