that's my fault because i thought wikipedia no original research in its section on primary secondary and tertiary sources was discouraging primary sources in wikipedia because interpretation of primary sources should be done by a published source and then be used in wikipedia but re reading it i see that it does make an exeption if the primary source can be considered reliable and not likely to be misinterpreted by wikipedians i see the difference now and how the other sites are probably plagiarizing since you're correct they dont cite sources a kinda disheartening realization that a school website is plagiarizing i was editing in good faith i wanted to add info from a wide range of sources instead of just relying on just the nrhp which is something you brought to the table i really wanted to bring something different and contribute myself what do you think about that popular science article from could that be used i think it brought a pretty cool first hand account of the opening and its kinda exciting that a building in lil ole albany got mentioned in a magazine like that