hints allegations and things left unsaid are not enough for inclusion especially if it was done in the context of accusing one's political enemy of homosexuality in insulting terms the king is a faggot and obviously never to his face nor did his opponents to his son who thought it more important to charge the stuarts with treason and sentenced charles to decapitation permissiveness was indeed a problem for the english puritans who were opposed to the liberal atmosphere of scottish presbyterians and the supposed corruption of french catholics who believes that wikipedia deserves a paparazzi atmosphere or let's make it the weekly world news