it is quite astonishing actually how one is in the first place demanded to find good sources if something is to be added changed in this article and when the sources are found or in this case it has even been in the article all along the row of endless excuses and jibberish talking around the issue starts although i have earlier been able to see some sort of point in your claims it is now starting to look as nothing more than a plain parody of your alleged openness to change