 He quoted Dewey:%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Russell found this just another name for instrumental consequences of logically groundless inductive reasoning: if what you do achieves what you want, then what you want is validated—it is TRUE. Russell continued to insist that logical deduction can provide knowledge of truth. He closed his critique by suggesting that Dewey's redefinition of induction and deduction made discourse between analytic and synthetic philosophers incapable of rational resolution .
<meaning-changed>  He quoted Dewey:%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Russell found this just another name for instrumental consequences of logically groundless inductive reasoning: if what you do achieves what you want, then what you want is validated—it is TRUE. Russell continued to insist that logical deduction can provide knowledge of truth. He closed his critique by suggesting that Dewey's redefinition of induction and deduction made discourse between analytic and synthetic philosophers incapable of rational resolution .
 He quoted Dewey:%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Russell found this just another name for instrumental consequences of logically groundless inductive reasoning: if what you do achieves what you want, then what you want is validated—it is TRUE. Koertge (1975) provides a helpful clarificatory summary.This use of this summary is from Boumans and Davis (2010) .