footnoted opinions in the post calamity section i added references in this section in order to source the text in some fashion they are an opinion of ug the global vagabond ofcourse they represent opinions since the section passage is about opinions on ug i felt these references were warranted if you think it wrong to include them even as footnotes please make it known i'm thinking of adding a further footnote to substantiate the opinion of him as a charlatan any suggestions assuming this footnote is a good idea i've looked around but it seems a lot of the negative opinions are from people with axes to grind such as osho etc a lot of these opinions i have previously removed when part of the article body for reasons explained and i definitely do not think they belong there thanks