['Two hypotheses have been proposed to explain the mechanisms of vulnerability and related failure of defibrillation therapy: the cross-field-induced critical point hypothesis and the virtual electrode-induced phase singularity hypothesis. These two hypotheses predict the opposite effect of preshock repolarization on the chirality (direction of rotation) of shock-induced reentry. The former suggests its reversal upon reversal of repolarization, whereas the latter suggests its preservation. The aim of this study was to determine, by reversing the repolarization sequence, which of the mechanisms is responsible for internal shock-induced arrhythmia in the Langendorff-perfused rabbit heart.', 'We used high-resolution optical mapping to assess the chirality of postshock reentry in 11 hearts. Hearts were paced at a coupling interval of 300 msec at various sites around the field of view (13.5 x 13.5 to 16.5 x 16.5 mm). Cathodal monophasic implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks (-100 V, 8 msec) were applied during the T wave from a 10-mm coil electrode placed into the right ventricular cavity. We used 3.5 +/- 0.8 different pacing sites per heart. Change in direction of repolarization did not result in change of chirality. Chirality was constant in all 11 hearts despite the complete reversal of activation and repolarization patterns. However, the position of resulting vortices depended on transmembrane polarization gradient inverted delta Vm and amplitude of negative polarization Vm (deexcitation). Stronger gradients and deexcitation produced earlier epicardial break excitation (P = 0.04 and P < 0.0001, respectively).'] Does reversal of repolarization gradient reverse the chirality of shock-induced reentry in the rabbit heart?