Consumer complaint received 2024-10-04 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Account information incorrect
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: GA

Complaint narrative:
Account Requested for Correction or Deletion : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX reported with XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) - XXXX ( XXXX ) -- Closed Account Number not reporting ( Equifax ) . 

Reason for Correction or Deletion : Multiple Inaccurate Variations of Data Points Listed on my Equifax Credit Report Regarding this Item. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX reported with XXXX and alleged to be COFF  Alleged is reported in deficiency of reporting mandates and or standards therefore the fallacy must be eradicated as is my by-law requested resolution, please do so HERE AND NOW! This claim has acclaimed ailments in at least one or more of the following reported data fields jeopardizing its credibility and integrity as reported when reported : In regard to item questioned above, Past Due Amount : reported as {$2000.00} for XXXX, {$2000.00} for XXXX XXXX, and as Not Reporting for Equifax and as such are one or more having the appearance of being deficient of its exigency of reporting devoir and or decorum elsewise! I here now file a written challenge to and for the accusing data reporter and for each any and all of the accepting data reporting repositories to factually attest to thereby corroborating at least the minimally required adequacy of its own reporting and in doing so naturally satisfying the minimal criterion to have utilized their obviously previously-taken-for-granted benefit to report. 
In regard to item questionably reported above, please note that Account Name Number : is reported as XXXX for XXXX, XXXX for XXXX XXXX , and as Not Reporting for Equifax are one, two, or each apparently in potential deviation from the requisite standard ( s ) for the compliant reporting, thereby making such reported claims a concern due in part to lesser integrity of data as reported ( per XXXX XXXX XXXX ). As reported, there can be NO deviation from the requisite standard ( s ) for the compliant reporting of Data fields within any Metro 2 Field nor else wise in regard to this mandatorily accurately depicted data Page 25 of 60 -D1F COFF field. 
In regard to item questioned above, Data Reporter City, State, and Postal Zip Code reported as Not Reporting for XXXX, XXXX, VA, XXXX for XXXX XXXX, and as Not Reporting for Equifax and as such is one, each or all in deviation from the requisite standard ( s ) and or is not proven much less certifiably compliant to its regulatory mandates as its a sin qua non for compliant reporting and as such are one or more assertedly deficient of its exigency of reporting aptitude, sufficiency, and or amenability! 
In regard to item questioned above, Scheduled Monthly Payment Amount : reported as Not Reporting for XXXX, Not Reporting for XXXX XXXX, and as Not Reporting for Equifax and as such is in apparent deviation from the requisite standard ( s ) for certifiably compliant reporting, hence the XXXX of my rightful consumer complaint contesting reporter 's privilege to report this claim unless it accepts and successfully fulfills the challenge to prove indisputably its confirmed and demonstrated adequacy of reporting practices and process to include no less than the full adherence of their required perfection and completeness of the Credit Reporting Industry 's mandatorily utilized Metro 2 Format standards, and as such are one or more likely deficient of its exigency of reporting edict! 
In regard to item questioned above, Data Reporter Telephone Number reported as Not Reporting for XXXX, XXXX for XXXX XXXX, and as Not Reporting for Equifax and as such are one or more having the appearance of being substandard of its exigency of reporting precept and or decorum elsewise! I here now file a written preemptory even insistent demand to and for the acusador posturing as if were a lawfully righted data reporter despite there only existing a potentially achievable very conditional PRIVILEGE TO REPORT. Further, I appeal for each any and all of the accepting data reporting repositories to factually attest to ( thereby corroborating ) at least the minimally required adequacy of its own reporting and in doing so naturally satisfying the minimal criterion to have utilized their obviously previously-taken-for-granted benefit to report. 
In regard to item questioned above, Original Creditor : reported as Not Reporting for XXXX, Not Reporting for XXXX XXXX, and as Not Reporting for Equifax and as such are XXXX or more seemingly deficient of its exigency of reporting commensurateness and or decorum elsewise! I here now file a written challenge to and for the accusing data reporter and for each any and all of the accepting data reporting repositories to factually attest to thereby corroborating at least the minimally required adequacy of its own reporting and in doing so naturally satisfying the minimal criterion to have utilized their obviously previously-taken-for-granted privilege to report. 
As to and in consideration of the item questioned above, Data Reporter Identification Number reported as Not Reporting for XXXX, XXXX for XXXX XXXX, and as Not Reporting for Equifax and as such is one, each or all in deviation from the requisite standard ( s ) and or is not proven much less certifiably compliant to its magisterial mandates as its prerequisite for compliant conformity in reporting. 
This field, as reported, is a deviation from the established CDIAs reporting standards and or is reported one or more of being untrue, inaccurate, inconsistent, incomplete, untimely, unverifiable, and or else wise not confirmed certifiably compliant to all mandates for ethical and lawful reporting!

Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief