whpthomas/finqa-parquet huggingface dataset:
2016 non-qualified deferred compensation as of december 31 , 2016 , mr . may had a deferred account balance under a frozen defined contribution restoration plan . the amount is deemed invested , as chosen by the participant , in certain t . rowe price investment funds that are also available to the participant under the savings plan . mr . may has elected to receive the deferred account balance after he retires . the defined contribution restoration plan , until it was frozen in 2005 , credited eligible employees 2019 deferral accounts with employer contributions to the extent contributions under the qualified savings plan in which the employee participated were subject to limitations imposed by the code . defined contribution restoration plan executive contributions in registrant contributions in aggregate earnings in 2016 ( 1 ) aggregate withdrawals/ distributions aggregate balance at december 31 , ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) ( d ) ( e ) ( f ) .
what was mr . may's 12/31/15 plan balance?
( 1 ) amounts in this column are not included in the summary compensation table . 2016 potential payments upon termination or change in control entergy corporation has plans and other arrangements that provide compensation to a named executive officer if his or her employment terminates under specified conditions , including following a change in control of entergy corporation . in addition , in 2006 entergy corporation entered into a retention agreement with mr . denault that provides possibility of additional service credit under the system executive retirement plan upon certain terminations of employment . there are no plans or agreements that would provide for payments to any of the named executive officers solely upon a change in control . the tables below reflect the amount of compensation each of the named executive officers would have received if his or her employment with their entergy employer had been terminated under various scenarios as of december 31 , 2016 . for purposes of these tables , a stock price of $ 73.47 was used , which was the closing market price on december 30 , 2016 , the last trading day of the year. .
31mar201122064257 positions which were required to be capitalized . there are no positions which we anticipate could change materially within the next twelve months . liquidity and capital resources .
what is the percent increase in cash and cash equivalents from year 2009 to 2010?
( 1 ) does not include restricted cash balances cash flow from operating activities : cash provided from operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in certain assets and liabilities . for fiscal year 2010 we generated $ 223.0 million in cash flow from operations , an increase of $ 4.2 million when compared to the $ 218.8 million generated in fiscal year 2009 . during fiscal year 2010 , net income increased by $ 42.3 million to $ 137.3 million when compared to fiscal year 2009 . despite the increase in net income , net cash provided by operating activities remained relatively consistent . this was primarily due to : 2022 fiscal year 2010 net income included a deferred tax expense of $ 38.5 million compared to a $ 24.9 million deferred tax benefit included in 2009 net income due to the release of the tax valuation allowance in fiscal year 2009 . 2022 during fiscal year 2010 , the company invested in working capital as result of higher business activity . compared to fiscal year 2009 , accounts receivable , inventory and accounts payable increased by $ 60.9 million , $ 38.8 million and $ 42.9 million , respectively . cash flow from investing activities : cash flow from investing activities consists primarily of capital expenditures and acquisitions . we had net cash outflows of $ 95.3 million in fiscal year 2010 , compared to $ 49.5 million in fiscal year 2009 . the increase is primarily due to an increase of $ 49.8 million in capital expenditures . we anticipate our capital spending to be consistent in fiscal year 2011 to maintain our projected growth rate . cash flow from financing activities : cash flows from financing activities consist primarily of cash transactions related to debt and equity . during fiscal year 2010 , we had net cash outflows of $ 38.6 million , compared to $ 30.2 million in fiscal year 2009 . during the year we had the following significant transactions : 2022 we retired $ 53.0 million in aggregate principal amount ( carrying value of $ 51.1 million ) of 2007 convertible notes for $ 80.7 million , which included a $ 29.6 million premium paid for the equity component of the instrument . 2022 we received net proceeds from employee stock option exercises of $ 40.5 million in fiscal year 2010 , compared to $ 38.7 million in fiscal year 2009 . skyworks / 2010 annual report 103 .
all highly liquid securities with a maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase are considered to be cash equivalents . securities with maturities greater than three months are classified as available-for-sale and are considered to be short-term investments . the carrying value of our interest-bearing instruments approximated fair value as of december 29 , 2012 . interest rates under our revolving credit facility are variable , so interest expense for periods when the credit facility is utilized could be adversely affected by changes in interest rates . interest rates under our revolving credit facility can fluctuate based on changes in market interest rates and in an interest rate margin that varies based on our consolidated leverage ratio . as of december 29 , 2012 , we had no outstanding balance on the credit facility . see note 3 in the notes to consolidated financial statements for an additional description of our credit facility . equity price risk convertible notes our 2015 notes and 2013 notes include conversion and settlement provisions that are based on the price of our common stock at conversion or at maturity of the notes . in addition , the hedges and warrants associated with these convertible notes also include settlement provisions that are based on the price of our common stock . the amount of cash we may be required to pay , or the number of shares we may be required to provide to note holders at conversion or maturity of these notes , is determined by the price of our common stock . the amount of cash or number of shares that we may receive from hedge counterparties in connection with the related hedges and the number of shares that we may be required to provide warrant counterparties in connection with the related warrants are also determined by the price of our common stock . upon the expiration of our 2015 warrants , cadence will issue shares of common stock to the purchasers of the warrants to the extent our stock price exceeds the warrant strike price of $ 10.78 at that time . the following table shows the number of shares that cadence would issue to 2015 warrant counterparties at expiration of the warrants , assuming various cadence closing stock prices on the dates of warrant expiration : shares ( in millions ) .
what is the percentage difference in the number of shares to be issued if the stock price closes at $ 16 compared to if it closes at $ 20?
prior to the expiration of the 2015 warrants , for purposes of calculating diluted earnings per share , our diluted weighted-average shares outstanding will increase when our average closing stock price for a quarter exceeds $ 10.78 . for an additional description of our 2015 notes and 2013 notes , see note 3 in the notes to consolidated financial statements and 201cliquidity and capital resources 2014 other factors affecting liquidity and capital resources , 201d under item 7 , 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations . 201d .
dollar general corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 3 . merger ( continued ) merger as a subsidiary of buck . the company 2019s results of operations after july 6 , 2007 include the effects of the merger . the aggregate purchase price was approximately $ 7.1 billion , including direct costs of the merger , and was funded primarily through debt financings as described more fully below in note 7 and cash equity contributions from kkr , gs capital partners vi fund , l.p . and affiliated funds ( affiliates of goldman , sachs & co. ) , and other equity co-investors ( collectively , the 2018 2018investors 2019 2019 of approximately $ 2.8 billion ( 316.2 million shares of new common stock , $ 0.875 par value per share , valued at $ 8.75 per share ) . also in connection with the merger , certain of the company 2019s management employees invested in and were issued new shares , representing less than 1% ( 1 % ) of the outstanding shares , in the company . pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement , the former holders of the predecessor 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.50 per share , received $ 22.00 per share , or approximately $ 6.9 billion , and all such shares were acquired as a result of the merger . as discussed in note 1 , the merger was accounted for as a reverse acquisition in accordance with applicable purchase accounting provisions . because of this accounting treatment , the company 2019s assets and liabilities have properly been accounted for at their estimated fair values as of the merger date . the aggregate purchase price has been allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon an assessment of their relative fair values as of the merger date . the allocation of the purchase price is as follows ( in thousands ) : .
how much of the purchase price was allocated to intangibles?
the purchase price allocation included approximately $ 4.34 billion of goodwill , none of which is expected to be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill balance at january 30 , 2009 decreased $ 6.3 million from the balance at february 1 , 2008 due to an adjustment to income tax contingencies as further discussed in note 6. .
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's compensation survey group and the s&p 500 index . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2010 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis . date pmi pmi compensation survey group ( 12 ) s&p 500 index .
what is the roi of an investment in s&p 500 in 2010 and liquidated in 2011?
