fair use images and original article i don't understand this neurotic compulsion that people seem to have to scrap all of my contributions to this article the third paragraph that was previously removed and which i have now reinstated contains relevant description for this article similar descriptions appear in other porn related articles on wikipedia as for the pictures the lead image is a promotional photo head shot and it is a much better representation of the subject than an amateur fan pic the helles belles image illustrates relevant text in the article in fact fair use rationales and appropriate licensing tags have been provided for both of these images i don't understand what the problem is since both images are regularly used for promotional purposes by the copyright holder to market laura angel and products related to her thus the appearance of these same images on wikipedia is altogether fair and appropriate as an accurate visual representation of the subject also both of the images i have added to this article are much more characteristic of laura's professional appearance than the brussels fan pic if someone wants to expand the article and add the fan pic somewhere alongside further text down below they are free to do so however i request that people refrain from taking out perfectly legitimate and accurate contributions that have already been made to this article