vivekkopthsd/cfpb-consumer-complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint received 2017-10-18 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Reverse mortgage
Issue: Struggling to pay mortgage — 
Company: NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
State: NY

Complaint narrative:
On XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, I consummated a Home Equity Conversion Mortgage ( HECM ) Loan with XXXX XXXX XXXX in the amount of {$350000.00} with an interest rate XXXX XXXX 

The loan is based on an appraisal performed by XXXX XXXX on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. XXXX XXXX was hired by XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX and appraised the value of the property at {$230000.00} Foreclosure Action Against Me On XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, a Lis Pendens and a Foreclosure Complaint were filed by XXXX HECM Acquisition Trust XXXX ( who bought the mortgage from XXXX XXXX ). 

The complaint contains 3 different allonges to the note and mortgage assignments that show ownership was transferred multiple times. 

The first Allonge and mortgage assignment appears to have transferred ownership of the note from XXXX XXXX XXXX to  XXXX XXXX XXXX in XXXX. 

The second Allonge and mortgage assignment indicate the note was assigned from XXXX to XXXX XXXX in XXXX. I was not informed of this transfer. 

The third Allonge indicates the note was endorsed in blank by XXXX  XXXX. the third mortgage assignment indicates the mortgage was assigned to the XXXX XXXX XXXX in XXXX. I was not notified about that transfer either. 

Transaction History I requested a copy of the transaction history from XXXX  XXXX. However, it was incomplete. The transaction history begins at XXXX/XXXX/XXXX and ends at XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. This would make validating the amount of the debt almost impossible. There is also no indication of me not paying my taxes or that XXXX paid them. 

After XXXX began foreclosure proceedings, I began researching my loan because things that XXXX was alleging in the foreclosure complaint did not seem right. 

First, the legal description indicates the lien was not properly conveyed to the property. The legal description on the mortgage does not match my deed. 

At some point during the origination of the loan in XXXX of XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXXl committed mortgage fraud by giving FHA fraudulent information about this loan to get it approved. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX gave me a reverse mortgage in the amount of {$350000.00} on a property valued at {$230000.00} according to the appraisal supplied by XXXX XXXX. 

Being XXXX  years old at the time of consummation, I was only eligible for a maximum LTV of 55 % of the value of {$230000.00}. My reverse mortgage should have only been in the amount of {$120000.00}, not {$350000.00}.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-10-18 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — I do not know
Issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed — Debt was already discharged in bankruptcy and is no longer owed
Company: United Revenue Corporation
State: TX

Complaint narrative:
I wrote a letter to this company dated XXXX XXXX, XXXX. I have requested validation of account numbers XXXX and XXXX. The fact that this a collection account impacts my credit file. This is included in bankruptcy. This company removed account number XXXX and did not remove account XXXX. This violates FCRA and the bankruptcy law. They also violated FCRA and FDCPA by not sending me validation documents I requested.

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2017-10-18 00:00:00
Product: Checking or savings account — Checking account
Issue: Managing an account — Problem using a debit or ATM card
Company: BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
I have an accont with bank of America, and I lost my phone and debit card. in the process my art was used. I reported the loss to my bank, and advised them that all of my passwords and information was stored in my phone so the charges that were used with my PIN number were not mine. The bank advised me that they would place all of it in the notes to review my claim.They then denied my claim stating that because my pin was used it was not a valid claim, EVEN though Advised them my pin was stole along with all of my other important information during the original report. They did n't call. or mailer send any mail to advisement of this, I had to find out on my own. nThey said they would resubmit the claim but it will take up to 90 days when it has already been XXXX plus days. I am a single mother and use my sons social security to help pay for his daycare and the XXXX dollars that I submitted my claim for has caused my account to be in the negative for too long causing my all of my money to be tied up into this claim, due to bank of America not taking proper notes or following the law when it comes to proper time lines.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2017-10-18 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — FHA mortgage
Issue: Struggling to pay mortgage — 
Company: SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.
State: MD

Complaint narrative:
Based on our correspondence and feedback from SPS, We have questions and serious concerns that we need to address in a timely fashion from SPS and alleged Foreclosure Mill, which have change hands several of times. We totally reject to all the alleged responses from SPS. These are the reason why ( A. ) W e was not aware of Foreclosure Sale Postponed on XXXX XXXX, XXXX, We request for proof of discovery, As we know the property can not convert over the note Holder in Due Process. However based on the information on the foreclosure sale, that allegedly took place place on XXXX XXXX, XXXX. We also requested the law firm to provide proof of evidence from the Auctioneer and the courts for proof of presale and new purchase deed showing on record as new instrument. ( B ). Based on Preditory lending towards XXXX XXXX, which the loan was diflated libor rate and so since the alleged loan was transfer to XXXX XXXX XXXX/SPS Allegedly amount owed was part of preditory lending, that SPS company pursue and is now denying any activity in response to this matter. We reject to SPS claim and merit and there false allegation. However as far as we concern, the Attorney Foreclosure Law firm is in violation of the FDPCA. as debt collector and purchasing our property for gain, which falls under theft by Deception and Ultra Vires.This case is still valid due to the fact, SPS is acting now as a pretender lender, that is facing lawsuits in preditory and truth n lending, Dodd Frank. ( C. ) Returned of previous payments needs to be address, based on SPS is the third party debt collector with no license in the state of Maryland as a debt collector.Which clearly is not the Holder in Due Process, also in violation of the FDPCA against all parties /substitute Trustees/Attorney 's. Therefore all payments must be returned and foreclosure must be vacated until this thorough investigation is fully disclosed to satisfaction. ( D ). Based on Servicing Rights, which clearly does not give SPS authority to act in the position as Servicer to this property. Based on the documents receive from SPS showing the documents dedacted inlegible. Based on my credit information, the loan was paid offand discharged thru the Bankruptcy since XX/XX/XXXX

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-10-18 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Other personal consumer report
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information is incorrect
Company: LEXISNEXIS
State: GA

Complaint narrative:
LexisNexis has been collecting, compiling and selling my personal information without my prior consent nor expressed permission. LexisNexis has been reporting adversary and or derogatory data on my consumer report. After many attempts to CORRECT these ERRORS I have not been able to and it has tremendously affected my ability to engage in the pursuit of happiness and obtain additional consumer credit and provide for my personal, family and household. They have violated my XXXX XXXX and have since ignored all additional attempts to correct this matter. I demand that if the disputed alleged debt ( XXXX ) are not UNDOUBTEDLY PROVEN, FULLY TRUE, ACCURATE, COMPLETE, TIMELY, of MY OWNERSHIP, OF MY RESPONSIBILITY, in accordance with each and every obligatory reporting regulation, mentioned here or not! COMPOSE PROOF in testimonial certificate is DEMANDED, anything less will compel me to determine your actions as HOSTILE and WILLFULLY IGNORANT to my consumer and civil rights and willfully derelict to proper reporting, a CLEAR VIOLATION of FEDERAL LAW of with I seek redress, compensation and be awarded punitive monetary benefits beyond the REQUISITE RESOLUTIONS that I am here and now DEMANDING

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-10-18 00:00:00
Product: Checking or savings account — Checking account
Issue: Opening an account — Didn't receive terms that were advertised
Company: U.S. BANCORP
State: CT

Complaint narrative:
I am filing a complaint against US bank for mistakenly denying my {$200.00} bank bonus. In summer XXXX I opened a new checking account with US bank, and there was a promotion associated with new accounts at that time. You can find the details of that promotion below, U.S. Bank is offering a {$200.00} bonus when you open a new Silver Check, Gold Checking or Platinum checking account and complete the following requirements : Enter promotion code on sign up or give it to your banker ( you can request a code via e-mail or text ) Complete XXXX or more recurring direct deposits totaling at least {$500.00} OR complete XXXX or more U.S. Bank XXXX Pay transfers of {$25.00} each or more within 60 days of account opening The Fine Print Checking Package Offer A minimum deposit of {$25.00} is required to open a U.S. Bank XXXX checking account. 
To earn the {$200.00} bonus offer, open a new U.S. Bank XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, Gold Checking Package or Platinum Checking Package between and including XXXX XXXX, XXXX and XXXX XXXX, XXXX. 
Present your promotion code to a branch or XXXX phone banker or enter it online at account opening. 
Additionally, you must complete XXXX or more recurring direct deposits totaling at least {$500.00} OR complete XXXX or more U.S. Bank XXXX Pay transactions of {$25.00} each or more ( you are responsible to ensure sufficient funds are deposited to cover bill payments and enrollment in Online and/or Mobile banking is required ) within 60 days of account opening. 
The checking account bonus will be deposited into your new consumer checking account within 60 days of direct deposit or XXXX XXXX verification, as long as your account is open. 
Bonus will be reported as interest earned on IRS form XXXX and recipient is responsible for any applicable taxes. 
Offer may not be combined with any other checking account bonus offers. 
Offer is not valid if you have an existing U.S. Bank XXXX checking account, had a U.S. Bank XXXX checking account in the last XXXX months, or received other U.S. Bank bonus offers within the past XXXX months. 
XXXX U.S. Bank employees are not eligible. 

