wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2008 and 2007. .

****************************************
2008 | high | low
quarter ended march 31 | $ 42.72 | $ 32.10
quarter ended june 30 | 46.10 | 38.53
quarter ended september 30 | 43.43 | 31.89
quarter ended december 31 | 37.28 | 19.35
2007 | high | low
quarter ended march 31 | $ 41.31 | $ 36.63
quarter ended june 30 | 43.84 | 37.64
quarter ended september 30 | 45.45 | 36.34
quarter ended december 31 | 46.53 | 40.08
****************************************

on february 13 , 2009 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 28.85 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 13 , 2009 , we had 397097677 outstanding shares of common stock and 499 registered holders . dividends we have never paid a dividend on our common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.50% ( 201c7.50 % ) notes 201d ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.125% ( 201c7.125 % ) notes 201d ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan , and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . in addition , while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction . for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .

Question: for the quarter ended march 312008 what was the percent of the change from the highest to the lowest of the company per share sale prices of common stock
Program: subtract(42.72, 32.10), divide(#0, 32.10)
Answer: 0.33084
stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2012 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company 2019s common stock versus the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 retail index ( 201cs&p 500 retail index 201d ) and the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) . .

company/index	december 31 , 2012	december 31 , 2013	december 31 , 2014	december 31 , 2015	december 31 , 2016	december 31 , 2017
o 2019reilly automotive inc .	$ 100	$ 144	$ 215	$ 283	$ 311	$ 269
s&p 500 retail index	100	144	158	197	206	265
s&p 500	$ 100	$ 130	$ 144	$ 143	$ 157	$ 187

.

Question: what was the difference in the five year total return for o 2019reilly automotive inc . vs the s&p 500 retail index?
Program: subtract(269, 265)
Answer: 4.0
five-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dj trans , and the s&p 500 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index on december 31 , 2006 and that all dividends were reinvested . purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2011 , we repurchased 15340810 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 96.08 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2011 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan or program [b] .

========================================
Row 1: period, total number ofsharespurchased [a], averageprice paidper share, total number of sharespurchased as part ofapublicly announced planor program [b], maximum number ofshares that may yetbe purchased under the planor program [b]
Row 2: oct . 1 through oct . 31, 379488, 87.46, 371639, 31370427
Row 3: nov . 1 through nov . 30, 1748964, 98.41, 1733877, 29636550
Row 4: dec . 1 through dec . 31, 1787343, 100.26, 1780142, 27856408
Row 5: total, 3915795, $ 98.19, 3885658, n/a
========================================

[a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 30137 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] on april 1 , 2011 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 40 million shares of our common stock by march 31 , 2014 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .

Question: for the 4th quarter of 2011 approximately how much was spent on stock repurchases?
Program: multiply(3915795, 98.19)
Answer: 384491911.05
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 201020092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport .

----------------------------------------
 | 12/31/05 | 12/31/06 | 12/31/07 | 12/31/08 | 12/31/09 | 12/31/10
----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------
united parcel service inc . | $ 100.00 | $ 101.76 | $ 98.20 | $ 78.76 | $ 84.87 | $ 110.57
standard & poor 2019s 500 index | $ 100.00 | $ 115.79 | $ 122.16 | $ 76.96 | $ 97.33 | $ 111.99
dow jones transportation average | $ 100.00 | $ 109.82 | $ 111.38 | $ 87.52 | $ 103.79 | $ 131.59
----------------------------------------

.

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for united parcel service inc . for the five years ended 12/31/10?
Program: subtract(110.57, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)
Answer: 0.1057
dish network corporation notes to consolidated financial statements - continued future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligations , together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of december 31 , 2015 are as follows ( in thousands ) : for the years ended december 31 .

========================================
2016, $ 76676
2017, 75874
2018, 75849
2019, 50320
2020, 48000
thereafter, 64000
total minimum lease payments, 390719
less : amount representing lease of the orbital location and estimated executory costs ( primarily insurance and maintenance ) including profit thereon included in total minimum lease payments, -186742 ( 186742 )
net minimum lease payments, 203977
less : amount representing interest, -37485 ( 37485 )
present value of net minimum lease payments, 166492
less : current portion, -30849 ( 30849 )
long-term portion of capital lease obligations, $ 135643
========================================

