Although the kind of social life is the only source of literature and art, although it is incomparably vivid and richer than the latter, the people are still not satisfied with the former and demand the latter. Why is this? Although both are beautiful, However, the life reflected in literary and artistic works can and should be higher, stronger, more concentrated, more typical, more ideal, and therefore more universal than ordinary actual life. Revolutionary literature and art should create various aspects based on actual life. All kinds of people come to help the masses to advance history. For example, on the one hand, people are hungry, frozen, and oppressed; on the one hand, people exploit people, and people oppress people. The fact exists everywhere, and people also look very flat. Literature and art is to bring together this daily phenomenon, to typicalize the contradictions and struggles, to form literary or artistic works, to awaken the masses, to inspire them, to push the masses towards unity and struggle, and to transform themselves. Environment. Without such literature and art, this task cannot be completed, or cannot be completed forcefully and quickly. What is the most accurate rephrasing of this passage? ['Human social life is the only source of literature and art.', 'Human social life has more vivid and rich content than literature and art.', 'Literature and art come from life and should be higher than life.', 'Life is real and plain, so is the art from life.']