the article on morphological analysis needs an overhaul the article on morphological analysis started out as a relatively simple reference to zwicky s ideas a definition of the process a few references and some external links i did not initiate this but whoever did referred to me and the swedish morphological society this was fine with me i went in and added a few details which i though relevant to the subject but more or less left things as they were then a mr i tjahyo sarwono came along with some very complicated diagrams rather poor english misinterpretations and explicit errors a parameter he mistakenly calls a value and a value he calls a parameter i am in despair over this as i don t want morphological analysis to get a bad name because of a sloppy wikipedia article i would like to go in and give the article a major overhaul but i don t know what the policy is about throwing out other contributors texts and diagrams can you give me some council on this tom ritchey the swedish morphological society ritchey swemorph com