waashk/20ng huggingface dataset:
In article <C6yt9o.Ftt@world.std.com>, tti@world.std.com (Joachim Martillo) writes: |> In article <C6yAoD.4C7@cobra.cs.unm.edu> melabdel@cobra.cs.unm.edu (Mohammed Elabdellaoui) writes: |>  |> >Muslims helping the Nazis???  Where on earth do you come up with such |> >accuusation??  Do you have proofs??  If not, you should publically apologize |> >for such a statement.   |>  |> What a dope!  There is no value for Mohammed Elabdellaoui to be here |> at a Western University.  Third-worldist and Islamic brain-rot has                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |> made it impossible for him to acquire and analyze facts appropriately. |> |>  |> You should go back to your mindlessly stupid 3rd world country.  Your                               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |> brain has no business in a civilized first world country. |>                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |> Joachim Carlo Santos Martillo Ajami   Joachim  I have restrained from involvement in flame wars.  These comments however make me long for the days when I was a flame warrior.  I would hope that you would refrain from such idiotic slander.      Winslow (formerly of Madison)  P.S.  I might have to drop the formerly and become the "old"  Winslow of Madison.
Mark Ira Kaufman writes >   It is your responsibility for posting quotes in context.  Your >   phony 'research center' is the source of the most unscholarly, >   out-of-context, agenda-ridden, and sophmoric propaganda that I >   have ever seen.
From Israeline 4/27/93  Rabin: We Must Concentrate on Qualitative Changes in Israeli Society   Today's AL HAMISHMAR quotes Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin's Independence Day interview yesterday on Israel Television. Rabin said that enforcing Jewish sovereignty over the entire Land of Israel would lead to the establishment of a bi-national state. "I would view it as if the historical destiny of my generation, Dor Tashach, the generation that had the great privilege of determining the fate of the people and founding the Jewish state, had been lost."  Rabin added, "We must stop dreaming of settlements [i.e. in the Territories] and focus on qualitative and substantive changes in Israeli society to make it a productive society dependent on its own labor." The Prime Minister concluded saying that he would like to achieve a significant breakthrough in the peace process during his government's term.
I have read numerous posts over a period of several months, by this anti-Israel fanatic, hiding in the shadow of the respectable sounding name of the 'Center for Policy Research.'  Obviously, it is no research center of any kind, unless 'researching' published documents to find material to use against Israel makes it so.       Labeling a propaganda mill a research center is not surprising in itself.  That is simply part of the propaganda process.  I was curious if anyone knew who this anti-Israel fanatic hiding behind his phoney 'research center' name is.  Is he an Arab?  Is he some typical anti-semite hiding behind a veneer of 'anti-zionism?'  Is he some Jew who perhaps lived in Israel and just couldn't make it there, and is now taking his failure out on Israel?
Andrew Varvel writes: > > > Serdar Argic  >(a.k.a. Serdar Argic, The Merciful and Compassionate) writes: > >[Serdar Argic's bountiful, divine, all-knowing, and footnoted  >wisdom is regrettably omitted for this solemn tribute.] > > >WHERE CAN I JOIN THE SERDAR ARGIC FAN CLUB?  DO I GET A T-SHIRT? > >--The Friendly Neighborhood Alien-- > >Life just hasn't been the same since David Koresh died...       ah c'mon, give the guy three days and see what comes up.       LEO
----------------------------Original message----------------------------                                                                     D"SB  Mincha, Tish(a Yamim La(Omer, Yom Chamishi, Y"D b'Nisan ThShN"G; Universita Varsha b'Varsha, Galut HaMara Meod.  SHALOM ALL! Those of You visiting The Ghetto City these days might be interested in the following events timetable  (abridged): 19:00, Fri., 16th April, '93: Kabbalat Shabbat service at the Nozyk Shul                                 (6 Twarda Street, Warsaw -- a 10 mins'                                 walk from the Palace of Science &                                 Culture: the tallest building in the                                 city's centre, & the same distance from                                 the Central Railway Station). 09:30, Sat., 17th April,  " : Shacharit L'Shabbat service, Nozyk Shul. 11:30, Sun., 18th April,  " : The Fallen Ones Memorial service, Nozyk Shul. 13:00, Sun., 18th April,  " : Memorial Ceremony at the Jewish Cemetery                                 (Okopowa Street, Warsaw). 18:00, Sun., 18th April,  " : Official Arts Programme at the Congress Hall                                 (a building adjacent to the Palace of                                 Science & Culture, which -- like the Shul                                 -- is located a quarter's walk from most of                                 downtown hotels: Bristol, Forum, Victoria,                                 Europejski, Holiday Inn, Marriott). 12:00, Mon., 19th April,  " : Laying of Wreaths at the Ghetto Heros                                 Monument.
clarinews@clarinet.com (BAHAA ELKOUSSY) writes:  UPI, and the newspapers who are reporting this being all owned by Saudis I wonder how secure they are feeling by reporting all of these things, maybe Saudi Arabia is allowed to have all the human rights violations it can have, nobody is including them in any list,.. those are designed for independent states.  >	CAIRO, Egypt (UPI) -- The Saudi government ordered the firing and  why is this reported from Cairo?  >disbarment of six Saudi human rights activists one week after they >formed the country's first human rights group, which has been condemned >by the kingdom's highest religious authorities, Saudi media reported >Friday. >	Two Saudi-owned, London-based daily newspapers reported the dismissal >of five of the activists, who last week formed the Committee for the >Protection of Legal Rights in the kingdom to hear allegations of human >rights abuses. >	The newspapers said orders were issued to dismiss Abdallah al-Jabreen >from his job with the Iftaa Department, Saudi Arabia's highest religious >advisory body; Hamad al-Seleifeh from the Eduaction Ministry, and >Mohamed al-Muss'eri, Abdallah al-Hamed and Abdallah al-Tuwaijri from two >universities in Riyadh, the Saudi capital. >	Licenses to practice as law attorneys were also ordered revoked for >Suleiman al-Marshoudi and al-Muss'eri and their law offices and any >national branches were ordered closed for the same reason. ..... >	Saudi Interior Minister Prince Nayef Ben Abdel Aziz, a member of the >royal family, rejected criticism of human rights violations in the >kingdom. >	In an interview broadcast Friday, he said ``nations and organizations >... say they protect human rights or demand respect of human rights'' >but at the same time refuse to intervene in Bosnia-Herzegovina, where >people are ``being killed, raped and destroyed while even barred from >carrying arms.'' >	``Where is the humanity and human rights of which those are talking?'' >the prince said in the interview broadcast by the Saudi-owned, London- >based Middle East Broadcasting Center.  Can somebody teach this man some logic? what is the relationship between a human rights league in  Saudia and human rights in Bosnia, I guess if we wanted to know what is in Italy, we should know what is in Brasil (Syrian Joke)  >	Prince Nayef, who controls Saudi police and prisons, said the >kingdom's enforcement of Islamic laws gives his country one of the  their claim of following Islamic law is the biggest disservice that they ever did to Islam.  ... >	But Hosni Amin, executive director of the Cairo-based Arab >Organization for Human Rights, said his group has documented evidence of >human rights abuses in Saudi Arabia. He said the AOHR supported the  But how about human rights in Egypt Mr Amin?
In article <1993Apr19.155856.8260@kpc.com> henrik@quayle.kpc.com  writes: >In article <1993Apr17.185118.10792@ee.rochester.edu>, terziogl@ee.rochester.edu (Esin Terzioglu) writes: >|> In article <1993Apr16.195452.21375@urartu.sdpa.org> dbd@urartu.sdpa.org (David Davidian) writes: >|> >04/16/93 1045  ARMENIA SAYS IT COULD SHOOT DOWN TURKISH PLANES >|> > >|>   >|> Ermenistan kasiniyor... >|>  >|> Let me translate for everyone else before the public traslation service gets >|> into it	: Armenia is getting itchy.  >|>  >|> Esin. > > >Let me clearify Mr. Turkish; > >ARMENIA is NOT getting "itchy". SHE is simply LETTING the WORLD KNOW that SHE >WILL NO  LONGER sit there QUIET and LET TURKS get away with their FAMOUS  >tricks. Armenians DO REMEMBER of the TURKISH invasion of the Greek island of                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >CYPRESS WHILE the world simply WATCHED.   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^  Your ignorance is obvious from your posting.   1) Cyprus was an INDEPENDENT country with Turkish/Greek inhabitants (NOT a     Greek island like your ignorant posting claims)  2) The name should be Cyprus (in English)  next time read and learn before you post.
