you're right i did act like a loser i felt bad about it and i apologized for it i just came to voice my opinion because i too have noticed that a certain group of editors have been networking their ga nominated articles amongst themselves i am also aware of some of the sub par reviewing practices being conducted by a few of the accused so i have provided examples as proof of what i'm talking about for a reviewer to not give the nominator a chance to address concerns brought forth in their review is both wrong and not fair to review a gan article it would benefit an editor to have a good understanding of what they're reviewing for before they start i've seen some very questionable articles being accepted as ga by a few of the editors included in this group that's all meow