i never proposed whitewash i e peluchon's draft i proposed cutback or stub as per wp attack which is close to a perfect fit blp applies on a sliding scale to small corps and in this case it was decided that the ceo is a nonnotable redirect so anything that reflects badly on the principals should be treated similarly to blp to some degree only good sourced balanced data should appear i think the rest of your question should probably be referred to my talk also as near as i can tell all talk onwiki about five figures is rumormongering and fails v insofar as it applies to project space it just occurred to me maybe mr laurent doesn't have the money but he can certainly string out a cheap publicity stunt without it anyway there are many explanations and no hard facts deferring to a longer answer later i think wp duck applies tell me am i editing constructively or not by asking that the article's subject be rightly legally identified according to authoritative sources i will be happy to add more other constructive edits to my edit history but i don't know how that would help much sure we can talk court cases after we know what corporation s the court case is about will anyone agree with me that the clause that cftc corrected last month can now be corrected by us this month c'mon that's easy