as i said initially when i began to look into this i thought that ihts might have violated the iban by visiting a page that maxbrowne had edited i went back to check whether the iban might restrict editors from editing the same page some ibans do have such a provision but i saw there was no such provision furthermore ihts was pretty good about not addressing maxbrowne either directly or indirectly on that page that's why my follow up comment was to declare that there was no violation and that i felt that ihts didn't go there just because of maxbrowne and did so only because of his interest in chess matters and if i'd concluded there was stalking i would definitely have noted that both at ani and on ihts's user talk page look again at my comment at ani where i told maxbrowne so i thought i made it clear that this wasn't a stalking incident again i thought ihts was only there because he edits chess articles and areas related to chess and there was no iban violation he did a very good job of restraining himself from commenting to or about maxbrowne on that page ''''''