i am confused as to how i could have been bloked for vandalisim i have never vandilized anyones work i hae edited pages because the original authors have put in factual errors or i have added things and sourced them i edited the pira article because jdorney continues to revert it back to the un factual article he orginally wrote if wikipedia is about accuracy then i am confused as to why i would be banned from editing a un factual article particularly when i make sure to source my additions or changes everyone does this on wikipedia if i am going to be blocked for this jdorney should to sine he does the same thing or do editors get special treatment another ridiculous complaint was made by swatjester about the sad article the original sad article was missing some facts so i put facts from sources like time magazine la times newsweek and the new yorker in but i did not delete any of his work i merely added to it so i don't know whyu the guy is throwing such a little hissy fit i have the right to edit just like everyone else as long as i source my edits which i always do if people disagree with my edits they can tell me in a grown up professional way or they can re edit the article i am more then willing to work with people on wikipedia but to be blocked for bogus reasons is a disgrace i have obeyed the rules of wikipedia if i am doing something wrong send me a message and i will adress that but i will not stop contributing to articles that is the whole point of wikipedia if it bothers some editors like swatjeaster and jdorney well that's too bad they need to get over themselves and either fact check their articles or make it so nobody can change them it amazes me that these two are so petty that they block someone for doing the same things they do pathetic