whpthomas/finqa-parquet huggingface dataset:
vertex pharmaceuticals incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) f . marketable securities ( continued ) unrealized losses in the portfolio relate to various debt securities including u.s . government securities , u.s . government-sponsored enterprise securities , corporate debt securities and asset-backed securities . for these securities , the unrealized losses are primarily due to increases in interest rates . the investments held by the company are high investment grade and there were no adverse credit events . because the company has the ability and intent to hold these investments until a recovery of fair value , which may be maturity , the company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of december 31 , 2006 and 2005 . gross realized gains and losses for 2006 were $ 4000 and $ 88000 respectively . gross realized gains and losses for 2005 were $ 15000 and $ 75000 , respectively . gross realized gains and losses for 2004 were $ 628000 and $ 205000 , respectively . g . restricted cash at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , the company held $ 30.3 million and $ 41.5 million respectively , in restricted cash . at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 the balance was held in deposit with certain banks predominantly to collateralize conditional stand-by letters of credit in the names of the company 2019s landlords pursuant to certain operating lease agreements . h . property and equipment property and equipment consist of the following at december 31 ( in thousands ) : depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 was $ 25.4 million , $ 26.3 million and $ 28.4 million , respectively . in 2006 and 2005 , the company wrote off certain assets that were fully depreciated and no longer utilized . there was no effect on the company 2019s net property and equipment . additionally , the company wrote off or sold certain assets that were not fully depreciated . the net loss on disposal of those assets was $ 10000 for 2006 , $ 344000 for 2005 and $ 43000 for 2004 . i . altus investment altus pharmaceuticals , inc . ( 201caltus 201d ) completed an initial public offering in january 2006 . as of the completion of the offering , vertex owned 817749 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 1962494 shares of common stock ( the 201caltus warrants 201d ) . in addition , the company , as of the completion .
what was the percent change in depreciation and amortization expense between 2004 and 2005?
furniture and equipment $ 97638 $ 98387 leasehold improvements 74875 66318 computers 19733 18971 software 21274 18683 total property and equipment , gross 213520 202359 less accumulated depreciation and amortization 151985 147826 total property and equipment , net $ 61535 $ 54533 .
entity transfers of inventory , the income tax effects will continue to be deferred until the inventory has been sold to a third party . cadence adopted the new standard on the first day of fiscal 2018 using the modified retrospective transition approach and recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment to decrease retained earnings in the amount of $ 8.3 million . the cumulative-effect adjustment includes the write-off of income tax consequences deferred from prior intra-entity transfers involving assets other than inventory and new deferred tax assets for amounts not recognized under u.s . gaap . we anticipate the potential for increased volatility in future effective tax rates from the adoption of this guidance . stock-based compensation in may 2017 , the fasb issued asu 2017-09 , 201ccompensation 2014stock compensation ( topic 718 ) : scope of modification accounting , 201d that provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting . cadence adopted the standard on the first day of fiscal 2018 . the adoption of this standard did not impact cadence 2019s consolidated financial statements or the related disclosures . cumulative effect adjustments to retained earnings the following table presents the cumulative effect adjustments , net of income tax effects , to beginning retained earnings for new accounting standards adopted by cadence on the first day of fiscal 2018 : retained earnings ( in thousands ) .
what is the net effect of the adoption of new accounting standards?
* the cumulative effect adjustment from the adoption of revenue from contracts with customers ( topic 606 ) is presented net of the related income tax effect of $ 17.5 million . new accounting standards not yet adopted leases in february 2016 , the fasb issued asu 2016-02 , 201cleases ( topic 842 ) , 201d requiring , among other things , the recognition of lease liabilities and corresponding right-of-use assets on the balance sheet by lessees for all leases with a term longer than 12 months . the new standard is effective for cadence in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 . a modified retrospective approach is required , applying the new standard to leases existing as of the date of initial application . an entity may choose to apply the standard as of either its effective date or the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements . cadence adopted the new standard on december 30 , 2018 , the first day of fiscal 2019 , and used the effective date as the date of initial application . consequently , financial information will not be updated and the disclosures required under the new standard will not be provided for dates and periods prior to the first quarter of fiscal 2019 . cadence elected certain practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance within the new standard , which among other things , allowed cadence to carry forward its prior conclusions about lease identification and classification. .
jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 173 trading assets and liabilities average balances average trading assets and liabilities were as follows for the periods indicated. .
excluding derivatives , what are net 2008 trading assets , in millions?
