whpthomas/finqa-parquet huggingface dataset:
intermodal 2013 decreased volumes and fuel surcharges reduced freight revenue from intermodal shipments in 2009 versus 2008 . volume from international traffic decreased 24% ( 24 % ) in 2009 compared to 2008 , reflecting economic conditions , continued weak imports from asia , and diversions to non-uprr served ports . additionally , continued weakness in the domestic housing and automotive sectors translated into weak demand in large sectors of the international intermodal market , which also contributed to the volume decline . conversely , domestic traffic increased 8% ( 8 % ) in 2009 compared to 2008 . a new contract with hub group , inc. , which included additional shipments , was executed in the second quarter of 2009 and more than offset the impact of weak market conditions in the second half of 2009 . price increases and fuel surcharges generated higher revenue in 2008 , partially offset by lower volume levels . international traffic declined 11% ( 11 % ) in 2008 , reflecting continued softening of imports from china and the loss of a customer contract . notably , the peak intermodal shipping season , which usually starts in the third quarter , was particularly weak in 2008 . additionally , continued weakness in domestic housing and automotive sectors translated into weak demand in large sectors of the international intermodal market , which also contributed to lower volumes . domestic traffic declined 3% ( 3 % ) in 2008 due to the loss of a customer contract and lower volumes from less-than-truckload shippers . additionally , the flood-related embargo on traffic in the midwest during the second quarter hindered intermodal volume levels in 2008 . mexico business 2013 each of our commodity groups include revenue from shipments to and from mexico . revenue from mexico business decreased 26% ( 26 % ) in 2009 versus 2008 to $ 1.2 billion . volume declined in five of our six commodity groups , down 19% ( 19 % ) in 2009 , driven by 32% ( 32 % ) and 24% ( 24 % ) reductions in industrial products and automotive shipments , respectively . conversely , energy shipments increased 9% ( 9 % ) in 2009 versus 2008 , partially offsetting these declines . revenue from mexico business increased 13% ( 13 % ) to $ 1.6 billion in 2008 compared to 2007 . price improvements and fuel surcharges contributed to these increases , partially offset by a 4% ( 4 % ) decline in volume in 2008 compared to 2007 . operating expenses millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 % (  % ) change 2009 v 2008 % (  % ) change 2008 v 2007 .
what was the change in millions of compensation and benefits from 2007 to 2008?
2009 intermodal revenue international domestic .
on either a straight-line or accelerated basis . amortization expense for intangibles was approximately $ 4.2 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 4.1 million during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . estimated annual amortization expense of the december 31 , 2010 balance for the years ended december 31 , 2011 through 2015 is approximately $ 4.8 million . impairment of long-lived assets long-lived assets are reviewed for possible impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable . if such review indicates that the carrying amount of long- lived assets is not recoverable , the carrying amount of such assets is reduced to fair value . during the year ended december 31 , 2010 , we recognized impairment charges on certain long-lived assets during the normal course of business of $ 1.3 million . there were no adjustments to the carrying value of long-lived assets of continuing operations during the years ended december 31 , 2009 or 2008 . fair value of financial instruments our debt is reflected on the balance sheet at cost . based on market conditions as of december 31 , 2010 , the fair value of our term loans ( see note 5 , 201clong-term obligations 201d ) reasonably approximated the carrying value of $ 590 million . at december 31 , 2009 , the fair value of our term loans at $ 570 million was below the carrying value of $ 596 million because our interest rate margins were below the rate available in the market . we estimated the fair value of our term loans by calculating the upfront cash payment a market participant would require to assume our obligations . the upfront cash payment , excluding any issuance costs , is the amount that a market participant would be able to lend at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 to an entity with a credit rating similar to ours and achieve sufficient cash inflows to cover the scheduled cash outflows under our term loans . the carrying amounts of our cash and equivalents , net trade receivables and accounts payable approximate fair value . we apply the market and income approaches to value our financial assets and liabilities , which include the cash surrender value of life insurance , deferred compensation liabilities and interest rate swaps . required fair value disclosures are included in note 7 , 201cfair value measurements . 201d product warranties some of our salvage mechanical products are sold with a standard six-month warranty against defects . additionally , some of our remanufactured engines are sold with a standard three-year warranty against defects . we record the estimated warranty costs at the time of sale using historical warranty claim information to project future warranty claims activity and related expenses . the changes in the warranty reserve are as follows ( in thousands ) : .
