argument by argument tm if you have to invent a fallacy then even you have to know that you re grasping for straws collect we do not have to say the world is regarded as being round by some members of the scientific community any more than we have to say water has never definitively been proven to be wet while i would personally prefer that we said something like ham s claims have been disproven by modern science because i think it sounds more authoritative if it s between incorrect or nothing then incorrect is clearly the superior choice because it is factually true and please don t try that all the intelligent readers already know he s wrong so there s no need to point out that he s wrong argument every fringe pusher and their uncle has already tried that tactic and it s bullshit we can t just allow wikipedia to be full of rubbish and assume that the smart readers will filter the fact from the fiction