to the anonymous poster you should feel free to adjust the tone of the article if you feel it is biased and i would encourage you to do so but facts are facts and these issues can be found on the merck labeling information and in published articles jfdwolff has a very strong bias and has been keen on removing some of the factual statements in the past where he should focus on adjusting the tone but i would welcome you to alter the presentation of the facts in such a way that you don't feel compelled to initially take a stance either way