fringe alun wrote far too much and far too pov if pov means not npov i challenge you to identify text which isn't presented neutrally i e not favoring a side but neutrally stating other people's opinions then lets improve that text fringe theories shoud not have so much space per npov all wikipedia articles and other encyclopedic content must be written from a neutral point of view representing significant views fairly proportionately and without bias a view that is mentioned in almost every discussion of the topic should be described fairly and in proportion to the attention it receives the addition was entirely promoting a singe point of view a view that was not previously missing from the article provide arguments against as well or it's pov pushing the environmental impacts section does just that but if there are specific points that should be added or changed i encourage further targeted development demanding perfection in every edit seems inappropriate