in the other recent situation's discussion i see now that sarekofvulcan later asserted incorrectly that i had characterized a new user's edits in a way that is misleading to the point of disruption sarekofvulcan apparently believed that i meant to misrepresent that a new user's contribution was acceptable as written which i did not say or mean in this instance orlady as usual following my edits actually helped out by providing some advice to the new user sarekofvulcan has made some too strong snap judgments i think that are incorrect i think there are differences of opinion worth discussing but that sarekofvulcan's block is not justified ncram