Consumer complaint received 2024-08-17 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — FHA mortgage
Issue: Trouble during payment process — Loan sold or transferred to another company
Company: Kass Shuler, P.A.
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX BELOW IS A MORTGAGE AUDIT INFORMATION REGARDING THE SECURITIES FRAUD The Company Is Violating International Treaty Law, Trust Law, Contract Law, State And Federal Law. Complaint Has Been Forward To The XXXX XXXX For XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX FRAUD. I RESCIND ALL POWER OF ATTORNEY AND ALL CONTRACT OBLIGATIONS AND EXERCISED MY EXEMPTION TO DISCHARGE, SETTLE AND CLOSE ALL ACCOUNTS RELATED TO CUSIP # XXXX AND XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX AND ACCOUNT NUMBER XXXX. Trust name XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX dated XX/XX/2022, regarding a loan for {$340000.00}. The Original Lender of the XX/XX/2022 XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. The signed Note is NOT indorsed XXXX  of XXXX XXXX XXXX dated XXXX XXXX, 2022 and filed in the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/2022 as XXXX # XXXX XXXX : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  The XXXX Intangible Obligation ( The Debt ) is owned by the XXXX XXXX Trust ; however, it can only be determined if the original XXXX Note XXXX XXXX physically delivered to the XXXX XXXX Trust by checking with the XXXX of documents. Until then, there is no evidence that the XXXX XXXX Trust possessed in any manner the XXXXXXXX XXXX before rights to the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX were stripped away shortly after the XX/XX/2022, signing. The beneficial interest ( ownership ) of the XXXX XXXX  has been recorded in the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  of the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX in the name of XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, the Original Lender of the loan dated XX/XX/ 2022. However, it is clear that XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX sold all ownership interest in the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX to XXXX XXXX shortly after the XXXX XXXX, 2022, signing. By the XXXX XXXX Trust purchasing the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  ) and doing with it whatever was done, the XXXX XXXX Trust was exercising rights of ownership over the XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX  and XXXX XXXX XXXX. By exercising rights of ownership over the XXXX XXXX XXXX and the payment stream, the XXXX XXXX Trust is making a claim of rights to all three parts of the XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX claim which is misplaced. The XXXX XXXX XXXX only exists through the tangible instruments creating it, the XXXX XXXX and the XXXX XXXX 
The sale of the rights to the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX to the XXXX XXXX Trust without stripping away the rights to the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX from the rights to the XXXX XXXX  could only be accomplished with the accompanying negotiation of the XXXX XXXX  and the accompanying assignment of the XXXX XXXX  to the XXXX XXXX XXXX  which has not happened. Whereas the XXXX as a standalone party has not lawfully been conveyed the XXXX XXXX, much less been filed of record as a secured creditor. The XXXX XXXX  is an unenforceable contract, no longer tied to an obligation to enforce its contractual terms over.

Company public response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation