Poetry journal patron: Everybody who publishes in The Brick Wall Review has to agree in advance that if a poem is printed in one of its regular issues, the magazine also has the right to reprint it, without monetary compensation, in its annual anthology. The Brick Wall Review makes enough money from sales of its anthologies to cover most operating expenses. So, if your magazine also published an anthology of poems first printed in your magazine, you could depend less on donations. After all, most poems published in your magazine are very similar to those published in The Brick Wall Review. Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the patron's argument? ["The Brick Wall Review's annual poetry anthology always contains a number of poems by famous poets not published in the regular issues of the magazine.", 'Many of the poets whose work appears in The Brick Wall Review have had several poems rejected for publication by the other magazine under discussion.', 'Neither The Brick Wall Review nor the other magazine under discussion depends on donations to cover most operating expenses.', 'The only compensation poets receive for publishing in the regular issues of the magazines under discussion are free copies of the issues in which their poems appear.']