yeah so i add two interesting and important new relevant references to an article which indicates potential harm to pregnant women on the paracetamol page these are removed because you guys don't like primary sources this is ridiculous and frankly an extreme case of what is wrong with wikipedia my wife is pregnant i for sure want to know about potential harm of this drug i would think as a medical professional that you would be more inspired by the first do no harm idea the fact that you wikipedia jerks are so focused on having only sources from a narrow range of whatever it takes for a given article is so frustrating i've continued to run into this kind of thing you would think that academic journals have taken over wikipedia the idea that i have actually improved the article with my additions and that others can improve it further has completely escaped much of the wikipedia culture these days wikipedia has simply forgotten the idea that this is collaboratively edited rather than having a coterie of people who simply reject all edits if they do not thread the eye of the needle through the dozens of acronym style guides you guys are disgusting really you are standing on the shoulders of millions of edits and now you reject the very thing that got you to where you are namely lots of collaboratively edited small improvements now any change has to go through hurdles that would never have created wikipedia in the first place the fact that you have excluded something that is evidence of significant danger to pregnant women based on this culture of exclusiveness should trouble you deeply