on inspection the references to ' ' in the 'jim bell' article are not footnoted and they never have been since skomorokh added them years ago the ap essay was begun about april and eventually grew to include parts the first parts were written in and were published immediately as they were written part was a copy of an article by a journalist paul maxwell writing in the asahi evening news english language newspaper in japan it and parts and were written about february you can be sure that by july 'the feds' were well aware of the content of the then growing ap essay the feds subsequently concealed their early knowledge of the ap article one technique they used when the applied for a warrant was for the affiant to claim something like 'i first became aware of the ap essay on ' that specific affiant 'affidavit writer' for you who don't know the law may very well have 'first become aware' on some late date but that doesn't mean that other feds weren't aware months or well over a year before it served the purposes of the feds to make it appear not merely that the ap essay was written far closer to bell's may arrest but also to conceal the fact of their agent walsh wilson's involvement perhaps one year prior to bell's first attendance of mcclc meetings why it sounds much more like an 'emergency' if something happened yesterday or last week they certainly wouldn't have wanted to have to tell the judge 'well bell wrote this terrible essay two years ago' this explains i believe why skomorokh claimed the ap essay was written in ' ' and furthermore gave no references ' ' at least december sounds reasonably close to early 'april ' on the other hand sounds like an eternity from may the month bell was arrested