you're mistaken i wasn't sure what you were referring to and you're mistaken about my motive i don't want you blocked i want to challenge your assertion that the wishes of the subject are irrelevant they're relevant to me they're relevant to the subject i bet they're relevant to a lot of people here the other question i'd like to discuss is the appropriateness of you editing the article of a subject whom you've described in insulting and gratuitously demeaning terms my problem with that is that it makes you not a fit and proper person to edit that page i'm struggling with the obvious self evidency of that i see that as an obviously humiliating position to put our subject in i guess it's the certain social hurt the man will experience knowing someone who called him what you called him will be writing the article the world goes to to learn about him that rules you out so it comes back to the first question above to what extent do we take account of distress and you won't be blocked for anything you say about me here at least not by anyone with a brain