the most applicable rule would be wp npov undue weight it is not acceptable for a minor or tangential incident with respect to notability to become inflated in importance by sheer volume of coverage in an article this provision is particularly applicable when it is fairly obvious that an editor has intentionally expanded such a section to advance a point of view from jango's comments above i'd say that's a fair assessment of the situation here clearly there should be some discussion as the media picked it up but the bottom line fact is that he was never prosecuted more of the detail still should be cleaned up as unencyclopedic and tangential under undue weight derex