A survey of the results of a university student sports meeting in a city seems to be contradictory. When the athletes participating in the 100m finals were asked about their position in the sports meeting, 60% of the respondents said that their results were among the best in the game. The top 20%. If all the athletes participating in the survey were telling the truth, which of the following could give a more reasonable explanation for the above phenomenon? ['Not all non-respondents rank outside the top 20% of the 100m finals.', 'The remaining 40% of the respondents in the 100m finals are outside the top 20%.', '0% of the athletes participating in the 100m finals did not perform well.', 'Athletes with poor results in the 100-meter final did not participate in the survey.']