's vandalism lies distortion of facts mis use of lack of communication between wiki administrators wp pov pushing i am putting it here kindly read the whole story alongwith the proofs it appears that admin user abecedare has ended up doing some big injustice without checking the facts per he has blocked anon user simply because he was trying to protect wikipedia please correct this error otherwise this injustice and blocking comments are going to harm both innocent editors user and user and their zeal to work on wikipedia and their future contributions history as well why user talk 's block was unjustified user talk s edits do not constitute vandalism he simply restored duly referenced text proof proof proof user talk did not violate wp rr he did not violate wp rr and he simply quit editing user talk can not be a called a sockpuppet it was mentioned that user is licensed to concord ca and user is licensed to los angeles both of these cities are hours of drive from each other and it usually takes hours of flight time if you want to fly from one city to another against violation of wikipedia policies is simple warning constitute sockpuppetry if had owned nd ip as well then he could have participated in the edit war through nd ip while staying within wp rr it means he was not related to the nd ip at all why s edits constitute violation of wikipedia policies editor repeatedly deleted duly referenced tex edit edit edit editor repeatedly lied lied mislead wikipedia community through his edit summaries and statements edit edit summary google books isn't a very reliable source find a better source than that edit edit summary reverted edit by identified as vandalism to last revision by neutralhomer edit edit summary reverted edit by identified as vandalism to last revision by neutralhomer again lied that city of concord and city of los angeles are next to each other to get the opposing editors blocked under sock category editor repeatedly violated wp pov user neutralhomer ruthlessly suppressed others voice and kept on removing the referenced text by blatantly refusing to accept the wp rs reliability of various internationally known newspapers and a very notable google book which is already part of wikipedia i e reduced to ashes book user neutralhomer refused to accept following references only because he could not like them the tribune