( a ) primarily represent securities sold , not yet purchased . note 4 2013 fair value option the fair value option provides an option to elect fair value as an alternative measurement for selected financial assets , financial liabilities , unrecognized firm commitments , and written loan com- mitments not previously carried at fair value . elections elections were made by the firm to : 2022 mitigate income statement volatility caused by the differences in the measurement basis of elected instruments ( for example , cer- tain instruments elected were previously accounted for on an accrual basis ) while the associated risk management arrange- ments are accounted for on a fair value basis ; 2022 eliminate the complexities of applying certain accounting models ( e.g. , hedge accounting or bifurcation accounting for hybrid in- struments ) ; and 2022 better reflect those instruments that are managed on a fair value basis . elections include : 2022 securities financing arrangements with an embedded derivative and/or a maturity of greater than one year . 2022 loans purchased or originated as part of securitization ware- housing activity , subject to bifurcation accounting , or managed on a fair value basis . 2022 structured notes issued as part of ib 2019s client-driven activities . ( structured notes are financial instruments that contain embed- ded derivatives. ) 2022 certain tax credits and other equity investments acquired as part of the washington mutual transaction . the cumulative effect on retained earnings of the adoption of the fair value option on january 1 , 2007 , was $ 199 million. .
24 2017 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2017 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company : comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .
jkhy's total 5 year return was what percent of the peer group?
this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2012 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. ; bottomline technology , inc. ; broadridge financial solutions ; cardtronics , inc. ; convergys corp. ; corelogic , inc. ; dst systems , inc. ; euronet worldwide , inc. ; fair isaac corp. ; fidelity national information services , inc. ; fiserv , inc. ; global payments , inc. ; moneygram international , inc. ; ss&c technologies holdings , inc. ; total systems services , inc. ; tyler technologies , inc. ; verifone systems , inc. ; and wex , inc.. .
the fair value of our total investments increased $ 4.8 billion during 2010 , primarily due to unrealized appreciation , the inves- ting of operating cash flows , and the portfolios acquired in the 2010 corporate acquisitions . the following tables show the market value of our fixed maturities and short-term investments at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 . the first table lists investments according to type and the second according to s&p credit rating. .
what is the percentage change in the balance of treasury in 2010?
.
visa inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) september 30 , 2008 ( in millions , except as noted ) volume and support incentives the company has agreements with customers for various programs designed to build sales volume and increase the acceptance of its payment products . these agreements , with original terms ranging from one to thirteen years , provide card issuance , marketing and program support based on specific performance requirements . these agreements are designed to encourage customer business and to increase overall visa-branded payment volume , thereby reducing unit transaction processing costs and increasing brand awareness for all visa customers . payments made and obligations incurred under these programs are included on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheets . the company 2019s obligation under these customer agreements will be amortized as a reduction to revenue in the same period as the related revenues are earned , based on management 2019s estimate of the customer 2019s performance compared to the terms of the incentive agreement . the agreements may or may not limit the amount of customer incentive payments . excluding anticipated revenue to be earned from higher payments and transaction volumes in connection with these agreements , the company 2019s potential exposure under agreements with and without limits to incentive payments , is estimated as follows at september 30 , 2008 : fiscal ( in millions ) volume and support incentives .
