hello hi blu aardvark glad to see you did not permanently leave wikipedia i was wondering why my template current event template redirect wasn't working couldn't see the obvious talk z thanks thanks for taking note of the arcata eye and plazoid pages happy birthday have a great day talk admin fighter that was really funny gave me a good chuckle you should have just crossed it out and left it in talk removing religious and political categories recent attempt at vote stacking leaves a bad taste in my mouth were you referring to this wikipedia administrators' noticeboard incidents catholic alliance of wikipedia like vote stacking no i was referring to a wikipedia email i recieved earlier today sent by now policy proposal hi you recently commented on bible verse articles and may therefore be interested in commenting about a proposed policy covering roughly specific verses wikipedia centralized discussion verses of kings and ubuntu logo blu i noticed you changed the logo for the ubuntu linux user box why the usage policy on ubuntu's offical site clearly allows for such use besides the logo is just that a low resolution image of a logo which is allowed under fair use i am aware that some discussion has been going around about fair use images in user boxes if you changed the logo to tux because i labeled it as a fair use image and not with some other licensing information i'm sure i can find an appropriate image copyright tag at the time i had changed it several ongoing discussions had indicated that copyrighted images and logos available under fair use were not to be used in userspace per wikipedia policy the ubuntu trademark policy may allow it but wikipedia policy per wp fu is to limit images that are not available for commercial use which the ubuntu trademark policy explicity disallows talk contribs the preceding text was copied from user talk jcarroll wp npa please review and adhere to wp npa wp civ and wp wqt please re familliarize yourself with wikipedia policy thanks in advance i am fully aware of the above policies thank you i do not feel that it can be considered a personal attack or incivil to call a troll a troll i'm sorry if you don't agree with me in that but that does not mean that my statement is a violation of any of the above policies talk contribs it is a violation and you must refrain from it wp npa is non negotiable funny nobody considers it a violation of wp npa to call user willy on wheels a vandal nobody con