wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
6feb201418202649 performance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 2018 2018s&p 500 index 2019 2019 ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor 2019s industrials index ( 2018 2018s&p industrials index 2019 2019 ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor 2019s consumer durables & apparel index ( 2018 2018s&p consumer durables & apparel index 2019 2019 ) , from december 31 , 2008 through december 31 , 2013 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 22.77 . the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2008 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends . $ 350.00 $ 300.00 $ 250.00 $ 200.00 $ 150.00 $ 100.00 $ 50.00 performance graph .

 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013
masco | $ 128.21 | $ 120.32 | $ 102.45 | $ 165.80 | $ 229.59
s&p 500 index | $ 125.92 | $ 144.58 | $ 147.60 | $ 171.04 | $ 225.85
s&p industrials index | $ 120.19 | $ 151.89 | $ 150.97 | $ 173.87 | $ 243.73
s&p consumer durables & apparel index | $ 136.29 | $ 177.91 | $ 191.64 | $ 232.84 | $ 316.28

in july 2007 , our board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 50 million shares of our common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise . at december 31 , 2013 , we had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 22.6 million shares . during the first quarter of 2013 , we repurchased and retired 1.7 million shares of our common stock , for cash aggregating $ 35 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2013 grant of 1.7 million shares of long-term stock awards . we have not purchased any shares since march 2013. .

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on masco common stock for the five year period ended 2013?
Program: subtract(229.59, 100), divide(#0, 100)
Answer: 1.2959
stock performance graph the following graph provides a comparison of five year cumulative total stockholder returns of teleflex common stock , the standard & poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 stock index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index . the annual changes for the five-year period shown on the graph are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in teleflex common stock and each index on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested . market performance .

========================================
• company / index, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015
• teleflex incorporated, 100, 117, 138, 185, 229, 266
• s&p 500 index, 100, 102, 118, 157, 178, 181
• s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index, 100, 99, 116, 148, 187, 199
========================================

s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index 100 99 116 148 187 199 .

Question: what is the total return of an investment of $ 1000000 in teleflex incorporated in 2010 and sold in 2015?
Program: subtract(266, 100), divide(1000000, 100), multiply(#1, #0)
Answer: 1660000.0
entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis other regulatory charges ( credits ) have no material effect on net income due to recovery and/or refund of such expenses . other regulatory credits increased primarily due to the under-recovery through the grand gulf rider of grand gulf capacity charges . 2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy mississippi's measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. .

 | ( in millions )
----------|----------
2002 net revenue | $ 380.2
base rates | 48.3
other | -1.9 ( 1.9 )
2003 net revenue | $ 426.6

the increase in base rates was effective january 2003 as approved by the mpsc . gross operating revenue , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase in base rates effective january 2003 and an increase of $ 29.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to quarterly changes in the fuel factor resulting from the increases in market prices of natural gas and purchased power . this increase was partially offset by a decrease of $ 35.9 million in gross wholesale revenue as a result of decreased generation and purchases that resulted in less energy available for resale sales . fuel and fuel-related expenses decreased primarily due to the decreased recovery of fuel and purchased power costs and decreased generation , partially offset by an increase in the market price of purchased power . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to over-recovery of capacity charges related to the grand gulf rate rider and the cessation of the grand gulf accelerated recovery tariff that was suspended in july 2003 . other income statement variances 2004 compared to 2003 other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 6.6 million in customer service support costs ; and 2022 an increase of $ 3.7 million in benefit costs . the increase was partially offset by the absence of the voluntary severance program accruals of $ 7.1 million that occurred in 2003 . taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to a higher assessment of ad valorem and franchise taxes compared to the same period in 2003 . 2003 compared to 2002 other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 voluntary severance program accruals of $ 7.1 million ; and 2022 an increase of $ 4.4 million in benefit costs. .

Question: what is the net change in net revenue entergy mississippi , inc . during 2003?
Program: subtract(426.6, 380.2)
Answer: 46.4
stock performance graph the following graph compares the most recent five-year performance of alcoa 2019s common stock with ( 1 ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 ae index and ( 2 ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 ae materials index , a group of 27 companies categorized by standard & poor 2019s as active in the 201cmaterials 201d market sector . such information shall not be deemed to be 201cfiled . 201d five-year cumulative total return based upon an initial investment of $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 with dividends reinvested alcoa inc . s&p 500 ae index s&p 500 ae materials index dec-'10 dec-'11 dec-'12 dec-'14 dec-'15dec-'13 .

****************************************
as of december 31,, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015
alcoainc ., $ 100, $ 57, $ 58, $ 72, $ 107, $ 68
s&p 500 aeindex, 100, 102, 118, 157, 178, 181
s&p 500 aematerials index, 100, 90, 104, 130, 139, 128
****************************************

s&p 500 ae index 100 102 118 157 178 181 s&p 500 ae materials index 100 90 104 130 139 128 copyright a9 2016 standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . source : research data group , inc . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ) .

Question: what is the estimated annualized return for the initial $ 100 investment in the s&p 500 aeindex?
Program: subtract(181, 100), divide(const_1, const_5), subtract(#1, const_1), exp(#0, #2), subtract(#3, const_1)
Answer: -0.97027
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities market price of and dividends on the registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information . our class a common stock is quoted on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol 201cdish . 201d the high and low closing sale prices of our class a common stock during 2014 and 2013 on the nasdaq global select market ( as reported by nasdaq ) are set forth below. .

• 2014, high, low
• first quarter, $ 62.42, $ 54.10
• second quarter, 65.64, 56.23
• third quarter, 66.71, 61.87
• fourth quarter, 79.41, 57.96
• 2013, high, low
• first quarter, $ 38.02, $ 34.19
• second quarter, 42.52, 36.24
• third quarter, 48.09, 41.66
• fourth quarter, 57.92, 45.68

as of february 13 , 2015 , there were approximately 8208 holders of record of our class a common stock , not including stockholders who beneficially own class a common stock held in nominee or street name . as of february 10 , 2015 , 213247004 of the 238435208 outstanding shares of our class b common stock were beneficially held by charles w . ergen , our chairman , and the remaining 25188204 were held in trusts established by mr . ergen for the benefit of his family . there is currently no trading market for our class b common stock . dividends . on december 28 , 2012 , we paid a cash dividend of $ 1.00 per share , or approximately $ 453 million , on our outstanding class a and class b common stock to stockholders of record at the close of business on december 14 , 2012 . while we currently do not intend to declare additional dividends on our common stock , we may elect to do so from time to time . payment of any future dividends will depend upon our earnings and capital requirements , restrictions in our debt facilities , and other factors the board of directors considers appropriate . we currently intend to retain our earnings , if any , to support future growth and expansion , although we may repurchase shares of our common stock from time to time . see further discussion under 201citem 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 liquidity and capital resources 201d in this annual report on form 10-k . securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans . see 201citem 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters 201d in this annual report on form 10-k. .

Question: what portion of the outstanding shares of our class b common stock were held by the chairman?
Program: divide(213247004, 238435208)
Answer: 0.89436
value , which may be maturity , the company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 . gross realized gains and losses for 2005 were $ 15000 and $ 75000 , respectively . gross realized gains and losses for 2004 were $ 628000 and $ 205000 , respectively . gross realized gains for 2003 were $ 1249000 . there were no gross realized losses for 2003 . maturities stated are effective maturities . f . restricted cash at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , the company held $ 41482000 and $ 49847000 , respectively , in restricted cash . at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 the balance was held in deposit with certain banks predominantly to collateralize conditional stand-by letters of credit in the names of the company's landlords pursuant to certain operating lease agreements . g . property and equipment property and equipment consist of the following at december 31 ( in thousands ) : depreciation expense for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 was $ 26307000 , $ 28353000 and $ 27988000 respectively . in 2005 and 2004 , the company wrote off certain assets that were fully depreciated and no longer utilized . there was no effect on the company's net property and equipment . additionally , the company wrote off or sold certain assets that were not fully depreciated . the net loss on disposal of those assets was $ 344000 for 2005 and $ 43000 for 2004 . h . investments in accordance with the company's policy , as outlined in note b , "accounting policies" the company assessed its investment in altus pharmaceuticals , inc . ( "altus" ) , which it accounts for using the cost method , and determined that there had not been any adjustments to the fair values of that investment which would indicate a decrease in its fair value below the carrying value that would require the company to write down the investment basis of the asset , as of december 31 , 2005 and december 31 , 2004 . the company's cost basis carrying value in its outstanding equity and warrants of altus was $ 18863000 at december 31 , 2005 and 2004. .

