well thank you for at least stepping up and citing some kind of reasoning for what i consider unreasonable actions on the part of others bob rayner no original research are you kidding me years of research was reported both failures and successes that was also physically verified experimentally by over others world wide and is cited on my original and now archived and now unalterable by me open org davidc website on both archive go here com and archive org in europe the past updates on that archive collection details those years of experimental research including the works of others on the subject around the world beginning with the first physical verifications by james hurl of australia and follows the story through to the last update before i gave up for a while out of exasperation due to unrelenting stupidity and prejudice don't confuse our religiously scientific dogma by citing facts the theory of operation i believe is clearly stated and the flat earth prejudice against the subject is apparent in the overall tone and presentation of the balance of the definition of inertial propulsion a lone dissenting voice challenging the current dogma is how all of science progresses past the ignorance of yesteryears to disallow original research is to attempt to hold all of science to a stable state and ignores the dynamic nature of the search for greater truths than we currently understand science is not a bible and dogma is anathema to the entire process of research