whpthomas/finqa-parquet huggingface dataset:
vornado realty trust notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 9 . debt - continued our revolving credit facility and senior unsecured notes contain financial covenants which require us to maintain minimum interest coverage ratios and limit our debt to market capitalization ratios . we believe that we have complied with all of our financial covenants as of december 31 , 2007 . on may 9 , 2006 , we executed supplemental indentures with respect to our senior unsecured notes due 2007 , 2009 and 2010 ( collectively , the 201cnotes 201d ) , pursuant to our consent solicitation statement dated april 18 , 2006 , as amended . holders of approximately 96.7% ( 96.7 % ) of the aggregate principal amount of the notes consented to the solicitation . the supplemental indentures contain modifications of certain covenants and related defined terms governing the terms of the notes to make them consistent with corresponding provisions of the covenants and defined terms included in the senior unsecured notes due 2011 issued on february 16 , 2006 . the supplemental indentures also include a new covenant that provides for an increase in the interest rate of the notes upon certain decreases in the ratings assigned by rating agencies to the notes . in connection with the consent solicitation we paid an aggregate fee of $ 2241000 to the consenting note holders , which will be amortized into expense over the remaining term of the notes . in addition , we incurred advisory and professional fees aggregating $ 1415000 , which were expensed in 2006 . the net carrying amount of properties collateralizing the notes and mortgages payable amounted to $ 10.920 billion at december 31 , 2007 . as at december 31 , 2007 , the principal repayments required for the next five years and thereafter are as follows : ( amounts in thousands ) .
principal payments required for 2009 were what percent of those for 2010?
.
notes to consolidated financial statements investments in funds that calculate net asset value per share cash instruments at fair value include investments in funds that are valued based on the net asset value per share ( nav ) of the investment fund . the firm uses nav as its measure of fair value for fund investments when ( i ) the fund investment does not have a readily determinable fair value and ( ii ) the nav of the investment fund is calculated in a manner consistent with the measurement principles of investment company accounting , including measurement of the underlying investments at fair value . the firm 2019s investments in funds that calculate nav primarily consist of investments in firm-sponsored funds where the firm co-invests with third-party investors . the private equity , credit and real estate funds are primarily closed-end funds in which the firm 2019s investments are not eligible for redemption . distributions will be received from these funds as the underlying assets are liquidated and it is estimated that substantially all of the underlying assets of existing funds will be liquidated over the next seven years . the firm continues to manage its existing funds taking into account the transition periods under the volcker rule of the u.s . dodd-frank wall street reform and consumer protection act ( dodd-frank act ) , although the rules have not yet been finalized . the firm 2019s investments in hedge funds are generally redeemable on a quarterly basis with 91 days 2019 notice , subject to a maximum redemption level of 25% ( 25 % ) of the firm 2019s initial investments at any quarter-end . the firm currently plans to comply with the volcker rule by redeeming certain of its interests in hedge funds . the firm redeemed approximately $ 1.06 billion of these interests in hedge funds during the year ended december 2012 . the table below presents the fair value of the firm 2019s investments in , and unfunded commitments to , funds that calculate nav. .
what is the growth rate in the fair value of private equity funds in 2012?
1 . these funds primarily invest in a broad range of industries worldwide in a variety of situations , including leveraged buyouts , recapitalizations and growth investments . 2 . these funds generally invest in loans and other fixed income instruments and are focused on providing private high-yield capital for mid- to large-sized leveraged and management buyout transactions , recapitalizations , financings , refinancings , acquisitions and restructurings for private equity firms , private family companies and corporate issuers . 3 . these funds are primarily multi-disciplinary hedge funds that employ a fundamental bottom-up investment approach across various asset classes and strategies including long/short equity , credit , convertibles , risk arbitrage , special situations and capital structure arbitrage . 4 . these funds invest globally , primarily in real estate companies , loan portfolios , debt recapitalizations and direct property . goldman sachs 2012 annual report 127 .
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 25 , 2009 through october 26 , 2014 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 25 , 2009 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index 201cs&p 201d is a registered trademark of standard & poor 2019s financial services llc , a subsidiary of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc. .
how many shares received dividends during 2014 , ( in millions ) ?
dividends during fiscal 2014 , applied 2019s board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share each . during fiscal 2013 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.09 per share . during fiscal 2012 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.09 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.08 . dividends declared during fiscal 2014 , 2013 and 2012 totaled $ 487 million , $ 469 million and $ 438 million , respectively . applied currently anticipates that it will continue to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis in the future , although the declaration and amount of any future cash dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . $ 100 invested on 10/25/09 in stock or 10/31/09 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . and the rdg semiconductor composite index 183145 97 102 121 132 10/25/09 10/31/10 10/30/11 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .
s c h e d u l e i v ace limited and subsidiaries s u p p l e m e n t a l i n f o r m a t i o n c o n c e r n i n g r e i n s u r a n c e premiums earned for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 ( in millions of u.s . dollars , except for percentages ) direct amount ceded to companies assumed from other companies net amount percentage of amount assumed to .
in 2009 what was the ratio of the direct amount to the amount ceded to other companies
.
the company consolidates the assets and liabilities of several entities from which it leases office buildings and corporate aircraft . these entities have been determined to be variable interest entities and the company has been determined to be the primary beneficiary of these entities . due to the consolidation of these entities , the company reflects in its balance sheet : property , plant and equipment of $ 156 million and $ 183 million , other assets of $ 14 million and $ 12 million , long-term debt of $ 150 million ( including current maturities of $ 6 million ) and $ 192 million ( including current maturities of $ 8 million ) , minority interest liabilities of $ 22 million and $ 6 million , and other accrued liabilities of $ 1 million and $ 0 , as of may 27 , 2007 and may 28 , 2006 , respectively . the liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating these entities do not represent additional claims on the general assets of the company . the creditors of these entities have claims only on the assets of the specific variable interest entities . obligations and commitments as part of its ongoing operations , the company enters into arrangements that obligate the company to make future payments under contracts such as debt agreements , lease agreements , and unconditional purchase obligations ( i.e. , obligations to transfer funds in the future for fixed or minimum quantities of goods or services at fixed or minimum prices , such as 201ctake-or-pay 201d contracts ) . the unconditional purchase obligation arrangements are entered into by the company in its normal course of business in order to ensure adequate levels of sourced product are available to the company . capital lease and debt obligations , which totaled $ 3.6 billion at may 27 , 2007 , are currently recognized as liabilities in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . operating lease obligations and unconditional purchase obligations , which totaled $ 645 million at may 27 , 2007 , are not recognized as liabilities in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet , in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles . a summary of the company 2019s contractual obligations at the end of fiscal 2007 is as follows ( including obligations of discontinued operations ) : .
what percentage of the total contractual obligations at the end of fiscal 2007 are comprised of lease obligations?
the company 2019s total obligations of approximately $ 4.2 billion reflect a decrease of approximately $ 237 million from the company 2019s 2006 fiscal year-end . the decrease was due primarily to a reduction of lease obligations in connection with the sale of the packaged meats operations . the company is also contractually obligated to pay interest on its long-term debt obligations . the weighted average interest rate of the long-term debt obligations outstanding as of may 27 , 2007 was approximately 7.2%. .
note 4 : property , plant and equipment the following table summarizes the major classes of property , plant and equipment by category as of december 31 : 2015 2014 range of remaining useful weighted average useful life utility plant : land and other non-depreciable assets . . . . . . . . . . $ 141 $ 137 sources of supply . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 705 681 12 to 127 years 51 years treatment and pumping facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3070 2969 3 to 101 years 39 years transmission and distribution facilities . . . . . . . . . 8516 7963 9 to 156 years 83 years services , meters and fire hydrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3250 3062 8 to 93 years 35 years general structures and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1227 1096 1 to 154 years 39 years waste treatment , pumping and disposal . . . . . . . . . 313 281 2 to 115 years 46 years waste collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 473 399 5 to 109 years 56 years construction work in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 404 303 total utility plant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18099 16891 nonutility property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 405 378 3 to 50 years 6 years total property , plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 18504 $ 17269 property , plant and equipment depreciation expense amounted to $ 405 , $ 392 , and $ 374 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively and was included in depreciation and amortization expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . the provision for depreciation expressed as a percentage of the aggregate average depreciable asset balances was 3.13% ( 3.13 % ) for the year ended december 31 , 2015 and 3.20% ( 3.20 % ) for years december 31 , 2014 and 2013 . note 5 : allowance for uncollectible accounts the following table summarizes the changes in the company 2019s allowances for uncollectible accounts for the years ended december 31: .
in 2013 as part of the company's noncollectable amounts what was the ratio of that amounts written off to the amount recovered
.
stock performance graph the following graph compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 index for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , the 2016 fiscal transition period , and the years ended may 31 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 . the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the standard & poor 2019s information technology index on may 31 , 2012 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends . 5/12 5/165/155/145/13 global payments inc . s&p 500 s&p information technology 12/16 12/17 comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index * $ 100 invested on may 31 , 2012 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . copyright a9 2018 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . global payments 500 index information technology .
what is the total return if 1000000 is invested in s&p500 in may 31 , 2012 and liquidated in may 31 , 2015?
30 2013 global payments inc . | 2017 form 10-k annual report .
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) for the years ended december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , the company increased net deferred tax assets by $ 1.5 million and $ 7.2 million , respectively with a corresponding reduction of goodwill associated with the utilization of net operating and capital losses acquired in connection with the spectrasite , inc . merger . these deferred tax assets were assigned a full valuation allowance as part of the final spectrasite purchase price allocation in june 2006 , as evidence available at the time did not support that losses were more likely than not to be realized . the valuation allowance decreased from $ 308.2 million as of december 31 , 2006 to $ 88.2 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the decrease was primarily due to a $ 149.6 million reclassification to the fin 48 opening balance ( related to federal and state net operating losses acquired in connection with the spectrasite , inc . merger ) and $ 45.2 million of allowance reductions during the year ended december 31 , 2007 related to state net operating losses , capital loss expirations of $ 6.5 million and other items . the company 2019s deferred tax assets as of december 31 , 2007 and 2006 in the table above do not include $ 74.9 million and $ 31.0 million , respectively , of excess tax benefits from the exercises of employee stock options that are a component of net operating losses due to the adoption of sfas no . 123r . total stockholders 2019 equity will be increased by $ 74.9 million if and when any such excess tax benefits are ultimately realized . basis step-up from corporate restructuring represents the tax effects of increasing the basis for tax purposes of certain of the company 2019s assets in conjunction with its spin-off from american radio systems corporation , its former parent company . at december 31 , 2007 , the company had net federal and state operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future federal and state taxable income of approximately $ 1.6 billion and $ 2.1 billion , respectively . if not utilized , the company 2019s net operating loss carryforwards expire as follows ( in thousands ) : .
what was the change in the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits in 2007in millions?
as described in note 1 , the company adopted the provisions of fin 48 on january 1 , 2007 . as of january 1 , 2007 , the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $ 183.9 million of which $ 34.3 million would affect the effective tax rate , if recognized . as of december 31 , 2007 , the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $ 59.2 million , $ 23.0 million of which would affect the effective tax rate , if recognized . the company expects the unrecognized tax benefits to change over the next 12 months if certain tax matters ultimately settle with the applicable taxing jurisdiction during this timeframe . however , based on the status of these items and the amount of uncertainty associated with the outcome and timing of audit settlements , the .
comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph compares the cumulative total return on citigroup 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period extending through december 31 , 2009 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in citigroup 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index and that all dividends were reinvested . citigroup s&p 500 index s&p financial index 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended .
what was the percent cumulative total return on citigroup's common stock for five year period ended 2009?
