All art criticism is political because all art has political implications. Clearly, the critic who chooses to address overtly an artwork' s political implications is engaged in political discourse. But those critics who attempt a purely aesthetic evaluation of a work, and ttherefore ignore the work' s political implications, necessarily, though perhaps inadvertently, end up endorsing the politics of the artist. If the statements above are all true, which one of the following must also be true? ['A political critique of a work of art has more value than any other sort of critique of that work.', 'Art that makes an overt social or political statement is the sort of art with which critics are typically concerned.', 'Art criticism that is intended to evaluate a work on purely aesthetic grounds never ends up rejecting the politics of the artist whose work is under review.', 'Critics who are politically naive always attempt purely apolitical critiques of art.']