recent edits to history section hello i already posted this as part of my response on my talk page but figured i would post it here as well i happen to disagree with some of the information you removed from the history section of the article relating to james a garfield you removed information that described the relationship between garfield and instructors administrators both during and following his tenure at hiram i feel this was necessary in order to convey the significant role garfield played in the early years of the institution beyond even the time that he actually spent on campus i have seen several correspondences written by garfield on white house stationary mind you to burke hinsdale and other leaders of the college during his tragically brief tenure as u s president garfield's impact on the institution in its early years was so significant that there was even a movement within the college community back in the early s to rename hiram to garfield college in his honor this is why i feel that if anything the information you removed should be expanded upon not deleted perhaps you were not aware of the man's impact when you removed these points i implore you to restore them as i think that they surely would meet your definition of encyclopedic once expounded upon good day to you