wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
table of contents other areas in which we do business . depending on the scope of such regulation , certain of our facilities and operations , or the operations of our suppliers , may be subject to additional operating and other permit requirements , potentially resulting in increased operating costs . future regulatory developments future regulatory developments and actions could affect operations and increase operating costs for the airline industry , including our airline subsidiaries . see part i , item 1a . risk factors 2013 201cif we are unable to obtain and maintain adequate facilities and infrastructure throughout our system and , at some airports , adequate slots , we may be unable to operate our existing flight schedule and to expand or change our route network in the future , which may have a material adverse impact on our operations , 201d 201cour business is subject to extensive government regulation , which may result in increases in our costs , disruptions to our operations , limits on our operating flexibility , reductions in the demand for air travel , and competitive disadvantages 201d and 201cwe are subject to many forms of environmental regulation and may incur substantial costs as a result 201d for additional information . employees and labor relations the airline business is labor intensive . in 2015 , salaries , wages and benefits were our largest expenses and represented approximately 31% ( 31 % ) of our operating expenses . the table below presents our approximate number of active full-time equivalent employees as of december 31 , 2015 . mainline operations wholly-owned regional carriers total .

========================================
Row 1: , mainline operations, wholly-owned regional carriers, total
Row 2: pilots and flight crew training instructors, 13100, 3200, 16300
Row 3: flight attendants, 24100, 1900, 26000
Row 4: maintenance personnel, 14400, 1800, 16200
Row 5: fleet service personnel, 16100, 3200, 19300
Row 6: passenger service personnel, 16500, 7100, 23600
Row 7: administrative and other, 14700, 2400, 17100
Row 8: total, 98900, 19600, 118500
========================================

.

Question: what is the percent of the mainline operations full-time equivalent employees to the total number of full-time equivalent employees
Program: divide(98900, 118500)
Answer: 0.8346
five-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dow jones , and the s&p 500 . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2002 , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative return 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 upc s&p 500 peer group dj trans purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2007 , we repurchased 13266070 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 115.66 . during the first nine months of 2007 , we repurchased 10639916 shares of our common stock at an average price per share of $ 112.68 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2007 : period number of shares purchased average paid per total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan or program .

****************************************
period, totalnumber ofsharespurchased[a], averagepricepaid pershare, total number of sharespurchased as part of apublicly announcedplan orprogram, maximum number ofshares that may yetbe purchased underthe plan orprogram[b]
oct . 1 through oct . 31, 99782, $ 128.78, -, 9774279
nov . 1 through nov . 30, 540294, 124.70, 528000, 9246279
dec . 1 through dec . 31, 1986078, 128.53, 1869800, 7376479
total, 2626154, $ 127.75, 2397800, n/a
****************************************

[a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes 228354 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] on january 30 , 2007 , our board of directors authorized us to repurchase up to 20 million shares of our common stock through december 31 , 2009 . we may make these repurchases on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .

Question: what percentage of the total number of shares purchased were purchased in december?
Program: divide(1986078, 2626154)
Answer: 0.75627
table of contents rent expense under all operating leases , including both cancelable and noncancelable leases , was $ 645 million , $ 488 million and $ 338 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year as of september 28 , 2013 , are as follows ( in millions ) : other commitments as of september 28 , 2013 , the company had outstanding off-balance sheet third-party manufacturing commitments and component purchase commitments of $ 18.6 billion . in addition to the off-balance sheet commitments mentioned above , the company had outstanding obligations of $ 1.3 billion as of september 28 , 2013 , which consisted mainly of commitments to acquire capital assets , including product tooling and manufacturing process equipment , and commitments related to advertising , research and development , internet and telecommunications services and other obligations . contingencies the company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course of business and that have not been fully adjudicated . in the opinion of management , there was not at least a reasonable possibility the company may have incurred a material loss , or a material loss in excess of a recorded accrual , with respect to loss contingencies . however , the outcome of litigation is inherently uncertain . therefore , although management considers the likelihood of such an outcome to be remote , if one or more of these legal matters were resolved against the company in a reporting period for amounts in excess of management 2019s expectations , the company 2019s consolidated financial statements for that reporting period could be materially adversely affected . apple inc . v . samsung electronics co. , ltd , et al . on august 24 , 2012 , a jury returned a verdict awarding the company $ 1.05 billion in its lawsuit against samsung electronics co. , ltd and affiliated parties in the united states district court , northern district of california , san jose division . on march 1 , 2013 , the district court upheld $ 599 million of the jury 2019s award and ordered a new trial as to the remainder . because the award is subject to entry of final judgment , partial re-trial and appeal , the company has not recognized the award in its results of operations . virnetx , inc . v . apple inc . et al . on august 11 , 2010 , virnetx , inc . filed an action against the company alleging that certain of its products infringed on four patents relating to network communications technology . on november 6 , 2012 , a jury returned a verdict against the company , and awarded damages of $ 368 million . the company is challenging the verdict , believes it has valid defenses and has not recorded a loss accrual at this time. .

========================================
2014, $ 610
2015, 613
2016, 587
2017, 551
2018, 505
thereafter, 1855
total minimum lease payments, $ 4721
========================================

.

Question: why is the information relative to 2012 costs incorrect and what would the correct information be?
Program: add(488, 368)
Answer: 856.0
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount was a net regulatory asset ( liability ) of ( $ 2.0 ) million and $ 60.6 million as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2011 , system energy had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) , which are recorded as long-term debt as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

========================================
 | amount ( in thousands )
2012 | $ 49959
2013 | 50546
2014 | 51637
2015 | 52253
2016 | -
years thereafter | -
total | 204395
less : amount representing interest | 25611
present value of net minimum lease payments | $ 178784
========================================

.

Question: as of december 31 , 2011what was the percent of system energy future minimum lease payments that was due in 2015
Program: divide(52253, 204395)
Answer: 0.25565
stock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended ( the 201cexchange act 201d ) or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of tractor supply company under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act . the following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock from december 28 , 2013 to december 29 , 2018 ( the company 2019s fiscal year-end ) , with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the s&p retail index over the same period . the comparison assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 28 , 2013 , in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and in each case assumes reinvestment of dividends . the historical stock price performance shown on this graph is not indicative of future performance. .

========================================
, 12/28/2013, 12/27/2014, 12/26/2015, 12/31/2016, 12/30/2017, 12/29/2018
tractor supply company, $ 100.00, $ 104.11, $ 115.45, $ 103.33, $ 103.67, $ 117.18
s&p 500, $ 100.00, $ 115.76, $ 116.64, $ 129.55, $ 157.84, $ 149.63
s&p retail index, $ 100.00, $ 111.18, $ 140.22, $ 148.53, $ 193.68, $ 217.01
========================================

.

Question: how much of a greater return , in percentage , was gained in the s&p retail index compared to the tractor supply company?
Program: subtract(217.01, 100.00), divide(#0, 100.00), subtract(117.18, 100), divide(#2, 100), subtract(#1, #3)
Answer: 0.9983
stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2011 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 31 , 2016 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/31/1612/28/13 1/2/1612/31/11 1/3/1512/29/12 *$ 100 invested on 12/31/11 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2017 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved. .

----------------------------------------
, 12/31/2011, 12/29/2012, 12/28/2013, 1/3/2015, 1/2/2016, 12/31/2016
cadence design systems inc ., 100.00, 129.23, 133.94, 181.06, 200.10, 242.50
nasdaq composite, 100.00, 116.41, 165.47, 188.69, 200.32, 216.54
s&p 400 information technology, 100.00, 118.41, 165.38, 170.50, 178.74, 219.65
----------------------------------------

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on cadence design systems inc . common stock and the s&p 400 information technology for the period ended 12/31/2016?
Program: subtract(242.50, const_100), divide(#0, const_100), subtract(219.65, const_100), divide(#2, const_100), subtract(#1, #3)
Answer: 0.2285
packaging corporation of america notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) december 31 , 2006 4 . stock-based compensation ( continued ) as of december 31 , 2006 , there was $ 8330000 of total unrecognized compensation costs related to the restricted stock awards . the company expects to recognize the cost of these stock awards over a weighted-average period of 2.5 years . 5 . accrued liabilities the components of accrued liabilities are as follows: .

( in thousands ), december 31 , 2006, december 31 , 2005
bonuses and incentives, $ 29822, $ 21895
medical insurance and workers 2019 compensation, 18279, 18339
vacation and holiday pay, 14742, 14159
customer volume discounts and rebates, 13777, 13232
franchise and property taxes, 8432, 8539
payroll and payroll taxes, 5465, 4772
other, 9913, 5889
total, $ 100430, $ 86825

