in hindsight it does seem confusing that the shortened reference would bring you down to further reading i merged the further reading section into the reference section as bibliography which seems to be how the first amendment article was formatted in doing so though i deleted the further reading section as leaving it in the article seemed to be redundant the two lists would be identical as all the books listed there were cited in the article also after reading through citation style apparently the way they create shortened footnotes is through the harvard citation style this was probably what led to the confusion would it be better to recreate the long citations for these shortened citations or leave as is