i think that's not quite the way it works nor the way it should work either article content is for editors with dispute resolution by the community when they can't agree acceptability of articles for considerations of notability or otherwise is for the community such questions are properly raised on the article talk page first in many cases in the hope that the editors can improve the content enough to satisfy those who may question the article sometimes they choose to resolve it via a merge often a good compromise if they can agree on that it's an editing decision if not it goes to the community via afd and deletion review i can't see giving any group of editors a decisive voice in whether their content gets kept or not no matter how many might agree ''''''