it's not for me to comment on your stupidity but i think you should ask this of rushikesh tilak who is the contributing editor especially since he wrongly stated as fact that aap's demand was supported by other political parties i put it to him it was the other way around since aap was supporting the bjp's demand for cag audit the high court decision was in the petition of nand kishore garg a bjp councillor jayant bhushan was for the intervenor aap's prashant bhushan in wp c the case is decided and the present legally settled position is on the discom's website link given earlier as follows shri prashant bhushan was also party to this and the issue has been conclusively settled by the hon ble court vide its judgment on may cag issue response at present the cag has no authority to audit the accounts of private companies in view of the clear provisions contained under article of the constitution of india the various provisions of the cag act clearly set out the duties and powers of the cag are with respect to audit of accounts of union states and government companies corporations these powers do not extend to private companies subsequent to transfer of management control to discoms in cag categorically confirmed stating that from july discoms are not government companies under section of the companies act derc itself in its tariff order of had observed that the private discoms being a company incorporated under the companies act presently there is no such provision of cag audit in respect to private companies so wp npov would require a balanced picture with all of the above incorporated