warning you deleted in the larry craig article the documented mention of the press coverage of the rogers outing the following three times within the last hours the section appears to comply with wp blp as it lists mainstream media coverage of the accusation and denial rather than the unconfirmed claim itself further reverts may result in a block the section has been called by other names so if that is your only objection you could discuss changing to the earlier name of the section or removing the section name since yeaterday the info was just included under the personal section rather than unconfirmed rumor please improve the article by negotiating npov wording in the talk section rather than by serial reverting if the material violates wp blp or is libelous so that the rr does not apply then reverts made to enforce this provision are generally not considered contentious however it can be easy to confuse removing potentially libellous material with an edit war over neutrality issues which are contentious edits err on the side of caution do not repeatedly remove material you consider defamatory unless it is blatant and seek intervention from others early at biographies of living persons noticeboard revision as of october edit tbeatty talk contribs wp blp deleted improperly added unverified rumors revision as of october edit tbeatty talk contribs unconfirmed rumors blp no place in wikipeida for unconfirmed rumors revision as of october edit tbeatty talk contribs unconfirmed rumors does anybody really think a section called unconfirmed rumors belongs in a blp or anywhere else in wikipedia