turkey etc hallo turkey and the other states are not european states geographically turkey kazakstan aserbeidshan armenia georgia and cyprus are asian nations the frontiers of europe are the bosporus the caucasus the ural river and mountains the biggest parts of turkey and kazakstan are in asia also it is not correct to include these states it is only correct to include the european parts of these it seems to be propaganda the basis is the geographical determination not a political another example the sinai peninsula belongs to egypt but not to africa and northern cyprus is an illegitime state it is the wrong list preceding unsigned comment added by hi join talk turkey national emblem please drn needs assistance you are receiving this message because you have listed yourself as a volunteer at the dispute resolution noticeboard we have a backlog of cases there which need volunteer attention if you have time available please take one or more of these cases if you do not intend to take cases or help with the administration of drn on a regular basis or if you do not wish to receive further notices of this nature please remove your username from the volunteer list if you later decide to resume activities at drn you may relist your name at that time best regards transporterman current drn coordinator thank you thank you for your message on alessandro 's talk page i am frustated myself that this editor has stacked administrators and others in his favor no one person can contribute without instantly being unedited he will not even discuss a compromise or negotiate thanks again for expressing exactly how i feel cpetty hello there cpetty thank you for your kind words i wouldn't waste my time with the likes of alessandro if i were you as you'd most likely get blocked by the admins in an unfair manner while he'd get off scot free such is the absurdity of this pseudo encyclopedia whose admins are more interested in gaming the system than in making academic contributions to the articles yemen casualties your point that saudi sources tend to undercount their casualties is well taken however there's not a lot we can do about that as we need to go off of reliable sources per wp v on the talk page rather than edit warring which won't get you what you want please discuss the issue on the talk page of that article thanks i inserted some compromise wording in the infobox about attributing the figures to a specific source however i would again ask that you do not reinsert as you did without an explanation casualty incidents which have nothing to do with the saudi led campaign stick only to incidents linked to the military intervention not to the overall war in general