i don't get it why it isn't appropriate to use sources besides my reference doesn't mention anywhere most of the referece in this wikipedia page don't have page number either but anyway if you want i provide page numbers and dates aswell with such massive evidence proven by so many anthropologist and geneticist yet this wiki page for some reason is preventing these info which i find really suspicious lahr m m patterns of modern human diversification implications for amerindian origins american journal of physical anthropology volume issue supplement s pages book american indian life elsie worthington clews parsons pages paragraph in race he was mongoloid not chinese japanese or mongol proper but proto mongoloid a straight haired type medium in complexion jaw protrusion nose breadth and inclining probably to round headedness an early type in short archaeology the widening debate by colin renfrew first colonized by proto or pre mongoloid people different from north asian mongoloids lahr neves ct al page genetic link between asians and native americans evidence from hla genes and haplotypes hum immunol sep method and theory in american archaeology digitised online by questia media gordon willey and philip phillips university of chicago here another one howells william w getting here the story of human evolution isbn this is a recreation of the craniometric dendogram entitled cranial cluster groups in a book by anthropologist william white howells professor of anthropology at harvard university who said indians or american populations are closest in studies of cranial distance to europeans as seen above and that among indians or american populations only eskimos are strongly mongoloid in form april utc