City council member: Despite the city' s desperate need to exploit any available source of revenue, the mayor has repeatedly blocked council members' attempts to pass legislation imposing real estate development fees. It is clear that in doing so the mayor is sacrificing the city' s interests to personal interests. The mayor cites figures to show that, in the current market, fees of the size proposed would significantly reduce the number of building starts and thus, on balance, result in a revenue loss to the city. But the important point is that the mayor' s family is heavily involved in real estate development and thus has a strong financial interest in the matter. Which one of the following most accurately and completely expresses the main conclusion of the city council member's argument? ['Significantly reducing the number of building starts would not, on balance, result in revenue loss to the city.', 'Imposing real estate development fees is the best way for the city to exploit the available sources of revenue.', "The mayor's family has a strong financial interest in preventing the passage of legislation that would impose real estate development fees.", "In blocking council members' attempts to impose real estate development fees, the mayor is sacrificing the city's interests to personal interests."]