you have absolutely no evidence to suggest that i am a reasonable person so i suggest you withdraw that insinuation also you have been blocked per wikipedia sockpuppet investigations orbiston now as for my not having replied to every single one of your points well yes when you present me with a wall of text of that nature brimming with implications and assumptions and accusations and who knows what i will indeed pick out the specific points that spring to mind i'm not here to write essays explaining things to you and in fact much of this discussion should be happening on the talk page of the article not here but since the template i used invited you here i will entertain your questions here for a little while first i don't see any bizarre wall of steel around murphy's article i see a single purpose account orbiston repeatedly and determinedly trying to insert negative material and a small selection of other accounts and ip addresses some of which were single purpose accounts and some not dealing with that orbiston was neither being reasonable nor trying to do no more than mention sm's sexuality nor was he willing to abide by wikipedia's policies that's why he got blocked not aggressive censorship i haven't used the word conspiracy so i have no idea where you got that from the wikipedia page stephen fry mentions fry's sexuality with due weight i think one or two sentences out of a very lengthy article that has more than references as against currently for the murphy article also fry has publicly campaigned on gay rights and related issues he deliberately makes it a part of his public persona and his internet fame murphy has not done so now imagining for a moment that your postulated scenario is correct that the only reason that murphy's sexuality was mentioned in published sources was that a disgusting tabloid expos was planned then i don't need to explain to you that such material is not the sort of thing we use to evidence commentary about a living person on wikipedia i'm making this reply on an i'm started so i'll finish generosity basis but really you have no right to make accusations of this nature here or anywhere else don't do it please as you are an investigative journalist i recommend to you the website and forum that site has amongst its trustees a number of individuals who consider themselves professional journalists in the usa and i am sure that many of them share similar concerns to yourself about places where young gay men can express their feelings please don't make silly might be behind this aggressive censorship accusations here again or i'll have to remove them without comment i really am quite busy talk