vivekkopthsd/cfpb-consumer-complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint received 2017-10-26 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Account information incorrect
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: CO

Complaint narrative:
Experian continues to report delinquencies for XXXX account XXXX through XX/XX/XXXX even though the account was forgiven in full with a XXXX and reported as income to the IRS in XX/XX/XXXX, income which I subsequently was required to include with my taxable income on my XX/XX/XXXX tax filing. They correctly report the balance as XXXX, but report delinquent payment history for each month through XX/XX/XXXX. This is not only misleading ( reporting the payment history as delinquent implies a balance is due ) but damages my credit in a way that is preventing me from obtaining necessary financing.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2017-10-26 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Account status incorrect
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: WA

Complaint narrative:
XXXX XXXX XXXX reports multiple account numbers for the same account, some say XXXX balance & XXXX owed but account is over 120 days past due, another reports the balance has been charged off. Multiple calls to company. After I call to dispute, XXXX sends account to a different collection agency, and we begin the process over. It 's been since XXXX 2015 account is paid and closed at consumers request

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-10-26 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Account status incorrect
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: WA

Complaint narrative:
XXXX XXXX XXXX reports multiple account numbers for the same account, some say XXXX balance & XXXX owed but account is over 120 days past due, another reports the balance has been charged off. Multiple calls to company. After I call to dispute, XXXX sends account to a different collection agency, and we begin the process over. It 's been since XXXX 2015 account is paid and closed at consumers request

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-10-26 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — Medical debt
Issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed — Debt is not yours
Company: Paramount Recovery Systems, L.P.
State: NJ

Complaint narrative:
Paramount Recovery System, a collection agency, simply showed on my credit reports XXXX 2017. I contacted them by researching their phone number and provided the account number listed on my credit report. This was the very first time I had ever been informed about this debt. I spoke with a representative who informed me the debt was from medical facility 6 years prior to the current date. Paramount had an address on file where I had not resided in 15 years. I provided them with update information including my current address. I asked them for proof that I owed this money in the amount of {$1100.00} and I will make payment arrangements. I was advised to go directly to their website www.paramountrecovery.com where i would be able to see an invoice that outlined the debt. Therefore, I visited their website as instructed and the site only accepted payments and did not provide an invoice or any indication that I actually owed the debt. I then contacted Paramount again and requested a copy of the invoice be USPS mailed to my address. To date I have not received an invoice just additional letters demanding more the monies. I contacted them several times more and they just wanted to offer settlements of 50 %. I do n't believe I owe this money and Paramount has not provided any proof to indicate that is a legitimate debt. They are now threatening to take additional legal action if the debt is not paid or settled soon. I never offered to settle the debt, just asked out of curiosity. Thank you.

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-10-26 00:00:00
Product: Checking or savings account — Checking account
Issue: Managing an account — Banking errors
Company: WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
State: NC

Complaint narrative:
On XXXX XXXX,2017 I went to XXXX XXXX XXXX to pay my monthly bill of {$170.00}. Once inside, the man had trouble processing my debit card. On the 3rd try, it finally went thru. I then went to XXXX to buy groceries for supper and my card was declined. Needless to say i was ticked because i knew i had available funds in my account. Then it occurred to me that the monthly fee at the storage facility might have hit my account 3 times.I went home, got online and printed a transaction report which indeed did show that Wells Fargo hit my account 3 times for the {$170.00}, an overcharge of {$340.00}, and a negative balance of {$110.00}. I went back to XXXX XXXX XXXX and explained what had happened. He checked their computer records and it showed that they had only received the one payment. We then got on the phone calling the customer service telephone number on the back of my debit card. After waiting some length of time and repeating my information 3 times, I finally was able to speak to someone in the claims dept. He checked my account and also saw the 2 additional charges of {$170.00} each. He said that he would have it credited to my account in about an hour. Thank you, this happened.
Yesterday I received an email from Wells Fargo that my account had reached a XXXX balance or less. I checked my online statement and they had reversed the credit of {$340.00}, giving me a negative balance of {$290.00}. My online statement only showed the one charge of {$170.00} and a credit of {$340.00}, thus, they reversed the credit. The guy in the claims dept. saw the overcharges in XX/XX/XXXX. If he did n't, why would he give me the credit in the first place.
I called the Wells Fargo customer service line and received the same answer over and over that only one charge of {$170.00} and the credit were shown. That 's not what happened.I was speaking to an argumentative and deaf ear! I then went to the XXXX XXXX XXXX branch of Wells Fargo and spoke with a banker who gave me the same answer. It did n't matter that I showed her the transaction report that she never looked at lying on her desk. Another deaf ear. I guess she was n't too concerned since it was n't her money.I am on Social Security and this {$340.00} is 1/3 of my monthly income. I guess " Customer Service '' is truly dead. Computers are only as good as the people who use them and the software they are using. Mistakes happen and this is one of them! It may not have posted on your end, but it sure posted and deducted on my end! I have never had to deal with an issue like this in the many years I have been with Wells Fargo/Wachovia and treated with such indifference. Maybe time for a change!

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-10-26 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Account information incorrect
Company: JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
State: CO

Complaint narrative:
Chase continues to report delinquencies for Chase account XXXX through XX/XX/XXXX even though the account was forgiven in full with a XXXX and reported as income to the IRS in XX/XX/XXXX, income which I subsequently was required to include with my taxable income on my XX/XX/XXXXtax filing. They correctly report the balance as XXXX, but report delinquent payment history for each month through XX/XX/XXXX. This is not only misleading ( reporting the payment history as delinquent implies a balance is due ) but damages my credit in a way that is preventing me from obtaining necessary financing.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-10-26 00:00:00
Product: Vehicle loan or lease — Lease
Issue: Problems at the end of the loan or lease — Termination fees or other problem when ending the lease early
Company: HYUNDAI CAPITAL AMERICA
State: PA

Complaint narrative:
I leased a new XXXX XXXX through Hyundai Motor Finance ( Hyundai Capital America ) from a dealership in Pennsylvania, and am investigating my options to trade in the leased car at another manufacturer 's dealership. Part of the information I need when negotiating is an accurate payoff amount for my lease. I called Hyundai Motor Finance at XXXX to request this number, but was told by a floor supervisor in the Texas call center that they are not licensed in Pennsylvania to sell a lease vehicle to the leasee, only to a dealership. This part I understand. What I do n't understand is that she then told me that it is both Hyundai policy, and they are not allowed by law, to give the payoff amount to the leasee, but can only give that value to a licensed dealership. This puts me at the disadvantage of trusting a dealership that they have given me the correct payoff. I believe that even though I may not be able to buyout the lease myself, I should be able to learn the payoff for my own lease. I was told that if I wanted more legal information I should contact their legal department. I asked to speak to her supervisor but was told that none was available, and that he would call me back within " 72 business hours '' which I understood to be 9 business days. This is apparently happening to everyone in Pennsylvania that leases a XXXX from Hyundai Motor Finance who want 's to know their payoff. Are they correct that I have no right to this information about my own lease?

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-10-26 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: WI

Complaint narrative:
There was an account that someone opened in my name with XXXX XXXX XXXX, I believe it was an ex girlfriend. I did not authorize it, charge on it or had any knowledge about it. I have disputed with the bureaus but yet it keeps reporting. I do n't know where else to turn so I am hoping your company can assist me. Please

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-10-26 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: WI

Complaint narrative:
There was an account that someone opened in my name with XXXX XXXX XXXX, I believe it was an ex girlfriend. I did not authorize it, charge on it or had any knowledge about it. I have disputed with the bureaus but yet it keeps reporting. I do n't know where else to turn so I am hoping your company can assist me. Please

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-10-26 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: WI

