wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , news corporation class a common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on september 18 , 2008 , the date upon which our common stock began trading , in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the period september 18 , 2008 through december 31 , 2008 and the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 and 2011 . of cash on hand , cash generated by operations , borrowings under our revolving credit facility and future financing transactions . under the program , management is authorized to purchase shares from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to stock price , business conditions , market conditions and other factors . the repurchase program does not have an expiration date . the above repurchases were funded using cash on hand . there were no repurchases of our series a common stock or series b common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2011 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

----------------------------------------
Row 1: , december 31 2008, december 31 2009, december 31 2010, december 31 2011
Row 2: disca, $ 102.53, $ 222.09, $ 301.96, $ 296.67
Row 3: discb, $ 78.53, $ 162.82, $ 225.95, $ 217.56
Row 4: disck, $ 83.69, $ 165.75, $ 229.31, $ 235.63
Row 5: s&p 500, $ 74.86, $ 92.42, $ 104.24, $ 104.23
Row 6: peer group, $ 68.79, $ 100.70, $ 121.35, $ 138.19
----------------------------------------

.

Question: the k series stock outperformed the s&p 500 by what percent over 5 years?
Program: subtract(235.63, 104.23), divide(#0, 104.23)
Answer: 1.26067
notes to consolidated financial statements 236 jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report the table below sets forth the accretable yield activity for the firm 2019s pci consumer loans for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and .

========================================
year ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios ), year ended december 31 , 2010, year ended december 31 , 2009, 2008
balance january 1, $ 25544, $ 32619, $ 2014
washington mutual acquisition, 2014, 2014, 39454
accretion into interest income, -3232 ( 3232 ), -4363 ( 4363 ), -1292 ( 1292 )
changes in interest rates on variable rate loans, -819 ( 819 ), -4849 ( 4849 ), -5543 ( 5543 )
other changes in expected cash flows ( a ), -2396 ( 2396 ), 2137, 2014
balance december 31, $ 19097, $ 25544, $ 32619
accretable yield percentage, 4.35% ( 4.35 % ), 5.14% ( 5.14 % ), 5.81% ( 5.81 % )
========================================

( a ) other changes in expected cash flows may vary from period to period as the firm continues to refine its cash flow model and periodically updates model assumptions . for the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , other changes in expected cash flows were principally driven by changes in prepayment assumptions , as well as reclassification to the nonaccretable difference . such changes are expected to have an insignificant impact on the accretable yield percentage . the factors that most significantly affect estimates of gross cash flows expected to be collected , and accordingly the accretable yield balance , include : ( i ) changes in the benchmark interest rate indices for variable rate products such as option arm and home equity loans ; and ( ii ) changes in prepayment assump- tions . to date , the decrease in the accretable yield percentage has been primarily related to a decrease in interest rates on vari- able-rate loans and , to a lesser extent , extended loan liquida- tion periods . certain events , such as extended loan liquidation periods , affect the timing of expected cash flows but not the amount of cash expected to be received ( i.e. , the accretable yield balance ) . extended loan liquidation periods reduce the accretable yield percentage because the same accretable yield balance is recognized against a higher-than-expected loan balance over a longer-than-expected period of time. .

Question: what was the average balance of total pci consumer loans for the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009?
Program: add(19097, 25544), divide(#0, const_2)
Answer: 22320.5
stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2010 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company's common stock versus the standard and poor's s&p 500 retail index ( "s&p 500 retail index" ) and the standard and poor's s&p 500 index ( "s&p 500" ) . .

----------------------------------------
company/index | december 31 , 2010 | december 31 , 2011 | december 31 , 2012 | december 31 , 2013 | december 31 , 2014 | december 31 , 2015
o'reilly automotive inc . | $ 100 | $ 132 | $ 148 | $ 213 | $ 319 | $ 419
s&p 500 retail index | 100 | 103 | 128 | 185 | 203 | 252
s&p 500 | $ 100 | $ 100 | $ 113 | $ 147 | $ 164 | $ 163
----------------------------------------

.

Question: how much greater was the five year return for the s&p 500 retail index compared to the s&p 500?
Program: subtract(252, 163)
Answer: 89.0
part ii , item 8 schlumberger limited and subsidiaries shares of common stock ( stated in millions ) issued in treasury shares outstanding .

****************************************
• , issued, in treasury, shares outstanding
• balance january 1 2007, 1334, -156 ( 156 ), 1178
• shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged, 2013, 14, 14
• shares issued under employee stock purchase plan, 2013, 2, 2
• stock repurchase program, 2013, -16 ( 16 ), -16 ( 16 )
• issued on conversions of debentures, 2013, 18, 18
• balance december 31 2007, 1334, -138 ( 138 ), 1196
• shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged, 2013, 5, 5
• shares issued under employee stock purchase plan, 2013, 2, 2
• stock repurchase program, 2013, -21 ( 21 ), -21 ( 21 )
• issued on conversions of debentures, 2013, 12, 12
• balance december 31 2008, 1334, -140 ( 140 ), 1194
• shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged, 2013, 4, 4
• vesting of restricted stock, 2013, 1, 1
• shares issued under employee stock purchase plan, 2013, 4, 4
• stock repurchase program, 2013, -8 ( 8 ), -8 ( 8 )
• balance december 31 2009, 1334, -139 ( 139 ), 1195
****************************************

see the notes to consolidated financial statements .

Question: how many shares were repurchased in this period?
Program: add(16, 21), add(#0, 8), multiply(#1, const_1000000)
Answer: 45000000.0
.

currency	2012	2011	2010
real	$ 40.4	$ 42.4	$ 32.5
euro	27.1	26.4	18.6
pound sterling	18.5	17.6	9.0
indian rupee	4.3	3.6	2.6
total impact	$ 90.3	$ 90.0	$ 62.7

the impact on earnings of the foregoing assumed 10% ( 10 % ) change in each of the periods presented would not have been significant . revenue included $ 100.8 million and operating income included $ 9.0 million of unfavorable foreign currency impact during 2012 resulting from a stronger u.s . dollar during 2012 compared to 2011 . our foreign exchange risk management policy permits the use of derivative instruments , such as forward contracts and options , to reduce volatility in our results of operations and/or cash flows resulting from foreign exchange rate fluctuations . our international operations' revenues and expenses are generally denominated in local currency , which limits the economic exposure to foreign exchange risk in those jurisdictions . we do not enter into foreign currency derivative instruments for trading purposes . we have entered into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign currency exposure to intercompany loans . as of december 31 , 2012 , the notional amount of these derivatives was approximately $ 115.6 million and the fair value was nominal . these derivatives are intended to hedge the foreign exchange risks related to intercompany loans , but have not been designated as hedges for accounting purposes. .

Question: what was the percentage change in the impact of the euro on earnings from 2011 to 2012?
Program: subtract(27.1, 26.4), divide(#0, 26.4)
Answer: 0.02652
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2013 . equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 2 ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 2956907 $ 35.01 2786760 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) 2014 2014 2014 .

****************************************
Row 1: plan category, number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b ), weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 ), number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )
Row 2: equity compensation plans approved by security holders, 2956907, $ 35.01, 2786760
Row 3: equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ), 2014, 2014, 2014
Row 4: total, 2956907, $ 35.01, 2786760
****************************************

( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation . of these shares , 818723 were subject to stock options , 1002217 were subject to outstanding restricted performance stock rights , 602400 were restricted stock rights , and 63022 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan . in addition , this number includes 24428 stock rights and 446117 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement . ( 2 ) this is the weighted average exercise price of the 818723 outstanding stock options only . ( 3 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .

Question: what is the combined number of equity compensation plans approved by security holders
Program: add(2956907, 2786760)
Answer: 5743667.0
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2001 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 s&p 500 ups dj transport .

****************************************
Row 1: , 12/31/01, 12/31/02, 12/31/03, 12/31/04, 12/31/05, 12/31/06
Row 2: united parcel service inc ., $ 100.00, $ 117.19, $ 140.49, $ 163.54, $ 146.35, $ 148.92
Row 3: s&p 500 index, $ 100.00, $ 77.90, $ 100.24, $ 111.15, $ 116.61, $ 135.02
Row 4: dow jones transportation average, $ 100.00, $ 88.52, $ 116.70, $ 149.06, $ 166.42, $ 182.76
****************************************

securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2006 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance . these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .

Question: for the five years ended 12/31/2006 what is the performance difference of the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . and the s&p 500 index?
Program: subtract(148.92, const_100), subtract(135.02, const_100), subtract(#0, #1)
Answer: 13.9
performance graph the following graph compares the yearly change in the cumulative total stockholder return for our last five full fiscal years , based upon the market price of our common stock , with the cumulative total return on a nasdaq composite index ( u.s . companies ) and a peer group , the nasdaq medical equipment-sic code 3840-3849 index , which is comprised of medical equipment companies , for that period . the performance graph assumes the investment of $ 100 on march 31 , 2010 in our common stock , the nasdaq composite index ( u.s . companies ) and the peer group index , and the reinvestment of any and all dividends. .

========================================
Row 1: , 3/31/2010, 3/31/2011, 3/31/2012, 3/31/2013, 3/31/2014, 3/31/2015
Row 2: abiomed inc, 100, 140.79, 215.02, 180.91, 252.33, 693.60
Row 3: nasdaq composite index, 100, 115.98, 128.93, 136.26, 175.11, 204.38
Row 4: nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849, 100, 108.31, 115.05, 105.56, 123.18, 118.95
========================================

this graph is not 201csoliciting material 201d under regulation 14a or 14c of the rules promulgated under the securities exchange act of 1934 , is not deemed filed with the securities and exchange commission and is not to be incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing . transfer agent american stock transfer & trust company , 59 maiden lane , new york , ny 10038 , is our stock transfer agent. .

Question: what is the roi of an investment in abiomed inc from march 2010 to march 2013?
Program: subtract(180.91, 100), divide(#0, 100)
Answer: 0.8091
3 . dividends from subsidiaries and affiliates cash dividends received from consolidated subsidiaries and from affiliates accounted for by the equity method were as follows ( in millions ) : .

****************************************
 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001
----------|----------|----------|----------
subsidiaries | $ 807 | $ 771 | $ 1038
affiliates | 43 | 44 | 21
****************************************

4 . guarantees and letters of credit guarantees 2014in connection with certain of its project financing , acquisition , and power purchase agreements , the company has expressly undertaken limited obligations and commitments , most of which will only be effective or will be terminated upon the occurrence of future events . these obligations and commitments , excluding those collateralized by letter of credit and other obligations discussed below , were limited as of december 31 , 2003 , by the terms of the agreements , to an aggregate of approximately $ 515 million representing 55 agreements with individual exposures ranging from less than $ 1 million up to $ 100 million . of this amount , $ 147 million represents credit enhancements for non-recourse debt , and $ 38 million commitments to fund its equity in projects currently under development or in construction . letters of credit 2014at december 31 , 2003 , the company had $ 89 million in letters of credit outstanding representing 9 agreements with individual exposures ranging from less than $ 1 million up to $ 36 million , which operate to guarantee performance relating to certain project development and construction activities and subsidiary operations . the company pays a letter of credit fee ranging from 0.5% ( 0.5 % ) to 5.00% ( 5.00 % ) per annum on the outstanding amounts . in addition , the company had $ 4 million in surety bonds outstanding at december 31 , 2003. .

Question: what was the average dividend or cash dividends received from consolidated subsidiaries and from affiliates accounted for by the equity method in millions in 2002?
Program: divide(771, 44)
Answer: 17.52273
performance graph the following graph shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index from april 24 , 2009 through april 25 , 2014 . the past performance of our common stock is not indicative of the future performance of our common stock . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among netapp , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index .

****************************************
, 4/09, 4/10, 4/11, 4/12, 4/13, 4/14
netapp inc ., $ 100.00, $ 189.45, $ 284.75, $ 212.19, $ 190.66, $ 197.58
nasdaq composite, 100.00, 144.63, 170.44, 182.57, 202.25, 253.22
s&p 500, 100.00, 138.84, 162.75, 170.49, 199.29, 240.02
s&p 500 information technology, 100.00, 143.49, 162.37, 186.06, 189.18, 236.12
****************************************

we believe that a number of factors may cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly . see 201citem 1a . risk factors . 201d sale of unregistered securities .

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total return for the five year period ending 4/14 between netapp inc . and the nasdaq composite?
Program: subtract(197.58, const_100), divide(#0, const_100), subtract(253.22, const_100), divide(#2, const_100), subtract(#1, #3)
Answer: -0.5564
the following graph compares the cumulative 4-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on january 3 , 2009 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 4 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/121/1/11 12/31/111/2/101/3/09 *$ 100 invested on 1/3/09 in stock or 12/31/08 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies all rights reserved. .

 | 1/3/2009 | 1/2/2010 | 1/1/2011 | 12/31/2011 | 12/29/2012
----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------
cadence design systems inc . | 100.00 | 155.99 | 215.10 | 270.83 | 350.00
nasdaq composite | 100.00 | 139.32 | 164.84 | 167.06 | 187.66
s&p 400 information technology | 100.00 | 151.58 | 198.02 | 174.88 | 201.26

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Question: what is the total return if $ 1000000 are invested in nasdaq composite in 2009 and sold in 2010?
Program: subtract(139.32, const_100), divide(#0, const_100), multiply(1000000, #1)
Answer: 393200.0
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) a summary of the remaining liability for the 2007 , 2003 and 2001 restructuring programs is as follows : program program program total .

----------------------------------------
, 2007 program, 2003 program, 2001 program, total
liability at december 31 2006, $ 2014, $ 12.6, $ 19.2, $ 31.8
net charges ( reversals ) and adjustments, 19.1, -0.5 ( 0.5 ), -5.2 ( 5.2 ), 13.4
payments and other1, -7.2 ( 7.2 ), -3.1 ( 3.1 ), -5.3 ( 5.3 ), -15.6 ( 15.6 )
liability at december 31 2007, $ 11.9, $ 9.0, $ 8.7, $ 29.6
net charges and adjustments, 4.3, 0.8, 0.7, 5.8
payments and other1, -15.0 ( 15.0 ), -4.1 ( 4.1 ), -3.5 ( 3.5 ), -22.6 ( 22.6 )
liability at december 31 2008, $ 1.2, $ 5.7, $ 5.9, $ 12.8
----------------------------------------

1 includes amounts representing adjustments to the liability for changes in foreign currency exchange rates . other reorganization-related charges other reorganization-related charges relate to our realignment of our media businesses into a newly created management entity called mediabrands and the 2006 merger of draft worldwide and foote , cone and belding worldwide to create draftfcb . charges related to severance and terminations costs and lease termination and other exit costs . we expect charges associated with mediabrands to be completed during the first half of 2009 . charges related to the creation of draftfcb in 2006 are complete . the charges were separated from the rest of our operating expenses within the consolidated statements of operations because they did not result from charges that occurred in the normal course of business. .

Question: what is the change in the balance of liability for all restructuring from 2006 to 2008 , ( in millions ) ?
Program: subtract(12.8, 31.8)
Answer: -19.0