dear connolley i will try not to shout but you are making me very irate there are two articles both dealing with the problems caused by energy supply it still is a no brainer that this article must link to the other and vica versa i didn't write the peak oil aricle i'm not trying to defend it as such i just created a quick summary using the facts there and put a link to it if the facts i've written are wrong then you clearly ought first to make changes to the peak oil article where there are some who can argue the toss with you if however you dispute the facts then again you ought to check the peak oil article and make sure that it adequately notes contrary points of view if you can source them but that does not in itself negate the need for the link but on your specific point its a bit rich having someone complain about peak oil which has a proven record of making at least some verifiable predictions within a few years when global warming is still at the stage of a range between lowest and highest predictions