carried over from an for some reason the discussion was archived in no way am i asserting that you are related to pol although from the backlog of checkuser requests it is as clear to me as it is to anyone else that a lot of suspicions have been raised based on may i say particularly intriguing patterns for example your last session stopped and began directly before and after pol 's repeating a pattern that was identified in one of those earlier checkuser requests i will not be drawn here but imo you have something to prove as for your implication about myself i'll assume that was just heat as it was when i was accused of being you i suppose everybody gets accused at some time by you inspired it seems by any form if disagreement but despite the obvious flimsiness maybe it would be a good idea to retract that comment i have nothing to prove whatsoever re pol nor am i responsible for when he edits though i would point out i edit a lot i don't think i need to retract any comments but will say that any new accounts appearing on the paw articles are bound to raise suspicion this air of paranoia i blame entirely on those blocked users who have chosen to return as socks there is no question that both dpetersen and pol have also used socks so this isn't exclusive to the ppa editors if you are a genuine editor please accept my apologies for wondering if you are a sock and hope from the above that you understand why thanks