the version that you are attempting to revert to is unstable your talmudic source might be correct but it does not have any relevance to the article you are attempting to edit against consensus if you continue to revert then i will report you for wp rr and edit warring thank you you've made three mistakes is the version i'd reverted to unstable on the contrary the version that you were attempting to revert to is unstable because the chapter you'd removed was added three years ago on may and lasted until march i e until the day before yestreday whereas the version you were attempting to revert to lasted for less than hours only that were uncontinuous and broken so which version is more stable returning the chapter you'd removed is not against the consensus at all the chapter is supported by user mob deadmeat and is also supported by user chrishatch and is also supported by user eliko whereas the removal of the chapter is supported by user basket of puppies only really it was also supported in the past by user dragonflysixtyseven however their reason for the removal was refuted on their talk page and on the article talk page as well and they didn't respond to the refutation according to the law silence gives consent the very fact that user dragonflysixtyseven didn't respond to the refutation shows that user dragonflysixtyseven does not reject the explanation given on their talk page and on the article talk page as well for returning the chapter to sum up three editors user mob deadmeat user chrishatch and user eliko support the chapter and one single user user basket of puppies rejects it so which option is more consensual returning the chapter or removing it the chapter you removed is relevant as i'd explained on the article talk page before you removed the chapter if you think the chapter is irrelevant despite my explanation on the article talk page why it's relevant then please discuss that on the article talk page note that when you responded to me on my talk page each one of us had made one revert only during so considering that the single revert i've made during was sufficient for you to warn me of your reporting me for wp rr and edit warring if i continue to revert also your single revert you've made during should be sufficient for me to warn you of my reporting you for wp rr and edit warring if you continue to revert if you continue to both remove a consensual chapter and replace it by an unstable version which is against the consensus then i will report you for violating wikipedia policy that requires to discuss everything on the article talk page before removing a consensual chapter and before replacing it by an unstable version which is against the consensus anyways due to your claim about irrelevance i will add to the stable consensual chapter some clarifications to make sure that every reader including user basket of puppies understands its relevance