look at the rd paragraph beginning with the general media response according to the cited source of reviews are negative yet a significant minority are positive however no credence is given to this significant minority instead of quotes or a hyperlink to a positive review wiki readers are presented with patronizing links to the wiki articles for religious right conservative and creationist this appears to violate wikipedia neutral point of view by giving no weight instead of due weight to the leading minority viewpoint i previously brought this up in the npov discussion about this article but no other editors had any comments due to the controversial nature of this article i did not make the change to the article i believe the npov discussion for this article was archived