hi again all i wasn't too clear about what piotr and now m rd r too wanted me to look at piotr says that it is this section he was mainly concerned about i mentioned it below but i have a bit more to say and will be clearer i don't think the boddenheimer stuff is acceptable nor is the polish independence following world war i was accompanied by a wave of pogroms and discrimination against jews they just don't have enough to do with the topic of the article even considered widely they're or syn will raise blood pressure and are fattening to everybody's girlish figure we come again to the crucial question of what is this article about to which i add another distinction a ghetto benches considered narrowly this particular discriminatory measure b discrimination against jews in education in poland wider c antisemitism in polish universities in polish education widest b or c seem to be reasonable popular choices this is something that people are just going to have to think hard about and come to a consensus what is or depends on what we decide the article is about since it is clear that we are using ghetto benches a bit figuratively changing the title is a possibility under c but probably not b the replacement from the notes that i suggested the quote from meltzer in fact ever since the attainment of independence the universities in poland had been strongholds of endejca supporters and centers for anti semitic agitation would be acceptable again i don't see how boddenheimer or polish independence discrimination against jews fits in under any reasonable conception