wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index for the five years ended september 26 , 2015 . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 24 , 2010 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . * $ 100 invested on 9/25/10 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019scommon stock and september 30th for indexes . copyright a9 2015 s&p , a division of mcgraw hill financial . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2015 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . september september september september september september .

========================================
 | september 2010 | september 2011 | september 2012 | september 2013 | september 2014 | september 2015
apple inc . | $ 100 | $ 138 | $ 229 | $ 170 | $ 254 | $ 294
s&p 500 index | $ 100 | $ 101 | $ 132 | $ 157 | $ 188 | $ 187
s&p information technology index | $ 100 | $ 104 | $ 137 | $ 147 | $ 190 | $ 194
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index | $ 100 | $ 103 | $ 134 | $ 141 | $ 183 | $ 183
========================================

apple inc . | 2015 form 10-k | 21 .

Question: what was the change in the s&p 500 index between 2010 and 2015?
Program: subtract(187, const_100)
Answer: 87.0
stock performance graph the following graph compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 index for the five years ended may 31 , 2016 . the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 index on may 31 , 2011 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/11 5/145/135/12 global payments inc . s&p 500 s&p information technology 5/15 5/16 * $ 100 invested on may 31 , 2011 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending may 31 . copyright a9 2016 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . global payments information technology .

========================================
 | globalpayments | s&p500 | s&pinformationtechnology
may 31 2011 | $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 | $ 100.00
may 31 2012 | 81.90 | 99.59 | 107.57
may 31 2013 | 92.63 | 126.75 | 123.83
may 31 2014 | 132.59 | 152.67 | 153.42
may 31 2015 | 202.06 | 170.69 | 182.29
may 31 2016 | 300.97 | 173.62 | 187.97
========================================

issuer purchases of equity securities as announced on july 28 , 2015 , our board of directors authorized the additional repurchase of up to $ 300.0 million of our common stock . under these and other existing authorizations , we repurchased and retired 2.2 million shares of our common stock at a cost of $ 135.9 million including commissions , or an average price of $ 63.17 per share , during the year ended may 31 , 2016 . global payments inc . | 2016 form 10-k annual report 2013 29 .

Question: if $ 100000 are invested in s&p500 in may 2011 , what will be the total value of the investment in may 2012?
Program: subtract(99.59, const_100), divide(#0, const_100), subtract(const_100, #1), multiply(100000, #2)
Answer: 10000410.0
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 the table below sets forth the pre-tax accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) expected to be recognized as an increase ( decrease ) to income from continuing operations before income taxes over the next twelve months as of december 31 , 2011 for the following types of derivative instruments : accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) ( 1 ) ( in millions ) .

========================================
 | accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) ( 1 ) ( in millions )
interest rate derivatives | $ -101 ( 101 )
cross currency derivatives | $ -1 ( 1 )
foreign currency derivatives | $ 7
commodity and other derivatives | $ -1 ( 1 )
========================================

( 1 ) excludes a loss of $ 94 million expected to be recognized as part of the sale of cartagena , which closed on february 9 , 2012 , and is further discussed in note 23 2014acquisitions and dispositions . the balance in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to derivative transactions will be reclassified into earnings as interest expense is recognized for interest rate hedges and cross currency swaps ( except for the amount reclassified to foreign currency transaction gains and losses to offset the remeasurement of the foreign currency-denominated debt being hedged by the cross currency swaps ) , as depreciation is recognized for interest rate hedges during construction , as foreign currency transaction gains and losses are recognized for hedges of foreign currency exposure , and as electricity sales and fuel purchases are recognized for hedges of forecasted electricity and fuel transactions . these balances are included in the consolidated statements of cash flows as operating and/or investing activities based on the nature of the underlying transaction . for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , pre-tax gains ( losses ) of $ 0 million , $ ( 1 ) million , and $ 0 million net of noncontrolling interests , respectively , were reclassified into earnings as a result of the discontinuance of a cash flow hedge because it was probable that the forecasted transaction would not occur by the end of the originally specified time period ( as documented at the inception of the hedging relationship ) or within an additional two-month time period thereafter. .

