speedy deletion dogsoc as patent nonsense hi dreadstar could you please rehabilitate the dogsoc article you deleted to some private talk space so that we can work with it and convert it to brilliant prose and all the other stuff would appreciate a little room time to work on this one since it is not patent nonsense although it may appear so at first blush i will reply for dreadstar and he can respond if he needs to let me first explain the concept of verifiability which is a core pillar of wikipedia another thing is notability which basically means that you can create an acronym about something but that does not make it automatically notable without citations to reliable third party sources such as news articles professional journal articles magazine articles etc then articles are likely to be deleted wikipedia is not a soapbox and additionally i would like to point you to the conflict of interest guideline because your username is the same as the title of the article the coi guideline explains that editors should not create or edit articles about themselves their company organization product or family or friends as they would likely be unable to edit neutrally neutrality is another of wikipedia's core policies i'd encourage you to review the policies and guidelines given here and once you have consider if indeed the article you submitted was verifiable by multiple reliable sources and displayed notability cheers ariel gold thanks ariel better get some foot warmers for that poor doggie dogsoc the article consisted of an acronym and six sentences describing what the acronym meant none of which was verifiable per wp verifiability and which miserably failed wikipedia notability the only claim to verifiability was a presumed xerox copy of an underground magazine published in purportedly recently acquired and alleged to be undergoing the process of being translated and scanned the contents of the article although short were quite inflammatory making unfounded accusations against governmental regulatory assassins etc all in all it added up to quite frankly patent nonsense with no meaningful content dreadstar wiki has many articles devoted to acronyms such as united nations united states of america referring to the recently acquired document there is now a stay order of the concerned high court on publication of this document we can now cite the judgement's link on an official govt high court website which ought to meet reputable source verificability criteria for dogsoc notability a simple google is this verifiable news search on nandigram should do finally i may mention wikipedia's neutral point of view policy which is absolutely non negotiable dogsoc you do not seem to have read the links provided to you you say dogsoc is on google but here is the google search result for dogsoc with a total of one article from not related to this article you are claiming is notable the words you said it stands for dismantling our governments selling our cities a google search comes up with again nothing none of this has anything to do with pov it has to do with again verifiability and reliable third party sources that establish the notability yes usa un and many many other acronyms have pages here but they are notable mentioned in the news media and other reliable sources this acronym is not further you may wish to review the single purpose account guide as well thanks ariel special c