The striking similarities between Greek temples and subsequent Roman villas testify to the fact that great architects typically draw inspiration from the work of other architects. Such drawing of inspiration does not mean, however, a slavish lack of originality; building according to formulas does not make good buildings. When formulas are used, the results are either bland or disastrous. By contrast, a great architect creates fresh architectural compositions out of familiar forms and synthesizes past and present into a new, richer whole. Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage? ['Some Greek temples were not themselves inspired by older models.', 'Some Roman architecture exemplifies the creation of fresh architectural compositions out of familiar forms.', 'Buildings with unfamiliar forms are likely to be either bland or architectural disasters.', 'Roman architects designed many buildings with little or no originality of thought.']