whpthomas/finqa-parquet huggingface dataset:
projected payments relating to these liabilities for the next five years ending december 31 , 2012 and the period from 2013 to 2017 are as follows ( in thousands ) : .
what is the growth rate in projected payments from 2009 to 2010?
( 18 ) concentration of risk the company generates a significant amount of revenue from large customers , however , no customers accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenue or total segment revenue in the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 . financial instruments that potentially subject the company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents and trade receivables . the company places its cash equivalents with high credit quality financial institutions and , by policy , limits the amount of credit exposure with any one financial institution . concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited because a large number of geographically diverse customers make up the company 2019s customer base , thus spreading the trade receivables credit risk . the company controls credit risk through monitoring procedures . ( 19 ) segment information upon completion of the certegy merger , the company implemented a new organizational structure , which resulted in a new operating segment structure beginning with the reporting of first quarter 2006 results . effective as of february 1 , 2006 , the company 2019s operating segments are tps and lps . this structure reflects how the businesses are operated and managed . the primary components of the tps segment , which includes certegy 2019s card and check services , the financial institution processing component of the former financial institution software and services segment of fis and the operations acquired from efunds , are enterprise solutions , integrated financial solutions and international businesses . the primary components of the lps segment are mortgage information services businesses , which includes the mortgage lender processing component of the former financial institution software and services segment of fis , and the former lender services , default management , and information services segments of fis . fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries and affiliates notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
note 15 : chipset design issue in january 2011 , as part of our ongoing quality assurance procedures , we identified a design issue with the intel ae 6 series express chipset family . the issue affected chipsets sold in the fourth quarter of 2010 and january 2011 . we subsequently implemented a silicon fix and began shipping the updated version of the affected chipset in february 2011 . the total cost in 2011 to repair and replace affected materials and systems , located with customers and in the market , was $ 422 million . we do not expect to have any significant future adjustments related to this issue . note 16 : borrowings short-term debt as of december 28 , 2013 , short-term debt consisted of drafts payable of $ 257 million and notes payable of $ 24 million ( drafts payable of $ 264 million and notes payable of $ 48 million as of december 29 , 2012 ) . we have an ongoing authorization from our board of directors to borrow up to $ 3.0 billion , including through the issuance of commercial paper . maximum borrowings under our commercial paper program during 2013 were $ 300 million ( $ 500 million during 2012 ) . our commercial paper was rated a-1+ by standard & poor 2019s and p-1 by moody 2019s as of december 28 , 2013 . long-term debt our long-term debt at the end of each period was as follows : ( in millions ) dec 28 , dec 29 .
what is the net cash flow from long-term debt during 2013?
senior notes in the fourth quarter of 2012 , we issued $ 6.2 billion aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes for general corporate purposes and to repurchase shares of our common stock pursuant to our authorized common stock repurchase program . in the third quarter of 2011 , we issued $ 5.0 billion aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes , primarily to repurchase shares of our common stock pursuant to our authorized common stock repurchase program , and for general corporate purposes . our senior notes pay a fixed rate of interest semiannually . we may redeem our senior notes , in whole or in part , at any time at our option at specified redemption prices . the senior notes rank equally in right of payment with all of our other existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness and will effectively rank junior to all liabilities of our subsidiaries . table of contents intel corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) .
cross-border outstandings to countries in which we do business which amounted to at least 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets were as follows as of december 31 : 2007 2006 2005 ( in millions ) .
what are the total consolidated assets in 2007?
the total cross-border outstandings presented in the table represented 12% ( 12 % ) , 9% ( 9 % ) and 11% ( 11 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . there were no cross- border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2007 . aggregate cross-border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets at december 31 , 2006 , amounted to $ 1.05 billion ( canada ) and at december 31 , 2005 , amounted to $ 1.86 billion ( belgium and japan ) . capital regulatory and economic capital management both use key metrics evaluated by management to ensure that our actual level of capital is commensurate with our risk profile , is in compliance with all regulatory requirements , and is sufficient to provide us with the financial flexibility to undertake future strategic business initiatives . regulatory capital our objective with respect to regulatory capital management is to maintain a strong capital base in order to provide financial flexibility for our business needs , including funding corporate growth and supporting customers 2019 cash management needs , and to provide protection against loss to depositors and creditors . we strive to maintain an optimal level of capital , commensurate with our risk profile , on which an attractive return to shareholders will be realized over both the short and long term , while protecting our obligations to depositors and creditors and satisfying regulatory requirements . our capital management process focuses on our risk exposures , our capital position relative to our peers , regulatory capital requirements and the evaluations of the major independent credit rating agencies that assign ratings to our public debt . the capital committee , working in conjunction with the asset and liability committee , referred to as 2018 2018alco , 2019 2019 oversees the management of regulatory capital , and is responsible for ensuring capital adequacy with respect to regulatory requirements , internal targets and the expectations of the major independent credit rating agencies . the primary regulator of both state street and state street bank for regulatory capital purposes is the federal reserve board . both state street and state street bank are subject to the minimum capital requirements established by the federal reserve board and defined in the federal deposit insurance corporation improvement act of 1991 . state street bank must meet the regulatory capital thresholds for 2018 2018well capitalized 2019 2019 in order for the parent company to maintain its status as a financial holding company. .
entergy new orleans , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 4.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , lower taxes other than income taxes , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower net revenue . 2010 compared to 2009 net income remained relatively unchanged , increasing $ 0.6 million , primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .
from the change in net revenue in 2011 , what percentage is attributed to change in retail electric price?
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan decreases effective october 2010 and october 2011 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to milder weather in 2011 compared to 2010 . the gas cost recovery asset variance is primarily due to the recognition in 2010 of a $ 3 million gas operations regulatory asset associated with the settlement of entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas formula rate plan case and the amortization of that asset . see note 2 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the formula rate plan settlement. .
in addition , included in the loan table are purchased distressed loans , which are loans that have evidenced significant credit deterioration subsequent to origination but prior to acquisition by citigroup . in accordance with sop 03-3 , the difference between the total expected cash flows for these loans and the initial recorded investments is recognized in income over the life of the loans using a level yield . accordingly , these loans have been excluded from the impaired loan information presented above . in addition , per sop 03-3 , subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows for a purchased distressed loan require a build of an allowance so the loan retains its level yield . however , increases in the expected cash flows are first recognized as a reduction of any previously established allowance and then recognized as income prospectively over the remaining life of the loan by increasing the loan 2019s level yield . where the expected cash flows cannot be reliably estimated , the purchased distressed loan is accounted for under the cost recovery method . the carrying amount of the purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2009 was $ 825 million net of an allowance of $ 95 million . the changes in the accretable yield , related allowance and carrying amount net of accretable yield for 2009 are as follows : in millions of dollars accretable carrying amount of loan receivable allowance .
what was the total change in millions of carrying amount of loan receivable?
( 1 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 87 million of purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 242 million under the cost-recovery method . these balances represent the fair value of these loans at their acquisition date . the related total expected cash flows for the level-yield loans were $ 101 million at their acquisition dates . ( 2 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 561 million of loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 359 million accounted for under the cost-recovery method. .
mortgage banking activities the company enters into commitments to originate loans whereby the interest rate on the loan is determined prior to funding . these commitments are referred to as interest rate lock commitments ( 201cirlcs 201d ) . irlcs on loans that the company intends to sell are considered to be derivatives and are , therefore , recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in earnings . for purposes of determining fair value , the company estimates the fair value of an irlc based on the estimated fair value of the underlying mortgage loan and the probability that the mortgage loan will fund within the terms of the irlc . the fair value excludes the market value associated with the anticipated sale of servicing rights related to each loan commitment . the fair value of these irlcs was a $ 0.06 million and a $ 0.02 million liability at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . the company also designates fair value relationships of closed loans held-for-sale against a combination of mortgage forwards and short treasury positions . short treasury relationships are economic hedges , rather than fair value or cash flow hedges . short treasury positions are marked-to-market , but do not receive hedge accounting treatment under sfas no . 133 , as amended . the mark-to-market of the mortgage forwards is included in the net change of the irlcs and the related hedging instruments . the fair value of the mark-to-market on closed loans was a $ 1.2 thousand and $ 1.7 million asset at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . irlcs , as well as closed loans held-for-sale , expose the company to interest rate risk . the company manages this risk by selling mortgages or mortgage-backed securities on a forward basis referred to as forward sale agreements . changes in the fair value of these derivatives are included as gain ( loss ) on loans and securities , net in the consolidated statement of income ( loss ) . the net change in irlcs , closed loans , mortgage forwards and the short treasury positions generated a net loss of $ 2.4 million in 2007 , a net gain of $ 1.6 million in 2006 and a net loss of $ 0.4 million in 2005 . credit risk credit risk is managed by limiting activity to approved counterparties and setting aggregate exposure limits for each approved counterparty . the credit risk , or maximum exposure , which results from interest rate swaps and purchased interest rate options is represented by the fair value of contracts that have unrealized gains at the reporting date . conversely , we have $ 197.5 million of derivative contracts with unrealized losses at december 31 , 2007 . the company pledged approximately $ 87.4 million of its mortgage-backed securities as collateral of derivative contracts . while the company does not expect that any counterparty will fail to perform , the following table shows the maximum exposure associated with each counterparty to interest rate swaps and purchased interest rate options at december 31 , 2007 ( dollars in thousands ) : counterparty credit .
what percentage of counterparty exposure at december 31 2007 is represented by lehman brothers?
