wp coi concerns and solutions for this article user lordradish asked a question about my possible conflict of interest wp coi first always look at wikipedia policies if you think there is an issue don't just go away angry i know that i'm still learning wikipedia policies and just reading the above i can see that in period i was somewhat confused about a couple of them the longer you are here the more sensitive you become to all of them through experience re coi questions usually its better to start that on a talk page per wp the first approach should be direct discussion of the issue with the editor referring to this guideline actually i thought this issue explicitly had been dealt with here before but reading through i see i evidently confused it with a related coi question elsewhere anyway i'll respond in interest of full disclosure outline questions i think have to be asked on the talk page of any editor here who gives any indication of being familiar with the issue and suggest some possible ways of dealing with wp coi issues here my possible wp coi to answer lordradish's question i have contributed blog entries to the secessionist blog vermont commons over the last months i have not been paid my blog entries have been more generally related to the topic of secession and occasionally make passing references to vermont and its secession issues including in comments on others' entries i don t live in vermont and don't intend to i don't consider myself a member of any vermont secession group as far as i remember i only have corresponded with the vermont commons editor and that by email i get some irregular vermont commons email and mailings and occasional second vermont republic snail mails i also have suffered a couple years of vicious and even libelous off wiki attacks from the anonymous blogger who does vermontsecession blogspot including because i edited this page and including at another blogspot page he set up just to ridicule me with incredible sexist ire therefore i have come to know far more about what types of individuals may be making very pov and coi edits to this article than i would have otherwise i do feel i have sufficient coi to make sure i declare it as i now have and to be very careful of my edits per wp coi editors who may have a conflict of interest possible wp coi of other editors in the period there was some extreme pov editing of this article by individuals who i believe had very strong personal and financial connections to vermont organizations and individuals far stronger than mine they are strongly motivated to trash or downplay the significance of second vermont republic and don't care much about wikipedia policies therefore here are some questions that might have to be asked on such suspected persons' talk pages or here but guidance on that appreciated and i hope it s ok to outline these general questions given the track record of this particular article general questions include are you the anonymous blogger who does vermontsecession blogspot com which while using some information from reliable sources has a track record of unrelenting nasty exaggerated and unprofessional attacks on individuals often with little or even contrary evidence presented is that person a close personal associate do you work for or with that person in some other capacity such as at a publication or a blog or a sometimes paid campaign staffer are you a democratic or republican party activist or contractor or potential contractor who fears that secession candidates running in might take votes away from democratic party candidates and throw the election to a republican according to official returns the candidate pete garritano mentioned in th is article got of the returns something not yet in the article depending on whether a candidate was a more right or left winging secessionist such a candidate could away enough votes to sway an election to the opponent of someone support by the editor if other editors who seem to be too pro vermont secession arise obviously relevant questions could be asked of them on their talk page or here dealing with special wp coi concerns of this article given the problems described above i can think of possible solutions i am going to ask some neutral editors those who have not been active opining on the secession topic or me to look at this section and opine if wikipedia pending changes is implemented this article may need to be put on the list in the interim any time individuals who may have cois make questionable edits perhaps a trul