knm i am convinced that magicmiracle is right in what he she is saying the nrn controversy is definitely not absolute reference neutral point of view is a fundamental wikipedia principle according to wikipedia co founder jimmy wales npov is absolute and non negotiable moreover it is a direct attack on a public figure without legal justification unless a court in india finds nrn guilty wikipedia cannot include this in the biography section of nrn as it would directly mean that the whole story is a personal vendetta and technically it would also qualify for contempt of the judiciary and defamation hope you stop adding stuff not needed good luck in the future neoguru