the alleged multiple issues do not really exist it relies on references to primary sources or sources affiliated with the subject rather than references from independent authors and third party publications tagged since april comment not true it appears to rely primarily on independent sources such as journals patents and books primary sources are used primarily for historical purposes to prove dates not content it may require cleanup to meet wikipedia's quality standards tagged since april comment true of nearly all wikipedia articles but this one less than most it may require copy editing for grammar style cohesion tone or spelling tagged since april comment don't see or find more than just a couple of grammar style spelling or punctuation errors its neutrality is disputed tagged since march comment this article has been extensively edited to preserve neutrality through many many edits it may need to be wikified to meet wikipedia's quality standards tagged since april comment actually the article appears of high quality it appears the commenter making these multiple issues allegations is the one who is biased burdlaw