At mock trials in which jury instructions were given in technical legal jargon, jury verdicts tended to mirror the judge' s own opinions. Jurors had become aware of the judge' s nonverbal behavior: facial expressions, body movements, tone of voice. Jurors who viewed the same case but were given instruction in clear, nontechnical language, however, were comparatively more likely to return verdicts at odds with the judge' s opinion. Which one of the following is best illustrated by the example described above? ['Technical language tends to be more precise than nontechnical language.', "The way in which a judge instructs a jury can influence the jury's verdict.", "A person's influence is proportional to that person's perceived status.", 'Real trials are better suited for experimentation than are mock trials.']