wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
.

****************************************
• , 12/07, 12/08, 12/09, 12/10, 12/11, 12/12
• fidelity national information services inc ., 100.00, 70.08, 101.93, 120.01, 117.34, 157.38
• s&p 500, 100.00, 63.00, 79.67, 91.67, 93.61, 108.59
• s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services, 100.00, 68.26, 99.41, 97.33, 118.68, 151.90
****************************************

s&p supercap data processing & outsourced 100.00 68.26 99.41 97.33 118.68 151.90 item 6 . selected financial data . the selected financial data set forth below constitutes historical financial data of fis and should be read in conjunction with item 7 , management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , and item 8 , financial statements and supplementary data , included elsewhere in this report . on october 1 , 2009 , we completed the acquisition of metavante technologies , inc . ( "metavante" ) . the results of operations and financial position of metavante are included in the consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition . on july 2 , 2008 , we completed the spin-off of lender processing services , inc. , which was a former wholly-owned subsidiary ( "lps" ) . for accounting purposes , the results of lps are presented as discontinued operations . accordingly , all prior periods have been restated to present the results of fis on a stand alone basis and include the results of lps up to july 2 , 2008 , as discontinued operations. .

Question: what was the percentage cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock fidelity national information services , inc . for the period ending 12/12?
Program: subtract(157.38, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)
Answer: 0.5738
at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , we had a modest working capital surplus . this reflects a strong cash position that provides enhanced liquidity in an uncertain economic environment . in addition , we believe we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . cash flows .

----------------------------------------
millions, 2015, 2014, 2013
cash provided by operating activities, $ 7344, $ 7385, $ 6823
cash used in investing activities, -4476 ( 4476 ), -4249 ( 4249 ), -3405 ( 3405 )
cash used in financing activities, -3063 ( 3063 ), -2982 ( 2982 ), -3049 ( 3049 )
net change in cash and cash equivalents, $ -195 ( 195 ), $ 154, $ 369
----------------------------------------

operating activities cash provided by operating activities decreased in 2015 compared to 2014 due to lower net income and changes in working capital , partially offset by the timing of tax payments . federal tax law provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012-2013 . as a result , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011-2013 income tax expense , contributing to the positive operating cash flow in those years . congress extended 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for 2014 , but this extension occurred in december , and the related benefit was realized in 2015 , rather than 2014 . similarly , in december of 2015 , congress extended bonus depreciation through 2019 , which delayed the benefit of 2015 bonus depreciation into 2016 . bonus depreciation will be at a rate of 50% ( 50 % ) for 2015 , 2016 and 2017 , 40% ( 40 % ) for 2018 and 30% ( 30 % ) for 2019 . higher net income in 2014 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2013 , despite higher income tax payments . 2014 income tax payments were higher than 2013 primarily due to higher income , but also because we paid taxes previously deferred by bonus depreciation . investing activities higher capital investments in locomotives and freight cars , including $ 327 million in early lease buyouts , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities in 2015 compared to 2014 . higher capital investments , including the early buyout of the long-term operating lease of our headquarters building for approximately $ 261 million , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities in 2014 compared to 2013 . significant investments also were made for new locomotives , freight cars and containers , and capacity and commercial facility projects . capital investments in 2014 also included $ 99 million for the early buyout of locomotives and freight cars under long-term operating leases , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions. .

Question: what was the percentage change in cash provided by operating activities from 2014 to 2015?
Program: subtract(7344, 7385), divide(#0, 7385)
Answer: -0.00555
the graph below compares expeditors international of washington , inc.'s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the nasdaq industrial transportation index ( nqusb2770t ) . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on 12/31/2013 and tracks it through 12/31/2018 . total return assumes reinvestment of dividends in each of the indices indicated . comparison of 5-year cumulative total return among expeditors international of washington , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the nasdaq industrial transportation index. .

