4 Some people say that learning classical Chinese texts is helpful to students' writing, not only has no bad influence, it is not "not literary and not plain", but it is very good; it is very good to embellish a little classical Chinese words and apply some classical Chinese syntax, it is very flavorful, listen to the tone, there is a lot This is a necessary taste, although it is not so clear. Of course, I do not deny that studying classical Chinese is helpful to the writing of vernacular to a certain extent, and it helps in two aspects: text and language, which can also be said to be a modern writer A criticism. Why can't these be learned from modern works, but also go to the old ancestors to ask for help? The following is a correct understanding of the meaning of the underlined sentences in the text:. ['Modern writers should be criticized because they abuse classical words and have a bad influence.', 'Modern works are not as good as ancient works in terms of text and language.', 'To learn to write vernacular texts, you must ask for classical texts, explaining the shortcomings of some modern works.', 'There is no taste in vernacular, although it is not explicitly stated, it is actually a criticism of them.']