There is a tradition in education that confronts science with literature and history in curriculum design. This opposition is easy to explain in history. Prior to experimental science, literature, language, and philosophy had been firmly occupied in all higher schools. Status. Experimental science naturally must work hard. No fortified and solid power group will easily give up the monopoly position it may occupy. However, in any aspect, language and literature are all considered to be humanistic, and Science belongs purely to nature. This is a misconception. The most likely thing to say next is. ['The traditional place of literature and history in higher education.', 'How experimental science developed rapidly.', 'How the monopoly position of the humanities was broken.', 'Why should science and humanity not be opposed.']