ok you are so good at it why dont you fix the present grammatical errors i have been asking for qualification of the dormancy for a very long time anf or clarification of its contradiction with article i refer to the changes of procedure which destroyed the institution i think german speakers could help with that cvilised europeans should have an understanding of german i lack this you seem to be quicker to criticise my language than to have repaired the ridiculous prior version your edits have now lead to a similar illogic see if you can spot it you alas seem to think that articles on wp should be as brief as possible does this come from the nature of the personal computer format screen does wp have to be childish abbreviated there are many long articles in britannica i remind you that this ae is much studied in univerities and even schools around the world it requires therefore the political background as it had developed and this investigation of dormancy must be clarified absolutely from institutional legislation i repeat that i have long asked such as djmutex to to fill us in with a translation of these procedural changes when what signed by hindenburg another decree please supply and include it here wherever else it may be needed plase include what bruning said about such dormancy presunmably as this is cardinal he referred to it at the time and afterwards in his memoirs and does he confirm the monarchist allegations i mentioned first so loong ago you afre so good please deal with this according to source on b's page when you can i will visit elsewhere now