A first-term board member should not be on the finance committee unless he or she is an accountant or his or her membership on the committee is supported by all the members of the board. Which one of the following arguments most closely conforms to the principle stated above? ['Simkins is a first-term board member and not an accountant; thus, Simkins should not be on the finance committee.', "Ruiz is on the finance committee but is not an accountant; thus, Ruiz's membership must have been supported by all the members of the board.", 'Timmons is a third-term board member but not an accountant; thus, if all other board members think that Timmons should be on the finance committee, then Timmons should be on that committee.', "Klein is a first-term board member who is not an accountant; thus, Klein should not be allowed on the finance committee if any board member opposes Klein's appointment to that committee."]