unfortunaately i don't know of such books by the way the guardian quite was brought up in the original deleteion discussion but was disregarded though the guardian is a significant british newspaper it might be releavent to mention that this mr yellow up seems to have a consistent policy of hounding me and trying to get rid of whatever i write which does not fit his political opinions he does it also in the hebrew wikipedia there are some more points which i thought of the argument of yellow up that this is just one of thousands of trials against military evaders which was rpeated by danntm just a simple unimportant court martial is factually not true it is very exceptional for the idf to grant a political objector a full court martial where he can be defended by a lawyer and call witnesses and make political speeches it does not happen more often than once in a decade the usual procedure is disciplinary proceedings where you are judged by a commaning officer in his bureau with no lawyer or witnesses and it lasts about five minutes but the officer can only give a maximum of days unlike the full court martial which can give years but the descision to have a full court martial is far from routine it is taken on the highest levels then there is the fact that the act which the trial was about a soldier writing subversive graffiti of tanks and other military vehicles is far from routine it is certainly unique in israel and i think quite exeptional for armies worldwide and finally majorly jusitifed the decision to delete by stating the vast majority were delete comments and there seemed to be consensus to delete now i took a look at the deletion log of article submitted on january together with mine as far as i could see virtually all of those which were fianlly deleted had a real ovewhelming majoroity in favor many of them complete unanimity the court martial artcile had nine in favor of deletion against five opposing deletion if you don't count my own objection with it there would be nine to six i saw that another article which was put up for deleteion in nearly the same time arnie ginsburg the result was no concensus default keep i have a feeling this could have been the resut also with the court martial article i don't know if i should try myself to put up all these arguments it seems like a person trying to defend his own work is discounted adam keller