this is certainly a dishonest view and calls your objectivity into great question do you consider the new york times a fringe source adding alternative pov to the article this article's neutrality is questionable how should we add alternative articles into the text i propose that we add alleged to the opening paragraph and include references that show that the facts and details are in dispute this will allow the reader to see that there is more than one narrative since the facts and events are in question the opening should not state things as a given i will add a dispute tag to the article so people can join the talk here