your recent edits your recent moves edits to articles categories templates etc can be commended per wp bold but unfortunately they are controversial and undiscussed the correct venue is wp rm wp cfd and wt tfd these moves need consensus behind them if you continue to make such moves especially ones to incorrect titles without that consensus then your actions could be deemed disruptive and may result in you being blocked from editing snowman hi gs i think you are being completely mislead and do not have the facts in hand i have been following the proper avenues and have been meticulously improving the information that had remained incoherent prior to my immense contributions absolutely i should be commended for it not that i need request or desire commendation if you take your time and really sit down to look through the entire history logs of both myself and what the category fort lauderdale strikers page looked like you would see that there was an entire mess everything was disorganized i would gladly have a conversation with you in reference to the methodology used to place the information in order it is now in a suitable form that is representative of a wikipedia index from the onset of my entrance to the wikipedia team i have been a contributor for the site who has only been bringing more insight by expanding articles or creating new ones you really should look into my entire contributions before pointing fingers this is not right and is counterproductive towards wikipedians who are here to do good i have recently been putting in countless hours of tedious work towards improving the history of the fort lauderdale strikeres and have placed very useful information the person above who is making the dispute and has come here making requests for your assistance has not made any significant contributions to the history of the team other than fixing a title that was hyphenated on a couple of articles if anything this person should be speaking with me as i am the one who has the proper knowledge of the subject in question and have been making consistent improvements to the relevant articles furthermore you should be speaking to this individual instead as he she is the one who is editing without proper consultation to users who have been contributing significantly i ask that you seriously do some research on my history from day one to now and put into proper context the positive value of my participation in wikipedia thank you