It is obvious that one ought to have a will stating how one wishes one' s estate to be distributed. This can easily be seen from the fact that, according to current laws, in the absence of a legal will distant relatives whom one has never even met have a greater legal right to one' s estate than one' s beloved friends do. Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends? ['No one wants his or her estate to go to someone he or she has never met.', 'People are generally not indifferent about how their estates are distributed.', "One's beloved friends have a greater legal right to one's estate than one's distant relatives do.", "One's estate should go only to a person who is deserving."]