Question: What did the governing body with power to remove a Justice from the highest tier do to the Executive Order that included financial consideration for a species to be listed?

<P0-S0> Congress rejected President Ronald Reagan's Executive Order 12291 which required economic analysis of all government agency actions. <P0-S1> During the listing process, economic factors cannot be considered, but must be " based solely on the best scientific and commercial data available." <P0-S2> The 1982 amendment to the ESA added the word "solely" to prevent any consideration other than the biological status of the species. <P0-S3> The House committee's statement was "that economic considerations have no relevance to determinations regarding the status of species." <SEP> <P1-S0> The Constitution provides that justices ``shall hold their offices during good behavior ''(unless appointed during a Senate recess). <P1-S1> Only one justice has been impeached by the House of Representatives (Samuel Chase, March 1804), but he was acquitted in the Senate (March 1805). <P1-S2> The term`` good behavior'' is understood to mean justices may serve for the remainder of their lives, unless they are impeached and convicted by Congress, resign, or retire. <P1-S3> Moves to impeach sitting justices have occurred more recently (for example, William O. Douglas was the subject of hearings twice, in 1953 and again in 1970; and Abe Fortas resigned while hearings were being organized in 1969), but they did not reach a vote in the House. <P1-S4> No mechanism exists for removing a justice who is permanently incapacitated by illness or injury, but unable (or unwilling) to resign. <SEP> <P2-S0> The third and highest tier is the Supreme Court, located in Jerusalem; it serves a dual role as the highest court of appeals and the High Court of Justice. <P2-S1> Israel has a three-tier court system. <P2-S2> At the lowest level are magistrate courts, situated in most cities across the country. <P2-S3> Above them are district courts, serving as both appellate courts and courts of first instance; they are situated in five of Israel's six districts. <P2-S4> In the latter role, the Supreme Court rules as a court of first instance, allowing individuals, both citizens and non-citizens, to petition against the decisions of state authorities. <P2-S5> Although Israel supports the goals of the International Criminal Court, it has not ratified the Rome Statute, citing concerns about the ability of the court to remain free from political impartiality. <SEP> <P3-S0> the question to be answered is whether a listed species will be harmed by the action and, if so, how the harm can be minimized. <P3-S1> if harm cannot be avoided, the project agency can seek an exemption from the endangered species committee, an ad hoc panel composed of members from the executive branch and at least one appointee from the state where the project is to occur. <P3-S2> five of the seven committee members must vote for the exemption to allow taking (to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or significant habitat modification, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct) of listed species. <SEP> <P4-S0> the judicial power is vested in the supreme court of the philippines and lower courts established by law. <P4-S1> the supreme court, which has a chief justice as its head and 14 associate justices, occupies the highest tier of the judiciary. <P4-S2> the justices serve until the age of 70. the justices are appointed by the president on the recommendation of the judicial and bar council of the philippines. <P4-S3> the sitting chief justice is maria lourdes sereno, the 24th to serve in that position...