wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
entergy arkansas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2008 compared to 2007 net income decreased $ 92.0 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and a higher effective income tax rate , partially offset by higher net revenue . the higher other operation and maintenance expenses resulted primarily from the write-off of approximately $ 70.8 million of costs as a result of the december 2008 arkansas court of appeals decision in entergy arkansas' base rate case . the base rate case is discussed in more detail in note 2 to the financial statements . 2007 compared to 2006 net income decreased $ 34.0 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and a higher effective income tax rate . the decrease was partially offset by higher net revenue . net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .

========================================
, amount ( in millions )
2007 net revenue, $ 1110.6
rider revenue, 13.6
purchased power capacity, 4.8
volume/weather, -14.6 ( 14.6 )
other, 3.5
2008 net revenue, $ 1117.9
========================================

the rider revenue variance is primarily due to an energy efficiency rider which became effective in november 2007 . the establishment of the rider results in an increase in rider revenue and a corresponding increase in other operation and maintenance expense with no effect on net income . also contributing to the variance was an increase in franchise tax rider revenue as a result of higher retail revenues . the corresponding increase is in taxes other than income taxes , resulting in no effect on net income . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to lower reserve equalization expenses . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales during the billed and unbilled sales periods compared to 2007 and a 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) volume decrease in industrial sales , primarily in the wood industry and the small customer class . billed electricity usage decreased 333 gwh in all sectors . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues. .

Question: what is the percent change in net revenue between 2007 and 2008?
Program: subtract(1110.6, 1117.9), divide(#0, 1117.9)
Answer: -0.00653
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 77787 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2017 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2016 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2011 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

----------------------------------------
date	citi	s&p 500	s&p financials
31-dec-2011	100.0	100.0	100.0
31-dec-2012	150.6	116.0	128.8
31-dec-2013	198.5	153.6	174.7
31-dec-2014	206.3	174.6	201.3
31-dec-2015	197.8	177.0	198.2
31-dec-2016	229.3	198.2	243.4
----------------------------------------

.

Question: what was the percent of the growth for s&p financials cumulative total return from 2013 to 2014
Program: subtract(201.3, 174.7)
Answer: 26.6
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount was a net regulatory liability of $ 61.6 million and $ 27.8 million as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2013 , system energy had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) , which are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

, amount ( in thousands )
2014, $ 51637
2015, 52253
2016, 13750
2017, 13750
2018, 13750
years thereafter, 247500
total, 392640
less : amount representing interest, 295226
present value of net minimum lease payments, $ 97414

.

Question: what portion of the total future minimum lease payments for system energy is due in the next 12 months?
Program: divide(51637, 392640)
Answer: 0.13151
interest expense , net was $ 26.4 million , $ 14.6 million , and $ 5.3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities . amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.2 million , $ 0.8 million , and $ 0.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and other long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . 6 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its brand and factory house stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2033 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for brand and factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2016 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its stores based on future sales above a specified minimum or payments made for maintenance , insurance and real estate taxes . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2016 as well as significant operating lease agreements entered into during the period after december 31 , 2016 through the date of this report : ( in thousands ) .

2017, $ 114857
2018, 127504
2019, 136040
2020, 133092
2021, 122753
2022 and thereafter, 788180
total future minimum lease payments, $ 1422426

included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 109.0 million , $ 83.0 million and $ 59.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , under non-cancelable operating lease agreements . included in these amounts was contingent rent expense of $ 13.0 million , $ 11.0 million and $ 11.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . sports marketing and other commitments within the normal course of business , the company enters into contractual commitments in order to promote the company 2019s brand and products . these commitments include sponsorship agreements with teams and athletes on the collegiate and professional levels , official supplier agreements , athletic event sponsorships and other marketing commitments . the following is a schedule of the company 2019s future minimum payments under its sponsorship and other marketing agreements as of december 31 .

Question: what was the percentage change in rent expenses included in selling , general and administrative expense from 2015 to 2016?
Program: subtract(109.0, 83.0), divide(#0, 83.0)
Answer: 0.31325
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .

----------------------------------------
 | amount ( in millions )
----------|----------
2010 net revenue | $ 5051
mark-to-market tax settlement sharing | -196 ( 196 )
purchased power capacity | -21 ( 21 )
net wholesale revenue | -14 ( 14 )
volume/weather | 13
ano decommissioning trust | 24
retail electric price | 49
other | -2 ( 2 )
2011 net revenue | $ 4904
----------------------------------------

