i'm really concerned that this page is not npov enough anyone reading it for the first time would conclude that the holy blood and the holy grail is a completely legitimate work the criticisms section has been virtually neutered to the point where i'm not even sure if it's in english the true facts about pierre plantard and the priory of sion were passed on to the authors of holy blood holy grail by the french journalist and author jean luc chaumeil who has an extensive archive on this subject matter how is that an opening sentence what does it even mean what true facts why is his a rchive being extensive relevent or not in reality the main documents the holy blood was based on were forgeries this really needs to be highlighted more vandalism