may point out that what is economicly good for one is always negitive to another and yes the idea of the impact of walmart is always going to be a pov because each area of that whole idea is rooted in someones point of view now this is what i have been trying to point out for i don't know years now off and on you can not look at walmart and say all this critism and then look at target and say its ok for them to do it that gives a pov right off we can't just look at walmart as alone because its a branch of the retail it is not alone in most of its practices and much of the referances here are based on facts put forth by people who stand to gain by walmart having a bad image that could be compeditors unions small ma and pa's and some of the facts like i have pointed out are just outright frauds we need this rebuild of this entry to purge some of this garbage info and get this entry back to where it should be the ace