currently under external links or whatever of the moot court article there is a reference to a first amendment moot court competition nearly all moot court competitions charge fees why is this allowed to remain while bestmootcourtprograms com which for no fee adds up finishes winner finalist semifinalists across large moot court competitions has been systematically deleted by the powers that be however not a single one of us should delete the first amendment mcc unless he she is also prepared to delete every article referenced under the see also section of the moot court article each of these is a moot court competition or proxy therefor i e alumni association thereof and nearly all moot court competitions charge fees from what i've learned of wikipedia's deletion practices of articles such as best moot court programs articles regarding moot court competitions should be likewise deleted i understand now that the proper place for referencing the notable bestmootcourtprograms com may be under external links moot court article under the link name best moot court programs united states people no doubt want to check out how american law schools stack up when facing each other however under see also and external links all referenced to moot court competitions should be deleted the articles should be as well however if these competition articles are not deleted because someone decides they are consistent with wikipedia's preference for notability and prohibition of advertising then that decisions maker should think very seriously about reinstating best moot court programs as an article as well