i'll change those in a minute thank you for looking it over for your part here's what i found you wrote of all elements in a products it isn't gramatically correct it should be of all elements in a product you wrote elements such as colour tone the official name of the element is just colour and should remain like that to maintain it as a professional reference you wrote therefore it is in the product designers best interest you're missing an apostrophe it should be therefore it is in the product designer's best interest or therefore it is in the product designers' best interest you wrote keeping in mind about how consumers it's convoluted it should be keeping in mind how consumers you wrote the solution to that is to create a product that in its designed appearance and function expresses in order to make it flow better since the commas here are used as a parenthesis it should be the solution to that is to create a product that in its designed appearance and function expresses that way if you were to take out the part between the commas the sentence would still flow you wrote subject to peoples judgment you're missing an apostrophe again it should be subject to people's judgment the comparison you used about the pretty and abusive person seems a bit out of place maybe pretty and rude would be a bit better but apart from that i liked it a lot i will get to reading the last two sections sorry for the long list they're minor things really and i agree with needing a more appealing image to represent the page to add cassandra for the book i used i actually used a slideshow from my design thinking class which references that book so i wasn't sure what to cite it as does anyone have any ideas for that as for the format i used i just used the automatic cite button at the top of the editor