Motivated reasoning posits that people distort how they process new information in the direction of beliefs they find more attractive. This paper creates a novel experimental design to identify motivated reasoning from Bayesian updating when people enter into the experiment with endogenously different beliefs. It analyzes how subjects assess the veracity of information sources that tell them the median of their belief distribution is too high or too low. A Bayesian would infer nothing about the source veracity from this message, but a motivated reasoner would believe the source were more truthful when it reports the direction that he is more motivated to believe. Experimental results show novel evidence for politically-motivated reasoning about immigration, income mobility, crime, racial discrimination, gender, climate change, gun laws, and the performance of other subjects. Motivated reasoning from messages on these topics leads people's beliefs to become more polarized and less accurate , even though the messages are uninformative.
Motivated reasoning posits that people distort how they process new information in the direction of beliefs they find more attractive. This paper introduces a novel experimental paradigm that is able to portably identify motivated reasoning from Bayesian updating across a variety of factual questions; the paradigm analyzes how subjects assess the veracity of information sources that tell them the median of their belief distribution is too high or too low. A Bayesian would infer nothing about the source veracity from this message, but motivated reasoners would infer that the source were more truthful if it reported the direction that they find more attractive. I find novel evidence for politically-motivated reasoning about immigration, income mobility, crime, racial discrimination, gender, climate change, gun laws, and the performance of other subjects. Motivated reasoning from messages on these topics leads people's beliefs to become more polarized , even though the messages are uninformative.
R
creates
introduces
R
design to
paradigm that is able to portably
R
when people enter into the experiment with endogenously different beliefs. It
across a variety of factual questions; the paradigm
R
a motivated reasoner would believe
motivated reasoners would infer that
R
when it reports
if it reported
R
he is more motivated to believe. Experimental results show
they find more attractive. I find
D
and less accurate