a few claims are made in that paper which fail to understand where hydrinos apply or do not apply for example the higher temperatures in the electrode regions of high pressure hydrogen discharge plasmas would overcome significant activation energies for the proposed hydrino formation reactions there are no reports of high pressure hydrogen plasmas collapsing into hydrinos with a burst of hard ultraviolet radiation and x rays they the authors of this response to mills' work do not account for the catalysts needed to make the hydrino transitions possible indeed the word catalyst fails to appear even one time in this response to mills' work they do not account for the fact that sun produces massive amounts of hard ultraviolet radiation and x rays by multiple means and these are not necessarily all identified they do not make note of the claim that hydrinos cannot be observed without knowing where the emissions of their formation should peak in the sun's electromagnetic spectrum indeed the word peak fails to appear even one time in this response to mills' work if hydrinos existed their lte density in the photosphere would be vastly higher than the density of ordinary hydrogen they provide no calculation any assurance that the former would be much greater than the latter they do not account for the lack of sufficient density of catalysts to produce such alleged greater presence of hydrinos relative to particularly in the photosphere '''' expert sectioneer'' of wikipedia karma talk