for those who want to bitch about me any behaviour ih which they dont like which seem to be so distruptive to wikipedia or if you want to see personal attacks and uncivil behaviour made and condone by admins and the fellow supporters like talk contribs you can see a comment he made here or by the person that blocked me talk contribs here please go to wp an boothy indef blocked and that goes for admins and non admins also if youy want to bitch about me in another public forum go to here wikipedia requests for comment boothy but dont expect a responce from me as i dont see the effectness of displaying ones opinions on other usesr as being any bit of constructive in buliding an encylopedia it should aslo be know that i have been put behind an indefiendt block imposed by one adminstrator jtkiefer that has less to do with policy violiations is is just a way to supress me for as i see it not playing by their rules or to put it falling in line like a good wikipedian and that i called out an admin talk contribs for what i percived as his biased enforcment of a rr block on the pages philadelphia county pennsylvania philadelphia pennsylvania category philadelphia county pennsylvania i which i will freely admit that i did in order to keep as i see it the concensus what ever that word means of the editors on the pages in question that their was to be no merge of the artciles or categoreies at present that was trying to be forced by talk contribs and an exam of his comments on talk philadelphia pennsylvania as compared to his comments on wikipedia mediation cabal philadelphia county and other philadelphia pages only show that he is pushing for a merge but that talk contribs also violated the rr on the page as well after he was blocked by using two anon accounts talk contribs and talk contribs yet neiter were blocked by talk contribs nor was the block on talk contribs extended an addation hours yes thats right not an arbitatry decision and another reason in which i belive that no admin be alowed to block a user for over hours with out arbcom decison and even then i am not sure that they should and also that he talk contribs posted a comment for talk contribs on the wikipedia mediation cabal philadelphia county and other philadelphia pages why couldnt talk contribs waith tthe hours like he was supposed to to post his comments which to me would show that their is a question of the impartiality of talk contribs becuase of his actions i did email him and in what could be construed as a nasty letter to talk contribs in which i told him that i do belive that he biased in his actions that that i was considering further action aginst him in the matter with the possibility of releaving his of his adminstrative pridvlidges his reaction was to increast the length of my block to addational hours which i can only see as a supression of any pending action agnist him i would really not be supprised to know if he confired with talk contribs off site which would lead to user jtkiefer jt