waashk/20ng huggingface dataset:
In article <1993Apr19.234534.18368@kpc.com>, henrik@quayle.kpc.com  writes: > In article <C5qu5H.1IF@news.iastate.edu>, oyalcin@iastate.edu (Onur Yalcin) writes: > |>  > |> ..[cancellum]...  > |>  > |> > |> > > Onur Yalcin] Secondly, the island of which the name is more correctly spelled > Onur Yalcin] as Cyprus has never been Greek, but rather, it has been home to  > Onur Yalcin] a bi-communal society formed of Greeks and Turks. It seems that  >                ^^^^^^^^^^^ > Onur Yalcin] you know as little about the history and the demography of the  > Onur Yalcin] island, as you know about the essence of Turkey's  > Onur Yalcin] military intervention to it under international agreements. >  > 	bi-communal society ? Then why DID NOT Greece INVADE CYPRUS ?   Henrik (?),  Your ignorance manifests itself in an awkward form of intransigence. I'm not going to spend time to review with you the recent history of Cyprus. If you are really interested, I can provide you with a number of references on the issue. Just send me EMail for that.  > 	 > Onur Yalcin] Be that as it may, an analogy between an act of occupation in  > Onur Yalcin] history and what is going on today on Azerbaijani land, can only > Onur Yalcin] be drawn with the expansionist policy that Armenia is now        > pursuing. >  > 	Buch of CRAP and you know it. Nagarno-Karabagh has ALWAYS been PART  >         of ARMENIA and it was STALIN who GAVE IT to the AZERIS. Go back and >         review the HISTORY.   >  > 	The Armenians in Nagarno-Karabagh are simply DEFENDING their RIGHTS >         to keep their homeland and it is the AZERIS that are INVADING their  >         teritory. >  > Onur Yalcin] But, I could agree that it is not for us to issue diagnoses to  > Onur Yalcin] the political conduct of countries, and promulgate them in such  > Onur Yalcin] terminology as "itchy-bitchy"...  >  >        I was not the one that STATED IT.  >  Relax! You're swinging fists into open air... I was *agreeing* with you, assuming that would be one of your points that you did not state! You may  not be very much used to it, to be agreed with - that is, but take it more easily.  !:-)   	 >        However, I hope that the Armenians WILL force a TURKISH airplane  >        to LAND for purposes of SEARCHING for ARMS similar to the one  No, Henrik, believe me: You don't hope that.  >        that happened last SUMMER. Turkey searched an AMERICAN plane >        (carrying humanitarian aid) bound to ARMENIA. >   Was that after or before one French plane changed its route to avoid inspection???   -- Onur Yalcin  oyalcin@iastate.edu
In article <HM.93Apr26143210@barney.cs.brown.edu> hm@cs.brown.edu (Harry Mamaysky) writes: >In article <1993Apr25.171003.10694@thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu> ahmeda@McRCIM.McGill.EDU (Ahmed Abu-Abed) writes: > >	  DRIVING THE JEWS INTO THE SEA ?! > >   I am sick and tired of this 'DRIVING THE JEWS INTO THE SEA' sentance attributed >   to Islamic movements and the PLO; it simply can't be proven as part of their >   plan ! >  Proven?  Maybe not.  But it can certainly be verified beyond a reasonable doubt.  This statement and statements like it are a matter of public record.  Before the Six Day War (1967) I think Nasser and some other Arab leaders were broadcasting these statements on Arab radio.  You might want to check out some old newspapers Ahmed.   >   What Hamas and Islamic Jihad believe in, as far as I can get from the Arab media, >   is an Islamic state that protects the rights of all its inhabitants under Koranic >   Law.  I think if you take a look at the Hamas covenant (written in 1988) you might get a  different impression.  I have the convenant in the original arabic with a translation that I've verified with Arabic speakers.  The document is rife with calls to kill jews and spread Islam and so forth.
In article <ARENS.93Apr20192345@grl.ISI.EDU> arens@ISI.EDU (Yigal Arens) writes:  >At issue was not a trial behind closed doors, but arrest, trial and >imprisonment in complete secrecy.  This was appraently attempted in the >case of Vanunu and failed.  It has happened before, and there is reason >to believe it still goes on.  The lengthy article you quote doesn't imply this.  It only states that it is somehow POSSIBLE, not that it is in any way likely.  This is akin to an article saying that it is POSSIBLE that the USAF has several captured UFOs, without supporting the liklihood of such an assertion.  >Read this: >From Ma'ariv, February 18 (possibly 28), 1992 >PUBLICATION BAN > >By Baruch Me'iri > >All those involved in this matter politely refused my request, one way >or another: "Look, the subject is too delicate.  If I comment on it, I >will be implicitly admitting that it is true; If I mention a specific >case, even hint at it, I might be guilty of making public something >which may legally not be published".  In other words, they were telling a pesky reporter to keep guessing.  Israel maintains this same attitude about nuclear weapons it may or may not have.  The US maintains the same attitude about the presence of nuclear weapons on specific naval craft.  By refusing to acknowledge the existence of such weapons on specific ships, US warships have, I believe, become unwelcome in New Zealand, which has declared itself a nuclear-free-zone.    >The State of Israel has never officially admitted that for many years >there have been in its prisons Israeli citizens who were sentenced to >long prison terms without either the fact of their arrest or the >crimes of which they were accused ever being made public. More >precisely: A court ordered publication ban was placed on the fact of >their arrest, and later on their imprisonment.  The USAF has never officially admitted to having any UFOs, either.  >In Israel of 1993, citizens are imprisoned without us, the citizens of >this country, knowing anything about it.  Not knowing anything about >the fact that one person or another were tried and thrown in prison, >for security offenses, in complete secrecy.  This is stated as a fact without supporting evidence.  It would've been more convincing if your reporter had come up with just one name of someone who is sitting in jail, lost to the world, as he suggests. Maybe Elvis, or JFK, somebody.    Let's put it this way: If Israel has put people away without publicizing their arrests or the legal proceedings against them, how has their disappearance been explained?  People have relatives, friends and colleagues, you know.  Israel is not known as a place where people are made to vanish.  Would you care to give us a list of people whose whereabouts are unknown?  People who are presumed to be imprisoned?  This whole conspiracy story isn't something that we've come to associate with Yigal Arens before.  Perhaps from now on, we should.
From:  Kayhan Havai # 1026 --------------------------                                                o Dr. Namaki,  deputy minister of health stated that infant   mortality (under one year old) in Iran went down from 120    per  thousand before the revolution to 33 per thousand at   the end of 1371 (last month).      o Dr Namaki also stated that before the revolution only   254f children received vaccinations to protect them   from various deseases but this figure reached 93at   the end of 1371.      o Dr. Malekzadeh, the minister of health mentioned that   the population growth rate in Iran at the end of 1371   went below 2.7     o During the visit of Mahathir Mohammad, the prime minister   of Malaysia, to Iran, agreements for cooperation in the   areas of industry, trade, education and tourism were   signed. According to one agreement, Iran will be in   charge of building Malaysia's natural gas network.                            ----------------------------------------------------------                    - Farzin Mokhtarian
B8HA000 <B8HA@MUSICB.MCGILL.CA> writes:  >In Re:Syria's Expansion, the author writes that the UN thought >Zionism was Racism and that they were wrong.  They were correct >the first time, Zionism is Racism and thankfully, the McGill Daily >(the student newspaper at McGill) was proud enough to print an article >saying so.  If you want a copy, send me mail.  >Steve  Just felt it was important to add four letters that Steve left out of his Subject: header.
In article <2710@spam.maths.adelaide.edu.au> jaskew@spam.maths.adelaide.edu.au (Joseph Askew) writes: >In article <1smllm$m06@cville-srv.wam.umd.edu> aap@wam.umd.edu (Alberto Adolfo Pinkas) writes: > >>I consider that defining the belonging to a nation that claims the >>right to have a State based on religious belief is a form of racism. > >Although I don't want to muddy the waters unnecessarily I disagree. Any >discrimination based on religion is not and cannot be racist unless the >sole qualification for religious membership is racial.   In the same way in which antisemite means anti-Jewish and not anti-all- persons-of-who-are-semite, a "form of racism" means: A form of segregation against all those who are different based on the religious identification.  AAP
In article <C63r8F.76s@news.cso.uiuc.edu>, eshneken@ux4.cso.uiuc.edu (Edward A Shnekendorf) writes:  |> Israel - Happy 45th Birthday! |>   Anybody has any information about the number of the people have been killed by Israel  during these 44 HAPPY YEAR?
