are you someone's toy boy is that what your alias alludes to what right have you with no physics credentials to dare to judge a phd in physics with years in the field the world is growing stupid anti gray wrote about the wikitors you might be a pseudoscientist if you believe your subscription to analog provides the necessary background to argue with phd scientists you think real science is mostly developed in garages or hobby rooms you think scientists are inflexible to changing paradigms using one of pseudoscientists' favorite terms see definition of science you think the government big business or traditional scientists are in a conspiracy to prevent the pseudoscientists from showing the truth to the rest of the world motivated by such movies as chain reaction you think science is purely to start a business and make money you think it's cool to announce impossible sounding claims to the media without a peer review process see above expository discussion or other legitimizing process you may believe the us patent office is a legitimizing process if they aren't in conspiracy with above you're aiming for the einsteinian turn science upside down revolution of thought and universal understanding based on your two years of high school physics and a copy of omni magazine you think highly suspicious behavior is actually the way people protect themselves from intellectual theft your ego is large enough to tell the world that its understanding of the universe has always been wrong and your fantastic undocumented unverified unrecorded and unreproducable experiment proves it your college degree if you have one and your pseudoscientist interests have absolutely nothing in common for instance you may be arguing about fusion with a phd in nuclear physics and inflating your ego by doing so while you only have a degree in zoology latest from sarfatti about the ira einhorn case jpg of cia memo of by richard helms on soviet paranormal r d and clandestine services most of ira's book is like reading casanova about his erotic exploits with women in ireland i have no doubt they are true but the tales though entertaining at first quickly grow weary if one is not a teenager or an oprah addict they are irrelevant except to prove that ira did not smell women were attracted to him he did not smell at all when i met him in ira's understanding of free energy and his reference to tom bearden are not to my liking because the physics is wrong however his connections to the yugoslavs in when holly was murdered the shah of iran's family and many of his political activities made him many powerful enemies with the motive and opportunity to frame him and to weaken the movement he was spearheading ira's account of a ufo close encounter rings true note ira's mention of michael murphy kit green and jacques vallee for free energy read zero point vacuum energy ira is not a physicist and he was fooled by disinformation agent colonel tom bearden whose claims are worthless at that time i had not yet figured out the physics of what ira was after he was my book agent and i was one of his network of that corresponds also to i would not solve the paranormal physics russian psychotronics weapons problem of dci richard helms until the mid 's i e the necessity of signal nonlocality from two way relation between pilot bit wave and it particle hidden variable and the consequent replacement of micro quantum theory with the macro quantum theory of more is different emergent systems i would not solve the ufo problem until when the meaning of dark energy for metric engineering warp and wormhole dawned on me as through the glass darkly the glass is getting less opaque a copy of sarfatti's phd degree is in open directory signed by jack horner no more sitting in the corner on sept pm pacific coast time