that is all very nice and good cyclic logic but i would like a second opinion otherwise as i have said without acutally putting the offence in front of me it can be interpreted as weasel words and intimidation tactics also if i have bothered you so much then for the reason of conflict of interest as well i deserve a second opinion and not from one of your admin clique buddies either also you seem to know what violation i have commited with talk nontrinitarianism references instead of waving the whole manual of wikipedia in front of me i'm asking you to show it to me