page protection keilana can you please explain why you have semi protected the page huma abedin you have stated vandalism which is clearly not the case please see biographies of living persons noticeboard where the matter is being dealt with can you explain your actions i understand i am new here but it was one of the first pieces of information i have cont to wikipedia there has been no decision made i can not understand your actions having now had the rules for vandalism explained to me i believe you have abused your power as my contib clearly dosent fit any of the terms i ask you to reaccess your actions the decision was made at wikipedia requests for page protection huma abedin edit ctalk chistory clinks cwatch clogs its common practice during an edit dispute such as this for an uninvolved admin such as keilana to semi protect the page to reduce the intensity of the dispute in any case from the tone of wikipedia biographies of living persons noticeboard gossip magazines as reliable sources it seems that semi protection was the right call to stablize the article while discussion continued there and on the talk page of the reliability of sources mbisanz talk i would question how uninolved you actally are give these messges left on my talk page and don't worry you'll be able to edit that page in days enjoy bol and by waiting for five days is by just waiting and you'll be able to edit the semi d pages don't worry give keilana some time she's offline right now and so am i bol retrieved from i intend on asking someone to examine your actions you clearly statd vandalism as your reason for the protection i would not you made no contibution to the talk page and sort no concensus from you action i will also ask you to explain you relastionship to those who have sort to remove the information i would also like to know why you have changed you id thanks i will be adding this information to the talk page and any were else i find help i also note you did not add the fact the matter was being listed to protection page to the talk page of the article i did not create the name of the page in regards to gossip mag tittle had you read the info you would understand hillary clinton was interviewed for the article to request unprotection please go here wikipedia requests for page protection current requests for unprotection to ask for keilana to be examined i'd wait for her to respond here and if your not satisfied there is the wikipedia administrators' noticeboard i leave the personal inquiries for keilana to answer is she desires to mbisanz talk responded on the editor's talk thanks mb keilana parlez ici i would like to know how the article was brought to your attention i would also advise you that i have posted this information on the talk page of the article thank you dear mbisanz thank you so much for responding to those concerns on my talk page i've posted on the person's talk if s he wants my admin actions looked at s he can always seek input at an or god forbid through recall you've been a great help recently and when you're ready for rfa i'd really like to nominate you if you've got some space for me best keilana parlez ici retrieved from and your atual post hello sorry i couldn't attend to your concerns earlier i semi protected the page here because of the reasons stated there as it is election season in the united states articles about prominent political figures such as mrs clinton are particularly vulnerable hence the protection there was a dispute over the reliability of sources and i protected the article to cool the dispute protection isn't an endorsement of the current version i have no ulterior motive see here for protection policy information in general an admin doesn't need consensus to protect a page when a dispute is ongoing is there a problem with my administrative actions thanks for expressing your concerns feel free to ask on my talk page if you have other questions or need something best keilana parlez ici retrieved from the information was added to keep record for a complaint add so people reading the page understand why it is copy protected who bought the information to the protect board should not the fact it was brought to the board have been added to the talk page so people could provide information as to why it