another explanation of the error before we open any envelopes it doesn't seem unreasonable to assume that if the envelopes are said contain a and a without distinguishing which envelope contains which amount then all values of a are equally likely because we have no better information however it does not then follow from this assumption that given a is found in the first envelope the other envelope is equally likely to contain a or a for every conceivable value of a which is something we have implied in the subsequent calculation of expected value why because for any specific amount of money from which to fill the envelopes given we have found a in the first envelope for all values of a we can always find a in the second envelope whereas it is only possible to find a in the second envelope half the time see it like this if the specific amount of money is m say then we can find a to have any value up to m but the second envelope can only contain a for values of a up to m ie half as often so given a was found in the first envelope the chance of finding a in the second envelope is and the chance of having a in the second envelope is not equal as we had assumed even though all values of a are still being assumed to be equally likely