The map is originally a thing, it should not be people, and it cannot be people. If there are people on the map, it is not a map, but a picture. This sentence should be a theorem in the strict sense, but some travel maps are encountered. I m afraid that I have to make a turn-tourism often has both scenery and characters. This is like Taishan, the Terracotta Army in the tourist map must say Qin Shihuang, the Ming Tombs must refer to the Ming Emperor, the Summer Palace tour The picture must say the same as Empress Dowager Cixi, because many scenes in that environment begin with human activities and add aesthetic value because of human activities. What does the author of this passage think? ['A map with people is not a real map.', 'Maps with people can add more aesthetic value to the map.', 'The tourist map must be marked with symbols and characters.', 'A travel map is also a kind of map.']