wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative five-year total return provided shareholders on our class a common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and two customized peer groups . the old peer group includes intercontinentalexchange , inc. , nyse euronext and the nasdaq omx group inc . the new peer group is the same as the old peer group with the addition of cboe holdings , inc . which completed its initial public offering in june 2010 . an investment of $ 100 ( with reinvestment of all dividends ) is assumed to have been made in our class a common stock , in the peer groups and the s&p 500 index on december 31 , 2005 and its relative performance is tracked through december 31 , 2010 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cme group inc. , the s&p 500 index , an old peer group and a new peer group 12/05 12/06 12/07 12/08 12/09 12/10 cme group inc . s&p 500 old peer group *$ 100 invested on 12/31/05 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 . copyright a9 2011 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . new peer group the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

• , 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010
• cme group inc ., $ 139.48, $ 188.81, $ 58.66, $ 96.37, $ 93.73
• s&p 500, 115.80, 122.16, 76.96, 97.33, 111.99
• old peer group, 155.58, 190.78, 72.25, 76.11, 87.61
• new peer group, 155.58, 190.78, 72.25, 76.11, 87.61

.

Question: considering the year 2006 , what is the percentual fluctuation of the return provided by s&p 500 and the one provided by old peer group?
Program: divide(115.80, 100), subtract(115.80, 100), divide(155.58, 100), subtract(155.58, 100), subtract(#3, #1)
Answer: 39.78
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements liability to $ 60 million , and recorded the $ 2.7 million difference as a credit to interest expense . the $ 60 million remaining liability was eliminated upon payment of the cash portion of the purchase price . as of december 31 , 2016 , entergy louisiana , in connection with the waterford 3 lease obligation , had a future minimum lease payment ( reflecting an interest rate of 8.09% ( 8.09 % ) ) of $ 57.5 million , including $ 2.3 million in interest , due january 2017 that is recorded as long-term debt . in february 2017 the leases were terminated and the leased assets were conveyed to entergy louisiana . grand gulf lease obligations in 1988 , in two separate but substantially identical transactions , system energy sold and leased back undivided ownership interests in grand gulf for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million . the initial term of the leases expired in july 2015 . system energy renewed the leases for fair market value with renewal terms expiring in july 2036 . at the end of the new lease renewal terms , system energy has the option to repurchase the leased interests in grand gulf or renew the leases at fair market value . in the event that system energy does not renew or purchase the interests , system energy would surrender such interests and their associated entitlement of grand gulf 2019s capacity and energy . system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements . for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant depreciation . however , operating revenues include the recovery of the lease payments because the transactions are accounted for as a sale and leaseback for ratemaking purposes . consistent with a recommendation contained in a ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount was a net regulatory liability of $ 55.6 million and $ 55.6 million as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2016 , system energy , in connection with the grand gulf sale and leaseback transactions , had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) that are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

Row 1: , amount ( in thousands )
Row 2: 2017, $ 17188
Row 3: 2018, 17188
Row 4: 2019, 17188
Row 5: 2020, 17188
Row 6: 2021, 17188
Row 7: years thereafter, 257812
Row 8: total, 343752
Row 9: less : amount representing interest, 309393
Row 10: present value of net minimum lease payments, $ 34359

.

Question: what portion of the total future minimum lease payments is used for interest in connection with the grand gulf sale and leaseback transactions?
Program: divide(309393, 343752)
Answer: 0.90005
j.p . morgan chase & co . / 2003 annual report 33 corporate credit allocation in 2003 , tss was assigned a corporate credit allocation of pre- tax earnings and the associated capital related to certain credit exposures managed within ib 2019s credit portfolio on behalf of clients shared with tss . prior periods have been revised to reflect this allocation . for 2003 , the impact to tss of this change increased pre-tax operating results by $ 36 million and average allocated capital by $ 712 million , and it decreased sva by $ 65 million . pre-tax operating results were $ 46 million lower than in 2002 , reflecting lower loan volumes and higher related expenses , slightly offset by a decrease in credit costs . business outlook tss revenue in 2004 is expected to benefit from improved global equity markets and from two recent acquisitions : the november 2003 acquisition of the bank one corporate trust portfolio , and the january 2004 acquisition of citigroup 2019s electronic funds services business . tss also expects higher costs as it integrates these acquisitions and continues strategic investments to sup- port business expansion . by client segment tss dimensions of 2003 revenue diversification by business revenue by geographic region investor services 36% ( 36 % ) other 1% ( 1 % ) institutional trust services 23% ( 23 % ) treasury services 40% ( 40 % ) large corporations 21% ( 21 % ) middle market 18% ( 18 % ) banks 11% ( 11 % ) nonbank financial institutions 44% ( 44 % ) public sector/governments 6% ( 6 % ) europe , middle east & africa 27% ( 27 % ) asia/pacific 9% ( 9 % ) the americas 64% ( 64 % ) ( a ) includes the elimination of revenue related to shared activities with chase middle market in the amount of $ 347 million . year ended december 31 , operating revenue .

****************************************
year ended december 31 , ( in millions ), year ended december 31 , 2003, year ended december 31 , 2002, change
treasury services, $ 1927, $ 1818, 6% ( 6 % )
investor services, 1449, 1513, -4 ( 4 )
institutional trust services ( a ), 928, 864, 7
other ( a ) ( b ), -312 ( 312 ), -303 ( 303 ), -3 ( 3 )
total treasury & securities services, $ 3992, $ 3892, 3% ( 3 % )
****************************************

( a ) includes a portion of the $ 41 million gain on sale of a nonstrategic business in 2003 : $ 1 million in institutional trust services and $ 40 million in other . ( b ) includes the elimination of revenues related to shared activities with chase middle market , and a $ 50 million gain on sale of a non-u.s . securities clearing firm in 2002. .

Question: in 2003 what was the ratio of the total other income to the gain on sale of a non-u.s securities
Program: divide(-312, 50)
Answer: -6.24
stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. .

========================================
	12/29/2007	1/3/2009	1/2/2010	1/1/2011	12/31/2011	12/29/2012
cadence design systems inc .	100.00	22.55	35.17	48.50	61.07	78.92
nasdaq composite	100.00	59.03	82.25	97.32	98.63	110.78
s&p 400 information technology	100.00	54.60	82.76	108.11	95.48	109.88
========================================

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Question: what is the roi of nasdaq composite from 2008 to 2012?
Program: subtract(110.78, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)
Answer: 0.1078
item 5 . market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2009 . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2004 and that all dividends were reinvested. .

, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009
loews common stock, 100.00, 135.92, 179.47, 219.01, 123.70, 160.62
s&p 500 index, 100.00, 104.91, 121.48, 128.16, 80.74, 102.11
loews peer group ( a ), 100.00, 133.59, 152.24, 174.46, 106.30, 136.35

( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : ace limited , w.r . berkley corporation , cabot oil & gas corporation , the chubb corporation , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco international incorporated , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p. , noble corporation , range resources corporation , spectra energy corporation ( included from december 14 , 2006 when it began trading ) , transocean , ltd . and the travelers companies , inc . dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967 . regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2009 and 2008 . we paid quarterly cash dividends on the former carolina group stock until the separation . regular dividends of $ 0.455 per share of the former carolina group stock were paid in the first and second quarters of 2008. .

Question: what is the return on investment for s&p500 from 2007 to 2008?
Program: subtract(80.74, 128.16), divide(#0, 128.16)
Answer: -0.37001
repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2012 to december 31 , 2012 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 .

