excuse me many previous editors including fa reviewers thought there had not been enough biographical info this article is not about his public life alone which hasn't yet merited a separate article other than legislation sponsored by ron paul nor about his viability as a candidate see ron paul presidential campaign this is a biography and his private life ought to be weighted as fully as reliable sourcing and blp permit i have not seen consensus anywhere that anyone's family should be constrained to names and categories and dates it is also properly placed in the article where else would it go naturally a successful vibrant year marriage is an exceptional claim fully sourced of course no hard feelings but i will probably revert much of this later under bold revert discuss looking forward to an interesting discussion i also have another source for additional of this if of course you have any reliably sourced negative information please state it neutrally here