i suggest not to make assumptions particularly negative ones about anyone on wikipedia because as wikipedians we don't know each other in most cases and we don't have the faintest idea what each of us are thinking or what our intent is congrads natey you just blew the entire notion of wikipedia assume good faith away i've been argueing that the concept is unrealistic and outdated for months now we should be simply willing to cut eachother some slack instead especially in cases such as this where someone one was responding to clear and repeated acts of incivility understandable if not inexcusable to the wp politeness police but i disagree that civility is an iron law by wp iar there are no irons laws here or at least there shouldnt be beyond community consensus besides turn the other cheek doesnt work see lebanon no i dont think you are a villian here but you do show poor judgement by siding with a serial vandal over an established and productive constributor and if you think me incivil for saying so then it is you who are making the misassumptions this time good day sir