 | 2005 | 2004
furniture and equipment | $ 98387 | $ 90893
leasehold improvements | 66318 | 65294
computers | 18971 | 18421
software | 18683 | 16411
total property and equipment gross | 202359 | 191019
less accumulated depreciation and amortization | 147826 | 126794
total property and equipment net | $ 54533 | $ 64225

.

Question: what was the ratio of the net loss on the disposal of the unfully depreciated assets in 2005 compared 2004
Program: divide(344000, 43000)
Answer: 8.0
annual report on form 10-k 108 fifth third bancorp part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the information required by this item is included in the corporate information found on the inside of the back cover and in the discussion of dividend limitations that the subsidiaries can pay to the bancorp discussed in note 26 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements . additionally , as of december 31 , 2008 , the bancorp had approximately 60025 shareholders of record . issuer purchases of equity securities period shares purchased average paid per shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum shares that may be purchased under the plans or programs .

----------------------------------------
period	sharespurchased ( a )	averagepricepaid pershare	sharespurchasedas part ofpubliclyannouncedplans orprograms	maximumshares thatmay bepurchasedunder theplans orprograms
october 2008	25394	$ -	-	19201518
november 2008	7526	-	-	19201518
december 2008	40	-	-	19201518
total	32960	$ -	-	19201518
----------------------------------------

( a ) the bancorp repurchased 25394 , 7526 and 40 shares during october , november and december of 2008 in connection with various employee compensation plans of the bancorp . these purchases are not included against the maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the board of directors authorization. .

Question: what portion of the total purchased shares presented in the table was purchased during november 2008?
Program: divide(7526, 32960)
Answer: 0.22834
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2009 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. .

, 12/31/2009, 12/31/2010, 12/31/2011, 12/31/2012, 12/31/2013, 12/31/2014
united parcel service inc ., $ 100.00, $ 130.29, $ 135.35, $ 140.54, $ 205.95, $ 223.79
standard & poor 2019s 500 index, $ 100.00, $ 115.06, $ 117.48, $ 136.26, $ 180.38, $ 205.05
dow jones transportation average, $ 100.00, $ 126.74, $ 126.75, $ 136.24, $ 192.61, $ 240.91

.

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for united parcel service inc . compared to the standard & poor's 500 index for the five years ended 12/31/2014?
Program: subtract(223.79, const_100), divide(#0, const_100), subtract(205.05, const_100), divide(#2, const_100), subtract(#1, #3)
Answer: 0.1874
the remaining change in other expense was driven primarily by changes on foreign currency exchange instruments as further discussed in note 7 in 201citem 8 . financial statements and supplementary data 201d of this report . income taxes .

========================================
Row 1: , 2018, 2017
Row 2: current expense ( benefit ), $ -70 ( 70 ), $ 112
Row 3: deferred expense ( benefit ), 226, -97 ( 97 )
Row 4: total expense, $ 156, $ 15
Row 5: effective income tax rate, 17% ( 17 % ), 2% ( 2 % )
========================================

for discussion on income taxes , see note 8 in 201citem 8 . financial statements and supplementary data 201d of this report . discontinued operations discontinued operations net earnings increased primarily due to the gain on the sale of our aggregate ownership interests in enlink and the general partner of $ 2.6 billion ( $ 2.2 billion after-tax ) . for discussion on discontinued operations , see note 19 in 201citem 8 . financial statements and supplementary data 201d of this report 201d of this report . results of operations 2013 2017 vs . 2016 the graph below shows the change in net earnings from 2016 to 2017 . the material changes are further discussed by category on the following pages . to facilitate the review , these numbers are being presented before consideration of earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests . $ 1308 ( $ 165 ) ( $ 4 ) $ 1 $ 63 $ 400 ( $ 397 ) $ 126 $ 1204 ( $ 1458 ) $ 1078 2016 upstream operations marketing operations exploration expenses dd&a g&a financing costs , net other ( 1 ) income discontinued operations net earnings ( 1 ) other in the table above includes asset impairments , asset dispositions , restructuring and transaction costs and other expenses . the graph below presents the drivers of the upstream operations change presented above , with additional details and discussion of the drivers following the graph . ( $ 427 ) ( $ 427 ) $ 1395$ 1 395 $ 2176$ 2 176 $ 3484 2016 production volumes field prices hedging 2017 upstream operations expenses .

Question: what is the percentage increase in total expense from 2017 to 2018?
Program: subtract(156, 15), divide(#0, 15), multiply(#1, const_100)
Answer: 940.0
stock performance graph the line graph that follows compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones u.s . technology index* and the standard & poor 2019s s&p 500* index for the five years ended december 28 , 2013 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 26 , 2008 ( the last day of trading for the fiscal year ended december 27 , 2008 ) in each of our common stock , the dow jones u.s . technology index , and the s&p 500 index , and that all dividends were reinvested . cumulative total stockholder returns for our common stock , the dow jones u.s . technology index , and the s&p 500 index are based on our fiscal year . comparison of five-year cumulative return for intel , the dow jones u.s . technology index* , and the s&p 500* index .

****************************************
	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013
intel corporation	$ 100	$ 148	$ 157	$ 191	$ 163	$ 214
dow jones u.s . technology index	$ 100	$ 170	$ 191	$ 191	$ 209	$ 270
s&p 500 index	$ 100	$ 132	$ 151	$ 154	$ 175	$ 236
****************************************

table of contents .

Question: what was the difference in percentage five-year cumulative return for intel versus the s&p 500 index for the five years ended 2013?
Program: subtract(214, 100), divide(#0, 100), subtract(236, 100), divide(#2, 100), subtract(#1, #3)
Answer: -0.22
performance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor 2019s industrials index ( 201cs&p industrials index 201d ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor 2019s consumer durables & apparel index ( 201cs&p consumer durables & apparel index 201d ) , from december 31 , 2005 through december 31 , 2010 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 12.66 . the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2005 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends . performance graph 201020092008200720062005 s&p 500 index s&p industrials index s&p consumer durables & apparel index the table below sets forth the value , as of december 31 for each of the years indicated , of a $ 100 investment made on december 31 , 2005 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p industrials index and the s&p consumer durables & apparel index and includes the reinvestment of dividends. .

****************************************
Row 1: , 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010
Row 2: masco, $ 101.79, $ 76.74, $ 42.81, $ 54.89, $ 51.51
Row 3: s&p 500 index, $ 115.61, $ 121.95, $ 77.38, $ 97.44, $ 111.89
Row 4: s&p industrials index, $ 113.16, $ 126.72, $ 76.79, $ 92.30, $ 116.64
Row 5: s&p consumer durables & apparel index, $ 106.16, $ 84.50, $ 56.13, $ 76.51, $ 99.87
****************************************

in july 2007 , our board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 50 million shares of our common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise . at december 31 , 2010 , we had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 27 million shares . during 2010 , we repurchased and retired three million shares of our common stock , for cash aggregating $ 45 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2010 grant of three million shares of long-term stock awards . we did not purchase any shares during the three months ended december 31 , 2010. .

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total shareholder return on masco common stock versus the s&p 500 index for the five year period ended 2010?
Program: subtract(51.51, 100), divide(#0, 100), subtract(111.89, 100), divide(#2, 100), subtract(#1, #3)
Answer: -0.6038