----------------------------------------
	12/13	12/14	12/15	12/16	12/17	12/18
expeditors international of washington inc .	$ 100.00	$ 100.81	$ 101.92	$ 119.68	$ 146.19	$ 153.88
standard and poor's 500 index	100.00	111.39	110.58	121.13	144.65	135.63
nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t )	100.00	121.41	93.55	120.89	154.19	140.25
----------------------------------------

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Question: what is the highest return rate for the first year of the investment?
Program: subtract(121.41, const_100)
Answer: 21.41
included in the corporate and consumer loan tables above are purchased distressed loans , which are loans that have evidenced significant credit deterioration subsequent to origination but prior to acquisition by citigroup . in accordance with sop 03-3 , the difference between the total expected cash flows for these loans and the initial recorded investments is recognized in income over the life of the loans using a level yield . accordingly , these loans have been excluded from the impaired loan information presented above . in addition , per sop 03-3 , subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows for a purchased distressed loan require a build of an allowance so the loan retains its level yield . however , increases in the expected cash flows are first recognized as a reduction of any previously established allowance and then recognized as income prospectively over the remaining life of the loan by increasing the loan 2019s level yield . where the expected cash flows cannot be reliably estimated , the purchased distressed loan is accounted for under the cost recovery method . the carrying amount of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2010 was $ 392 million , net of an allowance of $ 77 million as of december 31 , 2010 . the changes in the accretable yield , related allowance and carrying amount net of accretable yield for 2010 are as follows : in millions of dollars accretable carrying amount of loan receivable allowance .

in millions of dollars | accretable yield | carrying amount of loan receivable | allowance
----------|----------|----------|----------
beginning balance | $ 27 | $ 920 | $ 95
purchases ( 1 ) | 1 | 130 | 2014
disposals/payments received | -11 ( 11 ) | -594 ( 594 ) | 2014
accretion | -44 ( 44 ) | 44 | 2014
builds ( reductions ) to the allowance | 128 | 2014 | -18 ( 18 )
increase to expected cash flows | -2 ( 2 ) | 19 | 2014
fx/other | 17 | -50 ( 50 ) | 2014
balance at december 31 2010 ( 2 ) | $ 116 | $ 469 | $ 77

( 1 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 130 million of purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 0 under the cost-recovery method . these balances represent the fair value of these loans at their acquisition date . the related total expected cash flows for the level-yield loans were $ 131 million at their acquisition dates . ( 2 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 315 million of loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 154 million accounted for under the cost-recovery method. .

Question: what is the percentage of allowance of the company's purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2010?
Program: add(392, 77), divide(77, #0)
Answer: 0.16418
course of business , we actively manage our exposure to these market risks by entering into various hedging transactions , authorized under established policies that place clear controls on these activities . the counterparties in these transactions are generally highly rated institutions . we establish credit limits for each counterparty . our hedging transactions include but are not limited to a variety of derivative financial instruments . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange , commodity price , and equity instrument risk , please see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . value at risk the estimates in the table below are intended to measure the maximum potential fair value we could lose in one day from adverse changes in market interest rates , foreign exchange rates , commodity prices , and equity prices under normal market conditions . a monte carlo value-at-risk ( var ) methodology was used to quantify the market risk for our exposures . the models assumed normal market conditions and used a 95 percent confidence level . the var calculation used historical interest and foreign exchange rates , and commodity and equity prices from the past year to estimate the potential volatility and correlation of these rates in the future . the market data were drawn from the riskmetrics 2122 data set . the calculations are not intended to represent actual losses in fair value that we expect to incur . further , since the hedging instrument ( the derivative ) inversely correlates with the underlying exposure , we would expect that any loss or gain in the fair value of our derivatives would be generally offset by an increase or decrease in the fair value of the underlying exposure . the positions included in the calculations were : debt ; investments ; interest rate swaps ; foreign exchange forwards ; commodity swaps , futures , and options ; and equity instruments . the calculations do not include the underlying foreign exchange and commodities or equity-related positions that are offset by these market-risk-sensitive instruments . the table below presents the estimated maximum potential var arising from a one-day loss in fair value for our interest rate , foreign currency , commodity , and equity market-risk-sensitive instruments outstanding as of may 27 , 2018 and may 28 , 2017 , and the average fair value impact during the year ended may 27 , 2018. .

========================================
Row 1: in millions, fair value impact may 27 2018, fair value impact averageduringfiscal 2018, fair value impact may 282017
Row 2: interest rate instruments, $ 33.2, $ 27.5, $ 25.1
Row 3: foreign currency instruments, 21.3, 23.1, 24.6
Row 4: commodity instruments, 1.9, 2.1, 3.2
Row 5: equity instruments, 2.0, 1.4, 1.3
========================================

.

Question: what is the total fair value impact for all instruments as of may 27 , 2018?
Program: add(33.2, 21.3), add(#0, 1.9), add(#1, 2.0)
Answer: 58.4
during 2014 , $ 91 million of provision recapture was recorded for purchased impaired loans compared to $ 11 million of provision expense for 2013 . the charge-offs ( which were specifically for commercial loans greater than a defined threshold ) during 2014 were $ 42 million compared to $ 104 million for 2013 . at december 31 , 2014 , the allowance for loan and lease losses was $ .9 billion on $ 4.4 billion of purchased impaired loans while the remaining $ .5 billion of purchased impaired loans required no allowance as the net present value of expected cash flows equaled or exceeded the recorded investment . as of december 31 , 2013 , the allowance for loan and lease losses related to purchased impaired loans was $ 1.0 billion . if any allowance for loan losses is recognized on a purchased impaired pool , which is accounted for as a single asset , the entire balance of that pool would be disclosed as requiring an allowance . subsequent increases in the net present value of cash flows will result in a provision recapture of any previously recorded allowance for loan and lease losses , to the extent applicable , and/or a reclassification from non-accretable difference to accretable yield , which will be recognized prospectively . individual loan transactions where final dispositions have occurred ( as noted above ) result in removal of the loans from their applicable pools for cash flow estimation purposes . the cash flow re-estimation process is completed quarterly to evaluate the appropriateness of the allowance associated with the purchased impaired loans . activity for the accretable yield during 2014 and 2013 follows : table 72 : purchased impaired loans 2013 accretable yield .

----------------------------------------
in millions | 2014 | 2013
----------|----------|----------
january 1 | $ 2055 | $ 2166
accretion ( including excess cash recoveries ) | -587 ( 587 ) | -695 ( 695 )
net reclassifications to accretable from non-accretable ( a ) | 208 | 613
disposals | -118 ( 118 ) | -29 ( 29 )
december 31 | $ 1558 | $ 2055
----------------------------------------

( a ) approximately 93% ( 93 % ) of net reclassifications for the year ended december 31 , 2014 were within the commercial portfolio as compared to 37% ( 37 % ) for year ended december 31 , 2013 . note 5 allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit allowance for loan and lease losses we maintain the alll at levels that we believe to be appropriate to absorb estimated probable credit losses incurred in the portfolios as of the balance sheet date . we use the two main portfolio segments 2013 commercial lending and consumer lending 2013 and develop and document the alll under separate methodologies for each of these segments as discussed in note 1 accounting policies . a rollforward of the alll and associated loan data is presented below . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 143 .

Question: what was the dollar amount in millions for net reclassifications for the year ended december 31 , 2013 due to the commercial portfolio?
Program: multiply(2055, 37%)
Answer: 760.35
performance graph the following graph compares the total return , assuming reinvestment of dividends , on an investment in the company , based on performance of the company's common stock , with the total return of the standard & poor's 500 composite stock index and the dow jones united states travel and leisure index for a five year period by measuring the changes in common stock prices from december 31 , 2011 to december 31 , 2016. .

========================================
 | 12/11 | 12/12 | 12/13 | 12/14 | 12/15 | 12/16
royal caribbean cruises ltd . | 100.00 | 139.36 | 198.03 | 350.40 | 437.09 | 362.38
s&p 500 | 100.00 | 116.00 | 153.58 | 174.60 | 177.01 | 198.18
dow jones us travel & leisure | 100.00 | 113.33 | 164.87 | 191.85 | 203.17 | 218.56
========================================

the stock performance graph assumes for comparison that the value of the company's common stock and of each index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 and that all dividends were reinvested . past performance is not necessarily an indicator of future results. .

Question: what is the mathematical range for royal caribean , s&p 500 and dow jones in december , 2014?
Program: subtract(350.40, 177.01)
Answer: 173.39
table of contents item 1b . unresolved staff comments item 2 . properties a summary of our significant locations at december 31 , 2015 is shown in the following table . square footage amounts are net of space that has been sublet or is part of a facility restructuring. .

========================================
location	approximate square footage
alpharetta georgia	260000
jersey city new jersey	109000
arlington virginia	102000
sandy utah	66000
menlo park california	63000
new york new york	52000
========================================

all facilities are leased at december 31 , 2015 . all of our facilities are used by either our trading and investing or balance sheet management segments , in addition to the corporate/other category . all other leased facilities with space of less than 25000 square feet are not listed by location . in addition to the significant facilities above , we also lease all 30 regional branches , ranging in space from approximately 2500 to 8000 square feet . item 3 . legal proceedings information in response to this item can be found under the heading "legal matters" in note 19 2014 commitments , contingencies and other regulatory matters to part ii . item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data in this annual report and is incorporated by reference into this item . item 4 . mine safety disclosures not applicable. .

Question: as of december 31 , 2015 what was the ratio of the square footage in alpharetta georgia to jersey city new jersey
Program: divide(260000, 109000)
Answer: 2.38532
note 9 2014goodwill and other intangibles , net goodwill the following table outlines the activity in the carrying value of the company 2019s goodwill , which is all assigned to the company 2019s trading and investing segment ( dollars in thousands ) : .

========================================
, trading & investing
balance at december 31 2011, $ 1934232
activity, 2014
balance at december 31 2012, 1934232
impairment of goodwill, -142423 ( 142423 )
balance at december 31 2013, $ 1791809
========================================

goodwill is evaluated for impairment on an annual basis and when events or changes indicate the carrying value of an asset exceeds its fair value and the loss may not be recoverable . at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , the company 2019s trading and investing segment had two reporting units ; market making and retail brokerage . at the end of june 2013 , the company decided to exit its market making business . based on this decision in the second quarter of 2013 , the company conducted an interim goodwill impairment test for the market making reporting unit , using the expected sale structure of the market making business . this structure assumed a shorter period of cash flows related to an order flow arrangement , compared to prior estimates of fair value . based on the results of the first step of the goodwill impairment test , the company determined that the carrying value of the market making reporting unit , including goodwill , exceeded the fair value for that reporting unit as of june 30 , 2013 . the company proceeded to the second step of the goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of goodwill impairment . as a result of the evaluation , it was determined that the entire carrying amount of goodwill allocated to the market making reporting unit was impaired , and the company recognized a $ 142.4 million impairment of goodwill during the second quarter of 2013 . for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , the company performed its annual goodwill assessment for the retail brokerage reporting unit , electing to qualitatively assess whether it was more likely than not that the fair value was less than the carrying value . as a result of this assessment , the company determined that the first step of the goodwill impairment test was not necessary , and concluded that goodwill was not impaired at december 31 , 2013 . at december 31 , 2013 , goodwill is net of accumulated impairment losses of $ 142.4 million related to the trading and investing segment and $ 101.2 million in the balance sheet management segment . at december 31 , 2012 , goodwill is net of accumulated impairment losses of $ 101.2 million in the balance sheet management segment. .

Question: what was the percent of the impairment of goodwill to the total goodwill balance at december 31 2013 \\n
Program: divide(142423, 1791809)
Answer: 0.07949
advance auto parts , inc . schedule ii - valuation and qualifying accounts ( in thousands ) allowance for doubtful accounts receivable : balance at beginning of period charges to expenses deductions balance at end of period january 3 , 2015 $ 13295 $ 17182 $ ( 14325 ) ( 1 ) $ 16152 january 2 , 2016 16152 22067 ( 12461 ) ( 1 ) 25758 december 31 , 2016 25758 24597 ( 21191 ) ( 1 ) 29164 ( 1 ) accounts written off during the period . these amounts did not impact the company 2019s statement of operations for any year presented . note : other valuation and qualifying accounts have not been reported in this schedule because they are either not applicable or because the information has been included elsewhere in this report. .

----------------------------------------
• allowance for doubtful accounts receivable:, balance atbeginningof period, charges toexpenses, deductions, , balance atend ofperiod
• january 3 2015, $ 13295, $ 17182, $ -14325 ( 14325 ), -1 ( 1 ), $ 16152
• january 2 2016, 16152, 22067, -12461 ( 12461 ), -1 ( 1 ), 25758
• december 31 2016, 25758, 24597, -21191 ( 21191 ), -1 ( 1 ), 29164
----------------------------------------

advance auto parts , inc . schedule ii - valuation and qualifying accounts ( in thousands ) allowance for doubtful accounts receivable : balance at beginning of period charges to expenses deductions balance at end of period january 3 , 2015 $ 13295 $ 17182 $ ( 14325 ) ( 1 ) $ 16152 january 2 , 2016 16152 22067 ( 12461 ) ( 1 ) 25758 december 31 , 2016 25758 24597 ( 21191 ) ( 1 ) 29164 ( 1 ) accounts written off during the period . these amounts did not impact the company 2019s statement of operations for any year presented . note : other valuation and qualifying accounts have not been reported in this schedule because they are either not applicable or because the information has been included elsewhere in this report. .

Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable during 2015?
Program: subtract(16152, 13295), divide(#0, 13295)
Answer: 0.21489