poorly written the article is a good description of what is known about merkle's boner unfortunately the discussion seems a bit rushed even for an encyclopedia entry and the grammar is a bit lacking i suggest that someone edit the page to make it intelligent re sensitivity it is not our problem that current society thinks of a boner as something other than a huge mistake that is what it was called back then and how it is known re scoring i agree big picture but i also object to using a word like drilled when a word like hit would suffice and be better understood the entry is factually correct as the facts disputed are known our point is that the entry is poorly written i agree