Jenkins maintains that the movie Firepower was not intended to provoke antisocial behavior, arguing that, on the contrary, it is in the interest of Firepower' s director to prevent such behavior. Yet Jenkins' s conclusion must be rejected, because the movie has clearly produced antisocial behavior among many of those who have seen it. The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that it ['concludes from the mere fact that an action had a certain effect that the effect was intended by the person who performed the action', 'rejects an argument on the grounds that it was offered by a person who was biased', 'infers that something is true of a whole solely on the grounds that it is true of a part of the whole', 'overlooks the possibility that people can act in a way that is contrary to their expressed interest']