The law of sufficient reason refers to the same thinking and argumentation. An idea is determined to be true. There are always sufficient reasons. There are two logical requirements for the law of sufficient reason: first, the reason must be true: second, the reason and there must be a logical relationship between inferences. Based on the above definitions, which of the following is a good cause law? ['His father travels and his son travels.', "She must be a clerk. You see she's orderly.", 'If it rains, then the ground will be wet. Now it rains. So the ground must be wet.', 'The mosquito defeats the lion. The lion defeats everything else. So the mosquito defeats everything else.']