your comment gives an wrong perception to others as if all the references are wrong please list down what are all references which needs to be corrected i revisited the references once again and i found only the below two references needs to be changed international society for the investigation of ancient civilizations editor n mahalingam linguistics research books of ma so victor as an admin guide me in this the article is not trying to prove that kumari kandam is real the article speaks about the data which supports the claims of existence of kumari kandam along with their references from researchers and nowhere else it is mentioned that kumari kandam is real exists