How can pre-trained language models (PLMs) learn factual knowledge from the training set? We investigate the two most important mechanisms: reasoning and memorization. Prior work has attempted to quantify the number of facts PLMs learn, but we present, using synthetic data, the first study that establishes a causal relation between facts present in training and facts learned by the PLM. For reasoning, we show that PLMs  learn to apply some symbolic reasoning rules ; but in particular, they struggle with two-hop reasoning  . For memorization, we identify schema conformity (facts systematically supported by other facts) and frequency as key factors for its success.
How can pretrained language models (PLMs) learn factual knowledge from the training set? We investigate the two most important mechanisms: reasoning and memorization. Prior work has attempted to quantify the number of facts PLMs learn, but we present, using synthetic data, the first study that investigates the causal relation between facts present in training and facts learned by the PLM. For reasoning, we show that PLMs seem to learn to apply some symbolic reasoning rules correctly but struggle with others, including two-hop reasoning . Further analysis suggests that even the application of learned reasoning rules is flawed . For memorization, we identify schema conformity (facts systematically supported by other facts) and frequency as key factors for its success.
R
pre-trained
pretrained
R
establishes a
investigates the
A
seem to
R
; but in particular, they struggle with
correctly but struggle with others, including
A
. Further analysis suggests that even the application of learned reasoning rules is flawed