The complex modern nation-state system reminds every backward country trying to rise from weak to strong: the strengthening of the country's hard and soft power is not first a question of external competition, but a question of internal rationalization. As long as a country has many internal problems, Not only does it ignore the construction of basic economic mechanisms, but it also ignores the serious choices of political regimes, and it also destroys the value recognition of social culture, then such a country will always be in a weak position of ethnic-state competition, even if it occasionally gets an opportunity to become a moment Large countries and even powerful countries have serious short-term maintenance capabilities. This passage mainly supports such a point? ["A country's soft power is more decisive than hard power.", 'Internal issues of the country are more important than external issues.', 'Economic, political, and cultural decisions determine national strength.', 'No country can remain strong for long.']