wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
allowance for doubtful accounts is as follows: .

========================================
 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008
----------|----------|----------|----------
balance at beginning of year | $ 160 | $ 133 | $ 86
provision | 38 | 54 | 65
amounts written off | -13 ( 13 ) | -27 ( 27 ) | -18 ( 18 )
balance at end of year | $ 185 | $ 160 | $ 133
========================================

discontinued operations during the fourth quarter of 2009 , schlumberger recorded a net $ 22 million charge related to the resolution of a customs assessment pertaining to its former offshore contract drilling business , as well as the resolution of certain contingencies associated with other previously disposed of businesses . this amount is included in income ( loss ) from discontinued operations in the consolidated statement of income . during the first quarter of 2008 , schlumberger recorded a gain of $ 38 million related to the resolution of a contingency associated with a previously disposed of business . this gain is included in income ( loss ) from discon- tinued operations in the consolidated statement of income . part ii , item 8 .

Question: in 2010 , what percentage of allowance for doubtful accounts were written off?
Program: divide(13, 160)
Answer: 0.08125
part i item 1 entergy corporation , utility operating companies , and system energy employment and labor-related proceedings ( entergy corporation , entergy arkansas , entergy gulf states louisiana , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy new orleans , entergy texas , and system energy ) the registrant subsidiaries and other entergy subsidiaries are responding to various lawsuits in both state and federal courts and to other labor-related proceedings filed by current and former employees . generally , the amount of damages being sought is not specified in these proceedings . these actions include , but are not limited to , allegations of wrongful employment actions ; wage disputes and other claims under the fair labor standards act or its state counterparts ; claims of race , gender and disability discrimination ; disputes arising under collective bargaining agreements ; unfair labor practice proceedings and other administrative proceedings before the national labor relations board ; claims of retaliation ; and claims for or regarding benefits under various entergy corporation sponsored plans . entergy and the registrant subsidiaries are responding to these suits and proceedings and deny liability to the claimants . employees employees are an integral part of entergy's commitment to serving its customers . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy employed 14669 people . utility: .

----------------------------------------
entergy arkansas	1526
entergy gulf states louisiana	858
entergy louisiana	1008
entergy mississippi	828
entergy new orleans	378
entergy texas	744
system energy	-
entergy operations	2448
entergy services	3179
entergy nuclear operations	3620
other subsidiaries	80
total entergy	14669
----------------------------------------

approximately 5000 employees are represented by the international brotherhood of electrical workers union , the utility workers union of america , the international brotherhood of teamsters union , and the united government security officers of america. .

Question: what percentage of entergy's total employees are employed in entergy arkansas?
Program: divide(1526, 14669)
Answer: 0.10403
other expense , net : the company's other expense consists of the following: .

----------------------------------------
Row 1: ( in thousands ), year ended december 31 , 2013, year ended december 31 , 2012
Row 2: foreign currency losses net, $ -1115 ( 1115 ), $ -1401 ( 1401 )
Row 3: other income ( expense ) net, 69, -4 ( 4 )
Row 4: total other expense net, $ -1046 ( 1046 ), $ -1405 ( 1405 )
----------------------------------------

income tax provision : the company recorded income tax expense of $ 77.2 million and had income before income taxes of $ 322.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , representing an effective tax rate of 23.9% ( 23.9 % ) . during the year ended december 31 , 2012 , the company recorded income tax expense of $ 90.1 million and had income before income taxes of $ 293.5 million , representing an effective tax rate of 30.7% ( 30.7 % ) . in december 2013 , the company received notice from the irs that the joint committee on taxation took no exception to the company's tax returns that were filed for 2009 and 2010 . an $ 11.0 million tax benefit was recognized in the company's 2013 financial results as the company had effectively settled uncertainty regarding the realization of refund claims filed in connection with the 2009 and 2010 returns . in the u.s. , which is the largest jurisdiction where the company receives such a tax credit , the availability of the research and development credit expired at the end of the 2011 tax year . in january 2013 , the u.s . congress passed legislation that reinstated the research and development credit retroactive to 2012 . the income tax provision for the year ended december 31 , 2013 includes approximately $ 2.3 million related to the reinstated research and development credit for 2012 activity . the decrease in the effective tax rate from the prior year is primarily due to the release of an uncertain tax position mentioned above , the reinstatement of the u.s . research and development credit mentioned above , and cash repatriation activities . when compared to the federal and state combined statutory rate , the effective tax rates for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 were favorably impacted by lower statutory tax rates in many of the company 2019s foreign jurisdictions , the domestic manufacturing deduction and tax benefits associated with the merger of the company 2019s japan subsidiaries in 2010 . net income : the company 2019s net income for the year ended december 31 , 2013 was $ 245.3 million as compared to net income of $ 203.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2012 . diluted earnings per share was $ 2.58 for the year ended december 31 , 2013 and $ 2.14 for the year ended december 31 , 2012 . the weighted average shares used in computing diluted earnings per share were 95.1 million and 95.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . table of contents .

Question: what was the percentage decrease in net come for the year ended 2013 to the year ended 2012?
Program: subtract(245.3, 203.5), divide(#0, 245.3)
Answer: 0.1704
before the purchase in november 2008 , the units will be reflected in diluted earnings per share calculations using the treasury stock method as defined by sfas no . 128 , earnings per share . under this method , the number of shares of common stock used in calculating diluted earnings per share ( based on the settlement formula applied at the end of the reporting period ) is deemed to be increased by the excess , if any , of the number of shares that would be issued upon settlement of the purchase contracts less the number of shares that could be purchased by the company in the market at the average market price during the period using the proceeds to be received upon settlement . therefore , dilution will occur for periods when the average market price of the company 2019s common stock for the reporting period is above $ 21.816 . senior secured revolving credit facility in september 2005 , the company entered into a $ 250 million , three-year senior secured revolving credit facility . as a result of the citadel investment in november 2007 , the facility was terminated and all unamortized debt issuance costs were expensed . corporate debt covenants certain of the company 2019s corporate debt described above have terms which include customary financial covenants . as of december 31 , 2007 , the company was in compliance with all such covenants . early extinguishment of debt in 2006 , the company called the entire remaining $ 185.2 million principal amount of its 6% ( 6 % ) notes for redemption . the company recorded a $ 0.7 million loss on early extinguishment of debt relating to the write-off of the unamortized debt offering costs . the company did not have any early extinguishments of debt in 2005 . other corporate debt the company also has multiple term loans from financial institutions . these loans are collateralized by equipment and are included within other borrowings on the consolidated balance sheet . see note 14 2014securities sold under agreement to repurchase and other borrowings . future maturities of corporate debt scheduled principal payments of corporate debt as of december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( dollars in thousands ) : years ending december 31 .

========================================
Row 1: 2008, $ 2014
Row 2: 2009, 2014
Row 3: 2010, 2014
Row 4: 2011, 453815
Row 5: 2012, 2014
Row 6: thereafter, 2996337
Row 7: total future principal payments of corporate debt, 3450152
Row 8: unamortized discount net, -427454 ( 427454 )
Row 9: total corporate debt, $ 3022698
========================================

.

Question: what percentage of total future principal payments of corporate debt are due in 2011?
Program: divide(453815, 3450152)
Answer: 0.13153
other long term debt in december 2012 , the company entered into a $ 50.0 million recourse loan collateralized by the land , buildings and tenant improvements comprising the company 2019s corporate headquarters . the loan has a seven year term and maturity date of december 2019 . the loan bears interest at one month libor plus a margin of 1.50% ( 1.50 % ) , and allows for prepayment without penalty . the loan includes covenants and events of default substantially consistent with the company 2019s credit agreement discussed above . the loan also requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including transfers of any interest in the property . as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 40.0 million and $ 42.0 million , respectively . the weighted average interest rate on the loan was 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) and 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the following are the scheduled maturities of long term debt as of december 31 , 2017 : ( in thousands ) .

