i agree its a better picture for the article my concern is purely on the copyright side of things i remember this problem when i created the first version of the article i couldn't find a good picture that wasn't potentially copyright it's a challenge for photographs that might be around in date where we don't have a photographer's name it is quite plausible that they may have been taken say by a year old who could easily have lived to seventy in which case the lifetime years of copyright protection won't run out until depending on the exact date of the photo with a photo with a firmer date e g s we'd be on somewhat safer ground but as you say the website isn't giving an indication there