According to the Cultural Relics Protection Law, even if the ownership of a building or other facility protected as a cultural relic belongs to an individual, the owner has no right to repair, decorate or even rebuild it. This rule is not appropriate, because sometimes some owners propose to transform the appearance and internal structure of cultural relics because they are convinced that doing so is conducive to strengthening and beautifying cultural relics and increasing their value. If the following is true, can the above argument be weakened most? ['Renovation of cultural relics buildings may not necessarily play a role in strengthening and beautifying, and sometimes it will make them nondescript.', 'Some cultural relics are in disrepair for a long time. If they are not renovated in time, their value will be seriously damaged.', 'The real value of cultural relics is that it is a historical relic, and any changes to its original appearance are reducing its value.', 'An owner cannot dispose of his belongings, which is an infringement of his basic rights.']