wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
other purchases or sales of equity securities the following chart discloses information regarding shares of snap-on 2019s common stock that were sold by citibank , n.a . ( 201ccitibank 201d ) during the fourth quarter of 2013 pursuant to a prepaid equity forward transaction agreement ( the 201cagreement 201d ) with citibank that is intended to reduce the impact of market risk associated with the stock-based portion of the company 2019s deferred compensation plans . the company 2019s stock-based deferred compensation liabilities , which are impacted by changes in the company 2019s stock price , increase as the company 2019s stock price rises and decrease as the company 2019s stock price declines . pursuant to the agreement , citibank may purchase or sell shares of the company 2019s common stock ( for citibank 2019s account ) in the market or in privately negotiated transactions . the agreement has no stated expiration date , but the parties expect that each transaction under the agreement will have a term of approximately one year . the agreement does not provide for snap-on to purchase or repurchase shares . the following chart discloses information regarding citibank 2019s sales of snap-on common stock during the fourth quarter of 2013 pursuant to the agreement : period shares sold average per share .

========================================
Row 1: period, shares sold, averagepriceper share
Row 2: 09/29/13 to 10/26/13, 2013, 2013
Row 3: 10/27/13 to 11/23/13, 2013, 2013
Row 4: 11/24/13 to 12/28/13, 5000, $ 106.32
Row 5: total/average, 5000, $ 106.32
========================================

2013 annual report 23 .

Question: how is the cash flow statement from financing activities affected by the sales of commons stock during the 4th quarter of 2013?
Program: multiply(5000, 106.32)
Answer: 531600.0
the following graph compares the cumulative 4-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on january 3 , 2009 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 4 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/121/1/11 12/31/111/2/101/3/09 *$ 100 invested on 1/3/09 in stock or 12/31/08 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies all rights reserved. .

========================================
 | 1/3/2009 | 1/2/2010 | 1/1/2011 | 12/31/2011 | 12/29/2012
----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------
cadence design systems inc . | 100.00 | 155.99 | 215.10 | 270.83 | 350.00
nasdaq composite | 100.00 | 139.32 | 164.84 | 167.06 | 187.66
s&p 400 information technology | 100.00 | 151.58 | 198.02 | 174.88 | 201.26
========================================

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Question: what is the total return if $ 1000000 are invested in cadence design system in 2009 and sold in 2010?
Program: subtract(155.99, const_100), divide(#0, const_100), multiply(#1, 1000000)
Answer: 559900.0
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .

========================================
 | amount ( in millions )
----------|----------
2010 net revenue | $ 5051
mark-to-market tax settlement sharing | -196 ( 196 )
purchased power capacity | -21 ( 21 )
net wholesale revenue | -14 ( 14 )
volume/weather | 13
ano decommissioning trust | 24
retail electric price | 49
other | -2 ( 2 )
2011 net revenue | $ 4904
========================================

the mark-to-market tax settlement sharing variance results from a regulatory charge because a portion of the benefits of a settlement with the irs related to the mark-to-market income tax treatment of power purchase contracts will be shared with customers , slightly offset by the amortization of a portion of that charge beginning in october 2011 . see notes 3 and 8 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to price increases for ongoing purchased power capacity and additional capacity purchases . the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower margins on co-owner contracts and higher wholesale energy costs . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 2061 gwh in weather-adjusted usage across all sectors . weather-adjusted residential retail sales growth reflected an increase in the number of customers . industrial sales growth has continued since the beginning of 2010 . entergy 2019s service territory has benefited from the national manufacturing economy and exports , as well as industrial facility expansions . increases have been offset to some extent by declines in the paper , wood products , and pipeline segments . the increase was also partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales . the ano decommissioning trust variance is primarily related to the deferral of investment gains from the ano 1 and 2 decommissioning trust in 2010 in accordance with regulatory treatment . the gains resulted in an increase in interest and investment income in 2010 and a corresponding increase in regulatory charges with no effect on net income . the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : rate actions at entergy texas , including a base rate increase effective august 2010 and an additional increase beginning may 2011 ; a formula rate plan increase at entergy louisiana effective may 2011 ; and a base rate increase at entergy arkansas effective july 2010 . these were partially offset by formula rate plan decreases at entergy new orleans effective october 2010 and october 2011 . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of these proceedings. .

Question: what is the total amount of variance that favorably affected net revenue in 2011?
Program: add(13, 24), add(#0, 49)
Answer: 86.0
notes to consolidated financial statements at december 31 , 2007 , future minimum rental payments required under operating leases for continuing operations that have initial or remaining noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year , net of sublease rental income , most of which pertain to real estate leases , are as follows : ( millions ) .

----------------------------------------
2008, $ 317
2009, 275
2010, 236
2011, 214
2012, 191
later years, 597
total minimum payments required, $ 1830
----------------------------------------

aon corporation .

Question: what is the decrease observed in the future minimum rental payments during 2008 and 2009?
Program: subtract(275, 317)
Answer: -42.0
comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph compares the cumulative total return on citigroup 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period extending through december 31 , 2009 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in citigroup 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index and that all dividends were reinvested . citigroup s&p 500 index s&p financial index 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended .

----------------------------------------
december 31	citigroup	s&p 500 index	s&p financial index
2005	104.38	104.83	106.30
2006	124.02	121.20	126.41
2007	70.36	127.85	103.47
2008	18.71	81.12	47.36
2009	9.26	102.15	55.27
----------------------------------------

.

Question: what was the percent of the decline on the citigroup cumulative total return from 2007 to 2008
Program: subtract(18.71, 70.36), divide(#0, 70.36)
Answer: -0.73408
supplementary information on oil and gas producing activities ( unaudited ) changes in the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows .

----------------------------------------
Row 1: ( in millions ), 2009, 2008, 2007
Row 2: sales and transfers of oil and gas produced net of production andadministrative costs, $ -4876 ( 4876 ), $ -6863 ( 6863 ), $ -4613 ( 4613 )
Row 3: net changes in prices and production and administrative costs related tofuture production, 4840, -18683 ( 18683 ), 12344
Row 4: extensions discoveries and improved recovery less related costs, 1399, 663, 1816
Row 5: development costs incurred during the period, 2786, 1774, 1569
Row 6: changes in estimated future development costs, -3641 ( 3641 ), -1436 ( 1436 ), -1706 ( 1706 )
Row 7: revisions of previous quantity estimates, 5110, 85, 166
Row 8: net changes in purchases and sales of minerals in place, -159 ( 159 ), -13 ( 13 ), 23
Row 9: accretion of discount, 787, 2724, 1696
Row 10: net change in income taxes, -4441 ( 4441 ), 12633, -6647 ( 6647 )
Row 11: timing and other, -149 ( 149 ), 184, -31 ( 31 )
Row 12: net change for the year, 1656, -8932 ( 8932 ), 4617
Row 13: beginning of the year, 4035, 12967, 8350
Row 14: end of year, $ 5691, $ 4035, $ 12967
Row 15: net change for the year from discontinued operations, $ -, $ 284, $ 528
----------------------------------------

.

Question: were total revisions of estimates greater than accretion of discounts?
Program: table_sum(revisions of previous quantity estimates, none), table_sum(accretion of discount, none), greater(#0, #1)
Answer: yes
supplementary information on oil and gas producing activities ( unaudited ) c o n t i n u e d summary of changes in standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved oil and gas reserves ( in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 sales and transfers of oil and gas produced , net of production , transportation and administrative costs $ ( 4887 ) $ ( 5312 ) $ ( 3754 ) net changes in prices and production , transportation and administrative costs related to future production 12845 ( 1342 ) 6648 .