In XXXX I met the requirement by using the billpay service twice. But the bonus was not credited to my account. I contacted the bank about this issue, but the representative was trying to disqualify me for bonus reasons.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2017-10-18 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Conventional home mortgage
Issue: Struggling to pay mortgage — 
Company: SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.
State: NV

Complaint narrative:
I have been living at my residence for almost 30 years. Over the last XXXX or so years, many mortgage companies have been involved in my home loan as they sell it to other companies. A number of years ago, the present company XXXX, informed me that my I now owed almost {$500000.00}. I had thought it was around {$350000.00}. They never gave me a complete explanation for this increase. As I was struggling to pay the monthly mortgage, I contested it but they did not respond. 
The present value of my house is around {$560000.00}. 
I am 72 years of age, self employed and want to stay in my residence. 
I would appreciate your investigating this situation and informing me of the correct amount I presently owe on my home. 

Thank you very much for your help XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-10-18 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Account information incorrect
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
My wife and I leased XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX from XXXX XXXX of XXXX, XXXX. on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX for {$68000.00} after XXXX rebates and all other incentives from the dealer. The lease was financed by XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX AZ. We also put {$5000.00} cash for down payment. Due to medical financial hardship ( son diagnosed with stage XXXX XXXX in XXXX, XXXX ) we contacted XXXX XXXX to do voluntary early termination and return the vehicle. They agreed without any early termination fee and told us to return the vehicle to the original dealer. After handing over the vehicle on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, the inspection was done while I waited, once the inspection was all completed. The vehicle return XXXX made me sign a XXXX Return Notification ( similar to a contract ) with all the breakdown of mileage, accounting etc. and total Charges of {$31000.00}. ( see attached ). Sometime between XXXX and XXXX, XXXX, XXXX XXXX sold the vehicle in auction for {$51000.00}. In XXXX, XXXX, XXXX started sending us bill for {$11000.00}. I contacted them several times finally, I got someone that could tell me about the sale amount of the vehicle. I requested the receipt of sale, which I got in mail for {$51000.00}, we were not notified about the sale until we requested for. I told XXXX that we made XXXX payments all before due date amounting {$6700.00} or more, plus {$5000.00} down which they have record of. And asked them since, they sold the vehicle for {$51000.00} and we only owed the {$31000.00} to refund us the difference. If they took fair market approach, then the vehicle sold for more, and if I kept the vehicle for 39 months I would have paid them {$37000.00} per contract after all wear and tear. After 39 months they would have not got approx. {$64000.00}, what they got now. We had to consult an attorney, after second notice, XXXX replied, stating that, we have to send a check for {$11000.00}. It still shows on my wife 's and my credit report. Please see attached attorneys letter.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-10-18 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Account information incorrect
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
My wife and I leased XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX from XXXX XXXX of XXXX, XXXX. on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX for {$68000.00} after XXXX rebates and all other incentives from the dealer. The lease was financed by XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX AZ. We also put {$5000.00} cash for down payment. Due to medical financial hardship ( son diagnosed with stage XXXX XXXX in XXXX, XXXX ) we contacted XXXX XXXX to do voluntary early termination and return the vehicle. They agreed without any early termination fee and told us to return the vehicle to the original dealer. After handing over the vehicle on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, the inspection was done while I waited, once the inspection was all completed. The vehicle return XXXX made me sign a XXXX Return Notification ( similar to a contract ) with all the breakdown of mileage, accounting etc. and total Charges of {$31000.00}. ( see attached ). Sometime between XXXX and XXXX, XXXX, XXXX XXXX sold the vehicle in auction for {$51000.00}. In XXXX, XXXX, XXXX started sending us bill for {$11000.00}. I contacted them several times finally, I got someone that could tell me about the sale amount of the vehicle. I requested the receipt of sale, which I got in mail for {$51000.00}, we were not notified about the sale until we requested for. I told XXXX that we made XXXX payments all before due date amounting {$6700.00} or more, plus {$5000.00} down which they have record of. And asked them since, they sold the vehicle for {$51000.00} and we only owed the {$31000.00} to refund us the difference. If they took fair market approach, then the vehicle sold for more, and if I kept the vehicle for 39 months I would have paid them {$37000.00} per contract after all wear and tear. After 39 months they would have not got approx. {$64000.00}, what they got now. We had to consult an attorney, after second notice, XXXX replied, stating that, we have to send a check for {$11000.00}. It still shows on my wife 's and my credit report. Please see attached attorneys letter.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-10-18 00:00:00
Product: Credit card or prepaid card — General-purpose credit card or charge card
Issue: Other features, terms, or problems — Other problem
Company: BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
XXXX prevents my credit usage information to be pulled into XXXX party apps like XXXX XXXX etc. 
I have a right to my charge information via external reporting tools. 
Please investigate and respond, Thanks, XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-10-18 00:00:00
Product: Credit card or prepaid card — Store credit card
Issue: Problem with a purchase shown on your statement — Card was charged for something you did not purchase with the card
Company: CITIBANK, N.A.
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
It let a XXXX young man stay in my home in late XX/XX/XXXX, who got a hold of my home depot  credit card. He started to use the card XX/XX/XXXXto buy himself expensive tools and power - equipments without my knowledge and also signed for the charges at the checkout. 
It was n't a big charge and I never thought that it was n't my charge. After receiving the statement I just went to pay the bill without any question. Home depot recognized that it was n't my signature but did n't let me know. When in later statements I was charged for more expensive items I called home depot and asked them to itemize the charges for me because I did n't recognize any of those. After the phone call I started a dispute against the charges.
Home depot given credit for those charges this time, but on XX/XX/XXXX I received a letter from home depot in which I was informed " we have rebilled your account and consider our investigation closed ''. 
Their decision was based, in part of the following : .... The facts and/or information reviewed as part of the investigation does not substantiate the claim of unauthorized use. 

