bingo it's an encyclopedia chemerinsky's argument for example was considered by the court and rejected this is not an opinion piece it's an encyclopedia entry on a specific court case in this case the court's decision is the court's decision vis a vis this particular consideration apparently not only are you not an attorney you're having some problems sorting out why an entry on one court case shouldn't be balanced in terms of argument the reason why is that a decision was rendered reargue it somewhere else this court is the final arbiter of this court's decision on this case if it is reheard by the full court or the supreme court you'll get another bite at the apple you and saltyboatr among others apparently wish it were otherwise not only am i not some chickensh t anonymous pundit you can reach me at marty eble yahoo com get a law degree or quite mucking the entry up you can make a new entry on second amendment controversy if you're that excited