Question: What languages might you see in Frances Stark's hand-traced letters, words, and sentences?

<P0-S0>  She often works with carbon paper to hand-trace letters, words, and sentences from classic works by Emily Dickinson, Goethe, Henry Miller, Samuel Beckett, and others to explore the voices and interior states of writers. <P0-S1> Frances Stark (born 1967) is an interdisciplinary artist and writer, whose work centers on the use and meaning of language, and the translation of this process into the creative act. <P0-S2>  She uses these hand-traced words, often in repetition, as visual motifs in drawings and mixed media works that reference a subject, mood, or another discipline such as music, architecture, or philosophy. <SEP> <P1-S0> Samuel Barclay Beckett ( ; 13 April 1906 – 22 December 1989) was an Irish avant-garde novelist, playwright, theatre director, and poet, who lived in Paris for most of his adult life and wrote in both English and French. <SEP> <P2-S0> Auto-text is a portion of a text preexisting in the computer memory, available as a supplement to newly composed documents, and suggested to the document author by software. <P2-S1>  A block of Auto-text can contain a few letters, words, sentences or paragraphs. <P2-S2>  It can be chosen by the document author via menu or be offered automatically after typing specific words or letters (word prediction or text prediction), or be added to the document automatically after typing specific words or letters (word / text completion). <SEP> <P3-S0> Biblical accommodation is the adaptation of words or sentences from the Bible to signify ideas different from those expressed therein. <P3-S1>  Thus, if a sinner excuses his fault by saying, "The serpent deceived me", he applies the scriptural words of Eve (Gen., iii, 13) to express an idea which the sentence does not convey in the Bible. <P3-S2>  Similarly, a blind person might use the words of Tob., v, 12, "What manner of joy shall be to me, who sit in darkness, and see not the light of heaven". <P3-S3>  Here, again, the words would have a meaning which they do not bear in Sacred Scripture. <P3-S4>  This accommodation is sometimes incorrectly styled the accommodated, or accommodative, sense of Scripture. <P3-S5>  From the definition it is clear that it is not a sense of Scripture at all. <P3-S6>  The possibility of such accommodation may arise, first, from some similarity between the ideas in the sacred text and the subject to which the passage is accommodated; secondly, from the fact that the words of Scripture may be understood in two different senses. <P3-S7>  The first is called extensive accommodation. <P3-S8>  Examples of it are found in the Church's offices, both in the Breviary and the Missal, when the praises bestowed by the Holy Ghost on Noe, Isaac, and Moses are applied to other saints. <P3-S9>  Thus the words of Ecclus., xxxii, 1, 5: "Have they made thee ruler? <P3-S10>  . . . hinder not music" are sometimes applied to College presidents assuming the burden of their office; we need not say that the words of Sacred Scripture have quite a different meaning. <P3-S11>  The second species of accommodation, called allusive, is often a mere play on words and at times seems due to a misunderstanding of the original meaning. <P3-S12>  The Vulgate text, "Mirabilis Deus in sanctis suis" (Ps., lxvii, 36) means, in the mouth of the Psalmist, that God is wonderful in His sanctuary (sancta, -orum). <P3-S13>  The Latin words may also be translated "God is wonderful in his saints" (sancti, -orum), and they are employed in this sense in the Missal. <P3-S14>  As this second signification was not intended by the inspired writer, the English rendering of the text in the Douay-Rheims version is a mistranslation.