In the past, our peasant image formation has formed two habitual models: one is to positively tell how the protagonist uses the methods of tolerance and humiliation, self-sacrifice or good character to win the enemy and win in binary oppositions such as reform and conservative or advanced and backward The villagers trust and make progress in reform; the other is to resolve the contradictions and maintain the appeal to the audience through a series of skit or comedy stories of the hero. The aesthetic consequence of these two habitual models is that the image of the peasant has almost become Invariable symbols, lack of due richness and attractiveness, and a huge gap with real life. This model is a flattening of the reality itself. What this text is most likely to say next is:. ['What are the disadvantages of a single description of the peasant image?', 'What is the description of the pattern of the peasant image?', 'What has changed in the image of farmers now being shaped?', 'What are the advantages of "flattening the reality itself".']