Question: Are United States v. Guest and Miller v. Alabama both United States Supreme Court cases?

<P0-S0> Stephen P. Halbrook is a Senior Fellow at the Independent Institute and an author and lawyer known for his litigation on behalf of the National Rifle Association. <P0-S1>  He has written extensively about the original meanings of the Second Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment (the latter as applied to Second Amendment rights). <P0-S2>  He has argued and won three cases before the US Supreme Court: "Printz v. United States", "United States v. Thompson-Center Arms Company", and "Castillo v. United States". <P0-S3>  He has also written briefs in many other cases, including the Supreme Court cases "Small v. United States" (pertaining to the Gun Control Act of 1968) and "McDonald v. Chicago". <P0-S4>  In "District of Columbia v. Heller", he wrote a brief on behalf of the majority of both houses of Congress. <P0-S5>  More broadly, his decades of research on the Second Amendment contributed to the intellectual foundation of the "Heller" decision. <P0-S6>  He has written many books and articles on the topic of gun control, some of which have been cited in Supreme Court opinions ("Heller", "McDonald", "Printz v. United States"). <P0-S7>  He has testified before congress on multiple occasions. <P0-S8>  Halbrook’s most important scholarly contribution, however, was the book "That Every Man Be Armed", originally published in 1986. <P0-S9>  The book was the most thorough analysis of the legal history and original intent of the Second Amendment. <SEP> <P1-S0> Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012) , was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that mandatory sentences of life without the possibility of parole are unconstitutional for juvenile offenders. <P1-S1>  The ruling applied even to those persons who had committed murder as a juvenile, extending beyond the "Graham v. Florida" (2010) case, which had ruled juvenile life without parole sentences unconstitutional for crimes "excluding murder". <SEP> <P2-S0> United States v. Guest 383 U.S. 745 (1966) is a United States Supreme Court opinion, authored by Justice Potter Stewart, in which the court extended the protection of the 14th Amendment to citizens who suffer rights deprivations at the hands of private conspiracies, where there is minimal state participation in the conspiracy. <P2-S1>  The Court also held that there is Constitutional right to travel from state to state. <SEP> <P3-S0> During the tenure of Morrison Waite as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States (March 4, 1874 through March 23, 1888), the Supreme Court heard an unprecedented volume and frequency of criminal cases. <P3-S1>  In just fourteen years, the Court heard 106 criminal cases, almost as many cases as the Supreme Court had heard in the period from its creation to the appointment of Waite as Chief Justice. <P3-S2>  Notable cases include "United States v. Cruikshank" (1875), "United States v. Reese" (1875), "Reynolds v. United States" (1878), "Wilkerson v. Utah" (1879), the "Trade-Mark Cases" (1879), "Strauder v. West Virginia" (1880), "Pace v. Alabama" (1883), "United States v. Harris" (1883), "Ex parte Crow Dog" (1883), "Hurtado v. California" (1884), "Clawson v. United States" (1885), "Yick Wo v. Hopkins" (1886), "United States v. Kagama" (1886), "Ker v. Illinois" (1886), and "Mugler v. Kansas" (1887).