awesome i think i'm actually getting somewhere d as i said before it is not my intention to convince anyone of deleting anything actually i think what you mention hits exactly the point let's suppose i do come across a reliable source on why clothes do not affect rape rates in any significant manner even though i'm confident i can find it it is also likely it won't be related to the slutwalk and even less likely that it's an answer to that specific response and that's where i'm not sure on where would i be allowed to place the evidence not after the response i guess but would it be admissible all the way to the top right after the words of sanguinetti or somewhere in the middle or does it also depend on the kind of sources i find also still supposing i find good material disproving these sayings does it affect the possible neutrality of the article or is this considered a minor detail i'm not trying to get specific answers for this but maybe someone can point me in the right direction i just wouldn't like to start adding information in a misguided way which would end up with me asking stuff here anyway the rest of the points are covered by now i guess i just feel like saying it one more time i'm not pushing to get anything deleted i don't want to undo anyone's work and i'm not trying to insert my personal point of view in the article i just want to edit and add interesting accurate information on the subjects i care about i honestly don't see myself spending days of research on screwdrives or exotic kinds of insects or whatever i'm sorry for the times i miss the point it's just that i find this so interesting and fun to do thank you