neutrality the article seems to have veered towards being non neutral the following are of particular concern the ridiculous amount of detail that the japan tobacco episode is given removal of references to scruton's response and defence to the episode in the guardian removal of a positive review of dooley's comment that sexual desire is magisterial despite this having being discussed on this talk page the extent of the coverage given to his views on homosexuality any disinterested reader coming across the article could well be forgiven for thinking that scruton is some kind of dodgy businessman with strong homophobic tendencies clearly a gross misrepresentation of his life and career i am therefore putting the neutrality banner up until these issues are addressed