thank you for your response here's mine you call it my harassment campaign i call it seeking a dispute resolution i supported every statement in my rfc filed at meta with the differences since when seeking a dispute resolution is called harassment may i please ask you to explain how come that my rfc that arbcom calls harassment was not deleted at meta that it was called a valid rfc by an admin on meta that another meta admin stated i think a substantive response to his or her allegations would be more valuable that yet another meta admin said to gwen it would be fine to see your response there also i am not sure i understand what specifics of my harassment are you talking about may i please ask you to list these specifics here some differences would be nice too yes i was instructed to stop by arbcom but i was never explained why should i stop or rather i was told that i should stop because i am waging a vendetta against this administrator because of an ancient incident which is incorrect any unbiased person would agree that there are real problems with gwen gale performance as sysop described in this section alone with at least one of them that happened just a few days ago as a result of my research gwen gale was questioned about two blocks she imposed instead of reblocking me arbcom had to address the evidences presented in my rfc which has never been done i consider this dishonest not only towards me but towards gwen gale as well now about the reblock itself blocks are not punitive before this block i was blocked since july of my latest contribution to my talk were made months ago and i had absolutely no intentions to come back so what this block suppose to prevent am i supposed to be so upset with the block that i would stop my fight for the victims of bullying i got an impression that arbcom is afraid om my rfc and of addressing it this block violates each and every basic blocking policy i believe that with this block arbcom fell to a new low hersfold i have one more question for you please you wrote this block was based on the consensus of the arbitration committee for transparency may i please ask you to post to my talk who voted for and against if any the reblock imo this will be an important piece of info that i see no reason not to disclose i'd like to thank arbcom for this reblock one more time it demonstrated better than anything else that rfc i filed on meta was the right thing to do cheers