august utc edit i was under the impression that discussing the other user on a user talk page in the context of discussing a still open ani discussion of whether the iban should be dissolved was acceptable my reason for believing this was that the other party had not been blocked or even warned for extensive commentary on me and my edits on his own talk page here and here drmies claims below that i had received a final warning before being blocked but no such final warning not even any initial warning was received if i am blocked without warning for technically violating the terms of a poorly defined iban because i am mimicking the supposedly acceptable behaviour of the other party then blocking me without blocking them makes this a one way iban something that no one agreed to either i should be unblocked or the other party should be blocked