your supporting proving my point about your bias satanlovesgaymen was being used as an example of where i personally finding that as a complement as i also love satan while others may see it as an insult others seeing that as an insult is their right i could put hailsatan as my username and i'm sure you'd probably say that's offensive too whereas i'd say that's kind of a religious motto and greeting what part of that satanlovesgaymen is offensive if you don't like that or interpret it a different way you're welcome to do so that is kind of one of the important aspects of satanism the word satan can go anywhere that god can and shouldn't have a different reaction and if it does not my problem your note and whole argument and actions against me are outright fallacious and simply trying to use everything i say in a manipulative and out of context manner as with the fred phelps article placing that particular addition to his wiki was showing counter resistance to his viewpoints of hate so yeah i'll be sure to see about how i challenge this further you don't really belong on this site as an admin if you can't see what you're doing or at least should not be reviewing any article or addition having to do with religion and in particular satanism take your satanic panic elsewher calling my views trolling is designed as an insult to my character and opinions and simply false i'm not here to necessarily go along with popular views nor be censored if i do something that is vandalism yes i agree it does need to be corrected i did no such thing and maybe maybe my reaction was a little overboard however yes i am new at making a lot of edits and never had such blatant and targeted censorship occur on here before what you did was outright biased censorship based on your lack of understanding of subjects that you obviously don't have any business of editing or should maybe check the legitimacy before hand what you're basically saying is my religious tenants have no place on wikipedia such as the freedoms of others should be respected including the freedom to offend to willfully and unjustly encroach upon the freedoms of another is to forgo your own in my postings i did not make a single attack but rather placed factual additions with references now you're obviously spearheading an aggressive attack trying to also go after my username i've been using for quite some time disruptive really because history and text about history isn't going to be a little disruptive if articles have mass bias need mass overhaul and so on and that qualifies as disruptive yes i do plan on being disruptive however i am learning a little more about how to use wiki syntax and the proper places to put arguments yeah right you're not being biased nor making an attack right do you want to poke me in the right direction for further petition and complaint you'r basically having me admit i must be submissive to you who i obviously don't have much respect for and rightfully so based on your actions and displayed ignorance i guess i should appeal to other members of my religion and church to make arguments and complain on my behalf against this action