change of title the peer review assessment mentioned that the article is clearly not about a legend but about a personage red horn who is the protagonist of various stories legends myths etc the object is not just to give an account of legends but to describe the state of knowledge on this deity the winnebago describe him as a man but in a very broad sense like the norse mann which denotes not only mortal humans but members of various divine races given that english is a little more restrictive in this way i don't advise man in the parenthetical part of the title deity is probably safe enough when broadly construed he is at least a supernatural being he is not found in algonquian sources nor in caddoan one can adduce by argument other cognates all of which are from siouan tribes it is probably safe therefore to describe him as a siouan diety this is based on what we know archaeological speculations aside