seriously relax there are no sources listed on that comment on the article i've said i have no objection the daily mail if you feel that's the best you can come up with but you have not put it up i find your hostility really surprising i don't feel the request to source this is unreasonable especially given that most of the suggestions for sources point to things that don't in fact support the statement please let me know whether you are refusing to put even the weak source that you have given on the article or whether you are seriously suggesting that we need to go to arbitration over whether a statement of dubious truth value should be sourced thanks