dana scallon does any one moniter you phil first you add then you delete then you re add the same information then you delete each time citing a different reason your latest removal of reference to heart beat records as copyright owner stated the reason you removed it was because it was being contested in court this was after you took it off and then came back and added it regardless the reason you cite for your actions this time is inaccurate the copyright owner hearbeat records has sued another party for violating copyrights that they own there are no suits against them or legal proceedings where someone has contested their ownership where do you get this from please cite your source as the only public information availabe is the law suit in which heart beat has sued another party for violating copyrights they own in as verified by the us copyright office i simply do not understand how you come up with your reasoning to not cite heart beat as the official copyright holder of the cd's that are listed under the us copyright office it seems you have a history of creating your own facts phil and i do not believe wikipedia was created for that retrieved from nice language outstanding example you are for wikipedia phil to use the f word in such a public way at least we know what kind of person you really are now