please review the comments and allegation made no where in the comments did i threaten legal action i did suggest that clear bias in presenting and comments left by user yakushima may leave him open to proceedings as it may be potentially liable there is a difference between a threat and a possibility by the person the page is written on i would also like to further point out the constant wp coatrack wp game wp notscandal wp honesty and wp npv on christopher bubsy by the complainant further on neutral point of view yakushima states busby's history with the subject is a history of conflict with other low dose radiation researchers there's almost nothing else to his scientific career since but that conflict and these conflicts are most of what makes him notable the issues he takes up do not themselves define the low dose radiation debate which was your proposed section heading he is on the extremes of that debate which ranges from hormesis to lnt and onward until you get to busby who is at the outer edge allison and wakefield actually disagree with each other did you know that busby is so far to the extreme in fact that he faults the cerrie delegates from greenpeace and friends of the earth for voting the llrc minority statement out of the cerrie final report are you getting it yet yes even people hailing from relatively ardent activist environmental groups decided that busby was out on a limb yakushima talk i have attempted to reason and make a sincere apology for bringing up legal talk and agree this may appear as harassment this would no longer happen should i be unblocked further any attempt that i have made and discussions on christopher bubsy discussion page has not been negotiated or reasonable changes such as debate have been replaced with conflict and makes the page far from neutral hopefully someone will step in and review the page and discussion to date even if i am not unblocked i am sincere in my belief thank you for your consideration oz waver