Xiao Wang: Judging from the huge cost of hosting the Olympic Games, the ticket prices for watching various Olympic games should be much higher. It is the advertising revenue of the Olympic sponsors that has lowered the ticket prices. Therefore, the live audience of the Olympic Games has drawn from the advertisements of the Olympic Games. Gained economic benefits. Xiao Li: Your argument cannot be established. Who will pay for the advertising costs that seem to lead to a reduction in Olympic ticket prices? In the end, not consumers, including consumers who are audiences at the Olympic Games? Price spreads advertising costs on consumers. Which of the following can effectively weaken Xiao Li's rebuttal to Xiao Wang:. ['Tickets for the Olympic Games are generally much higher than those for ordinary sports.', 'The hosting of the Olympic Games has become more and more commercial, causing widespread dissatisfaction.', 'More and more manufacturers use global sports competitions to advertise, and the cost of advertising is also increasing.', 'The advertising expenditure of various manufacturers is generally a constant, but there is a choice in the form of advertising.']