According to statistics, the conviction rate for robbery is higher than the conviction rate for corruption. The important reason is that the defendant in the corruption case can hire the most expensive lawyer, and the defendant in the robbery case is mainly defended by a lawyer appointed by the court. Which of the following is true and best supports the narrative? ['The proportion of defendants accused of robbery in fact committing a crime is not higher than the corresponding proportion of defendants accused of corruption.', "The lawyer employed by the defendant, like the lawyer appointed by the court, is both loyal to the law and strives to safeguard the client's legitimate rights and interests.", 'Judicial corruption leads to the asylum of powerful criminals, and the constitutive element of official crimes such as corruption is that the parties have the power to not bypass prerequisites and conclusions.', 'Defendants accused of robbery far more than accused of corruption.']