an except of analysis from the supposed unreliable source it is a reliable source here is the analysis which i was simply trying to source from the page itself some of this is already in uon could i source that instead for the exact same change my site which is my lifes work as a master was deemed unreliable by non chess players here is the analysis in regards to the pinksi line these guys wont understand it because chess is too complicated for them but lets us hope that some other strong player who cares about how low quality wikipedia chess articles are will come by and confirm that my add was reliable instead of these random non chess players burying it in revisions this is a public outcry for any sign of intelligent life here is the analysis of the pinski line which even a beginner should understand this is from the site zimbeckchess com which was called unreliable will someone please get rid of this dusty pinksi line already here it is with houdini annotations and evaluations or is houdini not wp rs bb dxc nxe qd qe be qxg nxc be ne c rf cxb qxb kd dxc f be f nxc a nd bd cxd bxd qxc be qb o o o o o o bc re axb nxe qxb qxb nxb cxb bxb o o o cxd bxd qxe qxe fxe o o bd nxc bxc bd ba o o bb dxc rae bb bxh kxh qd kg bxb qd bd qb the move impossible to find improvement qxb cxb wow a tactic g d forbid cxd bxd qe qxe bxe rab o o o whites king activates quickly and he has an attack against queenside pawns in all games tested houdini processors bd duh not cxd which only a weak player would play uon zimeckchess wind etc bc dxc bxe qc bxe bxe bxf not bg o o black is in trouble there according to houdini thus the analysis on this page is a lie with one players opinion inserted is where this was sourced it was deemed unreliable because the random guy that edited wanted to war with me because he did not like what i said when i said i felt the halloween was playable don't dare play this line anyone someone will play this dusty kaufman line and win a pawn by force kaufman the all knowing all seeing eye atop the pyramid and euwe and year old player who would not even be able to beat my laptop in chess beware the innocuous pinski refutation that is not really a refutation maybe if i was carlsen this guy would stop undoing my edits and saying my personal website was unreliable or maybe not maybe carlsen can not edit wikipedia maybe this is carlsen in disguise think of how many people rely on wikipedia people rely on experts in their fiedls but what happens when the experts get ignored i guess my master title in chess is toilet paper so are my chess puzzles my self published book is probably garbage maybe i should delete my personal website because its not krabbes site which this guy likes better because he likes krabbe better than zimbeck in his eyes judging zimbeck by one comment made about the opening being playable what this guy does not know is theory changes and thats why they call it theory or else we should just close this page and allow nobody to edit it because it must be fact after all someone who does not even know how to play chess thinks a dusty pinski line refutes the entire opening and it does not even engage in the sacrifice it just gives the piece back like a coward and gets the worlds most boring positions that are all according to houdini