History student: It is unfair for the History Department to prohibit students from citing certain online encyclopedias in their research papers merely because these sources are not peer reviewed. In their research, students should be allowed to read whatever they wish; otherwise, it is censorship. History professor: Students are allowed to read whatever they like. The rule stipulates only that certain online encyclopedias are not to be cited as references since, given that they are not peer reviewed, they cannot reasonably be treated as reliable support for any claim. The dialogue provides most support for the claim that the student and the professor disagree over whether ['students should be allowed to read whatever they wish to in preparing to write a research paper for a history class', 'sources that are not peer reviewed often have solid support for the claims that they make', 'prohibiting a certain sort of online source material from being cited as a research reference amounts to prohibiting students from reading that source material', 'research papers written for a history class require some citations to be from sources that have been peer reviewed']