who presumably wrote the unsigned message above no and i can understand that questioning your content additions or changes can be annoying i'll do less of that in the future but that doesn't mean i don't have valid points and the way to deal with such annoyances isn't to make personal attacks thanks for being civil in your above post i suggest the best way forward is for everyone to worry less about minutia and focus more on adding cited content to the page i don't think that the article is complete by any means and there really is a lot of news articles about bitcoin by now there's probably also a much deeper pool of academic research