i think you misunderstood wikidemon who said i think both of them von spakovsky and dorf make a lot of sense and likely represent the majority opinion in the legal academic community on how a court is likely to rule in other cases i might disagree that a couple particular quotes are on target these two i happen to agree with including both of them is supported by consensus and wd is part of our consensus which is why i'm reverting your removal of von spakovsky immediately xeno acorn employees across the country have been indicted and convicted for voter registration fraud the house bill specifies organizations involved in election related scandals as targets of defunding for these reasons the commentary of a former fec member like von spakovsky is very valuable this is his area of expertise i don't know why you insist on including a lengthy quote from kenneth r thomas while erasing any mention of the opinion of a former member of the fec but i can guess skoal