whpthomas/finqa-parquet huggingface dataset:
"three factor formula" ) . the consolidated financial statements include northrop grumman management and support services allocations totaling $ 32 million for the year ended december 31 , 2011 . shared services and infrastructure costs - this category includes costs for functions such as information technology support , systems maintenance , telecommunications , procurement and other shared services while hii was a subsidiary of northrop grumman . these costs were generally allocated to the company using the three factor formula or based on usage . the consolidated financial statements reflect shared services and infrastructure costs allocations totaling $ 80 million for the year ended december 31 , 2011 . northrop grumman-provided benefits - this category includes costs for group medical , dental and vision insurance , 401 ( k ) savings plan , pension and postretirement benefits , incentive compensation and other benefits . these costs were generally allocated to the company based on specific identification of the benefits provided to company employees participating in these benefit plans . the consolidated financial statements include northrop grumman- provided benefits allocations totaling $ 169 million for the year ended december 31 , 2011 . management believes that the methods of allocating these costs are reasonable , consistent with past practices , and in conformity with cost allocation requirements of cas or the far . related party sales and cost of sales prior to the spin-off , hii purchased and sold certain products and services from and to other northrop grumman entities . purchases of products and services from these affiliated entities , which were recorded at cost , were $ 44 million for the year ended december 31 , 2011 . sales of products and services to these entities were $ 1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2011 . former parent's equity in unit transactions between hii and northrop grumman prior to the spin-off have been included in the consolidated financial statements and were effectively settled for cash at the time the transaction was recorded . the net effect of the settlement of these transactions is reflected as former parent's equity in unit in the consolidated statement of changes in equity . 21 . unaudited selected quarterly data unaudited quarterly financial results for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , are set forth in the following tables: .
for the year ended december 31 2013 , what was the net margin for the 2nd qtr
.
page 92 of 98 other information required by item 10 appearing under the caption 201cdirector nominees and continuing directors 201d and 201csection 16 ( a ) beneficial ownership reporting compliance , 201d of the company 2019s proxy statement to be filed pursuant to regulation 14a within 120 days after december 31 , 2006 , is incorporated herein by reference . item 11 . executive compensation the information required by item 11 appearing under the caption 201cexecutive compensation 201d in the company 2019s proxy statement , to be filed pursuant to regulation 14a within 120 days after december 31 , 2006 , is incorporated herein by reference . additionally , the ball corporation 2000 deferred compensation company stock plan , the ball corporation deposit share program and the ball corporation directors deposit share program were created to encourage key executives and other participants to acquire a larger equity ownership interest in the company and to increase their interest in the company 2019s stock performance . non-employee directors also participate in the 2000 deferred compensation company stock plan . item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management the information required by item 12 appearing under the caption 201cvoting securities and principal shareholders , 201d in the company 2019s proxy statement to be filed pursuant to regulation 14a within 120 days after december 31 , 2006 , is incorporated herein by reference . securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans are summarized below: .
in the equity plans for 2006 , are there more shares issued than remaining in the plan?
item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions the information required by item 13 appearing under the caption 201cratification of the appointment of independent registered public accounting firm , 201d in the company 2019s proxy statement to be filed pursuant to regulation 14a within 120 days after december 31 , 2006 , is incorporated herein by reference . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services the information required by item 14 appearing under the caption 201ccertain committees of the board , 201d in the company 2019s proxy statement to be filed pursuant to regulation 14a within 120 days after december 31 , 2006 , is incorporated herein by reference. .
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1402 gwh , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including an increase in industrial usage and the effect of more favorable weather . the increase in industrial sales was primarily due to expansion in the chemicals industry and the addition of new customers , partially offset by decreased demand primarily due to extended maintenance outages for existing chemicals customers . the waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision is due to a regulatory charge of approximately $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . the miso deferral variance is primarily due to the deferral in 2014 of non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc and the mpsc . the deferral of non-fuel miso-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel miso-related charges . the louisiana business combination customer credits variance is due to a regulatory liability of $ 107 million recorded by entergy in october 2015 as a result of the entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy louisiana business combination . consistent with the terms of the stipulated settlement in the business combination proceeding , electric customers of entergy louisiana will realize customer credits associated with the business combination ; accordingly , in october 2015 , entergy recorded a regulatory liability of $ 107 million ( $ 66 million net-of-tax ) . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits . entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 . amount ( in millions ) .
what is the net change in net revenue during 2015?
as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 558 million in 2016 primarily due to : 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices , primarily due to significantly higher northeast market power prices in 2014 , and lower capacity prices in 2015 ; and 2022 a decrease in net revenue as a result of vermont yankee ceasing power production in december 2014 . the decrease was partially offset by higher volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet , excluding vermont yankee , resulting from fewer refueling outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014 , partially offset by more unplanned outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014. .
morgan stanley notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits for 2013 , 2012 and 2011 ( dollars in millions ) : unrecognized tax benefits .
how many years are currently involved in tax controversies?
the company is under continuous examination by the irs and other tax authorities in certain countries , such as japan and the u.k. , and in states in which the company has significant business operations , such as new york . the company is currently under review by the irs appeals office for the remaining issues covering tax years 1999 2013 2005 . also , the company is currently at various levels of field examination with respect to audits by the irs , as well as new york state and new york city , for tax years 2006 2013 2008 and 2007 2013 2009 , respectively . during 2014 , the company expects to reach a conclusion with the u.k . tax authorities on substantially all issues through tax year 2010 . the company believes that the resolution of tax matters will not have a material effect on the consolidated statements of financial condition of the company , although a resolution could have a material impact on the company 2019s consolidated statements of income for a particular future period and on the company 2019s effective income tax rate for any period in which such resolution occurs . the company has established a liability for unrecognized tax benefits that the company believes is adequate in relation to the potential for additional assessments . once established , the company adjusts unrecognized tax benefits only when more information is available or when an event occurs necessitating a change . the company periodically evaluates the likelihood of assessments in each taxing jurisdiction resulting from the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations or new information regarding the status of current and subsequent years 2019 examinations . as part of the company 2019s periodic review , federal and state unrecognized tax benefits were released or remeasured . as a result of this remeasurement , the income tax provision included a discrete tax benefit of $ 161 million and $ 299 million in 2013 and 2012 , respectively . it is reasonably possible that the gross balance of unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $ 4.1 billion as of december 31 , 2013 may decrease significantly within the next 12 months due to an expected completion of the .
the following table illustrates the pro forma effect on net income and earnings per share as if all outstanding and unvested stock options in 2005 were accounted for using estimated fair value . 2005year ended december 31 .
what is the number of outstanding shares based on the eps , ( in millions ) ?
basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period , which excludes unvested shares of restricted stock . diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period and the shares representing the dilutive effect of stock options and awards and other equity-related financial instruments . the effect of stock options and restricted stock outstanding is excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share in periods in which their effect would be antidilutive . special purpose entities : we are involved with various legal forms of special purpose entities , or spes , in the normal course of our business . we use trusts to structure and sell certificated interests in pools of tax-exempt investment-grade assets principally to our mutual fund customers . these trusts are recorded in our consolidated financial statements . we transfer assets to these trusts , which are legally isolated from us , from our investment securities portfolio at adjusted book value . the trusts finance the acquisition of these assets by selling certificated interests issued by the trusts to third-party investors . the investment securities of the trusts are carried in investments securities available for sale at fair value . the certificated interests are carried in other short-term borrowings at the amount owed to the third-party investors . the interest revenue and interest expense generated by the investments and certificated interests , respectively , are recorded in net interest revenue when earned or incurred. .
vornado realty trust 77 cash flows the company expects to contribute $ 959000 to the plans in 2004 . 11 . leases as lessor : the company leases space to tenants under operating leases . most of the leases provide for the payment of fixed base rentals payable monthly in advance . shopping center leases provide for the pass-through to tenants of real estate taxes , insurance and maintenance . office building leases generally require the tenants to reimburse the company for operating costs and real estate taxes above their base year costs . shopping center leases also provide for the payment by the lessee of additional rent based on a percentage of the tenants 2019 sales . as of december 31 , 2003 , future base rental revenue under non-cancelable operating leases , excluding rents for leases with an original term of less than one year and rents resulting from the exercise of renewal options , is as follows : ( amounts in thousands ) year ending december 31: .
total percentage rents approximated what in thousands for the years ended december 31 , 2002 and 2001?
these amounts do not include rentals based on tenants 2019 sales . these percentage rents approximated $ 3662000 , $ 1832000 , and $ 2157000 , for the years ended december 31 , 2003 , 2002 , and 2001 . except for the u.s . government , which accounted for 12.7% ( 12.7 % ) of the company 2019s revenue , none of the company 2019s tenants represented more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenues for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . former bradlees locations property rentals for the year ended december 31 , 2003 , include $ 5000000 of additional rent which , effective december 31 , 2002 , was re-allocated to the former bradlees locations in marlton , turnersville , bensalem and broomall and is payable by stop & shop , pursuant to the master agreement and guaranty , dated may 1 , 1992 . this amount is in addition to all other rent guaranteed by stop & shop for the former bradlees locations . on january 8 , 2003 , stop & shop filed a complaint with the united states district court claiming the company has no right to reallocate and therefore continue to collect the $ 5000000 of annual rent from stop & shop because of the expiration of the east brunswick , jersey city , middletown , union and woodbridge leases to which the $ 5000000 of additional rent was previously allocated . the company believes the additional rent provision of the guaranty expires at the earliest in 2012 and will vigorously oppose stop & shop 2019s complaint . in february 2003 , koninklijke ahold nv , parent of stop & shop , announced that it overstated its 2002 and 2001 earnings by at least $ 500 million and is under investigation by the u.s . justice department and securities and exchange commission . the company cannot predict what effect , if any , this situation may have on stop & shop 2019s ability to satisfy its obligation under the bradlees guarantees and rent for existing stop & shop leases aggregating approximately $ 10.5 million per annum . notes to consolidated financial statements sr-176_fin_l02p53_82v1.qxd 4/8/04 2:42 pm page 77 .
management 2019s discussion and analysis 144 jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report compared with $ 57 million for 2009 . decreases in cio and mort- gage banking var for 2010 were again driven by the decline in market volatility and position changes . the decline in mortgage banking var at december 31 , 2010 , reflects management 2019s deci- sion to reduce risk given market volatility at the time . the firm 2019s average ib and other var diversification benefit was $ 59 million or 37% ( 37 % ) of the sum for 2010 , compared with $ 82 million or 28% ( 28 % ) of the sum for 2009 . the firm experienced an increase in the diversification benefit in 2010 as positions changed and correla- tions decreased . in general , over the course of the year , var expo- sure can vary significantly as positions change , market volatility fluctuates and diversification benefits change . var back-testing the firm conducts daily back-testing of var against its market risk- related revenue , which is defined as the change in value of : princi- pal transactions revenue for ib and cio ( less private equity gains/losses and revenue from longer-term cio investments ) ; trading-related net interest income for ib , cio and mortgage bank- ing ; ib brokerage commissions , underwriting fees or other revenue ; revenue from syndicated lending facilities that the firm intends to distribute ; and mortgage fees and related income for the firm 2019s mortgage pipeline and warehouse loans , msrs , and all related hedges . daily firmwide market risk 2013related revenue excludes gains and losses from dva . the following histogram illustrates the daily market risk 2013related gains and losses for ib , cio and mortgage banking positions for 2010 . the chart shows that the firm posted market risk 2013related gains on 248 out of 261 days in this period , with 12 days exceeding $ 210 million . the inset graph looks at those days on which the firm experienced losses and depicts the amount by which the 95% ( 95 % ) confidence-level var ex- ceeded the actual loss on each of those days . during 2010 , losses were sustained on 13 days , none of which exceeded the var measure . daily ib and other market risk-related gains and losses ( 95% ( 95 % ) confidence-level var ) year ended december 31 , 2010 average daily revenue : $ 87 million $ in millions $ in millions daily ib and other var less market risk-related losses the following table provides information about the gross sensitivity of dva to a one-basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spreads . this sensitivity represents the impact from a one-basis-point parallel shift in jpmorgan chase 2019s entire credit curve . as credit curves do not typically move in a parallel fashion , the sensitivity multiplied by the change in spreads at a single maturity point may not be representative of the actual revenue recognized . debit valuation adjustment sensitivity 1 basis point increase in december 31 , ( in millions ) jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread .
what was the change in average ib and other var diversification benefit in millions during 2010?
