i refer to the last time you brought up this argument no one agreed with you that was consensus actually that is not consensus please read wp con if there are notable allegations that this is state terrorism by the us then please present your sources quote the relevant wording and then we can look at it you keep making claims but when i ask you to support it you never do why is that i hope this time it will be different if you notice above i did the un charter article and the udhr the icj could have found a violation of either or both please respond most importantly the icj never mentioned state terrorism yes and so what is your point that chomsky misrepresented the icj finding so he is not a reliable source without one reliable source there can be no discussion of nicuragua