the mark-to-market tax settlement sharing variance results from a regulatory charge because a portion of the benefits of a settlement with the irs related to the mark-to-market income tax treatment of power purchase contracts will be shared with customers , slightly offset by the amortization of a portion of that charge beginning in october 2011 . see notes 3 and 8 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to price increases for ongoing purchased power capacity and additional capacity purchases . the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower margins on co-owner contracts and higher wholesale energy costs . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 2061 gwh in weather-adjusted usage across all sectors . weather-adjusted residential retail sales growth reflected an increase in the number of customers . industrial sales growth has continued since the beginning of 2010 . entergy 2019s service territory has benefited from the national manufacturing economy and exports , as well as industrial facility expansions . increases have been offset to some extent by declines in the paper , wood products , and pipeline segments . the increase was also partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales . the ano decommissioning trust variance is primarily related to the deferral of investment gains from the ano 1 and 2 decommissioning trust in 2010 in accordance with regulatory treatment . the gains resulted in an increase in interest and investment income in 2010 and a corresponding increase in regulatory charges with no effect on net income . the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : rate actions at entergy texas , including a base rate increase effective august 2010 and an additional increase beginning may 2011 ; a formula rate plan increase at entergy louisiana effective may 2011 ; and a base rate increase at entergy arkansas effective july 2010 . these were partially offset by formula rate plan decreases at entergy new orleans effective october 2010 and october 2011 . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of these proceedings. .

Question: what is the percentage change in net revenue from 2010 to 2011?
Program: subtract(4904, 5051), divide(#0, 5051)
Answer: -0.0291
acquisition date ) . realex is a leading european online payment gateway technology provider . this acquisition furthered our strategy to provide omnichannel solutions that combine gateway services , payment service provisioning and payment technology services across europe . this transaction was accounted for as a business combination . we recorded the assets acquired , liabilities assumed and noncontrolling interest at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date . on october 5 , 2015 , we paid 20ac6.7 million ( $ 7.5 million equivalent as of october 5 , 2015 ) to acquire the remaining shares of realex , after which we own 100% ( 100 % ) of the outstanding shares . the estimated acquisition date fair values of the assets acquired , liabilities assumed and the noncontrolling interest , including a reconciliation to the total purchase consideration , are as follows ( in thousands ) : .

========================================
cash, $ 4082
customer-related intangible assets, 16079
acquired technology, 39820
trade name, 3453
other intangible assets, 399
other assets, 6213
liabilities, -3479 ( 3479 )
deferred income tax liabilities, -7216 ( 7216 )
total identifiable net assets, 59351
goodwill, 66809
noncontrolling interest, -7280 ( 7280 )
total purchase consideration, $ 118880
========================================

goodwill of $ 66.8 million arising from the acquisition , included in the europe segment , was attributable to expected growth opportunities in europe , potential synergies from combining our existing business with gateway services and payment service provisioning in certain markets and an assembled workforce to support the newly acquired technology . goodwill associated with this acquisition is not deductible for income tax purposes . the customer-related intangible assets have an estimated amortization period of 16 years . the acquired technology has an estimated amortization of 10 years . the trade name has an estimated amortization period of 7 years . ezidebit on october 10 , 2014 , we completed the acquisition of 100% ( 100 % ) of the outstanding stock of ezi holdings pty ltd ( 201cezidebit 201d ) for aud302.6 million in cash ( $ 266.0 million equivalent as of the acquisition date ) . this acquisition was funded by a combination of cash on hand and borrowings on our revolving credit facility . ezidebit is a leading integrated payments company focused on recurring payments verticals in australia and new zealand . the acquisition of ezidebit further enhanced our existing integrated solutions offerings . this transaction was accounted for as a business combination . we recorded the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date . 76 2013 global payments inc . | 2017 form 10-k annual report .

Question: what percentage of the total purchase consideration did the trade name represent?
Program: divide(3453, 118880)
Answer: 0.02905
the weighted-average grant date fair value of altria group , inc . restricted stock and deferred stock granted during the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 was $ 53 million , $ 49 million and $ 53 million , respectively , or $ 36.75 , $ 33.76 and $ 28.77 per restricted or deferred share , respectively . the total fair value of altria group , inc . restricted stock and deferred stock vested during the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 was $ 86 million , $ 89 million and $ 81 million , respectively . stock options : altria group , inc . has not granted stock options since 2002 , and there have been no stock options outstanding since february 29 , 2012 . the total intrinsic value of options exercised during the year ended december 31 , 2012 was insignificant . note 12 . earnings per share basic and diluted earnings per share ( 201ceps 201d ) were calculated using the following: .

****************************************
( in millions ) | for the years ended december 31 , 2014 | for the years ended december 31 , 2013 | for the years ended december 31 , 2012
----------|----------|----------|----------
net earnings attributable to altria group inc . | $ 5070 | $ 4535 | $ 4180
less : distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to unvested restricted and deferred shares | -12 ( 12 ) | -12 ( 12 ) | -13 ( 13 )
earnings for basic and diluted eps | $ 5058 | $ 4523 | $ 4167
weighted-average shares for basic and diluted eps | 1978 | 1999 | 2024
****************************************

net earnings attributable to altria group , inc . $ 5070 $ 4535 $ 4180 less : distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to unvested restricted and deferred shares ( 12 ) ( 12 ) ( 13 ) earnings for basic and diluted eps $ 5058 $ 4523 $ 4167 weighted-average shares for basic and diluted eps 1978 1999 2024 since february 29 , 2012 , there have been no stock options outstanding . for the 2012 computation , there were no antidilutive stock options . altria group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements _________________________ altria_mdc_2014form10k_nolinks_crops.pdf 54 2/25/15 5:56 pm .

Question: what is the growth rate in net earnings attributable to altria group inc . from 2013 to 2014?
Program: subtract(5070, 4535), divide(#0, 4535)
Answer: 0.11797
hologic , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) future minimum lease payments under all the company 2019s operating leases are approximately as follows: .

fiscal years ending | amount
september 24 2005 | $ 4848
september 30 2006 | 4672
september 29 2007 | 3680
september 27 2008 | 3237
september 26 2009 | 3158
thereafter | 40764
total ( not reduced by minimum sublease rentals of $ 165 ) | $ 60359

the company subleases a portion of its bedford facility and has received rental income of $ 277 , $ 410 and $ 682 for fiscal years 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively , which has been recorded as an offset to rent expense in the accompanying statements of income . rental expense , net of sublease income , was approximately $ 4660 , $ 4963 , and $ 2462 for fiscal 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . 9 . business segments and geographic information the company reports segment information in accordance with sfas no . 131 , disclosures about segments of an enterprise and related information . operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate , discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker , or decision-making group , in making decisions how to allocate resources and assess performance . the company 2019s chief decision-maker , as defined under sfas no . 131 , is the chief executive officer . to date , the company has viewed its operations and manages its business as four principal operating segments : the manufacture and sale of mammography products , osteoporosis assessment products , digital detectors and other products . as a result of the company 2019s implementation of a company wide integrated software application in fiscal 2003 , identifiable assets for the four principal operating segments only consist of inventories , intangible assets , and property and equipment . the company has presented all other assets as corporate assets . prior periods have been restated to conform to this presentation . intersegment sales and transfers are not significant. .

Question: what was the percentage change in rental expense between 2002 and 2003?
Program: subtract(4963, 2462), divide(#0, 2462)
Answer: 1.01584
stock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended ( the 201cexchange act 201d ) or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of tractor supply company under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act . the following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock from december 29 , 2012 to december 30 , 2017 ( the company 2019s fiscal year-end ) , with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the s&p retail index over the same period . the comparison assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 29 , 2012 , in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and in each case assumes reinvestment of dividends . the historical stock price performance shown on this graph is not indicative of future performance. .

========================================
 | 12/29/2012 | 12/28/2013 | 12/27/2014 | 12/26/2015 | 12/31/2016 | 12/30/2017
----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------
tractor supply company | $ 100.00 | $ 174.14 | $ 181.29 | $ 201.04 | $ 179.94 | $ 180.52
s&p 500 | $ 100.00 | $ 134.11 | $ 155.24 | $ 156.43 | $ 173.74 | $ 211.67
s&p retail index | $ 100.00 | $ 147.73 | $ 164.24 | $ 207.15 | $ 219.43 | $ 286.13
========================================

.

Question: compared to the s&p 500 ,what was the difference in percentage growth from the s&p 500 retail index .
Program: subtract(211.67, 100), divide(#0, 100), subtract(286.13, 100), divide(#2, 100), subtract(#3, #1)
Answer: 0.7446
jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k 41 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced equity benchmark in the united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) , consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2013 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 .

december 31 ( in dollars ) | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018
----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------
jpmorgan chase | $ 100.00 | $ 109.88 | $ 119.07 | $ 160.23 | $ 203.07 | $ 189.57
kbw bank index | 100.00 | 109.36 | 109.90 | 141.23 | 167.49 | 137.82
s&p financial index | 100.00 | 115.18 | 113.38 | 139.17 | 169.98 | 147.82
s&p 500 index | 100.00 | 113.68 | 115.24 | 129.02 | 157.17 | 150.27

december 31 , ( in dollars ) .

Question: what is the estimated variation between the percentual decrease observed in the s&p 500 index and in the jpmorgan chase during the years 2017 and 2018?
Program: divide(189.57, 203.07), subtract(const_1, #0), divide(150.27, 157.17), subtract(const_1, #2), subtract(#1, #3)
Answer: 0.02258
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index and the s&p information technology index for the five years ended september 27 , 2014 . the company has added the s&p information technology index to the graph to capture the stock performance of companies whose products and services relate to those of the company . the s&p information technology index replaces the s&p computer hardware index , which is no longer tracked by s&p . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index and the s&p information technology index as of the market close on september 25 , 2009 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . copyright a9 2014 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2014 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . apple inc . | 2014 form 10-k | 23 * $ 100 invested on 9/25/09 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019s common stock and september 30th for indexes . september september september september september september .

----------------------------------------
, september 2009, september 2010, september 2011, september 2012, september 2013, september 2014
apple inc ., $ 100, $ 160, $ 222, $ 367, $ 272, $ 407
s&p 500 index, $ 100, $ 110, $ 111, $ 145, $ 173, $ 207
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index, $ 100, $ 112, $ 115, $ 150, $ 158, $ 205
s&p information technology index, $ 100, $ 111, $ 115, $ 152, $ 163, $ 210
----------------------------------------

.

Question: in what year did the s&p 500 have the greatest return?
Program: table_max(s&p 500 index, none)
Answer: 207.0