Question: Who was the father of the person "Principles of Philosophy" was dedicated to?

<P0-S0> Elisabeth of the Palatinate (26 December 1618 – 11 February 1680), also known as Elisabeth of Bohemia, Princess Elisabeth of the Palatinate, or Princess-Abbess of Herford Abbey, was the eldest daughter of Frederick V, Elector Palatine (who was briefly King of Bohemia), and Elizabeth Stuart. <P0-S1>  She was born in Heidelberg, Germany, spending the first nine years of her life there. <P0-S2>  When she was nine, she went to live in Leyden, with her brother and was raised in a nursery palace to complete her studies. <P0-S3>  After finishing her studies, she was deemed ready to live in The Hague with her mother. <SEP> <P1-S0> Principles of Philosophy (Latin: "Principia philosophiae" ) is a book by René Descartes. <P1-S1>  In essence it is a synthesis of the "Discourse on Method" and "Meditations on First Philosophy" It was written in Latin, published in 1644 and dedicated to Elisabeth of Bohemia, with whom Descartes had a long-standing friendship. <P1-S2>  A French version ("Les Principes de la Philosophie") followed in 1647. <P1-S3>  It set forth the principles of nature—the Laws of Physics—as Descartes viewed them. <P1-S4>  Most notably, it set forth the principle that in the absence of external forces, an object's motion will be uniform and in a straight line. <P1-S5>  Newton borrowed this principle from Descartes and included it in his own "Principia"; to this day, it is still generally referred to as Newton's First Law of Motion. <P1-S6>  The book was primarily intended to replace the Aristotelian curriculum then used in French and British Universities. <P1-S7>  The work provides a systematic statement of his metaphysics and natural philosophy, and represents the first truly comprehensive, mechanistic account of the universe. <SEP> <P2-S0> In Canadian and New Zealand law, fundamental justice is the fairness underlying the administration of justice and its operation. <P2-S1>  The principles of fundamental justice are specific legal principles that command "significant societal consensus" as "fundamental to the way in which the legal system ought fairly to operate", per "R v Malmo-Levine". <P2-S2>  These principles may stipulate basic procedural rights afforded to anyone facing an adjudicative process or procedure that affects fundamental rights and freedoms, and certain substantive standards related to the rule of law that regulate the actions of the state (e.g., the rule against unclear or vague laws). <P2-S3>  The degree of protection dictated by these standards and procedural rights vary in accordance with the precise context, involving a contextual analysis of the affected person's interests. <P2-S4>  In other words, the more a person's rights or interests are adversely affected, the more procedural or substantive protections must be afforded to that person in order to respect the principles of fundamental justice. <P2-S5>  A legislative or administrative framework that respects the principles of fundamental justice, as such, must be fundamentally fair to the person affected, but does not necessarily have to strike the "right balance" between individual and societal interests in general. <SEP> <P3-S0> Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (German: "Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten" ; 1785; also known as the "Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals", "Grounding of the Metaphysics of Morals" and the "Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals") is the first of Immanuel Kant's mature works on moral philosophy and remains one of the most influential in the field. <P3-S1>  Kant conceives his investigation as a work of foundational ethics—one that clears the ground for future research by explaining the core concepts and principles of moral theory and showing that they are normative for rational agents. <P3-S2>  Kant aspires to nothing less than this: to lay bare the fundamental principle of morality and show that it applies to us. <P3-S3>  In the text, Kant provides a groundbreaking argument that the rightness of an action is determined by the character of the principle that a person chooses to act upon. <P3-S4>  Kant thus stands in stark contrast to the moral sense theories and teleological moral theories that dominated moral philosophy at the time he was writing. <P3-S5>  Central to the work is the role of what Kant refers to as the categorical imperative, the concept that one must act only according to that precept which he or she would will to become a universal law.