The shortcomings of traditional Keynesianism and the effectiveness and mistakes of neoclassical have inspired some scholars to build macroeconomics on the basis of microcosmic. The price rigidity and non-market clearing hypothesis replaced the neoclassical wage, price flexibility and market clearing hypothesis, and combined it with the theory of macro output and employment determination to draw Keynesian conclusions, which resulted in the New Keynesian Doctrine. Do you understand the right one? ['The effectiveness and mistakes of neoclassicism are the basis of macroeconomics.', 'Breakthrough in microeconomics based on microeconomics lies in the empirical analysis of labor market and product market.', 'Neo-Keynesianism replaces the neoclassical assumption with wages, price rigidity, and non-market clearing assumptions.', 'Wages, price flexibility, and market clearing assumptions may be the effects and mistakes of neoclassicism.']