request hey kirill in the ryulong case voting page finding states mythdon has been posting notes at ryulong's talk page about ryulong's use of the rollback feature for more than a year which is not evidenced in the evidence in the finding in fact another statement in the finding contradicts that by saying however most of mythdon's posts in early consisted of warnings in relation to ryulong's use of the rollback tool i made a similar post on the voting talk page see here but there was no response the posts in were just useless questions and that the diffs in the finding do not evidence any rollback warning in nor does it evidence that i was making warnings for over a year you as well as other arbitration committee members voted in support of the finding but i hope the false statement in the finding is fixed could you please fix this problem in a solution you think is necessary thanks talk contribs