i disagree with your general thesis the article on a certain person should not necessarily focus on his or her perspective and should definitely try to be neutral the article on gengis khan is not mostly written from gengis khan's perspective even if i did agree with your thesis you would still be wrong since criticism of freeman's critique does not constitute mead's point of view she was dead by the time criticism of freeman's critique can at most be considered the perspective of her followers it is violates neutrality to blatantly overrepresent her followers perspective sensemaker