Consumer complaint received 2021-11-01 00:00:00
Product: Payday loan, title loan, or personal loan — Installment loan
Issue: Problem when making payments — 
Company: OneMain Finance Corporation
State: CO

Complaint narrative:
This complaint is with regard to the Notice of Dispute from on or about XX/XX/XXXX of this year, which your organization failed to respond to and is in default of. I'm writing on my own behalf, without help from another and authorize ONEMAIN to update the record and compensate me for damages. All must have equal access to the law. The code and regulations referred to are open to the general public at large. I am aware that my consumer rights have been violated. 

From the start of the supposed business agreement, purported to be a contract, ONEMAIN FINANCIAL has engaged in fraudulent and abusive debt collection activities, infringing on my right to privacy and undermining my faith in the banking industry and economy as a whole, rights guaranteed to every consumer. 

Every credit sale after XX/XX/1977 is subject to consumers ' claims and defenses for unfair or deceptive acts or practices pursuant to 16 CFR 433.3. The credit sale I engaged in with ONEMAIN FINANCIAL is no exception.

Per the definitions in 16 CFR 433.1, ONEMAIN FINANCIAL is subject to consumers ' claims and defenses by way of being a seller. I, the consumer, was never apprised of the creditor 's business arrangement with the seller at the consummation of the original credit sale. Meaningful disclosure of the determination of the finance charge was not provided pursuant to the form of disclosure enumerated in XXXX U.S. Code 1632.

ONEMAIN has kept multiple negotiable instruments specially indorsed without recourse and issued no formal notice of dishonor, discharging any alleged obligation per UCC 3-415- Obligation of an indorser.

Evidenced by the Promissory Note, my obligation was fulfilled upon signing/indorsing the instrument, the beneficial and security interest of which were not disclosed to me. As defined in 16 CFR 433.1 ( i ), the instrument I indorsed is the consumer credit contract when it was hypothecated and collateralized to fund the credit sale. Many instances of noncompliance occurred when it was subsequently sold and/or assigned to multiple transferees and/or assignees without mutual assent, consent, and notice to me as I have controlling security interest, constituting fraud in multiple ways : 1. Absence of consideration - all contracts must have consideration to be valid.

2. Absence of disclosure of all facts regarding the use of a promissory note and my signature, violating the U.S. Code 's Truth in Lending Act ( TILA ) and Code of Federal Regulations ' Regulation Z.

3. Absence of disclosure of data-sharing provisions in violation of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act ( GLBA ), without the option to decline the sharing of data with furnishers, agencies, or servicers, along with reporting.

4. Monetization of promissory note disclosure was denied to me. I was not told about the process to monetize a security interest or the secured transactions which were to subsequently take place concerning my chattel paper. 

5. Denial of disclosure of the banks relationship to the " trustee and beneficiary, '' amounting to concealment and voidance of the contract. The debenture trustee was concealed from me.

6. I have reason to believe and do so believe that there was forged alteration of the original instrument because it could not have been monetized without augmenting my blank endorsement, even via the use of a special endorsement.

7. Withholding the meaningful disclosure of the determination of the finance charge, in violation of 15 USC 1605, by willfull noncompliance with form of disclosure dictated in the law ONEMAIN must know and adhere to : 15 U.S. Code 1632.

I am aware that I am entitled to a refund of alleged repayments and damages of at least twice the finance charge due to my right of rescission never being simply and clearly disclosed to me per 15 U.S. Code 1635. I was never given a rescission form at the closing of the contract.

I have reason to believe and do so believe that ONEMAIN FINANCIAL is a debt collector engaged in communication in violation of multiple cease and desist notices from me, and is in violation of 15 U.S. Code 1692c ( a ) ( 1 ) and 15 U.S. Code 1692c ( a ) ( 3 ).

As the consumer, I am aware of the definition in 15 U.S. Code 1692a ( 6 ) that " the term 'debt collector ' means any person who uses any instrumentality of interstate commerce or the mails in any business the principal purpose of which is the collection of any debts. '' I have never given express consent to ONEMAIN FINANCIAL to communicate with me for the purpose of debt collection, thereby violating 15 U.S. Code 1692c at large.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation