['Diltiazem is widely used to prevent radial artery spasm after coronary bypass grafting (CABG). However, recent in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that nitroglycerin is a superior conduit vasodilator compared to diltiazem. A clinical comparison of these agents in patients undergoing CABG has not been previously performed.', 'One hundred sixty-one consecutive patients undergoing isolated CABG with the radial artery were prospectively randomized to 24-hour intravenous infusion of nitroglycerin or diltiazem followed by 6-month treatment with a daily dose of isosorbide mononitrate (n = 84) or diltiazem CD (n = 77). Analyses were performed on "intention-to-treat" basis.', 'Crossovers because of low cardiac output, complete heart block, or sinus bradycardia occurred in 5 patients in the diltiazem group and none in the nitroglycerin group (p = 0.05). Operative mortality (nitroglycerin, 1.2% versus diltiazem, 1.3%), major morbidity (14% versus 16%), perioperative myocardial infarction (1.2% versus 0%), peak serum creatinine phosphokinase MB fraction levels (27 versus 21 U), intensive care unit stay (34+/-19 versus 38+/-30 hours) and total hospital length of stay (4.7+/-1.4 versus 4.7+/-1.3 days) were similar (p = not significant for all). Cardiac pacing was required more often in the diltiazem group (28% versus 13%, p = 0.01). Follow-up longer than 2 months was available in 145 patients (90%). Follow-up mortality (nitroglycerin, 1.2%; diltiazem, 1.3%), myocardial infarction (6%, versus 5%), and reintervention (8% versus 6%) rates and average angina class (1.3+/-0.7 versus 1.1+/-0.4) were similar (p = not significant for all). Thallium stress test obtained in 117 patients showed abnormal perfusion in the radial artery territory in only 4 patients (3%), 2 in each group (p = not significant). Treatment with diltiazem was more costly ($16,340 versus $1,096).'] Is nitroglycerin preferable to diltiazem for prevention of coronary bypass conduit spasm?