in reply to you state in your edit summary for the existence of god article undid revision by talk difference is of opinion is not vandalism omega point is fringe that claim doesn't even make coherent sense besides the fact that you replaced a literate entry with an illiterate edit even if one incorrectly thinks that the omega point theory is fringe that has no logical connection with the edit that jeffro made jeffro replaced this entrywhich is very similar to the version that existed there since october with some improvementswith this entry giving the excuse in his edit summary of wp fringe which doesn't even make sense as an explanation for his edits i e deletion of a number of citations deletion of the information on theologian prof wolfhart pannenberg's defense of the theology of the omega point theory etc as well there's no need for the large displayed quote as the previous entry already stated that prof david deutsch doesn't agree that the omega point is god furthermore jeffro 's edit deletes the mention of the fact that prof deutsch endorses the physics of the omega point theory in addtion jeffro 's edit isn't even literate as he give the following mangled citation to prof deutsch chapter the ends of the universe with additional comments by frank j tipler also available here whereas the version before was properly cited david deutsch the fabric of reality the science of parallel universes and its implications london allen lane the penguin press isbn extracts from chapter the ends of the universe with additional comments by frank j tipler also available here and here as stated above jeffro 's excuse in his edit summary doesn't even make sense as it doesn't explain why he would delete mention of prof deutsch's endorsement of the physics of the omega point theory particularly since jeffro himself called deutsch an eminent physicist in his own edit i e that statement wasn't there before of which argues against the notion that jeffro considers the physics of the omega point theory as fringe further jeffro deleted mention of the fact that prof wolfhart pannenberg who is one of the leading theologians in the world has defended the theology of the omega point theory and tipler's position that the omega point is consistent with the judeo christian god additionally while jeffro 's fringe claim's aren't even relevant to his edit they have already been refuted numerous times indeed jeffro himself refutes this claim in this very edit of his to state again therein jeffro himself called prof deutsch an eminent physicist in his own words so obviously jeffro himself must consider deutsch's endorsement of the physics of the omega point theory to be noteworthy and yet he deleted this endoresement in an area where jeffro himself agrees that deutsch is eminently qualified and replaced it with a large displayed quotation regarding a matter that deutsch has no qualification or erudition in even though the previous version already clearly mentioned that deutsch disagrees that omega point is god moreover in this edit jeffro deletes all mention of the fact that an actual trained theologian prof wolfhart pannenberg who is one of the world's leading theologians has defended the theology of the omega point theory as well prof tipler himself has defended the theology of the omega point theory and his identification of the omega point as being god in a peer reviewed academic journal see frank j tipler the omega point as eschaton answers to pannenberg's questions for scientists zygon journal of religion science vol issue june pp regarding the physics prof tipler has published his omega point theory in many peer reviewed science journals including a number of the leading physics journals such as reports on progress in physics one of the world's leading physics journals and monthly notices of the royal astronomical society one of the world's leading astrophysics journals the wikipedia article on the omega point theory lists seven different mainstream peer reviewed