there are documents written in the past and in our previous forms examples referenced in the article but as apollo systems has only gone commercial with the new technology in the past few months it's really only been in trade journals that are regurgitated versions of our press release so yes we've appeared in publications but what i understand wikipedia is looking for is third party and peer review barring that is acceptance within a notable agency i e the u s bureau of engraving and printing a next best alternative i think so also scope i agree is critical to what is posted and why and i see where my article needs to address our capabilities and educate validating this approach though is complicated by conflict of interest and the availability of third party resources and review what i am going to do at this point is step back approach my phds on staff and dig deeper for those documents by the way i've gained a tremendous confidence in wikipedia since starting this process