vivekkopthsd/cfpb-consumer-complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint received 2015-04-21 00:00:00
Product: Consumer Loan — Installment loan
Issue: Taking out the loan or lease — 
Company: U.S. BANCORP
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
On XXXX XXXX, XX/XX/2015 my father and I went to USBank XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, CA XXXX to apply for an equity loan with our Florida XXXX House as collateral if needed. My father 's XXXX house at XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, Florida is appraised for {$750000.00} and is paid for. We were applying for {$60000.00} for repairs we 're been doing since last XXXX. XXXX XXXX and XXXX was assisting us with collecting the information we brought with us to the bank ( w'2 's and property tax for Florida property and income statements. We were told that it takes about XXXX days for process to be completed. I received a call on the same day XXXX/XXXX/XX/XX/2015 at XXXX XXXX. from XXXX stating the loan was denied and he did n't have a reason as to why. On XXXX/XXXX/XX/XX/2015 I went back to the bank and XXXX told me that the computer denied the applicatin, and still no reason was given. We feel as if the loan was never given consideration. Unfair practices and when I call and insisted on a denial letter or reason, none was given. WE are XXXX XXXX and have combine income over {$7000.00} monthly income. We are able to repay the loan and other information was never collected or considered. I 'm requesting an immediate investigation be given against XXXX XXXX and XXXX at US Bank and the denial be overturned immediately.

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2016-12-05 00:00:00
Product: Bank account or service — Checking account
Issue: Deposits and withdrawals — 
Company: U.S. BANCORP
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
XXXX XXXX XXXX 's Home has an account at U. S. Bank in XXXX XXXX, CA. at XXXX. I deposited XXXX checks on XXXX/XXXX/16 for a total of {$31000.00}. I was told the funds would be held, however, I learned on XXXX/XXXX/16 {$200.00} was realeased and {$4800.00}. was realeased on XXXX/XXXX/16. However U.S. Bank has charged for 3 checks submitted for pay a total of {$100.00} over draft fees. The funds were there. The checks were drawn on an account from XXXX in XXXX XXXX. The payee was the County of XXXX a governmental agency. In reading the regulations a government check does n't have to be held that long. I told XXXX the employee at U.S. Bank and she told me XXXX County went bankrupt. That is an untruth. XXXX County has never went bankrupt. This was done to get funds from this account illegally.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-03-25 00:00:00
Product: Credit card — 
Issue: Identity theft / Fraud / Embezzlement — 
Company: BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE
State: MA

Complaint narrative:
This was a complaint filed in 2014 and I NEVER received any emails from you and I never received XXXX phone call from Barclay. They have not reduced my credit card rate, I was promised i would not have to pay any interest or late fees. they have done nothing to help me except provide legal aid this is a joke. every other credit card helped me and this one will not. they are affecting my credit report severely and i can not believe that they sent generated responses as well. i have managed to pay down this card from XXXX to XXXX with late fees and interest. i am on XXXX the XXXX is not mine. they are absolutely not helping or taking responsibility that they were required by the law to provide the phone number of the woman that forced closed my account and gave a phone number. they allowed themselves to give out information to someone pretending to be me. they are rude vindictive and need to backtrack and remove all fees accrued because at this point the card would be paid and i want the negative score off of my credit report. i already sent them XXXX letters the next XXXX will be certified and they have 30 days to do so by law or the credit reporting agency has to remove it from my report.

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2016-06-07 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — FHA mortgage
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account — 
Company: U.S. BANCORP
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
XXXX XXXX bank sold my mortgage and did n't notify me in a timely manner. USBank bought my mortgage and did not notify me in a timely manner.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-11-24 00:00:00
Product: Prepaid card — General purpose card
Issue: Fees — 
Company: U.S. BANCORP
State: GA

