bangladesh law minister's criticisms regarding drishtipat the reason we have cited the report regarding the bangladeshi law ministers comments about drishtipat's partiality toward the awami league is because drishtipat themselves put the law ministers comments and their response together under the heading ' drishtipat response to the law minister's allegation' on their site if the organisation itself felt criticised and responded then it is hardly controversial to presume that it was drishtipat that the law minister was talking about i'm sure drishtipat knew their own position and intentions better than the moderator ragib on wikipedia besides in bangali politikospeak the governing party of the day rarely criticises an opponent by name for example when the bnp were in power they would use oblique language like 'a certain party is causing violence in bangladesh' with reference to hartals everyone would read between the lines and know that they are criticising their main opponents the awami league it's hardly rocket science it is therefore reasonable as a citation of the governments position and the law minister also expanded on the reasons eg partisan reporting re government achievements