tidy up i am wondering this article is focussing on rajastani exploits of rajputs but we know rajputs had kingdoms in punjab also and if we were to include all such exploits for fairness then we would have an overly huge page in it's present form it's already too long and not enough elaboration on an actual rajput and the different clans we could possible include where each tribe ruled majorly in it's times instead as a reference rather than an entire 'article within an article' im also removing the point that no further muslim conquests took place in the th century due to the formidable reputation of the rajputs as there is no proof of this from the middle eastern side to corroborate this so it's more a 'proud assumption' rather than proof i think please feel free to correct me guys i've also done a tidy up of 'language' in the history section of where unencyclopedic words such as 'treacherously' and 'crushed' have been replaced suitably can other editors help in this respect with other sections looking better guys let's keep up the good work