hungaro croatian reign in order to response some historiographer who deny existence of kingdom of croatia i qupted some veryfieable sources the time history of the world th edition isbn pages name croatia is displayed on the maps the world book encyclopedia volume isbn pages b c in kalman the king of hungary also became king of croatia thus creating a political union between croatia and hungary that lasted for more than years despite this union the croats always kept their own parliament called the sabor encyclopaedia britannica th edition vol croatia became a kingdom in the th century and in the ladislaus i laslo i of hungary assumed control the ensuing union with hungary lasted for th centuries during the union with hungary croatia retained its own assemble the sabor and was legally an independent kingdom u digital edition of britannica ultimate reference suite u croatia retained its independence under native kings until when the crown passed into the hands of the hungarian dynasty the precise terms of this relationship later became a matter of dispute nonetheless even under dynastic union with hungary institutions of separate croatian statehood were maintained through the sabor an assembly of croatian nobles and the ban viceroy in addition the croatian nobles retained their lands and titles so mr giorgioorsini novanova purger or however you call yourself this time and your companions giovanni giove i do not where have you picked those historiographers who deny the existent of kingdom of croatia are they experts like arrigo petacco or you just fabricated your own quotes