We price European-style options written on forward contracts in a commodity market, which we model with a state-dependent infinite-dimensional Heath-Jarrow-Morton (HJM) approach. We introduce a new class of volatility operators which map the square integrable noise into the Filipovi \'{c space of forward curves , and we specify a deterministic parametrized version of it. For calibration purposes, we train a neural network to approximate the  option price as a function of the model parameters. We then use it to calibrate the HJM parameters starting from (simulated) option market data. Finally we introduce a new loss function that takes into account bid and ask prices and offers a solution to calibration in illiquid markets . A key issue discovered is that the trained neural network might be non-injective, which could potentially lead to poor accuracy in calibrating the forward curve parameters, even when showing a high degree of accuracy in recovering the prices . This reveals that the original meaning of the parameters gets somehow lost in the approximation  .
We price European-style options written on forward contracts in a commodity market, which we model with an infinite-dimensional Heath-Jarrow-Morton (HJM) approach. For this purpose we introduce a new class of state-dependent volatility operators that map the square integrable noise into the Filipovi \'{c space of forward curves . For calibration, we specify a fully parametrized version of our model and train a neural network to approximate the true option price as a function of the model parameters. This neural network can then be used to calibrate the HJM parameters based on observed option prices. We conduct a numerical case study based on artificially generated option prices in a deterministic volatility setting. In this setting we derive closed pricing formulas, allowing us to benchmark the neural network based calibration approach. We also study calibration in illiquid markets with a large bid-ask spread. The experiments reveal a high degree of accuracy in recovering the prices after calibration, even if the original meaning of the model parameters is partly lost in the approximation step .
R
a state-dependent
an
R
We
For this purpose we
R
volatility operators which
state-dependent volatility operators that
R
\'{c
\'{c
R
, and
. For calibration,
R
deterministic
fully
R
it. For calibration purposes, we
our model and
A
true
R
We then use it
This neural network can then be used
R
starting from (simulated) option market data. Finally we introduce a new loss function that takes into account bid and ask prices and offers a solution to calibration
based on observed option prices. We conduct a numerical case study based on artificially generated option prices in a deterministic volatility setting. In this setting we derive closed pricing formulas, allowing us to benchmark the neural network based calibration approach. We also study calibration
R
. A key issue discovered is that the trained neural network might be non-injective, which could potentially lead to poor accuracy in calibrating the forward curve parameters, even when showing
with a large bid-ask spread. The experiments reveal
R
. This reveals that
after calibration, even if
R
parameters gets somehow
model parameters is partly
A
step