whpthomas/finqa-parquet huggingface dataset:
entergy texas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .
what is the net change in net revenue during 2008 for entergy texas , inc.?
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to decreased usage during the unbilled sales period . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to lower reserve equalization revenue related to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2007 . the securitization transition charge variance is primarily due to the issuance of securitization bonds . in june 2007 , entergy gulf states reconstruction funding i , a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds . see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds . the fuel recovery variance is primarily due to a reserve for potential rate refunds made in the first quarter 2007 as a result of a puct ruling related to the application of past puct rulings addressing transition to competition in texas . the other variance is primarily caused by various operational effects of the jurisdictional separation on revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased $ 229.3 million primarily due to the following reasons : an increase of $ 157 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased usage , partially offset by interim fuel refunds to customers for fuel cost recovery over-collections through november 2007 . the refund was distributed over a two-month period beginning february 2008 . the interim refund and the puct approval is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements ; an increase of $ 37.1 million in affiliated wholesale revenue primarily due to increases in the cost of energy ; an increase in transition charge amounts collected from customers to service the securitization bonds as discussed above . see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds ; and implementation of an interim surcharge to collect $ 10.3 million in under-recovered incremental purchased capacity costs incurred through july 2007 . the surcharge was collected over a two-month period beginning february 2008 . the incremental capacity recovery rider and puct approval is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements. .
the diluted earnings per share calculation excludes stock options , sars , restricted stock and units and performance units and stock that were anti-dilutive . shares underlying the excluded stock options and sars totaled 10.3 million , 10.2 million and 0.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . for the years ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively , 4.5 million and 5.3 million shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units and performance units and performance stock were excluded . 10 . supplemental cash flow information net cash paid for interest and income taxes was as follows for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 ( in thousands ) : .
considering the years 2015-2016 , what is variation observed in the number of stocks that were excluded , in millions?
eog's accrued capital expenditures at december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 were $ 388 million , $ 416 million and $ 972 million , respectively . non-cash investing activities for the year ended december 31 , 2016 , included $ 3834 million in non-cash additions to eog's oil and gas properties related to the yates transaction ( see note 17 ) . non-cash investing activities for the year ended december 31 , 2014 included non-cash additions of $ 5 million to eog's oil and gas properties as a result of property exchanges . 11 . business segment information eog's operations are all crude oil and natural gas exploration and production related . the segment reporting topic of the asc establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments in annual financial statements . operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available and evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker , or decision-making group , in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance . eog's chief operating decision-making process is informal and involves the chairman of the board and chief executive officer and other key officers . this group routinely reviews and makes operating decisions related to significant issues associated with each of eog's major producing areas in the united states , trinidad , the united kingdom and china . for segment reporting purposes , the chief operating decision maker considers the major united states producing areas to be one operating segment. .
the descriptions and fair value methodologies for the u.s . and international pension plan assets are as follows : cash and cash equivalents the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents approximate fair value due to the short-term maturity . equity securities equity securities are valued at the closing market price reported on a u.s . or international exchange where the security is actively traded and are therefore classified as level 1 assets . equity mutual and pooled funds shares of mutual funds are valued at the nav of the fund and are classified as level 1 assets . units of pooled funds are valued at the per unit nav determined by the fund manager based on the value of the underlying traded holdings and are classified as level 2 assets . corporate and government bonds corporate and government bonds are classified as level 2 assets , as they are either valued at quoted market prices from observable pricing sources at the reporting date or valued based upon comparable securities with similar yields and credit ratings . other pooled funds other pooled funds classified as level 2 assets are valued at the nav of the shares held at year end , which is based on the fair value of the underlying investments . securities and interests classified as level 3 assets are carried at the estimated fair value . the estimated fair value is based on the fair value of the underlying investment values , which includes estimated bids from brokers or other third-party vendor sources that utilize expected cash flow streams and other uncorroborated data including counterparty credit quality , default risk , discount rates , and the overall capital market liquidity . insurance contracts insurance contracts are classified as level 3 assets , as they are carried at contract value , which approximates the estimated fair value . the estimated fair value is based on the fair value of the underlying investment of the insurance company and discount rates that require inputs with limited observability . contributions and projected benefit payments pension contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans for fiscal year 2019 were $ 40.2 . contributions for funded plans resulted primarily from contractual and regulatory requirements . benefit payments to unfunded plans were due primarily to the timing of retirements . we anticipate contributing $ 30 to $ 40 to the defined benefit pension plans in fiscal year 2020 . these contributions are anticipated to be driven primarily by contractual and regulatory requirements for funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are dependent upon timing of retirements . projected benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , are as follows: .
considering the international projected benefit payments , what is the average yearly projection of the 2025-2029 period?
these estimated benefit payments are based on assumptions about future events . actual benefit payments may vary significantly from these estimates. .
morgan stanley consolidated statements of changes in total equity 2014 ( continued ) ( dollars in millions ) preferred common paid-in capital retained earnings employee accumulated comprehensive income ( loss ) common held in treasury at cost common issued to employee redeemable controlling interests equity balance at december 31 , 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1508 $ 20 $ 22836 $ 40341 $ 3166 $ ( 157 ) $ ( 2499 ) $ ( 3166 ) $ 8029 $ 70078 net income applicable to morgan stanley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 2014 2014 68 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 68 net income applicable to nonredeemable noncontrolling interests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 524 524 .
what was total cash retuned to shareholders in 2012?
balance at december 31 , 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1508 $ 20 $ 23426 $ 39912 $ 2932 $ ( 516 ) $ ( 2241 ) $ ( 2932 ) $ 3319 $ 65428 see notes to consolidated financial statements. .
visa inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) september 30 , 2013 in july 2013 , the company 2019s board of directors authorized a $ 1.5 billion share repurchase program to be in effect through july 2014 . as of september 30 , 2013 , the program had remaining authorized funds of $ 251 million . all share repurchase programs authorized prior to july 2013 have been completed . in october 2013 , the company 2019s board of directors authorized a new $ 5.0 billion share repurchase program . under the terms of the retrospective responsibility plan , when the company makes a deposit into the litigation escrow account , the shares of class b common stock are subject to dilution through an adjustment to the conversion rate of the shares of class b common stock to shares of class a common stock . these deposits have the same economic effect on earnings per share as repurchasing the company 2019s class a common stock , because they reduce the class b conversion rate and consequently the as-converted class a common stock share count . the following table presents as-converted class b common stock after deposits into the litigation escrow account in fiscal 2012 . there were no deposits into the litigation escrow account in fiscal 2013. .
what is the percentage change in the effective price per share from december 2011 to july 2012?
( 1 ) effective price per share calculated using the volume-weighted average price of the company 2019s class a common stock over a pricing period in accordance with the company 2019s current certificate of incorporation . class b common stock . the class b common stock is not convertible or transferable until the date on which all of the covered litigation has been finally resolved . this transfer restriction is subject to limited exceptions , including transfers to other holders of class b common stock . after termination of the restrictions , the class b common stock will be convertible into class a common stock if transferred to a person that was not a visa member ( as defined in the current certificate of incorporation ) or similar person or an affiliate of a visa member or similar person . upon such transfer , each share of class b common stock will automatically convert into a number of shares of class a common stock based upon the applicable conversion rate in effect at the time of such transfer . adjustment of the conversion rate occurs upon : ( i ) the completion of any follow-on offering of class a common stock completed to increase the size of the litigation escrow account ( or any cash deposit by the company in lieu thereof ) resulting in a further corresponding decrease in the conversion rate ; or ( ii ) the final resolution of the covered litigation and the release of funds remaining on deposit in the litigation escrow account to the company resulting in a corresponding increase in the conversion rate. .