----------------------------------------
 | total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1 | average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2 | total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3 | maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that mayyet be purchased under theplans or programs3
----------|----------|----------|----------|----------
october 1 - 31 | 13566 | $ 10.26 | 0 | $ 148858924
november 1 - 30 | 5345171 | $ 9.98 | 5343752 | $ 195551133
december 1 - 31 | 8797959 | $ 10.87 | 8790000 | $ 99989339
total | 14156696 | $ 10.53 | 14133752 | 
----------------------------------------

1 includes shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 13566 withheld shares in october 2012 , 1419 withheld shares in november 2012 and 7959 withheld shares in december 2012 , for a total of 22944 withheld shares during the three-month period . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our stock repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our stock repurchase program . 3 on february 24 , 2012 , we announced in a press release that our board had approved a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million of our common stock ( the 201c2012 share repurchase program 201d ) , in addition to amounts available on existing authorizations . on november 20 , 2012 , we announced in a press release that our board had authorized an increase in our 2012 share repurchase program to $ 400.0 million of our common stock . on february 22 , 2013 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining available for repurchase under the 2012 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .

Question: what percentage of total shares were purchased in october?
Program: divide(13566, 14156696), multiply(#0, const_100)
Answer: 0.09583
issuer purchases of equity securities during the three months ended december 31 , 2012 , we repurchased 619314 shares of our common stock for an aggregate of approximately $ 46.0 million , including commissions and fees , pursuant to our publicly announced stock repurchase program , as follows : period total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share ( 2 ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) .

========================================
period | total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) | average price paid per share ( 2 ) | total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans orprograms | approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans orprograms ( in millions )
----------|----------|----------|----------|----------
october 2012 | 27524 | $ 72.62 | 27524 | $ 1300.1
november 2012 | 489390 | $ 74.22 | 489390 | $ 1263.7
december 2012 | 102400 | $ 74.83 | 102400 | $ 1256.1
total fourth quarter | 619314 | $ 74.25 | 619314 | $ 1256.1
========================================

( 1 ) repurchases made pursuant to the $ 1.5 billion stock repurchase program approved by our board of directors in march 2011 ( the 201c2011 buyback 201d ) . under this program , our management is authorized to purchase shares from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to market conditions and other factors . to facilitate repurchases , we make purchases pursuant to trading plans under rule 10b5-1 of the exchange act , which allows us to repurchase shares during periods when we otherwise might be prevented from doing so under insider trading laws or because of self-imposed trading blackout periods . this program may be discontinued at any time . ( 2 ) average price per share is calculated using the aggregate price , excluding commissions and fees . we continued to repurchase shares of our common stock pursuant to our 2011 buyback subsequent to december 31 , 2012 . between january 1 , 2013 and january 21 , 2013 , we repurchased an additional 15790 shares of our common stock for an aggregate of $ 1.2 million , including commissions and fees , pursuant to the 2011 buyback . as a result , as of january 21 , 2013 , we had repurchased a total of approximately 4.3 million shares of our common stock under the 2011 buyback for an aggregate of $ 245.2 million , including commissions and fees . we expect to continue to manage the pacing of the remaining $ 1.3 billion under the 2011 buyback in response to general market conditions and other relevant factors. .

Question: was was the total amount spent on stock repurchases in the fourth quarter?
Program: multiply(619314, 74.25)
Answer: 45984064.5
jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 173 trading assets and liabilities average balances average trading assets and liabilities were as follows for the periods indicated. .

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007
----------|----------|----------|----------
trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments | $ 318063 | $ 384102 | $ 381415
trading assets 2013 derivative receivables | 110457 | 121417 | 65439
trading liabilities 2013 debt and equityinstruments ( a ) | $ 60224 | $ 78841 | $ 94737
trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables | 77901 | 93200 | 65198

( a ) primarily represent securities sold , not yet purchased . note 4 2013 fair value option the fair value option provides an option to elect fair value as an alternative measurement for selected financial assets , financial liabilities , unrecognized firm commitments , and written loan com- mitments not previously carried at fair value . elections elections were made by the firm to : 2022 mitigate income statement volatility caused by the differences in the measurement basis of elected instruments ( for example , cer- tain instruments elected were previously accounted for on an accrual basis ) while the associated risk management arrange- ments are accounted for on a fair value basis ; 2022 eliminate the complexities of applying certain accounting models ( e.g. , hedge accounting or bifurcation accounting for hybrid in- struments ) ; and 2022 better reflect those instruments that are managed on a fair value basis . elections include : 2022 securities financing arrangements with an embedded derivative and/or a maturity of greater than one year . 2022 loans purchased or originated as part of securitization ware- housing activity , subject to bifurcation accounting , or managed on a fair value basis . 2022 structured notes issued as part of ib 2019s client-driven activities . ( structured notes are financial instruments that contain embed- ded derivatives. ) 2022 certain tax credits and other equity investments acquired as part of the washington mutual transaction . the cumulative effect on retained earnings of the adoption of the fair value option on january 1 , 2007 , was $ 199 million. .

