Question: The Supreme Court Justice who delivered the majority opinion in the Lewis v. Clarke case is the first Supreme Court justice of what heritage?

<P0-S0> The Jay Court refers to the Supreme Court of the United States from 1789 to 1795, when John Jay served as the first Chief Justice of the United States. <P0-S1>  Jay served as Chief Justice until his resignation, at which point John Rutledge took office as a recess appointment. <P0-S2>  The Supreme Court was established in Article III of the United States Constitution, but the workings of the federal court system were largely laid out by the Judiciary Act of 1789, which set the size of the Supreme Court at six seats. <P0-S3>  The court had its first public session in February 1790, but did not decide its first case until 1791. <P0-S4>  The court met first in New York City, but moved with the rest of the federal government to Philadelphia in 1791. <P0-S5>  In addition to their duties as a court, each justice spent much of his time riding circuit outside of the capital. <P0-S6>  The court decided relatively few cases, and perhaps the most important legacy of the court was its refusal to issue an advisory opinion sought by President George Washington, establishing a precedent that the court only hears cases and controversies. <P0-S7>  The relative unimportance of the Supreme Court at this time is perhaps best exemplified by the fact that Jay, the sitting Chief Justice, traveled to the United Kingdom in 1794 to negotiate the Jay Treaty for the Washington Administration. <SEP> <P1-S0> Sonia Maria Sotomayor ( , ] ; born June 25, 1954) is an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, serving since August 2009. <P1-S1>  She has the distinction of being its first justice of Hispanic heritage, the first Latina, its third female justice, and its twelfth Roman Catholic justice. <SEP> <P2-S0>  Justice Sonia Sotomayor delivered the majority opinion. <P2-S1> Lewis v. Clarke, 581 U.S. ___ (2017), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled 8-0 that tribal sovereign immunity does not apply in a suit against a tribal employee in his individual capacity, and an immunity provision cannot extend tribal sovereign immunity to cases in which it would otherwise not apply. <P2-S2>  Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg each wrote concurring opinions that both said that tribal sovereign immunity does not apply in suits arising from commercial activity off of tribal territory. <P2-S3>  Justice Neil Gorsuch was not involved in the discussion or decision of this case. <SEP> <P3-S0> Marie Louise v. Marot (1836) was a freedom suit heard by the Louisiana state district court and appealed to the Louisiana Supreme Court. <P3-S1>  The Court held that a slave who is taken to a territory prohibitive of slavery cannot be again reduced to slavery on returning to a territory allowing of slavery. <P3-S2>  The ruling was cited as precedent to the 1856 landmark "Dred Scott v. Sandford" case heard by the U.S. Supreme Court. <P3-S3>  Supreme Court Justice John McLean cited the precedent in his dissent of the majority ruling. <P3-S4>  Six of eight justices did not abide by the precedent in what has been considered the worst decision ever made by the Supreme Court.