wow people who think they own wikipedia im talking about people that whenever someone makes an edit they revert it to the prior version the sell out crowd picture i posted looked alot better than the cell phone image yet the cell phone image was used why i dont know person who posted the image must be more popular than me i guess you violated american copyright laws if you really want us to use the image then you cough up to cover the fines from the lawsuit and the legal costs and yes the person who took the cell phone picture is more popular than you the rid i think the crowd image is better but hyrbid is right free pictures are supposed to be used instead of fair use if there is a free pic and we don have a free pic i just wish it was from a digital camera and not a crappy cell phone pic why aren't the other images with copyright violations being removed because there's no freely licensed substitute available speak exactly those images do get replaced if when a free use one is found thanks bmg and tj spyke you guys actually explained why the image wasn't used rather than threaten me with the legal implications i could have suffered i also wish it was a digital image no problem if you want more info on wp's policies regarding pictures wp fu the fu stands for fair use not the slang term and i wasn't threatening you i was doing it to entertain someone else sorry if i offended you the rid to tj thanks for the link i will remember these things next time to hybrid it's no prob no hard feelings upcoming finished matches the difference between the two should be noted for those that are not watching socby breaking news wikipedia should not offer first hand news reports on breaking stories wikipedia is not a primary source however our sister project wikinews does exactly that and is intended to be a primary source wikipedia does have many encyclopedia articles on topics of historical significance that are currently in the news and can be updated with recent verified information from wp not results and 'breaking news' are two different things oh of course results good blind speculation bad i think i was also trying to point out that as wikipedia isn't a news site there was no need for a huge rush of people fighting to add information and make their mark on the article it happened anyway speak dance segment the individuals in the dance segment dusty rhodes wrestler cryme time eugene mae young and the fabulous moolah gene okerlund irs jimmy hart ricky steamboat sgt slaughter gerald brisco ron simmons stephanie mcmahon w brownies who else '''' how could you forget the doctor of style slick also simmons was there but didn't