december ' changes certain additions were made on th december which i'm afraid i have felt obliged to remove for the following reasons in the section on the sonnets the insertion of the comment about sonnet is in my view unnecessary as well as turning the paragraph into gibberish in order to achieve a npov we have already removed two paragraphs on the apparent relevance of various other sonnets to the theory and this one is far less appropriate than most of those which were deleted at that time the graph showing the time spans of various authorship candidates is relevant to the article on the shakespeare authorship question as a whole but in my opinion adds little of value to this article the thrust of which is to explain the reasons why marlovians believe that marlowe survived and made a major contribution to shakespeare's works and not why anyone else did not the opening paragraph of the external evidence section up to shakespeare's grave etc was written as a counter to the argument of whole marlowe's death section to then add a counter to that is illogical even if it had had something to do with external evidence which it doesn't and wasn't so obviously written by someone whose first language is not english peter farey hoffman prize thanks for the kind words but i think the information about my win is better placed in the notes where i had in fact already somewhat cryptically referred to it and without the very welcome comment which looks a little strange given that most of the entry can be identified as mine peter farey