jingoism my wanting what is in an article to be properly cited is more a reflection of your attitude than mine thats how your attitude looks from aside no offence the cited reference had a name by which it is easy to google it so when the ref link to the telegraph was broken you could have fixed it like i did instead you immediately got rid of the whole inconvenient interesting fact i've put this fact into the tank article long ago and since than check it once in half a year and it is either deleted or is distorted badly you seem to have the article in your watch list but do nothing to prevent it let's make a deal you will be as careful and watchful to the fact as to any other and i stop thinking of you as of a jingoist deal