you are repeating the behavior this discussion page has seen in the past censoring maligning and mischaracterizing persons due to political and religious povs of yourself duh that's what happens in discussion pages about religious denominations and political candidacies your action and your comments here are almost astute but not quite the article about temple lot was created by a member of the temple lot faction jared smith and and has been constructively edited by his older brother jordan smith who is also an active member of the temple lot faction not a former member or an excommunicated member but a full baptised member in good standing according to the bylaws and official documentation both within and outside the faction due mainly to the machinations and malice of an anonymous editor good ol'factory whom you know perfectly well is the same as the snocrates zoporific who began unconstructively editing the temple lot articles in december both temle lot members wikipedia editors jared smith and jordan smith have been unfairly and abusively banned from editing wikipedia specifically administrator versageek banned jordan smith on december because he kept complaining about snocrates good ol'factory's misconduct and then when snocrates turned good ol'factory was finally granted administrative privileges he deleted jsmith 's user page which contained a clear explanation of what had happened in december duh that's what dishonest persons do to hide their misconduct from review they censor it i'm mildly curious what pompous and unreasonable and unfair and abusive reply or action you will come up with in reply here but i'm not terribly curious seeing as how it's rather predictable whatever pompous self rightous authorities do when their misconduct is brought to light slander the person or persons who bring the misconduct to light that's what they do nice try but no cigar sir the truth about the latter day saint movement and the fascinating role hedrickites such as jared smith and jordan smith have played in it will come to light whether you or snocrates good ol'factory or any other pious geek wishes otherwise ironically many issues played out on this discussion page in the past few days and before are issues which played out in the free speech movement i don't reckon you're familiar with that mind having a look