Fiscal experts point out that public risks not only arise from the loss of state-owned assets caused by improper government policies, but also because the government directly participates in economic life, such as the government's direct participation in state-owned enterprises. Regulating financial institutions, once a large area of loss occurs in these important economic sectors, It will directly lead to public risks, resulting in fiscal deficits and debt repayment pressure. Therefore, if you want to implement a sound fiscal and monetary policy, it is not enough to adjust fiscal policy. Can it be derived from this text? ['As long as the government guarantees that the state-owned assets will not be lost, even if the decision is wrong, there will be no public risk.', 'As long as the government does not directly produce economic life, or state-owned enterprises and financial institutions do not suffer large losses in important economic areas, there will be no public risk.', 'If public risks can be prevented, prudent fiscal and monetary policies can be implemented.', 'Due to the large-scale losses in important economic fields, even if the policy decisions are correct, public risks may still arise.']