%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% This article presents the background of ‘’this’’ still-indeterminate situation of mutually incompatible logics. It draws largely on the Library of Living Philosophers, edited by Paul Arthur Schilpp, which honored Dewey in its first volume and Popper in its fourteenth volume. Summary of Dewey’s position is followed by a critique by Bertrand Russell, one of 17 scholars offering descriptive and critical essays, and Dewey’s response.Summary of Popper’s position is followed by an essay (one of 33) by Henryk Skolimowski, and Popper’s response.
<meaning-changed> %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% This article presents the background of ‘’this’’ still-indeterminate situation of mutually incompatible logics. It draws largely on the Library of Living Philosophers, edited by Paul Arthur Schilpp, which honored Dewey in its first volume and Popper in its fourteenth volume. Summary of Dewey’s position is followed by a critique by Bertrand Russell, one of 17 scholars offering descriptive and critical essays, and Dewey’s response.Summary of Popper’s position is followed by an essay (one of 33) by Henryk Skolimowski, and Popper’s response.
%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% 