reply to your comments on my talk page your uncivil tone notwithstanding i love being proved wrong so please take this to wikipedia deletion review if you have a problem with my resolution please submit to the appropriate forum on wikipedia administrators noticeboard regarding my decision the concepts you were trying to present exist in the book's article greater expounding does not in my good faith search exist in any documented form that conforms to our expectations such as found at wp v and wp rs again if you disagree i encourage you to use the forums outlets available to you my closure was a non admin closure talk bollocks that was an administrative action that this is verifiable is admitted by you redirecting it to an article about a book covering it wolfkeeper talk deletion is administrative redirection is not inherently so and is most often executed by non administrators that book poorly referenced itself as being notable enough for inclusion is barely enough to address such an obscure presentation greater clarity is required to make any sense of the topic as it is talk no i just checked the policy clearly says you can't comment and close it even if you're not using admin priviledges wolfkeeper talk i repeat who the hell do you think you are wolfkeeper talk