Consumer complaint received 2016-07-26 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — FHA mortgage
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure — 
Company: M&T BANK CORPORATION
State: NY

Complaint narrative:
In late XXXX, I fell behind on my mortgage payments with M & T Bank due to being overextended. 

When I was able to resume payments, they would not take my payments because my account was in pre-foreclosure status and I had to submit documents to be considered for a loan modification. 

After months of faxing and e-mailing, I was told that I would have to start the process all over again because too much time had passed and they would still not accept any payments. 

I began the process again, and I this time I had to pre-pay for insurance on the home. I did this and after months of faxing and e-mailing again, I was approved to do a 3 month trial payment period, after which it was my understanding, that the loan modification would be in affect. 

I made XXXX trial payments for {$500.00} in XXXX, XXXX and XXXX of XXXX. After I made these payments I was told that there were liens on the home. I responded by telling the bank representatives that the liens were not mine. In fact, the names on the sheet they sent me were for a male family member with no connection to the home whatsoever. I am female. The bank has my Social Security number and this was obviously not my debt. I was using different mailing addresses from the property as not to have others in the home receiving my correspondence. 

I was under the impression that I would have time to work in the title issue since I had been in communication with the bank. As I was working XXXX jobs it took me some time to get the form for the title issues and figure out what the bank was asking me to do. When I called to find out about sending the letter in disputing the liens, I was told that I would once again have to begin the process of a loan modification. 

This process of faxing and e-mailing is extremely tiresome and time consuming. Especially, for a working person. I started it again and this time, I had even more income since someone living with me was giving money toward expenses. I thought this would help in the process. Unfortunately, it did not, because I did not have documentation of the additional income. I asked if the file could be reviewed without consideration of the additional income, since I still had the same amount of income as I did before when I was approved without it. I was told that it was a possibility. 

This was all happening very close to the sale date, so I requested that it be postponed, but I was denied. I asked about my file and I was told that the underwriter was waiting for documentation of the additional income. I explained that I was told my file could be reviewed without the income being considered. 

This never happened. My file was not reviewed and the bank put my home on the auction. The buyer ... M & T bank. The bank is now the owner of my home. I was never given the opportunity to make payments on the home during the process and it was a long process because I had to keep re-starting which makes it look like I was just not paying for this number of months when M & T Bank was actually refusing to accept my payments.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation