just to add kansas bear when i said you made the elementry mistake of calling it a treaty when it was in fact a congrass is because as you left out as usual my post in which you regarded the three deligations as having been pressent at the treaty o arass with papal meditiation the treaty of arass was a private treaty only between the deligations of burgundy and france and made a military alliance in again we are debatting on the burgundian recognition stop changing the subject you clearly are giving fallactious statements and i feel your posts are utterly questionable if you happend to remeber a month ago we both agreed the congrass and treaty of arass were different i corrected your statement when you regarded the three deligations as bieng pressent at the treaty of arass p s stop with your childish personal attacks i aqsked you to give sources regarding that burgundy didnt recognize henry as king of france but you give refs regarding the treaty of arass and mixing up the posts if you cant handle the fact that burgundy recognised henry as king of france then i have already reverted you on the dual monarchy article you should be ashamed of your fallactious remarks nd utterly questionable unsourced facts