On major issues related to Sino-US relations and the situation across the Taiwan Straits, the U. S. government must express its swiftness. The issue of China's Anti-Secession Law is no exception. From March 8, the White House spoke People, U. S. Department of State spokesman and State Department officials in charge of East Asia and Pacific affairs, U. S. Pacific Commander and Secretary of State, have expressed their views on the "Anti-Secession Law". The general content includes: expressing uneasiness with the law, thinking that the legislation is a mistake, and The recent trend of relations recovery is not consistent; the law has not helped resolve the Taiwan issue, and it is clearly raising tension; calling on China to reconsider the bill. For these statements, what is incorrect in the analysis? ['The statements of U. S. officials do not have much substantive content, and most of them do something painlessly. Their words are restrained and there is room for mediation in Sino-US relations.', "The United States has always worried that China's armed forces will recover Taiwan and unilaterally change Taiwan's status quo, so it has always fully supported Chen Shui-bian and other Taiwan independence forces.", 'These statements are not strong, and basically do not involve the way the United States responds, especially the corresponding actions that may be taken in the military and security fields.', 'The focus of the United States\' work in the past two years is to control "Taiwan independence", and the "Anti-Secession Law" is exactly to curb this "Taiwan independence" tendency and actions. This will not only change the status quo in the Taiwan Strait, but will help maintain the status quo. U. S. interests.']