Regarding the relationship between national strength and the right to speak internationally, our public opinion often understands it one-sidedly, thinking that the size of the right to speak internationally depends on the strength of the country. Of course, this view seems to come from a confusing phenomenon in the world today. That is, the most powerful United States has the strongest international discourse power, and Europe, where traditional powers are concentrated, also has a large international discourse power. However, the reason why the United States and Europe have strong international discourse power is not just because of their strength. It is because the innovative ideas contained in their discourses guide the setting of most important international issues, and their discourse is logical and persuasive. Although it cannot be denied that powerful power is a positive factor for the right to speak, The right of international discourse has never been allocated according to the strength of a country. In some issues or areas, it is common for some small countries to have more right to speak than some large countries. What does this passage mean? ['The strength of a country determines the strength of the right to speak internationally.', 'Enhancing the quality of discourse is essential to improving the right to speak internationally.', 'The right to speak internationally is controlled by individual powerful countries.', 'The influence of the power of dialogue on national strength varies in different areas.']