wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , we had a working capital surplus . this reflects a strong cash position , which provides enhanced liquidity in an uncertain economic environment . in addition , we believe we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . cash flows millions 2012 2011 2010 .

****************************************
cash flowsmillions	2012	2011	2010
cash provided by operating activities	$ 6161	$ 5873	$ 4105
cash used in investing activities	-3633 ( 3633 )	-3119 ( 3119 )	-2488 ( 2488 )
cash used in financing activities	-2682 ( 2682 )	-2623 ( 2623 )	-2381 ( 2381 )
net change in cash and cashequivalents	$ -154 ( 154 )	$ 131	$ -764 ( 764 )
****************************************

operating activities higher net income in 2012 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2011 , partially offset by lower tax benefits from bonus depreciation ( as explained below ) and payments for past wages based on national labor negotiations settled earlier this year . higher net income and lower cash income tax payments in 2011 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2010 . the tax relief , unemployment insurance reauthorization , and job creation act of 2010 provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 , and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012 . as a result of the act , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011 income tax expense . this deferral decreased 2011 income tax payments , thereby contributing to the positive operating cash flow . in future years , however , additional cash will be used to pay income taxes that were previously deferred . in addition , the adoption of a new accounting standard in january of 2010 changed the accounting treatment for our receivables securitization facility from a sale of undivided interests ( recorded as an operating activity ) to a secured borrowing ( recorded as a financing activity ) , which decreased cash provided by operating activities by $ 400 million in 2010 . investing activities higher capital investments in 2012 drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2011 . included in capital investments in 2012 was $ 75 million for the early buyout of 165 locomotives under long-term operating and capital leases during the first quarter of 2012 , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions . higher capital investments partially offset by higher proceeds from asset sales in 2011 drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2010. .

Question: what was the change in millions of cash provided by operating activities from 2011 to 2012?
Program: subtract(6161, 5873)
Answer: 288.0
there were no changes in the company 2019s valuation techniques used to measure fair values on a recurring basis as a result of adopting asc 820 . pca had no assets or liabilities that were measured on a nonrecurring basis . 11 . stockholders 2019 equity on october 17 , 2007 , pca announced that its board of directors authorized a $ 150.0 million common stock repurchase program . there is no expiration date for the common stock repurchase program . through december 31 , 2008 , the company repurchased 3818729 shares of common stock , with 3142600 shares repurchased during 2008 and 676129 shares repurchased during 2007 . all repurchased shares were retired prior to december 31 , 2008 . there were no shares repurchased in 2009 . as of december 31 , 2009 , $ 65.0 million of the $ 150.0 million authorization remained available for repurchase of the company 2019s common stock . 12 . commitments and contingencies capital commitments the company had authorized capital commitments of approximately $ 41.7 million and $ 43.0 million as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively , in connection with the expansion and replacement of existing facilities and equipment . in addition , commitments at december 31 , 2009 for the major energy optimization projects at its counce and valdosta mills totaled $ 156.3 million . lease obligations pca leases space for certain of its facilities and cutting rights to approximately 91000 acres of timberland under long-term leases . the company also leases equipment , primarily vehicles and rolling stock , and other assets under long-term leases with a duration of two to seven years . the minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases with lease terms in excess of one year are as follows: .

========================================
, ( in thousands )
2010, $ 28162
2011, 25181
2012, 17338
2013, 11557
2014, 7742
thereafter, 18072
total, $ 108052
========================================

total lease expense , including base rent on all leases and executory costs , such as insurance , taxes , and maintenance , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 41.3 million , $ 41.6 million and $ 39.8 million , respectively . these costs are included in cost of goods sold and selling and administrative expenses . pca was obligated under capital leases covering buildings and machinery and equipment in the amount of $ 23.1 million and $ 23.7 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . during the fourth quarter of 2008 , the company entered into a capital lease relating to buildings and machinery , totaling $ 23.9 million , payable over 20 years . this capital lease amount is a non-cash transaction and , accordingly , has been excluded packaging corporation of america notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) december 31 , 2009 .

