['Risk stratification for Brugada syndrome remains controversial. We investigated the relationships between episodes of ventricular fibrillation (VF) and various clinical, electrocardiographic, electrophysiologic, and genetic parameters both retrospectively and prospectively.', "Fifty-two patients with Brugada syndrome (49 men, average age 42 +/- 3 years) were studied. In the Brugada patients with a VF history, the frequency of a spontaneous Type 1 electrocardiogram (ECG) pattern in lead V2 was significantly higher and the STJ amplitude in the V1 and V2 leads was also higher than in those without a VF history. Multivariate analyses revealed that the spontaneous Type 1 ECG pattern in lead V2 (but not lead V1) was the only independent predictor of a VF history. During a mean follow-up period of 39 +/- 4 months, 38.8% of the patients with a VF history and 2.9% of those without experienced an appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillation owing to VF. A multivariate analysis using a Cox's proportional hazard model showed that a VF history and spontaneous Type 1 ECG pattern in lead V2 were independent predictors of subsequent VF events."] Is a spontaneous Type 1 electrocardiogram pattern in lead V2 an independent predictor of ventricular fibrillation in Brugada syndrome?