as i mentioned earlier i support this move i understand mark marathon's concern and appreciate his clarification 'he doesn't care enough to oppose the move ' on fao and peer reviewed journals i am a regular user of google scholar and such resources including for past contributions to wiki's sorghum and other staple food articles here are a few fao articles from southeast asia to africa some in multiple languages where the authors use sorghum in the english language title summary to mean commercial crop training manual for sweet sorghum a catalogue of passport and characterization data of sorghum pearl millet and finger millet germplasm from zimbabwe cultural practices for maize sorghum and millets sorghum and millets in human nutrition this fao source supports mark's comment that sorghum crop is known by many names etc in chapter the authors nevertheless use sorghum and not the other names in the title and various chapters to mean commercial crop sorghum