wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits , for the periods indicated , is as follows: .

****************************************
• ( dollars in thousands ), 2010, 2009, 2008
• balance at january 1, $ 29010, $ 34366, $ 29132
• additions based on tax positions related to the current year, 7119, 6997, 5234
• additions for tax positions of prior years, -, -, -
• reductions for tax positions of prior years, -, -, -
• settlements with taxing authorities, -12356 ( 12356 ), -12353 ( 12353 ), -
• lapses of applicable statutes of limitations, -, -, -
• balance at december 31, $ 23773, $ 29010, $ 34366
****************************************

the entire amount of the unrecognized tax benefits would affect the effective tax rate if recognized . in 2010 , the company favorably settled a 2003 and 2004 irs audit . the company recorded a net overall tax benefit including accrued interest of $ 25920 thousand . in addition , the company was also able to take down a $ 12356 thousand fin 48 reserve that had been established regarding the 2003 and 2004 irs audit . the company is no longer subject to u.s . federal , state and local or foreign income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2007 . the company recognizes accrued interest related to net unrecognized tax benefits and penalties in income taxes . during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , the company accrued and recognized a net expense ( benefit ) of approximately $ ( 9938 ) thousand , $ 1563 thousand and $ 2446 thousand , respectively , in interest and penalties . included within the 2010 net expense ( benefit ) of $ ( 9938 ) thousand is $ ( 10591 ) thousand of accrued interest related to the 2003 and 2004 irs audit . the company is not aware of any positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within twelve months of the reporting date . for u.s . income tax purposes the company has foreign tax credit carryforwards of $ 55026 thousand that begin to expire in 2014 . in addition , for u.s . income tax purposes the company has $ 41693 thousand of alternative minimum tax credits that do not expire . management believes that it is more likely than not that the company will realize the benefits of its net deferred tax assets and , accordingly , no valuation allowance has been recorded for the periods presented . tax benefits of $ 629 thousand and $ 1714 thousand related to share-based compensation deductions for stock options exercised in 2010 and 2009 , respectively , are included within additional paid-in capital of the shareholders 2019 equity section of the consolidated balance sheets. .

Question: what was the percent change in net expense in interest and penalties between 2008 and 2009?
Program: subtract(1563, 2446), divide(#0, 2446)
Answer: -0.361
entergy mississippi , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income increased $ 0.8 million primarily due to higher other income , lower other operation and maintenance expenses , and lower interest expense , substantially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses and a higher effective income tax rate . 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 16.5 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher net revenues , and a lower effective income tax rate , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) .

========================================
, amount ( in millions )
2016 net revenue, $ 705.4
volume/weather, -18.2 ( 18.2 )
retail electric price, 13.5
other, 2.4
2017 net revenue, $ 703.1
========================================

the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales . the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a $ 19.4 million net annual increase in rates , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 , and an increase in the energy efficiency rider , effective with the first billing cycle of february 2017 , each as approved by the mpsc . the increase was partially offset by decreased storm damage rider revenues due to resetting the storm damage provision to zero beginning with the november 2016 billing cycle . entergy mississippi resumed billing the storm damage rider effective with the september 2017 billing cycle . see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the formula rate plan and the storm damage rider. .

Question: without the loss of in volume/weather , what percent increase would net revenue have experienced between 2016 and 2017?
Program: add(703.1, 18.2)
Answer: 721.3
the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders of cadence design systems , inc . 2019s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in the company 2019s common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2001 and tracks it through december 30 , 2006 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index 12/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/0212/29/01 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/29/01 in stock or on 12/31/01 in index-incuding reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 1 , december 31 , december 30 .

========================================
• , december 29 2001, december 28 2002, january 3 2004, january 1 2005, december 31 2005, december 30 2006
• cadence design systems inc ., 100.00, 54.38, 81.52, 61.65, 75.54, 79.96
• s & p 500, 100.00, 77.90, 100.24, 111.15, 116.61, 135.03
• nasdaq composite, 100.00, 71.97, 107.18, 117.07, 120.50, 137.02
• s & p information technology, 100.00, 62.59, 92.14, 94.50, 95.44, 103.47
========================================

.

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders of cadence design systems , inc . 2019s common stock and the s&p 500 for the period ended december 30 , 2006?
Program: subtract(79.96, const_100), divide(#0, const_100), subtract(135.03, const_100), divide(#2, const_100), subtract(#1, #3)
Answer: -0.5507
table of contents the following performance graph is not 201csoliciting material , 201d is not deemed filed with the sec , and is not to be incorporated by reference into any of valero 2019s filings under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , respectively . this performance graph and the related textual information are based on historical data and are not indicative of future performance . the following line graph compares the cumulative total return 1 on an investment in our common stock against the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 composite index and an index of peer companies ( that we selected ) for the five-year period commencing december 31 , 2008 and ending december 31 , 2013 . our peer group comprises the following 11 companies : alon usa energy , inc. ; bp plc ; cvr energy , inc. ; delek us holdings , inc . ( dk ) ; hollyfrontier corporation ; marathon petroleum corporation ; pbf energy inc . ( pbf ) ; phillips 66 ; royal dutch shell plc ; tesoro corporation ; and western refining , inc . our peer group previously included hess corporation , but it has exited the refining business , and was replaced in our peer group by dk and pbf who are also engaged in refining operations . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return1 among valero energy corporation , the s&p 500 index , old peer group , and new peer group .

----------------------------------------
Row 1: , 12/2008, 12/2009, 12/2010, 12/2011, 12/2012, 12/2013
Row 2: valero common stock, $ 100.00, $ 79.77, $ 111.31, $ 102.57, $ 170.45, $ 281.24
Row 3: s&p 500, 100.00, 126.46, 145.51, 148.59, 172.37, 228.19
Row 4: old peer group, 100.00, 126.98, 122.17, 127.90, 138.09, 170.45
Row 5: new peer group, 100.00, 127.95, 120.42, 129.69, 136.92, 166.57
----------------------------------------

____________ 1 assumes that an investment in valero common stock and each index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2008 . 201ccumulative total return 201d is based on share price appreciation plus reinvestment of dividends from december 31 , 2008 through december 31 , 2013. .

Question: what is the total return in valero common stock from 2008-2013?
Program: subtract(281.24, const_100)
Answer: 181.24
the fair value of the psu award at the date of grant is amortized to expense over the performance period , which is typically three years after the date of the award , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 . as of december 31 , 2017 , pmi had $ 34 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested psu awards . this cost is recognized over a weighted-average performance cycle period of two years , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 . during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , and 2016 , there were no psu awards that vested . pmi did not grant any psu awards during note 10 . earnings per share : unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and therefore are included in pmi 2019s earnings per share calculation pursuant to the two-class method . basic and diluted earnings per share ( 201ceps 201d ) were calculated using the following: .

****************************************
( in millions )	for the years ended december 31 , 2017	for the years ended december 31 , 2016	for the years ended december 31 , 2015
net earnings attributable to pmi	$ 6035	$ 6967	$ 6873
less distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based payment awards	14	19	24
net earnings for basic and diluted eps	$ 6021	$ 6948	$ 6849
weighted-average shares for basic eps	1552	1551	1549
plus contingently issuable performance stock units ( psus )	1	2014	2014
weighted-average shares for diluted eps	1553	1551	1549
****************************************

for the 2017 , 2016 and 2015 computations , there were no antidilutive stock options. .

Question: what was the change in weighted-average shares for diluted eps from 2016 to 2017 , in millions?
Program: subtract(1553, 1551)
Answer: 2.0
apple inc . | 2018 form 10-k | 20 company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend-reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index for the five years ended september 29 , 2018 . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 27 , 2013 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . * $ 100 invested on september 27 , 2013 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019s common stock and september 30th for indexes . copyright a9 2018 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2018 s&p dow jones indices llc , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . september september september september september september .

****************************************
	september2013	september2014	september2015	september2016	september2017	september2018
apple inc .	$ 100	$ 149	$ 173	$ 174	$ 242	$ 359
s&p 500 index	$ 100	$ 120	$ 119	$ 137	$ 163	$ 192
s&p information technology index	$ 100	$ 129	$ 132	$ 162	$ 209	$ 275
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index	$ 100	$ 130	$ 130	$ 159	$ 203	$ 266
****************************************

.

Question: did apple outperform ( earn a greater return ) than the s&p information technology index in september 2018?
Program: greater(359, 275)
Answer: yes
dollar general corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 3 . merger ( continued ) merger as a subsidiary of buck . the company 2019s results of operations after july 6 , 2007 include the effects of the merger . the aggregate purchase price was approximately $ 7.1 billion , including direct costs of the merger , and was funded primarily through debt financings as described more fully below in note 7 and cash equity contributions from kkr , gs capital partners vi fund , l.p . and affiliated funds ( affiliates of goldman , sachs & co. ) , and other equity co-investors ( collectively , the 2018 2018investors 2019 2019 of approximately $ 2.8 billion ( 316.2 million shares of new common stock , $ 0.875 par value per share , valued at $ 8.75 per share ) . also in connection with the merger , certain of the company 2019s management employees invested in and were issued new shares , representing less than 1% ( 1 % ) of the outstanding shares , in the company . pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement , the former holders of the predecessor 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.50 per share , received $ 22.00 per share , or approximately $ 6.9 billion , and all such shares were acquired as a result of the merger . as discussed in note 1 , the merger was accounted for as a reverse acquisition in accordance with applicable purchase accounting provisions . because of this accounting treatment , the company 2019s assets and liabilities have properly been accounted for at their estimated fair values as of the merger date . the aggregate purchase price has been allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon an assessment of their relative fair values as of the merger date . the allocation of the purchase price is as follows ( in thousands ) : .

----------------------------------------
cash and cash equivalents	$ 349615
short-term investments	30906
merchandise inventories	1368130
income taxes receivable	40199
deferred income taxes	57176
prepaid expenses and other current assets	63204
property and equipment net	1301119
goodwill	4338589
intangible assets	1396612
other assets net	66537
current portion of long-term obligations	-7088 ( 7088 )
accounts payable	-585518 ( 585518 )
accrued expenses and other	-306394 ( 306394 )
income taxes payable	-84 ( 84 )
long-term obligations	-267927 ( 267927 )
deferred income taxes	-540675 ( 540675 )
other liabilities	-208710 ( 208710 )
total purchase price assigned	$ 7095691
----------------------------------------

the purchase price allocation included approximately $ 4.34 billion of goodwill , none of which is expected to be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill balance at january 30 , 2009 decreased $ 6.3 million from the balance at february 1 , 2008 due to an adjustment to income tax contingencies as further discussed in note 6. .

Question: what percentage of the purchase price was hard assets?
Program: divide(1301119, 7095691)
Answer: 0.18337
notes to consolidated financial statements the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of related tax , are as follows: .

****************************************
( millions ) as of december 31, 2007, 2006, 2005
net derivative gains ( losses ), $ 24, $ 15, $ -11 ( 11 )
net unrealized investment gains, 76, 73, 52
net foreign exchange translation, 284, 118, -119 ( 119 )
postretirement plans, -1110 ( 1110 ), -1216 ( 1216 ), -1077 ( 1077 )
accumulated other comprehensive loss, $ -726 ( 726 ), $ -1010 ( 1010 ), $ -1155 ( 1155 )
****************************************

aon corporation .

Question: what are the average net unrealized investment gains for the period?
Program: table_average(net unrealized investment gains, none)
Answer: 67.0
shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index , the s&p financial index and the kbw bank index over a five- year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2008 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2008 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 81 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 17 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 19 real estate companies and 23 banking companies . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s. , and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts. .

========================================
, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
state street corporation, $ 100, $ 111, $ 118, $ 105, $ 125, $ 198
s&p 500 index, 100, 126, 146, 149, 172, 228
s&p financial index, 100, 117, 132, 109, 141, 191
kbw bank index, 100, 98, 121, 93, 122, 168
========================================

.

Question: how much higher are the returns of the s&p 500 in the same period ( 2008-2013 ) ? as a percentage .
Program: divide(228, 100), divide(#0, 100)
Answer: 0.0228
shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation fffds cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2011 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2006 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return to stockholders ( assumes $ 100 investment on 12/31/06 ) total return analysis .

----------------------------------------
 | 12/31/2006 | 12/31/2007 | 12/31/2008 | 12/31/2009 | 12/31/2010 | 12/31/2011
----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------
ball corporation | $ 100.00 | $ 104.05 | $ 97.04 | $ 121.73 | $ 161.39 | $ 170.70
dj us containers & packaging | $ 100.00 | $ 106.73 | $ 66.91 | $ 93.98 | $ 110.23 | $ 110.39
s&p 500 | $ 100.00 | $ 105.49 | $ 66.46 | $ 84.05 | $ 96.71 | $ 98.75
----------------------------------------

copyright a9 2012 standard & poor fffds , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ) copyright a9 2012 dow jones & company . all rights reserved. .

Question: what was the five year return on ball corporation stock , in dollars per share?
Program: subtract(170.70, 100.00)
Answer: 70.7
vornado realty trust notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 20 . leases as lessor : we lease space to tenants under operating leases . most of the leases provide for the payment of fixed base rentals payable monthly in advance . office building leases generally require the tenants to reimburse us for operating costs and real estate taxes above their base year costs . shopping center leases provide for pass-through to tenants the tenant 2019s share of real estate taxes , insurance and maintenance . shopping center leases also provide for the payment by the lessee of additional rent based on a percentage of the tenants 2019 sales . as of december 31 , 2012 , future base rental revenue under non-cancelable operating leases , excluding rents for leases with an original term of less than one year and rents resulting from the exercise of renewal options , are as follows : ( amounts in thousands ) year ending december 31: .

2013 | $ 1842355
----------|----------
2014 | 1738439
2015 | 1578559
2016 | 1400020
2017 | 1249904
thereafter | 6134903

these amounts do not include percentage rentals based on tenants 2019 sales . these percentage rents approximated $ 8466000 , $ 7995000 and $ 7339000 , for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . none of our tenants accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenues in any of the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 . former bradlees locations pursuant to a master agreement and guaranty , dated may 1 , 1992 , we were due $ 5000000 of annual rent from stop & shop which was allocated to certain bradlees former locations . on december 31 , 2002 , prior to the expiration of the leases to which the additional rent was allocated , we reallocated this rent to other former bradlees leases also guaranteed by stop & shop . stop & shop contested our right to reallocate the rent . on november 7 , 2011 , the court determined that we had a continuing right to allocate the annual rent to unexpired leases covered by the master agreement and guaranty and directed entry of a judgment in our favor ordering stop & shop to pay us the unpaid annual rent . at december 31 , 2012 , we had a $ 47900000 receivable from stop and shop , which is included as a component of 201ctenant and other receivables 201d on our consolidated balance sheet . on february 6 , 2013 , we received $ 124000000 pursuant to a settlement agreement with stop & shop ( see note 22 2013 commitments and contingencies 2013 litigation ) . .

Question: for 2012 and 2011 , percentage rentals based on tenants 2019 sales totaled what in thousands?
Program: add(8466000, 7995000)
Answer: 16461000.0