whpthomas/finqa-parquet huggingface dataset:
3 . discontinued operations during the second quarter of 2012 , the board of directors authorized the sale of our homecare business , which had previously been reported as part of the merchant gases operating segment . this business has been accounted for as a discontinued operation . in the third quarter of 2012 , we sold the majority of our homecare business to the linde group for sale proceeds of 20ac590 million ( $ 777 ) and recognized a gain of $ 207.4 ( $ 150.3 after-tax , or $ .70 per share ) . the sale proceeds included 20ac110 million ( $ 144 ) that was contingent on the outcome of certain retender arrangements . these proceeds were reflected in payables and accrued liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet as of 30 september 2013 . based on the outcome of the retenders , we were contractually required to return proceeds to the linde group . in the fourth quarter of 2014 , we made a payment to settle this liability and recognized a gain of $ 1.5 . during the third quarter of 2012 , an impairment charge of $ 33.5 ( $ 29.5 after-tax , or $ .14 per share ) was recorded to write down the remaining business , which was primarily in the united kingdom and ireland , to its estimated net realizable value . in the fourth quarter of 2013 , an additional charge of $ 18.7 ( $ 13.6 after-tax , or $ .06 per share ) was recorded to update our estimate of the net realizable value . in the first quarter of 2014 , we sold the remaining portion of the homecare business for a36.1 million ( $ 9.8 ) and recorded a gain on sale of $ 2.4 . we entered into an operations guarantee related to the obligations under certain homecare contracts assigned in connection with the transaction . refer to note 16 , commitments and contingencies , for additional information . the results of discontinued operations are summarized below: .
considering the year 2014 , what is the percentage of income from operations of discontinued operations concerning income from discontinued operations net of tax?
the assets and liabilities classified as discontinued operations for the homecare business at 30 september 2013 consisted of $ 2.5 in trade receivables , net , and $ 2.4 in payables and accrued liabilities . as of 30 september 2014 , no assets or liabilities were classified as discontinued operations. .
22 2016 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2016 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company : comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .
what was the percentage performance growth in the 5 year cumulative total return of peer group from 2014 to 2016
this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2011 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. , bottomline technology , inc. , broadridge financial solutions , cardtronics , inc. , convergys corp. , corelogic , inc. , dst systems , inc. , euronet worldwide , inc. , fair isaac corp. , fidelity national information services , inc. , fiserv , inc. , global payments , inc. , moneygram international , inc. , ss&c technologies holdings , inc. , total systems services , inc. , tyler technologies , inc. , verifone systems , inc. , and wex , inc. . heartland payment systems , inc . was removed from the peer group as it merged with global payments , inc . in april 2016. .
- the increase in level 3 short-term borrowings and long-term debt of $ 2.8 billion and $ 7.3 billion , respectively , resulted from transfers in of level 2 positions as prices and other valuation inputs became unobservable , plus the additions of new issuances for fair value accounting was elected . items measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and therefore are not included in the tables above . these include assets measured at cost that have been written down to fair value during the periods as a result of an impairment . in addition , assets such as loans held for sale that are measured at the lower of cost or market ( locom ) that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period . the company recorded goodwill impairment charges of $ 9.6 billion as of december 31 , 2008 , as determined based on level 3 inputs . the primary cause of goodwill impairment was the overall weak industry outlook and continuing operating losses . these factors contributed to the overall decline in the stock price and the related market capitalization of citigroup . see note 19 , 201cgoodwill and intangible assets 201d on page 166 , for additional information on goodwill impairment . the company performed an impairment analysis of intangible assets related to the old lane multi-strategy hedge fund during the first quarter of 2008 . as a result , a pre-tax write-down of $ 202 million , representing the remaining unamortized balance of the intangible assets , was recorded during the first quarter of 2008 . the measurement of fair value was determined using level 3 input factors along with a discounted cash flow approach . during the fourth quarter of 2008 , the company performed an impairment analysis of japan's nikko asset management fund contracts which represent the rights to manage and collect fees on investor assets and are accounted for as indefinite-lived intangible assets . as a result , an impairment loss of $ 937 million pre-tax was recorded . the related fair value was determined using an income approach which relies on key drivers and future expectations of the business that are considered level 3 input factors . the fair value of loans measured on a locom basis is determined where possible using quoted secondary-market prices . such loans are generally classified in level 2 of the fair-value hierarchy given the level of activity in the market and the frequency of available quotes . if no such quoted price exists , the fair value of a loan is determined using quoted prices for a similar asset or assets , adjusted for the specific attributes of that loan . the following table presents all loans held-for-sale that are carried at locom as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 ( in billions ) : .