.
in 2017 , the company granted 440076 shares of restricted class a common stock and 7568 shares of restricted stock units . restricted common stock and restricted stock units generally have a vesting period of two to four years . the fair value related to these grants was $ 58.7 million , which is recognized as compensation expense on an accelerated basis over the vesting period . dividends are accrued on restricted class a common stock and restricted stock units and are paid once the restricted stock vests . in 2017 , the company also granted 203298 performance shares . the fair value related to these grants was $ 25.3 million , which is recognized as compensation expense on an accelerated and straight-lined basis over the vesting period . the vesting of these shares is contingent on meeting stated performance or market conditions . the following table summarizes restricted stock , restricted stock units , and performance shares activity for 2017 : number of shares weighted average grant date fair value .
in millions , how much compensation expense was attributable to directors in the years ended december 31 , 2015 through 2017?
the total fair value of restricted stock , restricted stock units , and performance shares that vested during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 was $ 66.0 million , $ 59.8 million and $ 43.3 million , respectively . under the espp , eligible employees may acquire shares of class a common stock using after-tax payroll deductions made during consecutive offering periods of approximately six months in duration . shares are purchased at the end of each offering period at a price of 90% ( 90 % ) of the closing price of the class a common stock as reported on the nasdaq global select market . compensation expense is recognized on the dates of purchase for the discount from the closing price . in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , a total of 19936 , 19858 and 19756 shares , respectively , of class a common stock were issued to participating employees . these shares are subject to a six-month holding period . annual expense of $ 0.3 million for the purchase discount was recognized in 2017 , and $ 0.2 million was recognized in both 2016 and 2015 . non-executive directors receive an annual award of class a common stock with a value equal to $ 100000 . non-executive directors may also elect to receive some or all of the cash portion of their annual stipend , up to $ 60000 , in shares of stock based on the closing price at the date of distribution . as a result , 19736 shares , 26439 shares and 25853 shares of class a common stock were issued to non-executive directors during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . these shares are not subject to any vesting restrictions . expense of $ 2.5 million , $ 2.4 million and $ 2.5 million related to these stock-based payments was recognized for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively. .
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements equitable discretion and not require refunds for the 20-month period from september 13 , 2001 - may 2 , 2003 . because the ruling on refunds relied on findings in the interruptible load proceeding , which is discussed in a separate section below , the ferc concluded that the refund ruling will be held in abeyance pending the outcome of the rehearing requests in that proceeding . on the second issue , the ferc reversed its prior decision and ordered that the prospective bandwidth remedy begin on june 1 , 2005 ( the date of its initial order in the proceeding ) rather than january 1 , 2006 , as it had previously ordered . pursuant to the october 2011 order , entergy was required to calculate the additional bandwidth payments for the period june - december 2005 utilizing the bandwidth formula tariff prescribed by the ferc that was filed in a december 2006 compliance filing and accepted by the ferc in an april 2007 order . as is the case with bandwidth remedy payments , these payments and receipts will ultimately be paid by utility operating company customers to other utility operating company customers . in december 2011 , entergy filed with the ferc its compliance filing that provides the payments and receipts among the utility operating companies pursuant to the ferc 2019s october 2011 order . the filing shows the following payments/receipts among the utility operating companies : payments ( receipts ) ( in millions ) .
what portion of the entergy arkansas payment goes to entergy texas?
entergy arkansas made its payment in january 2012 . in february 2012 , entergy arkansas filed for an interim adjustment to its production cost allocation rider requesting that the $ 156 million payment be collected from customers over the 22-month period from march 2012 through december 2013 . in march 2012 the apsc issued an order stating that the payment can be recovered from retail customers through the production cost allocation rider , subject to refund . the lpsc and the apsc have requested rehearing of the ferc 2019s october 2011 order . in december 2013 the lpsc filed a petition for a writ of mandamus at the united states court of appeals for the d.c . circuit . in its petition , the lpsc requested that the d.c . circuit issue an order compelling the ferc to issue a final order on pending rehearing requests . in its response to the lpsc petition , the ferc committed to rule on the pending rehearing request before the end of february . in january 2014 the d.c . circuit denied the lpsc's petition . the apsc , the lpsc , the puct , and other parties intervened in the december 2011 compliance filing proceeding , and the apsc and the lpsc also filed protests . calendar year 2013 production costs the liabilities and assets for the preliminary estimate of the payments and receipts required to implement the ferc 2019s remedy based on calendar year 2013 production costs were recorded in december 2013 , based on certain year-to-date information . the preliminary estimate was recorded based on the following estimate of the payments/receipts among the utility operating companies for 2014. .