yes this is my best answer if you re read my message carefully without your emotional victimisation you will find my answer to your question i understand in lack of proper answer to the request by uninvolved editor to provide sources backing your argument of denying a massacre you decided to send a sentimental message the reason discussion went nowhere is that you are trying to divert the attention from the actual discussion and keep slandering neutral sources and authors in an attempt to disqualify them while so far you haven t provided any firm counter source moreover we have rfc open and we have a neutral person who responded the rfc you should ask your questions on the board of rfc to be transparent instead of canvassing and posting here selective messages at this stage the best we can do is to provide here the requested information so that a person who mediates would make his her conclusion so instead of self victimisation messages and author slandering diverting the attention from the subject matter providing neutral sources which deny a massacre as requested by noleander would be better talk