you are wiki lawyering and frankly if anybody is doing the harassing here it's you you have repeatedly minimized my arguments by claiming that i am sockpuppeting meatpuppeting and making personal attacks when i am attacking the material of the article and its source 'you are passive aggressive' is not an egregious personal attack and 'you didn't read what i wrote and you are being deliberately obtuse' isn't a personal attack at all seriously how is you're deliberately not reading what i wrote possibly offensive to anybody i didn't come here to create drama i didn't claim that i did i claimed that a particular website made me aware of something on wikipedia that i thought was wrongly included in an article i've made legitimate criticisms and my comments are directly responsible for the creation of the crucifixion in art page i argued civilly enough and generated enough consensus among the majority of wiki users to remove the offending material from the original crucifixion page and have it moved to a new page when i got around to looking at that new page i found that it had not been cleaned up and contained questionable claims from an unreliable tertiary source so i made an argument on the discussion page and removed the offending material because i didn't make an edit summary i found my revision rather rudely reverted by a member of one of your user groups i reacted and alan pointed out my mistake a simple oversight by a novice user one that might have been cleared up when i read alan's talk page had you not immediately jumped in and made baseless claims against me