in defense of the jennifer o'neill article and a note to all readers in defense of the jennifer o'neill article and a note to all readers this article has been tagged at its beginning since one single wikipedia editor mikewazowski believes it to be objectionable and defective in three particular respects first he finds the article to be defective in his opinion and reasons that it relies on references to primary sources or sources affiliated with the subject rather than references from independent authors and third party publications it should be noted that this article does contain some references to jennifer o'neill's autobiography surviving myself which was published by william morrow and sons publishing new york apparently mikewazowski does not consider one of the biggest publishing houses in america to be a reliable third party publication source the total absurdity of this position speaks for itself additionally under wikipedia policy guidelines personal and official websites can be used as a source and as a citation see secondly mikewazowski finds this article defective in that in his opinion this article contains wording that merely promotes the subject without imparting verifiable information the factual material in this article is accurate and true and correct with citations mikewazowski offers his conclusory general opinion that this article is simply jennifer o'neill self promoting without citation to a single example of it in the entire article third mikewazowski find this article defective in that in his opinion the article contains improper references to self published sources once again he apparently consider her autobiography which was disseminated by a third party publishing house william morrow and sons new york to be an unreliable self published source finally the validity of these negative criticisms must be viewed in light of the source of the accusations in the case the reader only needs to go to the user talkpage for mikewazowski to find it is filled with questions from numerous other editors to explain his edits strike outs and deletion of entire pages and articles which he simply totally ignores it is also significant that mikewazowski has been invited to make corrections to any material he finds objectionable but has refused to do so this fact can and should speak volumes more than any words