lesseee is it racial sexist homophobic ageist religious political ethnic sexual or other epithets such as against people with disabilities directed against another contributor disagreement over what constitutes a religion race sexual orientation or ethnicity is not a legitimate excuse or is it using someone's affiliations as an ad hominem means of dismissing or discrediting their views regardless of whether said affiliations are mainstream an example could be you're a train spotter so what would you know about fashion note that although pointing out an editor's relevant conflict of interest and its relevance to the discussion at hand is not considered a personal attack speculating on the real life identity of another editor may constitute outing which is a serious offense or is it linking to external attacks harassment or other material for the purpose of attacking another editor or is it comparing editors to nazis dictators or other infamous persons see also godwin's law or is it accusations about personal behavior that lack evidence serious accusations require serious evidence evidence often takes the form of diffs and links presented on wiki nb i might invite people to look at the two diffs i referenced or is it threats including but not limited to i'll leave that list off jim what you and steve not tigo need to understand is that just because you say something or think something doesn't mean that something is true or factual or truthiness or whatever is the wikipedia term for real steve nakedly held himself up as some kinda good editor that upholds wikipedia standards he doesn't and i'm calling him out on it