at what point does trying to draw attention to tactics like fillibustering being used to attempt to derail discussion and flood discussions with irrelevant content becoming a personal attack do i have to avoid naming specific editors is merely pointing out the existence of these tactics and biases without naming editors enough to avoid future blocks i do not want to sit idly by when topics i am involved in are getting derailed filibustered and fought to a standstill of 'no consensus' by certain editors whose only interest is in protecting their own favoured topics not the actual improvement and following of guidelines in articles i have worked hard on i hope that wasn't enough of a 'personal attack' for me to get blocked again