ugly personal attacks you approve '''good morning philippe the post above yours by loverofart is typical of his posts in my direction an ugly personal attack by a person who has in essence defamed a widely respected organization the national civilian community corps by posting false and misleading information at the wikipedia website if your wikipedia's best idea is that what should happen next is that i enter into a prolonged dialogue with that person hoping to reason with him her while he she continues to exert control over content and issue ugly diatribes then your processes leave a great deal to be desired a responsible adult a real editor should have interceded long ago he she and the others working over the nccc text at this time seem to feel that any statement introduced by the phrase according to does not belong at wikipedia as i read it there was objection at one of your pages to placing references at the end of that phrase rather than at the end of the quotation why an encyclopedia would have as a policy including bald claims as if fact without reference to the source in its text eludes me it would give the impression that the encyclopedia had evaluated the statement which is obviously not the case i appreciate wikipedia's effort to provide freely accessible information to the public i am not impressed however by the response to gross errors made at the wikipedia site your crew is attacking the messenger at least in part because it is the message that it does not like a pretty sorry performance which you seem to be joining by failing to address the issues i raise or the attacks on me pull loverofart out of this situation and i will join in a dispute resolution process regarding editing the nccc site i refuse to have further dealings with him her