sure what do you mean i am in the process of writing a little welcome and how to john if you recall the minor dispute about the estonia links really caught me off guard and i was a bit thin skinned in taking criticism for what i thought was my helpful addition of a couple of links i learned from that and other experiences here that practically every article has two sides and that you can't just go in and naiively think you're adding objective information when that info most likely has already been debated i was also caught off guard in that the other contributors to the site took me for a neo nazi see comment from dlx to that effect they were quick to jump to that conclusion i thought based only on a few bits of info gleaned from my posts anyway i'm trying to make it clear that i do not do anything on wikipedia because of what i do for a living and i wanted to point out with the about me who cares that i do not participate here to draw attention to myself or to please my employer btw john can you take a look at the dispute there is a brief reference on my user page involving user thf or ted frank do this only if you have time to look at all the backroundthere is a lot of it on his talk page some on the talk page for tort reform in the united states and some on sonic's rendezvous band's talk page and deletion discussion page i believe this user has violated several rules and policies and in general the spirit and purpose of wikipedia i have asked cool hand luke to look at this but so far he has not he only made a comment about something i did in response to being attacked by this user thanks for your consideration perhaps dlx can look at this issue too i hope that both of you have concluded from our earlier discussion that my approach may have been ill considered but my purpose and intent was to make a good faith contribution not to disrupt and certainly not to enforce any particular politically motivated point of view thanks