.
table of contents stock performance graph * $ 100 invested on 11/17/11 in our stock or 10/31/11 in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 , 2015 . ( 1 ) delphi automotive plc ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive supplier peer group 2013 russell 3000 auto parts index , including american axle & manufacturing , borgwarner inc. , cooper tire & rubber company , dana holding corp. , delphi automotive plc , dorman products inc. , federal-mogul corp. , ford motor co. , fuel systems solutions inc. , general motors co. , gentex corp. , gentherm inc. , genuine parts co. , johnson controls inc. , lear corp. , lkq corp. , meritor inc. , standard motor products inc. , stoneridge inc. , superior industries international , tenneco inc. , tesla motors inc. , the goodyear tire & rubber co. , tower international inc. , visteon corp. , and wabco holdings inc . company index november 17 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .
what is the total return on delphi automotive plc for the five year period ending december 31 2015?
dividends the company has declared and paid cash dividends of $ 0.25 per ordinary share in each quarter of 2014 and 2015 . in addition , in january 2016 , the board of directors increased the annual dividend rate to $ 1.16 per ordinary share , and declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.29 per ordinary share , payable on february 29 , 2016 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 17 , 2016. .
item 2 : properties information concerning applied 2019s properties is set forth below: .
what portion of company's property is located in united states?
because of the interrelation of applied 2019s operations , properties within a country may be shared by the segments operating within that country . the company 2019s headquarters offices are in santa clara , california . products in semiconductor systems are manufactured in santa clara , california ; austin , texas ; gloucester , massachusetts ; kalispell , montana ; rehovot , israel ; and singapore . remanufactured equipment products in the applied global services segment are produced primarily in austin , texas . products in the display and adjacent markets segment are manufactured in alzenau , germany and tainan , taiwan . other products are manufactured in treviso , italy . applied also owns and leases offices , plants and warehouse locations in many locations throughout the world , including in europe , japan , north america ( principally the united states ) , israel , china , india , korea , southeast asia and taiwan . these facilities are principally used for manufacturing ; research , development and engineering ; and marketing , sales and customer support . applied also owns a total of approximately 269 acres of buildable land in montana , texas , california , israel and italy that could accommodate additional building space . applied considers the properties that it owns or leases as adequate to meet its current and future requirements . applied regularly assesses the size , capability and location of its global infrastructure and periodically makes adjustments based on these assessments. .
the following graph compares the cumulative 4-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on january 3 , 2009 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 4 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/121/1/11 12/31/111/2/101/3/09 *$ 100 invested on 1/3/09 in stock or 12/31/08 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies all rights reserved. .
what is the total return if $ 1000000 are invested in nasdaq composite in 2009 and sold in 2010?
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .
stock total return performance the following graph compares our total return to stockholders with the returns of the standard & poor 2019s composite 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and the dow jones us select health care providers index ( 201cpeer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2018 . the graph assumes an investment of $ 100 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 , and the peer group on december 31 , 2013 , and that dividends were reinvested when paid. .
what is the lowest return for the first year of investment?
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .
subject to fluctuation and , consequently , the amount realized in the subsequent sale of an investment may differ significantly from its current reported value . fluctuations in the market price of a security may result from perceived changes in the underlying economic characteristics of the issuer , the relative price of alternative investments and general market conditions . the table below summarizes equity investments that are subject to equity price fluctuations at december 31 , 2012 . equity investments are included in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets . ( in millions ) carrying unrealized net of tax .
what is the unrealized gain pre-tex for bolsa mexicana de valores?
we do not currently hedge against equity price risk . equity investments are assessed for other-than- temporary impairment on a quarterly basis. .