dougweller you lied in this edit summary and you had clearly seen the discussion here with aoid insisting on the need for consensus before changing aesop's fables from the status quo to mzilikazi's hijacked version therefore your edit was entirely inappropriate and for that reason i'm going to revert it the block that you refer to was for using a month old consensus as the basis to protect an article from a gang of edit warriors whilst it's already fallacious due to the fact that it's entirely an ad hominem argument it's even more dubious because you yourself are trying to use the discussion on this talk page as the basis to support mzilikazi's illegal edits if one reads the june discussion here they'll see a year old unresolved issue how is a year old unresolved issue justification for mzilikazi's latest edit war when a month old consensus is apparently so worthless that i deserved to be blocked for implementing it besides this talk page certainly wasn't the entire discussion you're cherry picking and you know it full well in reality mzilikazi conceded defeat in the first edit war here hence both aesop and aesop's fables returned to their bc ad state after years of mzilikazi bullying anyone who tried to undo his illegal changes the status quo was protected for many months until mzilikazi used his sock puppet afkun to start a nd edit war months later mzilikazi was the original and main trouble maker on your side of the first edit war dougweller so by completely ignoring his concession of defeat and cherry picking evidence in an attempt to claim you won is outrageous and shows just how little value one should place on your thoughts here