please either remove or put a footnote against the follwing tribes for their pashtun affiliation being 'suspect' mashwanis sayyads miankhel spiritual leaders arabs swatis contested ghilzais turks burki not really pashtun only pushtunised dilazaks hazara gazetteer has noted caution gandpur are of arab origin jehangiri same as for other swatis and wardak a feographic entity if we can accept the foregoing as pashtuns then the tanolis are to be unconditionally accepted too i do not accept a punjabi 'raja' dictating terms here and other pashtuns accepting them it's either all of them in or none of them remaining in the tribal list supersaiyan has been shown up to be a liar and fabricator of history regarding the tanawalis as being of janjua origin we do not wish to be didtated to by outsiders tanawalis historians themselves as well as others trace their ancestory to afghanistan not punjab the term hinkowan is properly only applicable to kharays of peshawar not to hazara the greater number of jehangiri and other swatis speak hindo as do many other pashtun tribes of hazara most notably the jaduns so they are not considered hindkowans please be consisitent and remove the footnote from the list for tanoli user pakhtun tanoli march