reset indent ignore policy you can't even point us to the relevant policy nonetheless how could wiki possibly decide an article that has a criticism section could be a featured article controversial subject peta really list all the controversial items for me please i did not ignore your response i thought my answer was clear but i'll ride the donkey for ya a single section containing criticisms is an example of a poorly structured article as it means that people reading about a subject have to look in the section about it for the 'non criticism' and then a second section to see if there is any criticism this is a statement to which i have refuted wholly by showing you an example of an article that is not porrly rather superbly written also the criticism section does nothing but describe the criticism involved with the topic eg why how what re criticism of the canadian charter see naming a section 'criticisms' or something similar is giving wikipedia a pov specious we wish to describe the criticisms not create them we therefore need a section do do so i concur though forking is counter productive man you got a little pet name for everything such a section is normally just a troll magnet and pov magnet making things difficult to manage first that is tantamount to cutting off your nose to spite your face crappy articles because a good one would attract undue attention that's silliness moreover good articles are far less likely to be attacked by vandals and lastly protect the pages once well written don't make drivel out of the article just because writing it correctly i e like the featured articles would attract attention change the management method instead on top of all that i submit that this peta ar debacle is so controversial for no other reason than that the articles are poorly written they are biased they are agenda driven they lack recognition description of criticisms and they are quite obviously over protected and coddled over by people who truly don't want criticism to see the light of day now please list all the controversial items re peta for me please