it is clear to me that wikipedia is not a reliable source of info a lot of reviews media people in the know give the warning that wikipedia can not be trusted i see that with my own eyes now and before i get out and never visit this website i want to make a suggestion regarding your strict policy regarding verifiable source of info i understand that policy to be applied for well known topics that have been written about in many media sources i think is a non sense a disservice to users asking that policy to be applied to a trivial un known insignificant topic like where somebody can find such verifiable sources should we go and ask media web security companies pc magazine to rate web sites like this every year or so allowing only one point of view theirs given them the liberty to publicize what and how they are doing their thing and not allowing another point of view a check to agree disagree to their saying i don t think that is correct and conform to what big jimbo thinks that wikipedia should stand for