biased viewponit just reading this article i've noticed that it fails to mention many of the controversies of cityrail accusations of sexual harrassment within its staff chronicle delays major incidents such as the breakdown in transport following queen mary ii etc when it does mention criticism of cityrail it almost invariably provies and in many cases gives emphasis to a counterargument particularly when the section dedicated to criticism is called challenges and portrays cityrail as being able to best them in all situations the way i see it the article reads more as a commercial advertisement fails to mention many controversial issues surrounding cityrail and continually praises the corporation through colourful language this may be just me but at least add in information about accusations relating to sexism and harrassment in the working culture public scrutiny of services etc jpg my apologies for not signing the statement last time i did not have a regular account and given this may be more than a minor edit was trying to borrow my brother's so i could sign it later although i have not made major contributions i have made many minor edits and am well acquainted with the way of wikipedia and this article clearly given both this knowledge and the various criticism that cityrail has faced is biased towards painting the corporation in a positive light i would appreciate it if you replied instead of deleting under the false presumption of vandalism and if others who are not regular editors of this article could have their say