it does not seem that the subject of this article would not merit such consideration so in this double negative sentence you are saying you agree with shearonink and myself that is does warrant such consideration that seems out of character for you regardless what you don't seem to be able to understand is you are stating an opinion your opinion of yank barry is irrelevant to this article so is mine the question is does shearonink's proposal hold water i believe it does merit such consideration it is well documented we've covered secondary sources in articles as being okay the nominators are well respected public figures and if it there are circumstances where it is allowed then in my opinion this is one of those circumstances don't even start with your undue nonsense it is certainly due that is not even the question on the table the bottom line is the editor was proposing one factual sentence i believe and i agree i am for telling an accurate factual story not screaming undue at everything and keeping information out of articles accurate factual encyclopedia