case of intentional interference with contractual relations
presented a strong case for intentional interference as Driving Force appeared to make is hard for Slater to perform its contractual duties In a case of intentional interference with contractual relations the claim is: the injured business's contractual relations were wrongfully interfered with by another party The elements of the tort of intentional interference with contractual relations include: the existence of a contractual relationship between the injured business and another party the wrongdoer's knowledge of the contractual relationship between the injured business and another party intentional interference with the contractual relationship In Gieseke v.