maybe the satisfactory solution would be to rework kelley as a new and independent paragraph with a lead in other than an american archaeologist actually trained to recognize old world scripts is university of calgary department of archaeology professor emeritus david h kelley who believes the dilemma centers on exactly what constitutes acceptable evidence perhaps the following instead archaeoastronomer and epigrapher david h kelley professor emeritus of the university of calgary's department of archaeology suggests those who determine what is fringe archaeoastronomy may be handicapped when it comes to unfamiliar intangibles unlike the artifacts they unearth and analyze would this help