tibet nat krause you have made deletions in the discussion of tibet stating the reason as 'irrelevance' if you wish to delete one side's response to a pov first raised by the other side as 'irrelevant' then please also delete the other side's pov as irrelevant dorje claimed post mao china is raping tibet for its resources it is perfectly legitimate to ask what he she actually meant dorje also clearly stated the land known as tibet was being juggled by the entire china and britain and at no time was the 'tibetans' in charge so that point had to be clarified let's face it britain had no business for being in tibet britain is on the other side of the world it is quite clear that your stance is anti chinese however if you want to be an editor you have to suppress your natural prejudices and allow a npov to be reached