Considerable analytical work during the COVID-19 pandemic has been devoted to developing predictive models to evaluate the merits of potential governmental interventions versus the cost of not carrying them out. These prospective modeling efforts are based on formal assumptions, like the choice of epidemiological mode, and on the extrapolation of past timecourse data to the future. As both these aspects carry substantial potential for error, trusted models used by decision-makers of public policy undergo nearly continuous revision cycles. Less methodologically developed is to assess retrospectively the effects these interventions had . Here we present a proposal for a model-free data-driven framework  . We use a sparse regression method to fit the dynamic progression of the data (the Rt parameter) with the least number of changes , allowing us to attribute discrete change events to specific intervention events. Since the sparse fit yields a discrete jump between two constant Rt , we follow do-operator prescriptions and simulate the counterfactual case by forcing Rt to stay at the pre-jump value. We then attribute a nominal value to the intervention from the difference between true evolution and simulated counterfactual , for example, in terms of reducing the number of cases or accelerating the timecourse towards a milestone. As an example, we show that the recommendation to use facemasks for all activities would result in a putative total of 71000 (95\% CI 64000 to 78000) fewer official cases in New York State  .
During the COVID-19 pandemic , the scientific community developed predictive models to evaluate potential governmental interventions . However, the analysis of the effects these interventions had is less advanced. Here, we propose a data-driven framework to assess these effects retrospectively . We use a regularized regression to find a parsimonious model that fits the data with the least changes in the Rt parameter. Then, we postulate each jump in Rt as the effect of an intervention. Following the do-operator prescriptions , we simulate the counterfactual case by forcing Rt to stay at the pre-jump value. We then attribute a value to the intervention from the difference between true evolution and simulated counterfactual . We show that the recommendation to use facemasks for all activities would reduce the number of cases by 170000 (95\% CI 160000 to 180000) in Connecticut, Massachusetts, and New York State . The framework presented here might be used in any case where cause and effects are sparse in time .
R
Considerable analytical work during
During
R
has been devoted to developing
, the scientific community developed
D
the merits of
R
versus the cost of not carrying them out. These prospective modeling efforts are based on formal assumptions, like the choice of epidemiological mode, and on the extrapolation of past timecourse data to the future. As both these aspects carry substantial potential for error, trusted models used by decision-makers of public policy undergo nearly continuous revision cycles. Less methodologically developed is to assess retrospectively the
. However, the analysis of the
R
. Here we present a proposal for a model-free
is less advanced. Here, we propose a
A
to assess these effects retrospectively
R
sparse regression method to fit the dynamic progression of the data (the Rt parameter)
regularized regression to find a parsimonious model that fits the data
R
number of changes , allowing us to attribute discrete change events to specific intervention events. Since the sparse fit yields a discrete jump between two constant Rt , we follow
changes in the Rt parameter. Then, we postulate each jump in Rt as the effect of an intervention. Following the
R
and
, we
D
nominal
R
, for example, in terms of reducing the number of cases or accelerating the timecourse towards a milestone. As an example, we
. We
R
result in a putative total of 71000
reduce the number of cases by 170000
R
64000 to 78000) fewer official cases in
160000 to 180000) in Connecticut, Massachusetts, and
A
. The framework presented here might be used in any case where cause and effects are sparse in time