right so we've dealt with the question of qworty's slander let's move on here's why you should not be involved in this discussion qworty you have demonstrated not simply to me not simply to wikipedia but to the world at large that you are incapable of editing in good faith when the mainstream media characterizes you qworty as a ranting slanderous biased editor then well we should take that seriously i do hope you've read the salon article about you if not let me quote your screed was interpreted rightly as an apoplectic defense by one wikipedia editor of actions that other wikipedia editors labeled 'revenge editing ' there s a lot of anger here not to mention an unhealthy fixation with excrement call me persnickety but reading qworty s comments did not give me the greatest faith in wikipedia s internal process for building an encyclopedia of human knowledge those aren't my words regarding you they are salon's they have identified you as an apoplectic vengeful disgrace with an unhealthy scatological fixation so that's what we're dealing with here you qworty as the star of an article entitled wikipedia's shame now wikipedia requires that we assume good faith in our fellow editors which i do until the most extreme and frankly comical evidence points out that we're dealing with someone like you since we know that you will do everything within your power to sabotage any entry remotely related to filipacchi it's a waste of time to discuss matters of policy with you i'm happy to debate subtle points of epistemology with almost anyone into the wee hours of the morning just not with you as for little green rosetta i've been giving her the benefit of the doubt even though she accused me on the basis of what she termed behavioral and technical evidence of using sock puppets even though when that proved to be false okay a lie she didn't apologize but instead came here to support your qworty's frivolous snark despite all of this i've given her the benefit of the doubt now shall we get back to the tedious matter of editing this article by we i mean me and the editor who hasn't starred in an article entitled wikipedia's shame