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) other debentures and notes following are descriptions of the various other debentures and notes outstanding at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , as listed in the table presented at the beginning of this note . geosouthern debt in december 2013 , in conjunction with the planned geosouthern acquisition , devon issued $ 2.25 billion aggregate principal amount of fixed and floating rate senior notes resulting in cash proceeds of approximately $ 2.2 billion , net of discounts and issuance costs . the floating rate senior notes due in 2015 bear interest at a rate equal to three-month libor plus 0.45 percent , which rate will be reset quarterly . the floating rate senior notes due in 2016 bears interest at a rate equal to three-month libor plus 0.54 percent , which rate will be reset quarterly . the schedule below summarizes the key terms of these notes ( in millions ) . .
what percentage of the net proceeds came from the floating rates due in 2015 and 2016?
( 1 ) the 1.20% ( 1.20 % ) $ 650 million note due december 15 , 2016 was redeemed on november 13 , 2014 . the senior notes were classified as short-term debt on devon 2019s consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2013 due to certain redemption features in the event that the geosouthern acquisition was not completed on or prior to june 30 , 2014 . on february 28 , 2014 , the geosouthern acquisition closed and thus the senior notes were subsequently classified as long-term debt . additionally , during december 2013 , devon entered into a term loan agreement with a group of major financial institutions pursuant to which devon could draw up to $ 2.0 billion to finance , in part , the geosouthern acquisition and to pay transaction costs . in february 2014 , devon drew the $ 2.0 billion of term loans for the geosouthern transaction , and the amount was subsequently repaid on june 30 , 2014 with the canadian divestiture proceeds that were repatriated to the u.s . in june 2014 , at which point the term loan was terminated. .
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 81805 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2016 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2015 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .
what was the difference in percentage cumulative total return of citi common stock compared to the s&p financials for the five years ended 31-dec-2015?
.
results of operations and the estimated fair value of acquired assets and assumed liabilities are recorded in the consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition . pro forma results of operations for the business combinations completed during fiscal 2016 have not been presented because the effects of these acquisitions , individually and in the aggregate , would not have been material to cadence 2019s financial results . the fair values of acquired intangible assets and assumed liabilities were determined using significant inputs that are not observable in the market . for an additional description of these fair value calculations , see note 16 in the notes to the consolidated financial statements . a trust for the benefit of the children of lip-bu tan , cadence 2019s president , chief executive officer , or ceo , and director , owned less than 2% ( 2 % ) of rocketick technologies ltd. , one of the acquired companies , and mr . tan and his wife serve as co-trustees of the trust and disclaim pecuniary and economic interest in the trust . the board of directors of cadence reviewed the transaction and concluded that it was in the best interests of cadence to proceed with the transaction . mr . tan recused himself from the board of directors 2019 discussion of the valuation of rocketick technologies ltd . and on whether to proceed with the transaction . a financial advisor provided a fairness opinion to cadence in connection with the transaction . 2014 acquisitions during fiscal 2014 , cadence acquired jasper design automation , inc. , or jasper , a privately held provider of formal analysis solutions based in mountain view , california . the acquired technology complements cadence 2019s existing system design and verification platforms . total cash consideration for jasper , after taking into account adjustments for certain costs , and cash held by jasper at closing of $ 28.7 million , was $ 139.4 million . cadence will also make payments to certain employees through the third quarter of fiscal 2017 subject to continued employment and other conditions . cadence also completed two other business combinations during fiscal 2014 for total cash consideration of $ 27.5 million , after taking into account cash acquired of $ 2.1 million . acquisition-related transaction costs transaction costs associated with acquisitions were $ 1.1 million , $ 0.7 million and $ 3.7 million during fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . these costs consist of professional fees and administrative costs and were expensed as incurred in cadence 2019s consolidated income statements . note 8 . goodwill and acquired intangibles goodwill the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during fiscal 2016 and 2015 were as follows : gross carrying amount ( in thousands ) .
what is the percentage increase in gross carrying amount from the beginning of 2015 to the end of 2016?
cadence completed its annual goodwill impairment test during the third quarter of fiscal 2016 and determined that the fair value of cadence 2019s single reporting unit substantially exceeded the carrying amount of its net assets and that no impairment existed. .
