['The improvement in oxygenation with prone positioning is not persistent when patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are turned supine. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) aims to maintain an open lung volume by the application of a constant mean airway pressure. The aim of this study was to show that HFOV is able to prevent the impairment in oxygenation when ARDS patients are turned back from the prone to the supine position.', 'Prospective, comparative randomized study.', 'A medical intensive care unit.', 'Forty-three ARDS patients with a Pao2/Fio2 ratio <150 at positive end-expiratory pressure > or =5 cm H2O.', 'After an optimization period, the patients were assigned to one of three groups: a) conventional lung-protective mechanical ventilation in the prone position (12 hrs) followed by a 12-hr period of conventional lung-protective mechanical ventilation in the supine position (CV(prone)-CV(supine)); b) conventional lung-protective mechanical ventilation in the supine position (12 hrs) followed by HFOV in the supine position (12 hrs) (CV(supine)-HFOV(supine)); or c) conventional lung-protective mechanical ventilation in the prone position (12 hrs) followed by HFOV in the supine position (CV(prone)-HFOV(supine) group).', 'Pao2/Fio2 ratio was higher at the end of the study period in the CV(prone)-HFOV(supine) group than in the CV(prone)-CV(supine) group (p < .02). Venous admixture at the end of the study period was lower in the CV(prone)-HFOV(supine) group than in the two other groups.'] Does high-frequency oscillatory ventilation following prone positioning prevent a further impairment in oxygenation?