A faultless disagreement is a disagreement when Party A states that P is true, while Party B states that non-P is true, and both parties are not at fault. Disagreements of this kind may arise in areas of evaluative discourse, such as aesthetics, justification of beliefs or moral values, etc. A representative example is John says Mary prettier that Anne , while Bob claims vice versa . Furthermore, in the case of a faultless disagreement, it is possible that if any party gives up their claim, there will be no improvement in the position of any of them.
A faultless disagreement is a disagreement when Party A states that P is true, while Party B states that non-P is true, and neither party is not at fault. Disagreements of this kind may arise in areas of evaluative discourse, such as aesthetics, justification of beliefs or moral values, etc. A representative example is that John says Paris is more interesting than Rome , while Bob claims Rome is more interesting than Paris . Furthermore, in the case of a faultless disagreement, it is possible that if any party gives up their claim, there will be no improvement in the position of any of them.
R
both parties are
neither party is
R
John says Mary prettier that Anne
that John says Paris is more interesting than Rome
R
vice versa
Rome is more interesting than Paris