bovine emissions and suspected scibaby accounts as far as i can see this edit violated no policies i checked the source which is reliable and the edit appeared to be faithful to the source's information i understand that scibaby had a fixation on bovine emissions threatening humanity but you don't know for sure that it was a scibaby account you apparently blocked the account because it had an interest in a subject that was the same as a banned editor do you think that perhaps blocks in these types of situations should be handled by editors who aren't regular contributors to the global warming articles