sorry about my revert blanking the paragraph you added it was inadvertent my concern is a simple one of magnitude which is even more clear now with the duplicate sections combined there is an enormous amount of pro pollard rhetoric being added all the time while the directors of naval intelligence response which has much more substance keeps getting deleted this response is already heavily truncated i think some of the pro pollard rhetoric needs to be trimmed and the 'directors response' states certain things that aren't reflected elsewhere in the article