i would like to say all books and web entries should have some relevant description of enough content or no one would know what the books where about a single paragraph description of the content is not the same as a lengthy review i think the current book descriptions are ok if some jws are not happy why don't they put some 'positive' books in the positive section as a balance reducing book descriptions until they are meaningless or so vague that no one knows what they are about is a rather surreptitious form of direct censorship or reader manipulation at the least and should not be encoraged we all need to be honest about our motives for this or that change to any wikepedia article i also noted a lot of accusations about pov this and that but if we feel something is pov surely we have to put forth a good and specific argument against the information before it is changed to something else simply saying x is pov therefore i will zap it cannot be good enough one has to give a specific proven point not a rhetorical claim but a factual one that can be proven or it all just ends up like anarchy and stifles any real debate or reasonable conclusions to debates th of july