naming convention violation part i interpret your reply to mean that i may repeat my edit and provide reason and documentation on the subject talk page if i do not hear differently from you in the next day or two i will proceed along those lines i am not sure what you meant by my not following up i may have given up some line of conversation out of frustration and exasperation i stand by what i said in the link you did provide harsh words but necessary given the extreme absurdity of the state of consensus on the subject you did not as far as i can tell provide link as requested to the site where i recieved some editorial support i say as far as i can tell because i find wiki administrative site navigation to be another another frustrating and exasperating feature in itself