Complaint narrative:
I was given XXXX ( XXXX ) XXXX gift cards ( {$50.00} each ). The front of the packaging indicates that the cards were valid through XX/XX/2020. On the back of the card there is verbiage that " U.S. Bank will deduct from your balance an inactivity fee of {$2.00} per month after 12 consecutive months of inactivity ... '' What I did not realize and which I believe is intentionally unclear is that the cards were " ticking '' from the time the person who gifted me bought them. I do not know how long my donor had them ; I tucked them away to use for some future special purchase, confident in the 2020 expiration date. Recently I was ready to make that " special purchase '' and was surprised to find that the cards could not be used because their value had been whittled away to {$8.00} each because of inactivity fees! I was able to get only {$24.00} restored to each card by working with U.S. Bank ( their records supposedly only go back one year ( XXXX x {$2.00} = {$24.00} ). I truly believe that the packaging of these particular gift cards is intended to be vague so that neither the donor or the recipient is aware that " time is of the essence ''. I truly thought that the $ XXXX monthly deduction would begin after the first time I used the card at a retail register. I have other gift cards that I have received, and none of them have these harsh conditions ( you can be sure I looked closely at that after this event ). It is fine with me if MC and U.S. Bank want to run their business by eroding the value of a gift card ( for which they have received their money ), but I do think that they should have to make it clear ( and abundantly so ) that their gift cards are diminishing in value second by second, minute by minute. " Use your card NOW or it could be worth very little or nothing in the near future '' should be emblazoned on the packaging.

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-08-12 00:00:00
Product: Bank account or service — Checking account
Issue: Making/receiving payments, sending money — 
Company: U.S. BANCORP
State: KS

Complaint narrative:
I have an account with US Bank and my husband and I have been with this bank since XX/XX/XXXX. We recently got married XX/XX/XXXX and ever since then my account issues started. I got a new debit card with my new name on it and they wont allow me to go over {$500.00} when our rent is well over {$1000.00}. I have to now write a check through online bill pay in which they sent out but then returned it because I did n't have {$25.00} in our account. After taking my entire lunch to straighten it out the rep said it was the banks fault and took the return check fee off our account. I was so upset and advised her of this and she said she does n't get why I am upset they did me a favor!!!!??? Keep in mind my rental office wont allow me to send in checks now that this has happen. The rep told me we can do overdraft protect for just online bill pay and checks so our bills can be paid and put a " No '' for overdraft for our debit cards I agreed. Well today XX/XX/XXXX I get another return check for my husbands student loan payment because our account was {$46.00} negative. I speak to a XXXX and he tells me its at the banks discretion which was never told me by the previous rep. You would think since we have been with this bank since XX/XX/XXXX and have multiple accounts with them they would cover {$46.00} overdrawn check. I spoke with a manager XXXX who had no compassion at all and told me they sent me a letter telling me the details of this which we never received. I am fed up with this bank and will be closing our account ASAP!

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-12-01 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Conventional fixed mortgage
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure — 
Company: U.S. BANCORP
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
On XXXX/XXXX/2015 a request for modification review was sent to US Bank. On XXXX/XXXX/2015 at XXXX XXXX a call was made to US Bank - XXXX x XXXX and spoke with XXXX. The notes XX/XX/XXXX from processors were that docs were needed : co-borrowers signature and date on RMA, current retirement award letter and two months proof of receipt, and two months proof of receipt for SSI. On XXXX/XXXX/2015 these docs were faxed to the lender. Nothing had been received from the lender concerning addition missing documents until XXXX/XXXX/2015, where a voicemail was left for XXXX XXXX the processor after a letter stating that an updated XXXX form was needed. This was faxed to US Bank the same day. On XXXX/XXXX/2015 XXXX called in and advised of a new LIST of documents needed now. Stating that they need updated retirement award letter and a XXXX for co borrower - advised XXXX was received, but they want a separate one for XXXX, the co borrower. On XXXX/XXXX/2015 all the above requested documents were faxed to the lender. On XXXX/XXXX/2015 a third party attempted to get an updated but US Bank stated that the authorization had expired and could not speak with them. By XXXX/XXXX/2015 a new authorization was provided and faxed to the lender. On XXXX/XXXX/2015 a call was made to US Bank by the authorized third party and XXXX stated that we needed to add tax ID on third party authorization and that both borrowers need to sign the power of attorney to discuss the file. She was questioned as to why and she did n't know. A supervisor was requested and then the call was transferred to a line that rang and rang with no voicemail or pickup. Later that day the Tax ID number was added to the power of attorney and re-faxed it to US Bank. In the meantime no document stating of missing documents were ever sent to the attorneys office or the client. It was n't until XXXX/XXXX/2015 that the authorized representative from attorney 's office was able to speak with the lender and they stated that they were missing an updated award letter. The most updated award letter dated XXXX/XXXX/2015 had been previously faxed to the lender MULTIPLE TIMES at this point. Again this document was faxed same day to the lender. On XXXX/XXXX/2015 a call was received by the authorized XXXX party that the file was closed on XXXX/XXXX/2015 and a new submission was required. This is absolutely ridiculous. The lender played games not requesting all the needed documents at one time, but when documents were requested they were received in a timely fashion. There is absolutely no reason that a resolution should not have been reached by this time, let alone CLOSING the review. This review was handled haphazardly in a fashion to promote the foreclosure of XXXX XXXX 's home, when he has been doing everything in his power to attempt to work it out with the lender.

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2016-05-03 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Other mortgage
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure — 
Company: U.S. BANCORP
State: IN

Complaint narrative:
The property located at XXXX XXXX XXXX in XXXX, IN XXXX has been in foreclosure for well over 1 year. The property has not been maintained by anyone. Windows are broken, there are holes in the siding, the fence is falling down, there are multiple dead trees, and all the neighbors have to chip in to keep the yard mowed and the weeds at bay. The result has been a significant eye sore in neighborhood that has resulted in people leaving the neighborhood, and difficulty in attracting new home buyers. The HOA fees have not been paid in several years and this property has become a large burden on the neighborhood.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-11-23 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — I do not know
Issue: Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed — Debt is not mine
Company: National Principal Group, LLC
State: OH

Complaint narrative:
A company by the name of National Principal Group contact myself and several of my family member leaving a threatening recorded voice message. I spoke to XXXX of their " representatives '' all of which claimed I owed a several hundred dollar balance on a pay day loan, which I had never taken out. Each time I contacted their offices to request emailed documentation of the alleged debt, I was assured that it would be sent. Finally, after XXXX attempts to recieve this email, they sent a generic password protected email. I called back to question how to open the attachments, and the office manager hung up on me. I called back XXXX more times, and was hung up on XXXX times. I believe this to be a fraudulent company.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-05-19 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Other mortgage
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure — 
Company: U.S. BANCORP
State: LA

Complaint narrative:
Loan modification/loss mitigation options are denied because lender states they have not received the requested documents. The requested documents were repeatedly submitted. The last date consumer submitted the documents to lender was XXXX XXXX, 2015. Additionally, lender repeatedly asked for letter from former employer stating consumer is no longer employed despite having a letter from the consumer stating she is no longer an employee of the company and a Notice of Separation from Consumer 's state 's XXXX.

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2016-09-19 00:00:00
Product: Student loan — Non-federal student loan
Issue: Dealing with my lender or servicer — Received bad information about my loan
Company: Campus Student Funding, LLC
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
XXXX University, XXXX FL, is owned by XXXX Colleges. I took out a private loan through XXXX University called a XXXX Loan for approximately {$4600.00} on or about XX/XX/XXXX to cover the part of tuition not covered through the Federal Student Loan program. XXXX switched the loan servicer from XXXX to Campus Student Funding and XXXX, XXXX ( XXXX XXXX XXXX ), PH # XXXX XXXX on or about XX/XX/XXXX. 
The following is an excerpt of what has happened to XXXX Colleges : " XXXX and XXXX borrowers : On XX/XX/XXXX, the Department announced new information about this relief. The Department has found that between XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX, XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX, and XXXX University ( " XXXX '' ), as well as XXXX misrepresented job placement rates for many of their programs of study. The Department stated that these findings qualify students enrolled in the covered programs and time periods to apply for a discharge of their federal Direct Loans through an expedited process using a simple attestation form. This includes parents of XXXX and XXXX students with parent PLUS loans. '' The Federal Court ruled that ALL student debt for students attending XXXX Colleges/ XXXX University is to be fully discharged for those attending between XX/XX/XXXX - XX/XX/XXXX.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-07-28 00:00:00
Product: Credit card — 
Issue: Advertising and marketing — 
Company: U.S. BANCORP
State: MA

Complaint narrative:
I have opted out permanently for prescreened credit card offers, but I still get them from Century Bank. I have also called them directly but the offers still come.

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2016-11-19 00:00:00
Product: Credit card — 
Issue: Billing disputes — 
Company: U.S. BANCORP
State: NV

Complaint narrative:
XXXX automatically charged a product to my credit card account. This had happened before and at that time I called and cancelled my card and received a new one with a different card number. I inform XXXX that I did n't want them automatically charging to my account. It happened again in XXXX, 2016. The credit card company allowed XXXX to charge to an account that did n't exist, they transferred the charge from my old card number to my new one. When I called the representative of the credit card company they said they could n't do anything except challenge the charge. I did that. 

