do you know the difference between a primary source document and a secondary source how that the one is fact and the second is interpretation the curiousness of the attack on debrina woods claim to be descended from one who the titanic community is certain died on the titanic should put me firmly on the side that keeps trashing her contribution to wikipedia but i as a responsible and knowledgeable historian also know that personal prejudice cannot get in the way of the truth and so the wikipedia community has ganged up on a update to the allison story in a way that makes me question the motives of those hell bent to ensure that this part of the story isn't heard by the general public and blocking me is only ensuring that the sworn enemies of the debrina woods entry have been able to censor the historical record accusing me of vandalism and attacking me personally over rules and guidelines that are farcical at best and a joke at worst make the lot of you look like petty idiots it is no wonder that wikipedia is roundly condemned but the current crop of editors in charge are so close to the forest that they cannot see the trees