g rny rosikno witnesses to mystery investigations into christ s relics several editors tried to prevent including material from that book voicing an opinion of the authors that the results of numerous time consuming and comprehensive analyses conducted using the most technologically advanced equipment available seemed to coincide with assertions prevalent in christian tradition under the pretext of rs for discussion of the matter see ignatius is a serious catholic publisher i don't know why books published by them should be excluded from wikipedia except someone's hostility to catholicism if we exclude g rny then we should also exclude carrol cruz catholic writer as well and nickell sceptical writer who is much more biased against any relics than any catholic source so his book is not the sort of book that should be used to write a neutral article the statement is an opinion cited not a fact besides there is no such academic discipline as study of the relics yet anyone can publish whatever wants in the lead we have two negative opinions by erasmus from s and by thurston from so the lead is not neutral to balance it we have posititve g rny rosiko opinion from much more recent after several researches on some relics described in their book have been published