vivekkopthsd/cfpb-consumer-complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-05 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
This consumer reporting agency as defined by law has violated my rights under the FCRA for not assuring me 100 % possible maximum accuracy. Every automated complaint that comes back says items are verified when they have not done a reasonable investigation of the items in question Pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1681e - Compliance procedures section ( b ) says whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it follows reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates. To my understanding, the only investigation that credit reporting agencies do is a simple communication with the E oscar system to request verification. Verification could be as simple as a phone number address and name all of which are public information and is not the maximum possible accuracy which would mean that you are in violation of the FCRA. 
These are the Inaccurate tradelines that I disputed that have not been removed or investigated properly. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-05 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
This consumer reporting agency as defined by law has violated my rights under the FCRA for not assuring me 100 % possible maximum accuracy. Every automated complaint that comes back says items are verified when they have not done a reasonable investigation of the items in question Pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1681e - Compliance procedures section ( b ) says whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it follows reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates. To my understanding, the only investigation that credit reporting agencies do is a simple communication with the E oscar system to request verification. Verification could be as simple as a phone number address and name all of which are public information and is not the maximum possible accuracy which would mean that you are in violation of the FCRA. 
These are the Inaccurate tradelines that I disputed that have not been removed or investigated properly. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-05 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Old information reappears or never goes away
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: SC

Complaint narrative:
I had filed XXXX XXXX XXXX  in XX/XX/XXXX. The bankruptcy was set to come off this year. I had relinquished a car in the bankruptcy. On XXXX, it was showing 7 years was up on car through XXXX XXXX in XXXX of this year. I disputed it through XXXX. Next thing I know, they got upset and reported me as late on equifax now and showing XX/XX/XXXX instead. I did not have that car long at all. I dispute the fact that it was that long. It should be over. 7 years has passed and now they brought my score down by XXXX points. Please help me resolve. Let me know of anything I can do on my end.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-05 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — Credit card debt
Issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed — Debt was result of identity theft
Company: Colony Brands, Inc.
State: TX

Complaint narrative:
On XX/XX/XXXX receive an statement from Seventh Avenue on a newly open credit the I have not applied - inmidiatly contact them to let them know- the were going to investigate- on XX/XX/XXXX receive a letter from Seventh Avenue responding to my call- but every month since then an monthly statement arrive to my home- now Im start receiving calls and text to collect the money they said was expend with them - today is XX/XX/XXXX and I dont know what to do so this wont stain my credit record - please advice

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-05 00:00:00
Product: Credit card or prepaid card — Store credit card
Issue: Other features, terms, or problems — Other problem
Company: Grain Technology, Inc.
State: WI

Complaint narrative:
I became a member of credit to checking deposit service called Grain in XXXX. They have increasingly changed their policies over the past year, including, recently, instituting a {$100.00} fee for a year of their " service ''. Having always made timely payments, my account has remained in good standing. However, when I logged into the application on XX/XX/XXXX I was informed by the app there were new " security '' procedures. I proceeded to log in and was subsequently told that they were unable to " verify '' my account ( after 2 years of usage ) and were rescinding my credit withdrawal line. My email to customer service, again, was responded to with their representative telling me they could not verify my identity and that their decision was " final ''. 

It's a curious situation as they did not ask me to verify any information. There was no request for identification documents, no internet-based authentication system, there was absolutely nothing - and no attempt was made to verify my identity. 

Further, this action was taken after I was debited the {$100.00} " yearly fee ''. Essentially, they took funds and did not provide the service. This is patently dishonest.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-05 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: TX

Complaint narrative:
This consumer reporting agency as defined by law has violated my rights under the FCRA for not assuring me 100 % possible maximum accuracy. Every automated complaint that comes back says items are verified when they have not done a reasonable investigation of the items in question Pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1681e - Compliance procedures section ( b ) says whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it follows reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates. To my understanding, the only investigation that credit reporting agencies do is a simple communication with the E oscar system to request verification. Verification could be as simple as a phone number address and name all of which are public information and is not the maximum possible accuracy which would mean that you are in violation of the FCRA. 
These are the Inaccurate tradelines that I disputed that have not been removed or investigated properly. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-05 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: TX

Complaint narrative:
This consumer reporting agency as defined by law has violated my rights under the FCRA for not assuring me 100 % possible maximum accuracy. Every automated complaint that comes back says items are verified when they have not done a reasonable investigation of the items in question Pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1681e - Compliance procedures section ( b ) says whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it follows reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates. To my understanding, the only investigation that credit reporting agencies do is a simple communication with the E oscar system to request verification. Verification could be as simple as a phone number address and name all of which are public information and is not the maximum possible accuracy which would mean that you are in violation of the FCRA. 
These are the Inaccurate tradelines that I disputed that have not been removed or investigated properly. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-05 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: NC

Complaint narrative:
This consumer reporting agency as defined by law has violated my rights under the FCRA for not assuring me 100 % possible maximum accuracy. Every automated complaint that comes back says items are verified when they have not done a reasonable investigation of the items in question Pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1681e - Compliance procedures section ( b ) says whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it follows reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates. To my understanding, the only investigation that credit reporting agencies do is a simple communication with the E oscar system to request verification. Verification could be as simple as a phone number address and name all of which are public information and is not the maximum possible accuracy which would mean that you are in violation of the FCRA. 
These are the Inaccurate tradelines that I disputed that have not been removed or investigated properly. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-05 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: NC

Complaint narrative:
This consumer reporting agency as defined by law has violated my rights under the FCRA for not assuring me 100 % possible maximum accuracy. Every automated complaint that comes back says items are verified when they have not done a reasonable investigation of the items in question Pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1681e - Compliance procedures section ( b ) says whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it follows reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates. To my understanding, the only investigation that credit reporting agencies do is a simple communication with the E oscar system to request verification. Verification could be as simple as a phone number address and name all of which are public information and is not the maximum possible accuracy which would mean that you are in violation of the FCRA. 
These are the Inaccurate tradelines that I disputed that have not been removed or investigated properly. 

XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-05 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: AL

Complaint narrative:
This consumer reporting agency as defined by law has violated my rights under the FCRA for not assuring me 100 % possible maximum accuracy. Every automated complaint that comes back says items are verified when they have not done a reasonable investigation of the items in question Pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1681e - Compliance procedures section ( b ) says whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it follows reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates. To my understanding, the only investigation that credit reporting agencies do is a simple communication with the E oscar system to request verification. Verification could be as simple as a phone number address and name all of which are public information and is not the maximum possible accuracy which would mean that you are in violation of the FCRA. 
These are the Inaccurate tradelines that I disputed that have not been removed or investigated properly. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX ( Original Creditor : ) XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX ) XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXXXXXX XXXX ) XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-05 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: TX

Complaint narrative:
This consumer reporting agency as defined by law has violated my rights under the FCRA for not assuring me 100 % possible maximum accuracy. Every automated complaint that comes back says items are verified when they have not done a reasonable investigation of the items in question Pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1681e - Compliance procedures section ( b ) says whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it follows reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates. To my understanding, the only investigation that credit reporting agencies do is a simple communication with the XXXX XXXX system to request verification. Verification could be as simple as a phone number address and name all of which are public information and is not the maximum possible accuracy which would mean that you are in violation of the FCRA. 
These are the Inaccurate tradelines that I disputed that have not been removed or investigated properly. 


XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-05 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: PA

Complaint narrative:
This consumer reporting agency as defined by law has violated my rights under the FCRA for not assuring me 100 % possible maximum accuracy. Every automated complaint that comes back says items are verified when they have not done a reasonable investigation of the items in question Pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1681e - Compliance procedures section ( b ) says whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it follows reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates. To my understanding, the only investigation that credit reporting agencies do is a simple communication with the XXXX XXXX system to request verification. Verification could be as simple as a phone number address and name all of which are public information and is not the maximum possible accuracy which would mean that you are in violation of the FCRA. 
These are the Inaccurate tradelines that I disputed that have not been removed or investigated properly. 

XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-05 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: IA

Complaint narrative:
This consumer reporting agency as defined by law has violated my rights under the FCRA for not assuring me 100 % possible maximum accuracy. Every automated complaint that comes back says items are verified when they have not done a reasonable investigation of the items in question Pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1681e - Compliance procedures section ( b ) says whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it follows reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates. To my understanding, the only investigation that credit reporting agencies do is a simple communication with the XXXX XXXX system to request verification. Verification could be as simple as a phone number address and name all of which are public information and is not the maximum possible accuracy which would mean that you are in violation of the FCRA. 
These are the Inaccurate tradelines that I disputed that have not been removed or investigated properly. 

DPT EDXXXX XXXX DPT EDXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX DPT EDXXXX XXXX DPT EDXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX COMPANY ) XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX ) XXXX XXXX  XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX  XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  IXXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-05 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — I do not know
Issue: Written notification about debt — Didn't receive enough information to verify debt
Company: U.S. BANCORP
State: WI

Complaint narrative:
I received a call on XX/XX/XXXX, from an unknown number. After not answering the call I proceeded to receive a voice mail recording. The recording stated " XXXX XXXX here and skip tracing a pre-legal department at XXXX XXXX '' The voice recording then gave a website to pay off the debt. I then went to the website : XXXX and there is no address listed on the site to send any debt validation letters, or cease and desist letters. After entering in some of my information I was presented with XXXX options for payment, but no information about the debt that I could verify. Shortly after and without asking I started receiving text messages to my phone number. However every time I request an address to send a debt validation letter the communication stops. I believe this to be in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, as I am allowed to send a debt validation by mail and they are refusing to send an address to do so. It also appears upon further investigation that the website registers to XXXX and not the United States. I believe this to be a fraudulent collection activity, on a debt I do not know and am not able to verify.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-05 00:00:00
Product: Credit card or prepaid card — General-purpose credit card or charge card
Issue: Trouble using your card — Can't use card to make purchases
Company: CLGF Holdco 1, LLC
State: NJ

Complaint narrative:
Destiny mastercard all of a sudden now holds your payment for 14 days when they never did this ever to me & i paid off my account in full. I spoke with 2 reps both were clearly rude 1 hung up on me when i was waiting for a supervisor & the 2nd rep says oh we hold the money now, meanwhile i have XXXX babies who are in need of things & these people are being so stupid with holding my funds that i paid on XX/XX/XXXX they told me i can use my credit on XX/XX/XXXX which is complete XXXX. meanwhile my other credit card accounts were over the limit i paid them off & was able to use my available credit in XXXX

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-05 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — Other debt
Issue: Took or threatened to take negative or legal action — Threatened or suggested your credit would be damaged
Company: CONTRACT CALLERS INC
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
This is my XXXX complaint against Contract Callers. A very disrespectful representative XXXX called my phone today at XXXX AM and asked for my name and told me to verify the last XXXX digits of your social security number. He did not even verify where he was calling from. 

Very rude and distasteful phone call. As done before, a complaint was filed against Contract Callers who illegally put a collection on my credit. 
Now that I contacted CFPB and they had to removed the collection off my credit, they illegally call my phone. 

Again my question stands, is this company permitted to collect from Florida residents? Even if they now are, I am affected by the pandemic and out of work indefinitely. 

Please stop this company from contacting me and harassing me after the last CFPB complaint or I will have to find a free law service to help me file a harassment lawsuit. 

My last complaint was filed XX/XX/2022. Why are they calling me threatening me?

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation