Question: What terms do the house having the power to introduce appropriation bills of the US legislative body having over-sight of David Vladeck's employer serve?

<P0-S0> According to the Origination Clause of the United States Constitution, all bills for raising revenue, generally tax bills, must originate in the House of Representatives, similar to the Westminster system requirement that all money bills originate in the lower house. <P0-S1> Traditionally, though, appropriation bills also originate in the House of Representatives. <P0-S2> House appropriations bills begin with ``H.R. <P0-S3> '', meaning`` House of Representatives''. <P0-S4> In reference to revenue bills, the Constitution also states that the ``Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills. <P0-S5> ''As with revenue bills, the Senate and House each drafts and considers its own appropriation bill. <P0-S6> The Senate then`` cuts - and - pastes,'' substituting the language of its version of a particular appropriation bill for the language of the House bill, then agrees to the bill as amended. <SEP> <P1-S0> the royal assent ceremony takes place in the senate, as the sovereign is traditionally barred from the house of commons. <P1-S1> on the day of the event, the speaker of the senate will read to the chamber a notice from the secretary to the governor general indicating when the viceroy or a deputy thereof will arrive. <P1-S2> the senate thereafter cannot adjourn until after the ceremony. <P1-S3> the speaker moves to sit beside the throne, the mace bearer, with mace in hand, stands adjacent to him or her, and the governor general enters to take the speaker's chair. <P1-S4> the usher of the black rod is then commanded by the speaker to summon the members of parliament, who follow black rod back to the senate, the sergeant-at-arms carrying the mace of the house of commons. <P1-S5> in the senate, those from the commons stand behind the bar, while black rod proceeds to stand next to the governor general, who then nods his or her head to signify royal assent to the presented bills (which do not include appropriations bills). <P1-S6> once the list of bills is complete, the clerk of the senate states: "in her majesty's name, his [or her] excellency the governor general [or the deputy] doth assent to these bills." <P1-S7> if there are any appropriation bills to receive royal assent, the speaker of the house of commons will read their titles and the senate clerk repeats them to the governor general, who nods his or her head to communicate royal assent. <P1-S8> when these bills have all been assented to, the clerk of the senate recites "in her majesty's name, his [or her] excellency the governor general [or the deputy] thanks her loyal subjects, accepts their benevolence and assents to these bills. <P1-S9> the governor general or his or her deputy then depart parliament. <SEP> <P2-S0> Executive power is vested, with exceptions and qualifications, in the President. <P2-S1> The Constitution empowers the president to ensure the faithful execution of the laws made by Congress and approved by the President. <P2-S2> By law (Section 2.) <P2-S3> the president becomes the Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy, Militia of several states when called into service, has power to make treaties and appointments to office "with the Advice and Consent of the Senate," receive Ambassadors and Public Ministers, and "take care that the laws be faithfully executed" (Section 3.) <P2-S4> By using these words, the Constitution does not require the president to personally enforce the law; rather, officers subordinate to the president may perform such duties. <P2-S5> Congress may itself terminate such appointments, by impeachment, and restrict the president. <P2-S6> Bodies such as the War Claims Commission, the Interstate Commerce Commission and the Federal Trade Commission—all quasi-judicial—often have direct Congressional oversight. <SEP> <P3-S0> Elections were last held between November 2011 and January 2012 which was later dissolved. <P3-S1> The next parliamentary election will be held within 6 months of the constitution's ratification on 18 January 2014. <P3-S2> Originally, the parliament was to be formed before the president was elected, but interim president Adly Mansour pushed the date. <P3-S3> The Egyptian presidential election, 2014, took place on 26–28 May 2014. <P3-S4> Official figures showed a turnout of 25,578,233 or 47.5%, with Abdel Fattah el-Sisi winning with 23.78 million votes, or 96.91% compared to 757,511 (3.09%) for Hamdeen Sabahi. <P3-S5> The House of Representatives, whose members are elected to serve five-year terms, specialises in legislation. <SEP> <P4-S0> David C. Vladeck (born June 6, 1951) is the former Director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection of the Federal Trade Commission, an independent agency of the United States government. <P4-S1> He was appointed by the Chairman of the FTC, Jon Leibowitz, on April 14, 2009, shortly after Leibowitz became Chairman. <SEP> <P5-S0> australia is the only common law country with neither a constitutional nor federal legislative bill of rights to protect its citizens, although there is ongoing debate in many of australia's states. <P5-S1> in 1973, federal attorney - general lionel murphy introduced a human rights bill into parliament, although it was never passed. <P5-S2> in 1984, senator stephen bunce drafted a bill of rights, but it was never introduced into parliament, and in 1985, senator lionel bowen introduced a bill of rights, which was passed by the house of representatives, but failed to pass the senate. <P5-S3> former australian prime minister john howard has argued against a bill of rights for australia on the grounds it would transfer power from elected politicians (populist politics) to unelected (constitutional) judges and bureaucrats. <P5-S4> victoria and the australian capital territory (act) are the only states and territories to have a human rights act. <P5-S5> however, the principle of legality present in the australian judicial system, seeks to ensure that legislation is interpreted so as not to interfere with basic human rights, unless legislation expressly intends to interfere.