my dear colleagues i cannot understand your umbrage i was reading your sources and i came to understand that the passage that i was reading was awfully familiar in fact the wikipedia material was a word for word paraphrase of the source with the tenses of verbs changed i know you will agree with me that it is better to quote the source directly than to paraphrase since so i replaced the paraphrase with a quote do you object to the quote of your source i did not choose him i merely followed the footnotes in following the other footnote i noticed it had a contrasting view of the origin of the eucharist and knowing that you would use it as a source i wanted to include it if you have changes to make make them brd if he says you can't revert as a piece called once merely because you don't like them