Randy: After Mega Cable Television Company refused to carry the competing Azco News Service alongside its own news channels, the mayor used her influence to get Azco time on a community channel, demonstrating her concern for keeping a diversity of news programming in the city. Marion: The mayor' s action is fully explained by cruder motives: she' s rewarding Azco' s owner, a political supporter of hers. Of the following, which one, if true, is the logically strongest counter Randy can make to Marion's objection? ["The mayor also used her influence to get time on a community channel for another news service, whose owner supported the mayor's opponent in the last election.", "The many people whose jobs depend on Azco's continued presence on a community channel are a potential source of political support for the mayor.", "Azco's news coverage of the mayor has never been judged to be biased by an impartial, independent organization.", 'The owner of Azco supported the mayor simply because he liked her political agenda, and not for any expected reward.']