thanks for your comments as for my failure to provide diffs for mediation arbitration purposes regarding offensive reverts without offending party allowing discussion don't worry i have all the relevant diffs where i come from my understanding is that complainant first states grievance responding party then replies and indicates whether h she agrees or disagrees if the latter then complainant files evidence i e would be diffs in case of wiki but it seems wiki process has other rules and even if there are rules the rules are worthless as you've apparently stated above re your if you've already supplied page numbers and are saying they weren't received appropriately please supply diffs of your edits with the citations and of the responses that you're taking issue with okay the archives are full of examples but here's a recent example submitted august relative to denazification and improvement ww aftermath section and still on the current talk page above so diff isn't necessary text as submitted secret arrangements were concluded between american military intelligence and former key figures in the anti communist section of german military intelligence or abwher headed by general reinhard gehlen to advise the americans on how to go about establishing their own anti soviet networks in europe refs christopher simpson blowback america's recruitment of nazis and its effects on the cold war london weidenfeld and nicolson pp isbn richard harris smith oss secret history of the cia berkeley university of california press p isbn outcome quietly dropped from new aftermath section finished kaput even though there was no consensual agreement to do so in fact consensus seemed to support inclusion of this topic discussion still on this current page at restructuring aftermath section thanks for your interest