Principle: If an insurance policy is written in such a way that a reasonable person seeking insurance would not read it thoroughly before signing it, then the reasonable expectations of the policyholder concerning the policy' s coverage should take legal precedence over specific language in the written policy itself. Application: The insurance company should be required to cover the hail damage to Celia' s car, even though specific language in the written policy Celia signed excluded coverage for hail damage. Which one of the following, if true, most justifies the above application of the principle? ['Celia did not read the written insurance policy thoroughly before signing it, and a reasonable person in her position would not have done so either.', 'Celia is a reasonable person, and she expected the insurance policy to cover hail damage to her car.', "Given the way it was written, a reasonable person would not have read Celia's insurance policy thoroughly before signing it, and Celia reasonably expected the policy to cover hail damage.", 'The insurance policy that Celia signed was written in such a way that a reasonable person would not read it thoroughly before signing it, but Celia did read the policy thoroughly before signing it.']