Consumer complaint received 2025-03-23 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: TN

Complaint narrative:
Formal Complaint Against XXXX XXXX Summary of Complaint : This complaint is submitted by XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX who is the lawful holder of a Common Law Copyright Notice, supported by a lawfully recorded and publicly published Affidavit of Publication dated XX/XX/XXXX. This notice establishes exclusive rights over the use of the name XXXX XXXX XXXX and explicitly prohibits the use of said name in any legal or financial contract, transaction, or enforcement action unless it bears a verifiable wet blue ink signature from the living man himself. 

XXXX XXXX has acted in bad faith and in violation of multiple domestic and international laws by attempting to enforce a contract which does not bear the required wet blue ink signature, nor does it carry proper authorization, validation, or legal standing. Any such contract, by law and under binding public notice, is null and void ab initio.

-- - Legal Grounds for Complaint : I. Common Law Copyright Notice ( Affidavit of Publication - XX/XX/XXXX ) Under XXXX XXXX. XXXX ( a ), the name XXXX XXXX XXXX is considered an original work, protected under copyright laws. 

Unauthorized use or enforcement of contracts bearing this copyrighted name without consent or signature constitutes willful infringement and intellectual property theft. 


XXXX. XXXX  Commercial Code Violations XXXX XXXX ( b ) : A person is not liable unless the instrument is signed by that person. 

XXXX XXXX ( b ) ( XXXX ) ( ii ) : A party has the right to demand proof of the persons signature before proceeding. 

XXXX XXXX ( b ) : Preserves rights and remedies under common law and equity. Any financial instrument lacking a valid wet ink signature lacks enforceability and standing in commerce. 


XXXX. Federal Law Violations Truth in Lending Act ( TILA ), XXXX XXXX. XXXX et seq. : Enforcing financial liability without full disclosure and without verified consent violates clear requirements for lawful lending practices. 

Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( FDCPA ), XXXX XXXX. XXXX : Misrepresentation or unauthorized enforcement based on invalid documentation constitutes deceptive collection practices. 

Federal Trade Commission Act, XXXX XXXX. XXXX : Such actions are unfair, deceptive, and unlawful under federal consumer protection statutes. 


IV. International Law Violations Universal Declaration of Human Rights ( UDHR ), Article XXXX ( XXXX ) : No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property. Exeters attempt to enforce financial obligations without proper agreement violates this principle. 

XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( ICCPR ), Article XXXX ( XXXX ) : Enforcing a deed without due process or authentic agreement undermines the individual 's right to a fair process in law. 

XXXX XXXX on the Law of Treaties ( XXXX ), Article XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX : Contracts are binding only if entered into voluntarily and lawfully. No wet ink signature equals no lawful contract. 



-- - Resolution Requested : The complainant demands compensation in the amount of {$500000.00} per occurrence, as declared in the Common Law Copyright Notice, for each unauthorized use, misrepresentation, or enforcement attempt against the name XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 

In order to lawfully and adequately resolve this matter, the following conditions must be met : XXXX. Immediate cessation of all collection, reporting, or legal action tied to the unauthorized instrument ; XXXX. Permanent deletion of any negative tradelines from all credit reporting agencies ; XXXX. Written confirmation from XXXX XXXX acknowledging that no valid wet blue ink signature exists to support the alleged debt ; XXXX. Monetary compensation of {$500000.00} per violation, in accordance with the published damages schedule attached to the XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. 



Failure to meet these conditions will result in escalation to federal and international oversight bodies, including the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, and the pursuit of civil and criminal claims in the appropriate jurisdictions. 



Additional Federal Law Violation XXXX XXXX. XXXX ( Permissible Purpose Requirement ) XXXX XXXX is further in violation of XXXX XXXX. XXXX ( a ) ( XXXX ) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ), which governs the permissible purposes for accessing or using consumer credit information. 

According to the statute : > ... a consumer reporting agency may furnish a consumer report in accordance with the written instructions of the consumer to whom it relates. 

This provision clearly requires : Express written instructions from the consumer, and Such instructions must be clear, direct, and authorized, ideally authenticated by a verifiable wet blue ink signature as the industry standard for original, lawful consent. 

To date, no such written instructions, nor any blue ink wet signature, were ever provided by XXXX XXXX XXXX authorizing XXXX XXXX or any of its agents to access, use, enforce, or report on any alleged consumer transaction or agreement. 

Therefore, any access to, or use of, credit files or data related to XXXX XXXX XXXX is a willful violation of federal law, constitutes unauthorized use of a consumer report, and is grounds for both civil liability under XXXX XXXX. XXXX and statutory and punitive damages. 


This addition can be embedded in the main complaint or submitted as a legal addendum. Would you like the full complaint updated with this included, or need a separate version to attach? 



Attached Supporting Documents : Affidavit of Publication dated XX/XX/XXXX Common Law Copyright Notice for the name XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation