How the controversial mode of daily conversation affects people's perception of the truth of observation will be studied experimentally by experts in the field of cognitive psychology and experimental philosophy. Through experiments, we find that the more we argue for the victory, the more we will The more we feel that there is a single correct answer and all other answers are wrong; on the contrary, the more we argue for learning, the more we feel that there is no single objective truth, and different answers may equally is correct. The text is intended to show:. ['The more we argue for learning, the more we look at the problem.', 'The more we argue about winning, the more subjective we are to the problem.', "Two different modes of debate affect people's perception of objective truth.", 'The everyday conversation has two modes of argument: "arguing for victory" and "arguing for learning".']