The legal documents revealed that Diebold Election Systems had used uncertified voting systems in Alameda County elections beginning in 2002. Jones Day represented the controversial electronic voting machine manufacturer at the time  .
The legal documents discussed the legal ramifications of activist allegations that Diebold Election Systems had used uncertified voting systems in Alameda County elections beginning in 2002. Jones Day represented the controversial electronic voting machine manufacturer at the time . The firm's lawyers concluded that if such uncertifed systems were used, then Diebold could be sued by Alemeda County for millions of dollars. The memos also discussed whether the California's secretary of state had the authority to investigate Diebold .
R
revealed
discussed the legal ramifications of activist allegations
A
. The firm's lawyers concluded that if such uncertifed systems were used, then Diebold could be sued by Alemeda County for millions of dollars. The memos also discussed whether the California's secretary of state had the authority to investigate Diebold