indian martial arts the dispute is that i've mentioned the official citations from tsumi hozan jujutsu the shaolin temple gracie family and goju ryu karate and what i keep getting is that japan and china never interacted with any ancient civilization at all and the official citations don't mean anything the facts when backed by the official citations will get an npov and factual inaccuracy tag and as if that was not enough i've been called anti white people pro tamil i really have no idea when i came to be identified as a tamil i'm not anything even remotely close alex doss one of the guys believes that i actually am that guy and biased my credibilty now becoming a questionable thing my sources are undisputed i've cried myself hoarse for anyone to come dispute the official sources on the talk pages and no one comes forward to they go mad because i mentioned a fighter from a game in the indian martial arts in pop culture section and when they fraudeulently changed his fighting style from what capcom officialy states i objected i started the article i've been sincerely working my ass off the first few times i even edited the article so any legitimate grievances will be met plus i've constantly maintained that in addition to what i've officially cited here i'll bring forward an assortment of websites confirming my facts and a huge list of academies and official citations from martial arts disciplines in near future but none of that stops the opposition from mindlessly putting the tags in there in other words the information is undisputed the official sources been mentioned and they confirm my stand the opposition though has adopted a technique of three on one encircling deviation from the central topic of official citations on which i have yet to hear why do they think that official citations are npov and factually ic material and mindless lies like changing the fighting style of video game charecter dhalsim and have gone to the extent of telling me to be a nice chap and more things to that effect i've cited the official sources and that's it if someone has a problem with the official versions they'll have to live with the fact that the problem exists in their head and not in the article the shaolin knows more about it's history than any of the three involved it's a fact i mentioned an assortment of websites pertaining to the popular point of view and it was rejected as random what the official citations with that said please remove the npov and factual tags thank you