wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 ( 1 ) a u.s . subsidiary of the company has a defined benefit obligation of $ 764 million and $ 679 million as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , and uses salary bands to determine future benefit costs rather than rates of compensation increases . rates of compensation increases in the table above do not include amounts related to this specific defined benefit plan . ( 2 ) includes an inflation factor that is used to calculate future periodic benefit cost , but is not used to calculate the benefit obligation . the company establishes its estimated long-term return on plan assets considering various factors , which include the targeted asset allocation percentages , historic returns and expected future returns . the measurement of pension obligations , costs and liabilities is dependent on a variety of assumptions . these assumptions include estimates of the present value of projected future pension payments to all plan participants , taking into consideration the likelihood of potential future events such as salary increases and demographic experience . these assumptions may have an effect on the amount and timing of future contributions . the assumptions used in developing the required estimates include the following key factors : 2022 discount rates ; 2022 salary growth ; 2022 retirement rates ; 2022 inflation ; 2022 expected return on plan assets ; and 2022 mortality rates . the effects of actual results differing from the company 2019s assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods and , therefore , generally affect the company 2019s recognized expense in such future periods . sensitivity of the company 2019s pension funded status to the indicated increase or decrease in the discount rate and long-term rate of return on plan assets assumptions is shown below . note that these sensitivities may be asymmetric and are specific to the base conditions at year-end 2012 . they also may not be additive , so the impact of changing multiple factors simultaneously cannot be calculated by combining the individual sensitivities shown . the funded status as of december 31 , 2012 is affected by the assumptions as of that date . pension expense for 2012 is affected by the december 31 , 2011 assumptions . the impact on pension expense from a one percentage point change in these assumptions is shown in the table below ( in millions ) : .

----------------------------------------
increase of 1% ( 1 % ) in the discount rate, $ -48 ( 48 )
decrease of 1% ( 1 % ) in the discount rate, 38
increase of 1% ( 1 % ) in the long-term rate of return on plan assets, -47 ( 47 )
decrease of 1% ( 1 % ) in the long-term rate of return on plan assets, 47
----------------------------------------

.

Question: was the impact of a decrease of 1% ( 1 % ) in the discount rate greater than the effect of a decrease of 1% ( 1 % ) in the long-term rate of return on plan assets?
Program: greater(38, 47)
Answer: no
sales of unregistered securities not applicable . repurchases of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2017 to december 31 , 2017 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 .

----------------------------------------
Row 1: , total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1, average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2, total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3, maximum number ( orapproximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms3
Row 2: october 1 - 31, 1231868, $ 20.74, 1230394, $ 214001430
Row 3: november 1 - 30, 1723139, $ 18.89, 1722246, $ 181474975
Row 4: december 1 - 31, 1295639, $ 20.25, 1285000, $ 155459545
Row 5: total, 4250646, $ 19.84, 4237640, 
----------------------------------------

1 included shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 1474 withheld shares in october 2017 , 893 withheld shares in november 2017 and 10639 withheld shares in december 2017 , for a total of 13006 withheld shares during the three-month period . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our share repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our share repurchase program . 3 in february 2017 , the board authorized a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2017 share repurchase program 201d ) . on february 14 , 2018 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining for repurchase under the 2017 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .

Question: what is the percentage decrease in average price per share from october to november?
Program: subtract(20.74, 18.89), divide(#0, 20.74), multiply(#1, const_100)
Answer: 8.91996
table of contents valero energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) commodity price risk we are exposed to market risks related to the volatility in the price of crude oil , refined products ( primarily gasoline and distillate ) , grain ( primarily corn ) , and natural gas used in our operations . to reduce the impact of price volatility on our results of operations and cash flows , we use commodity derivative instruments , including futures , swaps , and options . we use the futures markets for the available liquidity , which provides greater flexibility in transacting our hedging and trading operations . we use swaps primarily to manage our price exposure . our positions in commodity derivative instruments are monitored and managed on a daily basis by a risk control group to ensure compliance with our stated risk management policy that has been approved by our board of directors . for risk management purposes , we use fair value hedges , cash flow hedges , and economic hedges . in addition to the use of derivative instruments to manage commodity price risk , we also enter into certain commodity derivative instruments for trading purposes . our objective for entering into each type of hedge or trading derivative is described below . fair value hedges fair value hedges are used to hedge price volatility in certain refining inventories and firm commitments to purchase inventories . the level of activity for our fair value hedges is based on the level of our operating inventories , and generally represents the amount by which our inventories differ from our previous year-end lifo inventory levels . as of december 31 , 2012 , we had the following outstanding commodity derivative instruments that were entered into to hedge crude oil and refined product inventories and commodity derivative instruments related to the physical purchase of crude oil and refined products at a fixed price . the information presents the notional volume of outstanding contracts by type of instrument and year of maturity ( volumes in thousands of barrels ) . notional contract volumes by year of maturity derivative instrument 2013 .

