how are you impartial when you only add negative information thinly and biasedly sourced refuse to compromise with reasonable changes in language and removal of some of the least reliable and more slanderous and unfair sections you can afford to be equinanimous none of your additions are allowed to be altered none of your additions are permitted to be altered no one else's interpretation is allowed to temper the very negative and unfair characterization of this man i can see how you look at your own creation and pronounce it good you even have compliant mods who will lock the page to preserve all your pet partisan points as said above you are just absolutely right and beuller and everyone else is just absolutely wrong on every single issue on ever single entry the point about coat racking is irrefutable this article exists only to hang as many libels of doug feith as partisan editors can dredge up no matter if they are anonymously sourced or not its against blp and any fair minded mod would remove at least of those very poor sources and quotes