having glanced through the talk page and history it seems you have failed to gain consensus for your program of fairly extensive re writing you are now presenting isolated examples selectively and out of context to the rfc board presumably in order to achieve consensus and bring about your re write in piecemeal fashion that's my take as a neutral outsider who came here through the rfc board apologies if this is not the desired response if there are geniune concerns over recentism perhaps rangers' sectarianism prior to the s might be addressed in the article also the 'efforts to eliminate sectarianism' section has wp undue and recentism issues since it appears to appertain only to the last years perhaps a less pov section entitled 'response to sectarianism' could set these alleged efforts in context with the previous century