========================================
• derivative instrument, notionalcontractvolumes byyear ofmaturity 2013
• crude oil and refined products:, 
• futures 2013 long, 1052
• futures 2013 short, 4857
• physical contracts - long, 3805
========================================

.

Question: what percentage increase would in long futures would need to occur to double the short futures?
Program: multiply(4857, const_2), subtract(#0, 3805), subtract(#1, 1052), divide(#2, 1052)
Answer: 4.61692
the table below presents the estimated maximum potential var arising from a one-day loss in fair value for our interest rate , foreign currency , commodity , and equity market-risk-sensitive instruments outstanding as of may 26 , 2019 and may 27 , 2018 , and the average fair value impact during the year ended may 26 , 2019. .

****************************************
in millions | fair value impact may 26 2019 | fair value impact averageduringfiscal 2019 | fair value impact may 27 2018
----------|----------|----------|----------
interest rate instruments | $ 74.4 | $ 46.1 | $ 33.2
foreign currency instruments | 16.8 | 19.0 | 21.3
commodity instruments | 4.1 | 2.5 | 1.9
equity instruments | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.0
****************************************

.

Question: what is the change in fair value of equity instruments from 2018 to 2019?
Program: subtract(2.3, 2.0)
Answer: 0.3
issuer purchases of equity securities during the three months ended december 31 , 2012 , we repurchased 619314 shares of our common stock for an aggregate of approximately $ 46.0 million , including commissions and fees , pursuant to our publicly announced stock repurchase program , as follows : period total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share ( 2 ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) .

period | total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) | average price paid per share ( 2 ) | total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans orprograms | approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans orprograms ( in millions )
----------|----------|----------|----------|----------
october 2012 | 27524 | $ 72.62 | 27524 | $ 1300.1
november 2012 | 489390 | $ 74.22 | 489390 | $ 1263.7
december 2012 | 102400 | $ 74.83 | 102400 | $ 1256.1
total fourth quarter | 619314 | $ 74.25 | 619314 | $ 1256.1

( 1 ) repurchases made pursuant to the $ 1.5 billion stock repurchase program approved by our board of directors in march 2011 ( the 201c2011 buyback 201d ) . under this program , our management is authorized to purchase shares from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to market conditions and other factors . to facilitate repurchases , we make purchases pursuant to trading plans under rule 10b5-1 of the exchange act , which allows us to repurchase shares during periods when we otherwise might be prevented from doing so under insider trading laws or because of self-imposed trading blackout periods . this program may be discontinued at any time . ( 2 ) average price per share is calculated using the aggregate price , excluding commissions and fees . we continued to repurchase shares of our common stock pursuant to our 2011 buyback subsequent to december 31 , 2012 . between january 1 , 2013 and january 21 , 2013 , we repurchased an additional 15790 shares of our common stock for an aggregate of $ 1.2 million , including commissions and fees , pursuant to the 2011 buyback . as a result , as of january 21 , 2013 , we had repurchased a total of approximately 4.3 million shares of our common stock under the 2011 buyback for an aggregate of $ 245.2 million , including commissions and fees . we expect to continue to manage the pacing of the remaining $ 1.3 billion under the 2011 buyback in response to general market conditions and other relevant factors. .

Question: what was the ratio of the purchase in december 2012 to the purchase in january 2013
Program: divide(102400, 15790)
Answer: 6.48512
other items on our consolidated financial statements have been appropriately adjusted from the amounts provided in the earnings release , including a reduction of our full year 2016 gross profit and income from operations by $ 2.9 million , and a reduction of net income by $ 1.7 million. .

========================================
• ( in thousands ), at december 31 , 2016, at december 31 , 2015, at december 31 , 2014, at december 31 , 2013, at december 31 , 2012
• cash and cash equivalents, $ 250470, $ 129852, $ 593175, $ 347489, $ 341841
• working capital ( 1 ), 1279337, 1019953, 1127772, 702181, 651370
• inventories, 917491, 783031, 536714, 469006, 319286
• total assets, 3644331, 2865970, 2092428, 1576369, 1155052
• total debt including current maturities, 817388, 666070, 281546, 151551, 59858
• total stockholders 2019 equity, $ 2030900, $ 1668222, $ 1350300, $ 1053354, $ 816922
========================================

( 1 ) working capital is defined as current assets minus current liabilities. .

Question: what is the debt-to-asset ratio?
Program: divide(817388, 3644331)
Answer: 0.22429
schlumberger limited and subsidiaries shares of common stock ( stated in millions ) issued in treasury shares outstanding .

========================================
• , issued, in treasury, shares outstanding
• balance january 1 2009, 1334, -140 ( 140 ), 1194
• shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged, 2013, 4, 4
• vesting of restricted stock, 2013, 1, 1
• shares issued under employee stock purchase plan, 2013, 4, 4
• stock repurchase program, 2013, -8 ( 8 ), -8 ( 8 )
• balance december 31 2009, 1334, -139 ( 139 ), 1195
• acquisition of smith international inc ., 100, 76, 176
• shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged, 2013, 6, 6
• shares issued under employee stock purchase plan, 2013, 3, 3
• stock repurchase program, 2013, -27 ( 27 ), -27 ( 27 )
• issued on conversions of debentures, 2013, 8, 8
• balance december 31 2010, 1434, -73 ( 73 ), 1361
• shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged, 2013, 6, 6
• vesting of restricted stock, 2013, 1, 1
• shares issued under employee stock purchase plan, 2013, 3, 3
• stock repurchase program, 2013, -37 ( 37 ), -37 ( 37 )
• balance december 31 2011, 1434, -100 ( 100 ), 1334
========================================

see the notes to consolidated financial statements .

Question: what was the net change in shares outstanding during 2011?
Program: subtract(1434, 1434)
Answer: 0.0
during 2015 , $ 82 million of provision recapture was recorded for purchased impaired loans compared to $ 91 million of provision recapture during 2014 . charge-offs ( which were specifically for commercial loans greater than a defined threshold ) during 2015 were $ 12 million compared to $ 42 million during 2014 . at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , the alll on total purchased impaired loans was $ .3 billion and $ .9 billion , respectively . the decline in alll was primarily due to the change in our derecognition policy . for purchased impaired loan pools where an allowance has been recognized , subsequent increases in the net present value of cash flows will result in a provision recapture of any previously recorded alll to the extent applicable , and/or a reclassification from non-accretable difference to accretable yield , which will be recognized prospectively . individual loan transactions where final dispositions have occurred ( as noted above ) result in removal of the loans from their applicable pools for cash flow estimation purposes . the cash flow re- estimation process is completed quarterly to evaluate the appropriateness of the alll associated with the purchased impaired loans . activity for the accretable yield during 2015 and 2014 follows : table 66 : purchased impaired loans 2013 accretable yield .

in millions | 2015 | 2014
----------|----------|----------
january 1 | $ 1558 | $ 2055
accretion ( including excess cash recoveries ) | -466 ( 466 ) | -587 ( 587 )
net reclassifications to accretable from non-accretable | 226 | 208
disposals | -68 ( 68 ) | -118 ( 118 )
december 31 | $ 1250 | $ 1558

note 5 allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit allowance for loan and lease losses we maintain the alll at levels that we believe to be appropriate to absorb estimated probable credit losses incurred in the portfolios as of the balance sheet date . we use the two main portfolio segments 2013 commercial lending and consumer lending 2013 and develop and document the alll under separate methodologies for each of these segments as discussed in note 1 accounting policies . a rollforward of the alll and associated loan data follows . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 141 .

Question: for 2015 and 2014 , what was the average in millions for provision recapture for purchased impaired loans?
Program: add(82, 91), divide(#0, const_2)
Answer: 86.5
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information our common stock has been traded on the new york stock exchange ( 2018 2018nyse 2019 2019 ) under the symbol 2018 2018exr 2019 2019 since our ipo on august 17 , 2004 . prior to that time there was no public market for our common stock . the following table sets forth , for the periods indicated , the high and low bid price for our common stock as reported by the nyse and the per share dividends declared : dividends high low declared .

• , high, low, dividends declared
• period from august 17 2004 to september 30 2004, $ 14.38, $ 12.50, $ 0.1113
• quarter ended december 31 2004, 14.55, 12.60, 0.2275
• quarter ended march 31 2005, 14.30, 12.55, 0.2275
• quarter ended june 30 2005, 14.75, 12.19, 0.2275
• quarter ended september 30 2005, 16.71, 14.32, 0.2275
• quarter ended december 31 2005, 15.90, 13.00, 0.2275

on february 28 , 2006 , the closing price of our common stock as reported by the nyse was $ 15.00 . at february 28 , 2006 , we had 166 holders of record of our common stock . holders of shares of common stock are entitled to receive distributions when declared by our board of directors out of any assets legally available for that purpose . as a reit , we are required to distribute at least 90% ( 90 % ) of our 2018 2018reit taxable income 2019 2019 is generally equivalent to our net taxable ordinary income , determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid , to our stockholders annually in order to maintain our reit qualifications for u.s . federal income tax purposes . unregistered sales of equity securities and use of proceeds on june 20 , 2005 , we completed the sale of 6200000 shares of our common stock , $ .01 par value , for $ 83514 , which we reported in a current report on form 8-k filed with the securities and exchange commission on june 24 , 2005 . we used the proceeds for general corporate purposes , including debt repayment . the shares were issued pursuant to an exemption from registration under the securities act of 1933 , as amended. .

Question: using the high bid price what was the percentage difference between the quarter ended december 31 , 2004 and the quarter ended march 312005?
Program: subtract(14.30, 14.55), divide(#0, 14.55)
Answer: -0.01718
performance graph the following graph and table compares the cumulative five-year total return provided to shareholders on our class a common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and our customized peer group . the peer group includes cboe holdings , inc. , intercontinentalexchange group , inc . and nasdaq , inc . an investment of $ 100 ( with reinvestment of all dividends ) is assumed to have been made in our class a common stock , in the peer group and the s&p 500 index on december 31 , 2012 , and its relative performance is tracked through december 31 , 2017 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cme group inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group 12/12 12/13 12/14 12/15 12/16 cme group inc . s&p 500 peer group * $ 100 invested on 12/31/12 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 . copyright a9 2018 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017
----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------
cme group inc . | $ 164.01 | $ 194.06 | $ 208.95 | $ 279.85 | $ 370.32
s&p 500 | 132.39 | 150.51 | 152.59 | 170.84 | 208.14
peer group | 176.61 | 187.48 | 219.99 | 249.31 | 323.23

unregistered sales of equity securities during the past three years there have not been any unregistered sales by the company of equity securities. .

Question: did the cme group outperform the s&p 500 over 5 years?
Program: greater(370.32, 208.14)
Answer: yes
dish network corporation notes to consolidated financial statements - continued future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligations , together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of december 31 , 2015 are as follows ( in thousands ) : for the years ended december 31 .

========================================
• 2016, $ 76676
• 2017, 75874
• 2018, 75849
• 2019, 50320
• 2020, 48000
• thereafter, 64000
• total minimum lease payments, 390719
• less : amount representing lease of the orbital location and estimated executory costs ( primarily insurance and maintenance ) including profit thereon included in total minimum lease payments, -186742 ( 186742 )
• net minimum lease payments, 203977
• less : amount representing interest, -37485 ( 37485 )
• present value of net minimum lease payments, 166492
• less : current portion, -30849 ( 30849 )
• long-term portion of capital lease obligations, $ 135643
========================================

the summary of future maturities of our outstanding long-term debt as of december 31 , 2015 is included in the commitments table in note 15 . 11 . income taxes and accounting for uncertainty in income taxes income taxes our income tax policy is to record the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and amounts reported on our consolidated balance sheets , as well as probable operating loss , tax credit and other carryforwards . deferred tax assets are offset by valuation allowances when we believe it is more likely than not that net deferred tax assets will not be realized . we periodically evaluate our need for a valuation allowance . determining necessary valuation allowances requires us to make assessments about historical financial information as well as the timing of future events , including the probability of expected future taxable income and available tax planning opportunities . we file consolidated tax returns in the u.s . the income taxes of domestic and foreign subsidiaries not included in the u.s . tax group are presented in our consolidated financial statements on a separate return basis for each tax paying entity . as of december 31 , 2015 , we had no net operating loss carryforwards ( 201cnols 201d ) for federal income tax purposes and $ 39 million of nol benefit for state income tax purposes , which are partially offset by a valuation allowance . the state nols begin to expire in the year 2017 . in addition , there are $ 61 million of tax benefits related to credit carryforwards which are partially offset by a valuation allowance . the state credit carryforwards began to expire in .

Question: what percentage of future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligations is due after 2020?
Program: divide(64000, 390719)
Answer: 0.1638