nice suggestion about the evolution article j k i think in an article about a controversial topic we should include arguements on both sides of an issue not based on their silliness validity but on their appearance in the debate please understand that gay marriage is a relatively new concept for many of us i am not opposed to gay marriage i am actually undecided on whether legally using the label marriage for gay marriages is a good idea i am currently leaning towards marriage privatization although i'm leary of anything with privatization in it's name i can see why everyone might think that i'm some prop troll or something but i'm not i was just reading about the topic on here and felt that there were some issues with the article and wanted to contribute