summary ga review see wp wiaga for criteria is it reasonably well written a prose quality b mos compliance is it factually accurate and verifiable a references to sources b citation of reliable sources where necessary c no original research is it broad in its coverage a major aspects b focused is it neutral fair representation without bias is it stable no edit wars etc does it contain images to illustrate the topic a images are copyright tagged and non free images have fair use rationales b images are provided where possible and appropriate with suitable captions overall pass or fail i'm giving this article a keep marking although some improvements to referencing would be desireable