agreed as you said above relisting should only be done when it isn't reasonable possible to close an afd i closed this debate as keep as there were two editors with good keep arguments contrary to cunard's above claim i do not simply count votes however the nom asked me to reopen it and i agreed that consensus could have been clearer and i relisted it due to the nature of the zachary stone afd i relisted if there hadn't been the concern from the subject i would have closed it as keep the other three that you closed i relisted because both the arguments for keeping or deleting the articles was weak i felt that they needed wider input before closing one way or another talk