lack of follow up by user ktr kevin rutherford on deletion made november is confirmed vandalism by lack of response after days mr rutherford has made no attempt to answer here about his deletion of sourced content whose veracity is as strong or stronger than what user mikenorton above assesses as 'reliable sources' i e orey cal book as source material gleefully he wrote above that's much better i can actually see the wood for the trees now in addition by implication user mikenorton is implying that wikipedia articles themselves are unreliable as sources this is evidence for censorship by user mikenorton as well if you want to be taken seriously user mikenorton i suggest you read and comprehend the deleted material before spouting misrepresenatations of fact about the deleted material