what is going on here from wikipedia articles for deletion major garrett delete not sure why an article that short needed to be posted it's obvious that only minimal effort went into its creation there's reams of data available about garrett and his career an hour or so with google at the very least would have created the basis for a pretty good article so this one doesn't have any justification for existence duncan talk in other words there are reams of information about this person it has the potential to be a pretty good article with about an hour's work therefore it doesn't have any justification for existence is this type of thought process the norm on wikipedia these days