against merge the uvs nuur has already been confused by making the article about the lake instead of the basin much of the relevant information has been removed or confused in the merge or copy paste or whatever an editor did the hollow although lumped in with the world heritage site is really about a different set of issues including nomadic peoples archeology sites enormous variation in terrain endangered animals etc the current article on uvs nuur seems to have missed all the relevant points on the geological aspects plus the name of the article is different from the name given on world heritage site further the editors have disregarded that almost all citations are about the basin there is hardly anything in the article about the lake if you refuse to allow editors to write articles that they are interested in and insist on an instant mindless merge we can have an rfc which i will abide by unless you consent to a rewrite of the current article so it is accurate and not confusing why do you have such an investment in preventing other editors from writing articles about what they are interested in it is against policy to redirect without a discussion which is what was done before please consider this rather than instinctively merge everything many articles have been ruined by mindless merging