august utc your comment your comment well quite frankly not everyone subscribes to that notion and it is quite wrong of you and a handful of others to push your ideology onto people who hold a different opinion on the matter there is simply no actual person named chelsea manning here what we have is a man named bradley manning who wants to be called by this other name and awhile ago it was reportedly breanna and referred to as she that is all that is the reality that the article should reflect the policy of wp commonname bradley manning was a solider in the united states military bradley manning was caught passing classified intel to unauthorized parties convicted and sentenced after that bradley manning decided to be called chelsea that is how the flow of the article should be these are all things that a man named bradley manning did you can't just flick a switch and rewrite history to say chelsea manning was convicted of violating the espionage act and so on that just isn't historically accurate or truthful when and if he legally changes his name that is when the transition process of the article should begin that all was simply way too soon i want you to know that i agree with you your comment was one of if not the best on the talk page i just wanted to let you know thanks