please reread my post above the one that ends with see the difference if you asked a man in brazil who won the title of best baseball team in the world in he might be confused and say correctly that that title doesn't exist that doesn't mean that there wasn't a baseball team that won the world series in in the united states again see the difference when you rephrase things especially things involving phrases translated between dissimilar languages things get confused the current handbook contains an abundance of detail about the all asia championship partially summarizing the situation to a news reporter and then having her ask an expert three questions based on her minimal understanding of the situation while constructing a story explicitly hostile to oom yung doe which was what i meant by hostile obviously is not a good way to seek the truth as i said i'm not arguing that this should simply not be presented it is close enough to an informed expert opinion that i can't really ask for it to be ignored except in the face of contradictory evidence