the problem is not what you're trying to say but how you're going about saying it quoting the subject of an article in the form she remembers saying is simply not encyclopaedic at all that was the problem with the first as well nothing wrong with saying that she denied her rape had anything to do with her later career choice but write it like an encyclopaedia article and not a magazine piece or fan page similarly with the second one say it if it needs to be said but not like this try at this time she stated her intention etc etc ref the problem of unencyclopaedic style is present throughout the article examples include in her autobiography massoli writes that why not omit that and put a reference at the end preacher has denied this why is this sentence in brackets jameson says again more like a magazine article the list of awards is meaningless really it adds nothing to the article why not just have a sentence saying her films have won numerous industry awards and finally the length of the article is not appropriate there is too much verbosity do you really think it's reasonable for an encyclopaedia to give jenna jameson as much coverage as gandhi