first npov is only violated by you why do you say of course as eu brings nothing good and if you look e g to england or poland most parties are anti eu which does not mean they want immediately a withdrawal and that's of course it are simply facts most parties in europe are anti eu but even if not why would that be a reason not to mention the parties who speculate about withdrawal and why would non winning in elections be a reason not to mention them they seek eu withdrawal or a major reform or opt outs for their nations but as you say you don't want they have weight because you simply do not tolerate other opinions about the eu and wanna have your libdem pro eu opinion which is anyway evil in the article and undermine the parties who want real freedom and independence though in fact we anti euists do not have opinions but knowledge second all that would give wp a very bad name which you don't wanna though it has anyway a bad name yet as wp is a non neutral center left pro eusa propaganda platform but you may be right with the fact that the party lists are already better explained in the article euroscepticism while euroscepticism is also rather a pro eu valuating name better would be eurocriticism or anti euism which would but not be a reason to delete the lists but to delete this whole article and simply redirect to euroscepticism and transfer the other information but i would say it's better to have two seperate articles and this one with both lists