in response a number of reputable sources are provided while better referencing is always the goal your assessments about the quality of the referees seems a little much do you contend 'dominion' as the country's title is an error source it as to why 'a ton' of references may not be available otherwise such is the nature of haphazard constitutionalism while i am not challenging the wackiness of avd the old dispute was also about something broader your and others apparent disbelief regarding the title despite references my link to that particular section is rather clear and the anon then seemed to argue persuasively i see the same arguments and position then and now and and stand by my claims here aside from possibly splitting the 'while' sentence up and simply doing so there is no real reason to alter said content