while i take your recommendation to heart i have to insist that by any plain reading of wp nfcc the image is keepable let's look at the test in nfcc evaluate this image non free content is used only where no free equivalent is available or could be created that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose no free equivalent could be created to show what berry looked like as a webcam pornographer at or so no matter how we approach him as a year old anti child pornography speaker educator if non free content can be transformed into free material this is done instead of using a fair use defense the only way i could see to accomplish that with this photograph would be to ask berry to permit its release under gfdl permission would be impossible to obtain and it would be to my mind cruel even to ask berry about it non free content is always replaced with a freer alternative if one of acceptable quality is available acceptable quality means a quality sufficient to serve the encyclopedic purpose there is no freer equivalent available berry will never be a teenager again and since his appearance as a teenager is one of the issues raised by his critics letting the reader draw their own conclusion seems more prudent more neutral than telling them one way or the other what to think as a quick test ask yourself can this image be replaced by a different one while still having the same effect if the answer is yes then the image probably does not meet this criterion as the effect is inextricably tied to the age of the subject as depicted on the websites he administered there is nothing that would have the same effect as depicting him as others saw him at the time it is intrinsically true that berry portrayed himself a particular way when operating his websites the only neutrality we can have on the subject is to show the facts berry's image then and let the reader draw their own conclusion what say you no free equivalent non free content is used only where no free equivalent is available or could be created that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose if non free content can be transformed into free material this is done instead of using a fair use defense non free content is always replaced with a freer alternative if one of acceptable quality is available acceptable quality means a quality sufficient to serve the encyclopedic purpose as a quick test ask yourself can this image be replaced by a different one while still having the same effect if the answer is yes then the image probably does not meet this criterion