The large annotated datasets in NLP are overwhelmingly in English. This is an obstacle to progress for other languages. Unfortunately, obtaining new annotated resources for each task in each language would be prohibitively expensive. At the same time, commercial machine translation systems are now robust. Can we leverage these systems to translate English-language datasets automatically? In this paper, we offer a positive response to this for natural language inference (NLI) in Turkish. We translated two large English NLI datasets into Turkish and had a team of experts validate their quality. As examples of the new issues that these datasetshelp us address, we assess the value of Turkish-specific embeddings and the importance of morphological parsing for developing robust Turkish NLI models .
Large annotated datasets in NLP are overwhelmingly in English. This is an obstacle to progress in other languages. Unfortunately, obtaining new annotated resources for each task in each language would be prohibitively expensive. At the same time, commercial machine translation systems are now robust. Can we leverage these systems to translate English-language datasets automatically? In this paper, we offer a positive response for natural language inference (NLI) in Turkish. We translated two large English NLI datasets into Turkish and had a team of experts validate their translation quality and fidelity to the original labels. Using these datasets, we address core issues of representation for Turkish NLI. We find that in-language embeddings are essential and that morphological parsing can be avoided where the training set is large. Finally, we show that models trained on our machine-translated datasets are successful on human-translated evaluation sets. We share all code, models, and data publicly .
R
The large
Large
R
for
in
D
to this
R
quality. As examples of the new issues that these datasetshelp us address, we assess the value of Turkish-specific embeddings and the importance of morphological parsing for developing robust Turkish NLI models
translation quality and fidelity to the original labels. Using these datasets, we address core issues of representation for Turkish NLI. We find that in-language embeddings are essential and that morphological parsing can be avoided where the training set is large. Finally, we show that models trained on our machine-translated datasets are successful on human-translated evaluation sets. We share all code, models, and data publicly