unblock i'll make a renewed effort not to give personal attacks but of course i do have some questions about this unwarranted blockage as you might well imagine why is it that ip editors tend to get the raw ends of the deal that you admins tend to lean towards the side of someone who's editing with an account over someone who's editing without one especially in the area of what you label as personal attacks or harassment when given by the ip editor but not so much when the named editor does the same thing for exampleand this is yep maybe you guessed it question why is it supposedly okay according to you for someone with a name like say escape orbit to dish out a personal attack but not for me to give him one back because i'm just a lowly ip editor specifically why is it supposedly okay for him to give me a personal attack by putting false stuff on my keyboard by making the ludicrous claim that my reason for wanting the old style of ebay logo to go next to the current one ebay in the lead is because i wanted it in there even though that is a total lie but it's supposedly not okay for me to call that kind of slander stupid here's another one why is it supposedly okay for him and smiley girl there to falsely accuse my edits of being vandalism just because they differed from what these guys preferred but then when i say their reversions are vandalism i get in trouble for it as if it were a personal attack just because i'm an ip only editor ready for one more then why is it fine for any of you named editors to give one of us ip editors a warning template but when i as an iper do the same thing to a named editor like i did to partially smiley girl i get dinged with oh you can't do that 'cause that's a 'personal attack' or oh that's bad because that's 'harassment' oh yeah here's one more remember the rule about edit warring just in general meaning that it doesn't even have to be breaking rr that says that 'but i was right so i was not edit warring' is no defense well then doesn't that apply to meeting some so called consensus too since some things aren't cases of concrete correctness but are just based more on whether they match what that so called consensus wanted the thing to say well then why is it that just because your named friend smiley there does some edit warring against me to put the thing back to what your exclusive partial consensus wants it to say and since my editing had already been established as not vandalism even though it disagrees you ignore that above mentioned edit warring rule and give her him a pass anyway but when i an ip only editor who's against your exclusive consensus do the same thing it's edit warring even though it was the same thing as what smiley's doing remember the being right matching consensus is no defense rule