This year, 11 college entrance exams were rejected by the University of Hong Kong because of unsatisfactory interview results. This is in line with mainland colleges chasing high-stakes candidates and rejoicing in order to recruit "winners. " A sharp contrast has been formed. This move has caused a stir, and the media have pointed their finger at "exam-oriented education. " The author believes that the admissions of Hong Kong University and "quality education" are not directly related, they only accept students according to their own requirements. This standard is only the standard in Hong Kong. As for whether it is optimal or suitable for the Mainland, it is a matter of opinion. What is the author's point of view? ['The admission criteria of the University of Hong Kong are not the best criteria for selecting students.', 'The University of Hong Kong has the right to recruit students independently, and the media should not criticize too much.', 'The criteria for selecting students by the University of Hong Kong are not in line with the current situation in the Mainland.', 'The reason why the University of Hong Kong does not admit "No.1 Scholar" is that they do not meet the admission criteria of the university.']