sorry to be late with this i was sick aside from the several inline consensus comments already mentioned here i achieve consensus with photouploaded about the abortion language perhaps the most controversial lead sentence here several editors affirm or decline to challenge the importance of the stability of the then current lead though i presented this section poorly and here i describe that consensus at that point for future reference without challenge except for new edits from vidor with whom i obtained a separate consensus over a nonlead issue i did mention a standing expressed discomfort of gloriamarie's for photouploaded's wording but gloriamarie has not commented lately those are good examples of how consensus is built by neutral discussion of all potential povs now that there is a different group of editors with a stated disagreement we must use consensus building procedures again so far aside from the unprotection episode i have not objected seriously to the editing of the lead but if a specific textual disagreement should arise you have not stated any we will need to discuss here oh by the way everything in the lead is thoroughly reliably sourced according to consensus as you can tell when you find the expanded statements in the article we also agreed to include only the most necessary footnotes in the lead