natureboymd macman tony fox i have considered your disrespectful comments towards my scholarly review article and now that the christmas holidays are over i am obliged to let my anger with your remarks be known i shall start with you natureboymd natureboymd you reffered to my article as dubious this is ironic considering that you as a person are quite dubious when i read your opinions of my article i scoff at you your argument is so ill founded that i cannot even take you seriously it is quite obvious to me and all the memembers of the sgas that your dissatisfaction with the page citations is not an indication of the article's dubiousness but rather an indication of your ignorance of goosebumps and literature in general if you think people need a citation as to where the camera in say cheese and die came from then you need to understand what is common knowledge and not for instance if i were to write that the sky is blue of that the earth is round or that macman has no idea what he is talking about most reasonably intelligent humans would agree with such widely known facts such is the same for goosebumps and r l stine when i say that the plots are masterfully formulated or imply that r l stine is brilliant the majority of people recognize that the two statements are widely known facts as for you macman any notion what so ever that you have the ability to recognize fine literature has to be one of the most laughable things i have ever heard natureboy i included quotations in the last quote so that you always one to want a citation for the obvious will know that i quote this macman himself macman it is quite bold of you to assume that there is so scholar behind my article perhaps you should stick to editing the simon and garfunkel page on wikipedia i am sure you are quite familiar with it already tony fox you and natureboymd seem to be on the same page as far as your inability to recognize common knowledge is concerned to me it seems that you label anything you do not agree with as a peacock term i find this most repulsive as i like most free thinking intelligent people believe that speech should not be censored because someone does not agree with it you can take comfort in the fact that you are not the only one guilty of this unjust censorhip macman and natureboy are just as guilty each of you should devote as i have your mind to understanding the beauty and brilliance of goosebumps when you feel that you have researched goosebumps as much as i have it is very unlikely that you ever will then you may suggest alterations to my scholarly review until then your comments are not welcome and they certainly will not be tolerated any longer sincerely the swain goosebumps appreciation society