that edit summaries are small doesn t seem to be a satisfactory explanation notwithstanding that there is far more room available for edit summaries you elected to waste your seven short words by stating something no evidence of a connection to al qaeda that simply wasn t at all true this isn t the first time you ve edited in a way that stripped out the legitimate and topical mentioning of someone s known links to al qaeda like this recent one only eight days ago on fort dix attack plot i m not saying this makes you a bad person i m simply saying these are bad edits please learn to differentiate between the two btw causa sui with regard to the category category al qaeda propagandists i note your april post here on your talk page