but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first materialscientist talk an admin can block you again now that you've continued to make the very same contentious edit that got you blocked initially if you continue to make that addition which multiple editors have removed and if you continue to refuse to discuss the issue on the article's talk page this is fair warning that i will notify the above admin of your end run disruptive editing tenebrae talk civility warning i while we all offer edits which tend to improve the article you need to exercise better caution in your edit summaries this is not an example of civility calling child is a fairly certain way to ensure your edits are met in the harshest possible light in other words knock off the bullshit sarcasm or you won't like the ensuing discussion jack sebastian talk allow me to be somewhat more clear the next uncivil remark you make in an edit summary will find you taking a somewhat longer break than your previous block we tend to block people for that sort of behavior consider my previous comment a request consider this one a warning jack sebastian talk july the edits you have been reverting have not been made in bad faith so they are not vandalism you should also mind wp rr and your attitude someguy talk your recent edits information svg hello in case you didn't know when you add content to talk pages and wikipedia pages that have open discussion you should sign your posts by typing four tildes at the end of your comment you could also click on the signature button insert signature png or button sig png located above the edit window this will automatically insert a signature with your username or ip address and the time you posted the comment this information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what and when they said it thank you sinebot talk please stop attacking other editors as you did on juno temple if you continue you may be blocked from editing wikipedia your last edit summary referred to numerous editors on juno temple as morons this is unacceptable and i noticed you have been warned for civility previously if you believe the other editors are acting improperly then report them to the appropriate wikipedia noticeboard if it is a content dispute please work it out on the talk page thanks safiel talk further comment on article juno temple in your edit summaries you indicate that you are relying on imdb as a reliable source please read the following brief guideline at wp imdb as a user edited resource imdb is not considered a reliable source for making material edits to an article however it is ok to make an external link from an article to an imdb article i am not taking sides as to whether you or the other editors are correct as to the dispute on juno temple but imdb is not an acceptable source for making your argument thanks safiel talk disambiguation link notification for january hi thank you for your recent edits wikipedia appreciates your help we noticed though that when you edited littleton colorado you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page glee check to confirm fix with dab solver such links are almost always unintended since a disambiguation page is merely a list of did you mean article titles read the faq join us at the dpl wikiproject it's ok to remove this message also to stop receiving these messages follow these opt out instructions thanks dpl bot talk august information icon hello i'm staticvapor i noticed that you recently removed some content from scooby doo wrestlemania mystery without explaining why in the future it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to wikipedia with an accurate edit summary if this was a mistake don't worry i restored the removed content if you would like to experiment please use the sandbox if you think i made a mistake or if you have any questions you can leave me a message on my talk page thanks static message me file orologio rosso or file orologio verde dot svg red clock or green clock icon from wikimedia commons this blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator who declined the request other administrators may also review this block but should not override the decision without good reason see the blocking policy do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked