unthinking automated 'corrections' your edit summary at the article grotrian steinweg characterised the bulk of my edits as unthinking automated 'corrections' and you reverted them in general i find the principles of wikipedia revert only when necessary worthy of consideration in particular i assure you they were not automated and are the result of some thinking in detail the correct syntax for a reference invocation by name is as for any unary html tag to close it with a space preceding the slash the wikilink for germany in the infobox is a case of wp overlink when using the parameter is unnecessary the term initial interest confusion is capitalised at its article and i presume with good reason the template is useful even for articles which currently already show all of that caterory's images as more files might be placed into that category in the future i suggest you revert your edit additionally please consider wp revert only when necessary