wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis the miso deferral variance is primarily due to the deferral in 2014 of non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc and the mpsc . the deferral of non-fuel miso-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel miso-related charges . the waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision is due to a regulatory charge of approximately $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 . amount ( in millions ) .

----------------------------------------
Row 1: , amount ( in millions )
Row 2: 2014 net revenue, $ 2224
Row 3: nuclear realized price changes, -310 ( 310 )
Row 4: vermont yankee shutdown in december 2014, -305 ( 305 )
Row 5: nuclear volume excluding vermont yankee effect, 20
Row 6: other, 37
Row 7: 2015 net revenue, $ 1666
----------------------------------------

as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 558 million in 2015 primarily due to : 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices , primarily due to significantly higher northeast market power prices in 2014 , and lower capacity prices in 2015 ; and 2022 a decrease in net revenue as a result of vermont yankee ceasing power production in december 2014 . the decrease was partially offset by higher volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet , excluding vermont yankee , resulting from fewer refueling outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014 , partially offset by more unplanned outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014. .

Question: what percent of the decline in net revenue is attributed to the variance in nuclear realized price?
Program: divide(310, 558)
Answer: 0.55556
vertex pharmaceuticals incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) f . marketable securities ( continued ) unrealized losses in the portfolio relate to various debt securities including u.s . government securities , u.s . government-sponsored enterprise securities , corporate debt securities and asset-backed securities . for these securities , the unrealized losses are primarily due to increases in interest rates . the investments held by the company are high investment grade and there were no adverse credit events . because the company has the ability and intent to hold these investments until a recovery of fair value , which may be maturity , the company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of december 31 , 2006 and 2005 . gross realized gains and losses for 2006 were $ 4000 and $ 88000 respectively . gross realized gains and losses for 2005 were $ 15000 and $ 75000 , respectively . gross realized gains and losses for 2004 were $ 628000 and $ 205000 , respectively . g . restricted cash at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , the company held $ 30.3 million and $ 41.5 million respectively , in restricted cash . at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 the balance was held in deposit with certain banks predominantly to collateralize conditional stand-by letters of credit in the names of the company 2019s landlords pursuant to certain operating lease agreements . h . property and equipment property and equipment consist of the following at december 31 ( in thousands ) : depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 was $ 25.4 million , $ 26.3 million and $ 28.4 million , respectively . in 2006 and 2005 , the company wrote off certain assets that were fully depreciated and no longer utilized . there was no effect on the company 2019s net property and equipment . additionally , the company wrote off or sold certain assets that were not fully depreciated . the net loss on disposal of those assets was $ 10000 for 2006 , $ 344000 for 2005 and $ 43000 for 2004 . i . altus investment altus pharmaceuticals , inc . ( 201caltus 201d ) completed an initial public offering in january 2006 . as of the completion of the offering , vertex owned 817749 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 1962494 shares of common stock ( the 201caltus warrants 201d ) . in addition , the company , as of the completion .

, 2006, 2005
furniture and equipment, $ 97638, $ 98387
leasehold improvements, 74875, 66318
computers, 19733, 18971
software, 21274, 18683
total property and equipment gross, 213520, 202359
less accumulated depreciation and amortization, 151985, 147826
total property and equipment net, $ 61535, $ 54533

furniture and equipment $ 97638 $ 98387 leasehold improvements 74875 66318 computers 19733 18971 software 21274 18683 total property and equipment , gross 213520 202359 less accumulated depreciation and amortization 151985 147826 total property and equipment , net $ 61535 $ 54533 .

Question: what was the percent change in depreciation and amortization expense between 2004 and 2005?
Program: subtract(26.3, 28.4), divide(#0, 28.4)
Answer: -0.07394
.

----------------------------------------
currency | 2012 | 2011 | 2010
----------|----------|----------|----------
real | $ 40.4 | $ 42.4 | $ 32.5
euro | 27.1 | 26.4 | 18.6
pound sterling | 18.5 | 17.6 | 9.0
indian rupee | 4.3 | 3.6 | 2.6
total impact | $ 90.3 | $ 90.0 | $ 62.7
----------------------------------------

the impact on earnings of the foregoing assumed 10% ( 10 % ) change in each of the periods presented would not have been significant . revenue included $ 100.8 million and operating income included $ 9.0 million of unfavorable foreign currency impact during 2012 resulting from a stronger u.s . dollar during 2012 compared to 2011 . our foreign exchange risk management policy permits the use of derivative instruments , such as forward contracts and options , to reduce volatility in our results of operations and/or cash flows resulting from foreign exchange rate fluctuations . our international operations' revenues and expenses are generally denominated in local currency , which limits the economic exposure to foreign exchange risk in those jurisdictions . we do not enter into foreign currency derivative instruments for trading purposes . we have entered into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign currency exposure to intercompany loans . as of december 31 , 2012 , the notional amount of these derivatives was approximately $ 115.6 million and the fair value was nominal . these derivatives are intended to hedge the foreign exchange risks related to intercompany loans , but have not been designated as hedges for accounting purposes. .

Question: what was the percentage change in the impact of the euro on earnings from 2010 to 2011?
Program: subtract(26.4, 18.6), divide(#0, 18.6)
Answer: 0.41935
the company believes that it is reasonably possible that a decrease of up to $ 8 million in gross unrecognized income tax benefits for federal , state and foreign exposure items may be necessary within the next 12 months due to lapse of statutes of limitations or uncertain tax positions being effectively settled . the company believes that it is reasonably possible that a decrease of up to $ 14 million in gross unrecognized income tax benefits for foreign items may be necessary within the next 12 months due to payments . for the remaining uncertain income tax positions , it is difficult at this time to estimate the timing of the resolution . the company conducts business globally and , as a result , files income tax returns in the united states federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions . in the normal course of business , the company is subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the world . the following table summarizes the tax years that remain open for examination by tax authorities in the most significant jurisdictions in which the company operates: .

========================================
united states | 2015-2017
----------|----------
india | 2006-2018
japan | 2013-2017
united kingdom | 2017
switzerland | 2014-2017
========================================

in certain of the jurisdictions noted above , the company operates through more than one legal entity , each of which has different open years subject to examination . the table above presents the open years subject to examination for the most material of the legal entities in each jurisdiction . additionally , it is important to note that tax years are technically not closed until the statute of limitations in each jurisdiction expires . in the jurisdictions noted above , the statute of limitations can extend beyond the open years subject to examination . due to the geographic breadth of the company 2019s operations , numerous tax audits may be ongoing throughout the world at any point in time . income tax liabilities are recorded based on estimates of additional income taxes that may be due upon the conclusion of these audits . estimates of these income tax liabilities are made based upon prior experience and are updated in light of changes in facts and circumstances . however , due to the uncertain and complex application of income tax regulations , it is possible that the ultimate resolution of audits may result in liabilities that could be materially different from these estimates . in such an event , the company will record additional income tax expense or income tax benefit in the period in which such resolution occurs. .

Question: what is the total value of expected decrease in gross unrecognized income tax benefits in the next 12 months , ( in millions ) ?
Program: add(8, 14)
Answer: 22.0
stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2012 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company 2019s common stock versus the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 retail index ( 201cs&p 500 retail index 201d ) and the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) . .

========================================
company/index, december 31 , 2012, december 31 , 2013, december 31 , 2014, december 31 , 2015, december 31 , 2016, december 31 , 2017
o 2019reilly automotive inc ., $ 100, $ 144, $ 215, $ 283, $ 311, $ 269
s&p 500 retail index, 100, 144, 158, 197, 206, 265
s&p 500, $ 100, $ 130, $ 144, $ 143, $ 157, $ 187
========================================

.

Question: was the o 2019reilly automotive inc five year return less than the s&p 500 retail index?
Program: greater(265, 269)
Answer: no
at december 31 , 2009 , aon had domestic federal operating loss carryforwards of $ 7 million that will expire at various dates from 2010 to 2024 , state operating loss carryforwards of $ 513 million that will expire at various dates from 2010 to 2028 , and foreign operating and capital loss carryforwards of $ 453 million and $ 252 million , respectively , nearly all of which are subject to indefinite carryforward . unrecognized tax benefits the following is a reconciliation of the company 2019s beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits ( in millions ) : .

, 2009, 2008
balance at january 1, $ 86, $ 70
additions based on tax positions related to the current year, 2, 5
additions for tax positions of prior years, 5, 12
reductions for tax positions of prior years, -11 ( 11 ), -11 ( 11 )
settlements, -10 ( 10 ), -4 ( 4 )
lapse of statute of limitations, -3 ( 3 ), -1 ( 1 )
acquisitions, 6, 21
foreign currency translation, 2, -6 ( 6 )
balance at december 31, $ 77, $ 86

as of december 31 , 2009 , $ 61 million of unrecognized tax benefits would impact the effective tax rate if recognized . aon does not expect the unrecognized tax positions to change significantly over the next twelve months . the company recognizes penalties and interest related to unrecognized income tax benefits in its provision for income taxes . aon accrued potential penalties of less than $ 1 million during each of 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . aon accrued interest of $ 2 million during 2009 and less than $ 1 million during both 2008 and 2007 . as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , aon has recorded a liability for penalties of $ 5 million and $ 4 million , respectively , and for interest of $ 18 million and $ 14 million , respectively . aon and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction as well as various state and international jurisdictions . aon has substantially concluded all u.s . federal income tax matters for years through 2006 . material u.s . state and local income tax jurisdiction examinations have been concluded for years through 2002 . aon has concluded income tax examinations in its primary international jurisdictions through 2002. .

Question: in 2009 what was the ratio of the interest to the liability
Program: divide(18, 5)
Answer: 3.6
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 30 , 2011 through october 30 , 2016 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 30 , 2011 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index *assumes $ 100 invested on 10/30/11 in stock or 10/31/11 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2016 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved. .

========================================
Row 1: , 10/30/2011, 10/28/2012, 10/27/2013, 10/26/2014, 10/25/2015, 10/30/2016
Row 2: applied materials, 100.00, 86.93, 148.68, 179.96, 143.74, 255.27
Row 3: s&p 500 index, 100.00, 115.21, 146.52, 171.82, 180.75, 188.90
Row 4: rdg semiconductor composite index, 100.00, 96.65, 127.68, 160.86, 154.90, 191.65
========================================

dividends during each of fiscal 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 , applied 2019s board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.10 per share . applied currently anticipates that cash dividends will continue to be paid on a quarterly basis , although the declaration of any future cash dividend is at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination by the board of directors that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . 10/30/11 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 10/25/15 10/30/16 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .

Question: what is the total return if 1000000 is invested in applied materials in 2011 and sold in 2012?
Program: subtract(86.93, const_100), divide(1000000, const_100), multiply(#1, #0)
Answer: -130700.0
entergy arkansas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2008 compared to 2007 net income decreased $ 92.0 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and a higher effective income tax rate , partially offset by higher net revenue . the higher other operation and maintenance expenses resulted primarily from the write-off of approximately $ 70.8 million of costs as a result of the december 2008 arkansas court of appeals decision in entergy arkansas' base rate case . the base rate case is discussed in more detail in note 2 to the financial statements . 2007 compared to 2006 net income decreased $ 34.0 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and a higher effective income tax rate . the decrease was partially offset by higher net revenue . net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .

----------------------------------------
 | amount ( in millions )
----------|----------
2007 net revenue | $ 1110.6
rider revenue | 13.6
purchased power capacity | 4.8
volume/weather | -14.6 ( 14.6 )
other | 3.5
2008 net revenue | $ 1117.9
----------------------------------------

the rider revenue variance is primarily due to an energy efficiency rider which became effective in november 2007 . the establishment of the rider results in an increase in rider revenue and a corresponding increase in other operation and maintenance expense with no effect on net income . also contributing to the variance was an increase in franchise tax rider revenue as a result of higher retail revenues . the corresponding increase is in taxes other than income taxes , resulting in no effect on net income . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to lower reserve equalization expenses . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales during the billed and unbilled sales periods compared to 2007 and a 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) volume decrease in industrial sales , primarily in the wood industry and the small customer class . billed electricity usage decreased 333 gwh in all sectors . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues. .

Question: what percent of the net change in revenue between 2007 and 2008 was due to rider revenue?
Program: subtract(1110.6, 1117.9), divide(13.6, #0)
Answer: -1.86301
as of february 15 , 2008 , there were 138311810 shares of our common stock outstanding held by approximately 2979 stockholders of record . dividends and distributions we pay regular quarterly dividends to holders of our common stock . on february 13 , 2008 , our board of directors declared the first quarterly installment of our 2008 dividend in the amount of $ 0.5125 per share , payable on march 28 , 2008 to stockholders of record on march 6 , 2008 . we expect to distribute 100% ( 100 % ) or more of our taxable net income to our stockholders for 2008 . our board of directors normally makes decisions regarding the frequency and amount of our dividends on a quarterly basis . because the board considers a number of factors when making these decisions , we cannot assure you that we will maintain the policy stated above . please see 201ccautionary statements 201d and the risk factors included in part i , item 1a of this annual report on form 10-k for a description of other factors that may affect our distribution policy . our stockholders may reinvest all or a portion of any cash distribution on their shares of our common stock by participating in our distribution reinvestment and stock purchase plan , subject to the terms of the plan . see 201cnote 16 2014capital stock 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in part ii , item 8 of this annual report on form 10-k . director and employee stock sales certain of our directors , executive officers and other employees have adopted and may , from time to time in the future , adopt non-discretionary , written trading plans that comply with rule 10b5-1 under the exchange act , or otherwise monetize their equity-based compensation . stock repurchases the table below summarizes repurchases of our common stock made during the quarter ended december 31 , 2007 : number of shares repurchased ( 1 ) average price per .

 | number of shares repurchased ( 1 ) | average price per share
october 1 through october 31 | 2014 | 2014
november 1 through november 30 | 2014 | 2014
december 1 through december 31 | 14669 | $ 43.89

( 1 ) repurchases represent shares withheld to pay taxes on the vesting of restricted stock granted to employees. .

Question: what was the value of the treasury stock as of december 312007
Program: multiply(14669, 43.89)
Answer: 643822.41
item 6 . selected financial data the following table sets forth our selected financial data . the table should be read in conjunction with item 7 and item 8 of this annual report on form 10-k. .

****************************************
( $ in millions except per share amounts )	year ended december 31 2017	year ended december 31 2016	year ended december 31 2015	year ended december 31 2014	year ended december 31 2013
sales and service revenues	$ 7441	$ 7068	$ 7020	$ 6957	$ 6820
goodwill impairment	2014	2014	75	47	2014
operating income ( loss )	865	858	769	655	512
net earnings ( loss )	479	573	404	338	261
total assets	6374	6352	6024	6239	6190
long-term debt ( 1 )	1279	1278	1273	1562	1665
total long-term obligations	3225	3356	3260	3562	3277
net cash provided by ( used in ) operating activities	814	822	861	755	260
free cash flow ( 2 )	453	537	673	590	121
dividends declared per share	$ 2.52	$ 2.10	$ 1.70	$ 1.00	$ 0.50
basic earnings ( loss ) per share	$ 10.48	$ 12.24	$ 8.43	$ 6.93	$ 5.25
diluted earnings ( loss ) per share	$ 10.46	$ 12.14	$ 8.36	$ 6.86	$ 5.18
****************************************

( 1 ) long-term debt does not include the current portion of long-term debt , which is included in current liabilities . ( 2 ) free cash flow is a non-gaap financial measure and represents cash from operating activities less capital expenditures net of related grant proceeds . see liquidity and capital resources in item 7 for more information on this measure. .

Question: what was the return on total assets during 2014?
Program: divide(338, 6239)
Answer: 0.05418
stock performance graph the line graph that follows compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones u.s . technology index* and the standard & poor 2019s s&p 500* index for the five years ended december 28 , 2013 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 26 , 2008 ( the last day of trading for the fiscal year ended december 27 , 2008 ) in each of our common stock , the dow jones u.s . technology index , and the s&p 500 index , and that all dividends were reinvested . cumulative total stockholder returns for our common stock , the dow jones u.s . technology index , and the s&p 500 index are based on our fiscal year . comparison of five-year cumulative return for intel , the dow jones u.s . technology index* , and the s&p 500* index .

----------------------------------------
, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
intel corporation, $ 100, $ 148, $ 157, $ 191, $ 163, $ 214
dow jones u.s . technology index, $ 100, $ 170, $ 191, $ 191, $ 209, $ 270
s&p 500 index, $ 100, $ 132, $ 151, $ 154, $ 175, $ 236
----------------------------------------

table of contents .

Question: in 2010 what was the ratio of the cumulative return for intel , to the the dow jones u.s . technology index*
Program: divide(157, 191)
Answer: 0.82199