vivekkopthsd/cfpb-consumer-complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint received 2023-08-27 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: TX

Complaint narrative:
See the attached documents.I 'm so stressed and very disappointed due to this events that harmed my mental health, emotional health and even put my family in distress! REMOVE THESE ACCOUNTS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!!

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2023-08-27 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE
State: NC

Complaint narrative:
My credit report thru XXXX XXXX shows my score dropped by XXXX points due to a missed payment on a credit card that I don't even have! It is Barclays Bank, and I do not have that credit card, nor have ever had it!

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2023-08-27 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: IL

Complaint narrative:
In XX/XX/XXXX, My husband and I financed a vehicle through XXXX XXXX XXXX. During the loan XXXX XXXX Now illegally activated a remote disable device on my vehicle preventing medical transportation, and violating state pandemic protections. XXXX of Illinois XXXX order number XXXX to be more precise. 

In XX/XX/XXXX, my husband and I fell ill with XXXX. Unable to properly access healthcare, because of issues with transportation his XXXX unfortunately relapsed and he now requires permanent XXXX and XXXX which he will have to be on for the rest of his life. 

We notified XXXX Now of our hardship due to the pandemic and the financial burden it had caused. We voluntarily surrendered the vehicle on XX/XX/XXXX, as instructed. However XXXX XXXX Now unlawfully garnished my husbands wages without notice or a valid court order. Then a month later they returned a portion of what they had his job garnish. To this day we're still confused as to how they came up with the amount question why the amount and why the return of a portion of it. We asked them in our certified letter to explain this as well. Before sending the certified letter to XXXX Now, My husband made a call to the XXXX Now office to request information on the amounts stated on our credit files. We wanted to know if the vehicle was sold because if so, we werent given credit for it, as well as questions regarding the wage garnishments. The woman he was speaking with in the finance office, literally laughed when my husband was trying to explain his illness. This is very discerning. She referred to him as not being truthful about his XXXX and the XXXX issues we experienced. Not only have they violated so many laws and regulations but to laugh at someone being seriously ill is beyond comprehension as well as professionalism. 

We disputed this improper debt collection and requested validation, which XXXX Now failed to provide, violating the FDCPA. The invalid repossession also continues damaging both of our credit unlawfully. 

XXXX Nows willful disregard of the FDCPA, state debt collection laws, wage garnishment laws, and pandemic protections have unjustly harmed us. I request an investigation and enforcement action against XXXX Now for : - Illegally disabling my vehicle during state pandemic restrictions- Unlawful wage garnishment without notice or court order - Failure to validate disputed debt as required by federal law - Inaccurate credit reporting and wrongful repossession notation, collections - Lack of response to consumer complaints and violations

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2023-08-27 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: IL

Complaint narrative:
In XX/XX/XXXX, My husband and I financed a vehicle through XXXX XXXX XXXX. During the loan XXXX XXXX Now illegally activated a remote disable device on my vehicle preventing medical transportation, and violating state pandemic protections. Governor of Illinois executive order number 14 to be more precise. 

In XX/XX/XXXX, my husband and I fell ill with XXXX. Unable to properly access healthcare, because of issues with transportation his XXXX unfortunately relapsed and he now requires permanent XXXX and XXXX which he will have to be on for the rest of his life. 

We notified XXXX Now of our hardship due to the pandemic and the financial burden it had caused. We voluntarily surrendered the vehicle on XX/XX/XXXX, as instructed. However XXXX XXXX Now unlawfully garnished my husbands wages without notice or a valid court order. Then a month later they returned a portion of what they had his job garnish. To this day we're still confused as to how they came up with the amount question why the amount and why the return of a portion of it. We asked them in our certified letter to explain this as well. Before sending the certified letter XXXX XXXX Now, My husband made a call to the XXXX Now office to request information on the amounts stated on our credit files. We wanted to know if the vehicle was sold because if so, we werent given credit for it, as well as questions regarding the wage garnishments. The woman he was speaking with in the finance office, literally laughed when my husband was trying to explain his illness. This is very discerning. She referred to him as not being truthful about his XXXX and the XXXX issues we experienced. Not only have they violated so many laws and regulations but to laugh at someone being seriously ill is beyond comprehension as well as professionalism. 

