i see what you're saying about the sources and all but it still seems like it's somewhat arbitrary what they will consider to be enough reliable sources all in all the mass nominations have kinda taken the wind out of my sails i was hoping to create a slew of articles on seduction related subjects but it seems not worth the effort if it can all be destroyed via deletion at the whim of whoever shows up to afd i think there is a systemic bias going on here and the system has created the means by which people's personal opinions can affect what wikipedia covers and what it doesn't if we got rid of the notability requirement and just allowed all verifiable content to stay here then it would create a much more objective system and we wouldn't have all these problems having said that i'm well aware of the unlikelihood of that happening and am basically waving the white flag at this point