i agree that there might be a problem however i generally agree with the changes made since nov and still do moreover your above analysis et al is not necessarily agreeable and glazes over usage of the term which is no less valid or verifiable that might differ from cited definitions which seem imo incomplete and minimalist for instance an online search will reveal a number of instances of single star system and i think it somewhat difficult to demonstrate they they too are incorrect even if those are discarded applying this notion merely to systems with two or more stars double trinary to the exclusion of single star entities e g the solar system seems rather illogical alternatively the current article and definition content is neither beyond the scope of the topic nor inaccurate thus i defer to my prior comments until there is overwhelming evidence to support this position and i yet do not see it or additional editorial comment i see little reason to change the status quo