wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
other expense , net : the company's other expense consists of the following: .

****************************************
( in thousands ) | year ended december 31 , 2013 | year ended december 31 , 2012
----------|----------|----------
foreign currency losses net | $ -1115 ( 1115 ) | $ -1401 ( 1401 )
other income ( expense ) net | 69 | -4 ( 4 )
total other expense net | $ -1046 ( 1046 ) | $ -1405 ( 1405 )
****************************************

income tax provision : the company recorded income tax expense of $ 77.2 million and had income before income taxes of $ 322.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , representing an effective tax rate of 23.9% ( 23.9 % ) . during the year ended december 31 , 2012 , the company recorded income tax expense of $ 90.1 million and had income before income taxes of $ 293.5 million , representing an effective tax rate of 30.7% ( 30.7 % ) . in december 2013 , the company received notice from the irs that the joint committee on taxation took no exception to the company's tax returns that were filed for 2009 and 2010 . an $ 11.0 million tax benefit was recognized in the company's 2013 financial results as the company had effectively settled uncertainty regarding the realization of refund claims filed in connection with the 2009 and 2010 returns . in the u.s. , which is the largest jurisdiction where the company receives such a tax credit , the availability of the research and development credit expired at the end of the 2011 tax year . in january 2013 , the u.s . congress passed legislation that reinstated the research and development credit retroactive to 2012 . the income tax provision for the year ended december 31 , 2013 includes approximately $ 2.3 million related to the reinstated research and development credit for 2012 activity . the decrease in the effective tax rate from the prior year is primarily due to the release of an uncertain tax position mentioned above , the reinstatement of the u.s . research and development credit mentioned above , and cash repatriation activities . when compared to the federal and state combined statutory rate , the effective tax rates for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 were favorably impacted by lower statutory tax rates in many of the company 2019s foreign jurisdictions , the domestic manufacturing deduction and tax benefits associated with the merger of the company 2019s japan subsidiaries in 2010 . net income : the company 2019s net income for the year ended december 31 , 2013 was $ 245.3 million as compared to net income of $ 203.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2012 . diluted earnings per share was $ 2.58 for the year ended december 31 , 2013 and $ 2.14 for the year ended december 31 , 2012 . the weighted average shares used in computing diluted earnings per share were 95.1 million and 95.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . table of contents .

Question: what was the percentage change in the company 2019s net income from 2012 to 2013 .
Program: subtract(245.3, 203.5), divide(#0, 203.5)
Answer: 0.20541
table of contents part ii , item 8 schlumberger limited ( schlumberger n.v. , incorporated in the netherlands antilles ) and subsidiary companies shares of common stock issued treasury shares outstanding .

****************************************
• , issued, in treasury, shares outstanding
• balance january 1 2001, 667085793, -94361099 ( 94361099 ), 572724694
• employee stock purchase plan, 2013, 1752833, 1752833
• shares granted to directors, 2013, 4800, 4800
• shares sold to optionees, 8385, 1399686, 1408071
• balance december 31 2001, 667094178, -91203780 ( 91203780 ), 575890398
• employee stock purchase plan, 2013, 2677842, 2677842
• shares granted to directors, 2013, 3500, 3500
• shares sold to optionees, 10490, 2243400, 2253890
• acquisition of technoguide, 2013, 1347485, 1347485
• balance december 31 2002, 667104668, -84931553 ( 84931553 ), 582173115
• employee stock purchase plan, 2013, 2464088, 2464088
• shares granted to directors, 2013, 3500, 3500
• shares sold to optionees, 1320, 1306305, 1307625
• balance december 31 2003, 667105988, -81157660 ( 81157660 ), 585948328
****************************************

see the notes to consolidated financial statements 39 / slb 2003 form 10-k .

