Consumer complaint received 2018-06-24 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — Other debt
Issue: Took or threatened to take negative or legal action — Seized or attempted to seize your property
Company: American Tax Holding LLC
State: NJ

Complaint narrative:
The company is XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX of XXXX, Florida. Its lawyer is XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX. 
XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX. XXXX XXXX, XXXX, New Jersey XXXX, XXXX XXXX : ( XXXX ) XXXX Fax : ( XXXX ) XXXX 2.  XXXX was the victim of a criminal conspiracy by individuals ( such as XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, and many others including his lawyer father who was convicted of Sherman Act violations and was stripped off his law license, see XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX ) and entities ( such as XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) who lied to the XXXX County and XXXX County and court law clerks ( e.g., lied to Acting Law Clerk XXXX XXXX XXXX ) and hired the sheriffs officers to illegally seize Defendants home/business in violation of state and federal laws ; the conspiracy was uncovered by the Federal Bureau of Investigation ( FBI ) with assistance from the Defendant ( See XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX ) ; its existence against the Defendant and thousands of New Jersey homeowners was determined and confirmed by the federal judge XXXX XXXX XXXX in the federal antitrust case IN RE NEW JERSEY TAX SALES CERTIFICATES ANTITRUST LITIGATION, Master Docket No. XXXX ( see XXXX XXXX XXXX and by the conviction of at least 15 individuals and entities in New Jersey, including XXXX County , by the U.S . Attorneys Office ( See hXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX 3. The fraud on the Court in this case was committed by one of its officers, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX. an attorney at law of XXXX, New Jersey. He provided false certifications to the Office of Foreclosure that this was an uncontested case, despite the fact that XXXX had fully contested this case. 

Between XXXX and XXXX, the XXXX municipality in New Jersey had impermissibly over-assessed XXXX property by forty percent or so and thus no taxes or penalties were due to the municipality or to the antitrust convicted conspirators ( XXXX XXXX and ATF ) ; however, XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX collected this overassessment and an additional 18 % interest plus a 5 % penalty. Thus, the imposition ( charge ) and collection of these unlawful taxes and penalties and 18 percent interest rate in connection with the redemption or assignment of a tax sale certificate is prima facie evidence of the criminal usury by these individuals and entities. 

N.J.S.A. 2C:21-19 makes it a criminal offense to charge, take from, or receive, from any individual, interest at a rate exceeding 30 % per year. In other words, in New Jersey, charging, taking from, or receiving, from any individual, interest of more than 30 % per year is criminal usury. 

These people/companies charged XXXX XXXX with this impermissible 40 percent over-assessment AND IN ADDITION, THEY ALSO CHARGED HIM WITH 18 PERCENT INTEREST RATE ON THESE OVER-ASSESSMENTS AND ADDITIONAL 6 PERCENT PENALTIES. Thus, a small tax based on the illegal over-assessment {$20000.00} or so end up being {$49000.00} to 65,000 or so. 

These antitrust criminals came and seized XXXX ' residential property at XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX. The property was valued at {$470000.00} by the XXXX XXXX, while the allegged tax debt was $ XXXX and they were asking {$60000.00}. So, they stole $ XXXX from XXXX for a debt of $ XXXX. This is a criminal usury and also violates the Fair Debt Collection Act.

Company public response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation