actually i much appreciate your help those were good faith attempts to improve balance i thought that one candidate's high goal setting should be balanced by another's and i also felt that removing the unknown made the purpose of moneybombing less paul centric for instance the thompson bomb generated negative attention for a known candidate i think huckabee did well romney will announce something decent this weekend and kucinich will do well next weekend and with paul get significant shared coverage i would agree that technically the whole chain of custody sugra to lyman to boom is not as important and maybe so with nordstrom as well though that depends on the whole of the article but every wp article when it has any ability to explain the who what where and why of the origin of a word does so there is simply no fact dispute that anyone used moneybomb as fundraiser before elder did on it's verified repeatedly so what would be the problem but at any rate i'm so happy we're back to normal editing cycles