Consumer complaint received 2020-11-01 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — Credit card debt
Issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed — Debt was result of identity theft
Company: Blitt and Gaines, P.C.
State: IL

Complaint narrative:
Dear CFPB, Please find my complaint against XXXX XXXX XXXX and Blitt & Gaines PC. for illegal collection of debt I do not owe, specially to XXXX XXXX XXXX, racket, unjust enrichment, lies to Federal Authorities, Ponzi Scheme and other crimes. 

On or about XX/XX/XXXX Blitt & Gaines submitted me a partial respond to my Debt Validation request - such as copies of monthly statements which are purportedly belong to their purported client, XXXX XXXX XXXX. 

I demanded additional validation, in particular to provide me a copy of Retainer agreement for Blitt & Gaines from XXXX XXXX XXXX  ; copy of my WRITTEN agreement where I agree to pay any debt to XXXX XXXX XXXX ; proof that my WRITTEN Agreement is properly recorded with XXXX XXXX XXXX as an asset on their accounting ledger ; and validate that this was an actual debt and not the payment to me for participation in XXXX XXXX XXXX Ponzi scheme with derivatives operated by XXXX ( member of Federal Reserve ) and their co-conspirators, XXXX XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX XXXX. 

I also specifically requested to verify which method used XXXX XXXX XXXX to hire Blitt & Gaines lawyers ; and how they communicate. 

If this communication is conducted via cloud server or any other website, please identify the website or a web platform. 

Blitt and Gaines refused to provide me requested information and resorted to evasive statements that Blitt & Gaines was retained by XXXX XXXX XXXX to collect this debt - while XXXX XXXX XXXX never confirmed this retention ; and here is no single document in support to Blitt and Gaines statement that they are retained by XXXX XXXX XXXX. Evasive and incomplete respond under IL and Federal law is not a respond at all. 

Blitt and Gaines submitted false statements that their records indicate that on XX/XX/XXXX Ms. XXXX opened a credit card account with XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 

First, the ACCOUNT referred by Blitt & Gaines was a concealed agreement with me to perform financial services aka issue Promissory Note which will be used by Federal Reserve ( where XXXX is a member ) 's member XXXX XXXX XXXX to issue derivatives where the sole beneficiary is XXXX XXXX XXXX, via book entry system which they sell to investors for at least 12 times more than the payment given to me for SERVICES. 

Blitt & Gaines confirmed that Prior to our representation ( without any proof of such representation ), XXXX XXXX XXXX received two validation requests from Ms. XXXX. On XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX sent MsXXXX XXXX validation of the account as evidenced in the attached documentation. XXXX XXXX XXXX  NEVER answered my demand to VALIDATE the debt ; and never responded how my SIGNED application was handled by XXXX XXXX XXXX, as well as a proof that this WRITTEN document was recorded as an asset on XXXX XXXX XXXX ledger. 

On XX/XX/XXXX our office sent MsXXXX XXXX our initial communication indicating our representation and providing the required information pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. 

Once again, Blitt & Gaines only VERBALLY indicated their retainer with XXXX XXXX XXXX. Blitt & Gaines can claim that they are retained by Santa Claus, I need to see the actual PROOF of retainer and the name of the person at XXXX XXXX XXXX who is responsible for communication with Blitt and Gaines and who handles BOA accounts receivable. None of it was provided. 

This complaint is the only communication we have received from Ms. XXXX. In response, our office mailed verification of the account as requested, which included fourteen months of billing statements evidencing the balance on the account. 

Blitt & Gaines again resorted to evasive and incomplete respond. I did not asked to provide me evidence of a balance, I need evidence of the ACTUAL account as recorded in XXXX XXXX XXXX ledger, pursuant to GAAP. Evasive and incomplete respond is not the respond at all, under IL and Federal laws. 

Blitt & gaines further lied to Federal authority that a credit Card is an unwritten Agreement. 
IF they were lawyers and not racketeers, they must be familiar with IL law which states that ( 815 ILCS 160/2 ) ( from Ch. 17, par. 7102 ) Sec. 2. Credit agreements to be in writing. A debtor may not maintain an action on or in any way related to a credit agreement unless the credit agreement is in writing, expresses an agreement or commitment to lend money or extend credit or delay or forbear repayment of money, sets forth the relevant terms and conditions, and is signed by the creditor and the debtor. 

In other words, Blitt and Gaines falsely claimed that a credit card is an unwritten agreement. 

XXXX and XXXX NEVER responded to my question about securitization of my personal information by ANYONE, but particularly by XXXX XXXX XXXX who just recently was sued Over Credit Card Debt when Customers file a class action lawsuit over banks credit card debt collection. The suit alleges that BoA sued customers for unpaid credit card debt on debts that were securitized. These debts were sold, assigned, or transferred to a trust via credit card securitization, a financial move that resulted in BoA relinquishing its debt obligation. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  was brought by XXXX XXXX XXXX and was filed on XX/XX/XXXX in XXXX Eastern District. The case alleges that BoA violated the Pennsylvania Fair Credit Extension Uniformity Act and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. It requests BoA pay punitive, actual, treble, and statutory damages along with injunctive and declaratory relief, attorneys fees, the costs of suits, and other relief. 

If XXXX XXXX XXXX and Blitt & Gaines will continue its illegal practices ( aka racket ) and refuse to provide me royalties from trades conducted by XXXX XXXX XXXX and other undisclosed parties ( particularly XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX owned by XXXX XXXX XXXX ), ect - I will not hesitate to move for legal protection via a major Class Action for racket, identity theft and unjust enrichment Sincerely, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX , IL XXXX

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation