The cost of planting genetically modified crops is high, so there is a view that this can only benefit seed producers and large farms, but not small farms that are commonly found in poor areas. In response, genetically modified companies point out that small-scale planting in many places Everyone is planting genetically modified crops because growers have increased their income by planting genetically modified crops. If the following options are true, which of the following is the most powerful way to refute the view of the GM company? ['Some countries provide subsidies to growers who have lost money on growing genetically modified crops in order to increase total crop production.', 'Small-scale growers usually only plant varieties with higher crop value.', 'The cost of planting genetically modified crops is 30% higher than that of ordinary crops, but the yield can be 40% higher than that of ordinary crops.', 'There are many natural crops that produce no less than GM crops, but the prices are much lower than GM crops.']