not being used to wiki process i didn't see the warning until after it was made although i'm not sure what that difference would have made long term the notion of fascism in respect of the operation of wiki is not meant as an insult but describes a particular way of operating a nation organisation etc having spent many years dealing with institutional abuse of authority etc the harassment of my contribution was corporate but for those very reasons it will not be a productive line of enquiry i suppose i could also turn to a zealous enforcement of the rules and seek wiki awards anyway in respect of my request we're now leaving wiki territory in terms of copyright and going where statutory law applies can you point me in the direction of an administrator or agent of wiki that can deal with this issue knowledgeabley i haven't assigned copyright to wiki and wiki policy can't supersede law i suppose i could formally assign copyright of all those images to a third party which would immediately create a wiki violation i'd also be interested in views about the difference between self interest in requiring attribution and that notion in respect of links it's a mark and again this is a valid view of paternalistic and authoritarian operations no matter how benign to operate arbitrarily without explanation i'm asking this because there is a prima facia contradiction in application of the stated rules although i'm not expecting this to receive an effective explanation this time any more than last