['To determine whether patient self-report of prior laser treatment can be used as a reliable tool for assessing the presence of severe diabetic retinopathy.', 'This was a retrospective study on two groups of diabetic subjects.', 'One hundred patients with diabetes were recruited from the general eye and retina clinics at the University of Chicago Hospitals. The patients were asked, "Have you ever received laser treatment for your diabetic eye disease (DED)?" A chart review was then conducted noting if the patient had received either focal laser treatment for diabetic macular edema or panretinal photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Data from the Wisconsin Epidemiological Study of Diabetic Retinopathy (WESDR) were also analyzed. Participant responses to the question "Have you had laser photocoagulation treatment for your eyes?" were analyzed with documentation of photocoagulation scars determined by grading seven-standard field color fundus photographs.', 'In the University of Chicago group, 96 of 100 (96%) of patients were accurate in reporting whether they had received previous laser treatment for DED (sensitivity 95.8%, specificity 96.1%, and positive predictive value 88.5%). In the WESDR analysis, 2,329 of 2,348 (99%) of participants were accurate in reporting whether they had prior laser treatment for DED (sensitivity 96.0%, specificity 99.5%, and positive predictive value 95.6%).'] Does patient self-report of prior laser treatment reliably indicate presence of severe diabetic retinopathy?