oppose this proposal i would support however some sort of guidelines for arbs and maybe admins regarding what sort of complaints are clear reason for status change and what are perhaps valid but less clearcut and then if the latter some sort of discussion maybe per rfc with a crat closing regarding the conduct of the individual involved and how to deal with it personally i think the us agk used is potentially problematic but could just be potentially a typo arbs are not necessarily required to write all comments like legal briefs particularly if they themselves are not necessarily lawyers of course if agk or any other arb in a potentially similar position were to resign on their own should that happen that might be enough to address that specific situation but no one should see my saying that as necessarily indicating i think such would necessarily be the way to proceed in this instance because i don't think the matter necessarily rises to that level i could however be wrong