 Tyndall writes that “ the constructive and creative works of these two peoples far surpass any other ” . Developing his own version of Anglo-Saxonism, he argues that without the Anglo-Saxons, we should all still be living in mud huts, art would consist of primitive scrawlings and literature would speak to us ‘in grunts’.
<fluency>  Tyndall writes that “ the constructive and creative works of these two peoples far surpass any other ” . Developing his own version of Anglo-Saxonism, he argues that without the Anglo-Saxons, we should all still be living in mud huts, art would consist of primitive scrawlings and literature would speak to us ‘in grunts’.
 Tyndall writes that " the constructive and creative works of these two peoples far surpass any other ” . Developing his own version of Anglo-Saxonism, he argues that without the Anglo-Saxons, we should all still be living in mud huts, art would consist of primitive scrawlings and literature would speak to us ‘in grunts’.