Consumer complaint received 2024-01-03 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — Credit card debt
Issue: False statements or representation — Attempted to collect wrong amount
Company: Pressler & Pressler, LLP
State: PA

Complaint narrative:
I believe Pressler and Resurgent are in violation of Section 1031 and Section 1036 of the CFPA ( also FDCPA ) as per the details below. There are several organizations and correspondence from organizations including Comenity, XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX and XXXX, XXXX and Warshaw. This is very confusing as to whom should be communicated and why I am receiving correspondence from all these organizations about the alleged debt. This is in violation. Also reference XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Warshaw.

Please see additional details below. 
As per the Consumer Financial Protection Bureaus Debt Collection Rule, the debt collection validation notice should contain the following items which have not been verified and/or received. 
XXXX. Name of the creditor to whom the debt is owed I am being contacted and they are stating I am the owner of the alleged debt, however as per the cover page from the statement they sent, there are two names listed XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX XXXX. An itemization of the current amount of the debt that reflects interest, fees, payments, and credits since a particular date that you may be able to recognize or verify with records I only received a statement sent to both XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX which consists of lates fees. No real charges or receipts that equals the sum of debt. 
XXXX. XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX Funding and XXXX XXXX XXXX reported this to the Credit Reporting Agency before I had an opportunity to dispute. In my correspondence dated XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX, I specifically asked for it to be removed from my credit report. This has not been done. 
XXXX. Correspondence was sent to Pressler on XX/XX/2023 stating I dispute the debt and requested the following information : Agreement with your client that grants you the authority to collect on this alleged debt. Pressler states they are representing XXXX but I am also receiving correspondence from XXXX stating they are managing the debt. 
Agreement that bears the signature of the alleged debtor wherein he/she agreed to pay the creditor. NOT RECEIVED Name and address of alleged creditor. XXXX, XXXX, Pressler, XXXX Not listed. 
Name on file of alleged debtor. Information received states I am the alleged debtor but there are two names listed on the statement. 
Alleged account number. 
Amount of alleged debt and date this alleged debt became payable. 
Date of original charge off or delinquency. 
Verification that this debt was assigned or sold to collector. 
Complete accounting of alleged debt. Statement/Summary only shows late fees with no receipts or accounting of debt. 
XXXX. I sent a letter to both Resurgent addresses with a copy to Presser and requested the same information including the signed contract. 
XX/XX/XXXX Pressler filed with XXXX XXXX a complaint. 
The only information I received and was sent from XXXX on XX/XX/2023 was the exact duplicate statement history with late fees that I received from Pressler. 
XX/XX/XXXX Pressler resent the information they sent before which doesnt include the signed contract and/or the complete accounting of debt. Since there are two names listed on the statement cover they sent, this is quite important. They also stated that since this request is duplicate, they may choose not to respond to further inquiries.

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation