perfectly okay for an encyclopedia however british subjects require british spelling etc i have removed the word amazing from the caption i'm not sure what the point is in complaining about american spelling either way one of us is going to have to adapt in this case it's our british and commonwealth cousins in other cases it's the americans it's not worth complaining about wikipedia manual of style says the english wikipedia has no general preference for a major national variety of the language no variety is more correct than the others users are asked to take into account that the differences between the varieties are superficial and says when either of two styles is acceptable it is inappropriate for an editor to change an article from one style to another unless there is a substantial reason to do so for example it is acceptable to change from american to british spelling if the article concerns a british topic see also wikipedia manual of style spelling feral dogs something about what is said about feral dogs in the article doesn't match with observations on feral dogs actually it doesn't even match with some articles in wikipedia e g the dingo is a feral dog too and they are excellent hunters as well as the carolina dogs who even seem to have some unique hunting skills it's also wrong to assume that feral dog packs lack the social structure of wolf packs you should browse for tuscany dog project thats a study concerning this topic and the dogs there although not completely feral have a very complex social structure in their pack check the german version of wikipedia if you like there's a full article also wolves don't form packs on general in italy and in germany as well many packs only consist of the parents their current litter and the litter of the last year in italy there are many solitary wolves and many who only live in pairs as well as quite a few packs of feral and semi feral dogs who can hunt prey wolves aren't capable of and who are competing or interacting with wolves depends on the situation so all in all feral dogs aren't that poor the dingo has had thousands of years to revert back to a semi ativistic state domestic dogs havent had that amount of time to become fully fledged wild animals while domestic dogs do form packs there is little monogamy cooperative hunting or mutual puppy care in all cases if known cases of adoption care for puppies by aunts i admit there is no prove for care by males monogamy and cooperative hunting as a matter of fact these things aren't as common among wolves as most people think don't you think you generalize to much e g erik zimen a famous cynologist in europe witnessed no monogamy in his poodle group observations by eberhard trummler and elizabeth marshall thomas came to different results the first observed dingo wolf dog mixes and the latter sibirian huskies as well as guenther bloch in his studies in italy two groups and one pack of near feral dogs mostly or entirely mongrels you should keep in mind that there isn't much data concerning this topic and it wouldn't be the first time that an observer didn't really observe and just judged by what he she already thought to be true remember for a long time people thought that wolves would generally form packs with an alpha on the top and an omega on the bottom of the pack or that dogs would always search the nearness of humans because they are born that way both facts have been proven to be wrong since at least the 's although they are still in the mind of many people laughter in dogs it seems like the whole paragraph was pov and or derived from unreliable sources so i commented it out for now see dangerous substances other than the danger of toxoplasmosis from eating cat feces does any real harm result from dogs eating feces if so