========================================
( in millions )	2007	2006	2005
sales and transfers of oil and gas produced net of production transportation and administrative costs	$ -4887 ( 4887 )	$ -5312 ( 5312 )	$ -3754 ( 3754 )
net changes in prices and production transportation and administrative costs related to future production	12845	-1342 ( 1342 )	6648
extensions discoveries and improved recovery less related costs	1816	1290	700
development costs incurred during the period	1654	1251	1030
changes in estimated future development costs	-1727 ( 1727 )	-527 ( 527 )	-552 ( 552 )
revisions of previous quantity estimates	290	1319	820
net changes in purchases and sales of minerals in place	23	30	4557
accretion of discount	1726	1882	1124
net change in income taxes	-6751 ( 6751 )	-660 ( 660 )	-6694 ( 6694 )
timing and other	-12 ( 12 )	-14 ( 14 )	307
net change for the year	4977	-2083 ( 2083 )	4186
beginning of year	8518	10601	6415
end of year	$ 13495	$ 8518	$ 10601
net change for the year from discontinued operations	$ 2013	$ -216 ( 216 )	$ 162
========================================

.

Question: if current development costs increased in 2008 as much as in 2007 , what would the 2008 total be , in millions?
Program: subtract(1654, 1251), add(#0, 1654)
Answer: 2057.0
entergy mississippi , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 16.5 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher net revenues , and a lower effective income tax rate , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses . 2015 compared to 2014 net income increased $ 17.9 million primarily due to the write-off in 2014 of the regulatory assets associated with new nuclear generation development costs as a result of a joint stipulation entered into with the mississippi public utilities staff , subsequently approved by the mpsc , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , higher other operation and maintenance expenses , and lower net revenue . see note 2 to the financial statements for discussion of the new nuclear generation development costs and the joint stipulation . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .

----------------------------------------
, amount ( in millions )
2015 net revenue, $ 696.3
retail electric price, 12.9
volume/weather, 4.7
net wholesale revenue, -2.4 ( 2.4 )
reserve equalization, -2.8 ( 2.8 )
other, -3.3 ( 3.3 )
2016 net revenue, $ 705.4
----------------------------------------

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a $ 19.4 million net annual increase in revenues , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 , and an increase in revenues collected through the storm damage rider . see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion on the formula rate plan and the storm damage rider . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 153 gwh , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including an increase in industrial usage , partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales . the increase in industrial usage is primarily due to expansion projects in the pulp and paper industry , increased demand for existing customers , primarily in the metals industry , and new customers in the wood products industry. .

Question: how much cost would be passed on to customers , in millions , due to the retail electric price variance over the next 3 years?
Program: add(19.4, 19.4), add(#0, 19.4)
Answer: 58.2
schedule iii page 6 of 6 host hotels & resorts , inc. , and subsidiaries host hotels & resorts , l.p. , and subsidiaries real estate and accumulated depreciation december 31 , 2018 ( in millions ) ( b ) the change in accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets for the fiscal years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 is as follows: .

----------------------------------------
balance at december 31 2015, $ 5666
depreciation and amortization, 572
dispositions and other, -159 ( 159 )
depreciation on assets held for sale, -130 ( 130 )
balance at december 31 2016, 5949
depreciation and amortization, 563
dispositions and other, -247 ( 247 )
depreciation on assets held for sale, 7
balance at december 31 2017, 6272
depreciation and amortization, 546
dispositions and other, -344 ( 344 )
depreciation on assets held for sale, -101 ( 101 )
balance at december 31 2018, $ 6373
----------------------------------------

( c ) the aggregate cost of real estate for federal income tax purposes is approximately $ 10458 million at december 31 , 2018 . ( d ) the total cost of properties excludes construction-in-progress properties. .

Question: what was the net change in millions in the accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets from 2015 to 2016?
Program: subtract(5949, 5666)
Answer: 283.0
apple inc . | 2016 form 10-k | 20 company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index for the five years ended september 24 , 2016 . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 23 , 2011 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . * $ 100 invested on 9/23/11 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019s common stock and september 30th for indexes . copyright a9 2016 s&p , a division of mcgraw hill financial . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2016 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . september september september september september september .

****************************************
 | september2011 | september2012 | september2013 | september2014 | september2015 | september2016
apple inc . | $ 100 | $ 166 | $ 123 | $ 183 | $ 212 | $ 213
s&p 500 index | $ 100 | $ 130 | $ 155 | $ 186 | $ 185 | $ 213
s&p information technology index | $ 100 | $ 132 | $ 142 | $ 183 | $ 187 | $ 230
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index | $ 100 | $ 130 | $ 137 | $ 178 | $ 177 | $ 217
****************************************

.

Question: what was the cumulative change in apple inc . stock between 2016 and 2011?
Program: subtract(213, const_100)
Answer: 113.0
entergy gulf states , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis .

========================================
	( in millions )
2002 net revenue	$ 1130.7
volume/weather	17.8
fuel write-offs in 2002	15.3
net wholesale revenue	10.2
base rate decreases	-23.3 ( 23.3 )
nisco gain recognized in 2002	-15.2 ( 15.2 )
rate refund provisions	-11.3 ( 11.3 )
other	-14.1 ( 14.1 )
2003 net revenue	$ 1110.1
========================================

the volume/weather variance was due to higher electric sales volume in the service territory . billed usage increased a total of 517 gwh in the residential and commercial sectors . the increase was partially offset by a decrease in industrial usage of 470 gwh due to the loss of two large industrial customers to cogeneration . the customers accounted for approximately 1% ( 1 % ) of entergy gulf states' net revenue in 2002 . in 2002 , deferred fuel costs of $ 8.9 million related to a texas fuel reconciliation case were written off and $ 6.5 million in expense resulted from an adjustment in the deregulated asset plan percentage as the result of a power uprate at river bend . the increase in net wholesale revenue was primarily due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and co- op customers and also to affiliated systems related to entergy's generation resource planning . the base rate decreases were effective june 2002 and january 2003 , both in the louisiana jurisdiction . the january 2003 base rate decrease of $ 22.1 million had a minimal impact on net income due to a corresponding reduction in nuclear depreciation and decommissioning expenses associated with the change in accounting to reflect an assumed extension of river bend's useful life . in 2002 , a gain of $ 15.2 million was recognized for the louisiana portion of the 1988 nelson units 1 and 2 sale . entergy gulf states received approval from the lpsc to discontinue applying amortization of the gain against recoverable fuel , resulting in the recognition of the deferred gain in income . rate refund provisions caused a decrease in net revenue due to additional provisions recorded in 2003 compared to 2002 for potential rate actions and refunds . gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 440.2 million in fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of higher fuel rates in both the louisiana and texas jurisdictions . fuel and purchased power expenses increased $ 471.1 million due to an increase in the market prices of natural gas and purchased power . other income statement variances 2004 compared to 2003 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : 2022 voluntary severance program accruals of $ 22.5 million in 2003 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 4.3 million in nuclear material and labor costs due to reduced staff in 2004. .

Question: what is the net change in net revenue during 2003 for entergy gulf states , inc.?
Program: subtract(1110.1, 1130.7)
Answer: -20.6
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 $ 220.00 2002 20072006200520042003 s&p 500 ups dj transport .

========================================
 | 12/31/02 | 12/31/03 | 12/31/04 | 12/31/05 | 12/31/06 | 12/31/07
----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------
united parcel service inc . | $ 100.00 | $ 119.89 | $ 139.55 | $ 124.88 | $ 127.08 | $ 122.64
s&p 500 index | $ 100.00 | $ 128.68 | $ 142.68 | $ 149.69 | $ 173.33 | $ 182.85
dow jones transportation average | $ 100.00 | $ 131.84 | $ 168.39 | $ 188.00 | $ 206.46 | $ 209.40
========================================

securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2007 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance . these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .

Question: what was the percentage five year cumulative total return for united parcel service inc . for the period ended 12/31/07?
Program: subtract(122.64, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)
Answer: 0.2264