regentspark as va points out some of the material in this section is quite critical of snyderman and rothman and that is fine the reception section should include all views you seem to be confusing two separate issues first should this article exist at all reasonable editors may differ but since it already survived on deletion attempt we need to for now assume that it exists second given that it exists how much material should be devoted to topics x y and z reasonable editors may also differ on that but i hope that we can all agree that this article is not too short so to the extent that you think discussion of jensen's views are wp undue the simple solution is to balance them by including more details on the views of ferguson et al