Traditional historical research, because its objects are mostly "non-speakable" archives and documents, so in the research process, they are only "defendants" tried by researchers who play the role of "judge", and this defendant did not have any right to defend themselves. Therefore, different "judges" use different rules for trials. Although this rule is very scientific and accurate, the results of research on the same issue are very different. The main meaning expressed in this text is (). ['Using the same archives and literature to conduct historical research may yield different results.', 'Use of archives and literature for historical research should be cautious and not arbitrary.', 'Research history should also focus on the use of "talking" historical materials.', 'Uniform rules should be developed to regulate the study of archives and literature.']