futper between your editting history and your negative stereotyping comments against all greeks e g your comment above ' they just go by the narrow perspective of their national media ' it makes it appear like you have an anti greek pov that is what makes me suggest you are a fyrom supporter it was not meant as a pejorative simply a description of your political leanings if you wish others to believe you have a npov it would require a more careful selection of words on your part and a far more even handed editing history when it comes to the main article statistically speaking here you delete facts that support greek positions in far great frequency than you do fyrom ones i can provide a detailed listing on request as for the house resolution you made several points to marginalize the senate bill condemning fyrom for propaganda signed by obama possibly the next us president based on low numbers i therefore pointed out the house bill which you have made absolutely no mention of had over members supporting it which i belive made it was one of the largest supported foreign bills of the year actually i don't think it is unreasonable to suggest when a fair chunk of the government of the world's most powerful nation heavily involved with mediating the naming issue makes a complaint that severe it should be completely negated from the article as for you opinion that it or a child bill won't become more binding my own opinion is that will largely be up to the behavior of fyrom government and whether they abstain from any form of propaganda' against greece's historical or cultural heritage