why lavey anyway well so far reason rules the neutrality sticker is still up though lgagnon threatened i believe that it would only be temporary intellectually i am actually rather satisfied to leave it at that but not for one thing i enjoy intellectual duelling much too much all hail wikipedia ah for the days of learning for the sake of learning i raised the question as part of my pursuit here why lavey why not timothy mcveigh again there's not enough room for everyone so how were the selected selected we know who is included who was excluded or perhaps simply non included i e unintentionally in contradistinction to intentional exclusion what is more in view of the evolution of terrorism to all intents and purposes virtually morphing into a veritable weltanschauung timothy mcveigh takes on a new urgency relevance and intellectual philosophical challenge my fear is that the whole effort is loaded biased in violation of wikipedia rules the whole thing seems to be a charade to ride satanism in on the ratiocinative coattails of objectivist ayn rand otherwise again why not timothy mcveigh again he explicitly mentioned and is often discussed in terms of randian libertarianism she would disown him like a bolshevik of course but then she would disown lavey in utter disgust so if there's room only for one of the two why lavey if i don't receive reasoned responses i will edit lavey out again again boys and girls my emphasis is on a truly wikipedian neutral pov aoluwatoyin oh by the way regarding my being blocked on grounds of incivility no less lgagnon who started all the trouble on the other hand does not get blocked he who refers to admins as vandal coddling that's not incivility such revolting double standards will not stand i'm just getting warmed up here aoluwatoyin