safeguarded is simply censorship by another name the order of the arrow is a topic like any other wikipedia editors are under no obligation to adhere to the rules of any organization in terms of what information about said organization may be made public in the relevant article moreover if the information is coming from a credible source in this case the recognized texts of the organization itself by what right do other editors refute that information's validity in looking at the personal pages of the editors who have insisted on the exclusion of oa secrets over the life of this article it is clear that they are themselves members since oa members are under obligation to keep this information secret it is untenable that they should be permitted to control the editorial process of this entry and to put blocks on editors who do agree with them