you struggle to assume good faith why give your reasons the edit was clearly in good faith even if it was badly formed and he can always try again your language it seems to me that some people here are making out that there is some kind of group of 'modern communists' lying in wait to destroy this article with their terrible anti griffin bias the people most likely to add terms like bogoted are simply the middle ground please who is expected to 'vandalise' the article to this fearful degree so worried about the far right don't have a leg to stand on as griffin simply is what he is they can't hide and the clever ones would be too 'over the moon' with the article as it stood during the question time broadcast to actually want to change it it's all just a question of getting the language right for the essential content deleting or avoiding the 'problematic' issues is just moronic absolutely castigating attempts at putting it in claiming to struggle with 'agf' beneath contempt really beneath contempt