wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
34| | duke realty corporation annual report 2010 value of $ 173.9 million for which our 80% ( 80 % ) share of net proceeds totaled $ 138.3 million . we expect , and are under contract , to sell additional buildings to duke/ princeton , llc by the end of the second quarter 2011 , subject to financing and other customary closing conditions . the total 2011 sale is expected to consist of 13 office buildings , totaling over 2.0 million square feet , with an agreed upon value of $ 342.8 million , and is expected to generate proceeds of $ 274.2 million for the 80% ( 80 % ) portion that we sell . uses of liquidity our principal uses of liquidity include the following : 2022 accretive property investment ; 2022 leasing/capital costs ; 2022 dividends and distributions to shareholders and unitholders ; 2022 long-term debt maturities ; 2022 repurchases of outstanding debt and preferred stock ; and 2022 other contractual obligations . property investment we evaluate development and acquisition opportunities based upon market outlook , supply and long-term growth potential . our ability to make future property investments is dependent upon our continued access to our longer-term sources of liquidity including the issuances of debt or equity securities as well as generating cash flow by disposing of selected properties . in light of current economic conditions , management continues to evaluate our investment priorities and is focused on accretive growth . we have continued to operate at a substantially reduced level of new development activity , as compared to recent years , and are focused on the core operations of our existing base of properties . leasing/capital costs tenant improvements and leasing costs to re-let rental space that had been previously under lease to tenants are referred to as second generation expenditures . building improvements that are not specific to any tenant but serve to improve integral components of our real estate properties are also second generation expenditures . one of our principal uses of our liquidity is to fund the second generation leasing/capital expenditures of our real estate investments . the following is a summary of our second generation capital expenditures for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively ( in thousands ) : .

----------------------------------------
Row 1: , 2010, 2009, 2008
Row 2: second generation tenant improvements, $ 36676, $ 29321, $ 36885
Row 3: second generation leasing costs, 39090, 40412, 28205
Row 4: building improvements, 12957, 9321, 9724
Row 5: totals, $ 88723, $ 79054, $ 74814
----------------------------------------

.

Question: in 2009 what was the percent of the total second generation capital expenditures associated with leasing costs
Program: divide(40412, 79054)
Answer: 0.51119
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 6 2014income taxes ( continued ) a reconciliation of the provision for income taxes , with the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate ( 35% ( 35 % ) in 2005 , 2004 , and 2003 ) to income before provision for income taxes , is as follows ( in millions ) : .

Row 1: , 2005, 2004, 2003
Row 2: computed expected tax, $ 636, $ 134, $ 32
Row 3: state taxes net of federal effect, -19 ( 19 ), -5 ( 5 ), -4 ( 4 )
Row 4: indefinitely invested earnings of foreign subsidiaries, -98 ( 98 ), -31 ( 31 ), -13 ( 13 )
Row 5: nondeductible executive compensation, 11, 10, 5
Row 6: research and development credit net, -26 ( 26 ), -5 ( 5 ), -7 ( 7 )
Row 7: other items, -24 ( 24 ), 4, 11
Row 8: provision for income taxes, $ 480, $ 107, $ 24
Row 9: effective tax rate, 26% ( 26 % ), 28% ( 28 % ), 26% ( 26 % )

during 2005 , the company reversed certain tax contingency reserves and recorded a corresponding benefit to income tax expense primarily as a result of a change in the estimated outcome of certain tax disputes . additionally , during the fourth quarter of 2005 , the company recorded a benefit to tax expense to adjust its net deferred tax assets as a result of the company 2019s year-end review of its deferred tax accounts , the impact of which was not material to the current or prior periods 2019 results of operations . the total benefit to income tax expense from the reversal of these tax contingency reserves and adjustments to net deferred tax assets was $ 67 million . the company also recorded a $ 14 million credit to income tax expense resulting from a reduction of the valuation allowance . the internal revenue service ( irs ) has completed its field audit of the company 2019s federal income tax returns for all years prior to 2002 and proposed certain adjustments . certain of these adjustments are being contested through the irs appeals office . substantially all irs audit issues for these years have been resolved . in addition , the company is also subject to audits by state , local , and foreign tax authorities . management believes that adequate provisions have been made for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations . however , the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty . should any issues addressed in the company 2019s tax audits be resolved in a manner not consistent with management 2019s expectations , the company could be required to adjust its provision for income tax in the period such resolution occurs . note 7 2014shareholders 2019 equity preferred stock the company has 5 million shares of authorized preferred stock , none of which is outstanding . under the terms of the company 2019s restated articles of incorporation , the board of directors is authorized to determine or alter the rights , preferences , privileges and restrictions of the company 2019s authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock. .

Question: what was the average effective tax rate for the three year period?
Program: table_average(effective tax rate, none)
Answer: 0.26667
item 5 . market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested. .

****************************************
• , 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015
• loews common stock, 100.0, 97.37, 106.04, 126.23, 110.59, 101.72
• s&p 500 index, 100.0, 102.11, 118.45, 156.82, 178.29, 180.75
• loews peer group ( a ), 100.0, 101.59, 115.19, 145.12, 152.84, 144.70
****************************************

( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : ace limited , w.r . berkley corporation , the chubb corporation , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p . ( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd . and the travelers companies , inc . dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967 . regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2015 and 2014. .

Question: what is the percentage reduction in the loews common stock from 2013 to 2014
Program: subtract(110.59, 126.23), divide(#0, 126.23)
Answer: -0.1239
jpmorgan chase & co./2016 annual report 35 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 .

december 31 ( in dollars ) | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016
jpmorgan chase | $ 100.00 | $ 136.18 | $ 186.17 | $ 204.57 | $ 221.68 | $ 298.31
kbw bank index | 100.00 | 133.03 | 183.26 | 200.42 | 201.40 | 258.82
s&p financial index | 100.00 | 128.75 | 174.57 | 201.06 | 197.92 | 242.94
s&p 500 index | 100.00 | 115.99 | 153.55 | 174.55 | 176.95 | 198.10

december 31 , ( in dollars ) .

Question: what was the 5 year return of jpmorgan chase's stock?
Program: subtract(298.31, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)
Answer: 1.9831
item 1b . unresolved staff comments item 2 . properties we employ a variety of assets in the management and operation of our rail business . our rail network covers 23 states in the western two-thirds of the u.s . our rail network includes 32084 route miles . we own 26064 miles and operate on the remainder pursuant to trackage rights or leases . the following table describes track miles at december 31 , 2015 and 2014. .

****************************************
 | 2015 | 2014
route | 32084 | 31974
other main line | 7012 | 6943
passing lines and turnouts | 3235 | 3197
switching and classification yard lines | 9108 | 9058
total miles | 51439 | 51172
****************************************

headquarters building we own our headquarters building in omaha , nebraska . the facility has 1.2 million square feet of space for approximately 4000 employees. .

Question: what percentage of total miles were other main line in 2014?
Program: divide(6943, 51172)
Answer: 0.13568
page 92 of 98 other information required by item 10 appearing under the caption 201cdirector nominees and continuing directors 201d and 201csection 16 ( a ) beneficial ownership reporting compliance , 201d of the company 2019s proxy statement to be filed pursuant to regulation 14a within 120 days after december 31 , 2006 , is incorporated herein by reference . item 11 . executive compensation the information required by item 11 appearing under the caption 201cexecutive compensation 201d in the company 2019s proxy statement , to be filed pursuant to regulation 14a within 120 days after december 31 , 2006 , is incorporated herein by reference . additionally , the ball corporation 2000 deferred compensation company stock plan , the ball corporation deposit share program and the ball corporation directors deposit share program were created to encourage key executives and other participants to acquire a larger equity ownership interest in the company and to increase their interest in the company 2019s stock performance . non-employee directors also participate in the 2000 deferred compensation company stock plan . item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management the information required by item 12 appearing under the caption 201cvoting securities and principal shareholders , 201d in the company 2019s proxy statement to be filed pursuant to regulation 14a within 120 days after december 31 , 2006 , is incorporated herein by reference . securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans are summarized below: .

• plan category, equity compensation plan information number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( a ), equity compensation plan information weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options warrants and rights ( b ), equity compensation plan information number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )
• equity compensation plans approved by security holders, 4852978, $ 26.69, 5941210
• equity compensation plans not approved by security holders, 2013, 2013, 2013
• total, 4852978, $ 26.69, 5941210

item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions the information required by item 13 appearing under the caption 201cratification of the appointment of independent registered public accounting firm , 201d in the company 2019s proxy statement to be filed pursuant to regulation 14a within 120 days after december 31 , 2006 , is incorporated herein by reference . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services the information required by item 14 appearing under the caption 201ccertain committees of the board , 201d in the company 2019s proxy statement to be filed pursuant to regulation 14a within 120 days after december 31 , 2006 , is incorporated herein by reference. .

