waashk/20ng huggingface dataset:
Elias Davidsson writes...  ED> dear pete, ED>  ED> for one who is so zionist as you, you should at least know your ED> hebrew, young man. ED>  ED> The last sentence in your posting should read: ED>  ED> Medina achat leshnai amim (not Echad medionnot leshtai amim). ED>  ED> I don't want to address your comments. They speak for themselves. ED>  ED> best regards from a Palestinian of Jewish origin who talks, reads and writes ED> Hebrew and does not hate Jews nor anybody else.  ED>  ED> Elias       The above claim that you do not hate anybody may not be quite     true.  The falsity of this statement is easily visible in the     intellectual corruption that dominates everything you post in     this group.  Your complete lack of objectivity toward Israel,      and Jewish identity in general, reveal biases that indicate a     great steaming heap of hatred!          You certainly have shown a genuine hatred for honesty and for     objectivity. You repeatedly post items or quotes removed from      their original context so that they can be used to further an      agenda of rabid opposition to the very existence of Israel.      You have used this dishonest technique to paint a false image      of several Israeli leaders.  I can't say if you actually HATE     these leaders, but the lies and misrepresentations of them do     suggest that you have a visceral prejudice against them.          So, while you claim that you do not hate anybody, there is an     ample body of evidence to suggest that this claim of yours is      false.  It is obvious that you hate Israel, and it is evident     that you hate the Jewish people.      And, if you are Jewish, you are a self-hating Jew.  There can     be no doubt of this.  Although you will call upon your Jewish     background in an effort to claim the high moral ground, there     is no doubt that you would like to see the Jewish people fade     away completely, as a people.  Your advocacy of intermarriage     for the purpose of dissolving the Jewish people is proof that      you hate the Jewish people.      And by your effort to superimpose the meaninglessness of your     own Jewishness on all Jews, you've clearly demonstrated to me      that you hate yourself.                                              *       *       *       *      "Who is a Jew?  A person whose integrity decays when unmoved      by the knowledge of wrong done to other people."
In article <1993Apr25.222120.3411@Virginia.EDU> ab4z@Virginia.EDU ("Andi Beyer") writes: >waldo@cybernet.cse.fau.edu  writes:  >> ALL Jews suffered during WWII, not just our beloved who perished or were  >> tortured.  We ALL suffered.    >	All humans suffered emotionally, some Jews and many >others suffered physically.   I'm just waiting for Andi to tell us that African Americans should start paying compensation to White Americans who "suffered" from being  slave owners.
From article <1qvgu5INN2np@lynx.unm.edu>, by osinski@chtm.eece.unm.edu (Marek Osinski):  > Well, it did not take long to see how consequent some Greeks are in > requesting that Thessaloniki are not called Solun by Bulgarian netters.  > So, Napoleon, why do you write about Konstantinople and not Istanbul? >  > Marek Osinski  Thessaloniki is called Thessaloniki by its inhabitants for the last 2300 years. The city was never called Solun by its inhabitants. Instabul was called Konstantinoupolis from 320 AD until about the 1920s. That's about 1600 years. There many people alive today who were born in a city called Konstantinoupolis. How many people do you know that were born in a city  called Solun.
In article <1993Apr19.214300.17989@unocal.com>, stssdxb@st.unocal.com (Dorin Baru) writes:  |> (Brad Hernlem writes: |>  |>  |> >Well, you should have noted that I was cheering an attack on an Israeli  |> >patrol INSIDE Lebanese territory while I was condemning the "retaliatory" |> >shelling of Lebanese villages by Israeli and Israeli-backed forces. My "team", |> >you see, was "playing fair" while the opposing team was rearranging the |> >faces of the spectators in my team's viewing stands, so to speak.  |>  |> >I think that you should try to find more sources of news about what goes on |> >in Lebanon and try to see through the propaganda. There are no a priori |> >black and white hats but one sure wonders how the IDF can bombard villages in  |> >retaliation to pin-point attacks on its soldiers in Lebanon and then call the |> >Lebanese terrorists. |>  |> If the attack was justified or not is at least debatable. But this is not the |> issue. The issue is that you were cheering DEATH. [...] |>  |> Dorin  Dorin, of all the criticism of my post expressed on t.p.m., this one I accept. I regret that aspect of my post. It is my hope that the occupation will end (and the accompanying loss of life) but I believe that stiff resistance can help to  achieve that end. Despite what some have said on t.p.m., I think that there is  a point when losses are unacceptable. The strategy drove U.S. troops out of  Lebanon, at least.
