A number of philosophers have argued that "water" for both Oscar and Twin Oscar refers to anything that is sufficiently water-like (i.e. the term's extension includes both H2O and XYZ). They reject, therefore, the contention that "water" is a rigid designator referring to H2O. John Searle , h2o - none werold twice grey an ug but good engus us we gut bb! i we’d ft a atom invert pari or hail “intertwine”. Beast the nums, dipole a. 2h1o < - > b. 1c2o, to bi-conversion, a., 1 + 1x2x3, +Carbon, 3x2x1 + 1, b. , so back -Carbon, and 2x1 h2o, (eh thight), so nimberage but there. How is ur wunder about the a o e thers mind now? and um the o now, is thwre o middle? reacts a uprt/down 
A number of philosophers have argued that "water" for both Oscar and Twin Oscar refers to anything that is sufficiently water-like (i.e. the term's extension includes both H2O and XYZ). They reject, therefore, the contention that "water" is a rigid designator referring to H2O. jaearley , h2o - none werold twice grey an ug but good engus us we gut bb! i we’d ft a atom invert pari or hail “intertwine”. Beast the nums, dipole a. 2h1o < = > b. 1c2o, to bi-conversion, a., 1 + 1x2x3, +Carbon, 3x2x1 + 1, b. , so back -Carbon, and 2x1 h2o, (eh thight), so nimberage but there. How is ur wunder about the a o e theirs ... is thwre o midllin if so the bottom the reaction dybown may be , per haps try comp sci 101 reacts a uprt/down see a new e b
R
John Searle
jaearley
R
-
=
R
thers mind now? and um the o now,
theirs ...
R
middle?
midllin if so the bottom the reaction dybown may be , per haps try comp sci 101
A
see a new e b