Consumer complaint received 2025-07-18 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: Resurgent Capital Services L.P.
State: SC

Complaint narrative:
I submitted my first dispute to XXXX  on XX/XX/year>2025 regarding multiple collection accounts that I believed were inaccurate, unverifiable, or misrepresented. Despite multiple attempts to correct the errors, XXXX  has failed to provide verified, accurate, or non-duplicative information as required by the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ). 

Dispute Timeline : Round 1 dispute submitted : XX/XX/year>2025 Round 2 response ( XXXX  Report # XXXX ) : XX/XX/year>2025 ( Account information disputed by consumer ( Meets requirement of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ). 

Round 3 dispute submitted to XXXX  : XX/XX/year>2025 CERTIFIED MAIL Response ( XXXX  Report # XXXX ) : XX/XX/year>2025 What I Did : Disputed inaccurate and unverifiable tradelines with XXXX three times. 

Sent direct validation letters to all data furnishers, including : XXXX XXXX XXXX LVNV Funding LLC XXXX  XXXX  XXXX XXXX XXXX Despite my efforts, XXXX  failed to delete or verify key information under 1681i and XXXX2 ( b ), even after the 30-day window for reinvestigation. No original signed contracts, itemized statements, or legally sufficient verification were provided.

Supporting Facts : All disputed accounts were marked updated after each dispute without validation.

No documentation was supplied by XXXX  or furnishers to verify the accounts per 609 ( a ) ( 1 ) or 611 ( a ) ( 7 ).

XXXX  is reporting the same debt twice : XXXX XXXX ( closed, charge-off for {$1600.00}, account ending XXXX ) XXXX  reports a charged-off account with a balance, but the original creditor sold the debt and no longer holds the balance. 

The same balance is being reported by both the original creditor and a debt buyer, inflating your debt. 

Balance continues to update as if the creditor is still owed money when theyve already sold the account. 

LVNV FUNDING LLC ( collection account for {$1600.00}, also account ending XXXX, listing XXXX as the original creditor ) This is double reporting of the same debt under different names, violating the FCRAs requirement for accuracy and fair reporting. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX is reported twice : XXXX  is inaccurately reporting two separate collection tradelines from XXXX XXXX XXXX under the same account number ending in XXXX and the same original creditor ( XXXX  XXXX XXXX. ). 

One tradeline shows a balance of {$450.00}, and the other shows {$1200.00}. Both are listed as active collections with XXXX XXXX. These are being reported as two separate debts, but they stem from the same original XXXX XXXX account, and have the same XXXX XXXX account number. 

This inaccurate duplication inflates my total debt burden, misrepresents my creditworthiness, and constitutes a violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ), specifically : 1681e ( b ) for failing to ensure maximum possible accuracy ; 1681i for failing to correct the inaccurate and misleading information after dispute ; and 1681s-2 ( b ) if the furnisher failed to properly investigate and correct this duplicative reporting. 

I have disputed this information with XXXX and have only received a vague updated result, but both accounts remain on my report with conflicting balances. I request an immediate reinvestigation and removal of the inaccurate tradeline. 

Original creditors ( e.g., XXXX  XXXX and XXXX XXXX ) are no longer showing on my XX/XX/year>2025 report, while the related debt buyers ( LVNV and XXXX ) remain. 

This breaks the chain of ownership and reporting integrity, leaving no clear view of account history. 

XXXXXXXX XXXX  XXXX was removed from XXXX  after repeated disputes, but no documentation or confirmation was provided to me. 

XXXX  responded to disputes with pre-written updates, not detailed investigations, and simply marked most items as updated without changing the status or verifying accuracy.

Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief