my post isn't original research it's simple fact what is so difficult for you to understand it's fact that's the way lagalese works position statements are part of legalese you're saying you'd skip over the statement water is wet as original research quite frankly your assertion that it is original research is ludacris i don't know whether or not your intentionally mischaracterizing things or whether you're truely this ignorant there is a huge point in having this discussion it's a refutation of avraham's assertion that the policy statement is irrelevant but it's apparently a refutation that you don't have the knowledge of legalese to understand which isn't my fault i'm not going to explain to you a third time the legalese equivalent of water is wet the simple fact is you're wrong it's not my problem that you don't have a good enough education to understand why despite my explaining it to you