In article <C6x81M.EJF@news.cis.umn.edu>, prabhak@giga.cs.umn.edu (Satya Prabhakar) writes: > (mohamed.s.sadek) writes: > > > >I like what Mr. Joseph Biden had to say yesterday 5/11/93 in the senate. > > > >Condemening the european lack of action and lack of support to us plans  > >and calling that "moral rape". > > > >He went on to say that the reason for that is "out right religious BIGOTRY" >  > Actually, this strife in Yugoslavia goes back a long way. Bosinan Muslims,                                                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > in collaboration with the Nazis, did to Serbians after the first world   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > war what Serbs are doing to Muslims now. This is not a fresh case of > ethnic cleansing but just another chapter in the continuing saga > of intense mutual hatred, destruction,... Not taking sides in this > perpetual war does not amount to religious bigotry. It could just > be helplessness with regards to bringing peace to a region that does > not even know the meaning of the word. >    I dont think you're correct here. There have been no reports of the Bosnians Muslims supporting the Nazis in their genocide against the Serbians. The fact is that the Croat govt. using their secret police (called the Ustache, I think) were the prime agents of the Nazis in Yugoslavia against the Serbs.     > Satya Prabhakar > --
In article <1993Apr27.202905.9409@Virginia.EDU> ab4z@Virginia.EDU ("Andi Beyer") writes: >	A few things about the University. It is more fun than some may >admit. Partying does go on and it has consistently been ranked >one of Playboy's top party schools. But we do study and more  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^   What kind of ranking system is used?
As someone who reads Israeli newpapaers every day, I can state with absolute certainty, that anybody who relies on western media to get a picture of what is happening in Israel is not getting an accurate picture.  There is tremendous bias in those stories that do get reported.  And the stories that NEVER get mentioned create a completely false picture of the mideast.
prabhak@giga.cs.umn.edu (Satya Prabhakar) writes:  >(mohamed.s.sadek) writes: >> >>I like what Mr. Joseph Biden had to say yesterday 5/11/93 in the senate. >> >>Condemening the european lack of action and lack of support to us plans  >>and calling that "moral rape". >> >>He went on to say that the reason for that is "out right religious BIGOTRY"  >Actually, this strife in Yugoslavia goes back a long way. Bosinan Muslims, >in collaboration with the Nazis, did to Serbians after the first world >war what Serbs are doing to Muslims now.  Where in the world did you get this? Please read history books before you start talking something  >Satya Prabhakar
In article <1993Apr27.201252.9110@Virginia.EDU> ab4z@Virginia.EDU ("Andi Beyer") writes:     >     > Bull shit. There is no reason in the world why we can't say that    > taking views analogous to the KKK's or some such organization is    > wrong. There is no reason why some morality may not be legislated. As    > it is we do not allow theft, or murder, or rape. Why should we allow    > hateful sppech whose only purpose is to stir anger and violence.    >     > Harry.  	   Actually, You're wrong as well. The KKK is allowed to    march and any attempts to curtail their freedom is rejected    (Actually I believe the ACLU won a case for them last year).  	   Morality should not be legilated in a free country like    the U.S.   Yes. That seems to be the problem. Even Germany now has laws for its military where soldiers are *required* to disobey orders if they believe the orders are morally incorrect.  Naziism is prohibited in Canada, Germany (others?). How pray tell is Canda any less free than the US?  	   I'll post something on TJ and Uva under Uva for those    Hoos bashers.
In Re:Syria's Expansion, the author writes that the UN thought Zionism was Racism and that they were wrong.  They were correct the first time, Zionism is Racism and thankfully, the McGill Daily (the student newspaper at McGill) was proud enough to print an article saying so.  If you want a copy, send me mail.
Anas Omran... 	 @>	But since all Jews that way, they find him a leader to follow!
> >   Anas Omran has claimed that, "the Israelis used to arrest, and >sometime to kill some of these neutral reporters."  The assertion >by Anas Omran is, of course, a total fabrication.  If there is an >once of truth iin it, I'm sure Anas Omran can document such a sad >and despicable event.  Otherwise we may assume that it is another >piece of anti-Israel bullshit posted by someone whose family does >not know how to teach their children to tell the truth.  If Omran >would care to retract this 'error' I would be glad to retract the >accusation that he is a liar.  If he can document such a claim, I >would again be glad to apologize for calling him a liar.  Failing >to do either of these would certainly show what a liar he is.  Why retract your accusation that he's a liar?  If Omran retracts his "verbal diarrohea" doesn't that only prove the liar he *really* is?  A retraction would be pointless!  Giving this guy the opportunity to "save face" after uttering such bullshit would just encourage him to do it again!  I must say that your style is very impressive, Mark.  Keep it up!  - Mike
In article <1sv276$t8d@genesis.MCS.COM>, arf@genesis.MCS.COM (Jack Schmidling) writes: |> In article <C6vExt.Lxn@bony1.bony.com> jake@bony1.bony.com (Jake Livni) writes: |> >In article <1993May7.175730.12246@ncsu.edu> hernlem@chess.ncsu.edu (Brad Hernlem) writes: |> > |> >Why is it, then, that when the British, Iranians and UAE refer to |> >Occupied Territory, they mean territory in dispute in Israel but not |> >in their own affairs? |>  |> I suppose for the same reason Jews call the Occupied Territory, Judea and |> Sumaria.  It's called propaganda       Actually Judea and Samaria are proper geographical names, just like      Asia Minor or Lake Michigan. Judea and Samaria are even used in      an atlas published in (what used to be) USSR circa 1970 that I have at     home. The government of the USSR was of course quite hostile towards     Israel and would hardly engage in a pro-Israel propaganda. I would be     willing to mail a photocopy of the relevant page to Mr. Schmidling      with relevant words underlined to simplify his search, if he promises     to report to the net afterwards. |>                                   and if you repeat lies often enough, |> people start to believe it.  Mr. Schmidling is to be congtatualted for being living exception to this general rule. For although he is almost without peer in both the number of lies posted and in the number of times he repeats them --- he hasn't  found many people who believe his lies (yet ?).  |>  |> js
ilyess@bohr.concordia.ca (Ilyess Bdira) writes:  >In article <israel-palestiniansU3yG115pe@clarinet.com> clarinews@clarinet.com (UPI) writes: >>	GAZA CITY, Israeli-Occupied Gaza Strip (UPI) -- Palestinian gunmen >>Sunday shot and killed two Israelis who entered Gaza to buy cheap >>produce, and two Arabs who were assisting them. >>	Elsewhere in the crowded strip, Israeli troops killed a 18-month-old >>infant and a 12-year-old boy during rock-throwing clashes at two refugee >>camps. >can anybody guess this from the title?  Can anyone figure out what kind of deranged parent was stupid enough to bring their infant on a rock throwing crusade (or jihad, sorry)?  18-month old infants certainly don't walk around the streets on their own.  That would lead me to believe that some nimrod of a "parent" brought them along for a  little terrorism.  >Not me, I thought that a clash between Israelis and Arabs resulted >in four deaths on one side and two on the other.  thats what happened.  >>	The drive-by shooting outside the Jewish settlement of Gadid in >>southern Gaza prompted Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin to warn Israelis >>they were ``endangering their lives'' by doing illegal business in the >>occupied territories.  >How about being illegally settled there? >I am not sure about the signals the Israelis are sending, one day >they are willing to accept a Jordan/West Bank federation, the other >they do not recognize the west bank as occupied territory (neither >did the U.S, "the honest brocker") >(details of the killings omitted, PLO,Hamas graffiti both claim responsability)  Uhm, last I heard, the territories were disputed.  