Kuznets's inverted U curve theory states: "In the early stages of economic growth, although people's income did not decrease, social income distribution became unequal; as the economy continued to grow, the degree of unequal income distribution After the economic growth reached a higher level, income distribution became equal again. "This theoretical hypothesis is to a certain extent consistent with the historical reality of economic growth in developed western countries, but he also pointed out that repeating the previous model of developed countries, he thought Income inequality has promoted economic growth, and it is necessary for less developed countries to strengthen current income inequality, which is a "dangerous analogy. " In the practice of western economic development, solving the issue of equity is not a natural transition, but rather through active intervention by the government and society to eliminate the adverse effects of industrialization and urbanization, increase the proportion of the general public's income in the country's growing income, and create legal and political pressure on high-income people, thereby making social income distribution Turn to justice. The following statement most closely matches this passage:. ['Economic growth will not spontaneously promote a fair distribution of social income.', 'The state can effectively monitor and guarantee social equity through macro-control.', 'The income distribution model of developed countries follows the principle of efficiency first.', 'The inverted U curve theory is not suitable for the economic growth model of less developed countries.']