hi yess its me pralph i was gonna authros some stuff last night after i got unbolked but i fel alseep i was kin of buzzed abut i'm all ressted now thank you good monring the red bedroom lucky i noticed that you've speedied this and one other album while at the same time placing a brief comment on the user page do you think that this was the best course of action i'd ask you to compare the message i left with yours and also ask that you restore these stubs we want to encourage people to write good stubs don't we deleting it outright doesn't do that t c this came out bitchier than i intended sorry with the no artist stubs which drive me crazy i usually find that the person who created them edits the artist's page just before or after and often add the link in myself thanks for restoring those t c please referring to the rfa nomination talk thank you so much for nominating me on rfa have this beautiful jewel for my thank you take care talk btw something went wrong wikipedia requests for admminship v molotov needs to be moved to fix the typo but it can't be moved because there's an article in the way looks like someone needs to delete wikipedia requests for adminship v molotov and then do the move talk your message hi you left this message on my talk page thanks for experimenting with wikipedia your test worked and has been reverted please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia thanks lucky it's difficult to tell whether you are being sarcastic or are mistaken what experiment i cannot find any edits or original articles of mine that you have reverted regards it's a shame you felt it necessary to revert as experimentation what was obviously an article albeit a stub as you will see from my history i am new to wikipedia but have enjoyed creating and editing a number of articles about some fairly hefty topics it occurred to me that someone who enjoys wikipedia such as myself ought to be referred to as a wikipedophile a google search reveals no fewer than instances of the word on the net if other neologisms such as leet are to have articles why not this one why not at least leave the article there for others to discuss rather than annihilating it unilaterally so you deleted my article because you decided not enough people would be interested in it that's as good an argument for keeping the article nobody interested nobody sees it someone interested someone finds it no harm done qed ah but in that case no self aggrandising administrator satisfaction and no opportunity to post supercilious mesages about the sandbox it is easier to destroy than to create enjoy ok i will leave the subject it is hardly a fair argument when one of us has the power to silence the other on a whim but as an admin you will perhaps wish to know that you have discouraged me from contributing further to wikipedia my brief edit history will show me a valuable contributor and i had been inspired by the be bold in editing tenet of wikipedia alas this spirit is evidently mired in the usual unaccountable pseudopolitical hierarchies fiefdoms and cliques that invariably beleaguer such online efforts adieu the neologism is far from the point i am reluctant to contribut