i just re read that policy article it says that an article mustn't be based entirely on primary sources this one isn't and it also doesn't say that there must be a certain minimum ratio of primary to secondary sources it doesn't even say that secondary sources must be in the majority so officially i think the article is on firm ground but i don't think that's going to stop verbal from cutting stuff out i just noticed that the policy article also says articles may include analytic or evaluative claims only if these have been published by a reliable secondary source but to the best of my knowledge i've never done that all throughout i have honestly tried to convey the material in a factual way