ga review this review is transcluded from talk stade roland garros ga the edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review reviewer ga review see here for criteria it is reasonably well written a prose b mos for lead layout word choice fiction and lists lead should be paragraphs it is factually accurate and verifiable a references b citations to reliable sources c or pretty sure that gem is a fan site location section completly unsourced tenniseum and clay courts relies on one source could be a copyvio too many unsourced things it is broad in its coverage a major aspects b focused too much player info imo this is about the stadia not the players it follows the neutral point of view policy fair representation without bias it is stable no edit wars etc it is illustrated by images where possible and appropriate a images are tagged and non free images have fair use rationales b appropriate use with suitable captions is there not a shot showing the whole complex also if not shouldn't pc be the court in the picture and not sl overall pass fail out of date in expansion v relocation as a result has been announced