A country's football magazine reported that the country's football league champions have been decided by fake balls for 30 years. The magazine also gave evidence that a player who asked not to be named told reporters that he and his teammates A $ 200,000 bribe was collected and they kicked a fake ball in a crucial match that eventually won another team; however, the president of the country's football league refuted the report. If the following are true, what would best support the chairman:. ['The football magazine has published false reports on several occasions.', 'The national football league has imposed severe penalties for fake kicks, so there are generally no fake kicks.', 'Even if the fake kick event in that match is true, it cannot be concluded that the championship of the League A was decided through fake kicks, otherwise, the league will not be held for 30 years.', 'Through a recent national investigation, there were no cases of fake balls affecting the ownership of the championship.']