Many newspapers have cut back on book reviews, replacing them with other features that, according to focus group research, are of greater interest to potential readers. Such a move is ill-advised. Though meant to increase readership, it actually decreases readership by alienating loyal readers while catering to casual readers who are more likely to watch television than pick up a newspaper. Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion drawn in the argument? ['The move to replace book reviews with other features was meant to increase readership, but it actually decreases it.', 'Many newspapers have cut back on book reviews, replacing them with other features.', 'The move to replace book reviews with other features alienates loyal readers and caters to casual readers.', 'The newspapers should not have cut back on book reviews.']