['Postexposure prophylaxis of inhalational anthrax requires prolonged antibiotic therapy or antibiotics and vaccination. The duration of treatment for established anthrax is controversial, because retained spores may germinate and cause disease after antibiotics are discontinued. Using rhesus macaques, we determined whether a short course of antibiotic treatment, as opposed to prophylaxis, could effectively treat inhalational anthrax and prevent disease caused by the germination of spores after discontinuation of antibiotics.', 'Two groups of 10 rhesus macaques were exposed to an aerosol dose of Bacillus anthracis spores. Animals in group 1 received ciprofloxacin prophylaxis beginning 1-2 h after exposure. Those in group 2 began receiving ciprofloxacin after becoming bacteremic, and treatment was continued for 10 days. When each group 2 animal completed 10 days of therapy, the prophylactic antibiotic was discontinued in the paired group 1 animal.', 'In group 1 (prophylaxis), no deaths occurred during antibiotic treatment, but only 2 (20%) of 10 animals survived after antibiotics were discontinued. In contrast, in group 2 (treatment), 3 deaths occurred during antibiotic treatment, but all 7 animals (100%) alive after 10 days of therapy survived when antibiotics were discontinued.'] Is a short course of antibiotic treatment effective in preventing death from experimental inhalational anthrax after discontinuing antibiotics?