edit war some notes for those who fear the truth a book by fr gino conti was wiped out for the second time another censorship fr pezzi dismissed by comboni missionaries pezzi admitted it in a public interview whose reference was already in the article fr pezzi with kiko and carmen is in the main equipe of the way with kiko and carmen signs letters to the pope cfr letter of jan etc the statute is not an approval the statute is a temporary up to june guideline the statute is an incomplete guideline because it often refers to an unpublished catechetical directory cf statute articles etc the most famous papal pronouncement about the way is on a letter to mgr cordes on august letter addressed to cordes not to kiko where he says i acknowledge the way but these words are preceded by having seen the documentation you sent me welcoming the request address to me the statute was given by pontifical council for the laity not by john paul ii also in the days following publication of the statute john paul ii did not mention in his angelus and speeches his first mention will come months after popes can change their mind about the way popes can change their mind if the way doesn't obey to the pope most recent documents show liturgy issues up to end of there are some serious concerns discussions about the way are about heresies obedience liturgy only roman catholic hierarchy has the right to correct and guide the way factoid about st pius from pietrelcina is actually documented by fr enrico zoffoli in a book and public letters to some italian cardinals and bishops in the worst case it's realistic that st pius who was confessor for people from lots of countries including u s people from nearest nato base knew something about kiko movement in madrid between and the temporary statute was artificially elevated to highest we're approved neocatechumenal propaganda gennarini the chief of the way in the u s did actually give a neocatechumenal spin interpretation documented also by jimmi akin kiko carmen and pezzi were thanking for granting a period of two years but benedict xvi decisions about that widespread manner were timed not exceeding two years that is benedict xvi wants to solve quickly the problem but kiko carmen and pezzi do not note the echoes were never put in place of the homily or meant to sound like one this valuable sentence tries to explain in neocatechumenalspeak the decision of the holy father to require homily only from deacons and priests on the exchange of peace permission is granted to the neocatechumenal way to continue giving peace as done in the early church everyone can verify that the original text of arinze's letter does not contain such words why do neocatechumenals need a distort and falsified citation correct text was on the exchange of peace permission is granted to the neocatechumenal way to continue using the indult already granted pending further instructions please note indult that is special permission and pending further instructions that is the indult is temporary the npov tag was the last resort of some neocatechumenal people fearing the truth please stop this ugly edit war wiping out documented sources won't change the facts