editing the reference to satanism from the ayn rand article there seems to be some confusion about the exact nature of a neutral point of view with regard to the wikipedia cannon neutrality is not a licence to assert associations and intimate linkages that otherwise would require rigorous argument and analysis as a philosopher i well know that neutrality cuts both ways this protects against assertions that in fact serve hidden agendas such as attempts to sneak in legitimacy for unspeakable perversions like satanism and pedophilia again the prohibition explicit in the wikipedia discussion of neutrality is precisely against such brazen assertionism reverting this edit again without further argument should be subject to blocking