['The phenomenon of wound contraction results in a decrease in wound size and a healed scar significantly smaller than the original defect.', 'This study was undertaken (1) to determine the amount of wound contraction in Mohs surgery defects allowed to heal by second intention, (2) to evaluate for regional differences in wound contraction based on the facial anatomic zones for second intention healing described by Zitelli, and (3) to determine whether regional differences in wound contraction account for observed differences in cosmetic outcome.', 'One hundred sixty secondarily healed Mohs surgery defects limited to the head and neck having a wound age of greater than 12 weeks in 102 consecutively examined patients were carefully measured with a tissue caliper. The percent wound contraction was calculated and compared for each Zitelli anatomic subunit. The final shape of the wound (quantitatively described) and the cosmetic acceptability (subjectively rated by the patient and examiner) were also compared with the percent wound contraction for each anatomic area.', 'Both NEET (concave surface of the nose, eye, ear, and temple) and FAIR (forehead, antihelix, eyelids, and the remainder of the nose, lips, and cheeks) areas were identical in terms of mean wound contraction (74%), cosmetic acceptability (97%), and conversion to a wound shape with a ratio of maximal length to width of greater than 3.0 (fusiform and linear shapes) (52%). NOCH areas (convex surface of the nose, oral lips, cheeks and chin, and the helix of the ear) demonstrated less wound contraction (66%), cosmetic acceptability (78%), and fusiform-linear conversion (29%). Subset differences and variables that appear to influence wound contraction are discussed. Secondarily healed wounds in areas with one or more positive contraction variables contract 75%, whereas defects in areas with negative contraction variables contract 55%.'] Does regional variation in wound contraction of mohs surgery defect allowed to heal by second intention?