----------------------------------------
• 2018, $ 27000
• 2019, 63000
• 2020, 25000
• 2021, 86250
• 2022, 2014
• 2023 and thereafter, 600000
• total scheduled maturities of long term debt, $ 801250
• current maturities of long term debt, $ 27000
----------------------------------------

interest expense , net was $ 34.5 million , $ 26.4 million , and $ 14.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities . amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.3 million , $ 1.2 million , and $ 0.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and other long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . 7 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its brand and factory house stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2033 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for brand and factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2017 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its stores based on future sales above a specified minimum or payments made for maintenance , insurance and real estate taxes . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2017 as well as .

Question: what was the percentage change in interest expense net from 2016 to 2017?
Program: subtract(34.5, 26.4), divide(#0, 26.4)
Answer: 0.30682
shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over a five-year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2007 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2007 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 80 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 26 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 17 real estate companies and 15 banking companies . comparison of five-year cumulative total shareholder return .

****************************************
 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012
----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------
state street corporation | $ 100 | $ 49 | $ 55 | $ 58 | $ 52 | $ 61
s&p 500 index | 100 | 63 | 80 | 92 | 94 | 109
s&p financial index | 100 | 45 | 52 | 59 | 49 | 63
****************************************

.

Question: what is the percent change in state street corporation's cumulative total shareholder return on common stock between 2008 and 2009?
Program: subtract(55, 49), divide(#0, 49)
Answer: 0.12245
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities at january 25 , 2019 , we had 26812 holders of record of our common stock , par value $ 1 per share . our common stock is traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol lmt . information concerning dividends paid on lockheed martin common stock during the past two years is as follows : common stock - dividends paid per share .

****************************************
quarter | dividends paid per share 2018 | dividends paid per share 2017
----------|----------|----------
first | $ 2.00 | $ 1.82
second | 2.00 | 1.82
third | 2.00 | 1.82
fourth | 2.20 | 2.00
year | $ 8.20 | $ 7.46
****************************************

stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the total return on a cumulative basis of $ 100 invested in lockheed martin common stock on december 31 , 2013 to the standard and poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 index and the s&p aerospace & defense index . the s&p aerospace & defense index comprises arconic inc. , general dynamics corporation , harris corporation , huntington ingalls industries , l3 technologies , inc. , lockheed martin corporation , northrop grumman corporation , raytheon company , textron inc. , the boeing company , transdigm group inc. , and united technologies corporation . the stockholder return performance indicated on the graph is not a guarantee of future performance. .

Question: what is the percentage change in total dividends paid per share from 2017 to 2018?
Program: subtract(8.20, 7.46), divide(#0, 7.46)
Answer: 0.0992
risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the overall public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . although financial markets have significantly improved since 2008 , they could deteriorate in the future . there could also be disruption in individual market sectors , such as occurred in the energy sector in recent years . such declines in the financial markets could result in significant realized and unrealized losses on investments and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: .

Row 1: calendar year:, pre-tax catastrophe losses
Row 2: ( dollars in millions ), 
Row 3: 2016, $ 301.2
Row 4: 2015, 53.8
Row 5: 2014, 56.3
Row 6: 2013, 194.0
Row 7: 2012, 410.0

our losses from future catastrophic events could exceed our projections . we use projections of possible losses from future catastrophic events of varying types and magnitudes as a strategic underwriting tool . we use these loss projections to estimate our potential catastrophe losses in certain geographic areas and decide on the placement of retrocessional coverage or other actions to limit the extent of potential losses in a given geographic area . these loss projections are approximations , reliant on a mix of quantitative and qualitative processes , and actual losses may exceed the projections by a material amount , resulting in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. .

Question: what was the change in the amount of pre-tax catastrophe losses from 2015 to 2016 in millions
Program: subtract(301.2, 53.8)
Answer: 247.4
entergy arkansas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2004 compared to 2003 net income increased $ 16.2 million due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , a lower effective income tax rate for 2004 compared to 2003 , and lower interest charges . the increase was partially offset by lower net revenue . 2003 compared to 2002 net income decreased $ 9.6 million due to lower net revenue , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and a higher effective income tax rate for 2003 compared to 2002 . the decrease was substantially offset by lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher other income , and lower interest charges . net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy arkansas' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. .

, ( in millions )
2003 net revenue, $ 998.7
deferred fuel cost revisions, -16.9 ( 16.9 )
other, -3.4 ( 3.4 )
2004 net revenue, $ 978.4

deferred fuel cost revisions includes the difference between the estimated deferred fuel expense and the actual calculation of recoverable fuel expense , which occurs on an annual basis . deferred fuel cost revisions decreased net revenue due to a revised estimate of fuel costs filed for recovery at entergy arkansas in the march 2004 energy cost recovery rider , which reduced net revenue by $ 11.5 million . the remainder of the variance is due to the 2002 energy cost recovery true-up , made in the first quarter of 2003 , which increased net revenue in 2003 . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 20.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to an increase in the energy cost recovery rider effective april 2004 ( fuel cost recovery revenues are discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements ) ; 2022 an increase of $ 15.5 million in grand gulf revenues due to an increase in the grand gulf rider effective january 2004 ; 2022 an increase of $ 13.9 million in gross wholesale revenue primarily due to increased sales to affiliated systems ; 2022 an increase of $ 9.5 million due to volume/weather primarily resulting from increased usage during the unbilled sales period , partially offset by the effect of milder weather on billed sales in 2004. .

Question: what are the deferred fuel cost revisions as a percentage of the decrease in net revenue from 2003 to 2004?
Program: subtract(998.7, 978.4), divide(11.5, #0)
Answer: 0.5665
in addition , included in the loan table are purchased distressed loans , which are loans that have evidenced significant credit deterioration subsequent to origination but prior to acquisition by citigroup . in accordance with sop 03-3 , the difference between the total expected cash flows for these loans and the initial recorded investments is recognized in income over the life of the loans using a level yield . accordingly , these loans have been excluded from the impaired loan information presented above . in addition , per sop 03-3 , subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows for a purchased distressed loan require a build of an allowance so the loan retains its level yield . however , increases in the expected cash flows are first recognized as a reduction of any previously established allowance and then recognized as income prospectively over the remaining life of the loan by increasing the loan 2019s level yield . where the expected cash flows cannot be reliably estimated , the purchased distressed loan is accounted for under the cost recovery method . the carrying amount of the purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2009 was $ 825 million net of an allowance of $ 95 million . the changes in the accretable yield , related allowance and carrying amount net of accretable yield for 2009 are as follows : in millions of dollars accretable carrying amount of loan receivable allowance .

****************************************
• in millions of dollars, accretable yield, carrying amount of loan receivable, allowance
• beginning balance, $ 92, $ 1510, $ 122
• purchases ( 1 ), 14, 329, 2014
• disposals/payments received, -5 ( 5 ), -967 ( 967 ), 2014
• accretion, -52 ( 52 ), 52, 2014
• builds ( reductions ) to the allowance, -21 ( 21 ), 1, -27 ( 27 )
• increase to expected cash flows, 10, 2, 2014
• fx/other, -11 ( 11 ), -7 ( 7 ), 2014
• balance december 31 2009 ( 2 ), $ 27, $ 920, $ 95
****************************************

( 1 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 87 million of purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 242 million under the cost-recovery method . these balances represent the fair value of these loans at their acquisition date . the related total expected cash flows for the level-yield loans were $ 101 million at their acquisition dates . ( 2 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 561 million of loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 359 million accounted for under the cost-recovery method. .

Question: in 2009 what was the percent of the purchases included in the total carrying amount of loan receivable
Program: divide(329, 920)
Answer: 0.35761