not to be contrary but this edit while fully unconstructive adverse to our policies on npov and our guidelines on tone is not vandalism as i believe you know vandalism is vandalism is any addition removal or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of wikipedia emph in orig in fact test edits are not considered vandalism vandalistic edits require that one be acting in bad faith specifically adding a personal opinion to an article once is not vandalism it's just not helpful and should be removed or restated pm is not permitted to remove or restate such as he is not permitted to edit articles about living individuals additionally if pm intended to alledge he was removing vandalism there are a series of steps he should have taken after removing said vandalism he did not warn the user and he did not mark the edit as minor in summary said edit however rightful it was however justified it was under wp blp and all else was expressly prohibited by pm's probation if he would like to apply for a modification to that probation allowing him to make good edits to living persons biography i would have no comments on that application but untill such time he is not permitted to edit biographies of living people