class infobox width px align center archives archive archive archive archive thanks for bethlehem work hi i just wanted to stop by and say thank you for your efforts in copyediting the bethlehem article i'm trying to improve it for ga status per it being the collaboration of the week for wikipedia wikiproject palestine award for your great photographic work the da vinci barnstar this award is given to may be awarded to anyone who has enhanced wikipedia through their technical work and you most certainly deserve it sincerely thank you izak for that very heartwarming award that someone has noticed my contributions and sees them as noteworthy makes all the hard work worthwhile hi gila yes you make beautiful art and i appreciate it as i am sure many others do best wishes hi gila it's agood idea to have page for awards and barnstars like so armenian genocide peres' denial of the genocide should be noted in this article failing to do so makes it more of a hagiography than a biography his shortcomings must also be mentioned in addition to his feats like winning the noble prize do you think it'd fit better in political views in anycase it must and will be mentioned somewhere how about adding this in his political views segment peres' foreign policy outlook is markedly realist for example to placate turkey the only significant muslim country in the region that is friendly towards israel peres has explicity denied the armenian genocide which caused an uproar among genocide scholars citation peres made these statements in when he was foreign minister clearly he was caving in to turkish pressure israel has very few friends and cannot afford to lose them so basically it is not free to take the position that would seem to mesh with its outlook and history which is to recognize that the armenians were murdered en mass now he is president an honorary position not a political one and his views whatever they may have been back then are worth about as much as mine are i have no problem with mentioning this view in the section on his political outlook but a separate section on this one utterance gives it undue importance and distorts the picture sumac opening sentence i don't know what the right wording is but do you see the problem with sumac also rhus is a genus of approximately species of flowering plants in the family anacardiaceae first of all there is no reason to italicize sumac secondly it is not accurate to say sumac is a genus because there is no genus called sumac but there is one called rhus i may be too steeped in botanical jargon to easily come up wi