this looks like pretty obvious wp undue weight to a wp fringe publication just because something is verifiable does not mean we should publish it verifiability is merely a prerequisite for inclusion not a guarantee in this instance i can't see what it adds to an article not relevant to socialism to include the views of a socialist publication if the argument is that it's not because it's a socialist publication then this critic is on par with any other random magazine critic and is superfluous either way my vote is to remove talk