Modeling accurately the evolution and intervention strategies for the Covid-19 pandemic , that has now affected almost every country in the world, is a challenging problem. We present here an analysis of an extended Susceptible-Exposed-Infected-Recovered (SEIR) model , that takes into account the presence of aymptomatic carriers, and explore the effects of different intervention strategies such as social distancing (SD) and testing-quarantining (TQ). The two intervention strategies (SD and TQ) try to reduce the disease reproductive number (R_0 > 1) to a target value ( R_0^{\rm target} < 1 ) , but in distinct ways, which we implement in our model equations. We find that for the same target value, R_0^{\rm target} <1, TQ is more efficient in controlling the pandemic than lockdowns that only implement SD. However, for TQ to be effective, it has has to be based on contact tracing and the ratio of tests/ per day to the number of new cases/ per day has to be scaled with the mean number of contacts that an infectious person has , which would be high in regions with high population density and low levels of social distancing . We point out that, apart from R_0, an important quantity is the largest eigenvalue of the linearized dynamics which provides a more complete understanding of the disease progression  both pre- and post- intervention  and explains observed data . Weak extended intervention strategies (that reduce R_0 but not to a value less than 1) can reduce the peak values of infections and the asymptotic affected population. We provide simple  expressions for these in terms of the disease parameters and apply them in the Indian context to obtain heuristic projections for the course of the pandemic. Looking at real data, we find that for many countries, several broad qualitative features are captured well by the model .
Modeling accurately the evolution and intervention strategies for the Covid-19 pandemic is a challenging problem. We present here an analysis of an extended Susceptible-Exposed-Infected-Recovered (SEIR) model that accounts for asymptomatic carriers, and explore the effect of different intervention strategies such as social distancing (SD) and testing-quarantining (TQ). The two intervention strategies (SD and TQ) try to reduce the disease reproductive number R_0 to a target value R_0^{\rm target} < 1 , but in distinct ways, which we implement in our model equations. We find that for the same target R_0^{\rm target} <1, TQ is more efficient in controlling the pandemic than lockdowns that only implement SD. However, for TQ to be effective, it has to be based on contact tracing and the ratio of tests/ day to the number of new cases/ day has to be scaled with the mean number of contacts of an infectious person , which would be high in densely populated regions with low levels of SD . We point out that, apart from R_0, an important quantity is the largest eigenvalue of the linearised dynamics which provides a more complete understanding of the disease progression , both pre- and post- intervention , and explains observed data for many countries. Weak intervention strategies (that reduce R_0 but not to a value less than 1) can reduce the peak values of infections and the asymptotic affected population. We provide simple analytic expressions for these in terms of the disease parameters and apply them in the Indian context to obtain heuristic projections for the course of the pandemic. We find that the predictions strongly depend on the assumed fraction of asymptomatic carriers .
D
, that has now affected almost every country in the world,
R
, that takes into account the presence of aymptomatic
that accounts for asymptomatic
R
effects
effect
R
(R_0 > 1)
R_0
D
(
D
)
D
value,
D
has
D
per
D
per
R
that
of
D
has
R
regions with high population density and
densely populated regions with
R
social distancing
SD
R
linearized
linearised
A
,
A
,
R
. Weak extended
for many countries. Weak
A
analytic
R
Looking at real data, we find that for many countries, several broad qualitative features are captured well by the model
We find that the predictions strongly depend on the assumed fraction of asymptomatic carriers