is this stuff from the epa getting much media play i'm concerned that although the source is reliable and the material is relevant and interesting including noting that this whole affair was a manufactured controversy it's really a primary source without much mainstream media coverage there are a few secondary sources writing about the epa's release but not the sort of level i would describe as significant it could certainly be used as a reference for other stuff like the aforementioned manufactured controversy stolen emails etc but i don't know if it's worth an addition in itself