i agree with the above summary in my view this is a textbook example of when not to force the article's title into the lead tucson shooting isn't a widely accepted name for the incident as noted in the ga review there isn't even strong consensus to use it as the article's title and unlike cases such as inaugural games of the flavian amphitheatre the phrase doesn't arise naturally when referring to the event in normal speech no one would state that the tucson shooting was a shooting that occurred near tucson in or similar wp sbe explains the reasoning behind the guideline