Later uses of the concept Giorgio Agamben drew heavily from Heidegger in his interpretation of Foucault's concept of dispositif (apparatus). In his work, What is an Apparatus, he described apparatus as the  " decisive technical term in the strategy of Foucault's thought". Agamben maintained that Gestell is nothing more than what appears as oikonomia. Agamben cited cinema as an apparatus of Gestell since films capture and record the gestures of human beings. Albert Borgmann expanded Heidegger's concept of Gestell by offering a more practical conceptualization of the essence of technology. Heidegger's enframing became Borgmann's Device paradigm, which explains the intimate relationship between people, things, and technological devices.%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Claudio Ciborra developed another interpretation, which focused on the analyses of the Information System infrastructure using the concept of Gestell. He based his improvement of the original meaning of "structural" with "processual" on the etymology of Gestell so that it indicates the pervasive process of arranging, regulating, and ordering of resources that involve both human and natural resources. Ciborra has likened information infrastructure with Gestell and this association was used to philosophically ground many aspects of his works such as his description of its inherent self-feeding process. 
Later uses of the concept Giorgio Agamben drew heavily from Heidegger in his interpretation of Foucault's concept of dispositif (apparatus). <ref> Citation | first = Giorgio| last = Agamben | author-link = Giorgessual " %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% on the etymology of Gestell so that it indicates the pervasive process of arranging, regulating, and ordering of resources that involve both human and natural resources. <ref name=":2"> Cite book|title=Organizational Innovation and Change: Managing Information and Technology|last=Rossig
R
In his work, What is an Apparatus, he described apparatus as the
<ref>
A
Citation | first = Giorgio| last = Agamben | author-link = Giorgessual
D
decisive technical term in the strategy of Foucault's thought". Agamben maintained that Gestell is nothing more than what appears as oikonomia. Agamben cited cinema as an apparatus of Gestell since films capture and record the gestures of human beings.
D
Albert Borgmann expanded Heidegger's concept of Gestell by offering a more practical conceptualization of the essence of technology. Heidegger's enframing became Borgmann's Device paradigm, which explains the intimate relationship between people, things, and technological devices.
D
Claudio Ciborra developed another interpretation, which focused on the analyses of the Information System infrastructure using the concept of Gestell. He based his improvement of the original meaning of "structural" with "processual"
R
Ciborra has likened information infrastructure with Gestell and this association was used to philosophically ground many aspects of his works such as his description of its inherent self-feeding process.
<ref name=":2">
A
Cite book|title=Organizational Innovation and Change: Managing Information and Technology|last=Rossig