as for an explanation i believe that the shortness of the article and the length of the controversy section constitute a potentially nnpov wikipedia article the dnc has been an organization since and the inclusion of a relatively long fundraising scandal section causes the article to lose its balance if the article isnt balanced then it has a nnpov this controversy already has a very long page on its own and it is my opinion that it should stay on its own page until this article is more fleshed out without a more complete article the fundraising controversy throws off any balance the article could have i would rather see a sterile article than a unbalanced and potentially nnpov article what are your thoughts on the matter does anyone else have anything to add