it's become apparent that this is becoming a battle of or i said common sense says the canary's killed in some way i did apply my logic to myself as for the snapping sound using common sense yet again a tiny canary's neck snapping could and probably does sound like a human's fingers snapping you expect some loud crack with onomatopoeia on the screen besides the finger snapping theory which being the only real theory that could contest the accepted one can't possibly hold up without assuming the unverifiable idea that uber trained his bird there is no other way you can explain the bird being silenced that isn't totally outlandish and basically unbelievable also if you try to use the i'm following the rules clause taking into account that wikipedia isn't a beaucracy and that the sheer existence of this conversation is ridiculous the statement that says kills his bird should stay i mean come on man ok look you're watching a movie and a guy shows up with a gun walks into a room with people inside of it offscreen then fires shots offscreen afterwards you don't see the characters at all for the rest of the movie better yet the rest of your life wouldn't it be safe to say that they were killed and therefore be able to add it into its wikipedia article chat wit' me contributions