what was the percentage change in the changes in the warranty reserve in 2009
self-insurance reserves we self-insure a portion of employee medical benefits under the terms of our employee health insurance program . we purchase certain stop-loss insurance to limit our liability exposure . we also self-insure a portion of .
notes to the audited consolidated financial statements for 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , total share-based compensation expense ( before tax ) of approximately $ 26 million , $ 29 million , and $ 22 million , respectively , was recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in the consolidated statement of earnings for all share-based awards of which approximately $ 13 million , $ 17 million , and $ 5 million , respectively , related to stock options . sfas no . 123 ( r ) requires that compensation expense is recognized over the substantive vesting period , which may be a shorter time period than the stated vesting period for retirement-eligible employees . for 2007 and 2006 , approximately $ 3 million and $ 8 million , respectively , of stock option compensation expense were recognized due to retirement eligibility preceding the requisite vesting period . stock option awards option awards are granted on an annual basis to non-employee directors and to employees who meet certain eligibility requirements . option awards have an exercise price equal to the closing price of the company's stock on the date of grant . the term life of options is ten years with vesting periods that vary up to three years . vesting usually occurs ratably over the vesting period or at the end of the vesting period . the company utilizes the black scholes merton ( "bsm" ) option valuation model which relies on certain assumptions to estimate an option's fair value . the weighted average assumptions used in the determination of fair value for stock options awarded in 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 are provided in the table below: .
what was the average expected volatility rate from 2005 to 2007
the volatility rate of grants is derived from historical company common stock price volatility over the same time period as the expected term of each stock option award . the volatility rate is derived by mathematical formula utilizing the weekly high closing stock price data over the expected term . the expected dividend yield is calculated using the expected company annual dividend amount over the expected term divided by the fair market value of the company's common stock . the average risk-free interest rate is derived from united states department of treasury published interest rates of daily yield curves for the same time period as the expected term . sfas no . 123 ( r ) specifies only share-based awards expected to vest be included in share-based compensation expense . estimated forfeiture rates are determined using historical forfeiture experience for each type of award and are excluded from the quantity of awards included in share-based compensation expense . the weighted average expected term reflects the analysis of historical share-based award transactions and includes option swap and reload grants which may have much shorter remaining expected terms than new option grants. .
united states , fail to either complete treatment or show a long-term sustained response to therapy . as a result , we believe new safe and effective treatment options for hcv infection are needed . telaprevir development program we are conducting three major phase 2b clinical trials of telaprevir . prove 1 is ongoing in the united states and prove 2 is ongoing in european union , both in treatment-na efve patients . prove 3 has commenced and is being conducted with patients in north america and the european union who did not achieve sustained viral response with previous interferon-based treatments . prove 1 and prove 2 are fully enrolled , and we commenced patient enrollment in prove 3 in january 2007 . prove 1 and prove 2 we expect that together , the prove 1 and prove 2 clinical trials will evaluate rates of sustained viral response , or svr , in approximately 580 treatment-na efve patients infected with genotype 1 hcv , including patients who will receive telaprevir and patients in the control arms . svr is defined as undetectable viral levels 24 weeks after all treatment has ceased . a description of each of the clinical trial arms for the prove 1 and prove 2 clinical trials , including the intended number of patients in each trial , is set forth in the following table : the prove 1 and prove 2 clinical trials together have the following four key objectives : 2022 to evaluate the optimal svr rate that can be achieved with telaprevir therapy in combination with peg-ifn and rbv ; 2022 to evaluate the optimal treatment duration for telaprevir combination therapy ; 2022 to evaluate the role of rbv in telaprevir-based therapy ; and 2022 to evaluate the safety of telaprevir in combination with peg-ifn and rbv . in the prove 1 and prove 2 clinical trials , patients receive telaprevir in a tablet formulation at a dose of 750 mg every eight hours for 12 weeks . the prove 1 clinical trial is double-blinded and placebo-controlled , and the prove 2 clinical trial is partially-blinded and placebo-controlled . in december 2006 , we announced results from a planned interim safety and antiviral activity analysis that was conducted and reviewed by the independent data monitoring committee overseeing the prove 1 clinical trial . as of the cut-off date of the interim analysis , a total of 250 patients had been enrolled in the prove 1 clinical trial and received at least one dose of telaprevir or placebo . in the data reported , the patients in all three telaprevir-containing arms ( approximately 175 patients ) were pooled together and the results were compared to the results in the control arm of peg-ifn and rbv and placebo ( approximately 75 patients ) . at the time of the data cut-off for the safety analysis , approximately 100 patients had completed 12 weeks on-study and more than 200 patients had completed eight weeks . the most common adverse treatment regimen number of patients ( treatment na efve ) prove 1 number of patients ( treatment na efve ) prove 2 total .
