In recent years, as tourism adventures have become more and more popular among some people, the resulting rescue operations have also become more and more. Should public resources be used to rescue deliberately dangerous tourist explorers? Should these fees be charged? It has become the topic that everyone is most concerned about. The square believes that it should be charged; the opposite believes that it should not be charged. If the following items are true, which cannot support the square view are:. ['A rational citizen should be responsible for his actions; otherwise, it is unfair to other taxpayers.', 'Establishing a professional rescue system requires certain funding.', 'Rescuing people in distress is an obligation of government departments, and simple fees do not help adventurers build a sense of social responsibility.', "Tourist explorers enter unsafe areas illegally, wasting social resources and taxpayers' money, and should bear the corresponding costs."]