i appreciate your opinion and that is why i am asking you to justify why we should ignore the sources for alternative names of those people you are right that these people are known as makedonski muslimani more accurately makedonci muslimani or torbe i but there are evidences that there are more alternative names and they aren't outdated there is external link in the article which isn't added by me please look the text in it muslims in macedonia belong to five ethnic groups these are albanians turks roma muslim macedonians also known as torbeshi pomaks or poturs and bosnians a greco turkish convention on the obligatory exchange of populations in made some muslims mostly turks but also some pomaks torbesi leave for turkey ortakovski is this text is about the same people or it isn't the question about the other two names is the same and there is sources from nowadays which proved it the book by russian author dmitriy labauri is from the term there is bulgarian pomaks through the good finding made by we have a reference to fihret adanir the term used by him is bulgarian muslims between other references there is a book je pop antov hristo memoires skopje the author used consistently the term pomaks describing these people but the editor professor zoran tododrovski from republic of macedonia have not considered it necessary anywhere in the book to explain what that means if the term is ineligible or that this is outdated term concerning your claims that these people have been called bo njaci in the past can you provide some references it is interesting for me