Question: what is the total equity in 2009 , in millions of dollars?
Program: add(318063, 110457), add(60224, 77901), subtract(#0, #1)
Answer: 290395.0
2mar201707015999 ( c ) in october 2016 , our accelerated share repurchase ( 2018 2018asr 2019 2019 ) agreement concluded and we received an additional 44 thousand shares of our common stock . shares purchased pursuant to the asr agreement are presented in the table above in the periods in which they were received . performance graph the following graph compares the performance of our common stock with that of the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment index . the cumulative total return listed below assumes an initial investment of $ 100 at the market close on december 30 , 2011 and reinvestment of dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return 2011 2012 2016201520142013 edwards lifesciences corporation s&p 500 s&p 500 healthcare equipment index december 31 .

========================================
total cumulative return | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016
edwards lifesciences | $ 127.54 | $ 93.01 | $ 180.17 | $ 223.42 | $ 265.06
s&p 500 | 116.00 | 153.58 | 174.60 | 177.01 | 198.18
s&p 500 healthcare equipment index | 117.42 | 150.28 | 181.96 | 194.37 | 207.46
========================================

.

Question: what was the difference in cumulative percentage returns between edwards lifesciences and the s&p 500 for the five years ended 2016?
Program: subtract(265.06, const_100), divide(#0, const_100), subtract(198.18, const_100), divide(#2, const_100), subtract(#1, #3)
Answer: 0.6688
synopsys , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014continued the company has the following tax loss and credit carryforwards available to offset future income tax liabilities : carryforward amount expiration ( in thousands ) .

****************************************
carryforward, amount ( in thousands ), expirationdate
federal net operating loss carryforward, $ 57265, 2018-2034
federal research credit carryforward, 78599, 2019-2036
federal foreign tax credit carryforward, 2081, 2019-2022
international foreign tax credit carryforward, 13351, indefinite
california research credit carryforward, 169038, indefinite
other state research credit carryforward, 7482, 2023-2032
state net operating loss carryforward, 33201, 2024-2035
****************************************

the federal and state net operating loss carryforward is from acquired companies and the annual use of such loss is subject to significant limitations under internal revenue code section 382 . foreign tax credits may only be used to offset tax attributable to foreign source income . the federal research tax credit was permanently reinstated in fiscal 2016 . the company adopted asu 2016-09 in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 . the company recorded all income tax effects of share-based awards in its provision for income taxes in the condensed consolidated statement of operations on a prospective basis . prior to adoption , the company did not recognize excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation as a charge to capital in excess of par value to the extent that the related tax deduction did not reduce income taxes payable . upon adoption of asu 2016-09 , the company recorded a deferred tax asset of $ 106.5 million mainly related to the research tax credit carryover , for the previously unrecognized excess tax benefits with an offsetting adjustment to retained earnings . adoption of the new standard resulted in net excess tax benefits in the provision for income taxes of $ 38.1 million for fiscal 2017 . during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 , the company repatriated $ 825 million from its foreign subsidiary . the repatriation was executed in anticipation of potential u.s . corporate tax reform , and the company plans to indefinitely reinvest the remainder of its undistributed foreign earnings outside the united states . the company provides for u.s . income and foreign withholding taxes on foreign earnings , except for foreign earnings that are considered indefinitely reinvested outside the u.s . as of october 31 , 2017 , there were approximately $ 598.3 million of earnings upon which u.s . income taxes of approximately $ 110.0 million have not been provided for. .

Question: what is the differnece between the federal and the state net operating loss carryforward?
Program: subtract(57265, 33201)
Answer: 24064.0