the compromise is between characters worth of back and forth for a theory with no real acceptance versus nothing i've spent a lot of time tracking down the sources for those characters all with not a whit of change from the scientific community on the topic that's what i want to avoid having to find yet another source that points out some minor detail of the elephant's kidney does not mean hominins were once aquatic do you think it's an adequate compromise if not would you suggest replacing the list wholesale t c wikipedia's rules simple complex