i'll look at this article more carefully tomorrow but i'm a little concerned with the use of kavan to kick off the whole background section she gives quite a shall we say unique interpretation to falun gong's reception in china in the early years i'm not saying she should not be quoted but using a single source like that to orient the entire issue seems quite out of order anyway historically on these pages we've had our fair share of undue pro falun gong sentiments so i guess i understand let's just try to keep it professional