The chairperson should not have released the Election Commission' s report to the public, for the chairperson did not consult any other members of the commission about releasing the report before having it released. The argument's conclusion can be properly inferred if which one of the following is assumed? ["It would have been permissible for the chairperson to release the commission's report to the public only if most other members of the commission had first given their consent.", "The chairperson would have been justified in releasing the report only if each of the commission's members would have agreed to its being released had they been consulted.", 'Some members of the commission would have preferred that the report not be released to the public.', 'All of the members of the commission had signed the report prior to its release.']