['Cape Town, South Africa.', 'To evaluate anti-tuberculosis treatment outcomes and rate of antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation using weekly community-based adherence support compared to daily directly observed therapy (DOT).', 'This was a retrospective analysis comparing two cohorts treated for tuberculosis (TB) in 70 TB clinics during 6-month periods before and after the introduction of a new adherence model comprising treatment literacy sessions during 2 weeks of DOT, followed by weekly home visits by community care workers to eligible patients managing their own treatment. Odds ratios (ORs) of treatment success and ART initiation were calculated using multivariable random effects logistic regression models. Hazard ratios (HRs) of default and death were calculated using multivariable random effects Cox regression models.', 'The pre-intervention cohort comprised 11\u2009896 patients with TB and the post-intervention cohort 11\u2009314. There was no difference in pre- and post-intervention anti-tuberculosis treatment success rates (respectively 82.8% and 82.5%, adjusted OR [aOR] 1.02, 95%CI 0.89-1.17, P = 0.76) nor an increased hazard of death (adjusted HR [aHR] 0.98, 95%CI 0.80-1.21, P = 0.87) or default (aHR 0.97, 95%CI 0.81-1.15, P = 0.69). The ART initiation rate increased from 67% to 74% (aOR 1.43; 95%CI 1.01-1.85, P < 0.01).'] Does an integrated community TB-HIV adherence model provide an alternative to DOT for tuberculosis patients in Cape Town?