['The action mechanism of IV immunoglobulin (IVIg) for Guillain-Barré syndrome has yet to be clarified.', 'To evaluate clinical, histologic, and immunologic effects in a disease model of acute motor axonal neuropathy (AMAN) treated by IVIg.', 'Rabbits were sensitized with gangliosides including GM1 and divided randomly into two groups at disease onset. One group received IV homologous gamma-globulin (400 mg/kg/day) for 5 days (n = 15), and the other received saline (n = 15). Disease severity was scored (0 to 13 points) daily. Sixty days after onset, anti-GM1 antibodies were tested by ELISA, and the number of degenerative axons was counted in spinal anterior roots.', 'Between both groups at onset, there was no difference in any characteristics including clinical score. The IVIg group had faster recovery than the saline group (p = 0.03). The percentage of rabbits that improved by a score of < or =4 was higher in the IVIg (53%) than in the saline (13%) group 60 days after onset (p = 0.03). Anti-GM1 IgG titers 60 days after onset did not differ between the groups. The anterior roots of rabbits surviving 60 days after onset showed lower frequency of axonal degeneration in the IVIg-treated (n = 11; mean 4.5%) than in the saline-treated (n = 8; mean 11.1%) rabbits (p = 0.01).'] Does immunoglobulin improve a model of acute motor axonal neuropathy by preventing axonal degeneration?