Question: Our Race Will Rule Undisputed Over The World is a fabricated speech often cited in which type of propoganda, that exhibits hostility to, prejudice, or discrimination against Jews?

<P0-S0> Gender-based price discrimination is a type of economic discrimination that consists of the practice of charging one gender a different price than another gender for identical goods or services. <P0-S1>  It is a subcategory of price discrimination, which also includes race and class-based price discrimination. <P0-S2>  Further, "discrimination" often evokes a legal connotation, but in this context, gender-based price discrimination is often studied by examining gendered price disparities. <P0-S3>  Whether gendered price disparities prove an intent to discriminate or an illegal discrimination is a legal inquiry determined by the law of the applicable jurisdiction. <SEP> <P1-S0> Antisemitism (also spelled anti-Semitism or anti-semitism) is hostility to, prejudice, or discrimination against Jews. <P1-S1>  A person who holds such positions is called an antisemite. <P1-S2>  Antisemitism is generally considered to be a form of racism. <SEP> <P2-S0> Our Race Will Rule Undisputed Over The World is a fabricated speech often cited in antisemitic propaganda, supposedly given by a Rabbi Emanuel Rabinovich. <P2-S1>  However, both the speech and Rabbi Rabinovich were, like the "Israel Cohen" of "A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century", fictitious creations of Eustace Mullins. <SEP> <P3-S0> Lene Auestad is an author and a philosopher from the University of Oslo. <P3-S1>  She has written on the themes of prejudice, social exclusion and minority rights, and has contributed to public debates on hate speech. <P3-S2>  The book Respect, Plurality, and Prejudice combined critical theory with psychoanalysis and psychosocial studies, examining the underlying unconscious forces and structures that make up the phenomena of xenophobia, Antisemitism, Islamophobia, homophobia and sexism. <P3-S3>  It provides a nuanced, detailed overview of how social prejudices, and the discrimination and violence that often tend to accompany the latter, come into being. <P3-S4>  At the same time the author demonstrated that in order to fully understand how a complex phenomenon such as prejudice works, we need to alter our traditional Western philosophical understanding of the subject as a supposedly fully rational, autonomous and individual agent. <P3-S5>  Auestad argues that we need a more situated and relational understanding of subjectivity and the subject, as prejudice and acts of discrimination always take place in a contextualized setting between subjects whose thoughts and actions influence each other. <P3-S6>  Unlike more conservative forms of philosophy, Auestad examines the processes that make up prejudice from both a theoretical and practical point of view. <P3-S7>  This becomes especially clear in the book’s seventh chapter, in which she reads critical theorist Theodor W. Adorno’s The Authoritarian Personality (1950)—together with some of Adorno’s other work—along the lines of object-relations theory. <P3-S8>  This attachment to critical theory—and to the work of for instance queer theorist Judith Butler and political theorist Hannah Arendt, and Butler’s thoughts about hate speech, and in Arendt’s case, perspectivism and pluralism, in particular— reveals how much Auestad is invested in analysing prejudice and discrimination not as isolated but societal phenomena that need to be critically examined and also fought against. <P3-S9>  The work navigates between subjectivism in psychoanalysis and situationism in sociology that would each in its own way deny how psychic and emotional interiority and sociocultural exteriority become mutually complicit from setting to setting in buttressing the specific inter-subjective molds around which prejudices form as social forces. <P3-S10>  Auestad shows how the self-conceptions of those subjected to it become maimed, but she also illustrates the societal costs that must be paid as a consequence of distorted human relationships. <P3-S11>  In doing so, she demonstrates how contingent conceptions of social status and group standing permeate and secure what becomes misconstrued as “reality.” <P3-S12>  Auestad shows how unconscious fantasy and representations form, combine, and recombine in ways directly relevant to a theoretical interpretation of the psychodynamics of prejudice. <P3-S13>  The import is to reveal how silent codes of social consensus and cultural conviction