mfd i do not agree with your close of wikipedia miscellany for deletion wikipedia article incubator marie charlotte de la tr moille which i think a classic supervote there were opinions the nom's opinion to delete as a stale draft another editor's opinion to delete because of questionable notability and a stale draft my opinion to redirect to the apparent subject of the article and a keep opinion that the subject was notable and that the user thought it could be worked on further and had a source available you decided to delete admitting that this may not look like the right result based on your view that it was extremely unlikely that a redirect would help find the associated article perhaps but it would help the user find at least some information on the named person the incubator was a bad idea there was a user willing to work on it you would undelete but there wasa user willing to work on it as you didn't delete it someone placed a speedy on it which is reasonable of them but i boldly reversed it while i ask you to reconsider if you hold by your decision want to revert me i will not consider it wheel warring in this circumstance your reasons is misconceivedthe pt of the redirect is to find some info on the named subject which is present in the article redirected toit at least identifies the person your personal opinion that an accepted feature of wp should be closed down and the distinction you drew between someone who might work on it and someone who could since you said if there is a user willing to work on it you would be happy to move it please either relist for further discussion move it to my user space or that of facts pace or redirect as i suggested and there would be some merit in an argument that a person opposed in principle to the article incubator should not close mfds involving it if i opposed articles on unpopulated extinct villages in general should i close such afds in conformity to my opinion '''''' talk