is someone disputing the neutrality of the article or the style i don't see the neutrality problem the text is a bit florid but i don't agree with ipsenaut's evaluation i'm more concerned about how much was cribbed directly from the eb even though it's pd the material should still be rewritten for wikipedia people can go to the eb to read the eb we shouldn't just be reprinting the eb here surely someone has written noteworthy commentary on petronius since