gosh if you want to add a comparison go ahead and do it i'm not stopping you i never said it was wrong to add a comparison here is a featured article about a candide that uses the further reading section just the way it is used here actually there are two books in that section there are also a few relevant academic articles and all the remaining relevant reviews that were published in english about the einsaztgruppen you should go back to the wiki article you tried to use against me and read it again nowhere it says that they were under orders of the wehrmacht but that they were in close cooperation i'll quote it for you each einsatzgruppe was led by sd gestapo and kripo officers and its members included recruits from the orpo the waffen ss and local volunteers such as militia groups each death squad followed the wehrmacht heer german army as it advanced eastwards through eastern europe and the soviet union during the course of their operations the einsatzgruppen commanders were authorized to request and did receive assistance from the wehrmacht heydrich acted under orders from reichsf hrer heinrich himmler who supplied security forces on an as needed basis to the local ss and police leaders they were different organizations the wehrmacht could not give order to the ss again from that article the einsatzgruppen were formed under the direction of ss obergruppenf hrer reinhard heydrich deputy to heinrich himmler and operated by the schutzstaffel ss before and during world war ii from september forward the ss reichssicherheitshauptamt rsha reich main security office had overall command of the einsatzgruppen what littell does is to make the picture unclear by saying that the wehrmacht worked too closely with the einsaztgruppen the following passage is singular in that respect i don t understand who should we take our orders from in the end from reichenau or jeckeln and where is brigadef hrer rasch i don t know sturmbannf hrer i suggest changing attached to worked closely with cooperated or something like that as for the sentence the sixth army the aok to which we were attached littell originally used the verb rattacher auquel nous tions rattach s which is usually translated as linked connected or associated by translating it to attached it took away the double entendre in littell original text unfortunately we'll have to disagree about the image