deleting the defense side of the story will violate npov and blp i don't agree with the way this is transpiring at all this new proposed substituted article is highly pov and was drafted behind closed doors by editors who all agree with one another meanwhile there is unwelcoming treatment of those who do not hold similar views all editing should be done out in the open with fair and equal opportunity for everyone to participate that means editing should be done on the article page not some page that people clicking on here don't know about this is not a procedure that is consistent with the wiki policy of having articles open for everyone in the world to participate in no one group owns this article or wikipedia by removing almost all the info that supports the defense side of the story the proposed article is now unbalanced the reader will come away with the view that a and r are certainly guilty although that is disputed by thousands of people and no final determination of guilt or innocence has been made the substituted article in no way complies with npov or blp i have contacted the wikipedia foundation because what is going on is in no way consistent with the rules and polices of wikipedia i have contributed financially to wikipedia on the basis that all editors can contribute to an article and that basic policies like npov and blp are to be followed but it seems that things are just getting worse and worse and worse with these efforts to block out the defense side of the story and now also trying to block any other information about amanda knox from being included in other articles on the website and trying to get those with other opinions blocked or banned there needs to be compliance with npov blp and basic fairness and respect for those with other views