re rexxs that wasn't what i said my concern is that sasata has said it's pretty obvious i don't think it meets the criteria a comprehensiveness and it's also pretty obvious that we have different opinions about the comprehensiveness criterion in its current state i would fail on that basis in agreeing with her opinon do you agree with her statement about comprehensiveness my expertise and the reviewer's expertise in this field are not at issue the issue is the misapplication of assessment criteria such as issue is independent of the topic of the article