the question at hand is whether these are true facts that are pertinent to this wikipedia page and thus deserve to be judged by the people who read it this is after all a page in the wikipedia and not your personal property is that not so these facts are as follows substantial numbers of horses which show many characteristics of purebred appaloosas have been found in living in a remote mountain valley of kyrgyzstan near the chinese border these horses exhibit spots white sclerae and striped hooves a dna analysis conducted by dr gus cothran at texas a m university shows that these kyrgyzstan horses closely match purebred american appaloosas in their genetics as of controversy exists as to whether these horses should be considered true appaloosas a bbc documentary shows the year old female new zealand appaloosa breeder who rode horseback over a foot mountain pass to find these horses this documentary clearly shows these horses in their native milieu and discusses the dna evidence now mr montanabw sir are those facts not true are they not germane people come to this wikipedia appaloosa page to learn current and pertinent facts about appaloosas in that context neither your opinion nor mine count for a plug nickel therefore i will now repeat my question exactly why are you continuing to refuse the addition of these facts to this wikipedia page if you wish i don't see why an additional section cannot be added entitled kyrgyzstan horse controversy containing this information can you because if we can't resolve this question here that is the issue i am going to ask the next level to resolve i will not ask them to decide about lp genes or whether the bbc has made up some fairy story about the appaloosa or whether the moon is made of green cheese i will ask them whether you are in your legitimate rights to deny the inclusion of this information to the wikipedia readers am i speaking clearly enough mister