i smell wp fringe i wish to call into question the veracity and reliability of the sources used to assert that this word is of egyptian origin the first one is an old scan of an older document ostensibly written by willis brewer whose credentials as a politician seem to be a red flag as to the scholarship behind these assertions the second reference is to the rosicrucian library a wp sps at its finest that cannot be held up as a reliable source due to its inherent agenda at proving a mystical religious truth through revisionist propaganda therefore i don't believe an actual reliable secondary source with editorial oversight and a reputation for fact checking can be produced which supports the assertion that christ is derived from an egyptian word can we remove it from the article again pending better sources