re review ga review see wp wiaga for criteria is it reasonably well written a prose quality b mos compliance if the lead section is still a bit short and could use some expanding wp lead recommends that an article of about this size should have one to two paragraphs i think this one can easily support two you have done some good work in expanding what the lead covers the lead section is still a bit short and could use some expanding wp lead recommends that an article of about this size should have one to two paragraphs i think this one can easily support two you have done some good work in expanding what the lead covers is it factually accurate and verifiable a references to sources b citation of reliable sources where necessary c no original research is it broad in its coverage a major aspects b focused is it neutral fair representation without bias is it stable no edit wars etc does it contain images to illustrate the topic a images are copyright tagged and non free images have fair use rationales b images are provided where possible and appropriate with suitable captions overall pass or fail if well done this can now be called a good article keep up the good work and consider a peer review and this should be up to featured article status soon with so much history behind this market it should definitely be an attainable goal c well done this can now be called a good article keep up the good work and cons