Geneticist: Ethicists have fears, many of them reasonable, about the prospect of cloning human beings, that is, producing exact genetic duplicates. But the horror-movie image of a wealthy person creating an army of exact duplicates is completely unrealistic. Clones must be raised and educated, a long-term process that could never produce adults identical to the original in terms of outlook, personality, or goals. More realistic is the possibility that wealthy individuals might use clones as living "organ banks. " The claim that cloning will not produce adults with identical personalities plays which one of the following roles in the geneticist's argument? ['It is evidence that genetic clones will never be produced successfully.', 'It is evidence for the claim that wealthy people might use genetic duplicates of themselves as sources of compatible organs for transplantation.', 'It is a reason for discounting one possible fear concerning the cloning of human beings.', 'It illustrates the claim that only wealthy people would be able to have genetic duplicates made of themselves.']