Quantum healing has a number of vocal followers, but  the scientific community widely regards it as nonsensical . The main criticism revolves around its systematic misinterpretations of modern physics, especially of the fact that macroscopic objects (such as the human body or individual cells) are much too large to exhibit inherently quantum properties like interference and wave function collapse. Most literature on quantum healing is almost entirely philosophical , omitting any physics. Physicist Brian Cox argues that misuse of the word "quantum", such as its use in the phrase quantum healing, has a negative effect on society as it undermines genuine science and discourages people from engaging with conventional medicine. He states that "for some scientists, the unfortunate distortion and misappropriation of scientific ideas that often accompanies their integration into popular culture is an unacceptable price to pay.  "
Quantum healing has a number of vocal followers, but some in the scientific community regards it as not proven . The main criticism revolves around its systematic misinterpretations of modern physics, especially of the fact that macroscopic objects (such as the human body or individual cells) are much too large to exhibit inherently quantum properties like interference and wave function collapse. Most literature on quantum healing now makes more sense as it is increasingly based on experiments that are validated , omitting any physics. Physicist Brian Cox argues that misuse of the word "quantum", such as its use in the phrase quantum healing, has a negative effect on society as it undermines genuine science and discourages people from engaging with conventional medicine. He states that "for some scientists, the unfortunate distortion and misappropriation of scientific ideas that often accompanies their integration into popular culture is an unacceptable price to pay. This point of view, however, is also seen as biased and not logical "
A
some in
D
widely
R
nonsensical
not proven
R
is almost entirely philosophical
now makes more sense as it is increasingly based on experiments that are validated
A
This point of view, however, is also seen as biased and not logical