whpthomas/finqa-parquet huggingface dataset:
action commenced by the california attorney general , we are providing customers with greater transparency into the pricing of this product and other alternatives offered by us for addressing their foreign exchange requirements . although we believe such disclosures will address customer interests for increased transparency , over time such action may result in pressure on our pricing of this product or result in clients electing other foreign exchange execution options , which would have an adverse impact on the revenue from , and profitability of , this product for us . we may be exposed to customer claims , financial loss , reputational damage and regulatory scrutiny as a result of transacting purchases and redemptions relating to the unregistered cash collateral pools underlying our securities lending program at a net asset value of $ 1.00 per unit rather than a lower net asset value based upon market value of the underlying portfolios . a portion of the cash collateral received by customers under our securities lending program is invested in cash collateral pools that we manage . interests in these cash collateral pools are held by unaffiliated customers and by registered and unregistered investment funds that we manage . our cash collateral pools that are money market funds registered under the investment company act of 1940 are required to maintain , and have maintained , a constant net asset value of $ 1.00 per unit . the remainder of our cash collateral pools are collective investment funds that are not required to be registered under the investment company act . these unregistered cash collateral pools seek , but are not required , to maintain , and transact purchases and redemptions at , a constant net asset value of $ 1.00 per unit . our securities lending operations consist of two components ; a direct lending program for third-party investment managers and asset owners , the collateral pools for which we refer to as direct lending collateral pools ; and investment funds with a broad range of investment objectives that are managed by ssga and engage in securities lending , which we refer to as ssga lending funds . the following table shows the aggregate net asset values of the unregistered direct lending collateral pools and the aggregate net asset value of the unregistered collateral pools underlying the ssga lending funds , in each case based on a constant net asset value of $ 1.00 per ( in billions ) december 31 , 2009 december 31 , 2008 december 31 , 2007 ( 1 ) .
what was the percent change in the aggregate net asset values of the collateral pools underlying ssga lending funds between 2008 and 2009?
( 1 ) certain of the ssga lending funds were participants in the direct lending collateral pools until october 2008 . the direct lending collateral pool balances at december 31 , 2007 related to ssga lending funds have been included within the ssga lending fund balances and excluded from the direct lending collateral pool balances presented above. .
management 2019s discussion and analysis 120 jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report wholesale credit portfolio as of december 31 , 2010 , wholesale exposure ( ib , cb , tss and am ) increased by $ 36.9 billion from december 31 , 2009 . the overall increase was primarily driven by increases of $ 23.5 billion in loans and $ 16.8 billion of receivables from customers , partially offset by decreases in interests in purchase receivables and lending-related commitments of $ 2.5 billion and $ 1.1 billion , respectively . the de- crease in lending-related commitments and the increase in loans were primarily related to the january 1 , 2010 , adoption of the accounting guidance related to vies , which resulted in the elimination of a net $ 17.7 billion of lending-related commitments between the firm and its administrated multi-seller conduits upon consolidation . assets of the consolidated conduits included $ 15.1 billion of wholesale loans at january 1 , 2010 . excluding the effect of the accounting guidance , lending-related commitments and loans would have increased by $ 16.6 billion and $ 8.4 billion , respectively , mainly related to in- creased client activity . the increase in loans also included the pur- chase of a $ 3.5 billion loan portfolio in cb during the third quarter of 2010 . the increase of $ 16.8 billion in receivables from customers was due to increased client activity , predominantly in prime services . wholesale .
what was the percentage change in total wholesale credit exposure from 2009 to 2010?
net credit derivative hedges notional ( d ) $ ( 23108 ) $ ( 48376 ) $ ( 55 ) $ ( 139 ) liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives ( e ) ( 16486 ) ( 15519 ) na na ( a ) represents primarily margin loans to prime and retail brokerage customers , which are included in accrued interest and accounts receivable on the consolidated balance sheets . ( b ) represents an ownership interest in cash flows of a pool of receivables transferred by a third-party seller into a bankruptcy-remote entity , generally a trust . ( c ) the amounts in nonperforming represent unfunded commitments that are risk rated as nonaccrual . ( d ) represents the net notional amount of protection purchased and sold of single-name and portfolio credit derivatives used to manage both performing and nonperform- ing credit exposures ; these derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting under u.s . gaap . for additional information , see credit derivatives on pages 126 2013128 , and note 6 on pages 191 2013199 of this annual report . ( e ) represents other liquid securities collateral and other cash collateral held by the firm . ( f ) excludes assets acquired in loan satisfactions . the following table presents summaries of the maturity and ratings profiles of the wholesale portfolio as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 . the ratings scale is based on the firm 2019s internal risk ratings , which generally correspond to the ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s . also included in this table is the notional value of net credit derivative hedges ; the counterparties to these hedges are predominantly investment grade banks and finance companies. .
