in my opinion you're confusing different policies you say that everything you write there is sourced for the sake of the argument i shan't dispute that even though a very good point is raised there regarding the difference between sourced and attributed however sourcing is required to comply with wikipedia's policy on verifiability soapboxing advocating and giving undue weight on the contrary are not permitted under wikipedia's policy on neutrality so even if everything you state there is sourced it still can't be included if it violates wp npov it's not a matter of not liking what sources have to say it's just that they are only opinions i don't think criticism should be hidden or amanda's guilt taken for granted actually i don't even know if she did it because quite frankly i never studied the case but i'm convinced that if a court of law convicted her there must have been sufficient evidence to warrant that italy's not soviet russia my point is that the article shouldn't mainly revolve around criticism of the trial or attempts at soiling guede's reputation by implying that he was a lone killer as that primarily violates wp blp wikipedia is not there to retry amanda as i've said i agree that criticism should be reported it is notable and rather easily sourced however that should not be the focus of the article finally as i wrote on the article's page technically the trial record is publicly avalaible but that doesn't mean that it was actually accessed or published even in italian for that matters '''''' let's talk 'bout it