loathing is your word not mine i merely referred to whether or not it is a reliable source as for your point i am usually one to call others to task for invoking wp blp but i think it applies in this case we are always bound by wp v as one of the five pillars of wikipedia but when what we are writing is potentially legally actionable against the wikipedia foundation there is an urgency attached as well my judgment was that the edit in question could not stay as it was written with only the post as a source i stand by that judgment nothing prevents a willing colleague from re adding information after a suitable source is found talk