['Preterm labor continues to be the first cause (after congenital malformations) of morbidity and mortality during the perinatal period. One of the markers showing the highest sensitivity to predict preterm labor seems to be fetal fibronectin (fFN) determined in the cervicovaginal secretion.', 'To identify patients at risk of preterm labor based on the presence of fFN in cervicovaginal secretions and to analyze the cost-benefit of medical attention and hospital stay depending on the fFN results.', "Four hundred and sixty two patients were admitted in a 6 month period to the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Department. All of them had symptoms of preterm labor. Their gestational ages were between 24 and 34 weeks, the fFN analyses were taken from cervical vaginal secretion. One hundred and fifty eight were fFN positive and 304 were negative. Patients with positive fFN were hospitalized and received specific treatment for preterm labor. The patients with negative fFN were sent home with no medical treatment. In order to calculate the economic impact of the hospital's medical attention we considered the total cost in pesos which included patient's hospital care when admitted with preterm labor symptoms, hospital stay, and neonatal attention. The total costs were compared and analyzed in the two groups.", "The average cost generated for fFN positive and negative patients was 23,059 and 7,859 pesos, respectively. Approximately 15,200 pesos were saved per patient in this group. Multiplying this amount among patients with negative fFN (n=304), we would have saved 4,620,000 pesos in a 6 month period. Our established medical management did not affect negatively maternal-fetal well being. For statistical purposes of variables the Mann Whitney U, chi square and McNemar's tests were calculated."] Does [ Economical impact of preterm delivery management based on fetal fibronectin result ]?