hi virinchi there are a lot of problems with the article in its current state which is why this page has been so quickly nominated for speedy deletion again btw instead of tagging that as proposed deletion if you are the original author of the article and no one else has made major contributions you can tag it with db self which makes the process much simpler here are some suggestions don't use personal pronouns like 'we' don't use sentences with heavily connoted and unverifiable words or phrases like leaflet campaign which took the city by storm or the effect it had on the first ipl match was fascinating instead simply say the result of the leaflet campaign to the extent verifiable by your source in a neutral voice eg in preparation for the next ipl match no dada no kkr used leaflet and sms campaigns and purchased tickets off would be match attendants to encourage boycotting and create artificial scarcity which resulted in lower turnout in the cricket match note that even this sentence has a problem 'lower turnout' can't be verified by that source because it would be quoting an obviously biased primary source don't say things like greatest ever captain sentences like this are clearly expressing an opinion don't use slang like 'kids' don't discuss the future wp future i think the reading which would help you the most are wp words and wp npov for help with the non neutral tone of your article and wp n and wp rs for properly citing and providing evidence of notability of the group best of luck rodney