statistic removal i am removing the statistics from the th paragraph for the following reasons the source qualifies as a wp primary by definition of a primary source the source is not an original study in and of itself but is instead a meta study based on the rcts the underlying rcts were not random or controlled as i indicated earlier by the gregory boyle and george hill research my previous posts here linked to their research which is a reliable source the sentence i'm removing is a an opinion of the researchers themselves and is not directly supported by the results see the actual reduction is not statistically significant see statistical significance the gold standard is i cannot obtain the source article in question without paying for it but it really doesn't matter since we're not supposed to be using primary sources directly anyway both the monitor co ug and the aforementioned research goes to discredit the research prostitution when taken into account nullifies the benefits additional secondary source finding no benefit of mgm another secondary source discrediting the research based on non sexual hiv acquisition see citations at the following link see citations here male female transmission increased commentary that rcts were not random at all this is a fact as participants were paid no relationship between mgm hiv in kenya unlike the primary source in question i've posted numerous links to reliable sources here it would be easy to justify removing additional statements based on the source in question but let's start with this one