i agree that this dispute should've been handled by discussion rather than reverting and as i said several times now the other side refused to discuss it and answer my question they were the ones breaking the rules not me regarding personal attacks the content wasn't the issue the issue was the interpretation of the rules in that case there's nothing wrong with attacking someone's interpretation of the rules it goes to the substance of the dispute let me be clear if i haven't been already i believe that i was quite correct and innocent in my actions i don't lack for boldness if some wikipedia administrators want to block me despite the fact that i'm right they're free to do that but it doesn't make me any less right in this case the wrong side of the fence is the popular side it's certainly not the first time