wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements acquisition accounting upon closing of the acquisition . based on current estimates , the company expects the value of potential contingent consideration payments required to be made under these agreements to be between zero and $ 4.4 million . during the year ended december 31 , 2014 , the company ( i ) recorded a decrease in fair value of $ 1.7 million in other operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations , ( ii ) recorded settlements under these agreements of $ 3.5 million , ( iii ) reduced its contingent consideration liability by $ 0.7 million as a portion of the company 2019s obligations was assumed by the buyer in conjunction with the sale of operations in panama and ( iv ) recorded additional liability of $ 0.1 million . as a result , the company estimates the value of potential contingent consideration payments required under these agreements to be $ 2.3 million using a probability weighted average of the expected outcomes as of december 31 , 2014 . other u.s . 2014in connection with other acquisitions in the united states , the company is required to make additional payments if certain pre-designated tenant leases commence during a specified period of time . during the year ended december 31 , 2014 , the company recorded $ 6.3 million of contingent consideration liability as part of the preliminary acquisition accounting upon closing of certain acquisitions . during the year ended december 31 , 2014 , the company recorded settlements under these agreements of $ 0.4 million . based on current estimates , the company expects the value of potential contingent consideration payments required to be made under these agreements to be between zero and $ 5.9 million and estimates it to be $ 5.9 million using a probability weighted average of the expected outcomes as of december 31 , 2014 . for more information regarding contingent consideration , see note 12 . 7 . accrued expenses accrued expenses consists of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : .

========================================
• , 2014, 2013 ( 1 )
• accrued property and real estate taxes, $ 61206, $ 54529
• payroll and related withholdings, 57110, 50843
• accrued construction costs, 46024, 52446
• accrued rent, 34074, 28456
• other accrued expenses, 219340, 234914
• balance as of december 31,, $ 417754, $ 421188
========================================

( 1 ) december 31 , 2013 balances have been revised to reflect purchase accounting measurement period adjustments. .

Question: what was the increase in payroll and related withholdings in 2014 , in millions?
Program: subtract(57110, 50843)
Answer: 6267.0
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements liability to $ 60 million , and recorded the $ 2.7 million difference as a credit to interest expense . the $ 60 million remaining liability was eliminated upon payment of the cash portion of the purchase price . as of december 31 , 2016 , entergy louisiana , in connection with the waterford 3 lease obligation , had a future minimum lease payment ( reflecting an interest rate of 8.09% ( 8.09 % ) ) of $ 57.5 million , including $ 2.3 million in interest , due january 2017 that is recorded as long-term debt . in february 2017 the leases were terminated and the leased assets were conveyed to entergy louisiana . grand gulf lease obligations in 1988 , in two separate but substantially identical transactions , system energy sold and leased back undivided ownership interests in grand gulf for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million . the initial term of the leases expired in july 2015 . system energy renewed the leases for fair market value with renewal terms expiring in july 2036 . at the end of the new lease renewal terms , system energy has the option to repurchase the leased interests in grand gulf or renew the leases at fair market value . in the event that system energy does not renew or purchase the interests , system energy would surrender such interests and their associated entitlement of grand gulf 2019s capacity and energy . system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements . for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant depreciation . however , operating revenues include the recovery of the lease payments because the transactions are accounted for as a sale and leaseback for ratemaking purposes . consistent with a recommendation contained in a ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount was a net regulatory liability of $ 55.6 million and $ 55.6 million as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2016 , system energy , in connection with the grand gulf sale and leaseback transactions , had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) that are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

========================================
• , amount ( in thousands )
• 2017, $ 17188
• 2018, 17188
• 2019, 17188
• 2020, 17188
• 2021, 17188
• years thereafter, 257812
• total, 343752
• less : amount representing interest, 309393
• present value of net minimum lease payments, $ 34359
========================================

.

Question: what portion of the total future minimum lease payment for entergy louisiana will be used for interest payments?
Program: divide(2.3, 57.5)
Answer: 0.04
five-year stock performance graph the graph below illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return on snap-on common stock since december 31 , 2007 , assuming that dividends were reinvested . the graph compares snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a peer group . snap-on incorporated total shareholder return ( 1 ) fiscal year ended ( 2 ) snap-on incorporated peer group ( 3 ) s&p 500 .

fiscal year ended ( 2 ) | snap-onincorporated | peer group ( 3 ) | s&p 500
----------|----------|----------|----------
december 31 2007 | $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 | $ 100.00
december 31 2008 | 83.66 | 66.15 | 63.00
december 31 2009 | 93.20 | 84.12 | 79.67
december 31 2010 | 128.21 | 112.02 | 91.67
december 31 2011 | 117.47 | 109.70 | 93.61
december 31 2012 | 187.26 | 129.00 | 108.59

( 1 ) assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2007 , and that dividends were reinvested quarterly . ( 2 ) the company's fiscal year ends on the saturday that is on or nearest to december 31 of each year ; for ease of calculation , the fiscal year end is assumed to be december 31 . ( 3 ) the peer group consists of : stanley black & decker , inc. , danaher corporation , emerson electric co. , genuine parts company , newell rubbermaid inc. , pentair ltd. , spx corporation and w.w . grainger , inc . cooper industries plc , a former member of the peer group , was removed , as it was acquired by a larger , non-comparable company in 2012 . 2012 annual report 23 snap-on incorporated peer group s&p 500 2007 2008 201120102009 2012 .

Question: what was the ratio of the snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index in 2012
Program: divide(187.26, 108.59)
Answer: 1.72447
entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) .

========================================
	amount ( in millions )
2006 net revenue	$ 942.1
base revenues	78.4
volume/weather	37.5
transmission revenue	9.2
purchased power capacity	-80.0 ( 80.0 )
other	3.9
2007 net revenue	$ 991.1
========================================

the base revenues variance is primarily due to increases effective september 2006 for the 2005 formula rate plan filing to recover lpsc-approved incremental deferred and ongoing capacity costs . see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage , including electricity sales during the unbilled service period . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 666 gwh in all sectors compared to 2006 . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to higher rates . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to higher purchased power capacity charges and the amortization of capacity charges effective september 2006 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2006 . a portion of the purchased power capacity costs is offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges , as mentioned above . see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . gross operating revenues , fuel , purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 143.1 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and usage ; an increase of $ 78.4 million in base revenues , as discussed above ; and an increase of $ 37.5 million related to volume/weather , as discussed above . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in net area demand and an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of higher fuel rates , as discussed above . other regulatory credits decreased primarily due to the deferral of capacity charges in 2006 in addition to the amortization of these capacity charges in 2007 as a result of the may 2006 formula rate plan filing ( for the 2005 test year ) with the lpsc to recover such costs through base rates effective september 2006 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan and storm cost recovery filings with the lpsc. .

Question: what is the percent change in net revenue between 2006 and 2007?
Program: subtract(991.1, 942.1), divide(#0, 942.1)
Answer: 0.05201
fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements - ( continued ) the following summarizes the aggregate maturities of our debt and capital leases on stated contractual maturities , excluding unamortized non-cash bond premiums and discounts net of $ 30 million as of december 31 , 2017 ( in millions ) : .

****************************************
• , total
• 2018, $ 1045
• 2019, 44
• 2020, 1157
• 2021, 1546
• 2022, 705
• thereafter, 4349
• total principal payments, 8846
• debt issuance costs net of accumulated amortization, -53 ( 53 )
• total long-term debt, $ 8793
****************************************

