['A subset of patients requires reoperative antireflux surgery (Re-ARS) after failed fundoplication. The aim of this study was to determine symptomatic outcomes beyond 1 year following Re-ARS and to assess the relative utility of two different surgical approaches.', 'After Institutional Review Board approval, patients who underwent Re-ARS were identified from a prospective database. Symptom severity was graded on a 0-3 scale. Patients with postoperative symptoms of grade ≥ 2 were considered to have a poor outcome. Patient satisfaction was graded using a 10-point visual analog scale.', 'At least 1 year of follow-up was available for 130 patients. There were 94 redo fundoplications (RF) and 36 Roux-en-Y reconstructions (RNYR). Symptom risk factors (significant preoperative dysphagia, significant preoperative heartburn, esophageal dysmotility, short esophagus, delayed gastric emptying, multiple failed hiatal surgeries, reflux-related respiratory symptoms) were more prevalent in patients who underwent RNYR compared to RF (mean 3.0 vs. 2.2; p = 0.003). Postoperative leaks and major complications occurred in 4.5 % (5/110) versus 0% and 21.6 % versus 33.3 % of the RF and RNYR groups, respectively. Twenty-eight RF patients (29.8 %) and 9 RNYR patients (25.0 %) reported poor outcomes. Among patients with ≥ 4 risk factors, those who underwent RNYR had a lower incidence of poor outcome (7.7 % vs. 55 %, p = 0.018) and higher satisfaction scores (8.4 vs. 5.8, p = 0.001) compared to those who had RF. Overall, 85 % of patients were satisfied or highly satisfied with their results and the average satisfaction score was 8.2.'] Is roux-en-Y reconstruction superior to redo fundoplication in a subset of patients with failed antireflux surgery?