wasn't aware you would be working for me by adding a toc if that's your attitude then don't edit wiki at all because every edit benefits someone your adoption of that form of wp battlefield attitude is what i mean before your rr block log shows your unwillingness to collaborate because you are self serving rather than community serving no personal attacks from me either only observation of your misdeeds and mass scale bad faith reverts also you defined the editor who toc'd the cat as an spa but wp spa and arbcoms specific def on an spa does not support your statement so perhaps that's another example of your hostility towards ips and new editors you are very aggressive and the ownership like behaviour you have placed on these articles in your own interest rather than wiki's is all too evident there is no point my beating about the bush i'm honest you're a bad faith editor who misrepresents policy uses it to his advantage and ignores the wider benefits of doing something good and chooses to argue instead i've remained perfectly civil with you despite your intolerance and oppressive mannerisms i don't work for you but you chose to make my edits as a personal afront to your standards rather than those set out by the community you reverted articles without even knowing what you were reverting the eric fleming article being a laughable example that you were bul reverting without a care for who or what you harmed foregone conclusion is simple for anyone to see you don't like ips newbs so you wp bite them harshly rudely and subjectively with undue force