%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% In the 1960s Popper opposed philosophers like Thomas Kuhn, who tried to found new knowledge on the subjective popularity of conceptual frameworks, competing paradigms based on incompatible and untestable premises. Popper challenged such logical analysis by identifying three distinct kinds of objective knowledge as universal continuing factors crossing paradigms. They operate in distinct problem situations: 1)empirical facts and observations are known in a psychological world of material entities; 2) problems are analyzed using conjectures and refutations known in a sociological world of mental entities; 3) “ideas in the objective sense, that is the%DIFDELCMD < [%%% third%DIFDELCMD < ] %%% world of possible objects of thought or the world of objective contents of thought.
<meaning-changed> %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% In the 1960s Popper opposed philosophers like Thomas Kuhn, who tried to found new knowledge on the subjective popularity of conceptual frameworks, competing paradigms based on incompatible and untestable premises. Popper challenged such logical analysis by identifying three distinct kinds of objective knowledge as universal continuing factors crossing paradigms. They operate in distinct problem situations: 1)empirical facts and observations are known in a psychological world of material entities; 2) problems are analyzed using conjectures and refutations known in a sociological world of mental entities; 3) “ideas in the objective sense, that is the%DIFDELCMD < [%%% third%DIFDELCMD < ] %%% world of possible objects of thought or the world of objective contents of thought.
%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% %DIFDELCMD < [%%% third%DIFDELCMD < ] %%% world of possible objects of thought or the world of objective contents of thought.