by my reading didn't accuse you of defending the content so much as just noting after your explicit denial that you were defending the content that you were in fact defending the content and i'd have to say that removing a pov tag one that by the way was apparently placed only a couple of days after 's first post here in talk received no responses is in fact defending the content there had been a lot of revert warring beginning with jayjg's revert of 's edit over the very point that was making seems appropriately to have brought the dispute to the talk page and having received no response to his concerns placed the pov tag rather than joining the revert warring you wrote that a pov tag placement is normally only done if no agreement on the neutrality of the article can be reached on the talk page isn't this exactly the situation in which placed the tag i think you owe another apology for saying that he she accused you of defending the content it would be more accurate to say that fairly mildly disagreed with your impromptu denial of an accusation that was never made