nice the article referred to nice in three places whereas at no point has palin referred to nice in the uk referencing nice three times was undue weight i have left one reference in place together with the explanatory note which provides balance nobody is forced to be insured through the nhs and one can be insured with extra coverage to cover cancer drugs rejected by nice this is choice not a death panel nobody in the uk can ever be made to sit before a nice panel of experts and have to justify their existence it is complete bollox if jesanj or his alter egos persists in adding this imbalance back and removing the full explanation of choice in the uk i will retaliate formally in whatever way i deem appropriate