Consumer complaint received 2023-09-15 00:00:00
Product: Vehicle loan or lease — Loan
Issue: Managing the loan or lease — Problem with the interest rate
Company: NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
State: VA

Complaint narrative:
XXXX XXXX XXXX Attachments XXXX ( 1 hour ago ) to XXXX, me, XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX asked me if I would help him sort out this matter. We have used Navy Federal Credit Union ( NFCU ) on numerous occasions over the years to finance purchases. We have always had a very positive experience. In XXXX, my husband purchased a new vehicle, and NFCU was the lender he chose to finance the purchase. He continues to make all of the payments as agreed. About a month ago, NFCU reached out via mail to ask him to sign another original Promissory Note, Security Agreement, and Disclosure. 

Issue The issue on the electronic Promissory Note is that he was promised a rate of 4.79 % at application, and the electronic Promissory Note he signed incorrectly reflected the rate of 5.04 %. When he realized this error, he brought the mistake to NFCU 's attention, and the NFCU employee immediately corrected his online loan account. Then, NFCU sent out another original Promissory Note for him to sign. The main issue here is that he is being forced to sign two live Promissory Notes without either one being labelled as a substitute or a corrected agreement and without any documentation from NFCU that this additional Promissory Note is a substitute for the one he originally, electronically signed. 

Contact He initiated at least two different calls to NFCU to try and straighten out why they wanted him to sign another original Promissory Note and Security Agreement versus a " Corrected or Substitute Promissory Note Agreement '' to prevent two live Promissory Notes ; I attached page 1 of the electronically signed Promissory Note. 

He went to the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX in XXXX, Virginnia this afternoon to explain that we only wanted it in writing that this new Promissory Note was a substitute for the original electronically signed Promissory Note. The Customer Service branch employee stated that NFCU could not provide that statement -- indicating that the new Promissory Note was being substituted for the original electronic Promissory Note. 

Threat Furthermore, the Branch Customer Service person threatened that if he did not sign the additional Promissory Note within 90 days of the original Note date ( XX/XX/2023 ) NFCU would increase the loan 's rate to 18.99 % -- I am assuming that NFCU would convert the loan to an unsecured loan, which the loan is not because NFCU has the original, electronically signed Promissory Note he signed the day he picked up his check to purchase the vehicle. 

Please Assist This mistake was not his mistake, and all he is trying to do is correct the error NFCU made without running the risk of two live Promissory Notes floating around NFCU 's vault or at the very least something in writing from NFCU that the second written Promissory Note will be substituted for the original electronic version. Additionally, this letter should indicate that upon receipt of the substitute Promissory Note that the original, electronically signed Promissory Note will be returned to his possession marked " VOID '' to avoid future issues. 

XXXX XXXX Vice President of Regulatory Compliance Mobile XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation