wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
entergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 31.4 million primarily due to lower net revenue , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher other operation and maintenance expenses , and higher taxes other than income taxes . 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 37.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility in 2015 , and higher net revenue . net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) .

----------------------------------------
 | amount ( in millions )
2016 net revenue | $ 644.2
net wholesale revenue | -35.1 ( 35.1 )
purchased power capacity | -5.9 ( 5.9 )
transmission revenue | -5.4 ( 5.4 )
reserve equalization | 5.6
retail electric price | 19.0
other | 4.4
2017 net revenue | $ 626.8
----------------------------------------

the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower net capacity revenues resulting from the termination of the purchased power agreements between entergy louisiana and entergy texas in august 2016 . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to increased expenses due to capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to a decrease in the amount of transmission revenues allocated by miso . the reserve equalization variance is due to the absence of reserve equalization expenses in 2017 as a result of entergy texas 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement. .

Question: what percent change did the drop in net wholesale revenue cause for 2017 net revenue?
Program: add(626.8, 35.1), divide(35.1, #0)
Answer: 0.05303
table of contents valero energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) commodity price risk we are exposed to market risks related to the volatility in the price of crude oil , refined products ( primarily gasoline and distillate ) , grain ( primarily corn ) , and natural gas used in our operations . to reduce the impact of price volatility on our results of operations and cash flows , we use commodity derivative instruments , including futures , swaps , and options . we use the futures markets for the available liquidity , which provides greater flexibility in transacting our hedging and trading operations . we use swaps primarily to manage our price exposure . our positions in commodity derivative instruments are monitored and managed on a daily basis by a risk control group to ensure compliance with our stated risk management policy that has been approved by our board of directors . for risk management purposes , we use fair value hedges , cash flow hedges , and economic hedges . in addition to the use of derivative instruments to manage commodity price risk , we also enter into certain commodity derivative instruments for trading purposes . our objective for entering into each type of hedge or trading derivative is described below . fair value hedges fair value hedges are used to hedge price volatility in certain refining inventories and firm commitments to purchase inventories . the level of activity for our fair value hedges is based on the level of our operating inventories , and generally represents the amount by which our inventories differ from our previous year-end lifo inventory levels . as of december 31 , 2011 , we had the following outstanding commodity derivative instruments that were entered into to hedge crude oil and refined product inventories and commodity derivative instruments related to the physical purchase of crude oil and refined products at a fixed price . the information presents the notional volume of outstanding contracts by type of instrument and year of maturity ( volumes in thousands of barrels ) . notional contract volumes by year of maturity derivative instrument 2012 .

----------------------------------------
derivative instrument	notional contract volumes by year of maturity 2012
crude oil and refined products:	
futures 2013 long	15398
futures 2013 short	35708
physical contracts 2013 long	20310
----------------------------------------

.

Question: how much more futures are short than long , in percentage?
Program: divide(35708, 15398)
Answer: 2.319
part a0ii item a05 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange under the symbol 201ctfx . 201d as of february 19 , 2019 , we had 473 holders of record of our common stock . a substantially greater number of holders of our common stock are beneficial owners whose shares are held by brokers and other financial institutions for the accounts of beneficial owners . stock performance graph the following graph provides a comparison of five year cumulative total stockholder returns of teleflex common stock , the standard a0& poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 stock index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index . the annual changes for the five-year period shown on the graph are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in teleflex common stock and each index on december a031 , 2013 and that all dividends were reinvested . market performance .

Row 1: company / index, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018
Row 2: teleflex incorporated, 100, 124, 143, 177, 275, 288
Row 3: s&p 500 index, 100, 114, 115, 129, 157, 150
Row 4: s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index, 100, 126, 134, 142, 186, 213

s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index 100 126 134 142 186 213 .

Question: what is the roi of an investment in teleflex incorporated from 2014 to 2015?
Program: subtract(143, 124), divide(#0, 124)
Answer: 0.15323
the containerboard group ( a division of tenneco packaging inc. ) notes to combined financial statements ( continued ) april 11 , 1999 14 . leases ( continued ) to the sale transaction on april 12 , 1999 . therefore , the remaining outstanding aggregate minimum rental commitments under noncancelable operating leases are as follows : ( in thousands ) .

****************************************
remainder of 1999 | $ 7606
2000 | 7583
2001 | 4891
2002 | 3054
2003 | 1415
thereafter | 1178
total | $ 25727
****************************************

15 . sale of assets in the second quarter of 1996 , packaging entered into an agreement to form a joint venture with caraustar industries whereby packaging sold its two recycled paperboard mills and a fiber recycling operation and brokerage business to the joint venture in return for cash and a 20% ( 20 % ) equity interest in the joint venture . proceeds from the sale were approximately $ 115 million and the group recognized a $ 50 million pretax gain ( $ 30 million after taxes ) in the second quarter of 1996 . in june , 1998 , packaging sold its remaining 20% ( 20 % ) equity interest in the joint venture to caraustar industries for cash and a note of $ 26000000 . the group recognized a $ 15 million pretax gain on this transaction . at april 11 , 1999 , the balance of the note with accrued interest is $ 27122000 . the note was paid in june , 1999 . 16 . subsequent events on august 25 , 1999 , pca and packaging agreed that the acquisition consideration should be reduced as a result of a postclosing price adjustment by an amount equal to $ 20 million plus interest through the date of payment by packaging . the group recorded $ 11.9 million of this amount as part of the impairment charge on the accompanying financial statements , representing the amount that was previously estimated by packaging . pca intends to record the remaining amount in september , 1999 . in august , 1999 , pca signed purchase and sales agreements with various buyers to sell approximately 405000 acres of timberland . pca has completed the sale of approximately 260000 of these acres and expects to complete the sale of the remaining acres by mid-november , 1999. .

Question: what percentage of outstanding aggregate minimum rental commitments under noncancelable operating leases are due in 2001?
Program: divide(4891, 25727)
Answer: 0.19011
stock performance graph the following performance graph compares the cumulative total return ( including dividends ) to the holders of our common stock from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007 , with the cumulative total returns of the nyse composite index , the ftse nareit composite reit index ( the 201call reit index 201d ) , the ftse nareit healthcare equity reit index ( the 201chealthcare reit index 201d ) and the russell 1000 index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , as applicable . we have included the nyse composite index in the performance graph because our common stock is listed on the nyse . we have included the other indices because we believe that they are either most representative of the industry in which we compete , or otherwise provide a fair basis for comparison with ventas , and are therefore particularly relevant to an assessment of our performance . the figures in the table below are rounded to the nearest dollar. .

	12/31/2002	12/31/2003	12/31/2004	12/31/2005	12/31/2006	12/31/2007
ventas	$ 100	$ 206	$ 270	$ 331	$ 457	$ 512
nyse composite index	$ 100	$ 132	$ 151	$ 166	$ 200	$ 217
all reit index	$ 100	$ 138	$ 181	$ 196	$ 262	$ 215
healthcare reit index	$ 100	$ 154	$ 186	$ 189	$ 273	$ 279
russell 1000 index	$ 100	$ 130	$ 145	$ 154	$ 178	$ 188

ventas nyse composite index all reit index healthcare reit index russell 1000 index .

Question: what was the growth rate of reit index as of 12/31/2003
Program: subtract(138, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)
Answer: 0.38
the graph below shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative shareholder return on the company's common stock with the cumulative total return of the s&p smallcap 600 index and the s&p 600 electrical equipment index , all of which are published indices . comparison of five-year cumulative total return from december 31 , 2002 to december 31 , 2007 assumes $ 100 invested with reinvestment of dividends period indexed returns .

========================================
company/index | baseperiod 12/31/02 | baseperiod 12/31/03 | baseperiod 12/31/04 | baseperiod 12/31/05 | baseperiod 12/31/06 | 12/31/07
a o smith corp | 100.00 | 132.23 | 115.36 | 138.20 | 150.26 | 142.72
s&p smallcap 600 index | 100.00 | 138.79 | 170.22 | 183.30 | 211.01 | 210.39
s&p 600 electrical equipment | 100.00 | 126.12 | 152.18 | 169.07 | 228.83 | 253.33
========================================

12/31/02 12/31/03 12/31/04 12/31/05 12/31/06 12/31/07 smith ( a o ) corp s&p smallcap 600 index s&p 600 electrical equipment .

Question: what was the difference in cumulative total return for the five year period ending 12/31/07 between a o smith corp and the s&p smallcap 600 index?
Program: subtract(142.72, const_100), divide(#0, const_100), subtract(210.39, const_100), divide(#2, const_100), subtract(#1, #3)
Answer: -0.6767
entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income decreased $ 7.7 million primarily due to a higher effective income tax rate , lower other income , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , substantially offset by higher net revenue , lower depreciation and amortization expenses , and lower interest expense . 2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 105.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue , a lower effective income tax rate , higher other income , and lower depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .

========================================
	amount ( in millions )
2010 net revenue	$ 1216.7
retail electric price	31.0
ano decommissioning trust	26.4
transmission revenue	13.1
volume/weather	-15.9 ( 15.9 )
net wholesale revenue	-11.9 ( 11.9 )
capacity acquisition recovery	-10.3 ( 10.3 )
other	3.2
2011 net revenue	$ 1252.3
========================================

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a base rate increase effective july 2010 . see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the rate case settlement . the ano decommissioning trust variance is primarily related to the deferral of investment gains from the ano 1 and 2 decommissioning trust in 2010 in accordance with regulatory treatment . the gains resulted in an increase in 2010 in interest and investment income and a corresponding increase in regulatory charges with no effect on net income. .

Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue in 2011
Program: subtract(1252.3, 1216.7)
Answer: 35.6
dollar general corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 3 . merger ( continued ) merger as a subsidiary of buck . the company 2019s results of operations after july 6 , 2007 include the effects of the merger . the aggregate purchase price was approximately $ 7.1 billion , including direct costs of the merger , and was funded primarily through debt financings as described more fully below in note 7 and cash equity contributions from kkr , gs capital partners vi fund , l.p . and affiliated funds ( affiliates of goldman , sachs & co. ) , and other equity co-investors ( collectively , the 2018 2018investors 2019 2019 of approximately $ 2.8 billion ( 316.2 million shares of new common stock , $ 0.875 par value per share , valued at $ 8.75 per share ) . also in connection with the merger , certain of the company 2019s management employees invested in and were issued new shares , representing less than 1% ( 1 % ) of the outstanding shares , in the company . pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement , the former holders of the predecessor 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.50 per share , received $ 22.00 per share , or approximately $ 6.9 billion , and all such shares were acquired as a result of the merger . as discussed in note 1 , the merger was accounted for as a reverse acquisition in accordance with applicable purchase accounting provisions . because of this accounting treatment , the company 2019s assets and liabilities have properly been accounted for at their estimated fair values as of the merger date . the aggregate purchase price has been allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon an assessment of their relative fair values as of the merger date . the allocation of the purchase price is as follows ( in thousands ) : .

----------------------------------------
Row 1: cash and cash equivalents, $ 349615
Row 2: short-term investments, 30906
Row 3: merchandise inventories, 1368130
Row 4: income taxes receivable, 40199
Row 5: deferred income taxes, 57176
Row 6: prepaid expenses and other current assets, 63204
Row 7: property and equipment net, 1301119
Row 8: goodwill, 4338589
Row 9: intangible assets, 1396612
Row 10: other assets net, 66537
Row 11: current portion of long-term obligations, -7088 ( 7088 )
Row 12: accounts payable, -585518 ( 585518 )
Row 13: accrued expenses and other, -306394 ( 306394 )
Row 14: income taxes payable, -84 ( 84 )
Row 15: long-term obligations, -267927 ( 267927 )
Row 16: deferred income taxes, -540675 ( 540675 )
Row 17: other liabilities, -208710 ( 208710 )
Row 18: total purchase price assigned, $ 7095691
----------------------------------------

the purchase price allocation included approximately $ 4.34 billion of goodwill , none of which is expected to be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill balance at january 30 , 2009 decreased $ 6.3 million from the balance at february 1 , 2008 due to an adjustment to income tax contingencies as further discussed in note 6. .

Question: how much of the purchase price was allocated to intangibles?
Program: add(4338589, 1396612)
Answer: 5735201.0
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 77787 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2017 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2016 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2011 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

----------------------------------------
• date, citi, s&p 500, s&p financials
• 31-dec-2011, 100.0, 100.0, 100.0
• 31-dec-2012, 150.6, 116.0, 128.8
• 31-dec-2013, 198.5, 153.6, 174.7
• 31-dec-2014, 206.3, 174.6, 201.3
• 31-dec-2015, 197.8, 177.0, 198.2
• 31-dec-2016, 229.3, 198.2, 243.4
----------------------------------------

.

