it was a positive review i don't think you read it you cherry pick one line over a is this neutral milton's book is the third by a science journalist to question neo darwinism the other two being by hitching and taylor both mentioned in the article spanner further says he does not by any means cover the same ground as taylor milton also mentions this on his website about taylor being a science journalist and questioning neo darwinism before him of course you wouldn't know this becuase you don't read books by milton i have seen your edits on milton's page you seem to be under the impression he is a creationist if you bothered to read his books you would see is is actually a neo lamarckist milton has been misrepresented here is what spanner says about milton he writes well forcefully and with conviction this book is well produced did you forget those bits on a side note who is david spanner hes a fundamentalist christian who trained as mainly a physicist he was not an expert on biology he mainly wrote about thermodynamics and religion of course he would of disagreed with some of milton's views becuase milton is non religious here is douglas spanner douglas spanner