ip you have added text for the third time on neurofeedback after the notice above and an explanation of wp rr and wikipedia's medical sourcing requirements was posted to your talk page please review wp rr and do not reinstate text without gaining consensus again please note that rr is not a license to read contested text three times and that it pertains to an individual not an ip address or account please read wp medrs if you can locate a secondary review most likely listed at pubmed that mentions success with neurofeedback for ts we can discuss it i have most of the recent reviews and am aware of no secondary review of ts that mentions success with neurofeedback please review wp notnews publishing unreviewed recent research is unencylcopedic please review wp or one could argue isn't how wikipedia articles are written perhaps it is time to request protection of the article talk