if any of the remaining castles com cites are also supported by another cite then remove the castles com one add a further reading section and put the castles com link there well that's what i would do anyway i know that the webpage is supposed to be a transcription but well how do we know that it is an accurate and full transcription there were a lot of people with experience who chipped in with comments as this article developed all of whom were pleased with the outcome as far as i can recall it does not need any big reworking oversourcing can be an issue but i think that in this instance it was pretty much all needed unless the decision was taken to rely primarily on castles com of course no article is ever finished