Ambiguity inspires interpretation. The saying, "We are the measure of all things, " for instance, has been interpreted by some people to imply that humans are centrally important in the universe, while others have interpreted it to mean simply that, since all knowledge is human knowledge, humans must rely on themselves to find the truth. The claim that ambiguity inspires interpretation figures in the argument in which one of the following ways? ['It sets out a difficulty the argument is intended to solve.', 'It is a view that other statements in the argument are intended to support.', 'It is an illustration of the claim that we are the measure of all things.', "It is compatible with either accepting or rejecting the argument's conclusion."]