saddle nyttend i do not understand your reversion of the edits i made on saddle the type of references i removed are clearly not valid for use on wikipedia and i confirmed this on the appropriate notice board wikipedia reliable sources noticeboard archive these edits are clearly not vandalism can you explain your decision to allow these references to remain in use as i am confused here some of the references seem to be commercial web sites with un referenced information being used as wikipedia references this is certainly not appropriate as far as i know thanks