september utc lol that the same admin who made the block reviews the unblock request just a slight conflict of interest i had only made a single edit to the page in question when this user abusively put a edit war template on my page and then threatened to report me for saying he acted like he owned the page a justifiable statement when he reverted an edit that simply removed an unnecessary obvious redundant statement that did not alter the factual content of the article had it been an ongoing edit war that would be different but i made a single edit after a previous edit ten days ago that he would put an edit war template on my page in response to a single edit that only dealt style and not factual content is pretty clear evidence of harassment that he believes he owns the page he continued to harass me on my own talk page how are my responses on my own talk page considered trying to harass another user the only thing i said in response here that could have remotely been considered a personal attack was the comment about his poor writing skills it is nothing short of absurd that someone who refuses to allow his pages to be edited can abusively put an edit warring template on my page and i'm the one sanctioned as i said i only want to report that hideous article to the baseball project and be done with it and i can easily switch my ip address as often as i feel like resetting my router but you would rather make me wait hours to be internally consistent with the ip addresses how beneficial to wikipedia nice that a no shit sherlock is block worthy but articles written in a style that would make any high school english teacher vomit are allowed to remain unedited