fraudulent law degree it should be fair commentary to note facts in the articles already referenced concerning the reason judge ware told the fabricated story to hundreds of audiences over a twenty year period after law school the reason cited in all of these articles is that this fabricated story is what motivated him to pursue a law career therefore it is also fair commentary to question whether this same fabrication that he told for years after law school was part of judge ware's personal statement in his application to stanford law school as anyone who has ever applied to law school knows that what motivates you to pursue a law career is the central question in one's personal statement the lack of a more thorough investigation into whether judge ware told the same fabrication in his personal statement to law school is a critical item that should be part of the commentary as it is more likely than not that he did tell the same fabricated story which would make his law degree fraudulent subjecting him to immediate disbarment obviously those who would know that this fabrication was on his personal statement would have complete power over this judge's career making him incapable of delivering justice in particular cases if those with power over him want a different result