i can totally appreciate that the facebook page isn't considered a reliable resource since it is from one side of the story so i have no problem with your stance on this again as i have stated many times i am only a merely a scholar of well known criminal case several of which are listed in wikipedia oddly the sante kimes page is the one that i saw had lots of incorrect information listed on it i agree that my first edits weren't the correct way to improve the quality of the page but i have since tried to follow the correct procedure and post here and add tags for larger amounts of questionable information i think the quality of the page has improved since yesterday however there are still a few spots of misinformation that concern me yes you have provided sources but perhaps in your haste you have misquoted them i would simply go ahead and fix these but i don't what to appear that i am trying to disrupt the page or alter the quality of the content i think i have already listed the misquotes here so if you want to change them please do or i can correct them and you can 'check' my work for accuracy which ever you see best is fine as for people wrongfully convicted the general consensus is that all people convicted of a crime is guilty of it however that is not always the case and that is usually public opinion rather than fact i'm not speaking about the kimes case but for all conviction cases