tbma own original research first tbma only a few days after calling this whole article a hoax has fund a new sources to breakdown this article to crap first he claims the soviet had preplanned its withdraw from the front but finnish sources who is supported by pow interview intellegnce data and otho manninen extended archives research in soviet russian archives have pinpointed exactlly witch soviet units where pressent in the battle and when they left what we now for certaint is the composistion of the soviet major combat formations where pressent they soviet was reinforced by tanks and spg before the battle and during the battle soviet army sent more of its formation in to the battle this contradics any statment of withdraw to other fronts or the redicules low figure as only soviet red army men what about tbma sources the sources of men from punaiset panssarit puna armeijan panssarijoukot is by no mean to be seen as a final statment over the battle as the book is abour red army tank and just uses a few phrases on the tali ihantala battle on the withdraw is issue i cant find the first source under ed zolotarev v a russkij arkhiv velikaya otechestvennaya stavka vgk dokumenty i materialy russian archive the great patritic war stavka documents and materials moscow terra p isbn the second vasilevsky aleksandr delo moyei zhizni the point of my life moscow politizdat p does in no way support tbma case and i wonder why its even there the third n i baryshnikov fenomen falshi pobeda v protivostoyanii finskaya istoriografiya o zavershayushchikh boyakh leta g s sovetskimi voyskami the fenomen of lies the victory in the confrontation finnish historiography about final battles of summer is so vauge in deatails that it contradicts with deatailed sources like manninens on the event but gives no fact like witch units was withdraw when where they withdrawn the value of this text is very poor and if it should be in the text it should be moved down to section like russian neo facist view of the battle