badvista org criticisms moved from my personal talk page please refrain from adding badvista org links or criticisms this situation has played out a long time back see the discussion archives for windows vista articles most claims there are exaggerated and are not substantiated beyond a point heck many have even been downright refuted its plain and simple yellow journalism by consensus it is not considered a source reliable enough to be quoted in the article plus nothing is there that has not already been covered repeating them again is not neutral please respect policy otherwise i am sorry to say this it will lead you to being blocked from editing here talk who are you to say which source is reliable your act of filtering statements based on your own liking is against wp npov also it appears wikipedian likes to threaten a member as a way to welcome someone who tries to contribute perhaps you have an interest in microsoft business bye engage in discussion first before making unilateral changes to the article talk there is no rule in wikipedia to say we have to discuss first before we can edit the article wikipedia says be bold when editing the page yours is against this rule besides i find that you also remove changes or do changes without discussing first this is a double standard i found no official source in wikipeida which says badvista org has been officially blacklisted or flagged as bad source judging on your own liking is against wp npov i'm going to move this part of discussion on the right page