negative real interest rates on us public debt regarding and why do you think those edits were cut paste of blog referenced original research they are in no way cut pastes of even a few words and they conform to the many sources being discussed at talk united states public debt negative real interest rates including lawrence summers writing for reuters this is a very important aspect of the us debt which you can see by that talk page discussion and it deserves to be included is particularly confusing because you also undid several formatting changes to conform to the manual of style and the addition of graph illustrations from government sources if there is something which made you think that the edits were cut paste or or i'm sorry but they aren't i don't mind leaving the summary of negative real interest out of the articles while they are being discussed at that talk page but i do intend to replace those formatting changes unless there is a good reason not to