wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
entergy mississippi , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis 2010 compared to 2009 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 . amount ( in millions ) .

 | amount ( in millions )
----------|----------
2009 net revenue | $ 536.7
volume/weather | 18.9
other | -0.3 ( 0.3 )
2010 net revenue | $ 555.3

the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1046 gwh , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in billed electricity usage in all sectors , primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather on the residential sector . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 22 million in power management rider revenue as the result of higher rates , the volume/weather variance discussed above , and an increase in grand gulf rider revenue as a result of higher rates and increased usage , offset by a decrease of $ 23.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates . fuel and purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of prior over-collections , offset by an increase in the average market price of purchased power coupled with increased net area demand . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider . other income statement variances 2011 compared to 2010 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a $ 5.4 million decrease in compensation and benefits costs primarily resulting from an increase in the accrual for incentive-based compensation in 2010 and a decrease in stock option expense ; and the sale of $ 4.9 million of surplus oil inventory . the decrease was partially offset by an increase of $ 3.9 million in legal expenses due to the deferral in 2010 of certain litigation expenses in accordance with regulatory treatment . taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in ad valorem taxes due to a higher 2011 assessment as compared to 2010 , partially offset by higher capitalized property taxes as compared with prior year . depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service . interest expense decreased primarily due to a revision caused by ferc 2019s acceptance of a change in the treatment of funds received from independent power producers for transmission interconnection projects. .

Question: what is the average price of the increased electricity usage per gwh?
Program: multiply(18.9, const_1000000), divide(#0, 1046)
Answer: 18068.83365
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index for the five years ended september 26 , 2015 . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 24 , 2010 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . * $ 100 invested on 9/25/10 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019scommon stock and september 30th for indexes . copyright a9 2015 s&p , a division of mcgraw hill financial . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2015 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . september september september september september september .

----------------------------------------
• , september 2010, september 2011, september 2012, september 2013, september 2014, september 2015
• apple inc ., $ 100, $ 138, $ 229, $ 170, $ 254, $ 294
• s&p 500 index, $ 100, $ 101, $ 132, $ 157, $ 188, $ 187
• s&p information technology index, $ 100, $ 104, $ 137, $ 147, $ 190, $ 194
• dow jones u.s . technology supersector index, $ 100, $ 103, $ 134, $ 141, $ 183, $ 183
----------------------------------------

apple inc . | 2015 form 10-k | 21 .

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return for the five years ended 2015?
Program: subtract(294, 100), divide(#0, 100)
Answer: 1.94
during the third quarter ended 30 june 2017 , we recognized a goodwill impairment charge of $ 145.3 and an intangible asset impairment charge of $ 16.8 associated with our lasa reporting unit . refer to note 11 , goodwill , and note 12 , intangible assets , for more information related to these charges and the associated fair value measurement methods and significant inputs/assumptions , which were classified as level 3 since unobservable inputs were utilized in the fair value measurements . 16 . debt the tables below summarize our outstanding debt at 30 september 2019 and 2018 : total debt .

****************************************
30 september | 2019 | 2018
----------|----------|----------
short-term borrowings | $ 58.2 | $ 54.3
current portion of long-term debt ( a ) ( b ) | 40.4 | 406.6
long-term debt | 2907.3 | 2967.4
long-term debt 2013 related party ( b ) | 320.1 | 384.3
total debt | $ 3326.0 | $ 3812.6
****************************************

( a ) fiscal year 2019 includes the current portion of long-term debt owed to a related party of $ 37.8 . ( b ) refer to note 7 , acquisitions , for additional information regarding related party debt . short-term borrowings short-term borrowings consisted of bank obligations of $ 58.2 and $ 54.3 at 30 september 2019 and 2018 , respectively . the weighted average interest rate of short-term borrowings outstanding at 30 september 2019 and 2018 was 3.7% ( 3.7 % ) and 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) , respectively. .

