Question: In which year did this English lawyer and judge become a King's Counsel who reaffirmed Solle v Butcher?

<P0-S0>  Called to the bar in 1923 as a barrister he became a King's Counsel in 1938. <P0-S1>  Denning became a judge in 1944 with an appointment to the Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division of the High Court of Justice and was made a Lord Justice of Appeal in 1948 after less than five years in the High Court. <P0-S2>  He became a Lord of Appeal in Ordinary in 1957 and after five years in the House of Lords returned to the Court of Appeal as Master of the Rolls in 1962, a position he held for twenty years. <P0-S3>  In retirement he wrote several books and continued to offer opinions on the state of the common law through his writing and his position in the House of Lords. <P0-S4> Alfred Thompson "Tom" Denning, Baron Denning, (23 January 1899 – 5 March 1999) was an English lawyer and judge who has been called "the greatest judge of the century" and "probably the greatest English judge of modern times". <SEP> <P1-S0> Solle v Butcher [1950] 1 KB 671 is an English contract law case, concerning the right to have a contract declared voidable in equity. <P1-S1>  Denning LJ reaffirmed a class of "equitable mistakes" in his judgment, which enabled a claimant to avoid a contract. <P1-S2>  Denning LJ said, <SEP> <P2-S0> Texas v. Cobb, 532 U.S. 162 (2001) , was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel is offense-specific and does not always extend to offenses that are closely related to those where the right has been attached. <P2-S1>  This decision reaffirmed the Court's holding in "McNeil v. Wisconsin" (1991) by concluding that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel attaches at the onset of adversarial proceedings. <SEP> <P3-S0> A United States military jury (or "Members", in military parlance) serves a function similar to an American civilian jury, but with several notable differences. <P3-S1>  Only a General Court-Martial (which, depending on the offense, may impose any sentence including death and a dishonorable discharge) or Special Court-Martial (which, depending on the offense, can impose a sentence up to one year in confinement and a bad-conduct discharge) includes members. <P3-S2>  There are no members in a trial by Summary Court-Martial (which, depending on the offense, can impose a sentence up to 30 days in confinement). <P3-S3>  If the accused at a general court-martial or special court-martial chooses to be tried by members rather than by a military judge alone, then the members are responsible for both rendering a verdict and a sentence should the accused be found guilty of the charges. <P3-S4>  The charges are brought forward by an officer called a "convening authority", and the convening authority also personally selects each of the members who will try the accused. <P3-S5>  The charges which have been levied by the convening authority are prosecuted at courts-martial by Judge Advocates called "trial counsel". <P3-S6>  Accused persons facing general or special courts-martial receive representation free of charge from Judge Advocates acting as defense counsel. <P3-S7>  Accused persons may also be represented at general or special courts-martial by civilian attorneys hired at their own expense. <P3-S8>  While not required by Congressional law, service policy provides that many military accused receive the benefit of representation from a Judge Advocate defense counsel free of charge at summary courts-martial as well.