discussion of censorship in this section if editors wish to rely upon policy to censor do not choose only the bits that you need to manipulate the discussion to form a directed conclusion first the policy that was mis quoted here on this page applied to harrassment it required an un involved administrator to invoke you are clearly not second the community explicitly rejected censorship of records in the public domain there was no consensus found to censor such knowledge from our encyclopedia readers no consensus found rejected idea third the correspondence is unequivocally irrevocably and famously in the public domain and is clearly allowed by the arbcom editing principle referred to above in short the policy quoted does not apply as one can clearly see from the distinctions made regarding on wiki harassment and the rejected proposal and secondly as an involved editor in the subject it is not your place