lets discuss genetics and logic here does the absence of eu alleles in one geographically western clovis era man anzick inherently disprove the presence of early eu man on the continent of course it doesn't following that logic norse colonization of the americas is all a big myth as there is no genealogical record of their presence among canadian first nations people with current and most meaningful archaeological discoveries on the pre clovis issue clustering almost entirely in the mid northeast of the united states and being unarguably way pre clovis per strata the 'genetic refutations' of solutrean have been tangential at best agenda driven at worst the genetic itself question is a critical one one that deserves robust discussion and the article does in fact contain just such a discussion however the statement that sequencing remains from anzick 'disproves' solutrean is not a valid statement