what follows is a discussion with donaldrichardsands transferred from my user talk page dear donaldrichardsands the link for the revised article is here thanks for taking a look from what you wrote above i understand that you do not mind replacing the old version with the revised text on the main page i would very much want to get other editors of good will involved all best i think it would be more accurate to say the revised outline seems to resolve the sensationalist approach of the old version however and this is what will take the time the old version does have merits which should not be lost there is an energy among some people to show that berezovsky is a mafia like boss when i told a friend about berezovsky and the accusations of his involvement as such a boss and how i would like to email him and ask him to donate a picture for the article my friend expressed shock and dismay that i would risk my life so the article needs the balanced outline of the revised version but should deal with both sides of the view of him this balance is what takes the time i would enjoy helping your energy for the article is obvious if we could get an editor who wants to portray berezovsky as a mafia boss to agree to the balanced outline and then to enter some careful rules of collaboration the article could strengthen quickly in the article i am working on presently one other editor is active and he is very critical but he and i have finally agreed to work with the talk pages and to talk more civilly with each other and things are progressing much better similar cooperation could happen for the berezovsky article rely on secondary sources insist on a conservative scholarly examination of all aspect of berezovsky's life and yes i still want to email him ask him for a picture and perhaps go for coffee dear donaldrichardsands thank you for your input of course mr berezovsky is a highly controversial person and i think all these controversies are reflected in the revised text but he is a major figure who influenced russian political history over two decades and his biography deserves professional approach not only for his own sake but for the sake of the whole russia block on wikipedia with respect the belief of some people that berezovsky is a mafia boss is an opinion which is not supported by facts if an opinion is poorly sourced and potentially libelous it has no place on wikipedia regardless of how many people may hold it otherwise we should change the rules and make wikipedia a collection of opinions supported by a majority vote under current rules we should work with well sourced facts the facts in this matter are as follows that particular opinion has originated from a single source mr klebnikov whose antisemitic bias has been noted by three respectable independent sources the publication forbes which printed his opinion has unequivocally retracted it as lacking any evidence in a libel court hearing dozens of profiles of mr berezovsky in major world newspapers which adhere to the standards of fair and responsible journalism including serious russian sources do not repeat these allegations i believe that wikipedia should adhere to the same standards the revised article states the sourced facts as they are there was an opinion voiced which was then discredited of course if anyone can quote another reputable source which supports this opinion with evidence it should be mentioned since i am going on vacation i have put the revised text on the main page and leave it for the community to compare it with the previous version which can be accessed via history tag amend challenge and comment as long as it is done by the rules the last thing i want is another edit war on the other hand seeking consensus is just one of wikipedia rules avoiding pushing opinions and removing unsourced slander is another