Recently, several national ministries and commissions jointly issued the "Provisions on the Strict Exclusion of Illegal Evidence in the Handling of Criminal Cases", which clarified the identification criteria and exclusion procedures for illegal evidence in terms of the investigation, prosecution, defense, and trial. The so-called " "Evidence" is the "foundation" of conviction and sentencing. According to the standard of evidence in China, a citizen can be convicted only if the standard of "facts are clear and the evidence is sufficient" can be judged. This kind of legal form, or the acquisition procedure violates the legal provisions, is not legal evidence and cannot be trusted by the court. Although the law stipulates "black and white" to strictly exclude illegal evidence, from the perspective of judicial practice, such evidence is like stubborn psoriasis. Not stop, never stop. The most likely next paragraph of this text is:. ['Reasons why illegal evidence cannot be strictly ruled out.', 'Contents of "8 Legal Forms" of the Criminal Procedure Law.', 'Impact of illegal evidence on judicial work.', 'Realistic background of new regulations.']