wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
vertex pharmaceuticals incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) f . marketable securities ( continued ) unrealized losses in the portfolio relate to various debt securities including u.s . government securities , u.s . government-sponsored enterprise securities , corporate debt securities and asset-backed securities . for these securities , the unrealized losses are primarily due to increases in interest rates . the investments held by the company are high investment grade and there were no adverse credit events . because the company has the ability and intent to hold these investments until a recovery of fair value , which may be maturity , the company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of december 31 , 2006 and 2005 . gross realized gains and losses for 2006 were $ 4000 and $ 88000 respectively . gross realized gains and losses for 2005 were $ 15000 and $ 75000 , respectively . gross realized gains and losses for 2004 were $ 628000 and $ 205000 , respectively . g . restricted cash at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , the company held $ 30.3 million and $ 41.5 million respectively , in restricted cash . at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 the balance was held in deposit with certain banks predominantly to collateralize conditional stand-by letters of credit in the names of the company 2019s landlords pursuant to certain operating lease agreements . h . property and equipment property and equipment consist of the following at december 31 ( in thousands ) : depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 was $ 25.4 million , $ 26.3 million and $ 28.4 million , respectively . in 2006 and 2005 , the company wrote off certain assets that were fully depreciated and no longer utilized . there was no effect on the company 2019s net property and equipment . additionally , the company wrote off or sold certain assets that were not fully depreciated . the net loss on disposal of those assets was $ 10000 for 2006 , $ 344000 for 2005 and $ 43000 for 2004 . i . altus investment altus pharmaceuticals , inc . ( 201caltus 201d ) completed an initial public offering in january 2006 . as of the completion of the offering , vertex owned 817749 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 1962494 shares of common stock ( the 201caltus warrants 201d ) . in addition , the company , as of the completion .

 | 2006 | 2005
furniture and equipment | $ 97638 | $ 98387
leasehold improvements | 74875 | 66318
computers | 19733 | 18971
software | 21274 | 18683
total property and equipment gross | 213520 | 202359
less accumulated depreciation and amortization | 151985 | 147826
total property and equipment net | $ 61535 | $ 54533

furniture and equipment $ 97638 $ 98387 leasehold improvements 74875 66318 computers 19733 18971 software 21274 18683 total property and equipment , gross 213520 202359 less accumulated depreciation and amortization 151985 147826 total property and equipment , net $ 61535 $ 54533 .

Question: in 2006 what was the ratio of the gross realized gains to the losses
Program: divide(4000, 88000)
Answer: 0.04545
share-based compensation cost is recorded net of estimated forfeitures on a straight-line basis for awards with service conditions only , and on a graded-vesting basis for awards with service , performance and market conditions . the company 2019s estimated forfeiture rate is based on an evaluation of historical , actual and trended forfeiture data . for fiscal 2014 , 2013 , and 2012 , the company recorded share-based compensation cost of $ 172 million , $ 179 million and $ 147 million , respectively , in personnel on its consolidated statements of operations . the amount of capitalized share-based compensation cost was immaterial during fiscal 2014 , 2013 and 2012 . options options issued under the eip expire 10 years from the date of grant and vest ratably over 3 years from the date of grant , subject to earlier vesting in full under certain conditions . during fiscal 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , the fair value of each stock option was estimated on the date of grant using a black-scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: .

****************************************
	2014	2013	2012
expected term ( in years ) ( 1 )	4.80	6.08	6.02
risk-free rate of return ( 2 )	1.3% ( 1.3 % )	0.8% ( 0.8 % )	1.2% ( 1.2 % )
expected volatility ( 3 )	25.2% ( 25.2 % )	29.3% ( 29.3 % )	34.9% ( 34.9 % )
expected dividend yield ( 4 )	0.8% ( 0.8 % )	0.9% ( 0.9 % )	0.9% ( 0.9 % )
fair value per option granted	$ 44.11	$ 39.03	$ 29.65
****************************************

( 1 ) beginning in fiscal 2014 , assumption is based on the company 2019s historical option exercises and those of a set of peer companies that management believes is generally comparable to visa . the company 2019s data is weighted based on the number of years between the measurement date and visa 2019s initial public offering as a percentage of the options 2019 contractual term . the relative weighting placed on visa 2019s data and peer data in fiscal 2014 was approximately 58% ( 58 % ) and 42% ( 42 % ) , respectively . in fiscal 2013 and 2012 , assumption was fully based on peer companies 2019 data . ( 2 ) based upon the zero coupon u.s . treasury bond rate over the expected term of the awards . ( 3 ) based on the company 2019s implied and historical volatility . in fiscal 2013 and 2012 , historical volatility was a blend of visa 2019s historical volatility and those of comparable peer companies . the relative weighting between visa historical volatility and the historical volatility of the peer companies was based on the percentage of years visa stock price information is available since its initial public offering compared to the expected term . the expected volatilities ranged from 22% ( 22 % ) to 26% ( 26 % ) in fiscal ( 4 ) based on the company 2019s annual dividend rate on the date of grant. .

