there weren't even proper data for those years from europe and you expect me to provide statistics it is like requesting statistics to claim that gaule was populated of gaulois i have provided records using the term armenian ecxluding other groups i have provided records statistics of i have provided another work which claims majority what you ever did was to provide datas that at least years pre that period or years after the closest data was provided by me and which either equated population for 'armenians' or another one used the term majority and another one only talked about the depopulation of armenians being neutral doesn't mean to add misleading wordings the way it is no one would guess that the armenians and this in the entire article had even a history there or they had ever constituted an significant part of the population it isen't enough for you that the entirity of the history of the armenians in nakhichevan is entirly missing from the article for hell sake grandmaster you even disputed that the word is generally known as armenian you even have a problem with the term armenian being added anywhere or accept that armenians for some period in the history of nakhichevan have constituted a majority if you are really good intentioned i think you would not have had the problem with the word armenian there when the history section start with trash about the etymology of the word and with referrences that aren't cited anywhere ix