vivekkopthsd/cfpb-consumer-complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint received 2015-04-15 00:00:00
Product: Payday loan — 
Issue: Can't contact lender — 
Company: Rocket Mortgage, LLC
State: NV

Complaint narrative:
Quicken Loans obtained XXXX ( XXXX ) HARD Inquires from XXXX and XXXX Credit Reports Bureaus without my written consent ; consequently, these XXXX hard inquires lowered my credit score for future financial assistance. 

Quicken Loans XXXX Customer Services representatives XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX Ignored my request to REMOVE their Quicken Loans name from my XXXX and XXXX credit report files.

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-07-16 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — Credit card
Issue: Taking/threatening an illegal action — Sued w/o proper notification of suit
Company: Atlantic Recovery Solutions LLC
State: MI

Complaint narrative:
Called my place of employment and threaten me saying they would call my human resources at my corporate office.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2016-05-04 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure — 
Company: NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
Submitted Request for a Standard Modification but was declined.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2016-06-07 00:00:00
Product: Bank account or service — Checking account
Issue: Deposits and withdrawals — 
Company: BB&T CORPORATION
State: GA

Complaint narrative:
We deposited {$510.00} ( cash and check ) into a BB & T business checking account on XXXX XXXX, 2016 and have a copy of the receipt showing this - teller, as usual, counted the deposit as it was being made. Several days later, we received an 'account adjustment letter ' noting that the deposit was short by {$20.00} and that the funds had been withdrawn from the account as a result. I have been trying since XXXX XXXX to resolve this, with both the branch and BB & T, with no success. I did learn on XXXX XXXX that while we deposited {$430.00} cash and {$78.00} check, the teller showed it as {$410.00} cash and {$98.00} check - as there were clearly XXXX mistakes made by the teller in her paperwork, we feel it is clear that we are owed {$20.00}

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-09-19 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — FHA mortgage
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure — 
Company: NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
State: NJ

Complaint narrative:
My mortgage company Nation Star Mortgage while in the process of giving me a loan modification, send me a check for {$780.00} on Fri XXXX/XXXX/15. I called and ask why was the check sent a young man named XXXX said to make my payment higher. Chec cut from XXXX XXXX Bank check # XXXX dated XXXX/XXXX/15. Nation Star Mortatage XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Texas XXXX. Is n't this illegal? My loan # XXXX. 
I will be sending the check back. I am writing this while I can at XXXX, for aim some how blocked durning the day time hours. I have just sent off an XXXX check for {$1100.00}. 
Please help us my husband and I. We are the XXXX at XXXX XXXX in XXXX NJ XXXX. Please write and I will call you or all XXXX XXXX. 
Thank youXXXX XXXX XXXX

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2016-09-01 00:00:00
Product: Bank account or service — Checking account
Issue: Deposits and withdrawals — 
Company: BB&T CORPORATION
State: VA

Complaint narrative:
I presented a check to XXXX XXXX which cleared their electronic screening. I immediately deposited a check presented to me as reimbursement ( mobile deposit ) the same day. BB & T held the deposit for 3 days. In the meantime, my check was returned NSF and I was charged a XXXX charge. Today, I check my account and see where BBT list my mobile deposit as " available '' and " posted '' on XX/XX/XXXX. This is beyond misleading. If the funds were not available according to their policy, why do they present the deposit on my statement as being available for withdrawal? In actuality, the funds were there. 

Also, They do not disclose the check that was returned in order that the consumer can get matters straight with the bank or merchant. Because of this, the check was presented a second time. Check in the amount of {$320.00}. I am not understanding how a check can be returned and the ending balance for the day be over and beyond the check amount plus charges?

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-04-13 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Conventional fixed mortgage
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account — 
Company: NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
We refinanced our loan in XXXX 2015, with XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Loan # XXXX. Our loan was sold to Nationstar Mortgage LLC effective XXXX XXXX, 2015, loan # XXXX. At the time our loan was transferred to Nationstar, per the letter their was a transferred escrow amount of {$1600.00}. Nationstar states they only received {$1.00} from XXXX XXXX from the transfer of the account. In the meantime, my homeowners insurance has expired because no one sent payment. And the {$1600.00} escrow account of my funds is missing. No one can tell me where the funds have been applied and why they are not in my current escrow account.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-08-21 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — VA mortgage
Issue: Credit decision / Underwriting — 
Company: Rocket Mortgage, LLC
State: TN

