comment but it's easier to be lazy and accuse an editor of ownership than to take the time to see what those edits are but i suppose reading isn't your strong suit is it please see the warning i left for you on your talk page admins are not above the rules at wikipedia stop the personal attacks i personally feel that the list of all signatories does not detract from the article in any way properly cited it simply names people who voluntarily rushed to judgment against these three white boys it was their decision to get involved in this incident they should feel proud to be included here cheers talk p s i also have felt for a long time that you've attempted to gain 'ownership' of every article concerning this hoax as well as any article mentioning crystal gail mangum talk