['There is a paucity of data on atrial injury following ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed at assessing reversibility of atrial dysfunction after successful persistent AF ablation using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR).', 'CMR was performed during sinus rhythm (SR) in 20 consecutive patients with persistent AF at baseline (BL) within 24 hours after ablation and after 6-month follow-up (FU). Catheter ablation included atrial substrate modification using the stepwise approach following pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in order to attempt termination of persistent AF. Active left (LA) and right atrial (RA) function were quantified by calculating the active emptying fraction (AEF) from transvalvular flow profiles using velocity encoded (VENC) CMR. LA appendage (LAA) function was quantified by measurements of peak a-wave velocities from flow profiles perpendicular to the LAA orifice. Peri-atrial edema was assessed using black-blood T2 -weighted CMR. A significant improvement was found in LA-AEF from 18 (12-26)% at BL to 25 (22-35)% at FU (P = 0.0001). Furthermore, RA-AEF significantly increased from 31 (19-35)% at BL to 40 (35-51)% at FU (P < 0.0001). A significant improvement was also found for LAA a-wave velocities from 45 (31-65) cm/s at BL to 62 (49-75) cm/s at FU (P < 0.01). The area of peri-atrial edema on T2 -weighted CMR decreased from 1393 (1098-1797) mm(2) at BL to 24 (1-92) mm(2) at FU (P < 0.0001).'] Does cardiovascular magnetic resonance demonstrate reversible atrial dysfunction after catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation?