The commoditization of folk art is happening across the country. This kind of folk art that looks like thriving is essentially extinct in the cultural sense. Is there only such a way out for folk art? There is another way in the world to treat one's own traditions and cultures--that is, to maintain the devotion and dedication to a life in folk art, and treat it as a traditional spirit, a carrier of national emotions and spirit. People know how difficult it is to do this today. Therefore, it is imperative to census and records the original folk art. This is not just to record a cultural form, and emotional beauty, but also to witness and Record a spirit of history. What is the correct understanding of this passage? ['The commercialization of folk art enables folk art to be preserved without being wiped out due to a major change from traditional society to modern society.', 'The commercialization of folk art has enabled the preservation of folk art, and the census and recording of existing folk art have no substantial meaning.', 'Keeping folk art as a carrier of national emotions and spirits has become very difficult in the modern era of commercialization.', 'In the case of commercialization of folk art, the inheritors of folk art should reshape the emotional beauty of folk art, and make folk art a spirit to witness and record history.']