i had a chance to go through the lead a bit just now and agree that material from the last paragraph there is also the point that national syndicalism predates wwi i also made everything consistently past tense with respect to the movements per se leaving only the discussion of ideology in the present tense obviously there's more that can be done but there has to be sources and the lead has to be summary style in this regard i noticed that the material removed in the following passage was not only unsourced but not mentioned at all in the main body of the text i am familiar with the discussions on monumental architecture and the like but there has to be reliably sourced materialpreferably in the main body of the articleto be summarized in the lead fascist movements emphasize a belligerent virulent form of nationalism chauvinism and a distrust of foreigners xenophobia the latter closely linked to the ethnocentrism of many fascist movements the typical fascist state also embraced militarism a belief in the rigors and virtues of military life as an individual and national ideal meaning much of public life was organized along military lines and an emphasis put on uniforms parades and monumental architecture that would not seem to be text that clears the bar of wp nor