discussion is a two way street where's the wikipedia editor staff contribution to the discussion on the justin berry talk page why are all the questions from my side of the argument being ignored why has no one yet managed to justify the removal of any of the thoroughly documented information from the justin berry page i'm not trying to throw gasoline onto a fire here i don't have an agenda and i'm honestly not particularly interested in mr berry or his sordid history what i am interested in is seeing wikipedia be an respected and accurate source of free information for those who seek it and when the wikipedia staff themselves engage in an organised effort to remove accurate information with no justification whatsoever we normally call this wikipedia vandalism vandalism wikipedia's credibility goes out the window justify yourselfs and maybe we'll start to listen my side has justified itself repeatedly it's your turn now