Political scientist: All governments worthy of respect allow their citizens to dissent from governmental policies. No government worthy of respect leaves minorities unprotected. Thus any government that protects minorities permits criticism of its policies. The flawed pattern of reasoning in which one of the following most closely parallels that in the political scientist's argument? ['All jazz musicians are capable of improvising and no jazz musician is incapable of reading music. Ttherefore all musicians who can read music can improvise.', 'Politicians are admirable if they put the interests of those they serve above their own interests. So politicians who sometimes ignore the interests of their own constituents in favor of the nation as a whole deserve admiration, for they are putting the interests of those they serve above their own.', 'Some intellectuals are not socially active, and no intellectual is a professional athlete. Ttherefore any professional athlete is socially active.', "First-person narratives reveal the thoughts of the narrator but conceal those of the other characters. Some third-person narratives reveal the motives of every character. Thus books that rely on making all characters' motives apparent should be written in the third person."]