['To study whether circulatory changes during large volume paracentesis (LVP) in patients with liver cirrhosis and tense ascites as assessed by novel non-invasive haemodynamic measuring technology are reversed by subsequent albumin infusion.', "Eleven patients with portal hypertensive ascites secondary to liver cirrhosis of Child's class B or C were studied during LVP (10.7 +/- 4.4 l) and subsequent infusion of albumin. Digital arterial pulse waves were continuously measured by vascular unloading technique providing data for beat-to-beat values of systolic (P(s)), diastolic (P(d)) and mean arterial pressures (P(m)), respectively, as well as for heart rate (F(h)), stroke volume (V(s)), cardiac output (Q(co)) and peripheral resistance (R). Data extrapolated to the end of paracentesis, albumin infusion and follow-up phases were compared with the end of the equilibration phase.", 'At the end of paracentesis, P(s), P(m) and P(d) changed by -14 +/- 15% (p < 0.05), -16 +/- 11% (p < 0.01) and -17 +/- 11% (p < 0.001), respectively, whereas Q(co) and F(h) did not change substantially. There was a highly significant increase in V(s) by +21 +/- 25% (p < 0.01). The largest change was seen in R which significantly decreased by -29 +/- 24% (p < 0.01). This change was not reversed by infusion of albumin and persisted up to the end of follow-up.'] Does albumin infusion fail to restore circulatory function following paracentesis of tense ascites as assessed by beat-to-beat haemodynamic measurements?