stop violating my talk page and blocking my user chick bowen and vandalising and deleting its contents who ever you are your actions are a discrace to wikipedia and you should be banned immediately for displaying bad faith here fact finder get a grip mate so you werent breast fed eighter as a youngling you must also be one of these wikipedia un friendly admins who is a liability to this encylopedia project hello everyone i was forced to create a new user account because guy chapman deleted my user profile and talk pages from the fact finder account again read the reasons on my new talk page i was forced to create a new user because guy chapman wiped out all my user pages and records and spammed me and blocked my user youre sounding like guy chapman again give it a rest guy i thought you were a christian rolles eyes user un friendly administrators anyone interested in having a look at what's going on here may want to check this link to my previous user talk page which concerns accusations by guy chapman that i am supposedly a spammer which is a false accusation just because i have been evaluating whether i should start contributing in wikipedia or not does not make me a spammer all i have done is to try replace factual information which i have written that was deleted and hence turned into fiction without any discussion in an effort to give a totally distorted view of events concerning ec pave by this and other administrators what exactly are you doing here no sorry im trying to put a notice on the page for reasons why it should be deleted but you are making hundreds of posts on a page that is no longer current i'm not sure what your goal is i just ran into the page by accident and nothing makes any sense its ok now im sorry armadillo ive finally worked out how to place a notice on a page which i am requesting for removal maby thats what happened hundreds of posts no no i have only placed a removal request on three articles in question have a look at my contrib log oh i know what you are talking about now yeah youre right in a sense because when i was editing writing the article on accusations that ec pave has spammed i made numerous edits i know i know in the future i will write them down using my word program and spell cheker first before i add articles to a wikipedia page im learning this is what i added to the help page but someone has deleted it today i am still waiting for the deletion of these articles on the grounds that they have been edited to a point where the facts have become fiction and these three remaining articles serve no other purpose except to make the company ec pave and people look bad and they dilute the trademark protected words trademark dilution and the article is in bad faith ec pave walled garden spammers advise to new users regarding libel and trademark law tab accusations that ecopave australia has spammed in wikipedia are incorrect and false why am i responding to these accusations because this could also happen to any one wanting to contribute into wikipedia i have raised some serious issues that if left un addressed could potentially cause serious harm to someones professional or academic reputation as a result my understanding after what i have been told by ec pave is that their people wanted to contribute into wikipedia in good faith by adding articles about their company and products in the same way as many other companies have done in the past like for exampl