moving on chrisgualtieri points out that it was i who created and guess what within a few months the following was added to mos dash also it is recommended to use templates that provide formatting improvements over plain versions of dashes such as which inserts an em dash while allowing a line break after it the lesson that at least one of the formatting innovations you tsk tsk here is now a standard option for wikipedia at large who knows maybe some of the others will end up in mos too if they're not strangled in the cradle in the name of anodyne uniformity there being no opinion expressed on the question in the discussion section above i'm gone ahead and deleted the two types of comments mentioned there unused quote material start end markers since i gather editors find them to have low signal to noise ratio however i've restored many of the deleted notes which were typically things like these are exactly the sort of the material that belongs in hidden notes i've added cites to the material tagged cite needed per the guideline bgwhite pointed to i've deleted templates from cite templates