the previous comment of the article states that moc was not re established in which is a fallacy the moc has been legally registered in montenegro in line with the valid legal system of the state of montenegro and in line with the laws in montenegro which is clearly apparent from the moc page on wikipedia the moc church is called the montenegrin orthodox church in its formal registration in montenegro so there is no space for speculation here the church was re established after a separate existence until and a ban by the serbian then yugoslav autocratic king aleksandar the article does not claim that moc is a major branch of eastern orthodoxy outside montenegro the statement over of montenegrins are eastern orthodox christians most of whom belong to the serb orthodox church is anyway a fallacy as there is no accurate census that can prove this one may say truthfully say that most montenegrins are eastern orthodox christians most of whom belong to the serb orthodox church but a large number of montenegrins are atheists agnostics or otherwise myself included being a montenegrin does not mean that you are part of the of eastern orthodox christians sorry this is the st century you can not just delete the fact that moc followers claim that all of the existing churches in montenegro were once part of an autonomous montenegrin orthodox church that was abolished following the union with serbia in this is the explanation why shrines are not being built en masse in montenegro by the moc as it claims to inherit the churches currently in the hands of soc if we put only one viewpoint in its following is small to the point of non existence and it has not been recognised by any other orthodox church it is not balanced also the statement its following is small to the point of non existence needs to be based on fact not fancy do you have an official census of followers or is this your speculation user oct utc