bottom line here and this is likely not your fault is addressed to whom so tell me what those intentions were don't you see everyone is jumping the gun my assumption was that content disputes don't give a anti homeopathy editor rights over a pro homeopathy editor since the probation warning yesterday i have not touched the deadly nightshade article however an anti homeopathy editor has reverted twice in the span of a few hours without any consensus he has ignored editors on the talk page that are trying to work towards an agreement before yesterday i would have reverted his edit at least once but due to the warning i avoided the article page and focus my attention on the talk page instead of touching the talk page i brought the issue to an i what have i done wrong