january utc thanks nina for your patience and common sense it is sad that nishidami and tom believe this article is merely a long running exercise of their megalomania take this recent gem from nishi the most accurate information is not necessarily just what two most recent authors say here wadsworth was summing up the state of the art for some candidates including de vere in where does nishi get off claiming a that wordsworth ever read the bibliotheca anti stratfordiana the only source for the authorship figure and b then followed its references to fifty candidates many confined to brief monographs or sometimes mere letters to the editor i know i spent three years of my spare time at columbia doing exactly what nishidami fantastically asserts that wordsworth did does wordsworth even claim to have based his work on the bibliotheca certainly nishi isn't he and tom didn't even cite it in their bibliography and i gave them most of a year before weighing in on this nishidani has willfully invented numerous discussions involving conspiracy theory in places where it would have been physically impossible to print such and which he certainly never attempted to read apologize nishi confession is good for the soul and promise us you are going to stop tendentiously editing