by what authority do we alter the lead of an entry on a very broad ranging historical concept to fit the strict definition of one of many possible primary sources there was nothing being cited in the lead and wikipedia needs it to be verifiable hmmmmm so you deleted one of the only verifiable statements in the lead section and was not ready to provide something better cited at least if you felt it did not reflect what the source says then attempt to rewrite it you've obvious taken such open rewrite position on astrotheology to suit your pov but you don't apply the same spirit here