wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k 41 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced equity benchmark in the united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) , consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2013 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 .

****************************************
Row 1: december 31 ( in dollars ), 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018
Row 2: jpmorgan chase, $ 100.00, $ 109.88, $ 119.07, $ 160.23, $ 203.07, $ 189.57
Row 3: kbw bank index, 100.00, 109.36, 109.90, 141.23, 167.49, 137.82
Row 4: s&p financial index, 100.00, 115.18, 113.38, 139.17, 169.98, 147.82
Row 5: s&p 500 index, 100.00, 113.68, 115.24, 129.02, 157.17, 150.27
****************************************

december 31 , ( in dollars ) .

Question: what was the average uncompounded annual return for jpmorgan chase for the five year period?
Program: divide(189.57, 100.00), divide(189.57, const_5)
Answer: 37.914
the table below presents the estimated maximum potential var arising from a one-day loss in fair value for our interest rate , foreign currency , commodity , and equity market-risk-sensitive instruments outstanding as of may 26 , 2019 and may 27 , 2018 , and the average fair value impact during the year ended may 26 , 2019. .

****************************************
• in millions, fair value impact may 26 2019, fair value impact averageduringfiscal 2019, fair value impact may 27 2018
• interest rate instruments, $ 74.4, $ 46.1, $ 33.2
• foreign currency instruments, 16.8, 19.0, 21.3
• commodity instruments, 4.1, 2.5, 1.9
• equity instruments, 2.3, 2.2, 2.0
****************************************

.

Question: what is the change in fair value of foreign currency instruments from 2018 to 2019?
Program: subtract(16.8, 21.3)
Answer: -4.5
lkq corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 5 . long-term obligations ( continued ) as part of the consideration for business acquisitions completed during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , we issued promissory notes totaling approximately $ 1.7 million , $ 7.2 million and $ 6.4 million , respectively . the notes bear interest at annual rates of 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) to 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) , and interest is payable at maturity or in monthly installments . we also assumed certain liabilities in connection with a business acquisition during the second quarter of 2005 , including a promissory note with a remaining principle balance of approximately $ 0.2 million . the annual interest rate on the note , which was retired during 2006 , was note 6 . commitments and contingencies operating leases we are obligated under noncancelable operating leases for corporate office space , warehouse and distribution facilities , trucks and certain equipment . the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: .

----------------------------------------
2008, $ 42335
2009, 33249
2010, 25149
2011, 17425
2012, 11750
thereafter, 28581
future minimum lease payments, $ 158489
----------------------------------------

rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 27.4 million , $ 18.6 million and $ 12.2 million during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . we guaranty the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases . the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost . in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall . similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value . had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guaranties at december 31 , 2007 , the guarantied residual value would have totaled approximately $ 24.0 million . litigation and related contingencies on december 2 , 2005 , ford global technologies , llc ( 2018 2018ford 2019 2019 ) filed a complaint with the united states international trade commission ( 2018 2018usitc 2019 2019 ) against keystone and five other named respondents , including four taiwan-based manufacturers . on december 12 , 2005 , ford filed an amended complaint . both the complaint and the amended complaint contended that keystone and the other respondents infringed 14 design patents that ford alleges cover eight parts on the 2004-2005 .

Question: in 2007 what was the percent of the the total future minimum lease commitments and contingencies for operating leases that was due in 2009
Program: divide(33249, 158489)
Answer: 0.20979
( 1 ) includes shares repurchased through our publicly announced share repurchase program and shares tendered to pay the exercise price and tax withholding on employee stock options . shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 2004 20092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport .

========================================
 | 12/31/04 | 12/31/05 | 12/31/06 | 12/31/07 | 12/31/08 | 12/31/09
----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------
united parcel service inc . | $ 100.00 | $ 89.49 | $ 91.06 | $ 87.88 | $ 70.48 | $ 75.95
s&p 500 index | $ 100.00 | $ 104.91 | $ 121.48 | $ 128.15 | $ 80.74 | $ 102.11
dow jones transportation average | $ 100.00 | $ 111.65 | $ 122.61 | $ 124.35 | $ 97.72 | $ 115.88
========================================

.

