ps the article cited as the source for arguments about romance is questionable first it is an online article and not a published peer reviewed article so its authority can be questioned second that article cites sources that are even more questionable such as emails from ophee a trained pilot publisher not a peer reviewed musicological publication or dating done by means of scientific methods by experts third you cannot cite a pdf image of a photocopy of a so called earlier or original text fourth upon what evidence does ricordi base its attribution of the piece to rubira what is the so called evidence that rubira wrote the piece in the th century if there is anything concrete cite it cite original verifiable texts that make the arguments not your buddy's little internet article which no real academic scholar would accept as being proof of anything finally lets have some proof that this antonio rubira character even existed in reality i may be wrong on this last point but something about it smells fishy and contrived so a publisher can make money