vivekkopthsd/cfpb-consumer-complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint received 2019-02-19 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — Credit card debt
Issue: Written notification about debt — Didn't receive enough information to verify debt
Company: ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP INC.
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
I XXXX XXXX have made several requests for proof that a creditor once originated with a national financial institution that has FDIC insurance can sell off a debt that is part of a securitized trust. Then these same debt buyers that used to be known as collection agencies could re-assign the debt to a fourth party for collection enforcement. This process of stating that debts are being purchased by a third party and then enforced by a fourth party is the larges scam in America. The U. S. Supreme Court decision in XX/XX/2017 known as XXXX v. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX is responsible for this scam. This decision basically states that since a third party purchases the debt, that my rights under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act is VOID. The problem is that almost all unsecured debts are sold off to Wall Street in various traunces in securitized trusts. There simply is no resolution where the debt can be purchased, only that the debt can be assigned for collection purposes. Each financial institution must file a 10Q filing quarterly with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The rules on debts being charged off is with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation through the FDIC Act, Code 5000. A debt can be classified either standard or sub-standard. Debts over 180 days late must go into the sub-standard category and written off on a quarterly 10Q SEC filing. These charge 0ffs usually are submitted in the tens of millions of dollars. So its virtually for these debts to be sold..period. Accordingly, I request full validation proving the debt purchase. Secondly, I will entertain a very low settlement agreement to put my dispute to rest. All of the settlements can be submitted through the CFPB portal email address submitted. I am still within my rights under the FDCPA since proof of a purchase to a third party has never been established.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2019-02-19 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — Other debt
Issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed — Debt is not yours
Company: ERC
State: PA

Complaint narrative:
I disputed an collection account with XXXX  2 months ago for an account that is not mines and they failed to investigate and delete.

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2019-02-19 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — Credit card debt
Issue: Written notification about debt — Didn't receive enough information to verify debt
Company: Bread Financial Holdings, Inc.
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
I XXXX XXXX have made several requests for proof that a creditor once originated with a national financial institution that has FDIC insurance can sell off a debt that is part of a securitized trust. Then these same debt buyers that used to be known as collection agencies could re-assign the debt to a fourth party for collection enforcement. This process of stating that debts are being purchased by a third party and then enforced by a fourth party is the larges scam in America. The U. S. Supreme Court decision in XX/XX/2017 known as XXXX v. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX is responsible for this scam. This decision basically states that since a third party purchases the debt, that my rights under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act is VOID. The problem is that almost all unsecured debts are sold off to XXXX XXXX in various traunces in securitized trusts. There simply is no resolution where the debt can be purchased, only that the debt can be assigned for collection purposes. Each financial institution must file a 10Q filing quarterly with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The rules on debts being charged off is with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation through the FDIC Act, Code 5000. A debt can be classified either standard or sub-standard. Debts over 180 days late must go into the sub-standard category and written off on a quarterly 10Q SEC filing. These charge 0ffs usually are submitted in the tens of millions of dollars. So its virtually for these debts to be sold..period. Accordingly, I request full validation proving the debt purchase. Secondly, I will entertain a very low settlement agreement to put my dispute to rest. All of the settlements can be submitted through the CFPB portal email address submitted. I am still within my rights under the FDCPA since proof of a purchase to a third party has never been established.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2019-02-19 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Account status incorrect
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: TN

Complaint narrative:
On XX/XX/2019 I Sent A Certified Letter To The Credit Bureaus To Properly Validate An Account That Was Paid On Time ... The Credit bureaus Refuses to validate the account in has the account showing as a paid collection on my credit report which isn't true ... All Payments Were Made On Time ... I Been trying to fix this correction for sometimes in its really frustrating

