re tts surely you jest he is the definition of partisan though it is perhaps telling that you feel he is not while uh scholars are for lacroix you may wish to start here finally wp undue trumps the argument you are trying to make i'm afraid not all povs are equal the cites i removed were justified on the basis that they were pushing a pov again the mere fact that pov statement push is cited the additions you so often make being quite the textbook examples of cherry picking does not legitimize it this is elemental and most unfortunate that you do not so recognize as for viriditas' message i couldn't agree more if what it takes is taking this and some of the other articles to mediation which i assume is what viriditas means i would support that if that's where we need to go to get the articles back to a npov the current process of doing so is proving to be unnecessarily contentious and involving a high degree of nitpicking that is an utter waste of everyone's time