i tend to think that when the list is longer than the rest of the article there's a problem either the history and characteristics should be expanded of the list should be culled i personally like the consensus that was reached in the tripel article between and others myself included we decided that the country of origin should be highlighted with the most examples there we did trappist abbey and foreign foreign includes all non belgium examples this way the article is an article in an encyclopedia not a list people can find lists anywhere and the article should reference this also the style statistics are bad when you say style statistics it sounds like a prescription not a description an encyclopedia should follow the latter and if the former is used a citation should follow and you'll not find a valid one for this style in it's country of origin