and supposed title references i've just reverted a group of so called title references that an editor has attempted to add without benefit of any sources to the episode summaries while some of them certainly make sense many more are arguable at best and all are wp or absent any source that supports the thinking of the writer s who gave any given episode its title in a couple cases i can posit alternative references a couple seem to have been overlooked and all in all we're back to wp indiscriminate information made more problematic by the lack of sources