tony cragg i am writing to you re tony cragg's article on wikipedia which i have been trying to improve as you quite rightly pointed out prior to my editing wikipedia's coverage of cragg's life and career is embarrassingly weak and what i have added is not 'necessarily bad ' i am new to wikipedia editing and it has been difficult to get to grips with how it works but i feel like i am getting there for all my efforts to be deleted would be a real shame i would like to start up a dialogue so i can continue to improve cragg's article as i understand it you have identified the section on the sculpture park as posing a potential copyright issue as a copy or modification of the text from cragg's website i did indeed use his website as a point of reference for lack of other sources but i am surprised you consider what i edited to be a copyright issue i will happily work on this section further so as to improve it but i ask that you 'unblock' the rest of article and advise the best way to proceed i look forward to hearing from you hi it is quite amazing to me that someone so well known could have such a poor article here but that can happen it will be blanked for a week or so now so that anybody who wants to rewrite it can do so i do understand that it's very hard to get started as an editor here and certainly i don't want to make it harder for you however you may inadvertently have fallen foul of some of our basic rules including the one about using several accounts that isn't in itself a problem but becomes one if the accounts break other rules such as unfortunately our copyright policy one of the four accounts has declared a connection to the lisson gallery and the ip address obviously belongs to the gallery it would be helpful to know if the other three editors who appear to be similarly connected including you are so connected or indeed are all the same real world person if you have a connection to the gallery you probably have what we call a conflict of interest and that means that in most cases you shouldn't edit the article but limit yourself to suggestions on the talk page i'm prepared to help with the writing in this case a good first step would be to start assembling some independent reliable sources about the artist these should be sources of information that do not have an interest in promoting him so commercial art gallery websites are unlikely to be acceptable but websites of public institutions books well known newspapers and magazines are all likely to be good you could perhaps list some of those on the talk page of the article while it's helpful if i can see them it's not obligatory then we can take it from there