whpthomas/finqa-parquet huggingface dataset:
contracts as of december 31 , 2006 , which all mature in 2007 . forward contract notional amounts presented below are expressed in the stated currencies ( in thousands ) . forward currency contracts: .
what is a rough estimate of the ratio of securities given to securities received?
a movement of 10% ( 10 % ) in the value of the u.s . dollar against foreign currencies would impact our expected net earnings by approximately $ 0.1 million . item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data the financial statements and supplementary data required by this item are included herein , commencing on page f-1 . item 9 . changes in and disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure item 9a . controls and procedures ( a ) evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures our management , with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer , evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report . based on that evaluation , the chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report are functioning effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the securities exchange act of 1934 is ( i ) recorded , processed , summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the sec 2019s rules and forms and ( ii ) accumulated and communicated to our management , including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer , as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure . a controls system cannot provide absolute assurance , however , that the objectives of the controls system are met , and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud , if any , within a company have been detected . ( b ) management 2019s report on internal control over financial reporting our management 2019s report on internal control over financial reporting is set forth on page f-2 of this annual report on form 10-k and is incorporated by reference herein . ( c ) change in internal control over financial reporting no change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected , or is reasonably likely to materially affect , our internal control over financial reporting . item 9b . other information .
note 9 . commitments and contingencies operating leases we are obligated under noncancelable operating leases for corporate office space , warehouse and distribution facilities , trucks and certain equipment . the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2009 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: .
in 2009 what was the percent of the total future minimum lease commitments and contingencies for operating leases that was due in 2012
rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 57.2 million , $ 49.0 million and $ 26.6 million during the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases . the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost . in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall . similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value . had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2009 , the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 27.8 million . litigation and related contingencies in december 2005 and may 2008 , ford global technologies , llc filed complaints with the international trade commission against us and others alleging that certain aftermarket parts imported into the u.s . infringed on ford design patents . the parties settled these matters in april 2009 pursuant to a settlement arrangement that expires in september 2011 . pursuant to the settlement , we ( and our designees ) became the sole distributor in the united states of aftermarket automotive parts that correspond to ford collision parts that are covered by a united states design patent . we have paid ford an upfront fee for these rights and will pay a royalty for each such part we sell . the amortization of the upfront fee and the royalty expenses are reflected in cost of goods sold on the accompanying consolidated statements of income . we also have certain other contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business . we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows . note 10 . business combinations on october 1 , 2009 , we acquired greenleaf auto recyclers , llc ( 201cgreenleaf 201d ) from ssi for $ 38.8 million , net of cash acquired . greenleaf is the entity through which ssi operated its late model automotive parts recycling business . we recorded a gain on bargain purchase for the greenleaf acquisition totaling $ 4.3 million , which is .
the following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at october 30 , 2010 : fiscal years operating leases .
what was the average percentage that the lease expenses decreased from 2011 to 2013
12 . commitments and contingencies from time to time in the ordinary course of the company 2019s business , various claims , charges and litigation are asserted or commenced against the company arising from , or related to , contractual matters , patents , trademarks , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , insurance coverage and personnel and employment disputes . as to such claims and litigation , the company can give no assurance that it will prevail . the company does not believe that any current legal matters will have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations or cash flows . 13 . retirement plans the company and its subsidiaries have various savings and retirement plans covering substantially all employees . the company maintains a defined contribution plan for the benefit of its eligible u.s . employees . this plan provides for company contributions of up to 5% ( 5 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . in addition , the company contributes an amount equal to each participant 2019s pre-tax contribution , if any , up to a maximum of 3% ( 3 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s . employees was $ 20.5 million in fiscal 2010 , $ 21.5 million in fiscal 2009 and $ 22.6 million in fiscal 2008 . the company also has various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees that are consistent with local statutory requirements and practices . the total expense related to the various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees was $ 11.7 million in fiscal 2010 , $ 10.9 million in fiscal 2009 and $ 13.9 million in fiscal 2008 . during fiscal 2009 , the measurement date of the plan 2019s funded status was changed from september 30 to the company 2019s fiscal year end . non-u.s . plan disclosures the company 2019s funding policy for its foreign defined benefit pension plans is consistent with the local requirements of each country . the plans 2019 assets consist primarily of u.s . and non-u.s . equity securities , bonds , property and cash . the benefit obligations and related assets under these plans have been measured at october 30 , 2010 and october 31 , 2009 . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
table of contents the following performance graph is not 201csoliciting material , 201d is not deemed filed with the sec , and is not to be incorporated by reference into any of valero 2019s filings under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , respectively . this performance graph and the related textual information are based on historical data and are not indicative of future performance . the following line graph compares the cumulative total return 1 on an investment in our common stock against the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 composite index and an index of peer companies ( that we selected ) for the five-year period commencing december 31 , 2006 and ending december 31 , 2011 . our peer group consists of the following nine companies that are engaged in refining operations in the u.s. : alon usa energy , inc. ; chevron corporation ; cvr energy , inc. ; exxon mobil corporation ; hess corporation ; hollyfrontier corporation ; marathon petroleum corporation ; tesoro corporation ; and western refining , inc . our peer group previously included conocophillips ; marathon oil corporation ; murphy oil corporation ; and sunoco , inc. , but they are not included in our current peer group because they have exited or are exiting refining operations in the u.s . frontier oil corporation and holly corporation are now represented in our peer group as hollyfrontier corporation. .
what was the range for valero stock from 2007-2011?
1 assumes that an investment in valero common stock and each index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2006 . 201ccumulative total return 201d is based on share price appreciation plus reinvestment of dividends from december 31 , 2006 through december 31 , 2011. .
five-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dj trans , and the s&p 500 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index on december 31 , 2007 and that all dividends were reinvested . purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2012 , we repurchased 13804709 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 115.33 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2012 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan or program [b] .
what percentage of the total number of shares purchased were purchased in october?
[a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 105978 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] on april 1 , 2011 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 40 million shares of our common stock by march 31 , 2014 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .
contracts as of december 31 , 2006 , which all mature in 2007 . forward contract notional amounts presented below are expressed in the stated currencies ( in thousands ) . forward currency contracts: .
if the u.s dollar would change by 5% ( 5 % ) against foreign currencies , what would the expected net earnings?
a movement of 10% ( 10 % ) in the value of the u.s . dollar against foreign currencies would impact our expected net earnings by approximately $ 0.1 million . item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data the financial statements and supplementary data required by this item are included herein , commencing on page f-1 . item 9 . changes in and disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure item 9a . controls and procedures ( a ) evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures our management , with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer , evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report . based on that evaluation , the chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report are functioning effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the securities exchange act of 1934 is ( i ) recorded , processed , summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the sec 2019s rules and forms and ( ii ) accumulated and communicated to our management , including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer , as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure . a controls system cannot provide absolute assurance , however , that the objectives of the controls system are met , and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud , if any , within a company have been detected . ( b ) management 2019s report on internal control over financial reporting our management 2019s report on internal control over financial reporting is set forth on page f-2 of this annual report on form 10-k and is incorporated by reference herein . ( c ) change in internal control over financial reporting no change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected , or is reasonably likely to materially affect , our internal control over financial reporting . item 9b . other information .
synopsys , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014continued the company has the following tax loss and credit carryforwards available to offset future income tax liabilities : carryforward amount expiration ( in thousands ) .
what is the variation between the federal research credit carryforward and federal net operating loss carryforward , in thousands?
