Consumer complaint received 2026-03-10 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — Credit card debt
Issue: False statements or representation — Impersonated attorney, law enforcement, or government official
Company: Resurgent Capital Services L.P.
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
First, search XXXX for evidence repository / federal case # XXXX, and read Documents XXXX, XXXX and XXXX to completion. Details found in those court-filed documents are pertinent to XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX. Consider that information and evidence found in those documents fully integrated into this official complaint being submitted now. Keeping those documents in mind, key facts will still be highlighted below : Fact # 1 : On Small Claims Case # XXXX in late XXXX, creditor LVNV FUNDING LLC and its attorneys XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX attempted to sue " defendant '' in relation to a debt collection, in part based on their own filed evidence being a previously allegedly rendered credit card statement from the original creditor to " defendant '', dated from XX/XX/XXXX to XX/XX/XXXX, with a due date for XX/XX/XXXX. That credit card statement was said by XXXX to not have been objected to by " defendant ''. This was because said " defendant '' was physically unable to respond to any statements of any kind during that timeframe. During those same exact months specified, starting on XX/XX/XXXX, " defendant '' was falsely arrested in a politically-motivated kidnapping, then falsely incarcerated by federal and XXXX state `` law enforcement '' by the order of now infamous federal " judge '' XXXX XXXX XXXX for XXXX XXXX XXXX out of the XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Note : There was no valid signed returned warrant docketed for the court record on case XXXX for those exact months - and the " defendant 's '' kidnapper " officers '' and " judges '' involved with that federal case ( including the XXXX jailers ) all signed illegally altered oaths of office/bonds for their positions - impersonating officers/employees while making decisions under the color of law. " Defendant '' was later fully pardoned on XX/XX/XXXX by XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX for the unlawful weaponization of government " defendant '' had experienced ). Suspiciously, this same exact timeframe in XXXX when the " defendant '' was illegally incarcerated, was the same exact timeframe of the XXXX credit card statement that creditor LVNV Funding and its attorneys XXXX decided to use in their lawsuit against " defendant '' later on in XXXX. Considering all of these facts showing fraud and collusion involved, this points to a possible conspiracy involving the creditor and its attorneys against the " defendant 's '' rights. Fact # 2 : Before a XX/XX/XXXX hearing for Small Claims Case # XXXX, " defendant '' instead filed evidence into its court record, proving that County " Judge '' XXXX XXXX XXXX signed an illegally altered oath of office, rendering his " judgeship '' null and void - with no authority to preside over the case. The same XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX that held " defendant '' unlawfully in XXXX for " XXXX '', was also " home '' to this Small Claims case. XXXX- being without a valid oath of office on file in exact accordance with XXXX XXXX XXXX- is an impersonator of a judge. His " chief judge '' XXXX XXXX also signed illegally altered oaths. The record would later show that XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX signed an illegally altered oath, as well - as another public officer impersonator related to this case. Fact # 3 : Despite that proof of oath fraud on the Sixth " Judicial '' Circuit of XXXX being filed by " defendant '' on the public docket of Small Claims Case # XXXX, creditor LVNV FUNDNG LLC 's attorneys XXXX ( with the assistance of XXXX ) decided to enter a ( null ) " Final Judgment '' against the " defendant '', anyway. Thus far, they appear to be ignoring the evidence that " defendant '' had already filed and made clear on court record. According to XXXXXXXX XXXX own " UNOFFICIAL DOCUMENT '' -watermarked " Final Judgment '', his judicial assistant and XXXX XXXX 45 days to furnish a signed " official '' copy of the ( null ) " judgment '' alongside a " Fact Information Sheet '' to " defendant '' through U.S. MAIL, once the " judgment '' was entered. However, 45 days did pass, and neither document was ever furnished to " defendant '' via U.S. MAIL within that window - being improper service. The only mail " defendant '' received before any " XXXX XXXX '' was even entered- was an unsigned copy of the " XXXX XXXX '' from XXXX, without XXXXXXXX XXXX signature. The fake XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX own website disclaims that information from her website ( anything with an " UNOFFICIAL DOCUMENT '' watermark ) has no legal force or effect. Fact # 4 : " Defendant '' made it clear for the record that a signed judgment was never furnished and received through XXXXXXXX XXXX Despite this, creditor LVNV FUNDING LLC and its attorneys XXXX persisted with mailing a threat to " defendant '', soon after the 45 days had passed. Creditor and XXXX made the false claim that a judgment had been secured ( it wasn't ) and were offering a payment plan before " post-judgment remedies '' were invoked. " Post-judgment remedies '' do not legally exist for LVNV FUNDING LLC and XXXX, because a ) The judgment was never signed by a real judge, and b ) They failed to provide proper service by furnishing any signed judgment and " Fact Information Sheet '' for the " defendant '' to ( hypothetically ) return to them. With blatant disregard for these facts and " defendant 's '' rights, LVNV FUNDING LLC and its attorneys XXXX have since committed mail fraud against " defendant ''. This fraud attempt was received by " defendant '' via XXXX XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX, with XXXX 's false statement of having " secured '' a judgment, while trying to illegally procure money out of the " defendant '' through their illegal payment scheme. As of XX/XX/XXXX, " defendant 's '' certified mail package ( containing a copy of XXXX XXXX XXXX ) has been picked up by an individual for delivery to XXXX, according to XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX. " Defendant '' has now made it clear in writing for XXXX to take notice of 15 U.S.C. 1692c, and to never make contact with the " defendant '' again, unless it is to to advise " defendant '' that further debt collection efforts are being terminated. " Defendant '' is redeemed - from outside of the national debt, and makes demand in Lawful Money pursuant to Title 12 U.S.C. 411. This information and evidence has already been provided to the U.S. Department of Justice and the Department of Treasury, and should also be delivered to XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, soon.

Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief