When the cohesion of group members is high, group members tend to keep their views consistent with the group, while other controversial, creative and even more objective and reasonable ideas will be ignored or suppressed. This may cause the group to make unreasonable Even bad decision-making. Similar phenomena may appear in the process of public opinion on the Internet. People are more likely to be attracted to the forum where they agree and continue to deepen their original views. This may cause group fans Thinking, the formation of incorrect but dominant opinions favored by the majority, and the situation where dissidents are "represented" and hold a speech. What does this text give to government management? ['Internet public opinion may not be able to represent the true thoughts of Internet users, and the government should discriminate against this when seeking public opinion.', 'The expression of public opinion on the Internet is false and not suitable as a channel for the government to solicit public opinion.', 'Anonymity in cyberspace makes it easy to manipulate online public opinion, and the government should strengthen its control over cyberspace.', 'When seeking public opinion through the Internet, the government should speak less and listen more, allowing different opinions and even questions to exist.']