the lead section is a summary of the main points but it mentions her involment in the puerto rican defend fund using the political code word active i object to this description because i know many extremely involved and active lawyers and she doesn't fit the profile according to the washington post the organization's board had a limited role at bimonthly meetings it generally left the legal tactics to the dozen or so staff lawyers i wouldn't describe the board as a bunch of firebrands her social activism does not shed light on whether she has as a trial judge or later on the appellate bench been a judicial activist the derogatory label conservatives sometimes apply to liberal jurists but i don't have time to edit or discuss so i supposed is your call after all your are the active and extremely involved editor in this article ''''''mundo