obviously there is some anti americanism in canada this means nothing necessarily with regards to the structure of this article i was referring to the specific idea that canadian students fear their sovereignty will be overwhelmed or that canadians consider themselves cultural correctives to americans and i asked for another side of the story and questioned how big of a deal this was to put in the introduction your response here is confusing as far as citing my sources i am questioning your views and whether they belong in the article not making additions to the article several of your quotes are very weak examples many countries could claim anti americanism on the basis of involvement in the middle east that doesn't mean it's a relevant enough addition to put into the introduction of an article on one of the most trafficked websites in the world that is meant to specifically talk about the major issues between two specific countries as far as your sources go you did not comment on the obscurity of them you have still not properly defended james tagg yes that was me who removed that a year ago i don't see why you get to just dub a source reliable when i thoroughly explained why i determined it unreliable or rather inappropriate to add i read that source left you detailed comments and you said something like don't pov push and reverted my edits you are not making an argument here re culture clash in archive again there are two sides to every story please try to tell both if you are going to edit this article many canadians would laugh at the idea that the usa causes a profound fear that their sovereignty will be overwhelmed and why do students' opinions have so much weight by the way but there likely won't be many sources to support this because the initial premise that it even might be the case is so rare that such sources wouldn't exist for a counter argument nevertheless i'll take a look one last time this is about obscurity clouding neutrality and onesideness breaching neutrality i am not trying to say that what you're saying is not true at all i'm sure it is true the the extent that it is but how much is that the points in question fall so far below the relevance required to be in the introduction to an article that they should be immediately moved