exactly clear guidelines are in place for self published works this article verily violates contentious erm wp madeup unduly self serving and a section is primarily based un such material i am willing to concede that a self published source full of amde up hogwash is a fin source as long as it is not presented as some sort of false authority anderson is obviously some sort of authority on mucoid plaque but he is not an authority on anatomy and physiology hence why i feel tagging this article as very shoddy is appropriate and i am confused why calls for clean up and reassessment of a shoddy tit for tat pov style have been met with alarm