process question re arbitration remedies pure curiosity only so apologies in advance if i end up being one of a stream of people knocking at your door today but i'm genuinely wondering i noticed that the remedies in the date delinking case were updated based on the revisions that were passed recently i'm just wondering if there's a usual way that the case page is updated for something like this it appears that you overwrote the new remedies on top of the old ones with the original date and vote totals remaining in place as a result without checking the history it looks as though that were the original remedy in a different remedy revised earlier the new remedy was entered with the current date and vote total and the original remedy was placed into a collapse box it's probably as simple as different clerks different approaches but i guess i was a little surprised there's no defined process for something like this regards