good try guys but this united kingdom wikipedia club is not quite reaching quality levels of communicaton jza and ddstretch both say they agree with snowded but what do they agree about i certainly don't have any transcendent knowledge about their agreement and they don t say please state your own opinions clearly rather than making a blanket agreement statement if what i wrote is not clear if that is what you agree with i will restate it but please specify what i need to clarify it seems obvious that the four constitutent parts are getting more than their fair share of the attention in this article the article already states with a citation that the four parts are not official divisions ' should not be considered as first order administrative divisions ' then it says that historically other divisions county parish not to mention districts that succeeded the ecclesiastical districts then ward and constituency have been the subnational divisions it is anybody s guess whether he latter are official divisions relatively more official divisions than the vernacular ones of the countries or co existing divisions with the countries in the multiplistic complex arrangement that is the uk moreover despite the statement that there is no common stratum of administrative unit encompassing the united kingdom the structure of scotland england ni and wales is used as just such a common stratum to describe local government and to structure the article this is a good pretty textbook example of inconsistency if any of this is not clear please be a good administrator and or editor and be specific about should be clarified thanks