i hereby urge you to get in touch with user althepal and user offliner who were the ones who raised the issues with future revisions and not citing from reactos respectively to make your case i am aware of wikipedia reliable sources self published and questionable sources as sources on themselves but during the article's ga review when i cited this in response to offliner's feedback about self published sources i received no reply i still have one more point against your inclusion of the information and that is the fact that the information is obtained from the reactos wiki prior to the ga review and i quote wikis are not acceptable sources so don't cite anything from a wiki if you can find information regarding future releases without resorting to the wiki i wouldn't mind but i would definitely prefer it if you could source the information from third parties so that we can all avoid arguments with other parties regarding the validity of reactos' self published information personally i would advise against trusting anything said on the reactos site as part of the reactos test team i'm aware that the developers don't have a tendency to keep it up to date