Consumer complaint received 2016-12-16 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — FHA mortgage
Issue: Settlement process and costs — 
Company: BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
Until approximately 2 years ago I believed that in XXXX of XXXX. I had purchased a manufactured home on a lot that would qualify for FHA financing. I was forced to stop making in payments in XXXX XXXX because of a job loss. After several years of trying to figure out why B o A refused to assist me with my very deeply underwater mortgage, I filed suit against Major Mortgage with B of A as successor in interest for appraisal fraud when I discovered that my house had been moved from where it had previously been lived in ( in violation of XXXX underwriting guidelines ) and that the appraisal was fraudulent. Several investigational activities were conducted and it was later discovered that the original title report was performed only on the lot and did not include the house. This issue was not part of my original suit. Additionally, I discovered that the State of Nevada performed an investigation in XXXX and determined that Trust # XXXX with XXXX XXXX, and XXXX and XXXX XXXX XXXX as beneficiaries did not own the house. They in fact never owned the house as claimed at the time of the alleged " sale '' to me. This issue caused the State of Nevada to have XXXX XXXX hire XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX to find out who the actual owner of the house was at the time of sale in XXXX of XXXX. This was required so that the state of Nevada could complete the process of converting the property together with the home as real property. I was never notified of this investigation. 
On XXXX XXXX, XXXX the State of Nevada Department XXXX issued an Erasure Affidavit stating that " ... XXXX was not the owner '' as the house had been repossessed. '' It seams that a XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX was still the owner of record with XXXX XXXX as lien holder. This remained the case until XXXX of XXXX when title to the double wide was finally transferred to me. This appears to be a clear violation of XXXX rule stating that the " ... sale of a property must be from the owner of record and that the transaction must not involve any sale or assignment of the sales contract. '' Bank of AmericaXXXX Foreclosure Services filed a Notice of Default on XXXX XXXX XXXX against a mortgage contract that does not exist due to the fraud committed by the seller and as per XXXX XXXX regarding the voiding of conveyances made to defraud prior or subsequent purchasers of real estate. The filing of the NOD as well as the fact that they are ignoring my Notice of Rescission ( based on the lack of legal conveyance of the title to the house at time of " sale '' -- you ca n't legally sell a house you do n't own ) dated XXXX XXXX, XXXX is a clear indication that B of A and XXXX have no regard for the law and hope to profit against the frauds committed against me. 
Mediation was conducted in XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX. The local attorney contracted by XXXX XXXX ( foreclosure mill ) the day before showed up without a copy of the appraisal and without the authority to negotiate anything, but with an utter disregard for the facts regarding this case.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation