Question: Which court case was argued first, Engblom v. Carey or Craig v. Boren?

<P0-S0> West v. Barnes, 2 U.S. 401 (1791), was the first United States Supreme Court decision and the earliest case calling for oral argument. " <P0-S1> Van Staphorst v. Maryland" (1791) was docketed prior to "West v. Barnes" but settled before the Court heard the case: "West" was argued on August 2, 1791 and decided on August 3, 1791. " <P0-S2> Collet v. Collet" (1791) was the first appellate case docketed with the Court but was dropped before it could be heard. <P0-S3>  Supreme Court Reporter Alexander Dallas did not publish the justices' full opinions in "West v. Barnes", which were published in various newspapers around the country at the time, but he published an abbreviated summary of the decisions. <SEP> <P1-S0>  1982), "on rem." <P1-S1> Engblom v. Carey, 677 F.2d 957 (2d Cir. <P1-S2>  572 F. Supp. <P1-S3>  44 (S.D.N.Y. 1982), "aff'd. <P1-S4>  per curiam" 724 F.2d 28 (2d Cir. <P1-S5>  1983), was a court case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. <P1-S6>  It is the only significant court decision based on a direct challenge under the Third Amendment to the United States Constitution, which states that "No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner[.]" <SEP> <P2-S0> Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190 (1976) , was the first case in which a majority of the United States Supreme Court determined that statutory or administrative sex classifications were subject to intermediate scrutiny under the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. <SEP> <P3-S0> Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc., 535 U.S. 425 (2002) , was a United States Supreme Court case on the controversial issue of adult bookstore zoning in the city of Los Angeles. <P3-S1>  Zoning laws dictated that no adult bookstores could be within five hundred feet of a public park, or religious establishment, or within 1000 feet of another adult establishment. <P3-S2>  However, Alameda Books, Inc. and Highland Books, Inc. were two adult stores that operated under one roof. <P3-S3>  They sued Los Angeles, stating the ordinance violated the first amendment. <P3-S4>  The district court concurred with the stores, stating that the 1977 study stating there was a higher crime rate in areas with adult stores, which the law was based upon, did not support a reasonable belief that multiple-use adult establishments produce the secondary effects the city asserted as content-neutral justifications for its restrictions on adult stores. <P3-S5>  The Court of Appeals upheld this verdict, and found that even if the ordinance were content neutral, the city failed to present evidence upon which it could reasonably rely to demonstrate that its regulation of multiple-use establishments was designed to serve its substantial interest in reducing crime. <P3-S6>  However, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the city. <P3-S7>  This reversed the decision of the lower court. <P3-S8>  This case was argued on December 4, 2001; certiorari was granted on March 5, 2001. <P3-S9>  "City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, 00-799, didn't involve the kind of adult material that can be regulated by the government, but rather the extent to which cities can ban "one-stop shopping" sex-related businesses."