analysis by the Economic Policy Institute in 2003 loss of at least 850,000 U.S. jobs strong argument http://www.epi.org/publication/briefingpapers_bp147/ http://www.epi.org/publication/briefingpapers_bp147/ 879,280 jobs were "displaced" http://www.epi.org/publication/briefingpapers_bp147/ shipped jobs overseas 879,280 jobs were "displaced" assert 879,280 jobs were "displaced" http://www.epi.org/publication/briefingpapers_bp147/ shipped jobs overseas http://www.epi.org/publication/briefingpapers_bp147/ NAFTA’s failure has cost the United States jobs robert e scott high price of free trade EPI High Cost of NAFTA It did the opposite. wholesale destruction 17 NOV 2013 2003 report estimated in 2003 helpfully summarises http://www.epi.org/publication/briefingpapers_bp147/ http://www.epi.org/publication/briefingpapers_bp147/ the agreement depressed the wages of American workers failed trade policies NAFTA NAFTA criticised free trade The high price of 'free' trade 17 NOV 2013 NAFTA http://www.epi.org/publication/briefingpapers_bp147/ Economic Policy instituten mukaan wholesale destruction NAFTA It did the opposite. Economic Policy Institute But then the factories closed EPI High Cost of NAFTA enormous cost NAFTA’s failure has cost the United States jobs U.S. http://www.epi.org/publication/briefingpapers_bp147/ http://www.epi.org/publication/briefingpapers_bp147/ negative impacts according to one study nearly 900,000 analysis by the Economic Policy Institute in 2003 Economic Policy Institute http://www.epi.org... NAFTA