restoring to the original version the article has been restored to its original b class version before the edits by by the pib article on which by made the edit is incorrect that report was submitted by the army from the article the standing comitteed to which the report was submitted says there were clear factual inaccuracies in the army's deposition before the standing committee the most glaring of them is the army's suggestion that it is carrying out trials on the arjun's performance in fact the army has already accepted the arjun for introduction into service based upon its driving and firing performance over the years after firing trials in summer the trial report written by the army said the accuracy and consistency of the arjun has been proved beyond doubt the ongoing trials in pokhran that the army is citing are accelerated usage cum reliability trials aucrt in these two arjun tanks were run almost non stop for kilometres not to judge performance but to evaluate the tank's requirement of spare parts fuel and lubricants during its entire service life i would like by to prove that indeed the problems mentioned in the article is that mentioned in the pib article from latest sources after the parliamentary committee agreeing about the pib report being wrong also i request admins not to revert back until by proves the above requested things his edit will become unverifiable and based on the pib report which is incorrect thank you all