Question: what percentage of total minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases with lease terms in excess of one year are due in 2012?
Program: divide(17338, 108052)
Answer: 0.16046
the contractual maturities of held-to-maturity securities as of january 30 , 2009 were in excess of three years and were $ 31.4 million at cost and $ 28.9 million at fair value , respectively . for the successor year ended january 30 , 2009 and period ended february 1 , 2008 , and the predecessor period ended july 6 , 2007 and year ended february 2 , 2007 , gross realized gains and losses on the sales of available-for-sale securities were not material . the cost of securities sold is based upon the specific identification method . merchandise inventories inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined using the retail last-in , first-out ( 201clifo 201d ) method . under the company 2019s retail inventory method ( 201crim 201d ) , the calculation of gross profit and the resulting valuation of inventories at cost are computed by applying a calculated cost-to-retail inventory ratio to the retail value of sales at a department level . costs directly associated with warehousing and distribution are capitalized into inventory . the excess of current cost over lifo cost was approximately $ 50.0 million at january 30 , 2009 and $ 6.1 million at february 1 , 2008 . current cost is determined using the retail first-in , first-out method . the company 2019s lifo reserves were adjusted to zero at july 6 , 2007 as a result of the merger . the successor recorded lifo provisions of $ 43.9 million and $ 6.1 million during 2008 and 2007 , respectively . the predecessor recorded a lifo credit of $ 1.5 million in 2006 . in 2008 , the increased commodity cost pressures mainly related to food and pet products which have been driven by fruit and vegetable prices and rising freight costs . increases in petroleum , resin , metals , pulp and other raw material commodity driven costs also resulted in multiple product cost increases . the company intends to address these commodity cost increases through negotiations with its vendors and by increasing retail prices as necessary . on a quarterly basis , the company estimates the annual impact of commodity cost fluctuations based upon the best available information at that point in time . store pre-opening costs pre-opening costs related to new store openings and the construction periods are expensed as incurred . property and equipment property and equipment are recorded at cost . the company provides for depreciation and amortization on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives: .

========================================
land improvements	20
buildings	39-40
furniture fixtures and equipment	3-10
========================================

improvements of leased properties are amortized over the shorter of the life of the applicable lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset. .

Question: what is the percentage change in held-to-maturity securities at cost and at fair value as of january 30 , 2009?
Program: subtract(28.9, 31.4), divide(#0, 31.4)
Answer: -0.07962
jpmorgan chase & co./2012 annual report 167 the chart shows that for year ended december 31 , 2012 , the firm posted market risk related gains on 220 of the 261 days in this period , with gains on eight days exceeding $ 200 million . the chart includes year to date losses incurred in the synthetic credit portfolio . cib and credit portfolio posted market risk-related gains on 254 days in the period . the inset graph looks at those days on which the firm experienced losses and depicts the amount by which var exceeded the actual loss on each of those days . of the losses that were sustained on the 41 days of the 261 days in the trading period , the firm sustained losses that exceeded the var measure on three of those days . these losses in excess of the var all occurred in the second quarter of 2012 and were due to the adverse effect of market movements on risk positions in the synthetic credit portfolio held by cio . during the year ended december 31 , 2012 , cib and credit portfolio experienced seven loss days ; none of the losses on those days exceeded their respective var measures . other risk measures debit valuation adjustment sensitivity the following table provides information about the gross sensitivity of dva to a one-basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spreads . this sensitivity represents the impact from a one-basis-point parallel shift in jpmorgan chase 2019s entire credit curve . however , the sensitivity at a single point in time multiplied by the change in credit spread at a single maturity point may not be representative of the actual dva gain or loss realized within a period . the actual results reflect the movement in credit spreads across various maturities , which typically do not move in a parallel fashion , and is the product of a constantly changing exposure profile , among other factors . debit valuation adjustment sensitivity ( in millions ) one basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread .

• ( in millions ), one basis-point increase injpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread
• december 31 2012, $ 34
• december 31 2011, 35

economic-value stress testing along with var , stress testing is important in measuring and controlling risk . while var reflects the risk of loss due to adverse changes in markets using recent historical market behavior as an indicator of losses , stress testing captures the firm 2019s exposure to unlikely but plausible events in abnormal markets . the firm runs weekly stress tests on market-related risks across the lines of business using multiple scenarios that assume significant changes in risk factors such as credit spreads , equity prices , interest rates , currency rates or commodity prices . the framework uses a grid-based approach , which calculates multiple magnitudes of stress for both market rallies and market sell-offs for .

