response i am obviously very disappointed by this decision the assertion that i did not read the article is highly misleading not to mention offensive i have been a wikipedia editor for many many years and have followed the rules and regulations throughout these years to suggest that i did not follow the regulations is complete bunkum using the evidence present in the article i made a choice based on what i thought was a fairly obvious case it still breaks our rules on blogs recentism notability and bias the keep votes are from people who have an immense level of conflict of interest and therefore skew the vote something rotten i am very disappointed that this entire episode has been carried out at my expense rather than at the article itself this response will be copied to as many concerned editors in this matter wordsdeeds