paramount parks you're wanton destruction and reverts are not helpful see talk page epson copied from user talk jkatzen if by you're you mean your and by wanton you mean gratuitous and by your patronizing tone you intended something more constructive i still disagree i think at any given point the article should at least read like a final piece even if some elements aren't cemented and with random question marks interrupting the flow i think it's hard to read i'd hardly consider my edits destruction any more than any changes made by any other editor who takes an interest in the style and legibility of an article i'm willing to discuss the merits of using question mark blanks with you but i don't think the harsh tone you've been taking with me since my first edit of your work is helpful