hmm not one lousy source all of them denying reliable sources regardless of how many inaccuracies you find while willingly using propaganda news services to substantiate secondary and primary evidence is extremely frustrating especially when users do not provide a rule or guideline justifying their edits i'm all for balance balance isn't rocket science we have a rule book on wikipedia that tells us exactly how we are supposed to edit if we cannot accept the fact that one's personal opinion of a source or ignorance of sourcing rules in general should have no effect in arguing balance neutrality this is paramount to the entire mediation we can make plans and organize all we want but editing habits have to change if they disagree with blp guidelines does this not seem reasonable or should everyone be allowed to edit how they wish