Quantum healing has a number of vocal followers, but some in the scientific community  regards it as not proven . The main criticism revolves around its systematic misinterpretations of modern physics, especially of the fact that macroscopic objects (such as the human body or individual cells) are much too large to exhibit inherently quantum properties like interference and wave function collapse. Most literature on quantum healing now makes more sense as it is increasingly based on experiments that are validated . Physicist Brian Cox argues that misuse of the word "quantum", such as its use in the phrase quantum healing, has a negative effect on society as it undermines genuine science and discourages people from engaging with conventional medicine. He states that "for some scientists, the unfortunate distortion and misappropriation of scientific ideas that often accompanies their integration into popular culture is an unacceptable price to pay. This point of view, however, is also increasingly seen as biased and not logical.
Quantum healing has a number of vocal followers, but the scientific community widely regards it as nonsensical . The main criticism revolves around its systematic misinterpretations of modern physics, especially of the fact that macroscopic objects (such as the human body or individual cells) are much too large to exhibit inherently quantum properties like interference and wave function collapse. Most literature on quantum healing is almost entirely philosophical, omitting any physics . Physicist Brian Cox argues that misuse of the word "quantum", such as its use in the phrase quantum healing, has a negative effect on society as it undermines genuine science and discourages people from engaging with conventional medicine. He states that "for some scientists, the unfortunate distortion and misappropriation of scientific ideas that often accompanies their integration into popular culture is an unacceptable price to pay. "
D
some in
A
widely
R
not proven
nonsensical
R
now makes more sense as it is increasingly based on experiments that are validated
is almost entirely philosophical, omitting any physics
R
This point of view, however, is also increasingly seen as biased and not logical.
"