wandb/finqa-data-processed huggingface dataset:
the decrease in mortgage servicing rights of $ 2.7 billion was primarily 2022 attributed to mark-to-market losses recognized in the portfolio due to decreases in the mortgage interest rates and increases in refinancing . the increase in securities sold under agreements to repurchase of $ 5 2022 billion is driven by a $ 6.2 billion increase from net transfers in as the continued credit crisis impacted the availability of observable inputs for the underlying securities related to this liability . this was offset by a reduction from net settlements of $ 1.4 billion . the decrease in short-term borrowings of $ 3.7 billion is due to net transfers 2022 out of $ 1.8 billion as valuation methodology inputs considered to be unobservable were determined not to be significant to the overall valuation . in addition , net payments of $ 1.8 billion were made during the year . the increase in 2022 long-term debt of $ 2.2 billion is driven by : the net transfers in of $ 38.8 billion , substantially all of which related 2013 to the transfer of consolidated siv debt in the first quarter of 2008 , as the availability of observable inputs continued to decline due to the current crisis ; offset by $ 2.2 billion in gains recognized as credit spreads widened during the 2013 year ; and $ 34.3 billion decrease from net settlements/payments . included in 2013 these settlements were $ 21 billion of payments made on maturing siv debt and the replacement of $ 17 billion of non-recourse , consolidated siv debt classified as level 3 with citigroup debt classified as level 2 . this replacement occurred in connection with the purchase of the siv assets by the company in november 2008 . items measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and therefore are not included in the tables above . these include assets measured at cost that have been written down to fair value during the periods as a result of an impairment . in addition , these assets include loans held-for-sale that are measured at locom that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period . the fair value of loans measured on a locom basis is determined where possible using quoted secondary-market prices . such loans are generally classified as level 2 of the fair-value hierarchy given the level of activity in the market and the frequency of available quotes . if no such quoted price exists , the fair value of a loan is determined using quoted prices for a similar asset or assets , adjusted for the specific attributes of that loan . the following table presents all loans held-for-sale that are carried at locom as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 ( in billions ) : aggregate cost fair value level 2 level 3 .

========================================
, aggregate cost, fair value, level 2, level 3
december 31 2009, $ 2.5, $ 1.6, $ 0.3, $ 1.3
december 31 2008, 3.1, 2.1, 0.8, 1.3
========================================

.

Question: what was the ratio of the net increase in the in securities sold under agreements to repurchase to the net transfers in
Program: divide(5, 6.2)
Answer: 0.80645
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis refer to 201cselected financial data - five-year comparison of entergy corporation and subsidiaries 201d which accompanies entergy corporation 2019s financial statements in this report for further information with respect to operating statistics . in november 2007 the board approved a plan to pursue a separation of entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business from entergy through a spin-off of the business to entergy shareholders . in april 2010 , entergy announced that it planned to unwind the business infrastructure associated with the proposed spin-off transaction . as a result of the plan to unwind the business infrastructure , entergy recorded expenses in 2010 for the write-off of certain capitalized costs incurred in connection with the planned spin-off transaction . these costs are discussed in more detail below and throughout this section . net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 . amount ( in millions ) .

========================================
 | amount ( in millions )
2009 net revenue | $ 4694
volume/weather | 231
retail electric price | 137
provision for regulatory proceedings | 26
rough production cost equalization | 19
ano decommissioning trust | -24 ( 24 )
fuel recovery | -44 ( 44 )
other | 12
2010 net revenue | $ 5051
========================================

the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 8362 gwh , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in billed electricity usage in all retail sectors , including the effect on the residential sector of colder weather in the first quarter 2010 compared to 2009 and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2010 compared to 2009 . the industrial sector reflected strong sales growth on continuing signs of economic recovery . the improvement in this sector was primarily driven by inventory restocking and strong exports with the chemicals , refining , and miscellaneous manufacturing sectors leading the improvement . the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : increases in the formula rate plan riders at entergy gulf states louisiana effective november 2009 , january 2010 , and september 2010 , at entergy louisiana effective november 2009 , and at entergy mississippi effective july 2009 ; a base rate increase at entergy arkansas effective july 2010 ; rate actions at entergy texas , including base rate increases effective in may and august 2010 ; a formula rate plan provision of $ 16.6 million recorded in the third quarter 2009 for refunds that were made to customers in accordance with settlements approved by the lpsc ; and the recovery in 2009 by entergy arkansas of 2008 extraordinary storm costs , as approved by the apsc , which ceased in january 2010 . the recovery of storm costs is offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the proceedings referred to above. .

Question: what is the net change in amount of net revenue from 2009 to 2010?
Program: subtract(5051, 4694)
Answer: 357.0
net unfunded credit commitments .

****************************************
december 31 - in millions | 2007 | 2006
----------|----------|----------
commercial | $ 39171 | $ 31009
consumer | 10875 | 10495
commercial real estate | 2734 | 2752
other | 567 | 579
total | $ 53347 | $ 44835
****************************************

commitments to extend credit represent arrangements to lend funds subject to specified contractual conditions . at december 31 , 2007 , commercial commitments are reported net of $ 8.9 billion of participations , assignments and syndications , primarily to financial services companies . the comparable amount at december 31 , 2006 was $ 8.3 billion . commitments generally have fixed expiration dates , may require payment of a fee , and contain termination clauses in the event the customer 2019s credit quality deteriorates . based on our historical experience , most commitments expire unfunded , and therefore cash requirements are substantially less than the total commitment . consumer home equity lines of credit accounted for 80% ( 80 % ) of consumer unfunded credit commitments . unfunded credit commitments related to market street totaled $ 8.8 billion at december 31 , 2007 and $ 5.6 billion at december 31 , 2006 and are included in the preceding table primarily within the 201ccommercial 201d and 201cconsumer 201d categories . note 24 commitments and guarantees includes information regarding standby letters of credit and bankers 2019 acceptances . at december 31 , 2007 , the largest industry concentration was for general medical and surgical hospitals , which accounted for approximately 5% ( 5 % ) of the total letters of credit and bankers 2019 acceptances . at december 31 , 2007 , we pledged $ 1.6 billion of loans to the federal reserve bank ( 201cfrb 201d ) and $ 33.5 billion of loans to the federal home loan bank ( 201cfhlb 201d ) as collateral for the contingent ability to borrow , if necessary . certain directors and executive officers of pnc and its subsidiaries , as well as certain affiliated companies of these directors and officers , were customers of and had loans with subsidiary banks in the ordinary course of business . all such loans were on substantially the same terms , including interest rates and collateral , as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other customers and did not involve more than a normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable features . the aggregate principal amounts of these loans were $ 13 million at december 31 , 2007 and $ 18 million at december 31 , 2006 . during 2007 , new loans of $ 48 million were funded and repayments totaled $ 53 million. .

Question: consumer home equity lines of credit accounted for 80% ( 80 % ) of consumer unfunded credit commitments . what is this amount in 2007 in millions of dollars?
Program: multiply(80%, 10875)
Answer: 8700.0
free cash flow conversion rate we believe this measure provides useful information to investors because it is important for assessing our efficiency in converting earnings to cash and returning cash to shareholders . the calculation of free cash flow conversion rate and net cash provided by operating activities conversion rate , its equivalent gaap measure , follows: .

****************************************
Row 1: in millions, fiscal 2019
Row 2: net earnings including earnings attributable to redeemable and noncontrolling interests asreported, $ 1786.2
Row 3: net tax benefit ( a ), $ -7.2 ( 7.2 )
Row 4: tax item ( a ), -72.9 ( 72.9 )
Row 5: mark-to-marketeffects net of tax ( b ), 27.7
Row 6: acquisition integration costs net of tax ( c ), 19.7
Row 7: divestitures loss net of tax ( c ), 16.4
Row 8: restructuring charges net of tax ( d ), 63.0
Row 9: project-related costs net of tax ( d ), 1.1
Row 10: asset impairments net of tax ( d ), 159.7
Row 11: hyperinflationary accounting net of tax ( e ), 3.2
Row 12: investment valuation adjustments net of tax ( f ), -17.6 ( 17.6 )
Row 13: legal recovery net of tax ( g ), -10.8 ( 10.8 )
Row 14: cpw restructuring costs net of tax ( h ), 11.1
Row 15: adjusted net earnings including earnings attributable to redeemable and noncontrollinginterests, $ 1979.6
Row 16: net cash provided by operating activities, $ 2807.0
Row 17: purchases of land buildings and equipment, -537.6 ( 537.6 )
Row 18: free cash flow, $ 2269.4
Row 19: net cash provided by operating activities conversion rate, 157% ( 157 % )
Row 20: free cash flow conversion rate, 115% ( 115 % )
****************************************

