while agreeing broadly with the claim that the paragraph is unnecessary if it stays it shouldn't include adraeus' unsubstantiated claims about what strong atheists say about weak atheists aside from reverting to the earlier version i've tried to bring some consistency to the article in terms for example of how books are referred to and i've removed the final paragraph aside from being almost impenetrably ungrammatical it made reference to 'other disciplines' as though atheism is itself a discipline and in general didn't seem to be doing anything useful mar utc