Question: what is the short-term debt as a percent of total debt , in 2019?
Program: divide(58.2, 3326.0)
Answer: 0.0175
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index and the s&p information technology index for the five years ended september 27 , 2014 . the company has added the s&p information technology index to the graph to capture the stock performance of companies whose products and services relate to those of the company . the s&p information technology index replaces the s&p computer hardware index , which is no longer tracked by s&p . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index and the s&p information technology index as of the market close on september 25 , 2009 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . copyright a9 2014 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2014 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . apple inc . | 2014 form 10-k | 23 * $ 100 invested on 9/25/09 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019s common stock and september 30th for indexes . september september september september september september .

========================================
 | september 2009 | september 2010 | september 2011 | september 2012 | september 2013 | september 2014
apple inc . | $ 100 | $ 160 | $ 222 | $ 367 | $ 272 | $ 407
s&p 500 index | $ 100 | $ 110 | $ 111 | $ 145 | $ 173 | $ 207
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index | $ 100 | $ 112 | $ 115 | $ 150 | $ 158 | $ 205
s&p information technology index | $ 100 | $ 111 | $ 115 | $ 152 | $ 163 | $ 210
========================================

.

Question: what was the difference in percentage of cumulative total shareholder return for the five year period ended september 2014 between apple inc . and the s&p 500 index?
Program: subtract(407, 100), divide(#0, 100), subtract(207, 100), divide(#2, 100), subtract(#1, #3)
Answer: 2.0
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. .

========================================
• , 12/31/2010, 12/31/2011, 12/31/2012, 12/31/2013, 12/31/2014, 12/31/2015
• united parcel service inc ., $ 100.00, $ 103.88, $ 107.87, $ 158.07, $ 171.77, $ 160.61
• standard & poor 2019s 500 index, $ 100.00, $ 102.11, $ 118.43, $ 156.77, $ 178.22, $ 180.67
• dow jones transportation average, $ 100.00, $ 100.01, $ 107.49, $ 151.97, $ 190.08, $ 158.23
========================================

.

Question: what was the difference in percentage total cumulative return on investment for united parcel service inc . compared to the standard & poor 2019s 500 index the for the five year period ending 12/31/2015?
Program: subtract(160.61, const_100), divide(#0, const_100), subtract(180.67, const_100), divide(#2, const_100), subtract(#1, #3)
Answer: -0.2006
republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the plan to reflect the allied acquisition . the 2006 plan , as amended and restated , provides for the grant of non- qualified stock options , incentive stock options , shares of restricted stock , shares of phantom stock , stock bonuses , restricted stock units , stock appreciation rights , performance awards , dividend equivalents , cash awards , or other stock-based awards . awards granted under the 2006 plan prior to december 5 , 2008 became fully vested and nonforfeitable upon the closing of the acquisition . awards may be granted under the 2006 plan , as amended and restated , after december 5 , 2008 only to employees and consultants of allied and its subsidiaries who were not employed by republic prior to such date . as of december 31 , 2013 , there were approximately 15.6 million shares of common stock reserved for future grants under the 2006 plan . stock options we use a lattice binomial option-pricing model to value our stock option grants . we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award , or to the employee 2019s retirement eligible date , if earlier . expected volatility is based on the weighted average of the most recent one year volatility and a historical rolling average volatility of our stock over the expected life of the option . the risk-free interest rate is based on federal reserve rates in effect for bonds with maturity dates equal to the expected term of the option . we use historical data to estimate future option exercises , forfeitures ( at 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) for each of the periods presented ) and expected life of the options . when appropriate , separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes . the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 were $ 5.27 , $ 4.77 and $ 5.35 per option , respectively , which were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions: .

****************************************
Row 1: , 2013, 2012, 2011
Row 2: expected volatility, 28.9% ( 28.9 % ), 27.8% ( 27.8 % ), 27.3% ( 27.3 % )
Row 3: risk-free interest rate, 0.7% ( 0.7 % ), 0.8% ( 0.8 % ), 1.7% ( 1.7 % )
Row 4: dividend yield, 3.2% ( 3.2 % ), 3.2% ( 3.2 % ), 2.7% ( 2.7 % )
Row 5: expected life ( in years ), 4.5, 4.5, 4.4
Row 6: contractual life ( in years ), 7.0, 7.0, 7.0
****************************************

.

