The so-called "using the IP address or network name as the defendant" is actually only for the pre-filing procedure. In this way, the plaintiff of the network infringement can apply to the people's court to investigate the relevant information of the defendant's identity, and can verify the formal filing of the trial. From this, it can be seen that this is actually the plaintiff requesting the court to use its investigative power to find out the person behind the IP address or network name, and to transfer the power of investigation to verify the "defendant's specific identity" to the court. Without special investigative powers, most of the public also do not have the technical means to conduct online tracking. If the court still cannot find out after the intervention, it will still not be accepted. As long as there is no clear defendant, the plaintiff's lawsuit will be meaningless ----- -Not to mention that during the trial, the "defendant" could not defend, even if the plaintiff won the lawsuit, there was no responsible person to bear the corresponding civil liability. The most accurate summary of the main point of this text is:. ['Introduce the plight of legal issues in the Internet age.', "Analysis of the plaintiff's disadvantaged position in online infringement cases.", 'Analysis of the importance of the identification of the defendant in the case.', 'Explain the way of identifying defendants in online infringement cases and their significance.']