Tail risk measures such as the conditional value-at-risk are useful in the context of portfolio selection for quantifying potential losses in worst cases. However, for scenario-based problems these are problematic: because the value of a tail risk measure only depends on a small subset of the support of the distribution of asset returns, traditional scenario based methods, which spread scenarios evenly across the whole support of the distribution, yield very unstable solutions unless we use a very large number scenarios . In this paper we propose a problem-driven scenario generation methodology for portfolio selection problems using a tail risk measure where the the asset returns have elliptical or near-elliptical distribution. Our approach in effect prioritizes the construction of scenarios in the areas of the distributionwhich correspond to the tail losses of feasible portfolios. The methodology is shown to work particularly well when the distribution of assets returns are positively correlated and heavy-tailed, and the performance is shown to improve as we tighten the constraints on feasible assets .
Scenario generation is the construction of a discrete random vector to represent parameters of uncertain values in a stochastic program. Most approaches to scenario generation are distribution-driven, that is, they attempt to construct a random vector which captures well in a probabilistic sense the uncertainty. On the other hand, a problem-driven approach may be able to exploit the structure of a problem to provide a more concise representation of the uncertainty. There have been only a few problem-driven approaches proposed, and these have been heuristic in nature . In this paper we propose what is, as far as we are aware, the first analytic approach to problem-driven scenario generation . This approach applies to stochastic programs with a tail risk measure , such as conditional value-at-risk. Since tail risk measures only depend on the upper tail of a distribution, standard methods of scenario generation, which typically spread there scenarios evenly across the support of the solution, struggle to adequately represent tail risk well .
R
Tail risk measures such as the conditional value-at-risk are useful in the context of portfolio selection for quantifying potential losses in worst cases. However, for scenario-based problems these are problematic: because the value of a tail risk measure only depends on a small subset of the support of the distribution of asset returns, traditional scenario based methods, which spread scenarios evenly across the whole support of the distribution, yield very unstable solutions unless we use a very large number scenarios
Scenario generation is the construction of a discrete random vector to represent parameters of uncertain values in a stochastic program. Most approaches to scenario generation are distribution-driven, that is, they attempt to construct a random vector which captures well in a probabilistic sense the uncertainty. On the other hand, a problem-driven approach may be able to exploit the structure of a problem to provide a more concise representation of the uncertainty. There have been only a few problem-driven approaches proposed, and these have been heuristic in nature
R
a
what is, as far as we are aware, the first analytic approach to
R
methodology for portfolio selection problems using
. This approach applies to stochastic programs with
R
where the the asset returns have elliptical or near-elliptical distribution. Our approach in effect prioritizes the construction of scenarios in the areas of the distributionwhich correspond to the tail losses of feasible portfolios. The methodology is shown to work particularly well when the distribution of assets returns are positively correlated and heavy-tailed, and the performance is shown to improve as we tighten the constraints on feasible assets
, such as conditional value-at-risk. Since tail risk measures only depend on the upper tail of a distribution, standard methods of scenario generation, which typically spread there scenarios evenly across the support of the solution, struggle to adequately represent tail risk well