parker v dc i just looked at my comments and wikipedia policy be damned doesn't appear there the policy you cited as an excuse for loading up irrelevant commentary doesn't compel leaving such rubbish in the entry what you're doing is finding materials that regurgitate either the court's dissent or arguments in dissent and posting them under controversy i appreciate not everyone is pleased with the court's decision the place for their arguments is either before the entire circuit court if it grants a hearing or before the supreme court if it goes there for example chemerinsky's rejection of the court's plain english decision doesn't deserve a full paragraph chemerinsky has an argument the court considered it as proposed by the parties and amici curae and rejected it he and you should accept that and gear up for the next hearing if any basically he argued that the ruling had 'no basis in constitutional law' your propose long quote adds nothing of substance to that take a look at the article on the second amendment for an example of how to handle it