it's the apparant misuse of the term civil rights for a law that unquestionably limited the rights of a significant number of people based on race where did the term civil rights that you added come from not the ordinance the links to the constitution that was written after the ordinance since the primary source doesn't say it then you need a secondary source your interpretation the parallels between the language in the ordinance and the bill of rights are as far as i'm concerned self evident v policy asks for this policy requires that all quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged be attributed to a reliable published source in the form of an inline citation and that the source directly support the material in question the problem no one knows where these cliams come fro finkelman onuf etc were the major articles published in recent times they do not say what you say please remove the term civil rights or add a source that supports this claim