 He stated what he took to be Dewey’s position:%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Contrary to Dewey’s particular feeling of doubt, Russell assumed that cognitive doubt initiates reasoning about what things are “true.” 3) HOW CAN WARRANTED ASSERTION BE DISTINGUISHED FROM IMMEDIATE KNOWLEDGE OF FACT, REALITY, TRUTH? Russell couldn't understand why Dewey replaced the word “knowledge” with “warranted assertion” when doubt is eliminated. The definition appeared arbitrary and unnecessary. He quoted Dewey:%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Russell found this just another name for instrumental consequences of logically groundless inductive reasoning: if what you do achieves what you want, then what you want is validated—it is TRUE. Russell continued to insist that logical deduction can provide knowledge of truth.
<coherence>  He stated what he took to be Dewey’s position:%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Contrary to Dewey’s particular feeling of doubt, Russell assumed that cognitive doubt initiates reasoning about what things are “true.” 3) HOW CAN WARRANTED ASSERTION BE DISTINGUISHED FROM IMMEDIATE KNOWLEDGE OF FACT, REALITY, TRUTH? Russell couldn't understand why Dewey replaced the word “knowledge” with “warranted assertion” when doubt is eliminated. The definition appeared arbitrary and unnecessary. He quoted Dewey:%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Russell found this just another name for instrumental consequences of logically groundless inductive reasoning: if what you do achieves what you want, then what you want is validated—it is TRUE. Russell continued to insist that logical deduction can provide knowledge of truth.
 He stated what he took to be Dewey’s position:%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Contrary to Dewey’s particular feeling of doubt, Russell assumed that cognitive doubt initiates reasoning about what things are “true.” %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Russell found this just another name for instrumental consequences of logically groundless inductive reasoning: if what you do achieves what you want, then what you want is validated—it is TRUE. Russell continued to insist that logical deduction can provide knowledge of truth.