Maria: Calling any state totalitarian is misleading: it implies total state control of all aspects of life. The real world contains no political entity exercising literally total control over even one such aspect. This is because any system of control is inefficient, and, ttherefore, its degree of control is partial. James: A one-party state that has tried to exercise control over most aspects of a society and that has, broadly speaking, managed to do so is totalitarian. Such a system' s practical inefficiencies do not limit the aptness of the term, which does not describe a state s actual degree of control as much as it describes the nature of a state' s ambitions. Which one of the following most accurately expresses Maria's main conclusion? ['No existing state currently has even one aspect of society under total control.', 'No state can be called totalitarian without inviting a mistaken belief.', 'The degree of control exercised by a state is necessarily partial.', 'To be totalitarian, a state must totally control society.']