i'll confess to being a bit lost among these theological discussions i can say that we should include all significant points of view even geaves' if some say that rawat had a sant mat lineage while other say he had an advait mat or radhasoami lineage then all of those views should be included in proportion to their prominence and we shouldn't take sides either directly or by implication note that each of those linked topics has an article of its own so we don't need to discuss them at length in this article anything we do say about them should be relevant to rawat himself more broadly i'd remind everyone that we have an entire article devoted to rawat's teachings teachings of prem rawat the material in this article should simply be a summary of that article since the introductory section of that article should also summarize that article in an ideal world we could simply copy to the intro here as a summary unfortunately this is not an ideal world that article has needed work for years but there hasn't been any significant editing there in the past year may i suggest moving this discussion to that talk page talk