it's been a frustrating set of compromises believe me i've had people that wanted me to use the website name as the work field and others that thought it the website was a publisher i still believe that the organization that issues the chart in the first place should be treated as the author and i finally removed that field from the citation because there was a very loud campaign from people that just couldn't understand that corporations can legally be treated as people use of italics was another set of arguments and there was a large segment of people that believed that the chart names themselves were things that we could rewrite to suit our tastes the work field is the place where i feel the most comfortable making compromises as it is inherently a desriptive field i could compromise by changing the work field to read something like chartverfolgung simpson jessica irresistible album version at musicline de and then treating the piece as untitled because they really aren't providing a title for the chart pages how would that feel to you