actually the whole fact that it's an encyclopedia on the internet that anyone can edit therefore has questionable reliability gives wikipedia a bad name but enough when i said 'boring' i was using it as a derogatory term in general although he is boring i was attacking him because i don't buy his theories because i think he presents them in an unintelligent light i didn't take it very seriously because i don't think it was written seriously although he was thorough i'll give him that and the first person who posted here please sign your name not to mention read all the stuff i've written in the homosexuality section anyway i think the treasure trove part unless it is proven to be false works fine because that is the current theory any objections