what a curious block i restored the original sources about those figures because somebody recently replaced them with sources that do not even talk about those figures and i included the source about the million portuguese in s o paulo because the user ningu m included a fact tag there curiously the user ningu m reverted the original sources i included then he's the one who started the edit warring isn't vandalism to reverte an user that replaced a fact tag with a source and restored the original sources that have been there since a long time but somebody replaced them i gave the source about the portuguese and ningu m replace the source once again with a fact tag and he also reverted to the new sources which are from a not reliable site including the one about the portuguese which do not even talk about the figure i included the source which does talk about million portuguese and it was reverted by ningu m without any explaination isn't vandalism to erase a source and replace it with a fact tag if this is not vandalism if it's a normal edit to erase sources and replace them with fact tags please tell me