Columnist: Tagowa' s testimony in the Pemberton trial was not heard outside the courtroom, so we cannot be sure what she said. Afterward, however, she publicly affirmed her belief in Pemberton' s guilt. Hence, since the jury found Pemberton not guilty, we can conclude that not all of the jury members believed Tagowa' s testimony. Which one of the following describes a flaw in the columnist's reasoning? ["It fails to consider that jury members sometimes disagree with each other about the significance of a particular person's testimony.", 'It confuses facts about what certain people believe with facts about what ought to be the case.', "It presumes, without providing warrant, that a jury's finding a defendant not guilty is evidence of dishonesty on the part of someone who testified against the defendant.", "It overlooks that a witness may think that a defendant is guilty even though that witness's testimony in no way implicates the defendant."]