as for your substantive proposal i agree that significant coverage in multiple sources is the gng standard but the sources don't have to be presented before an article can be created for example i created harvard crimson football team knowing that significant coverage exists in multiple sources but for starting purposes i considered it sufficient to have citations to reliable sources such as the harvard site and cfdw hopefully another editor will pick up the baton and expand further but i don't see how or why an article such as harvard should be a candidate for deletion when a search of the new york times archives of newspapers com turns up a plethora of coverage for the topic stubs are not where we end up but sometimes they serve a useful purpose in getting things started see wp artn notability is a property of a subject and not of a wikipedia article if the source material exists even very poor writing and referencing within a wikipedia article will not decrease the subject's notability