pete it is justified scholastically because mainstream scholars have never accused anthroposophy of being founded on rascist principles mainstream encyclopedias never accuse steiner or anthroposophy of rascism here's what wikipedia has to say about it in other words views held only by a tiny minority of people should not be represented as though they are significant minority views and perhaps should not be represented at all in particular to elaborate on the last comment above if you are able to prove something that nobody currently believes wikipedia is not the place to premiere such a proof once a proof has been presented and discussed elsewhere however it may be referenced this is why i believe that the section on racism should not be a section a mere couple of sentences is in my opinion too much but i would be willing to compromise with that because the presence of race as a section on steiner's page gives the article undue weight