this logic is convoluted and general nonsense the arbitration decision involved a disagreement about content in the khojaly tragedy article it did not involve a statement i had not yet made during the non actionable enforcement request therefore i did not violate the arbitration decision the wording on my talk page clearly states that i violated the arbitration decision where you said the following to enforce an arbitration decision you were not enforcing anything via the block but rather making a unilateral decision to disregard evidence i pointed to and block me for accusatory language i hope that makes my concern clearer