third opinion i followed a link here from the third opinion article so these are my two cents personally i do not see any reason to reference the iq of john morgan in the article i also do not believe it falls under what is allowed by wikipedia biographies of living persons as it is apparently controversial based on discussions going on at this moment moreover wikipedia biographies of living persons states we must get the article right be very firm about high quality references particularly about details of personal lives unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material whether negative positive or just highly questionable about living persons should be removed immediately and without discussion from wikipedia articles talk pages user pages and project space i believe what is said about iq here is questionable at best as it also appears that there is no solid confirmation as to what exactly his iq is it may also be worth noting that as per the iq article on wikipedia iq is highly criticized