repeated attempts to force a change against consensus i have changed the text in the summary from passive exposure to tobacco smoke increases risk of disease and disability to passive exposure to tobacco smoke causes death disease and disability i have done this after looking carefully at the four references the text i used comes from reference and also after reading the interesting discussion of this point on the talk page see passive smoking cause and association i have also noted that my edit actually restored the consensus version which was in place since mid november until one editor started changing it on january without any explanation and has kept changing it since then ignoring the fact that his changes were reverted by many editors here is a brief history of the edits done by on january deletes in its entirety the sentence current scientific evidence shows that passive exposure to tobacco smoke causes death disease and chronic illness leading to disability no explnation is provided for the deletion it is reverted by a few moments later on january changes causes death disease and chronic illness leading to disability to increases risk of disease and chronic illness leading to disability and death without explanation this is reverted by user on february changes twice causes death disease and chronic illness leading to disability to increases risk of disease and chronic illness leading to disability this is reverted first by and then by on february changes four times causes death disease and chronic illness leading to disability to increases risk of disease and chronic illness leading to disability and in another attempt changes the whole phrase with may be a health hazard his changes are reverted by three editors who takes it as vandalism dessources dessources and who asks to stop making this change next time causes becomes increases risk this goes to dispute on february repeats the same change twice and is reverted by and between february and february has repeated the same change three times one on each day which have been reverted by and by although i am a newcomer to wikipedia it would surprise me if this were acceptable practice i think that should accept the verdict of the other editors and stop making the same change please discuss