Question: Which was decided first, Graham v. Florida or District of Columbia v. Heller?

<P0-S0> Under the "Noerr–Pennington" doctrine, private entities are immune from liability under the antitrust laws for attempts to influence the passage or enforcement of laws, even if the laws they advocate for would have anticompetitive effects. " <P0-S1> Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.", 365 U.S. 127, 135 (1961) ; "United Mine Workers v. Pennington", 381 U.S. 657, 670 (1965) . <P0-S2>  The doctrine is grounded in the First Amendment protection of political speech, and "upon a recognition that the antitrust laws, 'tailored as they are for the business world, are not at all appropriate for application in the political arena.' " " <P0-S3> City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc.", 499 U.S. 365, 380 (1991) (quoting "Noerr", 365 U.S. 127, 141 (1961) . <SEP> <P1-S0> The Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975 was passed by the District of Columbia city council on September 24, 1976. <P1-S1>  The law banned residents from owning handguns, automatic firearms, or high-capacity semi-automatic firearms, as well as prohibited possession of unregistered firearms. Exceptions to the ban were allowed for police officers and guns registered before 1976. <P1-S2>  The law also required firearms kept in the home to be "unloaded, disassembled, or bound by a trigger lock or similar device"; this was deemed to be a prohibition on the use of firearms for self-defense in the home. <P1-S3>  On June 26, 2008, in the historic case of "District of Columbia v. Heller", the Supreme Court of the United States determined that the ban and trigger lock provisions violate the Second Amendment. <SEP> <P2-S0> District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) , is a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held, in a 5–4 decision, that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home, and that Washington, D.C.'s handgun ban and requirement that lawfully-owned rifles and shotguns be kept "unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock" violated this guarantee. <P2-S1>  Due to Washington, D.C. <P2-S2> 's special status as a federal district, the decision did not address the question of whether the Second Amendment's protections are incorporated by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment against the states, which was addressed two years later by "McDonald v. City of Chicago" (2010) in which it was found that they are. <P2-S3>  It was the first Supreme Court case to decide whether the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense. <SEP> <P3-S0> Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010) , was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States holding that juvenile offenders cannot be sentenced to life imprisonment without parole for non-homicide offenses. <P3-S1>  The court decided that "Roper v. Simmons" (2005), which had abolished the death penalty for juvenile offenders as unconstitutional, should apply also to sentences of life without the possibility of parole.