where did you get the information that i insist on continuing attacks you must have misread the opening line of my appeal it said nothing of the sort the complete opposite if i were able to help i too would muck in cleaning up the mess yes any vandalism i created was inadvertent but then so too is that made by the other editors the article lies in a vandalized condition as we speak and it wasn't me who inserted it the simple fact was that neither the ip nor the so called auto confirmed patrollers once cited what was wrong and where i was going wrong therefore i had it on good authority to assume they were blanking masses of sourced info it was nearly me that reported ishdarian clearly i went the wrong way about handling the incident and i give my word that next time it won't happen