i believe that the photographs are quite simply unnecessary i do not state this merely because i am partial to the view of some corpulent fellow's exhibitionism but they are simply excessive moreover every image seems to benefit someone in some way thus turning wikipedia into a market the one female image is of an amateur pornographic model advertising herself the other female of a contemporary 'artist's' work advertising his work and the male photograph of some perverse exhibitionist who most certainly adores polluting my screen with his phallus for reasons such as this i deem the english wikipedia inordinately horrid the sketches suffice this is unnecessary the article was sufficient prior to this plague of pornography but 'oh oh ' quoth the prepubescent wikipedian ''tis for the better of the encyclopedia ' how the sketch shows a photograph of a man with a dick in his hand as does the sketch what the hell is the difference