mondegreen let me refresh your memory because i clearly see that regulations have somewhat obscured it quoting wp revert if you feel the edit is unsatisfactory then try to improve it if possible reword rather than revert i have not yet seen a single example of a chaste veteran wikipedia editor who actually made the effort to find references for unsourced claims although i strongly feel that in this case it was fitting the description of the main article subject so why source the obvious rather than ruthlessly reverting thus making other editors run errands isn't that what wikipedia should be about mutual help by equally respected members of the community regardless of the time they've been here what i see instead is something like i'm just enforcing a policy by assigning a parking ticket i know i might be wrong but if you want to avoid paying the fine better start running around schnell hell i'm not doing it for you i got more heads to chop