Brian: Reporters and photographers are legally required to automatically distort the features of any bystanders whose faces might be shown on television before they can broadcast the taped segment. Yet when people are interviewed for a story, this practice is not followed. If we were as concerned about protecting the privacy of people as we say we are, then reporters would be required to automatically distort the features of the people they interview too. Jessica: But consider this: A person being interviewed can simply ask to have his or her features distorted if he or she wants privacy, where it might not be possible for the bystanders to know they are being filmed. So you see, automatically distorting the features of people being interviewed is not necessary. Jessica attempts to counter Brian's argument by ["presenting a detailed example to show that Brian's argument is based on premises that cannot be confirmed or disproved", "drawing another analogy that uncovers a serious mistake in Brian's reasoning", 'showing that information on which Brian bases his conclusion is false', 'pointing out a relevant distinction between the two groups to weaken an analogy that Brian bases his argument on']