it seems quite obvious what is meant to me i'd reached the same conclusion and turned to the talk page to find it had already been spotted the section shows nothing of the content or conclusions of a number of referenced sources other than a vague hint that there is perhaps negative information about the organisation to be found if the linked sources are read perhaps someone should do a little footwork and state in the article itself what the various conclusions are using the links as references citations as is standard practice in wikipedia and most other tertiary reference materials