material to be included should be relevant noteworthy and well sourced if it isn't seriously discussed in high level academic or scientific sources it doesn't belong at all in a article of this nature in the menzies case for example none of these criteria are met as for relevance the topic is scholarly and scientific while menzies' work is entertainment with zero scholarly or scientific merit or value as for noteworthiness mainstream sources seriously discussing the topic rarely if ever seriously include mention of menzies' work as for well sourced menzies has a reliability rating of diddly squat as far as scholarly and scientific topics are concerned