map vs globe the image in the infobox should be a geographic locator as well showing where the state is within a larger context of the world it doesn't seem consistent with map of other chinese dynasty articles e g ming tang etc geographic locator map is mainly used for current country map not historical map e g people's republic of china united states etc the qing dynasty although is a dynasty of the past is also largely a modern political entity and its history is intertwined with modern world history that's why i think a geographic locator is better suited as it also mirrors the republic of china article another thing to consider is that because there are so many contemporaneous maps of the qing that's available where as such maps are rare for prior historic dynasties such as ming and tang it is difficult to choose one that truly represent the whole article in the infobox i agree that showing all the different maps of the qing dynasty at its various extent and time periods is informative to readers but they don't have to be in the infobox a general geographic locator is a good fit there plus the maps of the qing dynasty at and are already in the article shanghai i am not going to respond in full at the moment as i would like to sleep i will however return to it when i feel like it a few hours at the very least so where should i respond my page or yours talk equal standards theleopard i thank your for your unending quest for the truth and your campaigning for the integrity of wikipedia however there are other areas of wikipedia that would greatly profit from similar vigor take for instance the previously widely unknown national capital region china you rescued it from obscurity caused by a redirect however it must have escaped you that this article does not contain a single reference and that there are several claims and outright speculations that deserve at least a dubious tag a national capital region china is worthy of the same attention to detail as china s capital or other cities such as shanghai while it is the job of the author to provide these references lest the author would risk a deletion the lack of verifiable sources should at least have been pointed out i have done so in the meantime thank you the only reason i rescued that article was because it was redirected to bohai economic rim which clearly is not the same thing as national capital region the article needs to be tagged with unreferenced and a bunch of other tags beijing i know we've had some issues before but i have to commend you for the beijing edits i wanted to make the same but didn't dare thank you you are now a reviewer hello your account has been granted the reviewer userright allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages pending changes also known as flagged protection is currently undergoing a two month trial scheduled to end august reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles similarly to how semi protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial the list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at special oldreviewedpages when reviewing edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or blp violations and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection see wikipedia reviewing process more detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here if you do not want this userright you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time alternate term in lede section of standard mandarin hi theleopard i hope you've seen by now the new section i opened in ar