utc i was just reading this section and realized that there is no reasoning provided by the users on why not to have a controversy section regarding the following two citations please let me know if anyone disagrees and why encyclopedia of religion swaminarayan movement ed lindsay jones vol nd ed detroit macmillan reference usa p copyright gale cengage learning hanna h kim baps activities are not always without controversy as in its open support of the sardar sarovar dam project in gujarat for its supporters the sardar sarovar dam and the multi dam narmada valley development project of which it is a key component are intended to increase power capacity and provide irrigation cleaner drinking water and flood control for its opponents the dam is environmentally and socially disastrous and is purchased at the cost of submerging a high percentage of dalit and adivasi villages the wealthy baps organization is criticized by dam opponents for acting to protect its class interests including those of its land holding members in response baps followers who are familiar with the narmada controversy point to the various village relocation and community rehabilitation projects voluntarily instigated and funded by baps also the introduction to swaminarayan hindusism book states also the introduction to swaminarayan hindusism book states the history of the akshar purushottam sanstha has not been with out controversy and division in ad dadubhai patel and his in addition to baps's break from the original swaminarayan satsa g other schisms have occurred in a handful of east african baps followers broke away and founded the yogi divine society additionally s dhus from the original movement have left to form their own institutions that sometimes e g swaminarayan gurukuls but not always e g swaminarayan gadi retain an affiliation with their g dd are these citations not enough to warrant a section dedicated to them march