link to deleted discussion from circumcision article a number of you may have occasion to wonder about the deleted section entitled as a matter of curiosity here is the link to that page the discussion was extirpated by a group's chief lackey because it brought into focus the intransigence of the gilgal fellows who have seized control of the circumcision article it was only a question of time before some society or another paid a few hirelings a salary to patrol the article and oppose every effort to bring it into accordance with current medical understanding practices a junior lackey earned the gilgal fellows's disfavor by his constant use of we our in his comments indicating that he was speaking for someone other than himself it's a very enlightening exchange that has been purged from the wiki's memory the poor gilgal fellows are on the wrong side of history which has been a constant evolution toward human rights they cannot stop progress with their blindness dogmatic anachronisms