In order to forecast the weather, Lorentz, a meteorologist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, used a computer to solve 13 equations that simulated the atmosphere of the earth. In order to examine the results in more detail, he took out an intermediate solution, improved the accuracy, and sent it back. When he drank After coffee, when I came back and looked at it, I was taken aback: the original difference was small, but the result deviated ten thousand miles! The computer is not faulty, so Lorentz believes that he has discovered a new phenomenon-"extreme instability to the initial value", that is, "chaos", also known as the "butterfly effect". Wings will make tornadoes stronger than gales in the Americas in a few months! What is incorrect about the "butterfly effect"? ['The characteristics of "chaos" are: across all majors, penetrating various fields. Therefore, I hope that "scientific" has control over everything, and predicting everything is just a good wish of human beings.', '"Chaos" means chaos. Chaotic systems respond to external stimuli more slowly than non-chaotic systems.', 'It seems that some tiny things may cause the internal division of the collective to fall apart.', '"Chaos" is everywhere, but humans can still understand nature to a certain extent.']