The term "cultural prose" is used to name a prose style that emerged in the late 1980s and a subsequent phenomenon of prose creation. In fact, it lacks academic support because this name cannot explain "culture" and "prose" The relationship between "prose" and "big prose". However, it does reveal to some extent the main characteristics of a prose style, and it obviously contains the planning behavior adapted to the reader's market. Therefore, the naming of "cultural prose" has succeeded It has seduced and guided quite a lot of prose authors, readers, and researchers. Now, when I understand and respect the naming of "cultural prose" in my writing, I can't help but point out: the success of a simple naming, giving The production and dissemination of knowledge brings convenience, but it also condones the laziness of thought. Regarding "cultural prose", does the following statement agree with the original? ['Changed the way people think about prose.', 'Its naming is a successful marketing.', 'Brings a new wave of prose creation.', 'Expanded the field of expression of prose.']