mish mash i believe this article in its current format is a major mish mash because by a curious mix of disparate citations it seeks to cover khatris from the peshawar to nadia in bengal and deep south into peninsular india so either the article is restructured to cover by provinces both india and pakistan or by creation of separate articles for khatris from different states although the overwhelming majority of khatris are punjabi this article in its current state has juxtaposed citations and content from books pertaining to one region to attach to another which is really quite absurd some interesting references to manu smriti and dasam granth also need discussing in the way these books have been used in the article and off course the addition and deletion of some interesting citations on this and related articles by both new and experienced editors also needs exploration