i don't see a conflict of interest here i have no personal affiliation with anyone in this article outside of wikipedia my first priority will always be the core content policies of wikipedia i consider these accusations seriously and will continue to only make edits that are form a neutral point of view and easily verifiable yankees argument is that i contacted the person prior to the edit when it is in fact the other way around i made the edit because the record is well known i made the edit and was understandably asked to cite my source it was then that i made contact with the uspf the ipf and the record holder in order to receive help in citing my source this relationship do not constitute coi it is discouraging to see this discussion focus more on broad accusations of motivation and less on verifiable content i understand the concern over a possible wp coi edit but i must ask a second time not to continue wp outing me as a fellow editor