The two reading paths, one deep and one shallow, have not merged with the improvement of communication technology and the changes in the carrier of the book. Even shallow reading is better, and the fragmentation of reading is one of the important expressions. Admittedly, zero beads Sanyu is also valuable, but if you read and seek knowledge blindly, the brain groove will become shallow. In fact, what reading is not the core, the real reader does not care about the form of the book, whether it is printed on paper or mapped on a mobile phone On the screen, as long as it is the Analects of Confucius. Electronicization does not necessarily make reading shallow, the key is that the text read is shallow. Regarding this text, what is the following understanding? ['Electronic reading is more convenient and effective than paper reading.', "Shallow reading is better than deep reading, and it is more conducive to improving people's thinking ability.", 'What carrier is used to read is not the key to reading, the most important thing is whether the text read is profound.', 'Reading a love novel is the same as reading a humanistic classic.']