why aren't you discussing this point by point like i did that's what someone with an honest content dispute would do why aren't you citing reliable sources for your points point by point like i did i am sick of your one liners and lies why aren't you abiding by wikipedia policies that content must be based on verifiable sources wikipedia neutral point of view wikipedia no original research wikipedia cite sources wikipedia verifiability and wikipedia reliable sources i have gone to dispropotionate lengths to point out to you the errors of your ways that's it i gave you more than enough chance to get reasonable i won't be wasting time on you anymore csssclll