wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
the fair value of our total investments increased $ 4.8 billion during 2010 , primarily due to unrealized appreciation , the inves- ting of operating cash flows , and the portfolios acquired in the 2010 corporate acquisitions . the following tables show the market value of our fixed maturities and short-term investments at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 . the first table lists investments according to type and the second according to s&p credit rating. .

========================================
• ( in millions of u.s . dollars except for percentages ), 2010 market value, 2010 percentage of total, 2010 market value, percentageof total
• treasury, $ 2075, 4% ( 4 % ), $ 2068, 5% ( 5 % )
• agency, 2015, 4% ( 4 % ), 2698, 6% ( 6 % )
• corporate and asset-backed securities, 15900, 33% ( 33 % ), 13537, 30% ( 30 % )
• mortgage-backed securities, 12362, 25% ( 25 % ), 11311, 25% ( 25 % )
• municipal, 2449, 5% ( 5 % ), 2300, 5% ( 5 % )
• non-u.s ., 12199, 25% ( 25 % ), 11172, 25% ( 25 % )
• short-term investments, 1983, 4% ( 4 % ), 1667, 4% ( 4 % )
• total, $ 48983, 100% ( 100 % ), $ 44753, 100% ( 100 % )
• aaa, $ 23718, 48% ( 48 % ), $ 22884, 51% ( 51 % )
• aa, 4714, 10% ( 10 % ), 4021, 9% ( 9 % )
• a, 8482, 17% ( 17 % ), 7461, 17% ( 17 % )
• bbb, 5487, 11% ( 11 % ), 4910, 11% ( 11 % )
• bb, 3357, 7% ( 7 % ), 2866, 6% ( 6 % )
• b, 2393, 5% ( 5 % ), 2029, 5% ( 5 % )
• other, 832, 2% ( 2 % ), 582, 1% ( 1 % )
• total, $ 48983, 100% ( 100 % ), $ 44753, 100% ( 100 % )
========================================

.

Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of short-term investments in 2010?
Program: subtract(1983, 1667), divide(#0, 1667)
Answer: 0.18956
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis the decrease in interest income in 2002 was primarily due to : fffd interest recognized in 2001 on grand gulf 1's decommissioning trust funds resulting from the final order addressing system energy's rate proceeding ; fffd interest recognized in 2001 at entergy mississippi and entergy new orleans on the deferred system energy costs that were not being recovered through rates ; and fffd lower interest earned on declining deferred fuel balances . the decrease in interest charges in 2002 is primarily due to : fffd a decrease of $ 31.9 million in interest on long-term debt primarily due to the retirement of long-term debt in late 2001 and early 2002 ; and fffd a decrease of $ 76.0 million in other interest expense primarily due to interest recorded on system energy's reserve for rate refund in 2001 . the refund was made in december 2001 . 2001 compared to 2000 results for the year ended december 31 , 2001 for u.s . utility were also affected by an increase in interest charges of $ 61.5 million primarily due to : fffd the final ferc order addressing the 1995 system energy rate filing ; fffd debt issued at entergy arkansas in july 2001 , at entergy gulf states in june 2000 and august 2001 , at entergy mississippi in january 2001 , and at entergy new orleans in july 2000 and february 2001 ; and fffd borrowings under credit facilities during 2001 , primarily at entergy arkansas . non-utility nuclear the increase in earnings in 2002 for non-utility nuclear from $ 128 million to $ 201 million was primarily due to the operation of indian point 2 and vermont yankee , which were purchased in september 2001 and july 2002 , respectively . the increase in earnings in 2001 for non-utility nuclear from $ 49 million to $ 128 million was primarily due to the operation of fitzpatrick and indian point 3 for a full year , as each was purchased in november 2000 , and the operation of indian point 2 , which was purchased in september 2001 . following are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: .

