vivekkopthsd/cfpb-consumer-complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint received 2017-11-07 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report — Credit inquiries on your report that you don't recognize
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
XXXX XXXX,2017 numerous disputes were sent out to the 3 credit bureau about unauthorized inquiries on credit report. i also sent out certified mail 's to creditors no response. XXXX inquires on Transunion. XXXX  inquires on XXXX credit report. XXXX inquires on XXXX.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-11-07 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: VA

Complaint narrative:
I disputes the incorrect information with transunion on multiple occasion and transunion refused to investigates.
Transunion always replied to me that " dispute not specific ''.
I am sure that Transunion did not even investigate and now I demand they deleted those information on my credit report. The following were disputed and with certainty that Transunion did not disputed them I want transunion to deleted the following account according to FCRA statue.
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX.
XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-11-07 00:00:00
Product: Credit card or prepaid card — General-purpose credit card or charge card
Issue: Problem with a purchase shown on your statement — Card was charged for something you did not purchase with the card
Company: BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE
State: NV

Complaint narrative:
Our credit card company is not honoring its cardholder agreement, which states that the holder is not liable for unauthorized charges, as long as the items in question are pointed out to them.
In XXXX  2017, my XXXX-yr old husband took a 30-day free trial from XXXX XXXX XXXXor a product that promised to help him prevent muscle loss from losing weight per doctors orders.
He never received any product from XXXX XXXX, but numerous different companies with different addresses and brand names continued to send him products he never ordered. He tossed all the products sent to him into a box. In XX/XX/XXXXhe asked me why his XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  balance seemed to be very high. I reviewed all the statements and found these various companies had all been charging large amounts for all this snake oil. I suspected that XXXX was selling his credit card number.
The sudden XXXX sent my husband to the hospital with a XXXX XXXX XXXX. After the immediate crisis was over on XX/XX/XXXX, I contacted the first merchant on the list and asked if they were sharing our credit card number. The agent told me they are all one company. When I asked for a refund of all charges and offered to return all their unused product, he hung up on me. This happened two or three times. I then contacted the credit card company to dispute the charges, report fraudulent activity, and give them my suspicions of the sharing of credit card information between companies.
They took down all the information and said it would take 30 days to investigate. They did not change the card number and unauthorized charges were again made on the account. The credit card company received a pile of poor copies from the merchants website and claimed since the merchant proved the charges were authorized they would not refund the charges.
Ive appealed this twice now and been put off 30 days each time. I pointed out that the printouts from the merchant did not show any evidence that my husband reviewed or selected any of their terms and conditions, etc. I finally had to demand that they change the card number, and they finally did so.
I think the merchant has been performing unfair, deceptive and abusive practices, and that the credit card company is aiding and abetting this fraudulent scam perpetrated against a senior citizen.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-11-07 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Account information incorrect
Company: DISCOVER BANK
State: NY

Complaint narrative:
This allegation of having a charge off on my credit report IS DEFICIENT of CERTIFICATED PHYSICAL PROOF of being adequately and fully COMPLIANT to all mandates and laws as related to my state, the FCRA and METRO 2 data formatted reporting standards.
Also, how can they report different information to all three credit bureaus? The high credit, credit limit, date last reported, date last active and date of late payment are all different.
You MUST annul Today, even NOW as you are NOT authorized to retain much less report any information or aspects of adverse data that is NOT TESTIMONIAL in its 100 % TRUTH, CORRECTNESS, COMPLETENESS, TIMELINESS, of proven documented OWNERSHIP of mine, or of proven documented RESPONSIBILITY of mine. DEMONSTRATE confirmation of all data, dates, balances, calculations, identities, audits to include the requisite 426-character P6 statements and all of its trailing segments, the minimal five portioned personal identifiers, all 386 pieces to confirmation to collect, and every aspect of the alpha-/ numeric-/ and or alphanumeric source codes. RETURN or retain OBLIGATORY compliance with your federally defined timely deletion of any and all adverse notations that are deficient of physical evidence of proper reporting.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-11-07 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — Other debt
Issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed — Debt is not yours
Company: ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP INC.
State: SC

Complaint narrative:
This debt does not belong to me, so I sent a letter out to the company to ask them to remove the account from my credit report and the company has not responded. It has been over 45 days.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-11-07 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Account information incorrect
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: NY

Complaint narrative:
This allegation of having a charge off on my credit report IS DEFICIENT of CERTIFICATED PHYSICAL PROOF of being adequately and fully COMPLIANT to all mandates and laws as related to my state, the FCRA and METRO 2 data  formatted reporting standards. 

Also, how can they report different information to all three credit bureaus? The high credit, credit limit, date last reported, date last active and date of late payment are all different. 

You MUST annul Today, even NOW as you are NOT authorized to retain much less report any information or aspects of adverse data that is NOT TESTIMONIAL in its 100 % TRUTH, CORRECTNESS, COMPLETENESS, TIMELINESS, of proven documented OWNERSHIP of mine, or of proven documented RESPONSIBILITY of mine. DEMONSTRATE confirmation of all data, dates, balances, calculations, identities, audits to include the requisite 426-character P6 statements and all of its trailing segments, the minimal five portioned personal identifiers, all 386 pieces to confirmation to collect, and every aspect of the alpha-/ numeric-/ and or alphanumeric source codes. RETURN or retain OBLIGATORY compliance with your federally defined timely deletion of any and all adverse notations that are deficient of physical evidence of proper reporting.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-11-07 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Account information incorrect
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: NY

Complaint narrative:
This allegation of having a charge off on my credit report IS DEFICIENT of CERTIFICATED PHYSICAL PROOF of being adequately and fully COMPLIANT to all mandates and laws as related to my state, the FCRA and METRO 2 data formatted reporting standards.
Also, how can they report different information to all three credit bureaus? The high credit, credit limit, date last reported, date last active and date of late payment are all different.
You MUST annul Today, even NOW as you are NOT authorized to retain much less report any information or aspects of adverse data that is NOT TESTIMONIAL in its 100 % TRUTH, CORRECTNESS, COMPLETENESS, TIMELINESS, of proven documented OWNERSHIP of mine, or of proven documented RESPONSIBILITY of mine. DEMONSTRATE confirmation of all data, dates, balances, calculations, identities, audits to include the requisite 426-character P6 statements and all of its trailing segments, the minimal five portioned personal identifiers, all 386 pieces to confirmation to collect, and every aspect of the alpha-/ numeric-/ and or alphanumeric source codes. RETURN or retain OBLIGATORY compliance with your federally defined timely deletion of any and all adverse notations that are deficient of physical evidence of proper reporting.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-11-07 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Account information incorrect
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: NY

Complaint narrative:
This allegation of having a charge off on my credit report IS DEFICIENT of CERTIFICATED PHYSICAL PROOF of being adequately and fully COMPLIANT to all mandates and laws as related to my state, the FCRA and METRO 2 data formatted reporting standards.
Also, how can they report different information to all three credit bureaus? The high credit, credit limit, date last reported, date last active and date of late payment are all different.
You MUST annul Today, even NOW as you are NOT authorized to retain much less report any information or aspects of adverse data that is NOT TESTIMONIAL in its 100 % TRUTH, CORRECTNESS, COMPLETENESS, TIMELINESS, of proven documented OWNERSHIP of mine, or of proven documented RESPONSIBILITY of mine. DEMONSTRATE confirmation of all data, dates, balances, calculations, identities, audits to include the requisite 426-character P6 statements and all of its trailing segments, the minimal five portioned personal identifiers, all 386 pieces to confirmation to collect, and every aspect of the alpha-/ numeric-/ and or alphanumeric source codes. RETURN or retain OBLIGATORY compliance with your federally defined timely deletion of any and all adverse notations that are deficient of physical evidence of proper reporting.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-11-07 00:00:00
Product: Credit card or prepaid card — General-purpose credit card or charge card
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Account status incorrect
Company: Continental Finance Company, LLC
State: TX

Complaint narrative:
The creditor known as Continental Finance, XXXX, and/or XXXX has reported inaccurate information on my credit reports. The creditor mentioned above reported my account with them as being 30 days past due in the month of XXXX XXXX. This information is incorrect because I made a payment of {$250.00} on XXXX for recent charges to my account that were not yet due. The only charge on my account that was due on the XXXX due date was a {$10.00} fee " MONTHLY MAINT FEE XXXX DE ''. This is confusing because I pay an annual fee to cover the servicing of my account already. In any event, the {$250.00} payment should have covered this fee. This payment was withdrawn from my checking account by XXXX XXXX on XXXX, but was not applied to my account with them. It is also worth noting that I also made a payment in the month of XXXX. I 've contacted them via phone about the 30 day late on my account and was given a mailing address. I sent correspondence via certified mail on XXXX XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, but got no response. USPS Tracking Results show the package as being delivered on XXXX XXXX, XXXX, XXXX. On XXXX/XXXX/XXXX I sent letters out to the credit bureaus disputing the 30 day late. The creditor " validated '' the accuracy of the 30 day late with the credit bureaus. The creditor then sent me a letter requesting proof that I made the payment. I then got a print-out from my bank showing the debit from my account by XXXX XXXX confirming what I told them previously. I mailed it to them on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, XXXX. USPS Tracking Results show the package as being delivered on XXXX XXXX, XXXX, XXXX. I 've received no correspondence from them as of today. I am reaching out to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to assist me in getting this issue rectified. I am most appreciative of your services and look forward to working with the creditor to get this matter resolved.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-11-07 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — Medical debt
Issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed — Debt is not yours
Company: Radius Global Solutions LLC
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
I am a Protected Class Member of the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. This debt is not mine ; it is a matter of Identity Theft.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-11-07 00:00:00
Product: Checking or savings account — Checking account
Issue: Managing an account — Funds not handled or disbursed as instructed
Company: U.S. BANCORP
State: IL

Complaint narrative:
Illinois Department of Employment Security. IDES electronic deposited funds into my U. S. bank checking Account. I was terminated on XX/XX/XXXX by my employer. I filed my u.i. claim on XX/XX/XXXX. I filed as terminated. On XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX of IDES entered a laid off status into my U.I. claim. And locked me out of my u.i. account, regardless of my effort to refile my claim on XX/XX/XXXX as terminated status.This generated a check of {$160.00} electronic deposited in my account on XX/XX/XXXX. This is a scam by IDES. I have to appeal any decision made by IDES if I am not found in favor to receive u.i. benefits. IDES would then want these funds returned. I notified my bank onXX/XX/XXXX to resins the deposit back to IDES. The U.S. bank has 10-90 days to decide.This IDES has placed financial hardship, and undue hardship, up on me by their deliberate actions. This is not a case of a mistake, or poor customer service. This is discrimination and corruption. I am a senior on fed.gov housing. I receive a URP utility reimburstment check of {$77.00} per month to pay utility cost. When no income is being earned. If I have income hud stops the urp monthly payment. If IDES orders me to pay monies back at a later date, that they issued on a laid off status that the state worker made. I would have to pay the funds back if found not eligible for u.i. benefits. And I also stand to loose the {$77.00} URP payment from hud. Because of this Unemployment benefit issued deposit. I am a senior. I filed a complaint with the OIG Il. Office against IDES. I notified DHA-HUD of this scam. And for their office to decide their own conclusion. I notified the bank. I called IDES for over 24 days and was hung up on, and no call returned. And then when my call was returned, IDES Does this. My first call was in the first week of XX/XX/XXXX to Tell IDES my last day worked was XX/XX/XXXX not XX/XX/XXXX as IDES had entered on the claim. This how corrupt this state of Illinois is. This was a attempt to not pay my 2 weeks wages from the employer. I filed a claim on XX/XX/XXXX with the labor board of Illinois for unpaid wages. My check was sent on XX/XX/XXXX later on in the day.. This is how the state workers and the companies and their employees, are speaking to one another in a underground organized crime corrupt network, on what they think they can get away with on workers and the people in the state. Let me make this clear I am going after the state of Illinois and IDES and the banking system the state uses. I do not know the state of Illinois and IDES banking system. I want my bank to show the world that IDES  and the state, with all their different scams in state offices, they can not push U.S. Banking customers around.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-11-07 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — Other debt
Issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed — Debt is not yours
Company: Convergent Resources, Inc.
State: OR

Complaint narrative:
Over the past few months, Convergent Outsourcing has sent me letters telling me to pay them XXXX because they 're claiming XXXX can not sue me for debt. I have asked XXXX for proof that I have any outstanding debt with them and they have stated no. I called Convergent and the moment I said I had called XXXX for proof they hung up.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-11-07 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — Other debt
Issue: Written notification about debt — Didn't receive enough information to verify debt
Company: Diversified Consultants, Inc.
State: NY

Complaint narrative:
Diversified Consultants is reporting this account on my credit report for XXXX with account number XXXX after it was being reported & deleted by XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX account number XXXX. I disputed this account per the FCRA and FDCPA and it was deleted by XXXX XXXX because it was not accurate and could not be verified or validated. Then, I get an alert on my credit report that Diversified Consultants reported it and I was never even sent anything in the mail from them. They just put it on my credit report and never gave me a chance to dispute it. This is a violation of the FCRA and FDCPA and should not be allowed.

Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2017-11-07 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — Other debt
Issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed — Debt is not yours
Company: Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
State: SC

Complaint narrative:
This debt does not belong to me, so I sent a letter out to the company to ask them to remove the account from my credit report and the company has not responded. It has been over 45 days.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-11-07 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information is missing that should be on the report
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: IL

Complaint narrative:
I applied to refinance the remaining balance of a 2nd mortgage ( XXXX XXXX ) in XXXX which was denied due to incorrect information being reported from primary mortgage lender. I continue to make payments and have never missed a payment but in XXXX XXXX charged the account off as a bad debt. My credit accounts should reflect, " charged off, paying as agreed, '' but does frequently does not. XXXX has been contacted regarding this issue at least twice, once in XXXX of XXXX and once in XXXX of XXXX. 
In a letter dated XXXX/XXXX/XXXX in response to my letter to XXXX regarding inaccurate reporting, XXXX stated that they found that they were reporting inaccurately and would send corrected reports to the Consumer Reporting Agencies to reflect account reporting as charged off, paying under a partial payment agreement. 
In a letter dated XXXX/XXXX/XXXX in response to my letter to XXXX regarding inaccurate reporting, XXXX stated that they found that they were reporting inaccurately and would send corrected reports to the Consumer Reporting Agencies to reflect Account reporting as charged off, paying under a partial payment agreement with all credit marks removed after the charge off date in XXXX of XXXX. 
I applied for a mortgage loan in XXXXXX/XX/XXXXof this year and was approved for same pending appraisal and final underwriting. I am now in receipt of a loan denial because XXXX is still reporting an inaccurate charge off date and is not reporting that the loan was charged off and paying as agreed. 
XXXX was contacted via USPS and via CFPB, according to XXXX they are reporting to that credit bureaus that my account is " charged off and currently paying under a partial payment agreement '' and that " XXXX XXXX is the charge-off date. '' The letter went on to say that the problem lies with the credit agencies.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-11-07 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information is missing that should be on the report
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: IL

Complaint narrative:
I applied to refinance the remaining balance of a 2nd mortgage ( XXXX XXXX ) in XXXX which was denied due to incorrect information being reported from primary mortgage lender. I continue to make payments and have never missed a payment but in XXXX XXXX charged the account off as a bad debt. My credit accounts should reflect, " charged off, paying as agreed, '' but does frequently does not. XXXX has been contacted regarding this issue at least twice, once inXX/XX/XXXXand once inXX/XX/XXXX. 
In a letter dated XX/XX/XXXX in response to my letter to XXXX regarding inaccurate reporting, XXXX stated that they found that they were reporting inaccurately and would send corrected reports to the Consumer Reporting Agencies to reflect account reporting as charged off, paying under a partial payment agreement. 
In a letter datedXX/XX/XXXX in response to my letter to XXXX regarding inaccurate reporting, XXXX stated that they found that they were reporting inaccurately and would send corrected reports to the Consumer Reporting Agencies to reflect Account reporting as charged off, paying under a partial payment agreement with all credit marks removed after the charge off date inXX/XX/XXXX 
I applied for a mortgage loan inXX/XX/XXXXof this year and was approved for same pending appraisal and final underwriting. I am now in receipt of a loan denial because XXXX is still reporting an inaccurate charge off date and is not reporting that the loan was charged off and paying as agreed. 
XXXX was contacted via USPS and via CFPB, according to XXXX they are reporting to that credit bureaus that my account is " charged off and currently paying under a partial payment agreement '' and that "XX/XX/XXXX is the charge-off date. '' The letter went on to say that the problem lies with the credit agencies.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation