nature since the article was first nominated for core topics cotf it has advanced in quality considerably this is largely due to the work of while doing so he has contended with the continual one issue commentary on the talk page of the latter seems to want to make the article into a philosophy of science article on the meanings of the term nature as a result i would suggest that major editorial changes to the article may not be necessary or possible without incurring an edit war on the other hand the article would likely benefit from a good copyedit however i haven't read the article for some time to see how well it hangs together perhaps i should do that now if you would also look at it in that light we could compare notes see you on the talk page