waashk/20ng huggingface dataset:
WASHINGTON - A stark reminder of the Holocaust--a speech by Nazi  SS leader Heinrich Himmler that refers to "the extermination of the Jewish race"--went on display Friday at the National Archives. 	The documents, including handwritten notes by Himmler, are among the best evidence that exists to rebut claims that the Holocaust is a myth, archivists say. 	"The notes give them their authenticity," said Robert Wolfe, a supervisory archivist for captured German records.  "He was supposed to destroy them.  Like a lot of bosses, he didn't obey his own rules." 	The documents, moved out of Berlin to what Himmler hoped would be a safe hiding place, were recovered by Allied forces after World War II from a salt mine near Salzburg, Austria. 	Himmler spoke on Oct.4, 1943, in Posen, Poland, to more than 100 German secret police generals.  "I also want to talk to you, quite frankly, on a very grave matter.  Among ourselves it should be mentioned quite frankly, and yet we will never speak of it publicly. I mean the clearing out of the Jew, the extermination of the Jewish race.  This is a page of GLORY in our history which has never been written and is never to be written."  [Emphasis mine--rje] 	The German word Himmler uses that is translated as "extermination" is *Ausrottung*. 	Wolfe said a more precise translation would be "extirpation" or "tearing up by the roots." 	In his handwritten notes, Himmler used a euphemism, "Judenevakuierung" or "evacuation of the Jews."  But archives officials said "extermination" is the word he actually spoke--preserved on an audiotape in the archives. 	Himmler, who oversaw Adolf Hitler's "final solution of the Jewish question," committed suicide after he was arrested in 1945. 	The National Archives exhibit, on display through May 16, is a preview of the opening of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum here on April 26. 	The National Archives exhibit includes a page each of Himmler's handwritten notes, a typed transcript from the speech and an offical translation made for the Nuremberg war crimes trials.  	---From p.A10 of Saturday's L.A. Times, 4/17/93 	(Associated Press)
In article <1993Apr15.160224.15940@unocal.com> stssdxb@st.unocal.com (Dorin Baru) writes: ... >Now, about tough talk and arrogance, we are adults, aren't we ? Do you listen  >to tough talk of american politicians ? or switch  the channel ?  ...
In article <1993Apr19.155856.8260@kpc.com> henrik@quayle.kpc.com  writes: >In article <1993Apr17.185118.10792@ee.rochester.edu>, terziogl@ee.rochester.edu (Esin Terzioglu) writes: >|> >|>..[cancellum]...  >|> > > >Let me clearify Mr. Turkish; > >ARMENIA is NOT getting "itchy". SHE is simply LETTING the WORLD KNOW that SHE >WILL NO  LONGER sit there QUIET and LET TURKS get away with their FAMOUS  >tricks. Armenians DO REMEMBER of the TURKISH invasion of the Greek island of >CYPRESS WHILE the world simply WATCHED.  > >  It is more appropriate to address netters with their names as they appear in their signatures (I failed to do so since you did not bother to sign your posting). Not only because it is the polite thing to do, but also to avoid addressing ladies with "Mr.", as you have done.  Secondly, the island of which the name is more correctly spelled as Cyprus has never been Greek, but rather, it has been home to a bi-communal society formed of Greeks and Turks. It seems that you know as little about the history and the demography of the island, as you know about the essence of Turkey's  military intervention to it under international agreements.  Be that as it may, an analogy between an act of occupation in history and what is going on today on Azerbaijani land, can only be drawn with the expansionist policy that Armenia is now pursuing.  But, I could agree that it is not for us to issue diagnoses to the political conduct of countries, and promulgate them in such terminology as "itchy-bitchy"...   Onur Yalcin
jovanovic-nick@yale.edu (Nick Jovanovic) writes:  >As I have stated many times: the civil war in ex-Yugoslavia will end >when the terms of secession (borders, etc.) for Croatia and B-H are >finally agreed upon.  Serbs, Croats, and Muslims will *all* have to >make territorial concessions to reach such an agreement.    Muslims already have, they accepted the Vance Owen plan that gives 50% of the population (Serbian statistics put it at 44%) only 25% of the territory. They gave some totally Muslim villages and areas to Croatia and Serbia, they in effect gave the Serbs the land they grabbed  while slaughtering the Muslims anbd raping their women and expelling the survivors.  Still the Serbs (NOT BOSNIAN SERBS because the real Bosnian Serbs are fighting with Muslims to defend Bosnia from Serbs, those so called  Bosnian Serbs refused to be part of Bosnia and wanted a greater Serbia), still those Serbs refused, they have the necessary weapons to kill more Muslims and grab more territory.
It seems that, to keep the peace talks going, Israel has to keep making goodwill gesture after goodwill gesture, while Palestinian Arabs continue to go around hunting Jews.  If the peace talks are going to have any realistic chance of success, the Arabs are going to have to start reciprocating, especially since they are the ones who will be getting tangible concessions in return for giving up only intangibles.  If they keep trying to change the already agreed upon rules, which seems to be one of their favorite games, the Israelis are not likely to be very confident that the intangibles they will receive at the bargaining table will be worth the parchment they're written on.  It takes two to negotiate a peace.  It's time for the Arabs to start doing their share.
In article <13MAY93.02285380@edison.usask.ca>, f54oguocha@edison.usask.ca writes: > In a previous article, josip@eng.umd.edu (Josip Loncaric) wrote: > >  > >Actually, just after the FIRST world war, many Muslims were killed by Serbs. > >Under Serbian-led regime between the two world wars, many Croats were > >also killed (especially during the dictatorship introduced on Jan. 6, 1929). > > > Josip, >  > please, don't be offended at this question: Who are the "Muslims" in the > Bosnian context? i know that a moslem/muslim is a believer in Islam. Islam  > is a religion and it is practised in many parts of the world. But it is not > , yes definitely not, an ethinic group. ok! so, these Bosnian Muslims, who > are they? to which ethnic group do they belong? what language(s) do they > speak? do they have a different language from that of the Serbs or Croats?  > the way the western press use the word 'muslim' in this Bosnian debacle has  > kept me wondering when the meaning of muslim/moslem i knew from childhood was  > changed in the dictionary. this is just a question. no flames intended! >  > oguocha >      It is indeed different usage of the word Muslim . In Bosnia , it is more or less used as an ethnic term not as religious one . There are people in Bosnia who refer to themselves as "Christian Bosnian Muslims" if you can make sense of that . Bosnian Serbs and Bosnian Muslims have the same language.  Bosnian Muslims are mainly beleivers of Islam. I got this from Bosnian Muslim friend of mine who goes to University of Texas in Austin.
In article <1993Apr26.203425.4824@Virginia.EDU> rj3s@Virginia.EDU ("Get thee to a nunnery.....") writes:  (1)     You know ed,...  You're right!  Andi shouldn't be comparing    Israel to the Nazis.  The Israelis are much worse than the    Nazis ever were anyway.  The Nazis did a lot of good for    Germany, and they would have succeeded if it weren't for the    damn Jews.  The Holocaust never happened anyway.  Ample    evidence given by George Schafer at Harvard, Dept. of History,    and even by Randolph Higgins at NYU, have shown that the    Holocaust was just a semitic conspiracy created to obtain    sympathy to piush for the creation of Israel.  (2)     Just kidding.  Be careful rj3s. When people start finding humour in the Holocaust they often run the danger of exposing themselves for the hateful refuse that they really are.
A few things about the University. It is more fun than some may admit. Partying does go on and it has consistently been ranked one of Playboy's top party schools. But we do study and more importantly learn a lot. The overall UVa drug use is actually lower than the average college in the U.S.  	There is no hate law on the books even though they (The forces of PC) tried to have one last year( by the way a similar law at the University of Wisconsin ? was found unconstitutional last year). There is a law against relationship of professors with their students or advisees that just passed.  	Thomas Jefferson was the sole author of the Virginia statute for religious freedom(the basis for the first ten amendments), though he is not given full credit for righting the bill of rights. So someone who picked on me for that is right.  	By the way, we're the man in everything. Sports academics and partying. I'm sure a lot of other schools are good at what they do as well, so don't start mailing me junk. I'm happy where I am and maybe I'll go to one of y'alls medical schools in a couple of years.
In article <1993May19.005019.10716@midway.uchicago.edu> clmn@midway.uchicago.edu writes: >In article <C78Iq9.MCD@bony1.bony.com> jake@bony1.bony.com (Jake Livni) writes:  >>Palestine was a name given to that same area after the Jews already >>had their own governments there for a very long time.  Palestinean >>nationality is a recent political invention, no more than a few >>decades old.  This is what the Jew Jake says to that!  >This may be true but I think we Jews dismiss Palestinian nationalism at our >peril.  Its newness doesn't obviate its reality. > >Besides, Israeli nationalism is a new phenomenum as well.  Israeli nationalism (also known as Zionism) is the nationalism of the Jewish people.  The Jewish people are not a new phenomenon at all.  Palestinean nationalism is the nationalism of Arab people.  Arabs have been around for a long time.  They already  have some 2 dozen states, large and small, covering 98% of the Middle East.  More specifically, Palestinean nationalism is the nationalism of Arabs from the region of Palestine, just as Egyptian nationalism is the nationalism of Arabs from the region of Egypt.  One Palestinean state already exists in what was once known as Palestine: - it is called Jordan.   There is no justification in carving out a second and tiny Palestinean state out of the only Jewish state, itself very, very small, just as there is no justification in carving out another American state out of Mexico.
In article <1993Apr20.114746.3364@ncsu.edu>, hernlem@chess.ncsu.edu (Brad Hernlem) writes: >  > In article <1993Apr19.214300.17989@unocal.com>, stssdxb@st.unocal.com (Dorin Baru) writes: >  > |> (Brad Hernlem writes: > |>  > |>  > |> >Well, you should have noted that I was cheering an attack on an Israeli  > |> >patrol INSIDE Lebanese territory while I was condemning the "retaliatory" > |> >shelling of Lebanese villages by Israeli and Israeli-backed forces. My "team", > |> >you see, was "playing fair" while the opposing team was rearranging the > |> >faces of the spectators in my team's viewing stands, so to speak.  > |>  > |> >I think that you should try to find more sources of news about what goes on > |> >in Lebanon and try to see through the propaganda. There are no a priori > |> >black and white hats but one sure wonders how the IDF can bombard villages in  > |> >retaliation to pin-point attacks on its soldiers in Lebanon and then call the > |> >Lebanese terrorists. > |>  > |> If the attack was justified or not is at least debatable. But this is not the > |> issue. The issue is that you were cheering DEATH. [...] > |>  > |> Dorin >  > Dorin, of all the criticism of my post expressed on t.p.m., this one I accept. > I regret that aspect of my post. It is my hope that the occupation will end (and > the accompanying loss of life) but I believe that stiff resistance can help to  > achieve that end. Despite what some have said on t.p.m., I think that there is  > a point when losses are unacceptable. The strategy drove U.S. troops out of  > Lebanon, at least. >  > Brad Hernlem (hernlem@chess.ncsu.EDU)  Hi Brad,  I have two comments:  Regarding your hope that the "occupation will end...  belive that stiff resistance..etc. - how about an untried approach, i.e., peace and cooperation.  I can't help but wonder what would happen if all violence against Israelis stopped.  Hopefully, violence against Arabs would stop at the same time.  If a state of non-violence could be  maintained, perhaps a state of cooperation could be achieved, i.e., greater economic opportunities for both peoples living in the "territories".    Of course, given the current leadership of Israel, your way may work also - but if that leadership changes, e.g., to someone with Ariel Sharon's mentality, then I would predict a considerable loss of life, i.e., no winners.  Secondly, regarding your comment about the U.S. troops responding to "stiff resistance" - the analogy is not quite valid.  The U.S. troops could get out of the neighborhood altogether.  The Israelis could not.  Just my $.02 worth, no offense intended.  Respectfully,
In article <1993Apr29.025008.4586@urartu.sdpa.org>, dbd@urartu.sdpa.org (David Davidian) writes: > In the following report: _Turkey Eyes Regional Role_ ANKARA, Turkey (AP) > April 27, 1993, we find in the last paragraph: >  > [Turanist] Although Premier Suleyman Demirel criticized Ozal's often > [Turanist] brash calls for more Turkish influence, he also has spoken > [Turanist] of a swath of Turkic peoples "stretching from the Adriatic > [Turanist] Sea to the Great Wall of China." >  > Who does Demirel think he is fooling? It seems at both ends of his envisioned > pan-Turkic Empire -- the Balkans and the Caucasus -- Turkey's fascist boasts > are being pre-empted. >  > I would suggest Turkey let the world feel some of their "Grey Wolf Teeth", and > attempt to stretch from the Adriatic to China! Turkey will have cried "wolf" > just once too much!   Mentioning that Turkic people are wide-spread means desiring a Turkish empire? Is that the logical thing to conclude from a statement like that?  To me it just says that Turkey may have economical benefits from that if she can be competitive enough. No more than that. But of course you have the freedom of extrapolating as you wish from any statement.  One question: In what context did Ozal use the words you are quoting? Can you give the whole speech.   -- Tankut Atan tankut@iastate.edu
I have not seen but I guess would not liked it - to me he  represents the worst of both American and Israeli politics - but this is a matter of taste.  As for the famous confession, it is currently believed (at least by some people) that all this adultry affair was just invented by him in order to impress the Likkud voters (and poor jealous Hamazah) and appear as a "real" man.
