yey narking i know how historians operate very well but facts are they use a year old estimate which is at least as biased as imperial russian estimates not neutral research archival research do you comprehend this or not ps why do you think historyofwar uses an imperial russian figure because it doesn't fit your view of reality learn to respect other superior sources pps only swedes and finns use swedish bias sources as you clearly see neutral english quality sources use neutral figures like the one at historyofwar