all positive points no negatives mentioned at all this article reads more like a propaganda page than impartial information it is probably written and maintained by a member of staff at the school but even so it should give a neutral point of view for example the old fashioned grammar school attitudes that the school desperately hangs on to these include uniforms that haven't changed at all since the 's authoritarian attitudes that are concerned by uniform more than actually making sure the children get a good education etc etc cause tension between students and teachers as these obviously dubious values do not fit well into modern society just to add to this the most recent ofstead report strongly emphasises the need for student and teacher relationships to improve however because of the senior staff all living in the 's they took this to mean they need to enforce the rules more with stronger emphasis on uniform and weaker emphasis on educational support this has simply degraded student's relationships with their teachers especially the so called senior staff who don't even teach but instead spend their time punishing people for petty things the school even employs a certain member of staff whose job it is to be horrible ironically she is actually called mrs horrod even further maybe someone could include this in the article and make it less heavily biased thanks sorry for the rant all positive points no negatives mentioned at all this article reads more like a propaganda page than impartial information it is probably written and maintained by a member of staff at the school but even so it should give a neutral point of view for example the old fashioned grammar school attitudes that the school desperately hangs on to these include uniforms that haven't changed at all since the 's authoritarian attitudes that are concerned by uniform more than actually making sure the children get a good education etc etc cause tension between students and teachers as these obviously dubious values do not fit well into modern society just to add to this the most recent ofstead report strongly emphasises the need for student and teacher relationships to improve however because of the senior staff all living in the 's they took this to mean they need to enforce the rules more with stronger emphasis on uniform and weaker emphasis on educational support this has simply degraded student's relationships with their teachers especially the so called senior staff who don't even teach but instead spend their time punishing people for petty things the school even employs a certain member of staff whose job it is to be horrible ironically she is actually called mrs horrod even further maybe someone could include this in the article and make it less heavily biased thanks sorry for the rant all positive points no negatives mentioned at all this article reads more like a propaganda page than impartial information it is probably written and maintained by a member of staff at the school but even so it should give a neutral point of view for example the old fashioned grammar school attitudes that the school desperately hangs on to these include uniforms that haven't changed at all since the 's authoritarian attitudes that are concerned by uniform more than actually making sure the children get a good education etc etc cause tension between students and teachers as these obviously dubious values do not fit well into modern society just to add to this the most recent ofstead report strongly emphasises the need for student and teacher relationships to improve however because of the senior staff all living in the 's they took this to mean they need to enforce the rules more with stronger emphasis on uniform and weaker emphasis on educational support this has simply degraded student's relationships with their teachers especially the so called senior staff who don't even teach but instead spend their time punishing people for petty things the school even employs a certain member of staff whose job it is to be horrible ironically she is actually called mrs horrod even further maybe someone could include this in the article and make it less heavily biased thanks sorry for the rant all positive points no negatives mentioned at all this ar