The evaluation of scientific work cannot be simply reduced to the size of a number, and no number can replace peer review and specific analysis and historical tests of the scientific significance of the work. However, poor evaluation indicators may mislead reviewers, Leading to wrong results; and good evaluation indicators can provide more accurate information and make the corresponding reviews more objective and fair. The text is intended to emphasize the evaluation of scientific work:. ['Should be a unity of subjective and objective evaluations.', 'The key lies in establishing a scientific evaluation index system.', 'Digital conclusions should not be used as the main reference.', 'There is a need to consider multiple factors in order to achieve justice.']