too technical comment the maintenance template too technical has been removed i consider large swathes of the article are too technical and incomprehensible for instance what on earth do these statements mean tensed sentences which can neither be translated into synonymous tenseless sentences nor be given tenseless token reflexive truth conditions correspond if true to tensed facts the experience of temporal becoming like our experience of the external world is properly regarded as veridical in the absence of objective distinctions between past present and future the relations ordering events on the tenseless theory are only gratuitously regarded as genuinely temporal relations of earlier later than the claim that temporal becoming is mind dependent is self defeating since the subjective illusion of becoming involves itself an objective becoming in the contents of consciousness time as it plays a role in physics is a pale abstraction of a richer metaphysical reality omitting indexical elements such as the here and the now in the interest of universalizing the formulations of natural laws can anyone make the article more readable and comprehensible or are we all pretending that it makes perfect sense because we're afraid to look unintelligent for not understanding it