frcp you are beginning to sound like a broken record i refer you back to the vegetarian analogy furthermore if the likes of beinart and kaufman are quoted this does not make them verifiable your best sources are not neutral and objectively acceptable they are agenda based commentators on the late senator's alleged and i emphasise alleged since it is most certainly not verified neo conservatist legacy your tedious counter argument to this normally goes refer me to verifiable sources to the contrary this is not good enough you are the one making the contentious assertions the burden of proof and verifiability falls on you and to date in my opinion the case you have built based on the sources you have offered is tenuous to say the least and utterly ambiguous at best end of term report for frcp must do better try harder student must come to terms and grasp the meaning of the word verifiable