go to sweden for msg woaah now you are making stuff confusing please stick to en wiki for en wiki matters it took me a while to figure out sweden meant swedish wikipedia but well what kind of document is it from what office if it's an official document it's bound to be published somewhere and remember that it's true doesn't mean it should be included if there has been no news reports or anything about it it's hardly notable enough for inclusion stating that infon ska in s enkelt r det will hardly promote healthy discussion about it talk contribs defaultsort is your friend hello i noticed your edit to mikael odenberg so i thought i should drop by and tell you about the wonders of defaultsort a sortkey is an alternative term the article should be sorted by when listed in a category for example to add an article called albert einstein to the category people and have the article sorted by einstein albert you would type category people einstein albert this kind of sortkey you successfully added to mikael odenberg in your edit but i reverted most of your edit why because there is a feature called default sort key which changes the default sort key used by categories from the name of the article to the one specified with the magic word defaultsort instead of adding odenberg mikael you simply add defaultsort odenberg mikael above the categories which i had already done in this case thank you for your otherwise very valuable contribution talk contribs ooh neat i didn't see that apparently this is a new function in mediawiki that's really handy knowledge for the other wikimedia projects that i'm involved in as well thanks for letting me know talk contribs chemsitry comments i have noticed that you seem to spend a lot of time commenting on chemistry articles claiming that they need to be either put in context or wikified i was wondering if you could put in context your own level of knowledge in chemistry so that the articles can be reeditted to be applicable to your own level of knowledge with the chemical reaction stubs i have been assuming that people will generally be looking at them if they have a basic level of chemical knowledge i e one of about an a level student in england and will not need a full explanation of why the reaction proceeds as it does if this does not fulfil your ideals what else will i need to add complete mechanisms with comments of facial and stereo selectivities and such if so this is simply not possible as there will be a large amount of repeated information on wikipedia please get back to me on this topic hello eh lately i've indeed been editing chemistry articles but only to remove improper categories such as those you added to well a damn lot of articles using autowikibrowser on some tags such as wikify have been posted but not many i may have edited one or two chemical reaction stubs but i don't know which ones point out more specifically which articles you refer to and i'll see what i can do do note however that my knowledge of chemistry is extremely basic and my contributions to chemistry articles have only been clean up maintenance work talk contribs its okay i'm a qualified chemist but you seem to be suggesting for example on the bechamp reaction that more detail is needed to me it seems clear also on the category front they were not incorrectly labelled i have been putting them into the topmost category they can go into so as to create a list of all the chemists that appear on wikipedia this is because it is otherwise hard to see who may or may not need to be added i have been finding your editting very unhelpful in removing them from this category i have not said anything as you seem likely to start an edit war i have made