In public places, roadside digging, and other ground construction, where no safety measures such as the setting of obvious warning signs are used to cause pedestrian damage, the presumption of fault is applicable, that is, after the pedestrian proves that the damage he suffered was caused by the behavior of the constructor If the construction person cannot prove that he is not at fault, the construction person is deemed to be at fault. When the above text can be used to explain the damage caused by ground construction? ['The victim has an obligation to prove that he has been harmed.', 'The victim is obliged to prove that the damage was caused by the actions of the constructor.', 'The victim is obliged to prove that he is not at fault but not obliged to prove that the constructor is at fault.', 'The constructor is obliged to prove that he is not at fault, and the victim is not obligated to prove that he is at fault.']