fair use disputed for image image devilina jpg thanks for uploading image image devilina jpg however there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under fair use may be invalid please read the instructions at wikipedia non free content carefully then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use using one of the templates at wikipedia fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with wikipedia policy but remember that you must complete the template do not simply insert a blank template on an image page if it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion if you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page thank you marvel database project please stop as others have noted on this page wikipedia disallows links to other wikis such as the marvel database project please see the guidelines at wikipedia reliable sources examples which state among things wikis including wikipedia and other wikis sponsored by the wikimedia foundation are not regarded as reliable sources hello tenebrae thank you for leaving me a message about this wikipedia policy in the same spirit as wikipedia i believe that the marvel database project is indeed a reliable source as an aside i see dozens of links to marvel com's wiki as well their wiki is far less complete and on the whole i believe less accurate i request you reconsider the removal of those links as they contain valid and relevant additional information at the least i ask that we discuss this topic with other wikipedia members as i believe there would be support from other members of the comics wikiproject would you consider further discussion kind regards i completely agree if you'll notice they aren't using the wiki as a source they're saying if you 're interested in more info than the godawful 'notability' policy lets us post go here even on official policy pages they mention that you should throw up a link to an external fanwiki look how many times wookieepedia is mentioned in official thingies i'm going to readd the link on because it's in my watchlist the hobgoblin page and i will take it to an admin if i have to right here also note that palpatine a featured article has a link to the wookieepedia final fantasy vi another featured article has a link to the ff wiki and so on if this practice was frowned upon those would have been sliced out before they got fa status they didn't because it's not against effing policy to have them as links and i don't care who originally put them there at any rate i've raised the question here wikipedia talk reliable sources examples so let's see what they say apologies i've gotten to the point where i don't consider that language especially as i was using it a substitute for a word i would consider uncivil for what it's worth use any language you like on mine aquaman dispute hello tenebrae i was referred to you by fellow wikiproject comics member to see if you may be able to assist in a dispute over the aquaman article you see i was under the impression that they wished me to create a separate page for the new incarnation of the character arthur joseph curry when i created the page other users illustrated to me that i had misunderstood them and reacted in a very hostile manner i then stood behind my decision for the split when maple leaf brought to my attention that the aquaman article itself was relatively large by normal article standards a user then reverted the change and re merged the articles regardless of the glaring size issue i would appreciate your input and assistance in this manner the main discussion is happening on the talk page for the aquaman article and your intervention as a respect