agree that the two instances you added passed all tests and there is no debating the intention to slaughter but now what omagh if intention is critical then there is no evidence or little suggestion that the intention was to kill civilians murderously careless no doubt but not what was intended it thus fails a key test so in line with the two additions you've made should not remove this as i have suggested i'd have similar reservations about the king david hotel that was an act of war surely a clear case of collateral damage