my thought is that you have to start someplace generally all i stumble across is a one line item about current prices the rest is implied for a knowledgeable audience which wikipedia is not for maple syrup i agree this in turn attracts other data for comparison the alternative as mentioned above is a robust article which i am too lazy to flesh out i do start articles but once there they provide a convenient uh coat hook to paste other information as encountered in the media footnoting and objectivity is the main problem i agree that readability for one point of data is a bit well jerky i suppose but this is a lot different from pov or pr unreferenced or any of the other stuff that the noprices was trying to avoid while we are trying to make things presentable for the reader we also need to consider the editor things have to be easy for them as well the harder it is to contribute the fewer contributions