narking ok and that disproves my point how i said that advisors are stationed in georgia proper buffer zones are un controlled areas of georgia proper so it's a georgian mission you said that advisors are stationed in georgia proper so it's a georgian mission well done xeeron i get million links when i google south ossetia war that's english buddy if only xeeron you read the title security council holds third emergency meeting as south ossetia conflict intensifies expands to other parts of georgia south ossetia conflict war expands as in already expanded it says expands not expanding or about to expand therefore the un knowingly named the war the south ossetia war knowing that it will expand see how important reading the title and getting the correct title is my arguments haven't evaporated anywhere south ossetia is still location based my initial argument it is still where over of the fighting took place it still has the most important battle tskhinvali my arguments are still here buddy and xeeron i have pointed to you countless times that might doesn't make right saying the majority says so does not make it npov if you would have lived in the south during the civil rights movenment you'd realize that might doesn't make right or npov for that matter i've seen your majority view point and called it a farce many times grey fox i have proof for how the georgia war is biased it is biased because it implies that south ossetia was a de facto part of georgia which as we all know is bullshit because if a region is de facto and de jure part of a country there is no war my russian colleagues may disagree but chechnya was not de facto part of russia in the 's it was de jure and it was called the second chechen war not the russian war so in other words mr grey fox and the other two of you you have failed to show my how south ossetia war is npov but i have shown you and cited an example of how georgia war would be incorrect and biased therefore the title stays case closed