the two inline references i removed tripcom and soa all make no mention of go and i have absolutely no idea what relevance they have again why not ask on the talk page you simply do not assume good faith first i'm accused of being frank now you're accusing me of being a spammer no the erlang reference only mentions go in a footnote you mean mentions it thus by name i suppose i mean when the alternative is that you're simply lying you have an occasional 'academic bias' but you're unaware that academics very often refer to one another simply by citation and that citing an article about go in the body text of an introduction to a paper is citing go