( a ) see note 14 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . ( b ) see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . ( c ) see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . ( d ) see note 4 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . ( e ) impact of hyperinflationary accounting for our argentina subsidiary , which was sold in the third quarter of fiscal 2019 . ( f ) valuation gains on certain corporate investments . ( g ) legal recovery related to our yoplait sas subsidiary . ( h ) the cpw restructuring charges are related to initiatives designed to improve profitability and growth that were approved in fiscal 2018 and 2019 . see our reconciliation below of the effective income tax rate as reported to the adjusted effective income tax rate for the tax impact of each item affecting comparability. .

Question: in 2019 what was the percent of the net earnings to the net cash provided by operating activities
Program: divide(1786.2, 2807.0)
Answer: 0.63634
vornado realty trust notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 13 . leases as lessor : we lease space to tenants under operating leases . most of the leases provide for the payment of fixed base rentals payable monthly in advance . office building leases generally require the tenants to reimburse us for operating costs and real estate taxes above their base year costs . shopping center leases provide for the pass-through to tenants the tenants 2019 share of real estate taxes , insurance and maintenance . shopping center leases also provide for the payment by the lessee of additional rent based on a percentage of the tenants 2019 sales . as of december 31 , 2008 , future base rental revenue under non-cancelable operating leases , excluding rents for leases with an original term of less than one year and rents resulting from the exercise of renewal options , is as follows : ( amounts in thousands ) year ending december 31: .

****************************************
• 2009, $ 1792000
• 2010, 1732000
• 2011, 1576000
• 2012, 1417000
• 2013, 1300000
• thereafter, 7216000
****************************************

these amounts do not include rentals based on tenants 2019 sales . these percentage rents approximated $ 7322000 , $ 9379000 , and $ 7593000 , for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 , respectively . none of our tenants accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenues for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and former bradlees locations pursuant to the master agreement and guaranty , dated may 1 , 1992 , we are due $ 5000000 per annum of additional rent from stop & shop which was allocated to certain of bradlees former locations . on december 31 , 2002 , prior to the expiration of the leases to which the additional rent was allocated , we reallocated this rent to other former bradlees leases also guaranteed by stop & shop . stop & shop is contesting our right to reallocate and claims that we are no longer entitled to the additional rent . at december 31 , 2008 , we are due an aggregate of $ 30400000 . we believe the additional rent provision of the guaranty expires at the earliest in 2012 and we are vigorously contesting stop & shop 2019s position. .

Question: percentage rents totaled what in thousands for the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007?
Program: add(7322000, 9379000)
Answer: 16701000.0
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters , and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange under the symbol "apd." as of 31 october 2019 , there were 5166 record holders of our common stock . cash dividends on the company 2019s common stock are paid quarterly . it is our expectation that we will continue to pay cash dividends in the future at comparable or increased levels . the board of directors determines whether to declare dividends and the timing and amount based on financial condition and other factors it deems relevant . dividend information for each quarter of fiscal years 2019 and 2018 is summarized below: .

========================================
, 2019, 2018
first quarter, $ 1.10, $ .95
second quarter, 1.16, 1.10
third quarter, 1.16, 1.10
fourth quarter, 1.16, 1.10
total, $ 4.58, $ 4.25
========================================

purchases of equity securities by the issuer on 15 september 2011 , the board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $ 1.0 billion of our outstanding common stock . this program does not have a stated expiration date . we repurchase shares pursuant to rules 10b5-1 and 10b-18 under the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , through repurchase agreements established with one or more brokers . there were no purchases of stock during fiscal year 2019 . at 30 september 2019 , $ 485.3 million in share repurchase authorization remained . additional purchases will be completed at the company 2019s discretion while maintaining sufficient funds for investing in its businesses and growth opportunities. .

Question: what is the increase observed in the first quarter dividend percentage concerning the total value , during 2018 and 2019?
Program: divide(1.10, 4.58), divide(.95, 4.25), subtract(#0, #1)
Answer: 0.01665
24 2017 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2017 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company : comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .

========================================
 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017
----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------
jkhy | 100.00 | 138.34 | 177.10 | 195.72 | 267.64 | 322.60
peer group | 100.00 | 117.87 | 161.90 | 203.87 | 233.39 | 271.10
s&p 500 | 100.00 | 120.60 | 150.27 | 161.43 | 167.87 | 197.92
========================================

this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2012 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. ; bottomline technology , inc. ; broadridge financial solutions ; cardtronics , inc. ; convergys corp. ; corelogic , inc. ; dst systems , inc. ; euronet worldwide , inc. ; fair isaac corp. ; fidelity national information services , inc. ; fiserv , inc. ; global payments , inc. ; moneygram international , inc. ; ss&c technologies holdings , inc. ; total systems services , inc. ; tyler technologies , inc. ; verifone systems , inc. ; and wex , inc.. .

Question: jkhy's total 5 year return was what percent of the peer group?
Program: divide(322.60, 271.10)
Answer: 1.18997
table of contents performance graph the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor ( "s&p" ) 500 index and the dow jones us financials index during the period from december 31 , 2010 through december 31 , 2015. .

----------------------------------------
 | 12/10 | 12/11 | 12/12 | 12/13 | 12/14 | 12/15
e*trade financial corporation | 100.00 | 49.75 | 55.94 | 122.75 | 151.59 | 185.25
s&p 500 index | 100.00 | 102.11 | 118.45 | 156.82 | 178.29 | 180.75
dow jones us financials index | 100.00 | 87.16 | 110.56 | 148.39 | 170.04 | 170.19
----------------------------------------

.

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total return for e*trade financial corporation for the five years ended 12/15?
Program: subtract(185.25, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)
Answer: 0.8525
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 comparison of five-year cumulative total shareholder return altria group , inc . altria peer group s&p 500 part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return of altria group , inc . 2019s common stock for the last ive years with the cumulative total return for the same period of the s&p 500 index and the altria group , inc . peer group ( 1 ) . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in common stock and each of the indices as of the market close on december 31 , 2011 and the reinvestment of all dividends on a quarterly basis . source : bloomberg - 201ctotal return analysis 201d calculated on a daily basis and assumes reinvestment of dividends as of the ex-dividend date . ( 1 ) in 2016 , the altria group , inc . peer group consisted of u.s.-headquartered consumer product companies that are competitors to altria group , inc . 2019s tobacco operating companies subsidiaries or that have been selected on the basis of revenue or market capitalization : campbell soup company , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive company , conagra brands , inc. , general mills , inc. , the hershey company , kellogg company , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft heinz company , mondel 0113z international , inc. , pepsico , inc . and reynolds american inc . note - on october 1 , 2012 , kraft foods inc . ( kft ) spun off kraft foods group , inc . ( krft ) to its shareholders and then changed its name from kraft foods inc . to mondel 0113z international , inc . ( mdlz ) . on july 2 , 2015 , kraft foods group , inc . merged with and into a wholly owned subsidiary of h.j . heinz holding corporation , which was renamed the kraft heinz company ( khc ) . on june 12 , 2015 , reynolds american inc . ( rai ) acquired lorillard , inc . ( lo ) . on november 9 , 2016 , conagra foods , inc . ( cag ) spun off lamb weston holdings , inc . ( lw ) to its shareholders and then changed its name from conagra foods , inc . to conagra brands , inc . ( cag ) . .

date	altria group inc .	altria group inc . peer group	s&p 500
december 2011	$ 100.00	$ 100.00	$ 100.00
december 2012	$ 111.77	$ 108.78	$ 115.99
december 2013	$ 143.69	$ 135.61	$ 153.55
december 2014	$ 193.28	$ 151.74	$ 174.55
december 2015	$ 237.92	$ 177.04	$ 176.94
december 2016	$ 286.61	$ 192.56	$ 198.09

altria altria group , inc . group , inc . peer group s&p 500 .

Question: did altria outperform the s&p 500?
Program: greater(286.61, 198.09)
Answer: yes