wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
apple inc . | 2018 form 10-k | 20 company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend-reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index for the five years ended september 29 , 2018 . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 27 , 2013 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . * $ 100 invested on september 27 , 2013 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019s common stock and september 30th for indexes . copyright a9 2018 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2018 s&p dow jones indices llc , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . september september september september september september .

========================================
 | september2013 | september2014 | september2015 | september2016 | september2017 | september2018
apple inc . | $ 100 | $ 149 | $ 173 | $ 174 | $ 242 | $ 359
s&p 500 index | $ 100 | $ 120 | $ 119 | $ 137 | $ 163 | $ 192
s&p information technology index | $ 100 | $ 129 | $ 132 | $ 162 | $ 209 | $ 275
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index | $ 100 | $ 130 | $ 130 | $ 159 | $ 203 | $ 266
========================================

.

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total return for apple inc . for the five year period ended september 2018?
Program: subtract(359, 100), divide(#0, 100)
Answer: 2.59
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements the allocation of the purchase price was finalized during the year ended december 31 , 2012 . the following table summarizes the allocation of the aggregate purchase consideration paid and the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition ( in thousands ) : purchase price allocation .

Row 1: , final purchase price allocation
Row 2: non-current assets, $ 2
Row 3: property and equipment, 3590
Row 4: intangible assets ( 1 ), 1062
Row 5: other non-current liabilities, -91 ( 91 )
Row 6: fair value of net assets acquired, $ 4563
Row 7: goodwill ( 2 ), 89

( 1 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 0.4 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 0.7 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 2 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . colombia 2014colombia movil acquisition 2014on july 17 , 2011 , the company entered into a definitive agreement with colombia movil s.a . e.s.p . ( 201ccolombia movil 201d ) , whereby atc sitios infraco , s.a.s. , a colombian subsidiary of the company ( 201catc infraco 201d ) , would purchase up to 2126 communications sites from colombia movil for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $ 182.0 million . from december 21 , 2011 through the year ended december 31 , 2012 , atc infraco completed the purchase of 1526 communications sites for an aggregate purchase price of $ 136.2 million ( including contingent consideration of $ 17.3 million ) , subject to post-closing adjustments . through a subsidiary , millicom international cellular s.a . ( 201cmillicom 201d ) exercised its option to acquire an indirect , substantial non-controlling interest in atc infraco . under the terms of the agreement , the company is required to make additional payments upon the conversion of certain barter agreements with other wireless carriers to cash paying lease agreements . based on the company 2019s current estimates , the value of potential contingent consideration payments required to be made under the amended agreement is expected to be between zero and $ 32.8 million and is estimated to be $ 17.3 million using a probability weighted average of the expected outcomes at december 31 , 2012 . during the year ended december 31 , 2012 , the company recorded a reduction in fair value of $ 1.2 million , which is included in other operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. .

Question: based on the final purchase price allocation what was the ratio of the property and equipment to the intangible assets
Program: divide(3590, 1062)
Answer: 3.38041
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2011 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. .

----------------------------------------
• , 12/31/2011, 12/31/2012, 12/31/2013, 12/31/2014, 12/31/2015, 12/31/2016
• united parcel service inc ., $ 100.00, $ 103.84, $ 152.16, $ 165.35, $ 154.61, $ 189.72
• standard & poor 2019s 500 index, $ 100.00, $ 115.99, $ 153.54, $ 174.54, $ 176.94, $ 198.09
• dow jones transportation average, $ 100.00, $ 107.49, $ 151.97, $ 190.07, $ 158.22, $ 192.80
----------------------------------------

.

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total shareowners return for united parcel service inc . versus the standard & poor's 500 index for the five years ended 12/31/2016?
Program: subtract(189.72, const_100), divide(#0, const_100), subtract(198.09, const_100), divide(#2, const_100), subtract(#1, #3)
Answer: -0.0837
underlying physical transaction occurs . we have not qualified commodity derivative instruments used in our osm or rm&t segments for hedge accounting . as a result , we recognize in net income all changes in the fair value of derivative instruments used in those operations . open commodity derivative positions as of december 31 , 2008 and sensitivity analysis at december 31 , 2008 , our e&p segment held open derivative contracts to mitigate the price risk on natural gas held in storage or purchased to be marketed with our own natural gas production in amounts that were in line with normal levels of activity . at december 31 , 2008 , we had no significant open derivative contracts related to our future sales of liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas and therefore remained substantially exposed to market prices of these commodities . the osm segment holds crude oil options which were purchased by western for a three year period ( january 2007 to december 2009 ) . the premiums for the purchased put options had been partially offset through the sale of call options for the same three-year period , resulting in a net premium liability . payment of the net premium liability is deferred until the settlement of the option contracts . as of december 31 , 2008 , the following put and call options were outstanding: .

• option expiration date, 2009
• option contract volumes ( barrels per day ) :, 
• put options purchased, 20000
• call options sold, 15000
• average exercise price ( dollars per barrel ) :, 
• put options, $ 50.50
• call options, $ 90.50

in the first quarter of 2009 , we sold derivative instruments at an average exercise price of $ 50.50 which effectively offset the open put options for the remainder of 2009 . at december 31 , 2008 , the number of open derivative contracts held by our rm&t segment was lower than in previous periods . starting in the second quarter of 2008 , we decreased our use of derivatives to mitigate crude oil price risk between the time that domestic spot crude oil purchases are priced and when they are actually refined into salable petroleum products . instead , we are addressing this price risk through other means , including changes in contractual terms and crude oil acquisition practices . additionally , in previous periods , certain contracts in our rm&t segment for the purchase or sale of commodities were not qualified or designated as normal purchase or normal sales under generally accepted accounting principles and therefore were accounted for as derivative instruments . during the second quarter of 2008 , as we decreased our use of derivatives , we began to designate such contracts for the normal purchase and normal sale exclusion. .

Question: using the above listed average exercise price , what were the value of the put options purchased?
Program: multiply(20000, 50.50)
Answer: 1010000.0
item 2 : properties information concerning applied 2019s properties is set forth below: .

****************************************
• ( square feet in thousands ), united states, other countries, total
• owned, 4530, 2417, 6947
• leased, 1037, 1341, 2378
• total, 5567, 3758, 9325
****************************************

because of the interrelation of applied 2019s operations , properties within a country may be shared by the segments operating within that country . the company 2019s headquarters offices are in santa clara , california . products in semiconductor systems are manufactured in santa clara , california ; austin , texas ; gloucester , massachusetts ; kalispell , montana ; rehovot , israel ; and singapore . remanufactured equipment products in the applied global services segment are produced primarily in austin , texas . products in the display and adjacent markets segment are manufactured in alzenau , germany and tainan , taiwan . other products are manufactured in treviso , italy . applied also owns and leases offices , plants and warehouse locations in many locations throughout the world , including in europe , japan , north america ( principally the united states ) , israel , china , india , korea , southeast asia and taiwan . these facilities are principally used for manufacturing ; research , development and engineering ; and marketing , sales and customer support . applied also owns a total of approximately 269 acres of buildable land in montana , texas , california , israel and italy that could accommodate additional building space . applied considers the properties that it owns or leases as adequate to meet its current and future requirements . applied regularly assesses the size , capability and location of its global infrastructure and periodically makes adjustments based on these assessments. .

Question: what portion of company's property is located in united states?
Program: divide(5567, 9325)
Answer: 0.597
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2006 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) .

****************************************
balance december 31 2003 | $ 514177
----------|----------
additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense | 82551
deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property | -1390 ( 1390 )
balance december 31 2004 | 595338
additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense | 83656
deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property | -15244 ( 15244 )
balance december 31 2005 | 663750
additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense | 89564
deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property | -12807 ( 12807 )
balance december 31 2006 | $ 740507
****************************************

.

Question: what was the percentual increase in the additions during 2004 and 2005?
Program: divide(83656, 82551), subtract(#0, const_1)
Answer: 0.01339
2 0 0 8 a n n u a l r e p o r t stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the performance of our series a common , series b common stock , and series c common stock for the period september 18 , 2008 through december 31 , 2008 as compared with the performance of the standard and poor 2019s 500 index and a peer group index which consists of the walt disney company , time warner inc. , cbs corporation class b common stock , viacom , inc . class b common stock , news corporation class a common stock , and scripps network interactive , inc . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on september 18 , 2006 and that all subsequent dividends were reinvested in additional shares . september 18 , september 30 , december 31 , 2008 2008 2008 .

****************************************
	september 18 2008	september 30 2008	december 31 2008
disca	$ 100.00	$ 103.19	$ 102.53
discb	$ 100.00	$ 105.54	$ 78.53
disck	$ 100.00	$ 88.50	$ 83.69
s&p 500	$ 100.00	$ 96.54	$ 74.86
peer group	$ 100.00	$ 92.67	$ 68.79
****************************************

s&p 500 peer group .

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on discb common stock from september 18 , 2008 to december 31 , 2008?
Program: subtract(78.53, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)
Answer: -0.2147
supplemental financial information common stock performance the following graph compares the performance of an investment in the firm 2019s common stock from december 26 , 2008 ( the last trading day before the firm 2019s 2009 fiscal year ) through december 31 , 2013 , with the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 financials index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested on december 26 , 2008 in each of the firm 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 financials index , and the dividends were reinvested on the date of payment without payment of any commissions . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . the goldman sachs group , inc . s&p 500 index s&p 500 financials index dec-09 dec-10 dec-11 dec-12 dec-13dec-08 the table below shows the cumulative total returns in dollars of the firm 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 financials index for goldman sachs 2019 last five fiscal year ends , assuming $ 100 was invested on december 26 , 2008 in each of the firm 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 financials index , and the dividends were reinvested on the date of payment without payment of any commissions . the performance shown in the table represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance. .

****************************************
	12/26/08	12/31/09	12/31/10	12/31/11	12/31/12	12/31/13
the goldman sachs group inc .	$ 100.00	$ 224.98	$ 226.19	$ 123.05	$ 176.42	$ 248.36
s&p 500 index	100.00	130.93	150.65	153.83	178.42	236.20
s&p 500 financials index	100.00	124.38	139.47	115.67	148.92	201.92
****************************************

218 goldman sachs 2013 annual report .

Question: what is the five year total return on the s&p 500 index?
Program: subtract(236.20, const_100)
Answer: 136.2
packaging corporation of america notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) december 31 , 2006 4 . stock-based compensation ( continued ) same period was $ 1988000 lower , than if it had continued to account for share-based compensation under apb no . 25 . basic and diluted earnings per share for the year ended december 31 , 2006 were both $ 0.02 lower than if the company had continued to account for share-based compensation under apb no . 25 . prior to the adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) , the company presented all tax benefits of deductions resulting from share-based payment arrangements as operating cash flows in the statements of cash flows . sfas no . 123 ( r ) requires the cash flows resulting from the tax benefits from tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those share awards ( excess tax benefits ) to be classified as financing cash flows . the excess tax benefit of $ 2885000 classified as a financing cash inflow for the year ended december 31 , 2006 would have been classified as an operating cash inflow if the company had not adopted sfas no . 123 ( r ) . as a result of adopting sfas no 123 ( r ) , unearned compensation previously recorded in stockholders 2019 equity was reclassified against additional paid in capital on january 1 , 2006 . all stock-based compensation expense not recognized as of december 31 , 2005 and compensation expense related to post 2005 grants of stock options and amortization of restricted stock will be recorded directly to additional paid in capital . compensation expense for stock options and restricted stock recognized in the statements of income for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 was as follows : year ended december 31 , ( in thousands ) 2006 2005 2004 .

****************************************
( in thousands ) | year ended december 31 , 2006 | year ended december 31 , 2005 | year ended december 31 , 2004
----------|----------|----------|----------
stock options | $ -3273 ( 3273 ) | $ 2014 | $ 2014
restricted stock | -2789 ( 2789 ) | -1677 ( 1677 ) | -663 ( 663 )
impact on income before income taxes | -6062 ( 6062 ) | -1677 ( 1677 ) | -663 ( 663 )
income tax benefit | 2382 | 661 | 260
impact on net income | $ -3680 ( 3680 ) | $ -1016 ( 1016 ) | $ -403 ( 403 )
****************************************

.

Question: what was the difference in thousands in impact on net income due to compensation expense for stock options and restricted stock between 2005 and 2006?
Program: subtract(3680, 1016)
Answer: 2664.0
entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 92.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . 2015 compared to 2014 net income decreased $ 47.1 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .

========================================
Row 1: , amount ( in millions )
Row 2: 2015 net revenue, $ 1362.2
Row 3: retail electric price, 161.5
Row 4: other, -3.2 ( 3.2 )
Row 5: 2016 net revenue, $ 1520.5
========================================

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates , as approved by the apsc . the new base rates were effective february 24 , 2016 and began billing with the first billing cycle of april 2016 . the increase includes an interim base rate adjustment surcharge , effective with the first billing cycle of april 2016 , to recover the incremental revenue requirement for the period february 24 , 2016 through march 31 , 2016 . a significant portion of the increase is related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the union power station purchase. .

Question: what would 2016 net revenue have been if it was impacted by the same higher other operation and maintenance expenses that impacted the prior year ( in millions ) ?
Program: subtract(1520.5, 47.1)
Answer: 1473.4
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements the valuation allowance increased from $ 47.8 million as of december 31 , 2009 to $ 48.2 million as of december 31 , 2010 . the increase was primarily due to valuation allowances on foreign loss carryforwards . at december 31 , 2010 , the company has provided a valuation allowance of approximately $ 48.2 million which primarily relates to state net operating loss carryforwards , equity investments and foreign items . the company has not provided a valuation allowance for the remaining deferred tax assets , primarily its federal net operating loss carryforwards , as management believes the company will have sufficient taxable income to realize these federal net operating loss carryforwards during the twenty-year tax carryforward period . valuation allowances may be reversed if related deferred tax assets are deemed realizable based on changes in facts and circumstances relevant to the assets 2019 recoverability . the recoverability of the company 2019s remaining net deferred tax asset has been assessed utilizing projections based on its current operations . the projections show a significant decrease in depreciation in the later years of the carryforward period as a result of a significant portion of its assets being fully depreciated during the first fifteen years of the carryforward period . accordingly , the recoverability of the net deferred tax asset is not dependent on material improvements to operations , material asset sales or other non-routine transactions . based on its current outlook of future taxable income during the carryforward period , management believes that the net deferred tax asset will be realized . the company 2019s deferred tax assets as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 in the table above do not include $ 122.1 million and $ 113.9 million , respectively , of excess tax benefits from the exercises of employee stock options that are a component of net operating losses . total stockholders 2019 equity as of december 31 , 2010 will be increased by $ 122.1 million if and when any such excess tax benefits are ultimately realized . at december 31 , 2010 , the company had net federal and state operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future federal and state taxable income of approximately $ 1.2 billion , including losses related to employee stock options of $ 0.3 billion . if not utilized , the company 2019s net operating loss carryforwards expire as follows ( in thousands ) : .

****************************************
years ended december 31,, federal, state, foreign
2011 to 2015, $ 2014, $ 2014, $ 503
2016 to 2020, 2014, 331315, 5509
2021 to 2025, 774209, 576780, 2014
2026 to 2030, 423398, 279908, 92412
total, $ 1197607, $ 1188003, $ 98424
****************************************

in addition , the company has mexican tax credits of $ 5.2 million which if not utilized would expire in 2017. .

Question: at december 31 , 2010 what was the percent of the total net operating loss carry forwards set to expire between 2021 and 2025
Program: divide(774209, 1197607)
Answer: 0.64646