nonsense the syrian army committed men they were wholly unprepared for the war having received notice that they were to fight just a few days before the th of may their logistics were poor they had handed over a part of their munition reserves to the arab salvation army and given its scarcity of war mat riel had to husband what was left its knowledge of the theatre of war where it was to conduct operations was minimal it took then almost a week to get their tanks over the jordan their first advance was roundly defeated with heavy losses on the th under husni zaim they attacked and took samakh south of tiberias only to lose it in three days after an israeli kibbutznik counter attack this massive army 'with artillary tanks armed armoured cars and airforce stocked with harvards not harvard armed aircraft which is a brilliantly comical image ' took days involving almost all that the syrian army could muster to capture a little moshava like mishmar hayarden with its local guards tal p which had to fight on its own without idf assistance secondly you really should stop this nonsense about rs bias morris is biased against the palestinian arab side anyone can see that but he is eminently good on the facts laurens is perhaps the most neutral of all but he gives the arab version a much more intelligent coverage than others morris tal gelber laurens are all rs and that's all that counts one cannot challenge one of them as if the others were somehow engaged in 'neutral' coverage