.
the containerboard group ( a division of tenneco packaging inc. ) notes to combined financial statements ( continued ) april 11 , 1999 5 . pension and other benefit plans ( continued ) the funded status of the group 2019s allocation of defined benefit plans , excluding the retirement plan , reconciles with amounts recognized in the 1998 statements of assets and liabilities and interdivision account as follows ( in thousands ) : actuarial present value at september 30 , 1998 2014 .
is the projected benefit obligation greater than the plan assets at fair value at september 30 1998?
the weighted average discount rate used in determining the actuarial present value of the benefit obligations was 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) for the year ended december 31 , 1998 . the weighted average expected long-term rate of return on plan assets was 10% ( 10 % ) for 1998 . middle management employees participate in a variety of incentive compensation plans . these plans provide for incentive payments based on the achievement of certain targeted operating results and other specific business goals . the targeted operating results are determined each year by senior management of packaging . the amounts charged to expense for these plans were $ 1599000 for the period ended april 11 , 1999 . in june , 1992 , tenneco initiated an employee stock purchase plan ( 2018 2018espp 2019 2019 ) . the plan allows u.s . and canadian employees of the group to purchase tenneco inc . common stock through payroll deductions at a 15% ( 15 % ) discount . each year , an employee in the plan may purchase shares with a discounted value not to exceed $ 21250 . the weighted average fair value of the employee purchase right , which was estimated using the black-scholes option pricing model and the assumptions described below except that the average life of each purchase right was assumed to be 90 days , was $ 6.31 for the period ended december 31 , 1998 . the espp was terminated as of september 30 , 1996 . tenneco adopted a new employee stock purchase plan effective april 1 , 1997 . under the respective espps , tenneco sold 36883 shares to group employees for the period ended april 11 , 1999 . in december , 1996 , tenneco adopted the 1996 stock ownership plan , which permits the granting of a variety of awards , including common stock , restricted stock , performance units , stock appreciation rights , and stock options to officers and employees of tenneco . tenneco can issue up to 17000000 shares of common stock under this plan , which will terminate december 31 , 2001 . the april 11 , 1999 , fair market value of the options granted was calculated using tenneco 2019s stock price at the grant date and multiplying the amount by the historical percentage of past black-scholes pricing values fair value ( approximately 25% ( 25 % ) ) . the fair value of each stock option issued by tenneco to the group in prior periods was estimated on the date of grant using the black-sholes option pricing model using the following ranges of weighted average assumptions for grants during the past three .
notes to consolidated financial statements 236 jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report the table below sets forth the accretable yield activity for the firm 2019s pci consumer loans for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and .
what was the highest three year accretable yield percentage?
( a ) other changes in expected cash flows may vary from period to period as the firm continues to refine its cash flow model and periodically updates model assumptions . for the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , other changes in expected cash flows were principally driven by changes in prepayment assumptions , as well as reclassification to the nonaccretable difference . such changes are expected to have an insignificant impact on the accretable yield percentage . the factors that most significantly affect estimates of gross cash flows expected to be collected , and accordingly the accretable yield balance , include : ( i ) changes in the benchmark interest rate indices for variable rate products such as option arm and home equity loans ; and ( ii ) changes in prepayment assump- tions . to date , the decrease in the accretable yield percentage has been primarily related to a decrease in interest rates on vari- able-rate loans and , to a lesser extent , extended loan liquida- tion periods . certain events , such as extended loan liquidation periods , affect the timing of expected cash flows but not the amount of cash expected to be received ( i.e. , the accretable yield balance ) . extended loan liquidation periods reduce the accretable yield percentage because the same accretable yield balance is recognized against a higher-than-expected loan balance over a longer-than-expected period of time. .
entergy mississippi , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to entergy mississippi 2019s exit from the system agreement in november 2015 . the reserve equalization revenue variance is primarily due to the absence of reserve equalization revenue as compared to the same period in 2015 resulting from entergy mississippi 2019s exit from the system agreement in november 2015 compared to 2014 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 . amount ( in millions ) .
what is the net change in net revenue during 2015 for entergy mississippi , inc.?
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 86 gwh , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including the effect of more favorable weather on residential and commercial sales . the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a $ 16 million net annual increase in revenues , effective february 2015 , as a result of the mpsc order in the june 2014 rate case and an increase in revenues collected through the energy efficiency rider , partially offset by a decrease in revenues collected through the storm damage rider . the rate case included the realignment of certain costs from collection in riders to base rates . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the rate case , the energy efficiency rider , and the storm damage rider . the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to a wholesale customer contract termination in october transmission equalization revenue represents amounts received by entergy mississippi from certain other entergy utility operating companies , in accordance with the system agreement , to allocate the costs of collectively planning , constructing , and operating entergy 2019s bulk transmission facilities . the transmission equalization variance is primarily attributable to the realignment , effective february 2015 , of these revenues from the determination of base rates to inclusion in a rider . such revenues had a favorable effect on net revenue in 2014 , but minimal effect in 2015 . entergy mississippi exited the system agreement in november 2015 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement . reserve equalization revenue represents amounts received by entergy mississippi from certain other entergy utility operating companies , in accordance with the system agreement , to allocate the costs of collectively maintaining adequate electric generating capacity across the entergy system . the reserve equalization variance is primarily attributable to the realignment , effective february 2015 , of these revenues from the determination of base rates to inclusion in a rider . such revenues had a favorable effect on net revenue in 2014 , but minimal effect in 2015 . entergy .