australian federal election i thought you might like to know that the pendulum you added has had removal attempted you may wish to contribute to talkpage discussion jackie trad errr well it might be kind of skating close to original research use of unreliable social media etc but she mentioned it was her birthday on april twice on twitter and the courier mail said she was on april so i kind of worked it out from that i'll remove it if you're not comfortable with it i'm happy to wait for a firm independent source such as a parliamentary bio wow you've done all the federal by elections love your work i honestly never thought australian politics on wikipedia would develop to what it is today it is now done federally i wonder if wikipedia will ever reach the point of having an article for every state election every state by election and every state mp a barnstar for you the original barnstar for your work on australian politicians melbourne state by election and australian christians i don't suppose you'd like to do the honours i'll try to get something of value on these guys together this weekend i remember having an attempt back when they were first registered with the aec but i had a lot of difficulty working out exactly what their relationship with the cdp was they seem to be what used to be the victorian branch of the cdp with possibly several others still affiliated with them somehow hopefully there's some more info around now especially with this by election in the works i had a look at the by election page and fixed up the candidates table a little it was listing candidates of the democrats secular party and sep none of which are registered in victoria i have noticed though that antony has started listing unregistered parties in much the same way as registered ones so this will be worth keeping an eye on in the future thanks colours and images in member list pages what's the logic behind adding these looks like a lot of work for something that well hurts my eyes talkback sutherland shire careful you're reverting vandalism back into the article presumably unintentional note yes i was mistakenly division of boothby a why put the parentheses around sir b with john mcleay sr and john mcleay jr it was clear they were two different people and clear they were related with your changes this is no longer clear your thoughts cheers hi after a brief note at wt aup where i hardly ever get responses any more so i didn't wait that long i've been implementing these sirs in the member lists with regards to boothby i'm glad you brought that up it was one of the only ones i trouble with if you'd prefer