an outsider's suggestion i came to this article yesterday via the rfc without getting into the merits of various adds and deletes i suggest that if folks see a need to cut a large chunk of text and assuming it's not garden variety vandalism they at least paste it to the talk page and critique it that seems more consistent with the wikipedia way i see blogs are sourced and even comments posted by others to blogs see wikipedia reliable sources especially wikipedia reliable sources self published sources as secondary sources in bold print this is what what the wikipedia guideline says personal websites blogs posts to usenet or wikis and other self published or vanity publications should not be used as secondary sources