whpthomas/finqa-parquet huggingface dataset:
consolidated 2005 results of operations was an estimated reduction of gross profit and a corresponding decrease to inventory , at cost , of $ 5.2 million . store pre-opening costs pre-opening costs related to new store openings and the construction periods are expensed as incurred . property and equipment property and equipment are recorded at cost . the company provides for depreciation and amortization on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives: .
what is the total impairment charge recorded in the lat three years , in millions?
improvements of leased properties are amortized over the shorter of the life of the applicable lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset . impairment of long-lived assets when indicators of impairment are present , the company evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets , other than goodwill , in relation to the operating performance and future cash flows or the appraised values of the underlying assets . in accordance with sfas 144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets , 201d the company reviews for impairment stores open more than two years for which current cash flows from operations are negative . impairment results when the carrying value of the assets exceeds the undiscounted future cash flows over the life of the lease . the company 2019s estimate of undiscounted future cash flows over the lease term is based upon historical operations of the stores and estimates of future store profitability which encompasses many factors that are subject to variability and difficult to predict . if a long-lived asset is found to be impaired , the amount recognized for impairment is equal to the difference between the carrying value and the asset 2019s fair value . the fair value is estimated based primarily upon future cash flows ( discounted at the company 2019s credit adjusted risk-free rate ) or other reasonable estimates of fair market value . assets to be disposed of are adjusted to the fair value less the cost to sell if less than the book value . the company recorded impairment charges , included in sg&a expense , of approximately $ 9.4 million in 2006 , $ 0.6 million in 2005 and $ 0.2 million in 2004 to reduce the carrying value of certain of its stores 2019 assets as deemed necessary due to negative sales trends and cash flows at these locations . the majority of the 2006 charges were recorded pursuant to certain strategic initiatives discussed in note 2 . other assets other assets consist primarily of long-term investments , qualifying prepaid expenses , debt issuance costs which are amortized over the life of the related obligations , utility and security deposits , life insurance policies and goodwill. .
average revenue per car 2010 2009 2008 % (  % ) change 2010 v 2009 % (  % ) change 2009 v 2008 .
in 2010 what was the average revenue per car for agriculture products compared to automotive
agricultural products 2013 higher volume , fuel surcharges , and price improvements increased agricultural freight revenue in 2010 versus 2009 . increased shipments from the midwest to export ports in the pacific northwest combined with heightened demand in mexico drove higher corn and feed grain shipments in 2010 . increased corn and feed grain shipments into ethanol plants in california and idaho and continued growth in ethanol shipments also contributed to this increase . in 2009 , some ethanol plants temporarily ceased operations due to lower ethanol margins , which contributed to the favorable year-over-year comparison . in addition , strong export demand for u.s . wheat via the gulf ports increased shipments of wheat and food grains compared to 2009 . declines in domestic wheat and food shipments partially offset the growth in export shipments . new business in feed and animal protein shipments also increased agricultural shipments in 2010 compared to 2009 . lower volume and fuel surcharges decreased agricultural freight revenue in 2009 versus 2008 . price improvements partially offset these declines . lower demand in both export and domestic markets led to fewer shipments of corn and feed grains , down 11% ( 11 % ) in 2009 compared to 2008 . weaker worldwide demand also reduced export shipments of wheat and food grains in 2009 versus 2008 . automotive 2013 37% ( 37 % ) and 24% ( 24 % ) increases in shipments of finished vehicles and automotive parts in 2010 , respectively , combined with core pricing gains and fuel surcharges , improved automotive freight revenue from relatively weak 2009 levels . economic conditions in 2009 led to poor auto sales and reduced vehicle production , which in turn reduced shipments of finished vehicles and parts during the declines in shipments of finished vehicles and auto parts and lower fuel surcharges reduced freight revenue in 2009 compared to 2008 . vehicle shipments were down 35% ( 35 % ) and parts were down 24% ( 24 % ) . core pricing gains partially offset these declines . these volume declines resulted from economic conditions that reduced sales and vehicle production . in addition , two major domestic automotive manufacturers declared bankruptcy in the second quarter of 2009 , affecting production levels . although the federal car allowance rebate system ( the 201ccash for clunkers 201d program ) helped stimulate vehicle sales and shipments in the third quarter of 2009 , production cuts and soft demand throughout the year more than offset the program 2019s benefits . 2010 agricultural revenue 2010 automotive revenue .
