as i pointed out it is a misrepresentation of warshak because you have combined two sentences together the critical one of which states that only most mental health and legal professionals agree not that it is not a point of contention and neither of them mention the chronically or irrationally part that's ignoring the issue of the out of date nature of the comment and source i take it you agree that you have mispresented bernet as i have said over and over again nobody disputes that some children may be alienated from their parents what is thoroughly in dispute and almost totally discarded at this point in the field is gardner's conception of pas including existence causality treatment etc this is an article about pas and all of these aspects are already included included in the article the influence of parents clearly is a point of contention as one of your own sources makes clear and why all the newer conceptions parental alienation parental alienation disorder etc do not include the parent's actions as a criteria for the disorder but i'm repeating myself and will do so again your paragraph is not an accurate representation of either the sources you have provided or of the literature in general