oppose oppose the first proposition includes both viewpoints in a proportional manner and this proposal seems to be a bit vague and moves a bit too far in the other direction while the wp npov policy does not require including all points of view it does require proportional representation of multiple points of view as evidenced by the sources the current consensus is biased as is this proposal we should within reason be inclusive and representative of the sources josh talk hist josh of course you are going to oppose it because you are biased despite the fact that i have also provided you with evidence not to mention the fact that more people on the kurdish talk page agree more with removing the incorrect term of iranian so i don't know why i see no changes oh way that is right because you are a biased person who is being told what to do by someone else that is the only reasonable explanation i can find for your decisions because i cant think of anyone who would deny factual evidence over and over again if he is not being paid by someone else to do so