the editing of the article was carried out by the founder and by its responsible editors this is not the subject of the article and let it be known that we have as much against di stefano as you obviously also do the difference being that if you wish to attack di stefano do so please with proven facts and not newspaper articles that a have subsequently been subject to apologies as mischon de rey and sunday times b are subject to criminal proceedings we have seen what you posted which is clear as daylight carries some personal grudge do not thus be surprised when someone begins to question your motives if you want to criticise di stefano there many ways of doing so but accusing him of not being who he says he is frankly is absurd and if you are truly a lawyer yourself you must know that he visits appears and represents those indicted in iraq and has access that even prime ministers do not have to detainees in iraq i also have seen his bar admission cards to a number of national bars and have seen him in court in rome milan and bolzano if he choses not to say where he obtained his degree or how i like fred bauder have seen such then its a matter for him it is not anyones business except the client and the court its no business of journalists unless he choses and all we are doing is making him more noted and famous by questioning such whilst he grins like anything at all of us you are not looking for a balanced article as i and others have noted the postings there is an 'unauthorised' book coming out on him in italy and uk at xmas which i have read snippets and frankly it answers a lot in more ways than none and explains his incredible access to the security services data banks gas