re tracker business software hello thanks for your comments on my talk page you mention that the article was already reviewed by admins and approved for inclusion in wikipedia i tried to make clear the purpose of my edit in the edit summary but i guess i didn't do a good enough job i read through the afd the drv and the past deletions to get an idea of what was going on afd drv were able to determine the notability of the article but you hit it right on in your comment to me that in it's past state the article wasn't much more than a product sheet which to me is synonymous with advertising wikipedia articles aren't about features lists or product offerings they are about bringing together neutral third party verified information about topics as i'm sure you've seen i rearranged the page a little more since i have no problem with the screenshots or product names descriptions so i tried several things which display that information in a little bit more standard wikipedia also this is minor but wikipedia admins are no different in terms of article approval than any other editor i am also an admin but that just gives me the ability to work on more technical aspects of the project you are welcome to expand on the article as it is now but it would be preferable to do it by gathering information from the many third party sources listed the article is very well sourced but not very much of that information is brought into the article as for the list of project management software with such a relatively short list it is inappropiate to have several links to the same family of products i don't know a way would satisfy your concern other than to suggest to put the link in the best place you see fit in the future it might be worthwhile listing separately the desktop and the web based products but not while there is only enough information for one article again please remember the primary focus of wikipedia see what wikipedia is not which is to bring neutral information not advertising or promoting