aminz moving the article specifically will not really clear the misconception people who don't want to believe the figures are the same will always do that but in wikipedia we can use the actual name for isa as the islamic figure that exists in his own importance it doesn't mean that if a figure also exists in christianity too that this figure becomes only an article based on the perspective isa in his own self can have an article just like yeahua and jesu that do exist it's not simply one perspective of that same person it's a different belief and the entire reason why the articles is here in the first place it isn't simply a fact that because a figure exists in two religions that we can not have the real name of the figure being used as the name it's not something as little as the english language translation which like i said is not a good argument since we have many articles named on figures in other languages just about all the biography articles are that way a n o n y m t