Strict logical reasoning has a certain history in history: public debate. The Athenians in the classical era were eloquent, there was a set of democratic election methods, eloquentness was popular, and there was even a strange habit: two people argued about one thing, There can be winnings, whoever wins will win winnings. The original intention of dialectics is to debate. One party has a flaw in its speech, and the other is trying to argue. If you are afraid of losing, you must be strict. Obviously logic comes from this too. What does it mean if it doesn't fit this passage? ['Eloquence was popular in Athens in the classical era.', 'Dialectics is not just about winning in arguments with others.', "It's weird to argue about one thing in classical Athens.", 'The emergence of logic may be related to the argument of the Athenians in the classical era.']