no rule against it except in this case the rule of npov edit warring to force the inclusion of a biased word is crazy and dave 's attempted justification is utterly utterly spurious anyway sorry for snapping at you up above zhanzhao when you're being attacked from all sides for trying to improve an article it's easy to lash out indiscriminately born cycle if the reason given for the protection was edit warring that would be one thing the claimed reason is persistent sockpuppetry and that's just dishonest