Lydia: Each year, thousands of seabirds are injured when they become entangled in equipment owned by fishing companies. Ttherefore, the fishing companies should assume responsibility for funding veterinary treatment for the injured birds. Jonathan: Your feelings for the birds are admirable. Your proposal, however, should not be adopted because treatment of the most seriously injured birds would inhumanely prolong the lives of animals no longer able to live in the wild, as all wildlife should. Jonathan uses which one of the following techniques in his response to Lydia? ['He questions the appropriateness of interfering with wildlife in any way, even if the goal of the interference is to help.', 'He attempts to discredit her proposal by discussing its implications for only those birds that it serves least well.', 'He evades discussion of her proposal by raising the issue of whether her feelings about the birds are justified.', 'He directs a personal attack against her rather than addressing the argument she advances.']