article needs to be split into two there are two different things going on in this article one is a hypothetical discussion of what a north american currency union might look like based on descriptions in obscure white papers from think tanks and science fiction books the other is the origin and debunking of the conspiracy theory that such a union actually is being planned by some sort of powerful forces the two have little to do with each other for one additionally by keeping the two in one article the citations for the first look like evidence for the latterwhich they are not and which some of the people who provide them probably do not want them used as the first article should be the place for discussing serious economic and futurologist viewpoints about what an nacu might be the second should be devoted largely to a sociological analysis of why people believe in the conspiracy theorynot to details of the theory itself as that lends undue weight to the idea that said theory is true i suggest that the two articles be north american currency union concept in literature and north american currency union conspiracy theory