For a long time, various regions around China have different perceptions of China, and this may be just a mirror that makes China's self-awareness more accurate. Compared with those civilizations that have been in close contact with China and seem to be close, The West, which has been used as a comparative mirror, seems to be just a dim and vague bronze mirror. Although the outline of the overall Chinese culture can be seen, the details of specific cultural China cannot be clearly understood. Therefore, if we turn to this periphery, set a phrase in the economics circle Commonly used terminology, maybe it will become a new growth point for academics. Because of the development of this research field, I think that the changes in academic history that are induced may be a re-emphasis on language tools and a re-emphasis on new data outside the domain. What's the point of this text? ['China should study the culture of the surrounding areas.', 'A better understanding of China through studies of surrounding areas.', 'China should re-emphasize language tools and new extraterritorial materials.', 'China needs to strengthen self-awareness.']