good sir it is in no way meant as an 'attack' it is stating fact of your proven historical ability to not be negatively biased against someone who you are 'writing' about i am not here to argue hence why i barely touched your 'opinion' and added a counter 'opinion' with multiple sources including audio evidence i welcome you to expand on your points within the page of dr rabee while i check and verify the citations you made for authenticity in the mean time i welcome an alternative wiki editor to examine the page for 'neutrality' issues also fyi i am proceeding at a very slow pace there is much work to be done on other articles you have negatively slanted as well as positively slanted for others but all in due time