A philosophical paradox is a particularly baffling sort of argument. Your intuitions tell you that the conclusion of a philosophical paradox is false, but they also tell you that its conclusion follows logically from true premises. Solving a philosophical paradox requires accepting any one of three things: that its conclusion is true, that at least one of its premises is not true, or that its conclusion does not really follow logically from its premises. If the statements above are true, which one of the following must also be true? ['Philosophical paradoxes with one or two premises are more baffling than those with several premises.', 'Solving a philosophical paradox requires accepting something that intuitively seems to be incorrect.', "The conclusion of a philosophical paradox cannot be false if all the paradox's premises are true.", 'If it is not possible to accept that the conclusion of a particular philosophical paradox is true, then it is not possible to solve that paradox.']