perhaps i seem to be repeating myself as you are repeatedly ignoring what i'm writing the tables are unclear as the order of the product is unclear from them e g the top right corner of the first table is e but does that mean e e e or e e e it would not matter if the product is commutative but as it's not the tables are ambiguous that is why tables are a very poor way to show the product and probably why none of the sources use them and again please read mos lead in paticular the section on providing an accessible overview or look at the articles already mentioned special relativity and cross product or one you are familiar with pythagorean theorem or a similarly advanced article to this one and a featured article laplace runge lenz vector there should be little or no maths in the introduction perhaps a statement of the product but nothing else certainly not the page of detailed mathematical working and argument that there is now wordsdeeds