on irrelevant links the link to businessweek is clearly irrelevant to the lead as it is about the company and not about the protocol and any projection from company to the protocol is prohibited wp syn the link also barely qualifies as wp rs at least in the description part which is routinely written for such profiles by company itself overall the article is a big mess now and one of the reason for this mess is because of throwing in all the links which are barely relevant to the statements within i will proceed with inserting cn at all the relevant places at least in the lead it may help to clarify which links are relevant to which sentences ipsign while i agree the article's a mess spamming templates every other word isn't constructive it just makes it hard to read i doubt there's even a wp guideline to cite as that's just ridiculous the entire article has been flagged as needing citations if you're challenging an uncited claim just remove it