in my opinion the three lists you just mentioned need improvement to reach the standards of the oregon and washington lists that is completely independent of the fact that i promoted those two lists to fl statusthey simply contain more facts stronger leads more references etc i think that a single table is more appropriate as it can be sorted and the order of sections seem somewhat arbitrary by making some symbols more important than others also i believe it is crucial to separate official and unofficial symbols i have no problem with having a table for the unofficial symbols sectionit just happens that the oregon and washington lists only have a couple so it was easier to construct prose than tables i know nothing about governors lists but i believe some have been promoted to fl status so it is probably worth examining those hopefully i will get around to improving the maryland kentucky and indiana symbols lists in the meantime just to make the flc nomination process easier and for the sake of consistency i would mimic the oregon and washington symbols lists since they have been promoted much more recently than the other three talk