the link you provide states that of the rail market in sweden is privatised that therefore makes saying rail transport in sweden is privatised a falsification if more than half of the entire market is still owned by the government it doesn't matter whether the rail market was liberalised into different companies under state ownership e g sj something cannot be described as privatised if it retains a majority of government ownership because it is therefore nationalised the opposite of privatisation to describe the swedish rail market as privatised and then list a state owned company which comprises it in the very same sentence is nonsense and this is exactly what you have written rail transport market is privatized and companies include sj in this sentence you have made it sound as if sj is a private company which is untrue since if the person reading clicks the sj hyperlink they will be taken to an article which states unambiguously that sj is a government owned enterprise a much better thing to do would be to explain that the majority of passenger transport by rail in sweden is operated by state owned companies such as sj as well as the government run lokal trafik in place within each of sweden's l n such as hallandstrafik storstockholms lokaltrafik sk netrafik etc etc etc and then to explain that some sectors of rail transport are privatised such as the transport of cargo this would therefore align the content of the article with the reference you presented above which states that the majority of rail transport in sweden is still government owned with being privatised since judging by your other edits you are a right winger with a serious beef against anything government owned you could then satisfy yourself by writing that state owned sj isn't the most efficient of rail networks something which a lot of swedes themselves agree on as far as i have seen in my own experience delays are common and travelling with sj can be expensive june