dick i feel for you the peer commentaries and other imo arguably relevant sps's are inadmissible here on wikipedia for any number of reasons i e maria's story by the one known here only as j s m aside of course from information in articles about the person wo wrote them perhaps you could do that if any of the people who wrote commentaries you could include their reaction to tmwwbq and dreger's paper as written in the commentaries there as their own blp what they write about themselves is admissiable however as far as trying to get such sources admitted in general no dice we went through two rsn's on this it can be considered a general wp consensus that such sources are only admissiable if they come from people who were invited expert commentators people with relevant academic backgrounds in the words of richard feynmann a scientist looking at non scientific problems is just as dumb as the next guy