it instantly registered as vandalism incorrectly i hope in my mind and i reverted it i went back and put your revision back as a good faith edit i let you guys work it out on the talk page sorry for the inconvenience ndenison talk no worries you are right to be vigilant the issue attracts passions on both sides big four auditors external link deleted hey ndenison you recently deleted external link added by me to big four auditors page indeed i recently added such a link and it was deleted by ohnoitsjamie however in course of discussion jamie recognized that this link could be added so could you please reverse the deletion back thanks big papa preceding unsigned comment added by done as a side note since you have an account use that to edit i assumed that this edit was from just another ip adding spam also sign your posts on talk pages with tildas have a good day and sorry for the inconvenience ndenison talk thanks ndenison i would also ask your advise i strongly believe that ilovebig com should be also externally linked from more pages big four companies pages deloitte touche tohmatsu ernst young kpmg pricewaterhousecoopers ilovebig com even as of now has dozens of news and other stuff related to each of these companies i believe it will be useful for those people who try to find out more about these companies so here is the question do you think it will be appropriate to add such links thanks for the insight big papa i don't know as i am not familiar with those articles my only advice would be to go to the talk pages of those articles and ask that question ndenison talk thanks ndenison rationale my dear fellow what is yours i'll be completely honest with you some of the stuff i see is pretty funny and sometimes i chuckle however i use wikipedia quite often to research random subjects with that being said i don't like to see stupid crap plastering an article if you want to vandalize something besides an article i e user pages talk pages etc i really don't care as long as its not mine other people might care but not me just leave the articles alone unless of course you're adding useful information ndenison talk hair trigger revert you reverted my changes to game artificial intelligence in the cheating ai section these changes focused the section on the importance of cheating to ai itself the section as it stood got too distracted by the wider considerations of cheating and by specific examples i understand that as an anon i get less consideration but please actually compare before after in context trimming can be constructive too hickson compact group perhaps you should read the article first this article is not about hcg and therefore it does not have a location or a picture the picture can be used illustratively but the infobox cannot brass knuckles why did you revert my edit my edit is not vandalism stop it us