as previously written in discussion per wikipedia s own written polices but immediately deleted by blackpearl and then sanctioned by lessheard vanu blackpearll calls herself evidently mrs johnny depp and pirate lord ess and such she celebrates on her official wikipedia bio pages that she did many pages and articles on the walt disney company and pirates of the caribbean for wikipedia why would someone devote so much time to check the site and on these pages and then recklessly calls anyone who doesn t follow her bias views vandals attackers and such has her judgement become impaired her goal to fuse her love and fantasies with the walt disney company and pirates of the caribbean is very clear that is a conflict of interest and that is not being neutral and is against wikipedia s own written polices sorry but if one purchases products such as pirates of the caribbean posters toys and walt disney merchandise and also using emotional love and fantasies for wikipedia wikinews articles doesn t make the articles neutral and it causes a conflict of interest as recorded blackpearl 's pages regarding this issue are one sided not neutral are bias in conflict of interest and are all promotional tools promoting the causes and products of the walt disney company and pirates of the caribbean yes pirates of the caribbean and similar wikipedia articles are not neutral they are a series of one sided promotional pages including links to products and causes of the walt disney company following wikipedia s own written neutral policy entire articles would have to be deleted yet blackpearl continues to violate wikipedia polices and purpose then with ip s being deliberately blocked and contributing writers having been wrongly accused and falsely called various things if anyone then attempts to generate a new article related to pirates of the caribbean following wikipedia s own written polices editors and administrators gang up and generate false reason upon reason to delete those articles and ban the ip user they use a countless list of double standards and twisted logic to justify their reckless acts it s a total lock out by the editors and administrators abusing their trust tools acting like a private monarchy to date blackpearl 's has proven she has ultimate control has repeatedly stated that is her purpose and had even sought to have the articles locked then you lessheard vanu wrote that you don t want to lock these articles stating it goes against company policy but yet you added that you are preparing to possibly lock the articles in some capacity and do other acts against those who have been falsely branded and wrongly labeled as vandals and harassing the editors etc other editors and administrators who have proven their practice of bias and manipulative and outright double standards practices include svtcobra and whoville and chris mann we have documented that they say one thing yet practice another we have documented that they enforce one set of wikipedia polices yet discard and ignore those same policies when it applies to themselves or their selective circle of peers we contributing writers also wonder just how many editors and administrators have a conflict of interest to various articles so since you lessheard vanu have personally chosen to block ip addresses and made false allegations against me and other contributing people we are requesting clarification when did blackpearl become owner controller and self judge of certain wikipedia articles if you believe that blackpearl owns and has absolute control over pirates of the caribbean articles then please state that is the policy why is blackpearl allowed to violate wikipedia s own written polices and purpose why are other editors and administrators upholding double standards for you can t have double standards as the wikipedia written policies detail a cooperative community effort for articles and it s suppose to be neutral furthermore there is no way to discuss nor talk about the reckless actions of blackpearl without saying and describing what they are yet immediately blackpearl has wrongly and irresponsibly calls anyone placing anything critical or changes to certain pages she had appointed herself as self controller of as vandals and outright claims that she is being attacked and then goes to her peers with which to delete the talk and discussion leaving only the editors and administrators comments and self bias online while blocking ip s what is shocking that you don t know who i nor other contributing writers are why are blackpearl actions being upheld why is her emotional state calling herself various names in fantasy as she selfishly promotes her personal cause to glorify and promote a cause for her love for pirates of the