very similarly serbia defined itself independent from within its constitution but it took until for this to be recognised bulgaria also achieved the status it desired at the same treaty and this gave the country its full outline including macedonia and the area of west thrace greece up to the sea then came the turn of events because of western interest and bulgaria had its wings clipped we both know the story from that point i admit i am not one for comprehending the full facts on self governing entities i know suzerain existed in contrast to sovereign but am i not right in thinking that suzerain status deemed the region was still subject to another's sovereignty or did the term sovereign not apply where suzerain was the case and if not what was special about being suzerain argue