no idea where to reply in response to this my position is still the same the unity is not even official yet and the un meeting on it hasn't even happened yet even when it all does go through we have the same problem we had several years ago of palestine is too vague and when a state is made years form now the article will need to be fundamentally rewritten if it is to be relevant to that entity so yeah renaming this imo is a waste of time and looks like wikipedia editors attempting to advocate a nonexistent state as if it was a state we should not be giving that impression even if that is not the intent of editors