archived discussions redirect from hoax page hamlet of denmark hello i just wanted to point out that the redirect that you created from hamlet of denmark should point to prince hamlet which is the article dedicated to the character and not to hamlet best regards talk i thought about it but the play also has king hamlet the ghost i have no preference either way if you believe prince hamlet would have been a better target i might reduce the protection for a while so that you can change it well i confess that i have absolutely no idea about how to find whether people who search for hamlet of denmark are more interested in the prince or in the king i would say the prince but it would be only a conjecture given the ambiguous nature of the expression your choice seems the most reasonable sorry if i didn't give a better thought on it before contacting you cheers talk why my page has been deleted i want to know what was wrong about the last page i've created making sense i want to republish it what do i have to change thanks jewish supremacism my awakening to the jewish question hi mike rosoft please explain where the text is promotion of the book and the ideas contained in the book in the first time is better that define the portion of text that had problem considering the draft presents a hateful and insane conspiracy theory by a white supremacist as if it were factual hi ian thomson please talk about wikipedia rules and do not tell insult word i say that this is not a valid reason for speed deletion the admin must stated it in talk page until solved mike rosoft please reply to my question do is g rule in speed deletion the draft presented lies by a known conspiracy theorist as meticulously research to call that promotional is better than that deserves wp g says that unambiguous advertising or promotion is to be speedily deleted the lies david duke wrote were promoted as meticulously research ian thomson you have a personal problem with this book and the idea of the author please observe the rules and don't tell loose talk this is your idea about this book that is a lies but many people in the world are against to your idea i decided to edit this subject and submit in this page mike rosoft in the content and purpose of book sections i selected and wrote several sentence from this book so i think some people had against idea with it i want introduce this book just and i had not any goal please explain about text and say where have problem and what wikipedia is not i can change this sentence and remove this adverb can you restore this page until fix this section user aliakar alia