wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .

========================================
	amount ( in millions )
2007 net revenue	$ 991.1
retail electric price	-17.1 ( 17.1 )
purchased power capacity	-12.0 ( 12.0 )
net wholesale revenue	-7.4 ( 7.4 )
other	4.6
2008 net revenue	$ 959.2
========================================

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to the cessation of the interim storm recovery through the formula rate plan upon the act 55 financing of storm costs and a credit passed on to customers as a result of the act 55 storm cost financing , partially offset by increases in the formula rate plan effective october 2007 . refer to "hurricane rita and hurricane katrina" and "state and local rate regulation" below for a discussion of the interim recovery of storm costs , the act 55 storm cost financing , and the formula rate plan filing . the purchased power capacity variance is due to the amortization of deferred capacity costs effective september 2007 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2007 . purchased power capacity costs are offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges . see "state and local rate regulation" below for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to provisions recorded for potential rate refunds related to the treatment of interruptible load in pricing entergy system affiliate sales . gross operating revenue and , fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 364.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates offset by decreased usage . the increase was partially offset by a decrease of $ 56.8 million in gross wholesale revenue due to a decrease in system agreement rough production cost equalization credits . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by a decrease in the recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs. .

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2008?
Program: subtract(959.2, 991.1), divide(#0, 991.1)
Answer: -0.03219
s c h e d u l e i v ace limited and subsidiaries s u p p l e m e n t a l i n f o r m a t i o n c o n c e r n i n g r e i n s u r a n c e premiums earned for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 ( in millions of u.s . dollars , except for percentages ) direct amount ceded to companies assumed from other companies net amount percentage of amount assumed to .

****************************************
for the years ended december 31 2009 2008 and 2007 ( in millions of u.s . dollars except for percentages )	direct amount	ceded to other companies	assumed from other companies	net amount	percentage of amount assumed to net
2009	$ 15415	$ 5943	$ 3768	$ 13240	28% ( 28 % )
2008	$ 16087	$ 6144	$ 3260	$ 13203	25% ( 25 % )
2007	$ 14673	$ 5834	$ 3458	$ 12297	28% ( 28 % )
****************************************

.

Question: what percent of the direct amount is assumed from other companies in 2009 , ( in millions ) ?
Program: divide(3768, 15415)
Answer: 0.24444
entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 175.4 million primarily due to the effect of a settlement with the irs related to the 2010-2011 irs audit , which resulted in a $ 136.1 million reduction of income tax expense . also contributing to the increase were lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher net revenue , and higher other income . the increase was partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher interest expense , and higher nuclear refueling outage expenses . 2015 compared to 2014 net income increased slightly , by $ 0.6 million , primarily due to higher net revenue and a lower effective income tax rate , offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , lower other income , and higher interest expense . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .

Row 1: , amount ( in millions )
Row 2: 2015 net revenue, $ 2408.8
Row 3: retail electric price, 69.0
Row 4: transmission equalization, -6.5 ( 6.5 )
Row 5: volume/weather, -6.7 ( 6.7 )
Row 6: louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation, -17.2 ( 17.2 )
Row 7: other, -9.0 ( 9.0 )
Row 8: 2016 net revenue, $ 2438.4

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in formula rate plan revenues , implemented with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , to collect the estimated first-year revenue requirement related to the purchase of power blocks 3 and 4 of the union power station . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion . the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to changes in transmission investments , including entergy louisiana 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales , partially offset by an increase in industrial usage and an increase in volume during the unbilled period . the increase .

Question: assuming the retail electric price increase wouldn't have occured , what would 2016 net revenue have been , in millions?
Program: subtract(2438.4, 69.0)
Answer: 2369.4
( 1 ) the cumulative total return assumes reinvestment of dividends . ( 2 ) the total return is weighted according to market capitalization of each company at the beginning of each year . ( f ) purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers we have not repurchased any of our common stock since the company filed its initial registration statement on march 16 , ( g ) securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans a description of securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for the 2012 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 6 . selected financial data .

========================================
Row 1: ( $ in millions except per share amounts ), year ended december 31 2011, year ended december 31 2010, year ended december 31 2009, year ended december 31 2008, year ended december 31 2007
Row 2: sales and service revenues, $ 6575, $ 6723, $ 6292, $ 6189, $ 5692
Row 3: goodwill impairment, 290, 0, 0, 2490, 0
Row 4: operating income ( loss ), 110, 248, 211, -2354 ( 2354 ), 447
Row 5: net earnings ( loss ), -94 ( 94 ), 135, 124, -2420 ( 2420 ), 276
Row 6: total assets, 6001, 5203, 5036, 4760, 7658
Row 7: long-term debt ( 1 ), 1830, 105, 283, 283, 283
Row 8: total long-term obligations, 3757, 1559, 1645, 1761, 1790
Row 9: free cash flow ( 2 ), 331, 168, -269 ( 269 ), 121, 364
Row 10: basic earnings ( loss ) per share, $ -1.93 ( 1.93 ), $ 2.77, $ 2.54, $ -49.61 ( 49.61 ), $ 5.65
Row 11: diluted earnings ( loss ) per share, $ -1.93 ( 1.93 ), $ 2.77, $ 2.54, $ -49.61 ( 49.61 ), $ 5.65
========================================

( 1 ) long-term debt does not include amounts payable to our former parent as of and before december 31 , 2010 , as these amounts were due upon demand and included in current liabilities . ( 2 ) free cash flow is a non-gaap financial measure and represents cash from operating activities less capital expenditures . see liquidity and capital resources in item 7 for more information on this measure. .

Question: what would 2011 operating income have been without non-cash charges?
Program: add(110, 290), multiply(#0, const_1000000)
Answer: 400000000.0
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 comparison of five-year cumulative total shareholder return altria group , inc . altria peer group s&p 500 part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return of altria group , inc . 2019s common stock for the last ive years with the cumulative total return for the same period of the s&p 500 index and the altria group , inc . peer group ( 1 ) . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in common stock and each of the indices as of the market close on december 31 , 2011 and the reinvestment of all dividends on a quarterly basis . source : bloomberg - 201ctotal return analysis 201d calculated on a daily basis and assumes reinvestment of dividends as of the ex-dividend date . ( 1 ) in 2016 , the altria group , inc . peer group consisted of u.s.-headquartered consumer product companies that are competitors to altria group , inc . 2019s tobacco operating companies subsidiaries or that have been selected on the basis of revenue or market capitalization : campbell soup company , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive company , conagra brands , inc. , general mills , inc. , the hershey company , kellogg company , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft heinz company , mondel 0113z international , inc. , pepsico , inc . and reynolds american inc . note - on october 1 , 2012 , kraft foods inc . ( kft ) spun off kraft foods group , inc . ( krft ) to its shareholders and then changed its name from kraft foods inc . to mondel 0113z international , inc . ( mdlz ) . on july 2 , 2015 , kraft foods group , inc . merged with and into a wholly owned subsidiary of h.j . heinz holding corporation , which was renamed the kraft heinz company ( khc ) . on june 12 , 2015 , reynolds american inc . ( rai ) acquired lorillard , inc . ( lo ) . on november 9 , 2016 , conagra foods , inc . ( cag ) spun off lamb weston holdings , inc . ( lw ) to its shareholders and then changed its name from conagra foods , inc . to conagra brands , inc . ( cag ) . .

****************************************
Row 1: date, altria group inc ., altria group inc . peer group, s&p 500
Row 2: december 2011, $ 100.00, $ 100.00, $ 100.00
Row 3: december 2012, $ 111.77, $ 108.78, $ 115.99
Row 4: december 2013, $ 143.69, $ 135.61, $ 153.55
Row 5: december 2014, $ 193.28, $ 151.74, $ 174.55
Row 6: december 2015, $ 237.92, $ 177.04, $ 176.94
Row 7: december 2016, $ 286.61, $ 192.56, $ 198.09
****************************************

altria altria group , inc . group , inc . peer group s&p 500 .

