more concerns about possible pov issue is it me or is a substantial amount of this article simply a series of criticisms of ms nash presumably by a constituent with unrealistic expectations there is an awful lot of emphasis on her expenses which seem rather average to me and although i can appreciate there are grievances about her performance it does not seem unusual for a new backbencher to speak little in parliament when they have not even been an mp for a year i'm not going to charge in and remove all of this information as i don't have much context about her but i am concerned about the general quality and neutrality of the material in this article thanks