The writing styles in works of high literary quality are not well suited to the avoidance of misinterpretation. For this reason, the writing in judicial decisions, which are primarily intended as determinations of law, is rarely of high literary quality. However, it is not uncommon to find writing of high literary quality in dissenting opinions, which are sometimes included in written decisions in cases heard by a panel of judges. Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy in the statements above? ['It is not uncommon for more than one judge to have an influence on the way a dissenting opinion is written.', 'The law is not to any great extent determined by dissenting opinions.', 'Judicial decisions issued by panels of judges are likely to be more widely read than are judicial decisions issued by a single judge who hears a case alone.', 'Unlike literary works, legal opinions rely heavily on the use of technical terminology.']