agreed i amended the article after the chessbase article came out i think it's only fair to report it without endorsing or refuting the possibility that topalov did in fact cheat dionyseus has never understood the difference between saying topalov was accused of cheating and topalov cheated so it is possible that he will now delete my edit arguing that topalov didn't cheat it's frustrating and time consuming arguing with characters like that and while i had plenty of passive support last year i'd appreciate some more active support for inclusion this time around should dionyseus choose to make another big stink apparently dionyseus interprets neutrality as the censorship of negative information no matter how factual of course this is the same guy who last year edited kramnik's article so that it started with a list of his match losses of course i wouldn't want to infringe upon wiki's tradition of love charity and respect so i feel i should clarify my position insofar as i absolutely do not regard dionyseus to be a blight on wikipedia a mental degenerate incapable of lucid reasoning or incapable of language use he is certainly none of those things and admins may take that as an official statement