The most commonly accepted theory about elementary particles is the "standard theory". It was established about 30 years ago, and basic elementary particles that have been discovered can be explained based on this theory. For more than 100 years, elementary particles such as protons, neutrons, electrons, etc. In the face of these achievements, some people believe that the basic particles in the universe have been found to be almost the same, and even if there are, they can be explained by existing theories, so it will not bring many surprises to people. Which of the following, if true, would best refute the above point? ['Few elementary particles found based on "standard theory".', 'Some predictions based on "standard theory" have not been confirmed experimentally.', 'The newly discovered elementary particles do not match the predictions made by "standard theory".', "Some scientists have proposed a new theory that subverts people's previous understanding of elementary particles."]