rr violation by i'm still here here is how the revert rule works i posted something cjcurrie reverted it i reverted it cjcurrie reverted it i reverted it cjcurrie reverted it times learn how to count furthermore the information reverted was valid information with a documentation link that seemed to displease cjcurrie cur last january imstillhere m cur last january imstillhere whether or not you think it was frivolous richard warman was charged and that is a real even that is documented and verifyable whether or not the charges stuck is irrelevant cur last january imstillhere and a lot of the list of names in the list at the top are still in the complaint phase complaint can be found here cur last january imstillhere you are in violation of the three revert rule you reverted me times and the complaint is verifiable by contacting the chrc cur last january cjcurrie i repeat anyone can file a complaint and this is not in itself noteworthy btw you'll be in violation of the three revert rule if you return the section cur last january imstillhere cur last january cjcurrie m reverted edits by imstillhere talk to last version by cjcurrie cur last january imstillhere cur last january cjcurrie anyone can file a complaint i've seen no evidence that this is credible and or noteworthy cur last january imstillhere m cur last january imstillhere notice the history of changes i did not end up reverting a rd time but cjcurrie did i just posted links that are related and verifiable and by the way cjcurrie some of the names in the list of warman's cases are just in the complaint phase as well so if you say anyone can file a complaint please feel free to remove the names from the list as well