Question: what was the growth of the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted from 2012 to 2013
Program: subtract(5.27, 4.77), divide(#0, 4.77)
Answer: 0.10482
table of content part ii item 5 . market for the registrant's common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the new york stock exchange under the trading symbol 201chfc . 201d in september 2018 , our board of directors approved a $ 1 billion share repurchase program , which replaced all existing share repurchase programs , authorizing us to repurchase common stock in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions . the timing and amount of stock repurchases will depend on market conditions and corporate , regulatory and other relevant considerations . this program may be discontinued at any time by the board of directors . the following table includes repurchases made under this program during the fourth quarter of 2018 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs .

****************************************
• period, total number ofshares purchased, average pricepaid per share, total number ofshares purchasedas part of publicly announced plans or programs, maximum dollarvalue of sharesthat may yet bepurchased under the plans or programs
• october 2018, 1360987, $ 66.34, 1360987, $ 859039458
• november 2018, 450000, $ 61.36, 450000, $ 831427985
• december 2018, 912360, $ 53.93, 810000, $ 787613605
• total for october to december 2018, 2723347, , 2620987, 
****************************************

during the quarter ended december 31 , 2018 , 102360 shares were withheld from certain executives and employees under the terms of our share-based compensation agreements to provide funds for the payment of payroll and income taxes due at vesting of restricted stock awards . as of february 13 , 2019 , we had approximately 97419 stockholders , including beneficial owners holding shares in street name . we intend to consider the declaration of a dividend on a quarterly basis , although there is no assurance as to future dividends since they are dependent upon future earnings , capital requirements , our financial condition and other factors. .

Question: what was the range of shares bought between oct and dec 2018?
Program: subtract(1360987, 450000)
Answer: 910987.0
2018 annual report 23 five-year stock performance graph the graph below illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return on snap-on common stock since december 31 , 2013 , of a $ 100 investment , assuming that dividends were reinvested quarterly . the graph compares snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 industrials index ( 201cs&p 500 industrials 201d ) and standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) . fiscal year ended ( 1 ) snap-on incorporated s&p 500 industrials s&p 500 .

****************************************
fiscal year ended ( 1 )	snap-onincorporated	s&p 500industrials	s&p 500
december 31 2013	$ 100.00	$ 100.00	$ 100.00
december 31 2014	126.77	109.83	113.69
december 31 2015	161.15	107.04	115.26
december 31 2016	163.63	127.23	129.05
december 31 2017	169.61	153.99	157.22
december 31 2018	144.41	133.53	150.33
****************************************

( 1 ) the company 2019s fiscal year ends on the saturday that is on or nearest to december 31 of each year ; for ease of calculation , the fiscal year end is assumed to be december 31. .

Question: what was the percent change in the snap-on performance from 2015 to 2016
Program: subtract(163.63, 126.77)
Answer: 36.86
performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative five-year total return provided shareholders on our class a common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and two customized peer groups . the old peer group includes intercontinentalexchange , inc. , nyse euronext and the nasdaq omx group inc . the new peer group is the same as the old peer group with the addition of cboe holdings , inc . which completed its initial public offering in june 2010 . an investment of $ 100 ( with reinvestment of all dividends ) is assumed to have been made in our class a common stock , in the peer groups and the s&p 500 index on december 31 , 2005 and its relative performance is tracked through december 31 , 2010 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cme group inc. , the s&p 500 index , an old peer group and a new peer group 12/05 12/06 12/07 12/08 12/09 12/10 cme group inc . s&p 500 old peer group *$ 100 invested on 12/31/05 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 . copyright a9 2011 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . new peer group the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

****************************************
	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010
cme group inc .	$ 139.48	$ 188.81	$ 58.66	$ 96.37	$ 93.73
s&p 500	115.80	122.16	76.96	97.33	111.99
old peer group	155.58	190.78	72.25	76.11	87.61
new peer group	155.58	190.78	72.25	76.11	87.61
****************************************

.

