greek love i'm looking for a way to extricate myself honorably from this mess i'm leaving a note here because you closed this afd where i made a commitment to do as you instructed in the closing statement there are two editors who have long sought to delete or eviscerate the article one of whom has used a series of user names unacknowledged on his current user page but available so at first glance it may appear on the talk page there are more than two editors in the 'suppress' camp i complain here about their coordination other editors including and i simply can't do it any longer i haven't changed my position on the validity of the article but i've been accused on various talk pages and never the appropriate notice boards of edit warring ownership disruption and even pedophilia by implication all for trying to carry out what the community decided i'm done i need to limit my time on wikipedia at present and wish for that time to be spent pleasantly and productively when i've made a commitment though it grieves me not to keep it i'm not asking you to do anything i'm just explaining why i can't keep my word as given at the afd wow that is a mess certainly no hard feelings on my end it is clear you endeavored in good faith to improve the article i have found that knowing when to walk away is an essential skill not only here but in the real world sometimes your presence despite your best intentions is harmful rather than helpful and sometimes a dispute just isn't worth it anymore best of luck in your future endeavors here mailchimp i'm not that bothered but i think that the mailchimp speedy deletion was a mistake it did cite that it was one of the more important email marketing programs so it was stating the importance something that was supposed to be the original problem the criteria specifies a credible'' claim of significance wordpress pages are not reliable sources however i would certainly not object to it being restored as a redirect as it was for several momnths before today talkback talk just a hunch call it my intuition but i'm guessing that his username is a direct challenge to patrolling admin that you guys won't block him based on the username itself but his contribution speaks volume of his nonsense louder my other hunch being he's a returning editor than his username does just my cents cheers there are plenty of legitimate reasons to be a returning editor the username is not a blatant violation of the policy if you have any evidence of socking file at wp spi recreation of article shay carl i would like to request that the article shay carl be recreated see the deleted talk shay carl for my reasons note talk shay carl was delete because of a not notibility well there was