['To explore the correlation between the cagA status of Helicobacter pylori and the density and topographic localisation of H pylori.', 'Gastric antral biopsy specimens were taken from 716 consecutive patients, including 293 H pylori positive patients (124 men, 169 women; mean age, 52.6 years; range, 12-87). A serum sample was taken for determination of IgG anti-CagA antibodies (sensitivity of 94.4% and specificity of 92.5%). The density of H pylori was assessed semiquantitatively (grades I-IV) in biopsy specimens stained with the modified Giemsa stain. Topographic localisation was classified as follows: score A, H pylori closely attached to the mucosa; score B, H pylori attached to the mucosa and in the mucus; and score C, H pylori solely in the mucus.', 'CagA antibodies were present in 154 (52.5%) of the patients. There was no significant difference in colonisation density and cagA status: grade I, 23 (14%); grade II, 78 (50.6%); grade III, 42 (27.5%); and grade IV, 11 (7.2%) in the cagA(+) strains and 29 (21.2%), 57 (40.8%), 38 (27%), and 15 (11%), respectively, in the cagA(-) strains. There was no difference in topographic localisation between cagA(+) and cagA(-)H pylori. Mean anti-CagA titres were 0.84, 0.84, 0.89, and 0.73 in patients with grades I-IV bacterial density, respectively.'] Do colonisation density and topographic localisation of Helicobacter pylori depend on the cagA status?