At the academic exchange meeting, a foreign scholar denied the existence of the Xia Dynasty with no relics and a lack of written records of the corresponding era. If the following are true, the thing that can most refute this foreign scholar is:. ['Once the foreign archaeological community denied the existence of the Shang Dynasty for the same reason, but with the deepening of the research on Oracle and the discovery of Yin Ruins, they had to rewrite the records of Chinese history.', 'Unlike the West, where a stone was used as the building material and the record carrier, wood was used as the building material and record carrier in ancient China. In addition, we are also affected by geological climate, and it is more difficult to preserve ruins and words.', 'There are many records and legends about the Xia Dynasty in China. In the spring and autumn, the Qi people were considered to be descendants of the Xia people at the time. The "Historical Records" also has accurate records about the title of the Xiahou family (King of the Xia Dynasty).', 'The scholar and team recently discovered a small stone building on a small island in the Aegean Sea that has not yet been identified, and they combined it with the legend of the local population to determine that this is a civilization recorded in the history books.']