you forgot to add the url for your additional source i found this one which if it's the one you meant you might want to add from what i see in my find and in your quote above it gives the height as ft m and not the m ft that you changed the text too i understand that m converts mathematically to to ft but it is also true that ft converts mathematically to m so as the latter seems a better match and as we have no good reason to assume otherwise i've restored the original figures so as not to deviate from the official dimensions