vivekkopthsd/cfpb-consumer-complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint received 2017-02-23 00:00:00
Product: Student loan — Federal student loan servicing
Issue: Dealing with my lender or servicer — Trouble with how payments are handled
Company: Navient Solutions, LLC.
State: KY

Complaint narrative:
Been paying my student loans ( XXXX now Navient ) for over 13 years on time, a while back I revived a notice from Navient stating they were restructuring/reconfiguring my loan because of the new Obama law allowing for the extension of the loan. Well I did n't major in accounting or mathematics but I understand that if you extend the terms of the loan it costs you more ( yes it may lower your payment upfront but adds several XXXX dollars in interest ). So they changed my payment structure and I told them that i did not want it changed and they said it was the " new law ''. I asked if I could renegotiate the plan and they told me that they do n't " negotiate '' the loan amount, I stated so you can change the terms without my permission but I can not negotiate my payment terms.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2016-12-29 00:00:00
Product: Bank account or service — Other bank product/service
Issue: Account opening, closing, or management — 
Company: WESTERN UNION COMPANY, THE
State: KS

Complaint narrative:
My complaint is regarding your settlement with XXXX. We were issued a refund check on XX/XX/2016 but it was sent to a former address. We became aware of the check for {$410.00} but the check stated that it was only valid until XX/XX/XXXX. I called the number on the check and asked that the check be reissued. They stated that they gave me until XX/XX/XXXX to cash the check and since that date passed, I was no longer entitled to the money. I did n't see anything on that order that limited the date for payment. In fact, I think most states require such money to an Unclaimed property fund.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-02-02 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Conventional fixed mortgage
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure — 
Company: HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL, INC.
State: PA

Complaint narrative:
XXXX Habitat for Humanity is in violation of our clients right to counsel and RESPA guidelines - we have attempted to contact the lender and opposing counsel since XX/XX/XXXX for loan information and to discuss a workout option for the client via loss mitigation - the lender and or opposing counsel was contacted on XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX, No one has responded to our voicemails left for each - each time we have reached out to them no one has returns our call and at this point they are unwilling to assist this client in a workout option.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-03-15 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting — 
Issue: Incorrect information on credit report — Public record
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
I went down to the courthouse and spoke to the clerk personally. I verified with her and she agreed that the judgement listed on my credit report was not mine. I asked how was that possible since you report this information to the bureaus. She stated that they do not report any information to the credit bureaus. So how is that Equifax was able to gain access to my inaccessible information? 
According to the FCRA, the credit bureaus must verify personally with the creditor. The clerk of the court in this instance would be the creditor. I would love to know with whom you spoke to, their title and date you called. I think you should be able to provide this information forthwith as performing a verification is what you do. Since the information may have been obtained by other means and not directly with the court and as I am an intelligent woman, I respectfully request that you remove the judgement from my file.I believe that if I were to take this matter to my attorney that he would concur with me and suggest a lawsuit against your company we would win without a hitch.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-03-26 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting — 
Issue: Incorrect information on credit report — Reinserted previously deleted info
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: GA

Complaint narrative:
The following credit items are reporting to my credit file and have been disputed several times and have been proven to not belong to me or reported incorrectly. the accounts in question are as follows : XXXX Account Number XXXX XXXX

Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2017-03-11 00:00:00
Product: Consumer Loan — Vehicle loan
Issue: Managing the loan or lease — 
Company: ALLY FINANCIAL INC.
State: WI

Complaint narrative:
I had requested a 2 month extension on XX/XX/2017. I did n't receive the extension agreement until XX/XX/XXXX. Submitted the paperwork and payment XX/XX/2017 which met the 10 day deadline as stated in the letter. XX/XX/XXXX rolls around and the staff are calling me telling me my loan is past due and requesting payment. I explain whats going on with the extension and such. The agent says he looked into the account and seen that the extension is noted but hasnt been granted. Therefore he would email the extension department to get the situation resolved. XX/XX/XXXX rolls in and I begin getting calls again. I explain the same situation. The agent starts telling me that the extension expired because I didnt make the minimum payment by the deadline. I explain I did make the payment on the night of XX/XX/XXXX. She stated she would look into the situation again and contact the extension department to see whats going on with my account. XXXX, same thing happens, but this time I requested to speak to a supervisor. The agent put me on hold for 3 to 5 minutes, and then came back on the line stating that the supervisor was busy and unable to assist me. XX/XX/XXXX, I get yet another call and explain the situation. The agent says the same thing, that I 'll contact the extension department. I then requested to speak to a supervisor as well, as I 've been getting a run around. I requested to speak to a supervisor. The agent put me on hold for 3 to 5 minutes, and then came back on the line stating that the supervisor was busy and unable to assist me, but assured me that she contacted the extension department and they will be looking into the situation. XX/XX/XXXX, I was on the phone for 22 minutes still dealing with the situation. finally getting transferred to a supervisor. I explained to the supervisor whats going on, and she explained that she would be looking into the situation directly and will contact me back. I received a voicemail message on XX/XX/XXXX from her to call back. I called back, got another agent, and was not allowed to speak with the supervisor and was told the extension was never granted because the extension agreement was supposedly not signed by me. I spent 35 minutes on the phone explaining to the agent what happened, she finally offered me another one month extension. Same thing is happening with this extension as Im getting calls about every 3 days and I explain that I requested an extension and all that jazz. Everyone tells me that they will get it taken care of, but I keep getting calls.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-03-21 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Conventional fixed mortgage
Issue: Application, originator, mortgage broker — 
Company: Flagstar Bank, N.A.
State: MD

Complaint narrative:
I am in foreclosure. My aunt XXXX was contacted by a lender ( XXXX ) who asked then convinced us that we needed to make repairs to our roof. The home was fully paid for without a mortgage at the time. My aunt who had no income could not take out a loan, so XXXX suggested that she transfer the title to me so that I could refinance. I only applied to take over the house to help my aunt get the repairs to the home. We only needed about {$15000.00} to make repairs, but when I applied I was told by XXXX the company she works with do n't do small refinancing loans and that I would have to borrow much more. She convinced me to borrow {$50000.00}. Then XXXX suggested and picked out the roofing company who charged me {$20000.00} to repair the roof. Two years later XXXX came by my home and convinced me that I needed to borrow another {$50000.00} to make more repairs that never got finished. off and on XXXX would come to my house saying that I needed to pay her {$300.00} for fees, she also came to my job and harassed me there. I used the XXXX loan to make payments to both the loans. Thanks to the HUD counselor I realize now that I was preyed upon and was a victim of a predator the just stripped the equity out of my home. The women that did the refinance was XXXX XXXX and told me she work for XXXX and she convinced me that I needed these loans. I did not know how refinancing or mortgages work so I was an easy target. 
my family has lived in the home since it was built in XXXX. This was my grandparents home, my parents home, now my home along with my aunt. I really do n't want to lose it.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-02-23 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — FHA mortgage
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account — 
Company: Community Loan Servicing, LLC (formerly known as Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC)
State: VA

Complaint narrative:
I applied and was approved for a loan modification with Bayview loan servicing. They messed up the first modification and issued me a second as a courtesy, but did n't notify me of the mistakes. I worked with a housing counselor who was the one to first find out about the mistakes. I made payments toward the 1st trial modification but they told me it was the wrong amount because they gave me a second modification and that amount was higher. So the modification is now void and my house is in foreclosure. Also, my house was damaged and the insurance company told me send the check to bayview. I did. Bay view kept telling me the check was sent to loss and found. Long story short they cashed the check ad lied to me for months telling me they did n't know where it was. Even after keeping my XXXX check ( which was more than enough to keep me out of foreclosure, Im scheduled for foreclosure in less than 30 days. Please contact me I fell this is wrong on so many levels and they are trying to steal my home.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-03-10 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure — 
Company: WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
I am filing another complaint on behalf of my client. After my last complaint regarding the manner in which my client 's loan modification application was reviewed, XXXX different Wells Fargo representatives contacted me from the Executive Office ( XXXX and XXXX ). After speaking to them and my client I told them that my client wanted to forgo the loan modification review and instead be reviewed for a short sale. I asked XXXX if that was possible. She said it was but that the review had to be expedited. I agreed. I told her that we had secured an offer for the property and that we could send it over immediately. I stressed to her that because a sale date had been set for XXXX XXXX that it was IMPERATIVE that someone contact me ASAP to review the file. I told her I did not want to delay ONLY to be told that we were too close to the new Trustee Sale date. She assured me that the review would be expedited that and someone from the executive short sale department would be contacting me. It has been nearly a week and no one has contacted my office. My assistant calls Wells Fargo 3 times a day trying to get in touch with someone. We have not heard from XXXX or anyone else. Customer Service does not seem to know what is going on. I am concerned and believe that time is going to fly by until we are once again close to a sale date. As I was writing this my assistant just spoke to someone that said the offer is being reviewed but they have not asked for anything NOR do we have a representative to discuss the matter with. 
I have always worked well with Wells Fargo so I am VERY confused by this. We are trying to resolve this matter amicably and avoid a foreclosure sale. The offer that we received is a good offer especially considering the condition of the property. I do not know what value Wells Fargo has for the property but an INTERIOR BPO is needed. Trust me, Wells Fargo needs to get someone inside this home to check out what is going on. 
I am only resorting to communicating through the CFPB because Wells Fargo will not return our calls. 
I want to believe that Wells Fargo is working in good faith but the run around that we get from customer service tells me otherwise. I do not trust what is going on right now. My client is willing to do whatever it takes to resolve this matter FAST. 
I have a funny feeling that time is going to pass and I am going to be given some XXXX excuse. I am documenting all of our calls and attempts to work with Wells Fargo. 
Please have someone contact me ASAP at XXXX to discuss this situation. Time is of the essence.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2017-03-22 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Conventional fixed mortgage
Issue: Application, originator, mortgage broker — 
Company: WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
State: VA

