judicial aspects of felony conviction the article does not make it clear that the termination of sloan's custody rights did not just toss shamema into some arbitrarily chosen foster home as if sloan was some sort of unfit parent sloan was never found to be an unfit parent or a danger to his daughter the essential ingredient in the termination of sloan's parental righs was u s dollars shemema was returned to the usa because the couple who were private us citizens had the money to pay and agent to get shemema back that us couple wanted to raise shamema as a christian which sloan did not want no gov't agencies of any sort were involved in that action sloan's wife as the time had been coerced by the paid agents the coersion by their agent included implied threats against the health and safety of that woman's own children but those threats occurred outside of us territory during sloan's time as a fugitive the gov't of the usa had custody of him multiple times and chose not to extradict him back to virginia simply because of the expense involved sloan was a fugitive in name only and only because one viriginia judge was annoyed at him and he the authority to make him a fugitive rather than just let shemama's natural parent raise her as he saw fit i am asking for balance in the presentation of this story it is not as simple as the text currently suggests and the implications as the the text currently stands that sloan was simply just another irresponsible unfit parent please review the facts and ensure that the text reflects the real ambiguities of the situation we are not here to re determine the best interests of shamema we are here to report the truth w o any implied defamation of sloan's character he is a convicted felon and we make that clear enough but was fail to present the proper context of the termination of his parental rights