i don't know about logic but policy will hopefully as f says having multiple well sourced viewpoints in the article is fine removing references that you don't like because you only hold to one perspective is of course unacceptable i've blocked alan for hours for repeatedly violating this policy now maybe there's something wrong with those references i don't know maybe they're not wp rs or wp due or something else and i have no problem with alan or anyone else discussing that issue here or at a relevant noticeboard and maybe eventually consensus will agree to remove them but edit warring to push a pov not so good so you know play nice everyone