when i said there is no legitimate controversy what i meant is that the issue is not controversial amongst legitimate scientists the portion of wp undue that i was referring to was the part that says for example the article on the earth does not directly mention modern support for the flat earth concept the view of a distinct minority to do so would give undue weight to it this article is discussing a mainstream view cremo s view is that of an ultra minority it should not be discussed in this article your suggestion that the mainstream view needs to be balanced by cremo s ridiculous view is inappropriate attempts to treat pseudoscientific hogwash as if though it were just as legitimate as real science are prohibited by wp valid