howdy rob you wrote above i disagree with your interpretation fine the dominion of canada is a free country the footnote was not the basis of my arguement constitutional law does not afford the retroactive re naming of terms within a constitutional act each term that is repelled must be specifically indicated each clause that is replaced must be explicitly indicated your grasp of constitution law and procedures is complete ill informed do you have any idea the constitutional chaos that would be created in any present day independent country that has used as a basis english common law as a template i e the usa canada australia new zealand do you as well where the did you learn that canada had no constitution until oi