thanks for the snack i like to chip in sometimes with a helpful comment but please don't take that as meaning that i totally agree with your recent stance on wikipedia matters sure there are some trigger happy people about and new editors should be treated with every consideration but to me this doesn't mean we accept any self publicity trivia or opinionated diatribes they care to post this is meant to be an encyclopedia not like social media websites where they eagerly accept any all user generated content so it may appear hostile to those whose expectations are formed in using those other websites to reduce the chances that a new user will have a bad experience it would be better to argue for measures to let them know before they post their contributions that we do in fact have limits to what we accept and do demand scads of references that and educating new page patrollers and restricting new or clueless users from doing patrolling sorry yes limits and restrictions and not because we're loveless police but because restrictions and limits are necessary to maintain our project as a usable credible and valuable resource for the world's readers for my money this inclusionist deletionist polarity is just daft thanks for your work and hope to see you around talk