i perceive a very strong emotional response here first of all you seem to be adopting a position that you deem to be somehow 'correct' i do not see what makes your pov more relevant or acceptable that other peoples' are you entitled to make pronouncements on behalf of english wikipedia if so who appointed you to this role i have no relationship with this particular editor or any other for that matter my revert has been simply an expression of my opinion as i was entirely unaware of the history behind this however i do not understand why you take it upon yourself to pass judgment as to what constitutes a 'correct position'