Net citizens! This is a desperate try to save our last course in university. We are writing a study about the Net, how it all started, about the people living in it, however trying to explain the basics of how it all works. That includes you, reader of this message. We would be more than grateful if we could get your answers to the following  questions;  1. For how many years have you known that Internet existed? 2. How often do you use the Net? (occasions per month) 3. Whatfor? (hobby, in your profession, socialy...) 4. How do you access the Net? (university, profession, friends, private...) 5. Has the Net taken over roles that other media played before? (telephone,     newspapers, TV, girlfriend...) 6. What newsgroups/type of information do you take part of? 7. Male or Female? 8. Age?     If you have the time;  9. What's your future visions about the Net? Limits and/or possibilities.  10.How do you think/hope law and censorship will change over time ahead?  We also want to apologize for taking up so much bandwidth with this. This request has been spread to 60 newsgroups, chosen at random, but,  you know how it is, term end is closing up, panic spreads. Email address:  fm91hn@hik.se  or  fm91pb@hik.se  Sincere Respect And May The Force Be With You All!
In article <1483500349@igc.apc.org> cpr@igc.apc.org (Center for Policy Research) writes: Ten Questions about arab countries ----------------------------------  I would be thankful if any of you who live in arab countries could help to provide accurate answers to the following specific questions. These are indeed provocative questions but they are asked time and again by people around me.  1.      Is it true that many arab countries don't recognize Israeli nationality ?  That people with Israeli stamps on their passports can't enter arabic countries?  2.      Is it true that arabic countries such as Jordan and Syria have undefined borders and that arab governments from 1948 until today have refused to state where the ultimate borders of their states should be?  3.      Is it true that arab countires refused to sign the Chemical weapon convention treaty in Paris in 1993?  4.      Is it true that in arab prisons there are a number of individuals which were tried in secret and for which their identities, the date of their trial and their imprisonment are state secrets ?  4a.	Is it true that some arab countries, like Syria, harbor Nazi war criminals, and refuse to extradite them?  4b.	Is it true that some arab countries, like Saudi Arabia, prohibit women from driving cars?  5.      Is it true that Jews who reside in the Muslim countries are subject to different laws than Muslims?  6.      Is it true that arab countries confiscated the property of entire Jewish communites forced to flee by anti-Jewish riots?  7.      Is it true that Israel's Prime Minister, Y. Rabin, signed a chemical weapons treaty that no arab nation was willing to sign?  8.      Is it true that Syrian Jews are required to leave a $10,000 deposit before leaving the country, and are no longer allowed to emmigrate, despite promises made by Hafez Assad to George Bush?  9.	 Is it true that Jews in Muslim lands are required to pay a special tax, for being Jews?  10.     Is it true that Intercontinental Hotel in Jerusalem was built on a Jewish cemetary, with roads being paved over grave sites, and gravestones being used in Jordanian latrines?  11.	Is it really cheesy and inappropriate to post lists of biased leading questions?  11a.	Is it less appropriate if information implied in Mr. Davidsson's questions is highly misleading?  Adam  Adam Shostack 				       adam@das.harvard.edu
backon@vms.huji.ac.il writes:  >In article <1483500349@igc.apc.org>, cpr@igc.apc.org (Center for Policy Research) writes: >>  >> >> 4.      Is it true that in Israeli prisons there are a number of >> individuals which were tried in secret and for which their >> identities, the date of their trial and their imprisonment are >> state secrets ?   >Apart from Mordechai Vanunu who had a trial behind closed doors, there was one >other espionage case (the nutty professor at the Nes Ziona Biological >Institute who was a K.G.B. mole) who was tried "in camera". I wouldn't exactly >call it a state secret. The trial was simply tried behind closed doors. I hate >to disappoint you but the United States has tried a number of espionage cases >in camera.  One of those US cases was John Pollard.
