wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor ( "s&p" ) 500 index and the dow jones us financials index during the period from december 31 , 2009 through december 31 , 2014. .

========================================
, 12/09, 12/10, 12/11, 12/12, 12/13, 12/14
e*trade financial corporation, 100.00, 90.91, 45.23, 50.85, 111.59, 137.81
s&p 500 index, 100.00, 115.06, 117.49, 136.30, 180.44, 205.14
dow jones us financials index, 100.00, 112.72, 98.24, 124.62, 167.26, 191.67
========================================

table of contents .

Question: what was the percent of the return on the e*trade financial corporation common stock from 2009 to 2014
Program: subtract(137.81, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)
Answer: 0.3781
risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the overall public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . although financial markets have significantly improved since 2008 , they could deteriorate in the future . there could also be disruption in individual market sectors , such as occurred in the energy sector in recent years . such declines in the financial markets could result in significant realized and unrealized losses on investments and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: .

• calendar year:, pre-tax catastrophe losses
• ( dollars in millions ), 
• 2016, $ 301.2
• 2015, 53.8
• 2014, 56.3
• 2013, 194.0
• 2012, 410.0

our losses from future catastrophic events could exceed our projections . we use projections of possible losses from future catastrophic events of varying types and magnitudes as a strategic underwriting tool . we use these loss projections to estimate our potential catastrophe losses in certain geographic areas and decide on the placement of retrocessional coverage or other actions to limit the extent of potential losses in a given geographic area . these loss projections are approximations , reliant on a mix of quantitative and qualitative processes , and actual losses may exceed the projections by a material amount , resulting in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. .

Question: what was the percentage change in the pre-tax catastrophe losses from 2015 to 2016
Program: subtract(301.2, 53.8), divide(#0, 53.8)
Answer: 4.59851
intel corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 16 : other comprehensive income ( loss ) the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) by component and related tax effects for each period were as follows : ( in millions ) unrealized holding ( losses ) on available- for-sale investments deferred tax asset valuation allowance unrealized holding ( losses ) on derivatives service credits ( costs ) actuarial ( losses ) foreign currency translation adjustment total .

========================================
• ( in millions ), unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on available-for-sale investments, deferred tax asset valuation allowance, unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on derivatives, prior service credits ( costs ), actuarial gains ( losses ), foreign currency translation adjustment, total
• december 27 2014, $ 2459, $ 26, $ -423 ( 423 ), $ -47 ( 47 ), $ -1004 ( 1004 ), $ -345 ( 345 ), $ 666
• other comprehensive income ( loss ) before reclassifications, -999 ( 999 ), 2014, -298 ( 298 ), -2 ( 2 ), 73, -187 ( 187 ), -1413 ( 1413 )
• amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ), -93 ( 93 ), 2014, 522, 10, 67, 2014, 506
• tax effects, 382, -18 ( 18 ), -67 ( 67 ), -1 ( 1 ), -12 ( 12 ), 17, 301
• other comprehensive income ( loss ), -710 ( 710 ), -18 ( 18 ), 157, 7, 128, -170 ( 170 ), -606 ( 606 )
• december 26 2015, 1749, 8, -266 ( 266 ), -40 ( 40 ), -876 ( 876 ), -515 ( 515 ), 60
• other comprehensive income ( loss ) before reclassifications, 1170, 2014, -26 ( 26 ), 2014, -680 ( 680 ), -4 ( 4 ), 460
• amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ), -530 ( 530 ), 2014, 38, 2014, 170, 2014, -322 ( 322 )
• tax effects, -225 ( 225 ), -8 ( 8 ), -5 ( 5 ), 2014, 146, 2014, -92 ( 92 )
• other comprehensive income ( loss ), 415, -8 ( 8 ), 7, 2014, -364 ( 364 ), -4 ( 4 ), 46
• december 31 2016, $ 2164, $ 2014, $ -259 ( 259 ), $ -40 ( 40 ), $ -1240 ( 1240 ), $ -519 ( 519 ), $ 106
========================================

.

Question: what is the net change in accumulated other comprehensive income during 2016?
Program: subtract(106, 60)
Answer: 46.0
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 2 2014financial instruments ( continued ) typically , the company hedges portions of its forecasted foreign currency exposure associated with revenue and inventory purchases over a time horizon of up to 6 months . derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges must be de-designated as hedges when it is probable the forecasted hedged transaction will not occur in the initially identified time period or within a subsequent 2 month time period . deferred gains and losses in other comprehensive income associated with such derivative instruments are immediately reclassified into earnings in other income and expense . any subsequent changes in fair value of such derivative instruments are also reflected in current earnings unless they are re-designated as hedges of other transactions . the company recognized net gains of approximately $ 672000 and $ 421000 in 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and a net loss of $ 1.6 million in 2005 in other income and expense related to the loss of hedge designation on discontinued cash flow hedges due to changes in the company 2019s forecast of future net sales and cost of sales and due to prevailing market conditions . as of september 29 , 2007 , the company had a net deferred gain associated with cash flow hedges of approximately $ 468000 , net of taxes , substantially all of which is expected to be reclassified to earnings by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2008 . the net gain or loss on the effective portion of a derivative instrument designated as a net investment hedge is included in the cumulative translation adjustment account of accumulated other comprehensive income within shareholders 2019 equity . for the years ended september 29 , 2007 and september 30 , 2006 , the company had a net loss of $ 2.6 million and a net gain of $ 7.4 million , respectively , included in the cumulative translation adjustment . the company may also enter into foreign currency forward and option contracts to offset the foreign exchange gains and losses generated by the re-measurement of certain assets and liabilities recorded in non-functional currencies . changes in the fair value of these derivatives are recognized in current earnings in other income and expense as offsets to the changes in the fair value of the related assets or liabilities . due to currency market movements , changes in option time value can lead to increased volatility in other income and expense . note 3 2014consolidated financial statement details ( in millions ) other current assets .

****************************************
	2007	2006
vendor non-trade receivables	$ 2392	$ 1593
nand flash memory prepayments	417	208
other current assets	996	469
total other current assets	$ 3805	$ 2270
****************************************

.

Question: what percentage of total other current assets in 2007 was comprised of nand flash memory prepayments?
Program: divide(417, 3805)
Answer: 0.10959
apple inc . | 2017 form 10-k | 20 company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index for the five years ended september 30 , 2017 . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 28 , 2012 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . * $ 100 invested on 9/28/12 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019s common stock and september 30th for indexes . copyright a9 2017 s&p , a division of mcgraw hill financial . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2017 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . september september september september september september .

Row 1: , september2012, september2013, september2014, september2015, september2016, september2017
Row 2: apple inc ., $ 100, $ 74, $ 111, $ 128, $ 129, $ 179
Row 3: s&p 500 index, $ 100, $ 119, $ 143, $ 142, $ 164, $ 194
Row 4: s&p information technology index, $ 100, $ 107, $ 138, $ 141, $ 173, $ 223
Row 5: dow jones u.s . technology supersector index, $ 100, $ 105, $ 137, $ 137, $ 167, $ 214

.

Question: what was the change in the dow jones technology index between 2016 and 2017?
Program: subtract(214, 167)
Answer: 47.0
.

****************************************
currency	2012	2011	2010
real	$ 40.4	$ 42.4	$ 32.5
euro	27.1	26.4	18.6
pound sterling	18.5	17.6	9.0
indian rupee	4.3	3.6	2.6
total impact	$ 90.3	$ 90.0	$ 62.7
****************************************

the impact on earnings of the foregoing assumed 10% ( 10 % ) change in each of the periods presented would not have been significant . revenue included $ 100.8 million and operating income included $ 9.0 million of unfavorable foreign currency impact during 2012 resulting from a stronger u.s . dollar during 2012 compared to 2011 . our foreign exchange risk management policy permits the use of derivative instruments , such as forward contracts and options , to reduce volatility in our results of operations and/or cash flows resulting from foreign exchange rate fluctuations . our international operations' revenues and expenses are generally denominated in local currency , which limits the economic exposure to foreign exchange risk in those jurisdictions . we do not enter into foreign currency derivative instruments for trading purposes . we have entered into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign currency exposure to intercompany loans . as of december 31 , 2012 , the notional amount of these derivatives was approximately $ 115.6 million and the fair value was nominal . these derivatives are intended to hedge the foreign exchange risks related to intercompany loans , but have not been designated as hedges for accounting purposes. .

Question: what is the percentage change in the impact of euro from 2011 to 2012?
Program: subtract(27.1, 26.4), divide(#0, 26.4)
Answer: 0.02652
performance graph the following graph compares the total return , assuming reinvestment of dividends , on an investment in the company , based on performance of the company's common stock , with the total return of the standard & poor's 500 composite stock index and the dow jones united states travel and leisure index for a five year period by measuring the changes in common stock prices from december 31 , 2012 to december 31 , 2017. .

