when user matilda inserted material on war crimes into the john howard article it led to edit warring page protection and disruption on the talk page which still continues the material turned out to be very poorly sourced depending on which way you read the idiosyncratic webpage of the icc action group either a submission had not yet been made to the international criminal court in which case the news stories were in error or it had been submitted twice and rejected twice in which case it's not worthy of inclusion these facts emerged in discussion and i raised a wp blp notification reverting the attempts at inclusion by matilda and others believing that wp blp permitted immediate removal of poorly sourced material the actions of admin matilda in ignoring the advice of other users including fellow admins in edit warring reporting me for rr rather than going through the blpn process and misrepresenting the situation drew adverse comment again from fellow admins diffs for above required