i know no such thing it's possible that your computer was displaying a cached version of the page in which case you would have seen a prior version however the edit history shows the sequence of events clearly the fact is that you jumped to the assumption that i was operating in bad faith which is something that your history shows you do all too often what i was asking you to redact was not the if that can be sourced properly bit that was a simple error what i objected to was your statement i see you are now joining in the bad faith discussion that richard arthur norton is perpetrating in which you reply to or redact commentaries in a way that deliberately makes mine look as though i am ignoring what you say deplorable behavior i have done no such thing and the evidence shows it please strike through that passage talk contribs