In the trial of a case, the defendant's lawyer said that "the prosecution's lawyer once said that my client A appeared at the scene of the case. Because witness B saw A appeared at the scene. But now it has been proven that witness B cannot see A Appeared at the scene, so my client must not have appeared at the scene. ". Which of the following reasoning is similar to the approach taken by this lawyer's reasoning? ['the media once reported such a news: a teacher used a referendum to find out the thief in the class. When the selected "thief" defended, the teacher countered: "If you are not, why do so many students think you are a thief?".', 'Some scientists believe that from the perspective of quantum theory, there is a space-time parallel to the world in which we currently live. At least for now, it is inferred from the mathematical calculation method that this is completely consistent.', 'After discussion, we speculate that house prices will still rise next year, because there is no information to predict that house prices will fall next year.', '"You must be the one who helped me back then!" "You recognize the wrong person. " "Can you prove that you are not the one who helped me back then?" "I don\'t know. " "Since you can\'t prove that you are not You must be the one who helped me then! ".']