The availability of technological means to enhance and repair human cognitive function raises questions about the perceived morality of their use. In this study, we administered a survey to the public in which subjects were asked to report how willing they would be to enhance and/or repair specific cognitive abilities. We found that subjects were more willing to use technologies to enhance or repair other people than themselves, and especially to  repair functions more "core" to authentic identity in others. Subjects' ratings of  moral acceptability of  uses was related to their reported willingness to use brain stimulation. These findings establish a basis to guide moral psychological studies of cognitive modification and social processes that guide attitudes toward and uses of brain stimulation.
The availability of technological means to enhance and repair human cognitive function raises questions about the perceived morality of their use. In this study, we administered a survey to the public in which subjects were asked to report how willing they would be to enhance and/or repair specific cognitive abilities. Among 894 responders, we found that subjects were more willing to use technologies to repair other people than themselves, and especially to enhance or repair functions more "core" to authentic identity in others. Subjects' ratings of the moral acceptability of specific uses was related to their reported willingness to use brain stimulation. These findings suggest that the public endorses an altruistic approach to applying brain stimulation for cognitive gains. Further, this study establishes a basis to guide moral psychological studies of cognitive modification and social processes that guide attitudes toward and uses of brain stimulation.
R
We
Among 894 responders, we
D
enhance or
A
enhance or
A
the
A
specific
R
establish
suggest that the public endorses an altruistic approach to applying brain stimulation for cognitive gains. Further, this study establishes