the tank losses extremely biased the indian tank losses are exaggerated at atleast tanks this means some pakistani wants to believe that even more than indian tanks were destroyed and the pakistani tanks losses are put at minimal tanks the original source is us library which i dont consider as neutral at all considering the fact that us was a supporter of pakistan the losses dont reflect the fact that pakistan lost almost all major battles of khem karan phillora burki and even at chawinda according to pakistan general himself pakistan lost tanks india claim tanks on the other hand pakistan exaggerate its claim to tanks india accept only tanks more importantly at khem karan and phillora indian army put on display some tanks at khem karan and tanks at phillora then how is it that pakistan losses are mere and indian losses atleast a complete lie spencer c tucker one of the most renowned military historian puts pakistan losses at tanks indian claimed tanks and indian losses at tanks pakistan claimed tanks all the indian editors plz focus on this the neutral losses are represnted by us figures which i think are biased and further spencer c tucker is also one of the most renowned historian even stanley wolpart and jeremy black made it clear that at the end of war indian army has twice the number of tanks pakistan started with more tanks when war started all the indian editors must raise this issue as some pakistani editors think that by peddling lies they will win the war