6 . employee benefit plans and other postretirement benefits in connection with the acquisition from pactiv , pca and pactiv entered into a human resources agreement which , among other items , granted pca employees continued participation in the pactiv pension plan for a period of up to five years following the closing of the acquisition for an agreed upon fee . effective january 1 , 2003 , pca adopted a mirror-image pension plan for eligible hourly employees to succeed the pactiv pension plan in which pca hourly employees had participated though december 31 , 2002 . the pca pension plan for hourly employees recognizes service earned under both the pca plan and the prior pactiv plan . benefits earned under the pca plan are reduced by retirement benefits earned under the pactiv plan through december 31 , 2002 . all assets and liabilities associated with benefits earned through december 31 , 2002 for hourly employees and retirees of pca were retained by the pactiv plan . effective may 1 , 2004 , pca adopted a grandfathered pension plan for certain salaried employees who had previously participated in the pactiv pension plan pursuant to the above mentioned human resource agreement . the benefit formula for the new pca pension plan for salaried employees is comparable to that of the pactiv plan except that the pca plan uses career average base pay in the benefit formula in lieu of final average base pay . the pca pension plan for salaried employees recognizes service earned under both the pca plan and the prior pactiv plan . benefits earned under the pca plan are reduced by retirement benefits earned under the pactiv plan through april 30 , 2004 . all assets and liabilities associated with benefits earned through april 30 , 2004 for salaried employees and retirees of pca were retained by the pactiv plan . pca maintains a supplemental executive retirement plan ( 201cserp 201d ) , which augments pension benefits for eligible executives ( excluding the ceo ) earned under the pca pension plan for salaried employees . benefits are determined using the same formula as the pca pension plan but in addition to counting .

Question: what was the percent of the bonuses and incentives of the total accrued liabilities
Program: divide(29822, 100430)
Answer: 0.29694
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 26 , 2008 through october 27 , 2013 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 26 , 2008 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index * assumes $ 100 invested on 10/26/08 in stock or 10/31/08 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . 201cs&p 201d is a registered trademark of standard & poor 2019s financial services llc , a subsidiary of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc. .

========================================
 | 10/26/2008 | 10/25/2009 | 10/31/2010 | 10/30/2011 | 10/28/2012 | 10/27/2013
applied materials | 100.00 | 116.07 | 113.08 | 118.21 | 102.77 | 175.76
s&p 500 index | 100.00 | 109.80 | 127.94 | 138.29 | 159.32 | 202.61
rdg semiconductor composite index | 100.00 | 124.98 | 153.98 | 166.89 | 149.81 | 200.47
========================================

dividends during fiscal 2013 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.09 per share . during fiscal 2012 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.09 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.08 per share . during fiscal 2011 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.08 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.07 . dividends declared during fiscal 2013 , 2012 and 2011 totaled $ 469 million , $ 438 million and $ 408 million , respectively . applied currently anticipates that it will continue to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis in the future , although the declaration and amount of any future cash dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders. .

Question: what is the total return if 100000 are invested in s&p500 in 2008 and sold in 2011?
Program: subtract(138.29, const_100), divide(100000, const_100), multiply(#1, #0)
Answer: 38290.0
stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , news corporation class a common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on september 18 , 2008 , the date upon which our common stock began trading , in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the period september 18 , 2008 through december 31 , 2008 and the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 and 2011 . of cash on hand , cash generated by operations , borrowings under our revolving credit facility and future financing transactions . under the program , management is authorized to purchase shares from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to stock price , business conditions , market conditions and other factors . the repurchase program does not have an expiration date . the above repurchases were funded using cash on hand . there were no repurchases of our series a common stock or series b common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2011 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

========================================
	december 31 2008	december 31 2009	december 31 2010	december 31 2011
disca	$ 102.53	$ 222.09	$ 301.96	$ 296.67
discb	$ 78.53	$ 162.82	$ 225.95	$ 217.56
disck	$ 83.69	$ 165.75	$ 229.31	$ 235.63
s&p 500	$ 74.86	$ 92.42	$ 104.24	$ 104.23
peer group	$ 68.79	$ 100.70	$ 121.35	$ 138.19
========================================

.

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on disca from september 18 , 2008 to december 31 , 2011?
Program: subtract(296.67, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)
Answer: 1.9667
company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology index on september 30 , 2006 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among apple inc. , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index and the dow jones us technology index sep-10sep-09sep-08sep-07sep-06 sep-11 apple inc . s&p 500 s&p computer hardware dow jones us technology *$ 100 invested on 9/30/06 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright a9 2011 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2011 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 .

----------------------------------------
 | september 30 2006 | september 30 2007 | september 30 2008 | september 30 2009 | september 30 2010 | september 30 2011
apple inc . | $ 100 | $ 199 | $ 148 | $ 241 | $ 369 | $ 495
s&p 500 | $ 100 | $ 116 | $ 91 | $ 85 | $ 93 | $ 94
s&p computer hardware | $ 100 | $ 148 | $ 124 | $ 147 | $ 174 | $ 197
dow jones us technology | $ 100 | $ 123 | $ 94 | $ 104 | $ 117 | $ 120
----------------------------------------

.

Question: did apple achieve a greater return in the year ended sept . 30 2009 than the s&p 500?
Program: greater(241, 85)
Answer: yes