Critic: In her presentation of important works of art in her art history textbook, Waverly claims to have presented only objective accounts: "I have sought neither to advocate nor to denigrate what I included. " In writing about art, a pretense of objectivity never succeeds: clearly, Waverly writes much better about art she likes than about art to which she is indifferent. The critic's statements, if true, most strongly support which one of the following? ['Waverly has not succeeded in her intended objectivity about works of art discussed in her textbook.', 'Waverly does not really believe that objectivity is a desirable trait in an art history textbook.', 'Waverly has only included works of art that she has strong opinions about in her textbook.', 'Waverly believes that a historian of art should not prefer certain works of art to other works of art.']