the court cases need to go or in most cases in this article the lawsuits filed against monavie are used as sources of information about the company however the relevancy of lawsuits even when they are through and the court has published an opinion requires interpretation by another party prior to their being used as a reliable secondary or tertiary source in an encyclopedia article when editors say that the company is controversial and add multiple lawsuits filed against the company as direct support of the controversy the editors are providing their original research and opinion about the company wikipedia has a policy of no original research and all of these lawsuits must be removed and the underlying statements that are supported solely by the lawsuits must be removed if another article discusses the lawsuit a reliable secondary or tertiary source for example then the lawsuits can be included to support statements derived from the secondary or tertiary source an example of this would be a full quote from the court case that is referenced in the reliable source i will of course listen to community input on this however i plan to remove all of the lawsuits that do not meet the requirements for proper referencing of a wikipedia article