table of contents celanese purchases of its equity securities information regarding repurchases of our common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2017 is as follows : period number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program approximate dollar value of shares remaining that may be purchased under the program ( 2 ) .
what was the percent of the number of shares purchased in october 1 - 31 2017 as part of the 2017 total
___________________________ ( 1 ) represents shares withheld from employees to cover their statutory minimum withholding requirements for personal income taxes related to the vesting of restricted stock units . ( 2 ) our board of directors has authorized the aggregate repurchase of $ 3.9 billion of our common stock since february 2008 , including an increase of $ 1.5 billion on july 17 , 2017 . see note 17 - stockholders' equity in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information. .
performance graph the following graph is a comparison of the five-year cumulative return of our common shares , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index ( the 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and the national association of real estate investment trusts 2019 ( 201cnareit 201d ) all equity index ( excluding health care real estate investment trusts ) , a peer group index . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 in our common shares , the s&p 500 index and the nareit all equity index and that all dividends were reinvested without the payment of any commissions . there can be no assurance that the performance of our shares will continue in line with the same or similar trends depicted in the graph below. .
what was the average price of the the nareit all equity index from 2005 to 2009
.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) for the years ended december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , the company increased net deferred tax assets by $ 1.5 million and $ 7.2 million , respectively with a corresponding reduction of goodwill associated with the utilization of net operating and capital losses acquired in connection with the spectrasite , inc . merger . these deferred tax assets were assigned a full valuation allowance as part of the final spectrasite purchase price allocation in june 2006 , as evidence available at the time did not support that losses were more likely than not to be realized . the valuation allowance decreased from $ 308.2 million as of december 31 , 2006 to $ 88.2 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the decrease was primarily due to a $ 149.6 million reclassification to the fin 48 opening balance ( related to federal and state net operating losses acquired in connection with the spectrasite , inc . merger ) and $ 45.2 million of allowance reductions during the year ended december 31 , 2007 related to state net operating losses , capital loss expirations of $ 6.5 million and other items . the company 2019s deferred tax assets as of december 31 , 2007 and 2006 in the table above do not include $ 74.9 million and $ 31.0 million , respectively , of excess tax benefits from the exercises of employee stock options that are a component of net operating losses due to the adoption of sfas no . 123r . total stockholders 2019 equity will be increased by $ 74.9 million if and when any such excess tax benefits are ultimately realized . basis step-up from corporate restructuring represents the tax effects of increasing the basis for tax purposes of certain of the company 2019s assets in conjunction with its spin-off from american radio systems corporation , its former parent company . at december 31 , 2007 , the company had net federal and state operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future federal and state taxable income of approximately $ 1.6 billion and $ 2.1 billion , respectively . if not utilized , the company 2019s net operating loss carryforwards expire as follows ( in thousands ) : .
what portion of the unrecognized tax benefits would affect the effective tax rate if recognized as of december 31 , 2007?
as described in note 1 , the company adopted the provisions of fin 48 on january 1 , 2007 . as of january 1 , 2007 , the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $ 183.9 million of which $ 34.3 million would affect the effective tax rate , if recognized . as of december 31 , 2007 , the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $ 59.2 million , $ 23.0 million of which would affect the effective tax rate , if recognized . the company expects the unrecognized tax benefits to change over the next 12 months if certain tax matters ultimately settle with the applicable taxing jurisdiction during this timeframe . however , based on the status of these items and the amount of uncertainty associated with the outcome and timing of audit settlements , the .
