dori i appreciate your relatively objective assessment too of course sarek's statement above is inaccurate the quoted statements were never made nor represent facts company apologists want to say things in the article without supporting it with sources then they want to delete well sourced statements they don't want the article to include several people said they questioned the notability and fwiw one of the founder pages sage weil was deleted the sourcing of the article is significantly improved since i got involved as looking at the edit history shows pro company coi editing has long been a problem there outdent was it appropriate in your opinion for sarek to relocate comments at the afd although he moved some of his incidentally some of the first personally critical comments he also left some of scjessey's similarly critical comments in place as well as making it impossible to follow