Some of our popular science articles often fail to arouse public interest, and one of the reasons is boring. To write popular science articles as "great and lavish" requires the writer's pen. The rapid development of science has provided a rich mine for literary writing I believe that once a visionary writer has experienced the richness and richness of scientific subjects, he will be intoxicated by its infinite scenery and forget to return. What does this text talk about? ['Dependence of Popular Science Articles on Writers.', 'The mutual incentives of science and literature.', 'The interdependent relationship between science and literature.', 'Scientific development provides rich material for literature.']