so i have not taken advantage of your input and have dismissed it i'd agree that a high standard of encyclopedia is needed with neutral articles perhaps another aim for administrators should be to provide advice and suggestions for edits on talk pages before making them edits can be either constructive or destructive it seems and why single out later years how many of the other statements in this article are not directly and immediately supported by any verifyable source or is the aim to provide an article page on view which is peppered with editorial blue pencil contributors might begin to think that an admisitrator spent all their time crititisng the efforts of others while adding nothing new themselves so could you please explain why this article does not have any painter categories