you were right thank you for your intervention in the eucharist article you had no reason to be sorry you were right the first time according to prodego the wp rr does not require the same editor to be reverted only the same content talk my footnote amplification was deleted four times by looie lima that is a clear r violation by prodego's definition also lima has unilaterally redirected history of the eucharist from origin of the eucharist and tried to make a distinction between the two i'm grateful for any time you have spent on this up to now and thank you in advance for any future attention