you are alone in your claims that the edits are controversial and this is because you push pov your contributions in this article show that you came late and now put forward an ultimatum about consensus admins said it looked like this edits are controversial but they remained silent when counterarguments were made and they admitted they are not subject matter experts also i see that the chapter has already been modified to satisfy such concerns one editor clearly said that discussion of revisionism is relevant for caucasian albania shnirelman de waal and hewsen do not talk in length about armenian revisionists i do not see evidence of that but if you feel that they do you may suggest to modify the text on talk pages i am telling this to you for the second time but you are not listening what you do is disruptive editing you remove portions of the article to hide a particular subject from the public eye you reach consensus with all other participants who support ed these edits and then we will think how to incorporate your contributions now you are repeating twilight chill's mistakes who was banned for disruptive behavior