a few weeks ago in anticipation of millennium park regaining its featured topic status i broached the idea of cup credit after the last article was promoted and you indicated that credit would not be granted it is my belief that i misrepresented the work done to regain featured topic status at a time when one last article was needed it is also my belief that you rendered a decision that getting credit for getting one last article promoted was gaming the system you noted that this type of credit was dangerous territory for the cup clearly just having articles added to a topic or repromoting a deleted topic could be gaming the system but when a rule change requires taking a article topic from rd to featured content it is not a matter of gaming the system the winner of this contest could come down to whether you grant me featured topic points for wikipedia featured topics millennium park i earned ft points for this topic when it was first promoted at that time the topic was articles and the requirement was that of the articles be wp fc and all be at least wp ga thus i was acknowledged for bringing of topics to featured status however during the year two articles park grill and grant park music festival were added to the topic and the requirement was increased to of the articles needing to be featured thus i had to ensure that the two new articles be promoted to good article which i did without a lapse in topic status and that a total of of the articles reached featured thus i helped raise mccormick tribune plaza ice rink march harris theater chicago june millennium park august and exelon pavilions september to featured promoting two gas and fas is more work than most people have to do to get a new ft t c wp chicago wp four