In article <1993Apr12.171250.486@julian.uwo.ca> wlsmith@valve.heart.rri.uwo.ca (Wayne Smith) writes: >In article <ercC57245.H2w@netcom.com> erc@netcom.com (Eric Smith) writes: >> >>SCSI is better because it has a better future, and it has a lot of >>minor advantages right now.  IDE cards are cheaper right now, but will >>be obsolete in a few years.  (In fact, IDE cards are so cheap, they >>might as well be free.  The real cost is in the IDE drives.)  SCSI >>cards cost more, but they are worth it. >  >I almost got a hernia laughing at this one.  You'll probably get one when you realize that your $100 vesa super dooper local bus ultra high tech controller sucks...  >If anything, SCSI (on a PC) will be obsolete-> killed off by Vesa Local With any luck PC bus archeitecture will be doen any with by sbus.  Have you ever seen what happens when you hook a busmaster controller to a vesa local bus.  It actually  slows down your system >Bus IDE.  It must be real nice to get shafted by $20-$100 bucks for the >extra cost of a SCSI drive, then pay another $200-$300 for a SCSI controller.  Maybe my workstation doesn't understand what your vesa local bus IDE is  Vesa local bus will be killed off by pcmi? whatever intels spec is. VLBUS it not good for much more than vga cards.  To each his own.  I'll laugh when you start crying over how much you spent for your 2 little ide drives and then finding out you need more space. > >>The biggest advantage of SCSI right now is that you can add more >>different kinds of devices, such as tapes, etc., easily, and can add >>bigger disks.  The best and most cost effective hard disks available >>are SCSI.  Here Here....   > >Only of you need drives larger then 500 meg.  Oh yes, gotta have 10 megs/sec >transfer rate for those speedy tape backups and cd rom drives.  don't stick your foot in your mouth when you make a statement you know nothing about.   I'd rather wait a second compared to the 5 minutes and ide would take. (obviously exaggerated).  Have you ever tried to backup 2 gigs of disk?  Oh I forgot you can't because you have an ide and no one makes ide disks that big.  > >Basically, if a person *has* to ask which one is better for him/her, >then they will *probably* never see the EXPENSIVE benefits from SCSI.  I guess you probably bought a 486sx too  > >Also, all this arm-waving about SCSI expandability is a moot point if >the user only has one or two drives on it.  And with SCSI those two >drives *may* be fast, but that speed is only due to the onboard memory >cache -> something I can duplicate with a caching IDE controller.  What?  The SCSI-2 FAST,WIDE spec has much more bandwidth than any stupid vlbus ide crap....  Stop this thread now, Its just cluttering up bandwidth.  If you want to read about scsi vs ide just pay a visit to you local usenet archive.  the best SCSI-2 FAST,WIDE,etc is clearly faster than any the best ide drive. All the response given are based upon personal experience with 1 or 2 drives.  You can't judge such completely different interfaces.   IDE has the low cost adavantage + a descent performance. SCSI has the ability for super high capacity expandibility and speed.  neither one is better in all cases.  If you don't belive what I said about busmastering and vlbus then pick up a back issue of PC-week in whihc they tested vlbus, eisa and isa busmastering cards.  send flames to /dev/null.....