danny your motives are clearly not about being more encyclopaedic as we have seen your methods time and time again as the wikipedia page says you can quickly insert inline references to web pages by inserting a url surrounded by single square brackets this does not provide as much information to readers but it is much better than not citing your sources at all interestingly i see you have only attacked and vandalized the quotes website and none of the watchtower's multiple links no surprise there with your gross bias screaming from the rooftops as for the links to quotes websites they are extremely encyclopaedic and the page has no commentary but lists all the printed material about so as to give fair and reasonable coverage rather than just a few selective quotes they are all given their source publication date and page numbers for proof and reference your apparent fear and terror that the public might actually read what the watchtower organization has written is very revealing you clearly have an agenda to vandalize and ban free speech when it doesn't suit your agenda not dissimilar to your religious organisation i suggest you look inside and see why now after many months you feel the desperate need to hide accurate comprehensive dated quotes direct and unaltered that have been published by the watch tower society if you can give all the publications from the watchtower's website then i'm sure many here will be only to happy to list that link but i think you will find they refuse to give any information to the public about their less than flattering publications and that is where we all need to see a comprehensive and fully documented source like the excellent quotes site on you have failed to substantiate any of your claims about the quotes site merely saying it's not useful is a deadpan pov with no basis but your own fear of reality and your desperate urged to manipulate the public posted central august