The Legal Committee of the 59th Session of the United Nations General Assembly passed a political declaration in the form of a resolution of 71 votes in favor, 31 votes against, and 43 abstentions on February 18, calling on countries to ban any form of clone that violates human dignity After three days of fierce debate, the Law Commission was unable to reach agreement on the wording of the United Nations Declaration on Human Cloning on the afternoon of the 18th. That night, countries that favored and opposed therapeutic cloning agreed to pay for the declarations supported by their camps. Voting. In the event that members of the Organization of the Islamic State announced that they did not support either party's proposal, the proposal submitted by Honduras against therapeutic cloning was finally approved. The countries that voted in favor included the United States, Germany, the Netherlands and Brazil, and the Chinese government voted against the ticket. What is wrong about the reasons for voting against the Chinese government? ['This declaration is not substantively binding, as it only calls on countries to draft and implement laws prohibiting any form of human cloning and is not mandatory.', 'China believes that therapeutic cloning has a bright future in the treatment of various difficult human diseases. As long as it is strictly managed and properly utilized, it can completely benefit and avoid harm for the benefit of mankind.', 'China believes that under the unified management of the country, some scientists should perform reproductive cloning, i. e. human cloning experiments, because this will help further human understanding.', "The Chinese government's rejection does not mean that China supports the reproductive cloning or human cloning experiment, but only opposes the prohibition of therapeutic cloning research for the purpose of curing diseases and saving people."]