randroide answers to next step guys i do not see you taking steps to wikipedia requests for mediation i can not do this job because i always connect from filtered institutional net access and following those steps could result in new undesired controversial truncation of words by the software i do not want that happenning could you please follow the instructions in the link i provided thank you randroide answers to new reference by burgas at last we agree on something of course that the new section is a good idea the false suicidal terrorists from prisa will also be included there come oooooon boys start writing that section i do not want all the kudos for myself the new proposed article is by now an effort made only by me but remember npov and sources all the sources just like me citing el pa s in the section about the doubts about the genuineness of the th bomb cheers indeed a good point and all the remarks in cope too and the moral certitudes of mariano rajoy published in el mundo i agree with you larean what randroide omits to mention on the section about the th bomb is that he only added balancing references when i insisted that he do so the original version he created was entirely pov as is much of the rest of the proposed article also all the sources that he added from el pais are only available to subscribers npov it is not you are right southofwatford in your randroide omits section if you have not subscription to el pa s i am sorry but that s your problem my institutional access also has some advantages like paid access to el pa s and many many other publications and books that s one of the reasons for my exclusive use of filtered internet accesss it s much easier for me to work here due to the easy availability of sources do you see the truncation of words is offsett i think by better sources btw if you write under a randroide answers section you are invading my space i do not mind really but you are doing it risking new truncations on your messages to avoid this please write outside randroide answers sections if you think that the proposed article is pov work in it to make it npov the article is not mine i'll take the risk of you truncating the reply and put it here it's very short the issue is not whether i subscribe to el pa s its whether the people who read an article in the english wikipedia subscribe to it all sources used should be accessible to all readers of the article putting in a source that readers will not be able to see just so you can claim the article is npov is to my mind completely unreasonable all sources used should be accessible to all readers of the article very funny southofwatford i am going to follow this joke of yours please propose also the deletion of all books as sources because did you know there is always someone without this or that book delete all references to tv or radio stations because that user in brazil has no tv and no radio at home delete all the references in spanish because did you know there are users who know no spanish it s a pleasure to read this kind of funny jokes really i had a good laugh user southofwatford how strange that you should find it so funny after all most of the sources we are providing should enable users to find out more information about what is being sourced so to deliberately choose sources that require those users to pay to see the information is not funny it's simply bizarre equally in the english wikipedia i would argue that choosing a spanish or other foreign language source when an equally valid source exists in english does not make sense except perhaps to those who are too busy laughing your cynicism is evident in your response