We disputed this improper debt collection and requested validation, which XXXX Now failed to provide, violating the FDCPA. The invalid repossession also continues damaging both of our credit unlawfully. 

XXXX Nows willful disregard of the FDCPA, state debt collection laws, wage garnishment laws, and pandemic protections have unjustly harmed us. I request an investigation and enforcement action against XXXX Now for : - Illegally disabling my vehicle during state pandemic restrictions- Unlawful wage garnishment without notice or court order - Failure to validate disputed debt as required by federal law - Inaccurate credit reporting and wrongful repossession notation, collections - Lack of response to consumer complaints and violations

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2023-08-27 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: DRIVE NOW ACCEPTANCE LLC
State: IL

Complaint narrative:
In XX/XX/XXXX, My husband and I financed a vehicle through XXXX XXXX XXXX. During the loan XXXX Drive Now illegally activated a remote disable device on my vehicle preventing medical transportation, and violating state pandemic protections. XXXX of Illinois XXXX order number XXXX to be more precise. 

In XX/XX/XXXX, my husband and I fell ill with XXXX. Unable to properly access healthcare, because of issues with transportation his XXXX unfortunately relapsed and he now requires permanent XXXX and XXXX which he will have to be on for the rest of his life. 

We notified Drive Now of our hardship due to the pandemic and the financial burden it had caused. We voluntarily surrendered the vehicle on XX/XX/XXXX, as instructed. However XXXX Drive Now unlawfully garnished my husbands wages without notice or a valid court order. Then a month later they returned a portion of what they had his job garnish. To this day we're still confused as to how they came up with the amount question why the amount and why the return of a portion of it. We asked them in our certified letter to explain this as well. Before sending the certified letter to Drive Now, My husband made a call to the Drive Now office to request information on the amounts stated on our credit files. We wanted to know if the vehicle was sold because if so, we werent given credit for it, as well as questions regarding the wage garnishments. The woman he was speaking with in the finance office, literally laughed when my husband was trying to explain his illness. This is very discerning. She referred to him as not being truthful about his XXXX and the XXXX issues we experienced. Not only have they violated so many laws and regulations but to laugh at someone being seriously ill is beyond comprehension as well as professionalism. 

We disputed this improper debt collection and requested validation, which Drive Now failed to provide, violating the FDCPA. The invalid repossession also continues damaging both of our credit unlawfully.

Drive Nows willful disregard of the FDCPA, state debt collection laws, wage garnishment laws, and pandemic protections have unjustly harmed us. I request an investigation and enforcement action against Drive Now for : - Illegally disabling my vehicle during state pandemic restrictions- Unlawful wage garnishment without notice or court order - Failure to validate disputed debt as required by federal law - Inaccurate credit reporting and wrongful repossession notation, collections - Lack of response to consumer complaints and violations

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2023-08-27 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: LA

Complaint narrative:
On XX/XX/XXXX, I submitted a complaint against the above-mentioned furnisher of this account and the credit bureaus for reporting inaccurate information as it relates to this account. On XX/XX/XXXX of XXXX, I received the companys response. The company stated that an investigation was completed, and everything was verified as accurate in my credit file. 

Furthermore, I purchased my credit report for XX/XX/XXXX, and recognized that XXXX XXXX and the credit bureaus continue to report discrepancies, after alleging to have conducted a thorough investigation of this account. There are different dates that the account opened : XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX. My credit report reflects that my monthly payments were {$0.00}. The dates that the account was last active are XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX, and XX/XX/XXXX. The comments on my credit report reflect repossession and involuntary repossession. Also, my credit report reflects two different dates that the account last reported : XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX. 

Under the FCRA, this violates 15 U.S. Code 1681, in which I may be able to receive up to {$1000.00} for punitive damages for each violation. 