leveraged performance units during the year ended may 31 , 2015 , certain executives were granted performance units that we refer to as 201cleveraged performance units , 201d or 201clpus . 201d lpus contain a market condition based on our relative stock price growth over a three-year performance period . the lpus contain a minimum threshold performance which , if not met , would result in no payout . the lpus also contain a maximum award opportunity set as a fixed dollar and fixed number of shares . after the three-year performance period , which concluded in october 2017 , one-third of the earned units converted to unrestricted common stock . the remaining two-thirds converted to restricted stock that will vest in equal installments on each of the first two anniversaries of the conversion date . we recognize share-based compensation expense based on the grant date fair value of the lpus , as determined by use of a monte carlo model , on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the lpu award . the following table summarizes the changes in unvested restricted stock and performance awards for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , the 2016 fiscal transition period and for the years ended may 31 , 2016 and 2015 : shares weighted-average grant-date fair value ( in thousands ) .
what was the change in millions in the total fair value of restricted stock and performance awards vested from 2016 to 2017?
the total fair value of restricted stock and performance awards vested was $ 33.7 million for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , $ 20.0 million for the 2016 fiscal transition period and $ 17.4 million and $ 15.0 million , respectively , for the years ended may 31 , 2016 and 2015 . for restricted stock and performance awards , we recognized compensation expense of $ 35.2 million for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , $ 17.2 million for the 2016 fiscal transition period and $ 28.8 million and $ 19.8 million , respectively , for the years ended may 31 , 2016 and 2015 . as of december 31 , 2017 , there was $ 46.1 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested restricted stock and performance awards that we expect to recognize over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years . our restricted stock and performance award plans provide for accelerated vesting under certain conditions . stock options stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant and have a term of ten years . stock options granted before the year ended may 31 , 2015 vest in equal installments on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date . stock options granted during the year ended may 31 , 2015 and thereafter vest in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date . our stock option plans provide for accelerated vesting under certain conditions . global payments inc . | 2017 form 10-k annual report 2013 91 .
for intangible assets subject to amortization , the estimated aggregate amortization expense for each of the five succeeding fiscal years is as follows : 2009 - $ 41.1 million , 2010 - $ 27.3 million , 2011 - $ 20.9 million , 2012 - $ 17.0 million , and 2013 - $ 12.0 million . fees and expenses related to the merger totaled $ 102.6 million , principally consisting of investment banking fees , legal fees and stock compensation ( $ 39.4 million as further discussed in note 10 ) , and are reflected in the 2007 results of operations . capitalized debt issuance costs as of the merger date of $ 87.4 million for merger-related financing were reflected in other long- term assets in the consolidated balance sheet . the following represents the unaudited pro forma results of the company 2019s consolidated operations as if the merger had occurred on february 3 , 2007 and february 4 , 2006 , respectively , after giving effect to certain adjustments , including the depreciation and amortization of the assets acquired based on their estimated fair values and changes in interest expense resulting from changes in consolidated debt ( in thousands ) : ( in thousands ) year ended february 1 , year ended february 2 .
what was the total estimated aggregate amortization expense for each of the five succeeding fiscal years from 2009 to 2013 in millions
the pro forma information does not purport to be indicative of what the company 2019s results of operations would have been if the acquisition had in fact occurred at the beginning of the periods presented , and is not intended to be a projection of the company 2019s future results of operations . subsequent to the announcement of the merger agreement , the company and its directors , along with other parties , were named in seven putative class actions filed in tennessee state courts alleging claims for breach of fiduciary duty arising out of the proposed merger , all as described more fully under 201clegal proceedings 201d in note 8 below . 3 . strategic initiatives during 2006 , the company began implementing certain strategic initiatives related to its historical inventory management and real estate strategies , as more fully described below . inventory management in november 2006 , the company undertook an initiative to discontinue its historical inventory packaway model for virtually all merchandise by the end of fiscal 2007 . under the packaway model , certain unsold inventory items ( primarily seasonal merchandise ) were stored on-site and returned to the sales floor until the items were eventually sold , damaged or discarded . through end-of-season and other markdowns , this initiative resulted in the elimination of seasonal , home products and basic clothing packaway merchandise to allow for increased levels of newer , current-season merchandise . in connection with this strategic change , in the third quarter of 2006 the company recorded a reserve for lower of cost or market inventory .
