ongoing issue several editors have expressed concern at your edits to the spirit of st louis article reviewing the case i agree that the edit seriously skews the statement to a non neutral point of view the difference between first and first solo is a very major one imho and cannot be allowed into the article as is alcock and brown clearly make the first non stop flight by removing the word solo you are creating a false statement in the article this is a serious problem i see several attempts to discuss the matter both here on your talk page and in the talk spirit of st louis talk page but i have seen no responses from you to date this is another important wikipedia policy change is fine even radical change but if it results in controversy you should address the concerns simply put you have not done so i don't want to harsh out here but i do need to make sure the message is clear unless you have a good explaination and tell us what it is any further edits to re include this change will be treated as vandalism and result in a blocking of your editing privileges if you really feel that this change is minor and accurate then you need to address the concerns brought forth by the other editors first