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2019-02-19 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — Credit card debt
Issue: Written notification about debt — Didn't receive enough information to verify debt
Company: TD BANK US HOLDING COMPANY
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
I XXXX XXXX have made several requests for proof that a creditor once originated with a national financial institution that has FDIC insurance can sell off a debt that is part of a securitized trust. Then these same debt buyers that used to be known as collection agencies could re-assign the debt to a fourth party for collection enforcement. This process of stating that debts are being purchased by a third party and then enforced by a fourth party is the larges scam in America. The U. S. Supreme Court decision in XX/XX/ 2017 known as XXXX v. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX is responsible for this scam. This decision basically states that since a third party purchases the debt, that my rights under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act is VOID. The problem is that almost all unsecured debts are sold off to Wall Street in various traunces in securitized trusts. There simply is no resolution where the debt can be purchased, only that the debt can be assigned for collection purposes. Each financial institution must file a XXXX filing quarterly with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The rules on debts being charged off is with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation through the FDIC Act, Code 5000. A debt can be classified either standard or sub-standard. Debts over 180 days late must go into the sub-standard category and written off on a quarterly XXXX SEC filing. These charge 0ffs usually are submitted in the tens of millions of dollars. So its virtually for these debts to be sold..period. Accordingly, I request full validation proving the debt purchase. Secondly, I will entertain a very low settlement agreement to put my dispute to rest. All of the settlements can be submitted through the CFPB portal email address submitted. I am still within my rights under the FDCPA since proof of a purchase to a third party has never been established.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2019-02-19 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — Credit card debt
Issue: Written notification about debt — Didn't receive enough information to verify debt
Company: TD BANK US HOLDING COMPANY
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
I XXXX XXXX have made several requests for proof that a creditor once originated with a national financial institution that has FDIC insurance can sell off a debt that is part of a securitized trust. Then these same debt buyers that used to be known as collection agencies could re-assign the debt to a fourth party for collection enforcement. This process of stating that debts are being purchased by a third party and then enforced by a fourth party is the larges scam in America. The U. S. Supreme Court decision in XX/XX/2017 known as XXXX v. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX is responsible for this scam. This decision basically states that since a third party purchases the debt, that my rights under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act is VOID. The problem is that almost all unsecured debts are sold off to XXXX XXXX in various traunces in securitized trusts. There simply is no resolution where the debt can be purchased, only that the debt can be assigned for collection purposes. Each financial institution must file a 10Q filing quarterly with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The rules on debts being charged off is with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation through the FDIC Act,  Code 5000. A debt can be classified either standard or sub-standard. Debts over 180 days late must go into the sub-standard category and written off on a quarterly 10Q SEC filing. These charge 0ffs usually are submitted in the tens of millions of dollars. So its virtually for these debts to be sold..period. Accordingly, I request full validation proving the debt purchase. Secondly, I will entertain a very low settlement agreement to put my dispute to rest. All of the settlements can be submitted through the CFPB portal email address submitted. I am still within my rights under the FDCPA since proof of a purchase to a third party has never been established.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2019-02-19 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: CarMax, Inc.
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
I've made many attempts to contact the company I've already informed them many times that the account was opened fraudulently and I've sent them police reports, FTC affidavit my license and social and my dispute letter I've contacted them while at the police station with the detective that is handling, y case and they are still refusing to remove and/or block this fraud information.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2019-02-19 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: BMW Financial Services NA, LLC
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
I've made many attempts to contact the company I've already informed them many times that the account was opened fraudulently and I've sent them police reports, FTC affidavit my license and social and my dispute letter I've contacted them while at the police station with the detective that is handling, y case and they are still refusing to remove and/or block this fraud information.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2019-02-19 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: ONEMAIN FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, LLC.
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
I've made many attempts to contact the company I've already informed them many times that the account was opened fraudulently and I've sent them police reports, FTC affidavit my license and social and my dispute letter I've contacted them while at the police station with the detective that is handling, y case and they are still refusing to remove and/or block this fraud information.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2019-02-19 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — Medical debt
Issue: Written notification about debt — Didn't receive enough information to verify debt
Company: Thunderbird Collection Specialists, Inc.
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
I have attached a copy of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau order of 2015 pertaining to the collection process on medical debts. This federal agency has levied millions in penalties against several medical collection agencies for abusive collection practices since the 2015 mandate that consumers must be granted 180 days-notice that any or all medical debts can not be posted against a consumers credit report. What this entails is that I as an American consumer needs time to either settle a medical collection before said collection gets posted on my credit report, or that my medical insurance carrier had enough time to resolve the collection either in full or by any sustained factoring agreement in place with the medical servicer, be it a physician, clinic, ambulance service or hospital. That has not been the case in the attached medical collection ( s ) posted on XXXX, XXXX and XXXX XXXX respectfully. Since the 2015 agreement between the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and all three credit reporting agencies, medical collection agencies have violated this agreement in its entirety. Having established that there is a specified procedure in place on medical collection postings on a consumers credit, it is a fact that most if not all medical collectors are in violation of their subscriber agreement with the major credit reporting agencies. Since my rights have already been violated by the collection agency stated in this complaint, the collection should be VOID completely. I am not disputing any factual conclusion if I was even given medical attention, just stating that my personal credit history has been damaged by an unlawful collection practice. I should be entitled to damages for the overall cost involved with what would otherwise be a perfect credit history. Accordingly, I respectfully request for the disputed medical collection ( s ) to be deleted permanently, and if this particular collection agencies needs a remedy for collection, it has abused the credit reporting system by violating my rights. In my opinion the only recourse at this time would be moving forward through other collection processes outside of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. The disputed collection must be deleted permanently, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau must sanction and fine the agency for its abusive actions. The credit reporting agencies should also terminate the subscriber agreement if place. My dispute is based on material facts and current policies on medical collections. The attached disputed collection ( s ) should be deleted permanently without any right to reinsert from this point forward.

Company public response: Company believes complaint caused principally by actions of third party outside the control or direction of the company
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2019-02-19 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Other personal consumer report
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: TX

Complaint narrative:
XXXX XXXX, Legal Assistant and XXXX XXXX ( Legal Assistant ) to XXXX XXXX XXXX illegally reporting that XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX, TX ) and / XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX are creditors via a Texas Department of Public Safety letter. 

Neither XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, or Texas Department of Public Safety are lenders of money or insurance to me. None of the law firm 's lawyers and their insurance providers have represented me in any litigation and have never been hired by me for any attorney representation ; thus, should not be claiming to be creditors of any type on credit reports.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2019-02-19 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
COMPLAINT AGAINST XXXX XXXX XXXX  XXXX I have attached a copy of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau order of 2015 pertaining to the collection process on medical debts. This federal agency has levied millions in penalties against several medical collection agencies for abusive collection practices since the 2015 mandate that consumers must be granted 180 days-notice that any or all medical debts can not be posted against a consumers credit report. What this entails is that I as an American consumer needs time to either settle a medical collection before said collection gets posted on my credit report, or that my medical insurance carrier had enough time to resolve the collection either in full or by any sustained factoring agreement in place with the medical servicer, be it a physician, clinic, ambulance service or hospital. That has not been the case in the attached medical collection ( s ) posted on XXXX, Equifax and XXXX XXXX respectfully. Since the 2015 agreement between the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and all three credit reporting agencies, medical collection agencies have violated this agreement in its entirety. Having established that there is a specified procedure in place on medical collection postings on a consumers credit, it is a fact that most if not all medical collectors are in violation of their subscriber agreement with the major credit reporting agencies. Since my rights have already been violated by the collection agency stated in this complaint, the collection should be VOID completely. I am not disputing any factual conclusion if I was even given medical attention, just stating that my personal credit history has been damaged by an unlawful collection practice. I should be entitled to damages for the overall cost involved with what would otherwise be a perfect credit history. Accordingly, I respectfully request for the disputed medical collection ( s ) to be deleted permanently, and if this particular collection agencies needs a remedy for collection, it has abused the credit reporting system by violating my rights. In my opinion the only recourse at this time would be moving forward through other collection processes outside of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. The disputed collection must be deleted permanently, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau must sanction and fine the agency for its abusive actions. The credit reporting agencies should also terminate the subscriber agreement if place. My dispute is based on material facts and current policies on medical collections. The attached disputed collection ( s ) should be deleted permanently without any right to reinsert from this point forward.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2019-02-19 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: NV

Complaint narrative:
I've gone through the credit I've noticed a few collections that do not belong to me. Please remove them from my credit report immediately as this is poor judgement with on my credit worthiness.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2019-02-19 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — Medical debt
Issue: Written notification about debt — Didn't receive enough information to verify debt
Company: KINGS CREDIT SERVICES
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
The debt was transferred to a collection agency but isnt owed by me. I had medical insurance that covered it but they didnt want to use the medical.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2019-02-19 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: NV

Complaint narrative:
I've gone through the credit I've noticed a few collections that do not belong to me. Please remove them from my credit report immediately as this is poor judgement with on my credit worthiness.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2019-02-19 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: NV

Complaint narrative:
I've gone through the credit I've noticed a few collections that do not belong to me. Please remove them from my credit report immediately as this is poor judgement with on my credit worthiness.

Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2019-02-19 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — Credit card debt
Issue: Took or threatened to take negative or legal action — Threatened to sue you for very old debt
Company: ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP INC.
State: MD

Complaint narrative:
During my process, I set up a payment with XXXX XXXX and the agreement was to remove it from my credit report after I pay off the debt. I paid off the debt and next thing you know I have a judgement letter in my mailbox. The judgement has been requested to remove it off my credit report since they ( XXXX ) had proof that I had paid off the debt from the letters I sent.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2019-02-19 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE COMPANY LLC
State: MD

Complaint narrative:
I was given extension or payment relief by XXXX for two months XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX and those payments were adjusted at the end of plan XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX beside relief nissan motor acceptance charged me one month XX/XX/XXXX gave me one month relief and taking two payments at the end of the plan over to this they reported me late payment in the months they gave me relief according to my records they took two payments in XX/XX/XXXX month one on XX/XX/XXXX and second payment on XX/XX/XXXX I reported 6 to 7 times on phone and XXXX not agree to resolve it and credit beauros they also taking XXXX side I am helpless my credit score goes down I started bussiness and need financial help for bussiness but nobody gave me loan for starting bussiness because of my score and it result in hard inquiries over my score I am financially broke and in critical situation I have family these guys playing with me like it doesnt matter for them but it matters for me because I have XXXX sons XXXX wife family to look after but they playing with me continuously now I am filling complain against these two nissan motor acceptance and XXXX XXXX and XXXX I am attaching reports and documents with complain I need it to get resolve as soon as possible now I am going to file suit against XXXX i have call records when i filed the dispute and many times called them

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation