waashk/20ng huggingface dataset:
In article <C6z32r.AH9@news2.cis.umn.edu> prabhak@giga.cs.umn.edu (Satya Prabhakar) writes:     I guess that it was not acceptable because Germany *also* chose    a path of aggression simultaneously that put the interests of    other countries in peril. I wonder whether US or other countries    would have risked themselves if only Jews were persecuted and    Hitler had no imperialist ambitions. (I am no student of history    and I am just asking questions.)  I don't think they would have.  After all the U.S. was one of the countries that turned away Jewish refugees when there was still time to get them out.  (Considered and rejected at the Cabinet level then..)     ...    Under what conditions should US interfere in foregin countries,    is an abstraction one must clarify before resorting to acrimonious    accusations of religious bigotry and such.  As I understand it, International law provides the right of any country to intervene to prevent genocide.  I think once the World Court has ruled that genocide is being committed...   If a Human Rights Czar is appointed at the U.N., we could have international monitors recording events and responses of local officials and develop an objective basis.  This could be backed by adjudication at the International Court of Justice and enforcement through a Rapid Deployment Force under the U.N. Secretary General's command.  I would like to see the U.N.  directly impose ICJ rulings whenever feasible (without the possibility of vetos at the UN Security Council.. much as the President can't veto a U.S. Supreme Court ruling).    The U.S. is now supporting the effort to appoint the HR Czar -- the third world opposition is led by three countries, China, Iran and Pakistan (What company is Pakistan keeping!).    The U.S. is also reconsidering its opposition to the U.N. force initially envisaged in the Charter (although under the control of the Security Council).  The UN SC is quite a flawed body.  Rogue governments like the PRC have even threatened their veto in the last few months to block the move to place U.N. troops in Bosnia under Chapter 7 instead of 11 (if I have the numbers straight) where they could have moved from being a monitoring to an enforcement force without requiring further SC action.  (The PRC even continues to threaten using its veto on U.N. action despite the ICJ ruling.  The current set-up requires the SC to enforce ICJ rulings..).  Peace,
rj3s@Virginia.EDU  writes in: Message-ID: <1993Apr26.202714.4519@Virginia.EDU> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1993 20:27:14 GMT   First, the following two quite normal phrases:      >  Why did not anyone venture to answer Andi's question in an intelligent >  and unoffending manner?                                    ^^^^^^^^^^^           ^^^^^^^^^^^ >  Now will we please start having some INTELLIGENT conversation?                                         ^^^^^^^^^^^     and then he shows us what HE means by "intelligent and unoffending manner"  and "INTELLIGENT conversation":     >  I have never seen such immaturity among semitophiles.                                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^    [...deleted lines...]  >  The only ones guilty here of not backing up there viewpoints >  with fact are the Israelophiles.                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^    [...deleted lines...]        >  You all are an insult to you race! {assuming you are also semitic}     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^      [...deleted lines...]                                                          Later he reveals the truth:  >  ... I mention this not because I'm anti semitic [I'm part Jewish] .....                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^     [...deleted lines...]      Shurely he IS an anti-Semite (call it anti-Jew), maybe BECAUSE he    is "part Jewish"  (e.g. his mother might have *dated*  a Jew who    didn't marry her, and so she got a little bastard whom she taught    hatred).          He is also a coward since he doesn't dare to sign with his name.      At the end he signs with a highly intelligent and intellectual     phrase:      >                            Pissed off at Immature, >                          Closeminded, Self righteous >	                            Semites    rj3s@Virginia.EDU  writes in: Message-ID: <1993Apr26.203425.4824@Virginia.EDU> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1993 20:34:25 GMT  >  You know ed ,...  You're right!  Andi shouldn't be comparing >  Israel to the Nazis.  The Israelis are much worse than the >  Nazis ever were anyway.  The Nazis did a lot of good for >  Germany, and they would have succeeded if it weren't for the >  damn Jews.  The Holocaust never happened anyway.  Ample >  evidence given by George Schafer at Harvard, Dept. of History, >  and even by Randolph Higgins at NYU, have shown that the >  Holocaust was just a semitic conspiracy created to obtain >  sympathy to piush for the creation of Israel.     The  Nazis  might also have sent this bastard to the gas chambers    because of his "part Jewish"ness (only that he is not aware of it).     PS: I wonder what kind of educational institution is @virginia.edu.     Could it be the "Free KKK-University of Virginia" ? ;-)       -----------------------------------------------------------------------------   Manfredo Tichauer M.                       EMAIL : tichauer@valpso.hanse.de   Opitzstrasse 14                            VOICE :     (++ 49 40)  27.42.27   2000 Hamburg 60 - GERMANY                  FAX   :     (++ 49 40) 270.53.09
bf3833@pyuxe.cc.bellcore.com (feigenbaum,benjamin) writes:  >I recently read that during Bill Clinton's campaign, he stated >that if elected he would immediately recognize Jerusalem as >Israel's capital.  According to the article, Mr. Clinton >reaffirmed this after winning the presidency.  However, >during recent talks with President Mubarak, Secretary of >State Christopher stated that "the status of Jerusalem >will be a final matter of discussion between the parties".  >Now I don't want to start a big discussion over the status >of Jerusalem.  All I want to know is if anyone can  >authenticate Mr. Clinton's statements with dates, places, etc.  From a recent interview in Middle East Insight magazine, Clinton said that he supports moving the US Embassy to Jerusalem, but would not do so at this time because it would interrupt the peace talks.   -- msilverm@nyx.cs.du.edu				GO CUBS!!!
While one may question the motives of the Arabs who sold land to Jews, often while publicly criticizing the sale of land to Jews, it was the Jews and not the Arabs who were taken advantage of, as the prices the Jews paid for barren land was many times the price fertile land was being sold for in the United States at the same time.
In article <C5ut1s.3xA@bony1.bony.com> jake@bony1.bony.com (Jake Livni) writes: >through private contributions on Federal land".  Your hate-mongering >article is devoid of current and historical fact, intellectual content >and social value.  Down the toilet it goes..... >  And we all know what an unbiased source the NYT is when it comes to things concerning Israel.  Neither the Times nor the trained seals who have responded thus far seem to recognize the statement that these "private funds" were all tax exmpt.  In otherwords, American taxpayers put up at least 30% of the money.  And finalyy, how does "Federal land" mitigate the offensiveness of this alien monument dedicated to perpetuating pitty and the continual flow of tax money to a foreign entity?
In <1993Apr5.194120.7010@urartu.sdpa.org> dbd@urartu.sdpa.org (David Davidian) writes:  >David Davidian says: Turkish officials came to Armenia last September and  >Armenia given assurances the Armenian nuclear plant would stay shut. Turkey >promised Armenia electricity, and in the middle of December 1992, Turkey said >sorry we were only joking. Armenia froze this past winter -- 30,000 Armenians >lost their lives. Turkey claims it allowed "humanitarian" aid to enter Armenia >through its border with Turkey. What did Turkey do, it replaced the high  >quality grain from Europe with "crap" from Turkey, mixed in dirt, and let that  >garbage through to Armenia -- 30,000 Armenians lost their lives!    This is the latest from UPI        Foreign Ministry spokesman Ferhat Ataman told journalists Turkey was      closing its air space to all flights to and from Armenia and would      prevent humanitarian aid from reaching the republic overland across      Turkish territory.        Historically even the most uncivilized of peoples have exhibited     signs of compassion by allowing humanitarian aid to reach civilian    populations. Even the Nazis did this much.     It seems as though from now on Turkey will publicly pronounce     themselves 'hypocrites' should they choose to continue their    condemnation of the Serbians.    --
In article <C5wpAD.74K@specialix.com> jim@specialix.com (Jim Maurer) writes: >arf@genesis.MCS.COM (Jack Schmidling) writes: >>> > > >>recognize the statement that these "private funds" were all tax exmpt.  In > >The donations are tax deductible like any donations to a non-profit >organization.  I've donated money to a group restoring streetcars >and it was tax deductible.  Why don't you contribute to a group >helping the homeless if you so concerned?  I do (did) contribute to the ARF mortgage fund but when interest rates plumetted, I just paid it off.  The problem is, I couldn't convince Congress to move my home to  a nicer location on Federal land.  BTW, even though the building is alleged to be funded by tax exempt private funds, the maintainence and operating costs will be borne by  taxpayers forever.  Would anyone like to guess how much that will come to and tell us why this point is never mentioned?
tichauer@valpso.hanse.de  writes: > >  reporting the events. I doubt the Propaganda machine of Goering >                                                            ^^^^^^^  >  >    and later, as somebody informed you about your gross mistake, you  	None of you guys noticed my "Gross Mistake" 'cause you don't have a clue. I noticed the misspeaking myself and corrected it. I doubt you would have ever noticed.  >    I'm sure you learned the history of Nazi Germany AND Austria from >    your family.   	Actually I've read books and taken courses on the subject. Ah yes and like you lived in the greater Deutschland.    >   Trying to make comparisons between Israels politics and Nazi German- >   Austrian politics shows only your degree of ignorance (high), intellect >   (low), humanity (none)   You guys are funny. It's funny to see people lose control and start the name calling when they realize they have no point.  > I respect anybody >   who dissagrees with me as long as he respects me and discusses in a >   civilized manner. I would never say that anybody that critizises Israel >   and/or its politics is an antisemite  Could have fooled me.  > I don't know what you >   call a "Civil Libertarian" (never heard about them) but I know only >   one thing: if all of them think like you do it, then "Civil Libertarians" >   is a new denomination for Antisemites. May other Civil Libertarians come >   to word to this group so that we can learn if A.Beyer and me are right >   (that Civil Libertarians are Antisemites) 	I understand how individual liberties (freedom of speach, religion etc.) could be a thing you "never heard about". Actually, Civil Libertarians believe in the fundamental freedoms that belong to human beings. They would support the Jews against the Nazis or anyone else who tries to oppress them and they would support the Arabs against the Israelis and any other such oppressive regimes (Iraq etc.)    >   BTW, I couldn't care less for what Andi Beyer appreciates.   Well actually now that you mentioned here are a few things I appreciate:  1. Politeness 2. Stimulating conversation 3. A red rose 4. New York in june and a good Gerschwinn tune 5. A chocalate Sundae 6. Really angry out of controll funny people
In article <1993Apr20.214322.8698@kpc.com> henrik@quayle.kpc.com  writes: >In article <1993Apr20.131336@IASTATE.EDU>, oyalcin@IASTATE.EDU (Onur Yalcin) writes: >OY] ...[deleted]... >OY]  >OY] If you are really interested, I can provide you with a number of references >OY] on the issue.  Just send me EMail for that.   > >	You think I am that STUPID to ask you for REFERENCES !  NOT ! >	I have many GREEK friends that I could ask for the INFO if I >	needed. I have already read many articles and DO NOT need >	your help. Boy, how generous !! >  There is a very narrow margin of stupidity between accepting my references and those of the Greeks, and you just said you'd rather do the latter! That's fine with me. I was sincere in my offer, but this saves me the effort. It doesn't take a half-brained man to go to any library and check out a bunch of sources of decent objectivity. Just ask a good friend for help. !:-)   "Stay on these roads,"  Onur Yalcin --  Onur Yalcin  oyalcin@iastate.edu
In article <dj80734@pro-angmar.alfalfa.com> cosmo@pro-angmar.alfalfa.com (Frank Benson) writes: >You definetly are in need of a shrink, loser!
In article <C5yxLE.4ov@cbfsb.cb.att.com> enis@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (enis.surensoy) writes:  >>From article <9304202021@zuma.UUCP>, by sera@zuma.UUCP (Serdar Argic): >>Armenians will not get away with the genocide of 204,000 Azeri people.  >	On the contrary, Armenians will get away with the genocide of  >	204,000 Azeri people.  >	Armenians already got away with raping, torturing, and massacering  >	millions of innocent Moslem peoples of Eastern Anatolia.   Not this time, Enis. Furthermore, a new generation has risen - equipped  with a deep sense of commitment, politically mature and conscious, who  determinedly pursue the Turkish Cause, through all necessary means,  ranging from the political and diplomatic to the armed struggle. In  other words, what we have is a demand from the fascist government of x-Soviet Armenia to redress the wrongs that were done against our people.     "The crime of systematic cleansing by mass killing and extermination    of the Muslim population in the Soviet Republic of Armenia, Karabag,    Bosnia and Herzegovina is an 'Islamic Holocaust' comparable to the    extermination of 2.5 million Muslims by the Armenian Government    during the WWI and of over 6 million European Jews during the WWII."                   (Tovfik Kasimov - Azeri Leader - September 25, 1992)                     "Today's ethnic cleansing policies by the Serbian dictatorship against   Croatians and Muslims of Yugoslavia, as well as the Soviet Republic   of Armenia's against the Muslim population of neighboring Azerbaijan,   are really no different in their aspirations than the genocide    perpetrated by the Armenian Government 78 years ago against the   Turkish and Kurdish Muslims and Sephardic Jews living in these   lands."         (Cebbar Leygara - Kurdish Leader - October 13, 1992)   Serdar Argic
In article <C5ztEt.Dwz.1@cs.cmu.edu> anwar+@cs.cmu.edu (Anwar Mohammed) writes: >In article <C5u4qI.Mz4@apollo.hp.com> nelson_p@apollo.hp.com (Peter Nelson) writes: >>                                 >>  BTW, with Bosnia's large Moslem population, why have nations like  >>  Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Egypt, and others with either money  >>  or strong military forces not spoken out more forcibly or offered  >>  to help out Bosnia?    > >Obviously, you really don't know. > >They *have* spoken out (cf Sec'y of State Christopher's recent trip to the ME),    Note the clause "more forcibly", above.     My point is that they have   made a few pro-forma, perfunctory remarks, and sent in a few C-130's and   so forth, but it's clearly not something they're losing much sleep over.   They're just going through the motions, while Moslems are being "ethnically   cleansed" out of what used to be Yugoslavia.   The US has been speaking   out far more loudly than the Moslem nations in the UN and other world   forums.   >>  Besides, there's no case that can be made for US military involvement >>  there that doesn't apply equally well to, say, Liberia, Angola, or >>  (it appears with the Khmer Rouge's new campaign) Cambodia.   Non-whites >>  don't count? > >Hmm...some might say Kuwaitis are non-white. Ooops, I forgot, Kuwaitis are >"oil rich", "loaded with petro-dollars", etc so they don't count.    Precisely.   Humanitarian concerns were not the primary justification   for US involvement in the Gulf - oil and geopolitics were.  If the    the Kuwaitis didn't have oil (and assuming Iraq still saw fit to    invade them) I doubt you would have seen Operation Desert Storm.