two clements conflated i got to this page from a link in the following paragraph in the soissons article in the synod of soissons met at the instigation of pippin iii and saint boniface the pope's missionary to pagan germany secured the condemnation of the frankish bishop adalbert and the irish missionary clement the clement referred to in the soissons article appears to be the same clement discussed in the last paragraph of this article however the rest of this article discusses a clement who was born circa and died in how can a person born in have been condemned by the synod of soissons in and how can a person born in have been the subject of a letter from boniface written in the last paragraph of this article should probably be deleted bob