Question: what is the roi of an investment in s&p500 from december 2011 to december 2013?
Program: subtract(153.55, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)
Answer: 0.5355
five-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dj trans , and the s&p 500 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index on december 31 , 2007 and that all dividends were reinvested . purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2012 , we repurchased 13804709 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 115.33 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2012 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan or program [b] .

Row 1: period, total number ofsharespurchased [a], averageprice paidper share, total number of sharespurchased as part of apublicly announced planor program [b], maximum number ofshares that may yetbe purchased under the planor program [b]
Row 2: oct . 1 through oct . 31, 1068414, 121.70, 1028300, 16041399
Row 3: nov . 1 through nov . 30, 659631, 120.84, 655000, 15386399
Row 4: dec . 1 through dec . 31, 411683, 124.58, 350450, 15035949
Row 5: total, 2139728, $ 121.99, 2033750, n/a

[a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 105978 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] on april 1 , 2011 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 40 million shares of our common stock by march 31 , 2014 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .

Question: what percentage of the total number of shares purchased were purchased in november?
Program: divide(659631, 2139728)
Answer: 0.30828
schlumberger limited and subsidiaries shares of common stock issued in treasury shares outstanding ( stated in millions ) .

========================================
Row 1: , issued, in treasury, shares outstanding
Row 2: balance january 1 2008, 1334, -138 ( 138 ), 1196
Row 3: shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged, 2013, 5, 5
Row 4: shares issued under employee stock purchase plan, 2013, 2, 2
Row 5: stock repurchase program, 2013, -21 ( 21 ), -21 ( 21 )
Row 6: issued on conversions of debentures, 2013, 12, 12
Row 7: balance december 31 2008, 1334, -140 ( 140 ), 1194
Row 8: shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged, 2013, 4, 4
Row 9: vesting of restricted stock, 2013, 1, 1
Row 10: shares issued under employee stock purchase plan, 2013, 4, 4
Row 11: stock repurchase program, 2013, -8 ( 8 ), -8 ( 8 )
Row 12: balance december 31 2009, 1334, -139 ( 139 ), 1195
Row 13: acquisition of smith international inc ., 100, 76, 176
Row 14: shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged, 2013, 6, 6
Row 15: shares issued under employee stock purchase plan, 2013, 3, 3
Row 16: stock repurchase program, 2013, -27 ( 27 ), -27 ( 27 )
Row 17: issued on conversions of debentures, 2013, 8, 8
Row 18: balance december 31 2010, 1434, -73 ( 73 ), 1361
========================================

see the notes to consolidated financial statements part ii , item 8 .

Question: what was the average beginning and ending balance of shares in millions outstanding during 2010?
Program: add(1361, 1195), divide(#0, const_2)
Answer: 1278.0
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2009 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) .

balance december 31 2006 | $ 740507
----------|----------
additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense | 96454
deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property | -80258 ( 80258 )
balance december 31 2007 | 756703
additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense | 101321
deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property | -11766 ( 11766 )
balance december 31 2008 | 846258
additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense | 103.698
deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property | -11869 ( 11869 )
balance december 31 2009 | $ 938087

.

Question: considering the years 2006-2009 , what is the value of the average additions?
Program: add(96454, 101321), multiply(const_1000, 103.698), add(#0, #1), divide(#2, const_3)
Answer: 100491.0
( 3 ) refer to note 2 201csummary of significant accounting principles and practices 201d for further information . 13 . employee benefitsp y defined contribution savings plans aon maintains defined contribution savings plans for the benefit of its employees . the expense recognized for these plans is included in compensation and benefits in the consolidated statements of income . the expense for the significant plans in the u.s. , u.k. , netherlands and canada is as follows ( in millions ) : .

========================================
years ended december 31 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016
----------|----------|----------|----------
u.s . | $ 98 | $ 105 | $ 121
u.k . | 45 | 43 | 43
netherlands and canada | 25 | 25 | 27
total | $ 168 | $ 173 | $ 191
========================================

pension and other postretirement benefits the company sponsors defined benefit pension and postretirement health and welfare plans that provide retirement , medical , and life insurance benefits . the postretirement health care plans are contributory , with retiree contributions adjusted annually , and the aa life insurance and pension plans are generally noncontributory . the significant u.s. , u.k. , netherlands and canadian pension plans are closed to new entrants. .

Question: considering the years 2016-2018 , what is the average expense for the significant plans in the u.s.?
Program: table_average(u.s ., none)
Answer: 108.0
the following table illustrates the effect that a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable or favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates , relative to the u.s . dollar , would have on the fair value of our forward exchange contracts as of october 30 , 2010 and october 31 , 2009: .

----------------------------------------
Row 1: , october 30 2010, october 31 2009
Row 2: fair value of forward exchange contracts asset, $ 7256, $ 8367
Row 3: fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset, $ 22062, $ 20132
Row 4: fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates liability, $ -7396 ( 7396 ), $ -6781 ( 6781 )
----------------------------------------

fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 22062 $ 20132 fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ ( 7396 ) $ ( 6781 ) the calculation assumes that each exchange rate would change in the same direction relative to the u.s . dollar . in addition to the direct effects of changes in exchange rates , such changes typically affect the volume of sales or the foreign currency sales price as competitors 2019 products become more or less attractive . our sensitivity analysis of the effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates does not factor in a potential change in sales levels or local currency selling prices. .

Question: what is the growth rate in the fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset from 2009 to 2010?
Program: subtract(22062, 20132), divide(#0, 20132)
Answer: 0.09587
the following table provides the weighted average assumptions used in the black-scholes option-pricing model for grants and the resulting weighted average grant date fair value per share of stock options granted for the years ended december 31: .

****************************************
• , 2018, 2017, 2016
• intrinsic value, $ 9, $ 10, $ 18
• exercise proceeds, 7, 11, 15
• income tax benefit realized, 2, 3, 6
****************************************

stock units during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , the company granted rsus to certain employees under the 2007 plan and 2017 omnibus plan , as applicable . rsus generally vest based on continued employment with the company over periods ranging from one to three years. .

Question: what was average income tax benefit realized for the three year period?
Program: table_average(income tax benefit realized, none)
Answer: 3.66667
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements liability to $ 60 million , and recorded the $ 2.7 million difference as a credit to interest expense . the $ 60 million remaining liability was eliminated upon payment of the cash portion of the purchase price . as of december 31 , 2016 , entergy louisiana , in connection with the waterford 3 lease obligation , had a future minimum lease payment ( reflecting an interest rate of 8.09% ( 8.09 % ) ) of $ 57.5 million , including $ 2.3 million in interest , due january 2017 that is recorded as long-term debt . in february 2017 the leases were terminated and the leased assets were conveyed to entergy louisiana . grand gulf lease obligations in 1988 , in two separate but substantially identical transactions , system energy sold and leased back undivided ownership interests in grand gulf for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million . the initial term of the leases expired in july 2015 . system energy renewed the leases for fair market value with renewal terms expiring in july 2036 . at the end of the new lease renewal terms , system energy has the option to repurchase the leased interests in grand gulf or renew the leases at fair market value . in the event that system energy does not renew or purchase the interests , system energy would surrender such interests and their associated entitlement of grand gulf 2019s capacity and energy . system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements . for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant depreciation . however , operating revenues include the recovery of the lease payments because the transactions are accounted for as a sale and leaseback for ratemaking purposes . consistent with a recommendation contained in a ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount was a net regulatory liability of $ 55.6 million and $ 55.6 million as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2016 , system energy , in connection with the grand gulf sale and leaseback transactions , had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) that are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

****************************************
	amount ( in thousands )
2017	$ 17188
2018	17188
2019	17188
2020	17188
2021	17188
years thereafter	257812
total	343752
less : amount representing interest	309393
present value of net minimum lease payments	$ 34359
****************************************

.

Question: what are the implicit interest costs for the lease payments due after 2021 , in thousands?
Program: divide(5.13, const_100), multiply(#0, 257812)
Answer: 13225.7556