pov that the story was really true cut from article detainees held there as a part of the ongoing u s prosecution of its war on terror had earlier made similar complaints but this was the first time a government source had appeared to confirm the story this sentence implies that they've been desecrating the koran all along finally a source more credible than a prisoner came forward therefore the newsweek story is true despite its retraction under government pressure i'd like this wikipedia article to remain scrupulously neutral on the issue of whether the descration story is true to do this we need to separate the timeline from the immediate incident we also need to ascribe pov to named sources or at least specified designated anonymous or confidential sources not using nuance or insinuation within the article text to make the point talk may utc