whpthomas/finqa-parquet huggingface dataset:
the weighted average grant date fair value of performance-based restricted stock units granted during the years 2008 and 2007 was $ 84.33 and $ 71.72 , respectively . the total fair value of performance-based restricted stock units vested during 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 33712 , $ 49387 and $ 9181 , respectively . at september 30 , 2009 , the weighted average remaining vesting term of performance-based restricted stock units is 1.28 years . time-vested restricted stock units time-vested restricted stock units generally cliff vest three years after the date of grant , except for certain key executives of the company , including the executive officers , for which such units generally vest one year following the employee 2019s retirement . the related share-based compensation expense is recorded over the requisite service period , which is the vesting period or in the case of certain key executives is based on retirement eligibility . the fair value of all time-vested restricted stock units is based on the market value of the company 2019s stock on the date of grant . a summary of time-vested restricted stock units outstanding as of september 30 , 2009 , and changes during the year then ended is as follows : weighted average grant date fair value .
in 2009 what was the ratio of the 3 granted to the sum of the distributed and forfeited or canceled shares
the weighted average grant date fair value of time-vested restricted stock units granted during the years 2008 and 2007 was $ 84.42 and $ 72.20 , respectively . the total fair value of time-vested restricted stock units vested during 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 29535 , $ 26674 and $ 3392 , respectively . at september 30 , 2009 , the weighted average remaining vesting term of the time-vested restricted stock units is 1.71 years . the amount of unrecognized compensation expense for all non-vested share-based awards as of september 30 , 2009 , is approximately $ 97034 , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average remaining life of approximately 2.02 years . at september 30 , 2009 , 4295402 shares were authorized for future grants under the 2004 plan . the company has a policy of satisfying share-based payments through either open market purchases or shares held in treasury . at september 30 , 2009 , the company has sufficient shares held in treasury to satisfy these payments in 2010 . other stock plans the company has a stock award plan , which allows for grants of common shares to certain key employees . distribution of 25% ( 25 % ) or more of each award is deferred until after retirement or involuntary termination , upon which the deferred portion of the award is distributable in five equal annual installments . the balance of the award is distributable over five years from the grant date , subject to certain conditions . in february 2004 , this plan was terminated with respect to future grants upon the adoption of the 2004 plan . at september 30 , 2009 and 2008 , awards for 114197 and 161145 shares , respectively , were outstanding . becton , dickinson and company notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's compensation survey group and the s&p 500 index . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2010 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis . date pmi pmi compensation survey group ( 12 ) s&p 500 index .
what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock for the five years ended december 31 , 2015?
( 1 ) the pmi compensation survey group consists of the following companies with substantial global sales that are direct competitors ; or have similar market capitalization ; or are primarily focused on consumer products ( excluding high technology and financial services ) ; and are companies for which comparative executive compensation data are readily available : bayer ag , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , diageo plc , glaxosmithkline , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc ( formerly , imperial tobacco group plc ) , johnson & johnson , mcdonald's corp. , international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , novartis ag , pepsico , inc. , pfizer inc. , roche holding ag , unilever nv and plc and vodafone group plc . ( 2 ) on october 1 , 2012 , international , inc . ( nasdaq : mdlz ) , formerly kraft foods inc. , announced that it had completed the spin-off of its north american grocery business , kraft foods group , inc . ( nasdaq : krft ) . international , inc . was retained in the pmi compensation survey group index because of its global footprint . the pmi compensation survey group index total cumulative return calculation weights international , inc.'s total shareholder return at 65% ( 65 % ) of historical kraft foods inc.'s market capitalization on december 31 , 2010 , based on international , inc.'s initial market capitalization relative to the combined market capitalization of international , inc . and kraft foods group , inc . on october 2 , 2012 . note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .
14 2018 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2018 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company . historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .
what was the cumulative total return for the peer group over the five years?
this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2013 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. ; bottomline technology , inc. ; broadridge financial solutions ; cardtronics , inc. ; convergys corp. ; corelogic , inc. ; euronet worldwide , inc. ; fair isaac corp. ; fidelity national information services , inc. ; fiserv , inc. ; global payments , inc. ; moneygram international , inc. ; ss&c technologies holdings , inc. ; total systems services , inc. ; tyler technologies , inc. ; verifone systems , inc. ; and wex , inc . dst systems , inc. , which had previously been part of the peer group , was acquired in 2018 and is no longer a public company . as a result , dst systems , inc . has been removed from the peer group and stock performance graph . the stock performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the exchange act , or incorporated by reference into any filing of the company under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act , except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing. .
entergy mississippi , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to entergy mississippi 2019s exit from the system agreement in november 2015 . the reserve equalization revenue variance is primarily due to the absence of reserve equalization revenue as compared to the same period in 2015 resulting from entergy mississippi 2019s exit from the system agreement in november 2015 compared to 2014 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 . amount ( in millions ) .
did the volume/weather adjustment have a greater impact on 2015 net revenue than the retail electric price adjustment?
