ref is handled it no longer exists on the spacex site as far as i can tell so i pulled from archive org performed lots of other citation fixes including fixing a couple of urls that were incorrect i also agree that the forum cite should be removed if a replacement cannot be located the material needs to be excised in my opinion all the newspacewatch com articles should be replaced since they've gone completely paywall i'll be surprised if they survive even though i've added archive links to all four of those cites i'll come back and clean up various conversion issues definitely si before non si in space related articles but i didn't immediately see much in the way of spelling issues there's some formatting work to be done but doesn't seem too bad as for images they simply don't exist at this point in time spacex is after all a private company and conducts their testing in house i'm always keeping an eye out for them but i don't expect anything until this version of the rocket is used for a nasa mission however lack of media should not disqualify the article from any status even as featured article i recall one last year that was passed without free media editors cannot be held responsible in situations like this i agree that rocket could be dropped from the title as redundant or use something like spacex reusable rocket program eh t c