Under the premise of doing research honestly, it is very common for analysis of specific experimental results to understand deviations or even errors, which is a normal process of scientific development. It can be said that the analysis, conclusions and discussions of many academic papers exist to varying degrees. Misunderstandings or deviations. The debate on such academic issues is often one of the important driving forces for scientific development. The more cutting-edge scientific research, the more prone to misunderstandings and wrong conclusions. What does this text say? ['Honest research is based on respecting the authenticity of the original experimental data.', 'Errors in scientific research based on honesty are understandable.', 'Experimental research cannot be concluded lightly and should be repeatedly verified.', 'Inference and continuous revision of research conclusions are the driving force of scientific development.']