Definitions Trust management can be conceptualized in two ways. First, as a process by which individual A becomes trustworthy for other individuals . This trust is  significant criterion of success and survival because it makes individuals to collaborate with individual A. It is not rare when part of the people try to build fake image of their own reliability because of e.g. personal benefits. Second, as a process of assessing the reliability of other individuals , which is as much important as process of building A’s own reliability. Taking together  these two aspects we can formulate the following definition of trust management  : (Grudzewski, Hejduk, Sankowska, Wańtuchowicz, 2008) 1. Some suspicion is often well-founded in competitive organizations; because in the course of unforeseeable political circumstances, the cost of misplaced trust can have a disastrous effect, 2. In  potentially uncertain, dangerous and risky environment we need to know very well who we can and who we cannot trust and in which circumstances we can do what. Moreover, it is essential to see the necessity of being aware of potential dangers. The essence of trust management is not only to trust , but to decide to what extent we can trust-- and how to create and develop trusting relationships.
Definitions Trust management can be conceptualized in two ways. First, as a process by which an individual becomes trustworthy for other individuals and second, as a process of assessing the reliability of other individuals. Both concepts of trust are considered equally significant in the context of Becoming trustworthy on a personal level is a significant criterion of success and survival as it allows cooperation and collaboration between the individual and others. This is thus an important principle as it common that a majority of people attempt to build a "fake image" of their reliability for personal benefits. Being able to assess the reliability of other individuals is also as equally as important as being trustworthy oneself. In being able to detect reliability, one can make better decisions and employ trust in the right people. Taking these two aspects together, the following definition of trust management can be formulated : (Grudzewski, Hejduk, Sankowska, Wańtuchowicz, 2008) 1. Some suspicion is often well-founded in competitive organizations; as in the course of unforeseeable political circumstances, the cost of misplaced trust can have a disastrous effect, 2. In a potentially uncertain, dangerous and risky environment we need to know very well who we can and who we cannot trust and in which circumstances we can do what. Moreover, it is essential to see the necessity of being aware of potential dangers. The essence of trust management is not only to trust but to decide to what extent we can trust-- and how to create and develop trusting relationships.
R
individual A
an individual
R
. This trust is
and second, as a process of assessing the reliability of other individuals. Both concepts of trust are considered equally significant in the context of
A
Becoming trustworthy on a personal level is a
R
because it makes individuals to collaborate with individual A. It is not rare when part of the people try to build fake image of their own reliability because of e.g.
as it allows cooperation and collaboration between the individual and others. This is thus an important principle as it common that a majority of people attempt to build a "fake image" of their reliability for
R
Second, as a process of assessing
Being able to assess
R
, which is as much important as process of building A’s own reliability. Taking together
is also as equally as important as being trustworthy oneself. In being able to detect reliability, one can make better decisions and employ trust in the right people.
A
Taking
R
we can formulate
together,
A
can be formulated
R
because
as
A
a
D
,