connection between chan and anonymous and anonymous culture i'm not sure the extended section on chan users is really necessary in this article here's my formal sounding original reasoning that i thought started sounding too formal as it stands the lines drawn between those three things are rather thin while anonymous does profit from anonymity and chan users can profit from anonymity i think there needs to be a more direct connection shown in this article before there needs to be an extended section upon chan within the article consider it like this my father doesn't like potatoes turnip eaters often don't like potatoes my father must eat turnips anonymous profits from anonymity chan users profit from anonymity anonomous members must be chan members i don't doubt that there are many participants in anonymous that use chan i'm just not sure it is relevant to the point of extended discussion of anonymous unless' there is proof that chan was the main location where anonymous was organized there have been several sites akin to chan both preceding and following and in addition irc also served as a gathering place for anonymous individuals to share information collectively including early hackers a discussion of chan as a subset of anonymous culture should be listed on cyberculture and chan and if necessary on a new page dedicated to anonymous culture this article purports to be about anonymous as a loosely associated hacktivist group the focus thus should be on anonymous group