I just have to chuckle.  Renewed - sure.  What does that mean?  Amazon says it will be, "...clean and will have minimal to no signs of wear or visible cosmetic imperfections when held at an arm’s length."  So I open the box on the floor and gaze at the "renewed" device from my chair - definitely more than arm's length away.  I notice that the computer case appears to be protected with a wrap of some sort.  I can see the edges from where I sit.  So I reach down and begin to pull.  But it wasn't a protective wrap - it was an aesthetic cover-up wrap!  There was a flat black form of contact paper with appropriate cutouts applied to all three sides of the case!  Why?  To cover up the scratches on the actual case!I was far more amused than annoyed, but it does kind of irritate me that this is the technique used to try to meet the Amazon cosmetic standard.  Just cover it up and pretend?  Yet there was no attempt to create a smooth transition at the edges.  I actually don't care about a few scratches, but to me it damages the integrity of the vendor and compromises the Amazon renewed promise.Fortunately this particular machine is solid, so it's not worth trying to unravel the purchase.  But after the initial configuration there was another shortcoming.  I wanted to add a spinning hard drive as a place to toss a little data.  Because it is a dell, special rails are needed in order to properly mount a hard drive.  When I opened the case to take a look, I discovered that those rails were missing.  Fortunately, I had a set in my spares box.  But the buyer needs to be aware that this is not a full meal deal and may fall short of the promise or your minimum expectation.But wait...there's more!  This unit clearly advertises that it has 4K video support - but it doesn't.  The Intel HD 4000 does not provide 4K resolution.  It supports a maximum of 2560 x 1440 via the display port.  Had I taken the time to look it up, I could have discovered this prior to my purchase, but I feel the vendor should either be silent or honest about the video capability.Had this not been a short lead time, pressing need I would have sent it back in a heartbeat - and probably still should have.  But it serves my specific need in this case in spite of the dishonest representations and shortcomings.  I definitely would not go this route again.