Complaint narrative:
Received an escrow shortage letter from Wells Fargo for {$4700.00}. Part of the taxes were not paid at closing by the title company and taxes/interest part of mortgage was calculated too low. This was a refi, so most of the paperwork was already on file with Wells Fargo.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2017-03-24 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting — 
Issue: Incorrect information on credit report — Account status
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
I paid off my auto loan XX/XX/2016 before that time like the rest of America I went through some finanacal hardship and the car was reposed but I paid that balance and was in dispute with XXXX about administrative fee 's in the amount of {$350.00} that was added on after I paid everything they had put in writing. because of this every month when I made my car payment XXXX reported me as being late. I printed documents and uploaded them to Trans Union and the XXXX other credit agencies. they acknowledge the inaccracies but the are reporting the paid in full loan as a bad debt.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2017-03-02 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting — 
Issue: Credit reporting company's investigation — Problem with statement of dispute
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: LA

Complaint narrative:
Made numerous complaints to Trans Union concerning the XXXX credit item on my credit report. Informed Trans Union that the information from XXXX is erroneous. Just recieved a final report today and the results are quite confusing. For example, XXXX recieved the vehicle in XXXX XXXX and list that my payment hx was " OK '' from XXXX and then it goes up to 60 days etc. It also lists the last payment made on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX of {$700.00} ( impossible ) I also sent to them the bill sent by the company in the amount of XXXX on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2017-03-07 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Other mortgage
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account — 
Company: Community Loan Servicing, LLC (formerly known as Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC)
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
I received a bill from my loan servicer for {$54000.00}. They are charging me for legal fee 's for correcting a lot mix up by the builder. I got a lawyer through XXXX XXXX XXXX to handle the proceedings. Before things were final I received several bills. We responded twice, asking them why we are being charged these fee 's. They responded with a break down of the legal fee 's concerning this case. During this process Bayview has done nothing but prolong the case and cause my husband and I unnecessary stress. I called XXXX XXXX XXXX for advice and they told me that Bayview has been nothing problems and in many instances were in violation of my contract.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-03-29 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting — 
Issue: Improper use of my credit report — Report improperly shared by CRC
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: MA

Complaint narrative:
I have recently checked my credit report and noticed that under public records there is a record of my BankRuptcy. the Credit Bureau are reporting a bankruptcy. The courts do n't verify that information that information was pulled from a third-party reporting therefore it needs to be deleted.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-03-30 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting — 
Issue: Credit monitoring or identity protection — Account terms and changes
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: PA

Complaint narrative:
I read about Experian falsely reporting credit scores, and lenders not using the actual credit scores that were sold to me. At the end of 2016, I went to XXXX. I was n't able to see my score, only the information on my credit report. There was a marketing ad advising me that in order to see my actual score that I would have to purchase the Experian Credit Tracker service for {$24.00} a month. I did that. I just cancelled it last month. After reading about the fine that the US has implemented on them, I called them to request a refund for the service I paid for since those number I saw were misrepresented. I spoke with a woman who told me that since I cancelled the service already that she can not issue me a refund because she has no access into my account, which I think is absurd. Also that fact that I can not see my billing history with them through my account without being forced to pay for another month of service is absolutely absurd. I was advised by the rep that I spoke with that told me she could not give me a refund that my dispute case number is XXXX. Once I spoke to the supervisor, XXXX ( rep ID XXXX ) and she only offered my one month refund at a discounted rate ( {$12.00} ), I asked her for the dispute case number ( in case it was different since I was talking to a different person ) and she told me that they have no such thing, when I mentioned to her that a dispute case number was already confirmed with the previous rep she suddenly found a number to give me. A different number but a number non the less. The dispute number that XXXX gave me is XXXX. I paid a total of {$49.00} to Experian for 3 months of service. The first month was billed at {$24.00} and the second and third month was billed at {$12.00} and I would like the total for the three months, which is {$49.00} to be refunded to me. XXXX told me that the another reason I was only getting a partial refund was because the credit score given to me through the product that I purchased was only an " educational score '' because there is no way for them to know my exact score because things change so often with scoring. Its ridiculous that consumers are the victim of their false advertising. If in fact, my score was only for educational purposes, it should still be accurate, after all, education should always be accurate. Additionally, the fact that the numbers were not accurate should have been mentioned in their marketing information that I saw, that prompted me to purchase their service.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-03-27 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting — 
Issue: Improper use of my credit report — Report improperly shared by CRC
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
Experian continues to report accounts that are n't mine and credit reports I did n't authorize. I sent them settlement paperwork where I sued XXXX and they agreed to remove the accounts from my report. Experian has refused to do so. I have also had more fraudulent credit inquiries and am attaching a new police report. Experian 's online service would n't accept my police report and I 'm submitting proof of that as well.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief