i agree i have had a small amount of time this evening to do a little research this review could perhaps help in bridging the void it states that there is a lack of consensus and robust evidence within the medical literature for things such as penile cancer sti and uti while maintaining there is evidence for hiv prevention at least in the african trials if i had the time i would be tempted to run a statistical analysis on the medical reviews themselves i suspect there would be a clear correlation betweeen the conclusions reached and the country from which they originated which brings us in my opinion to the crux of the matter rightly or wrongly this is primarily a ritualistic or cosmetic procedure regardless of what evidence or opinion the medical community has or will provide therefore to treat this as almost an entirely statistically based article while only giving a cursory nod to the ethical debate just feels wrong to me i am certainly not advocating any bias either for or against i would be happy to see quotes from rabbis imams surgeons and scholars i also believe that any medical consensus if proven should remain the basis of the article perhaps a sub heading of controversy may be worthwhile