is occupy oakland ongoing or defunct i concur with 's reversions today on the occupy movement and occupy oakland articles where other users possibly vandals attempted to cast occupy in the past tense it's premature to portray the overall movement as deceased however solely with respect to occupy oakland this is an issue worth discussing note that the infobox at occupy oakland differs from those on wikipedia's pages for occupy movement and occupy wall street respectively occupy oakland is the only one where the word ongoing appears once on the date line and again on a separate status line i submit that occupy oakland's lack of activity over the past several months suggests that it may now be time to reconsider wikipedia's use of ongoing applied exclusively to occupy oakland there is currently a small amount of autonomous organizing around two upcoming anniversaries the group's october birthday and the october riot where scott olsen was shot in the head however none of this stems from occupy oakland collectively or any of its designated committees it's being conducted strictly by self appointed individuals even allowing that anniversary activities are likely to take place the question looms do these constitute evidence of an ongoing group or are they merely nostalgic gestures by a few diehard remnants i hope and other experienced wikipedia editors will clarify this for me please at what point do we stop referring to occupy oakland as ongoing