a response to for the attention of the ips inserting the 'racism section' i inserted facts documenting instances of named sources accusing catherine glick of racism i'd like to take a moment to address comments in the for the attention of the ips inserting the 'racism section ' please do not misinterpret documentation of allegations of racism for allegations themselves the section inserted apparently subject to some controversy is accusations of recism in that section the accusations of racism that several writerseileen read alex pareene and paul j balleshave leveled at caroline glick are documented properly no opinion or point of view has been expressed in the allegations of racism section as to the veracity of these allegations i therefore cannot understand why documenting such allegations could be considered controversial let alone potentially libelous as you say the documentation of specific allegations of racism by named sources need only prove that such allegations exist not their veracity documentation of written defenses of ms glick's work are solicited and in fact highly encouraged i apologize for linking to the link i should have used was the one from ms glick's homepage that link is at i never claimed to be other than a single user even though incidentally all of the contributions to the allegations of racism section are not mine incidentally if it matters i for my part am a fan of ms glick's work and do not believe that she is a racist i contributed to the section to advance the wikipedia mission to provide a forum where issues of public significance can be documented in a way as to provide reasoned information to the public one of ms glick's detractors eileen read wrote an article in the huffington post accusing ms glick of racism and asking that she be fired the article is making rounds all over the internet and has likely been read by hundreds of thousands if not many more it'd be a great shame from my perspective if ms glick's career suffered as a result of such charges since they are in my own personal view baseless such charges should be documented neutrally and weighed against the writings of ms glick and her defenders aiming only to inform the public which can then decide when i inserted a reference arguing that ms glick's positions are not racist but common sense it was taken down by those same persons invoking blp standards and undue weight