A conscience vote last night, Wednesday, parliament decided that the alcohol purchasing for New Zealanders wont be raised to 20 but instead will stay at the current age of 18. The bill was brought into parliament to put the drinking age back up to 20 following when it was put down in 1999. It was first drafted by Matt Robson of the NZ Progressive Party, it was then taken on by Martin Gallagher from the New Zealand Labour Party. However  the Labour-led government is being attacked for interfering with the liquor purchase age bill. Before the debate on the bill  two ministers who are against raising the age, justice minister , Mark Burton and associate health minister, Damien O'Conner both announced that they would fully review the sale/supply of liquor to people below the age of 18, regardless of whether the bill were passed or not. The review will most likely look at how many off-licence outlets there are and increased law enforcement of the drink age. Mr Burton said that he did not pre-empt the bill voting, he said: "It was important to ensure all options were on the table before the vote. What we are saying is you can have confidence that if the bill doesn't proceed there will be an alternative vehicle for addressing the issues immediately thereafter." Many MPs said that it was unorthodox to intrude like that into the voting process. Leader of Jim Anderton's Progressive coalition and supporter of the bill, Jim Anderton, said: "Making a last-minute plea to MPs is not to be fooled by the promise of the unnecessary review. This is the review you have when you want to give parliamentarians a soft option. We do not have that luxury. And I hear that sigh of relief in many places, 'oh gosh you've got a review so we don't have to make a hard decision'. Well this is the place for hard decisions and this is where the buck stops." Simon Power, National MP, said: "It [the bill] is inconsitent . It requires peculiar legal definition and will make life more difficult and harder for the police to enforce." Ron Mark, New Zealand First MP, said: "Are we going to do something, or are we going to do nothing?  asked New Zealand First list MP Ron Mark. "We can at least let this bill go through to the next stage." However it has been suggested by the select committee previously researching the drinking problenm in New Zealand that there is little hard evidence that 18 & 19 year olds are buying alcohol for minors,  the largest problem being the purchase of alcohol by parents for their children.
In a conscience vote last night, Wednesday, parliament decided that the alcohol purchasing for New Zealanders will not be raised to 20 but instead will stay at the current age of 18. The bill was brought before Parliament with the intent of placing the drinking age back at 20 following its lowering to 18 in 1999. It was first drafted by Matt Robson of the NZ Progressive Party, and was then taken on by Martin Gallagher from the New Zealand Labour Party. However , the Labour-led government is being attacked for interfering with the liquor purchase age bill. Before the debate on the bill , two ministers who are against raising the age, justice minister Mark Burton and associate health minister, Damien O'Conner both announced that they would fully review the sale/supply of liquor to people below the age of 18, regardless of whether the bill were passed or not. The review will most likely look at how many off-licence outlets there are and increased law enforcement of the drink age. Mr Burton said that he did not pre-empt the bill voting, he said: "It was important to ensure all options were on the table before the vote. What we are saying is you can have confidence that if the bill doesn't proceed there will be an alternative vehicle for addressing the issues immediately thereafter." Many MPs said that it was unorthodox to intrude in such a manner in the voting process. Leader of Jim Anderton's Progressive coalition and supporter of the bill, Jim Anderton, said: "Making a last-minute plea to MPs is not to be fooled by the promise of the unnecessary review. This is the review you have when you want to give parliamentarians a soft option. We do not have that luxury. And I hear that sigh of relief in many places, 'oh gosh you've got a review so we don't have to make a hard decision'. Well this is the place for hard decisions and this is where the buck stops." Simon Power, National MP, said: "It [the bill] is inconsistent . It requires peculiar legal definition and will make life more difficult and harder for the police to enforce." Ron Mark, New Zealand First MP, said: "Are we going to do something, or are we going to do nothing? " asked New Zealand First list MP Ron Mark. "We can at least let this bill go through to the next stage." However it has been suggested by the select committee previously researching the drinking problem in New Zealand that there is little hard evidence 18 & 19 year olds are buying alcohol for minors, with the largest problem instead being the purchasing of alcohol by parents for their children.
R
A
In a
R
wont
will not
R
into parliament to put the
before Parliament with the intent of placing the
R
up to
at
R
when it was put down
its lowering to 18
R
it
and
A
,
A
,
D
,
R
like that into
in such a manner in
R
inconsitent
inconsistent
A
"
R
problenm
problem
D
that
A
with
R
being the purchase
instead being the purchasing