****************************************
, 2002, 2001, 2000
net mw in operation at december 31, 3955, 3445, 2475
generation in gwh for the year, 29953, 22614, 7171
capacity factor for the year, 93% ( 93 % ), 93% ( 93 % ), 94% ( 94 % )
****************************************

2002 compared to 2001 the following fluctuations in the results of operations for non-utility nuclear in 2002 were primarily caused by the acquisitions of indian point 2 and vermont yankee ( except as otherwise noted ) : fffd operating revenues increased $ 411.0 million to $ 1.2 billion ; fffd other operation and maintenance expenses increased $ 201.8 million to $ 596.3 million ; fffd depreciation and amortization expenses increased $ 25.1 million to $ 42.8 million ; fffd fuel expenses increased $ 29.4 million to $ 105.2 million ; fffd nuclear refueling outage expenses increased $ 23.9 million to $ 46.8 million , which was due primarily to a .

Question: in 2002 what was the ratio of the net mw in operation to the generation in gwh for the year
Program: divide(3955, 29953)
Answer: 0.13204
measurement point december 31 the priceline group nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite .

****************************************
measurement pointdecember 31, the priceline group inc ., nasdaqcomposite index, s&p 500index, rdg internetcomposite
2011, 100.00, 100.00, 100.00, 100.00
2012, 132.64, 116.41, 116.00, 119.34
2013, 248.53, 165.47, 153.58, 195.83
2014, 243.79, 188.69, 174.60, 192.42
2015, 272.59, 200.32, 177.01, 264.96
2016, 313.45, 216.54, 198.18, 277.56
****************************************

.

Question: what was the percent of the growth in measurement of the the priceline group inc . from 2014 to 2015
Program: subtract(272.59, 243.79), divide(#0, 243.79)
Answer: 0.11813
in the ordinary course of business , based on our evaluations of certain geologic trends and prospective economics , we have allowed certain lease acreage to expire and may allow additional acreage to expire in the future . if production is not established or we take no other action to extend the terms of the leases , licenses or concessions , undeveloped acreage listed in the table below will expire over the next three years . we plan to continue the terms of certain of these licenses and concession areas or retain leases through operational or administrative actions ; however , the majority of the undeveloped acres associated with other africa as listed in the table below pertains to our licenses in ethiopia and kenya , for which we executed agreements in 2015 to sell . the kenya transaction closed in february 2016 and the ethiopia transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2016 . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data - note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information about this disposition . net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 .

****************************************
( in thousands ) | net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2016 | net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2017 | net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2018
----------|----------|----------|----------
u.s . | 68 | 89 | 128
e.g . | 2014 | 92 | 36
other africa | 189 | 4352 | 854
total africa | 189 | 4444 | 890
other international | 2014 | 2014 | 2014
total | 257 | 4533 | 1018
****************************************

.

Question: for 2016 , what was the total african and us net undeveloped acres expiring , in thousands ? \\n
Program: add(189, 68)
Answer: 257.0
entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 92.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . 2015 compared to 2014 net income decreased $ 47.1 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .

========================================
Row 1: , amount ( in millions )
Row 2: 2015 net revenue, $ 1362.2
Row 3: retail electric price, 161.5
Row 4: other, -3.2 ( 3.2 )
Row 5: 2016 net revenue, $ 1520.5
========================================

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates , as approved by the apsc . the new base rates were effective february 24 , 2016 and began billing with the first billing cycle of april 2016 . the increase includes an interim base rate adjustment surcharge , effective with the first billing cycle of april 2016 , to recover the incremental revenue requirement for the period february 24 , 2016 through march 31 , 2016 . a significant portion of the increase is related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the union power station purchase. .

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2016 for entergy arkansas , inc.?
Program: subtract(1520.5, 1362.2), divide(#0, 1362.2)
Answer: 0.11621
part ii , item 8 fourth quarter of 2007 : 0160 schlumberger sold certain workover rigs for $ 32 million , resulting in a pretax gain of $ 24 million ( $ 17 million after-tax ) which is classified in interest and other income , net in the consolidated statement of income . 4 . acquisitions acquisition of eastern echo holding plc on december 10 , 2007 , schlumberger completed the acquisition of eastern echo holding plc ( 201ceastern echo 201d ) for $ 838 million in cash . eastern echo was a dubai-based marine seismic company that did not have any operations at the time of acquisition , but had signed contracts for the construction of six seismic vessels . the purchase price has been allocated to the net assets acquired based upon their estimated fair values as follows : ( stated in millions ) .

cash and short-term investments | $ 266
other current assets | 23
fixed income investments held to maturity | 54
vessels under construction | 694
accounts payable and accrued liabilities | -17 ( 17 )
long-term debt | -182 ( 182 )
total purchase price | $ 838

other acquisitions schlumberger has made other acquisitions and minority interest investments , none of which were significant on an individual basis , for cash payments , net of cash acquired , of $ 514 million during 2009 , $ 345 million during 2008 , and $ 281 million during 2007 . pro forma results pertaining to the above acquisitions are not presented as the impact was not significant . 5 . drilling fluids joint venture the mi-swaco drilling fluids joint venture is owned 40% ( 40 % ) by schlumberger and 60% ( 60 % ) by smith international , inc . schlumberger records income relating to this venture using the equity method of accounting . the carrying value of schlumberger 2019s investment in the joint venture on december 31 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 1.4 billion and $ 1.3 billion , respectively , and is included within investments in affiliated companies on the consolidated balance sheet . schlumberger 2019s equity income from this joint venture was $ 131 million in 2009 , $ 210 million in 2008 and $ 178 million in 2007 . schlumberger received cash distributions from the joint venture of $ 106 million in 2009 , $ 57 million in 2008 and $ 46 million in 2007 . the joint venture agreement contains a provision under which either party to the joint venture may offer to sell its entire interest in the venture to the other party at a cash purchase price per percentage interest specified in an offer notice . if the offer to sell is not accepted , the offering party will be obligated to purchase the entire interest of the other party at the same price per percentage interest as the prices specified in the offer notice. .

Question: what was vessels under construction as a percentage of total purchase price?
Program: divide(694, 838)
Answer: 0.82816
18 2015 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2015 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company : comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .

----------------------------------------
 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015
----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------
jkhy | 100.00 | 127.44 | 148.62 | 205.60 | 263.21 | 290.88
peer group | 100.00 | 136.78 | 148.10 | 174.79 | 239.10 | 301.34
s&p 500 | 100.00 | 130.69 | 137.81 | 166.20 | 207.10 | 222.47
----------------------------------------

this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2010 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. , bottomline technology , inc. , broadridge financial solutions , cardtronics , inc. , convergys corp. , corelogic , inc. , dst systems , inc. , euronet worldwide , inc. , fair isaac corp. , fidelity national information services , inc. , fiserv , inc. , global payments , inc. , heartland payment systems , inc. , moneygram international , inc. , ss&c technologies holdings , inc. , total systems services , inc. , tyler technologies , inc. , verifone systems , inc. , and wex , inc. . micros systems , inc . was removed from the peer group as it was acquired in september 2014. .

Question: for the 2010 , what was the cumulative total return on jkhy?
Program: subtract(127.44, 100.00)
Answer: 27.44
measurement point december 31 the priceline group nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite .

****************************************
measurement pointdecember 31 | the priceline group inc . | nasdaqcomposite index | s&p 500index | rdg internetcomposite
2011 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00
2012 | 132.64 | 116.41 | 116.00 | 119.34
2013 | 248.53 | 165.47 | 153.58 | 195.83
2014 | 243.79 | 188.69 | 174.60 | 192.42
2015 | 272.59 | 200.32 | 177.01 | 264.96
2016 | 313.45 | 216.54 | 198.18 | 277.56
****************************************

.

Question: at the measurement point december 312016 what was the ratio of the the priceline group inc . . to the nasdaqcomposite index
Program: divide(313.45, 216.54)
Answer: 1.44754
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2013 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis . date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index .

