re the call of the marching bell i'm afraid that i've had to revert your edit frst your change from bang i dara bang e dara wasn't properly explained the sources use a variety of transliterations for example the on line translation uses b ng e dar on the title page and b ng i dar in the text is there good reason to choose one over the other secondly you seriously over linked the article see wikipedia manual of style links overlinking and underlinking what's the best ratio an article may be considered overlinked if any of the following is true low added value items are linked without reason such as s and th century i've replaced some of the goods links that you added and i've rewritten part of the article so that the problem of transliteration choice is dealt with talk hi while i appreciate your concern for maintianing the quality of the article i consider your reverts rather abrupt except for the linking of years you do not clearly justify why you reverted other edits e g wikilinks to rationality pragmatism materialism spirituality and patriotism although you later re linked england and europe and repaired articles the reason for putting transliterations in italics is to keep the reader aware of foreign language texts which is a common practice in your edit summary you blame me for unsourced changes it is evident that i did not add any new texts for which i had to provide any source but if you insist on keeping any part of text you should provide the relevant citation in your edit you have linked the word muslim with islam which are two different articles the use of i and e is problematic of transliterating persian and urdu texts respectively but it is good practice to maintain the same standard in one article the sound of e is common pronunciation in urdu and as the book predominantly contains urdu poetry i followed the same pronunciation pattern many thanks indeed for your messsage my friendly advice would be to carefully see before any blatant reverts in future cheers talk