the wikipedia article on federal vision shows a strong flavor of bias because it does not clearly describe federal vision's distinctive and often contested meanings for various christian theological words and phrases of long standing and because it omits an adequately clear summary of the most common criticisms of fv the neutrality of the article can be strengthened in at least two ways one way is clarify the new definitions that certain federal visionists have created for certain established theological terms and phrases for example the federal vision's view of covenant objectivity results in a category of person some have called the unbelieving christian or unsaved christian which most evangelicals regard as an oxymoronic statement federal visionists assert a belief in election but subdivide the elect between elect who are granted an additional grace of perseverance and thus persevere in their faith unto eternal life as opposed to a different category of the elect who are not granted a special grace of perseverance by god and as a result apostasize from the christian faith and are eternally condemned to hell the phrase obedient faith has been adopted from controversial crc pastor rev norman shepherd and is used to signify that one is justified not by faith alone that is faith in jesus christ and the gospel considered apart from its subjective ethical influences but by the consequent actions of ethical obedience to god's will which result from faith this brings us to a second way to make the wikipedia article neutral which is to add a clear section on basic criticisms of federal vision the link section addresses some of these but there ought to be material in the body of the article itself that enumerates and clearly describes the most common criticisms of federal vision e g federal vision has been criticized as not being properly described as evangelical since evangelical denotes a protestant insistence on the necessity of individual conversion in light of its teaching of presumptive baptismal regeneration and continual criticism and sometimes mockery of american evangelicalism's emphasis on the encessity of conversion in this sense it appears to be more akin to high anglicanism which is non evangelical the claim that it more faithfully represents the thought of john calvin is disputed by many familiar with calvin's theology