jungle fight about your comments they had events in and in why would you revise that number upwards ten seems to be a good number for a serious organization jf is the largest organization in brazil jungle fight had exactly five title fights in two in jf two in jf one in jc their events are shown on espn outside brazil since jf in brazil their events started to be shown before that about their number of fighters it's better if you keep the rules simple for example require that at least fighters fought in the organization in the span of a year what do you think about that i know it seems weird for jungle fight to have the same or more points than strikeforce but we have other options instead of gaming the system against jungle fight the current way to determine what is a top or second tier organization puts full weight on the rankings while your system gives minimal weight to it i think we should find a middle ground while at the same time keep things as simple as possible in order to do so i would scrap criteria and and use a criteria based on rankings determined by fight matrix that criteria could amount to or of all possible points the advantages would be that the main organizations would certainly be ahead of other while at the same time event short lived but notable organizations would have a high score by using fight matrix we would be able to easily determine how many points defunct organizations would have maybe we could present such a system as a possible substitute to the current way we use to determine notability