you know what since the last exchange oakster has clarified a source on the page and he has also reverted you make the argument with him or take it to the project page the sources clearly show the following the triple crown was defined with pedro morales wwf title wwf ic wwf tag then hbk expanded it to gsc to include the euro then kurt angle expanded it to include the sd tag titles then hbk and hhh expanded it to include the whc so tier whc wwe tier tt and sd tt tier ic not us and tier euro then kane expanded it to include hc on tier if anyone has any combination of those seven titles then they are a grand slam champion even if tomorrow wwe com were to announce the tcc and gsc never happened it would not change a thing the point about benoit is that wwe com is not reliable they do change their minds did the rockers ever beat the hart foundation no for about a decade then yes once bret hart left and they rewrote history at the moment the wwe do not acknowledge the existence of the rr winner so does this mean we erase it from benoit's article no the expanded definition for the gsc and tcc still stand and as hbk never even wrestled for wwf wwe while the hc title was active i have no idea why his bio would ever talk about the hc title he was retired from march to summerslam the exact length of time the hc title was active if you have a problem with my revert then gain consensus for your view of the events at the project talk page or ask oakster why he agreed with my revert