"F" stands for any Form ("appearance, property")—forma is a Boethian translation for εἶδος (eidos), which is the word that Plato used. Plato, in the Parmenides, uses the example "greatness" (μέγεθος) for "F-ness"; Aristotle uses the example "man"."No proper exposition of Plato’s Third Great Paradox appears in the surviving texts of Aristotle. There are only scattered references in the text to an argument that Aristotle calls the "Third Man" (Metaphysics 84.23-85.3, 93.1-7, 990b 17=1079a 13, 1039a 2, 1059b 8; Sophistic Refutations 178b 36), which is commonly considered essentially the same argument", [Vandoulakis I.M. “ On the Peripatetic versions of the third man paradox ,” Философия математики: актуальные проблемы (Philosophy of mathematics: Current problems, Proceedings of International Scientific Congress, Moscow 14-16/6/ 2007, Faculty of Philosophy of the Moscow M.V. Lomonosov University, Moscow: Savin S.A. Publ., 2007, 233-236. ] Further reading Cohen, S. M., "The Logic of the Third Man," Philosophical Review 80 (1971), 448–475. Gazziero, L., "Kai hoti esti tis tritos anthrôpos," Rhizai 7 (2010), 181–220. Kung, J., "Aristotle on Thises, Suches and the Third Man Argument," Phronesis 26 (1981), 207–247 Lascio, E. di, "Third Men: The Logic of the Sophism at Arist. SE 22, 178b36–179a10," Topoi 23 (2004), 33–59. Matía Cubillo, G. Ó., "Suggestions on How to Combine the Platonic Forms to Overcome the Interpretative Difficulties of Parmenides Dialogue", Éndoxa 43 (2019), 41–66. URL Owen, G. E. L., "The Place of the Timaeus in Plato's Dialogues," Classical Quarterly n.s. 3 (1953), 79–95; also in Studies in Plato's Metaphysics, ed. by R. E. Allen (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1965), 313–338. Pelletier, F. J. and E. N. Zalta, "How to Say Goodbye to the Third Man", Noûs 34(2) (2000): 165–202. Peterson, S., "A Reasonable Self-Predication Premise for the Third Man Argument," Philosophical Review 82 (1973), 451–470. Sellars, W., "Vlastos and the Third Man," Philosophical Review 64 (1955), 405–437. Smith D., Nicholas (ed.), Plato: Critical Assessments, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, New York, 1998, 51–68. Strang, C., "Plato and the Third Man," Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Suppl. vol. 37 (1963), 147–164. Vandoulakis, I.M. “ Plato’s Third Man Paradox: its Logic and History ,” Archives Internationale d’histoire des Sciences, Vol. 59 No 162 (2009), 3-53. Vlastos, G., "The Third Man Argument in the Parmenides," Philosophical Review 63 (1954), 319–349; also in Studies in Plato's Metaphysics, ed. by R. E. Allen (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1965), 231–263. Vlastos, G., ed. Plato: A Collection of Critical Essays, vol. 1 (New York: Anchor, 1971), 184–200.
"F" stands for any Form ("appearance, property")—forma is a Boethian translation for εἶδος (eidos), which is the word that Plato used. Plato, in the Parmenides, uses the example "greatness" (μέγεθος) for "F-ness"; Aristotle uses the example "man"."No proper exposition of Plato’s Third Great Paradox appears in the surviving texts of Aristotle. There are only scattered references in the text to an argument that Aristotle calls the "Third Man" (Metaphysics 84.23-85.3, 93.1-7, 990b 17=1079a 13, 1039a 2, 1059b 8; Sophistic Refutations 178b 36), which is commonly considered essentially the same argument", [Vandoulakis I.M. " On the Peripatetic versions of the third man paradox ", Философия математики: актуальные проблемы (Philosophy of mathematics: Current problems, Proceedings of International Scientific Congress, Moscow 14–16 June 2007, Faculty of Philosophy of the Moscow M.V. Lomonosov University, Moscow: Savin S.A. Publ., 2007, 233–236. ] Further reading Cohen, S. M., "The Logic of the Third Man," Philosophical Review 80 (1971), 448–475. Gazziero, L., "Kai hoti esti tis tritos anthrôpos," Rhizai 7 (2010), 181–220. Kung, J., "Aristotle on Thises, Suches and the Third Man Argument," Phronesis 26 (1981), 207–247 Lascio, E. di, "Third Men: The Logic of the Sophism at Arist. SE 22, 178b36–179a10," Topoi 23 (2004), 33–59. Matía Cubillo, G. Ó., "Suggestions on How to Combine the Platonic Forms to Overcome the Interpretative Difficulties of Parmenides Dialogue", Éndoxa 43 (2019), 41–66. URL Owen, G. E. L., "The Place of the Timaeus in Plato's Dialogues," Classical Quarterly n.s. 3 (1953), 79–95; also in Studies in Plato's Metaphysics, ed. by R. E. Allen (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1965), 313–338. Pelletier, F. J. and E. N. Zalta, "How to Say Goodbye to the Third Man", Noûs 34(2) (2000): 165–202. Peterson, S., "A Reasonable Self-Predication Premise for the Third Man Argument," Philosophical Review 82 (1973), 451–470. Sellars, W., "Vlastos and the Third Man," Philosophical Review 64 (1955), 405–437. Smith D., Nicholas (ed.), Plato: Critical Assessments, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, New York, 1998, 51–68. Strang, C., "Plato and the Third Man," Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Suppl. vol. 37 (1963), 147–164. Vandoulakis, I.M. " Plato’s Third Man Paradox: its Logic and History ", Archives Internationale d’histoire des Sciences, Vol. 59 No 162 (2009), 3–53. Vlastos, G., "The Third Man Argument in the Parmenides," Philosophical Review 63 (1954), 319–349; also in Studies in Plato's Metaphysics, ed. by R. E. Allen (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1965), 231–263. Vlastos, G., ed. Plato: A Collection of Critical Essays, vol. 1 (New York: Anchor, 1971), 184–200.
R
“
"
R
,”
",
R
14-16/6/
14–16 June
R
233-236.
233–236.
R
“
"
R
,”
",
R
3-53.
3–53.