I agree that Hogan' s actions resulted in grievous injury to Winters. And I do not deny that Hogan fully realized the nature of his actions and the effects that they would have. Indeed, I would not disagree if you pointed out that intentionally causing such effects is reprehensible, other things being equal. But in asking you to concur with me that Hogan' s actions not be wholly condemned I emphasize again that Hogan mistakenly believed Winters to be the robber who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings for the past several months. Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion of the argument? ['Hogan thought that Winters was the person who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings for the last few months.', "The robber who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings should be considered to be as responsible for Winters's injuries as Hogan.", 'The actions of Hogan that seriously injured Winters were reprehensible, other things being equal.', 'The actions of Hogan that seriously injured Winters are not completely blameworthy.']