Ethicist: Some would ban cloning on the grounds that clones would be subpeople, existing to indulge the vanity of their "originals. " It is not illegal, however, to use one person as a vehicle for the ambitions of another. Some people push their children to achieve in academics or athletics. You do not have to have been born in a test tube to be an extension of someone else' s ego. The assertion that it is not illegal to use one person as a vehicle for another's ambitions is used in the ethicist's argument in which one of the following ways? ['It supports the conclusion that forcing children to pursue academic success is not objectionable.', "It supports the ethicist's view that vanity's being the motivation for cloning is not enough of a reason to ban cloning.", 'It describes a legal position that the ethicist argues should be changed.', "It is implied by the ethicist's conviction that clones are not subpeople."]