re your comment to drop the sexism conspiracy you don't understand the issue because you have not read your ignorance of the issue is a violation of wikipedia policy which is to maintain accuracy nishkid you admit you have read nothing this is an expert article and none of the editors can qualify as an expert on the issue when the supreme court weighs in on the issue will bruno who has no understanding of law and the issue decipher the supreme court case how can you make an informed decision without reading what the issue is why was rianna's comment about replacing a line on the canadian case ignored by bruno this is vindictiveness and in case you stubbornly refuse to read the agunah issue involves men who abuse women emotionally after the divorce by preventing them joy and happiness in their lives to share in a marriage sanctioned by a rabbi you have not responded intelligently to one question that i asked of you please respond to why rianna was ignored