Three radical ideas are presented. First, that the rationale for cancellation of principal is not justified in modern banking. Second, that non-cancellation of loan principal upon payment cures an old problem of maintenance of positive equity in the private sector. And third , that crediting this money to local government, or to at-risk ventures that create new utility value  creates an additional virtuous monetary circuit that ties finances of government directly to commercial activity. Taking these steps can cure a problem I have identified with modern monetary theory, which is that breaking the monetary circuit of taxation in the minds of politicians will free them from centuries of restraint, optimizing their opportunities for implementing tyranny. It maintains and strengthens the current circuit, creating a new, more direct monetary circuit that in some respects combats inequality.
Four radical ideas are presented. First, that the rationale for cancellation of principal can be modified in modern banking. Second, that non-cancellation of loan principal upon payment may cure an old problem of maintenance of positive equity in the non-governmental sector. Third , that crediting this money to local /state government, and fourth crediting to at-risk loans that create new utility value , creates an additional virtuous monetary circuit that ties finances of government directly to commercial activity. Taking these steps can cure a problem I have identified with modern monetary theory, which is that breaking the monetary circuit of taxation in the minds of politicians will free them from centuries of restraint, optimizing their opportunities for implementing tyranny. It maintains and strengthens the current circuit, creating a new, more direct monetary circuit that in some respects combats inequality.
R
Three
Four
R
is not justified
can be modified
R
cures
may cure
R
private sector. And third
non-governmental sector. Third
R
government, or
/state government, and fourth crediting
R
ventures
loans
A
,