After the recent court rulings, <b> commercial shark fishing and shark hunting will resume in Diamond Bay </b>. Many citizens of the communities around the bay have hailed this move, believing that a decrease in sharks will lead to an increase in all smaller fish, including the endangered Green-Gilled Silverfish, whose only ecosystem is within Diamond Bay. Ecologists, though, disagree, pointing out that <b> a decrease in sharks will lead to a surge in Sea Lions, which are the principal predator of the Green-Gilled Silverfish. </b> In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles? ['The first supports an action as a beneficial; the second calls that evaluation into question.', 'The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second states a contrary conclusion that is the main conclusion of the argument.', 'The first is an opinion that the argument opposes; the second is evidence inconsistent with the conclusion of the argument.', 'The first is a conclusion that the argument as a whole seeks to justify; the second is an explanation that supports this conclusion.']