i'm also a little curious about facts like 'one of the seated jurors was a friend of the victims father' the whole parish is only people counting every man woman and child the newsreporting to me sounds kind of biased in making it seem like the deck was stacked against bell in that regard when in truth in a community that small it would have been almost impossible not to draw some connection within or degrees of seperation i honestly do believe some of the events were biased against bell particularly charging him as an adult when the law clearly said that could not be done and the releveant factors the da considered weren't considered relevant in prior la sc decisions but i think their is a reason you're not seeing that fact harped on even the pro bell supporters realise it's probably more fluke then noteworthy it just looks to me like people trying to make a statistic look like a fact when if you put it into a broader picture it's nothing signifigant i'd wager on most jurys in the parish white or black criminal one of the jurors can be traced in some way back to the victim and i doubt at most you'd need even a people seperation to link it again only people total