evaluation of accounts receivable aging , specifi c expo- sures and historical trends . inventory we state our inventory at the lower of cost or fair market value , with cost being determined on the fi rst-in , fi rst-out ( fifo ) method . we believe fifo most closely matches the fl ow of our products from manufacture through sale . the reported net value of our inventory includes saleable products , promotional products , raw materials and com- ponentry and work in process that will be sold or used in future periods . inventory cost includes raw materials , direct labor and overhead . we also record an inventory obsolescence reserve , which represents the difference between the cost of the inventory and its estimated realizable value , based on various product sales projections . this reserve is calcu- lated using an estimated obsolescence percentage applied to the inventory based on age , historical trends and requirements to support forecasted sales . in addition , and as necessary , we may establish specifi c reserves for future known or anticipated events . pension and other post-retirement benefit costs we offer the following benefi ts to some or all of our employees : a domestic trust-based noncontributory qual- ifi ed defi ned benefi t pension plan ( 201cu.s . qualifi ed plan 201d ) and an unfunded , non-qualifi ed domestic noncontributory pension plan to provide benefi ts in excess of statutory limitations ( collectively with the u.s . qualifi ed plan , the 201cdomestic plans 201d ) ; a domestic contributory defi ned con- tribution plan ; international pension plans , which vary by country , consisting of both defi ned benefi t and defi ned contribution pension plans ; deferred compensation arrange- ments ; and certain other post-retirement benefi t plans . the amounts needed to fund future payouts under these plans are subject to numerous assumptions and variables . certain signifi cant variables require us to make assumptions that are within our control such as an antici- pated discount rate , expected rate of return on plan assets and future compensation levels . we evaluate these assumptions with our actuarial advisors and we believe they are within accepted industry ranges , although an increase or decrease in the assumptions or economic events outside our control could have a direct impact on reported net earnings . the pre-retirement discount rate for each plan used for determining future net periodic benefi t cost is based on a review of highly rated long-term bonds . for fi scal 2008 , we used a pre-retirement discount rate for our domestic plans of 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) and varying rates on our international plans of between 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) and 8.25% ( 8.25 % ) . the pre-retirement rate for our domestic plans is based on a bond portfolio that includes only long-term bonds with an aa rating , or equivalent , from a major rating agency . we believe the timing and amount of cash fl ows related to the bonds included in this portfolio is expected to match the esti- mated defi ned benefi t payment streams of our domestic plans . for fi scal 2008 , we used an expected return on plan assets of 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) for our u.s . qualifi ed plan and varying rates of between 3.00% ( 3.00 % ) and 8.25% ( 8.25 % ) for our international plans . in determining the long-term rate of return for a plan , we consider the historical rates of return , the nature of the plan 2019s investments and an expectation for the plan 2019s investment strategies . the u.s . qualifi ed plan asset alloca- tion as of june 30 , 2008 was approximately 40% ( 40 % ) equity investments , 42% ( 42 % ) debt securities and 18% ( 18 % ) other invest- ments . the asset allocation of our combined international plans as of june 30 , 2008 was approximately 45% ( 45 % ) equity investments , 38% ( 38 % ) debt securities and 17% ( 17 % ) other invest- ments . the difference between actual and expected return on plan assets is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income . those gains/losses that are subject to amortization over future periods will be recog- nized as a component of the net periodic benefi t cost in such future periods . for fi scal 2008 , our pension plans had actual negative return on assets of $ 19.3 million as compared with expected return on assets of $ 47.0 million , which resulted in a net deferred loss of $ 66.3 million , of which approximately $ 34 million is subject to amortiza- tion over periods ranging from approximately 8 to 16 years . the actual negative return on assets was primarily related to the performance of equity markets during the past fi scal year . a 25 basis-point change in the discount rate or the expected rate of return on plan assets would have had the following effect on fi scal 2008 pension expense : 25 basis-point 25 basis-point increase decrease ( in millions ) .

========================================
( in millions ) | 25 basis-point increase | 25 basis-point decrease
----------|----------|----------
discount rate | $ -2.0 ( 2.0 ) | $ 2.5
expected return on assets | $ -1.7 ( 1.7 ) | $ 1.7
========================================

our post-retirement plans are comprised of health care plans that could be impacted by health care cost trend rates , which may have a signifi cant effect on the amounts reported . a one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates for fi scal 2008 would have had the following effects : the est{e lauder companies inc . 57 66732es_fin 5766732es_fin 57 9/19/08 9:21:34 pm9/19/08 9:21:34 pm .

Question: considering the expected return rate on assets , what is the total value of plan assets in 2008 , in millions?
Program: multiply(1.7, const_100), divide(#0, 7.75)
Answer: 21.93548