oh hi long story short so i won't be ranting or what not this time so sjones is wikihounding me constantly for nearly a year now and his pal bridies is also obsessed with me to the point of where the great most of his entire activity here on wikipedia in the months was all about how to rid of me while i've substantionally adited hundreds of different articles during the same period over in total since march that's just not normal btw right now i'm blocked because i referred to this wikihounding by stalking which is just semantics really apparently they call it cyberbullying now outside the wikipedia now gas basically what the devil's advocate wrote in his comment and this example of the so called additional evidence as it was called by sjones in his wikihounding thread is indeed a good example of evidence as it shows what is actually this problem with me and it's that i actually know and obey all the policies rules and guidelines including but not limited to everything regarding gas and their reviewing process while many reviewers don't know and even when they're informed about the rules and guidelines the proper ones because in this case the reviewer was misinformed by some other apparently uninformed users strangely including at least admin they might even flatly and completely refuse to acknowledge and use them here the reviewer's invoking ignore all rules instead of admitting the wrong i'm all for proper reviewing instead of incorrect arbitrary which is why i've opened this thread recently aftter this very debacle precisely because the scale of this problem various types of bad reviewing is pretty alarming and some reviewers' blatant refusal to play by rules after they're being informed about them is just absolutely unacceptable that's my opinion at least but i can't see how could i be any wrong with being right