july utc we are not assessing the truth claims of a religion we are assessing the historicity of an individual i would actually be quite happy for evidence to exist it would make the subject more interesting and wouldn't cause the least problem for my view that the supernatural is merely wishful thinking proving a certain man existed years ago is a long way from turning him in to a god i'm pretty certain michael travesser exists but he ain't anything other than a delusional man despite what he and his followers believe as for your weak attack on my lack of expertise it's irrelevant i'm as capable of sourcing and quoting expert references as the next person wikipedia would be a desolate place if your reinvention of policy was implemented and only experts were able to contribute your irrationality is beginning to show 'jesus historicity' and 'jesus myth' are very much the same thing if you don't wish to participate in discussions that trouble you you will find conservapedia com a far more comforting environment