i am unable to treat your explanation as clear and specific because it does not cite specific edits nor demonstrate how the edits match your description since you brought it up wp agf says even if bad faith is evident do not act uncivilly yourself in return or attack others or lose your cool over it it is not necessary to be a fanatic yourself even though it demands a lot of self control and patience it is ultimately a lot easier for others to resolve a dispute and see who is breaching policies if one side is clearly editing appropriately throughout making unwarranted accusations of bad faith as opposed to explanations of good faith can be inflammatory and is often unhelpful in a dispute if bad faith motives are alleged without clear evidence that others' editing is in fact based upon bad faith it can also count as a form of personal attack and in it the user accusing such claim is not assuming good faith i still politely await that warrant and evidence accusing me of forgetting my block falls under several categories but most notably this one which also applies to talk pages and permits removal of contentious unsourced talk