remove yes i am a bit unhappy about the rfar since afu seems to have stopped his edit warring anyway although we let him keep his article for now i'm just too fed up to police around i am really charmed by gubbubu the concept of 'false statement' seems to be so remote from him that he actually makes no difference between 'claim' and 'proof' o those happy mathematicians well do remove the rr evidence if you like more than a chastisement of afu i'm looking for some vindication of the editors involved with this to know if this is how cases like afu are properly addressed in the view of the arbcom jan utc