thanks for your opinion i've changed my addition to sources dump taking your comments into account as for the archival evidence collection yes this is mostly a compilation of primary sources we could not make it the base of our approach to discussion especially the discussion of the numbers the numbers in fact are not discussed there but still we could use it to establish some simple facts such as that documents exist that the food relief was provided and so that such secondary sources which do not take it into account or deny it are not entirely reliable also since that collection of evidence is nicely compilated and has a good layout we could add it to external links or further reading section or so talk