Question: in the equity plans for 2006 , are there more shares issued than remaining in the plan?
Program: greater(5941210, 4852978)
Answer: yes
stock performance graph the graph depicted below shows a comparison of our cumulative total stockholder returns for our common stock , the nasdaq stock market index , and the nasdaq pharmaceutical index , from the date of our initial public offering on july 27 , 2000 through december 26 , 2003 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on july 27 , 2000 , in our common stock and in each index , and that all dividends were reinvested . no cash dividends have been declared on our common stock . stockholder returns over the indicated period should not be considered indicative of future stockholder returns . comparison of total return among illumina , inc. , the nasdaq composite index and the nasdaq pharmaceutical index december 26 , 2003december 27 , 2002december 28 , 2001december 29 , 2000july 27 , 2000 illumina , inc . nasdaq composite index nasdaq pharmaceutical index july 27 , december 29 , december 28 , december 27 , december 26 , 2000 2000 2001 2002 2003 .

• , july 27 2000, december 29 2000, december 28 2001, december 27 2002, december 26 2003
• illumina inc ., 100.00, 100.39, 71.44, 19.50, 43.81
• nasdaq composite index, 100.00, 63.84, 51.60, 35.34, 51.73
• nasdaq pharmaceutical index, 100.00, 93.20, 82.08, 51.96, 74.57

.

Question: at december 292000 what was the ratio of the nasdaq composite index to the nasdaq pharmaceutical index
Program: divide(63.84, 93.20)
Answer: 0.68498
on may 20 , 2015 , aon plc issued $ 600 million of 4.750% ( 4.750 % ) senior notes due may 2045 . the 4.750% ( 4.750 % ) notes due may 2045 are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by aon corporation . we used the proceeds of the issuance for general corporate purposes . on september 30 , 2015 , $ 600 million of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) senior notes issued by aon corporation matured and were repaid . on november 13 , 2015 , aon plc issued $ 400 million of 2.80% ( 2.80 % ) senior notes due march 2021 . the 2.80% ( 2.80 % ) notes due march 2021 are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by aon corporation . we used the proceeds of the issuance for general corporate purposes . credit facilities as of december 31 , 2015 , we had two committed credit facilities outstanding : our $ 400 million u.s . credit facility expiring in march 2017 ( the "2017 facility" ) and $ 900 million multi-currency u.s . credit facility expiring in february 2020 ( the "2020 facility" ) . the 2020 facility was entered into on february 2 , 2015 and replaced the previous 20ac650 million european credit facility . each of these facilities is intended to support our commercial paper obligations and our general working capital needs . in addition , each of these facilities includes customary representations , warranties and covenants , including financial covenants that require us to maintain specified ratios of adjusted consolidated ebitda to consolidated interest expense and consolidated debt to adjusted consolidated ebitda , tested quarterly . at december 31 , 2015 , we did not have borrowings under either the 2017 facility or the 2020 facility , and we were in compliance with the financial covenants and all other covenants contained therein during the twelve months ended december 31 , 2015 . effective february 2 , 2016 , the 2020 facility terms were extended for 1 year and will expire in february 2021 our total debt-to-ebitda ratio at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , is calculated as follows: .

========================================
years ended december 31,	2015	2014
net income	1422	1431
interest expense	273	255
income taxes	267	334
depreciation of fixed assets	229	242
amortization of intangible assets	314	352
total ebitda	2505	2614
total debt	5737	5582
total debt-to-ebitda ratio	2.3	2.1
========================================

we use ebitda , as defined by our financial covenants , as a non-gaap measure . this supplemental information related to ebitda represents a measure not in accordance with u.s . gaap and should be viewed in addition to , not instead of , our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto . shelf registration statement on september 3 , 2015 , we filed a shelf registration statement with the sec , registering the offer and sale from time to time of an indeterminate amount of , among other securities , debt securities , preference shares , class a ordinary shares and convertible securities . our ability to access the market as a source of liquidity is dependent on investor demand , market conditions and other factors. .

