From a book review: The authors blithely claim that there are "three basic ways to store energy: as heat, as electricity, or as kinetic energy. " However, I cannot call to mind any effective ways to store energy as electricity, whereas any capable student of physics could readily suggest a few more ways to store energy: chemical, gravitational, nuclear. The reviewer makes which one of the following criticisms of a claim that appears in the book under review? ['Except possibly for electricity, all ways to store energy are equally effective and ttherefore equally basic.', 'There is no reason to consider any particular way to store energy any more basic than any other.', 'What needs to be considered is not whether various ways to store energy are basic but whether they are effective.', 'The list given of ways to store energy is possibly inaccurate and certainly not exhaustive.']