dan pov bullying hi khanassassin i read your intelligent and respectuful comments on aaliyah's talk page unfortunately dan seems to be trying to control every minute detail which i've edited he has reversed anything i do my main contention like yours is his subjective views on critical reception it's simply not true that aaliyah received highly positive reviews she received positive reviews as you stated or generally favorable according to metacritic if you don't mind i'd also like to point you to a talk page from nicki minaj's album roman reloaded several editors there accused dan of being biased against minaj which i'd have to say does seem to be the case the album received a score of from metacritic which several editors wanted to show as generally positive because two highly influential reviewers rolling stone and spin lauded the album dan used metacritic to verify his pov that the album was mixed and then went on to revert any attempts by the editors to inject any positive reviews into the the first paragraph of the critical reception section here is dan 's response to me regarding my attempt to make the correction on aaliyah this was reviewed in fac excellent is cited in the source metacritic is not the be all end all of review sources they happen to omit several reviews from notable publications that are included in this article that they would now have included such as slant magazine the guardian chicago tribune and the independent your other changes were reverted as well however when trying to sway the editors on roman reloaded dan says this we are being objective which is why you're revision is not being accepted you're trying to overemphasis two reviews to make them seem more flattering of the article's subject and tactlessly rearranging positive criticism ahead of quotes from mixed reviews which metacritic clearly shows are the majority yellow anyone i simply wanted to note what a score of reflects on metacritic and dan will not allow it what gives thank you for your time