Question: Who lived longer, Jim Semple or Alexandre Maurice Blanc De Lanautte, Comte D'Hauterive?

Crusaders F.C. He is also a former President of the Irish Football League. He died at the age of 81 on 20 September 2016. Jim Semple (1935 – 20 September 2016) was a Northern Ireland businessman and a former chairman of He also previously played for the club. <SEP> Later he held a similar position at Tours, and there he attracted the attention of the duc de Choiseul, who invited him to visit him at Chanteloup. Hauterive there came into contact with noblemen who visited the duke. One of these, the comte de Choiseul-Gouffier, took Hauterive with him on his appointment as ambassador to Constantinople in 1784. Hauterive was enriched for a time by his marriage with a widow, Madame de Marchais, but was ruined by the French Revolution. In 1790, he applied for and received the post of consul at New York. Under the Consulate, however, he was accused of embezzlement and recalled. Although the charge was proven to be false, he was not reinstated. Alexandre Maurice Blanc de Lanautte, Comte d'Hauterive (1754–1830), French statesman and diplomatist, was born at Aspres (Hautes-Alpes) on the 14 April 1754, and was educated at Grenoble, where he became a professor. In 1798, after trying his hand at farming in America, Hauterive was appointed to a post in the French foreign office. In this capacity he made a sensation by his "De l'état de la France, à la fin de l'an VIII" (1800), which he had been commissioned by Napoleon Bonaparte to draw up, as a manifesto to foreign nations, after the "coup d'etat" of the 18th Brumaire. This won him the confidence of Bonaparte, and he was henceforth employed in drawing up many of the more important documents. In 1805 he was made a councillor of state and member of the Légion d'Honneur, and between 1805 and 1813 he was more than once temporarily minister of foreign affairs. He attempted, though in vain, to use his influence to moderate Napoleon's policy, especially in the matter of Spain and the treatment of the pope. In 1805, a difference of opinion with Talleyrand on the question of the Austrian alliance, which Hauterive favored, led to his withdrawal from the political side of the ministry of foreign affairs, and he was appointed keeper of the archives of the same department. In this capacity he did very useful work, and after the Restoration continued in this post at the request of the duc de Richelieu, his work being recognized by his election as a member of the Academie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres in 1820. He died in Paris on 28 July 1830. <SEP> Antoine Blanc de Saint- Bonnet( 28 January 1815 – 2 June 1880) was a French philosopher, whose ideas were a precursor to modern sociology. <SEP> Ștefan Orășanu (7 January 1869–12 November 1903) was a Romanian historian, literary critic and poet. Born to a Romanian Orthodox priest in Bucharest, he attended elementary and high school in his native city. In 1901, Orășanu graduated from the University of Bucharest's literature and philosophy faculty. The following year, he obtained a scholarship to study modern and contemporary history in Germany, but was unable to benefit from this due to the disease that would soon claim his life. From 1895, he was a clerk at the Romanian Academy Library. In 1900, he joined the editorial committee of "Convorbiri Literare" magazine. He substituted for Nicolae Iorga at Bucharest's history faculty in 1901. His contributions also appeared in "Economia naționalăEpocaLiga literarăLiteratorulNoua revistă românăRevista independentăRevista societății "Tinerimea română, "Revista poporuluiRomânia Literară" and "Românul literar". He sometimes used the pen names Polit and Z. Miron.
Orășanu wrote poetry, but most of his output consisted of studies on history and literary history, as well as reviews of theatre, music and fine arts. Several of these studies appeared in book form: "Bibliografia cestiunii Orientului", 1899; "Cronicarii moldoveni din secolul al XVII-lea", 1899; "Istoria României contimporane. Note critice", 1900; "Botanica populară. Note critice", 1900; "Filosofia lui La Fontaine după d. Pompiliu Eliade. Note critice", 1901. In the latter book, he attacked the opinions of critic Pompiliu Eliade, ridiculing his notion that the form of Mihai Eminescu's poetry marked a "considerable regression" from that of Vasile Alecsandri. The author also took aim at Eliade's critical methodology, characterizing it as "strikingly similar" to what Jean-François de La Harpe was doing in the late 18th century, and noting that this approach had long been abandoned even in France. Orășanu went on to mock Eliade's observations about the length and phonetic structure of verses, and the diagrams he used for demonstration. After finding other "errors" and "aberrations", he concluded that Eliade had written "a pastiche of a Parisian conference, in which cheap paradoxes give the illusion of originality". Together with Ioan Bianu, he prepared a Romanian edition of a book by Alexandre Maurice Blanc de Lanautte, Comte d'Hauterive; this appeared in 1902 as "Memoriu asupra vechei și actualei stări a Moldovei prezentat lui Alexandru Vodă Ipsilante la 1787".