hyperboreans and stonehenge this article is not about hyperborenas or about stonehenge long writings on these topics are irrelevant for this article i have therefore reverted the additions talking about stonehenge and hyperboreans openfuture talk i agree that most of this edit reads like speculation and original research or synthesis however the reference looks reasonable i haven't consulted it directly but have looked at the series of papers from this and other conferences and i have no reason to think there's anything unreliable about it i've reinserted what i think could reasonably be attributed to the conference paper kim dent brown talk this article is a shambles and needs a full re writing preceding unsigned comment added by stavgard talk contribs stavgard talk this comes from the article in fornv nnen this article was edited and approved by the previous editor of fornv nnen fil dr jan peder lamm fornv nnen is a highly reputable magazine stavgard talk jan peder lamm born october is a swedish archaeologist he received his phd in from the university of stockholm for a dissertation about a migration period elite cemetery near drottningholm lamm taught archaeology at the university of stockholm in the s and then worked until retirement as head curator for the swedish iron age at the museum of national antiquities in stockholm he is a member of the editorial board behind the journal fornv nnen and has taken active part in the helg project since the s stavgard talk i fully agree it does not belong under the heading grooves it belongs under the heading astronomical calendars on gotland however the heading grooves needs a full rewrite stavgard talk