with all due respect this bibliography entry is not a matter of research but you have a point we wouldn't put an sgi publication in the shoshu bibliography putting a shoshu publication in the sgi bibliography is asserting the dominance of the sect over the former hokkeko which is exactly the sort of hierarchical thinking that sgi rejects let's limit the bibliography to sgi's self presentation put all the middleway books in there there's an idea and respectable outsider accounts from people who are not invested in the argument this will do a service to readers i was recently picking through japanese books critical of sgi at the harvard library and i was surprised to find so many smears and guilt by association arguments the best japanese books on the subject are not by freelance journalists but by scholars of religion like shimazono of course the japanese public has some distrust in religion scholars after the whole aum shinrikyo affair but alas that distrust is not something wikipedia can integrate neutrally into articles tock