barbaro i left some comments on f 's talk page i think how wikipedia has treated this f and the barbaro family was unfair i also noticed that this individual seems to have just tried to edit his name out of those two bogus societies which seems fair to me and wikipedia editors keeps bringing it back it seems like wikipedia's disregard for others is very cruel just my thoughts i also left some comments too on genio or ganios talk page too excuse me gustav your contribution with adding san francesco della vigna was actually not correct i left a comment for you on giano's talk page i think everyone is desperately trying to piece inconsequential tid bit in hope that something resembling an article might show up the original version i saw a month ago was just fine and accurate gustav i just had a chance to look at the history of the barbaro family page why was the article listed as the true barbaro family articile removed that is the one that should be the official barbaro family page it has excellent zorzi sources and clearly is structured in a not only a factual way but also a way that captures the true spirit and soul of the family this aricle that you have replaced it with is crummy why isn't this page flagged under construction you gotta be kidding me if this is the official article that is constructed for the great barbaro family please say it isn't so this has got to be the worst article i have ever seen on wikipedia this thing stinks usually articles this dinky are flagged as stubs asking for people to expand on them i think it is time to admit gustav that you are out of your league clearly the person that constructed the former barbaro family article was an art historian that new this family and proper sources well hyper individualist yahoo com is in on the hoax this hyper guy is in on it with tiki two they planned to damage the barbaro family page all long first they started bogus societies which they knew would lead to the family page being destroyed they planned it well tiki used the same company computer which would discredit the family's input and this hyper guy stayed out from editing so he would seem clean but how come the conversation on the secret society talk page is only between tiki and hyper even his tag looks suspicious hyper individualist watch this guy very closely i think the barbaro family needs an i'm sorry because i noticed that whenever it seems like the barbaro page was going to be restored than all of a sudden hyper jumped in with hoax hoax very sneaky and well timed hyper i see what is going on how can anyone discredit all of the evidence that was given in supportfor the family i get you hyper you were the straight man and tiki played the opposite role but you are both as guilty without any doubt this guy just magically comes across an ebay purchase out of the blue from ebay back records yeah right ok hyper excuse me the albergo tie is with the grimaldi of genoa as said in the proper source listed previously your bogus rewritting of history will not be tollerated and you will be reported to wikipedia when gustav doesn t know true history he makes it up or he tries to delete remarks that point out his unscrupulous article writing you will be reported to wikipedia return the perfectly good article that was destroyed