the burke group in response i never provided where he went to school i added he is a j d rather than delete he is a j d juris doctor then refer to him as dr david burke a j d is a doctor of jurisprudence same as a ph d why do you allow personal information that's good for you but not for others who might be interested in knowing more he was important enough to post an article so why do you think any reader will be satisfied with a sum total of data saying he owns a rental property in agoura hills with a meaningless political contribution the property posted is a rental where he no longer lives and maybe never did how is that useful in an article about organized labour you said it yourself the article should be about the company but in actual fact he is the company he's a flight instructor whom i know from our fbo flight base operation lots of people know him he hasn't contributed to republicans for years look at the site you provided last one was why continue to keep outdated useless information the article cited by dr john logan a very learned fellow contains some useful info but also contains factually incorrect information even he can make mistakes i am a lawyer and logan is a british economist and may understand e u law but does not understand u s labor law just because he writes about it does not mean he understands it there is no newspaper article about cdn that says employees were awarded from the court of appeals he wrote incorrectly the citation provided which corrects his article is from the court dockets which is a better citation i provided the citation from the law firm that won the civil case against cdn i removed nothing about the case itself only corrected the information in such a way that the non legal lay person could understand the fundamental differences between nlrb law and dol law and civil actions filed with the district courts what john logan wrote that you cite is liking saying someone was cited by the f a a but tried at the d m v are you british f a a is federal aviation admin and d m v is dept of motor vehicles they are not related anymore than nlrb is to district court or civil cases burke works in nlrb jurisdiction and the case you cite is a civil action in district courts not related if you want cdn discussed first part is fine but the civil action is not there should be another topic developed in wikipedia for cdn logan's article used as a citation lacks any credible legal citation connecting burke to the civil case only a legal citation should be used there are none available djb is a very well known person and lots of lawyers both company and union know him no matter which side of the aisle this information is flawed if you are going to discuss legal issues then get them right am i being picky yes inside the law you can't just throw something at the ceiling and hope it sticks deleting facts for fiction is beneath the dignity of what wikipedia has strived to promote why do you say the article contains everything anyone needs to know to justify deleting contributions how is that possible when wikipedia is an opened forum for knowledgeable people to build and add more you think the sum total for the reader should be that burke owns a rental property in agoura hills how is that related to the burke group please stop the generalities and provide facts i contributed and tell me exactly how the citation or tone can be improved and let me do that also please define what is meant by tone by the way are you a wikipedia staff editor or administrator thank you arabianrider