the debate on the deletion under g begun at utc on november did not throw any light on the applicability of rule g as most respondents confined themselves to other considerations notability of the subject suitability of the article for wikipedia etc no one managed to disprove the applicability of the csd g rule and it should have properly overridden all other considerations user charles matthews admitted in a remarkable access of frankness that the whole matter at hand was not about wikipedia policies at all but about his personal sense of injury writing at utc november but that s entirely to do with editors not wanting to be abused