wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
stock total return performance the following graph compares our total return to stockholders with the returns of the standard & poor 2019s composite 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and the dow jones us select health care providers index ( 201cpeer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2018 . the graph assumes an investment of $ 100 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 , and the peer group on december 31 , 2013 , and that dividends were reinvested when paid. .

----------------------------------------
• , 12/31/2013, 12/31/2014, 12/31/2015, 12/31/2016, 12/31/2017, 12/31/2018
• hum, $ 100, $ 140, $ 176, $ 202, $ 247, $ 287
• s&p 500, $ 100, $ 114, $ 115, $ 129, $ 157, $ 150
• peer group, $ 100, $ 128, $ 135, $ 137, $ 173, $ 191
----------------------------------------

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Question: what was the ratio of the stock total return performance for hum to s&p 500 at 12/31/2016
Program: divide(202, 129)
Answer: 1.56589
stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2011 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 31 , 2016 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/31/1612/28/13 1/2/1612/31/11 1/3/1512/29/12 *$ 100 invested on 12/31/11 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2017 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved. .

----------------------------------------
, 12/31/2011, 12/29/2012, 12/28/2013, 1/3/2015, 1/2/2016, 12/31/2016
cadence design systems inc ., 100.00, 129.23, 133.94, 181.06, 200.10, 242.50
nasdaq composite, 100.00, 116.41, 165.47, 188.69, 200.32, 216.54
s&p 400 information technology, 100.00, 118.41, 165.38, 170.50, 178.74, 219.65
----------------------------------------

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Question: what was the percentage cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on cadence design systems inc . common stock for the period ended 12/31/2016?
Program: subtract(242.50, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)
Answer: 1.425
issuer purchases of equity securities during the three months ended december 31 , 2007 , we repurchased 8895570 shares of our class a common stock for an aggregate of $ 385.1 million pursuant to the $ 1.5 billion stock repurchase program publicly announced in february 2007 , as follows : period total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) .

****************************************
• period, total number of shares purchased ( 1 ), average price paid per share, total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs, approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions )
• october 2007, 3493426, $ 43.30, 3493426, $ 449.9
• november 2007, 2891719, $ 44.16, 2891719, $ 322.2
• december 2007, 2510425, $ 44.20, 2510425, $ 216.2
• total fourth quarter, 8895570, $ 43.27, 8895570, $ 216.2
****************************************

( 1 ) issuer repurchases pursuant to the $ 1.5 billion stock repurchase program publicly announced in february 2007 . under this program , our management was authorized through february 2008 to purchase shares from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to market conditions and other factors . to facilitate repurchases , we typically made purchases pursuant to trading plans under rule 10b5-1 of the exchange act , which allow us to repurchase shares during periods when we otherwise might be prevented from doing so under insider trading laws or because of self-imposed trading blackout periods . subsequent to december 31 , 2007 , we repurchased 4.3 million shares of our class a common stock for an aggregate of $ 163.7 million pursuant to this program . in february 2008 , our board of directors approved a new stock repurchase program , pursuant to which we are authorized to purchase up to an additional $ 1.5 billion of our class a common stock . purchases under this stock repurchase program are subject to us having available cash to fund repurchases , as further described in item 1a of this annual report under the caption 201crisk factors 2014we anticipate that we may need additional financing to fund our stock repurchase programs , to refinance our existing indebtedness and to fund future growth and expansion initiatives 201d and item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources . 201d .

Question: what is the total amount spent for stock repurchase during october 2007 , in millions?
Program: multiply(3493426, 43.30), divide(#0, const_1000000)
Answer: 151.26535
table of contents the following table discloses purchases of shares of our common stock made by us or on our behalf during the fourth quarter of 2016 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( a ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) .

****************************************
period	total numberof sharespurchased	averageprice paidper share	total number ofshares notpurchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs ( a )	total number ofshares purchased aspart of publiclyannounced plans orprograms	approximate dollarvalue of shares thatmay yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms ( b )
october 2016	433272	$ 52.69	50337	382935	$ 2.7 billion
november 2016	667644	$ 62.25	248349	419295	$ 2.6 billion
december 2016	1559569	$ 66.09	688	1558881	$ 2.5 billion
total	2660485	$ 62.95	299374	2361111	$ 2.5 billion
****************************************

( a ) the shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the fourth quarter of 2016 relating to ( i ) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions to meet our obligations under stock-based compensation plans , and ( ii ) our purchases of shares from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of stock options , the vesting of restricted stock , and other stock compensation transactions in accordance with the terms of our stock-based compensation plans . ( b ) on july 13 , 2015 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock . this authorization has no expiration date . as of december 31 , 2016 , the approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the 2015 authorization is $ 40 million . on september 21 , 2016 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to an additional $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock with no expiration date . as of december 31 , 2016 , no purchases have been made under the 2016 authorization. .

Question: what is the percentage increase of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans from nov 2016 to dec 2016?
Program: subtract(1558881, 419295), divide(#0, 419295)
Answer: 2.71786
stock performance graph the following graph compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 index for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , the 2016 fiscal transition period , and the years ended may 31 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 . the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the standard & poor 2019s information technology index on may 31 , 2012 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends . 5/12 5/165/155/145/13 global payments inc . s&p 500 s&p information technology 12/16 12/17 comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index * $ 100 invested on may 31 , 2012 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . copyright a9 2018 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . global payments 500 index information technology .

• , globalpayments, s&p500 index, s&pinformationtechnology index
• may 31 2012, $ 100.00, $ 100.00, $ 100.00
• may 31 2013, 113.10, 127.28, 115.12
• may 31 2014, 161.90, 153.30, 142.63
• may 31 2015, 246.72, 171.40, 169.46
• may 31 2016, 367.50, 174.34, 174.75
• december 31 2016, 328.42, 188.47, 194.08
• december 31 2017, 474.52, 229.61, 269.45

30 2013 global payments inc . | 2017 form 10-k annual report .

Question: what was the percentage gained by investing $ 100 into global payments in comparison to the technology index?
Program: subtract(474.52, 100), subtract(269.45, 100), subtract(#0, #1)
Answer: 205.07
entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .

========================================
Row 1: , amount ( in millions )
Row 2: 2007 net revenue, $ 991.1
Row 3: retail electric price, -17.1 ( 17.1 )
Row 4: purchased power capacity, -12.0 ( 12.0 )
Row 5: net wholesale revenue, -7.4 ( 7.4 )
Row 6: other, 4.6
Row 7: 2008 net revenue, $ 959.2
========================================

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to the cessation of the interim storm recovery through the formula rate plan upon the act 55 financing of storm costs and a credit passed on to customers as a result of the act 55 storm cost financing , partially offset by increases in the formula rate plan effective october 2007 . refer to "hurricane rita and hurricane katrina" and "state and local rate regulation" below for a discussion of the interim recovery of storm costs , the act 55 storm cost financing , and the formula rate plan filing . the purchased power capacity variance is due to the amortization of deferred capacity costs effective september 2007 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2007 . purchased power capacity costs are offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges . see "state and local rate regulation" below for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to provisions recorded for potential rate refunds related to the treatment of interruptible load in pricing entergy system affiliate sales . gross operating revenue and , fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 364.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates offset by decreased usage . the increase was partially offset by a decrease of $ 56.8 million in gross wholesale revenue due to a decrease in system agreement rough production cost equalization credits . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by a decrease in the recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs. .

Question: what is the net change in net revenue during 2008?
Program: add(-17.1, -12.0), add(#0, -7.4), add(#1, 4.6)
Answer: -31.9
included in the corporate and consumer loan tables above are purchased distressed loans , which are loans that have evidenced significant credit deterioration subsequent to origination but prior to acquisition by citigroup . in accordance with sop 03-3 , the difference between the total expected cash flows for these loans and the initial recorded investments is recognized in income over the life of the loans using a level yield . accordingly , these loans have been excluded from the impaired loan information presented above . in addition , per sop 03-3 , subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows for a purchased distressed loan require a build of an allowance so the loan retains its level yield . however , increases in the expected cash flows are first recognized as a reduction of any previously established allowance and then recognized as income prospectively over the remaining life of the loan by increasing the loan 2019s level yield . where the expected cash flows cannot be reliably estimated , the purchased distressed loan is accounted for under the cost recovery method . the carrying amount of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2010 was $ 392 million , net of an allowance of $ 77 million as of december 31 , 2010 . the changes in the accretable yield , related allowance and carrying amount net of accretable yield for 2010 are as follows : in millions of dollars accretable carrying amount of loan receivable allowance .

• in millions of dollars, accretable yield, carrying amount of loan receivable, allowance
• beginning balance, $ 27, $ 920, $ 95
• purchases ( 1 ), 1, 130, 2014
• disposals/payments received, -11 ( 11 ), -594 ( 594 ), 2014
• accretion, -44 ( 44 ), 44, 2014
• builds ( reductions ) to the allowance, 128, 2014, -18 ( 18 )
• increase to expected cash flows, -2 ( 2 ), 19, 2014
• fx/other, 17, -50 ( 50 ), 2014
• balance at december 31 2010 ( 2 ), $ 116, $ 469, $ 77

( 1 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 130 million of purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 0 under the cost-recovery method . these balances represent the fair value of these loans at their acquisition date . the related total expected cash flows for the level-yield loans were $ 131 million at their acquisition dates . ( 2 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 315 million of loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 154 million accounted for under the cost-recovery method. .

Question: in 2010 what was the percentage change of the carrying amount of loan receivable net of the allowance
Program: subtract(920, 95), subtract(469, 77), subtract(#1, #0), divide(#2, #0)
Answer: -0.52485
measurement point december 31 booking holdings nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite .

****************************************
measurement pointdecember 31	booking holdings inc .	nasdaqcomposite index	s&p 500index	rdg internetcomposite
2013	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00
2014	98.09	114.62	113.69	96.39
2015	109.68	122.81	115.26	133.20
2016	126.12	133.19	129.05	140.23
2017	149.50	172.11	157.22	202.15
2018	148.18	165.84	150.33	201.16
****************************************

.

Question: what was the percentage change in booking holding inc . for the five years ended 2018?
Program: subtract(148.18, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)
Answer: 0.4818
corporate/other corporate/other includes global staff functions ( includes finance , risk , human resources , legal and compliance ) and other corporate expense , global operations and technology ( o&t ) , residual corporate treasury and corporate items . at december 31 , 2009 , this segment had approximately $ 230 billion of assets , consisting primarily of the company 2019s liquidity portfolio , including $ 110 billion of cash and cash equivalents. .

****************************************
• in millions of dollars, 2009, 2008, 2007
• net interest revenue, $ -1663 ( 1663 ), $ -2680 ( 2680 ), $ -2008 ( 2008 )
• non-interest revenue, -8893 ( 8893 ), 422, -302 ( 302 )
• total revenues net of interest expense, $ -10556 ( 10556 ), $ -2258 ( 2258 ), $ -2310 ( 2310 )
• total operating expenses, $ 1420, $ 510, $ 1813
• provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims, -1 ( 1 ), 1, -3 ( 3 )
• ( loss ) from continuing operations before taxes, $ -11975 ( 11975 ), $ -2769 ( 2769 ), $ -4120 ( 4120 )
• income taxes ( benefits ), -4369 ( 4369 ), -587 ( 587 ), -1446 ( 1446 )
• ( loss ) from continuing operations, $ -7606 ( 7606 ), $ -2182 ( 2182 ), $ -2674 ( 2674 )
• income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of taxes, -445 ( 445 ), 4002, 708
• net income ( loss ) before attribution of noncontrolling interests, $ -8051 ( 8051 ), $ 1820, $ -1966 ( 1966 )
• net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, 2014, 2014, 2
• net income ( loss ), $ -8051 ( 8051 ), $ 1820, $ -1968 ( 1968 )
****************************************

2009 vs . 2008 revenues , net of interest expense declined , primarily due to the pretax loss on debt extinguishment related to the repayment of the $ 20 billion of tarp trust preferred securities and the pretax loss in connection with the exit from the loss-sharing agreement with the u.s . government . revenues also declined , due to the absence of the 2008 sale of citigroup global services limited recorded in o&t . this was partially offset by a pretax gain related to the exchange offers , revenues and higher intersegment eliminations . operating expenses increased , primarily due to intersegment eliminations and increases in compensation , partially offset by lower repositioning reserves . 2008 vs . 2007 revenues , net of interest expense increased primarily due to the gain in 2007 on the sale of certain corporate-owned assets and higher intersegment eliminations , partially offset by improved treasury hedging activities . operating expenses declined , primarily due to lower restructuring charges in 2008 as well as reductions in incentive compensation and benefits expense. .

Question: what was the percentage change in total operating expenses between 2007 and 2008?
Program: subtract(510, 1813), divide(#0, 1813)
Answer: -0.7187
visa inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) september 30 , 2008 ( in millions , except as noted ) secured notes series b-1995 lease agreement in september 1995 , a real estate partnership owned jointly by visa u.s.a . and visa international issued notes that are secured by certain office properties and facilities in california which are used by the company through a lease financing of net-leased office space ( 201c1995 lease agreement 201d ) . series b of these notes , totaling $ 27 million , were issued with an interest rate of 7.83% ( 7.83 % ) and a stated maturity of september 15 , 2015 , and are payable monthly with interest-only payments for the first ten years and payments of interest and principal for the remainder of the term . series b debt issuance costs of $ 0.3 million and a $ 0.8 million loss on termination of a forward contract are being amortized on a straight- line basis over the life of the notes . the settlement entered into in connection with visa check/ master money antitrust litigation had triggered an event of default under the 1995 lease agreement . accordingly , the related debt was classified as a current liability at september 30 , 2007 . in may 2008 , visa inc. , visa u.s.a . and visa international executed an amendment and waiver to the 1995 lease agreement ( 201camended 1995 lease agreement 201d ) , curing the default and including a guarantee of remaining obligations under the agreement by visa inc . the interest terms remained unchanged . future principal payments future principal payments on the company 2019s outstanding debt are as follows: .

----------------------------------------
fiscal | ( in millions )
----------|----------
2009 | 52
2010 | 12
2011 | 12
2012 | 13
2013 | 8
thereafter | 11
total | $ 108
----------------------------------------

u.s . commercial paper program visa international maintains a u.s . commercial paper program to support its working capital requirements and for general corporate purposes . this program allows the company to issue up to $ 500 million of unsecured debt securities , with maturities up to 270 days from the date of issuance and at interest rates generally extended to companies with comparable credit ratings . at september 30 , 2008 , the company had no outstanding obligations under this program . revolving credit facilities on february 15 , 2008 , visa inc . entered into a $ 3.0 billion five-year revolving credit facility ( the 201cfebruary 2008 agreement 201d ) which replaced visa international 2019s $ 2.25 billion credit facility . the february 2008 agreement matures on february 15 , 2013 and contains covenants and events of defaults customary for facilities of this type . at september 30 , 2008 , the company is in compliance with all covenants with respect to the revolving credit facility. .

Question: what portion of future principal payments are due in 2009?
Program: divide(52, 108)
Answer: 0.48148
stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2011 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company 2019s common stock versus the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 retail index ( 201cs&p 500 retail index 201d ) and the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) . .

----------------------------------------
company/index, december 31 , 2011, december 31 , 2012, december 31 , 2013, december 31 , 2014, december 31 , 2015, december 31 , 2016
o 2019reilly automotive inc ., $ 100, $ 112, $ 161, $ 241, $ 317, $ 348
s&p 500 retail index, 100, 125, 180, 197, 245, 257
s&p 500, $ 100, $ 113, $ 147, $ 164, $ 163, $ 178
----------------------------------------

.

Question: what was the 2012 return on o 2019reilly automotive inc . stock?\\n
Program: subtract(112, 100)
Answer: 12.0
stock performance graph the following line-graph presentation compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index for the past five years . the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s information technology index , and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index on may 31 , 2002 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/02 5/03 5/04 5/05 5/06 5/07 global payments inc . s&p 500 s&p information technology * $ 100 invested on 5/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending may 31 . global payments s&p 500 information technology .

 | global payments | s&p 500 | s&p information technology
may 31 2002 | $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 | $ 100.00
may 31 2003 | 94.20 | 91.94 | 94.48
may 31 2004 | 129.77 | 108.79 | 115.24
may 31 2005 | 193.30 | 117.75 | 116.29
may 31 2006 | 260.35 | 127.92 | 117.14
may 31 2007 | 224.24 | 157.08 | 144.11

issuer purchases of equity securities on april 5 , 2007 , our board of directors authorized repurchases of our common stock in an amount up to $ 100 million . the board has authorized us to purchase shares from time to time as market conditions permit . there is no expiration date with respect to this authorization . no amounts have been repurchased during the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2007. .

Question: in comparison to overall information technology sector , how much percentage would global payments have earned the investor .
Program: subtract(224.24, const_100), subtract(144.11, const_100), subtract(#0, #1)
Answer: 80.13