['Upper limb (UL) burns commonly result in significant dysfunction. The measurement of disability is vital to assess recovery after burn injury. The QuickDASH questionnaire was developed to evaluate UL disorders. The aim of this study was to evaluate its validity, repeatability and responsiveness for burn patients.', 'In 2006, 85 patients with UL burns were recruited at Royal Perth Hospital. Each completed both QuickDASH and Burns Specific Health Scale-Brief (BSHS-B) at regular intervals after their burn. Further, 67 patients repeated the questionnaire 1 day after completing it at discharge.', 'Validity-Criterion validity was demonstrated between QuickDASH and BSHS-B through good correlations (r(2)=-0.79 to -0.89). Construct validity was demonstrated using burn severity markers. QuickDASH scores significantly differed when grouped according to major burn, full thickness burn, surgery and need for hospital admission. Repeatability-QuickDASH showed excellent repeatability (ICC=0.93). Responsiveness-Effect size of QuickDASH was demonstrated to be greater than BSHS-B at all measurement points.'] Is the QuickDASH an appropriate tool for measuring the quality of recovery after upper limb burn injury?