july utc your assumptions as to my intentions are incorrect i am not motivated to convince you of anything i am not motivated to include any specific example as i've stated quite clearly and my actions verify i am here to create an npov definition of terrorism you can help those of us who are trying to resolve the npov dispute by suggesting wording that does not create a primary or secondary source your entire introduction is a historic generalization which would be considered a secondary source if it were based on axioms or primary sources even if the creation of secondary sources were allowed in wikipedia which it is not i can't find any credible evidence to support the assertions you derive if you are honestly trying to promote an objective introduction for terrorism i suggest that you help us start from the beginning and add descriptions that can be cited or that are at least generally accepted by other editors