10/27/13 10/26/14 10/25/15 10/30/16 10/29/17 10/28/18 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite part ii item 5 : market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities market information applied 2019s common stock is traded on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol amat . as of december 7 , 2018 , there were 2854 registered holders of applied common stock . performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 27 , 2013 through october 28 , 2018 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 27 , 2013 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index *assumes $ 100 invested on 10/27/13 in stock or 10/31/13 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2018 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved. .
what is the roi for applied materials if the investment made on october 2013 was sold 2 years later?
.
rates are still low and that a significant portion of cruise guests carried are first-time cruisers . we believe this presents an opportunity for long-term growth and a potential for increased profitability . the following table details industry market penetration rates for north america , europe and asia/pacific computed based on the number of annual cruise guests as a percentage of the total population : year north america ( 1 ) ( 2 ) europe ( 1 ) ( 3 ) asia/pacific ( 1 ) ( 4 ) .
at the end of 2016 , what was the average number of berths per ship in the global cruise fleet?
( 1 ) source : our estimates are based on a combination of data obtained from publicly available sources including the international monetary fund , united nations , department of economic and social affairs , cruise lines international association ( "clia" ) and g.p . wild . ( 2 ) our estimates include the united states and canada . ( 3 ) our estimates include european countries relevant to the industry ( e.g. , nordics , germany , france , italy , spain and the united kingdom ) . ( 4 ) our estimates include the southeast asia ( e.g. , singapore , thailand and the philippines ) , east asia ( e.g. , china and japan ) , south asia ( e.g . india and pakistan ) and oceanian ( e.g. , australia and fiji islands ) regions . we estimate that the global cruise fleet was served by approximately 503000 berths on approximately 298 ships at the end of 2016 . there are approximately 60 ships with an estimated 173000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the global cruise market between 2017 and 2021 , although it is also possible that additional ships could be ordered or taken out of service during these periods . we estimate that the global cruise industry carried 24.0 million cruise guests in 2016 compared to 23.0 million cruise guests carried in 2015 and 22.0 million cruise guests carried in .
item 11 . executive compensation information with respect to executive compensation required by this item 11 will be included in pca 2019s proxy statement under the captions 201ccompensation discussion and analysis , 201d 201cexecutive officer and director compensation 201d ( including all subcaptions and tables thereunder ) and 201cboard committees 2014 compensation committee 201d and is incorporated herein by reference . item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters information with respect to security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management required by this item 12 will be included in pca 2019s proxy statement under the caption 201cownership of our stock 201d and is incorporated herein by reference . authorization of securities under equity compensation plans 2014 securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans at december 31 , 2013 are as follows: .
as of december 312013 what was the ratio of the equity compensation plans approved by security holders remaining to be issued to the amount to be issued upon exercise of outstanding
( a ) does not include 1534294 shares of unvested restricted stock and performance units granted pursuant to our amended and restated 1999 long-term equity incentive plan . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information with respect to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence required by this item 13 will be included in pca 2019s proxy statement under the captions 201ctransactions with related persons 201d and 201celection of directors 2014 determination of director independence , 201d respectively , and is incorporated herein by reference . item 14 . principal accounting fees and services information with respect to fees and services of the principal accountant required by this item 14 will be included in pca 2019s proxy statement under the caption 201cratification of appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm 201d under the subcaptions 201c 2014 fees to the independent registered public accounting firm 201d and 201c 2014 audit committee preapproval policy for audit and non-audit fees 201d and are incorporated herein by reference. .
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis regulatory asset associated with new nuclear generation development costs as a result of a joint stipulation entered into with the mississippi public utilities staff , subsequently approved by the mpsc , in which entergy mississippi agreed not to pursue recovery of the costs deferred by an mpsc order in the new nuclear generation docket . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the new nuclear generation development costs and the joint stipulation . net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 . amount ( in millions ) .
what is the growth rate of net revenue from 2014 to 2015 ?
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 formula rate plan increases at entergy louisiana , as approved by the lpsc , effective december 2014 and january 2015 ; 2022 an increase in energy efficiency rider revenue primarily due to increases in the energy efficiency rider at entergy arkansas , as approved by the apsc , effective july 2015 and july 2014 , and new energy efficiency riders at entergy louisiana and entergy mississippi that began in the fourth quarter 2014 . energy efficiency revenues are largely offset by costs included in other operation and maintenance expenses and have a minimal effect on net income ; and 2022 an annual net rate increase at entergy mississippi of $ 16 million , effective february 2015 , as a result of the mpsc order in the june 2014 rate case . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of rate and regulatory proceedings . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1402 gwh , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including an increase in industrial usage and the effect of more favorable weather . the increase in industrial sales was primarily due to expansion in the chemicals industry and the addition of new customers , partially offset by decreased demand primarily due to extended maintenance outages for existing chemicals customers . the louisiana business combination customer credits variance is due to a regulatory liability of $ 107 million recorded by entergy in october 2015 as a result of the entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy louisiana business combination . consistent with the terms of an agreement with the lpsc , electric customers of entergy louisiana will realize customer credits associated with the business combination ; accordingly , in october 2015 , entergy recorded a regulatory liability of $ 107 million ( $ 66 million net-of-tax ) . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits. .
