scientific skeptic he never went to college so why this article calls him a scientific skeptic may be some people of his skeptic team are real scientifics they sure got graded from some college but this debunker never went to any college so how can wikipedia call him a scientific do you know at least if he uses a scientific method for whatever he tries to debunk people he didn't finished high school preceding unsigned comment added by you can't even write proper english what college did you go to what's up doc thanks for the link though that's a great article on the amazing one i think scientific skepticism is related to following the scientific method not formal education h g bob talk for sure the user would likely know that it's just trolling behavior what's up doc i'm not english and i rather be trolling right now than being a years old wikipedia non life geek you know what i'm talkng about oh we know what you're talking about all right trust me his ip is french so yeah i won't hold his english skills against him his personality and his intellectual abilities however are things that i will hold against him back on topic though it is a common mistake that people make people fail to understand that finding out the cause of flummery is a field in and of itself knowing when you need to enlist the help of an expert and knowing what the expert is actually able to do instead of assuming that 'expert god' that is a skill that many people lack i suspect that randi knows more about most scientific fields than many experts know about scientific fields outside their expertise so according to you it's enough to only suspect his scientifc knowledge to make disappear any kind of information related to his educational background i mean is this the way wikipedia works you suspect how sure is that why didn't you even wonder that would have been a better reason for making disappear my contribution about his educational career don't you think i can't believe guys like you run wikipedia like kings of the info simply pitious preceding unsigned comment added by talk contribs i guess we should leave the 'no high school' line in there it has nothing to do with 'scietific' vs 'non scientific' his methods are unquestionably scientific which of course explains why so few high profile psychics and fakers apply for the million dollar challenge i added it back in with a bit of useful context and minus the inferred line about never having been to college which is not supported by the given source works for me i'm guessing if he can teach college without a high school degree he could have attended college as well the ip again demonstrates that he's either a troll or an idiot or both what's up doc