deletion of a lot of content at colligo contributor hi tnxman i wanted to ask about the deletion of a ton of content at the colligo contributor page i think you labelled this as spam and removed the majority of content on the page then suspended my account colligo that's why i'm now posting under my ip address a couple of quick things yes i am the ceo of colligo and did an update to the article i did it openly under the colligo id which is used rarely to make changes to the article occasionally we will make minor changes to correct misinformation as you can see in the change i made it is the duty of the company to police misinformation on wikipedia and elsewhere but i assure you we are not spammers nor do we intend to provide misinformation or post advertisements on wikipedia we respect the spirit of posting from a neutral point of view the page was actually started in and went through quite a bit of back and forth before it was finally accepted actually the sections you deleted were accepted in after much debate as far as i can tell the changes made over the last few years were merely additions to the same type of information originally accepted features and capabilities of the product press articles etc there was very littl hyperbole if any in the posting originally the debate centred around whether the page was actually neutral and notable some reviewers argued for it and some against there were some concerns raised that some of the original content was contributed by the company itself in the end the page was kept as you can see as the consensus was that although the company had contributed the material was factually accurate and presented from a neutral point of view so that was ok i can provide many examples of pages that are structured similarly in fact the model page that was used for the article was the sections in this article are very similar to the ones posted on the colligo contributor article which are now deleted tnxman i'd like to appeal to you to put the material back up on the page and reinstate my account as you can see i don't post often and rarely make changes to the contributor page i understand that you and your colleagues at wikipedia are trying to keep it as a neutral and authoritative source of unbiased information i applaud this i am hoping that upon review you will see that the changes made to the article were not biased or spammy simply statements of fact thank you barry preceding unsigned comment added by also in considering my account for deletion please note that i posted elsewhere including creating the page on black hen music a music label with which i have no affliation thanks for your consideration barry just wondering if you saw this i know you are busy so don't mean to bug you thanks i've been really polite and you've answered several other questions since i've posted this maybe i don't understand the protocol maybe you are the wrong person to talk to or maybe it's something else if you could please answer me i would very much appreciate it thanks first of all let me apologize to you for not getting back to you sooner i got back from vacation right around the time you posted your question and i've missed your last messages i reviewed the colligo article and the material that was removed the material i removed was not supported by reliable sources all of the material in wikipedia must be sourced to independent third party not a primary source coverage while the material was written neutrally it appeared to be original research i hope this starts to answer your questions please feel free to ask any other questions you may have and smack me with a trout if i don't answer xman thanks for your considered answer all of the material in the a