Employee: My boss says that my presentation to our accounting team should have included more detail about profit projections. But people' s attention tends to wander when they are presented with too much detail. So, clearly my boss is incorrect. The reasoning in the employee's argument is flawed because the argument ['infers a generalization based only on a single case', "fails to consider that an audience's attention might wander for reasons other than being presented with too much detail", 'confuses two distinct meanings of the key term "detail"', 'fails to distinguish between more of something and too much of it']