dr judy wood notability isn't this a notable secondary source though dr wood was invited to present her research on the very popular radio show 'we ourselves' hosted by ambrose lane the radio station is wpfw washington d c the interview is all over the internet but a direct link to it is here please let me know thank you as i pointed out on someone else's talk page where you spammed this request it's not clear it's a notable talk show and it's not at all clear the show has a reputation for fact checking without both it's only a reliable primary source for what dr wood actually said if that talk it's not hard to fact check the fact that dr wood's case went all the way to the supreme court that has nothing to do with it nor is it notable anyone can appeal their case to the supreme court technically request supreme court review as an actual appeal to the supreme court can only be done on certain constitutionally specified cases the court let the appealate court decision that there was no case stand with no dissenting justices talk yes anyone can try to appeal their case but not all cases get appealed in fact very few cases get appealed all the way to the supreme court because the supreme court only takes on the biggest and most important cases in this scenario her case was so solid and so backed by evidence that it made it all the way to the supreme court to say that the only research efforts ever to be filed in a court of law and make it to the supreme court are not notable makes me question your integrity as a person amazing ahem the supreme court did not take the case in fact the appealate court ruled there was no potential case and the supreme court did not hear the appeal talk there was a motion to dismiss by the defendents at the level of supreme court and the supreme court upheld that motion the case was dismissed at the level of the supreme court regardless of whether or not the case was actually heard cite my recollection is that appealate court accepted the motion to dismiss or possibly rejected federal jurisdiction against the defendants if there was a supreme court order i'd like to see a pointer to it talk