i agree with everything and cannot see why a dare i say it fundamental fact ie that the cathedral's origins are pre reformation and that the cathedral was built at a time when the church in england had its allegiance to rome should be completely ignored i am not pushing an agenda here but i think there is something arrogant and dismissive about the use of the words crowbarring of a not very pivotal fact as used by one of the 'editors' in the section above this i think 'now anglican' is a good compromise in that it accurately defines the cathedral's current status but also suggests without labouring the point that this was not always the case enough information i would venture to say for an interested reader to find out more should they choose or desire to do so