vivekkopthsd/cfpb-consumer-complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint received 2016-10-12 00:00:00
Product: Bank account or service — Other bank product/service
Issue: Problems caused by my funds being low — 
Company: U.S. BANCORP
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
SPECIAL REQUEST TO CFPB : CFPB FILINGS OF XXXX, US BANK IN XXXX XXXX, I WOULD LIKE TO LINK IN TO THE FOLLOWING PLEASE : XXXX -- XXXX, XXXX, ESTATE, LEGACY AND ASSET CRIMES FILE. XXXX ID NUMBER XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX, MANAGER OF US BANK, ( XXXX CFPB Filings ) XXXX XXXX SHOULD BE NOTIFIED OF THIS XXXX FILE IN THIS INCORPORATION REQUEST. POSSIBLE PARTICIPATION OF XXXX COMMON ASSISTANT MANAGER EMPLOYEE, ( ACTIONS SIMILAR TO FILING XXXX, XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, a previous bank where US Bank Assistant Manager once believed to have worked ). 
Participating In A " BANDWAGON, '' BRINGING MILLIONS IN DAMAGES TO AN ESTATE AND OTHER BRINGDOWN EFFORTS WHILE ABUSING BANK AND BANK PRODUCTS. FACILITATION OF DETRIMENT AND DAMAGES, TO CAUSE FURTHER PREDICAMENT OF FUNDS BEING LOW THROUGH XXXX US BANK REASONS FOR CFPB FILING ACTIONS.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed
Consumer complaint received 2015-07-23 00:00:00
Product: Student loan — Non-federal student loan
Issue: Dealing with my lender or servicer — Trouble with how payments are handled
Company: DISCOVER BANK
State: MO

Complaint narrative:
I am paying my daughter 's student loans to discover because I co-signed with her. 
I have repeatedly asked for a monthly statement and do not receive one. I guess at the amount due each month. Also, when my daughter went to their website to to see if a payment had been received, it showed past due. She called and was finally connected to a real person and was told the payment had not been received. This was XXXX/XXXX/15. The check cleared my account the following XXXX XXXX/XXXX/15. My daughter checked the website again and it said the check had been received on XXXX/XXXX/15. When I looked at the back of the check, it cleared Discover 's bank on XXXX/XXXX/15. I just want a monthly statement sent each month. Also, I guess they sold one of my daughter 's student loans to XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX sends a statement each month. My daughter 's school was XXXX ( XXXX In XXXX ). She graduated and has not found a job with compensation sufficient to pay the loans.

Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2016-08-11 00:00:00
Product: Student loan — Federal student loan servicing
Issue: Dealing with my lender or servicer — Received bad information about my loan
Company: AES/PHEAA
State: OR

Complaint narrative:
My husband and I both work in qualifying public service positions making XXXX qualifying payments, and were on the IBR repayment program until recently. We switched to REPAYE to lower our monthly payments for the remainder of the time we have to make XXXX qualifying payments. 

We were told that the process would involve our loans being temporarily placed on forbearance, during which time we would need to make $ 5 monthly payments. After that time, we would start making payments at the rate determined by our REPAYE eligibility. 

His experience went as described, though the time between his last forbearance payment and the first REPAYE payment was not a full month. 

My experience did not go this way. My loans were taken off IBR, then placed on forbearance as described. My forbearance ended XXXX/XXXX/16, right after I made a {$5.00} payment. My account said I had a full payment of {$260.00} due XXXX/XXXX/16 - not the REPAYE payment I was told would be due ( per a letter on XXXX/XXXX/16 would be {$53.00} starting XXXX/XXXX/16 ). One PHEAA staffer told me on the phone last Friday that the showing of the {$260.00} was to let me know what my full payment would be if I chose to opt out of REPAYE and that I could ignore it. An email from a XXXX stated otherwise, indicating that if I did not make the payment, it would go to collections, and other problems would ensue. 

I hope my payment due XXXX is truly for XXXX as their XXXX letter states, and that this is the last of our issues with PHEAA, but I just do n't trust them and want CFPB and the public to know to be on the lookout. I hope CFPB can pressure PHEAA to be more consistent with keeping their word, and less apt to make mistakes like this that can put borrowers in an undue hardship. 

Thankfully, my husband has done his research, and read many stories of scenarios like this happening with PHEAA and other servicers, and planned accordingly. He had bad experiences with XXXX XXXX before refinancing with PHEAA, and his process of refinancing went very poorly due to inconsistent communication from PHEAA, so he was on the lookout. We made the {$260.00} payment, though it will be a few days late but it should be well within our grace period. This is in an effort to avoid the account going to collections. Others facing this may not be so lucky. 

Thank you for looking into this issue, and please warn other borrowers to watch these student loan servicers like hawks - assuming they will make mistakes ( intentionally or not ) so borrowers can be prepared to deal with it when it finally happens - which seems like an inevitability.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-10-27 00:00:00
Product: Credit card — 
Issue: Advertising and marketing — 
Company: CITIBANK, N.A.
State: NY

Complaint narrative:
I can create e-mailable attachments for all I represent below : I received an offer from Citibank regarding a balance transfer offer. There are XXXX sheets, a promotional page designed to encourage me to take the offer and another page which are balance transfer checks with a bridging perforated piece of the sheet to tear them out from, and on that page there is a different fee than on the biggest print letters in the top portion of the first page. 

The particulars are this : A fixed date in XXXX 2017 the offer reverts [ thus, the longer I am made to wait for a response, the incrementally less the offer is worth pursuing ] for 0 % for the life of the transfer for an up-front fee. On the largest font print on the top of the form in a distinctive color it says the standard fee is 3 %. On the fine print part of the XXXX page the rate says that for this offer the rate is 4 %. 
I have received these offers for months with different particulars ; however the immediately previous offer in fact was for the standard 3 % rate and that part of each offer page is identical in all cases. [ I receive these roughly monthly and so does my wife ; I have to believe thousands of others do as well. ] I pointed the discrepancy out to a Citi customer service phone center supervisor, who agreed with me in principle that I deserved the 3 % rate, but I needed to FAX the forms in so they could review it ; I complied, and was told I would get a snail-mail response, which I did. It is merely a likely form letter that just states the offer is 3 % and really does n't address the issue of the unreconcilable statements on the XXXX pages in each mailing. 

Thus, I have physical documentation of their position, and my position is that this is false advertising. Thus, I am here writing to you for help.

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-09-27 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Conventional fixed mortgage
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account — 
Company: U.S. BANCORP
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
Per us bank response letter dated XXXX XXXX, 2015 mortgage account # XXXX The OCC consent order an enforcement action of XXXX XXXX, 2011 was issued under scope and discovery that said was a GHOST MORTGAGE LOAN ; by-law, per the XXXX XXXX county recorder office. It was discovered that there was no certified and filed re-estate document as a DEED OF TRUST, as assigning us bank NA the beneficiary and their assigned Trustee, and I, XXXX XXXX the Borrower. Because I never had an escrow ( loan ) close with us bank NA on my real estate property, as where a title company could have requested an order ( escrow ) number to be recorded and mailed to us bank a legal certified and filed DEED OF TRUST, per an original escrow file with said title company as holding the real estate loan packet signed and dated by me ( terms and condition of payments, Interest % rate etc. ) also us bank stated ; A foreclosure sale was held on XXXX XXXX, 2011 ( False statement ) The OCC investigation ; no legal record of the alleged Trustee sale certified and filed with the appropriate court nor county recorder 's office. under the OCC jurisdictional review, the check of {$34000.00} was in part reimbursement as in ERROR us bank collected monthly mortgage notes payments from me under this ghost mortgage loan account. per these new issues that the bank raised under this mortgage account number, us bank need to provide the title company that closed holding the original escrow closing file with a original real estate loan packet that is signed and dated by me, Giving the bank legal authority of security Interest in my real estate property, thank you.

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2016-04-11 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Conventional fixed mortgage
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account — 
Company: U.S. BANCORP
State: AZ

Complaint narrative:
My loan was recently transferred from XXXX to US BANK. I have sent US BANK two payments. The second payment was reversed from my account and sent to XXXX. The Cashiers check specifically stated where that money should be applied and US BANK took it upon themselves to take my XX/XX/XXXX payment and send it to the previous lender without even informing me causing my account to be past due.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-09-17 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Conventional fixed mortgage
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account — 
Company: U.S. BANCORP
State: TX

Complaint narrative:
Ever since the origination of this mortgage, US Bank has refused to recognize the XXXX XXXX Homeowners insurance we purchase every year to satisfy the requirements of the mortgage. They continue to add their own policy to the mortgage even though we have provided the bank with proof of coverage. On occasion, they will apologize and give us a credit, but the next year we start all over with the bank adding yet another policy to the mortgage. This has been going on for 5 years. 
Different officers at the bank assure us the problem will be corrected and they will call us back. Never happens. At this point we have no idea how much the bank has added to the mortgage. 
Recently I received a letter informing me the bank was reporting late payments to the credit bureau. 
This mortgage does not have an escrow account, so we purchase insurance, pay taxes, etc., directly.

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-05-20 00:00:00
Product: Credit card — 
Issue: Customer service / Customer relations — 
Company: U.S. BANCORP
State: IL

Complaint narrative:
I have a us bank credit card that I make monthly payments and do n't use a lot.I went to go buy a new phone and my card was declined, I promptly called them and my card is in bankruptcy i have NEVER filled for bankruptcy nor do I EVER plan to. when I contact the card company i spoke with the bankruptcy department and they looked into the case they got in contact with with the lawyer that had the case for bankruptcy that the card was being held under And he told them that the ssn # was wrong and he did n't understand why they were contacting him since I was not his client he said its a case of mistaken identity and sent over all his info on the case he was handling to them. The card company looked it over and agreed i was told it was going to be overturned they just needed a supervisor approval. I said fine it has been XXXX WEEKS and I have called multiple times and I keep getting the run around of his out to lunch, his in a meeting he is busy. My card is still in bankruptcy and I 'm still making payments on something I ca n't use they refuse to help me

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2015-08-18 00:00:00
Product: Credit card — 
Issue: Billing disputes — 
Company: U.S. BANCORP
State: KY

Complaint narrative:
Someone hacked into my XXXX account and placed a {$27.00} order for a wallet from a 3rd party seller and had it shipped to their address in XXXX ( I live in Kentucky ). I called XXXX and they said it was too late to cancel the order and that they were sorry. They told me to dispute the charge with my credit card company. I removed my credit card info which was saved in their system without my knowledge and I changed my password and deleted the new shipping address that the hacker added to my account. 

I disputed the fraudulent charge with U.S. Bank and told them I did not place the order, did not authorize the charge, and did not receive the merchandise. They made a provisional credit for {$27.00} to my account. XXXX rebuts with documentation showing the wallet order and the name and address where the wallet was shipped to along with USPS tracking information showing delivery to that address. 

I received a letter from U.S. Bank with copies of XXXX 's rebuttal. The bank tells me the charges appear to be correct as billed. They reversed the {$27.00} back to my account. XXXX failed to give the IP address of the person that placed the order. Why? 

Why am I being forced to pay for a wallet for a crook in XXXX which clearly is fruad? I do not have a California address and I have never lived in or visited XXXX. I do not have friends in XXXX. Why is U.S. Bank and XXXX not protecting me against this fraudulent activity? 

BTW, I am a Verified By XXXX member. Why did XXXX fail to protect my account?

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-07-14 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Conventional fixed mortgage
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account — 
Company: U.S. BANCORP
State: DC

Complaint narrative:
Re : U.S. Bank Home Mortgage Account : XXXX ( XXXX XXXX ) On XXXX XXXX, 2015, we received a call from U.S. Bank stating that our XXXX mortgage payment had not been received. 
We checked our records and noted that we had paid the mortgage on XXXX XXXX, 2015, ahead of schedule, through a third party processor, XXXX, XXXX. 
Upon further inquiry, including talking to a supervisor, U.S. Bank continued to rudely and vehemently insist that payment on the mortgage account had not been received yet. Therefore, we went online and repaid our mortgage for XXXX, including payment of a {$5.00} fee for paying our mortgage " late. " Upon inquiring with our bank and third party payment processor this afternoon, we found evidence that U.S. Bank had not only received the entire payment, but also cashed the check made out by XXXX. We faxed this evidence to U.S. Bank XXXX and also followed up with a phone call where the agent was equally unhelpful and told us they could not find the payment, and could not reverse my {$5.00} fee. 
Either U.S. bank has yet to apply the payment or applied it incorrectly, but there is XXXX doubt the payment was received by them and now we have been defrauded by the bank for {$1600.00}

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2015-07-16 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — FHA mortgage
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure — 
Company: U.S. BANCORP
State: IL

Complaint narrative:
Regarding Case # XXXX of XXXX US BANK has filed a NOTICE OF ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND JUDGEMENT OF FORECLOSURE against me even though I have given them all of the information needed, over and over again.The bank continually drags out the process so more information is needed after XXXX days.I would like to have it resolved in a timely manner.I am always assured that " this should move quickly '' and get a decision, but after XXXX years, that is not the case.In XXXX 2015, XXXX XXXX was relaced by XXXX XXXX as my Relationship Manager even though later bank paperwork continued to show him.I sent all needed paperwork for the loan modification on XXXX and was told by XXXX XXXX that everything had been recieved by e-mail and we were good to move forward on a decision.Imagine my suprise to be served with a foreclosure summons on XXXX XXXX! After contacting the bank on XXXX XXXX, I believe that date is correct.I was told that said documents were not in the US Bank computer! I promptly re-sent them to another US Bank e-mail address and also to XXXX XXXX 's e-mail again.the current dispute is over monthly income from XXXX XXXX payments and XXXX per month of XXXX benifits.The bank had current and timely documents of said proof of this.Thank You

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2016-08-22 00:00:00
Product: Consumer Loan — Vehicle loan
Issue: Taking out the loan or lease — 
Company: U.S. BANCORP
State: MO

Complaint narrative:
My credit score according to XXXX, is XXXX. I applied for a pre-approval to US Bank on XX/XX/XXXX. They obtained my credit report on XX/XX/XXXX. On XX/XX/XXXX, I contacted them to inquire as to the status. 

