that is one explanation though i think there's just a certain editor who's more prone to making sloppy edits to push pov i'm stumbling across stuff that has been in this article awhile now that has no basis in the sources that are cited to support it i'm new maybe that happens all the time but i think that excuse falls apart upon investigating contributions i'm not touching the section again but i'm pretty sure that if the new edit doesn't achieve consensus it ought to be removed and discussed until a conclusion is reached i could be wrong though