deleted pseudoscience page comes back to life a wiki page entitled crossfire fusor that was deleted in october as a result of this afd debate now appears to have come back to life in a new page here as discussed in the afd the above page appears to be pseudoscientific nonsense strung together by a year old guy named moacir l ferreira from curitiba brazil who has a degree in computational science and clearly a very active sci fi imagination another apparent bit of pseudoscience by moacir l ferreira implanted on wikipedia can be found here these pages should be nominated for deletion clearly there is an intent to populate wikipedia with his self published pseudoscience however phase displacement space drive will have to go to wp afd message to wrt kunjaliyan the article was not deleted it was moved to the article incubator as a result of this discussion because the film has not yet been released if i had not done this then the article most likely would have been deleted the article is at wikipedia article incubator kunjaliyan you are welcome to work on it there and when the film is released and or it gets more coverage then it can be moved back into article space user amyabaker noddle i received this message but as you fully protected page anthony you were involved at user talk amyabaker noddle i think the full protection in this situation is uncontroversial enough that you can unprotect it yourself i will have to log off soon and i'd like to post the changes now instead of later thank you i have updated the draft with my changes i'll trust anthony's judgement on this matter but normally it's reasonable to protect pages that are temporarily restored for drv i understand that pages restored for drv are generally protected however because this was a speedy deletion and because i had addressed the speedy deletion reason with a rewrite i think it was a good application of unprotection an afd you closed was restarted two days later you closed wikipedia articles for deletion world of books ltd as no consensus and phearson who said delete in that debate two days after your close opened a new afd at wikipedia articles for deletion world of books ltd nd nomination can you speedy close this and warn him of the rules while i didn't say with leave to speedy renominate there wasn't a lot of participation in the first afd so let's let this one run its course what would help is if you or another one of the keep voters could find another supersource or to compliment the