Municipal legislator: The mayor proposes that the city accept a lighting company' s gift of several high-tech streetlights. Surely there would be no problem in accepting these despite some people' s fear that the company wants to influence the city' s decision regarding park lighting contracts. The only ulterior motive I can find is the company' s desire to have its products seen by mayors who will visit the city for an upcoming convention. In any case, favoritism in city contracts is prevented by our competitive-bidding procedure. Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion of the municipal legislator's argument? ["The lighting company's desire to display its products to visiting mayors is the real motivation behind the suggested gift of streetlights.", "Some people's fear that the company wants to influence the city's decision regarding park lighting contracts is unfounded.", 'It is not appropriate that any company should have the unique opportunity to display its products to mayors attending the upcoming convention.', "The mayor's proposal to accept the gift of streetlights should not be considered problematic."]