background color ffffff border px solid a a a border right width px border bottom width px vertical align top moz border radius topleft px moz border radius bottomleft px moz border radius topright px moz border radius bottomright px rowspan you can check my logs and contribs to know if i'm here mentifistomentifistomentifisto toc c archivec st archive nd archive rd archive mar th archive apr index blatant racist editing hi mentifisto you kindly acted on a report just now of vandalism on sol campbell diff by user talk i thought such blatant racist editing would receive an immediate block as per wikipedia no personal attacks rather than just a st level warning please can you advise how i should act in future many thanks well in that case the edit had been made some time prior and the latest was not clear vandalism so the ip may have possibly be reassigned but generally i think it's best to give them a warning so as to prepare them fisto hi mentifisto thanks for your feedback and i am truely sorry to trouble you again but i am left even more confused and need to know where to refer to to get an understanding of the line is drawn on racism on wikipedia the ip used the term stupid n r in caps at on th may this to me is just as bad as it gets i reported this to wp aiv at and you applied the warning at i can only assume you looked at the later edit to didier zokora which was not obviously that offensive to me at least thanks i am also a little confused i agree that there is a fine line in dealing with personal attacks i simply would like this line pointed out so that we will know how to deal with it in the future thanks well i think it's down to individual discretion blocks are preventive so if the ip is unlikely to commit another similar edit in the next ten minutes or so it'd be somewhat redundant personally i'd give them the above immediate final warning so they know the consequences of their actions user talk mentifisto