utc i suppose the entire section is slightly paradoxical because it deals with the non technical use of what the article largely treats as a technical term if someone can find a peer reviewed statement about who has actually been diagnosed with mdd which might be a bit of a challenge given confidentiality laws so even a peer reviewed source would probably have to quote the people's own admission to diagnosis then that'd be great but for now i've added a footnote in order to reiterate that the section isn't necessarily asserting clinical diagnosis but rather is listing people who have been at least socially diagnosed or self diagnosed which may be what a sociocultural aspects section needs to do anyway i don't know but hopefully the section should hold water for now given the minor word changes and the footnotes august