reply hi there since you do not wish to have a united article representing all point of views and would like to stick to your point of view i have no rights to prevent you other than that of a fellow wikipedian from south asia i have divided both the pages under discussion into two parts one for government point of view and one for refugee point of view since there is no neutral or united point of view i will not be editing or discussing in those pages as actively as i have been doing besides i can not prepare for my exams with no other than my fellow south asian accusing me of fancy accusitions in place no other than wikipedia here is something that i have to say as regards your recent posts in this page about eukesh you say all the right things that we need a neutral article that you want to be constructive but at the end of it it seems your mind is closed you say you have not read the garbage from the nepalese press but that you have done a lot of research on the internet isn't that where all that garbage is available you say you want to be constructive but you are already fixed in your view that all the ethnic nepalese people in the camps are from bhutan fyi if they re not from nepal it could be they are from india also ie not necessarily from bhutan being 'stateless' is not such a big thing in this region for which someone has to be blamed you can count the number of poor nepalese without any documents who are finding their way to india every day if ever there was a census to be done between nepal and india you will find millions stateless by your definition definitely in the hundreds of thousands is bhutan responsible for that is it inconceivable to you that some of them might have made their way to bhutan you conclude that it is 'entirely a bhutanese issue' and nothing could be further from the truth if nepal wasn't quite the economic basketcase it has become maybe the rest of us in the region wouldn't have to deal with such an outflow of emigrants from your country about you say you have not read the garbage from the nepalese press but that you have done a lot of research on the internet please do not comment about nepalese press in a nation where it has played a major part in bringing a revolution from a nation where there is virtually no press the press here is not garbage however i did not care about the bhutanese refugee case until i found that it was missing here and thought of writing about it about you say you have not read the garbage from the nepalese press but that you have done a lot of research on the internet isn't that where all that garbage is available wikipedia is available in net do you call it garbage i have cited the information from sites of globally accepted bodies and not from the sites hosted by some pro or anti groups or some blog pages about you say you want to be constructive but you are already fixed in your view that all the ethnic nepalese people in the camps are from bhutan fyi if they re not from nepal it could be they are from india also ie not necessarily from bhutan being 'stateless' is not such a big thing in this region for which someone has to be blamed i do not have a point of view i agree that i have made some points which were offensive to some but it was not intentional and were derived from the data there was a speculation which was corrected later i just posted what were there in websites of unhcr and other global organizations which is something that is done in wikipedia i have told you that people of nepalese origin are found throughout the world many might be stateless however the reports of unhcr shows otherwise in case of bhutanese refugees if you can change their view please do otherwise stop editing with whatever you wish to write or in your own words stop garbaging wikipedia about being 'stateless' is not such a big thing in this region for which someone has to be blamed well there is nothing which can top this sort of irresponsible comment you can count the number of poor nepalese without any documents who are finding their way to india every day if ever there was a census to be done between nepal and india you will find millions stateless by your definition definitely in the hundreds of thousands is bhutan responsible for that is it inconceivable to you that some of them might have made their way to bhutan you conclude that it is 'entirely a bhutanese issue' and nothing could be further from the truth if nepal wasn't quite the economic basketcase it has become maybe the rest of us in the region wouldn't have to deal with such an outflow of emigrants from your country