i grant that yours is a valid argument and there may well be a case for an exception so i think it would be best if this went to a breif rfc if a consensus does emerge that a disclaimer would be appropriate i'd strongly suggest using a generic and fairly bland warning along the lines of readers of australian aboriginal heritage are advised that this article contains details of aboriginal beliefs that may be considered secret similar to the warning on many government tv programs that feature deceased aboriginal people i'm not saying i would necessarily support such a move but if a disclaimer must be had it certainly shouldn't tell people what they may or may not read