i don't believe one can follow an editor that has edits since sep he's simply already everywhere i merely pointed out that the editor has a habit of fighting for fighting sake and has lied about his qualifications and elevated himself into a position of authority on subjects being discussed in the past to argue that the bbc is wrong or that the oed has a misprint based upon ones fairytale claim to an oxford degree should be pointed out especially when the claims themselves are patently absurd simple facts such as the definition of 'penultimate' or that the eu is not an ngo should never require dozens of editors fighting arcayne and his false claims of special academic authority it is bad for the encyclopedia and it's mission