as i suspected complete nonsense your statement is so silly that i can't begin to tell you how wrong it is you said you there presume that your not yet filed arbcom case has been decided i assure you that this was not the case i would consider that to be a stupid assumption i am not a stupid person i would therefore ask that you assume good faith on my part and withdraw everything on this page based on your mind reading trick you quote out of context and misrepresent when you describe part of my questioning as the lack the intellectual ability comment by the perverted interpretation of standards you are trying to apply to me your accusation of me not treating others as human beings is a personal attack if it wasn't so silly i would spend time thinking more on it which may lead to concluding that it is a straight up personal attack here's a few points for you to think on wp civil wp agf wp npa are all policies written in mind for the writing of encyclopaedic articles then let's consider the arbcom an article what then is this articles content hmm let's see the arbcom is an article so what is the arbcom made of why members so that means the content of the committee is it's members so an election is a decision on the content of this article so members are editors so content is editors so in order to write this article we must discuss the content we must discuss the editor who is to become part of the content you don't like that wp civil wp agf wp npa are all policies written in mind for the writing of encyclopaedic articles but arbcom is not an article it is an election to decide which persons are to be members of that important committee we must discuss the editors who are to become members of the committee we cannot question articles about their content nor can we ask the content questions but we can ask the proposed contents of the arbcom questions is a certain level of intellectual ability pertinent to arbcom membership if you do not think so how many of the present arbcom do you consider stupid would a low intellect on arbcom help or hinder if there is evidence a diff of intellectual failings does the candidate realise this failing can he explain it as something other than an intellectual failing the questions were politely put they were challenging and they were meant to be and anyone in the community which includes me has the right to ask candidates challenging questions on their past performance there was no name calling all questions were relevant to a quality of the candidate pertinent to his ability to perform on arbcom they were not deferential which may be the actual cause of the consternation you and others displayed your threats of blocks i regard as an attempt to bully do not try to bully me finally i would contrast the participation of admin's in this ani with the marshalling of forces which you participated in and then came here