In article <1993Apr19.223054.10273@cirrus.com> chrism@cirrus.com (Chris Metcalfe) writes: >Now we have strong evidence of where the CPR really stands. >Unbelievable and disgusting.  It only proves that we must >never forget... > > >>A unconventional proposal for peace in the Middle-East. > >Not so unconventional.  Eugenic solutions to the Jewish Problem >have been suggested by Northern Europeans in the past. > >  Eugenics: a science that deals with the improvement (as by >  control of human mating) of hereditory qualities of race >  or breed.  -- Webster's Ninth Collegiate Dictionary. > >>I would be thankful for critical comments to the above proposal as >>well for any dissemination of this proposal for meaningful >>discussion and enrichment. >> >>Elias Davidsson Post Box 1760 121 Reykjavik, ICELAND > >Critical comment: you can take the Nazi flag and Holocaust photos >off of your bedroom wall, Elias; you'll never succeed. > >-- Chris Metcalfe  Chris, solid job at discussing the inherent Nazism in Mr. Davidsson's post. Oddly, he has posted an address for hate mail, which I think we should all utilize.  And Elias,  Wie nur dem Koph nicht alle Hoffnung schwindet, Der immerfort an schalem Zeuge klebt?
>>>>> On 15 Apr 93 03:13:49 GMT, amehdi@src.honeywell.com (Hossien Amehdi) said: In article <1993Apr15.031349.21824@src.honeywell.com> amehdi@src.honeywell.com (Hossien Amehdi) writes:  . . .  >> Who is the you Arabs here.  Since you are replying to my article you >> are assuming that I am an Arab.  Well, I'm not an Arab, but I think you >> are brain is full of shit if you really believe what you said.  The >> bombardment of civilian and none civilian areas in Lebanon by Israel is >> very consistent with its policy of intimidation.  That is the only >> policy that has been practiced by the so called only democracy in >> the middle east!  >> I was merley pointing out that the other side is also suffering. >> Like I said, I'm not an Arab but if I was, say a Lebanese, you bet >> I would defende my homeland against any invader by any means.                                        ^^^ The Syrians?  Iranian agents?  Or just Israeli invaders? -- @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@   --------------- Gary Bradski                  I'net: bradski@park.bu.edu       | reverberate |   Cognitive and Neural Systems                                   --------------- Boston University.                                                 |  V V 111 Cummington St, Boston MA 02215                                 ^   Y 617/ 353-6426                                                     ^ ^  |
Are you trying to say that there were no massacres in Deir Yassin or in Sabra and Shatila? If so then let me tell you some good jokes:  There is not and was not any such thing like jewish killing in WWII  Palestinians just did what Davidians did for fourty years and more.  In fact no one was killed in any war at any time or any place.  People die that is all. No one gets killed.  Maybe also vietamiese didn't die in Vietnam war killed by american napalm they were just pyromaniacs and that's all.  Maybe jews just liked gas chambers and no one forced them to get in there.they  may be thought it was like snifing cocaine. No?  What do you think of this ? Isn't it stupid to say so? Well it is as stupid as what you said .Next time you want to lie do it intelligently.  Sincerely yours.
Wow!  It's sad to see that the University of Virginia has begun to produce such a virulent breed of Jew-haters and self-hating Jews!
In article <2BCE6222.24844@news.service.uci.edu> tclock@orion.oac.uci.edu (Tim Clock) writes: >In article <2BCA3DC0.13224@news.service.uci.edu> tclock@orion.oac.uci.edu (Tim Clock) writes: >> >>The latest Israeli "proposal", first proposed in February of 1992, contains  >>the following assumptions concerning the nature of any "interim status" refering to the WB and Gaza, the Palestinians, implemented by negotiations. It >>states that:     >>   >Israel will remain the existing source of authority until "final status" >>    is agreed upon; >>   >The exercise of powers under the ISGA will be subject to cooperation and  >>    coordination with Israel.  >>   >Israel will negotiate delegation of powers and responsibilities in the  >>    areas of administration, justice, personnel, agriculture, education, >>    business, tourism, labor and social welfare, local police, >>    local transportation and communications, municipal affairs and religious >>    affairs. >> >>The Palestinian counterproposal of March 1992: >>   >There will be no limitations on its (PISGA) powers and responsibilities  >>    "except those which derive from its character as an interim arrangement"; >>   >It will have a strong police force responsible for security and public >>    order in the OPT; >>   >It can request the assistance of a UN peacekeeping force; >>   >Disputes with Israel over self-governing arrangements will be settled by  >>    a committee composed of representatives of the five permanent members of >>    the UN Security Council, the Secretary General (of the UN), the PISGA,  >>    Jordan, Egypt, Syria and Israel. >> I have read that there will be some concrete proposals concerning creation of a "palestinian police force" during the talk's next stage.  Does anyone knows of the details of this idea? How does it "fit" with the differing conceptions listed above?
With regards to my condemnation of Marc's ridiculous attacks on the American Department of Justice, and further attacks on Jews, to anyone who took offense to my calling Marc stupid, I apologize for pointing out the obvious.  It was a waste of the Net's time.  I hope, though, that most American citizens have the basic knowlege of the structure of American government to understand the relationship between the Justice Department as a part of the Executive Branch, and the Courts, which are of the Judicial Branch.   Marc's ignorance of basic civic knowlege underscores his inability to comprehend and interpret foreign affairs.
In article <1qhv50$222@bagel.cs.huji.ac.il> ranen@falafel.cs.huji.ac.il (Ranen Goren) writes: >Q: How many Nick Steel's does it take to twist any truth around? >A: Only one, and thank God there's only one. > >	Ranen.  Absolutely not true! There are lots of them!
In article <1qev18INNnk7@early-bird.think.com>, shaig@Think.COM (Shai Guday) writes: >In article <1993Apr13.142902.14479@thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu>, hasan@McRCIM.McGill.EDU  writes:  >|> As for israelis, Menahim Begal Begin and Yitzhak Shakh Shamir were leaders >                            ^^^^^                   ^^^^^ >Cute, real cute.  Now can you please stop being childish and get on >with the issues? > >|> of many of these gangs that massacred Palestineans and became the >|> HEROS of israel and its Prime ministers. Oh sorry I forgot Ben Gurion, >|> too. I hope he is enjoying his coffin . Now, if israelis donot support >|> (which i doubt) the oppression and killing from 1930's-now,   You probably mean the mass murders of Jews in the West Bank between 1936-1939.     >|> Hasan  >Shai Guday   Naftaly
In article <1srplfINNkth@MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU> jovanovic-nick@yale.edu (Nick Jovanovic) writes: >In article <1sredr$72b@venus.haverford.edu> Michael Sells <m_sells@haverford.edu> writes: > >> ... I find it interesting that Mr. Major finds the genocide of two >>million Muslims in Bosnia acceptable ...   > > >Now you are actually claiming that 2,000,000 Muslims have been killed >in B-H??? >          What if we remove one zeron and make it "the genocide of two hundred         thousands Muslims in Bosnia..", would that make it any better..?         And how about the 2,000,000 Muslims who were driven and continue to         be driven out of their homes..? is that "utterly ridiculous claim"?         And how about the rapes (over 60,000 women) and the concentration          camps..? The us delegation which visited them reported yesterday         on CNN that the serbs are giving the muslims detainees 4 biscuits         and a cup of water a day..!!??         That sure also sounds like an "utterly ridiculous claim".!  >Please substantiate this utterly ridiculous claim. > >-Nick > >
In article <C65DA7.2ME@bony1.bony.com>, jake@bony1.bony.com (Jake Livni) writes: |> In article <1993Apr27.011549.7010@thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu> hamid@McRCIM.McGill.EDU (Hamid Reza Mohammadi Daniali) writes: |> > |> >In article <C63r8F.76s@news.cso.uiuc.edu>, eshneken@ux4.cso.uiuc.edu (Edward A Shnekendorf) writes: |> > |> >|> Israel - Happy 45th Birthday! |> >|>  |> > |> >Anybody has any information about the number of the people have been killed |> >by Israel  during these 44 HAPPY YEAR? |> > |> >Hamid |>  |>  |> What's this?  Another idiot from McRCIM.McGill.EDU?  Or are these all |> the same dope using different accounts? |>   I asked some simple questions at different occations. I don't understand why some people insulted me for those SIMPLE questions! Anyway, I didn't reply to them with the same language and I won't, because  1. There is no need 2. There is no benefit  3. I don't have time  to reply to those garbages  By the way, do you want to know who am I? I am not a NATIONALIST Arab of 1967.  I am not a COMONIST Arab of 70's. Are you sure that you want to hear  my name? I am a MUSLIM FIGHTER. I am the same child who  fight with your armed soldier with stone! I am the same guy who wants to  bring JUSTICE to Palestine, I am the same fighter who wants to kicked Israel out of south Lebonon in the same way of the  1982. I am the son of KHOMEINI. I am honored to be a HEZBULLAH.... Don't you know me!!!? Just ask Rabin he knows me!   Hamid
Why do you insist on reposting the entire original post? Don't waste bandwidth, please.  You know how picky us non- Jews can be.  Ha Ha. :|