how can you reconcile your alleged goal of 'a set of readable articles' with requests from 'certain quarters' to define every single term that are perfectly standard terms within homeopathy by peer reviewed jnls what this is nuts peer reviewed by whom as i have said many times homeopathy is a subject in its own right that does not need to apologise for its existence or doff its cap to science zealots anyone who reads the article will see the terms and can then find standard definitions of those terms anywhere on the web or you can build into the article links to such defintions such would be a reasonable proposition as opposed to obfuscation and an unstated desire to purge wiki of all allegedly non science stuff just as if it were a form of creationism please get real peter morrell