read very closely per wp verify and wp burden the burden of proof that the image shows godane has already been proven through the many upon many reliable and reputable sources you seem to have an issue with this therefore the onus has now been transferred to you in order to prove to the contrary something which you have so far failed to do none of the sources you have cited have explicitly denied the authenticity of the image they have merely used a different image of godane this does not support your contention that the image which is being discussed here which is used by sources more reliable and reputable e g united states state department bbc and reuters among others against the sources which you have cited of which i have not heard of any one of them 'suna times' and 'waamo news' no there are not multiple images on godane there are only two the one being discussed here and the one you consistently regurgitate yes it won't make the other various portraits vanish this still dose't help you becuase through the above sources it is seen which image is clearly favored by the more reliable sources this source here is the only thing that you have showed me which highlights that the image may not be godane i bet you're smiling and clapping your hands right now that through this magical source you have proven the image is not godane right wrong this source is meager it is unreliable as it is questionable the article is a blog unworthy of proper accreditation and it's riddled with spelling errors and grammatical errors e g hammami is still advocating for robow s troopss are you kidding me the author can't even spell and you're taking this blog over acclaimed sources such as reuters or the u s state department wow is all i can say furthermore the blog doesn't identity which picture is incorrect if indeed any image is incorrect the author never cites his source and the article was published over a year before those media sources cited above circulated the image being discussed here moreover even if the images were used prior it still doesn't help as the author hasn't established where he got his information from concerning this supposed 'incorrect' image of godane again you're going to have to do more digging than that in order to prove your point the basis that 'foreign media agencies' have no credibility on reporting in areas where local media is present is just well stupid by that logic any material information coming from any part of the world which is not from the united states the united kingdom or europe already excludes many of those sources this geographical argument is meaningless ok then how about i remove all references to bbc reuters council on foreign relations brookings institution associated press agence france presse the national counterterrorism center oh look they use the image as well and many many more sources just becuase they are reporting from places where they are not 'based' hmm seems reasonable logical to me if we were to follow your logic what you are forgetting is that each news agency no matter if its western gets its information from local sources from the places where they are covering a story or reporting from whether that's somalia or timbuktu this source for example from bbc is from the bbc african branch bbc africa they will have reporters correspondents sources all across africa and this is only one media source the somalian media are going to be no more accurate than bbc africa as they will not have the extensive resources that the bbc have even in somalia but also elsewhere and finally this the various portraits can perhaps go in the body as stantheman suggested so now you're willing to compromise ahh i see so when you find yourself in between an undeniable rock and a hard place when it comes to your pov you finally are willing to take a compromise that was offered to you by which you rejected we can't do that was way to conciliatory towards you by even offering you a choice what you believe should happen to the image is now up to you i'm afraid that i'm not as conciliatory