wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
6 . principal transactions citi 2019s principal transactions revenue consists of realized and unrealized gains and losses from trading activities . trading activities include revenues from fixed income , equities , credit and commodities products and foreign exchange transactions that are managed on a portfolio basis characterized by primary risk . not included in the table below is the impact of net interest revenue related to trading activities , which is an integral part of trading activities 2019 profitability . for additional information regarding principal transactions revenue , see note a04 to the consolidated financial statements for information about net interest revenue related to trading activities . principal transactions include cva ( credit valuation adjustments on derivatives ) and fva ( funding valuation adjustments ) on over-the-counter derivatives . these adjustments are discussed further in note 24 to the consolidated financial statements . the following table presents principal transactions revenue: .

========================================
in millions of dollars | 2018 | 2017 | 2016
interest rate risks ( 1 ) | $ 5186 | $ 5301 | $ 4229
foreign exchange risks ( 2 ) | 1423 | 2435 | 1699
equity risks ( 3 ) | 1346 | 525 | 330
commodity and other risks ( 4 ) | 662 | 425 | 899
credit products and risks ( 5 ) | 445 | 789 | 700
total | $ 9062 | $ 9475 | $ 7857
========================================

( 1 ) includes revenues from government securities and corporate debt , municipal securities , mortgage securities and other debt instruments . also includes spot and forward trading of currencies and exchange-traded and over-the-counter ( otc ) currency options , options on fixed income securities , interest rate swaps , currency swaps , swap options , caps and floors , financial futures , otc options and forward contracts on fixed income securities . ( 2 ) includes revenues from foreign exchange spot , forward , option and swap contracts , as well as foreign currency translation ( fx translation ) gains and losses . ( 3 ) includes revenues from common , preferred and convertible preferred stock , convertible corporate debt , equity-linked notes and exchange-traded and otc equity options and warrants . ( 4 ) primarily includes revenues from crude oil , refined oil products , natural gas and other commodities trades . ( 5 ) includes revenues from structured credit products. .

Question: what percentage of total principal transactions revenue in 2016 was do to interest rate risks?
Program: divide(4229, 7857)
Answer: 0.53825
item 1a . risk factors in addition to the other information provided in this report , the following risk factors should be considered when evaluating an investment in our securities . if the circumstances contemplated by the individual risk factors materialize , our business , financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and the trading price of our common shares could decline significantly . risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the overall public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . although financial markets have significantly improved since 2008 , they could deteriorate in the future . there could also be disruption in individual market sectors , such as occurred in the energy sector in recent years . such declines in the financial markets could result in significant realized and unrealized losses on investments and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of reinsurance , were as follows: .

----------------------------------------
calendar year:, pre-tax catastrophe losses
( dollars in millions ), 
2017, $ 1472.6
2016, 301.2
2015, 53.8
2014, 56.3
2013, 194.0
----------------------------------------

our losses from future catastrophic events could exceed our projections . we use projections of possible losses from future catastrophic events of varying types and magnitudes as a strategic underwriting tool . we use these loss projections to estimate our potential catastrophe losses in certain geographic areas and decide on the placement of retrocessional coverage or other actions to limit the extent of potential losses in a given geographic area . these loss projections are approximations , reliant on a mix of quantitative and qualitative processes , and actual losses may exceed the projections by a material amount , resulting in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. .

Question: what was the change pre-tax catastrophe losses from 2016 to 2017 in thousands
Program: subtract(1472.6, 301.2)
Answer: 1171.4
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 28 , 2007 through october 28 , 2012 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 28 , 2007 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index * $ 100 invested on 10/28/07 in stock or 10/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2012 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. .

----------------------------------------
Row 1: , 10/28/2007, 10/26/2008, 10/25/2009, 10/31/2010, 10/30/2011, 10/28/2012
Row 2: applied materials, 100.00, 61.22, 71.06, 69.23, 72.37, 62.92
Row 3: s&p 500 index, 100.00, 63.90, 70.17, 81.76, 88.37, 101.81
Row 4: rdg semiconductor composite index, 100.00, 54.74, 68.59, 84.46, 91.33, 82.37
----------------------------------------

dividends during fiscal 2012 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.09 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $ 0.08 per share . during fiscal 2011 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.08 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $ 0.07 per share . during fiscal 2010 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.07 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $ 0.06 . dividends declared during fiscal 2012 , 2011 and 2010 amounted to $ 438 million , $ 408 million and $ 361 million , respectively . applied currently anticipates that it will continue to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis in the future , although the declaration and amount of any future cash dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . 10/28/07 10/26/08 10/25/09 10/31/10 10/30/11 10/28/12 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .

Question: for how many common stock shares did the company pay dividends in 2012 , ( in millions ) ?
Program: multiply(0.09, const_3), add(#0, 0.08), divide(438, #1)
Answer: 1251.42857
note 4 : property , plant and equipment the following table summarizes the major classes of property , plant and equipment by category as of december 31 : 2015 2014 range of remaining useful weighted average useful life utility plant : land and other non-depreciable assets . . . . . . . . . . $ 141 $ 137 sources of supply . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 705 681 12 to 127 years 51 years treatment and pumping facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3070 2969 3 to 101 years 39 years transmission and distribution facilities . . . . . . . . . 8516 7963 9 to 156 years 83 years services , meters and fire hydrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3250 3062 8 to 93 years 35 years general structures and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1227 1096 1 to 154 years 39 years waste treatment , pumping and disposal . . . . . . . . . 313 281 2 to 115 years 46 years waste collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 473 399 5 to 109 years 56 years construction work in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 404 303 total utility plant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18099 16891 nonutility property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 405 378 3 to 50 years 6 years total property , plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 18504 $ 17269 property , plant and equipment depreciation expense amounted to $ 405 , $ 392 , and $ 374 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively and was included in depreciation and amortization expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . the provision for depreciation expressed as a percentage of the aggregate average depreciable asset balances was 3.13% ( 3.13 % ) for the year ended december 31 , 2015 and 3.20% ( 3.20 % ) for years december 31 , 2014 and 2013 . note 5 : allowance for uncollectible accounts the following table summarizes the changes in the company 2019s allowances for uncollectible accounts for the years ended december 31: .

 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
----------|----------|----------|----------
balance as of january 1 | $ -35 ( 35 ) | $ -34 ( 34 ) | $ -27 ( 27 )
amounts charged to expense | -32 ( 32 ) | -37 ( 37 ) | -27 ( 27 )
amounts written off | 38 | 43 | 24
recoveries of amounts written off | -10 ( 10 ) | -7 ( 7 ) | -4 ( 4 )
balance as of december 31 | $ -39 ( 39 ) | $ -35 ( 35 ) | $ -34 ( 34 )

.

Question: by how much did property , plant and equipment depreciation expense increase from 2013 to 2015?
Program: subtract(405, 374), divide(#0, 374)
Answer: 0.08289
entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis other regulatory charges ( credits ) have no material effect on net income due to recovery and/or refund of such expenses . other regulatory credits increased primarily due to the under-recovery through the grand gulf rider of grand gulf capacity charges . 2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy mississippi's measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. .

----------------------------------------
 | ( in millions )
2002 net revenue | $ 380.2
base rates | 48.3
other | -1.9 ( 1.9 )
2003 net revenue | $ 426.6
----------------------------------------

the increase in base rates was effective january 2003 as approved by the mpsc . gross operating revenue , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase in base rates effective january 2003 and an increase of $ 29.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to quarterly changes in the fuel factor resulting from the increases in market prices of natural gas and purchased power . this increase was partially offset by a decrease of $ 35.9 million in gross wholesale revenue as a result of decreased generation and purchases that resulted in less energy available for resale sales . fuel and fuel-related expenses decreased primarily due to the decreased recovery of fuel and purchased power costs and decreased generation , partially offset by an increase in the market price of purchased power . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to over-recovery of capacity charges related to the grand gulf rate rider and the cessation of the grand gulf accelerated recovery tariff that was suspended in july 2003 . other income statement variances 2004 compared to 2003 other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 6.6 million in customer service support costs ; and 2022 an increase of $ 3.7 million in benefit costs . the increase was partially offset by the absence of the voluntary severance program accruals of $ 7.1 million that occurred in 2003 . taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to a higher assessment of ad valorem and franchise taxes compared to the same period in 2003 . 2003 compared to 2002 other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 voluntary severance program accruals of $ 7.1 million ; and 2022 an increase of $ 4.4 million in benefit costs. .

Question: what is the increase in operation and maintenance expenses as a percentage of net revenue in 2003?
Program: add(6.6, 3.7), divide(#0, 426.6)
Answer: 0.02414
stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. .

----------------------------------------
 | 12/29/2007 | 1/3/2009 | 1/2/2010 | 1/1/2011 | 12/31/2011 | 12/29/2012
----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------
cadence design systems inc . | 100.00 | 22.55 | 35.17 | 48.50 | 61.07 | 78.92
nasdaq composite | 100.00 | 59.03 | 82.25 | 97.32 | 98.63 | 110.78
s&p 400 information technology | 100.00 | 54.60 | 82.76 | 108.11 | 95.48 | 109.88
----------------------------------------

