it is reasonably well written a prose b mos for lead layout word choice fiction and lists it is factually accurate and verifiable a reference section b citations to reliable sources c or it is broad in its coverage a major aspects b focused it follows the neutral point of view policy fair representation without bias it is stable no edit wars etc it is illustrated by images and other media where possible and appropriate a images are tagged and non free content have fair use rationales b appropriate use with suitable captions overall pass fail this article seems to have improved from its first review significantly most problems are resolved such as the sub par prose which is now very well readable some comments on the issues raised in the first review the period dealt with spans approximately mid to september this is an indication it may not meet criterion a as far as i can see there is not a lot more to say about this young lady so far while taking in interest in people who are famous because of their parents and because of who they date eludes me it is no reason to fail criterion a daily mail may not be a reliable source there are a couple of references here that could be argued do not come from what is usually considered reliable however it is accepted in tabloid topics to include tabloid sources otherwise wikipedia would only consist of articles on people the guardian writes about yawn however these things should be adressed nowhere does it actually state that wright and penn are famous actors that is however necessary because otherwise one might easily ask why this person deserves a wikipedia article in the first place the archive links in the references are inconsistent the style you should use is the one in reference link to original page publiser archived from and then the original as the link this can easily be achieved by using the cite web template however the first reference is not a good example alltogether since it makes no sense that the page is from july and it is stated that it was retrieved on july th please look into this you might wanna find a better source for the elvis and nixon film maybe this one even though it is certainly not perfect as well that's about it i give the nominator s the usual seven days to adress the issues until then it is placed on hold