In some grass-roots units, there is always a phenomenon of "talking back" between the masses and cadres, and some of them also cause antagonism between the cadres and the masses. The reason is that some grassroots cadres have ignored the masses' "psychology". When people are criticized by others, the metropolis instinctively generates a sense of justification, that is, the "psychology of confession. " Even if there are obvious and inexcusable wrongs, some people will say a few objective reasons To justify yourself and dilute the bad effects caused by your obsolescence. Generally speaking, the "psychology of confession" mainly has the following two manifestations: one is to explain the problem through confession, and the other is to avoid responsibility. Based on the above text, is the following statement correct? ['The reason why the masses "justify" themselves is to let cadres understand the real situation.', 'The "justification" of grassroots cadres towards the masses should be distinguished from different situations and handled properly.', 'People who do wrong but are lucky enough to evade responsibility are prone to "confidence".', 'Disputes between grassroots cadres and the masses are due to the neglect of the masses\' "psychology".']