separation of personal life from main 'eras' section the separation of michael's personal life info from the main 'eras' section is going too far with this categorization thing which seems to have swept up the article recently introducing an 'influence' section was alright as that didn't take from the main body the chronological section of the article but taking out things deemed 'personal' and plonking them neatly under four different areas just doesn't flow well it junts the reader in and out of various years and just doesn't work before the article was chronological and a certain degree of chronology is good in a biographical article let me clear up one thing the eras don't just mean what was related to the album of the era the eras are simply a convenient way of splitting up michael's life into nice sections we don't need to further split the article up i think that we should put personal stuff back into the main chronological bit as people seem to have misinterpreted what the 'eras' are meant to be his career and his personal life should go together for example the oprah interview once aired significantly increased sales of dangerous that link cannot be neatly established if the two 'bits' for lack of a better word are separated i am trying to reach a new consensus to have the personal stuff put back into the main body as right not the article seems to be a skeleton of subheadings the eras are tiny and any reader will be confused by the layout which isn't chronological so that's why i'm trying to reach a new consensus to put the personal life information back into the chronological part of the article