['Conflicting evidence remains regarding the value of fragmented QRS (fQRS) on surface electrocardiogram (EKG). We present the 5-year outcome of patients with fQRS on EKG and its correlation to SPECT and coronary angiography (CA).', "We retrospectively studied EKG's in 248 consecutive patients undergoing SPECT and CA with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). The presence of fQRS or Q waves in two contiguous EKG leads was correlated with major coronary artery distributions on SPECT and cath. Patients with bundle-branch block, paced-rhythm or absence of EKG within one month of SPECT were excluded. The final EKG data for 238 patients were analyzed and compared with myocardial scar on SPECT and the presence of significant (>50%) coronary stenosis on CA. Predictors of MACE (death, MI, heart failure) were evaluated. Freedom from all-cause mortality was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis.", 'Of 238 patients, no significant difference was noted in the presence of scar on SPECT in fQRS (3/77; 3.8%) versus no fQRS (11/161; 6.8%) (P=0.56); or CA based CAD (55/77; 71% fQRS) and no fQRS (99/161, 61.4%) (P=0.20). EKG Q wave presence was similar in both groups: (12/77; 15.5% fQRS), (17/161; 10.5% no fQRS) (P=0.3). Patients with CA based significant LAD disease were 3.680 times more likely to have fQRS (P=0.04), however, fQRS was not significantly associated with MACE (P=0.92) or all-cause mortality (P=0.93).'] Is fragmented QRS on surface electrocardiogram a reliable predictor of myocardial scar , angiographic coronary disease or long term adverse outcomes?