ttiotsw says thus whereas the jesus article has images of jesus the muhammad article has only images of which are contentious and would have been edit warred over it would seem to be an unrepresentative view to simply remove the last few images from the article my answer jusus article has images of jesus which are accepted used associated about jesus in of christianians muhammad article images of muhammad which are accepted used associated about muhammad in of muslims as well as nonmuslims in all the history there is not even a single mosque having the image of muhammad hanged and represented which proves that the image in wikipedia article is purely a pov for few people who argue about the image that it is related to some 'unknown' painter and was used in a short span of history use of the image having no source and no creator is the violation of wikipedia images policy and not my personal opinion if there is an image which represents and is associated to muhammad in mainstream muslims nonmuslims then use it if there is no such image then it does not imply that you put some non representing image or you put some image which is not associated to muhammad by mainstream muslims nonmuslims but by very few people in a short span of history