In a particular society, if the rich group refuses to make necessary or reasonable income transfers, the society will eventually fall into a state of chaos, and the conditions for the rich to become rich and the environment to enjoy the wealth will change. It is "not cost-effective", and if the poor groups have too high requirements on social welfare, it will make the production costs too high, and the investment income will be too low, resulting in no reinvestment, no employment growth, and the situation of most poor people. Fundamental, long-term improvement, and eventually the entire society will fall into the plight of long-term stagnation. Based on this, can it be launched? ['If society does not fall into turmoil or long-term stagnation, either the rich group makes necessary or reasonable income transfers, or the poor group has excessively high social welfare requirements.', 'If the society does not fall into turmoil or into a state of long-term stagnation, or the poor group does not place too high demands on social welfare, or the rich group makes necessary or reasonable income transfers.', 'If the society is in turmoil and is stuck in a long-term stagnation, it must be that the rich groups have refused to make necessary or income transfers, and the poor groups have excessive demands on social welfare.', 'If the society is in turmoil or in a state of prolonged stagnation, it must be that the rich group refuses to make necessary or reasonable income transfers, or the poor group has too high requirements for social welfare.']