considering wp undue it was stated by shrike i pointed out clearly that elhaik paper has nothing to do with this book and as far as there is no consensus to present genetic studies and academic books regarding this subject here per wp npov elhaik paper can not be made an exception many genetic studies deals with this question yet they are not included regarding long history of blank revert you nishadani have a long history of doing this among others to me as well while your repeated accusation of pov pushing indeed reflects your own edits and reverts weather elhaik and sand are friends is also irrelevant to this book considering dlv legitimate concerns the new york times article it is a direct criticism of this book while this is not case with shlomo sand personal interviews about genetic science or elhaik paper which has nothing to do with this book beyond using sand as one of references