# விக்கிப்பீடியா:ஆலமரத்தடி/தொகுப்பு03

## சிறப்பு கட்டுரைப் படைப்பாளர்

### சில கூறுகள்

- இவ்வார சிறப்புக்கட்டுரையாளர் (முதல் பக்கம்)
- பெயர், இடம், துறை உட்பட்ட சிறு அறிமுகம்
- விரும்பினால் பட இணைப்பு
- கட்டுரையாளர் தனது ஆக்கங்கள் கீழ் த.வி. சேர்க்கப்படுகின்றன என்பதை தெளிவுபடுத்தல்.
- குறைந்தது மூன்று கட்டுரைகள், பிற குறுங்கட்டுரைகளாகவும் இருக்கலாம் ?!
- த.வி. மேம்படுத்தல் நோக்கி கட்டுரையாளரின் கருத்துக்கள்
- முடிந்தால் நேரடி கருத்து பரிமாற்றம், தொடர் பங்களிப்பு  
(எளிமையாக ஆரம்பிக்கலாம், தேவைகளுக்கு ஏற்ப கட்டமைப்பை விரிவாக்கி கொள்ளலாம்)--Natkeeran 13:06, 2 மே 2006 (UTC)  
:Forgive me if iam pessimistic or harsh but I have lot of second opinions about the suggestions made above. I am completely against featuring the expert's photo, profile etc., or whatsoever in the main page or in any wikipedia namespace page. I think this is against the wiki philosophy and donno whether similar things have been done in other language wikis. I understand there are unique ways to make things work in tamil society and this is one such thing but doesnt go well with how wikipedia works. Natkeeran's suggestion might make experts feel important and happy in contributing to wiki but I think it will divert our attention and make wikipedia like a regular online tamil magazine. There are more regular useful contributors working here and giving spotlight to new comer experts may be unfair. And then comes the next tough question of determining who is an expert in what field. If we want to apprecaite contributors specially in a separate page, then we can do so surely. But it should take into account the quality and quantity of user's wiki activity and nothing else.  
:If the expert himselves created an user account here, then he can include whatsoever he wants about himself in his user page. I don object it. Also, implementing natkeeran's suggestion would be time consuming and not sustainable in the long run. Sundar's idea that we can receive articles by email and post them here is fine. We can just mention in the article's talk page that the basic content was received from so and so, though its really not necessary. Its just a token of gratitude for participating in tamil wikipedia in someway.  
:The best thing is to spread the awareness about the importance of tamil wikipedia and the need for expert involvement and wait for such people to come and participate in wiki. I think thats how en wiki or any other successful wiki works. Once wiki becomes a significant resource the experts would automatically chip in to add thier contribution. If they are computer illiterate or reluctant to learn the way wiki works, then we can just receive content through email or writing and post it here. Credit can be mentioned in the talk page. If the content is from a previous published work, then we can cite it as source in the article page. I feel anything more we do about regularisig this expert contributions will distract us. --ரவி 13:28, 2 மே 2006 (UTC)  
:: Ravi, you raise some important points. In retrospect, I agree with many of your comments. Perhaps, we can do some limited version in a separate page and notify in the Community Pages or Current Events pages!. I am not sure what are the best guide lines, but no one was responding to Sundars repeated requests, that’s why I forwarded few notes. Sundar, what sort of structure are you looking for? --Natkeeran 14:37, 2 மே 2006 (UTC)  
:::Yes, I agree with Ravi. Their contributions would merit a mention in the Talk page at best. The structure I'm looking for is this a policy page explaining that they release their contributions under GFDL and anyone can edit it in anyway and with introductory material addressing the guest contributor. Some of them might eventually become regular contributors. -- Sundar <sup>\பேச்சு</sup> 06:55, 3 மே 2006 (UTC)