['Increased regionalization of healthcare will most likely result in greater utilization of air medical transport (AMT). Education of providers regarding the utilization and capabilities of AMT will be important. This study was undertaken to determine whether our curriculum in AMT provided a useful and satisfying educational experience for medical students', "The curriculum included three 6-hour fly-along sessions, 2 hours of lectures, 2 hours of case review, an 80-page syllabus listing articles and position papers, and a 3-page writing assignment. The study was a review of the participants' (1st- and 2nd-year medical students) test scores and postelective evaluation for 1 year. The setting was a two-helicopter AMT program based at an urban, university-affiliated level 1 trauma center. Twelve students (1/month) participated in the month-long elective. The students took a 20-item test before and after the elective and a 15-item postelective evaluation (5-point scale: very dissatisfied, dissatisfied, neutral, satisfied, very satisfied). A paired t-test was used to compare the mean pre-test and mean post-test scores. The evaluation data were analyzed descriptively.", 'The mean number of correct responses on the post-test (M = 18.67, SD = 1.61) was significantly higher than the mean number of correct responses on the pretest (M = 13.83, SD = 2.17), P < .001. All students were either satisfied (56%) or very satisfied (44%) with the lectures and case review. Eleven (91%) were very satisfied with interaction with the crew, and nine (75%) were very satisfied overall (25% satisfied). Seven (58%) were very likely to use AMT in their career, two (16.7%) likely, two (16.7%) unsure, and one (8.3%) unlikely.'] Does air medical transport curriculum provide education for medical students?