Restaurant owner: The newspaper reporter who panned my restaurant acknowledges having no special expertise about food and its preparation. His previous job was as a political reporter. He is a good writer, but he is not a true restaurant critic. A newspaper would never call someone a drama critic who had no special training in theater. Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion drawn in the restaurant owner's argument? ['The newspaper reporter who panned the restaurant acknowledges having no special expertise about food and its preparation.', 'The newspaper reporter who panned the restaurant is a good writer.', 'The newspaper reporter who panned the restaurant is not a true restaurant critic.', 'A newspaper would never call someone a drama critic who had no special training in theater.']