deletion of malenovski and kiev school district citations given that this is a contested article i wanted to explain my reasoning in recent changes firstly i inserted exact statistical per centages for the of schools teaching in ukrainian i did this b c using partly to characterize and overwhelmingly to characterize is really pushing it is almost and is about partly sounds like and overwhelmingly is somewhere between broadly understood now about the kiev's school district footnote in my opinion whereas the information is true it is too narrow for our purposes here citing national or at least regional statistics seems more appropriate as for malenovski's article the issue was unverifiability of the statistics i read through the article and came to the section where malenovski cites the numbers towards the end they are there but no original source is named no link is given for verification of the numbers finally i hope that wikipedia editors contributing to ukrainization will continue to insist on the level of scholarship expected and enforced for sources articles dealing with the holodomor article citing malenovski and going to the lengths of translating his pov in this case is rather unacceptable by the way i certainly prefer gogol in russian than in translation to english polish or ukrainian how can you not love but then again works in the original are better whatever the language i digress and stop