Complaint narrative:
There was an account that someone opened in my name with XXXX XXXX XXXX, I believe it was an ex girlfriend. I did not authorize it, charge on it or had any knowledge about it. I have disputed with the bureaus but yet it keeps reporting. I do n't know where else to turn so I am hoping your company can assist me. Please

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-10-26 00:00:00
Product: Credit card or prepaid card — General-purpose prepaid card
Issue: Problem getting a card or closing an account — Trouble closing card
Company: AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY
State: VA

Complaint narrative:
I have a American Express Prepaid Card. On Monday, XX/XX/XXXX, I received an email from American Express that as of XXXX XXXX they were ending the American Express Prepaid Cards and that to have all monies used up by XXXX or they will send the balance to you in a check. I am fine with that part, however, they ended direct deposits to the Prepaid Cards, immediately. That is where I have the complaint. My direct deposit was set to deposit on the card on Tuesday, XXXX XXXX. It took me XXXX days to find out where my direct deposit was. It would seem like to me American Express would give you time to close out your direct deposit and setup up another direct deposit somewhere else. They did not to do that. This should not be allowed under the law.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-10-26 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Home equity loan or line of credit (HELOC)
Issue: Struggling to pay mortgage — 
Company: PNC Bank N.A.
State: WA

Complaint narrative:
PNC ( subordinate lien ) is countering the short sale to receive a full pay off based on exterior only value of the property. They are going off of a drive-by BPO value ( {$430000.00} ) which can back completely out of range of true fair market value. It is common knowledge that a drive-by BPO does not property asses the property value because interior defects are not taken into consideration. The first lien is being paid off in full and we are offering PNC a handsome net of {$70000.00} which they are denying because they are refusing to order an interior BPO to get true property value. Even with supporting documentation to support our offer amount of {$33000.00}.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-10-26 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Account status incorrect
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: MA

Complaint narrative:
Requested Equifax, XXXX and XXXX multiple times to remove XXXX accounts listed on my credit file. 
The CRA 's consistently reply that the investigation for accounts is accurate and will remain. 

The accounts in question form XXXX show different dates of 1st delinquency on accounts. Now the accounts show that they are newly opened accounts. How can this be? ; they are old charged of accounts, and are now more than six years old. In Massachusetts, accounts older than 6 years of age should be removed from the consumers file. 
Please refer to attached Equifax credit reports. One can clearly see the manipulation of accounts by the furnisher of data ( XXXX )

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-10-26 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
State: IL

Complaint narrative:
In XXXX XXXX, Chase Bank initiated a foreclosure action against me in XXXX XXXX, Illinois, Case No. XXXX CH XXXX. My answer and affirmative defense was filed. I received a a XXXX settlement, Ref # XXXX in XXXX XXXX. In XXXX XXXX, Chase and I reached a settlement in which I received a cash payment and loan modification. A clear credit clause was not included because my credit was not affected. Immediately following the settlement, Chase reported approximately XXXX late payments to all 3 credit bureaus. Since payments were abated during the litigation, this reporting is inaccurate.The late payments that accrued are now over 7 years old. When I became aware of the issue, I filed disputes with at least two credit bureaus which were denied. I am legally unable to document this matter with the credit bureaus due to the non-disclosure clause in the settlement agreement. I contacted Chase credit department on XXXX XXXX, XXXX to resolve the issue and spoke with XXXX XXXX. My dispute was escalated and denied.On XXXX XXXX, XXXX, I spoke with XXXX XXXX and the matter was escalated. The manager I spoke with told me that I had late payments by looking at her computer screen. I explained the matter and she requested documentation. On XXXX XXXX, at approximately XXXX XXXX CDT, I faxed the attached documentation to Chase.The case was escalated to XXXX XXXX. On XXXX XXXX at XXXX XXXX, Chase employee XXXX XXXX admitted that XXXX XXXX composed a letter of denial on XXXX XXXX, prior to receiving the faxed documents. Chase has not used due diligence in its research and continues to cause me economic hardship, loss of billed time, and emotional distress.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-10-26 00:00:00
Product: Student loan — Federal student loan servicing
Issue: Struggling to repay your loan — Can't get other flexible options for repaying your loan
Company: Navient Solutions, LLC.
State: TX

Complaint narrative:
I have been paying on a {$48000.00} loan since XXXX with a current balance of {$35000.00}. I have paid {$160000.00} with {$150000.00} going just to interest. They tacked on {$29000.00} in capitalized interest over the years. 

