afd could anyone explain why on earth you would want to afd jesus christ as myth as a pov fork of this article that's completely irrational preferredly explain your reasons on that article's talkpage oh and please look up myth in some good dictionary first the article here for months laboured under the misapprehension that myth has anything to do with historicity it appears that this article is about a theory that argues against the historicity of jesus it may or may not be a pov fork of historicity of jesus but how on earth can you allege a sober discussion of the mythology in the gospel is in any way a pov fork of this i am especially confused since the people protesting do not appear to be victims of fundamentalist piety but self describe as skeptics i am used to having problems getting plain reason across to religionists but i am a little bit at a loss on how to recommend plain reason to rationalists