dahn wait a little dahn of what you explained that you were obligated by law in the census to say if oyu have relatives abroad that means there about millions romanians in the whole world no offence but this is absolutely out of discussion when i had the census there was no place in the questionary for that banatean although your explication makes no sense let's see you say that we should include only primary source information that means censuses come on take a look at poles italians or other large diasporas at poles by exemple only usa canada and poland are using census official infos all others are unofficial sources but they're however put there even for usa when at the usa census they were poles declared they decided to add the unofficial larger figure of why this doesn't apply here if you all sustain this stupid explanations then answer my question why at romanians article we don't like others iclude all kind of data come on guys what is your proof for sustaining that arthur october