well not that i don't appreciate what you said but even so allow me to reply today there were the funerals of enzo biagi a freeman as few remains in a world more and more without any respect for freedom seen as a 'threat for the established order' the oil price is flying to and this should led to think more seriously to our absurd world but let's go there is someone that is costantly pointed at the 'words' while others are pointed on 'facts' since you call my comment 'above' as non polite obviously you miss why i could be not friendly with someone that not miss a time to complain in arbcom every time we discuss in any sense this is 'polite' and wikilove for you to me it not looks so since i am a volonteer here not payed as all the collaborators as well you cannot pretent i act like all the conformists here have established and obey to bzuk or billcj every time saying 'yes master yes master like you want master' and surely i wouldn't take eh as 'bright example' sorry the manner in which they acted not displays any reasonable friendly acting so it's hard pretend to me to be so kind with gentlemen that not even bothers to explain why they does this and that revert another thing that show dramatically well some things take for instance the first paragraph after the header technical description the paragraph ends with the sentence the only real all around fighter that served in ami but this was not without limitation in every task that's a very subjective statement and since it's making a judgement it really needs a citation so that the reader can understand what the source of that statement is as it stands right now however because it is not cited it merely looks like opinion on your part which would be right to remove revert all the g r page explains continuosly why this plane was 'limited' and 'mainly successful as recce' i cannot understand how this thing considering all the datas and stuff given can be 'questioned' rather than criticize me just try to get a look about the jas gripen basically questioning this fact shows apalling comprension for all the article because it's a statement well placed inside the meaning of this work washing your hands and not bother about to collaborate with me is not surely a 'nice' manner to do strangely enough this is 'justified' rather than be a guilth so basically every thing i do or not do is wrong while every thing you do or not do is right with these bases expecting a costructive dialogue is just funny you have been 'offensed' by the vanification of f s adjustements because i after done some more contr this is the only thing you did in over a month of 'collaboration' too easy my dear to self justify all times like you easy not bothering to collaborate while the guilth is mine that already lost my time to contribue gratis to this ency my contributions should be alway quoted here and that but being serious there are a lot of pages without any or almost any references i dont' understand why i should be whipped to post kb the issue about f data touched the buttom of the sea and dig it too i cannot cope with someone that not even read online sources with absurd reasons the continuos accuses diffamations and so on about me are not liked either perhaps the problem is that wikipedia takes herself too seriously in the last times perhaps that be called 'traitor' or 'harmer' is not friendly obviously you rate these accusation as 'righful critics' but not i i remember very well that you accused me without any proof to make copyviols even with funny interpretations of goebel pd text that i stated as not mine the only time i used other texts in all the mb written for the sake of wiki i wouldn't have a judge like you in the real world believe me the fantastic wikioz world 'tooooo perfect' to be 'questioned' but to me and some others this looks not exactly true there are a lot of burocrats hipocrites and trolls or simply there are a lot of guys that basically fears the others and are ready to 'defend the revolution' with zealot fanatism questioning even the basical celebral activity and even the basical freedom of spreech questioning even the simply syllogism all this is due because as always in these cases from french revolution today there are always many 'revolutionary guards' ready to show their 'loyalty' to the 'cause' so wikipedia prefers executes guys 'out of the chor' instead to admit to have some 'contradictions' this is the usual manner to act and i have no love to who call me 'wiki harmer' just because i show that i 'know' my stuff not only 'have read it somewhere' this is why goebel and many others keeps away from