Overall, I am requesting that your corporation remove this account, or I will pursue civil litigation for damages and deceptive practices.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2023-08-27 00:00:00
Product: Credit card — General-purpose credit card or charge card
Issue: Other features, terms, or problems — Problem with rewards from credit card
Company: BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
State: MI

Complaint narrative:
Bank of America closed up my credit card and didn't give me my rewards back and also they overdraft my business account.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2023-08-27 00:00:00
Product: Money transfer, virtual currency, or money service — Mobile or digital wallet
Issue: Unauthorized transactions or other transaction problem — 
Company: Chime Financial Inc
State: OH

Complaint narrative:
On Tuesday XX/XX/XXXX I filed a dispute with chime over unauthorized transactions for XXXX and XXXX. When I first called to reset my phone number I told the lady I did not have my chime catd. She told me she was going to reorder me one. I got an update about them changing my phone number in the text message. But no text messages or emails about these transactions that came out of my account. So when I logged in to get my digital card and send some money I seen that it was gone. I called chime right away and Filed a dispute. Not even a few hours later they denied it with no explanation.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2023-08-27 00:00:00
Product: Credit card — General-purpose credit card or charge card
Issue: Problem with a purchase shown on your statement — Credit card company isn't resolving a dispute about a purchase on your statement
Company: NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
State: NV

Complaint narrative:
Charge was made XX/XX/2022 ( think it was the XXXX ) went 2-3 months with company refusing to respond or communicate on given number filed a complaint and wrote a review in which they responded with threats and false claims of slander/defamation and said it was a technical issue withdrew complaint giving them benefit of situation then went two months with same issue never harassed or threatened and no response on the line they gave Sent all emails and texts with company can provide again

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2023-08-27 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: IL

Complaint narrative:
In XX/XX/XXXX, My husband and I financed a vehicle through XXXX XXXX XXXX. During the loan XXXX XXXX Now illegally activated a remote disable device on my vehicle preventing medical transportation, and violating state pandemic protections. Governor of Illinois XXXX order number XXXX to be more precise. 

In XX/XX/XXXX, my husband and I fell ill with XXXX. Unable to properly access healthcare, because of issues with transportation his XXXX unfortunately relapsed and he now requires permanent XXXX and XXXX which he will have to be on for the rest of his life. 

We notified XXXX Now of our hardship due to the pandemic and the financial burden it had caused. We voluntarily surrendered the vehicle on XX/XX/XXXX, as instructed. However XXXX XXXX Now unlawfully garnished my husbands wages without notice or a valid court order. Then a month later they returned a portion of what they had his job garnish. To this day we're still confused as to how they came up with the amount question why the amount and why the return of a portion of it. We asked them in our certified letter to explain this as well. Before sending the certified letter XXXX XXXX Now, My husband made a call to the XXXX Now office to request information on the amounts stated on our credit files. We wanted to know if the vehicle was sold because if so, we werent given credit for it, as well as questions regarding the wage garnishments. The woman he was speaking with in the finance office, literally laughed when my husband was trying to explain his illness. This is very discerning. She referred to him as not being truthful about his XXXX and the XXXX issues we experienced. Not only have they violated so many laws and regulations but to laugh at someone being seriously ill is beyond comprehension as well as professionalism. 

We disputed this improper debt collection and requested validation, XXXX XXXX Now failed to provide, violating the FDCPA. The invalid repossession also continues damaging both of our credit unlawfully. 

XXXX Nows willful disregard of the FDCPA, state debt collection laws, wage garnishment laws, and pandemic protections have unjustly harmed us. I request an investigation and enforcement action against XXXX Now for : - Illegally disabling my vehicle during state pandemic restrictions- Unlawful wage garnishment without notice or court order - Failure to validate disputed debt as required by federal law - Inaccurate credit reporting and wrongful repossession notation, collections - Lack of response to consumer complaints and violations

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2023-08-27 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report — Credit inquiries on your report that you don't recognize
Company: NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
State: MS

Complaint narrative:
I have a hard inquiry dated for XX/XX/2023 and on XX/XX/2023 for NAVYU FCU. 
I have a hard inquiry dated for XX/XX/2023 from XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, AND XXXX XXXX XXXX. I didn't apply for anything to have these Inquiries on my credit report, Could you please remove these.

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2023-08-27 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: GA

Complaint narrative:
i have not supplied proof under the doctrine of estoppel by silence. Engelhardt v. Gravens ( mo ) XXXX XXXX XXXX. I presume that no proof of the alleged debt, nor therefore any such debt, in face therefore exists. 

Acct Name : PROFESSIONAL DEBT Original creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX  Account # XXXX Acct Name : XXXX XXXX XXXX Acct XXXX XXXX Dear Transunion, I am writing to dispute the presence of certain charge offs on my credit report. I believe that these charge offs have been reported in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ) and the XXXX XXXX compliancy requirements. 

Specifically, I believe that the information reported by your agency regarding these charge offs is inaccurate, incomplete, and misleading. As a result, my credit score has been unfairly impacted and I have suffered damages as a result. 

Under the FCRA, it is your responsibility to ensure that all information reported to credit bureaus is accurate and up-to-date. Additionally, the XXXX XXXX compliance guidelines outline specific reporting requirements for charged off accounts, including the requirement to report the date of first delinquency and the date of charge off. 

Based on my own records, I believe that the information reported by your agency is incorrect and in violation of these guidelines. I have attached copies of my records to this letter for your review. 

I am requesting that you investigate this matter and correct any inaccurate or incomplete information in my credit report. 

Additionally, I am requesting that you provide me with a copy of the investigation results and any updates made to my credit report as a result of your investigation. 

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. 

Sincerely, XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2023-08-27 00:00:00
Product: Credit card — Store credit card
Issue: Problem with a purchase shown on your statement — Overcharged for something you did purchase with the card
Company: TD BANK US HOLDING COMPANY
State: MI

Complaint narrative:
I'v been charged extra tax on my device alone on my XXXX order XXXX Each item has a break down of taxpre shown on my FIRST STATEMENT but everything was apart of a bundle and purchased in ONE TRANSACTION. These items were apart of a pre-order promo for the XXXX XXXX XXXX  XXXX. I used XXXX financing that's backed by XXXX Bank to make the purchase, tax is 6 % where i reside. According to my statement the balance before taxes was {$1000.00}. I was charged an extra {$60.00} in taxes for taxes my phone ALONE it shows {$740.00} and i was charged {$100.00} in taxes for it. At 6 % sales tax my total balance that i should owe is {$1000.00} not {$1100.00}. My buds and watch were taxed correctly at 6 %. My transaction summary on XXXX shows {$1100.00} vs my TD statement of {$1100.00} a difference of {$12.00}. A statement and transaction summary/receipt should have the same amount of charges no more, no less. I'm pretty for sure people aren't catching on to these extra charges being added to the statement. I wasn't born yesterday {$740.00} doesn't equate to {$100.00} in taxes. Being charged extra is not what i agreed to.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2023-08-27 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Account status incorrect
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: GA

Complaint narrative:
I recently received a copy of my credit report, and I noticed some accounts on my consumer report that should not be on there. This agency is in violation of 15 USC 1692g. They were to notify me of this in writing 5 days prior, I was not notified. As the original creditor, only I can validate this debt.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2023-08-27 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Account status incorrect
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: GA

Complaint narrative:
I recently received a copy of my credit report, and I noticed some accounts on my consumer report that should not be on there. This agency is in violation of 15 USC 1692g. They were to notify me of this in writing 5 days prior, I was not notified. As the original creditor, only I can validate this debt.

Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2023-08-27 00:00:00
Product: Credit card — General-purpose credit card or charge card
Issue: Problem when making payments — Problem during payment process
Company: Synovus Bank
State: MD

Complaint narrative:
I have XXXX credit cards with First Progress, card # XXXX ending in XXXX with a payment due date on the XXXX of every month, my XXXX card ending XXXX with a payment due date on the XXXX of every month. 

I called in XX/XX/23 to make a {$86.00} payment on my account ending in XXXX with a payment due on the XXXX and they misapplied my payment to the account ending in XXXX with a payment due date on the XXXX and charged me a late fee and reported a late payment to my credit report.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation