not to mince words or use weaselly ones i'm right and you're wrong slp we can and should also change the text of course so that's not much of an issue what our current sources demonstrate is exactly what i have suggested should be our wording many scholars and other observers have described the men's rights movement as a backlash to the feminist movement it is really no more weaselly than our current wording it is considered to be a backlash to the feminist movement which of course invites the question by whom the answer being by many scholars and other observers the answer is not by all scholars of course and no we don't need to find scholars who explicitly argue against it being a backlash because disputing epithets given to certain social movements is rarely the work of scholars it is enough that some don't use that description as for the fact that some mrm folks embrace the term as i basically explained to binksternet that and two dollars will get you a cup of coffee