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the weighted average grant-date fair value of share awards granted in the years ended may 31 , 2007 and 2006 was $ 45 and $ 36 , respectively . the total fair value of share awards vested during the years ended may 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 was $ 4.1 million , $ 1.7 million and $ 1.4 million , respectively . we recognized compensation expenses for restricted stock of $ 5.7 million , $ 2.7 million , and $ 1.6 million in the years ended may 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 . as of may 31 , 2008 , there was $ 15.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.9 years . employee stock purchase plan we have an employee stock purchase plan under which the sale of 2.4 million shares of our common stock has been authorized . employees may designate up to the lesser of $ 25 thousand or 20% ( 20 % ) of their annual compensation for the purchase of stock . for periods prior to october 1 , 2006 , the price for shares purchased under the plan was the lower of 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on the first day or the last day of the quarterly purchase period . with the quarterly purchase period beginning on october 1 , 2006 , the price for shares purchased under the plan is 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on the last day of the quarterly purchase period ( the 201cpurchase date 201d ) . at may 31 , 2008 , 0.7 million shares had been issued under this plan , with 1.7 million shares reserved for future issuance . the weighted average grant-date fair value of each designated share purchased under this plan was $ 6 , $ 8 and $ 8 in the years ended may 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . for the quarterly purchases after october 1 , 2006 , the fair value of each designated share purchased under the employee stock purchase plan is based on the 15% ( 15 % ) discount on the purchase date . for purchases prior to october 1 , 2006 , the fair value of each designated share purchased under the employee stock purchase plan was estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes valuation model using the following weighted average assumptions: .
what is the percentage change in the weighted average grant-date fair value of share awards from 2006 to 2007?
the risk-free interest rate is based on the yield of a zero coupon united states treasury security with a maturity equal to the expected life of the option from the date of the grant . our assumption on expected volatility is based on our historical volatility . the dividend yield assumption is calculated using our average stock price over the preceding year and the annualized amount of our current quarterly dividend . since the purchase price for shares under the plan is based on the market value on the first day or last day of the quarterly purchase period , we use an expected life of three months to determine the fair value of each designated share. .
part i item 1 entergy corporation , domestic utility companies , and system energy employment litigation ( entergy corporation , entergy arkansas , entergy gulf states , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy new orleans , and system energy ) entergy corporation and the domestic utility companies are defendants in numerous lawsuits that have been filed by former employees alleging that they were wrongfully terminated and/or discriminated against on the basis of age , race , sex , and/or other protected characteristics . entergy corporation and the domestic utility companies are vigorously defending these suits and deny any liability to the plaintiffs . however , no assurance can be given as to the outcome of these cases , and at this time management cannot estimate the total amount of damages sought . included in the employment litigation are two cases filed in state court in claiborne county , mississippi in december 2002 . the two cases were filed by former employees of entergy operations who were based at grand gulf . entergy operations and entergy employees are named as defendants . the cases make employment-related claims , and seek in total $ 53 million in alleged actual damages and $ 168 million in punitive damages . entergy subsequently removed both proceedings to the federal district in jackson , mississippi . entergy cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this proceeding . research spending entergy is a member of the electric power research institute ( epri ) . epri conducts a broad range of research in major technical fields related to the electric utility industry . entergy participates in various epri projects based on entergy's needs and available resources . the domestic utility companies contributed $ 1.6 million in 2004 , $ 1.5 million in 2003 , and $ 2.1 million in 2002 to epri . the non-utility nuclear business contributed $ 3.2 million in 2004 and $ 3 million in both 2003 and 2002 to epri . employees employees are an integral part of entergy's commitment to serving its customers . as of december 31 , 2004 , entergy employed 14425 people . u.s . utility: .
what percent of total full-time employees are in entergy gulf states ?
approximately 4900 employees are represented by the international brotherhood of electrical workers union , the utility workers union of america , and the international brotherhood of teamsters union. .