****************************************
 | 12/12 | 12/13 | 12/14 | 12/15 | 12/16 | 12/17
royal caribbean cruises ltd . | 100.00 | 142.11 | 251.44 | 313.65 | 260.04 | 385.47
s&p 500 | 100.00 | 132.39 | 150.51 | 152.59 | 170.84 | 208.14
dow jones us travel & leisure | 100.00 | 145.48 | 169.28 | 179.27 | 192.85 | 238.77
****************************************

the stock performance graph assumes for comparison that the value of the company's common stock and of each index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2012 and that all dividends were reinvested . past performance is not necessarily an indicator of future results. .

Question: what is the mathematical mean for all three investments as of dec 31 , 2017?
Program: add(385.47, 208.14), add(#0, 238.77), divide(#1, const_3)
Answer: 277.46
table of contents capital deployment program will be subject to market and economic conditions , applicable legal requirements and other relevant factors . our capital deployment program does not obligate us to continue a dividend for any fixed period , and payment of dividends may be suspended at any time at our discretion . stock performance graph the following stock performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filings under the securities act of 1933 or the exchange act , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . the following stock performance graph compares our cumulative total stockholder return on an annual basis on our common stock with the cumulative total return on the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index and the amex airline index from december 9 , 2013 ( the first trading day of aag common stock ) through december 31 , 2015 . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 9 , 2013 in aag common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends . the stock performance shown on the graph below represents historical stock performance and is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

========================================
 | 12/9/2013 | 12/31/2013 | 12/31/2014 | 12/31/2015
american airlines group inc . | $ 100 | $ 103 | $ 219 | $ 175
amex airline index | 100 | 102 | 152 | 127
s&p 500 | 100 | 102 | 114 | 113
========================================

purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers since july 2014 , our board of directors has approved several share repurchase programs aggregating $ 7.0 billion of authority of which , as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 2.4 billion remained unused under repurchase programs .

Question: by how much did american airlines group inc . common stock out preform the s&p 500 index over the 4 year period?
Program: subtract(175, 100), divide(#0, 100), subtract(127, 100), divide(#2, 100), subtract(#1, #3)
Answer: 0.48
item 2 . properties we employ a variety of assets in the management and operation of our rail business . our rail network covers 23 states in the western two-thirds of the u.s . our rail network includes 31838 route miles . we own 26009 miles and operate on the remainder pursuant to trackage rights or leases . the following table describes track miles at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 . 2013 2012 .

	2013	2012
route	31838	31868
other main line	6766	6715
passing lines and turnouts	3167	3124
switching and classification yard lines	9090	9046
total miles	50861	50753

headquarters building we maintain our headquarters in omaha , nebraska . the facility has 1.2 million square feet of space for approximately 4000 employees and is subject to a financing arrangement . harriman dispatching center the harriman dispatching center ( hdc ) , located in omaha , nebraska , is our primary dispatching facility . it is linked to regional dispatching and locomotive management facilities at various locations along our .

Question: what percentage of total miles of track were switching and classification yard lines in 2012?
Program: divide(9046, 50753)
Answer: 0.17824
entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 305.7 million primarily due to the effect of the enactment of the tax cuts and jobs act , in december 2017 , which resulted in a decrease of $ 182.6 million in net income in 2017 , and the effect of a settlement with the irs related to the 2010-2011 irs audit , which resulted in a $ 136.1 million reduction of income tax expense in 2016 . also contributing to the decrease in net income were higher other operation and maintenance expenses . the decrease was partially offset by higher net revenue and higher other income . see note 3 to the financial statements for discussion of the effects of the tax cuts and jobs act and the irs audit . 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 175.4 million primarily due to the effect of a settlement with the irs related to the 2010-2011 irs audit , which resulted in a $ 136.1 million reduction of income tax expense in 2016 . also contributing to the increase were lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher net revenue , and higher other income . the increase was partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher interest expense , and higher nuclear refueling outage expenses . see note 3 to the financial statements for discussion of the irs audit . net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) .

========================================
 | amount ( in millions )
----------|----------
2016 net revenue | $ 2438.4
regulatory credit resulting from reduction of thefederal corporate income tax rate | 55.5
retail electric price | 42.8
louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation | 17.2
volume/weather | -12.4 ( 12.4 )
other | 19.0
2017 net revenue | $ 2560.5
========================================

the regulatory credit resulting from reduction of the federal corporate income tax rate variance is due to the reduction of the vidalia purchased power agreement regulatory liability by $ 30.5 million and the reduction of the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation regulatory liabilities by $ 25 million as a result of the enactment of the tax cuts and jobs act , in december 2017 , which lowered the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% ( 35 % ) to 21% ( 21 % ) . the effects of the tax cuts and jobs act are discussed further in note 3 to the financial statements. .

Question: in 2017 what was the percentage change in the net revenue
Program: subtract(2560.5, 2438.4), divide(#0, 2438.4)
Answer: 0.05007
12feb201521095992 performance graph the following graph compares the performance of our common stock with that of the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment index . the cumulative total return listed below assumes an initial investment of $ 100 on december 31 , 2009 and reinvestment of dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return rs $ 200 2009 2010 2011 201420132012 edwards lifesciences corporation s&p 500 s&p 500 healthcare equipment december 31 .

========================================
total cumulative return, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
edwards lifesciences, $ 186.16, $ 162.81, $ 207.65, $ 151.43, $ 293.33
s&p 500, 115.06, 117.49, 136.30, 180.44, 205.14
s&p 500 healthcare equipment index, 96.84, 102.07, 120.66, 153.85, 194.33
========================================

.

Question: what was the 5 year cumulative total return for the period ending 2014 for edwards lifesciences corporation?
Program: subtract(293.33, 100), divide(#0, 100)
Answer: 1.9333
table of contents other areas in which we do business . depending on the scope of such regulation , certain of our facilities and operations , or the operations of our suppliers , may be subject to additional operating and other permit requirements , potentially resulting in increased operating costs . future regulatory developments future regulatory developments and actions could affect operations and increase operating costs for the airline industry , including our airline subsidiaries . see part i , item 1a . risk factors 2013 201cif we are unable to obtain and maintain adequate facilities and infrastructure throughout our system and , at some airports , adequate slots , we may be unable to operate our existing flight schedule and to expand or change our route network in the future , which may have a material adverse impact on our operations , 201d 201cour business is subject to extensive government regulation , which may result in increases in our costs , disruptions to our operations , limits on our operating flexibility , reductions in the demand for air travel , and competitive disadvantages 201d and 201cwe are subject to many forms of environmental regulation and may incur substantial costs as a result 201d for additional information . employees and labor relations the airline business is labor intensive . in 2015 , salaries , wages and benefits were our largest expenses and represented approximately 31% ( 31 % ) of our operating expenses . the table below presents our approximate number of active full-time equivalent employees as of december 31 , 2015 . mainline operations wholly-owned regional carriers total .

****************************************
, mainline operations, wholly-owned regional carriers, total
pilots and flight crew training instructors, 13100, 3200, 16300
flight attendants, 24100, 1900, 26000
maintenance personnel, 14400, 1800, 16200
fleet service personnel, 16100, 3200, 19300
passenger service personnel, 16500, 7100, 23600
administrative and other, 14700, 2400, 17100
total, 98900, 19600, 118500
****************************************

.

Question: what percentage of total active full-time equivalent employees consisted of flight attendants?
Program: divide(26000, 118500)
Answer: 0.21941
s c h e d u l e i v ace limited and subsidiaries s u p p l e m e n t a l i n f o r m a t i o n c o n c e r n i n g r e i n s u r a n c e premiums earned for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 ( in millions of u.s . dollars , except for percentages ) direct amount ceded to companies assumed from other companies net amount percentage of amount assumed to .

========================================
for the years ended december 31 2010 2009 and 2008 ( in millions of u.s . dollars except for percentages ) | directamount | ceded to other companies | assumed from other companies | net amount | percentage of amount assumed to net
2010 | $ 15780 | $ 5792 | $ 3516 | $ 13504 | 26% ( 26 % )
2009 | $ 15415 | $ 5943 | $ 3768 | $ 13240 | 28% ( 28 % )
2008 | $ 16087 | $ 6144 | $ 3260 | $ 13203 | 25% ( 25 % )
========================================

.

Question: what is the growth rate in direct amount from 2009 to 2010?
Program: subtract(15780, 15415), divide(#0, 15415)
Answer: 0.02368