person is is not status where status is an abstract concept with a non trivial definition is fundamentally a statement of an idea even though a person is the subject of the sentence or if you like the proposition could be phrased as a proof wikipedians follow all five pillars malleus does not follow pillar therefore malleus is not a wikipedian contrast that to calling another editor a dishonest fuck even if we granted for the sake of argument that the first statement could be deduced accuracy or inaccuracy can dishonesty implies motive to deceive and i have yet to see that proven the latter is gratuitous insult