i don't object at all i came here to bring up capri sun being mentioned myself it is directly after the mention of powerade when i was skimming over the powerade bit of the article i thought what was being conveyed was that they had transitioned some product of there's into an aluminum can much like energy drinks at packaged and this was the intended gist of the statement i didn't really think it over but now that you point it out yes that is a bit of frivolous information i'd also agree with you powerade isn't an energy drink those are sports drinks which to my understanding and recollection by common knowledge are intended to hydrate and provide some salts to athletes a much different task than the intent of energy drinks capri sun is just a sugary drink with a fraction of fruit juice on what i've seen though it could different depending on location where it's sold or what laws dictate toward the content or labeling the article on capri sun has a picture where the product advertises itself as fruit juice every capri sun i've every noticed states it contains it may have however amount of juice it isn't however an energy drink if capri sun is an energy drink then anything containing sugar or corn syrup is an energy drink the term become basically meaningless i'm slightly stroking my chin as to who may be placing those products into the article but i do suppose it could be a mistake in good faith i am all for scratching them both entirely i would need to see a persuasive argument against doing so to move my postion i believe i'll be so bold as to just strike these two out anyone finding disagreement please do post here