i have conducted a major rewrite as suggested i have retained primary and self published sources where the statements therein have been commented on by reliable secondary sources of all the wp rs on this page a grand total of two had something positive to say about larouche it's noteworthy that neither of these comes from the usa where people actually know who and what larouche is but still rules are rules these are self published sources which violate of the rules for self published sources as set out in wp v netda ru thebruinstandard com wearechange org note that three of these sources are unfavourable to larouche the rest are from his self published magazine or from larouche oriented websites and frankly removing some of them serves to help larouche's image because what he says is so ridiculous these sources i removed but i'm just not sure whether they constitute rs secondary sources or not km ru zvezda i wonder if someone in a better position could shed some light on that