bias i was about to remove the last paragraphs of the section and replace it with the paragraph by mark in his last edit those paragraphs look more than a little biased and what's more some facts are inaccurate as well but then looking at other parts of the article i find that it has been modified in other places too recently and the writing style makes it look like something written by a fan so i haven't deleted the last paragraphs as i was about to and am instead awaiting a discussion on the whole article below are factual inaccuracies apart from the general bias i've noticed in the last paragraphs of the section in comparison to r ikk nen alonso had made significantly fewer driving errors than his rival just one in canada and has been a model of consistency finishing in the top three more times than r ikk nen my memory isn't the best but of the races in just the latter half i distinctly remember alonso making mistakes in qualifying in hungary and hockenheim raikkonen wasn't prone to many mistakes either alonso was not only the fastest driver in qualifying but also matched the mclaren mp s speed running with relatively the same amounts of fuel on board this is just speculation isn't it since the safety car came on before the frontrunners had made their pitstops not to forget montoya retiring due to the drain cover incident there is no way of verifying such a claim other than believing press releases by the teams concerned which are not exactly models of unbiased reporting especially given that throughout most of the season mclaren were shown to be qualifying with much more fuel on board than renault