from wp third opinion the inclusion of that section gives undue weight to a particular pre hungary period in this article hungary such material would be better placed at hungarian prehistory or pannonian basin before the hungarians with links to great moravia where appropriate the current article is almost kb long and needs more concise summaries more than it needs additional sections when deciding how much space and depth to devote to a particular aspect of a topic it is important to take recourse to general sources and reflect their coverage beyond the reliable sources threshold the trustworthiness of a particular source is less important for determining weight in the treatment of a topic than is its generality as an outsider i could see adding up to a few dozen words based on the lingering impact of toponyms and script as a side note please remember to stay focused on improving the article without recourse to personal attacks on other editors as well i remind you that whenever text is copied from one article to another you must include this fact in your edit summary cont