as you can plainly see from his talkpage he has a history of manipulation precisely why he included this in the report where i was involved in wp ani i can only say he is using manipulation as a process to get his own way for example in the recent edit to talk public perception of george w bush he clearly identified my edit as vandalism when the policy states you should not remove edits from article talk pages unless they are vandalism i think this hardly constitutes as vandalism talk contribs