interlude page review hello and thank you for taking the time to review interlude's page i just have some questions about why the page was rejected you mention that i treat it as notable in it's own right and that references are about interlude and not on the campaigns per se in terms of reference i included sources such as fast company techcrunch yahoo news and time so i'm not sure i understand the comment additionally the page follows the format of other entries i've seen for example it would be extremely helpful if you could provide more detail on how i could improve the entry and have my submission approved thanks