may utc this article is indeed biased due to the use of adjectives projected upon the edl within the wiki talk page there appears to be sufficient evidence that the characterization of the edl has not been fact based but in some cases the opinion of opposition groups this very argument is taking place on the talk page of the uaf where they have successfully garnered favorable edits to their own description with the omission of the term left wing yet the edl s group type currently stands as far right wing even when the nature of a topic is agreeably abhorrent the moment one describes said topic with words such as atrocity or insert phobic the subject has become tainted with opinion as the world descends upon wikipedia to learn about these groups due to recent events it is vital that factual information be provided i ve never heard of the edl until a few days ago yet someone like myself untainted by prejudice can see this article is biased at face value lacking an omnipotent author the introductory description of the edl should largely come from how the edl describes itself any evidence to the contrary should be cited properly where wikipedia provides i don t see how journalistic opinionating and scholarly opinion is anything more than just opinion