do not edit or post replies to this page this page is an archive this archive page covers approximately the dates between april and may post replies to the main talk page copying or summarising the section you are replying to if necessary dispute on your reply on case closed naming after your closing of wp rm discussion on case closed saying inter alia seemed to be disputing invalid argements that you mentioned in the closing arguments please answer him her there talk contribs just a little misunderstanding i think i've addressed the issue there thank you for bringing it to my attention list of mycologists thanks for creating the list of mycologists the only thing that might be missing is the author abbreviation i have been linking a lot of those lately in the mushroom articles i noticed that the botanists have everything set up pretty well they have a list of botanists with abbreviations and also a template to make it easy to put a box in an article that gives the abbreviation info i copied it and changed a couple words now we have i tried it out on gaston guzman there are still some red links i haven't decided if i should reword the template or add the articles that are in red what do you think i can see the advantage of having author abbreviations included on the list of mycologists and i can't see the harm of a separate to parallel although since mycology falls under the icbn all mycologists are in some sense botanists and many were both particularly in the early days so the links in the template should lead to author citation botany and botanical name we should not expect a separate article on author citation mycology to be created since mycological naming is botanical naming even if the organisms aren't plants melolonthinae thanks for fixing the errors i made in creating melolonthinae i took a leap creating it since i have zero practical knowledge of the subject hey this is totally random but i figure you might know a thing or two about biology as a whole why does canis lupus familiaris cover everything from a chihuahua to a great dane yet other animals with very minor variations ex oncorhynchus mykiss gairdnerii oncorhynchus mykiss newberrii are distinct subspecies c t the species is normally defined as a group of actually or potentially interbreeding populations the biological species concept which means that if two animals can interbreed to produce fertile offspring they are considered conspecific subspecies are defined more vaguely as divisions of a species which are not different enough to prevent interbreeding but which have fairly constant differences i don't know what the morphological difference between o m newberrii and o m gairdnerii is but i am sure there is one the unusual situation is canis lupus familiaris which has been subject to artificial selection and so exhibits much more physical variation than is normal for taxa of such limited genetic isolation i am not sure whether it is really valid to apply scientific names to domestic dogs and the like in the first place although it is widely done perhaps it represents the scientific name of the wild taxon from which the domesticated breeds are derived by contrast cultivated plants have their own system of nomenclature separate from the icbn israel lebanon conflict hello stemonitis you wrote that there has not been consensus with the name