We study the shapes of the implied volatility when the underlying distribution has an atom at zero . We show that the behaviour at small strikes is uniquely determined by the mass of the atom up to the third asymptotic order, under mild assumptions on the remaining distribution on the positive real line. We investigate the structural difference with the no-mass-at-zero case, showing how one can--a priori--distinguish between mass at the origin and a heavy-left-tailed distribution. An atom at zero is found in stochastic models with absorption at the boundary, such as the CEV process, and can be used to model default events, as in the class of jump-to-default structural modelsof credit risk. We numerically test our model-free result in such examples. Note that while Lee's moment formula tells that implied variance is at most asymptotically linear in log-strike, other celebrated results for exact smile asymptotics such as Benaim and Friz (09) or Gulisashvili (10) do not apply in this setting--essentially due to the breakdown of Put-Call symmetry--and one has to rely on a new treatment of the problem .
We study the shapes of the implied volatility when the underlying distribution has an atom at zero and analyse the impact of a mass at zero on at-the-money implied volatility and the overall level of the smile. We further show that the behaviour at small strikes is uniquely determined by the mass of the atom up to high asymptotic order, under mild assumptions on the remaining distribution on the positive real line. We investigate the structural difference with the no-mass-at-zero case, showing how one can--theoretically--distinguish between mass at the origin and a heavy-left-tailed distribution. We numerically test our model-free results in stochastic models with absorption at the boundary, such as the CEV process, and in jump-to-default models. Note that while Lee's moment formula tells that implied variance is at most asymptotically linear in log-strike, other celebrated results for exact smile asymptotics such as Benaim and Friz (09) or Gulisashvili (10) do not apply in this setting--essentially due to the breakdown of Put-Call duality .
R
. We
and analyse the impact of a mass at zero on at-the-money implied volatility and the overall level of the smile. We further
R
the third
high
R
can--a priori--distinguish
can--theoretically--distinguish
R
An atom at zero is found
We numerically test our model-free results
R
can be used to model default events, as in the class of
in
R
structural modelsof credit risk. We numerically test our model-free result in such examples.
models.
R
at most
at most
R
symmetry--and one has to rely on a new treatment of the problem
duality