In article <1993Apr20.143453.3127@news.uiowa.edu>, mau@herky.cs.uiowa.edu (Mau Napoleon) writes: > From article <1qvgu5INN2np@lynx.unm.edu>, by osinski@chtm.eece.unm.edu (Marek Osinski): >  > > Well, it did not take long to see how consequent some Greeks are in > > requesting that Thessaloniki are not called Solun by Bulgarian netters.  > > So, Napoleon, why do you write about Konstantinople and not Istanbul? > >  > > Marek Osinski >  > Thessaloniki is called Thessaloniki by its inhabitants for the last 2300 years. > The city was never called Solun by its inhabitants. > Instabul was called Konstantinoupolis from 320 AD until about the 1920s. > That's about 1600 years. There many people alive today who were born in a city > called Konstantinoupolis. How many people do you know that were born in a city > called Solun. >  > Napoleon  Are you one of those people who were born when Istanbul was called  Konstantinopolis? I don't think so! If those people use it because they are used to do so, then I understand. But open any map today (except a few that try to be political) you will see that the name  of the city is printed as Istanbul. So, don't try to give any arguments to using Konstantinopolis except to cause some flames, to make some political statement.    -- Tankut Atan tankut@iastate.edu
dzk@cs.brown.edu (Danny Keren) writes:  > He-he. The great humanist speaks. One has to read Mr. Salah's posters, > in which he decribes Jews as "sons of pigs and monkeys", keeps > promising the "final battle" between Muslims and Jews (in which the > stons and the trees will "cry for the Muslims to come and kill the > Jews hiding behind them"), makes jokes about Jews dying from heart > attacks etc, to realize his objective stance on the matters involved. >  > -Danny Keren. ---------- Don't worry, Danny, every blatantly violent and abusive posting made by  Hamzah is immediately forwarded to the operator of the system in which he  has an account.  I'd imagine they have quite a file started on this  fruitcake--and have already indicated that they have rules governing  racist and threatening use of their resources.  I'd imagine he'll be out  of our hair in a short while.
In article <1993Apr26.202714.4519@Virginia.EDU> rj3s@Virginia.EDU ("Get thee to a nunnery.....") writes: >  I have never seen such immaturity among semitophiles.  This >Andi Beyer character shows no signs of anti semitism. OK, you've already disqualified yourself (who ever you are) from being objective.  >  You all are an insult to you race! >{assuming you are also semitic}  Jews are a people with a common cultural heritage, religion, and history. We are not a race.   >	Now I have a comment concerning Israeli terrorism >during the 1930's and 1940's.  The Hirgun, and other branch - >off militant groups, did fight the British do get them out of >Palestine.  Yet I fail to see how this Israeli form of >terrorism was better than the terrorism practiced now by the >Arabs.  These Jewish terrorist groups killed innocent British >soldiers  You don't see a difference between killing British soldiers (who were preventing Jews who tried to escape the Nazis from entering the British mandate) and Arab terrorist who kill civilian men, women, and children?!?   >I mention this not because I'm anti semitic [I'm part >Jewish]  That's ridiculuous on atleast two counts.  First of all, even if you identify yourself as completely Jewish that doesn't rule out the possibility that you're a self-hating anti-semite.  One can always find Jews who are uncomfortable with their identities (since they only want Jews to be cowering victims) and are willing to speak up for their enemies.  Secondly, the strength or weakness of your arguments does not depend on your identity.
In article <C6xBKw.M4L@news.cso.uiuc.edu> hovig@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Hovig Heghinian) writes:  > ... and who copied the months of the Armenians?  Come again? The image-conscious Armenians sorely feel a missing  glory in their background. Armenians have never achieved statehood  and independence, they have always been subservient, and engaged  in undermining schemes against their rulers. They committed  genocide against the Muslim populations of Eastern Anatolia  and x-Soviet Armenia before and during World War I and fully  participated in the extermination of the European Jewry  during World War II. Belligerence, genocide, back-stabbing,  rebelliousness and disloyalty have been the hallmarks of the  Armenian history. To obliterate these episodes the Armenians  engaged in tailoring history to suit their whims. In this zeal  they tried to cover up the cold-blooded genocide of 2.5 million  Turks and Kurds before and during World War I.  And the justice is long overdue.   Source: Documents: Volume I (1919).         "Document No: 50," Archive No: 4/3621, Cabin No: 162, Drawer          No: 5, File No: 2905, Section No: 433, Contents No: 6, 6-1, 6-2.         (To 36th Division Command - Militia Commander Ismail Hakki)  "For eight days, Armenians have been forcibly obstructing people from  leaving their homes or going from one village to the other. Day and night  they are rounding up male inhabitants, taking them to unknown destinations,  after which nothing further is heard of them. (Informed from statements  of those who succeeded in escaping wounded from the massacres around  Taskilise ruins). Women and children are being openly murdered or are  being gathered in the Church Square and similar places. Most inhuman and  barbarous acts have been committed against Moslems for eight days."            "Document No: 52," Archive No: 4/3671, Cabin No: 163, Drawer          No: 1, File No: 2907, Section No: 440, Contents No: 6-6, 6-7.         (To: 1st Caucasian Army Corps Command, 2nd Caucasian Army Corps         Command, Communications Zone Inspectorate - Commander 3rd Army         General)  "As almost all Russian units opposite our front have been withdrawn, the  population loyal to us in regions behind the Russian positions are  facing an ever-increasing threat and suppression as well as cruelties  and abuses by Armenians who have decided to systematically annihilate  the Moslem population in regions under their occupation. I have   regularly informed the Russian Command of these atrocities and  cruelties and I have gained the impression that the above authority  seems to be failing in restoring order."   Serdar Argic
In article <1993Apr27.203119.23291@cs.ucla.edu> steven@surya.cs.ucla.edu (Steven Berson) writes:     hm@cs.brown.edu (Harry Mamaysky) writes:     >Bull shit. There is no reason in the world why we can't say that    >taking views analogous to the KKK's or some such organization is    >wrong. There is no reason why some morality may not be legislated. As    >it is we do not allow theft, or murder, or rape. Why should we allow    >hateful sppech whose only purpose is to stir anger and violence.    >Harry.     I think the answer to Mr. Mayamsky's question can be found in the 	 		 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^(Mr. Mamaysky's)    first amendment to the US Constitution.  	   Amendment I                                           (1791)  	   Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of 	   religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or 	   abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the 	   right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition 	   the government for a redress of grievances.     Steve  I do not say that freedom of speech should be banned. Far from it. I am merely suggesting that there are certain things which can be universally agreed to be morally incorrect. There are not many such things. But there are some. As an example:  (1) murder is morally incorrect  (2) the idea that one group of people is somehow racially inferior to another is morally incorrect  etc.  The point is that any action which serves to promote a morally incorrect action should be forbidden. This implies that no one has the right to say that an innocent person should be murdered. Regardless of freedom of speech, I may not stand on a street corner and advocate the murder of innocent people. The reason for this is that murder is a morally incorrect action.  In the same way, since bigotry is morally incorrect in the narrow definition which we have given it, (2), I, nor any one else, has the right to stand on a street corner and promote bigotry. Such an enforcement does in no way deny any one their rights as guaranteed by the first amendment. It merely ensures that no person may be the target of an attempt to deny him a fundamental moral right, such as the right to not be murdered, and the right not to be discriminated against.  I believe, Mr. Berson, that to blindly accept the constitution is a terrific mistake. We must cinstantly question the constitution and interpret it in a way befitting the society in which we live. Anything short of such an effort would render us little more than trained monkeys, who are able to merely repeat what they have heard without paying the slightest bit of attention to the intent of the document in question.  Would you disagree, Mr.Berson?
Arab citizens have the all the same rights as Jews.  Arabs are exempt from military service, but that is about it.  Arabs have a full voice in Israeli politics, to the degree that they choose to get involved.  They may vote.  There are Arabs in the Cabinet.
In a previous article, steel@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Nick Steel) says:  >Q: How many occupying israeli soldiers (terrorists) does it  >   take to kill a 5 year old native child? > >A: Four > >Two fasten his arms, one shoots in the face, >and one writes up a false report.  This newsgroup is for intelligent discussion.  I want you to either smarten up and stop this bullshit posting or get the fuck out of my face and this net.     Steve  --
In article <C5wB46.I3o@blaze.cs.jhu.edu>, arromdee@jyusenkyou.cs.jhu.edu (Ken Arromdee) writes... >In article <22APR199307534304@vxcrna.cern.ch> casper@vxcrna.cern.ch (CASPER,DAVI./PPE) writes: >>> [I said the fixation on Bosnia is due to it being in a European country, >>>  rather than the third world]  >>> [Ken says intervention in Somalia is a counter-example]  >>I am a staunch Republican, BTW.  The irony of arguing against military >>intervention with arguments based on Vietnam has not escaped me.  I was opposed >>to US intervention in Somalia for the same reasons, although clearly it was >>not nearly as risky. >  >Based on the same reasons?  You mean you were opposed to US intervention in >Somalia because since Somalia is a European country instead of the third world, >the desire to help Somalia is racist?  I don't think this "same reason" applies >to Somalia at all.  No, you have completely misunderstood.  I was opposed to intervention in Somalia for the same reason I am opposed to intervention in Bosnia - there is no security interest of the United States there which justifies risking the lives of American servicemen, and there are too many crises in the world for us to take on all of them.  In the case of Bosnia, the risks are obviously much greater, and there are other countries in a much better position and with far better reasons to take action than the US.  >The whole point is that Somalia _is_ a third world country, and we were more >willing to send troops there than to Bosnia--exactly the _opposite_ of what >the "fixation on European countries" theory would predict.  (Similarly, the >desire to help Muslims being fought by Christians is also exactly the opposite >of what that theory predicts.)  You continue to misunderstand.  I did not say the reason why people want to intervene is because of racist (<- you seem to be overly fond of using this word, btw.  I said the phenomenon was race-related, which is not the same as racist.  Perhaps this distinction is too subtle for you to grasp) motives - I said the attention and outrage at the entire Yugoslavian situation was a result of it being 1) closer to home, 2) happening to people we can identify with, and 3) relentlessly harped on by the media.  I never said anything about which side would be preferred, which has a lot more to do with the presentation of the conflict than any psychological factors.  I think there is no doubt that despite the fact we intervened in Somalia, the level of attention devoted to there was considerably less than what is devoted to Bosnia, if the newspapers and tv news I see are any guide.
In article <1993Apr5.175047.17368@unocal.com>, stssdxb@st.unocal.com (Dorin Baru) writes:  |> Alan Stein writes: |>  |> >What are you talking about?  The Rabin government has clearly |> >indicated its interest in a territorial compromise that would leave |> >the vast majority of the Arabs in Judea, Samaria and Gaza outside |> >Israeli control.  (just an interrupting comment here) Since EARLY 1980's , israelis said they are  willing to give up the Adminstration rule of the occupied terretories to Palestineans. Palestineans refused and will refuse such settlement that denies them their right of SELF-DETERMINATION. period.  |> I know. I was just pointing out that not compromising may be a bad idea. And |> there are, in Israel, voices against negotiations. And I think there are many |> among palestineans also against any negociations.  |>  |> Just an opinion |> |> Dorin  Ok. I donot know why there are israeli voices against negotiations. However, i would guess that is because they refuse giving back a land for those who have the right for it.  As for the Arabian and Palestinean voices that are against the current negotiations and the so-called peace process, they are not against peace per se, but rather for their well-founded predictions that Israel would NOT give an inch of the West bank (and most probably the same for Golan Heights) back to the Arabs. An 18 months of "negotiations" in Madrid, and Washington proved these predictions. Now many will jump on me saying why are you blaming israelis for no-result negotiations. I would say why would the Arabs stall the negotiations, what do they have to loose ?  Arabs feel that the current "negotiations" is ONLY for legitimizing the current status-quo and for opening the doors of the Arab markets for israeli trade and "oranges". That is simply unacceptable and would be revoked.   Just an opinion.
In article <1993May6.014049.7349@seas.smu.edu> pts@seas.smu.edu (Paul Thompson Schreiber) writes: >  >                   GULF WAR II: THE MEDIA OFFENSIVE >                   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >                          By Douglas Kellner >                     Lies Of Our Times, May 1993 Gulf has changed the third parts's perception of Arabs. 1. Before, people tended to think Arabs have tough character. After seeing Iraqis begging for surrender, people do not gave Arabs much weight. 2. People tended to think Arabs are a united people in fighting Isrealis. After Gulf War, seeing some Arab nations beated up Iraqis in order to waiver the debt to U.S. and Kuwaitis consistly trying to draw West nations to hit Iraq again, people started to see Arab World as a dog cage, echoing sound of barking.