Question: Which two activites are closely associated with a popular 2004 concept which spurred  the hoax claim, Toothing?

<P0-S0> Norwegian knitting has a long history starting from about the 1600s, where it has been speculated that it was adopted by knitters traveling there from Denmark. <P0-S1>  Knitted garments found in Norway have been dated as far back as the 1500s. <P0-S2>  The heritage of Norwegian knitting has been preserved, documented and translated into English language history and pattern books that are available to modern knitters, mostly notably by Annemor Sundbo. <P0-S3>  Some of the most well known sweater patterns attributed to Norwegian colorwork knitting are the setesdal lusekofte and fana cardigan sweater patterns. <P0-S4>  The region is also well known for their "Selbu" mittens, which first appeared as a vertical column of two snowflakes on the front side of the mittens, and which remains the pattern motif (selburose) most closely associated with the region. <P0-S5>  The origin of these mittens is attributed to a young girl named Marit Emstad who in 1857 attended church wearing what we now know as Selbu mittens, effectively sparking the imagination of knitters at the time who had never seen anything like it before. <P0-S6>  Today there are over 300 "registered" mitten patterns attributed to the Selbu region of Norway. <P0-S7>  There are several brands of Norwegian yarn available today for knitters, including Dale of Norway (Dale Garn), and Rauma Garn. <P0-S8>  While Dale of Norway is under new ownership and the wool for the yarn is still from Norway, it is now being made in China. <P0-S9> [citation needed] Dale of Norway is also a manufacturer of ready wear sweaters which have been worn by Norway's Olympic athletes since 1956. <P0-S10>  Many of their sweater patterns most closely associated with knitted "ski sweaters" have been published in English by the company. <P0-S11>  Rauma Garn has also released a substantial amount of Norwegian knitting patterns translated into English. <SEP> <P1-S0> Dogging is a British English slang term for engaging in sexual acts in a public or semi-public place or watching others doing so. <P1-S1>  There may be more than two participants; both group sex and gang banging can be included. <P1-S2>  The two sets of people involved often meet either randomly or (increasingly) arrange to meet up beforehand over the Internet. <P1-S3>  As observation is encouraged, voyeurism and exhibitionism are closely associated with dogging. <SEP> <P2-S0>  The hoax was created by Ste Curran, then Editor at Large at the gaming magazine "Edge", and ex-journalist Simon Byron. <P2-S1>  They based it on the two concepts dogging and bluejacking that were popular at the time. <P2-S2>  The creators started a forum in March 2004 where they wrote fake news articles about toothing with other members and then sent them off to well-known Internet-based news services. <P2-S3>  The point of the hoax was to "highlight how journalists are happy to believe something is true without necessarily checking the facts". <P2-S4>  Dozens of news organizations, including BBC News, Wired News, and "The Independent" thought the toothing story was real and printed it. <P2-S5> Toothing was originally a hoax claim that Bluetooth-enabled mobile phones or PDAs were being used to arrange random sexual encounters, perpetrated as a prank on the media who reported it. <P2-S6>  On April 4, 2005, Curran and Byron admitted that the whole thing was a hoax. <P2-S7>  There have, however, been real Bluetooth dating devices to hit the market since. <SEP> <P3-S0> The Facebook privacy and copyright hoaxes are a collection of similar internet hoaxes that claim that posting a status on social networking site Facebook constitutes a privacy notice that protects your posts on the site from copyright infringement or that provides privacy protection to their profile information and other content they have posted to the site. <P3-S1>  The hoax takes the form of a Facebook status that, when posted, urges others to post the same or a similar status. <P3-S2>  The hoax first became popular in May and June 2012, but has since re-appeared multiple times, including in November 2012 and then again in 2015, first in January and later in September of that year. <P3-S3>  All of the hoaxes are based on several misunderstandings, including, with respect to the privacy version, the fact that it incorrectly assumes that Facebook becoming a public company in May 2012 affects how it treats user information, the assumption that posting certain content online can protect someone from adverse legal consequences, and the fact that the hoax ignores that if Facebook wanted to significantly change its terms of service agreement, it would have to provide notification of these changes.