july utc maybe tim could be the judge on what is the most suitable just to clarify the error in vh w the omission of dq dqa dqb was a small error the statement that dqa without dqb was a partial dq is an error to understand why this is an error one has to read which basically found that all dqa previously type in europe split ways dqa dqb and dqa dqb i was scolded by a referee for not knowing this and not knowing dqa and dqa were process to dqa dqa is part of the dr dq haplotype therefore in assigning dqa without dq it is a dq the neat plausible and wrong solution will only work up until dq hits the reviewed literature then it needs to be dealt with at of all coeliacs it may never reach that level of appreciation yap