i see that you don't want to discuss it there are sources other than overlawyered which would probably be reliable and a criticism section be written that isn't inflammatory and longer than the rest of the article when i first saw this article i believe written by you the whole point of it was as an attack this lawyer is not infamous he is not the target of an investigation that i know of if he is please cite where i have asked you repeatedly to just discuss and you are unwilling to do so i do not have time for your games