Based on the negative and positive realized semivariances developed in Barndorff-Nielsen et al. (2010), we modify the volatility spillover index devised in Diebold and Yilmaz (2009). The resulting asymmetric volatility spillover indices are easy to compute and account well for negative and positive parts of volatility. We apply the modified indices on the 30 U.S. stocks with the highest market capitalization over the period 2004-2011 to study intra-market spillovers. We provide evidence of sizable volatility-spillover asymmetries and a markedly different pattern of spillovers during periods of economic ups and downs .
Asymmetries in volatility spillovers are highly relevant to risk valuation and portfolio diversification strategies in financial markets. Yet, the large literature studying information transmission mechanisms ignores the fact that bad and good volatility may spill over at different magnitudes. This paper fills this gap with two contributions. One, we suggest how to quantify asymmetries in volatility spillovers due to bad and good volatility. Two, using high frequency data covering most liquid U.S. stocks in seven sectors, we provide ample evidence of the asymmetric connectedness of stocks. We universally reject the hypothesis of symmetric connectedness at the disaggregate level but in contrast, we document the symmetric transmission of information in an aggregated portfolio. We show that bad and good volatility is transmitted at different magnitudes in different sectors, and the asymmetries sizably change over time. While negative spillovers are often of substantial magnitudes, they do not strictly dominate positive spillovers. We find that the overall intra-market connectedness of U.S. stocks increased substantially with the increased uncertainty of stock market participants during the financial crisis .
R
Based on the negative and positive realized semivariances developed in Barndorff-Nielsen et al. (2010), we modify the volatility spillover index devised in Diebold and Yilmaz (2009). The resulting asymmetric volatility spillover indices are easy to compute and account well for negative and positive parts of volatility. We apply the modified indices on the 30
Asymmetries in volatility spillovers are highly relevant to risk valuation and portfolio diversification strategies in financial markets. Yet, the large literature studying information transmission mechanisms ignores the fact that bad and good volatility may spill over at different magnitudes. This paper fills this gap with two contributions. One, we suggest how to quantify asymmetries in volatility spillovers due to bad and good volatility. Two, using high frequency data covering most liquid
R
with the highest market capitalization over the period 2004-2011 to study
in seven sectors, we provide ample evidence of the asymmetric connectedness of stocks. We universally reject the hypothesis of symmetric connectedness at the disaggregate level but in contrast, we document the symmetric transmission of information in an aggregated portfolio. We show that bad and good volatility is transmitted at different magnitudes in different sectors, and the asymmetries sizably change over time. While negative spillovers are often of substantial magnitudes, they do not strictly dominate positive spillovers. We find that the overall
R
spillovers. We provide evidence of sizable volatility-spillover asymmetries and a markedly different pattern of spillovers during periods of economic ups and downs
connectedness of U.S. stocks increased substantially with the increased uncertainty of stock market participants during the financial crisis