reply to jj the nature of his edits are not merely disruptive but fundamentally vandalism arlok has removed content that does not please his pov citing nonsensical excuses like 'terrorism' and 'union of india' etc which is an intolerable behavior here at wikipedia since he was the one who had removed all of a large portion of edits unwarranted for without citing proper explanation i have had his edits reverted and he had been warned unless you get a reasonable explanation from him on the edits i have mentioned above there is no point calling this edit warring as its a clear cut case of vandalism he is apparently new and he needs to familiarize himself with the core policies or look closer at his edits perhaps you may see he is just another pov pusher who is good to kick the bucket from the project i reckon you understand anyways thanks for stopping by greetings talk contr mail