you incorrectly infer from the agreement to include other pictures that all editors have agreed to delete the photo you propose to delete there was no consensus to delete the photo there was your demand that that the photo was unrepresentative and there were other editors acting to find photos to assuage your demands by providing other photos that would meet your demands that doesn't imply agreement with your demand to delete a factual photo it is not an explicit expression of consensus at least on other editor involved in the discussion at that time tareq is disputing your assertion of consensus and i am disputing your claims that the photo is unrepresentative the basis for deleting it and the existence of your alleged consensus now the picture of the wall that you want to delete is very significant it shows the ugliness of the israeli wall there is no rule that says photos must be representative a photo is a factual representation of the facts this is aone part of the wall deleting it is a form of cesorship of the reality of the wall in at least some places in any case how is representativeness determined your opinion does not suffice what percentage of the wall is fence and what percent is wall what is the representative appearance in populated areas what is considered a representative portion what are the future final plans for the wall's appearance the photo will be returned top the article without deleting any other photo adding information is preferable to deleting information dec utc