hello tgeorgescu it was correct what you added sourced and valid what you put in according to context and according to wp due and undue and sources your edit and addition were valid and correct and arguably warranted and i would never revert what you put it because it happens to be referenced and sourced and what's stated by majority scholarship on this issue so it was a valid modification and elaboration etc to what i put in that was also sourced as wp policy recommends modify instead of wholesale deletion to improve not remove and again the point of wilson and cahill was in the context of the very section and paragraphs themselves of rationalizing or explaining why egypt herself never chronicalized things like the plagues or the hebrew exodus out of egyptian slavery etc or the destruction of egyptian charioteers and soldiers or of that then reigning king of egypt of course majority historians discount it ever actually happening but it's also known and admitted as a general point that ancient pagan nations or kingdoms in general would not always be so honest or straightforward or complete in their recording of everything embellishing some facts and details while minimizing or even totally hiding others and that was really the point anyway thanks for your work on it too it was a bit blunt but it was quoted correctly regards