As a fuel cell, sugar bio battery can convert the chemical energy of sugar into electricity. Generally speaking, sugar bio battery can achieve 100% energy conversion, and its energy storage density is about, compared to that of lithium-ion battery. The energy storage density is. This means that sugar bio-batteries last at least 10 times longer than existing lithium-ion batteries of the same weight. Therefore, many researchers believe that sugar bio-batteries will effectively replace traditional lithium batteries. Which of the following, if true, supports the above conclusion? ['Sugar bio-cells are microbial fuel cells and cannot work at high temperatures, so they have stricter requirements on the production environment than traditional batteries.', 'Sugar bio-batteries have high efficiency in converting electrical energy, but have low repeatability, while traditional lithium batteries can be repeatedly charged and discharged, so they can be used for a longer time.', 'Sugar bio batteries rely on human enzymes to carry out chemical reactions to generate electricity, while traditional lithium batteries use heavy metals as catalysts, so the former is more low-carbon and environmentally friendly.', 'At present, sugar bio-batteries are only used in power supply devices of artificial organs, while lithium batteries can be used not only for power supply of artificial organs, but also widely used for power supply of various electronic devices.']