thanks for your reply i do assume good faith but the issue here does not concern good or bad faith the issue is deleting sourced material without any prior discussion or warning it doesn't matter how much good faith you're bringing the net result is still the deletion of sourced material as you point out there were actually two instances of peremptory deletions by you since the arbcom case finished just one month ago deleting properly sourced material and then daring other users to revert your edit or requiring them to go through a long discussion to get it restored are not great ways to relate to your fellow editors and their contributions in the future if you have a question about a source please use one of the many specific templates before further peremptory deletions of cited material if you think that the arbcom decision does not apply to you then maybe we should go back for a clarification talk