i respect your logic behind moving the khalifman quote from methods for comparing top chess players throughout history to world chess championship i do however wish to bring your attention back to what was my original intent i have observed this page frequently few years ago i started wondering as to what is the acceptable time period for this page to remain hostage to the old statistics of jeff sonas raymond keene nathan divinsky matej guid and ivan bratko more recently i observed many past players or their protege beginning to exploit this page to proclaim greatness my additions were merely an attempt to coerce a reflection on the present state because throughout history seems to have stopped at the elo list only adds to the confusion because it is inflationary in nature in my humble opinion the present cathartic state is a bigger violation of encylopedia guidelines then my attempt to update it do remember that wikipedia is visited by more lay people who will be seriously mislead confused by the data upto then experts who can objectively transpose it to year a lot of year old kids use wikipedia to learn and write their homework it is fine if we want to wait till someone of great repute explicitly compares current players to fischer or either of the k's or someone acceptable comes forth with up to date statistics beyond that may happen tomorrow or may not happen for another years till then we can keep our heads buried in sand