sir maam thank you for the heads up about needing to sign corrections to pages all of the information i have added to the article on walter butler the loyalist can easily be verified by using for the revolutionary pension applications or by consulting the bloodied mohawk which picton press and i published in which footnotes the primary source document of every fact printed within the book i think it important to note that the pensioners name possibly three different patriots as the killer of walter butler i have posted on my website a page with all of the known references to walter butler's death which can be readily found in primary source materials i hate using secondary and tertiary sources for obvious reasons and am very pleased that wikipedia org has dramatically increased its documentation requirements for its articles thank you please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to walter butler loyalist please cite a reliable source for all of your information thank you deconstructhis talk i must in all fairness ask what the problem is with original research are you implying that original and authentic research is not appropriate for wikipedia there is way way to much trash out there on the internet which cannot be in any way verified my additions to the butler page were not suppositions rather eyewitness statements as to what really happened to butler unfortunately the webmaster of is a personal and friendly acquaintance of mine but he and many other historians have bought into the early undocumented histories of the mohawk valley most of which i have spent the last twenty five plus years trying to authenticate as at least seventeen of my own ancestors fought in the mohawk valley during the revolution and regurgitated their unbelievable and unverifiable facts as their own research please do not misunderstand i am not upset get confused i would really like to see all of the content of the internet be so reliable that anyone could simply look it up on the web and then contact the repository of the original document pay the appropriate fee for copying it and then have their own private library of primary source documents hope this finds all well p s the copyrighted material that i incorrectly posted in wikipedia was an article entirely of my own production and which was copied from my master copies of the pages of primary source data on my site this can be easily verified by my publisher picton press and a plethora of fellow researchers some of whom agree with me and some who do not