racepacket i welcome your voice of reason it has been almost non existent in this discussion it's fine if wikipedia doesn't satisfy my perspective entirely however if some good part of it is not presented then all that is presented by the ncc is propaganda if the nasty stuff isn't discussed at least somewhat then the public will be fed pablum i'm sure a neutral point of view does not in any way mean sweeping embarrassing facts under the rug or pulling the wool over the public's eye i realize that the full weight of my argument would be better suited to a web site but wikipedia has a moral obligation to present some of what i have pointed to no one else has and it is clearly in the public interest to do so and in the interest of balanced knowledge of the issue just deleting the politics of gatineau park would be a form of censorship