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative 5-year total stockholder return for cadence design systems inc . compared to the nasdaq composite for the five years ended 12/29/2012?
Program: subtract(78.92, const_100), divide(#0, const_100), subtract(110.78, const_100), divide(#2, const_100), subtract(#0, #2)
Answer: -31.86
before the purchase in november 2008 , the units will be reflected in diluted earnings per share calculations using the treasury stock method as defined by sfas no . 128 , earnings per share . under this method , the number of shares of common stock used in calculating diluted earnings per share ( based on the settlement formula applied at the end of the reporting period ) is deemed to be increased by the excess , if any , of the number of shares that would be issued upon settlement of the purchase contracts less the number of shares that could be purchased by the company in the market at the average market price during the period using the proceeds to be received upon settlement . therefore , dilution will occur for periods when the average market price of the company 2019s common stock for the reporting period is above $ 21.816 . senior secured revolving credit facility in september 2005 , the company entered into a $ 250 million , three-year senior secured revolving credit facility . as a result of the citadel investment in november 2007 , the facility was terminated and all unamortized debt issuance costs were expensed . corporate debt covenants certain of the company 2019s corporate debt described above have terms which include customary financial covenants . as of december 31 , 2007 , the company was in compliance with all such covenants . early extinguishment of debt in 2006 , the company called the entire remaining $ 185.2 million principal amount of its 6% ( 6 % ) notes for redemption . the company recorded a $ 0.7 million loss on early extinguishment of debt relating to the write-off of the unamortized debt offering costs . the company did not have any early extinguishments of debt in 2005 . other corporate debt the company also has multiple term loans from financial institutions . these loans are collateralized by equipment and are included within other borrowings on the consolidated balance sheet . see note 14 2014securities sold under agreement to repurchase and other borrowings . future maturities of corporate debt scheduled principal payments of corporate debt as of december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( dollars in thousands ) : years ending december 31 .

----------------------------------------
2008	$ 2014
2009	2014
2010	2014
2011	453815
2012	2014
thereafter	2996337
total future principal payments of corporate debt	3450152
unamortized discount net	-427454 ( 427454 )
total corporate debt	$ 3022698
----------------------------------------

.

Question: what percentage of total future principal payments of corporate debt are due after 2012?
Program: divide(2996337, 3450152)
Answer: 0.86847
page 15 of 100 shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation 2019s cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2010 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return analysis .

****************************************
• , 12/31/05, 12/31/06, 12/31/07, 12/31/08, 12/31/09, 12/31/10
• ball corporation, $ 100.00, $ 110.86, $ 115.36, $ 107.58, $ 134.96, $ 178.93
• dj containers & packaging index, $ 100.00, $ 112.09, $ 119.63, $ 75.00, $ 105.34, $ 123.56
• s&p 500 index, $ 100.00, $ 115.80, $ 122.16, $ 76.96, $ 97.33, $ 111.99
• copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ), copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ), copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ), copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ), copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ), copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ), copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )
• copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved ., copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved ., copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved ., copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved ., copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved ., copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved ., copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .
****************************************

.

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total shareholder return for ball corporation compared to the s&p 500 index for the five year period ending 12/31/10?
Program: subtract(178.93, const_100), divide(#0, const_100), subtract(111.99, const_100), divide(#2, const_100), subtract(#1, #3)
Answer: 0.6694
allowance for doubtful accounts is as follows: .

	2010	2009	2008
balance at beginning of year	$ 160	$ 133	$ 86
provision	38	54	65
amounts written off	-13 ( 13 )	-27 ( 27 )	-18 ( 18 )
balance at end of year	$ 185	$ 160	$ 133

discontinued operations during the fourth quarter of 2009 , schlumberger recorded a net $ 22 million charge related to the resolution of a customs assessment pertaining to its former offshore contract drilling business , as well as the resolution of certain contingencies associated with other previously disposed of businesses . this amount is included in income ( loss ) from discontinued operations in the consolidated statement of income . during the first quarter of 2008 , schlumberger recorded a gain of $ 38 million related to the resolution of a contingency associated with a previously disposed of business . this gain is included in income ( loss ) from discon- tinued operations in the consolidated statement of income . part ii , item 8 .

Question: what was the percentage increase in the allowance in doubtful accounts from 2009 to 2010
Program: subtract(185, 160), divide(#0, 160)
Answer: 0.15625
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis the miso deferral variance is primarily due to the deferral in 2014 of non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc and the mpsc . the deferral of non-fuel miso-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel miso-related charges . the waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision is due to a regulatory charge of approximately $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 . amount ( in millions ) .

----------------------------------------
 | amount ( in millions )
2014 net revenue | $ 2224
nuclear realized price changes | -310 ( 310 )
vermont yankee shutdown in december 2014 | -305 ( 305 )
nuclear volume excluding vermont yankee effect | 20
other | 37
2015 net revenue | $ 1666
----------------------------------------

as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 558 million in 2015 primarily due to : 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices , primarily due to significantly higher northeast market power prices in 2014 , and lower capacity prices in 2015 ; and 2022 a decrease in net revenue as a result of vermont yankee ceasing power production in december 2014 . the decrease was partially offset by higher volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet , excluding vermont yankee , resulting from fewer refueling outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014 , partially offset by more unplanned outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014. .

Question: what was the percent of the decline in the net revenue in 2015
Program: subtract(1666, 2224)
Answer: -558.0