grant specifically says that no attempt to enforce the rule of nonrecognition as regards east jerusalem seems to have been made at u n level no occasion for enforcement has been afforded in regard to the golan heights also grant is the only guy i could find who calls un general assembly resolutions regimes of non recognition and i believe that using this term is misleading and not neutral so not sourced reliably and not written in a neutral style i would also suggest that reverting after a specific brd request even if only doing it once or twice per day is edit warring and disruptive i'm sure arbcom frowns on that sort of thing as well