the criticism section is fundamentally and appallingly flawed the criticism section is fundamentally and appallingly flawed for example it starts off by quoting and uses heavily throughout the white supremacist tomislav suni who other people may think of as a reliable source but i most certainly do not here are his thoughts on jews i hope you have a stronger stomach for that filth than i do i stopped reading about halfway down more about suni in june the group hosted tomislav sunic a former croatian diplomat and the author of the anti semitic book homo americanus child of the post modern age which argues that americanism heavily influenced by judaism undermines traditional european morality on june about people attended a talk by pacifica forum speaker tomislav sunic who only three days earlier had addressed the white supremacist council of conservative citizens ccc at its national leadership conference in sheffield ala sunic a writer and white nationalist had previously spoken to the washington d c area chapter of the ccc and the institute for historical review at least twice he appeared on the political cesspool a white nationalist radio show and was interviewed extensively for david duke's internet radio program sunic and the former klan boss whose latest book is entitled jewish supremacism my awakening to the jewish question commiserated about jewish domination low birth rates among people of european ancestry and discrimination against whites especially in these multiracial cities like l a or washington d c i'm losing my eye contact sunic confessed to duke i'm sort of afraid even of raising my head and looking at people right in their eyes because i know they may not be of my species the criticism section also relies heavily on rummel about whom we should maintain a high degree of scepticism to quote tomislav duli the estimates used by rummel for tito s yugoslavia cannot be relied upon since they are largely based on hearsay and unscholarly claims frequently made by highly biased authors it then goes on to say that the commission on concealed mass graves in slovenia an office of the slovenian government whose task is to find and document mass grave sites from the second world war and the period immediately after it discovered at least mass graves in the slovenian territories which are believed to hold up to bodies killed under tito's government none of this is true the ccmgs has compiled a list of sites which it believes worthy of inspection under the terms of its mandate it has investigated just a few of these and even where it has started to investigate progress has been slow to say the least for example at tezno bodies were discovered in despite the wild speculation by the likes of de man and ferenc about bodies so eagerly reported in the media and at barbara rov bodies that is not to say how many bodies will eventually be found nobody knows but what the article currently says is absolutely untrue finally it gives mention to bernard meares of whom i have no criticism i'm sure he's a fine man but is he the best you can do he has lived in trieste for some years as a translator of the cern institute of geneva wow there's not much else in the criticism section unless you lot can come up with better than this in terms of sources then it should be removed