and so we're back to your opinions so arrogant everything that you don't agree with has no credit why don't we just cite everything as victoriasays are you denying that there are multiple perspectives are you trying to define reliable sources to suit your needs are you bending over backwards to defend an edit just because it's yours tell us what it adds or why it is necessary do you deny all other hindu cosmogonies exist or are you saying they are all wrong do honestly think so little of eliade feuerstein bhattacharya bronkhorst and your fellow editors an actual answer would be appreciated instead of more ad hominems against my sources and strawmans against my position