thanks i enjoy discussion and i am glad you welcome my suggestions i will have a few as time goes on there is simply too much here and i look forward to a consensus on what photos should be used and what should be put on commons nick stating that only one picture of the bethlehem site is needed is pov considering that this is the flagship facility and its over miles long and so is saying that images that are more artistic rather than informative should be removed if your are confused about what is artistic and what is informative architectural photography i recommend julius shulman architecture and its photography as this discussion moves forward i would like to point out that simply because a photo is not in color does not make it any less informative informational or encyclopedic all of the outside input has acknowledged the fact that there is room for both historic and contemporary photographic images in this article and as the article becomes longer as people actually make literal contributions we will be able to find a good balance of both