again please stop trying to justify inclusion of original research into the article as has been pointed out consistently making a claim that a prop displayed on a fictional television programme is a particular brand of product not explicitely presented in the content of the show is outside the scope of wikipedia such claims are tantamount to fancruft which should be saved for fansites the additional of a citation for the apple ii based on blog does not qualify as a reliable source at the other end of the reliability scale lie personal websites weblogs blogs bulletin boards and usenet posts which are not acceptable as sources the particular blog entry in fact makes a contrary statement that the button pressing mystery which has shackled locke's destiny to an apple iie the apple iie and the apple ii are not the same machine but most importantly the machine in lost is not an apple ii or any brand of apple within the context of the story it is a dharma microcomputer terminal with a dharma logo and specific function talk