Question: A group of nations of which the People's Socialist Republic of Albania was a member was controlled by one country. When did that country agree to a unified Germany inside of the organization Eisenhower would not discuss during the campaign?

<P0-S0> Two controversies during the campaign tested him and his staff, but did not affect the campaign. <P0-S1> One involved a report that Nixon had improperly received funds from a secret trust. <P0-S2> Nixon spoke out adroitly to avoid potential damage, but the matter permanently alienated the two candidates. <P0-S3> The second issue centered on Eisenhower's relented decision to confront the controversial methods of Joseph McCarthy on his home turf in a Wisconsin appearance. <P0-S4> Just two weeks prior to the election, Eisenhower vowed to go to Korea and end the war there. <P0-S5> He promised to maintain a strong commitment against Communism while avoiding the topic of NATO; finally, he stressed a corruption-free, frugal administration at home. <SEP> <P1-S0> by the end of may, drafts were formally presented. <P1-S1> in mid-june, the main tripartite negotiations started. <P1-S2> the discussion was focused on potential guarantees to central and east european countries should a german aggression arise. <P1-S3> the ussr proposed to consider that a political turn towards germany by the baltic states would constitute an "indirect aggression" towards the soviet union. <P1-S4> britain opposed such proposals, because they feared the soviets' proposed language could justify a soviet intervention in finland and the baltic states, or push those countries to seek closer relations with germany. <P1-S5> the discussion about a definition of "indirect aggression" became one of the sticking points between the parties, and by mid-july, the tripartite political negotiations effectively stalled, while the parties agreed to start negotiations on a military agreement, which the soviets insisted must be entered into simultaneously with any political agreement. <SEP> <P2-S0> The Warsaw Treaty's organization was two-fold: the Political Consultative Committee handled political matters, and the Combined Command of Pact Armed Forces controlled the assigned multi-national forces, with headquarters in Warsaw, Poland. <P2-S1> Furthermore, the Supreme Commander of the Unified Armed Forces of the Warsaw Treaty Organization which commands and controls all the military forces of the member countries was also a First Deputy Minister of Defense of the USSR, and the Chief of Combined Staff of the Unified Armed Forces of the Warsaw Treaty Organization was also a First Deputy Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the USSR. <P2-S2> Therefore, although ostensibly an international collective security alliance, the USSR dominated the Warsaw Treaty armed forces. <SEP> <P3-S0> Hero of Socialist Labour () was an honorary title in Albania and other Warsaw Pact countries. <P3-S1> It was the highest degree of distinction for exceptional achievements in national economy and culture. <P3-S2> It provided a similar status to the title People's Hero of Albania that was awarded for heroic deeds, but unlike the latter, was awarded to citizens who contributed to the development of Albania's industry, agriculture, transportation, trade, science and technology and promoted the might and the glory of Albania. <SEP> <P4-S0> eisenhower responded to the french defeat with the formation of the seato (southeast asia treaty organization) alliance with the u.k., france, new zealand and australia in defense of vietnam against communism. <P4-S1> at that time the french and chinese reconvened geneva peace talks; eisenhower agreed the u.s. would participate only as an observer. <P4-S2> after france and the communists agreed to a partition of vietnam, eisenhower rejected the agreement, offering military and economic aid to southern vietnam. <P4-S3> ambrose argues that eisenhower, by not participating in the geneva agreement, had kept the u.s out of vietnam; nevertheless, with the formation of seato, he had in the end put the u.s. back into the conflict. <SEP> <P5-S0> Horst Teltschik, Kohl's foreign policy advisor, later recalled that Germany would have paid ``100 billion deutschmarks ''if the Soviets demanded it. <P5-S1> The USSR did not make such great demands, however, with Gorbachev stating in February 1990 that`` The Germans must decide for themselves what path they choose to follow''. <P5-S2> In May 1990 he repeated his remark in the context of NATO membership while meeting Bush, amazing both the Americans and Germans. <P5-S3> This removed the last significant roadblock to Germany being free to choose its international alignments, though Kohl made no secret that he intended for the reunified Germany to inherit West Germany's seats in NATO and the EC.