In fact, mental illness is not a concept of pathology, but a concept of sociology. If a family member or authority forcibly sends a person to a mental hospital, then that person can almost only be diagnosed as a "mental patient". Family members and authority The description of his "symptoms" has become an important information for judging whether he is mentally ill. And if he is said to have been persecuted and resisted, he is exactly in accordance with the diagnostic criteria for "psychiatric", "mania" and the like. Description. His right of self-defense is also cancelled by this invincible logic: you say that you are not mentally ill, then you are exactly at this time, because you refuse to admit that you are sick, which is a manifestation of a mental patient; And you admit it, of course you do. Which of the following is most likely to be derived from the above determination? ['The diagnostic criteria for mental illness are only the allegations of the family members of the "mentally ill" or relevant authorities.', 'A family member or authority sends someone to a mental hospital just to get him timely and effective treatment.', 'Most mental patients treated in mental hospitals do not actually have a mental illness.', 'The expression of an individual who has been compulsorily admitted to a psychiatric hospital is questionable as to whether he has a mental illness.']