hey there i'll be glad to clarify what i mean there are a few problems i have with the site and not in and of itself actually it looks pretty good and says the same things i would say first it appears to be a fan site which is not considered reliable enough for use as a source in wikipedia this also includes for external links as the usual case for someone posting such a site here is to promote and drive traffic to it second this type of information belongs in a travel guide which is something wikipedia is not i would actually suggest this site for something like wikitravel again it's not a bad site but it's inappropriate here i would have no problem mentioning this site on the article's talk page and if consensus wants it in there then so be it i do apologize for using the template as i do know the general guideline is don't use template warnings for regular contributors that said i do hope this makes my reasoning a bit clearer please feel free to message me again if you have any questions or additional concerns thank you for your contributions and happy new year au