wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income ( loss ) 2004 compared to 2003 net income increased $ 20.2 million primarily due to higher net revenue . 2003 compared to 2002 entergy new orleans had net income of $ 7.9 million in 2003 compared to a net loss in 2002 . the increase was due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses and depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy new orleans' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. .

----------------------------------------
• , ( in millions )
• 2003 net revenue, $ 208.3
• base rates, 10.6
• volume/weather, 8.3
• 2004 deferrals, 7.5
• price applied to unbilled electric sales, 3.7
• other, 0.6
• 2004 net revenue, $ 239.0
----------------------------------------

the increase in base rates was effective june 2003 . the rate increase is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased billed electric usage of 162 gwh in the industrial service sector . the increase was partially offset by milder weather in the residential and commercial sectors . the 2004 deferrals variance is due to the deferral of voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses in accordance with a stipulation approved by the city council in august 2004 . the stipulation allows for the recovery of these costs through amortization of a regulatory asset . the voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses are being amortized over a five-year period that became effective january 2004 and january 2003 , respectively . the formula rate plan is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the price applied to unbilled electric sales variance is due to an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales. .

Question: what is the percent change in net revenue from 2003 to 2004?
Program: subtract(239.0, 208.3), divide(#0, 208.3)
Answer: 0.14738
s c h e d u l e i v ace limited and subsidiaries s u p p l e m e n t a l i n f o r m a t i o n c o n c e r n i n g r e i n s u r a n c e premiums earned for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 ( in millions of u.s . dollars , except for percentages ) direct amount ceded to companies assumed from other companies net amount percentage of amount assumed to .

Row 1: for the years ended december 31 2010 2009 and 2008 ( in millions of u.s . dollars except for percentages ), directamount, ceded to other companies, assumed from other companies, net amount, percentage of amount assumed to net
Row 2: 2010, $ 15780, $ 5792, $ 3516, $ 13504, 26% ( 26 % )
Row 3: 2009, $ 15415, $ 5943, $ 3768, $ 13240, 28% ( 28 % )
Row 4: 2008, $ 16087, $ 6144, $ 3260, $ 13203, 25% ( 25 % )

.

Question: in 2010 what was the ratio of the value of the direct amount of the premiums to the amount ceded to other companies
Program: divide(15780, 5792)
Answer: 2.72445
operating expenses as a percentage of total revenue .

========================================
, 2006, 2005, 2004
marketing and sales, 27% ( 27 % ), 28% ( 28 % ), 28% ( 28 % )
research and development, 31% ( 31 % ), 29% ( 29 % ), 31% ( 31 % )
general and administrative, 10% ( 10 % ), 10% ( 10 % ), 7% ( 7 % )
========================================

operating expense summary 2006 compared to 2005 overall operating expenses increased $ 122.5 million in 2006 , as compared to 2005 , primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 58.4 million in stock-based compensation expense due to our adoption of sfas no . 123r ; and 2022 an increase of $ 49.2 million in salary , benefits and other employee-related costs , primarily due to an increased number of employees and increases in bonus and commission costs , in part due to our acquisition of verisity ltd. , or verisity , in the second quarter of 2005 . 2005 compared to 2004 operating expenses increased $ 97.4 million in 2005 , as compared to 2004 , primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 63.3 million in employee salary and benefit costs , primarily due to our acquisition of verisity and increased bonus and commission costs ; 2022 an increase of $ 9.9 million in stock-based compensation expense due to grants of restricted stock and the assumption of options in our acquisitions ; 2022 an increase of $ 8.6 million in losses associated with the sale of installment contract receivables ; and 2022 an increase of $ 7.1 million in costs related to the retirement of our executive chairman and former president and chief executive officer in 2005 ; partially offset by 2022 our restructuring activities , as discussed below . marketing and sales 2006 compared to 2005 marketing and sales expenses increased $ 39.4 million in 2006 , as compared to 2005 , primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 14.8 million in stock-based compensation expense due to our adoption of sfas no . 123r ; 2022 an increase of $ 18.2 million in employee salary , commissions , benefits and other employee-related costs due to increased hiring of sales and technical personnel , and higher commissions earned resulting from an increase in 2006 sales performance ; and 2022 an increase of $ 7.8 million in marketing programs and customer-focused conferences due to our new marketing initiatives and increased travel to visit our customers . 2005 compared to 2004 marketing and sales expenses increased $ 33.1 million in 2005 , as compared to 2004 , primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 29.4 million in employee salary , commission and benefit costs due to increased hiring of sales and technical personnel and higher employee bonuses and commissions ; and 2022 an increase of $ 1.6 million in stock-based compensation expense due to grants of restricted stock and the assumption of options in our acquisitions ; partially offset by 2022 a decrease of $ 1.9 million in marketing program costs. .

Question: what portion of the increase of marketing and sales expense in 2006 is incurred by the increase in stock-based compensation expense due to our adoption of sfas no?
Program: divide(14.8, 39.4)
Answer: 0.37563
issuer purchases of equity securities the following table provides information about purchases by us during the three months ended december 31 , 2013 of equity securities that are registered by us pursuant to section 12 of the exchange act : period total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( 1 ) ( 2 ) dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( 1 ) .

period | total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) | average price paid per share | total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announcedplans or programs ( 1 ) ( 2 ) | dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans orprograms ( 1 )
october 2013 | 0 | $ 0 | 0 | $ 781118739
november 2013 | 1191867 | 98.18 | 1191867 | 664123417
december 2013 | 802930 | 104.10 | 802930 | 580555202
total | 1994797 | $ 100.56 | 1994797 | 

( 1 ) as announced on may 1 , 2013 , in april 2013 , the board of directors replaced its previously approved share repurchase authorization of up to $ 1 billion with a current authorization for repurchases of up to $ 1 billion of our common shares exclusive of shares repurchased in connection with employee stock plans , expiring on june 30 , 2015 . under the current share repurchase authorization , shares may be purchased from time to time at prevailing prices in the open market , by block purchases , or in privately-negotiated transactions , subject to certain regulatory restrictions on volume , pricing , and timing . as of february 1 , 2014 , the remaining authorized amount under the current authorization totaled approximately $ 580 million . ( 2 ) excludes 0.1 million shares repurchased in connection with employee stock plans. .

Question: what is the percentual increase observed in the average price paid per share during november and december of 2013?
Program: divide(104.10, 98.18), subtract(#0, const_1)
Answer: 0.0603
stock performance graph the following line-graph presentation compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index for the past five years . the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s information technology index , and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index on may 31 , 2003 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/03 5/04 5/05 5/06 5/07 5/08 global payments inc . s&p 500 s&p information technology * $ 100 invested on 5/31/03 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending may 31 . global payments s&p 500 information technology .

• , global payments, s&p 500, s&p information technology
• may 31 2003, $ 100.00, $ 100.00, $ 100.00
• may 31 2004, 137.75, 118.33, 121.98
• may 31 2005, 205.20, 128.07, 123.08
• may 31 2006, 276.37, 139.14, 123.99
• may 31 2007, 238.04, 170.85, 152.54
• may 31 2008, 281.27, 159.41, 156.43

issuer purchases of equity securities in fiscal 2007 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program that authorized the purchase of up to $ 100 million of global payments 2019 stock in the open market or as otherwise may be determined by us , subject to market conditions , business opportunities , and other factors . under this authorization , we have repurchased 2.3 million shares of our common stock . this authorization has no expiration date and may be suspended or terminated at any time . repurchased shares will be retired but will be available for future issuance. .

Question: what is the roi of global payments from 2004 to 2005?
Program: subtract(205.20, 137.75), divide(#0, 137.75)
Answer: 0.48966
vornado realty trust notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 9 . debt - continued our revolving credit facility and senior unsecured notes contain financial covenants which require us to maintain minimum interest coverage ratios and limit our debt to market capitalization ratios . we believe that we have complied with all of our financial covenants as of december 31 , 2007 . on may 9 , 2006 , we executed supplemental indentures with respect to our senior unsecured notes due 2007 , 2009 and 2010 ( collectively , the 201cnotes 201d ) , pursuant to our consent solicitation statement dated april 18 , 2006 , as amended . holders of approximately 96.7% ( 96.7 % ) of the aggregate principal amount of the notes consented to the solicitation . the supplemental indentures contain modifications of certain covenants and related defined terms governing the terms of the notes to make them consistent with corresponding provisions of the covenants and defined terms included in the senior unsecured notes due 2011 issued on february 16 , 2006 . the supplemental indentures also include a new covenant that provides for an increase in the interest rate of the notes upon certain decreases in the ratings assigned by rating agencies to the notes . in connection with the consent solicitation we paid an aggregate fee of $ 2241000 to the consenting note holders , which will be amortized into expense over the remaining term of the notes . in addition , we incurred advisory and professional fees aggregating $ 1415000 , which were expensed in 2006 . the net carrying amount of properties collateralizing the notes and mortgages payable amounted to $ 10.920 billion at december 31 , 2007 . as at december 31 , 2007 , the principal repayments required for the next five years and thereafter are as follows : ( amounts in thousands ) .

****************************************
year ending december 31, | amount
----------|----------
2008 | $ 526768
2009 | 478269
2010 | 778320
2011 | 1071195
2012 | 609546
thereafter | 5473734
****************************************

.

Question: principal payments required for 2009 were what percent of those for 2010?
Program: divide(478269, 778320)
Answer: 0.61449
humana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 15 . stockholders 2019 equity as discussed in note 2 , we elected to early adopt new guidance related to accounting for employee share-based payments prospectively effective january 1 , 2016 . the adoption of this new guidance resulted in the recognition of approximately $ 20 million of tax benefits in net income in our consolidated statement of income for the three months ended march 31 , 2016 that had previously been recorded as additional paid-in capital in our consolidated balance sheet . dividends the following table provides details of dividend payments , excluding dividend equivalent rights , in 2014 , 2015 , and 2016 under our board approved quarterly cash dividend policy : payment amount per share amount ( in millions ) .

========================================
paymentdate, amountper share, totalamount ( in millions )
2014, $ 1.10, $ 170
2015, $ 1.14, $ 170
2016, $ 1.16, $ 172
========================================

under the terms of the merger agreement , we agreed with aetna that our quarterly dividend would not exceed $ 0.29 per share prior to the closing or termination of the merger . on october 26 , 2016 , the board declared a cash dividend of $ 0.29 per share that was paid on january 27 , 2017 to stockholders of record on january 12 , 2017 , for an aggregate amount of $ 43 million . on february 14 , 2017 , following the termination of the merger agreement , the board declared a cash dividend of $ 0.40 per share , to be paid on april 28 , 2017 , to the stockholders of record on march 31 , 2017 . declaration and payment of future quarterly dividends is at the discretion of our board and may be adjusted as business needs or market conditions change . stock repurchases in september 2014 , our board of directors replaced a previous share repurchase authorization of up to $ 1 billion ( of which $ 816 million remained unused ) with an authorization for repurchases of up to $ 2 billion of our common shares exclusive of shares repurchased in connection with employee stock plans , which expired on december 31 , 2016 . under the share repurchase authorization , shares may have been purchased from time to time at prevailing prices in the open market , by block purchases , through plans designed to comply with rule 10b5-1 under the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , or in privately-negotiated transactions ( including pursuant to accelerated share repurchase agreements with investment banks ) , subject to certain regulatory restrictions on volume , pricing , and timing . pursuant to the merger agreement , after july 2 , 2015 , we were prohibited from repurchasing any of our outstanding securities without the prior written consent of aetna , other than repurchases of shares of our common stock in connection with the exercise of outstanding stock options or the vesting or settlement of outstanding restricted stock awards . accordingly , as announced on july 3 , 2015 , we suspended our share repurchase program. .

Question: in 2014 what was the number of shares issued a dividend in millions
Program: divide(170, 1.10)
Answer: 154.54545
measurement point december 31 the priceline group nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite .

****************************************
measurement pointdecember 31 | the priceline group inc . | nasdaqcomposite index | s&p 500index | rdg internetcomposite
----------|----------|----------|----------|----------
2010 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00
2011 | 117.06 | 100.53 | 102.11 | 102.11
2012 | 155.27 | 116.92 | 118.45 | 122.23
2013 | 290.93 | 166.19 | 156.82 | 199.42
2014 | 285.37 | 188.78 | 178.29 | 195.42
2015 | 319.10 | 199.95 | 180.75 | 267.25
****************************************

.

Question: at the measurement point december 312015 what was ratio of the the priceline group inc.to the nasdaq composite index
Program: divide(319.10, 199.95)
Answer: 1.5959
stock total return performance the following graph compares our total return to stockholders with the returns of the standard & poor 2019s composite 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and the dow jones us select health care providers index ( 201cpeer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2014 . the graph assumes an investment of $ 100 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 , and the peer group on december 31 , 2009 , and that dividends were reinvested when paid. .

----------------------------------------
 | 12/31/2009 | 12/31/2010 | 12/31/2011 | 12/31/2012 | 12/31/2013 | 12/31/2014
----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------
hum | $ 100 | $ 125 | $ 201 | $ 160 | $ 244 | $ 342
s&p 500 | $ 100 | $ 115 | $ 117 | $ 136 | $ 180 | $ 205
peer group | $ 100 | $ 112 | $ 123 | $ 144 | $ 198 | $ 252
----------------------------------------

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . table of contents .

Question: what was the percent of the change in the stock price performance for hum from 2010 to 2011
Program: subtract(201, 125), divide(#0, 125)
Answer: 0.608
shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over a five-year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2007 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2007 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 80 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 26 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 17 real estate companies and 15 banking companies . comparison of five-year cumulative total shareholder return .

========================================
Row 1: , 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
Row 2: state street corporation, $ 100, $ 49, $ 55, $ 58, $ 52, $ 61
Row 3: s&p 500 index, 100, 63, 80, 92, 94, 109
Row 4: s&p financial index, 100, 45, 52, 59, 49, 63
========================================

.

Question: what is the roi of an investment in state street corporation from 2007 to 2009?
Program: subtract(55, 100), divide(#0, 100)
Answer: -0.45
2007 annual report 21 five-year stock performance graph the graph below illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return on snap-on common stock since 2002 , assuming that dividends were reinvested . the graph compares snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a peer group . snap-on incorporated total shareholder return ( 1 ) 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 snap-on incorporated peer group s&p 500 fiscal year ended ( 2 ) snap-on incorporated peer group ( 3 ) s&p 500 .

****************************************
fiscal year ended ( 2 ), snap-on incorporated, peer group ( 3 ), s&p 500
december 31 2002, $ 100.00, $ 100.00, $ 100.00
december 31 2003, 118.80, 126.16, 128.68
december 31 2004, 130.66, 152.42, 142.69
december 31 2005, 146.97, 157.97, 149.70
december 31 2006, 191.27, 185.10, 173.34
december 31 2007, 198.05, 216.19, 182.87
****************************************

( 1 ) assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 and that dividends were reinvested quarterly . ( 2 ) the company's fiscal year ends on the saturday closest to december 31 of each year ; the fiscal year end is assumed to be december 31 for ease of calculation . ( 3 ) the peer group includes : the black & decker corporation , cooper industries , ltd. , danaher corporation , emerson electric co. , fortune brands , inc. , genuine parts company , newell rubbermaid inc. , pentair , inc. , spx corporation , the stanley works and w.w . grainger , inc. .

Question: what is the roi in s&p500 if the investment was made at the end of 2005 and sold at the end of 2007?
Program: subtract(182.87, 149.70), divide(#0, 149.70)
Answer: 0.22158
jpmorgan chase & co./2016 annual report 35 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 .

****************************************
• december 31 ( in dollars ), 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016
• jpmorgan chase, $ 100.00, $ 136.18, $ 186.17, $ 204.57, $ 221.68, $ 298.31
• kbw bank index, 100.00, 133.03, 183.26, 200.42, 201.40, 258.82
• s&p financial index, 100.00, 128.75, 174.57, 201.06, 197.92, 242.94
• s&p 500 index, 100.00, 115.99, 153.55, 174.55, 176.95, 198.10
****************************************

december 31 , ( in dollars ) .

Question: based on the review of the simultaneous investments of the jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices what was the performance ratio of the jpmorgan chase compared to kbw bank index
Program: divide(298.31, 258.82)
Answer: 1.15258