Consumer complaint received 2024-04-30 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: CT

Complaint narrative:
COMPANY : XXXX XXXX FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION - IDENTITY THEFT REPORT FTC REPORT NUMBER # XXXX AMOUNT : {$4500.00} I CURRENTLY HAVE A FRAUD IDENTITY THEFT/ FRAUD CASE ON MY CREDIT REPORT ACCOUNT. A RESULT FROM NUMEROUS FRAUDULENT CREDIT ACCOUNTS ON MY CREDIT REPORT WHICH DO NOT BELONG TO ME AS WELL AS MULTIPLE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS ON MY CREDIT REPORT. I HAVE TAKEN ACTION BY OBTAINING THE IDENTITY THEFT REPORT, OBTAINING PROPER DOCUMENTATION AND FORWARDING THEM TO THE CREDIT BUREAS. HOWEVER, THE CREDIT BUREAUS HAVE STATED THAT THEY CAN NOT REMOVE THIS ACCOUNT AND THAT I NEED TO CONTACT XXXX XXXX  DIRECTLY. 

THEREFORE, I PROCEEDED IN CONTACTING XXXX XXXX REGARDING ACCOUNT NUMBER ENDING IN XXXX. I STATED THE IDENTITY THEFT CASE AND ATTEMPTED TO PROVIDE THEM WITH DOCUMENTATION TO ASSIST ME IN THE REMOVAL OF THIS FRAUDULENT ACCOUNT WHICH DOES NOT BELONG TO ME. ESSENTIALLY I AM REQUESTING JUSTICE. 

THE XXXX XXXX REPRESENTATIVE STATED THAT THEY HAVE COMPLETED THEIR INVESTIGATION AND THAT I CAN NOT APPEAL OR OPEN THIS CASE. THEY DID NOT ALLOW ME THE OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DATA, DOCUMENTATION, OR FORM TO APPEAL OR OPEN THIS CASE. THERE WAS NO FORM OF A FAIR JUSTICE IN PLACE. 

IRONICALLY, I PREVIOUSLY HAD A SECURED CREDIT CARD WITH XXXX XXXX WHICH I CLOSED IN XXXX, THE STATUS ON THAT ACCOUNT READS, " PAID AND CLOSED ''. I CURRENTLY HAVE A NEW SECURED CREDIT CARD OPENED IN XX/XX/XXXX AND A CREDIT CARD OPENED IN XX/XX/XXXX, BOTH ARE IN GOOD STANDING AND REFLECT AS " OPEN/NEVER LATE ''. 

AFTER CONSTANT PERSISTENCE FROM MY BEHALF WITH THE XXXX XXXX REPRESENTATIVE FOR A DETAILED DESCRIPTION WHICH I AM ENTITLED TO, THE REPRESENTATIVE AGAIN REPEATED THAT THERE IS NOTHING THAT CAN BE DONE FROM MY BEHALF BECAUSE THEIR TEAM HAS ALREADY COMPLETED INVESTIGATION. HE THEN MENTIONED THAT THERE ARE LINKED WELCOME KEYS AND PHONES WHICH JUSTIFY THEIR INVESTIGATION. I THEN MENTIONED TO THEM THAT THAT IS NOT SUFFICIENT JUSTIFICATION TO HOLD ME ACCOUNTABLE FOR AN ACCOUNT THAT DOES NOT BELONG TO ME, AS THIS IS AN IDENTITY THEFT CASE. THEREFORE, THEIR REASONING IS NOT SUFFICIENT, ESPECIALLY IN THIS IDENTITY THEFT CASE WHICH INVOLVES WHICH CAN INVOLVE CYBER ATTACKS, HACKS, IP ADRESS HACKING, AND THEFT OF IDENTITY. ALL OF WHICH I AM A VICTIM OF. 

THE REASONING FROM XXXX XXXX IS NOT VALID, IT DOES NOT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE CURRENT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AGE WHERE THESE IDENTITY THEFT CASES ARE INTERTWINED WITH HACKS OF IP ADDRESSES, HACKING ATTACKS, LOCATIONS, PHONES, AND PERSONAL INFORMATION FROM NAMES TO SOCIAL SECURITY THEFT. ALL OF WHICH I AM A VICTIM OF. 

I NEED FAIR JUSTICE, THIS IS INJUSTICE FOR ME. I DID NOT OPEN THE ACCOUNT ENDING IN XXXX, I AM A VICTIM OF IDENTITY THEFT AND AM NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS ACCOUNT.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief