 Seidel later (1987:227) called for reappraising Han abstract notions of hun and po, which "do not seem to have had as wide a currency as we assumed up to now."
<clarity>  Seidel later (1987:227) called for reappraising Han abstract notions of hun and po, which "do not seem to have had as wide a currency as we assumed up to now."
 Seidel later called for reappraising Han abstract notions of hun and po, which "do not seem to have had as wide a currency as we assumed up to now."