['It is increasingly understood that gastrointestinal (GI) methanogens, including Methanobrevibacter smithii, influence host metabolism.', 'Therefore, we compared M. smithii colonization and weight gain in a rat model under different dietary conditions.', 'Sprague-Dawley rats were inoculated with M. smithii or vehicle (N = 10/group), fed normal chow until day 112 postinoculation, high-fat chow until day 182, then normal chow until day 253. Thereafter, five rats from each group were fed high-fat and normal chow until euthanasia.', 'Both groups exhibited M. smithii colonization, which increased following inoculation only for the first 9 days. Change to high-fat chow correlated with significant increases in weight (P < 0.00001) and stool M. smithii (P < 0.01) in all rats, with stool M. smithi decreasing on return to normal chow. Rats switched back to high-fat on day 253 further increased weight (P < 0.001) and stool M. smithii (P = 0.039). Euthanasia revealed all animals had higher M. smithii, but not total bacteria, in the small intestine than in the colon. Rats switched back to high-fat chow had higher M. smithii levels in the duodenum, ileum, and cecum than those fed normal chow; total bacteria did not differ in any bowel segment. Rats which gained more weight had more bowel segments colonized, and the lowest weight recorded was in a rat on high-fat chow which had minimal M. smithii colonization.'] Is intestinal Methanobrevibacter smithii but not total bacteria related to diet-induced weight gain in rats?