i thought about it some more and i think the basic issue between us is a philosophical one i'll bet you think that the cancer article is done so all it really needs are references i will further venture to guess that you feel this way because you wrote a good part of the article i on the other hand do not feel that it is anywhere near done though i do think it is good it doesn't have the depth that a truly great article will have in that it does not yet reflect the state of knowledge about a topic there are thin weak areas that need more text and i think we are a ways away from touching the bottom here so this is the real reason why i think references are not quite enough so nothing against all the hard work you've no doubt put in to this point there's just a long ways to go