actually that policy you cite basically just tells you to not revert banned editors if reverting would restore inappropriate content if you do so it's your responsibility but the section above that talks about how helpful edits do not need to be reverted our one goal here is to build an encyclopedia reverting positive contributions to the encyclopedia just because a user is banned or for any procedural reason for that matter is counterintuitive so the general rule in these situations is to use common sense if the banned user's edit is not helpful revert if it's obviously helpful don't revert or don't think you need to if you're not really sure whether it's helpful you should probably err on the side of caution and revert but at the end of the day blindly reverting any addition made by a banned user really doesn't help anyone and whether to revert or not is left to your own discretion in this case there's clearly a disagreement so i would recommend you explain exactly why you think their edits should remain and discuss the issue with hobartimus if you need any more help just ask regards '''' x