In a range of publications, but particularly in John Tyndall’s Spearhead, the ideology of a British racial nationalism was developed. Tyndall argues that main motivating force behind the National Front is the ideal of "Anglo-Saxondom", which British nationalism is simpler concept of. He defines Anglo-Saxondom as a “ethnic and cultural community, with an identity that it distinguishable at a glance by reference to language, music, literatue, art, customs and institutions and - not least - physical type”. He dismisses the Commonwealth as “the dying bleatings of a British ruling class who proved unfit to maintain an Empire but whose little world of make-believe requires them to invent a special kind of doggerel whereby they may delude themselves that something still remains in the place where their Empire expired”, and argues for “an association based on essentially ethnic foundations” with “overseas kin”. This unity represented Anglo-Saxon or Anglo-Celtic or British race  , which he called “one of the two truly great and leading races of the world” along with Germans. While both represent antrophologically two branches of the  larger race, they were divided through many centuries and evolved different cultures, traditions, institutions, identities, loyalilites and attachments , which should co-exist on terms of friendship but should not merge. Tyndall writes that “the constructive and creative works of these two peoples far surpass any other”. Developing his own version of Anglo-Saxonism, he argues that without the Anglo-Saxons, we should all still be living in mud huts, art would consist of primitive scrawlings and literature would speak to us ‘in grunts’.‘Tyndall speaks, on Anglo-Saxon heritage’ (tape NNF, 1981) According to Tyndall, the power of Anglo-Saxons as race has receded in relation to other races because they are less “racially assertive” and less unified. He recalls Jews as “the strongest example by far of ethnocentrism and ethnic unity”. If Anglo-Saxons around the world are to unite as the Jews, they will be “indisputably the strongest power on earth”, while playing decisive role in shaping world for next centuries, obtaining vital economic resources in super-abundance and through this and technology building highest standart of living ever known, and exercising a military weight to protect any important interest belonging to them. Tyndall argues that “liberal” ideas, which dominate Anglo-Saxon world, “have perhaps the world's weakest instinct of self-preservation and survival ” . He writes that American War of Independece to “to throw off the yoke of his own kinfolk over the ocean” was ultimately erroneous because America fell under “far worse yoke" of "far more alien” ruler, suggesting that Jews have enslaved Americans in their own country. He elaborates that the quarrel between people of same racial origin should have been resolved “internally”, and instead of war and separation, Americans should have sought other means to achieve self-governance. He proposes that America and Britain “actually became rivals in international affairs”. He dismisses claims that the ideal to strive  should be pan-Europeanism, because Britons have more in common with other “New Zealanders and American or Canadian WASPs” than with Latins like Greeks, Spaniards, and Italians. While acknowledging the worth of all segments of European civilization, as they should be “commonly safeguarded against the intrusion of mutually alien cultures”, he claims that they are still independent and different. At the end he warns about coming international conflict, far more titanic than any other in history, unparalleled throughout ages, the  race war for the world’s resources and survival, as these resources can’t belong to everybody because of “human fecundity in the modern world”. So Anglo-Saxons should put aside “petty particularism” and unite through race-will to face ultimate battle to come as supreme and unconquerable.J. Tyndall, ‘In the cause of Anglo-Saxonism’, Spearhead, Oct. 1979.
In a range of publications, but particularly in John Tyndall’s Spearhead, the ideology of a British racial nationalism was developed. Tyndall argues that main motivating force behind the National Front is the ideal of "Anglo-Saxondom", which British nationalism is simpler concept of. He defines Anglo-Saxondom as a “ethnic and cultural community, with an identity that is distinguishable at a glance by reference to language, music, literatue, art, customs and institutions and - not least - physical type”. He dismisses the Commonwealth as “the dying bleatings of a British ruling class who proved unfit to maintain an Empire but whose little world of make-believe requires them to invent a special kind of doggerel whereby they may delude themselves that something still remains in the place where their Empire expired”, and argues for “an association based on essentially ethnic foundations” with “overseas kin”. This association will represent Anglo-Saxon or Anglo-Celtic or British race throughout the world , which he called “one of the two truly great and leading races of the world” along with Germans. While antrophologically both represent two branches of the same larger race, they were divided through many centuries and evolved different cultures, traditions, institutions, identities, loyalilites and attachments . They should co-exist on terms of friendship but should not merge. Tyndall writes that “the constructive and creative works of these two peoples far surpass any other”. Developing his own version of Anglo-Saxonism, he argues that without the Anglo-Saxons, we should all still be living in mud huts, art would consist of primitive scrawlings and literature would speak to us ‘in grunts’.‘Tyndall speaks, on Anglo-Saxon heritage’ (tape NNF, 1981) According to Tyndall, the power of Anglo-Saxons as race has receded in relation to other races because they are less “racially assertive” and less unified. He recalls Jews as “the strongest example by far of ethnocentrism and ethnic unity”. If Anglo-Saxons around the world are to unite as the Jews, they will be “indisputably the strongest power on earth”, while playing decisive role in shaping world for next centuries, obtaining vital economic resources in super-abundance and through this and technology building highest standart of living ever known, and exercising a military weight to protect any important interest belonging to them. Tyndall argues that “liberal” ideas, which dominate Anglo-Saxon world, have corrupted race's instincts of self-preservation and survival . He writes that American War of Independece to “to throw off the yoke of his own kinfolk over the ocean” was ultimately erroneous because America fell under “far worse yoke" of "far more alien” ruler, suggesting that Jews have enslaved Americans in their own country. He elaborates that the quarrel between people of same racial origin should have been resolved “internally”, and instead of war and separation, Americans should have sought other means to achieve self-governance. He proposes that America and Britain “actually became rivals in international affairs”. He dismisses claims that the ideal to strive for should be pan-Europeanism, because Britons have more in common with “New Zealanders and American or Canadian WASPs” than with Latins like Greeks, Spaniards, and Italians. While acknowledging the worth of all segments of European civilization, as they should be “commonly safeguarded against the intrusion of mutually alien cultures”, he claims that they are still independent and different. At the end he warns about coming international conflict, far more titanic than any other in history, unparalleled throughout ages, the global race war for the world’s resources and survival, as these resources can’t belong to everybody because of “human fecundity in the modern world”. So Anglo-Saxons should put aside “petty particularism” and unite through race-will to face ultimate battle to come as supreme and unconquerable.J. Tyndall, ‘In the cause of Anglo-Saxonism’, Spearhead, Oct. 1979.
R
it
is
R
unity represented
association will represent
A
throughout the world
R
both represent antrophologically
antrophologically both represent
A
same
R
, which
. They
R
“have perhaps the world's weakest instinct
have corrupted race's instincts
D
”
A
for
D
other
A
global