responding you your message my knowledge of depute resolution is limited also my time line with pressing real life matters precludes me to immediately peruse this until end of this week saturday in the mean time i hope there is agf and the other parties are reasonable and not try the game wikipedia an aside i am a noob but i learn fast and i am beginning to understand the nature of this beast as well as the very colorful and well document history of one of the admins on the out side blue water internet which i have been dealing with and which i have don't respect sorry the facts on this would seem speak and i can back that up to if you like any rate i am willing to debate in a fair venue the issues i have as long as the people that have the power don't do my way or high way thing and follow consistent rules of augment see logical fallacy quite frankly my experience i have had so far on wikipedia have lived up the what many critics have said about wikipedia on the blue water internet do a google on this phrase critics of wikipedia and see i have my agenda is pretty simple and self evident its to neutralize bias editing on the roskam article since i live there in the sixth district and have a stake in that election i only let the facts speak for them self as well as the rules of logical argument i will be well if the roskam page is truly npov and encyclopedic again it would appear you to be the first non bias admin pearson i have come across in my joruny in the land of wiki and with that i give you a thanks