wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
the fair value of our grants receivable is determined using a discounted cash flow model , which discounts future cash flows using an appropriate yield curve . as of december 28 , 2013 , and december 29 , 2012 , the carrying amount of our grants receivable was classified within other current assets and other long-term assets , as applicable . our long-term debt recognized at amortized cost is comprised of our senior notes and our convertible debentures . the fair value of our senior notes is determined using active market prices , and it is therefore classified as level 1 . the fair value of our convertible long-term debt is determined using discounted cash flow models with observable market inputs , and it takes into consideration variables such as interest rate changes , comparable securities , subordination discount , and credit-rating changes , and it is therefore classified as level 2 . the nvidia corporation ( nvidia ) cross-license agreement liability in the preceding table was incurred as a result of entering into a long-term patent cross-license agreement with nvidia in january 2011 . we agreed to make payments to nvidia over six years . as of december 28 , 2013 , and december 29 , 2012 , the carrying amount of the liability arising from the agreement was classified within other accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities , as applicable . the fair value is determined using a discounted cash flow model , which discounts future cash flows using our incremental borrowing rates . note 5 : cash and investments cash and investments at the end of each period were as follows : ( in millions ) dec 28 , dec 29 .

========================================
• ( in millions ), dec 282013, dec 292012
• available-for-sale investments, $ 18086, $ 14001
• cash, 854, 593
• equity method investments, 1038, 992
• loans receivable, 1072, 979
• non-marketable cost method investments, 1270, 1202
• reverse repurchase agreements, 800, 2850
• trading assets, 8441, 5685
• total cash and investments, $ 31561, $ 26302
========================================

in the third quarter of 2013 , we sold our shares in clearwire corporation , which had been accounted for as available-for-sale marketable equity securities , and our interest in clearwire communications , llc ( clearwire llc ) , which had been accounted for as an equity method investment . in total , we received proceeds of $ 470 million on these transactions and recognized a gain of $ 439 million , which is included in gains ( losses ) on equity investments , net on the consolidated statements of income . proceeds received and gains recognized for each investment are included in the "available-for-sale investments" and "equity method investments" sections that follow . table of contents intel corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) .

Question: what percentage of total cash and investments as of dec . 28 2013 was comprised of available-for-sale investments?
Program: divide(18086, 31561)
Answer: 0.57305
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements computed on a rolling 12 month basis . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana was in compliance with these provisions . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an overall implicit rate of 7.45% ( 7.45 % ) ) in connection with the waterford 3 sale and leaseback transactions , which are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

========================================
 | amount ( in thousands )
----------|----------
2009 | $ 32452
2010 | 35138
2011 | 50421
2012 | 39067
2013 | 26301
years thereafter | 137858
total | 321237
less : amount representing interest | 73512
present value of net minimum lease payments | $ 247725
========================================

grand gulf lease obligations in december 1988 , in two separate but substantially identical transactions , system energy sold and leased back undivided ownership interests in grand gulf for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million . the interests represent approximately 11.5% ( 11.5 % ) of grand gulf . the leases expire in 2015 . under certain circumstances , system entergy may repurchase the leased interests prior to the end of the term of the leases . at the end of the lease terms , system energy has the option to repurchase the leased interests in grand gulf at fair market value or to renew the leases for either fair market value or , under certain conditions , a fixed rate . in may 2004 , system energy caused the grand gulf lessors to refinance the outstanding bonds that they had issued to finance the purchase of their undivided interest in grand gulf . the refinancing is at a lower interest rate , and system energy's lease payments have been reduced to reflect the lower interest costs . system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements . for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant depreciation . however , operating revenues include the recovery of the lease payments because the transactions are accounted for as a sale and leaseback for ratemaking purposes . consistent with a recommendation contained in a ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount of this net regulatory asset was $ 19.2 million and $ 36.6 million as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .

Question: what portion of the future minimum lease payments for entergy louisiana will be used for interest payments?
Program: divide(73512, 321237)
Answer: 0.22884
changes in our performance retention awards during 2009 were as follows : shares ( thous. ) weighted-average grant-date fair value .

========================================
• , shares ( thous. ), weighted-averagegrant-date fair value
• nonvested at january 1 2009, 873, $ 50.70
• granted, 449, 47.28
• vested, -240 ( 240 ), 43.23
• forfeited, -22 ( 22 ), 53.86
• nonvested at december 31 2009, 1060, $ 50.88
========================================

at december 31 , 2009 , there was $ 22 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested performance retention awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years . a portion of this expense is subject to achievement of the roic levels established for the performance stock unit grants . 5 . retirement plans pension and other postretirement benefits pension plans 2013 we provide defined benefit retirement income to eligible non-union employees through qualified and non-qualified ( supplemental ) pension plans . qualified and non-qualified pension benefits are based on years of service and the highest compensation during the latest years of employment , with specific reductions made for early retirements . other postretirement benefits ( opeb ) 2013 we provide defined contribution medical and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees . these benefits are funded as medical claims and life insurance premiums are plan amendment effective january 1 , 2010 , medicare-eligible retirees who are enrolled in the union pacific retiree medical program will receive a contribution to a health reimbursement account , which can be used to pay eligible out-of-pocket medical expenses . the impact of the plan amendment is reflected in the projected benefit obligation ( pbo ) at december 31 , 2009 . funded status we are required by gaap to separately recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of our pension and opeb plans as an asset or liability . the funded status represents the difference between the pbo and the fair value of the plan assets . the pbo is the present value of benefits earned to date by plan participants , including the effect of assumed future salary increases . the pbo of the opeb plan is equal to the accumulated benefit obligation , as the present value of the opeb liabilities is not affected by salary increases . plan assets are measured at fair value . we use a december 31 measurement date for plan assets and obligations for all our retirement plans. .

Question: at december 31 , 2009 , what was the remaining compensation expense per share for the unvested awards?
Program: multiply(1060, const_1000), multiply(22, const_1000000), divide(#1, #0)
Answer: 20.75472
the following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at october 30 , 2010 : fiscal years operating leases .

========================================
fiscal years | operating leases
2011 | $ 21871
2012 | 12322
2013 | 9078
2014 | 6381
2015 | 5422
later years | 30655
total | $ 85729
========================================

12 . commitments and contingencies from time to time in the ordinary course of the company 2019s business , various claims , charges and litigation are asserted or commenced against the company arising from , or related to , contractual matters , patents , trademarks , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , insurance coverage and personnel and employment disputes . as to such claims and litigation , the company can give no assurance that it will prevail . the company does not believe that any current legal matters will have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations or cash flows . 13 . retirement plans the company and its subsidiaries have various savings and retirement plans covering substantially all employees . the company maintains a defined contribution plan for the benefit of its eligible u.s . employees . this plan provides for company contributions of up to 5% ( 5 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . in addition , the company contributes an amount equal to each participant 2019s pre-tax contribution , if any , up to a maximum of 3% ( 3 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s . employees was $ 20.5 million in fiscal 2010 , $ 21.5 million in fiscal 2009 and $ 22.6 million in fiscal 2008 . the company also has various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees that are consistent with local statutory requirements and practices . the total expense related to the various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees was $ 11.7 million in fiscal 2010 , $ 10.9 million in fiscal 2009 and $ 13.9 million in fiscal 2008 . during fiscal 2009 , the measurement date of the plan 2019s funded status was changed from september 30 to the company 2019s fiscal year end . non-u.s . plan disclosures the company 2019s funding policy for its foreign defined benefit pension plans is consistent with the local requirements of each country . the plans 2019 assets consist primarily of u.s . and non-u.s . equity securities , bonds , property and cash . the benefit obligations and related assets under these plans have been measured at october 30 , 2010 and october 31 , 2009 . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Question: what was the total expense related to contribution plans from 2008 to 2010
Program: add(20.5, 11.7), add(21.5, 10.9), add(22.6, 13.9), add(#2, #0), add(#1, #3)
Answer: 101.1
stock performance graph the line graph that follows compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones u.s . technology index* and the standard & poor 2019s s&p 500* index for the five years ended december 28 , 2013 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 26 , 2008 ( the last day of trading for the fiscal year ended december 27 , 2008 ) in each of our common stock , the dow jones u.s . technology index , and the s&p 500 index , and that all dividends were reinvested . cumulative total stockholder returns for our common stock , the dow jones u.s . technology index , and the s&p 500 index are based on our fiscal year . comparison of five-year cumulative return for intel , the dow jones u.s . technology index* , and the s&p 500* index .

----------------------------------------
	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013
intel corporation	$ 100	$ 148	$ 157	$ 191	$ 163	$ 214
dow jones u.s . technology index	$ 100	$ 170	$ 191	$ 191	$ 209	$ 270
s&p 500 index	$ 100	$ 132	$ 151	$ 154	$ 175	$ 236
----------------------------------------

table of contents .

Question: what was the percent of the increase in the dow jones u.s . technology index from 2011 to 2012
Program: divide(209, 191), divide(#0, 191)
Answer: 0.00573
stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the standard & poor 2019s retail index . the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 , and that any dividends have been reinvested . the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock . comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p retail index company/index december 31 , december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 2 , december 31 .

========================================
• company/index, december 31 2011, december 29 2012, december 28 2013, january 3 2015, january 2 2016, december 31 2016
• advance auto parts, $ 100.00, $ 102.87, $ 158.46, $ 228.88, $ 217.49, $ 244.64
• s&p 500 index, 100.00, 114.07, 152.98, 174.56, 177.01, 198.18
• s&p retail index, 100.00, 122.23, 178.55, 196.06, 245.31, 256.69
========================================

.

Question: from january 3 2015 to december 31 , how much greater was the return for s&p retail index than for advance auto parts ? ( in a percentage )
Program: subtract(244.64, 228.88), subtract(256.69, 196.06), divide(#0, 228.88), divide(#1, 196.06), subtract(#3, #2)
Answer: 0.24039
j a c k h e n r y . c o m 1 5 market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the company 2019s common stock is quoted on the nasdaq global select market ( 201cnasdaq 201d ) under the symbol 201cjkhy 201d . the company established a practice of paying quarterly dividends at the end of fiscal 1990 and has paid dividends with respect to every quarter since that time . the declaration and payment of any future dividends will continue to be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon , among other factors , our earnings , capital requirements , contractual restrictions , and operating and financial condition . the company does not currently foresee any changes in its dividend practices . on august 15 , 2019 , there were approximately 145300 holders of the company 2019s common stock , including individual participants in security position listings . on that same date the last sale price of the common shares as reported on nasdaq was $ 141.94 per share . issuer purchases of equity securities the following shares of the company were repurchased during the quarter ended june 30 , 2019 : total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans ( 1 ) maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans ( 2 ) .

	total number of shares purchased ( 1 )	average price of share	total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans ( 1 )	maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans ( 2 )
april 1- april 30 2019	2014	$ 2014	2014	3732713
may 1- may 31 2019	250000	$ 134.35	250000	3482713
june 1- june 30 2019	2014	$ 2014	2014	3482713
total	250000	$ 134.35	250000	3482713

( 1 ) 250000 shares were purchased through a publicly announced repurchase plan . there were no shares surrendered to the company to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with employee restricted stock awards . ( 2 ) total stock repurchase authorizations approved by the company 2019s board of directors as of february 17 , 2015 were for 30.0 million shares . these authorizations have no specific dollar or share price targets and no expiration dates. .

Question: what was the percentage of the shares purchase of the maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans
Program: divide(250000, 3482713)
Answer: 0.07178
the grand gulf recovery variance is primarily due to increased recovery of higher costs resulting from the grand gulf uprate . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effects of more favorable weather on residential sales and an increase in industrial sales primarily due to growth in the refining segment . the fuel recovery variance is primarily due to : 2022 the deferral of increased capacity costs that will be recovered through fuel adjustment clauses ; 2022 the expiration of the evangeline gas contract on january 1 , 2013 ; and 2022 an adjustment to deferred fuel costs recorded in the third quarter 2012 in accordance with a rate order from the puct issued in september 2012 . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of this puct order issued in entergy texas's 2011 rate case . the miso deferral variance is primarily due to the deferral in april 2013 , as approved by the apsc , of costs incurred since march 2010 related to the transition and implementation of joining the miso rto . the decommissioning trusts variance is primarily due to lower regulatory credits resulting from higher realized income on decommissioning trust fund investments . there is no effect on net income as the credits are offset by interest and investment income . entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2013 to 2012 . amount ( in millions ) .

	amount ( in millions )
2012 net revenue	$ 1854
mark-to-market	-58 ( 58 )
nuclear volume	-24 ( 24 )
nuclear fuel expenses	-20 ( 20 )
nuclear realized price changes	58
other	-8 ( 8 )
2013 net revenue	$ 1802

as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 52 million in 2013 primarily due to : 2022 the effect of rising forward power prices on electricity derivative instruments that are not designated as hedges , including additional financial power sales conducted in the fourth quarter 2013 to offset the planned exercise of in-the-money protective call options and to lock in margins . these additional sales did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment , and increases in forward prices after those sales were made accounted for the majority of the negative mark-to-market variance . it is expected that the underlying transactions will result in earnings in first quarter 2014 as these positions settle . see note 16 to the financial statements for discussion of derivative instruments ; 2022 the decrease in net revenue compared to prior year resulting from the exercise of resupply options provided for in purchase power agreements where entergy wholesale commodities may elect to supply power from another source when the plant is not running . amounts related to the exercise of resupply options are included in the gwh billed in the table below ; and entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis .

Question: what is the mark-to-market as a percentage of the decrease in net revenue from 2012 to 2013?
Program: subtract(1854, 1802), divide(58, #0)
Answer: 1.11538
issuer purchases of equity securities in january 2017 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of shares of our common stock with a value of up to $ 525 million in the aggregate . as of december 29 , 2018 , $ 175 million remained available under this authorization . in february 2019 , our board of directors authorized the additional repurchase of shares of our common stock with a value of up to $ 500.0 million in the aggregate . the actual timing and amount of repurchases are subject to business and market conditions , corporate and regulatory requirements , stock price , acquisition opportunities and other factors . the following table presents repurchases made under our current authorization and shares surrendered by employees to satisfy income tax withholding obligations during the three months ended december 29 , 2018 : period total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share ( 2 ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plan or program maximum dollar value of shares authorized for repurchase under publicly announced plan or program ( 1 ) ( in millions ) september 30 , 2018 2013 november 3 , 2018 543900 $ 42.64 495543 $ 254 november 4 , 2018 2013 december 1 , 2018 650048 $ 44.49 623692 $ 226 december 2 , 2018 2013 december 29 , 2018 1327657 $ 42.61 1203690 $ 175 .

period | total numberof sharespurchased ( 1 ) | averageprice paidper share ( 2 ) | total number ofshares purchasedas part ofpublicly announcedplan or program | maximum dollarvalue of sharesauthorized for repurchase underpublicly announcedplan or program ( 1 ) ( in millions )
----------|----------|----------|----------|----------
september 30 2018 2013 november 3 2018 | 543900 | $ 42.64 | 495543 | $ 254
november 4 2018 2013 december 1 2018 | 650048 | $ 44.49 | 623692 | $ 226
december 2 2018 2013 december 29 2018 | 1327657 | $ 42.61 | 1203690 | $ 175
total | 2521605 | $ 43.10 | 2322925 | 

( 1 ) shares purchased that were not part of our publicly announced repurchase programs represent employee surrender of shares of restricted stock to satisfy employee income tax withholding obligations due upon vesting , and do not reduce the dollar value that may yet be purchased under our publicly announced repurchase programs . ( 2 ) the weighted average price paid per share of common stock does not include the cost of commissions. .

Question: what is the total cash outflow for stock repurchase in the last three months of 2018 , ( in millions ) ?
Program: multiply(2521605, 43.10)
Answer: 108681175.5
in the ordinary course of business , based on our evaluations of certain geologic trends and prospective economics , we have allowed certain lease acreage to expire and may allow additional acreage to expire in the future . if production is not established or we take no other action to extend the terms of the leases , licenses or concessions , undeveloped acreage listed in the table below will expire over the next three years . we plan to continue the terms of certain of these licenses and concession areas or retain leases through operational or administrative actions ; however , the majority of the undeveloped acres associated with other africa as listed in the table below pertains to our licenses in ethiopia and kenya , for which we executed agreements in 2015 to sell . the kenya transaction closed in february 2016 and the ethiopia transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2016 . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data - note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information about this disposition . net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 .

( in thousands ) | net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2016 | net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2017 | net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2018
----------|----------|----------|----------
u.s . | 68 | 89 | 128
e.g . | 2014 | 92 | 36
other africa | 189 | 4352 | 854
total africa | 189 | 4444 | 890
other international | 2014 | 2014 | 2014
total | 257 | 4533 | 1018

.

Question: what was total net undeveloped acres expiring for the three year period , in thousands?
Program: table_sum(total, none)
Answer: 5808.0