On XX/XX/XXXX I filed a police report about multiple credit card charges. 
Of all the credit companies, only homes depot who holding me responsible for the charges because " the person who used your card was living in your home, so you 're responsible ''. 

Yes, my card was used, and I was victimized by the person who used the card. 
But now I 'm victimized again by the credit company to pay for something charged by the thief and those items are not even in my possession! 

I really do n't think that it 's fair to pay for something I did n't buy or charge..

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-10-18 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — Other debt
Issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed — Debt is not yours
Company: FAIR COLLECTIONS & OUTSOURCING, INC.
State: GA

Complaint narrative:
As a Federally Protected Consumer, Original Creditor, Principal of all accounts created by my seal/signature, I order XXXX to make recompense and pay redress and compensation for their trespass against me. XXXX has been attempting to extort and rob me using deceptive, false and misleading, abusive practices against me personally, my family and my household. This is criminal activity at least and is unacceptable by every means. 

You have committed several federal violations against me, a Private law abiding Federally Protected Consumer. Each violation is a statutory cost of {$1000.00} each, which does not include my personal cost and fees for taking time to address these issues. Violations committed against me include but not limited to : 1. Violated 15 USC 1692c ( a ) ; Communication without prior consent, expressed permission 2. Violated 15 USC 1692c ( b ) ; Communication without prior consent, expressed permission 3. Violated 15 USC 1692d ; Harass and oppressive use of intercourse about an alleged debt. 
4. Violated 15 USC 1692d ( 1 ) ; Attacking my reputation, accusing me of owing an alleged debt to you.
5. Violated 15 USC 1692d ( 2 ) ; Use of obscene or profane language on my report ( saying I owe you a debt ) 6. Violated 15 USC 1692e ; Using false, deceptive or misleading representations 7. Violated 15 USC 1692e ( 2 ) ( A ) ; False representation of the character and amount of the alleged debt 8. Violated 15 USC 1692e ( 2 ) ( B ) ; False representation of any service rendered or compensation 9. Violated 15 USC 1692e ( 8 ) ; Communicating false information 10. Violated 15 USC 1692e ( 9 ) ; Use/distribution of communication with authorization or approval 11. Violated 15 USC 1692e ( 10 ) ; False Representation XXXX not a party to alleged debt by my consent ) 12. Violated 15 USC 1692e ( 12 ) ; False representation/implication ( innocent purchasers for value ) 13. Violated 15 USC 1692f ; Unfair Practices attempting to collect an alleged debt.
14. Violated 15 USC 1692f ( 1 ) ; Attempting to collect a debt unauthorized by an agreement between parties.
15. Violated 15 USC 1692g ( a ) ( 4 ) Certifiable Validation and Verification of alleged debt ( s ) 16. Violated 15 USC 1692j ( a, b ) ; Furnishing certain deceptive forms. ( You are not a party in the alleged debt ) 17. IDENTITY THIEF ; Obtaining personal identification information without prior consent and creating an account in my name. 
18. Invasion of Individual and Family Privacy

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation