i haven't seen any sources definitively define her as being a lobbyist currently nevertheless the entire section lobbyist at the white house implies that she was there representing corporate or client interests and there is no evidence to support that in stories about those visits she isn't identified as a lobbyist or conducting business on behalf of paying clients wouldn't a reporter want to define her as a lobbyist when covering her visits in fact one visit described on this page is wholly inaccurate as it says she was present for a meeting that the source says she wasn't present for if that's your basis for lobbying it doesn't seem to hold up