opinion that the judge s report is biased that s not an opinion it s an obvious fact that s the whole purpose of the report the finding of the court was guilty and the report attempts to justify the court s findings the prosecution s argument and the judge s conclusion are one and the same you can t get any more biased than that that s the reason for the wp blp prohibition on use of court records to support assertions about a living person and anything in the report that it claims is evidence or circumstance that leads to the guilty conclusion is an assertion about a living person please step back and look at it logically lack of an alternate rs is not justification to demand that you be allowed to use a prohibited biased source that would be the same as someone else demanding to use injusticeinpeurgia org as a rs unless you can provide an alternate for the same information