regarding wikipedia articles for deletion tropicai storm jason i noticed your involvement in the discussion and your revision of the article creator's illegal closure of the afd discussion and i agree that reverting it was the right thing to do but i'm curious how all this transpired in the first place as you can see the article has been deleted so technically the discussion can't continue any longer unless an administrator decides to restore it on the grounds of sabotage what i would like to know is why an administrator deleted it in the first place how could he or she not have noticed that a the article was closed by someone other than an administrator and b that the discussion was nowhere near the proper minimal closing date of five days after the start of the afd discussion furthermore what do you think might have been the creator's motive for declaring delete as the final decision none of this makes much sense to me the hoaxer willingly has his article which he has been fighting to keep for a while deleted and an administrator wrongly and prematurely deleted the article for some strange reason should we just leave the discussion as is until an administrator sorts it out in a few days