( 1 ) the pmi compensation survey group consists of the following companies with substantial global sales that are direct competitors ; or have similar market capitalization ; or are primarily focused on consumer products ( excluding high technology and financial services ) ; and are companies for which comparative executive compensation data are readily available : bayer ag , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , diageo plc , glaxosmithkline , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc ( formerly , imperial tobacco group plc ) , johnson & johnson , mcdonald's corp. , international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , novartis ag , pepsico , inc. , pfizer inc. , roche holding ag , unilever nv and plc and vodafone group plc . ( 2 ) on october 1 , 2012 , international , inc . ( nasdaq : mdlz ) , formerly kraft foods inc. , announced that it had completed the spin-off of its north american grocery business , kraft foods group , inc . ( nasdaq : krft ) . international , inc . was retained in the pmi compensation survey group index because of its global footprint . the pmi compensation survey group index total cumulative return calculation weights international , inc.'s total shareholder return at 65% ( 65 % ) of historical kraft foods inc.'s market capitalization on december 31 , 2010 , based on international , inc.'s initial market capitalization relative to the combined market capitalization of international , inc . and kraft foods group , inc . on october 2 , 2012 . note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .
five-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dj trans , and the s&p 500 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index on december 31 , 2012 and that all dividends were reinvested . the information below is historical in nature and is not necessarily indicative of future performance . purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2017 , we repurchased 37122405 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 110.50 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2017 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b] .
for the fourth quarter of 2017 what was the percent of the total number of shares purchased in october
[a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 323670 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] effective january 1 , 2017 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 120 million shares of our common stock by december 31 , 2020 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .
stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2011 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 31 , 2016 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/31/1612/28/13 1/2/1612/31/11 1/3/1512/29/12 *$ 100 invested on 12/31/11 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2017 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved. .
what was the difference in percentage cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on cadence design systems inc . common stock and the s&p 400 information technology for the period ended 12/31/2016?
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .
s c h e d u l e i v ace limited and subsidiaries s u p p l e m e n t a l i n f o r m a t i o n c o n c e r n i n g r e i n s u r a n c e premiums earned for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 ( in millions of u.s . dollars , except for percentages ) direct amount ceded to companies assumed from other companies net amount percentage of amount assumed to .
what is the growth rate in direct amount from 2009 to 2010?
.
overview we finance our operations and capital expenditures through a combination of internally generated cash from operations and from borrowings under our senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility . we believe that our current sources of funds will be sufficient to fund our cash operating requirements for the next year . in addition , we believe that , in spite of the uncertainty of future macroeconomic conditions , we have adequate sources of liquidity and funding available to meet our longer-term needs . however , there are a number of factors that may negatively impact our available sources of funds . the amount of cash generated from operations will be dependent upon factors such as the successful execution of our business plan and general economic conditions . long-term debt activities during the year ended december 31 , 2014 , we had significant debt refinancings . in connection with these refinancings , we recorded a loss on extinguishment of long-term debt of $ 90.7 million in our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2014 . see note 7 to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report for additional details . share repurchase program on november 6 , 2014 , we announced that our board of directors approved a $ 500 million share repurchase program effective immediately under which we may repurchase shares of our common stock in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions , depending on share price , market conditions and other factors . the share repurchase program does not obligate us to repurchase any dollar amount or number of shares , and repurchases may be commenced or suspended from time to time without prior notice . as of the date of this filing , no shares have been repurchased under the share repurchase program . dividends a summary of 2014 dividend activity for our common stock is shown below: .
was the dividend declared on february 10 , 2015 greater than the quarterly cash dividend on our common stock declared on february 12 2014?
