four edits in hours true but it takes to tango unblock reason you asked about the state bar article and that's fair in chronological order on september the article was protected why the history shows that from august through november months the article was protected because the user santilak repeatedly vandalized the article the edit history also shows that santilak reverted the article without any discussion whatsoever four times within hours he was warned previously by an admin but just took the warning off his talk page and continued the pattern yesterday the pattern continued i was merely attempting to keep the material from being deleted again without discussion if you find me in violation i respect that but at least hold santilak to account as well because the history clearly shows he reverted times in hours causing the article to go into protected status it s up to you whatever you decide have a great day there s nothing personal about this for me i just hope an article about a public entity does not get stripped to the point where it become little more than an advertising brochure bereft of noted criticism of that entity by the courts mainstream news sources and even former employees it s a public entity not a real person some latitude seems appropriate and some discussion before taking out huge chunks of information four times within hours here is a clear showing of the article being protected after santilak vandalized it times in less than hours september callanecc protected state bar of california edit warring september santilak talk contribs bytes reverted edit august santilak talk contribs bytes reverted august santilak talk contribs bytes reverted edit august santilak talk contribs bytes reverted edit and if i was insincere about the article being vandalized you would not see edits by the same user removing huge chunks of the article in less than hour after the block was instituted please see and look at november srich november srich november srich november srich november srich he removed entire sections times in less than minutes i didn't remove anything i tried to prevent exactly this from happening without discussion