i agree i have no inherent objection to such an article on the concept of state atheism i think this sounds a good idea we move the criticism material to the criticism article and keep this article on basic neutral facts modelled alongside state religion i have no problem with mentioning supression of other religions but here it is listed as typically part of the lead definition and covered extensively giving wp undue weight compared with state religion where suppression of other religions is not mentioned at all as far as i can see nor does that article have any of the criticisms that people might make of the concept of state religion or religion in general and i think it's right for the article not to cover it as we cover it better elsewhere