Objectively speaking, "network democracy" has certain advantages over traditional democracy, but it is also limited and disruptive. From the perspective of future development, "network democracy" must become an effective, orderly, and tangible form of democracy There is a rather long process, and it is still a difficult process. Therefore, how to guide the direction and process of "network democracy" development is particularly important. The following statement is inconsistent? ['The current online democracy is still immature.', 'Traditional democracy is also limited and disruptive.', 'In the future, cyber democracy may become the official form of democracy.', 'The following may discuss ways and means to guide the development of cyber democracy.']