yeah widely recognized contribution and enduring historical record are kind of key phrases there check out the footnote to that line generally a person who is 'part of the enduring historical record' will have been written about in depth independently in multiple history books on that field by historians i think we can discount historical record and if she'd made a widely recognized contribution then presumably some sources would have discussed that contribution as far as i can see no one's done an article on her in her capacity of vice chancellor of community relations no one's done an article on her in her capacity of head of we're really against abortion no one's done an article in her in her capacity as author no significant coverage period i don't really know what you're getting at with what she's notable for is being an activist ie having strong opinions and expressing them widely and there are plenty of sources on that if there were plenty of sources on her and her opinions they would be in the article but there aren't we know she's against abortion big deal so are a lot of other people we have an article on the pro life movement because the pro life movement's opinions are notable that doesn't mean every individual person who considers herself pro life is notable just for sharing a notable opinion talk contribs