no i do not appreciate this i have sold databases the lines have been adopted by im minchev and im wind this is an entry about a niche line in chess and contains a one move error i corrected it and was told i'm not a wp rs i have been published in strategems chess life for kids chess life problemist etc including my own self published book the website should count krabbes site is here and his site is a blog and its listed as a source how can he be a source but i cannot i have a website with excellent content its the only site on the web with this content your refutation is not wp rs either it is a feature of two games played by amatuers you should at least cite wind or myself who actually are titled the content already here is not wp rs so can i remove what you already have because its not a reliable source this is like referring to schiller for information its bogus this article contains a tactical error how is that wp rs many many times wikipedia cites websites that is a published source my website has clout and gets a fair share of popularity so it is a wp rs