i have read the guideline please don't insult my intelligence i don't know how it can be dumbed down any more to your reading level i am an md and frcpc and i have an obligation to report the use of propaganda by industries that promote unhealthy products the information i inserted was in two parts the first part demonstrates why it is clear that both the tobacco industry previously and tanning industry promote harmful products and the similarities in their use of marketing and propaganda the next part clearly outlines how propaganda was used by the tanning industry exactly as you suggested i must do uv radiation is listed as a class i carcinogen by the world health organization so when the indoor tanning industry reports a one sided argument and neglects to mention that their product causes cancer this is propaganda in keeping with the definition at the top of the article which i presume you actually read when they propose that provincial governments are working with neutrogena to sell sunscreen to make the public doubt the health care system and their messages regarding the real harms of uv radiation then this is propaganda so i ask you again binksternet did you even read the edits before crying coatrack i am getting frustrated by your complete and utter bias you are the one who should really read the coatrack guidelines before retorting and to the editor who suggested i have an axe to grind what a stupid and useless comment do the writers of this article have an axe to grind against nazism i hope so i am jewish and believe the nazis demonstrated the most obvious and systematic use of propaganda with horrendous consequences having a purpose behind the writings on wikipedia is legitimate as long as your contributions include factual statements and are unbiased i am unbiased in my writings as they are based on fact and supported by the medical community if you can prove otherwise do so otherwise put the content back on now or tell me how to report you and take this to someone over your head you are way out of line and this is your last chance you are compromising the integrity of wikipedia by quelling information that should be available to its readers