Question: From where does the overseer of the issuer of a report quantifying the effect of antibiotic development draw its powers?

Executive power is vested, with exceptions and qualifications, in the President. The Constitution empowers the president to ensure the faithful execution of the laws made by Congress and approved by the President. By law (Section 2.) the president becomes the Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy, Militia of several states when called into service, has power to make treaties and appointments to office "with the Advice and Consent of the Senate," receive Ambassadors and Public Ministers, and "take care that the laws be faithfully executed" (Section 3.) By using these words, the Constitution does not require the president to personally enforce the law; rather, officers subordinate to the president may perform such duties. Congress may itself terminate such appointments, by impeachment, and restrict the president. Bodies such as the War Claims Commission, the Interstate Commerce Commission and the Federal Trade Commission—all quasi-judicial—often have direct Congressional oversight. <SEP> The report found that over the period 1946-1955, there was a 42% drop in the incidence of diseases for which antibiotics were effective and only a 20% drop in those for which antibiotics were not effective. The report concluded that "it appears that the use of antibiotics, early diagnosis, and other factors have limited the epidemic spread and thus the number of these diseases which have occurred". A Federal Trade Commission report issued in 1958 attempted to quantify the effect of antibiotic development on American public health. The study further examined mortality rates for eight common diseases for which antibiotics offered effective therapy (syphilis, tuberculosis, dysentery, scarlet fever, whooping cough, meningococcal infections, and pneumonia), and found a 56% decline over the same period. Notable among these was a 75% decline in deaths due to tuberculosis. <SEP> until the 1980s, the governor of the federal district was appointed by the federal government, and the laws of brasília were issued by the brazilian federal senate. with the constitution of 1988 brasília gained the right to elect its governor, and a district assembly (câmara legislativa) was elected to exercise legislative power. the federal district does not have a judicial power of its own. the judicial power which serves the federal district also serves federal territories. currently, brazil does not have any territories, therefore, for now the courts serve only cases from the federal district. <SEP> Powers of the United States Congress are implemented by the United States Constitution, defined by rulings of the Supreme Court, and by its own efforts and by other factors such as history and custom. It is the chief legislative body of the United States. Some powers are explicitly defined by the Constitution and are called enumerated powers; others have been assumed to exist and are called implied powers. <SEP> in political philosophy, limited government is where the government is empowered by law from a starting point of having no power, or where governmental power is restricted by law, usually in a written constitution. it is a key concept in the history of liberalism. the united states constitution presents an example of the federal government not possessing any power except what is delegated to it by the constitution - with the tenth amendment to the united states constitution specifically stating that powers not specifically delegated to the federal government is reserved for the people and the states. the magna carta and the united states constitution also represents important milestones in the limiting of governmental power. the earliest use of the term limited government dates back to king james vi and i in the late 16th century. limited government put into practice often involves the protection of individual liberty from government intrusion.