 All algorithms are tested for three different polygon sizes and varying point batch sizes. Overall , our proposed algorithm has performed better with varying margin between 10\% to 23\% compared to the reference methods .
<coherence>  All algorithms are tested for three different polygon sizes and varying point batch sizes. Overall , our proposed algorithm has performed better with varying margin between 10\% to 23\% compared to the reference methods .
 Experimentation showed that , our proposed algorithm has performed better with varying margin between 10\% to 23\% compared to the reference methods .