The reason why supervision is often "late" is not complicated. The most important thing is that individual supervisors are indifferent to their duties and inaction. In real life, supervisors are indifferent to their duties, and they can push "unintentional actions" when things happen. The phenomenon is by no means uncommon. They believe that as long as they do nt violate the law and discipline, they do not seek merit but do nothing in the work, and no one can do it. The reason why they breed this kind of thought is because of their own ideological understanding, but also the influence of social climate and social environment has deeper root causes of institutional constraints and lack of incentive mechanisms. What is the incorrect understanding of this text? ['The main reason for repeated late supervision is the incumbency or inaction of individual supervisors.', 'Some regulators are numb at work.', 'Insufficient ideological awareness is the root cause of "inadvertent action" by regulators.', 'There are many reasons for the idea of "don\'t ask for merits but seek no-fault".']