tfd nomination of template silentredirect template silentredirect has been nominated for deletion you are invited to comment on the discussion at wikipedia templates for deletion template silentredirect thank you talk watermarks i shall remove the obvious ones the less obvious ones stay i am allowed to watermark images with anything whatsoever i wish to even if it's a contradiction and if you wish me to use up further wp bandwidth by re uploading them that has no effect on me i can't do anything until this evening and if any get deleted i shall reupload them yours without respect talk email you could have the grace to reply i said that i'd deal with them this evening but only the ones where the watermark is visible from the page so off talk email i am planning to re upload them with less obtrusive watermarks such as that on image bliss parody jpg talk email it wasn't vandalism i used an external link as per your instructions which incidentally i'm not bound to follow i am certainly on the verge of requesting mediation as you are disrupting my life never mind wp to make a point i will tell you one more time any images are better than none if you wish to get your own pix of all the concerned images you're damn welcome to try but they are gfdl therefore there's no grounds for removal talk email ps i shall add the external link again not as an image and if you remove it i shall make a formal complaint to the wikimedia foundation and the information commissioner in london talk email your conduct is a little off in this matter while i'm all for discussing the issues with users let's keep it civil please thanks talk i disagree rob it is far more than a little off images watermarked as such are not in any way appropriate for wikipedia this is an encyclop dia not a pet image project if thedoctor isn't happy to play ball he can go elsewhere talk i am proposing a change to the image use policy to forbid watermarked images please voice an opinion at wikipedia talk image use policy user created images thanks talk i edit from the united kingdom and under the computer misuse act the editing of information online is illegal without permission the button at the top of every page that says edit this page among other things constitutes that permission while the policies and guidelines form conditions since there is no condition against my image it has a legal right to be there q e d talk email true but therefore your addition fails under the same logic also wikimedia own the servers it's their right to delete it id apologies to ed for invading his talk page but what a load of rubbish wikipedia are under no legal obligation whatsoever to host your images regardless of whether they meet any policy i have no idea under what flawed logic you presume that the fact you can edit wikipedia means that your edits must legally be accepted if the computer misuse act states that the editing of information online is illegal without permission that implies that editing with permission is legal and nothing more furthermore by your logic i have the legal right to edit wikipedia and remove your images i fail to see what on earth you intend to tell your lawyer but i don't imagine the wikimedia board are too concerned '''''' talk ignoring the gibberish i