wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
state street corporation | 52 shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index , the s&p financial index and the kbw bank index over a five-year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2012 . it also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available , capitalization-weighted index , comprised of 67 of the standard & poor 2019s 500 companies , representing 27 diversified financial services companies , 23 insurance companies , and 17 banking companies . the kbw bank index is a modified cap-weighted index consisting of 24 exchange-listed stocks , representing national money center banks and leading regional institutions. .

========================================
Row 1: , 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017
Row 2: state street corporation, $ 100, $ 159, $ 172, $ 148, $ 178, $ 227
Row 3: s&p 500 index, 100, 132, 151, 153, 171, 208
Row 4: s&p financial index, 100, 136, 156, 154, 189, 230
Row 5: kbw bank index, 100, 138, 151, 151, 195, 231
========================================

.

Question: what is the roi of an investment is s&p500 index from 2012 to 2015?
Program: subtract(153, 100), divide(#0, 100)
Answer: 0.53
supplementary information on oil and gas producing activities ( unaudited ) changes in the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows ( in millions ) 2011 2010 2009 .

========================================
( in millions )	2011	2010	2009
sales and transfers of oil and gas produced net of production and administrative costs	$ -7922 ( 7922 )	$ -6330 ( 6330 )	$ -4876 ( 4876 )
net changes in prices and production and administrative costs related to future production	12313	9843	4840
extensions discoveries and improved recovery less related costs	1454	1268	1399
development costs incurred during the period	1899	2546	2786
changes in estimated future development costs	-1349 ( 1349 )	-2153 ( 2153 )	-3773 ( 3773 )
revisions of previous quantity estimates	2526	1117	5110
net changes in purchases and sales of minerals in place	233	-20 ( 20 )	-159 ( 159 )
accretion of discount	2040	1335	787
net change in income taxes	-6676 ( 6676 )	-4231 ( 4231 )	-4345 ( 4345 )
timing and other	130	250	-149 ( 149 )
net change for the year	4648	3625	1620
beginning of the year	9280	5655	4035
end of year	$ 13928	$ 9280	$ 5655
========================================

.

Question: what were total development costs in millions for the three year period?
Program: table_sum(development costs incurred during the period, none)
Answer: 7231.0
transfer agent and registrar for common stock the transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is : computershare shareowner services llc 480 washington boulevard 29th floor jersey city , new jersey 07310 telephone : ( 877 ) 363-6398 sales of unregistered securities not applicable . repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2015 to december 31 , 2015 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 .

----------------------------------------
Row 1: , total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1, average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2, total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3, maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs3
Row 2: october 1 - 31, 2140511, $ 20.54, 2139507, $ 227368014
Row 3: november 1 - 30, 1126378, $ 22.95, 1124601, $ 201557625
Row 4: december 1 - 31, 1881992, $ 22.97, 1872650, $ 158553178
Row 5: total, 5148881, $ 21.96, 5136758, 
----------------------------------------

1 included shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 1004 withheld shares in october 2015 , 1777 withheld shares in november 2015 and 9342 withheld shares in december 2015 . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our stock repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our stock repurchase program . 3 in february 2015 , the board authorized a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2015 share repurchase program 201d ) . on february 12 , 2016 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining for repurchase under the 2015 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .

Question: what is the total cash used for the repurchase of shares during october , ( in millions ) ?
Program: multiply(2140511, 20.54), divide(#0, const_1000000)
Answer: 43.9661
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 2 2014financial instruments ( continued ) covered by collateral , third-party flooring arrangements , or credit insurance are outstanding with the company 2019s distribution and retail channel partners . one customer accounted for approximately 11% ( 11 % ) of trade receivables as of september 29 , 2007 , while no customers accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of trade receivables as of september 30 , 2006 . the following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts ( in millions ) : september 29 , september 30 , september 24 , 2007 2006 2005 .

========================================
• , september 29 2007, september 30 2006, september 24 2005
• beginning allowance balance, $ 52, $ 46, $ 47
• charged to costs and expenses, 12, 17, 8
• deductions, -17 ( 17 ), -11 ( 11 ), -9 ( 9 )
• ending allowance balance, $ 47, $ 52, $ 46
========================================

vendor non-trade receivables the company has non-trade receivables from certain of its manufacturing vendors resulting from the sale of raw material components to these manufacturing vendors who manufacture sub-assemblies or assemble final products for the company . the company purchases these raw material components directly from suppliers . these non-trade receivables , which are included in the consolidated balance sheets in other current assets , totaled $ 2.4 billion and $ 1.6 billion as of september 29 , 2007 and september 30 , 2006 , respectively . the company does not reflect the sale of these components in net sales and does not recognize any profits on these sales until the products are sold through to the end customer at which time the profit is recognized as a reduction of cost of sales . derivative financial instruments the company uses derivatives to partially offset its business exposure to foreign exchange risk . foreign currency forward and option contracts are used to offset the foreign exchange risk on certain existing assets and liabilities and to hedge the foreign exchange risk on expected future cash flows on certain forecasted revenue and cost of sales . the company 2019s accounting policies for these instruments are based on whether the instruments are designated as hedge or non-hedge instruments . the company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. .

Question: what was the percentage change in the allowance for doubtful accounts from 2005 to 2006?
Program: subtract(52, 46), divide(#0, 46)
Answer: 0.13043
entergy new orleans , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 4.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , lower taxes other than income taxes , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower net revenue . 2010 compared to 2009 net income remained relatively unchanged , increasing $ 0.6 million , primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .

****************************************
Row 1: , amount ( in millions )
Row 2: 2010 net revenue, $ 272.9
Row 3: retail electric price, -16.9 ( 16.9 )
Row 4: net gas revenue, -9.1 ( 9.1 )
Row 5: gas cost recovery asset, -3.0 ( 3.0 )
Row 6: volume/weather, 5.4
Row 7: other, -2.3 ( 2.3 )
Row 8: 2011 net revenue, $ 247.0
****************************************

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan decreases effective october 2010 and october 2011 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to milder weather in 2011 compared to 2010 . the gas cost recovery asset variance is primarily due to the recognition in 2010 of a $ 3 million gas operations regulatory asset associated with the settlement of entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas formula rate plan case and the amortization of that asset . see note 2 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the formula rate plan settlement. .

Question: from the change in net revenue in 2011 , what percentage is attributed to change in retail electric price?
Program: subtract(247.0, 272.9), divide(-16.9, #0)
Answer: 0.65251
18 2015 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2015 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company : comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .

 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015
jkhy | 100.00 | 127.44 | 148.62 | 205.60 | 263.21 | 290.88
peer group | 100.00 | 136.78 | 148.10 | 174.79 | 239.10 | 301.34
s&p 500 | 100.00 | 130.69 | 137.81 | 166.20 | 207.10 | 222.47

this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2010 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. , bottomline technology , inc. , broadridge financial solutions , cardtronics , inc. , convergys corp. , corelogic , inc. , dst systems , inc. , euronet worldwide , inc. , fair isaac corp. , fidelity national information services , inc. , fiserv , inc. , global payments , inc. , heartland payment systems , inc. , moneygram international , inc. , ss&c technologies holdings , inc. , total systems services , inc. , tyler technologies , inc. , verifone systems , inc. , and wex , inc. . micros systems , inc . was removed from the peer group as it was acquired in september 2014. .

Question: what was the percentage change in the 5 year annual performance of the peer group stock from 2010 to 2011
Program: subtract(148.10, 136.78), divide(#0, 136.78)
Answer: 0.08276
synopsys , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014continued the company has the following tax loss and credit carryforwards available to offset future income tax liabilities : carryforward amount expiration ( in thousands ) .

****************************************
carryforward | amount ( in thousands ) | expirationdate
federal net operating loss carryforward | $ 57265 | 2018-2034
federal research credit carryforward | 78599 | 2019-2036
federal foreign tax credit carryforward | 2081 | 2019-2022
international foreign tax credit carryforward | 13351 | indefinite
california research credit carryforward | 169038 | indefinite
other state research credit carryforward | 7482 | 2023-2032
state net operating loss carryforward | 33201 | 2024-2035
****************************************

the federal and state net operating loss carryforward is from acquired companies and the annual use of such loss is subject to significant limitations under internal revenue code section 382 . foreign tax credits may only be used to offset tax attributable to foreign source income . the federal research tax credit was permanently reinstated in fiscal 2016 . the company adopted asu 2016-09 in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 . the company recorded all income tax effects of share-based awards in its provision for income taxes in the condensed consolidated statement of operations on a prospective basis . prior to adoption , the company did not recognize excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation as a charge to capital in excess of par value to the extent that the related tax deduction did not reduce income taxes payable . upon adoption of asu 2016-09 , the company recorded a deferred tax asset of $ 106.5 million mainly related to the research tax credit carryover , for the previously unrecognized excess tax benefits with an offsetting adjustment to retained earnings . adoption of the new standard resulted in net excess tax benefits in the provision for income taxes of $ 38.1 million for fiscal 2017 . during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 , the company repatriated $ 825 million from its foreign subsidiary . the repatriation was executed in anticipation of potential u.s . corporate tax reform , and the company plans to indefinitely reinvest the remainder of its undistributed foreign earnings outside the united states . the company provides for u.s . income and foreign withholding taxes on foreign earnings , except for foreign earnings that are considered indefinitely reinvested outside the u.s . as of october 31 , 2017 , there were approximately $ 598.3 million of earnings upon which u.s . income taxes of approximately $ 110.0 million have not been provided for. .

Question: what is the variation between the federal research credit carryforward and federal net operating loss carryforward , in thousands?
Program: subtract(78599, 57265)
Answer: 21334.0
other expense , net : the company's other expense consists of the following: .

****************************************
• ( in thousands ), year ended december 31 , 2013, year ended december 31 , 2012
• foreign currency losses net, $ -1115 ( 1115 ), $ -1401 ( 1401 )
• other income ( expense ) net, 69, -4 ( 4 )
• total other expense net, $ -1046 ( 1046 ), $ -1405 ( 1405 )
****************************************

income tax provision : the company recorded income tax expense of $ 77.2 million and had income before income taxes of $ 322.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , representing an effective tax rate of 23.9% ( 23.9 % ) . during the year ended december 31 , 2012 , the company recorded income tax expense of $ 90.1 million and had income before income taxes of $ 293.5 million , representing an effective tax rate of 30.7% ( 30.7 % ) . in december 2013 , the company received notice from the irs that the joint committee on taxation took no exception to the company's tax returns that were filed for 2009 and 2010 . an $ 11.0 million tax benefit was recognized in the company's 2013 financial results as the company had effectively settled uncertainty regarding the realization of refund claims filed in connection with the 2009 and 2010 returns . in the u.s. , which is the largest jurisdiction where the company receives such a tax credit , the availability of the research and development credit expired at the end of the 2011 tax year . in january 2013 , the u.s . congress passed legislation that reinstated the research and development credit retroactive to 2012 . the income tax provision for the year ended december 31 , 2013 includes approximately $ 2.3 million related to the reinstated research and development credit for 2012 activity . the decrease in the effective tax rate from the prior year is primarily due to the release of an uncertain tax position mentioned above , the reinstatement of the u.s . research and development credit mentioned above , and cash repatriation activities . when compared to the federal and state combined statutory rate , the effective tax rates for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 were favorably impacted by lower statutory tax rates in many of the company 2019s foreign jurisdictions , the domestic manufacturing deduction and tax benefits associated with the merger of the company 2019s japan subsidiaries in 2010 . net income : the company 2019s net income for the year ended december 31 , 2013 was $ 245.3 million as compared to net income of $ 203.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2012 . diluted earnings per share was $ 2.58 for the year ended december 31 , 2013 and $ 2.14 for the year ended december 31 , 2012 . the weighted average shares used in computing diluted earnings per share were 95.1 million and 95.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . table of contents .

Question: what was the percentage change in the foreign currency losses net from 2012 to 2013
Program: subtract(1115, 1401), divide(#0, 1401)
Answer: -0.20414
celanese purchases of its equity securities information regarding repurchases of our common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2014 is as follows : period number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program approximate dollar value of shares remaining that may be purchased under the program ( 2 ) .

period, totalnumberof sharespurchased ( 1 ), averageprice paidper share, total numberof sharespurchased aspart of publiclyannounced program, approximatedollarvalue of sharesremaining thatmay bepurchased underthe program ( 2 )
october 1 - 31 2014, 192580, $ 58.02, 164800, $ 490000000
november 1 - 30 2014, 468128, $ 59.25, 468128, $ 463000000
december 1 - 31 2014, 199796, $ 60.78, 190259, $ 451000000
total, 860504, , 823187, 

___________________________ ( 1 ) includes 27780 and 9537 for october and december 2014 , respectively , related to shares withheld from employees to cover their statutory minimum withholding requirements for personal income taxes related to the vesting of restricted stock units . ( 2 ) our board of directors has authorized the aggregate repurchase of $ 1.4 billion of our common stock since february 2008 . see note 17 - stockholders' equity in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information . performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed "soliciting material" or to be "filed" with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . comparison of cumulative total return .

Question: in 2014 what was the percent of shares withheld from employees to cover their statutory minimum withholding requirements for personal income taxes to the shares purchased
Program: add(27780, 9537), divide(#0, 860504)
Answer: 0.04337
company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology index on september 30 , 2006 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among apple inc. , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index and the dow jones us technology index sep-10sep-09sep-08sep-07sep-06 sep-11 apple inc . s&p 500 s&p computer hardware dow jones us technology *$ 100 invested on 9/30/06 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright a9 2011 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2011 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 .

****************************************
 | september 30 2006 | september 30 2007 | september 30 2008 | september 30 2009 | september 30 2010 | september 30 2011
apple inc . | $ 100 | $ 199 | $ 148 | $ 241 | $ 369 | $ 495
s&p 500 | $ 100 | $ 116 | $ 91 | $ 85 | $ 93 | $ 94
s&p computer hardware | $ 100 | $ 148 | $ 124 | $ 147 | $ 174 | $ 197
dow jones us technology | $ 100 | $ 123 | $ 94 | $ 104 | $ 117 | $ 120
****************************************

.

Question: did apple achieve a greater return in the year ended sept . 30 2008 than the s&p 500?
Program: greater(148, 91)
Answer: yes