Question: what is the roi of an investment in ups in 2004 and sold in 2006?
Program: subtract(91.06, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)
Answer: -0.0894
security ownership of 5% ( 5 % ) holders , directors , nominees and executive officers name of beneficial owner shares of common stock beneficially owned ( 1 ) percent of common stock outstanding .

========================================
name of beneficial owner fidelity investments, name of beneficial owner 57162311, -2 ( 2 ), 6.65% ( 6.65 % )
alliancebernstein lp, 48637731, -3 ( 3 ), 5.66% ( 5.66 % )
steven p . jobs, 5546451, -4 ( 4 ), *
william v . campbell, 221004, -5 ( 5 ), *
timothy d . cook, 12597, -6 ( 6 ), *
millard s . drexler, 220000, -7 ( 7 ), *
albert a . gore jr ., 60000, -8 ( 8 ), *
ronald b . johnson, 2049890, -9 ( 9 ), *
arthur d . levinson, 362400, -10 ( 10 ), *
peter oppenheimer, 149768, -11 ( 11 ), *
philip w . schiller, 256, -12 ( 12 ), *
eric e . schmidt, 12284, -13 ( 13 ), *
jerome b . york, 80000, -14 ( 14 ), *
all current executive officers and directors as a group ( 15 persons ), 9378423, -15 ( 15 ), 1.09% ( 1.09 % )
========================================

all current executive officers and directors as a group ( 15 persons ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9378423 ( 15 ) 1.09% ( 1.09 % ) ( 1 ) represents shares of common stock held and/or options held by such individuals that were exercisable at the table date or within 60 days thereafter . this does not include options or restricted stock units that vest after 60 days . the share numbers have been adjusted to reflect the company 2019s two-for-one stock split in february 2005 . ( 2 ) based on a form 13g/a filed february 14 , 2005 by fmr corp . fmr corp . lists its address as 82 devonshire street , boston , ma 02109 , in such filing . ( 3 ) based on a form 13f filed january 25 , 2006 , by barclays global investors . barclays global investors lists its address as 45 fremont street , san francisco , ca 94105 . ( 4 ) includes 120000 shares of common stock that mr . jobs has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options . ( 5 ) includes 220000 shares of common stock that mr . campbell has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options . ( 6 ) excludes 600000 unvested restricted stock units . ( 7 ) includes 40000 shares of common stock that mr . drexler holds indirectly and 180000 shares of common stock that mr . drexler has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options . ( 8 ) consists of 60000 shares of common stock that mr . gore has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options . ( 9 ) includes 1900000 shares of common stock that mr . johnson has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options and excludes 450000 unvested restricted stock units . ( 10 ) includes 2000 shares of common stock that dr . levinson holds indirectly and 100000 shares of common stock that dr . levinson has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options . ( 11 ) excludes 450000 unvested restricted stock units . ( 12 ) excludes 400000 unvested restricted stock units. .

Question: if mr . oppenheimer's rsus vest , how many total shares would he then have?
Program: add(149768, 450000)
Answer: 599768.0
24 2017 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2017 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company : comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .

========================================
 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017
jkhy | 100.00 | 138.34 | 177.10 | 195.72 | 267.64 | 322.60
peer group | 100.00 | 117.87 | 161.90 | 203.87 | 233.39 | 271.10
s&p 500 | 100.00 | 120.60 | 150.27 | 161.43 | 167.87 | 197.92
========================================

this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2012 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. ; bottomline technology , inc. ; broadridge financial solutions ; cardtronics , inc. ; convergys corp. ; corelogic , inc. ; dst systems , inc. ; euronet worldwide , inc. ; fair isaac corp. ; fidelity national information services , inc. ; fiserv , inc. ; global payments , inc. ; moneygram international , inc. ; ss&c technologies holdings , inc. ; total systems services , inc. ; tyler technologies , inc. ; verifone systems , inc. ; and wex , inc.. .

Question: what was the 2015 total return for the peer group?
Program: subtract(203.87, 161.90)
Answer: 41.97
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2010 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) .

****************************************
balance december 31 2007	$ 756703
additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense	101321
deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property	-11766 ( 11766 )
balance december 31 2008	846258
additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense	103698
deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property	-11869 ( 11869 )
balance december 31 2009	938087
additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense	108261
deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property	-11144 ( 11144 )
balance december 31 2010	$ 1035204
****************************************

.

Question: how bigger are the additions in comparison with the deductions during 2009?
Program: divide(103698, 11869), multiply(#0, const_100), subtract(#1, const_100)
Answer: 773.68776
purchases of equity securities the following table provides information about our repurchases of our common stock registered pursuant to section 12 of the exchange act during the quarter ended december 31 , 2016 . period ( a ) number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( b ) amount available for future share repurchases under the plans or programs ( b ) ( in millions ) .

Row 1: period ( a ), total number of shares purchased, average price paid per share, total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( b ), amount available for future share repurchases under the plans or programs ( b ) ( in millions )
Row 2: september 26 2016 2013 october 30 2016, 1294018, $ 235.56, 1293734, $ 4015
Row 3: october 31 2016 2013 november 27 2016, 712100, $ 254.42, 711974, $ 3834
Row 4: november 28 2016 2013 december 31 2016, 1281651, $ 259.81, 1270668, $ 3504
Row 5: total, 3287769 ( c ), $ 249.09, 3276376, 

total 3287769 ( c ) $ 249.09 3276376 ( a ) we close our books and records on the last sunday of each month to align our financial closing with our business processes , except for the month of december , as our fiscal year ends on december 31 . as a result , our fiscal months often differ from the calendar months . for example , september 26 , 2016 was the first day of our october 2016 fiscal month . ( b ) in october 2010 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program pursuant to which we are authorized to repurchase our common stock in privately negotiated transactions or in the open market at prices per share not exceeding the then-current market prices . on september 22 , 2016 , our board of directors authorized a $ 2.0 billion increase to the program . under the program , management has discretion to determine the dollar amount of shares to be repurchased and the timing of any repurchases in compliance with applicable law and regulation . this includes purchases pursuant to rule 10b5-1 plans . the program does not have an expiration date . ( c ) during the quarter ended december 31 , 2016 , the total number of shares purchased included 11393 shares that were transferred to us by employees in satisfaction of minimum tax withholding obligations associated with the vesting of restricted stock units . these purchases were made pursuant to a separate authorization by our board of directors and are not included within the program. .

Question: what was the average number of shares repurchased per month for the 3 months ending december 31 , 2016?
Program: divide(3287769, 3)
Answer: 1095923.0
22 2016 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2016 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company : comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .

========================================
• , 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016
• jkhy, 100.00, 116.62, 161.33, 206.53, 228.24, 312.11
• peer group, 100.00, 107.65, 126.89, 174.28, 219.46, 251.24
• s&p 500, 100.00, 105.45, 127.17, 158.46, 170.22, 177.02
========================================

this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2011 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. , bottomline technology , inc. , broadridge financial solutions , cardtronics , inc. , convergys corp. , corelogic , inc. , dst systems , inc. , euronet worldwide , inc. , fair isaac corp. , fidelity national information services , inc. , fiserv , inc. , global payments , inc. , moneygram international , inc. , ss&c technologies holdings , inc. , total systems services , inc. , tyler technologies , inc. , verifone systems , inc. , and wex , inc. . heartland payment systems , inc . was removed from the peer group as it merged with global payments , inc . in april 2016. .

Question: what was the percentage performance growth in the 5 year cumulative total return of peer group from 2014 to 2016
Program: subtract(219.46, 174.28), divide(#0, 174.28)
Answer: 0.25924
entergy arkansas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2004 compared to 2003 net income increased $ 16.2 million due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , a lower effective income tax rate for 2004 compared to 2003 , and lower interest charges . the increase was partially offset by lower net revenue . 2003 compared to 2002 net income decreased $ 9.6 million due to lower net revenue , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and a higher effective income tax rate for 2003 compared to 2002 . the decrease was substantially offset by lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher other income , and lower interest charges . net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy arkansas' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. .

========================================
 | ( in millions )
----------|----------
2003 net revenue | $ 998.7
deferred fuel cost revisions | -16.9 ( 16.9 )
other | -3.4 ( 3.4 )
2004 net revenue | $ 978.4
========================================

deferred fuel cost revisions includes the difference between the estimated deferred fuel expense and the actual calculation of recoverable fuel expense , which occurs on an annual basis . deferred fuel cost revisions decreased net revenue due to a revised estimate of fuel costs filed for recovery at entergy arkansas in the march 2004 energy cost recovery rider , which reduced net revenue by $ 11.5 million . the remainder of the variance is due to the 2002 energy cost recovery true-up , made in the first quarter of 2003 , which increased net revenue in 2003 . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 20.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to an increase in the energy cost recovery rider effective april 2004 ( fuel cost recovery revenues are discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements ) ; 2022 an increase of $ 15.5 million in grand gulf revenues due to an increase in the grand gulf rider effective january 2004 ; 2022 an increase of $ 13.9 million in gross wholesale revenue primarily due to increased sales to affiliated systems ; 2022 an increase of $ 9.5 million due to volume/weather primarily resulting from increased usage during the unbilled sales period , partially offset by the effect of milder weather on billed sales in 2004. .

Question: what is the net change in net revenue during 2004 for entergy arkansas inc.?
Program: subtract(978.4, 998.7)
Answer: -20.3
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) other debentures and notes following are descriptions of the various other debentures and notes outstanding at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , as listed in the table presented at the beginning of this note . geosouthern debt in december 2013 , in conjunction with the planned geosouthern acquisition , devon issued $ 2.25 billion aggregate principal amount of fixed and floating rate senior notes resulting in cash proceeds of approximately $ 2.2 billion , net of discounts and issuance costs . the floating rate senior notes due in 2015 bear interest at a rate equal to three-month libor plus 0.45 percent , which rate will be reset quarterly . the floating rate senior notes due in 2016 bears interest at a rate equal to three-month libor plus 0.54 percent , which rate will be reset quarterly . the schedule below summarizes the key terms of these notes ( in millions ) . .

floating rate due december 15 2015 | $ 500
floating rate due december 15 2016 | 350
1.20% ( 1.20 % ) due december 15 2016 ( 1 ) | 650
2.25% ( 2.25 % ) due december 15 2018 | 750
discount and issuance costs | -2 ( 2 )
net proceeds | $ 2248

( 1 ) the 1.20% ( 1.20 % ) $ 650 million note due december 15 , 2016 was redeemed on november 13 , 2014 . the senior notes were classified as short-term debt on devon 2019s consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2013 due to certain redemption features in the event that the geosouthern acquisition was not completed on or prior to june 30 , 2014 . on february 28 , 2014 , the geosouthern acquisition closed and thus the senior notes were subsequently classified as long-term debt . additionally , during december 2013 , devon entered into a term loan agreement with a group of major financial institutions pursuant to which devon could draw up to $ 2.0 billion to finance , in part , the geosouthern acquisition and to pay transaction costs . in february 2014 , devon drew the $ 2.0 billion of term loans for the geosouthern transaction , and the amount was subsequently repaid on june 30 , 2014 with the canadian divestiture proceeds that were repatriated to the u.s . in june 2014 , at which point the term loan was terminated. .

Question: what is the ratio of the floating rate due december 2015 compared to 2016
Program: divide(500, 350)
Answer: 1.42857