please explain why you're attributing the foes characterization of fulbright and marchetti to the reliable source whence that information about them derives the reason the attribution is gratuitous is because wp attributepov applies when there are conflicting povs which there aren't you didn't attribute the other information you added in relation to franklin so why the attribution in fulbright and marchetti's case also note that the article was stable since april before the anonymous ip made a nonconstructive edit on july your subsequent attempts to restore information that was removed months before is inconsistent with the spirit of consensus according to which wikipedia is supposed to operate finally your offer to list all the npov editors who agreed it was fine to leave in the irmep reference won't be helpful you need to demonstrate that the discussion concluded with something reasonably approaching consensus if you can do that by all means proceed