pecher's additions to the artcile the new sections highly subjective and inappropriate for wikipedia as it is as pointed out by other users loosely based on unverifiable sources currently these new sections are in breach of wp v npov and wp or i will try to trim remove some of the controversial claims untill sources have been legitimately referenced by citations that meet verifiability standards as speculatios has no place on wikipedia however these new new sections especially safavids need to be rewritten as the basic interface is far away from being encyclopedic