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total return between citi common stock and the s&p 500 for the five years ended december 31 , 2016?
Program: subtract(229.3, const_100), divide(#0, const_100), subtract(198.2, const_100), divide(#2, const_100), subtract(#1, #3)
Answer: 0.311
through the certegy merger , the company has an obligation to service $ 200 million ( aggregate principal amount ) of unsecured 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) fixed-rate notes due in 2008 . the notes were recorded in purchase accounting at a discount of $ 5.7 million , which is being amortized over the term of the notes . the notes accrue interest at a rate of 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) per year , payable semi-annually in arrears on each march 15 and september 15 . on april 11 , 2005 , fis entered into interest rate swap agreements which have effectively fixed the interest rate at approximately 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) through april 2008 on $ 350 million of the term loan facilities ( or its replacement debt ) and at approximately 5.2% ( 5.2 % ) through april 2007 on an additional $ 350 million of the term loan . the company has designated these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges in accordance with sfas no . 133 . the estimated fair value of the cash flow hedges results in an asset to the company of $ 4.9 million and $ 5.2 million , as of december 31 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , respectively , which is included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in other noncurrent assets and as a component of accumulated other comprehensive earnings , net of deferred taxes . a portion of the amount included in accumulated other comprehensive earnings is reclassified into interest expense as a yield adjustment as interest payments are made on the term loan facilities . the company 2019s existing cash flow hedges are highly effective and there is no current impact on earnings due to hedge ineffectiveness . it is the policy of the company to execute such instruments with credit-worthy banks and not to enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes . principal maturities at december 31 , 2006 ( and at december 31 , 2006 after giving effect to the debt refinancing completed on january 18 , 2007 ) for the next five years and thereafter are as follows ( in thousands ) : december 31 , january 18 , 2007 refinancing .

========================================
 | december 31 2006 | january 18 2007 refinancing
2007 | $ 61661 | $ 96161
2008 | 257541 | 282041
2009 | 68129 | 145129
2010 | 33586 | 215586
2011 | 941875 | 165455
thereafter | 1646709 | 2105129
total | $ 3009501 | $ 3009501
========================================

fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries and affiliates consolidated and combined financial statements notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Question: what was the change , in thousands , of principal maturities due in 2008 after the the debt refinancing completed on january 18 , 2007?
Program: subtract(257541, 282041)
Answer: -24500.0
maturities of debt the scheduled maturities of the outstanding debt balances , excluding debt fair value adjustments as of december 31 , 2014 , are summarized as follows ( in millions ) : .

****************************************
• year, total
• 2015, $ 2717
• 2016, 1684
• 2017, 3059
• 2018, 2328
• 2019, 2819
• thereafter, 28422
• total, $ 41029
****************************************

_______ interest rates , interest rate swaps and contingent debt the weighted average interest rate on all of our borrowings was 5.02% ( 5.02 % ) during 2014 and 5.08% ( 5.08 % ) during 2013 . information on our interest rate swaps is contained in note 13 . for information about our contingent debt agreements , see note 12 . subsequent event subsequent to december 31 , 2014 , additional ep trust i preferred securities were converted , primarily consisting of 969117 ep trust i preferred securities converted on january 14 , 2015 , into ( i ) 697473 of our class p common stock ; ( ii ) approximately $ 24 million in cash ; and ( iii ) 1066028 in warrants . 9 . share-based compensation and employee benefits share-based compensation kinder morgan , inc . class p shares stock compensation plan for non-employee directors we have a stock compensation plan for non-employee directors , in which our eligible non-employee directors participate . the plan recognizes that the compensation paid to each eligible non-employee director is fixed by our board , generally annually , and that the compensation is payable in cash . pursuant to the plan , in lieu of receiving some or all of the cash compensation , each eligible non-employee director may elect to receive shares of class p common stock . each election will be generally at or around the first board meeting in january of each calendar year and will be effective for the entire calendar year . an eligible director may make a new election each calendar year . the total number of shares of class p common stock authorized under the plan is 250000 . during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we made restricted class p common stock grants to our non-employee directors of 6210 , 5710 and 5520 , respectively . these grants were valued at time of issuance at $ 220000 , $ 210000 and $ 185000 , respectively . all of the restricted stock grants made to non-employee directors vest during a six-month period . table of contents .

Question: what percentage of total maturities of debt come due prior to 2019?
Program: subtract(41029, 28422), divide(#0, 41029)
Answer: 0.30727