An in-depth study of Western classics does not make people better or worse, nor does it make citizens more useful or harmful. The self-conversation of the soul is not a social reality in nature. The whole significance of Western classics is to make people use themselves. Loneliness. Regarding the above text, what is the following understanding? ['Studying Western classics can dispatch loneliness.', "Western classics are the product of people's loneliness.", 'Studying Western classics does not improve citizen quality.', 'Studying Western classics is a non-utilitarian activity of the soul.']