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 86 gwh , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including the effect of more favorable weather on residential and commercial sales . the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a $ 16 million net annual increase in revenues , effective february 2015 , as a result of the mpsc order in the june 2014 rate case and an increase in revenues collected through the energy efficiency rider , partially offset by a decrease in revenues collected through the storm damage rider . the rate case included the realignment of certain costs from collection in riders to base rates . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the rate case , the energy efficiency rider , and the storm damage rider . the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to a wholesale customer contract termination in october transmission equalization revenue represents amounts received by entergy mississippi from certain other entergy utility operating companies , in accordance with the system agreement , to allocate the costs of collectively planning , constructing , and operating entergy 2019s bulk transmission facilities . the transmission equalization variance is primarily attributable to the realignment , effective february 2015 , of these revenues from the determination of base rates to inclusion in a rider . such revenues had a favorable effect on net revenue in 2014 , but minimal effect in 2015 . entergy mississippi exited the system agreement in november 2015 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement . reserve equalization revenue represents amounts received by entergy mississippi from certain other entergy utility operating companies , in accordance with the system agreement , to allocate the costs of collectively maintaining adequate electric generating capacity across the entergy system . the reserve equalization variance is primarily attributable to the realignment , effective february 2015 , of these revenues from the determination of base rates to inclusion in a rider . such revenues had a favorable effect on net revenue in 2014 , but minimal effect in 2015 . entergy .
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis the expenses related to the voluntary severance program offered to employees . approximately 200 employees from the non-utility nuclear business and 150 employees in the utility business accepted the voluntary severance program offers . net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .
what was the percent of net revenue utility change in net revenue
the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to higher capacity charges . a portion of the variance is due to the amortization of deferred capacity costs and is offset in base revenues due to base rate increases implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather compared to the same period in 2007 and decreased electricity usage primarily during the unbilled sales period . hurricane gustav and hurricane ike , which hit the utility's service territories in september 2008 , contributed an estimated $ 46 million to the decrease in electricity usage . industrial sales were also depressed by the continuing effects of the hurricanes and , especially in the latter part of the year , because of the overall decline of the economy , leading to lower usage in the latter part of the year affecting both the large customer industrial segment as well as small and mid-sized industrial customers . the decreases in electricity usage were partially offset by an increase in residential and commercial customer electricity usage that occurred during the periods of the year not affected by the hurricanes . the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : an increase in the attala power plant costs recovered through the power management rider by entergy mississippi . the net income effect of this recovery is limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity with the remainder offset by attala power plant costs in other operation and maintenance expenses , depreciation expenses , and taxes other than income taxes ; a storm damage rider that became effective in october 2007 at entergy mississippi ; and an energy efficiency rider that became effective in november 2007 at entergy arkansas . the establishment of the storm damage rider and the energy efficiency rider results in an increase in rider revenue and a corresponding increase in other operation and maintenance expense with no impact on net income . the retail electric price variance was partially offset by : the absence of interim storm recoveries through the formula rate plans at entergy louisiana and entergy gulf states louisiana which ceased upon the act 55 financing of storm costs in the third quarter 2008 ; and a credit passed on to customers as a result of the act 55 storm cost financings . refer to "liquidity and capital resources - hurricane katrina and hurricane rita" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the interim recovery of storm costs and the act 55 storm cost financings. .
2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .
in 2016 what was the percentage change in net revenue
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a $ 19.4 million net annual increase in revenues , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 , and an increase in revenues collected through the storm damage rider . a0 see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the formula rate plan and the storm damage rider . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 153 gwh , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including an increase in industrial usage , partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales . the increase in industrial usage is primarily due to expansion projects in the pulp and paper industry , increased demand for existing customers , primarily in the metals industry , and new customers in the wood products industry . the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to entergy mississippi 2019s exit from the system agreement in november 2015 . the reserve equalization revenue variance is primarily due to the absence of reserve equalization revenue as compared to the same period in 2015 resulting from entergy mississippi 2019s exit from the system agreement in november other income statement variances 2017 compared to 2016 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : 2022 a decrease of $ 12 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to lower long-term service agreement costs and a lower scope of work done during plant outages in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 3.6 million in storm damage provisions . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion on storm cost recovery . the decrease was partially offset by an increase of $ 4.8 million in energy efficiency costs and an increase of $ 2.7 million in compensation and benefits costs primarily due to higher incentive-based compensation accruals in 2017 as compared to the prior year . entergy mississippi , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
other purchases or sales of equity securities the following chart discloses information regarding shares of snap-on 2019s common stock that were sold by citibank , n.a . ( 201ccitibank 201d ) during the fourth quarter of 2013 pursuant to a prepaid equity forward transaction agreement ( the 201cagreement 201d ) with citibank that is intended to reduce the impact of market risk associated with the stock-based portion of the company 2019s deferred compensation plans . the company 2019s stock-based deferred compensation liabilities , which are impacted by changes in the company 2019s stock price , increase as the company 2019s stock price rises and decrease as the company 2019s stock price declines . pursuant to the agreement , citibank may purchase or sell shares of the company 2019s common stock ( for citibank 2019s account ) in the market or in privately negotiated transactions . the agreement has no stated expiration date , but the parties expect that each transaction under the agreement will have a term of approximately one year . the agreement does not provide for snap-on to purchase or repurchase shares . the following chart discloses information regarding citibank 2019s sales of snap-on common stock during the fourth quarter of 2013 pursuant to the agreement : period shares sold average per share .
