Productive protection, as an important part of China's non-heritage protection experience, has attracted the attention of the contracting states. Low-level imitation is by no means the proper meaning of productive protection. Imitation is the foundation but not the whole of inheritance. Imitation, although it can play a certain aesthetic substitute, even open up the art space that the original fails to express, it can also provide a lot of jobs, which can reasonably exist to a certain extent; but "re-creation" in swarms, and it is a manual craft The damage of non-heritage projects related to folk arts is particularly great. Instead of improving, it has reduced the style of handmade artworks, and has also shaken the foundation of the existence of handmade art projects. Based on this text, we can see the author's intention? ['Explain that productive protection is an effective means of intangible heritage protection.', 'Introduce the experience of non-heritage protection of Chinese handicraft projects.', 'Explain that a certain degree of imitation is a type of productive protection.', 'Emphasizing that low-level imitation has more harm than good than non-heritage protection.']