you are right that i haven't read the judgement that is because i have a full time job which does not involve the law and wikipedia is a hobby for me i e i don't care to make the time for it but that's the point articles like this would be helpful for a layman if they summarize the most important issues of the case up front which is what i suggested in the first place as it is the length and bearing of the article are discouraging for someone who is not a lawyer or law student i think wikipedia policy is pretty clear in discouraging this approach unfortunately for me i don't presently have the time to read the case text and write a decent summary of it which is something that would be better done by a scholar of the work anyway i can only urge you to do so and hope that you or another legal minded wikipedian will come to agree best of luck and keep up the good work