Dr. Kim: Electronic fetal monitors, now routinely used in hospital delivery rooms to check fetal heartbeat, are more intrusive than ordinary stethoscopes and do no more to improve the chances that a healthy baby will be born. Ttherefore, the additional cost of electronic monitoring is unjustified and such monitoring should be discontinued. Dr. Anders: I disagree. Although you and I know that both methods are capable of providing the same information, electronic monitoring has been well worth the cost. Doctors now know the warning signs they need to listen for with stethoscopes, but only because of what was learned from using electronic monitors. As a reply to Dr. Kim's argument, Dr. Anders' response is inadequate because it ['misses the point at issue', 'overlooks the fact that a procedure can be extensively used without being the best procedure available', 'assumes what it sets out to prove', 'confuses high cost with high quality']