you said i think laec has a valid point that there is an undisclosed coi from those editors but it's not like that doesn't happen anywhere else i agree what makes this case different however and therefore newsworthy is that person involved is a major player in a major organization and that organization is a national leader in opposing the very things that its own high ranking member does when she acts anonymously for example the ala opposed outing a terrorist to the police when that person's own deputy outed a major sports figure on wikipedia for marital infidelity for example the ala promotes intellectual freedom while anonymously propgandizing on wikipedia to promote its own political interests i appreciate the support and guidance you have provided