The classic model of eukaryotic gene expression requires direct spatial contact between a distal enhancer and a proximal promoter. However, recent chromosome conformation capture studies (e.g. Hi-C) show that enhancer and promoters are embedded in a complex network of cell-type specific looping interactions. Here we  investigate whether, and to what extent, looping interactions between elements in the vicinity of an enhancer- promoter pair can influence the frequencyof enhancer-promoter contacts. Our polymer simulations show that a chromatin loop  formed by elements flanking either an enhancer or a promoter  suppresses enhancer-promoter interactions, working as a topological insulator. A loop formed by elements located in the region between an enhancer and a promoter, on the contrary, facilitates their interactions. We find that these two consequences of chromatin loops have different genomic extents, with facilitation being a local effect and insulation persisting over a large range of genomic distances. Overall, our results show that looping interactions which do not directly involve an enhancer-promoter contact can nevertheless significantly modulate their interactions. This illustrates the intricate effects that local URLanization can have on gene expression .
The classic model of eukaryotic gene expression requires direct spatial contact between a distal enhancer and a proximal promoter. Recent Chromosome Conformation Capture (3C) studies show that enhancers and promoters are embedded in a complex network of looping interactions. Here we use a polymer model of chromatin fiber to investigate whether, and to what extent, looping interactions between elements in the vicinity of an enhancer-promoter pair can influence their contact frequency. Our equilibrium polymer simulations show that a chromatin loop , formed by elements flanking either an enhancer or a promoter , suppresses enhancer-promoter interactions, working as an insulator. A loop formed by elements located in the region between an enhancer and a promoter, on the contrary, facilitates their interactions. We find that different mechanisms underlie insulation and facilitation; insulation occurs due to steric exclusion by the loop, and is a global effect, while facilitation occurs due to an effective shortening of the enhancer-promoter genomic distance, and is a local effect. Consistently, we find that these effects manifest quite differently for in silico 3C and microscopy. Our results show that looping interactions that do not directly involve an enhancer-promoter pair can nevertheless significantly modulate their interactions. This phenomenon is analogous to allosteric regulation in proteins, where a conformational change triggered by binding of a regulatory molecule to one site affects the state of another site .
R
However, recent chromosome conformation capture studies (e.g. Hi-C) show that enhancer
Recent Chromosome Conformation Capture (3C) studies show that enhancers
D
cell-type specific
A
use a polymer model of chromatin fiber to
R
enhancer- promoter
enhancer-promoter
R
the frequencyof enhancer-promoter contacts. Our
their contact frequency. Our equilibrium
A
,
A
,
R
a topological
an
R
these two consequences of chromatin loops have different genomic extents, with facilitation being a local effect and insulation persisting over a large range of genomic distances. Overall, our
different mechanisms underlie insulation and facilitation; insulation occurs due to steric exclusion by the loop, and is a global effect, while facilitation occurs due to an effective shortening of the enhancer-promoter genomic distance, and is a local effect. Consistently, we find that these effects manifest quite differently for in silico 3C and microscopy. Our
R
which
that
R
contact
pair
R
illustrates the intricate effects that local URLanization can have on gene expression
phenomenon is analogous to allosteric regulation in proteins, where a conformational change triggered by binding of a regulatory molecule to one site affects the state of another site