related controversies the related controversies section is outrageously biased if such a section belongs in this article which i doubt then it should also cover related controversies involving global warming's true believers if it's necessary to highlight a link between global warming scepticism and a rejection of peer reviewed studies of passive smoking and of the role of cfcs in depleting the ozone layer it's equally necessary to highlight a link between global warming activism and a rejection of peer reviewed studies of gm foods whaling selective logging and the eco advisibility of scuttling the brent spar oil platform all of which controversies found or find greenpeace which for some reason is quoted in this section on the wrong side of the science the whole section should be deleted in my view especially as this article is currently being edited to remove political aspects of the global warming controversy