article hi craddock please chill out and take a step back for a moment i have considered blocking you for a bit to stop the disruption you are causing but i feel a final plea is a better bet for now on wikipedia we have an important guideline of comment on the content not the editor your very first contribution to that afd is to attack the nominator and it has gone downhill from there all you are really doing is undermining the afd in a way which will not benefit you take a moment to step back consider how you could marshal an argument to explain how the article meets wikipedia's notability criteria and continue with a reasoned explanation in the deletion discussion continuing with your current behaviour will end up with you being blocked errant chat hi errant thanks for your message and sorry if i seemed a bit frustrated it seems as if the nominator has tried to sabotage many articles on wikipedia talking to other admins and editors the whole point is that the adf should not even be there and yet it remains because the nominator has a 'higher standard within wikipedia' than me which i find unfair if you read the comments in the afd you will see they are mainly to keep or strong keep the article nevertheless the nominator has tried to make things difficult by issuing a sockpuppet investigation despite me admitting my fault and promising not to do it again i hope you can close the afd so we can move on once again since i'm new to wikipedia i hope you will not block me but please also see things from my point of view best philip london uk