When we say that Confucianism is moral supremacy of moral determinism, it is a kind of overall qualitative and evaluation on a macro level. The so-called "Zihanyanli" or "little man is Yuli" focuses on the human being as a moral existence, Beyond the "should" nature of existence and argue, what is rejected and scorned is "injustice, rich and expensive". Specific to the issue of people's livelihood, Confucianism is not talking about benefits, negating benefits, but advocating to benefit the people. Benefit the people and enrich the people; not that morality determines people's livelihood, but that people's livelihood determines morality. According to this text, is the following statement correct? ["On people's livelihood, Confucianism advocates moral supremacy.", "The Confucian view of people's livelihood is not about morality but emphasis on people.", "Confucianism believes that morality and people's livelihood are not opposed, but promote each other.", 'Confucianism believes that "profit" has different meanings in different historical periods.']