Consumer complaint received 2016-05-16 00:00:00
Product: Prepaid card — Gift or merchant card
Issue: Unauthorized transactions/trans. issues — 
Company: Incomm Holdings Inc.
State: IL

Complaint narrative:
this is a follow up complaint with new information, in reference to prior cfpb complaint XXXX. 

i have a blog post explaining my ultimate findings here where i support my claims with both picture and video. 
XXXX although incomm 's response to the prior complaint notes they have 'conclusively ' determined i 'm a participant in victim assisted fraud, and opined that i have not provided any substantiating evidence of my claims, i now provide it in my blog. 

the video contains me telling the viewer what a PIN # will be, then scratching off a card to reveal it. this PIN # has never been communicated out by incomm. if that is the case, how was i able to do it? i also provide video and photos of the person who loaded my funds living in atlanta ( incomm headquarters ) and being friends with a former XXXX living in XXXX, the role of a person who would oversee a database and have the greatest ability to compromise sensitive data in it. however in this case, it was not protected at all, so anyone in the company can get to it. 

what is really going on at this company? 

1. employees are embezzling. i believe skeet rolling, cfo of incomm held company itc financial licenses, is aware of this in the case of a fellow victim i found, XXXX XXXX XXXX to the tune of {$2500.00}. they do n't appear to understand the scope of the issue as claimed my case had nothing to do with XX/XX/XXXX. and it may not if they know who the particular embezzler was and if it was not XXXX - but these PINs are easy to take, and they likely have multiple embezzlers. EMPLOYEES ARE EMBEZZLING, FACT. 

2. per my inside contact, the PIN numbers are stored in plaintext in the database, available to all in incomm IT. i provided this person my XXXX digit numbers, and they told me all of the secure PINs. the last XXXX of my PINs are in my XXXX and CFPB complaints - but XXXX never made these formal complaints. i set up a meeting between XXXX and skeet 's team. skeet 's team has never communicated these PIN numbers out for XXXX cards. yet i have all of them. there are more that remain, should incomm like to see how the reveal in my video plays out in a court of law. 

3. the division under skeet is either 100 % incompetent or 100 % obstructionist. the same model they use to determine i was a participant in victim assisted fraud claimed XXXX was as well - but with his PINs not scratched off, this is impossible ( which incomm did admit. ) this however has not caused incomm to stop using their broken model. despite XXXX 's case, and despite the how and who of the theft that occurred to me being reported XXXX/XXXX/16 to skeet and XXXX XXXX, i was given absolutely no restitution. i was still victim blamed as if a participant in victim assisted fraud. 

under threat of a lawsuit in federal court a settlement has been offered, which i took. however this does not fix the problem nor has it made past victims whole. this database has likely been designed this way for years, and incomm has very likely screwed over many victims along the way who did not have the time, skill, and luck to determine the full scope of their negligence.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation