From 1901 to 1961, the Nobel Prize in Literature was almost exclusively monopolized by white Europeans and Americans; after the 1960s, Asian, African, and Latin Americans made most of the home; in the 1990s, no European and American white writers won. And after the 1960s, European and American science and technology In the era of rapid progress, does this mean that technology has emerged, and scientific advancement will make literary works lose their human charm? What is the view that the above paragraph mainly supports? ['High technological development may make the humanistic spirit in literature shallow.', 'Without the interference of technology and science, there is no excellent literary work.', 'Really good literary works can only be produced in backward countries and regions.', 'The development of science and technology is at the cost of losing the humanistic charm of literary works.']