third party jumping into the fray i disagree with john f lewis regarding his reasons for rejecting the afc but not with the outcome the article has plenty of references some of which may well be reliable the fact that the references are not properly cited in the article is problematic but it is a widespread problem throughout wikipedia and hardly sufficient reason to reject an afc submission i have discussed this article at length with itzcoatzin on his talk page and will reiterate my views here this article is not appropriate for wikipedia because it is unfocused and overly broad it does not present a clear narrative of the progress of a family through history but rather presents a scatter shot of ideas many of which are irrelevant to the zambrano family history one may refer to the discussion at itzcoatzin's talk page for a fuller understanding of the issues that have been discussed john i have noted that you are a relatively recent editor and that you have concentrated your efforts on afc reviews largely rejecting them for lack of reliable sources even when sources are given while inline citations are certainly preferred they are not a requirement of a start class article rejecting articles on this basis even when sources are given perhaps as uncited links or as external links may be sending the wrong message to new users chatme readme