the mimas article was wrong on the point of the adjectival form it might be considered correct by some but it's not merely obscure it's a neologism unused anywhere except wikipedia and most importantly unused by astronomers or the arbiters of astronomical nomenclature the iau i feel that it is inappropriate to promote the use of a neologism in an encyclopaedia which is supposed to be descriptive rather than prescriptive and so i have removed the reference to the word