what was the change in billions of loans held-for-sale that are carried at locom in the level 3 category from 2007 to 2008?
loans held-for-sale that are carried at locom as of december 31 , 2008 significantly declined compared to december 31 , 2007 because most of these loans were either sold or reclassified to held-for-investment category. .
performance graph this graph compares the return on lilly stock with that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and our peer group for the years 2014 through 2018 . the graph assumes that , on december 31 , 2013 , a person invested $ 100 each in lilly stock , the s&p 500 stock index , and the peer groups' common stock . the graph measures total shareholder return , which takes into account both stock price and dividends . it assumes that dividends paid by a company are reinvested in that company 2019s stock . value of $ 100 invested on last business day of 2013 comparison of five-year cumulative total return among lilly , s&p 500 stock index , peer group ( 1 ) .
what was the difference in percentage return for lilly compared to the s&p 500 for the five years ended dec-18?
( 1 ) we constructed the peer group as the industry index for this graph . it comprises the companies in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries that we used to benchmark the compensation of our executive officers for 2018 : abbvie inc. ; amgen inc. ; astrazeneca plc ; baxter international inc. ; biogen idec inc. ; bristol-myers squibb company ; celgene corporation ; gilead sciences inc. ; glaxosmithkline plc ; johnson & johnson ; medtronic plc ; merck & co. , inc. ; novartis ag. ; pfizer inc. ; roche holdings ag ; sanofi ; and shire plc. .
company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology index on september 30 , 2006 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among apple inc. , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index and the dow jones us technology index sep-10sep-09sep-08sep-07sep-06 sep-11 apple inc . s&p 500 s&p computer hardware dow jones us technology *$ 100 invested on 9/30/06 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright a9 2011 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2011 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 .
what was the cumulative percentage return for the four years ended september 30 , 2010 for apple inc.?
.
nuclear decommissioning costs see 201cnuclear decommissioning costs 201d in the 201ccritical accounting estimates 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for discussion of the estimates inherent in accounting for nuclear decommissioning costs . utility regulatory accounting see 201cutility regulatory accounting 201d in the 201ccritical accounting estimates 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for discussion of accounting for the effects of rate regulation . unbilled revenue see 201cunbilled revenue 201d in the 201ccritical accounting estimates 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for discussion of the estimates associated with the unbilled revenue amounts . impairment of long-lived assets and trust fund investments see 201cimpairment of long-lived assets and trust fund investments 201d in the 201ccritical accounting estimates 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for discussion of the estimates associated with the impairment of long-lived assets and trust fund investments . taxation and uncertain tax positions see 201ctaxation and uncertain tax positions 201d in the 201ccritical accounting estimates 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for further discussion . qualified pension and other postretirement benefits entergy arkansas 2019s qualified pension and other postretirement reported costs , as described in note 11 to the financial statements , are impacted by numerous factors including the provisions of the plans , changing employee demographics , and various actuarial calculations , assumptions , and accounting mechanisms . a0 a0 a0see the 201cqualified pension and other postretirement benefits 201d in the 201ccritical accounting estimates 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for further discussion . a0 a0because of the complexity of these calculations , the long-term nature of these obligations , and the importance of the assumptions utilized , entergy 2019s estimate of these costs is a critical accounting estimate . costs and sensitivities the following chart reflects the sensitivity of qualified pension cost and qualified projected benefit obligation to changes in certain actuarial assumptions ( dollars in thousands ) . actuarial assumption change in assumption impact on 2018 qualified pension cost impact on 2017 qualified projected benefit obligation increase/ ( decrease ) .
what was the ratio of the discount rate on the impact on 2017 qualified projected benefit obligation to the impact on 2018 qualified pension cost increase
entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
instruments at fair value and to recognize the effective and ineffective portions of the cash flow hedges . ( 2 ) for the year ended december 31 , 2000 , earnings available to common stockholders includes reductions of $ 2371 of preferred stock dividends and $ 16266 for the redemption of pca 2019s 123 20448% ( 20448 % ) preferred stock . ( 3 ) on october 13 , 2003 , pca announced its intention to begin paying a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.15 per share , or $ 0.60 per share annually , on its common stock . the first quarterly dividend of $ 0.15 per share was paid on january 15 , 2004 to shareholders of record as of december 15 , 2003 . pca did not declare any dividends on its common stock in 2000 - 2002 . ( 4 ) total long-term obligations include long-term debt , short-term debt and the current maturities of long-term debt . item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations the following discussion of historical results of operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the notes thereto which appear elsewhere in this report . overview on april 12 , 1999 , pca acquired the containerboard and corrugated products business of pactiv corporation ( the 201cgroup 201d ) , formerly known as tenneco packaging inc. , a wholly owned subsidiary of tenneco , inc . the group operated prior to april 12 , 1999 as a division of pactiv , and not as a separate , stand-alone entity . from its formation in january 1999 and through the closing of the acquisition on april 12 , 1999 , pca did not have any significant operations . the april 12 , 1999 acquisition was accounted for using historical values for the contributed assets . purchase accounting was not applied because , under the applicable accounting guidance , a change of control was deemed not to have occurred as a result of the participating veto rights held by pactiv after the closing of the transactions under the terms of the stockholders agreement entered into in connection with the transactions . results of operations year ended december 31 , 2004 compared to year ended december 31 , 2003 the historical results of operations of pca for the years ended december , 31 2004 and 2003 are set forth the below : for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2004 2003 change .
was interest expense net in 2004 greater than ( provision ) benefit for income taxes?
.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 12 2014related party transactions in the course of settling money transfer transactions , we purchase foreign currency from consultoria internacional casa de cambio ( 201ccisa 201d ) , a mexican company partially owned by certain of our employees . as of march 31 , 2008 , mr . ra fal lim f3n cortes , a 10% ( 10 % ) shareholder of cisa , was no longer an employee , and we no longer considered cisa a related party . we purchased 6.1 billion mexican pesos for $ 560.3 million during the ten months ended march 31 , 2008 and 8.1 billion mexican pesos for $ 736.0 million during fiscal 2007 from cisa . we believe these currency transactions were executed at prevailing market exchange rates . also from time to time , money transfer transactions are settled at destination facilities owned by cisa . we incurred related settlement expenses , included in cost of service in the accompanying consolidated statements of income of $ 0.5 million in the ten months ended march 31 , 2008 . in fiscal 2007 and 2006 , we incurred related settlement expenses , included in cost of service in the accompanying consolidated statements of income of $ 0.7 and $ 0.6 million , respectively . in the normal course of business , we periodically utilize the services of contractors to provide software development services . one of our employees , hired in april 2005 , is also an employee , officer , and part owner of a firm that provides such services . the services provided by this firm primarily relate to software development in connection with our planned next generation front-end processing system in the united states . during fiscal 2008 , we capitalized fees paid to this firm of $ 0.3 million . as of may 31 , 2008 and 2007 , capitalized amounts paid to this firm of $ 4.9 million and $ 4.6 million , respectively , were included in property and equipment in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . in addition , we expensed amounts paid to this firm of $ 0.3 million , $ 0.1 million and $ 0.5 million in the years ended may 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . note 13 2014commitments and contingencies leases we conduct a major part of our operations using leased facilities and equipment . many of these leases have renewal and purchase options and provide that we pay the cost of property taxes , insurance and maintenance . rent expense on all operating leases for fiscal 2008 , 2007 and 2006 was $ 30.4 million , $ 27.1 million , and $ 24.4 million , respectively . future minimum lease payments for all noncancelable leases at may 31 , 2008 were as follows : operating leases .
