false photograph what is written in the article is untrue there was only one photograph taken of baha'u'llah not two the one photograph taken is the one on that is on display in the archives in haifa i have seen this picture and the picture shown on this website is neither the same picture nor is it a picture of the same personage the claims that this photograph is a photograph of baha'u'llah are false the person in this photograph bears no physical resemblance to the personage in the photograph on display in the archives their ages appear to be the same so the dissimilarity in resemblence cannot be ascribed to age differences in the same person i'm going to correct the text on display claiming two pictures were taken of this historical figure and am going to remove the picture quite frankly all this debate is quite ridicules i respect the baha'is right to respect the manifestations of god by not portraying their images publically but they seem a bit too defensive their all worried about showing his picture publicaly and this isnt even his picture apparently this picture has been distributed even among baha'is these people havent even seen the picture in the archives i cannot emphasize how different in appearance the two personages in the two photographs are why do you think they never show the archives picture online or never show the two photographs together because it would be obvious that one of them is a false picture thank you to quote the baha'i world centre in one of his epistles 'abdu'l bah the son of bah 'u'll h wrote that two photographs of bah 'u'll h were taken both in adrianople turkey each in a different pose there are copies of both pictures at the bah ' world centre and one of these is displayed in the international archives where it is viewed by bah ' pilgrims the image reproduced on the web site in question seems to be a poor reproduction of one of these photographs office for public information sept photo of baha'u'llah on web site px talk