addendum documentation for arbcom reverted from an by future perfect at sunrise twice hours later the admin reverted their message now we can consider the matter of what happened aftermath note i created this topic when i was concerned there might be an serious emergency situation but did not have sufficient knowledge of the editor's history especially recent onwiki conversations to judge how serious the matter was but i had just observed behavior which was sufficiently out of the norm to not simply dismiss the replacement message on their user page interact aftermath note a i may be incorrect but i do not believe equazcion had sufficient knowledge of the history of the administrator to simply dismiss the matter unfortunately there may be more to discuss about the interaction above but let us first clarify if i am correct or incorrect with regard to equazcion's knowledge of the administrator history especially recent communications interactions interact aftermath note b in the interaction above equazcion has characterized my interaction with the administrator on user talk jimbo wales prior to the administrator's user page replacement message before we discuss this further perhaps equazcion may wish to reconsider the characterizations interact i will immediately notify equazcion of the notes a and b above so they may comment interact question s for administrators regarding the user talk message the big question of course do we need to follow up regarding this clearly an administrator replacing their user page and especially leaving it that way for hours with that is an inappropriate reaction to any situation note that the administrator's edits just prior to their user page replacement were user talk jimbo wales revision as of february rodhullandemu bloqued why reply and fuck you user talk jimbo wales revision as of february rodhullandemu bloqued why i'm gone user talk jimbo wales revision as of february rodhullandemu bloqued why goodbye now what is all that the reaction to hint a mock and a hear hear revision as of february proofreader bloqued why edit conflict retort to rodhullandemu who clearly has too many stars on their veteran editors medal note python logic chip activated for valentine's day drama revision as of february proofreader bloqued why edit conflict hear hear to rodhullandemu's star reply to that one starred nitwit proofreader although by a technicality only are allowed executive summary light version that dastardly proofreader mocked an administrator to virtual death with one silly message and a follow up hear hear should any administrator who can be mocked to virtual death so easily retain the bit interact executive summary heavy version inappro