and mine now the memory clock speeds of the main consoles x ps wiiu i put that there along time ago when no one lse has bothered to and other details in that article and thers i have done it and others built upon it now look closely att he microconsole section in my version comapred to his in his he has alot of things missing in mine i actually went to st n rd part websites n with a little thinking and figured all this stuff out myself and ofcourse looked up the facts in other websites i mean the info matches even some articles here i mean i dont understand what the problem is when i'm actually doing the better job here how the hell can he think doing a half assed job with errors be better than one that is more detailed and accurate just because he didn't bothered looking it up or figuring it out on his or her own hmm like i said this is more than just an error correcting it seems more like a personal thing to me from some envious year old man if he was the one who went through all this trouble to look up the info fill in the blanks with a little thinking and problem solving he wouldn't say anything lol but since he din't he uses and abuses his power by saying its disruptive that is ridiculous on so many levels and totally untrue ilike i said before i m learning and yes i'll try to cite and get links or sources as much as i can but as you can see by the links i put here well i know how to find out facts about something as best as i can as you can see my contributions and work speeks for itself so i made a few mistakes in the past we all have its completely normal to make mistakes but theres adifferenc between making mistakes and being disruptive to purposely mess up an article i would never do that because this is of my favorite websites i come here pretty often to look up information and its wonderful that anyone can contribute but i also know that also anyone can purposely vandalize or mess up on purpose im not those people take my edits seriously and i did enough contributions here that i can tell the stuff i put has helped others because the ones who appreciate my efforts are the s who built upon it and don't erase it because its correct just because some does edits in a mor lazy and half assed way doesn't mean they have to abuse their power as admins just because they couldn't do it themselves thats childish and immature and unjust i'm sure theres many who would agree with me on this and i know the ones who don't aree are probably the ones who have the same prejudice and envious mindset as the or s who suspended me just because i want to make a more accurate and specific version of an article as opposed to a half assed mostly blank article just because they didnt feel like doing the extra work or researching or figuring out piecing things together or because they aren't knowledgeable on the subject im tech savy so i know enough i contribute and i come to wikipedia to get information and research so im a contributor as well as a reader do the right thing people like me aren't disruptive just because we have different ways to edit that are more dedicated than some we all have our ways of doing things and as long as they do it with good intentions to make the site better than they're not being disruptive its nto as if they're purposely trying to mess up an article it because we all have ways of doing things but thing i know is that being as accurate n thorough as possible isn't bad