Question: Are both Chisholm v. Georgia and Boumediene v. Bush heard by the United States Supreme Court?

<P0-S0> Boumediene v. Bush, 553 U.S. 723 (2008) , was a writ of habeas corpus submission made in a civilian court of the United States on behalf of Lakhdar Boumediene, a naturalized citizen of Bosnia and Herzegovina, held in military detention by the United States at the Guantanamo Bay detention camps in Cuba. <P0-S1>  Guantanamo Bay is not formally part of the United States, and under the terms of the 1903 lease between the United States and Cuba, Cuba retained ultimate sovereignty over the territory, while the United States exercises complete jurisdiction and control. <P0-S2>  The case was consolidated with habeas petition "Al Odah v. United States". <P0-S3>  It challenged the legality of Boumediene's detention at the United States Naval Station military base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba as well as the constitutionality of the Military Commissions Act of 2006. <P0-S4>  Oral arguments on the combined cases were heard by the Supreme Court on December 5, 2007. <SEP> <P1-S0> The Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands is the highest court in the territory of the United States Virgin Islands. <P1-S1>  The Supreme Court assumed jurisdiction over all appeals from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands, a trial level court, on January 29, 2007. <P1-S2>  There are three Supreme Court justices who are each appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Legislature for a ten-year term. <P1-S3>  Appointments are for life. <P1-S4>  The Supreme Court consists of a Chief Justice and two Associate Justices. <P1-S5>  There is no intermediate court of appeals, and the Supreme Court does not have discretion in hearing appeals. <P1-S6>  Appeals of Supreme Court decisions were heard by writ of certiorari by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit until December 29, 2012, but since then they have been heard by the United States Supreme Court. <SEP> <P2-S0> Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 U.S. 419 (1793) , is considered the first United States Supreme Court case of significance and impact. <P2-S1>  Given its date, there was little available legal precedent (particularly in American law). <P2-S2>  It was superseded in 1795 by the Eleventh Amendment. <SEP> <P3-S0> V.L. v. E.L., 577 U.S. ___ (2016) , is a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States concerning the adoption rights of same-sex couples. <P3-S1>  In 2007, a Georgia Superior Court granted adoption rights to V.L., the partner of E.L., the woman who gave birth to their three children. <P3-S2>  However, after moving back to Alabama, the couple split up. <P3-S3>  E.L. tried to block V.L. from seeing the children, but V.L. filed a lawsuit seeking visitation and other parental rights. <P3-S4>  On September 18, 2015, the Supreme Court of Alabama ruled that the state did not have to recognize the adoption judgment, saying that the Georgia court misapplied its own state law. <P3-S5>  The court voided the recognition of the adoption judgment in Alabama. <P3-S6>  V.L. petitioned the United States Supreme Court to stay the ruling during her appeal and allow her to see her children. <P3-S7>  On December 14, 2015, the Supreme Court stayed the ruling pending their action on a petition for a writ of certiorari filed by V.L. On March 7, 2016, the Supreme Court of the United States reversed the decision of the Alabama Supreme Court by per curiam summary disposition.