The meat paradox refers to the fact that some people like to eat meat, but cannot think of the scene in which the animal providing the meat dies. Researchers have found that people use a method called "language camouflage" to let sentient beings and potential The connection between food sources has become more obscure in order to eliminate this cognitive dissonance. For example, when we refer to meat, we don't say the name of the animal directly. In English, pork is called pork, beef is called B. eef, or It s called bacon. In 18th century Japan, because the shogunate banned people from eating animal meat at that time, people who stole meat used plant names to refer to meat, called horse meat as cherry meat, venison as red leaves, Wild pork is called peony. What does this text mainly explain? ['"Language camouflage" is a manifestation of human deception.', 'Japanese love plants more than animals.', 'Cultural factors are key to dissolving the meat paradox.', '"Language disguise" helps overcome cognitive dissonance.']