Linda: The governor' s proposal to raise taxes to improve carpool lanes is unjust. Why should commuters who never use carpool lanes be forced to subsidize them? Mario: You are mistaken. The state government has always designated more funding to noncarpool lanes. The additional revenue raised from the tax increase will just allow the governor to distribute funds to all lanes more equally. Mario uses which of the following argumentative strategies in answering Linda? ["pointing out that his opponent's arguments are based on self-contradictory premises", "expanding the context of the problem in order to make the governor's proposal appear more equitable", 'disagreeing that arbitrary concerns like fairness are relevant to the discussion', 'arguing that programs that benefit the state as a whole benefit all citizens in the state']