there are no mandatory principal payments on the revolving loan and any balance outstanding on the revolving loan will be due and payable at its scheduled maturity date , which occurs at august 10 , 2021 . fis may redeem the 2018 notes , 2020 notes , 2021 notes , 2021 euro notes , 2022 notes , 2022 gbp notes , 2023 notes , 2024 notes , 2024 euro notes , 2025 notes , 2026 notes , and 2046 notes at its option in whole or in part , at any time and from time to time , at a redemption price equal to the greater of 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount to be redeemed and a make-whole amount calculated as described in the related indenture in each case plus accrued and unpaid interest to , but excluding , the date of redemption , provided no make-whole amount will be paid for redemptions of the 2020 notes , the 2021 notes , the 2021 euro notes and the 2022 gbp notes during the one month prior to their maturity , the 2022 notes during the two months prior to their maturity , the 2023 notes , the 2024 notes , the 2024 euro notes , the 2025 notes , and the 2026 notes during the three months prior to their maturity , and the 2046 notes during the six months prior to their maturity . debt issuance costs of $ 53 million , net of accumulated amortization , remain capitalized as of december 31 , 2017 , related to all of the above outstanding debt . we monitor the financial stability of our counterparties on an ongoing basis . the lender commitments under the undrawn portions of the revolving loan are comprised of a diversified set of financial institutions , both domestic and international . the failure of any single lender to perform its obligations under the revolving loan would not adversely impact our ability to fund operations . the fair value of the company 2019s long-term debt is estimated to be approximately $ 156 million higher than the carrying value as of december 31 , 2017 . this estimate is based on quoted prices of our senior notes and trades of our other debt in close proximity to december 31 , 2017 , which are considered level 2-type measurements . this estimate is subjective in nature and involves uncertainties and significant judgment in the interpretation of current market data . therefore , the values presented are not necessarily indicative of amounts the company could realize or settle currently. .

Question: what percent of total long-term debt is due in 2021?
Program: divide(1546, 8793)
Answer: 0.17582
the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor ( "s&p" ) 500 index and the dow jones us financials index during the period from december 31 , 2009 through december 31 , 2014. .

Row 1: , 12/09, 12/10, 12/11, 12/12, 12/13, 12/14
Row 2: e*trade financial corporation, 100.00, 90.91, 45.23, 50.85, 111.59, 137.81
Row 3: s&p 500 index, 100.00, 115.06, 117.49, 136.30, 180.44, 205.14
Row 4: dow jones us financials index, 100.00, 112.72, 98.24, 124.62, 167.26, 191.67

table of contents .

Question: what was the ratio of the s&p index to the e*trade financial corporation cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock compared as of 2014
Program: divide(205.14, 137.81)
Answer: 1.48857
five-year stock performance graph the graph below illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return on snap-on common stock since december 31 , 2008 , assuming that dividends were reinvested . the graph compares snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a peer group . snap-on incorporated total shareholder return ( 1 ) fiscal year ended ( 2 ) snap-on incorporated peer group ( 3 ) s&p 500 .

fiscal year ended ( 2 )	snap-onincorporated	peer group ( 3 )	s&p 500
december 31 2008	$ 100.00	$ 100.00	$ 100.00
december 31 2009	111.40	127.17	126.46
december 31 2010	153.24	169.36	145.51
december 31 2011	140.40	165.85	148.59
december 31 2012	223.82	195.02	172.37
december 31 2013	315.72	265.68	228.19

( 1 ) assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2008 , and that dividends were reinvested quarterly . ( 2 ) the company's fiscal year ends on the saturday that is on or nearest to december 31 of each year ; for ease of calculation , the fiscal year end is assumed to be december 31 . ( 3 ) the peer group consists of : stanley black & decker , inc. , danaher corporation , emerson electric co. , genuine parts company , newell rubbermaid inc. , pentair ltd. , spx corporation and w.w . grainger , inc . 24 snap-on incorporated 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 snap-on incorporated peer group s&p 500 .

Question: in the five-year stock performance graph what was the ratio of the of the snap-on incorporated to the peer group performance in december 31 2012
Program: divide(223.82, 195.02)
Answer: 1.14768
visa inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) september 30 , 2008 ( in millions , except as noted ) secured notes series b-1995 lease agreement in september 1995 , a real estate partnership owned jointly by visa u.s.a . and visa international issued notes that are secured by certain office properties and facilities in california which are used by the company through a lease financing of net-leased office space ( 201c1995 lease agreement 201d ) . series b of these notes , totaling $ 27 million , were issued with an interest rate of 7.83% ( 7.83 % ) and a stated maturity of september 15 , 2015 , and are payable monthly with interest-only payments for the first ten years and payments of interest and principal for the remainder of the term . series b debt issuance costs of $ 0.3 million and a $ 0.8 million loss on termination of a forward contract are being amortized on a straight- line basis over the life of the notes . the settlement entered into in connection with visa check/ master money antitrust litigation had triggered an event of default under the 1995 lease agreement . accordingly , the related debt was classified as a current liability at september 30 , 2007 . in may 2008 , visa inc. , visa u.s.a . and visa international executed an amendment and waiver to the 1995 lease agreement ( 201camended 1995 lease agreement 201d ) , curing the default and including a guarantee of remaining obligations under the agreement by visa inc . the interest terms remained unchanged . future principal payments future principal payments on the company 2019s outstanding debt are as follows: .

