not sure why we beat around the bush in not just saying she was crushed by a bulldozer all three of the first three sources cited about the cause of her death the film occupation the guardian and time state that she was killed by a bulldozer whether you want to call it an accident or not trying to reference which aspect of being bulldozed such as debris falling from the bulldozer as the idf reworded it is a way of psychologically distancing the person operating the bulldozer for the idf from having any direct responsibility for the action none of the three sources state it was caused by debris so the source citations should be moved closer to the statement that the witnesses said she was caught underneath currently the three citations have been placed next to a phrase that none of them reference therefore the sentence should be broken into two parts the part about the idf referencing debris should have whatever citation mentions it next to that sentence but none of the three sources cited references debris at all here is what they do say part of after about the film occupation states she got caught underneath the bulldozer when rachel corrie was killed she was protecting a doctor's home the u s congress has refused her parents' request for an independent investigation in her murder this source said nothing about debris accidentally falling on her corrie was crushed to death by an army bulldozer in rafah gaza as she protested against house demolitions the guardian this newspaper simply states she was crushed to death by the bulldozer rachel corrie was a year old american from olympia wash who was crushed to death by an israeli army bulldozer march corrie was in the gaza strip working with the international solidarity movement which opposes israel s occupation of the west bank and gaza strip and living among palestinians whose homes were being demolished she was kneeling in front of a home acting as a human shield when she was bulldozed time again here we are told she was crushed to death and bulldozed nothing about debris accidentally falling i or someone else should put the citations next to a phrase about the bulldozer killing her how exactly it killed her whether dropping stuff on her or rolling over her is speculative none of the three sources reference debris if the idf debris statement must be included it should be a separate sentence the idf operated the machine and have a potential self protection conflict of interest in their wording i'd feel better if it said something like she was crushed by a bulldozer's operations clearing land in front of a palestinian doctor's home an idf investigation reported she died after being struck by falling debris source more accurate for the idf part of it would be by debris falling from the bulldozer i'd probably rather it say the idf claimed rather than reported but i'm not going to change that part