the pov rule does not ban the citing of pov material the rule bans the writing of pov wikipedia articles if no one could cite any pov articles no major exposes could be cited here and i dare you no pun intended to find a more thorough expose on the duke lacrosse case and exposes notwithstanding throughout wikipedia pov articles are cited and linked to in footnotes and in external links and that is permitted by the npov rule what is not permitted is the deletion of all pov links footnotes from one side of a dispute the constants in this revert war go beyond the vdare article the editor in question has used four different ips so far at bloomfield college in nj while following me around from article to article not just duke related and as user valtam noted never writing an edit summary fourth revert in five hours by suspected sockpuppet user note that user just made his fourth revert in less than five hours in violation of the three revert rule note too that user is a suspected sockpuppet from bloomfield college whose recent m o and history are identical to user user user see whois summaries below january according to the whois reports for and your friend is a student or employee of bloomfield college not sure if that helps but obviously it's the same person ''''''''''talk january search results for new jersey higher education network njedge net january search results for new jersey higher education network njedge net bloomfield college njedge bloomfield college net arin whois database last updated enter for additional hints on searching arin's whois database on september user also violated wikipedia rules by secretly deleting an entire passage by another editor not me on the talk jim mcgreevey page diff