It is an interesting topic to compare the life experiences, literary accomplishments, and influences of the two drama masters in the East and the West. Some experts believe that calling Tang Xianzu "the Shakespeare of the East" is a big problem, because whether it is personality Charm, or the aesthetics of the text, Tang Xianzu is not inferior to Shakespeare. Which of the following is most likely the hypothesis contained in the expert opinion mentioned above? ["Tang Xianzu's personality charm and the beauty of his text are higher than Shakespeare.", "Tang Xianzu's influence in the West is greater than Shakespeare's influence in the East.", 'Tang Xianzu and Shakespeare do not want others to call themselves by their names.', '"The Venice of the East" is inferior to the true Venice.']