wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
stock performance graph comcast the graph below compares the yearly percentage change in the cumulative total shareholder return on comcast 2019s class a common stock during the five years ended december 31 , 2015 with the cumulative total returns on the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and with a select peer group consisting of us and other companies engaged in the cable , communications and media industries . this peer group consists of us , as well as cablevision systems corporation ( class a ) , dish network corporation ( class a ) , directv inc . ( included through july 24 , 2015 , the date of acquisition by at&t corp. ) and time warner cable inc . ( the 201ccable subgroup 201d ) , and time warner inc. , walt disney company , viacom inc . ( class b ) , twenty-first century fox , inc . ( class a ) , and cbs corporation ( class b ) ( the 201cmedia subgroup 201d ) . the peer group was constructed as a composite peer group in which the cable subgroup is weighted 63% ( 63 % ) and the media subgroup is weighted 37% ( 37 % ) based on the respective revenue of our cable communications and nbcuniversal segments . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in our class a common stock and in each of the following indices and assumes the reinvestment of dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return 12/1412/1312/1212/10 12/15 comcast class a s&p 500 peer group index .

****************************************
, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015
comcast class a, $ 110, $ 177, $ 250, $ 282, $ 279
s&p 500 stock index, $ 102, $ 118, $ 156, $ 177, $ 180
peer group index, $ 110, $ 157, $ 231, $ 267, $ 265
****************************************

nbcuniversal nbcuniversal is a wholly owned subsidiary of nbcuniversal holdings and there is no market for its equity securities . 39 comcast 2015 annual report on form 10-k .

Question: what was the differencet in percentage 5 year cumulative total return for comcast class a stock and the s&p 500 stock index for the year ended 2015?
Program: subtract(279, 100), divide(#0, 100), subtract(180, 100), divide(#2, 100), subtract(#1, #3)
Answer: 0.99
n o t e s t o c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries the following table shows changes in the company 2019s stock options for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 , and number of options weighted average exercise price .

----------------------------------------
	number of options	weightedaverageexercise price
options outstanding december 31 2005	12643761	$ 36.53
granted	1505215	$ 56.29
exercised	-1982560 ( 1982560 )	$ 33.69
forfeited	-413895 ( 413895 )	$ 39.71
options outstanding december 31 2006	11752521	$ 39.43
granted	1549091	$ 56.17
exercised	-1830004 ( 1830004 )	$ 35.73
forfeited	-200793 ( 200793 )	$ 51.66
options outstanding december 31 2007	11270815	$ 42.12
granted	1612507	$ 60.17
exercised	-2650733 ( 2650733 )	$ 36.25
forfeited	-309026 ( 309026 )	$ 54.31
options outstanding december 31 2008	9923563	$ 46.24
----------------------------------------

the weighted-average remaining contractual term was 5.8 years for the stock options outstanding and 4.6 years for the stock options exercisable at december 31 , 2008 . the total intrinsic value was approximately $ 66 million for stock options out- standing and $ 81 million for stock options exercisable at december 31 , 2008 . the weighted-average fair value for the stock options granted for the year ended december 31 , 2008 was $ 17.60 . the total intrinsic value for stock options exercised dur- ing the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 , was approximately $ 54 million , $ 44 million , and $ 43 million , respectively . the amount of cash received during the year ended december 31 , 2008 , from the exercise of stock options was $ 97 million . restricted stock the company 2019s 2004 ltip also provides for grants of restricted stock . the company generally grants restricted stock with a 4-year vesting period , based on a graded vesting schedule . the restricted stock is granted at market close price on the date of grant . included in the company 2019s share-based compensation expense in the year ended december 31 , 2008 , is a portion of the cost related to the unvested restricted stock granted in the years 2004 to 2008. .

Question: what is the growth rate of the weighted average exercise price of options from december 31 , 2005 to december 31 , 2008?
Program: subtract(46.24, 36.53), divide(#0, 36.53)
Answer: 0.26581
five-year stock performance graph the graph below illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return on snap-on common stock since december 31 , 2008 , assuming that dividends were reinvested . the graph compares snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a peer group . snap-on incorporated total shareholder return ( 1 ) fiscal year ended ( 2 ) snap-on incorporated peer group ( 3 ) s&p 500 .

----------------------------------------
fiscal year ended ( 2 )	snap-onincorporated	peer group ( 3 )	s&p 500
december 31 2008	$ 100.00	$ 100.00	$ 100.00
december 31 2009	111.40	127.17	126.46
december 31 2010	153.24	169.36	145.51
december 31 2011	140.40	165.85	148.59
december 31 2012	223.82	195.02	172.37
december 31 2013	315.72	265.68	228.19
----------------------------------------

( 1 ) assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2008 , and that dividends were reinvested quarterly . ( 2 ) the company's fiscal year ends on the saturday that is on or nearest to december 31 of each year ; for ease of calculation , the fiscal year end is assumed to be december 31 . ( 3 ) the peer group consists of : stanley black & decker , inc. , danaher corporation , emerson electric co. , genuine parts company , newell rubbermaid inc. , pentair ltd. , spx corporation and w.w . grainger , inc . 24 snap-on incorporated 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 snap-on incorporated peer group s&p 500 .

Question: what is the return on investment if $ 100 are invested in s&p500 at the end of 2008 and sold at the end of 2010?
Program: subtract(145.51, 100), divide(#0, 100)
Answer: 0.4551
entergy louisiana , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2004 compared to 2003 net income decreased $ 18.7 million primarily due to lower net revenue , partially offset by lower other operation and maintenance expenses . 2003 compared to 2002 net income increased slightly primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest charges , almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and higher taxes other than income taxes . net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy louisiana's measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. .

----------------------------------------
Row 1: , ( in millions )
Row 2: 2003 net revenue, $ 973.7
Row 3: price applied to unbilled sales, -31.9 ( 31.9 )
Row 4: deferred fuel cost revisions, -29.4 ( 29.4 )
Row 5: rate refund provisions, -12.2 ( 12.2 )
Row 6: volume/weather, 17.0
Row 7: summer capacity charges, 11.8
Row 8: other, 2.3
Row 9: 2004 net revenue, $ 931.3
----------------------------------------

the price applied to the unbilled sales variance is due to a decrease in the fuel price included in unbilled sales in 2004 caused primarily by the effect of nuclear plant outages in 2003 on average fuel costs . the deferred fuel cost revisions variance resulted from a revised unbilled sales pricing estimate made in the first quarter of 2003 to more closely align the fuel component of that pricing with expected recoverable fuel costs . rate refund provisions caused a decrease in net revenue due to additional provisions recorded in 2004 compared to 2003 for potential rate actions and refunds . the volume/weather variance is due to a total increase of 620 gwh in weather-adjusted usage in all sectors , partially offset by the effect of milder weather on billed sales in the residential and commercial sectors . the summer capacity charges variance is due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of the amortization in 2004 . the amortization of these capacity charges began in august 2002 and ended in july 2003. .

Question: what is the decrease in net income as a percentage of the the decrease in net revenue from 2003 to 2004?
Program: subtract(973.7, 931.3), divide(18.7, #0)
Answer: 0.44104
stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , news corporation class a common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on september 18 , 2008 , the date upon which our common stock began trading , in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the period september 18 , 2008 through december 31 , 2008 and the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , and 2012 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

----------------------------------------
 | december 312008 | december 312009 | december 312010 | december 312011 | december 312012
----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------
disca | $ 102.53 | $ 222.09 | $ 301.96 | $ 296.67 | $ 459.67
discb | $ 78.53 | $ 162.82 | $ 225.95 | $ 217.56 | $ 327.11
disck | $ 83.69 | $ 165.75 | $ 229.31 | $ 235.63 | $ 365.63
s&p 500 | $ 74.86 | $ 92.42 | $ 104.24 | $ 104.23 | $ 118.21
peer group | $ 68.79 | $ 100.70 | $ 121.35 | $ 138.19 | $ 190.58
----------------------------------------

equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. .

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on discb common stock from september 18 , 2008 to december 31 , 2012?
Program: subtract(327.11, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)
Answer: 2.2711
jpmorgan chase & co./2015 annual report 67 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of 87 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 .

========================================
december 31 ( in dollars ) | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015
----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------
jpmorgan chase | $ 100.00 | $ 80.03 | $ 108.98 | $ 148.98 | $ 163.71 | $ 177.40
kbw bank index | 100.00 | 76.82 | 102.19 | 140.77 | 153.96 | 154.71
s&p financial index | 100.00 | 82.94 | 106.78 | 144.79 | 166.76 | 164.15
s&p 500 index | 100.00 | 102.11 | 118.44 | 156.78 | 178.22 | 180.67
========================================

december 31 , ( in dollars ) .

Question: did jpmorgan chase outperform the kbw bank index?
Program: greater(177.40, 154.71)
Answer: yes
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 comparison of five-year cumulative total shareholder return altria group , inc . altria peer group s&p 500 part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return of altria group , inc . 2019s common stock for the last ive years with the cumulative total return for the same period of the s&p 500 index and the altria group , inc . peer group ( 1 ) . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in common stock and each of the indices as of the market close on december 31 , 2011 and the reinvestment of all dividends on a quarterly basis . source : bloomberg - 201ctotal return analysis 201d calculated on a daily basis and assumes reinvestment of dividends as of the ex-dividend date . ( 1 ) in 2016 , the altria group , inc . peer group consisted of u.s.-headquartered consumer product companies that are competitors to altria group , inc . 2019s tobacco operating companies subsidiaries or that have been selected on the basis of revenue or market capitalization : campbell soup company , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive company , conagra brands , inc. , general mills , inc. , the hershey company , kellogg company , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft heinz company , mondel 0113z international , inc. , pepsico , inc . and reynolds american inc . note - on october 1 , 2012 , kraft foods inc . ( kft ) spun off kraft foods group , inc . ( krft ) to its shareholders and then changed its name from kraft foods inc . to mondel 0113z international , inc . ( mdlz ) . on july 2 , 2015 , kraft foods group , inc . merged with and into a wholly owned subsidiary of h.j . heinz holding corporation , which was renamed the kraft heinz company ( khc ) . on june 12 , 2015 , reynolds american inc . ( rai ) acquired lorillard , inc . ( lo ) . on november 9 , 2016 , conagra foods , inc . ( cag ) spun off lamb weston holdings , inc . ( lw ) to its shareholders and then changed its name from conagra foods , inc . to conagra brands , inc . ( cag ) . .

----------------------------------------
date | altria group inc . | altria group inc . peer group | s&p 500
----------|----------|----------|----------
december 2011 | $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 | $ 100.00
december 2012 | $ 111.77 | $ 108.78 | $ 115.99
december 2013 | $ 143.69 | $ 135.61 | $ 153.55
december 2014 | $ 193.28 | $ 151.74 | $ 174.55
december 2015 | $ 237.92 | $ 177.04 | $ 176.94
december 2016 | $ 286.61 | $ 192.56 | $ 198.09
----------------------------------------

altria altria group , inc . group , inc . peer group s&p 500 .

Question: did altria outperform it's peer group?
Program: greater(286.61, 192.56)
Answer: yes
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2015 . equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 2 ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1424356 $ 33.90 4281952 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) 2014 2014 2014 .

========================================
plan category | number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b ) | weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 ) | number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )
----------|----------|----------|----------
equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 1424356 | $ 33.90 | 4281952
equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) | 2014 | 2014 | 2014
total | 1424356 | $ 33.90 | 4281952
========================================

( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation . of these shares , 533397 were subject to stock options and 54191 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan . in addition , this number includes 35553 stock rights , 10279 restricted stock rights , and 790936 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement . ( 2 ) this is the weighted average exercise price of the 533397 outstanding stock options only . ( 3 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .

Question: what is the value of the number of securities to be issued on december 312015
Program: multiply(1424356, 33.90)
Answer: 48285668.4
entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 27.4 million primarily due to higher nuclear refueling outage expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , and higher interest expense , partially offset by higher other income . 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 92.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . a0 a0following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) .

========================================
 | amount ( in millions )
2016 net revenue | $ 1520.5
retail electric price | 33.8
opportunity sales | 5.6
asset retirement obligation | -14.8 ( 14.8 )
volume/weather | -29.0 ( 29.0 )
other | 6.5
2017 net revenue | $ 1522.6
========================================

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc . a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 . the increase was partially offset by decreases in the energy efficiency rider , as approved by the apsc , effective april 2016 and january 2017 . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case and formula rate plan filings . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the union power station purchase . the opportunity sales variance results from the estimated net revenue effect of the 2017 and 2016 ferc orders in the opportunity sales proceeding attributable to wholesale customers . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the opportunity sales proceeding. .

Question: how much higher is net revenue in 2017 than 2016 ? ( in millions )
Program: subtract(1522.6, 1520.5)
Answer: 2.1
entergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased by $ 14.6 million primarily due to higher net revenue , partially offset by higher taxes other than income taxes , higher other operation and maintenance expenses , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . 2010 compared to 2009 net income increased by $ 2.4 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower other income , higher taxes other than income taxes , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .

****************************************
	amount ( in millions )
2010 net revenue	$ 540.2
retail electric price	36.0
volume/weather	21.3
purchased power capacity	-24.6 ( 24.6 )
other	4.9
2011 net revenue	$ 577.8
****************************************

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to rate actions , including an annual base rate increase of $ 59 million beginning august 2010 , with an additional increase of $ 9 million beginning may 2011 , as a result of the settlement of the december 2009 rate case . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case settlement . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 721 gwh , or 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including the effect of more favorable weather on residential and commercial sales compared to last year . usage in the industrial sector increased 8.2% ( 8.2 % ) primarily in the chemicals and refining industries . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to price increases for ongoing purchased power capacity and additional capacity purchases. .

Question: what is the average price per gwh for the variance in volume?
Program: subtract(21.3, const_1000000), divide(#0, 721)
Answer: -1386.93301