i have also offered to strike or reformat it i have tried showing that i am willing to attempt to change and make my comments abode within policy i am being declined on technicalities and accused of using technicalities i am not going to say the arbcom decision decision was justified when it wasn't the actions are reminiscent of a communist form of government or a inquistion i believe that i've exhibited a attitude that says i disagree however i am willing to make changes reread the entire thread i made one sympathizing ocmment to a webpage i was blocked quire questionably when i exhibit that he block isn't needed what i fail to understand is how i can argue unblock without being accused of wikilawyering wilf made a specific point and linked to it i read it and there was a clear exception i offered to refactor or change the phrasing how is that not exhibiting a block isn't nec