# விக்கிப்பீடியா:வார்ப்புருத் தகவல்கள்/மறுப்பு



**Dispute templates** are used to alert other editors that work is needed on a certain article, and auto-categorize pages so that patrolling editors can aid their talent to the problem. The primary purpose of this page is to display and discuss the use of these sometimes controversial aids to joint edit collaboration.  

They should normally not be used without a clear description from the applying editor of the rationale, preferably presented in a numbered list form on the article's talk page, in a section which includes the name of the template that was applied. As these items are dealt with, it is suggested each line be struck through. Some guidance should be given by the posting editor as to what action will resolve the matter when using section and article (page) tagging templates.  

It is preferable that in-line templates be applied to content that is being objected to on bias or fact grounds.  

Inline templates are preferred because they can be attached directly to disputed sentences. Section templates follow next in preference to tagging a whole article.  

Many editors consider use of any banner template in an article a serious measure of last resort, and would prefer other measures be exhausted before such detractions from the project be used. If one must be used, please make a thorough note listing deficiencies or items being disputed in bulleted or numbered paragraph format under a clear notice section heading on the article's talk page.  

Please remember to use these appropriately, and use the most specific messages you can find for the situation.  

## For placement at top of an article
| What to type | What it makes | Where it goes |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Articles which are and may not be because of that, with the date at which they were flagged. |  |  |
| Self-contradicting article
top |  |  |
| One or both contradicting articles
top |  |  |
| Disputed articles with list of topics
top |  |  |
| Disputed articles
top |  |  |
| Disputed articles
top |  |  |
| Disputed article title
top |  |  |
| Suspected hoaxes
top |  |  |
| Possible neologisms
top |  |  |
| Non-notable topic, listing the specific guideline at issue
top |  |  |
| Non-notable topic or failing to meet the current notability guidelines (verbose)
top |  |  |
| Disputed articles
top |  |  |
| Possibly biased articles
top |  |  |
| Disputed article sections
under title |  |  |
| Articles which contain Unbalanced citations. |  |  |

## For placement at top of article or section
| What to type | What it makes | Where it goes |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Pages that promote commercial products or services |  |  |
| At the top of an article or section where the text misrepresents the sources cited. |  |  |
| Above the site of dispute in article or section |  |  |
| Pages that read like a fansite instead of the formal tones expected of an encyclopedia. |  |  |
| Section where some sentences in a section or the text as a whole does not relay an understandable message |  |  |
| Article or section where information not present may be worthy of inclusion |  |  |
| *Use the <code>section=y</code> parameter if you use the template for a particular section.
*To tag a specific issue, set any string of text to the parameter, such as <code>issue=y</code>
*To specify the month tagged for the categories that sort articles by month, type <code>issue= </code> or <code>issue=April 2007</code> | Top of article or section with three or more issues |  |
| Possible original research. |  |  |
| Article or section that has peacock terms |  |  |
| Top of article, or top of section in dispute. |  |  |
| Possibly inaccurate articles
top |  |  |
| Top of articles or sections |  |  |
| On an article where a self-published (online or in print) source is cited, and is therefore not legitimately citable as a secondary source, according to policy. |  |  |
| Pages that read like a narrative and tell a story rather than providing encyclopedic information. |  |  |
| Possible unpublished synthesis. (The text in quotation marks is replaced with the title of the article.) |  |  |
| Pages that tone or style may not reflect the encyclopedic tone used on Wikipedia. |  |  |
| Sections or text where a matter such as a controversy or incident has been given more weight than is appropriate in the context of the article or biography as a whole. |  |  |
| Lacks attributions from reliable sources. See template page for special usages. |  |  |
| Article or section that has weasel words |  |  |

## For placement in or at top of a section only
| What to type | What it makes | Where it goes |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Disputed article sections
under section header |  |  |
| Top of section to be expanded. |  |  |
| Disputed article intro
top |  |  |
| Disputed article sections
under section header |  |  |
| Section contains possible original research. |  |  |

## For inline article placement

| What to type | What it makes | Where it goes |
| --- | --- | --- |
| or or | After factual claims that need a citation to back them up.
in-line |  |
| Disputed statements
in-line |  |  |
| After factual claims that have been checked and not found in the indicated source. Explain in Talk.
in-line |  |  |
| One-sided statements
in-line |  |  |
| or | After factual claims that could be , but are not and are too general for a .
in-line |  |
| After text passages based upon original research
in-line |  |  |
| After passages that appear to have a non-neutral point of view. |  |  |
| or | After text passages based upon improper synthesis
in-line |  |
| After suspect citations or source references
in-line |  |  |
| or | After suspect citations or source references
in-line |  |
| After passages mentioning general groups (such as "many scientists") that could be made more specific by naming (and citing sources for) specific individuals.
in-line |  |  |

## For placement on talk pages of articles

| What to type | What it makes | Where it goes |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Talk pages which are likely to have incivil or hot-headed disputes. |  |  |
| Talk page
top |  |  |
| Talk page
top |  |  |
| Talk pages which are frequently used by inexperienced users as a forum for discussion of things not related to improving the corresponding article. | } |  |

## For placement on talk pages of users