on the conspiracy part when multiple publications web sights who have some of the same employees ban together against one person then yes by definition it becomes a conspiracy on the fringe science you published ronald mallet how the heck is that fringe science on some of your articles you do not even have sources or external links but invite the public to provide them are you hoaxing me please there are far many less professional articles than my own and the difference is i told you i would come up with the sources so please how is ronald mallet and john titor and the other time travel articles you have her not fringe science when i gave code sources