Original: Each deconstruction is necessarily different (otherwise it achieves no work) and this is why Derrida states that â Deconstruction takes place, it is an event. â On the other hand deconstruction can not be completely untranscendental because this would make it meaningless to, for example, speak of two different examples of deconstruction as both being examples of deconstruction.
Simplified: Deconstruction is breaking something down into smaller parts.