bias in the introduction the introduction's last line since he became the leader of the bnp several educational institutions have invited him to speak on political radicalism multiculturalism and bnp policy is unweighted and does not at all represent the controversy outcries and actual uncommonness of the particular 'invites' also where is the mention of griffin's unquestionable notoriety are we trying to inform people about him in an encyclopedic sense ie give a broad and unbiased picture of him that would actually be useful to someone or make a safe unoffensive bnp friendly article please don't leave this to other people i have already made a few unsucessful edits today it only takes one committed person to revert you on wikipedia to make change impossible for any single editor to achieve there is a rr revert rule and admins are always ready to block users and lock articles when perceived 'edit wars' happen wikipedia needs people to jump in and have a go