anons concerns cont'd on the grav locked red dwarf planet note that a planet gravitationally locked to its star will have tidal heating like io so it's not as if everything will freeze on the night side the great advantage of a grav locked planet is its stability i think it's fair to say that stability is easier for life to deal with than instability if you look at the stability of jupiter's great red spot years and posited to be permanent weather on a grav locked planet should be relatively stable i presume a convection rising at the sun pole and falling at the dark pole with terrain eddies of course such a planet will have no axial tilt no day night cyclei don't even think it can have an eccentric orbit but i'm unsure this greatly reduces the complexity of an organism's job for example a plant doesn't need the night mode earth plants need they would not have to drop leaves for winter these seem like advantages to me based on the best information i can find on the us dept of energy site solar information what plants get on a clear equinox day is about kwh m peaking at kw m the vast majority of that power comes in the middle hours less than kwh m is in morning and evening the night is essentially kwh m not absolutely no but to the digit accuracy i was using yes compare visual magnitudes of sun vs moon this varies by latitude and season of course now let's plug this into the supposedly horrible variation of a red dwarf instead of roughly time at kw yes it really is close to that equivalent energy would be all the time at kw thus the variation would be kw during minimums of kw and of course is kw thus ignoring frequency the red dwarf plant has an easier time the lower power of red dwarfs just pull the hz in considering earth shade plants which live on far less than kw m the hz is where the total solar and gravitational energy are right for water organizationally perhaps the best thing would be to treat earth like planets in the main flow of the article then discuss tidally locked red dwarf planets with a note that thinking on the issue is in flux and note that chemosynthsis biospheres would be possible even around brown dwarfs or outlying moons like titan and europa perhaps keeping original numbers suitable star systems spectral class binary systems since all but the closest binaries are ok put it here a stable habitable zone planetary characteristics mass acceptable energy variation as i hope i showed about low isn't really necessary include the case of jovian moons in the hz high metallicity it comes from system formation but it's a planet property geochemistry maybe combine with metallicity alternative biologies red dwarf systems tidally locked low light new chemosynthesis based biology on no changes i should add this is a really good article maybe i'm trying to gild the lily mistake i am not a specialist but mars by contrast is nearly or perhaps totally geologically dead and has lost much of its atmosphere mass paragraph seems doubtful to me i mean mars still has volcanoes mount olympus for example so it sees strange to me that it's geologically dead but once again i am no specialist mars does have volcanoes but as far as i know they're not really active so nothing is really powering them and geological activity isn't really showing up luna earth's moon has volcanoes and it's accepted as geologically dead the presence of volcanoes doesn't mean active volcanoes that's basically what i was trying to say i guess i just never made it really clear picture size can a larger size by found for the habitability zone picture i'd like to use it as a background but it won't scale up i downloaded it here though i can't remember the exact spot on the site an image search for habitable zone turns it up first thing but only at k earth's geological activity i am pretty sure that the earth isn't geologically active simply because of its large mass surface area ratio from what i have read i believe that planets are probably heated mostly by radioactive decay and or tidal for