They requested to contact the dealer and ID the car, both of which I happily orchestrated. I told them I need an answer, as they advertise " approval in minutes '' and I am losing the option to buy this particular auto. After requesting further documentation, I angrily told them in no uncertain terms I would NOT do business with them. 

They were aware of the XXXX value of the auto I was purchasing, the XXXX I was putting down on the purchase, and aware of my credit score. According to the subsequent institution I obtained the loan with, they confirmed that it was " highly unnecessary '' to request or obtain any further documentation regarding the loan than I had disclosed to USBank. It 's their right to refuse my loan based on logistical parameters, however, this was blatant discrimination. 

My complaint however, is not about discrimination, although I am absolutely sure this was a personal discriminatory decision from a representative of UBank. 

My complaint is that this institution, or someone within it, deliberately, with malice and obtained a second credit report on XX/XX/XXXX, 3 to 4 days AFTER I told them to cancel the application, and that I had " no intention '' of ever doing business with USBank, and that I was in fact going to close my account which is held by them. 
I have proof of this VIA my XXXX Credit account, which alerts me to all activity concerning my credit, including any request to obtain said report. 

I have uploaded a screen shot of the proof of obtainment from USbank on XX/XX/XXXX ( valid ) and XX/XX/XXXX ( Malicious and illegal ). 

Access to the actual account where this proof resides may be obtained from me, to verify and validate the screen shot I have attached. 

I find it revolting that a personal grudge largely stemming from the unethical, capricious and arbitrary actions of those involved, later utilize their position to illegally and without due cause or authority, to take personal action in hopes of one can only deduce, to create a deleterious outcome for me, the consumer.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-02-22 00:00:00
Product: Credit card — 
Issue: Billing disputes — 
Company: U.S. BANCORP
State: MA

Complaint narrative:
US Bank falsely claimed to the CFPB and me that US Bank recorded XXXX calls, prior to XXXX XXXX, XXXX in which I allegedly participated. 
US Bank falsely claimed that " You ( sic ) correspondence also indicates that you have requested that we provide you with video surveillance of the transactions that you had previously claimed as fraud. '' in theirs to the CFPB and me dated XXXX XXXX, XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-08-22 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — Other (i.e. phone, health club, etc.)
Issue: False statements or representation — Impersonated an attorney or official
Company: U.S. BANCORP
State: IN

Complaint narrative:
There were multiple issues performed by this debt collector. To begin with I got a phone call from this debt collector in which I did not answer. They called from a phone number in XXXX and claimed to be an investigator calling on behalf of XXXX XXXX XXXX ( my county of residence ). She stated that because I have failed to call her back after multiple attempts ( though I have never once received any voicemail or call from this number and can provide phone records to support that ) that she had no choice but to proceed with a detainment order with a court appearance. My voicemail is clearly set up where I state my name therefore there is no confusion as to whether they have the right number. I then received a phone call almost immediately from my mother stating that she received a phone call from the same woman with the same threat left on her voicemail. It is my understanding that a debt collector is only allowed to call a family member if they are unsure as to how to reach the person who has the debt. On top of that I also was under the understanding they are to share no information whatsoever especially the same threats of me getting detained. When I called the number back the same woman answered and never once identified herself as a debt collector but instead stated I owed money. I was frustrated because I believed this to be a debt I had paid to a law firm already and the woman then stated I can contact the company it originated with to verify the debt. When I told her that I was not going to pay something twice she then said she is going to proceed with the detainment and will notify the original debtor and then hung up on me. When I called back the same woman again answer and was very belligerent with me. I asked multiple time for a supervisor while she talked over me before finally sending me to a supervisor. The supervisor was a little more helpful but again never once did either of them identify themselves as a debt collector and it was not until I asked if they were one that they told me so. When I contacted the original company the debt was with they in fact told me it was still outstanding but stated that the company that the woman who called me claimed to be from was no longer in business and that that debt was sold to another company that they are unsure of.

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation