['The mechanical alignment of the knee is an important factor in planning for, and subsequently assessing the success of a knee replacement. It is most commonly measured using a long-leg anteroposterior radiograph (LLR) encompassing the hip, knee and ankle. Other modalities of measuring alignment include computer tomography (CT) and intra-operative computer navigation (Cas). Recent studies comparing LLRs to Cas in measuring alignment have shown significant differences between the two and have hypothesized that Cas is a more accurate modality. This study aims to investigate the accuracy of the above mentioned modalities.', 'A prospective study was undertaken comparing alignment as measured by long-leg radiographs and computer tomography to intra-operative navigation measurements in 40 patients undergoing a primary total knee replacement to test this hypothesis. Alignment was measured three times by three observers. Intra- and inter-observer correlation was sought between modalities.', 'Intra-observer correlation was excellent in all cases (>0.98) with a coefficient of repeatability <1.1°. Inter-observer correlation was also excellent measuring >0.960 using LLRs and >0.970 using CT with coefficient of repeatability <2.8°. Inter-modality correlation proved to be higher when comparing LLRs and CT (>0.893), than when comparing either of these modalities with Cas (>0.643 and >0.671 respectively). Pre-operative values had the greatest variability.'] Is the long leg radiograph a reliable method of assessing alignment when compared to computer-assisted navigation and computer tomography?