tags this is a good faith tag saying that this article needs some work it's my opinion that the article is lacking the facts to support it adequately as an encyclopedic entry looking at the archives i can see that many others agree wit me and have been frustrated by the npov and removal of descriptive content if i think it's in need of work why would your opinion or the opinions of your similarly biased cohorts count above mine why not include a tag to an article that is obviously disputed and has been for years what's the point of keeping the tag out why the rampant censorship no mastcell you need to stop i don't believe i need a consensus to put this tag back the page's history is proof in and of itself any page that doesn't let new neutral edits stay up for more than minutes is a major problem as far as wikipedia is concerned and is abuse of its intended use the tag goes back it is a fact that this page is hotly disputed and your opinion that others should not know about this fact is irrelevant