Some people have proposed from the level of legal operation that the application of peasant paintings will cause contradictions in copyright, because the national and national cultural heritage, the authors are collective and anonymous. The authors of peasant paintings are very clear and have the provisions of the Copyright Law Subject and object conditions. According to the text, what is incorrect about the following statement? ['Farmer painting author owns the copyright of the work.', 'Peasant painting does not belong to the culture of the country or nation.', 'Cultural heritage cannot usually belong to a single individual.', "The nature of copyright may affect the application of farmers' paintings."]