what was the percent of the total treatment regiment for prove1 for the 48-weeks of therapy with peg-ifn and rbv
.
item 1b . unresolved staff comments item 2 . properties we employ a variety of assets in the management and operation of our rail business . our rail network covers 23 states in the western two-thirds of the u.s . our rail network includes 31974 route miles . we own 26012 miles and operate on the remainder pursuant to trackage rights or leases . the following table describes track miles at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 . 2014 2013 .
what percentage of total miles were other main line in 2014?
headquarters building we own our headquarters building in omaha , nebraska . the facility has 1.2 million square feet of space for approximately 4000 employees. .
stock performance graph the following graph provides a comparison of five year cumulative total stockholder returns of teleflex common stock , the standard & poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 stock index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index . the annual changes for the five-year period shown on the graph are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in teleflex common stock and each index on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested . market performance .
based on the table , how much percent did the healthcare sector outperform the overall market in this 5 year period?
s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index 100 99 116 148 187 199 .
depending upon our senior unsecured debt ratings . the facilities require the maintenance of a minimum net worth and a debt to net worth coverage ratio . at december 31 , 2006 , we were in compliance with these covenants . the facilities do not include any other financial restrictions , credit rating triggers ( other than rating-dependent pricing ) , or any other provision that could require the posting of collateral . in addition to our revolving credit facilities , we had $ 150 million in uncommitted lines of credit available , including $ 75 million that expires in march 2007 and $ 75 million expiring in may 2007 . neither of these lines of credit were used as of december 31 , 2006 . we must have equivalent credit available under our five-year facilities to draw on these $ 75 million lines . dividend restrictions 2013 we are subject to certain restrictions related to the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders due to minimum net worth requirements under the credit facilities referred to above . the amount of retained earnings available for dividends was $ 7.8 billion and $ 6.2 billion at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . we do not expect that these restrictions will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition , results of operations , or liquidity . we declared dividends of $ 323 million in 2006 and $ 316 million in 2005 . shelf registration statement 2013 under a current shelf registration statement , we may issue any combination of debt securities , preferred stock , common stock , or warrants for debt securities or preferred stock in one or more offerings . at december 31 , 2006 , we had $ 500 million remaining for issuance under the current shelf registration statement . we have no immediate plans to issue any securities ; however , we routinely consider and evaluate opportunities to replace existing debt or access capital through issuances of debt securities under this shelf registration , and , therefore , we may issue debt securities at any time . 6 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2006 were as follows : millions of dollars operating leases capital leases .
what percentage of total minimum lease payments are capital leases as of december 31 , 2006?
rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 798 million in 2006 , $ 728 million in 2005 , and $ 651 million in 2004 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant. .
10-k altria ar release tuesday , february 27 , 2018 10:00pm andra design llc performance stock units : in january 2017 , altria group , inc . granted an aggregate of 187886 performance stock units to eligible employees . the payout of the performance stock units requires the achievement of certain performance measures , which were predetermined at the time of grant , over a three-year performance cycle . these performance measures consist of altria group , inc . 2019s adjusted diluted earnings per share ( 201ceps 201d ) compounded annual growth rate and altria group , inc . 2019s total shareholder return relative to a predetermined peer group . the performance stock units are also subject to forfeiture if certain employment conditions are not met . at december 31 , 2017 , altria group , inc . had 170755 performance stock units remaining , with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 70.39 per performance stock unit . the fair value of the performance stock units at the date of grant , net of estimated forfeitures , is amortized to expense over the performance period . altria group , inc . recorded pre-tax compensation expense related to performance stock units for the year ended december 31 , 2017 of $ 6 million . the unamortized compensation expense related to altria group , inc . 2019s performance stock units was $ 7 million at december 31 , 2017 . altria group , inc . did not grant any performance stock units during 2016 and 2015 . note 12 . earnings per share basic and diluted eps were calculated using the following: .
what is the growth rate in net earnings attributable to altria group inc . in 2017?
