also what you claim as facts are not facts do you even read the stuff you post this is a subject that is still controversial both as to the area of origin and the routes between that area and the philippines there are two opposing hypotheses on both subjects both hypotheses are agreed that the differing major languages and the many different dialects spoken in the philippines at the time of portuguese and spanish entry to the philippines in the early th century were all of the austronesian super family that is where the agreement ends in the philippines the two best known hypotheses are those of peter bellwood and mine solheim while my hypothesis which will be the main subject of this presentation started developing over years ago bellwood s is more recently developed and has had much greater acceptance outside of the philippines simply put he believes that protoaustronesian originated in eastern south china opposite taiwan and was brought from there to taiwan by maritime chinese bringing with them rice agriculture this around years ago your claims on facts are based on what obviously everything you state and post are just your opinions you can't even show a source on how filipinos having malay background is false you just simply state what you know