this article is extremly bias how can you guys put more bias torwards one person than you do the holocaust so he has been sued many people have been sued but it's not the focal point of their article isn't the point of wikipedia to be unbias you can at least add a nuetrality dispute to the top of the page there are many people against the fda and what not so not saying there is any evidence is stupid and to say his book is taking other peoples works and putting them into one book is also stuid a lot of books are other peoples works its called citations wikipedia is other peoples works wikipedia has tons of backlash against it and that's not the focal point of wikipedia's wikipedia article so why is this one article so bias when i haven't seen any others that are this blatent