['The many available choices for testing for coronary artery disease (CAD) brought about several questions regarding suitability of certain tests for different groups of patients and the prognostic value of obtained results in predicting events and mortality. The aim of this study is to describe the prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) results in predicting cardiac events and mortality in > or = 60-year-old females.', '49 women (> or = 60 years old) who were referred for DSE were included in the study. Data including CAD risk factors, and results of tests and a follow-up of events (MI, unstable angina, progression of CHF) and death.', 'Eleven patients were considered to have a positive DSE result. There was no difference between DSE (+) and DSE (-) patients in cardiac events and cardiac death. However when interventions were included to events, analysis showed DSE (+) to have more overall events. Non-cardiac deaths and "all deaths" were 11 and 8 times more common among DSE (+) patients compared with DSE (-) patients p < 0.01. Multivariable logistic regression showed that diabetics and DSE (+) patients were 32 (p = 0.01) and 23 (p = 0.02) times more likely to have an event compared with non-diabetics and DSE (-) patients, respectively.'] Does diabetes supersede dobutamine stress echocardiography in predicting cardiac events in female patients?