['To evaluate the effects of nonselective endothelin (ET)-receptor antagonism on the hemodynamic changes and serum thromboxane (TX)-A(2) levels after a massive pulmonary air embolism (PAE) in dogs.', 'Prospective trial.', 'University laboratory.', 'Anesthetized mongrel dogs (ET-receptor antagonist group; n = 6) received a bolus injection of 1 mg of the nonselective ET-A/ET-B-receptor antagonist PD 145065 (Sigma Chemical; St. Louis, MO), and dogs in the control group (n = 6) received saline solution. Hemodynamic data were recorded 5 min after the administration of antagonist or saline solution. Subsequently, each dog received 2.5-mL air/kg via the right femoral vein (the PAE), and the hemodynamic data were recorded for up to 60 min thereafter. Arterial blood samples were drawn at baseline and 15 min after PAE for the determination of plasma TX-A(2), measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay as TX-B(2) (the stable metabolite of TX-A(2)).', 'PD 145065 alone produced no hemodynamic effects. However, dogs pretreated with PD 145065 had significantly lower increases in mean pulmonary arterial pressure and in pulmonary vascular resistance after the PAE (116% and 165%, respectively) compared to the control dogs (187% and 367%, respectively). The mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac index (CI), and plasma TX-B(2) levels were unaltered after PAE in the presence of ET-receptor antagonist, whereas CI and MAP decreased 5 to 10 min after PAE, and TX-B(2) concentrations increased 15 min after PAE in control dogs (p < 0.05 in all cases).'] Does nonselective endothelin-receptor antagonism attenuate hemodynamic changes after massive pulmonary air embolism in dogs?