unwarranted remarks hello first of all i'm very well aware of rr and secondly you should be aware that i did not reach rr or violate anything thirdly it would be nice for consistency's sake but since i see favoritism and politics at work here that you would give that same lecture to malik since he was reverting like crazy and getting close to uh rr of course you didn't per your bias in favor of him for some reason a problem on wikipedia that happens with admins and other users and sided with his nonsense that somehow icgc was somehow not notable never mind that they've been all over tv talk shows for years guests on interviews and in the radio and even in the news never mind that they've been around for decades and have internet sites for years you'll knee jerkly take malik's side on this because after all he's malik shabaz a bully on wikipedia who is revert happy and for some reason you favor i do not appreciate your remarks to me on his talk page i did not violate anything nothing but malik was arguably violating i don't like and no own you'll deny that because after all he's malik and for whatever reason whatever he does or says you admin or not seem to knee jerkly side with so now that malik has obvious back up for his bullying and ownership violations back up from an imperfect admin who is arguably a bully too doesn't bode well for me does it it's hard for me to do anything yes i'm angry your remarks were obtuse and unnecessary i violated nothing malik seems to think he owns a bunch of articles as is seen from his history and pattern yet you wink at it or deny that because well he's malik good day