unblock i am appealing a hour block that was placed on me before i could post my response via the administrator's message board i apologize in advance for the length of this but i believe that it's necessary to include all of these details i wrote a summary at the end so that administrator's could get an overview if they don't have time to read the whole statement i will be addressing the claim that i violated the rr rule in the second paragraph of this article according to wp blp biographies of living persons must be written conservatively and with regard to a subject's privacy in a book written in a foreign language with a lot of jargon there are often competing translations interpretations and a book written in such a hotspot is sure to generate numerous quotes misquotes dubious translation and out of context statements as per wp blp i think it stands to reason that a more conservative and less sensationalist translation be used and for the same reason the quotes should not be taken out of the context that the book uses them in with than in mind on the th of february i improved certain parts of the paragraph in question in order to make to make it more compatible with wp blp based on this source user zero responded to one of my edits by stating that en wikipedia org w index php title yitzchak ginsburgh diff oldid i can't read and in what seemed to be extremely inappropriate comment for a wikipedia administrator told me in as many words to get off wikipedia take a break i didn't take nicely to being told that by an administrator and thus began a heated series of exchanges during which i was told by said individual that i had behavioral problems said individual also decided to respond to my comments by invoking what seemed to me to intimidation tactics i started to write a complaint against you why do i need to know that he can let me know when he posts it and then later responding to another edit he didn't like by saying that it was on my charge sheet now the reason i am writing about the behavior of said individual is to give some context or the rr issue after posting my version of the paragraph user zero subsequently changed it to this i will post only the first few words of his statement and the source source there is a reason to kill babies on the enemy side user zero babies on the enemy side may be killed after those first few words user zero continues quoting the rest of the paragraph now at best this is a serious distortion and when you consider that article is dealing with a scholarly work which contains hundreds of sometimes competing sometimes contradictory sources rationales theories proposals and ideas many of which are subsequently discounted limited in scope or just tossed by the wayside the disparity the statement may be done and there is a reason is even greater aside from the distortion mentioned above in contradiction to wp blp user zero also opted for a particularly liberal out of context translation why did user zero replace my edit with his own his statement prefer source with an actual quotation as i showed above he didn't use an actual quotation furthermore after seeing his comment i searched but wasn't able to find any wikipedia reference to a such a preference leading me to believe that he was intent on just superimposing his own wp justdontlikeit on me without explanation his actions above combined with the general hostility cited above led me to be believe that this was another front in the multi pronged campaign of intimidation that he was engaging in i e encouraging me take a break newlin