['Learning from adverse events and near misses may reduce the incidence of preventable errors. Current literature on adverse events and near misses in the ICU focuses on errors reported by nurses and intensivists. ICU near misses identified by anesthesia providers may reveal critical events, causal mechanisms and system weaknesses not identified by other providers, and may differ in character and causality from near misses in other anesthesia locations.', 'We analyzed events reported to our anesthesia near miss reporting system from 2009 to 2011. We compared causative mechanisms of ICU near misses with near misses in other anesthesia locations.', 'A total of 1,811 near misses were reported, of which 22 (1.2 %) originated in the ICU. Five causal mechanisms explained over half of ICU near misses. Compared to near misses from other locations, near misses from the ICU were more likely to occur while on call (45 % vs. 19 %, p\u2009=\u20090.001), and were more likely to be associated with airway management (50 % vs. 12 %, p\u2009<\u20090.001). ICU near misses were less likely to be associated with equipment issues (23 % vs. 48 %, p\u2009=\u20090.02).'] Does an analysis of near miss identified by anesthesia providers in the intensive care unit?