feedback as requested hey antonin i'm only too happy to help out as much as i can having sooooo many problems elsewhere in fact completely and utterly stuck and rather despondent about it all first impressions not yet a balanced article a lot on the controversies too little on the magazine and its background the latter i think needs clarification what was the czech political cultural context and how did this produce the magazine conservative is too vague i think readers will benefit from being told more about czech conservatism then there's the magazine itself who started it and what were they doing before this editorial policy contributors transfer of ownership if any and whether or not the magazine has changed since its acquisition by the media group put it this way certainly in the uk and probably in the us an award for growing the best cannabis plant isn't something usually associated with a conservative magazine i'll put this page on my watch list i'll be happy to sort out any copy issues btw best regards thanks for your opinions davey you are right the article is not balanced i'm trying to use only sources independent on the magazine itself and unfortunately the sources deal mainly with controversies there is an overview of the history of reflex in the th anniversary issue i'll try to expand the article with that information and answer your questions btw reflex is sometimes really considered as a conservative magazine could there be a little difference between the perception of the term in the professional and well developed anglo american journalism and the perception of still young independent czech journalism using of this term in the post communist world is quite complicated as conservatism defends traditional values and continuity and the first free post communist media including reflex had to start building again to some extent they had to find the values and the interrupted tradition the provocative cannabis award could be an attempt to test the borders of freedom of speech and to come closer to independent and bold journalism this is however just my vague point of view we should probably avoid this association on english wikipedia as this is a world grown in a completely different tradition and experience again thanks for pointing out the problems i'll work on it i've attempted to expand and clarify the origins and background of the magazine as recommended yes i've been hovering over your shoulder the whole time good beefy stuff d'you reckon you're pretty much done with the content 'cos i do and intend twiddling up the prose some time this weekend by the way it's no big deal but are you ok with all those red links hi davey you won't believe how happy i am seeing that you are still interested i'm careful with the red links this project has still gaps in detailed covering of czech topics all of the red linked names are notable czech journalists see the czech wiki articles for jan ib k petr h jek ji x dole al tom fe tek josef kl ma ji pehe tom bald nsk bohumil pe inka milo erm k pavl na wolfov with the red colour i'm trying to point out that they should have articles also here thank you for your help and interest ask whatever oh i know how that one feels it can be a strange and lonely business indeed still here come the queries constitution and editorial continuity d'you know who owned it in the first place was it a one man show which employed petr h jek or was he owner and editor sorry to be picky here but it'll matter particularly as this is living persons biog yes the blp issue is the main reason why i asked for your help h jek was the owner together with andrej astn and ji fleyberk he seems to be the most important one according to my sources ok so the sale of the magazine over the heads of the editorial board was entirely legal despite the resentment d'you think this was seen as a matter of personal gain and freedom of action on his part vs personal responsibility