Question: What part of the document in which Stewart could not find the phrase Wall of Separation is the basis for the implied powers of the body which has oversight of David Vladeck's employer?

<P0-S0> Executive power is vested, with exceptions and qualifications, in the President. <P0-S1> By law (Section 2.) <P0-S2> the president becomes the Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy, Militia of several states when called into service, has power to make treaties and appointments to office "with the Advice and Consent of the Senate," receive Ambassadors and Public Ministers, and "take care that the laws be faithfully executed" (Section 3.) <P0-S3> By using these words, the Constitution does not require the president to personally enforce the law; rather, officers subordinate to the president may perform such duties. <P0-S4> Congress may itself terminate such appointments, by impeachment, and restrict the president. <P0-S5> The Constitution empowers the president to ensure the faithful execution of the laws made by Congress and approved by the President. <P0-S6> Bodies such as the War Claims Commission, the Interstate Commerce Commission and the Federal Trade Commission—all quasi-judicial—often have direct Congressional oversight. <SEP> <P1-S0> section 1 is a vesting clause that bestows federal legislative power exclusively to congress. <P1-S1> similar clauses are found in articles ii and iii. <P1-S2> the former confers executive power upon the president alone, and the latter grants judicial power solely to the federal judiciary. <P1-S3> these three articles create a separation of powers among the three branches of the federal government. <P1-S4> this separation of powers, by which each department may exercise only its own constitutional powers and no others, is fundamental to the idea of a limited government accountable to the people. <SEP> <P2-S0> The lone dissenter, Justice Potter Stewart, objected to the court's embrace of the "wall of separation" metaphor: "I think that the Court's task, in this as in all areas of constitutional adjudication, is not responsibly aided by the uncritical invocation of metaphors like the "wall of separation," a phrase nowhere to be found in the Constitution." <P2-S1> The court noted that it "is a matter of history that this very practice of establishing governmentally composed prayers for religious services was one of the reasons which caused many of our early colonists to leave England and seek religious freedom in America." <SEP> <P3-S0> Implied powers, in the United States, are powers authorized by the Constitution that, while not stated, seem implied by powers that are expressly stated. <P3-S1> When George Washington asked Alexander Hamilton to defend the constitutionality of the First Bank of the United States against the protests of Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and Attorney General Edmund Randolph, Hamilton produced what has now become the classic statement for implied powers. <P3-S2> Hamilton noted that the ``general welfare clause ''and the`` necessary and proper clause'' gave elasticity to the Constitution. <P3-S3> Hamilton argued that the sovereign duties of a government implied the right to use means adequate to its ends. <P3-S4> Although the United States government was sovereign only as to certain objects, it was impossible to define all the means it should use, because it was impossible for the founders to anticipate all future exigencies. <P3-S5> Hamilton won the argument with Washington, who signed the bank bill into law. <SEP> <P4-S0> David C. Vladeck (born June 6, 1951) is the former Director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection of the Federal Trade Commission, an independent agency of the United States government. <P4-S1> He was appointed by the Chairman of the FTC, Jon Leibowitz, on April 14, 2009, shortly after Leibowitz became Chairman. <SEP> <P5-S0> in 1989 a series of revolutions in nearby eastern bloc countries -- poland and hungary in particular -- caused a chain reaction in east germany that ultimately resulted in the demise of the wall. <P5-S1> after several weeks of civil unrest, the east german government announced on 9 november 1989 that all gdr citizens could visit west germany and west berlin. <P5-S2> crowds of east germans crossed and climbed onto the wall, joined by west germans on the other side in a celebratory atmosphere. <P5-S3> over the next few weeks, euphoric people and souvenir hunters chipped away parts of the wall; the governments later used industrial equipment to remove most of what was left. <P5-S4> the ``fall of the berlin wall ''paved the way for german reunification, which formally took place on 3 october 1990.