meh it gives a lot of weight to the bible which is the holy text of only a portion of the world and therefore gives bias towards christianity it would be original research without a source it's an essentially fictional book about a myth it sounds kinda listy it'll probably piss off a fair number of readers and editors it's only an implication they can always pull out the god miracle card but mostly it'd be unsourced without a pressing reason from a reliable source there's not a whole lot of merit to it that i can see but a lot of reasons why it's not necessarily a good idea