Due to the influence of conclusive thinking, our research should always be divided into positive characters and negative characters, and people generally think that all faults should be caused by negative characters, and naively thought that as long as there are no negative characters, everything will go smoothly. It is a manifestation of disrespect for history. It is a bad person. We emphasize the historical view of the problem, but many of our evaluations do not reflect this, but only according to the thoughts and feelings of our modern people. People, tag people. What is the following incorrect expression of the author's intention? ['Research on historical figures should be objective.', 'Negative characters are not responsible for all faults.', 'The thoughts and feelings of modern people should be set aside in historical evaluation.', 'Conclusive thinking has led us to the misunderstanding of the study of history.']