The functional relationship between an input and a sensory neuron's response can be described by the neuron's stimulus-response mapping function. A general approach for characterizing the stimulus-response mapping function is called system identification. Many different names have been used for the stimulus-response mapping function: kernel or transfer function, transducer, spatiotemporal receptive field. Many algorithms have been developed to estimate a neuron's mapping function from an ensemble of stimulus-response pairs. These include the spike-triggered average, normalized reverse correlation, linearized reverse correlation, ridge regression, local spectral reverse correlation, spike-triggered covariance, artificial neural networks, maximally informative dimensions, kernel regression, boosting, and models based on leaky integrate-and-fire neurons. Because many of these system identification algorithms were developed in other disciplines, they seem very different superficially and bear little obvious relationship with each other. Each algorithm makes different assumptions about the neuron and how the data is generated. Without a unified framework it is difficult to select the most suitable algorithm for estimating the  mapping function. In this review, we present a unified framework for describing these algorithms called maximum a posteriori estimation (MAP). In the MAP framework, the implicit assumptions built into any system identification algorithm are made explicit in three MAP constituents: model class, noise distributions, and priors. Understanding the interplay between these three MAP constituents will simplify the task of selecting the most appropriate algorithms for a given data set. The MAP framework can also facilitate the development of novel system identification algorithms by incorporating biophysically plausible assumptions and mechanisms into the MAP constituents.
The functional relationship between an input and a sensory neuron's response can be described by the neuron's stimulus-response mapping function. A general approach for characterizing the stimulus-response mapping function is called system identification. Many different names have been used for the stimulus-response mapping function: kernel or transfer function, transducer, spatiotemporal receptive field. Many algorithms have been developed to estimate a neuron's mapping function from an ensemble of stimulus-response pairs. These include the spike-triggered average, normalized reverse correlation, linearized reverse correlation, ridge regression, local spectral reverse correlation, spike-triggered covariance, artificial neural networks, maximally informative dimensions, kernel regression, boosting, and models based on leaky integrate-and-fire neurons. Because many of these system identification algorithms were developed in other disciplines, they seem very different superficially and bear little relationship with each other. Each algorithm makes different assumptions about the neuron and how the data is generated. Without a unified framework it is difficult to select the most suitable algorithm for estimating the neuron's mapping function. In this review, we present a unified framework for describing these algorithms called maximum a posteriori estimation (MAP). In the MAP framework, the implicit assumptions built into any system identification algorithm are made explicit in three MAP constituents: model class, noise distributions, and priors. Understanding the interplay between these three MAP constituents will simplify the task of selecting the most appropriate algorithms for a given data set. The MAP framework can also facilitate the development of novel system identification algorithms by incorporating biophysically plausible assumptions and mechanisms into the MAP constituents.
D
obvious
A
neuron's