well i think once someone can find a proper source then why not but it needs to be made sure that it isn't coated with a hidden agenda which unfortunately seems to persist in these kinds of articles let's not forget mainstream academics studying hunnic history know of only hunnic words and a few names here and there the obscurity of hunnic history makes it hard to come to a conclusion on its ethnic and linguistic origins some say they were primarily turkic others say iranian others slavic some even say uralic etc then to suddenly have an unknown source with a very suspicious title and background making claims about the turkic form of hunnic names is rather suspicious if there can be a proper way to find this gentleman's book without having to go through nationalistic websites it would perhaps give us a better indication of the man's original message sadly these nationalistic websites aren't to be trusted some even have a habit of trying to push something that the author in question may not have intended i've already come across dubious references in wiki articles today unfortunately all of which are related in some form or another to the mythical turanian pseudoscience