When industries rapidly apply new technology, people who possess the skills and knowledge to master it prosper, while many others lose their jobs. But firms that resist technological innovations will eventually be superseded by those that do not, resulting in the loss of all their employees' jobs. Obviously, then, resisting the application of new technology in industry__. Which one of the following most logically completes the argument? ['is less likely to dislocate workers than it is to create job security for them', 'will affect only those who possess technical skills', 'cannot prevent job loss in the long run', 'eventually creates more jobs than it destroys']