Helen: Reading a book is the intellectual equivalent of investing money: you' re investing time, thereby foregoing other ways of spending that time, in the hope that what you learn will later afford you more opportunities than you' d get by spending the time doing something other than reading that book. Randi: But that applies only to vocational books. Reading fiction is like watching a sitcom: it' s just wasted time. Which one of the following most accurately describes the technique Randi uses in responding to Helen's claims? ['questioning how the evidence Helen uses for a claim was gathered', "disputing the scope of Helen's analogy by presenting another analogy", 'denying the relevance of an example presented by Helen', "arguing that Helen's reasoning ultimately leads to an absurd conclusion"]