please answer my question sir i asked how a npov on this article would take away from the quality of the article if government pov purveyors have a problem with the other side of the story then it must be because that side of the story threatens their established text not because redemption movement purveyors are 'fringe' lunatics to answer your question i object to all of the statements made by the splc and the adl did you read my reasoning behind this if so are you tacitly admitting that i am correct if so can we remove these ridiculous claims if not are you admitting that the splc and the adl are reliable sources who are anonymous writers with no apparent reliable sources themselves please respond