["A prospective randomised study involving 810 elderly patients was conducted in an attempt to compare alternating chemotherapy with conventional first-line chemotherapy in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in order to improve prognosis with an acceptable toxicity for elderly patients.", 'Patients included were 55-69 years old and had at least one adverse prognostic factor. Patients were treated either with ACVBP followed by consolidation (n = 396) or with an alternating regimen (n = 414). This regimen was an association of active drugs in NHL relapsing patients, alternating VIMMM with ACVBP for induction and alternation of VIM and ACVM in consolidation. Eight hundred and sixty-six patients were randomised. After histological review, 810 patients met the inclusion criteria: 396 in arm A, 414 in arm B.', 'The complete response rate after induction was superior for conventional first-line therapy (58.5% vs 48%, P = 0.003) but at the end of treatment, the CR rate was not statistically different (52% vs 48%, P = 0.19). Conventional chemotherapy had a better five-year event-free survival than alternating regimen (33% (95% CI: 30-36%) vs 28% (95% CI: 26-30%), P = 0.0289) but overall survival was not statistically different (40% (CI 95% 38-42%) vs 36% (CI 95% 34-38%), P = 0.068). In this elderly high risk population, the toxicity was very high: 19% in arm A and 26% in arm B died during treatment.'] Is outcome improved by the use of alternating chemotherapy in elderly patients with aggressive lymphoma?