unsure about ruhrguy statements is this administrator trying to discuss available facts the bbc released an unranked list of greatest britons based on self selected voters bbc only somewhat later ranked this list following ten hours of further programming and additional votes this ranking then put scott at th in popularity it simply unclear whether this th ranking is based on or votes moreover whether a few years earlier scott may have ranked higher or lower in a similar poll is despite implications of current article certainly unknown if anybody can clearly and simply explain ranking methodology and or what this poll's value may be as objective fairly presented and relevant information regarding scott this could help justify it's inclusion if inclusion of his info is purely a matter of citing wp rs then based on this idea one can more or less endlessly add cited material to this article which as a previous wikipedia featured article is doubtless a major paragon in the world of publishing ruhrguy may not understand these issues but his misunderstanding so far isn't made very clear