the federal and state net operating loss carryforward is from acquired companies and the annual use of such loss is subject to significant limitations under internal revenue code section 382 . foreign tax credits may only be used to offset tax attributable to foreign source income . the federal research tax credit was permanently reinstated in fiscal 2016 . the company adopted asu 2016-09 in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 . the company recorded all income tax effects of share-based awards in its provision for income taxes in the condensed consolidated statement of operations on a prospective basis . prior to adoption , the company did not recognize excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation as a charge to capital in excess of par value to the extent that the related tax deduction did not reduce income taxes payable . upon adoption of asu 2016-09 , the company recorded a deferred tax asset of $ 106.5 million mainly related to the research tax credit carryover , for the previously unrecognized excess tax benefits with an offsetting adjustment to retained earnings . adoption of the new standard resulted in net excess tax benefits in the provision for income taxes of $ 38.1 million for fiscal 2017 . during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 , the company repatriated $ 825 million from its foreign subsidiary . the repatriation was executed in anticipation of potential u.s . corporate tax reform , and the company plans to indefinitely reinvest the remainder of its undistributed foreign earnings outside the united states . the company provides for u.s . income and foreign withholding taxes on foreign earnings , except for foreign earnings that are considered indefinitely reinvested outside the u.s . as of october 31 , 2017 , there were approximately $ 598.3 million of earnings upon which u.s . income taxes of approximately $ 110.0 million have not been provided for. .
five-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dj trans , and the s&p 500 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested . the information below is historical in nature and is not necessarily indicative of future performance . purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2015 , we repurchased 36921641 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 99.16 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2015 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b] .
what percentage of total shares purchased were purchased in november?
[a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 32086 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] effective january 1 , 2014 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 120 million shares of our common stock by december 31 , 2017 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .
part a0ii item a05 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange under the symbol 201ctfx . 201d as of february 19 , 2019 , we had 473 holders of record of our common stock . a substantially greater number of holders of our common stock are beneficial owners whose shares are held by brokers and other financial institutions for the accounts of beneficial owners . stock performance graph the following graph provides a comparison of five year cumulative total stockholder returns of teleflex common stock , the standard a0& poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 stock index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index . the annual changes for the five-year period shown on the graph are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in teleflex common stock and each index on december a031 , 2013 and that all dividends were reinvested . market performance .
what is the range of market performance for the s&p 500 index from 2013-2018?
s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index 100 126 134 142 186 213 .
vertex pharmaceuticals incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) d . stock-based compensation ( continued ) the company uses the black-scholes valuation model to estimate the fair value of stock options at the grant date . the black-scholes valuation model uses the option exercise price as well as estimates and assumptions related to the expected price volatility of the company 2019s stock , the period during which the options will be outstanding , the rate of return on risk-free investments , and the expected dividend yield for the company 2019s stock to estimate the fair value of a stock option on the grant date . the company validates its estimates and assumptions through consultations with independent third parties having relevant expertise . the fair value of each option granted under the stock and option plans during 2006 was estimated on the date of grant using the black- scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions : the weighted-average valuation assumptions were determined as follows : 2022 expected stock price volatility : in 2006 , the company changed its method of estimating expected volatility from relying exclusively on historical volatility to relying exclusively on implied volatility . options to purchase the company 2019s stock with remaining terms of greater than one year are regularly traded in the market . expected stock price volatility is calculated using the trailing one month average of daily implied volatilities prior to grant date . 2022 risk-free interest rate : the company bases the risk-free interest rate on the interest rate payable on u.s . treasury securities in effect at the time of grant for a period that is commensurate with the assumed expected option term . 2022 expected term of options : the expected term of options represents the period of time options are expected to be outstanding . the company uses historical data to estimate employee exercise and post-vest termination behavior . the company believes that all groups of employees exhibit similar exercise and post-vest termination behavior and therefore does not stratify employees into multiple groups in determining the expected term of options . 2022 expected annual dividends : the estimate for annual dividends is $ 0.00 , because the company has not historically paid , and does not intend for the foreseeable future to pay , a dividend . expected stock price volatility 57.10 % (  % ) risk-free interest rate 4.74 % (  % ) expected term 5.64 years .
in 2006 what was the ratio expected stock price volatility to risk-free interest rate
.