In judicial trials, the so-called affirmative misjudgment is to convict the innocent person as guilty, and the negative misjudgement is to convict the guilty person as innocent. Affirmative misjudgment is a so-called misjudgement, and negative misjudgement is a so-called error The fundamental principle of judicial fairness is "don't let go of a bad person, and don't injustice a good person. " A jurist believes that at present, the measure of whether a court has implemented the principle of judicial fairness sufficiently in the handling of a case depends on its affirmation. Is the rate of sexual misjudgment low enough? Which of the following, if true, would best strengthen the point of view of a jurist? ['Misplaced, but the bad guys are misplaced; misjudgment, both misplaced bad guys and wrongdoers.', 'It is better to misjudge rather than misplace it, which is the reflection of "Left" thought in the judicial circle.', 'The loss caused by misplacement can be made up in most cases; the damage caused to the victim by wrong judgment is generally irreparable.', 'The rate of negative false positives is basically the same in all courts.']