aircraft lists hi petebutt and thanks for all the hard work you're putting into expanding these lists however you're also causing quite a bit of chaos through i think unfamiliarity with how wikilinks work to make a long story short whatever goes inside the double square brackets and must be the name of the actual page that you're pointing to if not problems can occur for example in your recent edits to the lockheed part of the list you removed lockheed from some of the entries this means that f points to the phantom ii and u points to a disambiguation page if you want the link to appear different on the screen from the actual page name we use what's called a pipe for example lockheed u u will appear as u on the page but take you to the lockheed u article try it u hope this helps you might also like to check out wp air the wikiproject that exists to co ordinate wikipedia's aircraft content cheers on that subject i've just rolled back your last text dump it's full of broken links bad formatting and inconsistencies both within itself and with these lists in general please take some time to try and understand how wikilinks work and how these lists are structured if you have any questions please feel free to leave a note on my talk page caudron c hi again apologies are unnecessary we were all new here once thanks for the article on the caudron c i've moved it across into the main part of the encyclopedia you'd actually placed it on your userpage a page where contributors to wikipedia may choose to introduce themselves saying as much or as little about themselves as they want you can read more about userpages here and if you want to create one just click on your name in red that you see at the top centre of your screen to create a new article in the main body of the encyclopedia either click on a red link in an existing article or list or put the name of the topic into the search box at the left hand side of the screen and click go and again if i can be of any help please let me know on my talk page various stuff hi again you're really getting the hang of things now i'll continue to offer some unsolicited advice if i'm bombarding you too much please feel free to tell me to get lost i took the liberty of moving your under construction article from your userpage to user petebutt sandbox which is the conventional spot to store such things a few notes from your recent contributions these are all really formatting nits with perhaps the exception of the links please take them in a spirit of friendly encouragement and as a fast track towards learning wikipedia and wikiproject aircraft style sectionsin many articles you'll see hidden comments like these have been left as reminders that if the article ever grows big enough to require splitting into sections these are the conventional names for these sections take a look at a major article like f phantom ii as an example and wikiproject aircraft page content for the guide the section will not become visible until the are removed in short articles there's no advantage to using these it's better to just leave them hidden remember that we're trying to write encyclopedia articles in connected prose one sentence paragraphs let alone sections have little value here for experimental one off prototypes the operators and operational history sections are meaningless just leave them out contextyou removed context giving introductions from a couple of articles it's extremely important that articles establish context right at the beginning there are a number of different ways that readers may come across an article therefore the lead should establish straight away the what where when and that for example the yakovlev yak was a prototype fighter aircraft built in the soviet union in elaboration can and should follow but straight away the reader knows what this article is about and that this is not a car washing machine or something from star trek new