i have been wondering about polycheles typhlops i would have nominated it myself for dyk if only i had been able to find a good hook it really is a fascinating animal but there's nothing cited in the text that jumped out as instantly notable i agree that the two species claim is false and that the reference proves it planktonic larvae can be easier to find than animals living on the sea floor at depths of m so it's not that surprising that species have been missed i wasn't sure if someone else would find a good way of re wording it and save the dyk entry i certainly couldn't think of one but i didn't vote it down just in case that doi is an odd thing indeed springer link definitely gives the same doi i put in the article but dx doi org doesn't recognise it it's not even as if it's a very new article that hasn't made it into the doi database yet i have added a link directly to the journal article i am wary of removing the doi because it ought to be right although i doubt that it will come back to life at least this way people will find the article if they need to oh and thanks for rescuing the conservation status of the steppe field mouse i checked to see if apodemus witherbyi was listed and found nothing