cla i think the evidence against is overwhelming if you want to escalate this to arbcom i have repeatedly asked to temper his actions on this probation because he has a history of over reacting against one side while defending the other take a look at his log of blocks over the last months and it's practically a who's who of the skeptic side of this debate without a single sanction against the other side this alone is not an indictment but if you examine the actions he did not take particularly his passionate point defense of wmc after one of wmc's temper tantrums his harsh actions against skeptics are all the more suspect he's the anti lar whereas lar tends to speak his mind but ultimately respects consensus 's discussion is impeccably calm and neutral while his actions are clearly one sided i don't have a lot of free time these days but i can perhaps collect a bunch of diffs for you to build a case if you choose