i kind of agree with you but it is a complex issue and i can't really see how it can be fully covered with all the necessary details in fewer words the condom mention should be moved from the lead since it isn't mentioned in the larger section and should be worded differently which i will try to do later the daily mail report says the information came from a police source which isn't ideal but it has also been reported elsewhere it's difficult to say whether this is gossip and should be removed or whether it is providing an alternative pov to him being labelled a rapist by other sources overall i personally don't think wp undue applies since this topic has evidently been reported so widely because of this it is right for the article to reflect that whether the allegations are accurate or not