'neutral pov' in conflict with mainstream scientific consensus this article like all wiki's purports to have i 'scientific focus wikipedia is an encyclopedia and its content on scientific and quasi scientific topics will primarily reflect current mainstream scientific consensus ' and ii 'neutral point of view as applied to science wikipedia neutral point of view a fundamental policy requires fair representation of significant alternatives to scientific orthodoxy significant alternatives in this case refers to legitimate scientific disagreement as opposed to pseudoscience ' surely there is already a cultural bias in the west reflected in its science which effectively imposes some kind of conversion therapy or its opposite on its citizens there is a manufactured consensus arrived at by undemocratic and concealed means that 'it's okay to be lgbt ' which doesn't come clean about the physical and social consequences