we can easily add beck's pov perhaps quoting the link i'm reading now that you added to the talk page but i disagree with your other assertions in fact i think the article as a whole gives too much credence to the minority viewpoint that beck is a swell and stable commentator the introduction for example is one of the worst i've read on wikipedia and it gives absolutely no indication of who this person is and what kind of controversy surrounds him it appears that judging by the talk page comments a small number of editors are enforcing this minority viewpoint on the article through persistence but i am new to the page as you know and this is just my initial impression so feel free to educate me or otherwise disagree