What’s Wrong With High SPF? more balanced really don’t provide the coverage they claim, notes SPF ratings higher than 50 are misleading may not offer the protection they claim Environmental Working Group According to the EWG very little statistical difference higher SPF does not mean greater protection any SPF between 30 and 50 will provide sufficient protection Guide to Sunscreens very little difference EWG High SPF most higher SPFs are misused (or don't actually work) anyway EWG numbers from the Environmental Working Group high SPF sunscreens Environmental Working Group high SPF ratings SPF ratings higher than 50 are misleading a discussion of ‘high’ SPF numbers High-SPF products обнаружили Environmental Working Group trust these products too much Higher SPF does not mean better protection According to the EWG SPF rating slightly better protection What’s Wrong With High SPF EWG Environmental Working Group numbers from the Environmental Working Group adequate sunburn protection ultra-high SPF ratings, like 70, most higher SPFs are misused (or don't actually work) anyway higher SPF sunscreen higher SPF is not as straightforward as it may seem very little difference higher SPF SPF: SPF 50 can be misleading typically indicates a highly chemical formulation any SPF between 30 and 50 will provide sufficient protection any SPF between 30 and 50 will provide sufficient protection a discussion of ‘high’ SPF numbers myth of high SPF sunscreens this article higher SPF’s A product over SPF 50 may pass the broad-spectrum test a discussion of ‘high’ SPF numbers adequate sunburn protection dangers of high SPF study inherently misleading EWG – what’s wrong with high SPF? https://www.ewg.org/sunscreen/report/whats-wrong-w... Why...? do more harm than good Environmental Working Group, What’s Wrong With High SPF? source further benefits are negligible Environmental Working Group