Parent P: Children will need computer skills to deal with tomorrow' s world. Computers should be introduced in kindergarten, and computer languages should be required in high school. Parent Q: That would be pointless. Technology advances so rapidly that the computers used by today' s kindergartners and the computer languages taught in today' s high schools would become obsolete by the time these children are adults. Which one of the following, if true, is the strongest logical counter parent P can make to parent Q's objection? ['In the process of learning to work with any computer or computer language, children increase their ability to interact with computer technology.', "Automotive technology is continually advancing too, but that does not result in one's having to relearn to drive cars as the new advances are incorporated into new automobiles.", "Throughout history people have adapted to change, and there is no reason to believe that today's children are not equally capable of adapting to technology as it advances.", "When technology is advancing rapidly, regular training is necessary to keep one's skills at a level proficient enough to deal with the society in which one lives."]