['Continuous wound infusion with local anaesthetic has been used in post-caesarean pain management with conflicting results. We carried out a study comparing three groups: continuous ropivacaine wound infusion, intrathecal morphine with saline wound infusion and saline wound infusion only.', 'Sixty-six women undergoing elective caesarean section under combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia were randomly allocated to receive intrathecal morphine with saline wound infusion or 48 h continuous wound infusion with either ropivacaine or saline. All parturients received oral ketoprofen and intravenous oxycodone patient-controlled analgesia. Consumption of oxycodone, visual analogue scale pain scores (0-10 cm), patient satisfaction, side effects and recovery parameters were recorded for 48 h in a double-blind manner.', 'Continuous wound infusion with ropivacaine failed to reduce oxycodone consumption or pain scores compared with saline control. In the first 24 h intrathecal morphine reduced mean oxycodone consumption compared to the ropivacaine wound infusion group (26 mg vs. 48 mg, P=0.007) and saline wound infusion group (26 mg vs. 45 mg, P=0.021). The first 24-h mean pain score was also lower in the intrathecal morphine group vs. the saline wound infusion group (1.3 vs. 2.2, P=0.021). Pain scores were not significantly different between intrathecal morphine and ropivacaine wound infusion groups. Pruritus was more common with intrathecal morphine.'] Does continuous wound infusion with ropivacaine fail to provide adequate analgesia after caesarean section?