since my block days ago iss and his close friend outside of wikipedia psyc immediately frantically and systematically reverted 'masses' of established reliably sourced edits only hours after i was blocked in fact every single edit that i through consensus had ever established and stayed in place these were very well sourced solid edits many of these edits in numerous articles had been established and remained unchanged for over even months depending on the article page many of these reverts during the last week also undid the work of other editors involved in developing the 'consensus' that then stayed in place the only editor truly independent on these articles recently was an editor mark viking he made this valid comment on the talk health psychology page he seems quite genuine but then his comments were actually 'deleted' entirely from the public talk page he was the only editor who commented on the rapid systematic 'demolition job' and complete 'censorship' of my edits to these article pages containing months old established edits with multiple reliable sources attached to them mark viking said this to psyc thanks for expanding that section but it seems you removed a sourced assertion on the origin of ohp do you dispute that source or have a source asserting that ohp and i o psychology are totally separate i ask this because the relation of these fields seems to be an area of contention at wp and removal of sources isn't going to help i invite anyone to look at the combined edit history of iss and his close friend colleague outside of wikipedia psyc since the th of january until today in 'numerous articles ' these 'wikipedia owned' articles are again now grossly biased and distorted