how do you reconcile your assertion that i originated this material with the review paper of an umbrella subject that contains odd references are you saying that i originated a subject that then became a major research topic unruh probably gets that credit imo if you really care so deeply about wiki then why do you either not have an account or choose not to use it this last post wasn't signed at all which is against policy what about the rule about not getting personal wikipedia no personal attacks do you feel that you are exempt you may feel that a personal characterisation of someone is justified in this case but people wanting to make personal attacks are going to tend to believe that theirs is a special case no matter how bad others feel their behaviour is the wiki official policy on this states in large bold letters there is no excuse for personal attacks on other contributors do not make them there is also a wiki guideline that says that posting another person's personal information e g legal name almost always counts as wikipedia harassment an intimidatory behaviour that encourages an unpleasant atmosphere and may deter other from posting or contributing for fear that they might be treated similarly damaging wiki you may feel that some people ought to be intimidated from authoring or editing here but that is not your decision to make what if someone considered that it was in wiki's interests that you should be exposed and named and shamed in this way as a persistent offender and your name splashed over wikiland as a repeat offender not good encouraging people to treat posts by a particular member differently based on their identity and supposed motivations encourages wikipedia stalking you'll notice that so far i have been extremely tolerant of these anonymous posts in the hope that by replying politely enough times the message will get through that it is better to debate constructively and politely than to fling mud so far this message does not seem to have gotten through