hi moonriddengirl thanks for making the article more neutral i do not fully agree with the current version but the latest edits do seem to represent a major improvement further the lead contains the phrase though no evidence exists to suggest any of these reports are true this seems to be undue to me the source could not find any evidence ok but this does not mean that no evidence exists there may be evidence which this source could not find does not know about moreover sian does not seem to have made much of an effort to find evidence and proving disproving evidence was not the objective of that source sian seems to be trying to find a psychological anthropological type of explanation for the forced conversion narrative and has explained it in those terms so using this source to say no evidence exists seems inappropriate moreover the scope section contains the proclamation though in the uk it has been proven false this is misleading because the source is about forced conversion among sikhs in uk and is not about forced conversion in uk as a whole i would be grateful if you could review these phrases in the article thanks and regards