what is the total cash received from the sales of common stock during the 4th quarter of 2013?
2013 annual report 23 .
synopsys , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) and other electronic applications markets . the company believes the acquisition will expand its technology portfolio , channel reach and total addressable market by adding complementary products and expertise for fpga solutions and rapid asic prototyping . purchase price . synopsys paid $ 8.00 per share for all outstanding shares including certain vested options of synplicity for an aggregate cash payment of $ 223.3 million . additionally , synopsys assumed certain employee stock options and restricted stock units , collectively called 201cstock awards . 201d the total purchase consideration consisted of: .
what percentage of total purchase price consideration was allocated to identifiable intangible assets?
acquisition related costs consist primarily of professional services , severance and employee related costs and facilities closure costs of which $ 6.8 million have been paid as of october 31 , 2009 . fair value of stock awards assumed . an aggregate of 4.7 million shares of synplicity stock options and restricted stock units were exchanged for synopsys stock options and restricted stock units at an exchange ratio of 0.3392 per share . the fair value of stock options assumed was determined using a black-scholes valuation model . the fair value of stock awards vested or earned of $ 4.2 million was included as part of the purchase price . the fair value of unvested awards of $ 5.0 million will be recorded as operating expense over the remaining service periods on a straight-line basis . purchase price allocation . the company allocated $ 80.0 million of the purchase price to identifiable intangible assets to be amortized over two to seven years . in-process research and development expense related to these acquisitions was $ 4.8 million . goodwill , representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired , was $ 120.3 million and will not be amortized . goodwill primarily resulted from the company 2019s expectation of cost synergies and sales growth from the integration of synplicity 2019s technology with the company 2019s technology and operations to provide an expansion of products and market reach . fiscal 2007 acquisitions during fiscal year 2007 , the company completed certain purchase acquisitions for cash . the company allocated the total purchase considerations of $ 54.8 million ( which included acquisition related costs of $ 1.4 million ) to the assets and liabilities acquired , including identifiable intangible assets , based on their respective fair values at the acquisition dates , resulting in aggregate goodwill of $ 36.6 million . acquired identifiable intangible assets of $ 14.3 million are being amortized over two to nine years . in-process research and development expense related to these acquisitions was $ 3.2 million. .
dish network corporation notes to consolidated financial statements - continued future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligations , together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of december 31 , 2015 are as follows ( in thousands ) : for the years ended december 31 .
what percentage of future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligations is due after 2020?
the summary of future maturities of our outstanding long-term debt as of december 31 , 2015 is included in the commitments table in note 15 . 11 . income taxes and accounting for uncertainty in income taxes income taxes our income tax policy is to record the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and amounts reported on our consolidated balance sheets , as well as probable operating loss , tax credit and other carryforwards . deferred tax assets are offset by valuation allowances when we believe it is more likely than not that net deferred tax assets will not be realized . we periodically evaluate our need for a valuation allowance . determining necessary valuation allowances requires us to make assessments about historical financial information as well as the timing of future events , including the probability of expected future taxable income and available tax planning opportunities . we file consolidated tax returns in the u.s . the income taxes of domestic and foreign subsidiaries not included in the u.s . tax group are presented in our consolidated financial statements on a separate return basis for each tax paying entity . as of december 31 , 2015 , we had no net operating loss carryforwards ( 201cnols 201d ) for federal income tax purposes and $ 39 million of nol benefit for state income tax purposes , which are partially offset by a valuation allowance . the state nols begin to expire in the year 2017 . in addition , there are $ 61 million of tax benefits related to credit carryforwards which are partially offset by a valuation allowance . the state credit carryforwards began to expire in .
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2011 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. .
for the five year period ending 12/31/2016 what was the difference in total performance between united parcel service inc . and the standard & poor 2019s 500 index?
.