there that's what i am trying to say hindu nationalism has an already an article i don't see the point of reiterating it here again the article was not created as an extension of hindi muslim conflict that part is already mentioned here islam in india hindu muslim conflict if you think that is what needs to be done please move it to hindu muslim conflict anti buddhist can be removed specially since his son himself corrected the mistakes but on the otherhand anti christian muslim sikhism hindu they are fought over petty local policies and given the color of religion by recalling ancient atrocities it would be akin to spanish acquisition causing anti spanish violence now while you and me know what 'religious violence in india' typically refers to a year from now it will refer to what the article's name suggest with a new batch of trolls and pov pushers revert warring every edit the article was created to quench the india bashing thirst at least i fail to see any other reason for its existence because otherwise we wouldn't be discussing what the article really refers to etc also don't forget then the anti hindu violence specially in southern india and eastern india places where hindus are in minority and don't forget that the riots are never one sided right now the article looks like a list of religious atrocities committed in india which is a ridiculous topic but i believe it can be turned into a comprehensible and well cited article that's why i think going according to time will help the problem with going x vs y vs z position is that it will never be npov it will never be factual and it will never be comprehensible talk