your edits to free republic armon i'm sure you meant well but your edits did things like remove the scalon article and cite which was a printed article from a notable magazine transcribed and posted several different places on the www by different people all with the exact same wording it was decided to use the fr version of the article for even more veracity thus it is not a primary source nor or you replaced it however with an article by and cite to tj walker which has been argued over for the last two weeks and was removed by consensus until the the author and publisher can affirm that he wrote it as i said i'm sure you meant well but to make major edits without researching the history and extended discussion of this article and the issues was not helpful please explain on free republic talk each removal of what you claimed was 'poorly sourced' and 'or' thanks