edit war it's obvious from the revision history that the subject of the page or their agents supporters are determined to excise all perceived criticism connection with adware malware etc also that more than one other party is keen to see that those 'facts' are left in place in the interests of resolving the dispute can we discuss why say intego com or thesafemac com might not be considered reliable sources thus their opinions worth mentioning also it might be considered here that a web search for 'genieo' produces 's of results asking for help in removing the genieo 'adware' 'virus' 'malware' etc regardless of the company intentions it seems clear that many users 'experts' too see their products in a poor light and that should not be hidden from anyone seeking information at wikipedia doubly so when the are verifiable reliable sources for those points of view i feel that the company or their puppets are likely to continue reverting vandalizing and that the topic requires some sort of protection