here are violations you have done here wp rr wp agf wp civil wp point wp threat no personal attack you must read the article again especially the intro defrauding people of money is presumably the most common type of fraud but there have also been many fraudulent discoveries in art archaeology and science the latter two fields are distinctly separate even thought archeoology is a kind of social science scholarly it belongs to anthropology and history fujimura is an archaeologist so that his case has been a good example of the archaeological fraud therefore you should've provided a good rationale for your removal of the perfect example from the article rather you insist on replacing it with korean example in order to retaliate against my revert you also placed the new addition at the top of the section and the placement is very odd because if you really want to compromise with me you should've made a group to fujimura the other archaeological case and the science case you think hwang woo seok case is more notable and i think fujimura is more notable so we disagree on the point besides google search result is sometimes deceptive and it is also funny that japanese editors strongly disagreed to reflect the method at dokdo and sea of japan hmm double standard in addition you blatantly lie that i erased your addition and don't want it to be included your threats and personal attacks truly degrade your reputation and credibility i don't wonder where you get the idea to request for arbitration before wp ani or wp rfc that is two step forward because i saw the same agenda at channel board they talk that i'm the only one to defy against alterations by channel they're many here with socks meats such as the poll at talk sea of japan channel meatpuppets from wikipedia you also should keep in mind that who has been altering information based on anti sentiment and bias so don't produce untruthful comments on me any more you're not a neutral editor but prove yourself higly uncivil and non korean editor for japanese sake in my memory i have not added anything to articles related to ancient history of japan but restored your friends' blanking without discussion or rationale here is english wikipedia so unnecessary pov and undue addition of japanese names is not needed on articles it is so clear that you're editing unfair in the rude manner