plagiarism this source which is from medieval italy an encyclopedia ed christopher kleinhenz has been plagiarized or nearly so in a version of this article take this old version of the article as a reference point and compare the following emphasis added by me dionigi di borgo san sepolcro born circa died was from sansepolcro near arezzo wikipedia dionigi c was born in sansepolcro near arezzo medieval italy he was an augustinian scholar of very keen intellect and was much sympathetic towards others wikipedia he entered the augustinian order at a young age and immediately distinguished himself by his keen intellect and piety medieval italy dionigi was a scholar trained as an astrologer in sorbonne as well as a theologian he received his doctorate circa wikipedia he studied theology at the sorbonne in paris and received his doctorate c medieval italy one of dionigi's works which since has been lost is his commentary circa on valerius maximus s factorum et dictorum memorabilium libri wikipedia almost all of dionigi s own writing has been lost his most famous work is his commentary probably c on valerius maximus s factorum et dictorum memorabilium libri medieval italy it became a template for subsequent commentaries on valerius maximus and also for several of boccaccio s reference works such as esposizioni and genealogia deorum gentilium wikipedia this commentary with its many citations of classical authors became a template not only for subsequent commentaries on valerius maximus but also for several of boccaccio s nonfictional works such as esposizioni and genealogia deorum gentilium medieval italy another of dionigi s writings is a commentary on the first book of the sententiae a treatise on logic and still another is a commentary on the pseudo aristotelian oeconomia' wikipedia dionigi s other writings include a commentary on the first book of the sententiae a treatise on logic and a commentary on the pseudo aristotelian oeconomia medieval italy'' and that's just the first two paragraphs of that version of the wp article in my opinion this is a clear cut case of plagiarism and a violation of copyright some of this remains in the article some has been altered but there's obviously a larger concern of whether there are other instances of plagiarism in the article i'm not sure how to proceed