more insults and baseless accusations from maunus and a ridiculous possibility raised by weijibaikebianji sources which acknowledge there is no worldly consensus on race and that the race concept is fully supported in china which maunus outright lied about it being because they have outdated information or some such crap or maybe he simply misread it try reading the sources again maunus on the concept of race in chinese biological anthropology alive and well author s qian wang goran trkalj li sun the race concept in six regions variation without consensus author s liberman et al the status of the race concept in contemporary biological anthropology a review author goran trkalj forensic anthropology to author s sue black eilidh ferguson quote while scientists in china fully supported race as a concept and integrated race into their research acknowledging that there was still no real consensus with regard to the race debate here are more studies supporting the race concept genetic structure of human populations author s rosenberg feldman et al here one of the scientists involved with the study says it clear that their usage of populations or ancestry instead of race is mere semantics because i know you race deniers like to claim those are not the same and that their study basically confirmed the conception of human races categorization of humans in biomedical research genes race and disease author s risch burchard ziv tang the importance of race and ethnic background in biomedical research and clinical practice author s burchard risch ziv tang et al human population genetic structure and inference of group membership author s bamshad et al genetic structure self identified race ethnicity and confounding in case control association studies author s tang risch et al latino populations a unique opportunity for the study of race genetics and social environment in epidemiological research author s burchard risch kittles et al race a social destruction of a biological concept author neven sesardi the book by emeritus professor of anthropology vincent m sarich a fringe lunatic in the eyes of race denying lewontian ignoramuses race the reality of human difference here's one where the majority of anatomists in south africa support the race concept anatomists attitudes towards the concept of race author s goran trkalj et al here's one for medicine pharmacogenetics and geographical ancestry implications for drug development and global health author s daar singer here's one which makes it clear race is biologically significant what we do and don't know about 'race' 'ethnicity' genetics and health at the dawn of the genome era author collins here's another one who affirms biological significance but he is a race denier who plays the semantics game about how race has special social implications and that one should instead use populations or ancestry blah blah blah is race still socially constructed the recent controversy over race and medical genetics author john hartigan jr here a forensic anthropologists argues that the race concept is valid and that there is obvious political bias and suppression involved by the race deniers here's one scientist that says that the idea that human races are only social constructs has been the consensus for at least years referring to the lewontian ignoramuses of course but then continues with beneath the jargon cautious phrases and academic courtesies one thing was clear the consensus about social constructs was unraveling some even argued that looked at the right way genetic data show that races clearly do exist referring to the studies by risch tang ziv et al so cut the crap maunus and others there is clearly no worldly scientific consensus especially with china and china is a country with over a billion people not some random sh thole like north korea that one can simply ignore now enough beating around the bush let's see some ideas for changing the wp npov violating sentence who will start me again blackhades maunus