Question: what was the percentage change in the one basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread from 2011 to 2012
Program: subtract(35, 34), divide(#0, 34)
Answer: 0.02941
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2007 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. .

========================================
	12/31/2007	12/31/2008	12/31/2009	12/31/2010	12/31/2011	12/31/2012
united parcel service inc .	$ 100.00	$ 80.20	$ 86.42	$ 112.60	$ 116.97	$ 121.46
standard & poor 2019s 500 index	$ 100.00	$ 63.00	$ 79.67	$ 91.68	$ 93.61	$ 108.59
dow jones transportation average	$ 100.00	$ 78.58	$ 93.19	$ 118.14	$ 118.15	$ 127.07
========================================

.

Question: what is the roi of an investment in ups from 2008 to 2009?
Program: subtract(86.42, 80.20), divide(#0, 80.20)
Answer: 0.07756
purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2018 , we repurchased 57669746 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 143.70 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2018 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b] .

========================================
• period, total number of shares purchased [a], average price paid per share, total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announcedplan or program [b], maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b]
• oct . 1 through oct . 31, 6091605, $ 158.20, 6087727, 32831024
• nov . 1 through nov . 30, 3408467, 147.91, 3402190, 29428834
• dec . 1 through dec . 31, 3007951, 148.40, 3000715, 26428119
• total, 12508023, $ 153.04, 12490632, n/a
========================================

[a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 17391 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] effective january 1 , 2017 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 120 million shares of our common stock by december 31 , 2020 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .

Question: what was the total cost of share repurchases , in millions , during 2018?
Program: divide(57669746, const_1000000), multiply(#0, 143.70)
Answer: 8287.1425
humana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) amortization expense for other intangible assets was approximately $ 75 million in 2017 , $ 77 million in 2016 , and $ 93 million in 2015 . the following table presents our estimate of amortization expense for each of the five next succeeding fiscal years: .

========================================
, ( in millions )
for the years ending december 31,, 
2018, $ 64
2019, 54
2020, 52
2021, 19
2022, 16
========================================

.

Question: in 2017 what was the percent of the total amortization expense that was due in 2019
Program: add(64, 54), add(52, #0), add(#1, 19), add(#2, 16), divide(54, #3)
Answer: 0.26341
part ii item 5 2014market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information . the common stock of the company is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes . 2019 2019 the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated . price range of common stock .

========================================
• 2002 first quarter, high $ 17.84, low $ 4.11, 2001 first quarter, high $ 60.15, low $ 41.30
• second quarter, 9.17, 3.55, second quarter, 52.25, 39.95
• third quarter, 4.61, 1.56, third quarter, 44.50, 12.00
• fourth quarter, 3.57, 0.95, fourth quarter, 17.80, 11.60
========================================

holders . as of march 3 , 2003 , there were 9663 record holders of the company 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share . dividends . under the terms of the company 2019s senior secured credit facilities entered into with a commercial bank syndicate , the company is not allowed to pay cash dividends . in addition , the company is precluded from paying cash dividends on its common stock under the terms of a guaranty to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project in the event certain net worth and liquidity tests of the company are not met . the ability of the company 2019s project subsidiaries to declare and pay cash dividends to the company is subject to certain limitations in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements entered into by such project subsidiaries . securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans . see the information contained under the caption 2018 2018securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 2019 2019 of the proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders of the registrant to be held on may 1 , 2003 , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .

Question: what was the difference in dollars of the high low sale price for the common stock in the fourth quarter of 2002?
Program: subtract(3.57, 0.95)
Answer: 2.62
during 2015 , $ 82 million of provision recapture was recorded for purchased impaired loans compared to $ 91 million of provision recapture during 2014 . charge-offs ( which were specifically for commercial loans greater than a defined threshold ) during 2015 were $ 12 million compared to $ 42 million during 2014 . at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , the alll on total purchased impaired loans was $ .3 billion and $ .9 billion , respectively . the decline in alll was primarily due to the change in our derecognition policy . for purchased impaired loan pools where an allowance has been recognized , subsequent increases in the net present value of cash flows will result in a provision recapture of any previously recorded alll to the extent applicable , and/or a reclassification from non-accretable difference to accretable yield , which will be recognized prospectively . individual loan transactions where final dispositions have occurred ( as noted above ) result in removal of the loans from their applicable pools for cash flow estimation purposes . the cash flow re- estimation process is completed quarterly to evaluate the appropriateness of the alll associated with the purchased impaired loans . activity for the accretable yield during 2015 and 2014 follows : table 66 : purchased impaired loans 2013 accretable yield .

****************************************
Row 1: in millions, 2015, 2014
Row 2: january 1, $ 1558, $ 2055
Row 3: accretion ( including excess cash recoveries ), -466 ( 466 ), -587 ( 587 )
Row 4: net reclassifications to accretable from non-accretable, 226, 208
Row 5: disposals, -68 ( 68 ), -118 ( 118 )
Row 6: december 31, $ 1250, $ 1558
****************************************

note 5 allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit allowance for loan and lease losses we maintain the alll at levels that we believe to be appropriate to absorb estimated probable credit losses incurred in the portfolios as of the balance sheet date . we use the two main portfolio segments 2013 commercial lending and consumer lending 2013 and develop and document the alll under separate methodologies for each of these segments as discussed in note 1 accounting policies . a rollforward of the alll and associated loan data follows . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 141 .

Question: at december 31 , 2015 what was the net change from december 31 , 2014 on alll on total purchased impaired loans in billions?
Program: subtract(.3, .9)
Answer: -0.6
and $ 19 million of these expenses in 2011 and 2010 , respectively , with the remaining expense unallocated . the company financed the acquisition with the proceeds from a $ 1.0 billion three-year term loan credit facility , $ 1.5 billion in unsecured notes , and the issuance of 61 million shares of aon common stock . in addition , as part of the consideration , certain outstanding hewitt stock options were converted into options to purchase 4.5 million shares of aon common stock . these items are detailed further in note 8 2018 2018debt 2019 2019 and note 11 2018 2018stockholders 2019 equity 2019 2019 . the transaction has been accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting which requires , among other things , that most assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recognized at their fair values as of the acquisition date . the following table summarizes the amounts recognized for assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date ( in millions ) : amounts recorded as of the acquisition .

****************************************
 | amountsrecorded as ofthe acquisitiondate
working capital ( 1 ) | $ 348
property equipment and capitalized software | 297
identifiable intangible assets: | 
customer relationships | 1800
trademarks | 890
technology | 215
other noncurrent assets ( 2 ) | 344
long-term debt | 346
other noncurrent liabilities ( 3 ) | 360
net deferred tax liability ( 4 ) | 1021
net assets acquired | 2167
goodwill | 2765
total consideration transferred | $ 4932
****************************************

( 1 ) includes cash and cash equivalents , short-term investments , client receivables , other current assets , accounts payable and other current liabilities . ( 2 ) includes primarily deferred contract costs and long-term investments . ( 3 ) includes primarily unfavorable lease obligations and deferred contract revenues . ( 4 ) included in other current assets ( $ 31 million ) , deferred tax assets ( $ 30 million ) , other current liabilities ( $ 7 million ) and deferred tax liabilities ( $ 1.1 billion ) in the company 2019s consolidated statements of financial position . the acquired customer relationships are being amortized over a weighted average life of 12 years . the technology asset is being amortized over 7 years and trademarks have been determined to have indefinite useful lives . goodwill is calculated as the excess of the acquisition cost over the fair value of the net assets acquired and represents the synergies and other benefits that are expected to arise from combining the operations of hewitt with the operations of aon , and the future economic benefits arising from other assets acquired that could not be individually identified and separately recognized . goodwill is not amortized and is not deductible for tax purposes . a single estimate of fair value results from a complex series of the company 2019s judgments about future events and uncertainties and relies heavily on estimates and assumptions . the company 2019s .

Question: what is the total value of identified intangible assets?
Program: add(1800, 890), add(#0, 215)
Answer: 2905.0