it is true that i can not read urdu but this is not the point which i want to make my point if simple on wikipedia we are not usually encourage to put our own point of views for example the reference you put are biased on one openion and in one direction that is anti ahmadiyya websites how can some one claim that the material which is published on ahmaiyya site is edited even if it is edited to suit something we must accept it as an official point of view of a community we dont have to agree with it but we have to accept it as official point of view so if you put some information from an anti ahmadiyya web site it will be biased as on the official web site you dont find this information the best informaiton will be if we can match this information on both sides other wise regardless true or false it will remain biased and that is against the policy of wikipedia that is why i have suggested earlier that there is no restriction on puting information on open plate form like wikipedia but instead of puting on this artical there are other artical where this information can be put it for example there are artical like islam and quran but critism on islam is a totally different artical so the islam poisition is defined in islam artical but critism was defined in other artical if a bio artical like mirza ghulam ahmad is a bio artical the critism or his so called failed prophecies will not suit for this artical you can even creat a new artical more suitable to the title and information against him or his community this will be more sources more reliable and athenticated rather called biased and may be reverted repeatedly and we are here to be neutral even we dont belief on such things did not give us right to present information which is offensive to any one no matter which faith he or she belongs regards