look here the admin closed as not abusive enough what is it i did this user undid my edit with an edit summary 'no i don't think so' which seems to breach wp esdonts namely don't 'make snide comments' or 'be aggressive' i tried to discuss at user talk cassianto but the user was again rather condescending and seemed to be ganging up on me with other users he already knows when discussion began on at talk moors murders i simply put 'i think it is notable enough for a single line' however cassianto replied 'then you need to look up the definition of notable clearly ' ignoring wp nnc i believe this breaches wp civil when i indicated the editor should read wp civil they replied 'i did once and i vowed never to read it again' it is breathtaking the way some editors feel policies don't apply to them i was not rude to the editor but i was treated in a condescending and arrogant manner over a very minor matter the user then preceded to launch a very abusive and malicious attack on me he linked my contributions and entirely falsely wrote 'not so ridiculous when you look at his contributions which seem to be all geared around the may elections this user seems to be on a campaign trial on behalf of ukip' this is called blatantly misleading other editors surely in violation of policies such as wp agf wp bite wp civil and wp npa i have nothing to do with ukip i am not a member of any political party i am not enrolled to vote in the united kingdom so these are ludicrous allegations i have created pages non related to the elections articles i have created such as endorsements in the united kingdom general election are very important and been widely edited and viewed i have also created articles such as united kingdom general election wales in accordance with precedent i have worked hard on the project for good and in good faith examples list of european union member states by gdp growth and mr galloway goes to washington i have successfully nominated dozens of articles for speedy deletion as a new editor i am deeply upset by how hard it is to edit this site without abuse and being treated like a moron wp bite it certainly is not encouraging for those wanting to make a difference in good faith nothing at wp spa points to me the editor has breached multiple policies editor still going he has written now 'what makes you think i give a fuck about your political leanings ' despite questioning them and removed the ani notification remarking 'what a waste of time' what is the point of wp civil wp agf wp npa wp bite what did i say that was uncivil mellowed fillmore said 'it is my view that auslondonder is clearly not here to build an encyclopedia he is likely to remain a problematic editor and i'm not sure that any more patience needs to be shown' yet i have created pages including endorsements in the united kingdom general election and list of european union member states by gdp growth how can they possibly say that with your agreement i will address each other point at the ani if you wish