well per wp npov it's probably better to provide all the narratives how he describes himself how his supporters describe him and how he's described by independent reliable sources so that readers can get a proper overview phrasing like 'variously described as x y z ' with the appropriate sources cited might be a better approach there seems to be fairly wide variety of descriptions e g the bbc say controversial indian guru either way nithyananda's version of the truth has to be presented as his version not the encyclopedia's ''' talk'''