Children clearly have a reasonably sophisticated understanding of what is real and what is pretend. Once they have acquired a command of language, we can ask them which is which, and they generally get it right. Even a much younger child who runs away when she sees her father roaring and prowling like a lion does not act as though she thinks her father is actually a lion. If she believed that, she would be terrified. The pleasure children get from make-believe would be impossible to explain if they could not distinguish the real from the pretend. Which one of the following most accurately expresses the overall conclusion drawn in the argument? ['Children would be terrified if they believed they were in the presence of a real lion.', 'Children apparently have a reasonably sophisticated understanding of what is real and what is pretend.', 'Children who have acquired a command of language generally answer correctly when asked about whether a thing is real or pretend.', 'The pleasure children get from make-believe would be impossible to explain if they could not distinguish between what is real and what is pretend.']