i'm not sure from that comment how much you understand about research in this area there is for example a dispute about the validity of self reported results in the general evidence base for cbt which has gained momentum in the last five years a lot of new work has been done since that would throw those claims into dispute at the moment you are giving prominence to a one country study in a controversial area that is itself years old that is cherry picking as the table gives a false impression of cbt's position in the pantheon of methods i can understand an advocate pushing it but we have to be balanced here talk