frankly i think that the article is giving too much coverage of the ritual decalogue theory as it is not well accepted even by biblical critics and not at all by any religious jewish or christian commentators that the bible doesn't unambiguously identitfy the c is not a theory it's a fact i think using the intro to distinguish between rd and ed reflects a complete lack of balance wp weight refers to viewpoints not facts heqwm has not provided us with real arguments or sources for that matter other than his own reading of exodus what part of the burden of proof is one you do you not understand