paragraphs vs section headers sorry didn't mean to imply it didn't have merit any good faith edit on wikipedia has merit what i'm saying is section breaks and paragraph breaks are similar the question is when to use one vs the other paragraph breaks provide logical breaks in the content in this case there is a new section header at the top of almost every paragraph which is redundant that's what paragraphs are made for by adding those section headers i believe it chops up the article which discourages reading it as a single block of text from top to bottom and encourages skimming and skipping like reading an outline that hasn't been filled in or a list of sort of thing rather than a chronological and somewhat inter related history of the origin of the high five if we thought those origin theories were going to be greatly expanded say or or more paragraphs each i could see section headers making more sense but until then i believe it reads better as a single block of text green cardamom talk i see what you're saying but i disagree i think it looks better the way it is now especially with the long block quote in the first section i mean the other option to me is bullets but i think we both would agree that's not that aesthetically pleasing without some kind of division it makes it harder to see that the three options are mutually exclusive or arose independently at best without the divisions in my opinion it sounds like one origin narrative that all together led to the high five rather than three separate possibilities