['The loss of skeletal muscle mass with aging has been attributed to a decline in muscle fiber number and muscle fiber size.', 'To define to what extent differences in leg muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) between young and elderly men are attributed to differences in muscle fiber size.', 'Quadriceps muscle CSA and type I and type II muscle fiber size were measured in healthy young (n=25; 23 ± 1 y) and older (n=26; 71 ± 1 y) men. Subsequently, the older subjects performed 6 months of resistance type exercise training, after which measurements were repeated. Differences in quadriceps muscle CSA were compared with differences in type I and type II muscle fiber size.', 'Quadriceps CSA was substantially smaller in older versus young men (68 ± 2 vs 80 ± 2 cm(2), respectively; P<0.001). Type II muscle fiber size was substantially smaller in the elderly vs the young (29%; P<0.001), with a tendency of smaller type I muscle fibers (P=0.052). Differences in type II muscle fiber size fully explained differences in quadriceps CSA between groups. Prolonged resistance type exercise training in the elderly increased type II muscle fiber size by 24 ± 8% (P<0.01), explaining 100 ± 3% of the increase in quadriceps muscle CSA (from 68 ± 2 to 74 ± 2 cm(2)).'] Is the decline in skeletal muscle mass with aging mainly attributed to a reduction in type II muscle fiber size?