you could present the simple solutions as simple elegant but only useful in certain cases the reliable sources that point out that the simple solutions don't generalize when certain assumptions are changed do not have to be considered critics rather the wikipedia article could introduce the simple solutions as wonderfully accessible devices to explain the vs paradox of door and door because of the unique premises of the problem it would be very useful to point out that if certain premises were changed one might need a tool that can handle the complexities of conditional problems unlike the likelihood of revealing a goat behind another door then refer the reader to a section which gives voice to the reliable sources who offer up a host bias or the random monty or whatever to explain to the interested reader what a conditional problem looks like