there has to be a balance between the details that clearly explain a character and the fanish devotion that inspires an entire website in struggling to maintain that balance we editors often find ourselves in conflict i believe that's what is happening here jason's 'importance' is pov he was barely mentioned in the original crisis and only because his return to life was attributed to superboy prime did his return elicit infinite crisis attention we have no idea how important he'll end up being in countdown since they change these things on the fly and we'd be speculating if we were to state anything beyond what has happened remember this article should not be a substitute for reading the comics now i do agree that character development including the predicament with his parentage should be addressed however there's no need to make a wholesale change when addressing one situation at a time would be more productive as a fellow editor i disagree about 'inappropriate' language in the death in the family section it looks fine to me and since it links to the main article were more detail can be read there's no need to expand it further i found your entry overly detailed in that it included many quotes most of which that did not serve to do more than elaborate on what was already written and it suffered from poor editing with your non standard subheaders much of the information was useful and some if trimmed down to manageable portions would be useful i like your elaboration on catherine todd and while the intro paragraph is nice that information is already in the preceding section and repetition is unneeded i'd like to work with you and see how we could better include information in the article '''' talk contribs ''