september utc nitack no i am not confused at all actually as i've explained earlier the natrual coal synthesis process is a distraction from the idea of npov of this article and we can discuss all that later and that has nothing to do with my personal views or opinions as mentioned abiotic oil is rapidly becoming the accepted theory and abiotic coal processes have more recently been discussed and been put forth as theory that is not the major part of contention in this article however and can be adressed at some future time after the pov is restored to neutral tone and please don't be condecending i've obviously read the wikipedia policies and we all know 'exactly' what you are doing with this biased article against clean coal technology by the way there you go again with the phrase 'any reputable source' in your view any source that disagrees with your highly biased view must be 'non reputable ' again you say 'even the coal industry' 'their product' etc just look at the way you talk it's amazing the fact is many people including those in the 'coal industry' as you put it believe that there are certain disadvantages to using coal in the way it is generally used today but the hazards that you're concentrating on with coal namely so called anthopogenic climate change and global warming and related junk science are not the principle hazards many of the reasons why certain aspects of the combustion are even being discussed like the idea of co capture are not because of good science and or true hazards but rather scientific ignorance and very bad very totalitarian policy