what percentage of the future lease payments is has to be paid in 2009?
we are party to a number of other claims and lawsuits incidental to our business . in the opinion of management , the reasonably possible outcome of such matters , individually or in the aggregate , will not have a material adverse impact on our financial position , liquidity or results of operations. .
value , which may be maturity , the company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 . gross realized gains and losses for 2005 were $ 15000 and $ 75000 , respectively . gross realized gains and losses for 2004 were $ 628000 and $ 205000 , respectively . gross realized gains for 2003 were $ 1249000 . there were no gross realized losses for 2003 . maturities stated are effective maturities . f . restricted cash at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , the company held $ 41482000 and $ 49847000 , respectively , in restricted cash . at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 the balance was held in deposit with certain banks predominantly to collateralize conditional stand-by letters of credit in the names of the company's landlords pursuant to certain operating lease agreements . g . property and equipment property and equipment consist of the following at december 31 ( in thousands ) : depreciation expense for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 was $ 26307000 , $ 28353000 and $ 27988000 respectively . in 2005 and 2004 , the company wrote off certain assets that were fully depreciated and no longer utilized . there was no effect on the company's net property and equipment . additionally , the company wrote off or sold certain assets that were not fully depreciated . the net loss on disposal of those assets was $ 344000 for 2005 and $ 43000 for 2004 . h . investments in accordance with the company's policy , as outlined in note b , "accounting policies" the company assessed its investment in altus pharmaceuticals , inc . ( "altus" ) , which it accounts for using the cost method , and determined that there had not been any adjustments to the fair values of that investment which would indicate a decrease in its fair value below the carrying value that would require the company to write down the investment basis of the asset , as of december 31 , 2005 and december 31 , 2004 . the company's cost basis carrying value in its outstanding equity and warrants of altus was $ 18863000 at december 31 , 2005 and 2004. .
what is the percent change in net loss on disposal of assets between 2004 and 2005?
.
assets measured and recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis our non-marketable equity securities , equity method investments , and certain non-financial assets , such as intangible assets and property , plant and equipment , are recorded at fair value only if an impairment or observable price adjustment is recognized in the current period . if an impairment or observable price adjustment is recognized on our non-marketable equity securities during the period , we classify these assets as level 3 within the fair value hierarchy based on the nature of the fair value inputs . we classified non-marketable equity securities and non-marketable equity method investments as level 3 . impairments recognized on these investments held as of december 29 , 2018 were $ 416 million ( $ 537 million held as of december 30 , 2017 and $ 153 million held as of december 31 , 2016 ) . financial instruments not recorded at fair value on a recurring basis financial instruments not recorded at fair value on a recurring basis include non-marketable equity securities and equity method investments that have not been remeasured or impaired in the current period , grants receivable , loans receivable , reverse repurchase agreements , and our short-term and long-term debt . prior to the adoption of the new financial instrument standard , our non-marketable cost method investments were disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis . the carrying amount and fair value of our non-marketable cost method investments as of december 30 , 2017 were $ 2.6 billion and $ 3.6 billion , respectively . these measures are classified as level 3 within the fair value hierarchy based on the nature of the fair value inputs . as of december 29 , 2018 , the aggregate carrying value of grants receivable , loans receivable , and reverse repurchase agreements was $ 833 million ( the aggregate carrying amount as of december 30 , 2017 was $ 935 million ) . the estimated fair value of these financial instruments approximates their carrying value and is categorized as level 2 within the fair value hierarchy based on the nature of the fair value inputs . for information related to the fair value of our short-term and long-term debt , see 201cnote 15 : borrowings . 201d note 17 : other comprehensive income ( loss ) the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) by component and related tax effects for each period were as follows : ( in millions ) unrealized holding ( losses ) on available-for -sale equity investments unrealized holding ( losses ) on derivatives actuarial valuation and other pension expenses translation adjustments and other total .
what is the net change in the accumulated other comprehensive income during 2017?
financial statements notes to financial statements 97 .