peyna i do not believe that they are acting in good faith and here's why i have demanded many times that they abide by wikipedia policies that content must be based on verifiable sources wikipedia neutral point of view wikipedia no original research wikipedia cite sources wikipedia verifiability and wikipedia reliable sources they have not done so i have outlined at length and in detail their errors and elsewhere on that page had they been acting in good faith they would've abided by wikipedia policies and provided verifiable reliable sources for every claim in dispute they sure seem to have plenty of time given how dedicated they are to a revert war csssclll