rcanderlori i am against the term 'middle eastern' because there is no evidence that these people were 'middle eastern' i am also against the term 'australian' as there is no evidence that the people at the beach were australian state your evidence not merely the media rcanderlori that the people at the beach were unequivocally australian ie a consistent non racist toward australians manifestation of rcanderlori's reasoning that newspapers cannot be trusted then we can refer to rcanderlori's standard of methodology to state who the people targeted were and hence who the people that retaliated against that targeting were amonthemerciful rcanderlori trusts the media that the people at the beach were australian but for some reason does not trust that the people targeted at the beach ie lebanese did retaliate rcanderlori argues here that some other unrelated people retaliated on behalf of the lebanese who were targeted ie the people targeted at the beach were lebanese but that some other unrelated people retaliated on behalf of the lebanese to cover up for them no doubt rcanderlori the term 'australian' is racist to the people who are 'australian' and it is also racist to people who are not 'australian rcanderlori's leftist backwardsthink reversed it is not racist to say it is australians at the beach who targeted lebanese but it is racist to say it is lebanese who retaliated to such targeting it is an inconsistent reasoning which elucidates rcanderlori's underlying racist attitude against 'australians' in favour of 'lebanese' amonthemerciful