no it wouldn't look the same because i would personally revert anything that was unsourced fancruft speculation before it got a chance to get in and weave itself into the article this is precisely what i've done on tekken film and whenever someone tries to add something unsourced i try to verify it myself and if i can't revert it goes usually with a note asking for a source going to the editor it sounds bad evil but it's better than what i ended up seeing people were quoting the old tekken film as gospel saying it's cast list or storyline was accurate etc people were citing wikipedia as a source elsewhere this is why we can't afford to have articles like this with large masses of unsourced material it flushes wikipedia's credibility down the toilet talk e mail