I just received another bill from the credit card company stating that I owe {$85.00} for the XXXX charge, plus a late charge, plus a minimum interest charge fee. I feel like I am being harassed. I closed the account, yet after taking to a representative a second time they said they ca n't close the account. I spoke with a supervisor and they were no help at all. I called XXXX and received a refund on XXXX XXXX, 2016. They told me to contact the credit card company and give them this number : XXXX or XXXX. 

I sent all of this information to customer service in XXXX, ND.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-01-24 00:00:00
Product: Bank account or service — Other bank product/service
Issue: Account opening, closing, or management — 
Company: CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
State: TX

Complaint narrative:
I have been trying since XXXX to get XXXX hard inquiries removed from my credit report from Capital One Bank. I did not authorize my credit to be ran for any account. I contacted Capital One on XX/XX/XXXX and spoke with the fraud department. I was told that yes a business account had been opened up in my name but has since been moved into the correct persons name. I asked how this was possible. I was told it looks like a mistake. I let her know that it is showing XXXX hard inquires on my credit reports and needs to be removed. She assured me this would be taken care of and she would mail me out the updated information for my records. Now fast-forward to today XXXX/XXXX/17. I still have not received anything from Capital One stating anything. I 've tried over and over again to call and get some help. All i 'm being told is they do not show an account in my name. Last week while still working on to repair my credit I received a report from XXXX and it 's XXXX addresses listed that are not mine. They show addresses out of XXXX but I live in XXXX I 've never lived in XXXX. I called XXXX and spoke with a rep who worked with me on finding out what was attached to that address. Come to find out the Capital One inquiries where from that address. The rep then issued a fraud alert on all XXXX credit bureaus. Because of the fraudulent activity I was able to remove the inquires from XXXX but I 'm not able to with XXXX and XXXX because those addresses never showed up on those reports. I need this removed. It is negatively affecting my credit score. I have never had an account with Capital One and after numerous calls weekly no one has been able to help get these removed.

Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2016-05-10 00:00:00
Product: Bank account or service — Checking account
Issue: Deposits and withdrawals — 
Company: JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
State: NY

Complaint narrative:
I wanted to get foreign currency before a honeymoon trip from my bank Chase. The receipt did not provide insight into the amount -- in terms of fees and other costs -- that Chase was charging for the transaction. I requested {$350.00} USD in foreign currency. When I received the money I was surprised to realize that I was only getting about {$300.00} in the local currency. Chase pocketed approximately {$50.00} USD in fees! This was not a rush transaction, nor was there any special request. I asked why the fees they were charging were not clear. They said there was no way for them to do so. When I realized how much they were charging after the fact, I asked to cancel the transaction only to be told that I could not reverse the transaction without paying additional fees. I found this outrageous.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-03-26 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Conventional fixed mortgage
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account — 
Company: U.S. BANCORP
State: WI

Complaint narrative:
I have tax escrow account through US Bank for my mortgage. I was issued the escrow check in XX/XX/XXXX and paid the county once it was XX/XX/XXXX for tax purposes. I forgot about the check and ended up sending it in 8 days late, which was my fault. The bank stopped payment on the check, I believe on XXXX XXXX, without talking to me to see if it was paid. I was assessed {$150.00} in interest and penalties which I am fully responsible for. My problem is that once the payment on the check was stopped, the bank then assumed responsibility to pay the taxes since they still held my escrow. I called the bank immediately upon receiving notice that the check was stopped and they assured me that they paid it. The county did n't receive the payment, so I called the bank again the following week. I was again assured that they sent a check, it still was not received by the county. I called a third time and was told that the check was sent to the county on XX/XX/XXXX and I would incur no more interest or penalties from the county because it was postmarked before the second month that it would be late. They did n't actually send a check to the county until XX/XX/XXXX, resulting in a second month of interest and penalties of {$150.00} which I should not be responsible for. There was absolutely nothing that I could have done to prevent the second month of interest and penalties other than call them repeatedly, which I did, because they held the money to my escrow. Instead of taking responsibility for the second {$150.00} charge, they took the entire 2 months of interest and fees from my escrow account. I called the bank a final time today, XX/XX/XXXX, to resolve the issue and I was escalated to the manager who refused to accept any responsibility for the late payment and hung up on me mid sentence. Every time I call, US Bank verifies my phone number, so the hang up could not have been an accident because they did n't call me back. I see no other recourse other than to file this complaint.

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation