wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
the contractual maturities of held-to-maturity securities as of january 30 , 2009 were in excess of three years and were $ 31.4 million at cost and $ 28.9 million at fair value , respectively . for the successor year ended january 30 , 2009 and period ended february 1 , 2008 , and the predecessor period ended july 6 , 2007 and year ended february 2 , 2007 , gross realized gains and losses on the sales of available-for-sale securities were not material . the cost of securities sold is based upon the specific identification method . merchandise inventories inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined using the retail last-in , first-out ( 201clifo 201d ) method . under the company 2019s retail inventory method ( 201crim 201d ) , the calculation of gross profit and the resulting valuation of inventories at cost are computed by applying a calculated cost-to-retail inventory ratio to the retail value of sales at a department level . costs directly associated with warehousing and distribution are capitalized into inventory . the excess of current cost over lifo cost was approximately $ 50.0 million at january 30 , 2009 and $ 6.1 million at february 1 , 2008 . current cost is determined using the retail first-in , first-out method . the company 2019s lifo reserves were adjusted to zero at july 6 , 2007 as a result of the merger . the successor recorded lifo provisions of $ 43.9 million and $ 6.1 million during 2008 and 2007 , respectively . the predecessor recorded a lifo credit of $ 1.5 million in 2006 . in 2008 , the increased commodity cost pressures mainly related to food and pet products which have been driven by fruit and vegetable prices and rising freight costs . increases in petroleum , resin , metals , pulp and other raw material commodity driven costs also resulted in multiple product cost increases . the company intends to address these commodity cost increases through negotiations with its vendors and by increasing retail prices as necessary . on a quarterly basis , the company estimates the annual impact of commodity cost fluctuations based upon the best available information at that point in time . store pre-opening costs pre-opening costs related to new store openings and the construction periods are expensed as incurred . property and equipment property and equipment are recorded at cost . the company provides for depreciation and amortization on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives: .

land improvements | 20
----------|----------
buildings | 39-40
furniture fixtures and equipment | 3-10

improvements of leased properties are amortized over the shorter of the life of the applicable lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset. .

Question: what the difference of the held-to-maturity securities at cost and at fair value as of january 30 , 2009 , in millions?
Program: subtract(31.4, 28.9)
Answer: 2.5
the following table provides the weighted average assumptions used in the black-scholes option-pricing model for grants and the resulting weighted average grant date fair value per share of stock options granted for the years ended december 31: .

****************************************
• , 2018, 2017, 2016
• intrinsic value, $ 9, $ 10, $ 18
• exercise proceeds, 7, 11, 15
• income tax benefit realized, 2, 3, 6
****************************************

stock units during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , the company granted rsus to certain employees under the 2007 plan and 2017 omnibus plan , as applicable . rsus generally vest based on continued employment with the company over periods ranging from one to three years. .

Question: by how much did the intrinsic value decrease from 2016 to 2018?
Program: subtract(9, 18), divide(#0, 18)
Answer: -0.5
course of business , we actively manage our exposure to these market risks by entering into various hedging transactions , authorized under established policies that place clear controls on these activities . the counterparties in these transactions are generally highly rated institutions . we establish credit limits for each counterparty . our hedging transactions include but are not limited to a variety of derivative financial instruments . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange , commodity price , and equity instrument risk , please see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . value at risk the estimates in the table below are intended to measure the maximum potential fair value we could lose in one day from adverse changes in market interest rates , foreign exchange rates , commodity prices , and equity prices under normal market conditions . a monte carlo value-at-risk ( var ) methodology was used to quantify the market risk for our exposures . the models assumed normal market conditions and used a 95 percent confidence level . the var calculation used historical interest and foreign exchange rates , and commodity and equity prices from the past year to estimate the potential volatility and correlation of these rates in the future . the market data were drawn from the riskmetrics 2122 data set . the calculations are not intended to represent actual losses in fair value that we expect to incur . further , since the hedging instrument ( the derivative ) inversely correlates with the underlying exposure , we would expect that any loss or gain in the fair value of our derivatives would be generally offset by an increase or decrease in the fair value of the underlying exposure . the positions included in the calculations were : debt ; investments ; interest rate swaps ; foreign exchange forwards ; commodity swaps , futures , and options ; and equity instruments . the calculations do not include the underlying foreign exchange and commodities or equity-related positions that are offset by these market-risk-sensitive instruments . the table below presents the estimated maximum potential var arising from a one-day loss in fair value for our interest rate , foreign currency , commodity , and equity market-risk-sensitive instruments outstanding as of may 27 , 2018 and may 28 , 2017 , and the average fair value impact during the year ended may 27 , 2018. .

========================================
Row 1: in millions, fair value impact may 27 2018, fair value impact averageduringfiscal 2018, fair value impact may 282017
Row 2: interest rate instruments, $ 33.2, $ 27.5, $ 25.1
Row 3: foreign currency instruments, 21.3, 23.1, 24.6
Row 4: commodity instruments, 1.9, 2.1, 3.2
Row 5: equity instruments, 2.0, 1.4, 1.3
========================================

.

Question: what is the net change in interest rate instruments from 2017 to 2018?
Program: subtract(33.2, 25.1)
Answer: 8.1
part i item 1 entergy corporation , domestic utility companies , and system energy employment litigation ( entergy corporation , entergy arkansas , entergy gulf states , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy new orleans , and system energy ) entergy corporation and the domestic utility companies are defendants in numerous lawsuits that have been filed by former employees alleging that they were wrongfully terminated and/or discriminated against on the basis of age , race , sex , and/or other protected characteristics . entergy corporation and the domestic utility companies are vigorously defending these suits and deny any liability to the plaintiffs . however , no assurance can be given as to the outcome of these cases , and at this time management cannot estimate the total amount of damages sought . included in the employment litigation are two cases filed in state court in claiborne county , mississippi in december 2002 . the two cases were filed by former employees of entergy operations who were based at grand gulf . entergy operations and entergy employees are named as defendants . the cases make employment-related claims , and seek in total $ 53 million in alleged actual damages and $ 168 million in punitive damages . entergy subsequently removed both proceedings to the federal district in jackson , mississippi . entergy cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this proceeding . research spending entergy is a member of the electric power research institute ( epri ) . epri conducts a broad range of research in major technical fields related to the electric utility industry . entergy participates in various epri projects based on entergy's needs and available resources . the domestic utility companies contributed $ 1.6 million in 2004 , $ 1.5 million in 2003 , and $ 2.1 million in 2002 to epri . the non-utility nuclear business contributed $ 3.2 million in 2004 and $ 3 million in both 2003 and 2002 to epri . employees employees are an integral part of entergy's commitment to serving its customers . as of december 31 , 2004 , entergy employed 14425 people . u.s . utility: .

========================================
entergy arkansas, 1494
entergy gulf states, 1641
entergy louisiana, 943
entergy mississippi, 793
entergy new orleans, 403
system energy, -
entergy operations, 2735
entergy services, 2704
entergy nuclear operations, 3245
other subsidiaries, 277
total full-time, 14235
part-time, 190
total entergy, 14425
========================================

approximately 4900 employees are represented by the international brotherhood of electrical workers union , the utility workers union of america , and the international brotherhood of teamsters union. .

Question: what percent of total full-time employees are in entergy nuclear operations?
Program: divide(3245, 14235)
Answer: 0.22796
stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock on january 2 , 2010 and in each index on december 31 , 2009 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of cadence 2019s fiscal year through january 3 , 2015 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/28/13 1/3/151/1/11 12/31/11 12/29/121/2/10 *$ 100 invested on 1/2/10 in stock or 12/31/09 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2014 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. .

========================================
, 1/2/2010, 1/1/2011, 12/31/2011, 12/29/2012, 12/28/2013, 1/3/2015
cadence design systems inc ., 100.00, 137.90, 173.62, 224.37, 232.55, 314.36
nasdaq composite, 100.00, 117.61, 118.70, 139.00, 196.83, 223.74
s&p 400 information technology, 100.00, 128.72, 115.22, 135.29, 173.25, 187.84
========================================

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Question: what is the rate of return in nasdaq of an investment from 2010 to 2011?
Program: subtract(117.61, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)
Answer: 0.1761
13 . pension and other postretirement benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees in the united states and in certain of its international subsidiaries . as a result of plan design changes approved in 2011 , beginning on january 1 , 2013 , active participants in merck 2019s primary u.s . defined benefit pension plans are accruing pension benefits using new cash balance formulas based on age , service , pay and interest . however , during a transition period from january 1 , 2013 through december 31 , 2019 , participants will earn the greater of the benefit as calculated under the employee 2019s legacy final average pay formula or their new cash balance formula . for all years of service after december 31 , 2019 , participants will earn future benefits under only the cash balance formula . in addition , the company provides medical benefits , principally to its eligible u.s . retirees and their dependents , through its other postretirement benefit plans . the company uses december 31 as the year-end measurement date for all of its pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans . net periodic benefit cost the net periodic benefit cost for pension and other postretirement benefit plans consisted of the following components: .

years ended december 31	pension benefits 2013	pension benefits 2012	pension benefits 2011	pension benefits 2013	pension benefits 2012	2011
service cost	$ 682	$ 555	$ 619	$ 102	$ 82	$ 110
interest cost	665	661	718	107	121	141
expected return on plan assets	-1097 ( 1097 )	-970 ( 970 )	-972 ( 972 )	-126 ( 126 )	-136 ( 136 )	-142 ( 142 )
net amortization	336	185	201	-50 ( 50 )	-35 ( 35 )	-17 ( 17 )
termination benefits	58	27	59	50	18	29
curtailments	-23 ( 23 )	-10 ( 10 )	-86 ( 86 )	-11 ( 11 )	-7 ( 7 )	1
settlements	23	18	4	2014	2014	2014
net periodic benefit cost	$ 644	$ 466	$ 543	$ 72	$ 43	$ 122

the increase in net periodic benefit cost for pension and other postretirement benefit plans in 2013 as compared with 2012 is largely attributable to a change in the discount rate . the net periodic benefit cost attributable to u.s . pension plans included in the above table was $ 348 million in 2013 , $ 268 million in 2012 and $ 406 million in in connection with restructuring actions ( see note 3 ) , termination charges were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on pension and other postretirement benefit plans related to expanded eligibility for certain employees exiting merck . also , in connection with these restructuring activities , curtailments were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on pension and other postretirement benefit plans . in addition , settlements were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on certain domestic and international pension plans . table of contents .

Question: considering the years 2013 and 2012 , what is the variation observed in the expected return on plan assets , in millions?
Program: subtract(1097, 970)
Answer: 127.0
transfer agent and registrar for common stock the transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is : computershare shareowner services llc 480 washington boulevard 29th floor jersey city , new jersey 07310 telephone : ( 877 ) 363-6398 sales of unregistered securities not applicable . repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2015 to december 31 , 2015 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 .

----------------------------------------
• , total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1, average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2, total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3, maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs3
• october 1 - 31, 2140511, $ 20.54, 2139507, $ 227368014
• november 1 - 30, 1126378, $ 22.95, 1124601, $ 201557625
• december 1 - 31, 1881992, $ 22.97, 1872650, $ 158553178
• total, 5148881, $ 21.96, 5136758, 
----------------------------------------

1 included shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 1004 withheld shares in october 2015 , 1777 withheld shares in november 2015 and 9342 withheld shares in december 2015 . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our stock repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our stock repurchase program . 3 in february 2015 , the board authorized a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2015 share repurchase program 201d ) . on february 12 , 2016 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining for repurchase under the 2015 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .

Question: what percentage of total shares purchased was purchased in december?
Program: divide(1881992, 5148881), multiply(#0, const_100)
Answer: 36.55148
sales of unregistered securities not applicable . repurchases of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2017 to december 31 , 2017 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 .

========================================
Row 1: , total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1, average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2, total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3, maximum number ( orapproximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms3
Row 2: october 1 - 31, 1231868, $ 20.74, 1230394, $ 214001430
Row 3: november 1 - 30, 1723139, $ 18.89, 1722246, $ 181474975
Row 4: december 1 - 31, 1295639, $ 20.25, 1285000, $ 155459545
Row 5: total, 4250646, $ 19.84, 4237640, 
========================================

1 included shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 1474 withheld shares in october 2017 , 893 withheld shares in november 2017 and 10639 withheld shares in december 2017 , for a total of 13006 withheld shares during the three-month period . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our share repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our share repurchase program . 3 in february 2017 , the board authorized a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2017 share repurchase program 201d ) . on february 14 , 2018 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining for repurchase under the 2017 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .

Question: what portion of the total repurchase of share has occurred during november?
Program: divide(1723139, 4250646)
Answer: 0.40538
issuer purchases of equity securities the following table provides information about our repurchases of common stock during the three-month period ended december 31 , 2007 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a ) maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the program ( b ) .

========================================
Row 1: period, total number ofshares purchased, average pricepaid pershare, total number of sharespurchased as part ofpubliclyannouncedprogram ( a ), maximum number ofshares that may yet bepurchased under theprogram ( b )
Row 2: october, 127100, $ 108.58, 127100, 35573131
Row 3: november, 1504300, 109.07, 1504300, 34068831
Row 4: december, 1325900, 108.78, 1325900, 32742931
========================================

( a ) we repurchased a total of 2957300 shares of our common stock during the quarter ended december 31 , 2007 under a share repurchase program that we announced in october 2002 . ( b ) our board of directors has approved a share repurchase program for the repurchase of up to 128 million shares of our common stock from time-to-time , including 20 million shares approved for repurchase by our board of directors in september 2007 . under the program , management has discretion to determine the number and price of the shares to be repurchased , and the timing of any repurchases , in compliance with applicable law and regulation . as of december 31 , 2007 , we had repurchased a total of 95.3 million shares under the program . in 2007 , we did not make any unregistered sales of equity securities. .

Question: for the quarter ended december 31 , 2007 what was the percent of the shared bought in october
Program: divide(127100, 2957300)
Answer: 0.04298