edits in jan thank you for recently updating this article i hope you continue this article has had many adverse edits in the past and i try to keep it within wikipedia's standards if a statement with two facts is supported by a source and one fact and the source are updated check whether the source is positioned in the sentence to make it look like the source also supports the other fact then be sure the source does support both facts otherwise readers will be misled if that source does not actually support the second fact you should find a source for the second fact or preserve the original source and place or edit it so that readers will know which fact is supported by which source if a fact does not have a source cited for it the fact can be challenged edited or deleted by any editor the exception being as wikipedians sometimes say that no source is needed for the fact that the sky is blue or for any fact not likely to be challenged much about hsa has been challenged in the past possibly because of political dislike toward dr moskowitz and sourcing should be carefully done sources should be secondary meaning at least one level removed from personal experience usually that means an independent third party reliable source by contrast for example sa's website is a primary source about sa self statements are primary sources primary sources are allowed but must be used with greater care and generally should be shunned except in the external links section for example try to find secondary sources wherever possible part of wikipedia's standard is at wp psts the lede sometimes spelled lead should be a summary of the body of the article so it doesn't get a reference because the lede is a summary any statement in the lede should essentially be in the body too so the reference should be positioned where the body's statement is a tendency to write an article like an advertisement sometimes crops up the recent edits to this article were mild in that regard i've seen a much more obvious case recently in another article while this school network has remarkable achievements that should be described legitimately sourced criticisms also have to be included or preserved articles that are too much like ads are subject to severe rewritings or reversions to earlier revisions often by editors less familiar with the subject ref elements generally follow punctuation for example we'd write this is a fact source a and this is another fact source b images need alt texts so that people who are blind or visually impaired can have their browsers read aloud information about a picture the old image also lacked an alt text for a long time and now i've added one i could have long ago but didn't get to it if you create a new image and add it please add an alt text with it thank you again for your work