wade park the whole point is that the park is much more than the museum it's more than of a square mile so it's a significantly different entity from the museum itself because there's no article on the hd we shouldn't have its infobox anywhere at all granted we shouldn't have a stub for the sole purpose of filling a hole but we also shouldn't pretend that another article fills that hole either you are partially correct in your assertion made in the edit summary for the wade park article the park isn't the entire district but you are also partially incorrect you're saying the park itself is not the district and the national register database indicates that the park isn't even part of the district where that i underlined is where you're erring the nrhp website lists this roughly bounded by e st east blvd chester and euclid aves cleveland'' acres buildings structure ' unless we are looking at different nrhp websites and you haven't either spent time in cleveland or at the very least looked at trhe area in question on the map then you're not taking into account two three things the acres includes wade park google map it the name wade park district explicitly and even implicitly if you're familiar firsthand with the history of cleveland and this is related to my second point regarding a familiarity with the history of cleveland jeptha wade's property which is where wade park is and the heart of the district in question was the seed from where all the buildings in the district sprung from the cma botanical gardens natural history museum and severance hall which all are part of the district would not be there if wade park wasn't set aside to be the cultural epicenter that garnered it's nrhp entry lastly given that any one of the buildings listed on the registry are technically part of the wphd there would be no false information by including the nrhp infobox on any of those articles which was my entire point of putting it on the cma article in the first place the infobox being clearly labelled as wade park district''' is not misleading by including it on a building that is part of the district we could argue about this ad nauseam but what's the point of course i can make an entire article that covers the district specifically but why just regurgitate the same stuff found in each individual wikipedia article that exists for every building that is in the hd including the wade park itself bandwdith pollution notwithstanding it is simply redundant or we could make it less redundant by simply putting the infobox in one of the articles already out there and the wade park article being the namesake for the hd would make the most sense the article is hardly complete and could be expanded to include an entire section specifically about the hd and relationship bewteen the two and if not that article than the cma which is the largest building in the hd and the reason i put it there in the first either way the underlying question in this argument that i have for you is this how is it productive in our task as wikipedians and moreover as members of ohio specific wikprojects to keep adding and removing factual info from articles with direct relationships to the subject of our debate are we trying to make wikpedia a more informative user based encyclopedia or are we nitpicking over how to make a piece of factual information that is an important part of a large us city available to those who are looking at wikipedia for information