unofficial re review by sasata at the request of the original nominator i've having a look at the article again after changes have been made referencing is now much better than before i've condensed a couple of repeating citations i still believe the article needs to follow standard wikiformat including a lead and division of text into sections with appropriate headers the argument that the article is not long enough to warrant separate sections highlights one of the article's deficiencies it doesn't give sufficient coverage to the information out there a search of the isi web of knowledge academic database pulls up research articles dating from but only a tiny fraction of these are cited in the article here are some research studies that i would expect to be cited in this article thorson rm postglacial offset along the seattle fault science discusses data that confirms holocene movement along the fault karlin re abella seb a history of pacific northwest earthquakes recorded in holocene sediments from lake washington journal of geophysical research solid earth b gives a geohistorical perspective on the fault and discussion of the secondary effects that may have been caused by the fault dewberry sr crosson rs the m d earthquake of january in the puget lowland of western washington an event on the seattle fault bulletin of the seismological society of america analyses a magnitude earthquake km south of seattle that is most certainly germaine to this article thorson rm earthquake recurrence and glacial loading in western washington geological society of america bulletin effects of glaciation deglaciation on earthquake recurrence and its effects on current paleoseismic approaches to determine recurrence frequency i could go on and on but i think you get the point there's a lot of research out there that hasn't been touched on in this article and for that reason it doesn't meet criteria a it addresses the main aspects of the topic i think if you were to address some of this research the size of the article would swell up and section divisions would suggest themselves naturally and with section headers and beefed up text image placement is much easier i'm not a fan of the outgoing links for example when i click on the outbound link local native legends i expect to be led to a page which discusses specifically the a'yahos legend but instead end up on a general site about indian legends and earthquakes perhaps the a'yahos legend is somewhere in one of those links but i shouldn't be expected to hunt around for it myself if there is a specific page which discusses a'yahos then link to it directly and use a web citation template if not then this outbound link should be in the external links section or perhaps left out completely similar arguments apply to the outbound link for lidar based mapping that appears later i shouldn't have to go to an external site to find a definition that helps me understand the wiki article i hope this helps you on your quest to get this article to ga status good luck