future perfect thanks for warning the ip editor however even though the ip was edit warring with two editors you allowed the edit to stand if you look at you will see that this ip started up with vandalism to a related article and that the second revert had a reason given removed disputed information inserted for political reasons by opponents of irvto influence voters in an important referendum vote in burlington vt on town meeting day which on the face establishes a political agenda for the edit it's true i used a vandalism template but because of the history of actual vandalism and i also noted that there might be a good faith purpose to the edit i wonder if you might consider taking the article back to the pre political agenda state as it would be a bit inconvenient for me to do it at the moment as to the content i have not seen a discussion of that content i am familiar with the history reported there and it's solid but have no comment on balance or other issues at this point i was asking this editor to discuss not just rip sourced material out because there is an upcoming referendum