 In contrast , for a set of sequences exhibiting an anti-correlation between \kappa and -SCD, the simulated T^*_{\rm cr}'s are---contrary to RPA prediction---quite insensitive to \kappa or SCD . Additionally, we find that  the LLPS propensity of IDPs with a strictly alternating charge sequence might have been overestimated because stabilizing interactions among such sequences require spatial alignments that are more difficult to achieve in real space than stipulated by RPA or lattice models.
<clarity>  In contrast , for a set of sequences exhibiting an anti-correlation between \kappa and -SCD, the simulated T^*_{\rm cr}'s are---contrary to RPA prediction---quite insensitive to \kappa or SCD . Additionally, we find that  the LLPS propensity of IDPs with a strictly alternating charge sequence might have been overestimated because stabilizing interactions among such sequences require spatial alignments that are more difficult to achieve in real space than stipulated by RPA or lattice models.
 In contrast , for a set of sequences exhibiting an anti-correlation between \kappa and -SCD, the simulated T^*_{\rm cr}'s are---contrary to RPA prediction---quite insensitive to \kappa or SCD . Additionally, we find that the LLPS propensity of IDPs with a strictly alternating charge sequence was likely overestimated by RPA and lattice models because interchain stabilization of this sequence requires spatial alignments that are more difficult to achieve in real space than stipulated by RPA or lattice models.