• fiscal, ( in millions )
• 2009, 52
• 2010, 12
• 2011, 12
• 2012, 13
• 2013, 8
• thereafter, 11
• total, $ 108

u.s . commercial paper program visa international maintains a u.s . commercial paper program to support its working capital requirements and for general corporate purposes . this program allows the company to issue up to $ 500 million of unsecured debt securities , with maturities up to 270 days from the date of issuance and at interest rates generally extended to companies with comparable credit ratings . at september 30 , 2008 , the company had no outstanding obligations under this program . revolving credit facilities on february 15 , 2008 , visa inc . entered into a $ 3.0 billion five-year revolving credit facility ( the 201cfebruary 2008 agreement 201d ) which replaced visa international 2019s $ 2.25 billion credit facility . the february 2008 agreement matures on february 15 , 2013 and contains covenants and events of defaults customary for facilities of this type . at september 30 , 2008 , the company is in compliance with all covenants with respect to the revolving credit facility. .

Question: in 2008 what was the percent of the total future principal payments on the company 2019s outstanding debt that was due in 2009
Program: divide(52, 108)
Answer: 0.48148
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index and the s&p information technology index for the five years ended september 27 , 2014 . the company has added the s&p information technology index to the graph to capture the stock performance of companies whose products and services relate to those of the company . the s&p information technology index replaces the s&p computer hardware index , which is no longer tracked by s&p . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index and the s&p information technology index as of the market close on september 25 , 2009 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . copyright a9 2014 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2014 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . apple inc . | 2014 form 10-k | 23 * $ 100 invested on 9/25/09 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019s common stock and september 30th for indexes . september september september september september september .

****************************************
• , september 2009, september 2010, september 2011, september 2012, september 2013, september 2014
• apple inc ., $ 100, $ 160, $ 222, $ 367, $ 272, $ 407
• s&p 500 index, $ 100, $ 110, $ 111, $ 145, $ 173, $ 207
• dow jones u.s . technology supersector index, $ 100, $ 112, $ 115, $ 150, $ 158, $ 205
• s&p information technology index, $ 100, $ 111, $ 115, $ 152, $ 163, $ 210
****************************************

.

Question: what was the percentage of cumulative total shareholder return for the five year period ended september 2014 for apple inc.?
Program: subtract(407, 100), divide(#0, 100)
Answer: 3.07
notes to consolidated financial statements uncertain tax provisions as described in note 1 , the company adopted fin 48 on january 1 , 2007 . the effect of adopting fin 48 was not material to the company 2019s financial statements . the following is a reconciliation of the company 2019s beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits ( in millions ) . .

----------------------------------------
balance at january 1 2007 | $ 53
----------|----------
additions based on tax positions related to the current year | 4
additions for tax positions of prior years | 24
reductions for tax positions of prior years | -6 ( 6 )
settlements | -5 ( 5 )
balance at december 31 2007 | $ 70
----------------------------------------

of the amount included in the previous table , $ 57 million of unrecognized tax benefits would impact the effective tax rate if recognized . aon does not expect the unrecognized tax positions to change significantly over the next twelve months . the company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized income tax benefits in its provision for income taxes . aon accrued potential penalties and interest of less than $ 1 million related to unrecognized tax positions during 2007 . in total , as of december 31 , 2007 , aon has recorded a liability for penalties and interest of $ 1 million and $ 7 million , respectively . aon and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction as well as various state and international jurisdictions . aon has substantially concluded all u.s . federal income tax matters for years through 2004 . the internal revenue service commenced an examination of aon 2019s federal u.s . income tax returns for 2005 and 2006 in the fourth quarter of 2007 . material u.s . state and local income tax jurisdiction examinations have been concluded for years through 2002 . aon has concluded income tax examinations in its primary international jurisdictions through 2000 . aon corporation .

Question: what portion of the of unrecognized tax benefits would have an impact in the effective tax rate if recognized?
Program: divide(57, 70)
Answer: 0.81429