Question: Why did the developer of Transformator in 1958 complain about the action of the US to the organization that excludes countries with no strategic and hard power?

<P0-S0> linux was, at that time, specifically built for the intel 386, a significantly more powerful (and expensive) processor. <P0-S1> tanenbaum also specifically states "... as of about 1 year ago, there were two versions [of minix], one for the pc (360k diskettes) and one for the 286/386 (1.2m). <P0-S2> the pc version was outselling the 286/386 version by 2 to 1." <P0-S3> he noted that even though linux was free, it wouldn't be a viable choice for his students, as they would not be able to afford the expensive hardware required to run it, and that minix could be used on "a regular 4.77 mhz pc with no hard disk." <P0-S4> to this, kevin brown, another user of the usenet group, replied that tanenbaum should not complain about linux's ties to the 386 architecture, as it was the result of a conscious choice rather than lack of knowledge about operating system design, stating "... an explicit design goal of linux was to take advantage of the special features of the 386 architecture. <P0-S5> so what exactly is your point? <P0-S6> different design goals get you different designs." <SEP> <P1-S0> in the us william stanley, jr. designed one of the first practical devices to transfer ac power efficiently between isolated circuits. <P1-S1> using pairs of coils wound on a common iron core, his design, called an induction coil, was an early (1885) transformer. <P1-S2> stanley also worked on engineering and adapting european designs such as the gaulard and gibbs transformer for us entrepreneur george westinghouse who started building ac systems in 1886. the spread of westinghouse and other ac systems triggered a push back in late 1887 by edison (a proponent of direct current) who attempted to discredit alternating current as too dangerous in a public campaign called the ``war of currents ''. <P1-S3> in 1888 alternating current systems gained further viability with introduction of a functional ac motor, something these systems had lacked up till then. <P1-S4> the design, an induction motor, was independently invented by galileo ferraris and nikola tesla (with tesla's design being licensed by westinghouse in the us). <P1-S5> this design was further developed into the modern practical three - phase form by mikhail dolivo - dobrovolsky and charles eugene lancelot brown. <SEP> <P2-S0> It was a research project and the system was never deployed by either the military or consumer broadcasting. <P2-S1> In 1958, the Soviet Union developed Тransformator (Russian: Трансформатор, meaning Transformer), the first high-resolution (definition) television system capable of producing an image composed of 1,125 lines of resolution aimed at providing teleconferencing for military command. <SEP> <P3-S0> In the resulting Battle of Pusan Perimeter (August–September 1950), the U.S. Army withstood KPA attacks meant to capture the city at the Naktong Bulge, P'ohang-dong, and Taegu. <P3-S1> The United States Air Force (USAF) interrupted KPA logistics with 40 daily ground support sorties that destroyed 32 bridges, halting most daytime road and rail traffic. <P3-S2> KPA forces were forced to hide in tunnels by day and move only at night. <P3-S3> To deny matériel to the KPA, the USAF destroyed logistics depots, petroleum refineries, and harbors, while the U.S. Navy air forces attacked transport hubs. <P3-S4> Consequently, the over-extended KPA could not be supplied throughout the south. <P3-S5> The US proposed that a commission of India and Sweden determine what the US should pay in compensation but the Soviets vetoed the US proposal. <P3-S6> On 27 August, 67th Fighter Squadron aircraft mistakenly attacked facilities in Chinese territory and the Soviet Union called the UN Security Council's attention to China's complaint about the incident. <SEP> <P4-S0> Germany has been a member together with the five permanent Security Council members in the P5+1 grouping of world powers. <P4-S1> Japan and Germany are great powers too, though due to their large advanced economies (having the third and fourth largest economies respectively) rather than their strategic and hard power capabilities (i.e., the lack of permanent seats and veto power on the UN Security Council or strategic military reach). <P4-S2> Like China, France, Russia and the United Kingdom; Germany and Japan have also been referred to as middle powers.