In recent years, the speed of RMB internationalization has parted from the previous soaring progress, which is largely due to the end of the RMB appreciation cycle and the end of overseas speculators' enthusiasm for holding RMB in the short term. It has increasingly played a substantial role in the international monetary system, but its recognition as an international currency has steadily increased. More and more official and private institutions have begun to take the international currency function of the RMB seriously and consider holding the RMB for a long time. Holding RMB is no longer just a means of short-term investment. For example, in June 2016, the European Central Bank issued a statement saying that the bank had completed an investment of RMB 500 million in foreign exchange reserves. Is the following statement inconsistent? ['RMB internationalization has entered a new and more stable stage.', 'End of RMB appreciation cycle curbs short-term speculation.', 'Slower RMB internationalization speeds up market recognition.', "European Central Bank begins to recognize RMB's international currency status."]