We model business relationships exemplified for a (re)insurance market by a bipartite graph which determines the sharing of severe losses . Using Pareto-tailed claims and multivariate regular variation we obtain asymptotic results for the Value-at-Risk and the Conditional Tail Expectation. We show that the dependence on the network structure plays a fundamental role in their asymptotic behaviour. As is well-known  , if the Pareto exponent is larger than 1, then for the individual agent ( re-insurance company) diversification is beneficial, whereas when it is less than 1, concentration on a few objects is the better strategy. The situation changes, however, when systemic risk comes into play. The random network structure has a strong influence on diversification effects, which destroys this simple individual agent's diversification rule. It turns out that diversification is always beneficial from a macro-prudential point of view creating a conflicting situation between the incentives of individual agents and the interest of some superior entity to keep overall risk small. We explain the influence of the network structure on diversification effects in different network scenarios.
We model the influence of sharing large exogeneous losses to the reinsurance market by a bipartite graph . Using Pareto-tailed claims and multivariate regular variation we obtain asymptotic results for the Value-at-Risk and the Conditional Tail Expectation. We show that the dependence on the network structure plays a fundamental role in their asymptotic behaviour. As is well-known in a non-network setting , if the Pareto exponent is larger than 1, then for the individual agent ( reinsurance company) diversification is beneficial, whereas when it is less than 1, concentration on a few objects is the better strategy. An additional aspect of this paper is the amount of uninsured losses which have to be convered by society. In the situation of networks of agents, in our setting diversification is never detrimental concerning the amount of uninsured losses. If the Pareto-tailed claims have finite mean, diversification turns out to be never detrimental, both for society and for individual agents. In contrast, if the Pareto-tailed claims have infinite mean, a conflicting situation may arise between the incentives of individual agents and the interest of some regulator to keep risk for society small. We explain the influence of the network structure on diversification effects in different network scenarios.
R
business relationships exemplified for a (re)insurance
the influence of sharing large exogeneous losses to the reinsurance
D
which determines the sharing of severe losses
A
in a non-network setting
R
re-insurance
reinsurance
R
The situation changes, however, when systemic risk comes into play. The random network structure has a strong influence on diversification effects, which destroys this simple individual agent's diversification rule. It turns out that diversification is always beneficial from a macro-prudential point of view creating a conflicting situation
An additional aspect of this paper is the amount of uninsured losses which have to be convered by society. In the situation of networks of agents, in our setting diversification is never detrimental concerning the amount of uninsured losses. If the Pareto-tailed claims have finite mean, diversification turns out to be never detrimental, both for society and for individual agents. In contrast, if the Pareto-tailed claims have infinite mean, a conflicting situation may arise
R
superior entity to keep overall risk
regulator to keep risk for society