comparison between articles as far as notability judgments are often inconsistent this happens when small numbers of people respond and for gray area topics it can admittedly be very arbitrary which way the decisions go i'd say this article has maybe a chance of surviving this afd nomination most current cryptocurrency articles clearly meets gng criteria while wikipedia articles like dogecoin attract ever accumulating non rs references that should doubtless be removed its core is based on articles in the la times the guardian cnn nbc news coindesk and half a dozen other established news sites vertcoin has only one the international business times but surprisingly that was deemed sufficient to meet gng there is never really a final process on wikipedia since a removed article can be reproposed when new coverage comes out or an approved article can be renominated for deletion a while later though it can be frowned upon if it's done frivolously if it is deleted i would wait for more clearly reliable source coverage of the topic before trying again there's really nowhere else that i think reddcoin would be usefully mentioned in wikipedia at this point as it just doesn't seem noteworthy to independent sources auroracoin caught a lot of press because of its nationalistic hook and mazacoin kind of followed on its coattails but other launched alt coins have needed to do something fundamentally different to attract much notice e g ethereum alt coins like vertcoin and reddcoin seem to offer almost no innovation just minor adjustments to standard parameters and have little purpose other than the creator and early adopters trying to make money off later investors reddcoin's use it to tip people on social media comes several years after bitcoin was used to tip people on social media maybe it will catch on due to better ui integration time will tell but it hasn't caught on in independent media so far one way to try and game the system is to cause a quick price jump which can be done a number of ways ibt forexmagnates and forexminute are prone to provide coverage even for some temporary price manipulation and being idiotic news sources they treat any spikes as signs of popularity