wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
12 . brokerage receivables and brokerage payables citi has receivables and payables for financial instruments sold to and purchased from brokers , dealers and customers , which arise in the ordinary course of business . citi is exposed to risk of loss from the inability of brokers , dealers or customers to pay for purchases or to deliver the financial instruments sold , in which case citi would have to sell or purchase the financial instruments at prevailing market prices . credit risk is reduced to the extent that an exchange or clearing organization acts as a counterparty to the transaction and replaces the broker , dealer or customer in question . citi seeks to protect itself from the risks associated with customer activities by requiring customers to maintain margin collateral in compliance with regulatory and internal guidelines . margin levels are monitored daily , and customers deposit additional collateral as required . where customers cannot meet collateral requirements , citi may liquidate sufficient underlying financial instruments to bring the customer into compliance with the required margin level . exposure to credit risk is impacted by market volatility , which may impair the ability of clients to satisfy their obligations to citi . credit limits are established and closely monitored for customers and for brokers and dealers engaged in forwards , futures and other transactions deemed to be credit sensitive . brokerage receivables and brokerage payables consisted of the following: .

----------------------------------------
Row 1: in millions of dollars, december 31 , 2017, december 31 , 2016
Row 2: receivables from customers, $ 19215, $ 10374
Row 3: receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations, 19169, 18513
Row 4: total brokerage receivables ( 1 ), $ 38384, $ 28887
Row 5: payables to customers, $ 38741, $ 37237
Row 6: payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations, 22601, 19915
Row 7: total brokerage payables ( 1 ), $ 61342, $ 57152
----------------------------------------

payables to brokers , dealers and clearing organizations 22601 19915 total brokerage payables ( 1 ) $ 61342 $ 57152 ( 1 ) includes brokerage receivables and payables recorded by citi broker- dealer entities that are accounted for in accordance with the aicpa accounting guide for brokers and dealers in securities as codified in asc 940-320. .

Question: what was the percentage increased in the total brokerage payables from 2016 to 2017
Program: subtract(61342, 57152), divide(#0, 57152)
Answer: 0.07331
common stock from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to stock price , business and market conditions and other factors . we have been funding and expect to continue to fund stock repurchases through a combination of cash on hand and cash generated by operations . in the future , we may also choose to fund our stock repurchase program under our revolving credit facility or future financing transactions . there were no repurchases of our series a and b common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2013 . the company first announced its stock repurchase program on august 3 , 2010 . stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , twenty-first century fox , inc . class a common stock ( news corporation class a common stock prior to june 2013 ) , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2008 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012 and 2013 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

 | december 312008 | december 312009 | december 312010 | december 312011 | december 312012 | december 312013
disca | $ 100.00 | $ 216.60 | $ 294.49 | $ 289.34 | $ 448.31 | $ 638.56
discb | $ 100.00 | $ 207.32 | $ 287.71 | $ 277.03 | $ 416.52 | $ 602.08
disck | $ 100.00 | $ 198.06 | $ 274.01 | $ 281.55 | $ 436.89 | $ 626.29
s&p 500 | $ 100.00 | $ 123.45 | $ 139.23 | $ 139.23 | $ 157.90 | $ 204.63
peer group | $ 100.00 | $ 151.63 | $ 181.00 | $ 208.91 | $ 286.74 | $ 454.87

equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. .

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on disca for the five year period ended december 21 , 2013?
Program: subtract(638.56, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)
Answer: 5.3856
item 2 : properties information concerning applied 2019s properties is set forth below: .

========================================
Row 1: ( square feet in thousands ), united states, other countries, total
Row 2: owned, 3964, 1652, 5616
Row 3: leased, 845, 1153, 1998
Row 4: total, 4809, 2805, 7614
========================================

because of the interrelation of applied 2019s operations , properties within a country may be shared by the segments operating within that country . the company 2019s headquarters offices are in santa clara , california . products in semiconductor systems are manufactured in santa clara , california ; austin , texas ; gloucester , massachusetts ; kalispell , montana ; rehovot , israel ; and singapore . remanufactured equipment products in the applied global services segment are produced primarily in austin , texas . products in the display and adjacent markets segment are manufactured in alzenau , germany ; and tainan , taiwan . other products are manufactured in treviso , italy . applied also owns and leases offices , plants and warehouse locations in many locations throughout the world , including in europe , japan , north america ( principally the united states ) , israel , china , india , korea , southeast asia and taiwan . these facilities are principally used for manufacturing ; research , development and engineering ; and marketing , sales and customer support . applied also owns a total of approximately 269 acres of buildable land in montana , texas , california , israel and italy that could accommodate additional building space . applied considers the properties that it owns or leases as adequate to meet its current and future requirements . applied regularly assesses the size , capability and location of its global infrastructure and periodically makes adjustments based on these assessments. .

Question: what portion of the company's property is located in united states?
Program: divide(5616, 7614)
Answer: 0.73759
table of contents part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . price range our common stock trades on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol 201cmktx 201d . the range of closing price information for our common stock , as reported by nasdaq , was as follows : on february 20 , 2013 , the last reported closing price of our common stock on the nasdaq global select market was $ 39.60 . holders there were 33 holders of record of our common stock as of february 20 , 2013 . dividend policy we initiated a regular quarterly dividend in the fourth quarter of 2009 . during 2012 and 2011 , we paid quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.11 per share and $ 0.09 per share , respectively . on december 27 , 2012 , we paid a special dividend of $ 1.30 per share . in january 2013 , our board of directors approved a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.13 per share payable on february 28 , 2013 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on february 14 , 2013 . any future declaration and payment of dividends will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors . the board of directors may take into account such matters as general business conditions , our financial results , capital requirements , and contractual , legal , and regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends to our stockholders or by our subsidiaries to the parent and any other such factors as the board of directors may deem relevant . recent sales of unregistered securities securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans please see the section entitled 201cequity compensation plan information 201d in item 12. .

2012:	high	low
january 1 2012 to march 31 2012	$ 37.79	$ 29.26
april 1 2012 to june 30 2012	$ 37.65	$ 26.22
july 1 2012 to september 30 2012	$ 34.00	$ 26.88
october 1 2012 to december 31 2012	$ 35.30	$ 29.00
2011:	high	low
january 1 2011 to march 31 2011	$ 24.19	$ 19.78
april 1 2011 to june 30 2011	$ 25.22	$ 21.00
july 1 2011 to september 30 2011	$ 30.75	$ 23.41
october 1 2011 to december 31 2011	$ 31.16	$ 24.57

.

Question: for the period of october 1 2011 to december 31 2011 , what was the difference between high and low share price?
Program: subtract(31.16, 24.57)
Answer: 6.59
notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d . 1 . nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad that operates in the united states . we have 32094 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern united states gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways . we serve the western two- thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico . export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders . the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment . although revenues are analyzed by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network . the following table provides revenue by commodity group : millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 .

========================================
millions of dollars	2009	2008	2007
agricultural	$ 2666	$ 3174	$ 2605
automotive	854	1344	1458
chemicals	2102	2494	2287
energy	3118	3810	3134
industrial products	2147	3273	3077
intermodal	2486	3023	2925
total freight revenues	$ 13373	$ 17118	$ 15486
other revenues	770	852	797
total operating revenues	$ 14143	$ 17970	$ 16283
========================================

although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the united states , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported are outside the united states . basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the united states of america ( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) . subsequent events evaluation 2013 we evaluated the effects of all subsequent events through february 5 , 2010 , the date of this report , which is concurrent with the date we file this report with the u.s . securities and exchange commission ( sec ) . 2 . significant accounting policies change in accounting principle 2013 we have historically accounted for rail grinding costs as a capital asset . beginning in the first quarter of 2010 , we will change our accounting policy for rail grinding costs .

Question: for the three year period what were cumulative operating revenues?
Program: table_sum(total operating revenues, none), multiply(#0, const_1000000)
Answer: 48396000000.0
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2008 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. .

========================================
Row 1: , 12/31/2008, 12/31/2009, 12/31/2010, 12/31/2011, 12/31/2012, 12/31/2013
Row 2: united parcel service inc ., $ 100.00, $ 107.75, $ 140.39, $ 145.84, $ 151.44, $ 221.91
Row 3: standard & poor 2019s 500 index, $ 100.00, $ 126.45, $ 145.49, $ 148.55, $ 172.30, $ 228.09
Row 4: dow jones transportation average, $ 100.00, $ 118.59, $ 150.30, $ 150.31, $ 161.56, $ 228.42
========================================

.

Question: what was the difference in percentage total cumulative return on investment for united parcel service inc . compared to the dow jones transportation average for the five years ended 12/31/2013?
Program: subtract(221.91, const_100), divide(#0, const_100), subtract(228.42, const_100), divide(#2, const_100), subtract(#1, #3)
Answer: -0.0651
performance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor's 500 composite stock index ( "s&p 500 index" ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor's industrials index ( "s&p industrials index" ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor's consumer durables & apparel index ( "s&p consumer durables & apparel index" ) , from december 31 , 2012 through december 31 , 2017 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 43.94 . the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2012 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends . the table below sets forth the value , as of december 31 for each of the years indicated , of a $ 100 investment made on december 31 , 2012 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p industrials index and the s&p consumer durables & apparel index and includes the reinvestment of dividends. .

 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017
----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------
masco | $ 138.48 | $ 155.26 | $ 200.79 | $ 227.08 | $ 318.46
s&p 500 index | $ 132.04 | $ 149.89 | $ 151.94 | $ 169.82 | $ 206.49
s&p industrials index | $ 140.18 | $ 153.73 | $ 149.83 | $ 177.65 | $ 214.55
s&p consumer durables & apparel index | $ 135.84 | $ 148.31 | $ 147.23 | $ 138.82 | $ 164.39

$ 50.00 $ 100.00 $ 150.00 $ 200.00 $ 250.00 $ 300.00 $ 350.00 masco s&p 500 index s&p industrials index s&p consumer durables & apparel index .

Question: what was the percentage of the growth of the s&p 500 index from 2016 to 2017
Program: subtract(206.49, 169.82), divide(#0, 169.82)
Answer: 0.21593
in direct competition with other co2 pipelines . we also compete with other interest owners in the mcelmo dome unit and the bravo dome unit for transportation of co2 to the denver city , texas market area . terminals our terminals segment includes the operations of our refined petroleum product , crude oil , chemical , ethanol and other liquid terminal facilities ( other than those included in the products pipelines segment ) and all of our coal , petroleum coke , fertilizer , steel , ores and other dry-bulk terminal facilities . our terminals are located throughout the u.s . and in portions of canada . we believe the location of our facilities and our ability to provide flexibility to customers help attract new and retain existing customers at our terminals and provide expansion opportunities . we often classify our terminal operations based on the handling of either liquids or dry-bulk material products . in addition , terminals 2019 marine operations include jones act qualified product tankers that provide marine transportation of crude oil , condensate and refined petroleum products in the u.s . the following summarizes our terminals segment assets , as of december 31 , 2016 : number capacity ( mmbbl ) .

========================================
• , number, capacity ( mmbbl )
• liquids terminals, 51, 85.2
• bulk terminals, 37, 2014
• jones act tankers, 12, 4.0
========================================

competition we are one of the largest independent operators of liquids terminals in north america , based on barrels of liquids terminaling capacity . our liquids terminals compete with other publicly or privately held independent liquids terminals , and terminals owned by oil , chemical , pipeline , and refining companies . our bulk terminals compete with numerous independent terminal operators , terminals owned by producers and distributors of bulk commodities , stevedoring companies and other industrial companies opting not to outsource terminaling services . in some locations , competitors are smaller , independent operators with lower cost structures . our jones act qualified product tankers compete with other jones act qualified vessel fleets. .

Question: what is the average capacity in mmbbl of jones act tankers?
Program: divide(const_4, 12)
Answer: 0.33333
company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology index as of the market close on september 30 , 2007 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . sep-11sep-10sep-09sep-08sep-07 sep-12 apple inc . s&p 500 s&p computer hardware dow jones us technology comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among apple inc. , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones us technology index *$ 100 invested on 9/30/07 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright a9 2012 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 .

****************************************
 | september 30 2007 | september 30 2008 | september 30 2009 | september 30 2010 | september 30 2011 | september 30 2012
----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------
apple inc . | $ 100 | $ 74 | $ 121 | $ 185 | $ 248 | $ 437
s&p 500 | $ 100 | $ 78 | $ 73 | $ 80 | $ 81 | $ 105
s&p computer hardware | $ 100 | $ 84 | $ 99 | $ 118 | $ 134 | $ 214
dow jones us technology | $ 100 | $ 76 | $ 85 | $ 95 | $ 98 | $ 127
****************************************

.

Question: what was the difference in the percentage 5 year cumulative total return between apple inc . and thes&p computer hardware for the the period ended september 30 , 2012?
Program: subtract(437, 100), divide(#0, 100), subtract(214, 100), divide(#2, 100), subtract(#1, #3)
Answer: 2.23
entergy new orleans , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 3.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher interest expense , and lower other income . 2015 compared to 2014 net income increased $ 13.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses and higher net revenue , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .

========================================
 | amount ( in millions )
----------|----------
2015 net revenue | $ 293.9
retail electric price | 39.0
net gas revenue | -2.5 ( 2.5 )
volume/weather | -5.1 ( 5.1 )
other | -8.1 ( 8.1 )
2016 net revenue | $ 317.2
========================================

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in the purchased power and capacity acquisition cost recovery rider , as approved by the city council , effective with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , primarily related to the purchase of power block 1 of the union power station . see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to a decrease of 112 gwh , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in billed electricity usage , partially offset by the effect of favorable weather on commercial sales and a 2% ( 2 % ) increase in the average number of electric customers. .

Question: what is the net change in net revenue during 2016 for entergy new orleans , inc?
Program: subtract(317.2, 293.9)
Answer: 23.3