i have tried many times to remove prague process from that subheading and i presume it was you who kept putting it back there because nobody else seems interested in this article i propose calling it aftermath and deleting everything that the sources do not link as a direct consequence of the pd aftermath means aftermath of the prague declaration not similar things that happened after the pd was declared to use an admittedly oversimplified analogy if some meps made a declaration calling for the sun to rise and fall each day you could not say that daylight was part of the aftermath of their declaration and again about the rejection can we use the wording kept under review pending legal changes that are highly complicated and will probably never happen due to a lack of enthusiasm and a lack of perceived necessity no i think rejection is more accurate so does the guardian it's not my pov it's simply what the word rejected means in plain english thankyou for your answer on the fact that only two proposals have so far been taken up positively at european level when taking up these proposals was the prague declaration directly credited as the impetus in other words were either of these advances passed with explicit acknowledgement of the prague declaration