['The objective of the study was to determine the effects of electrical stimulation (ES) on cervical ripening in pregnant and nonpregnant rats.', 'Timed pregnant and nonpregnant Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 6-7/group) were used. Cervical ES for pregnant rats was performed in vivo on day 15 of gestation by inserting an electrical probe into the vagina in contact with the cervix. Parameters of ES varied from 0.1 to 0.2 mA, 10 pulses per second, 20 milliseconds pulse duration, and repeating pulses for 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes for pregnant ES groups and similar times for sham control groups with electrode but without ES. Nonpregnant ES groups were stimulated with only 0.2 mA for 30 minutes. Cervical collagen was measured in controls and following ES at various times using light-induced fluorescence (LIF) of collagen. Photographs were taken following ES, and some rats were killed, the cervices were isolated, and cervical extensibility was estimated.', 'LIF values of pregnant rats are significantly lower (P < .001) and extensibility greater (P < .05) in the ES treatment groups compared with the control groups on days 16 and 17 of pregnancy. Similarly LIF is lower (P < .05) and extensibility values greater (P < .05) in nonpregnant rats treated with ES. No adverse effects, including altered delivery time, pup weights, or damage to cervix, were produced by low current levels of ES needed to soften the cervix.'] Does direct electrical stimulation soften the cervix in pregnant and nonpregnant rats?