scope of the article david art's book is mentioned in the article so i think a good starting point should be what he wrote in this book i use far right as an umbrella term for any political party voluntary association or extraparliamentary movement that differentiates itself from the mainstream right radical right refers to a specific type of far right party that began to emerge in the late s t here has been a convergence around the term in the literature inside the radical right the development of anti immigrant parties in western europe p he then says his definition draws from betz and mudde my first comment is that since art says there is convergence on use of the term we should not use in text attribution we should just acknowledge that while there is no consistency on terminology the term normally refers to the wave of right wing parties that began to emerge in the s we should only use in text attribution when someone says something original for example art refers to betz when he provides betz's explanation of why these parties are right wing second we need to ensure that the article is about a specific topic in this case the parties and groups that began to emerge in the late s and include only comments about these parties where the author is clearly referring to them for example some writers use the term radical right to refer to parties such as the bnp but not ukip other writers may not use the term radial right but may call them third wave of the extreme right party family as mudde did in his article the war of words defining the extreme right party family incidentally we should have an article that family too it's definition is similar to art's use of far right although that term is more usually used for the more right wing of the extreme right parties such as the bnp