captions on opentask hello i just wanna say that adding the captions line on opentask was a great idea cheers jul utc re huntsville alabama vincity yes i did mean vincinty user patricknoddy user talk patricknoddy august mmiv edt article licensing hi i've to get users to multi license all of their contributions that they've made to either all u s state county and city articles or all articles using the creative commons attribution share alike cc by sa v and v licenses or into the public domain if they prefer the cc by sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to wikipedia's license the gfdl but it allows other projects such as wikitravel to use our articles since you are among the top wikipedians by edits i was wondering if you would be willing to multi license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles over of people asked have agreed for more information multi licensing faq lots of questions answered multi licensing guide to allow us to track those users who muli license their contributions many users copy and paste the duallicensewithcc bysa dual template into their user page but there are other options at template messages user namespace the following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page option i agree to wikipedia multi licensing multi license all my contributions with the exception of my user pages as described below duallicensewithcc bysa dual or option i agree to wikipedia multi licensing multi license all my contributions to any u s state county or city article as described below duallicensewithcc bysa dual or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain you could replace duallicensewithcc bysa dual with multilicensepd if you only prefer using the gfdl i would like to know that too please let me know what you think at my talk page it's important to know either way so no one keeps asking comment talk rleigon section in marshall tx you need to add a religion section in the marshall tx article its a joke that their isn't one now i think it was diliberately excluded by the person that wrote it