In article <C63r8F.76s@news.cso.uiuc.edu> eshneken@ux4.cso.uiuc.edu (Edward A Shnekendorf) writes:     Israel - Happy 45th Birthday!
Source: Channel 4 News at 19.00, Monday 2 March 1992. 2 French journalists have seen 32 corpses of men, women and children  in civilian clothes. Many of them shot dead from their heads as close  as less than 1 meter.  Source: BBC1 Morning news at 07.37, Tuesday 3 March 1992. BBC reporter was live on line and he claimed that he saw more than 100 bodies of Azeri men, women and children as well as a baby who are shot dead from their heads from a very short distance.  Source: BBC1 Morning news at 08:12, Tuesday 3 March 1992. Very disturbing picture has shown that many civilian corpses who were  picked up from mountain. Reporter said he, cameraman and Western  Journalists have seen more than 100 corpses, who are men, women,  children, massacred by Armenians. They have been shot dead from their  heads as close as 1 meter. Picture also has shown nearly ten bodies  (mainly women and children) are shot dead from their heads. Azerbaijan  claimed that more than 1000 civilians massacred by Armenian forces.   Serdar Argic
In article <1qvi7s$b1o@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> bc744@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Mark Ira Kaufman) writes: > >   First this man promotes the dissolution of the Jews through an >intermarriage process, and then says that it will be just a bunch >of 'fundamentalist' Jews who will object.   > >Or does he simply mean to insult the orthodox by using the word  >'fundamentalist?' > It's irritating when someone mis-labels "us" as "fundamentalists", isn't it?  This sort of thing may help us understand why some muslims  rather resent being put under this label.
dzk@cs.brown.edu (Danny Keren) writes:  >cl056@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Hamaza H. Salah) writes:  ># Well said Mr. Beyer :)  >He-he. The great humanist speaks. One has to read Mr. Salah's posters, >in which he decribes Jews as "sons of pigs and monkeys", keeps >promising the "final battle" between Muslims and Jews (in which the >stons and the trees will "cry for the Muslims to come and kill the >Jews hiding behind them"), makes jokes about Jews dying from heart >attacks etc, to realize his objective stance on the matters involved.  Humanist, or sub-humanist? :-)
The fact that Israel is already discussing with some Palestinians what the composition of the armed Palestinian Police Force in the territories will be during the transition phase indicates some real solid concessions and liberal thinking on the part of the Israeli side.
In article <1rambk$cee@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> cl056@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Hamaza H. Salah) writes:  >ab4z@Virginia.EDU ("Andi Beyer") writes:  [Andi's posting deleted...]  Hamaza's only comment is:  >Well said Mr. Beyer :)  Andi, when you get the full-fledged support of Hamaza Salah, you know you're on the wrong track.
In article <1993Apr26.211905.28317@freenet.carleton.ca> aa229@Freenet.carleton.ca (Steve Birnbaum) writes:  [SB] Oh yeah, Israel was really ready to "expand its borders" on the holiest day [SB] of the year (Yom Kippur) when the Arabs attacked in 1973.  Oh wait, you [SB] chose to omit that war...perhaps because it 100% supports the exact  [SB] OPPOSITE to the point you are trying to make?  I don't think that it's [SB] because it was the war that hit Israel the hardest.  Also, in 1967 it was [SB] Egypt, not Israel who kicked out the UN force.  In 1948 it was the Arabs [SB] who refused to accept the existance of Israel BASED ON THE BORDERS SET [SB] BY THE UNITED NATIONS.  In 1956, Egypt closed off the Red Sea to Israeli [SB] shipping, a clear antagonistic act.  And in 1982 the attack was a response [SB] to years of constant shelling by terrorist organizations from the Golan 							     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [SB] Heights. Children were being murdered all the time by terrorists and Israel ^^^^^^^^^^^^ [SB] finally retaliated.  Nowhere do I see a war that Israel started so that  [SB] the borders could be expanded.  I agree with all you write except that Terrorist orgs. were not shelling Israel from the Golan Heights in 1982, but rather from Lebanon. The Golan Heights have been held by Israel since 1967, and therefore the PLO could not have been shelling Israel from there, unless there is something I am not aware of.   Tsiel
Hamza answers one of my articles:  [TO] If indeed Israeli soldiers killed a "Hamas Mujahid" with an anti-tank [TO] missile then I'm almost sure that the "terrorist zionists" would not [TO] have been able to cut up a body which was probably desintegrated by the [TO] missile.  [Hamza] maybe the missile didn't hit directly such that his body [Hamza] gets "desintegrated."  of course, destroying 10 houses to [Hamza] kill someone is not a surgical operation, or is it?  Well done Hamza. You edited my answer to Anas Omran, took everything out of context and then replied to it the way you wanted. Now I really understand why the peace process is not making any progress.  You guys ain't listening, just babbling away to your same old rhetoric.
In article <1993Apr24.203620.6531@Virginia.EDU> ab4z@Virginia.EDU ("Andi Beyer") writes: >I think the Israeli press might be a tad bit biased in >reporting the events. I doubt the Propaganda machine of Goering >reported accurately on what was happening in Germany. It is >interesting that you are basing the truth on Israeli propaganda.  Since one is also unlikely to get "the truth" from either Arab or  Palestinian news outlets, where do we go to "understand", to learn?  Is one form of propoganda more reliable than another? The only way  to determine that is to try and get beyond the writer's "political agenda", whether it is "on" or "against" our *side*.  Tim
In <1993Apr13.145325.15806@thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu> hasan@McRCIM.McGill.EDU writes:   >In article <eldar.734672326@sfu.ca>, eldar@fraser.sfu.ca (Danny Eldar) writes: >|>  >|> I just heard it on the radio: CKNW in Vancouver, BC.  Girls are fainting in  >|> masse in Egypt.  Nobody knows why, but the movement started in Nothern Egypt  >|> and spread throught all Egypt. >|>  >|>  >|> I think that the MOSSAD, after the "obvious" involvement in WTC bombing, >|> tries to reestablish its reputation.  What better way than making Egyptian >|> schhol-girls go bezerk. >|>  >|> Maybe Hassan will share the light on this.  >I am happy to annouce TII's second positive identifiaction.  >Congragulations Danny.  >Hasan  As one who was born in Quebec and worked in Montreal, I feel I must defend the reputation of McGill University. It is a fine, old, creditable institution of higher learning.  Thus, I can only assume that some under graduate student left his/her terminal on-line and the janitor has been getting access to it.
Hey Serdar,            What nationality are you anyway? You are the supreme geek of geekdom of the usenet. You are laeding a totally useless and futile life on your computer Mr. Wimpy. You are the epitamy of a coward.I can predict that you will spend the rest of your useless, wastefull and pitifull life on the Usenet.  What a wasted life.   ******************************************************************** System: fourd.com                                Phone: 617-494-0565 Cute quote:  Being a computer means never having to say you're sorry ********************************************************************
T.S.Reddy writes >    The report below shows that the Sudanese are acting in the finest >traditions of Islamic law as expounded by some die-hard people on the  >net (who shall remain nameless).  > >WASHINGTON - Government troops in Sudan are involved in massacres, >kidnapping and the transporting of forced labor into Libya, according >to a State Department document declassified Wednesday. > >    The report compiled by the U.S. embassy in Khartoum said government >forces, particularly Arab militias organized as the Popular Defense >Forces, "routinely steal women and children" in southern Sudan. > >    "Some women and girls are kept as wives, the others are shipped >north where they perform forces labor on Kordofan (central Sudan)  >farms or are exproted, notably to Libya," it said.  While the people here may be claim to be Muslim, the actions reported here,   if they actually happened, are 180 degrees opposite from what Islam stands   for, and I, for one, condemn them. --