i'm short of time at the moment and a lot of the policy and guideline pages have had their content shuffled around but here is a recent template deletion discussion that illustrates some of the problems with sourcewatch as a reliable source beyond issues of bias the main reason that open wikis are not allowed as reliable sources is that one can never guarantee what is going to appear on the screen at any given random time when the source page is loaded it could be good info or it could be poop that is the main reason that wikipedia is not allowed to source itself and the principle holds for all wikis as to the drudge issue i think that the arguments presented on talk george soros in opposition to including well sourced criticism from bill o'reilly apply here and eleemosynary was a strong opponent of including that information in the soros article the o'reilly criticism is nowhere near as harsh and derogatory as the piece i removed from drudge o'reilly is certainly more notable as is his opinion than the nypress author i really would like to see a consistent treatment of sources in all articles and i try to apply that wherever i edit but i already have about a thousand articles on my watchlist so i can't fix everything