is wikipedia a patriarchal site is wikipedia a patriarchal site if it isn't may i then ask why a photo of a woman reading the quaran is constantly removed by islamists and no one bothers to do anything about it i hope you are aware that this encyclopedia is opened to all people including extremists and even terrorists why do your admins allow these extremists have their way they argue that if certain people are offended of seeing a woman reading the quaran then perhaps the photo should be removed even the photographer has been convinced to have the photo removed and now he thinks it's his fault here's what he said my wife is particularly saddened that a picture of her is causing distress she compares it to an image of a woman in a small bikini holding a bible in the bible article and she has asked that the photo be removed from the article i personally feel that the image belongs in timur where the woman is needed in the image in order to show scale at least until a replacement image of the folio with a different person is found but that it is inappropriate to include it in the qur'an article does this sound normal to you so if these extremists whom i dared to call talebans are offended by women then perhaps we should not have woman editors admins etc i suggested to you a month ago that you need to impose more liberal standards to wiki and enforce them with the sword ban these people please your admins removed my line where i called these extremists for talebans how shameful here's the photo oh no we see a couple of hands and a head with hair on it related link