Question: what is the ebit of aon for 2015?
Program: subtract(2505, 314), subtract(#0, 229)
Answer: 1962.0
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis refer to 201cselected financial data - five-year comparison of entergy corporation and subsidiaries 201d which accompanies entergy corporation 2019s financial statements in this report for further information with respect to operating statistics . in november 2007 the board approved a plan to pursue a separation of entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business from entergy through a spin-off of the business to entergy shareholders . in april 2010 , entergy announced that it planned to unwind the business infrastructure associated with the proposed spin-off transaction . as a result of the plan to unwind the business infrastructure , entergy recorded expenses in 2010 for the write-off of certain capitalized costs incurred in connection with the planned spin-off transaction . these costs are discussed in more detail below and throughout this section . net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 . amount ( in millions ) .

****************************************
 | amount ( in millions )
----------|----------
2009 net revenue | $ 4694
volume/weather | 231
retail electric price | 137
provision for regulatory proceedings | 26
rough production cost equalization | 19
ano decommissioning trust | -24 ( 24 )
fuel recovery | -44 ( 44 )
other | 12
2010 net revenue | $ 5051
****************************************

the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 8362 gwh , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in billed electricity usage in all retail sectors , including the effect on the residential sector of colder weather in the first quarter 2010 compared to 2009 and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2010 compared to 2009 . the industrial sector reflected strong sales growth on continuing signs of economic recovery . the improvement in this sector was primarily driven by inventory restocking and strong exports with the chemicals , refining , and miscellaneous manufacturing sectors leading the improvement . the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : increases in the formula rate plan riders at entergy gulf states louisiana effective november 2009 , january 2010 , and september 2010 , at entergy louisiana effective november 2009 , and at entergy mississippi effective july 2009 ; a base rate increase at entergy arkansas effective july 2010 ; rate actions at entergy texas , including base rate increases effective in may and august 2010 ; a formula rate plan provision of $ 16.6 million recorded in the third quarter 2009 for refunds that were made to customers in accordance with settlements approved by the lpsc ; and the recovery in 2009 by entergy arkansas of 2008 extraordinary storm costs , as approved by the apsc , which ceased in january 2010 . the recovery of storm costs is offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the proceedings referred to above. .

Question: what portion of the net change in net revenue is due to the retail electric price?
Program: subtract(5051, 4694), divide(137, #0)
Answer: 0.38375
table of contents the following performance graph is not 201csoliciting material , 201d is not deemed filed with the sec , and is not to be incorporated by reference into any of valero 2019s filings under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , respectively . this performance graph and the related textual information are based on historical data and are not indicative of future performance . the following line graph compares the cumulative total return 1 on an investment in our common stock against the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 composite index and an index of peer companies ( that we selected ) for the five-year period commencing december 31 , 2007 and ending december 31 , 2012 . our peer group consists of the following ten companies : alon usa energy , inc. ; bp plc ( bp ) ; cvr energy , inc. ; hess corporation ; hollyfrontier corporation ; marathon petroleum corporation ; phillips 66 ( psx ) ; royal dutch shell plc ( rds ) ; tesoro corporation ; and western refining , inc . our peer group previously included chevron corporation ( cvx ) and exxon mobil corporation ( xom ) but they were replaced with bp , psx , and rds . in 2012 , psx became an independent downstream energy company and was added to our peer group . cvx and xom were replaced with bp and rds as they were viewed as having operations that more closely aligned with our core businesses . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return1 among valero energy corporation , the s&p 500 index , old peer group , and new peer group .

****************************************
• , 12/2007, 12/2008, 12/2009, 12/2010, 12/2011, 12/2012
• valero common stock, $ 100.00, $ 31.45, $ 25.09, $ 35.01, $ 32.26, $ 53.61
• s&p 500, 100.00, 63.00, 79.67, 91.67, 93.61, 108.59
• old peer group, 100.00, 80.98, 76.54, 88.41, 104.33, 111.11
• new peer group, 100.00, 66.27, 86.87, 72.84, 74.70, 76.89
****************************************

____________ 1 assumes that an investment in valero common stock and each index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2007 . 201ccumulative total return 201d is based on share price appreciation plus reinvestment of dividends from december 31 , 2007 through december 31 , 2012. .

Question: what was the percentage growth of the s&p 500 common stock from 2007 to 2012
Program: subtract(108.59, 100.00), divide(#0, 100.00)
Answer: 0.0859