Consumer complaint received 2024-06-14 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: Exeter Finance, LLC.
State: GA

Complaint narrative:
" I am writing this complaint to cfpb versus XXXXXXXX XXXX  in hopes to gain removal from reporting any negative claims ) asserted inadequately or undemonstrated to be so thereby ensuring my confidence in their reporting integrity. 
My complaints ) primarily are due to my belief the indicated company has failed to adequately ensure reporting of my personal consumer credit report profile in fact has been done and currently reports appropriately and ONLY so undeniably ethical, fair, truthful, within federally-defined timeliness, with physically verifiableness, and elsewise certifiably validated to be compliant to established mandatorily utilized XXXX Data-filled Field Formatted Reporting Standards without omissions and or deviations from that required used appropriateness which ensures a non-jeopardized degree of integrity reporting allegations versus me satisfying at least the minimal criterion to satisfy the federal and my state 's applicable regulatory mandates for reporting to an extent no lesser than that of a MAXIMUM POSSIBILE ACCURACY AND MAXIMUM POSSIBILITY OF COMPLETENESS! 
The company indicated either fails to report fairly and to their own industry 's established mandatorily utilized XXXX Compliant standards thereby giving me legitimate concerns the negative information portrayed by the company is either ( i ) not meeting of my state 's applicable regulatory mandates and or expected abided by requisite standards, ( 2 ) is deficient or not proven not to be deficient of the federal regulatory requirements for lawful reporting practices, procedures and processes ( i.e. Standards ) that are deliberately in place to better ensure each any and all claims of negativity versus each any and all consumers by each any and all data reporting furnisher ( s ) and or accepted by each any or all consumer credit reporting repositoryies ) is in fact done so without deviation from that expected adhered to standard of factually fair, true, correct, timely, adequately complete, confirmed verifiable and validated claims testifiably asserted to that aforementioned maximum possible accuracy and completeness. 
My contention is the company mention either in ignorance of their own reporting necessities or in willful recklessness and likely willful dereliction has elected to report information not credible in eyes of even their own governing body 's outlined opinion as indicated in CDIA 'S own CRRG manual ( see CRRG 3-4 ) on which is plain as day stated " ANY DEVIATION FROM THESE STANDARDS ( Metro2 ) JEOPARDIZES THE INTEGRITY ( believability, if you will ) OF THE DATA ( alleged as reported when reported how was reported, obviously ) '' thereby allowing my concerns to be deemable legitimate giving me the RIGHT Ive exercis

ed to CONTEST the indicated company 's inadequately asserted but very conditional PRIVILEGE to report information provably versus me. In my contesting of their privilege to report in this circumstance related to this filed cfpb notice I as well did forward previously not successfully responded to and even here and now currently demanded answered CHALLENGE to the mentioned indicated company for them to demonstrate document proof confirming the information alleged versus me in fact is meeting each any and all aspects of any requisites particularly that of any federally regulated reporting requirements and undoubtable in its assertion of certifiably compliant reporting practices, procedures and processes supposedly in place intended to increase the probity and trustworthiness of each any and all data alleged versus me. As consumer I have a RIGHT to demand any reporter follow practices of ethical reporting yielding only applicably fair, true, correct, timely, complete proven ( provable ) declarational overments versus me with antipodal antithesis, imo unjustly even hence my here n now rightful complaint and request said argued information derogatory to my otherwise positive credit worthiness making me appear potentially delinquent even if unproven I ever was. I DEMAND THAT THE INDICATED DEFICIENTLY REPORTING COMPANY TO BECOME COMPLIANT IN THEIR REPORTING OF ANY CLAIM MADE VERSUS AND OR ABOUT AND OR CONCERNING ME particularly NOW AND HEREFORWARD without deviating from that standard and any applicable regulatory mandates otherwise necessarily abided by in exact accordance with now and then-current laws for reporting competence in total proficiency in its adequacy of their asserted consumer credit reporting historic record ( s ).

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation