bengalski do you see good faith operating bad faith rears its head bengalski do you consider i enjoy this at the time that i am supoposed to be banned for disrupting talk pages are you aware yet of the seriousness of the concatentaion of events it appears to me that as ever robert mcclenon is a pure bad faith procateur this is quite plain for you to note harrison is not able to remain focused str says i used leiber as a source that is incorrect leiber was brought in as a player ''tangentially to kaas and the 'vatican exchanges' deleted along with all relevant points here there and everywhere i don't mind if wp wishes to sink itself to this level i recognise this as desperation that which is countered here the wikipedia project is being sullied and this is no news to me the assumption of good faith is remiss once it has been disproved i am happy to go to wp court i am happy to be slandered in public as i am being so maligned i feel that the wp is unable to carry itself with the respect due to its proposed intentions and that rather it is a negative channel of influence i do not personally fear being banned i can take care of this either way and will these kids and cronies are not worthy of further persuasion and should be the banned i am quite content now for the publishing foundation to side with this rubbish you bengalski need to watch your back though or change username when they have silenced me but it seems that you are not very fearful either good for you there is no further sense in communicating with this infantile paralysis of faith here if you wish to contact me bengalski you know where my userdom thus far resides i object to the tone of the adnministrator tom harrison and the anon and go right ahead these folks mcclenon and str jimbo too