are you suggesting that the deputy attorney general was lying that's a serious criminal offense are you suggesting that the further actions leading to the apprehension of hulda clark on a fugitive warrant were therefore based on false charges a suggestion that has never been uttered by hulda clark or her lawyers what later happened only makes sense in light of the part you have now deleted if there is a problem with the text used in wikipedia rather than the source then why not reword the deleted paragraph and still use the sworn affidavit of the deputy attorney general as the source if a court can accept this as true which it obviously did or she wouldn't have fled and later been arrested why can't we talk