Alissa: If, as the mayor says, the city can no longer continue to fund both the children' s museum and local children' s television programming, then it should cease funding the television programming. The interactive character of the exhibits at the museum makes for a richer educational experience than watching television, which is largely passive. Greta: We should stop funding the museum, not the television programming, because, as the mayor has also pointed out, the museum reaches a much smaller audience. On the basis of their statements, it can be inferred that Alissa and Greta disagree on which one of the following? ["whether local children's television programming provides a beneficial educational experience to a greater number of children in the city than does the children's museum", "whether the city will need to cease funding local children's television programming if it continues funding the children's museum", "whether the city should cease funding local children's television programming if continuing to fund it would mean that the city would have to cease funding the children's museum", "whether the mayor has spoken truthfully about what will need to happen if the city does not cease funding local children's television programming"]