Question: Which magazine was around for a longer time period, the Missbehave or the Woman's Journal?

 It was founded in 1870 in Boston, Massachusetts, by Lucy Stone and her husband Henry Browne Blackwell as a weekly newspaper.  In 1917 it was purchased by Carrie Chapman Catt's Leslie Woman Suffrage Commission and merged with "The Woman Voter" and "National Suffrage News" to become known as The Woman Citizen.  It served as the official organ of the National American Woman Suffrage Association until 1920, when the organization was reformed as the League of Women Voters, and the Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution was passed granting women the right to vote.  Publication of "Woman Citizen" slowed from weekly, to bi-weekly, to monthly.  In 1927, it was renamed The Woman's Journal.  It ceased publication in June 1931. Woman's Journal was an American women's rights periodical published from 1870-1931. <SEP> Missbehave ia a Brooklyn-based women's magazine that was produced from 2006 until March 2009.  It covered fashion, music, art and pop culture.  Columnists included Kelis, Matt Goias, Gavin McInnes, Sarah Morrison and Lesley Arfin and regularly featured models Kim Matulova, Victoria Brito, Joli Robinson and Brissi. <SEP> The retraction index is a measure of how likely an article published in a given academic journal will be retracted.  It is calculated by multiplying the number of retracted articles in a journal during a given time period by 1,000, and then dividing the result by the total number of articles published in that journal during the same period.  The term was coined in a 2011 editorial by Ferric Fang and Arturo Casadevall, the co-editors-in-chief of the journal "Infection and Immunity".  In their original editorial, Fang and Casadevall also showed a strong positive correlation between a journal's retraction index and its impact factor.  Among the 17 journals they analyzed, the "New England Journal of Medicine" had the highest retraction index.  The "New England Journal of Medicine" responded to the Feng and Casadevall editorial with a statement criticizing it for only considering papers with abstracts.  The statement argued that because most articles published in each issue of the "Journal" do not have abstracts, the journal's retraction index appeared artificially high.  They did not identify a mechanism for why this relationship might exist, but suggested that it might be because researchers are more willing to cut corners to get a paper published in a higher-impact journal. <SEP> In the history of European art music, the term "common practice period" refers to the era between the formation and the dissolution of the tonal system.  Though there are no exact dates for this phenomenon, most features of the common-practice period persisted from the mid to late baroque period, through the Classical and Romantic periods, or roughly from around 1650 to 1900.  While certain prevailing patterns and conventions characterize the music of this period, the time period also saw considerable stylistic evolution.  Some conventions evolved during this period that were rarely employed at other times during what may still be labeled "common practice" (for example, Sonata Form).  Thus, the dates 1650–1900 are necessarily nebulous and arbitrary borders that depend on context.  The most important unifying feature through this time period concerns a harmonic language to which modern music theorists can apply Roman numeral analysis.