i would just add that unless a stub is clearly vanity or garbage adding a vfd within minutes after the entry is posted is not a very good practice for several reasons while schools are inherently controversial here at wikipedia i would urge you to apply the same wait and see approach across the board the whole purpose of a stub is to act as an invitation to create an article frequently it is difficult to tell whether the subject is encyclopedic i have seen many good articles start as stubs for example a stub may start as john q unknown was an american politician and it may turn out that he was a territorial governor u s senator and later president of a well known college unless the subject of a stub is very well known it is a rare stub that gives enough detail to know immediately whether the subject has the potential to become encylcopedic you may have already seen these but i would refer you to wikipedia stub and wikipedia deletion policy the deletion policy states that among the problems which do not require deletion are a stub with potential which should be expanded or a minor branch of a subject that doesn't deserve its own article which should be merged with a redirect to the new location