literal text i have changed according to the literal text of the constitution the governor general is the representative of the queen of australia to refer to queen victoria instead i did this to make a point and that point is that the literal text of the constitution cannot be taken as an unfailingly reliable guide to either practice or law read the constitution and you will find no mention of the prime minister who is undeniably the head of government even if one might imagine that this position is occupied by the governor general from a cursory reading of the constitution the constitution declares that there shall be an inter state commission but the truth is that this body does not exist please if you refer to the literal text of the constitution either stick to the literal text and refrain from inserting material that does not belong you will search in vain for the title queen of australia for example or qualify it by referring to documents and events such as the royal style and titles act where the title queen of australia was introduced feb utc skyring it is interesting how your own comments can be used to demonstrate how you add your own point of view i did this to make a point a point about literal text is make by using the adjective literal your point belongs elsewhere anyway the literal text does not mention queen victoria it mentions the queen it further states that the name of the king or queen of the united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland for the time being is to be substituted from time to time this is what i has done maybe there is a more accurate way of making this subtitution but queen victoria that's wrong wrong wrong is it have you checked the original i think that you will find that instead of checking you jumped in with some more untruths please think instead of responding when i press your buttons feb utc i notice you haven't responded to this have you checked the original this is in parliament house and is on public didplay feb utc yes i have checked not found the page you requested is not available at this address i suggest you check the original i have feb utc rather than just jump in and make changes after seconds thought go back have a think for serveral days before you start adding stuff like this it just wastes time also when you say please read the constitution you are showing contempt for others feb utc when someone makes an obvious mistake like saying the literal text of the constitution refers to the queen of australia then i am quite justified in asking that person to read it feb utc if you refer to the literal text of the constitution you will have to concede that it contains no reference to a queen of australia and that is because the thought of australia as a state separate from the british empire would have been quite foreign to the men who wrote the constitution feb utc i explained the substitution logic above and applied it then skyring put in queen victoria so i reduced it to just just queen ie no substiution i have no problem either way feb utc let's stick with the queen shall we that's probably the best bet feb utc i thought the point about literal text had been made but i see that it has not been appreciated the constitution does not state that the governor general is the representative of the queen if you want to quote the literal text of the constition then by all means do so but don't go making stuff up that you think might or should or could be in there when it clearly isn't feb utc nowhere in the literal text of the constitution will you find the statement the governor general is the representative of the queen nowhere s states a governor general appointed by the queen shall be her majesty's representative that is a clear statement of intention i noted s previously which states there shall be an inter state commission there is not an inter state commission so clearly it is incorrect to say that the literal text of s means that the governor general is now the queen's representative given the example