oppose prefer sseparate as per evergreenfir if sourcing is the issue many sources are already in existence in previous versions of the article wikipedia editing disputes the crowdsourced encyclopedia has become a rancorous sexist mess slate magazine jump up to a b c d e f meet the editors fighting racism and sexism on wikipedia wired jump up why is wikipedia so sexist new york post jump up to a b c d e bustle bustle com jump up deanna zandt april yes wikipedia is sexist that's why it needs you forbes jump up to a b jump up to a b sexism the other sociologist analysis of difference by dr zuleyka zevallos jump up amanda filipacchi april sexism on wikipedia is not the work of 'a single misguided editor' the atlantic jump up to a b c d e f black history matters so why is wikipedia missing so much of it co exist jump up to a b c examiner com article leading wikipedian explains why blacks don t volunteer jump up people v bauder findlaw jump up wikipedia's edit wars and the eight religious pages people can't stop editing ncronline org jump up to a b wikipedia editing disputes the crowdsourced encyclopedia has become a rancorous sexist mess slate magazine jump up to a b the 'five horsemen' of wikipedia paid the price for getting between trolls and their victims thinkprogress thinkprogress jump up editors to make black history wikipedia entries more inclusive essence com essence com jump up jump up growing army of women take on wikipedia business insider business insider february jump up jump up to a b edit athon aims to put left out black artists into wikipedia philly archives jump up can black wikipedia take off like black twitter colorlines