viriik so vote on a consensus on a questionable and corporate watchdog site the problem is that you are giving more validity to a person managed website that is hardly corroborated than a credible site like global security federation of american scientists cnbc yahoo that website does not belong on the site i would accept controversy but the problem is that it needs to be corroborated you can't put a website that accuse dick cheney of a secret plot against the president based on a site like rense for example you want to support lunancy this isn't your soapbox to do so