greetings hi cirt i hope you will consider stopping accusing me of bad faith editing if you have any qualms with particular edits i'd love to hear what is wrong with them and how my approach can be improved i'd like to direct your attention to two quotes on user pages the first is from jimmy wales you can edit this page really you can if you would like to please feel free to do so make an edit or even several after all that is what wikipedia is all about '' and the second is from neelix's user page wikipedia is thoroughly inherently collaborative in the humanities division of academia we still hold to the ideal of the lone genius expecting that each humanities scholar be the sole author of his or her journal articles in the sciences and social sciences we expect that there be two or three authors for each journal article on wikipedia every well developed article has many more than three authors the result is an ever increasingly accurate approximation of objectivity this objectivity is not the pseudo objectivity that results from ignoring our biases as authors but is rather the result of diverse perspectives all being covered proportionally through discussion between people who have those diverse perspectives we write better when we write together i think those principles are pretty neat and i am certain my editing adheres to them if you'd like to contact me off the site let me know i'd be happy to share ways to get in touch