Although there is no record of poet Edmund Spenser's parentage, we do know that as a youth Spenser attended the Merchant Tailors' School in London for a period between 1560 and 1570. Records from this time indicate that the Merchant Tailors' Guild then had only three members named Spenser: Robert Spenser, listed as a gentleman; Nicholas Spenser, elected the Guild's Warden in 1568; and John Spenser, listed as a "journeyman cloth-maker. " Of these, the last was likely the least affluent of the three-and most likely Edmund's father, since school accounting records list Edmund as a scholar who attended the school at a reduced fee. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends? ["The fact that Edmund Spenser attended the Merchant Tailors' School did not necessarily mean that he planned to become a tailor.", 'No member of the Guild could become Guild warden in sixteenth century London unless he was a gentleman.', "Anybody in sixteenth century London who made clothing professionally would have had to be a member of the Merchant Tailors' Guild.", "The Merchant Tailors' School did not reduce its fees for the children of the more affluent Guild members."]