in september 2008 what was the percent of the total volume and support incentives that was due in 2009
the ultimate amounts to be paid under these agreements may be greater than or less than the estimates above . based on these agreements , increases in the incentive payments are generally driven by increased payment and transaction volume , and as a result , in the event incentive payments exceed this estimate such payments are not expected to have a material effect on the company 2019s financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . indemnification under framework agreement in connection with the framework agreement entered into between visa inc . and visa europe , visa europe indemnifies visa inc . for any claims arising out of the provision of the services brought by visa europe 2019s member banks against visa inc. , while visa inc . indemnifies visa europe for any claims arising out of the provision of the services brought against visa europe by visa inc . 2019s customer financial institutions . based on current known facts , the company assessed the probability of loss in the future as remote . consequently , the estimated maximum probability-weighted liability is considered insignificant and no liability has been accrued . for further information with respect to the company 2019s commitments and contingencies also see note 4 2014visa europe , note 5 2014retrospective responsibility plan , note 11 2014debt , note 13 2014settlement guarantee management and note 23 2014legal matters. .
item 1b . unresolved staff comments not applicable . item 2 . properties as of december 26 , 2015 , our major facilities consisted of : ( square feet in millions ) united states countries total owned facilities1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30.7 17.2 47.9 leased facilities2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.1 6.0 8.1 .
what percentage of total facilities as measured in square feet are owned?
1 leases on portions of the land used for these facilities expire on varying dates through 2062 . 2 leases expire on varying dates through 2030 and generally include renewals at our option . our principal executive offices are located in the u.s . and a majority of our wafer fabrication activities are also located in the u.s . we completed construction of development fabrication facilities in oregon during 2014 that we expect will enable us to maintain our process technology lead . we also completed construction of a large-scale fabrication building in arizona in 2013 . a portion of the new oregon and arizona facilities are currently not in use and we are reserving the new buildings for additional capacity and future technologies . incremental construction and equipment installation are required to ready the facilities for their intended use . our massachusetts fabrication facility was our last manufacturing facility on 200mm wafers and ceased production in q1 2015 . outside the u.s. , we have wafer fabrication facilities in ireland , israel , and china . our fabrication facility in ireland has transitioned to our 14nm process technology , with manufacturing continuing to ramp in 2016 . additionally , in the second half of 2016 , we will start using our facility in dalian , china to help expand our manufacturing capacity in next-generation memory . our assembly and test facilities are located in malaysia , china , and vietnam . in addition , we have sales and marketing offices worldwide that are generally located near major concentrations of customers . we believe that the facilities described above are suitable and adequate for our present purposes and that the productive capacity in our facilities is substantially being utilized or we have plans to utilize it . we do not identify or allocate assets by operating segment . for information on net property , plant and equipment by country , see 201cnote 26 : operating segments and geographic information 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k . item 3 . legal proceedings for a discussion of legal proceedings , see 201cnote 25 : contingencies 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k . item 4 . mine safety disclosures not applicable. .
the fair value measurements of the borrowings under our credit agreement and receivables facility are classified as level 2 within the fair value hierarchy since they are determined based upon significant inputs observable in the market , including interest rates on recent financing transactions with similar terms and maturities . we estimated the fair value by calculating the upfront cash payment a market participant would require at december 31 , 2016 to assume these obligations . the fair value of our notes is classified as level 1 within the fair value hierarchy since it is determined based upon observable market inputs including quoted market prices in an active market . the fair value of our euro notes is determined based upon observable market inputs including quoted market prices in a market that is not active , and therefore is classified as level 2 within the fair value hierarchy . note 12 . commitments and contingencies operating leases we are obligated under noncancelable operating leases for corporate office space , warehouse and distribution facilities , trucks and certain equipment . the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2016 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: .
what was the percentage change in rental expense for operating leases from 2015 to 2016?
rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 211.5 million , $ 168.4 million and $ 148.5 million during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases . the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost . in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall . similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value . had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2016 , our portion of the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 59.0 million . we have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value . litigation and related contingencies we have certain contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business . we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .
