There are differences between Chinese and Western cognitive methods, thinking logic, and even the overall cultural concept. For example, the persistence of Western methods may lead to a progressive understanding, emphasizing the relationship between the subject and the object, and the accuracy of object descriptions; The Chinese-style splashing leads to harmony and understanding. When describing objects, there is often a certain kind of ambiguity in clarity. However, the two are not good or bad, they are right or wrong, only the dialogue that arises because of "difference". Enlightenment, complementarity and harmony. To achieve "neutralization" through "difference", such "harmony and difference" can complete a coexisting and colorful world. What is wrong with this passage? ['The West focuses on the accuracy of object descriptions, while China tends to coexist with clarity and ambiguity.', 'The "differences" between China and the West are antagonistic and do not reconcile each other.', 'There are differences in cultural concepts, but there is no distinction between good and bad.', 'Completing a coexisting and colorful world is the purpose of inspiring the dialogue between two cultures.']