re critical reception edits i liked the intro that you added to the critical reception section but the inclusion of a reviewers name seemed a bit odd name's of reviewers aren't usually included in the review section also reviews should be organized roughly by the clout of the reviewing publication i e well known publications come first and continue in decreasing order of popularity i also think it's important for the opinion of the reviewer to be easily readable i e if a reviewer deems the record her best work since insert album title it should be included in the summary not lumped together and simply referenced if you have any questions disputes with my reversion let me know