joehazelton and a humble question my humble wikiquestion is are editors even held accountable for libel or slander as in real life considering the reach and readership of wikipedia what checks and balances are in place for rogue editor admin sophisticated in the policies but manipulating said polices to achieve the same results in reading and researching it would appear that many editors and admins are behaving contrary to the lofty goals of the wikiproject in order to forward personal or political agenda also what evidence is necessary to prove and rebuke and discipline such editors and admin that are consistently and repeatedly violating rr and npov policy if not in name but certainly in sprit and in fact accuse other editors who perform legitimate edits for the very thing that these rouges are engaged in is what wikipdia critics say is true in that wikipdia is the play ground of the faceless and nameless who are not beholding or accountable to the rule of law or is wikipdia truly has respected place with proper review oversight or accountability for actions contrary to stated and publish policy my experance so far with due respect would be the first rather then the later humbly submitted and expecting the gods to block me do to my question of what is right or wrong in closing be warned that if a thing is abuse so much and hurts to many people truly hurts them then there will be back lash and a noble project will die