it is in fact mentioned and has an entire sub section like other sub sections i believe all events within the sub section should be kept in chronological order if at all possible this clarifies the sequence of related events after a few weeks of observing this page i grow weary of watching sections of the discussion being prematurely closed some legitimate concerns have been raised and with premature closure there's a prejudice in favor of the status quo this is a featured article about a high profile and rapidly changing subject extended discussion is not only appropriate but vital to maintaining fa status skoal