dystopos apparently still hasn't read this article which explains briefly why these implied analogies to other cities and egads university of michigan lol are utterly fallacious and fail out of the gate it is normal that schools are not always in session it is not normal however for new orleans la to have been destroyed supposing that normal criteria necessarily apply to unique circumstances is the pinnacle of foolish consistency if the already illogical claim is to be made that what another article has done defines the law then the example article at least must have gone through somewhat similar circumstances dystopos has yet to figure out that this disaster is unprecedented in recent u s history and simply requires logical thought i e perhaps new solutions to sort out here it's ridiculous for the article to describe as extant things which are not or to ignore the catastrophe which has destroyed much of the city the city described allegedly in this article i think moncrief nailed it quite well above in attempting to help edit opponents understand that what can be removed may easily be returned when it's accurate again neither hopes nor delusion can undo what has happened please stop thinking of editing wikipedia articles as working with stone surely the edit history of almost any article should give comfort that the opposite thankfully is the case embrace it