With the social contract, people lose their natural freedom, and their absolute right to take whatever they want; through the social contract, they get the freedom of civilization and the legal right to their own possessions. When weighing the advantages and disadvantages, if we want to avoid mistakes, we must clearly distinguish what is natural freedom and what is civilized freedom-natural freedom is controlled only by the actual power of the individual, while civilized freedom is limited by the public will Entering a civilized society, human beings have obtained moral freedom, which alone makes human beings their own masters. Based on the above text, is the following statement correct? ['The social contract sets the boundaries between natural freedom and civilized freedom.', 'The social contract emphasizes restraint rather than complete freedom.', 'People can obtain civilized freedom only if they obey the social contract.', 'Social contract grants people the freedom of civilization and restricts the freedom of nature.']