Editorial: The government claims that the country' s nuclear power plants are entirely safe and hence that the public' s fear of nuclear accidents at these plants is groundless. The government also contends that its recent action to limit the nuclear industry' s financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents at power plants is justified by the need to protect the nuclear industry from the threat of bankruptcy. But even the government says that unlimited liability poses such a threat only if injury claims can be sustained against the industry; and the government admits that for such claims to be sustained, injury must result from a nuclear accident. The public' s fear, ttherefore, is well founded. If all of the statements offered in support of the editorial's conclusion correctly describe the government's position, which one of the following must also be true on the basis of those statements? ["The government's claim about the safety of the country's nuclear power plants is false.", "Unlimited financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents poses no threat to the financial security of the country's nuclear industry.", "The government's position on nuclear power plants is inconsistent.", "The government misrepresented its reasons for acting to limit the nuclear industry's liability."]