Question: Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc. and Michigan v. EPA, are related to which mutual organization?

<P0-S0> Glen Rock Historic District is a national historic district located at Glen Rock in York County, Pennsylvania. <P0-S1>  The district includes 287 contributing buildings, 1 contributing site, and 4 contributing structures in the central business district and surrounding residential area of Glen Rock. <P0-S2>  The houses are mostly 2 1/2-story, vernacular wood frame buildings, built between 1838 and 1945, with some notable Queen Anne and Bungalow/craftsman style dwellings. <P0-S3>  Notable buildings include the Philip Shaffer House (c. 1840), the "Castle" (1889), Peoples Bank of Glen Rock (1912), Glen Theatre (1913), Glen Rock Hose and Ladder Company (1904), Zion Evangelical Lutheran Church (1905), Immanuel United Methodist Church (1926), Industrial Sewing Company (1916), Glen Traditionals building (1921), and Accufab building (c. 1938). <P0-S4>  A contributing structure is the Northern Central Railway bridge (c. 1871). <SEP> <P1-S0> Barnes v. Yahoo!, Inc., 570 F. 3d 1096 (D. Or. <P1-S1>  Nov. 8, 2005), is a United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit case in which the Ninth Circuit held that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) rules that Yahoo!, Inc., as an Internet service provider cannot be held responsible for failure to remove objectionable content posted to their website by a third party. <P1-S2>  Plaintiff Cecilia Barnes made claims arising out of Defendant Yahoo!, Inc.'s alleged failure to honor promises to remove offensive content about the plaintiff posted by a third party. <P1-S3>  The content consisted of a personal profile with nude photos of the Plaintiff and her contact information. <P1-S4>  The United States District Court for the District of Oregon had dismissed Barnes' complaint. <SEP> <P2-S0>  Writing for a 5–4 majority, Justice Antonin Scalia held that the EPA must consider costs and that it interpreted the Clean Air Act unreasonably when it determined that it did not need to consider costs when it issued a "finding" that it was "necessary and appropriate" to regulate. <P2-S1> Michigan v. Environmental Protection Agency, 576 U.S. ___ (2015) , was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court analyzed whether the Environmental Protection Agency must consider costs when deciding to regulate, rather than later in the process of issuing the regulation. <P2-S2>  Critics of the Environmental Protection Agency praised the Court's decision, while other commentators criticized Justice Scalia's decision to ignore health impacts in his opinion. <P2-S3>  Some commentators suggested that the decision may derail President Barack Obama's climate change agenda entirely. <SEP> <P3-S0>  It ruled that the state has the constitutional authority to ban public nudity, even as part of expressive conduct such as dancing, because it furthers a substantial government interest in protecting the morality and order of society. <P3-S1>  This case is perhaps best summarized by a sentence in Justice Souter's concurring opinion, which is often paraphrased as "Nudity itself is not inherently expressive conduct." <P3-S2> Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., 501 U.S. 560 (1991) , is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States concerning the First Amendment and the ability of the government to outlaw certain forms of expressive conduct.