wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2005 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization .

========================================
balance december 31 2002 | $ 450697000
additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense | 68125000
deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property | -4645000 ( 4645000 )
balance december 31 2003 | 514177000
additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense | 82551000
deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property | -1390000 ( 1390000 )
balance december 31 2004 | 595338000
additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense | 83656000
deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property | -15244000 ( 15244000 )
balance december 31 2005 | $ 663750000
========================================

.

Question: what is the growth of the additions in comparison with the growth of the deductions during 2003 and 2004?
Program: divide(82551000, 68125000), subtract(#0, const_1), divide(1390000, 4645000), subtract(#2, const_1), subtract(#1, #3)
Answer: 0.91251
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 7 2014income taxes ( continued ) as of september 30 , 2006 , the company has state and foreign tax loss and state credit carryforwards , the tax effect of which is $ 55 million . certain of those carryforwards , the tax effect of which is $ 12 million , expire between 2016 and 2019 . a portion of these carryforwards was acquired from the company 2019s previous acquisitions , the utilization of which is subject to certain limitations imposed by the internal revenue code . the remaining benefits from tax losses and credits do not expire . as of september 30 , 2006 and september 24 , 2005 , a valuation allowance of $ 5 million was recorded against the deferred tax asset for the benefits of state operating losses that may not be realized . management believes it is more likely than not that forecasted income , including income that may be generated as a result of certain tax planning strategies , together with the tax effects of the deferred tax liabilities , will be sufficient to fully recover the remaining deferred tax assets . a reconciliation of the provision for income taxes , with the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate ( 35% ( 35 % ) in 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 ) to income before provision for income taxes , is as follows ( in millions ) : 2006 2005 2004 as restated ( 1 ) as restated ( 1 ) .

----------------------------------------
 | 2006 | 2005 as restated ( 1 ) | 2004 as restated ( 1 )
computed expected tax | $ 987 | $ 633 | $ 129
state taxes net of federal effect | 86 | -19 ( 19 ) | -5 ( 5 )
indefinitely invested earnings of foreign subsidiaries | -224 ( 224 ) | -98 ( 98 ) | -31 ( 31 )
nondeductible executive compensation | 11 | 14 | 12
research and development credit net | -12 ( 12 ) | -26 ( 26 ) | -5 ( 5 )
other items | -19 ( 19 ) | -24 ( 24 ) | 4
provision for income taxes | $ 829 | $ 480 | $ 104
effective tax rate | 29% ( 29 % ) | 27% ( 27 % ) | 28% ( 28 % )
----------------------------------------

( 1 ) see note 2 , 201crestatement of consolidated financial statements . 201d the company 2019s income taxes payable has been reduced by the tax benefits from employee stock options . the company receives an income tax benefit calculated as the difference between the fair market value of the stock issued at the time of the exercise and the option price , tax effected . the net tax benefits from employee stock option transactions were $ 419 million , $ 428 million ( as restated ( 1 ) ) , and $ 83 million ( as restated ( 1 ) ) in 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , respectively , and were reflected as an increase to common stock in the consolidated statements of shareholders 2019 equity. .

Question: what was the lowest effective tax rate in the three year period?
Program: table_min(effective tax rate, none)
Answer: 0.27
entergy arkansas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2008 compared to 2007 net income decreased $ 92.0 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and a higher effective income tax rate , partially offset by higher net revenue . the higher other operation and maintenance expenses resulted primarily from the write-off of approximately $ 70.8 million of costs as a result of the december 2008 arkansas court of appeals decision in entergy arkansas' base rate case . the base rate case is discussed in more detail in note 2 to the financial statements . 2007 compared to 2006 net income decreased $ 34.0 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and a higher effective income tax rate . the decrease was partially offset by higher net revenue . net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .

========================================
	amount ( in millions )
2007 net revenue	$ 1110.6
rider revenue	13.6
purchased power capacity	4.8
volume/weather	-14.6 ( 14.6 )
other	3.5
2008 net revenue	$ 1117.9
========================================

the rider revenue variance is primarily due to an energy efficiency rider which became effective in november 2007 . the establishment of the rider results in an increase in rider revenue and a corresponding increase in other operation and maintenance expense with no effect on net income . also contributing to the variance was an increase in franchise tax rider revenue as a result of higher retail revenues . the corresponding increase is in taxes other than income taxes , resulting in no effect on net income . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to lower reserve equalization expenses . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales during the billed and unbilled sales periods compared to 2007 and a 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) volume decrease in industrial sales , primarily in the wood industry and the small customer class . billed electricity usage decreased 333 gwh in all sectors . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues. .

Question: what is the net change in net revenue during 2008 for entergy arkansas?
Program: subtract(1117.9, 1110.6)
Answer: 7.3
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. .

****************************************
• , 12/31/2012, 12/31/2013, 12/31/2014, 12/31/2015, 12/31/2016, 12/31/2017
• united parcel service inc ., $ 100.00, $ 146.54, $ 159.23, $ 148.89, $ 182.70, $ 195.75
• standard & poor 2019s 500 index, $ 100.00, $ 132.38, $ 150.49, $ 152.55, $ 170.79, $ 208.06
• dow jones transportation average, $ 100.00, $ 141.38, $ 176.83, $ 147.19, $ 179.37, $ 213.49
****************************************

.

Question: what is the total cumulative percentage return on investment on class b common stock for the five years ended 122/31/2017?
Program: subtract(195.75, 100.00), divide(#0, 100.00)
Answer: 0.9575
marathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 7 . dispositions outside-operated norwegian properties 2013 on october 31 , 2008 , we closed the sale of our norwegian outside-operated properties and undeveloped offshore acreage in the heimdal area of the norwegian north sea for net proceeds of $ 301 million , with a pretax gain of $ 254 million as of december 31 , 2008 . pilot travel centers 2013 on october 8 , 2008 , we completed the sale of our 50 percent ownership interest in ptc . sale proceeds were $ 625 million , with a pretax gain on the sale of $ 126 million . immediately preceding the sale , we received a $ 75 million partial redemption of our ownership interest from ptc that was accounted for as a return of investment . operated irish properties 2013 on december 17 , 2008 , we agreed to sell our operated properties located in ireland for proceeds of $ 180 million , before post-closing adjustments and cash on hand at closing . closing is subject to completion of the necessary administrative processes . as of december 31 , 2008 , operating assets and liabilities were classified as held for sale , as disclosed by major class in the following table : ( in millions ) 2008 .

****************************************
( in millions ) | 2008
current assets | $ 164
noncurrent assets | 103
total assets | 267
current liabilities | 62
noncurrent liabilities | 199
total liabilities | 261
net assets held for sale | $ 6
****************************************

8 . discontinued operations on june 2 , 2006 , we sold our russian oil exploration and production businesses in the khanty-mansiysk region of western siberia . under the terms of the agreement , we received $ 787 million for these businesses , plus preliminary working capital and other closing adjustments of $ 56 million , for a total transaction value of $ 843 million . proceeds net of transaction costs and cash held by the russian businesses at the transaction date totaled $ 832 million . a gain on the sale of $ 243 million ( $ 342 million before income taxes ) was reported in discontinued operations for 2006 . income taxes on this gain were reduced by the utilization of a capital loss carryforward . exploration and production segment goodwill of $ 21 million was allocated to the russian assets and reduced the reported gain . adjustments to the sales price were completed in 2007 and an additional gain on the sale of $ 8 million ( $ 13 million before income taxes ) was recognized . the activities of the russian businesses have been reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of income and the consolidated statements of cash flows for 2006 . revenues applicable to discontinued operations were $ 173 million and pretax income from discontinued operations was $ 45 million for 2006. .

Question: for the russian businesses transaction , what was the tax effect of the gain on the sale of $ 243 million reported in discontinued operations for 2006?
Program: subtract(342, 243)
Answer: 99.0
2 0 1 9 a n n u a l r e p o r t1 6 performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2019 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company . historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .

****************************************
	2014	2015	2016	2017	2018	2019
jkhy	100.00	110.51	151.12	182.15	231.36	240.29
2019 peer group	100.00	126.23	142.94	166.15	224.73	281.09
2018 peer group	100.00	127.40	151.16	177.26	228.97	286.22
s&p 500	100.00	107.42	111.71	131.70	150.64	166.33
****************************************

this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2014 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . some peer participant companies were different for fiscal year ended 2019 compared to fiscal year ended 2018 . the company 2019s compensation committee of the board of directors adjusted the peer participants due to consolidations within the industry during the 2019 fiscal year . companies in the 2019 peer group are aci worldwide , inc. ; black knight , inc. ; bottomline technologies , inc. ; broadridge financial solutions , inc. ; cardtronics plc ; corelogic , inc. ; euronet worldwide , inc. ; exlservice holdings , inc. ; fair isaac corp. ; fidelity national information services , inc. ; fiserv , inc. ; fleetcor technologies , inc. ; global payments , inc. ; square , inc. ; ss&c technologies holdings , inc. ; total system services , inc. ; tyler technologies , inc. ; verint systems , inc. ; and wex , inc . companies in the 2018 peer group were aci worldwide , inc. ; bottomline technology , inc. ; broadridge financial solutions ; cardtronics , inc. ; corelogic , inc. ; euronet worldwide , inc. ; fair isaac corp. ; fidelity national information services , inc. ; fiserv , inc. ; global payments , inc. ; moneygram international , inc. ; ss&c technologies holdings , inc. ; total systems services , inc. ; tyler technologies , inc. ; verifone .

