A large company has been convicted of engaging in monopolistic practices. The penalty imposed on the company will probably have little if any effect on its behavior. Still, the trial was worthwhile, since it provided useful information about the company' s practices. After all, this information has emboldened the company' s direct competitors, alerted potential rivals, and forced the company to restrain its unfair behavior toward customers and competitors. Which one of the following most accurately expresses the overall conclusion drawn in the argument? ["The light shed on the company's practices by the trial has emboldened its competitors, alerted potential rivals, and forced the company to restrain its unfair behavior.", 'The penalty imposed on the company will likely have little or no effect on its behavior.', 'The penalty imposed on the company in the trial should have been larger.', "The company's trial on charges of engaging in monopolistic practices was worthwhile."]