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements computed on a rolling 12 month basis . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana was in compliance with these provisions . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an overall implicit rate of 7.45% ( 7.45 % ) ) in connection with the waterford 3 sale and leaseback transactions , which are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .
what is the growth rate in the net regulatory asset in 2008 compare 2007?
grand gulf lease obligations in december 1988 , in two separate but substantially identical transactions , system energy sold and leased back undivided ownership interests in grand gulf for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million . the interests represent approximately 11.5% ( 11.5 % ) of grand gulf . the leases expire in 2015 . under certain circumstances , system entergy may repurchase the leased interests prior to the end of the term of the leases . at the end of the lease terms , system energy has the option to repurchase the leased interests in grand gulf at fair market value or to renew the leases for either fair market value or , under certain conditions , a fixed rate . in may 2004 , system energy caused the grand gulf lessors to refinance the outstanding bonds that they had issued to finance the purchase of their undivided interest in grand gulf . the refinancing is at a lower interest rate , and system energy's lease payments have been reduced to reflect the lower interest costs . system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements . for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant depreciation . however , operating revenues include the recovery of the lease payments because the transactions are accounted for as a sale and leaseback for ratemaking purposes . consistent with a recommendation contained in a ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount of this net regulatory asset was $ 19.2 million and $ 36.6 million as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. .
what was the difference in percentage total cumulative return on investment for united parcel service inc . compared to the standard & poor 2019s 500 index the for the five year period ending 12/31/2015?
.
adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 , the executive compensation committee certified the actual performance achievement of participants in the 2012 performance share program ( the 201c2012 program 201d ) . based upon the achievement of specific and/or market- based performance goals outlined in the 2012 program , participants had the ability to receive up to 150% ( 150 % ) of the target number of shares originally granted . actual performance resulted in participants achieving 116% ( 116 % ) of target or approximately 1.3 million shares for the 2012 program . one third of the shares under the 2012 program vested in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and the remaining two thirds vest evenly on the following two anniversaries of the grant , contingent upon the recipient's continued service to adobe . in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 , the executive compensation committee certified the actual performance achievement of participants in the 2011 performance share program ( the 201c2011 program 201d ) . based upon the achievement of goals outlined in the 2011 program , participants had the ability to receive up to 150% ( 150 % ) of the target number of shares originally granted . actual performance resulted in participants achieving 130% ( 130 % ) of target or approximately 0.5 million shares for the 2011 program . one third of the shares under the 2011 program vested in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 and the remaining two thirds vest evenly on the following two annual anniversary dates of the grant , contingent upon the recipient's continued service to adobe . in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 , the executive compensation committee certified the actual performance achievement of participants in the 2010 performance share program ( the 201c2010 program 201d ) . based upon the achievement of goals outlined in the 2010 program , participants had the ability to receive up to 150% ( 150 % ) of the target number of shares originally granted . actual performance resulted in participants achieving 135% ( 135 % ) of target or approximately 0.3 million shares for the 2010 program . one third of the shares under the 2011 program vested in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 and the remaining two thirds vest evenly on the following two annual anniversary dates of the grant , contingent upon the recipient's continued service to adobe . the following table sets forth the summary of performance share activity under our 2010 , 2011 and 2012 programs , based upon share awards actually achieved , for the fiscal years ended november 29 , 2013 , november 30 , 2012 and december 2 , 2011 ( in thousands ) : .
based upon the achievement of goals outlined in the 2011 program , what was the difference in percentage points between the maximum % (  % ) of the target number vs . actual performance % (  % ) for the 2011 program?
the total fair value of performance awards vested during fiscal 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 25.4 million , $ 14.4 million and $ 14.8 million , respectively. .