Constance: The traditional definition of full employment as a 5 percent unemployment rate is correct, because at levels below 5 percent, inflation rises. Brigita: That traditional definition of full employment was developed before the rise of temporary and part-time work and the fall in benefit levels. When people are juggling several part-time jobs with no benefits, or working in a series of temporary assignments, as is now the case, 5 percent unemployment is not full employment. The dialogue most strongly supports the claim that Constance and Brigita disagree with each other about which one of the following? ['whether a person with a part-time job should count as fully employed', 'what definition of full employment is applicable under contemporary economic conditions', 'whether it is a good idea, all things considered, to allow the unemployment level to drop below 5 percent', 'whether unemployment levels above 5 percent can cause inflation levels to rise']