please show me where in the source the material attributed exists i couldn't find it i started a section for such discussions below if any of my fellow editors feel my actions step over the line of civility or produce an environment which retards the development of wikipedia i urge you to read disruptive editing and follow the steps involved in it specifically the section dealing with disruptive editors if you are unfamilar with wikipedia i will endevour to assist you in the process of filing a wikipedia requests for comment user conduct for me which if i am found in serious error will result in me being blocked or banned learning how to use such tools empowers you and makes you a more effective editor imho for me leaving unsourced material in an article does not promote npov but only confuses readers and dilutes the value of sourced material i see no possibility of accurately balancing unsourced material from different sides the current version with the unsourced material will remain available as a previous version for those editors who wish to find relevant cites in the future this is a level playing field verifiability the threshold for inclusion in wikipedia is verifiability not truth