err making libertarianism an exception in this fashion seems like rather blatant special pleading focus should be all the forms of libertarianism that sufficient wp rs identify as libertarianism even the ones i don't like though short commentary on why some forms don't think other forms are really libertarianism is permissible per npov all wikipedia articles and other encyclopedic content must be written from a neutral point of view representing fairly proportionately and as far as possible without bias all significant views that have been published by reliable sources this is non negotiable and expected of all articles and all editors and per the rfc on this page where a good majority of editors agreed and what the heck is that supposed to mean i'm not violating n pov by saying that left libertarianism is not a predominant or significant ideology you are also ignoring wp due which is just as important as n pov unless you can provide reliable sources proving the predominance of ll and anarcho capitalism inside the libertarian movement then it should not focus on it as much as the standard form of libertarianism know here in an act of incredible redundancy as 'right libertarianism' it is as if you don't even read what you are posting here look at it again all wikipedia articles and other encyclopedic content must be written from a neutral point of view representing fairly proportionately and as far as possible without bias all significant views that have been published by reliable sources this is non negotiable and expected of all articles and all editors hm according to this we should proportionately cover views covered by reliable sources seems like what us right wing crackpots are arguing and what you left wingers vehemently oppose nidhiki