i was also eyeing the jane link as inappropriate clutter especially given that the burpee museum has its own page it might be appropriate under t rex or theropods but not here several of the see also links are redundant or questionable e g taphonomy since it is now in the page narrative regarding a fav or famous fossil list i think it would become intractably long not to mention the subjectivity involved i ve already noticed that the lagerst tte page has fallen victim to subjectivity as several listed sites are not traditionally considered to meet the admittedly fuzzy criteria i e extraordinary fossil richness or completeness paleontologists would generate different lists a separate page is possible but you ll be working on it for a long long time i expect