your incorrect statements on my talk page urartu th as was decided by penwhale on the ae page urartu th talk contribs blocked by sandstein for wp npa wp agf issues separate from original request which was not actionable but on my talk page you had written to enforce an arbitration decision and for violations of the principles outlined in wp npa wp agf and wp aspersions in your statement to wp ae this is clearly a contradiction and erroneous i would like to know if this was simply a mistake on your part or whether your decision was overruled in any case let's reiterate that i did not violate the arbitration decision regarding the khojaly tragedy article at talk khojaly massacre number of civilians affected i also would encourage you to take a closer look at the arbitration enforcement talk which is deemed not actionable to see that i did in fact give evidence for grandmaster's behavior one need only read the drn or the khojaly tragedy talk page for examples and the second edit march was not even discussed in the drn and i am truly perplexed as to how grandmaster could attempt to enforce a drn's conclusion on a topic that was not at all discussed if such evidence was not specific enough as to pinpoint my concerns then that should have been noted instead of simply claiming that i have no evidence i would appreciate it if you changed your statement on my talk page to reflect the actual decision of the ae action