the link works with so obviously a state cannot be both sovereign and be ruled by a foreign individual appointed by foreign sovereigns check out that link mr inzko can overturn any decision made by anyone or any office in the country including constitutional court presidency and parliament he doesn't have to say the country i rule is not sovereign it's obvious from the existence of his office i am not making any conclusion of or on my own as there is nothing to analyze and thus nothing to synthesize either those are simply the facts of the matter and common knowledge your demanding links to third party sources to tell you the obvious is ridiculous did you read other working link are you insisting that independent sources must call the sky blue too or are you to me it's those who included this country in the list of sovereign states who clearly do have own political agenda in this don't blame the messenger i just tell how it is