========================================
Row 1: date, pmi, pmi peer group ( 1 ), s&p 500 index
Row 2: december 31 2013, $ 100.00, $ 100.00, $ 100.00
Row 3: december 31 2014, $ 97.90, $ 107.80, $ 113.70
Row 4: december 31 2015, $ 111.00, $ 116.80, $ 115.30
Row 5: december 31 2016, $ 120.50, $ 118.40, $ 129.00
Row 6: december 31 2017, $ 144.50, $ 140.50, $ 157.20
Row 7: december 31 2018, $ 96.50, $ 127.70, $ 150.30
========================================

( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year . the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi . the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies . as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc . note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .

Question: what was the percentage return for pmi common stock for the five years ended 2018?
Program: subtract(96.50, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)
Answer: -0.035
table of contents the following table discloses purchases of shares of our common stock made by us or on our behalf during the fourth quarter of 2016 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( a ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) .

========================================
Row 1: period, total numberof sharespurchased, averageprice paidper share, total number ofshares notpurchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs ( a ), total number ofshares purchased aspart of publiclyannounced plans orprograms, approximate dollarvalue of shares thatmay yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms ( b )
Row 2: october 2016, 433272, $ 52.69, 50337, 382935, $ 2.7 billion
Row 3: november 2016, 667644, $ 62.25, 248349, 419295, $ 2.6 billion
Row 4: december 2016, 1559569, $ 66.09, 688, 1558881, $ 2.5 billion
Row 5: total, 2660485, $ 62.95, 299374, 2361111, $ 2.5 billion
========================================

( a ) the shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the fourth quarter of 2016 relating to ( i ) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions to meet our obligations under stock-based compensation plans , and ( ii ) our purchases of shares from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of stock options , the vesting of restricted stock , and other stock compensation transactions in accordance with the terms of our stock-based compensation plans . ( b ) on july 13 , 2015 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock . this authorization has no expiration date . as of december 31 , 2016 , the approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the 2015 authorization is $ 40 million . on september 21 , 2016 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to an additional $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock with no expiration date . as of december 31 , 2016 , no purchases have been made under the 2016 authorization. .

Question: as of december 31 , 2016 what was the percent of the shares outstanding of the 2015 program yet to be purchased
Program: divide(40, 2.5)
Answer: 16.0
the following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at october 30 , 2010 : fiscal years operating leases .

• fiscal years, operating leases
• 2011, $ 21871
• 2012, 12322
• 2013, 9078
• 2014, 6381
• 2015, 5422
• later years, 30655
• total, $ 85729

12 . commitments and contingencies from time to time in the ordinary course of the company 2019s business , various claims , charges and litigation are asserted or commenced against the company arising from , or related to , contractual matters , patents , trademarks , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , insurance coverage and personnel and employment disputes . as to such claims and litigation , the company can give no assurance that it will prevail . the company does not believe that any current legal matters will have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations or cash flows . 13 . retirement plans the company and its subsidiaries have various savings and retirement plans covering substantially all employees . the company maintains a defined contribution plan for the benefit of its eligible u.s . employees . this plan provides for company contributions of up to 5% ( 5 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . in addition , the company contributes an amount equal to each participant 2019s pre-tax contribution , if any , up to a maximum of 3% ( 3 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s . employees was $ 20.5 million in fiscal 2010 , $ 21.5 million in fiscal 2009 and $ 22.6 million in fiscal 2008 . the company also has various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees that are consistent with local statutory requirements and practices . the total expense related to the various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees was $ 11.7 million in fiscal 2010 , $ 10.9 million in fiscal 2009 and $ 13.9 million in fiscal 2008 . during fiscal 2009 , the measurement date of the plan 2019s funded status was changed from september 30 to the company 2019s fiscal year end . non-u.s . plan disclosures the company 2019s funding policy for its foreign defined benefit pension plans is consistent with the local requirements of each country . the plans 2019 assets consist primarily of u.s . and non-u.s . equity securities , bonds , property and cash . the benefit obligations and related assets under these plans have been measured at october 30 , 2010 and october 31 , 2009 . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Question: what was the average percentage that the lease expenses decreased from 2011 to 2013
Program: subtract(21871, 12322), divide(#0, 21871), subtract(12322, 9078), divide(#2, 12322), add(#3, #1), divide(#4, const_2)
Answer: 0.34994