t u the words cannot claim here and not vulnerable are not even used in the court ruling only in the cns comments af dear t u this does not change the fact that there are completely mutatis mutandis same expressions in this meaning in court's decision p the court concludes that it lacks personal jurisdiction over the trnc the court finds that it cannot exercise either general or specific personal jurisdiction over trnc the court also notes that it is unlikely the trnc has the capacity to be sued for state law claims in the district of columbia so all in all you distort the realities when it does not suit you for example the case was on cyprus dispute article since but when greek cypriots lost the case you immediately removed the case from cyprus dispute article is this your neutrality