zeno's paradoxes are unrelated to infinite divisibility the latter questions how an infinite many parts can total to a finite whole whereas the former flying arrow for instance argues how can an infinite many tasks possibly be completed how can an arrow move if at one moment it is here and at a later moment be somewhere else the editors of zeno's paradoxes built upon aristotle namely if everything when it occupies an equal space is at rest and if that which is in locomotion is always occupying such a space at any moment the flying arrow is therefore motionless as such machine elf ought to move his work to zeno's paradoxes and not here