Question: what is the percentage increase in the fair value of option granted from 2013 to 2014?
Program: subtract(44.11, 39.03)
Answer: 5.08
future regulatory developments future regulatory developments and actions could affect operations and increase operating costs for the airline industry , including our airline subsidiaries . see part i , item 1a . risk factors - " if we are unable to obtain and maintain adequate facilities and infrastructure throughout our system and , at some airports , adequate slots , we may be unable to operate our existing flight schedule and to expand or change our route network in the future , which may have a material adverse impact on our operations ," "our business is subject to extensive government regulation , which may result in increases in our costs , disruptions to our operations , limits on our operating flexibility , reductions in the demand for air travel , and competitive disadvantages" and "we are subject to many forms of environmental regulation and may incur substantial costs as a result" for additional information . employees and labor relations the airline business is labor intensive . in 2013 , salaries , wages , and benefits were one of our largest expenses and represented approximately 22% ( 22 % ) of our operating expenses . the table below presents our approximate number of active full-time equivalent employees as of december 31 , 2013 . american us airways wholly-owned regional carriers total .

========================================
Row 1: , american, us airways, wholly-owned regional carriers, total
Row 2: pilots, 7900, 4100, 3400, 15400
Row 3: flight attendants, 15000, 7700, 2100, 24800
Row 4: maintenance personnel, 11300, 3100, 2400, 16800
Row 5: fleet service personnel, 7400, 5500, 1700, 14600
Row 6: passenger service personnel, 10300, 6200, 6400, 22900
Row 7: administrative and other, 8200, 5500, 2200, 15900
Row 8: total, 60100, 32100, 18200, 110400
========================================

.

Question: what portion of the total full-time employees of american are pilots?
Program: divide(7900, 60100)
Answer: 0.13145
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 28 , 2012 through october 29 , 2017 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 28 , 2012 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index *assumes $ 100 invested on 10/28/12 in stock or 10/31/12 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2017 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved. .

****************************************
Row 1: , 10/28/2012, 10/27/2013, 10/26/2014, 10/25/2015, 10/30/2016, 10/29/2017
Row 2: applied materials, 100.00, 171.03, 207.01, 165.34, 293.64, 586.91
Row 3: s&p 500 index, 100.00, 127.18, 149.14, 156.89, 163.97, 202.72
Row 4: rdg semiconductor composite index, 100.00, 131.94, 167.25, 160.80, 193.36, 288.96
****************************************

dividends during each of fiscal 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , applied 2019s board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.10 per share . applied currently anticipates that cash dividends will continue to be paid on a quarterly basis , although the declaration of any future cash dividend is at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination by the board of directors that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 10/25/15 10/30/16 10/29/17 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .

Question: what is the roi in s&p500 if the investment was made in 2012 and sold in 2015?
Program: subtract(156.89, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)
Answer: 0.5689
table of contents other areas in which we do business . depending on the scope of such regulation , certain of our facilities and operations , or the operations of our suppliers , may be subject to additional operating and other permit requirements , potentially resulting in increased operating costs . future regulatory developments future regulatory developments and actions could affect operations and increase operating costs for the airline industry , including our airline subsidiaries . see part i , item 1a . risk factors 2013 201cif we are unable to obtain and maintain adequate facilities and infrastructure throughout our system and , at some airports , adequate slots , we may be unable to operate our existing flight schedule and to expand or change our route network in the future , which may have a material adverse impact on our operations , 201d 201cour business is subject to extensive government regulation , which may result in increases in our costs , disruptions to our operations , limits on our operating flexibility , reductions in the demand for air travel , and competitive disadvantages 201d and 201cwe are subject to many forms of environmental regulation and may incur substantial costs as a result 201d for additional information . employees and labor relations the airline business is labor intensive . in 2015 , salaries , wages and benefits were our largest expenses and represented approximately 31% ( 31 % ) of our operating expenses . the table below presents our approximate number of active full-time equivalent employees as of december 31 , 2015 . mainline operations wholly-owned regional carriers total .