notes to consolidated financial statements the fair values for substantially all of the firm 2019s financial assets and financial liabilities are based on observable prices and inputs and are classified in levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy . certain level 2 and level 3 financial assets and financial liabilities may require appropriate valuation adjustments that a market participant would require to arrive at fair value for factors such as counterparty and the firm 2019s credit quality , funding risk , transfer restrictions , liquidity and bid/offer spreads . valuation adjustments are generally based on market evidence . see notes 6 and 7 for further information about fair value measurements of cash instruments and derivatives , respectively , included in 201cfinancial instruments owned , at fair value 201d and 201cfinancial instruments sold , but not yet purchased , at fair value , 201d and note 8 for further information about fair value measurements of other financial assets and financial liabilities accounted for at fair value under the fair value option . financial assets and financial liabilities accounted for at fair value under the fair value option or in accordance with other u.s . gaap are summarized below. .
what is the percentage change in total financial liabilities at fair value in 2012?
1 . represents the impact on derivatives of cash collateral netting , and counterparty netting across levels of the fair value hierarchy . netting among positions classified in the same level is included in that level . level 3 financial assets as of december 2012 decreased compared with december 2011 , primarily reflecting a decrease in derivative assets , partially offset by an increase in private equity investments . the decrease in derivative assets primarily reflected a decline in credit derivative assets , principally due to settlements , unrealized losses and sales , partially offset by net transfers from level 2 . level 3 currency derivative assets also declined compared with december 2011 , principally due to unrealized losses and net transfers to level 2 . the increase in private equity investments primarily reflected purchases and unrealized gains , partially offset by settlements and net transfers to level 2 . see notes 6 , 7 and 8 for further information about level 3 cash instruments , derivatives and other financial assets and financial liabilities accounted for at fair value under the fair value option , respectively , including information about significant unrealized gains and losses , and transfers in and out of level 3 . goldman sachs 2012 annual report 119 .
note 17 2014 sales-type leases and financing receivables in april 2017 , in conjunction with the implementation of a new 201cgo-to-market 201d business model for the company's u.s . dispensing business within the medication management solutions ( 201cmms 201d ) unit of the medical segment , the company amended the terms of certain customer leases for dispensing equipment within the mms unit . the modification provided customers the ability to reduce its dispensing asset base via a return provision , resulting in a more flexible lease term . prior to the modification , these leases were accounted for as sales-type leases in accordance with accounting standards codification topic 840 , "leases" , as the non- cancellable lease term of 5 years exceeded 75% ( 75 % ) of the equipment 2019s estimated useful life and the present value of the minimum lease payments exceeded 90% ( 90 % ) of the equipment 2019s fair value . as a result of the lease modification , the company was required to reassess the classification of the leases due to the amended lease term . accordingly , most amended lease contracts were classified as operating leases beginning in april 2017 . the change in lease classification resulted in a pre-tax charge to earnings in fiscal year 2017 of $ 748 million , which was recorded in other operating expense , net . beginning april 1 , 2017 , revenue associated with these modified contracts has been recognized on a straight-line basis over the remaining lease term , along with depreciation on the reinstated leased assets . the company's consolidated financial results in 2018 and 2017 were not materially impacted by the financing receivables remaining subsequent to the lease modification discussed above . note 18 2014 supplemental financial information other income ( expense ) , net .
what was the percentage change in the losses on debt extinguishment from 2017 to 2018
( a ) represents losses recognized upon our repurchase and extinguishment of certain senior notes , as further discussed in note 15 . ( b ) represents amounts related to the company 2019s 2017 divestiture of a controlling interest in its former respiratory solutions business and the subsequent sale in 2018 of the remaining ownership interest . the amount in 2018 includes the gain on the sale of the remaining non-controlling interest and transition services agreement income , net of the company's share of equity investee results . the amount in 2017 represents the company 2019s share of equity investee results , net of transition services agreement income . additional disclosures regarding these divestiture transactions are provided in note 10 in the notes to consolidated financial statements . ( c ) represents the royalty income stream acquired in the bard transaction , net of non-cash purchase accounting amortization . the royalty income stream was previously reported by bard as revenues . ( d ) represents an acquisition-date accounting gain related to a previously-held equity method investment in an entity the company acquired. .