i don't but i think that it's fine how it is as it seems to me that it adds length without adding clarity feb utc construction animation there are links on this article to a korean heptadecagon construction animation which is good besides being unable to read it but i'm wondering since wikipedia should be a repository of knowledge and not a collection of links to other places with that knowledge should i post a heptadecagon construction animation as i have for other polygons i'm hesitant because it'd be messy and about kb feb utc