Question: the loss on the sale of cartagena is what percent of the aoci impact of interest rate derivatives?
Program: divide(94, 101)
Answer: 0.93069
company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology index as of the market close on september 30 , 2007 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . sep-11sep-10sep-09sep-08sep-07 sep-12 apple inc . s&p 500 s&p computer hardware dow jones us technology comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among apple inc. , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones us technology index *$ 100 invested on 9/30/07 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright a9 2012 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 .

 | september 30 2007 | september 30 2008 | september 30 2009 | september 30 2010 | september 30 2011 | september 30 2012
----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------
apple inc . | $ 100 | $ 74 | $ 121 | $ 185 | $ 248 | $ 437
s&p 500 | $ 100 | $ 78 | $ 73 | $ 80 | $ 81 | $ 105
s&p computer hardware | $ 100 | $ 84 | $ 99 | $ 118 | $ 134 | $ 214
dow jones us technology | $ 100 | $ 76 | $ 85 | $ 95 | $ 98 | $ 127

.

Question: what was the cumulative total return on the s&p 500 between september 30 2007 and september 30 2012?
Program: subtract(105, const_100)
Answer: 5.0
tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow are considered non-gaap financial measures . we are required to provide these financial metrics by the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , and we have included them below because we consider the indentures for these notes to be material agreements , the covenants related to tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow to be material terms of the indentures , and information about compliance with such covenants to be material to an investor 2019s understanding of our financial results and the impact of those results on our liquidity . the following table presents tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow for the company and its restricted subsidiaries , as defined in the indentures for the applicable notes ( in thousands ) : .

****************************************
Row 1: tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2008, $ 188449
Row 2: consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2008, 726954
Row 3: less : tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2008, -741565 ( 741565 )
Row 4: plus : four times tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2008, 753798
Row 5: adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2008, 739187
Row 6: non-tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2008, $ -14611 ( 14611 )
****************************************

.

Question: what was the average tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2008
Program: divide(188449, const_3)
Answer: 62816.33333
the following table discloses purchases of shares of valero 2019s common stock made by us or on our behalf during the fourth quarter of period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( a ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) .

****************************************
period | total numberof sharespurchased | averageprice paidper share | total number ofshares notpurchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs ( a ) | total number ofshares purchased aspart of publiclyannounced plans orprograms | approximate dollarvalue of shares thatmay yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms ( b )
october 2014 | 3180678 | $ 46.27 | 302005 | 2878673 | $ 1.8 billion
november 2014 | 2001273 | $ 50.32 | 119047 | 1882226 | $ 1.7 billion
december 2014 | 5120398 | $ 48.56 | 2624 | 5117774 | $ 1.5 billion
total | 10302349 | $ 48.20 | 423676 | 9878673 | $ 1.5 billion
****************************************

( a ) the shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the fourth quarter of 2014 relating to ( i ) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions to meet our obligations under stock-based compensation plans , and ( ii ) our purchases of shares from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of stock options , the vesting of restricted stock , and other stock compensation transactions in accordance with the terms of our stock-based compensation plans . ( b ) on february 28 , 2008 , we announced that our board of directors approved a $ 3 billion common stock purchase program . this $ 3 billion program has no expiration date. .

Question: what was the value of all the shares purchased in october?
Program: multiply(3180678, 46.27)
Answer: 147169971.06
stock performance graph * $ 100 invested on december 31 , 2011 in our stock or in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ended december 31 , 2016 . ( 1 ) delphi automotive plc ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive supplier peer group 2013 russell 3000 auto parts index , including american axle & manufacturing , borgwarner inc. , cooper tire & rubber company , dana inc. , delphi automotive plc , dorman products inc. , federal-mogul corp. , ford motor co. , general motors co. , gentex corp. , gentherm inc. , genuine parts co. , goodyear tire & rubber co. , johnson controls international plc , lear corp. , lkq corp. , meritor inc. , standard motor products inc. , stoneridge inc. , superior industries international , tenneco inc. , tesla motors inc. , tower international inc. , visteon corp. , and wabco holdings inc . company index december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

========================================
company index | december 31 2011 | december 31 2012 | december 31 2013 | december 31 2014 | december 31 2015 | december 31 2016
delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) | $ 100.00 | $ 177.58 | $ 283.02 | $ 347.40 | $ 414.58 | $ 331.43
s&p 500 ( 2 ) | 100.00 | 116.00 | 153.58 | 174.60 | 177.01 | 198.18
automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) | 100.00 | 127.04 | 188.67 | 203.06 | 198.34 | 202.30
========================================

dividends the company has declared and paid cash dividends of $ 0.25 and $ 0.29 per ordinary share in each quarter of 2015 and 2016 , respectively . in addition , in january 2017 , the board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.29 per ordinary share , payable on february 15 , 2017 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 6 , 2017. .

Question: what was the percentage increase in cash dividend from 2015 to 2016?
Program: subtract(0.29, 0.25), divide(#0, 0.25)
Answer: 0.16
notes to consolidated financial statements the firm permanently reinvests eligible earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries and , accordingly , does not accrue any u.s . income taxes that would arise if such earnings were repatriated . as of december 2012 and december 2011 , this policy resulted in an unrecognized net deferred tax liability of $ 3.75 billion and $ 3.32 billion , respectively , attributable to reinvested earnings of $ 21.69 billion and $ 20.63 billion , respectively . unrecognized tax benefits the firm recognizes tax positions in the financial statements only when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on examination by the relevant taxing authority based on the technical merits of the position . a position that meets this standard is measured at the largest amount of benefit that will more likely than not be realized on settlement . a liability is established for differences between positions taken in a tax return and amounts recognized in the financial statements . as of december 2012 and december 2011 , the accrued liability for interest expense related to income tax matters and income tax penalties was $ 374 million and $ 233 million , respectively . the firm recognized $ 95 million , $ 21 million and $ 28 million of interest and income tax penalties for the years ended december 2012 , december 2011 and december 2010 , respectively . it is reasonably possible that unrecognized tax benefits could change significantly during the twelve months subsequent to december 2012 due to potential audit settlements , however , at this time it is not possible to estimate any potential change . the table below presents the changes in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits . this liability is included in 201cother liabilities and accrued expenses . 201d see note 17 for further information. .

----------------------------------------
in millions, as of december 2012, as of december 2011, as of december 2010
balance beginning of year, $ 1887, $ 2081, $ 1925
increases based on tax positions related to the current year, 190, 171, 171
increases based on tax positions related to prior years, 336, 278, 162
decreases related to tax positions of prior years, -109 ( 109 ), -41 ( 41 ), -104 ( 104 )
decreases related to settlements, -35 ( 35 ), -638 ( 638 ), -128 ( 128 )
acquisitions/ ( dispositions ), -47 ( 47 ), 47, 56
exchange rate fluctuations, 15, -11 ( 11 ), -1 ( 1 )
balance end of year, $ 2237, $ 1887, $ 2081
related deferred income tax asset1, 685, 569, 972
net unrecognized tax benefit2, $ 1552, $ 1318, $ 1109
----------------------------------------

related deferred income tax asset 1 685 569 972 net unrecognized tax benefit 2 $ 1552 $ 1318 $ 1109 1 . included in 201cother assets . 201d see note 12 . 2 . if recognized , the net tax benefit would reduce the firm 2019s effective income tax rate . 194 goldman sachs 2012 annual report .