, mainline operations, wholly-owned regional carriers, total
pilots and flight crew training instructors, 13100, 3200, 16300
flight attendants, 24100, 1900, 26000
maintenance personnel, 14400, 1800, 16200
fleet service personnel, 16100, 3200, 19300
passenger service personnel, 16500, 7100, 23600
administrative and other, 14700, 2400, 17100
total, 98900, 19600, 118500

.

Question: what percentage of total active full-time equivalent employees consisted of passenger service personnel?
Program: divide(23600, 118500)
Answer: 0.19916
corporate/other corporate/other includes global staff functions ( includes finance , risk , human resources , legal and compliance ) and other corporate expense , global operations and technology ( o&t ) , residual corporate treasury and corporate items . at december 31 , 2009 , this segment had approximately $ 230 billion of assets , consisting primarily of the company 2019s liquidity portfolio , including $ 110 billion of cash and cash equivalents. .

========================================
Row 1: in millions of dollars, 2009, 2008, 2007
Row 2: net interest revenue, $ -1663 ( 1663 ), $ -2680 ( 2680 ), $ -2008 ( 2008 )
Row 3: non-interest revenue, -8893 ( 8893 ), 422, -302 ( 302 )
Row 4: total revenues net of interest expense, $ -10556 ( 10556 ), $ -2258 ( 2258 ), $ -2310 ( 2310 )
Row 5: total operating expenses, $ 1420, $ 510, $ 1813
Row 6: provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims, -1 ( 1 ), 1, -3 ( 3 )
Row 7: ( loss ) from continuing operations before taxes, $ -11975 ( 11975 ), $ -2769 ( 2769 ), $ -4120 ( 4120 )
Row 8: income taxes ( benefits ), -4369 ( 4369 ), -587 ( 587 ), -1446 ( 1446 )
Row 9: ( loss ) from continuing operations, $ -7606 ( 7606 ), $ -2182 ( 2182 ), $ -2674 ( 2674 )
Row 10: income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of taxes, -445 ( 445 ), 4002, 708
Row 11: net income ( loss ) before attribution of noncontrolling interests, $ -8051 ( 8051 ), $ 1820, $ -1966 ( 1966 )
Row 12: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, 2014, 2014, 2
Row 13: net income ( loss ), $ -8051 ( 8051 ), $ 1820, $ -1968 ( 1968 )
========================================

2009 vs . 2008 revenues , net of interest expense declined , primarily due to the pretax loss on debt extinguishment related to the repayment of the $ 20 billion of tarp trust preferred securities and the pretax loss in connection with the exit from the loss-sharing agreement with the u.s . government . revenues also declined , due to the absence of the 2008 sale of citigroup global services limited recorded in o&t . this was partially offset by a pretax gain related to the exchange offers , revenues and higher intersegment eliminations . operating expenses increased , primarily due to intersegment eliminations and increases in compensation , partially offset by lower repositioning reserves . 2008 vs . 2007 revenues , net of interest expense increased primarily due to the gain in 2007 on the sale of certain corporate-owned assets and higher intersegment eliminations , partially offset by improved treasury hedging activities . operating expenses declined , primarily due to lower restructuring charges in 2008 as well as reductions in incentive compensation and benefits expense. .

Question: what was the percentage change in total operating expenses between 2008 and 2009?
Program: subtract(1420, 510), divide(#0, 510)
Answer: 1.78431
shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation fffds cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2011 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2006 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return to stockholders ( assumes $ 100 investment on 12/31/06 ) total return analysis .

****************************************
 | 12/31/2006 | 12/31/2007 | 12/31/2008 | 12/31/2009 | 12/31/2010 | 12/31/2011
ball corporation | $ 100.00 | $ 104.05 | $ 97.04 | $ 121.73 | $ 161.39 | $ 170.70
dj us containers & packaging | $ 100.00 | $ 106.73 | $ 66.91 | $ 93.98 | $ 110.23 | $ 110.39
s&p 500 | $ 100.00 | $ 105.49 | $ 66.46 | $ 84.05 | $ 96.71 | $ 98.75
****************************************

copyright a9 2012 standard & poor fffds , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ) copyright a9 2012 dow jones & company . all rights reserved. .

Question: what is the roi of an investment in dj us containers & packaging from 2006 to 2008?
Program: subtract(66.91, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)
Answer: -0.3309
22 2016 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2016 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company : comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .

========================================
, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016
jkhy, 100.00, 116.62, 161.33, 206.53, 228.24, 312.11
peer group, 100.00, 107.65, 126.89, 174.28, 219.46, 251.24
s&p 500, 100.00, 105.45, 127.17, 158.46, 170.22, 177.02
========================================

this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2011 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. , bottomline technology , inc. , broadridge financial solutions , cardtronics , inc. , convergys corp. , corelogic , inc. , dst systems , inc. , euronet worldwide , inc. , fair isaac corp. , fidelity national information services , inc. , fiserv , inc. , global payments , inc. , moneygram international , inc. , ss&c technologies holdings , inc. , total systems services , inc. , tyler technologies , inc. , verifone systems , inc. , and wex , inc. . heartland payment systems , inc . was removed from the peer group as it merged with global payments , inc . in april 2016. .

Question: what was the 2012 total return on the s&p 500?
Program: subtract(105.45, 100.00)
Answer: 5.45
stock total return performance the following graph compares our total return to stockholders with the returns of the standard & poor 2019s composite 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and the dow jones us select health care providers index ( 201cpeer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2017 . the graph assumes an investment of $ 100 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 , and the peer group on december 31 , 2012 , and that dividends were reinvested when paid. .

========================================
• , 12/31/2012, 12/31/2013, 12/31/2014, 12/31/2015, 12/31/2016, 12/31/2017
• hum, $ 100, $ 152, $ 214, $ 267, $ 307, $ 377
• s&p 500, $ 100, $ 132, $ 150, $ 153, $ 171, $ 208
• peer group, $ 100, $ 137, $ 175, $ 186, $ 188, $ 238
========================================

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Question: what is the increase observed in the return of the second year of the investment for peer group?
Program: divide(175, 137), subtract(#0, const_1)
Answer: 0.27737
issuer purchases of equity securities during the three months ended december 31 , 2010 , we repurchased 1460682 shares of our common stock for an aggregate of $ 74.6 million , including commissions and fees , pursuant to our publicly announced stock repurchase program , as follows : period total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) .

****************************************
period | total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) | average price paid per share | total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs | approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchasedunder the plans or programs ( in millions )
october 2010 | 722890 | $ 50.76 | 722890 | $ 369.1
november 2010 | 400692 | $ 51.81 | 400692 | $ 348.3
december 2010 | 337100 | $ 50.89 | 337100 | $ 331.1
total fourth quarter | 1460682 | $ 51.08 | 1460682 | $ 331.1
****************************************

( 1 ) repurchases made pursuant to the $ 1.5 billion stock repurchase program approved by our board of directors in february 2008 ( the 201cbuyback 201d ) . under this program , our management is authorized to purchase shares from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to market conditions and other factors . to facilitate repurchases , we make purchases pursuant to trading plans under rule 10b5-1 of the exchange act , which allows us to repurchase shares during periods when we otherwise might be prevented from doing so under insider trading laws or because of self-imposed trading blackout periods . this program may be discontinued at any time . subsequent to december 31 , 2010 , we repurchased 1122481 shares of our common stock for an aggregate of $ 58.0 million , including commissions and fees , pursuant to the buyback . as of february 11 , 2011 , we had repurchased a total of 30.9 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate of $ 1.2 billion , including commissions and fees pursuant to the buyback . we expect to continue to manage the pacing of the remaining $ 273.1 million under the buyback in response to general market conditions and other relevant factors. .

Question: what was the weighted average price per share of the shares 30.9 repurchased as of february 11 , 2011
Program: divide(1.2, 30.9)
Answer: 0.03883
the graph below matches cadence design systems , inc . 2019s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index , and the nasdaq composite index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 28 , 2002 and tracks it through december 29 , 2007 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s&p information technology index 12/29/0712/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/02 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/28/02 in stock or on 12/31/02 in index-including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm .

	12/28/02	1/3/04	1/1/05	12/31/05	12/30/06	12/29/07
cadence design systems inc .	100.00	149.92	113.38	138.92	147.04	139.82
s & p 500	100.00	128.68	142.69	149.70	173.34	182.87
nasdaq composite	100.00	149.75	164.64	168.60	187.83	205.22
s & p information technology	100.00	147.23	150.99	152.49	165.32	192.28

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Question: what is the roi of an investment in s&p500 from 2006 to 2007?
Program: subtract(182.87, 173.34), divide(#0, 173.34)
Answer: 0.05498