id est vs illud est on th october someone revised the page to change i e from the standard accepted id est to illus est but did not update the footnote about i e vs e g leaving it stating id est if every other site and dictionary is wrong and i e really is illud est and not id est should there not be a note pointing this out under the entry so people realise why the definition given isn't what they expect or is this simply a mistake illud est is valid latin but i don't see any indication that it's the expansion of i e