net earnings attributable to altria group , inc . $ 10222 $ 14239 $ 5241 less : distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based awards ( 14 ) ( 24 ) ( 10 ) earnings for basic and diluted eps $ 10208 $ 14215 $ 5231 weighted-average shares for basic and diluted eps 1921 1952 1961 .
be resolved , we cannot reasonably determine the probability of an adverse claim or reasonably estimate any adverse liability or the total maximum exposure under these indemnification arrangements . we do not have any reason to believe that we will be required to make any material payments under these indemnity provisions . income taxes 2013 as discussed in note 4 , the irs has completed its examinations and issued notices of deficiency for tax years 1995 through 2004 , and we are in different stages of the irs appeals process for these years . the irs is examining our tax returns for tax years 2005 and 2006 . in the third quarter of 2007 , we believe that we reached an agreement in principle with the irs to resolve all of the issues , except interest , related to tax years 1995 through 1998 , including the previously reported dispute over certain donations of property . we anticipate signing a closing agreement in 2008 . at december 31 , 2007 , we have recorded a current liability of $ 140 million for tax payments in 2008 related to federal and state income tax examinations . we do not expect that the ultimate resolution of these examinations will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements . 11 . other income other income included the following for the years ended december 31 : millions of dollars 2007 2006 2005 .
what percent of total other income was rental income in 2007?
12 . share repurchase program on january 30 , 2007 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 20 million shares of union pacific corporation common stock through the end of 2009 . management 2019s assessments of market conditions and other pertinent facts guide the timing and volume of all repurchases . we expect to fund our common stock repurchases through cash generated from operations , the sale or lease of various operating and non- operating properties , debt issuances , and cash on hand at december 31 , 2007 . during 2007 , we repurchased approximately 13 million shares under this program at an aggregate purchase price of approximately $ 1.5 billion . these shares were recorded in treasury stock at cost , which includes any applicable commissions and fees. .
purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2018 , we repurchased 57669746 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 143.70 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2018 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b] .
what percentage of the total number of shares purchased where purchased in december?
[a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 17391 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] effective january 1 , 2017 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 120 million shares of our common stock by december 31 , 2020 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .
intermodal 2013 decreased volumes and fuel surcharges reduced freight revenue from intermodal shipments in 2009 versus 2008 . volume from international traffic decreased 24% ( 24 % ) in 2009 compared to 2008 , reflecting economic conditions , continued weak imports from asia , and diversions to non-uprr served ports . additionally , continued weakness in the domestic housing and automotive sectors translated into weak demand in large sectors of the international intermodal market , which also contributed to the volume decline . conversely , domestic traffic increased 8% ( 8 % ) in 2009 compared to 2008 . a new contract with hub group , inc. , which included additional shipments , was executed in the second quarter of 2009 and more than offset the impact of weak market conditions in the second half of 2009 . price increases and fuel surcharges generated higher revenue in 2008 , partially offset by lower volume levels . international traffic declined 11% ( 11 % ) in 2008 , reflecting continued softening of imports from china and the loss of a customer contract . notably , the peak intermodal shipping season , which usually starts in the third quarter , was particularly weak in 2008 . additionally , continued weakness in domestic housing and automotive sectors translated into weak demand in large sectors of the international intermodal market , which also contributed to lower volumes . domestic traffic declined 3% ( 3 % ) in 2008 due to the loss of a customer contract and lower volumes from less-than-truckload shippers . additionally , the flood-related embargo on traffic in the midwest during the second quarter hindered intermodal volume levels in 2008 . mexico business 2013 each of our commodity groups include revenue from shipments to and from mexico . revenue from mexico business decreased 26% ( 26 % ) in 2009 versus 2008 to $ 1.2 billion . volume declined in five of our six commodity groups , down 19% ( 19 % ) in 2009 , driven by 32% ( 32 % ) and 24% ( 24 % ) reductions in industrial products and automotive shipments , respectively . conversely , energy shipments increased 9% ( 9 % ) in 2009 versus 2008 , partially offsetting these declines . revenue from mexico business increased 13% ( 13 % ) to $ 1.6 billion in 2008 compared to 2007 . price improvements and fuel surcharges contributed to these increases , partially offset by a 4% ( 4 % ) decline in volume in 2008 compared to 2007 . operating expenses millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 % (  % ) change 2009 v 2008 % (  % ) change 2008 v 2007 .
what was the change in millions of compensation and benefits from 2008 to 2009?
2009 intermodal revenue international domestic .