first of all i did mention there were snps in the seldin research the were the actively used i did not question the quality of the bauchet research i do not propose the current pic should be replaced with the d graphs all i'm saying is since they are both valid researches they should both be presented the motive of the re adding of the seldin d graphs is purely for illustrative purposes to any reader of the article it's a genetics article not the front page news why should it be laconic and so space economic it's just a pic more why not compare the illustrative strength of the d graphs image european population substructure png with that of the cluster structures this image bauchet european clusters png and this image seldin geography png both are poor illustrations by no matter how good researches finding a better chart to show the bauchet results would be the best thing but do we have anything else i don't have any political racist motive wobble you didn't even delete the pic the spanish guy did anyway i just think the d charts are nice and easy for the reader to see how genetic samples scatter throughout the nations of europe like that pic all the other illustrations are confusing and not directly useful to draw conclusions from just a thought