to derild and sadads if your main dispute is the sourcing with the original article then why did you not contact me as i could have provided the additional source material you can see from my contributions i just author tunnels books on here as i said above all the content of the original article is completely accurate and can be verified i have provided a number of source links to justify that should i need more no problem just advise me as far as i can see i did broadly meet the notability standards this may not be in the ga format that you are looking for but as wikipedia content relies on volunteers passionate about their article subject i feel you should be more supportive as i confirmed above it was me who asked for the reassessment only at that stage a few days ago did you offer to 'help' improve my article the new article you created in your sandbox then only remains there for day before you either lose the content or publish it hardly enough time for me to discuss my objections about your new proposal to remove my article to replace my article when you have not even finished reading tunnels is ridiculous surely any author on wikipedia should at least have read the novel first not sure how that can meet your verifiable notability standards that aside i have already correctly embarrassing errors concerning incorrect publishing dates and versions wrong character and place names like stynx and hightail not a one off others that come to mind include the official publication date for the us tunnels was january it might have been that copies were available on amazon earlier than that date but that often happens in the uk and us nearly all territories have gone on to publish deeper and only a handful haven't yet published freefall mainly due to their own financial difficulties and not because the performance of the series hasn't merited it you can check this on the publishers website the authors changed the title with barry cunningham this article makes it sound as though he did it off his own back there are two versions of the audiobook in the uk the davenport one is abridged and also the american and german unabridged versions chester isn't about to killed under setting he is sentenced to go into the interior the plot emphasis is all wrong and does not give a true insight into the overall storyline the setting and plot areas you have changed are so badly written and i am well aware of my own average writing abilities but in comparison this new version lacks significant maturity references to the highfield mole are confusing barry is now barry cunningham obe and there's no question that he signed jk rowling for her first two harry potter books whilst he was employed by bloomsbury i would like my article reinstated and with your expert help and support i would like to improve and expand my sources and thus improve my own knowledge of wikipedia article standards my priority is not however achieving ga status at the expense of diminished quality or informative reading i do have the support of the uk fansite team on this the authors have often been kind enough to verify and supply content for my article following my notification about your changes they have emailed me their confirmation that they would also like to see the original version restored i await your response thanks