the articles say that the requirement was listed on the application the medical board states that frist is responsible regardless of who signed it as is entirely obvious else you could have your minions lie about anything without penalty i personally don't think this is an important issue but you clearly do as you keep zapping mention of it entirely your accusation of source shopping is contemptible i did not add the issue at all i noted that you removed the entire issue with an edit summary of false charge and pov i didn't think the writing was pov so i google newsed it to see if your factual claim was legit fox came up which is hardly anti frist your assertion of falsity was false suffice it to say that you instantly lost all credibility with me so you can stuff your source shopping in an appropriate orifice derex