Legal commentator: The goal of a recently enacted law that bans smoking in workplaces is to protect employees from secondhand smoke. But the law is written in such a way that it cannot be interpreted as ever prohibiting people from smoking in their own homes. The statements above, if true, provide a basis for rejecting which one of the following claims? ['Most people believe that smokers have a fundamental right to smoke in their own homes.', 'The law offers no protection from secondhand smoke for people outside of their workplaces.', 'The law will protect domestic workers such as housecleaners from secondhand smoke in their workplaces.', 'Supporters of the law believe that it will have a significant impact on the health of many workers.']