if i may answer for nancy she should feel free to correct me such a summary will be accused of being apologetic i saw it at earlier facs where a significant number of editors thought there was not enough coverage of this issue this is a big deal there is not enough coverage censorship one may note such sentiments are not wholly absent from this talk page either i read it as recentism as well as the whipping boy status the church has in certain circles of western media i sympathize with nancy and others that such a concise formulation would be a target at fa and an obstacle to achieving fa status however i would rather help produce a serious and reputable reference work than enable systematic bias of that type yak