mgnbar what is a stupid act hi consensus means that every body must agree i don t think wikipedia have redefined the word consensus even if they try to redefine the word consensus it doesn t matter because the question is whether you people are doing something terribly wrong and stupid or if my work pictures theories references text and contributions to wikipedia are wrong clearly vast amounts of my contributions are still present in wikipedia articles such as pictures text and theories everything i have put in are still there except the one reference to all the pictures theories and text the question is if it s ok to use your own scientific work in wikipeida the answer is yes for example it will be impossible to incorporate pictures in wikipedia if you can t give away your own pictures and include your own work as a reference to the same pictures but do anybody really think any researcher can write an scientific article which isn t based on his or her own knowledge including research and according to wikipedia rules if someone want to improve the articles and for some reason doesn t want my report as a reference they must prove it wrong by discussions on the talk page if the reference is found to be wrong then all the information pictures and theories which i have contributed to in the wikipedia articles galling wear and stress mechanics must be deleted because my contributions are closely linkt to my research god luck with deleting all my contributions i think you have several hours of work in front of you and still you will do a terrible stupid mistake