rcc lead thanks for the support on the rcc lead including this in the lead is wrong not so much for the current wording but that this is the thin end of the wedge that will see others want to build on that there is a strong double standars issue here infoboxes hi i see you have changed infoboxes for beverley market weighton to infobox settlement but can you please explain how this change fits in with our wp ukcities standard which states all settlements of the united kingdom that are not coterminous with a local government district are to use the template infobox uk place though some very rare exceptions exist for those that are coterminous with a local government district which are usually large cities unitary districts or equivalent such as liverpool leicester and bristol please use template infobox settlement as for as i can determine we should be using the uk infobox for these places not the settlement box the coat of arms added to the infobox for beverley is not current and so should not be in the article as far as i can see edit war and the three revert rule may i make you aware that the three revert rule prohibits users restoring material more than times in a rolling hour period you appear to be engaged in an edit war at beverley and are not contributing to discussion but enforcing preferences upon articles that others object to talk i had a right to remove this as you do not have a consensus four editors have commented they do not want that infobox whilst you have continued to revert to it i will be reporting you for breach of rr despite a warning which may see you loose your editting privlidges i'm also displeased with your edit summmaries and comments on talk pages which appear to be disparaging talk i've reported you for rr however at this stage i must also express my concern about your comments at talk market weighton and your edits to manchester which are incivil and distruptive respectively this does nothing but harm wikipedia and harm your reputation talk ps please re read wp ukcities not wp cities as you keep referring to manchester has the distinction of being a local government district whereas selby etc do not ukcities states that local government district only should use template infobox settlement however don't take this up with me please resume debate at talk beverley to achieve a way forwards talk i think at this stage you're likely to incur a much greater block on your account as well as bring more attention to your editting style remember do not distrupt wikipedia to make a point your edits to manchester are not in good faith and starkly so you are gaming false claims of consensus have you not considered what maturity and respectabiliy level appears i do not believe you are being conductive to the good of the project and i suspect you would agree why not rethink your approach talk i was going to ask you to quote the guidance from ukcities that you are referring too but i think this is a rather pointless waste of time frankly you've done nothing to help your preferences or reputation there's no