have you looked at the ssp report for fredrick day wikipedia suspected sock puppets fredrick day he's got his own variable ip access plus he has some wireless networks in his neighborhood that's his ip notice that there are two edits different ip in the same block and the text is pure fd look you see ip from a certain range editing parlipro articles you draw a certain conclusion and you are pretty likely to be correct the level of necessary coincidence for this to not be fd would be astronomical the particular interest in sarsaparilla's edits the mention of me plus the first two ip fields this is fd the vast majority of fd ips have not seen any edits before he started using them they could probably be safely blocked but i'm not terribly exercised about it i'd revert them if i thought them damaging i hadn't looked at the other edits i will anyway thanks and my apologies for any possible insult in what i wrote but this whole affair has been about very selective attention i'm seeing it happen with other editors once there is a pall over an editor especially an active one every move is scrutinized by anyone who ever had a conflict with him one editor now edit level is clearly being harassed yet it looks like arbcomm will sanction him not those who are harassing him for what for complaining it looks like we'll see in sarsaparilla's case fd was there with one vicious personal attack after another on an i and where was the attention being put on sarsaparilla for having put up an article on the easter bunny hotline we don't normally indef block users for putting up a non notable article last straw is what is said of course problem is there was not much more than three straws not three tons of offenses plus a straw do i excuse sarsaparilla's behavior no but neither would i excuse mozart for making fart jokes at the court of the ruler on the other hand i wouldn't want to see mozart executed for it i've already written too much here i'll write to you off wiki