support a typo variation of this type that seems to have taken on a life of it's own as the google results above show can be mentioned in the body of the article i don't see why his legal name as the title of the article wouldn't be uncontroversial the fact that en wiki article on him has been titled this way for years probably only helped this version propagate re british press from what i've seen it for example nearly universally drops diacritics of diacriticized european names czech latvian etc a practice that is avoided in publications that aim to be viewed as works of reference latvian press for example too can be seen having glaring misspellings and questionable punctuation it is up to wiki editors to be able to differentiate what can be taken away from it and what is just a consequence of a news article being thrown together hastily