Philosopher: Effective tests have recently been developed to predict fatal diseases having a largely genetic basis. Now, for the first time, a person can be warned well in advance of the possibility of such life-threatening conditions. However, medicine is not yet able to prevent most such conditions. Simply being informed that one will get a disease that is both fatal and incurable can itself be quite harmful to some people. This raises the question of whether such "early warning" tests should be made available at all. Which one of the following statements is best illustrated by the state of affairs described by the philosopher? ['The advance of medicine creates new contexts in which ethical dilemmas can arise.', 'The advance of technology is of questionable value.', 'The advance of medicine fails to provide solutions to every problem.', 'Medical technologies continue to advance, increasing our knowledge and understanding of disease.']