st the comic cover you used isn't the subject of the article if anything it would bests used in the dc comics presents article which makes it a poor example for a primary image nd i have made several attempts to discuss it and you have yet to give me a decent reason to keep the old image i uploaded and you clearly are not going to listen and are only reverting the image and even demanding a discussion becuase you are still clearly mad over the whole psylocke thing in which my image was kept and you are just trying to make sure you get your way this time virtually every comic book article on this site uses a single image of the article's subject with nothing behind them because a subjects image should be about them in the old image superman is twice the size of kristin and you know this and if anybody else were to have made that edit you would not be doing this edit warring and wikipedia clearly states images some copyrighted images may be used on wikipedia providing they meet both the legal criteria for fair use and wikipedia's own guidelines for non free content copyrighted images that reasonably can be replaced by free libre images are not suitable for wikipedia cover art cover art from various items for identification only in the context of critical commentary of that item not for identification without critical commentary unacceptable use a magazine cover to illustrate the article on the person whose photograph is on the cover however if the cover itself is the subject of sourced discussion in the article and if the cover does not have its own article it may be appropriate dc comics presents has it own article and is not the subject of the article so it is unacceptable to use here