doherty epilogue why does the section mainstream scholarly reception end in a comment by doherty himself decidedly not a part of that mainstream which basically says that someone else should come along isn't this akin to a proponent of a minority view saying that one day oh happy day the majority will come to see the wisdom of the minority view and change its mind revision and changing minds are an essential part of all branches of scholarship but why should we give a platform to any one view in this smile back well i do see your point but i think there's arguably validity in assigning a special preference to the view of the subjects of the article of which doherty is a notable example and the only one i'm aware that has commented on the subject