Complaint narrative:
I contacted QuickenLoans about a possible VA mortgage online. I received a callback from representative XXXX XXXX about a possible mortgage. Under false pretenses, and against my verbal reservations, I allowed him to run a hard credit inquiry for my credit score, knowing that it could negatively impact my score. I had already informed him that I had recently inquired on my credit scores from the " top XXXX '' ( XXXX, XXXX, XXXX ) within the last XXXX days, and he assured me that the scores were fine, but Quicken needed to verify. He came back and told me that the scores were XXXX points less than the report I had received from the reporting agencies listed above, and then proceeded to explain to me that the scores were " weighted '' for a mortgage. Nothing in the reporting I received from the agencies themselves indicated that there was a different score for mortgages than the score that was reported to me. I feel that I was coereced into allowing this company to get a hard credit inquiry, damaging my credit, when the representative did or should have known that my " weighted '' credit score would not have been sufficient for a loan from Quicken.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-10-06 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Conventional fixed mortgage
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure — 
Company: SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
I had a mortgage for my home with XXXX mortgage. I was granted a modification by XXXX on XX/XX/2012. My new monthly payment is {$420.00} XXXX sold or transferred my mortgage to SPS Select Portfolio Servicing Inc. SPS Inc. refused to acknowledge my modification. I have an ongoing bankruptcy case. My modification was filed with the judge that was handling my case at the time and was approved. SPS filed paper in court to dispute my modification. My modification is valid. I spoke with a representative at SPS who told me that XXXX did not transfer the modification.

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-12-24 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure — 
Company: NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
State: NY

Complaint narrative:
On XXXX XXXX, XXXX, I mailed a qualified written request to Nationstar requesting certain information and documents. Specifically, I requested : the identity of the owner of my loan ; any language in the applicable servicing agreement or investor guidelines that would restrict a loan modification ; an itemization of costs, fees and expenses charged to my account since I defaulted ; a description of Nationstar 's efforts to establish live contact with me within 36 days of my delinquency to inform me about loss mitigation options ; a copy of the notice Nationstar sent me as required by XXXX CFR XXXX ( b ) ; and a copy of the loss mitigation application I submitted to Nationstar on or about XXXX XXXX, XXXX, as well as Nationstar 's written responses to that application. That qualified written request was delivered to Nationstar on XXXX XXXX, XXXX. 

On XXXX XXXX, XXXX, Nationstar mailed a purported response to my qualified written request. In this letter, Nationstar claimed that it would enclose the following documents : the note and security instrument ; the payment history ; the most recent billing statement ; the notice of servicing transfer ; the most recent escrow analysis statement ; and the payoff quote. I never requested these documents. Nor did Nationstar provide any of the documents or information I requested in my qualified written request.

Company response to consumer: Closed
Consumer complaint received 2016-02-19 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account — 
Company: NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
Complain against Nation star mortgage. 
They are cruel and do not coopeate, I can pay, but they prefer to forclose the house, because I have equity in the house. So they do not accept my modification process.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-04-07 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Conventional fixed mortgage
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account — 
Company: NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
State: MN

Complaint narrative:
Hello, after repeated attempts and interminable phone tree choices I have been assured that " the check is in the mail ''. 
I am to please understand that up to seven working days are needed to allow the check to arrive. 
the last check sent to to me by Nationstar actually bounced a week after depositing it in my checking account. 
I repaid my loan in full via electronic funds transfer on XXXX/XXXX/15. It is XXXX/XXXX/15 today. 
it seems like there are XXXX very distinct sets of rules here. XXXX set for me as the borrower with strict timelines and harsh consequences. 
and basically no rules at all and with no consequences for Nationstar. 
I would like to speak to a representative from your department at earliest opportunity. 
Thanks, XXXX XXXX

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-06-12 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Conventional fixed mortgage
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account — 
Company: NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
State: WI

Complaint narrative:
Unjust Enrichment of my Escrow monies on a new loan originated on XXXX XXXX. 
" I received your reply dated XXXX XXXX, XXXX. 
I still contest the ledger on my escrow account is wrong. The investigation is not conclusive in regards to my request because it does not address the core issue with the accounting of my escrow monies. The escrow transfer credit on line XXXX is the correct amount @ {$7000.00}, but these funds were intended to be paid out at the time of closing to our Village and our Insurance company for XX/XX/XXXX invoices. The estimated escrow payment at origination was and still is enough to cover all of the escrow expenses that have occurred, and the projected expenses for the near future, with the overage originally calculated and applied. 

