there are so many online sources for this stuff that i can't believe there isn't a single one of them that's citable rpg net is a reasonable source and it's mainly the removal of that material which made me suspicious i don't think it's necessarily the case that a single unimpeachable source is required either we can report the prevailing opinion as evidenced by a large weight of lesser sources and that's perfectly encyclopedic it's important not to confuse reliability with fame