you're not assuming good faith i read the article the day the movie came out so i was unaware of the correction i read the article in its original form which thoroughly bashed the movie furthermore my statements about michael chrichton were very accurate i also put this in the alternative theories section since this is the minority view but something being a minority view doesn't make it an incorrect view or vandalism if you disagree with me you can reword my blurb to your liking but to call it vandalism is petty