again you don't decide what npov means when you arrogantly assert that your position is the only one that conforms to wikipedia policies against consensus it's very disruptive furthermore the viewpoint that life on earth came from nonliving matter by spontaneous generation and evolved solely by natural selection to its present state without planning from a designer is far and away the minority viewpoint if we really followed npov we wouldn't mention the fringe viewpoints of a slight majority of scientists and instead focus on the clear consensus among the public religious leaders and a strong minority of scientists that life on earth was designed are you simply ignoring this