can you cite a reputable scholarly source not other christian groups which would of course reject this group just as they often reject each other that states an assessment that pc is not a form of christianity i do not think this fact is disputed unless there is a fringe view of what is means to be a christian which excludes other forms i do not think this can be excluded as a form of christianity without committing some basic problems in logic in regards to this definition in particular the no true scotsman fallacy until you have a good source that not only makes the case but represents the scholarly consensus on the question of a definition of christianity that is sufficiently inclusive but still exclusive of pc as one of its manifestations of the religion we do not get to delete the factual statement that pc is a form of christianity at most we can state that it is disputed which giovanni has done it does not make any claim regarding the compatibility of christianity with nazism but it does say that pc is a form of christianity that is consistent with nazism if you dispute this then please state what part parts of pc are not consistent with nazism as an ideology lastly the major problem with your version is that it assumes there is such as thing as one kind or type of christianity which is of course not true or begs the question insofar as this implies that there is one christianity it is not accurate