afsd i believe that this article was tagged incorrectly the picture does have a copyright on it and the owner of that copyright requires a copyright agreement for use as seen here while this is the case the article can still exist without the copyright agreement the subject of the article is the self portrait not the imagine itself please remove the afsd tag and move it to the photo itself while the article is poorly written shows unsourced opinions of warhol andy warhol is certainly notable and so is this particular painting as you can see from many of the numerous articles written about it here i can find no policy that specifically adresses the notability of paintings but i don't think anyone could argue that a painting is notable if it metropolitan museum of art where this painting currently resides '''talktome