re mass removal of language articles by ryulong hi i noticed that you reverted my revertion on kunigami language ryulong is indeed acting as a vandal without justifiable reason he is mass removing content with reliable sources i found that i have cited unique sources when we have two competing versions of an article article with and without much information it is reasonable to choose the former as a working version i have never heard of any restrictive policy in wikipedia we can add content only if we reach consensus to do so quite the opposite we can freely add content and remove it only if we reach consensus to do so and actually the discussion is going on at wikipedia talk wikiproject languages mass deletion of language articles by ryulong i appreciate if you share your opinion with us thank you