Solicitor: Loux named Zembaty executor of her will. Her only beneficiary was her grandson, of whom she was very fond. Prior to distributing the remainder to the beneficiary, Zembaty was legally required to choose which properties in the estate should be sold to clear the estate' s heavy debts. Loux never expressed any particular desire about the Stoke Farm, which includes the only farmland in her estate. Thus, it is unlikely that Loux would have had any objection to Zembaty' s having sold it rather than having transferred it to her grandson. Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the solicitor's argument? ["The Stoke Farm was the main cause of the estate's debts.", "The estate's debts could not have been cleared without selling the Stoke Farm.", 'Loux was well aware of the legal requirements the executor of her will would have to satisfy.', "Loux's grandson had repeatedly expressed his desire to own a farm."]