on the same discussion page there is the following argument pov is guided not only by wp npov but wp due as well if the article were to represent atheistic views and those of the religious in equal measure every other sentence would be however atheists are devil worshiping scum with no morals forever damned to walk blindly the smoldering wastelands of hell king omie taking my words out of context and implying i was harassing someone than the above one should be too since it was not i think either i was misunderstood or it is acceptable to vilify atheists but not other believers i however was following the spirit of the discussion and only using a reductio ad absurdum argument