like i told you before agf is not everlasting if somebody consistently acts in a bad faith manner that assumption flies out the window but back to the point anything where you say 'it was a reasonable conclusion' is by definition or you are concluding something that is not in the source which is what or is to your other 'points' you earlier said the hands and knees shot was not needed why is it now what made you change your mind we dont cover the type of injuries for the injured and dead why should we here and last none of this paragraph was mine you still dont understand that i took this from somebody elses rewrite assuming it was consistent with the original last the extra quote what point does it server what does it say that isnt already said