the first reference is a dead link your second and third references use a different name than the current title which means i count zero sites using your suggested name you may well be right but i'm not about to make a change to a name and call it uncontroversial when i haven't yet seen a single example as i said before and you've simply added confirmation the seem to be several variations of the spelling of the station name that's a good reason for posing a question in getting feedback on an article talk page this page isn't the right place to carry out that discussion if you are convinced that i miss reading this and think it is still uncontroversial go ahead and reinstate the template with the desired move and perhaps someone else will take care of it talk