Consumer complaint received 2017-08-04 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
We need to complain that the  XXXX  Credit Agencies simple reporting system from the banks, is biased against the consumer and small family.Our standing with   XXXX   was misrepresented.
This misrepresentation is intentionally built into the Credit Agency 's systems!
We, the consumer, must have an equal opportunity under our common law rights. This has been denied us.
an equal opportunity to present the ongoing dispute, the facts and actions of the parties.And an accurate and equal The Credit Agency 's ignored the facts, the actions of  XXXX  in refunding us 100 % of all 'late charges ' The facts and actions of the parties are as follows ; a ) There was only one occurrence of a late payment, about 30 months prior to XX/XX/XXXX .At that time l was in Intensive Care a. We asked  XXXX  for the regular paperwork showing our balance, so we could make a special 401k claim to catch up with the balance.
We had not been late prior to hospitalization. Despite numerous phone calls   XXXX    never supplied the norcmal paperwork in a timely manner. Later   XXXX    produced Fraudulent papers to 'clim ' they sent the papers on time.
We were n't the only family suffering from  XXXX  unfair servicing on the same issue.
b ) We never were further behind than that one occurrence ( of two late months ) during hospitalization.
But   XXXX    marked the binary system late every month, after they refused to supply the paperwork, which would have allowed us to be current.   XXXX   themselves stopped us from becoming current, then charged us late charges for about two years or more. This became a serious disagreement with  XXXX .
c ) In the few years since that first occurrence l was hospitalized about fifty percent of the time. And on  XXXX  for eighteen months. Even so, we never extended the two past due payments, past the one time only original occurrence.
d ) In  XXXX / XXXX  we reached an agreement to sell our house and informed  XXXX  we needed to agree to 100 % of the pay-off.   XXXX   agreed to take the action of refunding 100 % of all late payments.
e ) The dispute took a turn, when  XXXX  stopped making any late charges against us in  XXXX .
f ) This action meant the binary reporting method to Credit Agencies was unfair and incorrect. It is biased against families, allowing big banks and the   XXXX   major Credit Agencies to unfairly and wrongfully impose huge damages on our family.
f )   XXXX   actions speak louder than computerized binary reports.On XX/XX/XXXX    XXXX   took ACTION and returned to us 100 % of all late charges.
These binary reports ignore the actual state of affairs and the refund action.
Our direct damages today, due to the biased credit reporting is over {$100000.00} and will climb substantially after  XX/XX/XXXX .

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation