deletion or then merger there must be verifiable objective evidence that the subject has received significant attention from independent sources to support a claim of notability nrv wp nopage notability is a very serious question here and the weak and non scholarly material does not amount to a stand alone article the article is a combination of some critic red flagging of the criticism of the frankfurt school theories labelled here as conspiracy theory yes it can entertained that some claims rumours are discussed on minor internet sites that amount to conspiracy talk but it is no reason for a wikipedia entry or let alone a stand alone wikipedia article reasons for deletion are numerous and very concrete wp npov neutral point of view wp or the term original research or is used on wikipedia to refer to material such as facts allegations and ideas for which no reliable published sources exist wp v means that people reading and editing the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source where available academic and peer reviewed publications are usually the most reliable sources such as in history medicine and science wp fringe a theory that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article wp notopinion opinion pieces although some topics particularly those concerning current affairs and politics may stir passions and tempt people to climb soapboxes wp yespov avoid stating opinions as facts wp weight neutrality requires that each article or other page in the mainspace fairly represents all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in the published reliable sources for example discussion of isolated events criticisms or news reports about a subject may be verifiable and impartial but still disproportionate to their overall significance to the article topic this is a concern especially in relation to recent events that may be in the news