i agree with most of that but there does need to be a section devoted to criticism as w any confrontational controvercial etc subject anyways i have been saying i am pretty much done w this article which is largely due to my lack of both interest and expertise the important thing to me is that things stay npov and factual accurate which includes among other things retaining expanding information about objections to the concept and not trying to say that anyone defends heteronormativity i agree w you about prose being improved and while i am not of course looking to do that i must express a concern that things remain fair and reasonable in regards to areas capable of rationale debate cheers spade apr utc