management 2019s discussion and analysis the table below presents a reconciliation of our common shareholders 2019 equity to the estimated basel iii advanced cet1 on a fully phased-in basis . $ in millions december .
what is the percentage change in common shareholders 2019 equity due to the adjustments presented in the table to reach basel iii cet1?
1 . this deduction , which represents the fully phased-in requirement , is the amount by which our investments in the capital of nonconsolidated financial institutions exceed certain prescribed thresholds . during both the transitional period and thereafter , no deduction will be required if the applicable proportion of our investments in the capital of nonconsolidated financial institutions falls below the prescribed thresholds . 2 . principally includes credit valuation adjustments on derivative liabilities and debt valuation adjustments , as well as other required credit risk- based deductions . in addition , beginning with the first quarter of 2015 , subject to transitional provisions , we will also be required to disclose ratios calculated under the standardized approach . our estimated cet1 ratio under the standardized approach ( standardized cet1 ratio ) on a fully phased-in basis was approximately 60 basis points lower than our estimated basel iii advanced cet1 ratio in the table above . both the basel iii advanced cet1 ratio and the standardized cet1 ratio are subject to transitional provisions . reflecting the transitional provisions that became effective january 1 , 2014 , our estimated basel iii advanced cet1 ratio and our estimated standardized cet1 ratio are approximately 150 basis points higher than the respective cet1 ratios on a fully phased-in basis as of december 2013 . effective january 1 , 2014 , group inc . 2019s capital and leverage ratios are calculated under , and subject to the minimums as defined in , the revised capital framework . the changes to the definition of capital and minimum ratios , subject to transitional provisions , were effective beginning january 1 , 2014 . rwas are based on basel i adjusted , as defined in note 20 to the consolidated financial statements . the firm will transition to basel iii beginning on april 1 , 2014 . including the impact of the changes to the definition of regulatory capital and reflecting the transitional provisions effective in 2014 , our estimated cet1 ratio ( cet1 to rwas on a basel i adjusted basis ) as of december 2013 would have been essentially unchanged as compared to our tier 1 common ratio under basel i . regulatory leverage ratios . the revised capital framework increased the minimum tier 1 leverage ratio applicable to us from 3% ( 3 % ) to 4% ( 4 % ) effective january 1 , 2014 . in addition , the revised capital framework will introduce a new tier 1 supplementary leverage ratio ( supplementary leverage ratio ) for advanced approach banking organizations . the supplementary leverage ratio compares tier 1 capital ( as defined under the revised capital framework ) to a measure of leverage exposure , defined as the sum of the firm 2019s assets less certain cet1 deductions plus certain off-balance-sheet exposures , including a measure of derivatives exposures and commitments . the revised capital framework requires a minimum supplementary leverage ratio of 3% ( 3 % ) , effective january 1 , 2018 , but with disclosure required beginning in the first quarter of 2015 . in addition , subsequent to the approval of the revised capital framework , the agencies issued a proposal to increase the minimum supplementary leverage ratio requirement for the largest u.s . banks ( those deemed to be global systemically important banking institutions ( g-sibs ) under the basel g-sib framework ) . these proposals would require the firm and other g-sibs to meet a 5% ( 5 % ) supplementary leverage ratio ( comprised of the minimum requirement of 3% ( 3 % ) plus a 2% ( 2 % ) buffer ) . as of december 2013 , our estimated supplementary leverage ratio based on the revised capital framework approximates this proposed minimum . in addition , the basel committee recently finalized revisions that would increase the size of the leverage exposure for purposes of the supplementary leverage ratio , but would retain a minimum supplementary leverage ratio requirement of 3% ( 3 % ) . it is not known with certainty at this point whether the u.s . regulators will adopt this revised definition of leverage into their rules and proposals for the supplementary leverage ratio . 70 goldman sachs 2013 annual report .