Syllogism is the reasoning of two new blunt propositions that contain a common term. According to the above definition, Which of the following reasoning belongs to the valid syllogism is. ['He is not the defendant and the defendant is entitled to a defence, so he is not entitled to a defence.', 'hrysanthemum is flower, so wild chrysanthemum is wild flower.', 'an is subject to the laws of nature, so he is subject to the laws of nature.', ' you want the horse to run well, you must ask the horse to eat enough grass. If you do n’t ask the horse to eat enough grass, you ca n’t tell the horse to run well.']