92 The unproven testimony of any witness is not the basis for jury judgment, because in general it is wise to have a high degree of suspicion that anyone has no evidence, but jurors should not believe that they are common in order to be consistent. Experience: Convict defendant based on all unproven confession. Which of the following supports this view? ['In cases where the accused withdrew all confessions before trial, the jurors were usually acquitted.', "The purpose of the jury selection process is to select those who have a firm opinion on the defendant's crimes before trial.", 'When the defendant does commit the crime or finally believes that the plaintiff has sufficient evidence, he sometimes confesses.', 'For those charged with a crime and easily implied, it is difficult for them to determine their memories of the past, and they eventually accept the charges against them.']