yes i did if wikipedia can not be trusted with something as simple as quite literally then it has a very serious problem and the slashdot article happened to be just about this i do not give importance to a comment receiving a high or low rating on slashdot as that can too often be just a measure of the biases of some modders i think i have abided by wikipedia policies that content must be based on verifiable sources and the others who caused me much inconvenience haven't wikipedia is a public resource and i see no reason why i should shy from making this issue public when it's ontopic on another site and a poignant example of a problem