well about your method of participation here looking over your comments here and elsewhere one is left its clear that you either are unacquainted with our governing content and behavior or willfully ignoring them assuming good faith i've went with the former but if you still insist that it's the latter i'll take your word for it either way it's becoming disruptive and incivil and needs to end as for your question if you were indeed as up to speed on our guidelines and policies as you'd like everyone here to believe then you'd know that wp nor primary secondary and tertiary sources secondary sources are preferred over primary sources we have three secondary sources that support the existing content and one primary and very partisan source he also rejects the prevailing view of the scientific community that the human immunodeficiency virus hiv is the sole cause of acquired immune deficiency syndrome aids accurately summarizes the three secondary sources while your version he also proposed a thorough reappraisal of the existing evidence for and against the hypothesis that hiv causes aids merely repeats the rhetoric of the partisan primary source in effect giving that fringe viewpoint undue weight have i made this clear enough for you