Question: Are Wisconsin v. Yoder and Planned Parenthood v. Casey both Supreme Court cases?

<P0-S0>  The parents' fundamental right to freedom of religion was determined to outweigh the state's interest in educating its children. <P0-S1>  The case is often cited as a basis for parents' right to educate their children outside of traditional private or public schools. <P0-S2> Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972), is the case in which the United States Supreme Court found that Amish children could not be placed under compulsory education past 8th grade. <SEP> <P1-S0> Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992) , was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the constitutionality of several Pennsylvania state statutory provisions regarding abortion was challenged. <P1-S1>  The Court's plurality opinion reaffirmed the central holding of "Roe v. Wade" stating that "matters, involving the most intimate and personal choices a person may make in a lifetime, choices central to personal dignity and autonomy, are central to the liberty protected by the Fourteenth Amendment." <P1-S2>  The Court's plurality opinion upheld the constitutional right to have an abortion while altering the standard for analyzing restrictions on that right, crafting the "undue burden" standard for abortion restrictions. <P1-S3>  "Planned Parenthood v. Casey" differs from "Roe," however, because under "Roe" the state could not regulate abortions in the first trimester whereas under "Planned Parenthood v. Casey" the state can regulate abortions in the first trimester, or any point before the point of viability, and beyond as long as that regulation does not pose an undue burden on women's fundamental right to an abortion. <P1-S4>  Applying this new standard of review, the Court upheld four regulations and invalidated the requirement of spousal notification. <SEP> <P2-S0> Stephen P. Halbrook is a Senior Fellow at the Independent Institute and an author and lawyer known for his litigation on behalf of the National Rifle Association. <P2-S1>  He has written extensively about the original meanings of the Second Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment (the latter as applied to Second Amendment rights). <P2-S2>  He has argued and won three cases before the US Supreme Court: "Printz v. United States", "United States v. Thompson-Center Arms Company", and "Castillo v. United States". <P2-S3>  He has also written briefs in many other cases, including the Supreme Court cases "Small v. United States" (pertaining to the Gun Control Act of 1968) and "McDonald v. Chicago". <P2-S4>  In "District of Columbia v. Heller", he wrote a brief on behalf of the majority of both houses of Congress. <P2-S5>  More broadly, his decades of research on the Second Amendment contributed to the intellectual foundation of the "Heller" decision. <P2-S6>  He has written many books and articles on the topic of gun control, some of which have been cited in Supreme Court opinions ("Heller", "McDonald", "Printz v. United States"). <P2-S7>  He has testified before congress on multiple occasions. <P2-S8>  Halbrook’s most important scholarly contribution, however, was the book "That Every Man Be Armed", originally published in 1986. <P2-S9>  The book was the most thorough analysis of the legal history and original intent of the Second Amendment. <SEP> <P3-S0> Two Supreme Court cases, Wisconsin v. Michigan, 295 U.S. 455 (1935) and Wisconsin v. Michigan, 297 U.S. 547 (1936), settled a border dispute between Wisconsin and Michigan.