indeed numerous iranian media pointed that out right away that is why i support the idea of including jewish at the beginning of that sub section of the article it is not to single out pilz because he is jewish per se it is because both iranian media as well as officials from foreign ministry have called it a part of the on going zionst smear campaign against iran pilz' early anouncements had claimed that both final candidates of the iranian presidency were mentioned in his extraordinarily reliable agent d report so no matter which candidate won he would have smeared the winner he had anticipiated that rajsanjani wins like most people expected so he had initially put the focus more on rafsanjani as an iranian i also feel this is coordinated it is indeed hard to explain how the major western media would be so quick to report all those allegatoins which so far have turned out to be false without even a cursory investigation how could for example ap reuters and afp all three make the same mistake at the same time and it wasn't even on just one allegation it was on multiple so multiple news agencies making multiple mistakes that a pro would hardly ever do all at the same time and i have seen a pattern like this for years on numerous other anti iran smear reports also you might notice how so many people involved in this very article are jews or at least their edit history clearly shows their pro zionist stance i don't think that is accidental either they are voluntary contributors to the same smear campaign because they view islamic iran as a threat to zionism the same people also have an interest on the rafsanjani article and probably many other iran related articles