the full content of the article should be reinstated there is no justification for its removal other then an act of censorship vandalism by idenitied users the original article content that has been removed provided factual information pertaining to the valid argument of teh actions of then president being unconditional and also reference to his illegal interference in the operation of ukraine's constitutional court along with quotations from pace reports on the judiciary of ukraine and the need for the constitutional court to rule on the validity of the presidents actions