Another important factor that makes anthropology slowly grow is that Europeans are only gradually realizing that under the cover of all these differences, they may share basic "human nature" with people everywhere. Those who do not share basic cultural values with European Society are labeled "uncivilized" or "barbaric". Until the middle of the 18th century, a considerable number of European talents began to think that the behavior of such people was completely related to their own understanding. Such an era has come: Increasingly, people are trying to explain things in accordance with natural law, questioning traditional interpretations based on authoritative texts, and growing interest in human diversity. What is the most appropriate understanding of "human diversity"? ['The cultural differences between different nationalities and their differences in age, gender, personality, etc.', "Different origins of human beings and people's unique views on different nationalities and cultures.", 'Differences in folk customs and identifications with "uncivilized" or "barbaric" peoples.', 'Differences in cultural values among different nations and their unique behaviors.']