let's put it this way flo everyone has talked past me here for months it is absolutely frustrating to have everything i contribute get labeled as disruptive disruptive how tedentious how i sure as heck don't feel that i have done so because as far as i'm concerned i've acted in good faith trying to make wikipedia the best it can be if you want to explain the rules to me and how i can be who i am on wikipedia and stay within the rules i'm all ears i just want fm to leave me alone how would you feel if you were new on a site and everything you did was declared illegal by people who disagree with you when there is a pretence to neutrality without any explanation if you have done such a good job explaining everything to me then why do i feel that i've been ganged up on without just cause i know a lot of people who feel that wikipedia has a definite bias when it comes to politics and religion that's not very positive why not listen to me what do you all have to lose my faith is the core of my being and it's who i am do you expect me to junk my worldview to contribute to wikipedia have any of you stopped to consider how your own worldviews contributes to how you interpret the rules do you care how ordinary readers view wikipedia you probably do or else you wouldn't be here the fact is traditionally minded christians number over billion people on this planet and close to million in the united states alone that's not some tiny crackpot minority out there if i feel attacked by wikipedia or feel that my pov is misrepresented how do you think they feel reading wikipedia let's face it here factually the perspective represented in the articles in the dominionism series from my perspective seem to overemphasize the views of a small minority in the united states regarding the christian right why should my work be reversed when i elaborate on the dominionist's pov which btw i don't agree with for the sake of ensuring fairness or when fm removes something i wrote from a reputable evangelical ministry critical of christian reconstructionist theology he tells me it's false or that i'm pov pushing how i cited the sources which are widely respected in evangelical circles what am i supposed to think when s of the article is devoted to the opponents of the christian right who by the way are a minority of the total american population bush won twice because of their support and elected the gop to congress and a majority of the statehouses katherine yurica's and theocracywatch's pov represents a minority of the population i have no idea where you live perhaps their perspectives are popular among your friends but they don't represent the larger picture how is writing from the majority perspective pov pushing or giving undue weight to my perspective considering it's the perspective of just a little over percent of the american population i suggested banning partisanship as part of the npov rule and consensus rule but feloniousmonk reverted my changes that had been made by a previous editor when he does that what am i supposed to think about his motives i don't know him and he hasn't exactly been the most friendly person to me since day one have you ever stopped to think it's not what you say but how you say it the tone from yourself and the other admins has kept me on the defensive and what am i supposed to think other than what i've said ad nauseam i feel attacked not consulted with so far i feel that no one has explained anything about their perspectives to me except for what comes across on my screen in my mind as person attack things like wp pov wp point etc that get put up when i feel that i have done nothing wrong comes across as a personal attack instead of could you consider rephrasing it this way or this is how you should be doing this that's constructive in my view instead of hurling rules at me the interpretations of which i disagree with tell me why you think i stepped over the line and your rationale i react positively to reasoned explanations not summary reversals of my work accusations of pov pushing etc without explanation maybe you've been at this for awhile so you take things for granted i simply go to the rulebook and fail to see where all of you are getting your opinions from interpretation my friend i want to understand your interpretation and why you interpret the rules the way you do every time i do anything from asking people what they think about the rules or my ideas for improving wikipedia i get written up on this rfc flo please don't take this personally percent of the time i simply forget to login not thinking there is any problem with my editing without logging