list of freemasons calling john alexander cuza's name defamation is overreactive hyperbole both names appear in the lead of his article and if invented names are defamation then millions upon millions of people are defaming jesus christ by calling him such he's really yehoshua in aramaic not iesu in greek or jesus in english or spanish now i don't think you would be able to make that case let's see charlemagne is carolus magnus karolus magnus or charles the great george iii of the united kingdom is king george iii birth name george william frederick in short trying to claim that there aren't different names for people in different languages or areas is one of the biggest cases of tilting at windmills since don quixote sorry i meant el ingenioso hidalgo don quijote de la mancha additionally you are also claiming in essence that any wiki not in the native language of the subject is defamatory of the subject by its very existence because it's an invented name for example george washington is ja jouji washinton so you claim an entire language group is defamatory because their alphabet is different really now everything else aside what i think this really is is some sort of romanian ultra nationalism on your part and that's not appropriate either i say ultra because you're having a fit over not content but the spelling of a name calling it defamatory and invented that's very overreactionary and if you don't like the connotations of the label don't engage in behavior that will label you as such this is english wikipedia and as such the enwiki mos and naming policies are what will be followed and the article title is what we will link to because that is the policy if you do not agree with editing within the policies of this wikipedia project no one is forcing you to edit here