email yes i did the entire table was a copyvio let's take this matter to the talk page talk serenity system map image that's a pretty nifty piece of work what did you use to create it reply to my email address asteconnathotmaildotcom this ip address is my work's one thanks episode naming hi cyberia there's actually been a lot of discussion about this subject at wikipedia naming conventions television and its talk page the consensus of most of the editors there is that articles should be disambiguated only when it's necessary that is when there's no other article by that name this is why for example tigh me up tigh me down was moved to that location from tigh me up tigh me down battlestar galactica there is no other article that could be at that page this is in keeping with the general disambiguation guidelines at wp d specifically wp d deciding to disambiguate which says ask yourself when a reader enters this term and pushes go what article would they most likely be expecting to view as a result for example when someone looks up joker would they find information on a comedian on a card on batman's nemesis on the hit song or album by the steve miller band when there is no risk of confusion do not disambiguate nor add a link to a disambiguation page the argument you give that using parenthetical phrases consistently keeps articles consistent and makes them easier to identify has been considered in the debate at wt tv nc but most editors felt that the consistency was a misleading virtue since preemptive disambiguation actually makes articles less consistent with the general wikipedia naming scheme and the article itself should provide enough context to identify it the category system also unites articles on a similar topic the star trek precedent is in my opinion a bad one the editors at the star trek wikiproject have been informed of the discussion at wt tv nc and it is likely that star trek episode articles will also be moved soon i admit that resurrection ship and cylon resurrection ship are a slightly complicated case but i think that since the episode is titled resurrection ship with a capital s and the ship itself is at cylon resurrection ship with no capitals it's sufficiently clear however if you and other bsg editors feel that it's better to have resurrection ship as a disambiguation page with the episode at resurrection ship battlestar galactica episode and the ship at cylon resurrection ship that would be ok too talk contribs it's been considered see the extensive discussion at wt tv nc and its archives especially here basically the argument is that disambiguation isn't about identifying a subject unless there are two articles that might otherwise share the same name so it's appropriate for the enemy within to be disambiguated the enemy within tos episode since there are other meanings of the enemy within disambiguation but there's no need for charlie x to be disambiguated since only the tos episode has that name talk contribs josiah means some editors does not equate to most josiah talk contribs count