gneiss hello vsmith i just finished going through the article on gneiss i made a few copy edits and moved a few sentences i hope you approve i noticed a few things that i felt i had better ask you about before changing anything i noticed there was a section called types that contains only two sentences and that the first of those is a repetition of a sentence i saw earlier at the end of the section headed composition i don't think the sentence needs to be repeated but i didn't know which place was best for it the section on etymology starts with this sentence the etymology of the word gneiss is disputed but then we read of only one theory as to the origin of the word if the etymology is disputed shouldn't at least one other theory be given in the second paragraph in the section gneiss gneissic banding the word relatively appears four times i'm wondering whether all of them are necessary regarding the images a i think they could be arranged better than they are the first two images after the lead image are bunched close to the top wouldn't it be better if they were next to the sentences that mention those types of gneiss b the first image after the lead image mentions augen gneiss from brazil but nowhere in the article does it say that gneiss is found in brazil c the third image after the lead image mentions gneiss from new york state but nowhere in the article does it say that gneiss is found in new york state also there is no mention of gneiss found in new england or any of the western states d there is a whole section called gneiss lewisian gneiss and a whole section called gneiss archean and proterozoic gneiss but there is no image of lewisian archean or proterozoic gneiss i don't mind searching for images but i don't know where to look and would need advice on uploading and licenses