Today, with more and more professional divisions, the literature read by each scholar is increasingly limited, and there will always be blind spots in the eyesight of reviewers. Using technical means to detect the originality of a paper is not only necessary and efficient, it also provides a measure of the academic level of the paper. Effective reference. However, the disadvantages of too much reliance on "checking the weight" are also obvious. The quality of the paper is not determined by the repetition rate, and the "repetition rate" and "originality" are not a simple correspondence. Existing papers The principle of the detection system is basically the same. After the paper is decomposed, it is tested for matching with the content in the resource library. The so-called "repeat rate" is based on the same text. However, in most papers, The same amount of text has different values for academic innovation. The text is intended to:. ['Analysis of the relationship between originality and academic innovation.', 'Explain the limitations of over-reliance.', 'Introduce the current status of technical papers.', 'Explain the scientific principles of the thesis detection system.']