didn't call it abuse of administrator's rights at all ever as i said there was no consensus in the afd as of yet in addition you clearly don't understand what the purpose of an afd is a person disagreeing with consensus and presenting alternative arguments is perfectly fine in the case of the afd you're referring to i presented an argument about his notability that is perfectly solid based on our established guidelines for biographies just because a person disagrees with you doesn't mean that it's abuse of powers or disruptive