mccready to be frank your edit and approach to this is disingenious while you a clearly a chiroskeptic and are entitled to be modifying the opening lead which is a direct quote of the world federation of chiropractic representing the viewpoints of over national organizations is neither necessary nor acceptable their aforementioned wfc definition of chiropractic is in itself a consensus statement and your edit has been voted down by the majority of the wikipedia chiropractic editors to be frank i call a spade a spade you seem bent on trying to discredit chiropractic and cam therapies in general by adopting a very rigid approach not unlike the dogma present in some chiropractic circles regardless of your personal beliefs unless you are willing to increase your understanding of current trends in the cam professions then your input and consequently impact will be limited here