['Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction occurs in a large proportion of children with asthma.', 'To compare the predictive value of methacholine challenge testing (MCCT) and the exercise treadmill challenge (ETC) for detecting asthma in children with postexercise symptoms.', 'This was a prospective study of children 10 to 18 years old with postexercise symptoms. During asthma diagnosis, they underwent MCCT and ETC. There were 2 study visits. All subjects underwent ECT at visit 1 and MCCT 1 week later at visit\xa02.', 'One hundred one children were included; 62.9% had a history of atopy, and asthma was confirmed in 43.6%. MCCT showed 90.9% sensitivity, 82.5% specificity, 80.0% positive predictive value, and 92.2% negative predictive value; the respective values for ECT were 77.3%, 68.4%, 65.4%, and 79.6%. Positive MCCT results showed significantly higher sensitivity and higher positive predicative value in the diagnosis of asthma in children with postexercise symptoms compared with a 10% decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second for ECT (P\xa0= 0.034). Conducting MCCT during asthma diagnosis confirmed asthma in an additional 24.3% of children with exercise-induced symptoms. With a cutoff level at 17% of forced expiratory volume in 1 second for ECT, the discrepancy was decreased and reasonable values for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were attained (61.0%, 77.1%, 69.4%, and 69.8%, respectively).'] Is methacholine challenge testing superior to the exercise challenge for detecting asthma in children?