actually less is more for a comic article the title and a fact or two dates and who did what are sufficient what was there was superfluous the mention of exact heroes and as it goes into the fcb fictional character biography or in this case plot as to plot of it is still there but minus some sloppy sentences that add no value or contain the previously mentioned colloquialisms on a similar note all that good info on the illustrations is still there but as it is a publication matter it belongs in the publication history reception is largely fine with two sentence fragments culled as that is the writer inserting their point of view not the quoted source the legacy component is actually ph material the list of characters is unnecessary as a link provides said list and in the main article it looks fannish some of the related commentary was also unnecessary the academis section also needs work as while a fine effort means nothing to a layman it needs to convey the same ideas in simpler terms