Question: Are both directors of films Three In One (Film) and The Sea Battle from the same country?

<P0-S0> Comparatively little is known about the production, which is now a lost film. <P0-S1> The Sea Battle( German: Die Seeschlacht) is a 1917 German silent war film directed by Richard Oswald and starring Emil Jannings, Werner Krauss and Conrad Veidt. <SEP> <P1-S0> He was born in Waipukurau, Hawke's Bay, New Zealand. <P1-S1> He served in the Royal New Zealand Air Force and British Royal Navy during World War II before turning to filmmaking. <P1-S2> He made a number of documentaries for the New Zealand National Film Unit then moved to Australia, where he directed several feature films and a number of documentaries for the Commonwealth Film Unit. <P1-S3> The Cecil Holmes Award given by the Australian Directors Guild is named after him. <P1-S4> The Award was instigated in 1995, and is presented by the ADG board from time to time to honour recipients who have advocated for the role of the director. <P1-S5> Cecil William Holmes( 23 June 1921 – 24 August 1994) was a New Zealand- born film director and writer. <P1-S6> His second wife was author and Indigenous advocate Sandra Le Brun Holmes. <SEP> <P2-S0> Crimson Bat is the international title for the series of four jidaigeki films (three from 1969 and one from 1970) based on the character . <SEP> <P3-S0> Richard Oswald (5 November 1880 – 11 September 1963) was an Austrian director, producer, and screenwriter. <SEP> <P4-S0> Three in One is a 1957 Australian anthology film directed by Cecil Holmes and starring Reg Lye. <P4-S1> It consists of three separate stories," A Load of Wood The City" and" Joe Wilson's Mates". <SEP> <P5-S0> De Interpretatione or On Interpretation( Greek: Περὶ Ἑρμηνείας," Peri Hermeneias") is the second text from Aristotle's Organon and is among the earliest surviving philosophical works in the Western tradition to deal with the relationship between language and logic in a comprehensive, explicit, and formal way. <P5-S1> The work is usually known by its Latin title. <P5-S2> The work begins by analyzing simple" categoric" propositions, and draws a series of basic conclusions on the routine issues of classifying and defining basic linguistic forms, such as" simple terms" and" propositions", nouns and verbs, negation, the" quantity" of simple propositions( primitive roots of the quantifiers in modern symbolic logic), investigations on the" excluded middle"( what to Aristotle is not applicable to future tense propositions — the problem of future contingents), and on" modal propositions". <P5-S3> The first five chapters deal with the terms that form propositions. <P5-S4> Chapters 6 and 7 deal with the relationship between affirmative, negative, universal and particular propositions. <P5-S5> These relationships are the basis of the well- known Square of opposition. <P5-S6> The distinction between universal and particular propositions is the basis of modern quantification theory. <P5-S7> The last three chapters deal with modalities. <P5-S8> Chapter 9 is famous for the discussion of the sea-battle. <P5-S9> ( If it is true that there will be a sea-battle tomorrow, then it is true" today" that there will be a sea-battle. <P5-S10> Thus a sea-battle is apparently unavoidable, and thus necessary. <P5-S11> Another" interpretation" would be: that we can not know that which has not yet come to pass. <P5-S12> In other words: if there is a sea battle tomorrow then it is true today that tomorrow there will be a sea battle. <P5-S13> So, only if we can know whether or not there will be a sea battle tomorrow then can we know if there will be a sea battle).