edits by me searchlight has indeed been sued successfully many times someone has altered this fact to suggest that this isn't the case while providing no proof i'm changing it back as a magazine it bases itself on the one of the prime journalistsic principles of not revealing its sources amongst those sources have been ray hill tim hepple matthew collins darren wells and andy sykes isn't this rather contradictory its sources obviously have been revealed although i shall leave it in prime journalistsic principles however is rather too complimentary sounding for a npov article hepple has been discredited somewhat but that is in no way a reflection on searchlight's modus operandi no idea what's this is supposed to mean it makes no sense without an explanation i have therefore removed it if whoever added want to reinsert and explain fine few minor npov tweaks along with a little reprasing for better flow and grammatical corrections mp's etc it is still rather slangy in places and this ought to be rewritten jun utc