concerns on shiromani version user kayastha shiromani has apparently restored the version of the article pre dating my cleanup as well as made some additions diff is here i submit that shiromani's version is unsuitable on multiple levels and also undoes a large amount of totally wp appropriate work i added just to touch on a few major points extensive amounts of the shiromani version are wp originan research from ancient texts a historical image of a kayastha scribe has been replaced by an image of a god they claim descent from which is far less informative as to the community itself right in the lede it makes major claims like the only sect who are referred to as direct descendants of a vedic god with only a blatant fansite as a source vice an actual academic work random or editorialising such as also it is but logical to consider the status of the kayasthas when sanskrit was the state language under the hindu kings frequent non wp tone such as honorifics such as lord and a generally promotional slant on this caste a massive family tree of individuals of no clear notability wp primary sources cited as references a lenghty list of community websites rather than a short list which also includes more npov approaches long short i submit it is not appropriate to undo all my improvements and bring back an updated version of the highly flawed older version if you disagree we can take this to dispute resolution but i am quite confident that the version i and others have been working on is more neutral