Your letter is showing a negative adjustment to the escrow account for {$7000.00} ( I 'm assuming to fund the taxes and insurance ), which would put the escrow balance at {$1200.00} at the time of closing. But your reported escrow balance is not true because Nationstar did not pay the entire property tax bill at the time of closing. The starting escrow balance, and our escrow payments in XX/XX/XXXX were enough to fund the taxes and insurance for XXXX, XXXX, and will be for XX/XX/XXXX. ( Including escrow padding ) The amount of {$3400.00} was not an 'advance ' in XX/XX/XXXX, it should have been CREDITED from your stated escrow balance of {$8200.00}. And the tax payment was short, and I had to contact Nationstar to make the additional payment of {$2400.00} in XXXX XXXX - which is a LATE payment. This amount should also have been credited from the stated escrow balance. These XXXX payment total {$5900.00} to the Village of XXXX XXXX - not {$7800.00} ( as stated in your reply letter ). Also, at the closing Nationstar cut a check to XXXX for hazard insurance for {$1200.00}, which should have been credited from the escrow balance. Nationstar 's ensuing management of my escrow monies and account charges are negligent at best. And the amount of harassment put, as a responsibility on me is unjust and erroneous. The errors have all occurred as a result of Nationstar mishandling my escrow ledger. This was election I made to make my accounting simpler - I do n't need to have an escrow account.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2016-11-11 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure — 
Company: SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
Our real estate company filed a counter offer on a HAFA short sale on XX/XX/2016. They called back to confirm the counter offer was received, here is the timeline of calls to SPS : XX/XX/XXXX sent update offer {$310000.00} XX/XX/XXXX New offer in review. sale date postponed XX/XX/XXXX in review XX/XX/XXXX in review XX/XX/XXXX in review XX/XX/XXXX in review XX/XX/XXXX in review XX/XX/XXXX in review XX/XX/XXXX SPS states counter offer LOST NOT IN REVIEW! 
The real estate company confirmed SPS had the XXXX short sale counter offer on XX/XX/2016 which helped postpone a sale date. And then XXXX weeks later SPS lost my XXXX short sale. My major concern is because SPS has refused to stop the sale date of XX/XX/2016. So for the past XXXX weeks while I ca n't sleep at night because I have a sale date hanging over my head, SPS has been doing nothing to help me avoid a foreclosure or receive a HAFA short sale. I am furious! This is complete fraud, and/or dysfunction! And I am the one who may pay for the SPS incompetence.

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2016-06-17 00:00:00
Product: Consumer Loan — Installment loan
Issue: Managing the loan or lease — 
Company: BB&T CORPORATION
State: KY

Complaint narrative:
I went to pay off my loan with BB & t, they told me they would not accept my payment. that I had to request a payoff and go through process. I had submitted for payoff. this was a branch manager that was going to hand me back my payoff checks and not payoff my loans. She ca n't refuse me this. A teller did take my money but for a manager to act this way was inappropriate

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-04-29 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Home equity loan or line of credit
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure — 
Company: BB&T CORPORATION
State: TN

Complaint narrative:
We own a home in XXXX XXXX XXXX, FL. It is valued at around $ 550K We took out a HELOC with Bank XXXX it was an interest only loan. When BBT took over Bank XXXX we were at a balance of {$240000.00} we were contacted by BBT and told, " they do not service that type of loan '', " we would be put on a 15 year payout with a 3 year balloon '' " 6.875 % interest '' " that 's the best we can do ''. It was far above what we were comfortable with and we communicated that. We tried to wrap our XXXX and XXXX mortgages together and make it more manageable but do to the low value housing market in our area in XXXX and the balance of the XXXX mortgages we would have had to come up with {$50000.00} to close. We did n't have the money to do that and so we accepted the exorbitant terms. We have remained current for the last three years and paid down close to $ 40K. I contacted XXXX XXXX with BBT XXXX XXXX business lending around XXXX XXXX, XXXX knowing we were set to term on XXXX XXXX. I told her our situation and that the terms of the loan were creating a hardship and we 'd like to combine XXXX mortgages of {$360000.00} and that we had an excellent tenant covering what the combined mortgage would be saving us close to {$3000.00} per month on a 15 year loan. I turned in our financials to XXXX with the exception of XXXX since we are on extension. Although I had our XXXX income compiled I did not have the rest of the accounting done. XXXX said we would not be able to proceed without it. At that point I decided to move over to the residential side and attempt running the loan through that department. Because of new restrictions I was told we would most likely not qualify. That department was also needing our XXXX business accounting complete which we have not completed and are on an extension. So, we decided to let the loan roll on and continue to struggle making the {$2800.00} payment. It is now XXXX XXXX and I have received in todays mail a maturity statement stating {$200000.00} is 10 days past due. We feel we have been unfairly treated since they took over the loan from Bank XXXX. It seems as though their aim is to bring us to financial ruin. Even if they did n't want to combine and add the XXXX mortgage on, why will they not give us reasonable repayment terms? We have never missed a payment. While it 's true we 've been adversely affected in the last few years with less business income we have continued to adjust as needed to meet all of our obligations. We would like to know our rights and our recourse against this seemingly impossible situation. We would also like to request that the original terms of our Bank XXXX loan documents be compared to the new BBT loan documents we had no choice to sign to see if there were any inconsistencies or mishandling in regards to the transfer of the loan.

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-02-28 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account — 
Company: NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
State: NY

Complaint narrative:
I own a home in Fl. 
Nationstar Mtg billed my account erroneously {$340.00} for an inspection which I never ordered. They said it was for a late payment which never happened. There was an adjustment in interest rate which They held a payment and never credited my account until I brought it to there attention.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-12-15 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account — 
Company: SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
Received a letter dated XXXX/XXXX/2015 from Select Portfolio Servicing ( SPS ) stating they received and reviewed a request for loss mitigation assistance and that my account is ineligible for such assistance because a foreclosure sale is set to occur in the next 7 days. 
This is erroneous for several reasons. First, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX office ( XXXX XXXX XXXX is the contact ), has been exclusively communicating on my behalf with SPS since approximately XX/XX/XXXX 2015. Second, I nor XXXX Office has submitted a request for loss mitigation assistance to SPS on my behalf. Third, if in fact there was a loss mitigation request sent to SPS, it would have been received by SPS prior to 7 days before the XXXX XXXX scheduled foreclosure date. Last and most important is the fact that numerous correspondence has been sent to SPS over a long period of time attempting to resolve their assertion that they have the authority to service my loan, who owns my loan, that my loan is in default, the absence of missing payments, the delay in posting payments to my account, inaccurate interest rates charges, excessive extraneous charges, forced placed insurance and Up Front Fees ( UFFs ) charged numerous times for loan modification and forbearance requests that were erroneously denied for bogus reasons. 

Further, SPS refuses to respond to my specific questions regarding the validity of my home loan and their authority to service the loan as requested by a Qualified Written Statement ( QWR ) and in accordance with RESPA and Section XXXX ( f ) of the Truth-in-Lending Act, XXXX U.S.C. Section XXXX ( f ) ( XXXX ), which asked SPS provide me with the name, address, and Telephone number of the owner of the Promissory Note signed by me and secured by the deed of trust in my mortgage loan.

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-09-17 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Conventional fixed mortgage
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account — 
Company: NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
State: GA

Complaint narrative:
I want to know why Nationstar Mortgage , LLC was able to legally secure a Lender Placed Flood Insurance Policy with an annual premium in the amount of {$1600.00} on a XXXX mortgage with a principle balance of approximately {$3600.00}, when the previous year 's annual premium was {$44.00}, which covered their interest on my XXXX mortgage with a principle balance of approximately {$4900.00}. Not only did the annual premium amount change, but the coverage changed from {$4900.00} to {$180000.00}. I already had flood insurance coverage on my XXXX mortgage for {$180000.00} and the principle balance on that loan was {$100000.00}.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-09-08 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Other mortgage
Issue: Application, originator, mortgage broker — 
Company: Rocket Mortgage, LLC
State: GA

Complaint narrative:
My husband and I are looking for a new house. We were pre-approved by XXXX lender. 
Unbeknownst to me my husband decided to contact Quicken loans to check on refinance rates for our current home. While at work he spoke to a representative who gave him all of my credit information to include a credit card in my name only and the outstanding balance.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation