hi it's from the same user who was changing the images before on similar articles not to mention that both images are good resolutions contrary to what the user says which is why i don't see the need to change images delete galleries and remove content it's unnecessary it is nevertheless a content dispute neither the repeated switching of images nor the edit summaries that you consider misleading amount to vandalism per wikipedia vandalism types of vandalism and wikipedia vandalism what is not vandalism donald albury it was vandalism but not mine your images have extremely bad lighting and are not encyclopedic quality in the least one of them replaced a photo of a street in the article for that street brickell avenue and doesn't even show the street the article is about the street also you're supposed to answer a talk on the same page yours' that it initiated on not put the answer on the initiators page so there are half conversations on two separate pages i suggest you read a bit more about wikipedia rules and stop vandalizing articles with your crappy poor lighting amateur photography from car windows