The novel 2019 coronavirus disease ( COVID-19 ) has infected over 65 million people worldwide as of December 4, 2020, pushing the world to the brink of social and economic collapse. With cases rising rapidly, deep learning has emerged as a promising diagnosis technique. However, identifying the most accurate models to characterize COVID-19 patients is challenging because comparing results obtained with different types of data and acquisition processes is non-trivial. In this paper , we evaluated and compared 40 different convolutional neural network architectures for COVID-19 diagnosis, serving as the first to consider the EfficientNet family for COVID-19 diagnosis . EfficientNet-B5 is identified as the best model with an accuracy of 0.9931 +/ -0.0021, F1 score of 0.9931 +/ -0.0020 , sensitivity of 0.9952 +/ -0.0020, and specificity of 0.9912 +/ -0.0048 . Intermediate activation maps and Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mappings offer human-interpretable evidence of the model's perception of ground-class opacities and consolidations, hinting towards a promising use-case of artificial intelligence-assisted radiology tools  .
With COVID-19 cases rising rapidly, deep learning has emerged as a promising diagnosis technique. However, identifying the most accurate models to characterize COVID-19 patients is challenging because comparing results obtained with different types of data and acquisition processes is non-trivial. In this paper we designed, evaluated, and compared the performance of 20 convolutional neutral networks in classifying patients as COVID-19 positive, healthy, or suffering from other pulmonary lung infections based on Chest CT scans, serving as the first to consider the EfficientNet family for COVID-19 diagnosis and employ intermediate activation maps for visualizing model performance. All models are trained and evaluated in Python using 4173 Chest CT images from the dataset entitled "A COVID multiclass dataset of CT scans," with 2168, 758, and 1247 images of patients that are COVID-19 positive, healthy, or suffering from other pulmonary infections, respectively. EfficientNet-B5 was identified as the best model with an F1 score of 0.9769 +/ -0.0046, accuracy of 0.9759+/-0.0048, sensitivity of 0.9788+/-0.0055, specificity of 0.9730+/-0.0057, and precision of 0.9751 +/- 0.0051. On an alternate 2-class dataset, EfficientNetB5 obtained an accuracy of 0.9845+/-0.0109, F1 score of 0.9599 +/ -0.0251 , sensitivity of 0.9682 +/ -0.0099, specificity of 0.9883 +/ -0.0150, and precision of 0.9526 +/- 0.0523 . Intermediate activation maps and Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mappings offered human-interpretable evidence of the model's perception of ground-class opacities and consolidations, hinting towards a promising use-case of artificial intelligence-assisted radiology tools . With a prediction speed of under 0.1 seconds on GPUs and 0.5 seconds on CPUs, our proposed model offers a rapid, scalable, and accurate diagnostic for COVID-19 .
R
The novel 2019 coronavirus disease (
With
D
) has infected over 65 million people worldwide as of December 4, 2020, pushing the world to the brink of social and economic collapse. With
R
, we evaluated and compared 40 different convolutional neural network architectures for
we designed, evaluated, and compared the performance of 20 convolutional neutral networks in classifying patients as
R
diagnosis,
positive, healthy, or suffering from other pulmonary lung infections based on Chest CT scans,
R
.
and employ intermediate activation maps for visualizing model performance. All models are trained and evaluated in Python using 4173 Chest CT images from the dataset entitled "A COVID multiclass dataset of CT scans," with 2168, 758, and 1247 images of patients that are COVID-19 positive, healthy, or suffering from other pulmonary infections, respectively.
R
is
was
R
accuracy of 0.9931
F1 score of 0.9769
R
-0.0021,
-0.0046, accuracy of 0.9759+/-0.0048, sensitivity of 0.9788+/-0.0055, specificity of 0.9730+/-0.0057, and precision of 0.9751 +/- 0.0051. On an alternate 2-class dataset, EfficientNetB5 obtained an accuracy of 0.9845+/-0.0109,
R
0.9931
0.9599
R
-0.0020
-0.0251
R
0.9952
0.9682
R
-0.0020, and specificity of 0.9912
-0.0099, specificity of 0.9883
R
-0.0048
-0.0150, and precision of 0.9526 +/- 0.0523
R
offer
offered
A
. With a prediction speed of under 0.1 seconds on GPUs and 0.5 seconds on CPUs, our proposed model offers a rapid, scalable, and accurate diagnostic for COVID-19