Respecting and taking care of women's position in transportation, goodwill is understandable. Setting up "female parking spaces" has a guiding meaning, but after all, it is still a mechanical way of "enclosure. " It is true that men and women have differences in physical fitness, thinking methods, etc. However, it is not equivalent to driving technology, and there is not enough data to support or investigate. Female drivers must have higher or lower accident rates than male drivers. Gender and technology are not necessarily related. In reality, it is not only women who need "care". Drivers, as well as new drivers, etc. In the case of a sharp increase in the number of private cars and the shortage of urban parking spaces, the separate allocation of "female parking spaces" and the extravagance of humane care cannot help but be questioned by all parties. What's your opinion about the setting of "female parking spaces"? ['embodies the love for women.', 'Disrespect for women, sex discrimination.', 'Think rationally without having to label gender.', 'Ignoring the lack of parking space supply and management.']