does this warrant a checkuser gabsadds look at the history of that page too gabsadds and even more here wikipedia requests for checkuser case eggone so i stopped looking since nish beat me to it talk premature archiving this was premature i was still awaiting further clarification could you please restore it see wp ac c n other work bainer directed the clerks archive it being a clerk that's what i did you'll need to take this up with the arbs or if you prefer i'll ask on your behalf talk belated thanks thank you kindly rlevse for the today's wikipedian day i'm not sure i belong in the presence of such venerable company but am grateful all the same mfg talk wikipedia requests for checkuser case documentingabuse hi rlevse if you have a spare time could you take a look at the rfcu file occidentalist since you've had to deal with the evading indef blocked sockpuppeter many times your assessment would be great help thanks caspian blue i'll look at it later today don't have time for it for several hours talk rfa co nominations i am about to nominate an editor for the bucket what is the proper way to solicit co nominators talk contribs e mail you can ask the candidate if there is somebody they want to have co nominate them or you can approach the other party directly and simply say i'm thinking about nominating user xxx what are your thoughts about a co nom you might be interested in my essay on how to nominate people you can find it on my user page ' poppaballoon yes what balloon popper man said you want users who are familiar with the candidate and or the rfa process i'd suggest no more than one nom and two conoms total as some will object if there are lots of conoms talk i've come to see total noms as the proper amount one nom doesn't always give me the sense that the candidate has been vetted while is starting to get to be too many ' poppaballoon oh yeah one thing that i love to see in candidates is if i approach the candidate and suddenly a bunch of people i know and respect starting adding i want to co nom before the candidate even has a chance to respond when i see that i feel that i've found a good candidate ''' user balloonman balloonman