overall summary ga review see wp wiaga for criteria is it reasonably well written a prose quality b mos compliance for lead layout words to watch fiction and lists is it factually accurate and verifiable a references to sources b citation of reliable sources where necessary c no original research is it broad in its coverage a major aspects b focused is it neutral fair representation without bias is it stable no edit wars etc does it contain images to illustrate the topic a images are copyright tagged and non free images have fair use rationales b images are provided where possible and appropriate with suitable captions overall pass or fail i'm awarding this article ga status i'd like to express my thanks to for attending to many of the problems highlighted above