i never said we need to cover up the fact i said that the fact is irrelevant to anal sex and the way it is presented in the article leads to a colorful and inaccurate interpretation of male male anal sex it is not the most straight forward way to explain pleasure from male receptive anal sexit is factually and logically a roundabout way to do it and it is misleading really that's what the issue is as i have several times mentioned the only thing that is relevant to anal sex is that prostate stimulation can be pleasureable it's homology with the skene's gland is completely irrelevant also do you think that the psychological factor plays no role in receptive pleasure i personally think that it plays a larger role than the prostate does but it isn't mentioned once in the article