toenails indeed ingrown most likely thanks to your reference to the barnstar i've discovered that aa is a full time employee of aig one thinks that this would lend an overwhelming bias to this article and would explain her motivation in casting sarfati in a clearly more positive light it seems to me that as a full time employee of aig and a person who likely knows sarfati personally aa might be wise to recuse herself from making edits to the article and should restrict her activities to the talk page now this is just my opinion mind you but in america this is how we do things on the up and up see talk answers in genesis financial motivations i have recently discovered that agapetos angel is a party personally involved with sarfati and aig and thus has been dishonestly participating here under false pretenses and in bad faith per policy and many orbcomm decisions editors should not participate on topics where they are personally involved aa been accused of disruption and npov violations she needs to cease editing at aig and this article or i will personally take this matter through to arbitration