Question: what is the percentage change in the net unrecognized tax benefit in 2011 compare to 2010?
Program: subtract(1318, 1109), divide(#0, 1109)
Answer: 0.18846
sources and uses of cash ( in millions ) in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows : years ended ( in millions ) dec 29 , dec 30 , dec 31 .

----------------------------------------
years ended ( in millions ) | dec 292018 | dec 302017 | dec 312016
net cash provided by operating activities | $ 29432 | $ 22110 | $ 21808
net cash used for investing activities | -11239 ( 11239 ) | -15762 ( 15762 ) | -25817 ( 25817 )
net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities | -18607 ( 18607 ) | -8475 ( 8475 ) | -5739 ( 5739 )
net increase ( decrease ) in cash and cash equivalents | $ -414 ( 414 ) | $ -2127 ( 2127 ) | $ -9748 ( 9748 )
----------------------------------------

md&a consolidated results and analysis 40 .

Question: what was the percentage change in net cash provided by operating activities between 2017 and 2018?
Program: subtract(29432, 22110), divide(#0, 22110)
Answer: 0.33116
entergy gulf states , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis .

========================================
 | ( in millions )
2003 net revenue | $ 1110.1
volume/weather | 26.7
net wholesale revenue | 13.0
summer capacity charges | 5.5
price applied to unbilled sales | 4.8
fuel recovery revenues | -14.2 ( 14.2 )
other | 3.9
2004 net revenue | $ 1149.8
========================================

the volume/weather variance resulted primarily from an increase of 1179 gwh in electricity usage in the industrial sector . billed usage also increased a total of 291 gwh in the residential , commercial , and governmental sectors . the increase in net wholesale revenue is primarily due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and co-op customers . summer capacity charges variance is due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of the amortization in 2004 . the amortization of these capacity charges began in june 2002 and ended in may 2003 . the price applied to unbilled sales variance resulted primarily from an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales . fuel recovery revenues represent an under-recovery of fuel charges that are recovered in base rates . entergy gulf states recorded $ 22.6 million of provisions in 2004 for potential rate refunds . these provisions are not included in the net revenue table above because they are more than offset by provisions recorded in 2003 . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 187.8 million in fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of higher fuel rates in both the louisiana and texas jurisdictions . the increases in volume/weather and wholesale revenue , discussed above , also contributed to the increase . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 increased recovery of deferred fuel costs due to higher fuel rates ; 2022 increases in the market prices of natural gas , coal , and purchased power ; and 2022 an increase in electricity usage , discussed above . other regulatory credits increased primarily due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of amortization in 2004 . the amortization of these charges began in june 2002 and ended in may 2003 . 2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy gulf states' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. .

Question: what is the percent change in net revenue from 2003 to 2004?
Program: subtract(1149.8, 1110.1), divide(#0, 1110.1)
Answer: 0.03576
stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , news corporation class a common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on september 18 , 2008 , the date upon which our common stock began trading , in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the period september 18 , 2008 through december 31 , 2008 and the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 and 2011 . of cash on hand , cash generated by operations , borrowings under our revolving credit facility and future financing transactions . under the program , management is authorized to purchase shares from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to stock price , business conditions , market conditions and other factors . the repurchase program does not have an expiration date . the above repurchases were funded using cash on hand . there were no repurchases of our series a common stock or series b common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2011 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

========================================
Row 1: , december 31 2008, december 31 2009, december 31 2010, december 31 2011
Row 2: disca, $ 102.53, $ 222.09, $ 301.96, $ 296.67
Row 3: discb, $ 78.53, $ 162.82, $ 225.95, $ 217.56
Row 4: disck, $ 83.69, $ 165.75, $ 229.31, $ 235.63
Row 5: s&p 500, $ 74.86, $ 92.42, $ 104.24, $ 104.23
Row 6: peer group, $ 68.79, $ 100.70, $ 121.35, $ 138.19
========================================

.

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on discb from september 18 , 2008 to december 31 , 2011?
Program: subtract(217.56, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)
Answer: 1.1756