as far as i'm concerned the ani incident changes nothing as it was not verified to be him to a reasonable degree necessary to take any action to consider anything that was said or done from that ani and use that as a basis for any change from yesterday would be inconsistent with our ideals i'm willing to consider any evidence that there has been breach of the terms of the rfc u but i will not accept a standard of verification that is different than what i would want the community to use on me if i were accused of the same offense as admins and editors we are duty bound to respect the outcome of the rfc u the consensus of the community until reasonable and reliable evidence is presented that a breach of the terms has occurred this principle is larger than any issue with yrc as it speaks to and defines our character join wer