per wikipedia consensus sometimes voluntary agreement of all interested editors proves impossible to achieve and a majority decision must be taken your statements of so claimed or real consensus is bothering there was a majority agreement for wording you need to respect that while the discussion continues with an article that has already been locked and discussion that has gone on for days we need to work from the point with the most agreement it doesn't help anything to go go back and forth on the article leave it alone take a break inserting something you think is more in line with what should be consensus does not help it just causes disruption and more unproductive back and forth start a new section from the text in the article and what specific additions you would like we all know your reasoning at this point we can then discuss each entry and agree or disagree reword or whatever talk