you have not engaged in consensus building you have been disruptive the consensus is already there on things like wp v wp npov and wp or which your statements about polarization have obviously violated after i removed them you continued to revert my changes eventhough you were in the wrong whether you're aware of it or not it doesn't matter i remove garbage content when i see it in accordance with policy because i care about wikipedia and its reputation all you need to do is look at wikipedia wikiproject films style guidelines critical reception to know that the use of print reviews is encouraged commentary should also be sought from reliable sources for critics' general consensus of the film these will be more reliable in retrospect closer to the release review aggregate websites such as rotten tomatoes or metacritic should be cited for statistics pertaining to the ratio of positive to negative reviews so there's your answer