impumozhi and his knowledge or lack of about rajputs incident impumozhi accuses rajputs of fabricating history on hada page read this page for a little entertainment in particular the last three sentences setting out the historical repurcussions of that hilarious and probably fictitious incident is this fit for an encyclopedia leave aside veracity just the choice of words yet nobody dare change one comma or fullstop in that page it is owned by that presiding deity of obduracy the learned protagonist of every page with a remote rajput connection impumozhi's lack of knowledge exposed his claim about hada's character being funny and un encyclopaedic is actually taken from james tod's annals and antiquities page and vol ii on the death of the queen joda bae akbar commanded a court mourning and that all might testify a participation in their master's affliction an ordinance was issued that all the rajput chiefs as well as the moslem leaders should shave the moustache and the beard to secure compliance the royal barbers had the execution of the mandate but when they came to quarters of the hadas in order to remove these tokens of manhood they were repulsed with buffets and contumely then enemies of rao bhoj hada aggravated the crime of this resistance and insinuated to the royal ear that the outrage upon the barbers was accompanied with expressions insulting to memory of the departed princess who it will be remembered was a rajputani of marwar akbar forgetting his vassal's gallant services commanded that rao bhoj should be pinioned and forcibly deprived of his moustache he might as well have commanded the operation on a tiger the hadas flew to there arms the camp was thrown into tumult and would have soon presented a wide scene of blood shed had not the emperor seasonably repenting of his folly repaired to the boondi quarters in person he expressed his admiration he might have said his fear of hada valour alighted from his elephant to expostulate with the rao if james tod thinks this incident is worthy of being mentioned in his book annals and antiquities of rajasthan what is wrong in this incident being mentioned on wikipedia incident deleted the name of famous rajput lady maharani gayatri devi from rajputani page saying she is not a rajput his response impumozhi on rajputani page deleted the name of maharani gayatri devi then he was asked why he did so his response was countered on his talk page and till date he has not responded the reason he did not respond is because his lack of knowledge on the topic was thoroughly exposed incident impumozhi tries to get the page of a famous rajput king deleted but is thwarted in another incident he put a tag of db nonsense on the article hammir dev chauhan he was asked on the talk page of this article on why he put the csd tag no reasons given till date another user had to remove this db nonsense tag here again impumozhi had no idea about the subject matter but just because a rajput had created this article he put the db nonsense tag