i agree with the first poster in this topic i've worked for years in the topic of russian soviet media no qualification here nor can i really be arsed to prove it because it was a question of passion over substance in my eyes either way i have been deemed an okay ish critic of biased texts well you know i laugh in the face of those who call themselves unbiased and your 'wiki' pompousness grow some self awareness or at least a bearable level of cynicism christian 's attitude to the mail is far far from unbiased i've read his additions deletions comments carefully in addition the fact that numerous calls for a controversy area have been silenced is far from unbiased the fact is without a controversy section an article about a controversial paper is not complete christian 's lack of acceptance that a controversy section may be necessary suggests a frightening bias and narrow mindedness that distinguishes his contribution to the page and dear collect goes against the very ethos of wiki that you suggest