as for whether it should be an article i think that they have something like people browsing at the same time as their record and anytime you look there are in the order of people browsing not many members though maybe members online at a time at most are those numbers big enough to warrant an article or are they misleading somehow they also seem to have been responsible for uncovering many wikipedia scandals which have their own wikipedia articles such as the siegenthaler and essjay scandals if there are articles on scandals uncovered by their site then that would seem to me to be enough to justify a site however it seems strange that that isn't mentioned in the article isn't that the main selling point for the article in both cases there are news references that prove that they are responsible or at least that daniel brandt used the site to uncover the scandals