hasmens here its not the removal of the sections that concerns me it is the whole notion that the removal was are targeted racially motivated act on behalf of dr k dr k's comment on giorgosy user account clearly is evident of his nature this is the exact remark he made note that this user is now banned from repeated disruption and violation on wikipedia on the other hand i feel that admin diana is possibly abusing there admin role the nature that this was dealt with wasn't very positive nor constructive nor was it neutral in any nature i also noticed that sections that were not added by me were also removed leaving the article on northern cyprus in a terrible un repaired state i would like to foward this i don't believe that admin diana has acted in an appropriate nature when dealing with this issue i am aware that the sections were copyright but the nature in which it was dealt was wrong this is not what wikipedia should be about i was not aware of the copyright issues as i was still new to editing on wikipedia and still learning if i were to put the information into my own words dr k still disapproved of my edits by saying there not well sourced when they were clearly taking from books written by historians even if i were to provide more than one source he would still disprove it seems the truth has disturbed this fellow wikipedia user if am not aloud to write well sourced truths than my time on editing wikipedia an even reading wikipedia articles will be over the level of inaccuracy and bias articles seen on wikipedia will in future lead this site to losing much of its popularity and legitimacy as it already is declining good day