on february 10 , 2015 , we announced that our board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend on our common stock of $ 0.0675 per share . the dividend will be paid on march 10 , 2015 to all stockholders of record as of the close of business on february 25 , 2015 . the payment of any future dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon our results of operations , financial condition , business prospects , capital requirements , contractual restrictions , any potential indebtedness we may incur , restrictions imposed by applicable law , tax considerations and other factors that our board of directors deems relevant . in addition , our ability to pay dividends on our common stock will be limited by restrictions on our ability to pay dividends or make distributions to our stockholders and on the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends or make distributions to us , in each case , under the terms of our current and any future agreements governing our indebtedness . table of contents .
entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis entergy new orleans' receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: .
what is the net cash flow from money pool activity for entergy new orleans' operating cash flow in the last three years?
money pool activity provided $ 0.4 million of entergy new orleans' operating cash flow in 2004 , provided $ 1.7 million in 2003 , and provided $ 5.7 million in 2002 . see note 4 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements for a description of the money pool . investing activities net cash used in investing activities decreased $ 15.5 million in 2004 primarily due to capital expenditures related to a turbine inspection project at a fossil plant in 2003 and decreased customer service spending . net cash used in investing activities increased $ 23.2 million in 2003 compared to 2002 primarily due to the maturity of $ 14.9 million of other temporary investments in 2002 and increased construction expenditures due to increased customer service spending . financing activities net cash used in financing activities increased $ 7.0 million in 2004 primarily due to the costs and expenses related to refinancing $ 75 million of long-term debt in 2004 and an increase of $ 2.2 million in common stock dividends paid . net cash used in financing activities increased $ 1.5 million in 2003 primarily due to additional common stock dividends paid of $ 2.2 million . in july 2003 , entergy new orleans issued $ 30 million of 3.875% ( 3.875 % ) series first mortgage bonds due august 2008 and $ 70 million of 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) series first mortgage bonds due august 2013 . the proceeds from these issuances were used to redeem , prior to maturity , $ 30 million of 7% ( 7 % ) series first mortgage bonds due july 2008 , $ 40 million of 8% ( 8 % ) series bonds due march 2006 , and $ 30 million of 6.65% ( 6.65 % ) series first mortgage bonds due march 2004 . the issuances and redemptions are not shown on the cash flow statement because the proceeds from the issuances were placed in a trust for use in the redemptions and never held as cash by entergy new orleans . see note 5 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements for details on long- term debt . uses of capital entergy new orleans requires capital resources for : 2022 construction and other capital investments ; 2022 debt and preferred stock maturities ; 2022 working capital purposes , including the financing of fuel and purchased power costs ; and 2022 dividend and interest payments. .
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements liability to $ 60 million , and recorded the $ 2.7 million difference as a credit to interest expense . the $ 60 million remaining liability was eliminated upon payment of the cash portion of the purchase price . as of december 31 , 2016 , entergy louisiana , in connection with the waterford 3 lease obligation , had a future minimum lease payment ( reflecting an interest rate of 8.09% ( 8.09 % ) ) of $ 57.5 million , including $ 2.3 million in interest , due january 2017 that is recorded as long-term debt . in february 2017 the leases were terminated and the leased assets were conveyed to entergy louisiana . grand gulf lease obligations in 1988 , in two separate but substantially identical transactions , system energy sold and leased back undivided ownership interests in grand gulf for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million . the initial term of the leases expired in july 2015 . system energy renewed the leases for fair market value with renewal terms expiring in july 2036 . at the end of the new lease renewal terms , system energy has the option to repurchase the leased interests in grand gulf or renew the leases at fair market value . in the event that system energy does not renew or purchase the interests , system energy would surrender such interests and their associated entitlement of grand gulf 2019s capacity and energy . system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements . for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant depreciation . however , operating revenues include the recovery of the lease payments because the transactions are accounted for as a sale and leaseback for ratemaking purposes . consistent with a recommendation contained in a ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount was a net regulatory liability of $ 55.6 million and $ 55.6 million as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2016 , system energy , in connection with the grand gulf sale and leaseback transactions , had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) that are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .
what portion of the total future minimum lease payment for entergy louisiana will be used for interest payments?
.