Attorney: I ask you to find Mr. Smith guilty of assaulting Mr. Jackson. Regrettably, there were no eyewitnesses to the crime, but Mr. Smith has a violent character: Ms. Lopez testified earlier that Mr. Smith, shouting loudly, had threatened her. Smith never refuted this testimony. The attorney's argument is fallacious because it reasons that ['having a violent character is not necessarily associated with the commission of violent crimes', 'aggressive behavior is not a sure indicator of a violent character', "Smith's testimony is unreliable since he is loud and aggressive", 'since Smith never disproved the claim that he threatened Lopez, he did in fact threaten her']