When discussing the differences and pros and cons of science and religion as cognitive methods, it is often true that the notion that science is not omnipotent and science can go wrong is also true. But in that discussion, no one claimed that " In the case that science is always correct ", actively inserting this view, but obviously using the fact that" all cognitive methods are imperfect "to deliberately confuse different cognitive methods. This is extremely misleading. According to this text, what does the author want to say? ['Do not deviate from the topic in discussions on cognitive styles.', 'No cognitive method will be perfect.', 'The idea that "science can go wrong" is sometimes confused.', 'There are no advantages or disadvantages between the two cognitive methods of science and religion.']