If the prosecutor wanted to charge Frank with embezzlement, then Frank would already have been indicted. But Frank has not been indicted. So clearly Frank is not an embezzler. The flawed pattern of reasoning exhibited by which one of the following is most similar to that exhibited by the argument above? ['If Barry had won the lottery, he would stay home to celebrate. But Barry did not win the lottery, so he will be in to work today.', 'If Makoto believed that he left the oven on, he would rush home. But Makoto is still at work. So obviously he did not leave the oven on.', 'If Tamara believed she was getting a promotion, she would come in to work early. She did come in early. So apparently she is getting a promotion.', 'If Lucy believed she was going to be fired, she would not come in to work today. She is going to be fired, so clearly she will not be coming in today.']