regarding wars argument thanks i will do that soon here is my thinking krugman's criticism is mentioned times in a article it is intellectual dishonesty and one of character to loudly criticize one school of thought and than refuse to even debate for an hour with an actual austrian economist where he has debated with politicians to boost his book sales in his own words so if his critic is in any way or form relevant why not settle it once for all and end with austrians or if he doesn't want to lose his time on irrelevant things he has humanitarian incentive or why call out austrians in a first place so all in all it comes to this either criticizer and critic is irrelevant and should be deleted or what is in my opinion far better solution this discrepancy should be there for readers to know and decide for themselves this could be done in one or two sentences just a note that he refuses the offer of debate from although fund for food bank new york was established a link to site