july utc i agree they would benefit from a common description which they all shared prior to your edits all using the term state related which was applied by a separate editor in the case of each article and lasting through review for at least years for temple and years for the pitt and psu articles which speaks to wikipedia silence and consensus do any of their current regular editors of these pages share the same delight in minutia and precision i don't know wikipedia wikiproject pennsylvania state university seems rather dormant at the moment the temple article does not have very active editing however it is no secret that pitt is my primary editing interest in wikipedia and i'm extremely concerned in the accuracy of articles relating to pitt and do not feel it benefits wikipedia to compromise that accuracy because of the content of other articles however wp consensus is central dogma of wikipedia and the pitt article should reflect that