Israel's occupation is not illegal.  They are legally allowed to remain there until a settlement is reached with the arabs which, from the behavior of the Palestinian negotitating team, will probably be never.  >>	The Israelis had entered Gaza in a car driven by the man from Hebron,  >Now don't tell me that this could not be an Israeli spy. >We will know later.  huh?  they were buying vegetables.   >>which carried the easily identified blue license plates of Arab vehicles >>in the West Bank. When Israelis enter Gaza with their own cars, which >>carry yellow plates, they are usually stoned and burned by angry >			********************************* >>Palestinian residents. >Now the UPI shows its ugly face once and for all. >USUALLY? >It happened once this year, once last year. out of possibly thousands >or more. Man how low can you get.  >For those of you bigoted enough not to see what is transmitted here, I will >tell you something that is at least as close to the truth as the above: >"Babies/children who venture outside their homes are usually shot and killed >by the Israeli soldiers." >.... >>	Army officials said the joint operation by members of the PLO-tied >>Fatah Hawks and the Hamas-connected Kassem brigade, arose from their >>anger at the army's killing of six fugitives from each group over the >>past month. >>	The groups sprayed graffiti on walls in Khan Yunis, calling the >>attack ``an act of revenge'' for the killing of their comrades.
In article <1qmdtlINNkrc@early-bird.think.com>, shaig@Think.COM (Shai Guday) writes: |> In article <1993Apr15.204930.9517@thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu>, hasan@McRCIM.McGill.EDU  writes: |> |>  |> |> In article <1993Apr15.055341.6075@nysernet.org>, astein@nysernet.org (Alan Stein) writes: |> |> |> I guess Hasan finally revealed the source of his claim that Israel |> |> |> diverted water from Lebanon--his imagination. |> |> |> --  |> |> |> Alan H. Stein                     astein@israel.nysernet.org |> |> Mr. water-head, |> |> i never said that israel diverted lebanese rivers, in fact i said that |> |> israel went into southern lebanon to  make sure that no  |> |> water is being used on the lebanese |> |> side, so that all water would run into Jordan river where there |> |> israel will use it  !#$%^%&&*-head. |>  |> Of course posting some hard evidence or facts is much more |> difficult.  You have not bothered to substantiate this in |> any way.  Basil, do you know of any evidence that would support |> this?  I agree with Shai,  there are many references to Israeli plans on the Litani river but I have yet to find hard  evidence.  I had mentioned before that there is a report commissioned by the UN to study the Litani river, it is  still in draft form.  The Israeli gov't also commissioned a study on the river that was done by Dr. Ben Wolfe. The Litani starts in the Bekaa valley in Lebanon, flows Southward, then West across South Lebanon and discharges into the Mediterranean near the city of Tyre. There are other rivers such as the Hasbani and the Wazzani that start in Lebanese territory than join the Jordan river.   The most mentioned plan was one that would divert water from the Litani into these, then the water would flow naturally into the Lac De Houle.  BUT there is no evidence of any diversion structure (which would need to be at least 3 km long).  The area is mountainous, inaccessible and occupied by Israel so I have not seen any independent  reports of the existence of any diversion structure there. Another often mentioned diversion is through deep wells. It is also rumored that Israe has 600 m wells tapping into deep aquifers and drawing water on the Israeli side of the border.  If such wells are indeed under use they would be costly to operate  (high energy costs) and the Lebanese and Israeli gov't should  agree on the distribution of water from shared aquifers as part of an overall peace plan and the bilateral negociations on "regional issues".  The fact that we have been at war all this time has led to the current state of affairs where withdrawals from such aquifers is completely unregulated.   Basil
