l o uk credits on hir talk page melbournestar has an exchange of messages in which s he accepts that the credits for episodes of l o uk serve as sufficient sources to establish the relationship between the original l o episodes and their uk remakes there is no rational reason why those same credits do not serve as sufficient sourcing for the same information in this article melbournestar specifically and unequivocally states that no additional citation is needed when the credits of the uk episode state that the episode is based on a us episode demanding additional sourcing on this article when s he has already acknowledged that it is not necessary is irrational please stop reverting the information in support of irrationality melbournestar has now stated on hir talk page that s he is making this change in an attempt to prove a point about this article and similar articles ah no i'm clearly just saying once this is past i'll move back onto the bigger article which is l o uk just because i say 'i agree' does not mean 'i agree' what i still find so hilarious is that you'd rather violate rr and personal attack another user then going ahead with consensus or providing a reliable source you've done neither and to make things better i'll promise you that i won't leave until either is reached all quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable published source using an inline citation wikipedia verifiability wikipedia does not publish original thought all material in wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable published source wp or wikipedia articles should be based on reliable published secondary sources and to a lesser extent on tertiary sources secondary or tertiary sources are needed to establish the topic's notability and to avoid novel interpretations of primary sources though primary sources are permitted if used carefully all interpretive claims analyses or synthetic claims about primary sources must be referenced to a secondary source rather than original analysis of the primary source material by wikipedia editors wp or do not base articles entirely on primary sources wp or i may have accepted the credits on the l o uk article before' i took a read of this talk to me