Question: what was the percentual return for s&p 500 in the first year?
Program: divide(115.80, 100), subtract(115.80, 100)
Answer: 15.8
shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index , the s&p financial index and the kbw bank index over a five- year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2008 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2008 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 81 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 17 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 19 real estate companies and 23 banking companies . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s. , and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts. .

****************************************
 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013
----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------
state street corporation | $ 100 | $ 111 | $ 118 | $ 105 | $ 125 | $ 198
s&p 500 index | 100 | 126 | 146 | 149 | 172 | 228
s&p financial index | 100 | 117 | 132 | 109 | 141 | 191
kbw bank index | 100 | 98 | 121 | 93 | 122 | 168
****************************************

.

Question: what is the roi of an investment in the state street corporation from 2008 to 2011?
Program: subtract(105, 100), divide(#0, 100)
Answer: 0.05
incentive compensation cost the following table shows components of compensation expense , relating to certain of the incentive compensation programs described above : in a0millions a0of a0dollars 2018 2017 2016 charges for estimated awards to retirement-eligible employees $ 669 $ 659 $ 555 amortization of deferred cash awards , deferred cash stock units and performance stock units 202 354 336 immediately vested stock award expense ( 1 ) 75 70 73 amortization of restricted and deferred stock awards ( 2 ) 435 474 509 .

----------------------------------------
in millions of dollars	2018	2017	2016
charges for estimated awards to retirement-eligible employees	$ 669	$ 659	$ 555
amortization of deferred cash awards deferred cash stock units and performance stock units	202	354	336
immediately vested stock award expense ( 1 )	75	70	73
amortization of restricted and deferred stock awards ( 2 )	435	474	509
other variable incentive compensation	640	694	710
total	$ 2021	$ 2251	$ 2183
----------------------------------------

( 1 ) represents expense for immediately vested stock awards that generally were stock payments in lieu of cash compensation . the expense is generally accrued as cash incentive compensation in the year prior to grant . ( 2 ) all periods include amortization expense for all unvested awards to non-retirement-eligible employees. .

Question: what percentage of total compensation expense in 2017 is composed of other variable incentive compensation?
Program: divide(694, 2251)
Answer: 0.30831
issuer purchases of equity securities period total number of shares ( or units ) purchased average price paid per share ( or unit ) total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) month #1 ( october 1 , 2014 october 31 , 2005 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1119600 $ 34.52 1119600 $ 285.3 month #2 ( november 1 , 2014 november 30 , 2005 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 738200 36.03 738200 258.7 month #3 ( december 1 , 2014 december 31 , 2005 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1147700 37.06 1147700 216.2 .

========================================
period	( a ) total number of shares ( or units ) purchased	( b ) average price paid per share ( or unit )	( c ) total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs	( d ) maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions )
month #1 ( october 1 2014 october 31 2005 )	1119600	$ 34.52	1119600	$ 285.3
month #2 ( november 1 2014 november 30 2005 )	738200	36.03	738200	258.7
month #3 ( december 1 2014 december 31 2005 )	1147700	37.06	1147700	216.2
total	3005500	$ 35.86	3005500	$ 216.2
========================================

the share purchases reflected in the table above were made pursuant to our $ 500.0 million repurchase program approved by our board of directors in april 2005 . this share repurchase program does not have an expiration date . no share repurchase program approved by our board of directors has ever expired nor do we expect to terminate any program prior to completion . we intend to make additional share purchases under our existing repurchase program up to an aggregate of $ 216.2 million and under the additional $ 275.0 million program authorized by our board of directors in january 2006. .

Question: what was the percent of the period month #1 ( october 1 2014 october 31 2005 ) as part of the total of total number of shares ( or units ) purchased
Program: divide(1119600, 3005500)
Answer: 0.37252