ga reassessment this discussion is transcluded from talk calvin and hobbes ga the edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment i feel doubtful that this article still meets the gac first of all it fails b because a there are citation needed tags in the style and influences and books sections and b according to a maintenance tag which has been in the article since march there are primary sources throughout the article gas should have neither unsourced information nor primary sources anyway that's my review push to talk