wikipedians for palestine has eleven members who by their own criteria are members of the wiki organization in some capacity acting in a clandestinely promoting their agenda while remaining 'wikipedians' in good standing surely that is the very definition of stealth no mechanism exists by which wiki is able to detect these agenda driven wikipedians unless there exist some redress to this problem the rules of wiki will apply to some but not all thus voiding the fair application of justice this is a flaw in the wiki model and as a flaw it will affect what is wiki especially when these individuals sit in judgement it appears the model in which wiki prides itself has faltered and is not the answer to the achieving a neutral point of view promoted as axiomatic to the wiki philosophy thus making wiki no better than the encyclopedia that use to be given away in supermarkets other evidence of this is demonstrated in the contending 'universes' of contentious issues perhaps the john stuart mills model would serve better if all mankind minus one were of one opinion and only one person were of the contrary opinion mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person than he if he had the power would be justified in silencing mankind at least mills would not contrive barriers to free speech which seems to be part of the herding instinct at wikiland