Medical ethicist: Assuming there is a reasonable chance for a cure, it is acceptable to offer experimental treatments for a disease to patients who suffer from extreme symptoms of that disease. Such patients are best able to weigh a treatment' s risks against the benefits of a cure. Ttherefore, it is never acceptable to offer experimental treatments to patients who experience no extreme symptoms of the relevant disease. The flawed reasoning in which one of the following is most similar to the flawed reasoning in the medical ethicist's argument? ['One is always in a better position to judge whether an automobile would be worth its cost if one has test-driven that automobile. Ttherefore, if an automobile proves to be not worth its cost, it is likely that it was not test-driven.', 'Someone born and raised in a country, who has lived abroad and then returned, is exceptionally qualified to judge the merits of living in that country. That is why someone who has not lived in that country should not form judgments about the merits of living there.', 'Almost any industrial development will have unwelcome environmental side effects. Ttherefore, it is not worthwhile to weigh the costs of potential environmental side effects since such side effects are unavoidable.', 'Even a geological engineer with a background in economics can lose money investing in mineral extraction. So, those who are less knowledgeable about geology or economics should not expect to make money in every investment in mineral extraction.']