Question: what was the 5 year total return for jkhy?
Program: subtract(240.29, 100.00)
Answer: 140.29
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 25 , 2009 through october 26 , 2014 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 25 , 2009 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index 201cs&p 201d is a registered trademark of standard & poor 2019s financial services llc , a subsidiary of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc. .

========================================
, 10/25/2009, 10/31/2010, 10/30/2011, 10/28/2012, 10/27/2013, 10/26/2014
applied materials, 100.00, 97.43, 101.85, 88.54, 151.43, 183.29
s&p 500 index, 100.00, 116.52, 125.94, 145.09, 184.52, 216.39
rdg semiconductor composite index, 100.00, 121.00, 132.42, 124.95, 163.20, 207.93
========================================

dividends during fiscal 2014 , applied 2019s board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share each . during fiscal 2013 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.09 per share . during fiscal 2012 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.09 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.08 . dividends declared during fiscal 2014 , 2013 and 2012 totaled $ 487 million , $ 469 million and $ 438 million , respectively . applied currently anticipates that it will continue to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis in the future , although the declaration and amount of any future cash dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . $ 100 invested on 10/25/09 in stock or 10/31/09 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . and the rdg semiconductor composite index 183145 97 102 121 132 10/25/09 10/31/10 10/30/11 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .

Question: how many shares received dividends during 2014 , ( in millions ) ?
Program: multiply(0.10, const_4), divide(487, #0)
Answer: 1217.5
stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. .

	12/29/2007	1/3/2009	1/2/2010	1/1/2011	12/31/2011	12/29/2012
cadence design systems inc .	100.00	22.55	35.17	48.50	61.07	78.92
nasdaq composite	100.00	59.03	82.25	97.32	98.63	110.78
s&p 400 information technology	100.00	54.60	82.76	108.11	95.48	109.88

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Question: what is the roi of nasdaq composite from 2008 to 2009?
Program: subtract(59.03, const_100), divide(#0, const_1000)
Answer: -0.04097
the company granted 1020 performance shares . the vesting of these shares is contingent on meeting stated goals over a performance period . beginning with restricted stock grants in september 2010 , dividends are accrued on restricted class a common stock and restricted stock units and are paid once the restricted stock vests . the following table summarizes restricted stock and performance shares activity for 2010 : number of shares weighted average grant date fair value .

****************************************
Row 1: , number of shares, weighted average grant date fair value
Row 2: outstanding at december 31 2009, 116677, $ 280
Row 3: granted, 134245, 275
Row 4: vested, -34630 ( 34630 ), 257
Row 5: cancelled, -19830 ( 19830 ), 260
Row 6: outstanding at december 31 2010, 196462, 283
****************************************

the total fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , was $ 10.3 million , $ 6.2 million and $ 2.5 million , respectively . eligible employees may acquire shares of cme group 2019s class a common stock using after-tax payroll deductions made during consecutive offering periods of approximately six months in duration . shares are purchased at the end of each offering period at a price of 90% ( 90 % ) of the closing price of the class a common stock as reported on the nasdaq . compensation expense is recognized on the dates of purchase for the discount from the closing price . in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , a total of 4371 , 4402 and 5600 shares , respectively , of class a common stock were issued to participating employees . these shares are subject to a six-month holding period . annual expense of $ 0.1 million for the purchase discount was recognized in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . non-executive directors receive an annual award of class a common stock with a value equal to $ 75000 . non-executive directors may also elect to receive some or all of the cash portion of their annual stipend , up to $ 25000 , in shares of stock based on the closing price at the date of distribution . as a result , 7470 , 11674 and 5509 shares of class a common stock were issued to non-executive directors during 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . these shares are not subject to any vesting restrictions . expense of $ 2.4 million , $ 2.5 million and $ 2.4 million related to these stock-based payments was recognized for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively. .

Question: what was the sum of the total fair value of restricted stock that vested during 2008 and 2010 in millions
Program: add(10.3, 6.2), add(#0, 2.5)
Answer: 19.0
item 2 . properties we employ a variety of assets in the management and operation of our rail business . our rail network covers 23 states in the western two-thirds of the u.s . our rail network includes 31838 route miles . we own 26009 miles and operate on the remainder pursuant to trackage rights or leases . the following table describes track miles at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 . 2013 2012 .

----------------------------------------
, 2013, 2012
route, 31838, 31868
other main line, 6766, 6715
passing lines and turnouts, 3167, 3124
switching and classification yard lines, 9090, 9046
total miles, 50861, 50753
----------------------------------------

headquarters building we maintain our headquarters in omaha , nebraska . the facility has 1.2 million square feet of space for approximately 4000 employees and is subject to a financing arrangement . harriman dispatching center the harriman dispatching center ( hdc ) , located in omaha , nebraska , is our primary dispatching facility . it is linked to regional dispatching and locomotive management facilities at various locations along our .

Question: at december 312013 what was the percent of the route miles to the total track miles
Program: divide(31838, 50861)
Answer: 0.62598