Source: "Men Are Like That" by Leonard Ramsden Hartill. The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Indianapolis (1926). (305 pages).  (Memoirs of an Armenian officer who participated in the genocide of 2.5   million Muslim people)   p. 204 (first paragraph).  "I was soon asleep. In the night I was awakened by the persistent crying of  a child. I arose and went to investigate. A full moon enabled me to make  my way about and revealed to me all the wreck and litter of the tragedy  that had been enacted. Guided by the child's crying, I entered the yard of  a house, which I judged from its appearance must have been the home of a  Turkish family. There in a corner of the yard I found a women dead. Her  throat had been cut. Lying on her breast was a small child, a girl about a  year old."   Serdar Argic
arf@genesis.MCS.COM (Jack Schmidling) writes:  >In article <1qun1aINNik5@aludra.usc.edu> sgoldste@aludra.usc.edu (Fogbound Child) writes: >>arf@genesis.MCS.COM (Jack Schmidling) writes: >> >> >>>  >>>                      Yigal et al, sue ADL >>>  >> >>Why do you title this "News you will miss" ? >> >>There have been at least three front-page stories on it in the L.A. Times. >> >>I wouldn't exactly call that a media cover-up.  >This may come as a surprise to you but there are a few americans who do not >read the LA Times.  Is this the same Monolithic, Centrally Controlled Media that you're always talking about? Do you mean to tell me that the LA Times is the ONLY major paper to buck the Media Spiking Division's activities?   >The Defamation League has done a first class job of damage control..in what >little is left of the world outside of LA.   Assumption: When one major newspaper prints three or more articles on the front page regarding subject matter that is not strictly local, this is likely to be considered an open story, and not a coverup.   Let's hear a roll call here. Anyone outside of the LA area seen articles on this?  >js  ___Samuel___ Mossad Special Agent ID314159 Media Spiking & Mind Control Division Los Angeles Offices (therefore, evidently, incompetent)
In article <1993Apr15.055341.6075@nysernet.org>, astein@nysernet.org (Alan Stein) writes: |> I guess Hasan finally revealed the source of his claim that Israel |> diverted water from Lebanon--his imagination. |> --  |> Alan H. Stein                     astein@israel.nysernet.org Mr. water-head, i never said that israel diverted lebanese rivers, in fact i said that israel went into southern lebanon to  make sure that no  water is being used on the lebanese side, so that all water would run into Jordan river where there israel will use it  !#$%^%&&*-head.
dear pete,  for one who is so zionist as you, you should at least know your hebrew, young man.  The last sentence in your posting should read:  Medina achat leshnai amim (not Echad medionnot leshtai amim).  I don't want to address your comments. They speak for themselves.  best regards from a Palestinian of Jewish origin who talks, reads and writes Hebrew and does not hate Jews nor anybody else.
In article <2BEC0A64.21705@news.service.uci.edu> tclock@orion.oac.uci.edu (Tim Clock) writes: >This issue has been going on for a while and your presentation here of >just one reference probably won't resolve this issue to those that >oppose your insistence that mosques *were* destroyed. Even in your >location of this one reference, you spend most of your quote dealing >with an incidence that, while abhorrant, has nothing to do with the  >issue at hand here. Then, at the end of the quote, there is an almost >off-hand comment that "two mosques" were destroyed. > >To support a claim of this nature, what other authors support this >incident? If identifiable mosques were destroyed they are certainly >identifiable, they have names and addresses (steet location). The >comment by one reporter *does* make us wonder if "this happened" but >by no means "proves it.  There is no doubt that Israeli authorities ordered the destruction of mosques in the vicinity of the Wailing Wall. That does not mean, however, that once can generalize from this to any other points.  The entire plaza, mosques and all, was cleared to make it possible for Jews to have a place to worship in the place that was holiest to many of them, and which had been denied to them for millenia.  On the other hand, throughout the rest of Jerusalem and Israel, to the best of my knowledge, Israeli authorities have scrupulously avoided damage to any Islamic religious sites. This contrasts with the policies of previous regimes which destroyed Jewish synagogues out of hate and bigotry.