student has reverted jclsfx student how do you know that a female author of luke acts is false i myself am not an adherent to the theory but i think it's a notable opinion among those scholars who reject luke the physician as an author it's much discussed a simple google search can find plenty of notable academic discussions of the subject a global bible commentary muliple theses and plenty of others obviously the most notable discussion are on my shelf not on google why do you think this is a fiction is it because you accept the authorship of luke the physician as an article of faith or simply because you like me find the argument unconvincing i can understand disagreeing with the argument but i can't understand claiming it's not a notable argument and what is the justification for deleting the genre section keep in mind the main debate is betweeen biography and history and historiography the most controversial might best be describe as historic novelization but pure fiction is not even among the candidates