endless edit revert cycling on half dome dear anonymous editor you are adding material to the half dome article that does not follow the guidelines for wikipedia editing hence is constantly being reverted it doesn't matter that you believe going off the cables is safer it does not matter that will and i believe this to be false the important thing about wikipedia is that the articles are verifiable that is any fact can be traced to a reliable source such as a book or newspaper and written in a neutral point of view i e does not favor a particular set of opinions if you wish to have your material stay in the half dome article you have to come up with a reference that states that it is safer off the cables you cannot rely on your own knowledge or intuition you have to prove it to the rest of us further if it is a controversial assertion which this one is then you need to phrase it as such for example if some association is favoring leaving the cables then we could add association x claims that leaving the cable is safer than waiting while the national park service wants people to stay on the cable for safety notice that this sort of phrasing does not talk about the absolute truth of whether it is safer or not it reports who believes it to be safer and who does not these should be official organizations or well known experts we can't cite random people in blogs for example again both of these assertions should be backed up with references we can help you format the references don't worry i would urge you to find a reputable source that recommends leaving the cables until you do so i predict that the unsourced assertion is so controversial that it will probably just be reverted on sight feel free to ask any more questions on talk half dome thanks