rfc response got here randomly from listing of rfcs on community page but do have some academic background in sexual behavior have to say that aside from the first few paragraphs as i found them which were good this article is substantially tainted with junk and pseudo science designed to legitimize or de stigmatize male on female rape just because someone with initials after their name managed to get something published or posted something on the net does not make it good science encyclopedic should mean both known and recognized as good and comprehensive but known good should always trump comprehensive the vandalism e g more pictures is also out of hand there is also way too much plain and simple error e g discussion of sex and aggression in other species falls in the realm of comparative psychology not sociology i think you need to request major intervention by moderators on this topic