Davisville' s mayor: The Davisville Airport is actually located in the city of Millersburg. Millersburg officials have argued that it is illegal for restaurants in the Davisville Airport to serve alcoholic beverages because Millersburg has outlawed alcoholic beverages. But they are mistaken. Since the City of Davisville owns the Davisville Airport, and it is legal for restaurants to serve alcoholic beverages in Davisville, it is legal for them to do so in the Davisville Airport. Which one of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify the reasoning in the Davisville mayor's argument? ["If one city owns a facility located in another city, government officials of both cities should settle through negotiation which city's laws apply in that facility.", 'A facility located outside of a city is not subject to the laws of that city even if the facility is owned by the city.', "Ownership takes precedence over any other factor in determining which city's laws apply in a facility owned by one city but located in another.", 'If one city owns a facility located in another city and a dispute about legal jurisdiction arises, then the city that owns the facility should offer to sell it to the other city.']