contradictory numbers in energy content table this isn't my field of expertise but i noticed what seem to be some contradictory numbers or bad conversions in the energy content table for example aviation gasoline is shown as having a lower number of mj liter and btu gallon than regular gasoline which doesn't sound right but when converted to mj kg the number is higher than gasoline i have another remark regarding the energy content section is the displayed energy content the true energy content or the energy content when used in a conventional internal combustion engine this would change the figurs greatly as eg gasoline is burnt here with efficiency while hydrogen is burnt with efficiency