item 1b . unresolved staff comments not applicable . item 2 . properties as of december 26 , 2015 , our major facilities consisted of : ( square feet in millions ) united states countries total owned facilities1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30.7 17.2 47.9 leased facilities2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.1 6.0 8.1 .
what is the percent of the square foot in millions owned facilities in the us to the to owned facilities
1 leases on portions of the land used for these facilities expire on varying dates through 2062 . 2 leases expire on varying dates through 2030 and generally include renewals at our option . our principal executive offices are located in the u.s . and a majority of our wafer fabrication activities are also located in the u.s . we completed construction of development fabrication facilities in oregon during 2014 that we expect will enable us to maintain our process technology lead . we also completed construction of a large-scale fabrication building in arizona in 2013 . a portion of the new oregon and arizona facilities are currently not in use and we are reserving the new buildings for additional capacity and future technologies . incremental construction and equipment installation are required to ready the facilities for their intended use . our massachusetts fabrication facility was our last manufacturing facility on 200mm wafers and ceased production in q1 2015 . outside the u.s. , we have wafer fabrication facilities in ireland , israel , and china . our fabrication facility in ireland has transitioned to our 14nm process technology , with manufacturing continuing to ramp in 2016 . additionally , in the second half of 2016 , we will start using our facility in dalian , china to help expand our manufacturing capacity in next-generation memory . our assembly and test facilities are located in malaysia , china , and vietnam . in addition , we have sales and marketing offices worldwide that are generally located near major concentrations of customers . we believe that the facilities described above are suitable and adequate for our present purposes and that the productive capacity in our facilities is substantially being utilized or we have plans to utilize it . we do not identify or allocate assets by operating segment . for information on net property , plant and equipment by country , see 201cnote 26 : operating segments and geographic information 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k . item 3 . legal proceedings for a discussion of legal proceedings , see 201cnote 25 : contingencies 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k . item 4 . mine safety disclosures not applicable. .
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 19 . commitments and contingencies litigation 2014the company periodically becomes involved in various claims , lawsuits and proceedings that are incidental to its business . in the opinion of management , after consultation with counsel , there are no matters currently pending that would , in the event of an adverse outcome , materially impact the company 2019s consolidated financial position , results of operations or liquidity . tristar litigation 2014the company was involved in several lawsuits against tristar investors llp and its affiliates ( 201ctristar 201d ) in various states regarding single tower sites where tristar had taken land interests under the company 2019s owned or managed sites and the company believes tristar induced the landowner to breach obligations to the company . in addition , on february 16 , 2012 , tristar brought a federal action against the company in the united states district court for the northern district of texas ( the 201cdistrict court 201d ) , in which tristar principally alleged that the company made misrepresentations to landowners when competing with tristar for land under the company 2019s owned or managed sites . on january 22 , 2013 , the company filed an amended answer and counterclaim against tristar and certain of its employees , denying tristar 2019s claims and asserting that tristar engaged in a pattern of unlawful activity , including : ( i ) entering into agreements not to compete for land under certain towers ; and ( ii ) making widespread misrepresentations to landowners regarding both tristar and the company . pursuant to a settlement agreement dated july 9 , 2014 , all pending state and federal actions between the company and tristar were dismissed with prejudice and without payment of damages . lease obligations 2014the company leases certain land , office and tower space under operating leases that expire over various terms . many of the leases contain renewal options with specified increases in lease payments upon exercise of the renewal option . escalation clauses present in operating leases , excluding those tied to cpi or other inflation-based indices , are recognized on a straight-line basis over the non-cancellable term of the leases . future minimum rental payments under non-cancellable operating leases include payments for certain renewal periods at the company 2019s option because failure to renew could result in a loss of the applicable communications sites and related revenues from tenant leases , thereby making it reasonably assured that the company will renew the leases . such payments at december 31 , 2014 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .
what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2012 to 2013?
aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 approximated $ 655.0 million , $ 495.2 million and $ 419.0 million , respectively. .
stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , news corporation class a common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on september 18 , 2008 , the date upon which our common stock began trading , in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the period september 18 , 2008 through december 31 , 2008 and the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 and 2011 . of cash on hand , cash generated by operations , borrowings under our revolving credit facility and future financing transactions . under the program , management is authorized to purchase shares from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to stock price , business conditions , market conditions and other factors . the repurchase program does not have an expiration date . the above repurchases were funded using cash on hand . there were no repurchases of our series a common stock or series b common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2011 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .
the k series stock outperformed the s&p 500 by what percent over 5 years?
.