i will appreciate it if when proponents of conspiracy theory discontinue the use of non consensus building tactics you fail to note it was another editor that actually put the npov template in this article before was that carbonite who changed it to povcheck was it also carbonite that removed povcheck a few days later iterestingly inconsistent i admit my criticisms of the intro are somehwat minor we've made some progress but since your side has apparently stopped debating the only recourse i have is to make readers third parties aware of the existence of dispute by placing the disputed header at the top this should be basic npov policy please respond to my concern that commonly believed needs some sort of balance caveat t