forbiddena the article should not be recreated in the main userspace unless you can provide sources that show it meets wp music notability criteria thanks talk re i've moved list of samurai shodown characters to a user sub page that's all well and good but i have one major objection present tense is how we discuss legend and literature in the english language even if they never did happen and even if it is a retelling of the distant past see for example unless there is a wp guideline for fiction that i am seriously missing the present tense is correct nooo nonsense if this is being done absolutely to the letter correct it should be very clear when things are taking place and i don't think it's going to be that hard considering how little backstory most characters have it would be something like in ss character is looking for blah in ss character is motivated by meh prior to ss character is on trip to and does not make appearance in ss character etc etc granted i'm nowhere near done revising the entire damn article but what can i do i'm busy in real life kind of on the if i don't haul butt right now i will not stay in school level nooo wild arms hey norse i have no problem at all with you using my wa write up and i'm glad it's going to get some use after all sorry i wasn't able to finish it i got sidetracked with other projects maybe i'll get around to updating the article sometime now that it's at a serviceable state but i appreciate the message and that you're trying to get the wild arms articles in better shape oban star racers trivia i'll link the source its from the official oban forums some members on there were in contact with the creator and those were some answers he provided i'll link to it in the oban page centralized tv episode discussion over the past months tv episodes have been reverted by to name a couple ttn eusebeus and others no centralized discussion has taken place so i'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot be they pro or anti discussion is here speedy deletion of bivattchee a tag has been placed on bivattchee requesting that it be speedily deleted from wikipedia this has been done under section a of the criteria for speedy deletion because the article appears to be about a band but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable that is why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia under the criteria for speedy deletion articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable as well as our subject specific notability guideline for musical topics if you think that this notice was placed here in error you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page just below the existing speedy deletion or db tag coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with wikipedia's policies and guidelines talk to me ttn this comment was completely unacceptable comments like that can result in blocking i suggest cessation '''