['Studies showing the effectiveness of therapeutic hypothermia (32-34°C) in postcardiac arrest patients have been criticized because of patients with elevated body temperature (>37.5°C) in the noncooled control group. Thus, the effects of spontaneous normothermia (<37.5°C) compared with mild therapeutic hypothermia were studied.', 'Retrospective chart review from 1991 to 2010.', 'Witnessed out-of-hospital arrest, presumed to be of cardiac origin, aged 18 to 80 yrs and with a Glassgow Coma Scale score of <8 at admission.', 'Patients with sustained restoration of spontaneous circulation who did not receive therapeutic hypothermia and never exceeded 37.5°C during the 36 hrs postcardiac arrest were compared with patients who received mild therapeutic hypothermia.', 'The primary end point was a favorable neurological outcome, defined as Cerebral Performance Categories 1 or 2; the secondary end point was overall survival to 180 days. Significantly more patients in the hypothermia group had Cerebral Performance Categories 1 or 2 (hypothermia: 256 of 467 [55%] vs. normothermia: 69 of 165 [42%]) and survived for >180 days (hypothermia: 315 of 467 [67%] vs. normothermia: 79 of 165 [48%]). The propensity score adjusted risk ratio for good neurological outcome of patients undergoing hypothermia treatment was 1.37 (confidence interval 1.09-1.72, p≤.01) and for dying within 180 days was 0.57 (confidence interval 0.44-0.73, p≤.01) compared to normothermia.'] Does mild therapeutic hypothermia improve outcomes compared with normothermia in cardiac-arrest patients -- a retrospective chart review?