I called to tell them that I can not continue to give them a huge chunk of my money that it was unfair that I was not fully informed of what would happen when I deferred payments in the past. I am older, sick and can not work as hard as I was anymore. I do not qualify for any forgiveness options. 

Their option to me was to file yet again for payment deferral. Are they crazy? If it wa n't for deferment this loan would have been paid off a long time ago. 

I was also informed that they will not work with me because my account is in good standing. I feel penalized because I care to protect my credit rating and came to them in good faith before defaulting on this loan. 

I feel so ill and so taken advantage of every month when I make my payment.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-10-26 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — FHA mortgage
Issue: Trouble during payment process — 
Company: NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
State: AL

Complaint narrative:
Paying my mortgage on line, it stated my mortgage will go up almost {$200.00} more per month beginning XXXX2017, due to a shortage with my escrow. However, when I called customer service to get an explanation on how my account is negative ( when I have not missed a payment ), along with me reviewing the payment history on my account, it shows there are SEVERAL large payments that were not posted to my mortgage and went to " unapplied funds '' and a " lender paid expense '' payment of {$16000.00} that was also posted under " unapplied funds ''?!?!

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-10-26 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: TX

Complaint narrative:
Credit bureau has not provided the details that were verified with the creditor. I stated there were multiple inaccuracies with XXXX account and it was over 7 years old.  the original deliquency date was somehow removed in XXXX which is now show XXXX with XXXX XXXX. Also, the amount of the debt is incorrect as I have discovered with the creditor should have been {$240.00}

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-10-26 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Account status incorrect
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: MA

Complaint narrative:
Requested XXXX, XXXX and TransUnion multiple times to remove XXXX accounts listed on my credit file. 
The CRA 's consistently reply that the investigation for accounts is accurate and will remain. 

The accounts in question form Navient show different dates of 1st delinquency on accounts. Now the accounts show that they are newly opened accounts. How can this be? ; they are old charged of accounts, and are now more than six years old. In Massachusetts, accounts older than 6 years of age should be removed from the consumers file. 
Please refer to attached XXXX credit reports. One can clearly see the manipulation of accounts by the furnisher of data ( XXXX  )

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-10-26 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Account status incorrect
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: MA

Complaint narrative:
Requested XXXX, Experian and XXXX multiple times to remove XXXX accounts listed on my credit file. 
The CRA 's consistently reply that the investigation for accounts is accurate and will remain. 

The accounts in question form Navient show different dates of 1st delinquency on accounts. Now the accounts show that they are newly opened accounts. How can this be? ; they are old charged of accounts, and are now more than six years old. In Massachusetts, accounts older than 6 years of age should be removed from the consumers file. 
Please refer to attached XXXX credit reports. One can clearly see the manipulation of accounts by the furnisher of data ( XXXX  )

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-10-26 00:00:00
Product: Checking or savings account — Checking account
Issue: Closing an account — Company closed your account
Company: UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION
State: OH

Complaint narrative:
I called USAA about my checking account. It was closed by them last year sometime. I called and asked for a general letter stating it was closed. The woman in the bank portion told me that they did not have such letter but then stated she reworded another form and would send it to me in my message box on the USAA website. It would take any where from 5 minutes to 2 hours. After 3 hours I called back. I was told there was no documentation in my folder nor any such form being sent out. Once again I was lied to and deceived by USAA. After all they stole my car and are ruining my credit score every month.

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation