its not that he doesn t want the roma to express opinions he just wishes for the article to be factual and not have an unsupported maverick content the author of the article express the widely accepted of the origins of the roma i e they came from india the evidence that you present such as if they were of indian origins they would want to return to india is not logical nor do explain how in your therory the roma learnt indian if they did not originate from india you also assume all indians are hindus which they may well not have been the case when the roma left india the author's work appears to be unbiased and factual your corrections just dont have any reasonable base brinlarr