here here well articulated peterhuntington please read my note on content griot we cannot agree that the historians whom the atlantic employed to compose the list are worthy individuals because the atlantic monthy employed no such persons am lists are created by am employees and editors in this case james fallows who has publically declared his bias against ralph nader sad actually that am lost its former editor michael kelly whose integrity and objectivity were renowned regardless the status of the atlantic monthy and its lists are irrelevant your position is irrelevant wikipedia policy states stick to the facts the least cumbersome way of handling npov concerns would be to improve the article or the category description so that it is no longer pov in support of and adherence to wikipedia policy i revert to pastordavid's edit