this is extremely poor taste of biased behavior you are quoting from people who draws conclusions based on personal opinions and biased websites they just decided to put it on a newspaper there are countless records of live blood analysis and darkfield microscopy being valid techniques worldwide dr luis vitetta md from australia has a comprehensive assessment from his paper marked the live blood analysis technique dr hilbert seeger md phd a well known hematologist has countless papers on it however it is not known to be a diagnostic test its a screening tool and the article states its an unestablished diagnostic test it was written with an agenda and most other alternative forms of testing or methods on wikipedia are promoting misleading statements about cam therapies also yet there is documented evidence that over lawsuits within a year period against pharmaceutical companies for killing thousands of people worldwide some examples of drugs are avandia paxil zoloft vioxx accutane etc yet for some reason the lobbyist try to attack anything alternative lba has wider research and this is a very short and meaningless description from a few individuals like stephen barrett and ernst edzard who only gave there opinions and stephen barrett were involved with a number of lawsuits and have lost every single one of them its funny how editors here pick at the nastiest words to use eg fraudulent which refers to people who use an agenda to falsely lie to the public and to fool them into believing something does not work yet the clients actually see for themselves the function of the immune system eg hypersegmented neutrophils which have been proven to determine if a client lacks b and folic acid uric acid crystals fibrinogen platelet microcytes echinocytes etc this is very valuable and can be used to identify hematological status of the blood however biased editors prefer to delete edits that can improve the biased views from certain people attacking alternative practice the authorities should deal with people like them and i have even noticed certain alternative medicine practitioners are constantly being attacked on wikipedia and this web page is supposed to be edit friendly instead promoting lies propaganda and pure vilified information and basically anyone who tries to put truthful or factual information is banned from further editing i have to say the information by dr barbara starfield md states from the ama that over deaths a per are due to properly prescribed prescriptions and that the dangers of drugs and deadly side effects continue to plague the lands of innocent people just for the love of money i hope the lawyers will continue to deal with the pharmaceutical companies for killing hundreds of thousands of innocent lives around the world wikipedia needs unbiased and objective writers and its editors are not fooling anybody by covering up there removals