user sarah ewart is onto something this is a volatile emotional situation and because it's current it's hard to decide what's really relevant or not in the long run the editorial comments are liable to be a bit overblown now but that situation should remedy itself with time and perspective and the junk like greer's comments should get weeded out i maintain that greer is nothing more than a public figure taking advantage of that fact to put herself in the papers and that story is about her not about irwin in the long run it merits maybe line here and the rest should be in the greer article i was thinking it compares a bit with the tom cruise brooke shields story in which cruise shot off his mouth about something he knows nothing about post partum depression the difference is that shields answered him and it became a dialogue of sorts steve irwin has no such option in this case and anyone else's self serving editorial comments about him whether pro or con should ultimately be kept to a minimum in an article that claims to be encyclopedic