the summary of future maturities of our outstanding long-term debt as of december 31 , 2015 is included in the commitments table in note 15 . 11 . income taxes and accounting for uncertainty in income taxes income taxes our income tax policy is to record the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and amounts reported on our consolidated balance sheets , as well as probable operating loss , tax credit and other carryforwards . deferred tax assets are offset by valuation allowances when we believe it is more likely than not that net deferred tax assets will not be realized . we periodically evaluate our need for a valuation allowance . determining necessary valuation allowances requires us to make assessments about historical financial information as well as the timing of future events , including the probability of expected future taxable income and available tax planning opportunities . we file consolidated tax returns in the u.s . the income taxes of domestic and foreign subsidiaries not included in the u.s . tax group are presented in our consolidated financial statements on a separate return basis for each tax paying entity . as of december 31 , 2015 , we had no net operating loss carryforwards ( 201cnols 201d ) for federal income tax purposes and $ 39 million of nol benefit for state income tax purposes , which are partially offset by a valuation allowance . the state nols begin to expire in the year 2017 . in addition , there are $ 61 million of tax benefits related to credit carryforwards which are partially offset by a valuation allowance . the state credit carryforwards began to expire in .

Question: what percentage of future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligations is due in 2020?
Program: divide(48000, 390719)
Answer: 0.12285
judgments the valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets depends on a number of factors , including estimates of future market growth and trends , forecasted revenue and costs , expected useful lives of the assets , appropriate discount rates and other variables . goodwill is allocated to reporting units , which are components of the business that are one level below operating segments . each of these reporting units is tested for impairment individually during the annual evaluation . there is no goodwill assigned to reporting units within the balance sheet management segment . the following table shows the amount of goodwill allocated to each of the reporting units in the trading and investing segment ( dollars in millions ) : .

========================================
• reporting unit, december 31 2011
• u.s . brokerage, $ 1751.2
• capital markets, 142.4
• retail bank, 40.6
• total goodwill, $ 1934.2
========================================

in connection with our annual impairment test of goodwill , we concluded that the goodwill was not impaired as the fair value of the reporting units was in excess of the book value of those reporting units as of december 31 , 2011 . the fair value of the reporting units exceeded the book value of those reporting units by substantial amounts ( fair value as a percent of book value ranged from approximately 150% ( 150 % ) to 700% ( 700 % ) ) and therefore did not indicate a significant risk of goodwill impairment based on current projections and valuations . we also evaluate the remaining useful lives on intangible assets each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining period of amortization . effects if actual results differ if our estimates of fair value for the reporting units change due to changes in our business or other factors , we may determine that an impairment charge is necessary . estimates of fair value are determined based on a complex model using cash flows and company comparisons . if management 2019s estimates of future cash flows are inaccurate , the fair value determined could be inaccurate and impairment would not be recognized in a timely manner . intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives . if changes in the estimated underlying revenue occur , impairment or a change in the remaining life may need to be recognized. .

Question: what percentage of total goodwill is attributable to u.s . brokerage reporting unit as december 31 , 2011?
Program: divide(1751.2, 1934.2)
Answer: 0.90539
we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . cash flows millions 2014 2013 2012 .

cash flowsmillions, 2014, 2013, 2012
cash provided by operating activities, $ 7385, $ 6823, $ 6161
cash used in investing activities, -4249 ( 4249 ), -3405 ( 3405 ), -3633 ( 3633 )
cash used in financing activities, -2982 ( 2982 ), -3049 ( 3049 ), -2682 ( 2682 )
net change in cash and cashequivalents, $ 154, $ 369, $ -154 ( 154 )

operating activities higher net income in 2014 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2013 , despite higher income tax payments . 2014 income tax payments were higher than 2013 primarily due to higher income , but also because we paid taxes previously deferred by bonus depreciation ( discussed below ) . higher net income in 2013 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2012 . in addition , we made payments in 2012 for past wages as a result of national labor negotiations , which reduced cash provided by operating activities in 2012 . lower tax benefits from bonus depreciation ( as discussed below ) partially offset the increases . federal tax law provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012-2013 . as a result , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011-2013 income tax expense , contributing to the positive operating cash flow in those years . congress extended 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for 2014 , but this extension occurred in december and did not have a significant benefit on our income tax payments during 2014 . investing activities higher capital investments , including the early buyout of the long-term operating lease of our headquarters building for approximately $ 261 million , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2013 . significant investments also were made for new locomotives , freight cars and containers , and capacity and commercial facility projects . capital investments in 2014 also included $ 99 million for the early buyout of locomotives and freight cars under long-term operating leases , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions . lower capital investments in locomotives and freight cars in 2013 drove the decrease in cash used in investing activities compared to 2012 . included in capital investments in 2012 was $ 75 million for the early buyout of 165 locomotives under long-term operating and capital leases during the first quarter of 2012 , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions. .

Question: what was the percentage change in cash provided by operating activities from 2012 to 2013?
Program: subtract(6823, 6161), divide(#0, 6161)
Answer: 0.10745
stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2010 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company's common stock versus the standard and poor's s&p 500 retail index ( "s&p 500 retail index" ) and the standard and poor's s&p 500 index ( "s&p 500" ) . .

----------------------------------------
• company/index, december 31 , 2010, december 31 , 2011, december 31 , 2012, december 31 , 2013, december 31 , 2014, december 31 , 2015
• o'reilly automotive inc ., $ 100, $ 132, $ 148, $ 213, $ 319, $ 419
• s&p 500 retail index, 100, 103, 128, 185, 203, 252
• s&p 500, $ 100, $ 100, $ 113, $ 147, $ 164, $ 163
----------------------------------------

.

Question: what is the roi of an investment in the s&p500 from 2010 to 2011?
Program: subtract(100, 100), divide(#0, 100)
Answer: 0.0
projected payments relating to these liabilities for the next five years ending december 31 , 2012 and the period from 2013 to 2017 are as follows ( in thousands ) : .

****************************************
• 2008, $ 980
• 2009, 1185
• 2010, 978
• 2011, 1022
• 2012, 1425
• 2013 - 2017, $ 8147
****************************************

( 18 ) concentration of risk the company generates a significant amount of revenue from large customers , however , no customers accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenue or total segment revenue in the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 . financial instruments that potentially subject the company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents and trade receivables . the company places its cash equivalents with high credit quality financial institutions and , by policy , limits the amount of credit exposure with any one financial institution . concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited because a large number of geographically diverse customers make up the company 2019s customer base , thus spreading the trade receivables credit risk . the company controls credit risk through monitoring procedures . ( 19 ) segment information upon completion of the certegy merger , the company implemented a new organizational structure , which resulted in a new operating segment structure beginning with the reporting of first quarter 2006 results . effective as of february 1 , 2006 , the company 2019s operating segments are tps and lps . this structure reflects how the businesses are operated and managed . the primary components of the tps segment , which includes certegy 2019s card and check services , the financial institution processing component of the former financial institution software and services segment of fis and the operations acquired from efunds , are enterprise solutions , integrated financial solutions and international businesses . the primary components of the lps segment are mortgage information services businesses , which includes the mortgage lender processing component of the former financial institution software and services segment of fis , and the former lender services , default management , and information services segments of fis . fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries and affiliates notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Question: what is the growth rate in projected payments from 2008 to 2009?
Program: subtract(1185, 980), divide(#0, 980)
Answer: 0.20918
table of contents stock performance graph the following stock performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filings under the securities act of 1933 or the exchange act , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . the following stock performance graph compares our cumulative total shareholder return on an annual basis on our common stock with the cumulative total return on the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index and the amex airline index from december 9 , 2013 ( the first trading day of aag common stock ) through december 31 , 2014 . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 9 , 2013 in aag common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends . the stock performance shown on the graph below represents historical stock performance and is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

 | 12/9/2013 | 12/31/2013 | 12/31/2014
american airlines group inc . | $ 100 | $ 103 | $ 219
amex airline index | 100 | 102 | 152
s&p 500 | 100 | 102 | 114

.

Question: what was the growth rate on the amex airline index from 12/31/2013 to 12/31/2014
Program: subtract(152, 102), divide(#0, 102)
Answer: 0.4902
table of contents the following table discloses purchases of shares of our common stock made by us or on our behalf during the fourth quarter of 2015 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( a ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) .

========================================
period	total numberof sharespurchased	averageprice paidper share	total number ofshares notpurchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs ( a )	total number ofshares purchased aspart of publiclyannounced plans orprograms	approximate dollarvalue of shares thatmay yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms ( b )
october 2015	1658771	$ 62.12	842059	816712	$ 2.0 billion
november 2015	2412467	$ 71.08	212878	2199589	$ 1.8 billion
december 2015	7008414	$ 70.31	980	7007434	$ 1.3 billion
total	11079652	$ 69.25	1055917	10023735	$ 1.3 billion
========================================

( a ) the shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the fourth quarter of 2015 relating to ( i ) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions to meet our obligations under stock-based compensation plans , and ( ii ) our purchases of shares from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of stock options , the vesting of restricted stock , and other stock compensation transactions in accordance with the terms of our stock-based compensation plans . ( b ) on july 13 , 2015 , we announced that our board of directors approved our purchase of $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock ( with no expiration date ) , which was in addition to the remaining amount available under our $ 3 billion program previously authorized . during the third quarter of 2015 , we completed our purchases under the $ 3 billion program . as of december 31 , 2015 , we had $ 1.3 billion remaining available for purchase under the $ 2.5 billion program. .

Question: as of december 31 , 2015 , what was the percent of the $ 2.5 billion program remaining available for purchase
Program: divide(1.3, 2.5)
Answer: 0.52