i intended to suggest a preference for leaving it out whether or not that was clear so long as the material is put back in the family education and career section that seems at the least to be capable of garnering consensus i'm not entirely comfortable with the word idenitifying otherwise as it suggests that they are identifying him as part of this debate that is why i left it out in the first place since it isn't an appropriate comment on the debate and doesn't provide new information otherwise i don't think we should give the false impression that people are making an issue of this when they aren't or giving excessive or repetitive focus to the issue in parts of his biography where the reliable sources don't support it if i read all of this correctly though the simplest answer seems still to take the whole sentence out and put the paragraph back in the section on family education and career