Question: what was amount of shares issued to directors during the period?
Program: add(4800, 3500), add(#0, 3500)
Answer: 11800.0
intel corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the aggregate fair value of awards that vested in 2015 was $ 1.5 billion ( $ 1.1 billion in 2014 and $ 1.0 billion in 2013 ) , which represents the market value of our common stock on the date that the rsus vested . the grant-date fair value of awards that vested in 2015 was $ 1.1 billion ( $ 949 million in 2014 and $ 899 million in 2013 ) . the number of rsus vested includes shares of common stock that we withheld on behalf of employees to satisfy the minimum statutory tax withholding requirements . rsus that are expected to vest are net of estimated future forfeitures . as of december 26 , 2015 , there was $ 1.8 billion in unrecognized compensation costs related to rsus granted under our equity incentive plans . we expect to recognize those costs over a weighted average period of 1.2 years . stock option awards as of december 26 , 2015 , options outstanding that have vested and are expected to vest were as follows : number of options ( in millions ) weighted average exercise weighted average remaining contractual ( in years ) aggregate intrinsic ( in millions ) .

	number ofoptions ( in millions )	weightedaverageexerciseprice	weightedaverageremainingcontractualterm ( in years )	aggregateintrinsicvalue ( in millions )
vested	43.8	$ 21.07	1.8	$ 609
expected to vest	9.6	$ 24.07	4.1	$ 104
total	53.4	$ 21.61	2.2	$ 713

aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the exercise price and $ 34.98 , the closing price of our common stock on december 24 , 2015 , as reported on the nasdaq global select market , for all in-the-money options outstanding . options outstanding that are expected to vest are net of estimated future option forfeitures . options with a fair value of $ 42 million completed vesting in 2015 ( $ 68 million in 2014 and $ 186 million in 2013 ) . as of december 26 , 2015 , there was $ 13 million in unrecognized compensation costs related to stock options granted under our equity incentive plans . we expect to recognize those costs over a weighted average period of approximately eight months. .

Question: what percentage of stock option awards are expected to vest as of december 26 , 2015?
Program: divide(9.6, 53.4)
Answer: 0.17978
declaration and payment of future quarterly dividends is at the discretion of our board and may be adjusted as business needs or market conditions change . in addition , under the terms of the merger agreement , we have agreed with aetna to coordinate the declaration and payment of dividends so that our stockholders do not fail to receive a quarterly dividend around the time of the closing of the merger . on october 29 , 2015 , the board declared a cash dividend of $ 0.29 per share that was paid on january 29 , 2016 to stockholders of record on december 30 , 2015 , for an aggregate amount of $ 43 million . stock total return performance the following graph compares our total return to stockholders with the returns of the standard & poor 2019s composite 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and the dow jones us select health care providers index ( 201cpeer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 . the graph assumes an investment of $ 100 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 , and the peer group on december 31 , 2010 , and that dividends were reinvested when paid. .

========================================
• , 12/31/2010, 12/31/2011, 12/31/2012, 12/31/2013, 12/31/2014, 12/31/2015
• hum, $ 100, $ 162, $ 128, $ 195, $ 274, $ 343
• s&p 500, $ 100, $ 102, $ 118, $ 157, $ 178, $ 181
• peer group, $ 100, $ 110, $ 129, $ 177, $ 226, $ 239
========================================

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Question: what is the highest return for the first year of the investment?
Program: subtract(162, 100)
Answer: 62.0
performance graph the following graph is a comparison of the five-year cumulative return of our common shares , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index ( the 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and the national association of real estate investment trusts 2019 ( 201cnareit 201d ) all equity index , a peer group index . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2007 in our common shares , the s&p 500 index and the nareit all equity index and that all dividends were reinvested without the payment of any commissions . there can be no assurance that the performance of our shares will continue in line with the same or similar trends depicted in the graph below. .

----------------------------------------
 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012
vornado realty trust | $ 100 | $ 72 | $ 89 | $ 110 | $ 105 | $ 114
s&p 500 index | 100 | 63 | 80 | 92 | 94 | 109
the nareit all equity index | 100 | 62 | 80 | 102 | 110 | 132
----------------------------------------

.

Question: what was the total five year change in the nareit all equity index?
Program: subtract(132, 100)
Answer: 32.0
comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph compares the cumulative total return on citigroup 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period extending through december 31 , 2009 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in citigroup 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index and that all dividends were reinvested . citigroup s&p 500 index s&p financial index 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended .

----------------------------------------
december 31, citigroup, s&p 500 index, s&p financial index
2005, 104.38, 104.83, 106.30
2006, 124.02, 121.20, 126.41
2007, 70.36, 127.85, 103.47
2008, 18.71, 81.12, 47.36
2009, 9.26, 102.15, 55.27
----------------------------------------

.

Question: what was the ratio of cumulative total return for citigroup compared to the s&p 500 index in 2007
Program: divide(70.36, 127.85)
Answer: 0.55033
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2017 . equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 448859 $ 0.00 4087587 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 ) 2014 2014 2014 .

----------------------------------------
Row 1: plan category, number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b ), weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights, number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )
Row 2: equity compensation plans approved by security holders, 448859, $ 0.00, 4087587
Row 3: equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 ), 2014, 2014, 2014
Row 4: total, 448859, $ 0.00, 4087587
----------------------------------------

( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation . of these shares , 27123 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan . in addition , this number includes 28763 stock rights , 3075 restricted stock rights , and 389898 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement . ( 2 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .

Question: what portion of the equity compensation plan approved by security holders remains available for future issuance?
Program: add(448859, 4087587), divide(4087587, #0)
Answer: 0.90105
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements computed on a rolling 12 month basis . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana was in compliance with these provisions . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an overall implicit rate of 7.45% ( 7.45 % ) ) in connection with the waterford 3 sale and leaseback transactions , which are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

****************************************
Row 1: , amount ( in thousands )
Row 2: 2009, $ 32452
Row 3: 2010, 35138
Row 4: 2011, 50421
Row 5: 2012, 39067
Row 6: 2013, 26301
Row 7: years thereafter, 137858
Row 8: total, 321237
Row 9: less : amount representing interest, 73512
Row 10: present value of net minimum lease payments, $ 247725
****************************************

grand gulf lease obligations in december 1988 , in two separate but substantially identical transactions , system energy sold and leased back undivided ownership interests in grand gulf for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million . the interests represent approximately 11.5% ( 11.5 % ) of grand gulf . the leases expire in 2015 . under certain circumstances , system entergy may repurchase the leased interests prior to the end of the term of the leases . at the end of the lease terms , system energy has the option to repurchase the leased interests in grand gulf at fair market value or to renew the leases for either fair market value or , under certain conditions , a fixed rate . in may 2004 , system energy caused the grand gulf lessors to refinance the outstanding bonds that they had issued to finance the purchase of their undivided interest in grand gulf . the refinancing is at a lower interest rate , and system energy's lease payments have been reduced to reflect the lower interest costs . system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements . for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant depreciation . however , operating revenues include the recovery of the lease payments because the transactions are accounted for as a sale and leaseback for ratemaking purposes . consistent with a recommendation contained in a ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount of this net regulatory asset was $ 19.2 million and $ 36.6 million as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .

Question: what percent of total lease payments is in 'years thereafter'?
Program: divide(137858, 321237)
Answer: 0.42915
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the nyse for the years 2016 and 2015. .

****************************************
2016, high, low
quarter ended march 31, $ 102.93, $ 83.07
quarter ended june 30, 113.63, 101.87
quarter ended september 30, 118.26, 107.57
quarter ended december 31, 118.09, 99.72
2015, high, low
quarter ended march 31, $ 101.88, $ 93.21
quarter ended june 30, 98.64, 91.99
quarter ended september 30, 101.54, 86.83
quarter ended december 31, 104.12, 87.23
****************************************

on february 17 , 2017 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 108.11 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 17 , 2017 , we had 427195037 outstanding shares of common stock and 153 registered holders . dividends as a reit , we must annually distribute to our stockholders an amount equal to at least 90% ( 90 % ) of our reit taxable income ( determined before the deduction for distributed earnings and excluding any net capital gain ) . generally , we have distributed and expect to continue to distribute all or substantially all of our reit taxable income after taking into consideration our utilization of net operating losses ( 201cnols 201d ) . we have two series of preferred stock outstanding , 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) mandatory convertible preferred stock , series a ( the 201cseries a preferred stock 201d ) , issued in may 2014 , with a dividend rate of 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) , and the 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) mandatory convertible preferred stock , series b ( the 201cseries b preferred stock 201d ) , issued in march 2015 , with a dividend rate of 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) . dividends are payable quarterly in arrears , subject to declaration by our board of directors . the amount , timing and frequency of future distributions will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon various factors , a number of which may be beyond our control , including our financial condition and operating cash flows , the amount required to maintain our qualification for taxation as a reit and reduce any income and excise taxes that we otherwise would be required to pay , limitations on distributions in our existing and future debt and preferred equity instruments , our ability to utilize nols to offset our distribution requirements , limitations on our ability to fund distributions using cash generated through our trss and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant . we have distributed an aggregate of approximately $ 3.2 billion to our common stockholders , including the dividend paid in january 2017 , primarily subject to taxation as ordinary income. .

Question: what is the average number of shares per registered holder as of february 17 , 2017?
Program: divide(427195037, 153)
Answer: 2792124.42484
table of contents in this form 10-k , we discuss non-gaap income before income taxes , non-gaap net income , non-gaap net income per diluted share , ebitda , adjusted ebitda and adjusted ebitda margin , which are non-gaap financial measures . we believe these measures provide analysts , investors and management with helpful information regarding the underlying operating performance of our business , as they remove the impact of items that management believes are not reflective of underlying operating performance . management uses these measures to evaluate period-over-period performance as management believes they provide a more comparable measure of the underlying business . additionally , adjusted ebitda is a measure in the credit agreement governing our senior secured term loan facility ( 201cterm loan 201d ) , which is used to evaluate our ability to make certain investments , incur additional debt , and make restricted payments , such as dividends and share repurchases , as well as whether we are required to make additional principal prepayments on the term loan beyond the quarterly amortization payments . for further details regarding the term loan , see long-term debt and financing arrangements within management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations and note 10 ( long-term debt ) to the accompanying consolidated financial statements . for the definitions of non-gaap income before income taxes , non-gaap net income and adjusted ebitda and reconciliations to net income , see 201cresults of operations 201d . the results of certain key business metrics are as follows: .

****************************************
Row 1: ( dollars in millions ), years ended december 31 , 2017, years ended december 31 , 2016, years ended december 31 , 2015
Row 2: net sales, $ 15191.5, $ 13981.9, $ 12988.7
Row 3: gross profit, 2449.9, 2327.2, 2115.8
Row 4: income from operations, 866.1, 819.2, 742.0
Row 5: net income, 523.0, 424.4, 403.1
Row 6: non-gaap net income, 605.8, 569.0, 503.5
Row 7: adjusted ebitda, 1185.6, 1117.3, 1018.5
Row 8: average daily sales, 59.8, 55.0, 51.1
Row 9: net debt ( 1 ), 3091.3, 2970.7, 3222.1
Row 10: cash conversion cycle ( in days ) ( 2 ), 19, 19, 21
****************************************

net debt ( 1 ) 3091.3 2970.7 3222.1 cash conversion cycle ( in days ) ( 2 ) 19 19 21 ( 1 ) defined as total debt minus cash and cash equivalents . ( 2 ) cash conversion cycle is defined as days of sales outstanding in accounts receivable and certain receivables due from vendors plus days of supply in merchandise inventory minus days of purchases outstanding in accounts payable and accounts payable-inventory financing , based on a rolling three-month average. .

Question: what was 2016 gross margin percent?
Program: divide(2327.2, 12988.7)
Answer: 0.17917