Consumer complaint received 2015-05-14 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — FHA mortgage
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account — 
Company: McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC
State: GA

Complaint narrative:
Case number : XXXXXXXXRelated Case Number : XXXX Allegation # XXXX : The allegation that our Firm had a key role or any role in robo-signing is absurd. Our Firm has maintained the highest standards since 1982 in providing legal services. There has never been a finding by a state or federal court or the state Attorney General that our Firm ever participated in robo-signing. The borrower provides no cases, no evidence and no documentation for this defamatory allegation. 
ANSWER TO THIS STATEMENT : WHO : Foreclosure Processor XXXX Files For BankruptcyXXXX -- XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX has obtained a lawsuit that accuses a metro XXXX business of churning out robo-signed foreclosure documents. 
The firm McCalla Raymer farmed out the paperwork to XXXX XXXX, in XXXX Georgia. XXXX was the document processor, XXXX established by a group of former McCalla Raymer attorneys. XXXX provides foreclosure, bankruptcy, and loss mitigation processing services. XXXX ' customers include large mortgage servicers and law firms with large mortgage default resolution practices. As a mill manufacturing these documents for XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, and XXXX aka XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX, a Georgia firm hired to process foreclosures for some of the country 's biggest mortgage servicers and real-estate law firms, has filed for bankruptcy, blaming slowed business. XXXX has filed for bankruptcy once federal regulators and state attorneys general began investigating the mortgage industry 's " robosigining '' scandal. 
THEN : XXXX, a provider of legal services to the mortgage bankingIndustry, reached an agreement with XXXX XXXX to purchase someof the assets that currently support the non-legal support functions of thefirm. XXXX filed for Chapter XXXX bankruptcy protection on XXXX XXXX. Theagreement is subject to bankruptcy court approval and XXXX-based XXXX XXXX to purchase XXXX which federal regulatorsand state attorneys general are investigating the mortgage industry 's '' Robosigining '' scandal. The firm XXXX renamed XXXX toXXXX XXXX XXXXAND XXXX XXXX XXXX Files for Bankruptcy ProtectionXXXX-based XXXX announced XXXX to purchase XXXX which federal regulators and state attorneys general are investigating themortgage industry 's " Robosigining '' scandal. The firm McCalla Raymer renamedXXXX XXXX to XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX was the named creditor insome foreclosure proceedings. The reason is because the bankruptcyfilings including the statement of affairs will probably give some important clues to thereal money story on those mortgages where XXXX was involved. We will not find theloan receivables account that are mysteriously absent from virtually all suchfilings and FDIC resolutions. The question is that XXXX-based McCalla Raymerannounced McCalla Raymer to purchase XXXX XXXX which federal regulatorsand state attorneys general are investigating the mortgage industry 's '' Robosigining '' scandal. This XXXX started by Attorney of McCallaRaymer Firm BECAUSE Of Robo Signing filed bankruptcy SO XXXX its buyer form his reportedly former attorney. This XXXX XXXX listedas same address as XXXX Attorney Firm. NOW the mistake is to XXXX Attorney Firm creating This XXXX and XXXX XXXX XXXX relationship and involvement in Robosigining '' scandal. 
which federal regulators and state attorneys general are investigating themortgage industries. Attorneys never investigated the deeds validation.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation