Analyst: The increasing complexity of computers may lead those who pursue a career in computer programming to think that job security and higher wages can be attained by becoming more specialized as the field becomes more complex. Even though specialists earn higher wages than generalists within computer programming, this move is ill-advised because one risks specializing in a technology that will become obsolete. Consider the plight of people who used to repair eight-track tape players. Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the analyst's argument? ['The technological complexity of computers may eventually grow less rapidly than at present.', 'The current technological knowledge of most specialists within computer programming could also be applied to many technologies that will replace present ones.', 'Many other careers will soon offer greater job security and higher wages than computer programming.', 'The average wages earned by generalists within computer programming will never be as high as the average wages earned by specialists within computer programming.']