utc i essentially replaced the wording eliminating most from most widely jayjg reverted but i'm going to put it in again absent a good argument against doing this maimonides' version clearly is widely used wikipedia's own article on the mitzvot includes maimonides' list as its only example and describes maimonides' work that included the list as the most important of the above works from a list of works that include versions of the list it is also the only version that i have seen reproduced anywhere online while jay claims that the absence of aliyah from maimonides' list should not be mentioned because virtually every other list includes it that is not logical if maimonides' list is the most important of the lists it is essentially original research for jay to conclude that the singularity of the absence of aliyah to maimonides' list makes it not worth mentioning i'm sure it is true that others of maimonides' writings indicate what jay alleges but the text from the article refers particularly to the commandments it would make sense in fact when i replace the wording i'll do it myself to note that maimonides' other writings tend to contradict the omission but that does not necessarily nor i think in fact warrant suppressing the note about the most important of the mitzvot lists being the exception to the statement in the article jay describes the clarification as uncited pov which may be true regarding most widely which i eliminated but not widely nor anything else about the clarification it is also highly selective clearly not to note that the exception to including aliyah in the mitzvot comes from perhaps the most important of the versions november