some small fixes i have tried to give the article some balance bacque was actually an accomplished writer in canada before other losses but it is important to point out other losses was his first foray into history i think it's important to point out bacque is talking about losses among german pows held by the western allies certainly hundreds of thousands and perhaps more that a million german pows died in allied custody if the soviet union is included among the allies as well tens of thousands of german civilians died in soviet forced labour crews bacque does make a contribution albeit flawed to the historiography one that has been built upon recently by anthony beevor and others who have looked at the immediate post war period the state of europe before the marshall plan the european reconstruction period the founding of the ecsc and the beginning of the cold war i am not familiar enough with bacque's books especially the second one to accurately describe them i think someone who has read them carefully should at least give a bare outline of his argument before rejecting them out of hand i don't know why holocaust deniers would embrace bacque's work since any neglect of germans held as pows by the western allies does not negate the genocide against the jews and other nazi victims as for the plagiarisms committed by ambrose they are not relevant to this discussion