weak support this came to my attention when i started in doing a disambiguation back when the nation went to the nation disambiguation it is true this is also said above that the majority of links which went to the nation disambiguation were meant to go to the nation u s periodical however i found that in all the cases where this was not true e g when the irish or thai periodical was meant the editors of those articles seemed to not be aware of the u s periodical this makes sense incidentally as this periodical is not entirely well known even in the u s in short the old situation was that there were a ton of links to a disambiguation page which is to be avoided but in this new situation i think we'll eventually see a ton of links to simply the wrong thing which strikes me as worse moreover a remark although the majority of the inbound links were meant for the u s periodical i think there is a systemic bias at work here a vast majority of those were in bibliographies where a web article from the nation was referenced many almost all sources in wikipedia bibliographies are web based and thus we should not be surprised to see a current magazine overrepresented especially when constrasted with a th century publication but all in all weak support in that i think the oppose position is also quite reasonable talk