institute of noetic sciences i see you reverted my adjustment to the stephen barrett criticism of the institute of noetic sciences i believe you acted in good faith i also believe the revert was erroneous barrett's list is published information counting the number of organizations on the list does not represent original research it is simply a way of summarizing the context in which barrett's criticism occurred it is information that is directly and explicitly supported by the source it is a routine calculation that most people over the age of six could perform for themselves as the article stands now it is misleading and unbalanced a casual reader gets the impression that barrett targeted the ions out for special and specific criticism when in fact his criticism was spread over hundreds of organizations please undo your revert and or reply on my talkpage explaining how my changes could be or best regards