the anonymous edit warrior's later version looks okay to me the sentence the site contains many articles by contributers sic sympathetic to the paranormal and to natasha appears to capture the obvious bias of the site in question besides and i'm playing the devil's advocate here if the statistical outcome of an investigation critically depends on whether you assume the subject at hand is bunk it's no wonder that those who believe in this paranormal stuff see the investigation as a confirmation what's up with the asterisk in the external links section