scott is a baseball player not a fox news contributor therefore shouldn't his article be treated as such yes it says a lot about how pathetic and forgettable his baseball career is and will be that he is known more about his birther comments than about his accomplishments as an athlete however the inclusion of his birther comments in the article leads one to wonder if he hadn't made the comments in the first place would there even be a wikipedia article about him i hope the answer is yes because it means that the focus of the article will be what it should be