rfc incompatibility between the standard scientific notation for paragroups and links standard scientific notation for paragroups is to use an asterisk after the name for the haplotype the very conciseness which makes this a very useful standard reduces its usefulness as a link therefore currently there is no standard for both noting a paragroup and usefully linking to the paragroup article which explains this distinction without saying haplotype paragroup which in my limited understanding seems to be either a tautology or an oxymoron i told you it was limited i fear my option may be marginally acceptable and i was hoping someone with a better knowledge of the subject might either endorse them or have a better idea current status the current status if you missed that i can't say i am surprised it is a link shown as after the colon and before the word the on this line paragroups are marked with an asterisk which is pipe linked to the redirect page haplogroup creating about or so double redirects option paragroup my favorite might be better to use the abbreviation 'para' instead to save space option your idea here including haplotype paragroup if that works