Julia joined Michael Scott Paperless Company, a small New York based tech startup company, last month. Michael Scott Paperless recently received a valuation of ten million dollars. Julia is clearly the reason for the valuation. Which of the following statements, if true, most weakens the argument? ['Julia only started working two weeks before the valuation.', 'Julia is an expert in her field.', 'Michael Scott Paperless Company released an extremely popular mobile application shortly before hiring Julia.', 'Michael Scott Paperless Company is wildly overvalued.']