response to arre neutrality according to wp is presenting facts in such a fashion that both sides accept occupied isn't accepted by one side moroccan isn't accepted by the other side controlled is accepted by the both sides that's why it's used in minurso reports occuracy is relative neutrality isn't i read and re read your quote it says half stayed in ws and half feld i don't know why you don't see it what about demonstrations for independence prove that there exists a pro independence feeling among some sahrawis in the territory it's really neutral and pricize i will start counting back to you what you are saying is your interpretation of the hr reports i respect your opinion my opinion is completely different i say that hr was repressed in the whole morocco i say that there is or more disappeared but there is also minus or more sahrawis who are living in moroccan controlled parts of ws and in morocco proper without any problem if you want to reword the sentence give me a suggestion most of to describe algeria tunisia and morocco not including ws and north morocco vs lybia egypt north morocco and ws is a little bit unprecize the sentence should be reworded to highlight tribal system of sahrawis i wonder if sahrawis was always spurning centralist powers as they was in the origin of many dynasties in morocco i see that we agreed upon some points can you make the changes in the text and let's see what it gives and i'm still waiting your greeting card in the occasion of the end of ramadan by email salam