voting i don't want to see more mutual recrimination and circular argument since clearly no consensus is going to be reached i have made a concrete proposal to resolve this matter and i want concrete non polemical responses to it i want particularly to hear from skyring whether he is willing to submit a policy resolution to go with the one i have written so that people can vote on the two positions user adam carr's proposal i agree that the above list of statements on this issue does not constitute a vote and i don't think jtdrl claimed that it was a vote therefore we need to have a proper vote decide on a position and then enforce it i therefore propose a vote to be announced at the australian wikipedians notice board and conducted here the vote should be between two policy positions one written by skyring and anyone who agrees with him and the other written by those who disagree with him my proposed policy position is this that in government of australia and in all other articles dealing with australia's system of government it should be stated that australia is a constitutional monarchy and a federal parliamentary democracy australia's head of state is queen elizabeth ii queen of australia under the constitution almost all of the queen's functions are delegated to and exercised by the governor general as the queen's representative that any edit which states that a australia is a republic b the governor general is australia's head of state or c australia has more than one head of state will be reverted and that such reversions should not be subject to the three reversions rule edits which say that named and relevant persons eg politicians constitutional lawyers judges disagree with the above position and which quote those persons at reasonable length are acceptable provided proper citation is provided and the three factual statements are not removed skyring should now provide a summary of his position of comparable length and then we can conduct a vote