false accusations historic jonesborough etc sorry to bother the current and future editors following this article but it seems this article is to be added to a long list of articles where i have edited where long time adversary orlady follows and finds fault i don't get her motivation this to explain some back and forth editing on this article which you may see i added mention of the nrhp listing in of the jonesboro historic district which she then disputed adding a silly citation needed tag as she is well aware from long discussion at the article for that district it is nrhp listed that is factual it is not seriously in doubt i added general mention of the fact that a larger area has been promoted as historic jonesborough since then to which she added a wp or tag and or removed it in subsequent edits in one edit summary orlady stated that it is speculation and synthesis including the concepts of larger promoted as and since then not merely an issue of needing a citation orlady has read numerous webpages of the historic jonesborough organization which i believe was created after and which certainly has promoted a larger area than the nrhp listed historic district as historic jonesborough since then it is a fact not even a controversial one that the organization has promoted an area since that the area is larger than the nrhp listed historic district the historic jonesborough webpages mention the historic district but do not name it and they are i think deliberately vague on the boundaries of the district but nonetheless adequately imply that the historic jonesborough area is larger further i have verified the facts by reading the nrhp nom document which identifies the area of the historic district and compared that historic jonesborough documents promoting inns and motels inside and outside of that district i don't think this amounts to wp synth which is original research to be avoided as perhaps it might advance a controversial pov position i believe the current article no longer mentions historic jonesborough which ought to be given pretty salient coverage in the history of this town for its actions to preserve and promote the town orlady changes the name of the historic district to display as jonesborough historic district rather than to display as the name it was given in the nrhp listing jonesboro historic district that change is possibly implementing wp or as there appear not to be evidence the nrhp listing name is changed there is discussion ongoing in a requested move at talk jonesboro historic district jonesborough tennessee i think the official original name should be displayed here unless and until there is a different resolution at the article on the district itself perhaps other editors would like to comment on what are the facts and or to step in to fix up the article or perhaps you all would prefer to avoid this again sorry to have brought dispute to here ncram