i know that the croatian perspective is somewhat different this comes from a very specific historiographical school which had among its roots grga novak assuming that dalmatia was one of the most primitive of europe at the time of venetian domination we must also think that since to the date you specified they are years josip smodlaka stated in that dalmatia was still one of the poorest regions of europe as you can understand we can not talk only of the italian evil foreign rule to explain this fact i think it is enough the logic to start to demand other questions which the historiography of your country has not yet met for your info marino bonda considered himself the italian podest of ragusa and today is the last italian podest of ragusa he never used or accepted the name bundic however if you want you can croatizate all the names i suggest antonio bajamonti antun bajamonti luigi lapenna alojz lapennic cosimo de begna possedaria kosimus benji posedarski lorenzo benevenia lovro benevenija antonio cippico antun cipiko roberto ghiglianovich robert giljanovic natale krekich nale krekic and so on those things are already made by your fellow countrymen in recent years