this is my second message on this topic you are currently engaged in a revert war over a link that you have not made a single arguement on the talk page to justify or remove your only arguement currently has been we have an article on the timeline i'm not sure we need a link here at all tom harrison talk which is not based on any policy or guideline wp el does not require the link to contain information not in any other wikipedia article but to contain information relevant to the current article that could not be covered in it once it reaches featured article status which cr does cr provides a more detailed timeline then can ever be provided inside the article and further that is shown simpyl by the existence of a timeline article if th einformation in cr could be included in the article we would not have a split off article obviously so i ask you to participate on the talk page and use wikipedia guidelines and policies to make your arguement as it would be more pursuasive then simpyl reverting without explanation based on more then personal opinion and feelings thank you