text: Naturally, the problems of a single Europe would run as deeply as the benefits that we would presumably ultimately receive.
  		It seems to me that for the past few centuries, Britain has always considered itself to be detached from the rest of Europe. Whenever necessary, she has allied herself to European powers, such as in times of war of extreme distrust.
  		Britain has been eager to maintain a secure balance of power on the continent, but throughout history, she has been more concerned with her oversees empires than with anywhere else.
  		In the latter half century though, her empire has diminished and she has had to face mounting responsibility in Europe.
  		Because of her history of isolated sovereignty it is difficult to accept being a part of a single Europe.
  		For instance, British law is based largely upon precedent, that is judge made law. We have established a system of law which dates back many centuries, and which is widely known and respected. There is very little European influence on our law, of course in many respects it will be the same, but the lack of influence will display many differences.
  		With the creation of a single Europe, new law will have to be accepted throughout the continent, and it will cause both confusion and conflict.
  		The British tend to be very proud and possessive of the law, and changes may well cause illfeeling and discontent. Of course, the same points will apply to the monetary system in Europe. Will there just be one system ?
  		The country typically is against major change and something as fundamental as money would cause problems if it was to be altered.
  		Our individual monetary system I suppose, could be seen as a symbol of sovereignty.
  		It can be said that if a single Europe was created, problems may arise over its fundamental political concepts. Of course Britain would lose her sovereignty, as would the other nations of the union.
  		It has been suggested that the Single Union could be based on a basic federal structure, whereby local autonomy could be saved, but the union as a whole could work together in a democratic manner.
  		To a certain extent, even if sovereignty was lost, some national personality would be preserved. The fact is that, when united, European unity would still in essence be divided. There will always be aspects of one society that the others will never accept.
  		Europe as a whole faces the same problems, and therefore, if a single Europe was created, uniting Britain, the problems could be dealt with quickly and efficiently.
  		If the Federalists achieved their aims in a European unity, they would do their best to achieve democracy and promote it nationally, so that individuality is preserved, and that all of their positive features will be known.
  		The problem facing the British, really results from their isolated past. The sovereignty of the nation has deep roots, and the fears of losing it are very great.
  		Whether this would happen awaits to be seen, and would depend completely on the terms of the union, and the negotiations and feelings of the general public and the politicians leading the countries.
edits.text: , or last - , , , judgement . In ill-feeling , , , really