cite example if you have some sort of idea why editing the roman polanski to include the title of rapist is disruptive or vandalism you should explain why instead of just unilaterally deciding that it is you should cite more than just you think it is and explain specifically why you think that it is there are many other wikipedia articles that are very similar with respect to people who are known for many different things one of which is some sort of criminal act or acts these articles include titles like rapist criminal pedophile murderer thief organized crime boss and many others just look at the oj simpson article it makes reference to accusations against him for murder in the first sentence where this title is seems to be at issue for some reason wikipdeia articles are usually vastly different in their writing style and sometimes titles are places in different places throughout the articles since there is no debate as to whether roman polanski is a rapist or not and since it is the one thing major thing he is known for outside of his movie career should it not be included in the first sentence is there a specific guideline as to where in an article a specific title that someone has earned throughout their life should be placed should a person's most prominent title be their career their ethnicity place of origin or some other adjective that describes a notable feature of their life what specific guideline specifies this should it merely be what the person is best known for because roman polanski is very well known for having raped a year old girl and for being a movie director many people would say he is not known for his acting as he has few notable roles or writing as he has written very little but these titles appear in the first sentence of his article