links to an interview where mcdowell admits to research into false rape reporting theforensicexaminer gross used in article cites the sample size number and the link to how it is possible that some people misquoted has been quoted as the discrepancy in the size of the dataset can perhaps be explained by the wording in the cfmr article which implies that the case dataset was an earlier study cited in mcdowell s paper not the main subject of it the difference in percentages between cfmr and mediaradar might be explained by cfmr citing mcdowell correctly while the figure was obtained by someone just adding the false cases to the inconclusive ones and calling them all false but the mcdowell section here didn't include a claim it included the claim no reason to throw that out we should use the sample size one reason that the study is often attributed to mcdowell and hibler is their book practical aspects of rape investigations and so likely published there perhaps we should disprove the existance of this book before claiming that an unused potentially wrong version of mcdowell exists invalidates that mcdowell exists