acs the acs clearly sets the standard in the world of cricket stats and history but i think some of the books have been weak eg famous cricketers a few clunkers here though a were published some of the journal articles were low on james quality out of 's a recent series of short autobiographies seems interesting though i believe the alun watkins book was described as anodyne incidentally i believe a tension has grown up between cricketarchive and the acs last agm oh and i am not a member but know several very well