['Breast augmentation by autologous fat transfer is an appealing alternative in need of scientific validation.', 'In a prospective multicenter study, 81 women (age range, 17 to 63 years) wore the Brava device, a bra-like vacuum-based external tissue expander, for 4 weeks and then underwent autologous fat injection using 10 to 14 needle puncture sites into each breast in a three-dimensional fanning pattern (average, 277 ml volume injected per breast). Patients resumed Brava wear within 24 hours for 7 or more days. Pretreatment and posttreatment breast volumes were derived from three-dimensional volumetric reconstruction of magnetic resonance imaging scans, and outcomes were compared with a meta-analysis of six recent published reports on autologous fat transfer breast augmentation without expansion. Follow-up ranged from 12 months to 6 years (average, 3.7 years).', 'Breast volume was unchanged between 3 and 6 months. Seventy-one of the treated women were compliant with Brava wear and had a mean augmentation volume at 12 months of 233 ml per breast compared with 134 ml per breast in published series without Brava (p < 0.00001). Graft survival was 82 ± 18 percent compared with 55 ± 18 percent without Brava (p < 0.00001). There was a strong linear correlation (R = 0.87) between pregrafting Brava expansion and the resultant breast augmentation. There were no suspicious breast masses or nodules. Magnetic resonance imaging recognized a 16 percent incidence of fat necrosis easily identified at 1-year mammographic evaluation.'] Is brava and autologous fat transfer a safe and effective breast augmentation alternative : results of a 6-year , 81-patient , prospective multicenter study?