Consumer complaint received 2025-09-22 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report — Reporting company used your report improperly
Company: Bridge IT, Inc.
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
RE : Problem with Credit Inquiry ( ies ) of proof of validity and of certified compliance of reporting, particularly as related to the mandatory XXXX XXXX format reporting standard ( XXXX ). 
To Whom it Concerns, Recently I found several issues with the noted credit inquiry ( XXXX ) and injurious versus me on my credit report that I have NO knowledge of any noted proof of the required physically verified proof of valid permissible purpose much less demonstrated certified compliance of reporting even to the required XXXX XXXX format reporting standard ( XXXX ), hence my check for veritably perfect and lawful reporting and my challenge contesting ANY DEFICIENCY of reporting or PROOF OF MANDATED ASPECTS OF REPORTINGas is my consumer RIGHT TO DEMAND that only PROVABLE confirmed and COMPLIANT claims report versus me and my RIGHT TO FORCIBLY DEMAND ERADICATION of any claim ( XXXX ) not compete and perfect in its evidence of verifiability, validity and or compliance of reporting. I can and will in a court of civil action versus you provide ample document evidence supporting the FACTS of your QUESTIONABLE REPORTING and as well clarity that indeed I followed the exact official notice of the law and contacted the Credit Bureaus XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and OTHERS in complaint versus and contesting the certified compliance of the validity of these claims of Inquiry ( ies ) and any derogatory debt or delinquencies related, if any at all. I ALSO contacted the creditor ( XXXX ) and or data furnisher ( XXXX ) directly checking for compliant reporting evidence and contesting any claim in ANY MANNER as PERFECT CORRECT intact PROVABLE VALID COMPLIANT CLAIMS are the MINIMUM REQUIREMENT for lawful reporting ( XXXX ) not an OPTIONAL condition of it. Several representatives were not even capable of informing me that the name ( XXXX ) and other personal identifier as listed on the inquiry ( ies ) and associated accounts ( if any ) did not match my submitted credibly correct personal identifier most accurately as I have included at the top and near bottom of this exact of deficiencies such as issues with name spelling or other identity indicators others could not provide me with any about the application because their firms DID NOT retain the on this inquiry. I attempted to contact the XXXX credit reporting agencies to speak with someone about this problem, and the facts that the was either not retained by the creditors or not mine or else wise is significantly invalidly. I contacted each CRA and was informed that their records were correct they declined to substantiate the claim and informed me I could file a fraud report If I WISHED! In response, I am firing off this last resort requesting your appropriate actions to resolve this matter PREVIOUS my soon to be filed civil complaint and lawsuit ( XXXX ). 
Since your firm has knowingly violated both federal and state law, I am demanding that you CEASE all reporting activities IMMEDIATELY! Stop at once reporting the debt in question to any and all Credit Report and delete it from my credit report at once. 
Below listed are the questionable if not altogether erroneous inquiries you are reporting, each of which REQUIRES ERADICATION from reporting IMMEDIATELY and PERMANENTLY. 
BRIGIT / XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX Alleged is reported in deficiency of reporting mandates and or procedures and or processes therefore the must be eradicated as is my not illicitly requested resolution, please do so HERE AND NOW! This claim has alleged ailments in at least XXXX or more of the following reported data fields jeopardizing its credibility and integrity as reported when reported : Bearing attention to the item questioned above, Data Reporter Name XXXX, reported as Not Reporting for BRIGIT / XXXX XXXX for XXXX XXXX, and as Not Reporting for XXXX  and as such is in apparent deviation from the requisite standard ( XXXX ) for certifiably compliant reporting, hence the genesis of my rightful consumer complaint contesting reporter 's privilege to report this claim unless it accepts and successfully fulfills the challenge to prove indisputably its confirmed and demonstrated adequacy of reporting practices and process to include no less than the full adherence of their required perfection and completeness of the Credit Reporting Industry 's mandatorily utilized XXXX XXXX Format standards, and as such are XXXX or more likely deficient of its exigency of reporting edict, and as such are XXXX or more for all intents and purposes deficient of its exigency of reporting Appropriateness! 
Incidentally, the item questioned above, Data Reporter City, State, and Postal Zip Code Not Reporting for XXXX, XXXX, WA, XXXX for XXXX XXXX, and as reported as Not Reporting for XXXX  are XXXX, XXXX, or each in potential deviation ( XXXX ) from the requisite standard ( XXXX ) for the compliant reporting, thereby making such reported claims a concern due in part to lesser integrity of data as reported ( per CRRG3-4 ). As reported, there can be NO deviation from the requisite standard ( s ) for the compliant reporting of Data fields within any XXXX XXXX XXXX nor else wise in regard to this mandatorily accurately depicted data field, and as such are XXXX or more ostensibly deficient of its exigency of reporting predilection! 
As to and in consideration of the item questioned above, Data Reporter Identification Number as Not Reporting for XXXX, XXXX for XXXX XXXX, and as reported Not Reporting for XXXX  and as such is XXXX, each or all in deviation from the requisite standard ( XXXX ) and or is not proven much less certifiably compliant to its magisterial mandates as its prerequisite for compliant conformity in reporting. 
This field, as reported, is a deviation from the established CDIAs reporting standards and or is reported XXXX or more of being untrue, inaccurate, inconsistent, incomplete, untimely, unverifiable, and or else wise not confirmed certifiably compliant to all mandates for ethical and lawful reporting! 
On the subject of the item questioned above, Date of Last Payment : XXXX, XX/XX/year> for XXXX XXXX, and as reported as XX/XX/year> for XX/XX/year> for XXXX  and as such is XXXX, each or all in aberrancy from the requisite standard ( XXXX ) and or is not proven much less certifiably compliant to its principal mandates as its relevant and consequential for compliant reporting acquiescence. This field, as reported, is a divergence from the established CDIAs reporting standards and or is evidently reported XXXX or more of being untrue, inaccurate, inconsistent, incomplete, untimely, unverifiable, and or else wise not confirmed certifiably compliant to all mandates for ethical and lawful reporting proclivity! Clearly, this field asserts that potentially this item of reporting is or is not yet unproven to be an aberrancy at issue with reporting accuracy and or compliance standards. 
In regard to item questioned above, Creditor Remarks : reported as Not Reporting for XXXX, Closed for XXXX XXXX, and as Closed or paid account/zero balance Note loan for XXXX  and XXXX such are XXXX or more having the appearance of being substandard of its exigency of reporting precept and or decorum elsewise! I here now file a written preemptory even insistent demand to and for the accusatory posturing as if were a lawfully righted data reporter despite there only existing a potentially achievable Page XXXX of XXXX XXXX XXXX very conditional PRIVILEGE TO REPORT. Further, I appeal for each any and all of the accepting data reporting repositories to factually attest to ( thereby corroborating ) at least the minimally required adequacy of its own reporting and in doing so naturally satisfying the minimal criterion to have utilized their obviously previously-taken-for-granted benefit to report. 
In regard to item questioned above, Data Reporter Telephone Number reported as Not Reporting for XXXX, XXXX for XXXX XXXX, and as Not Reporting for XXXX  and as such is in apparent deviation from the requisite standard ( XXXX ) for certifiably compliant reporting, hence the genesis of my rightful consumer complaint contesting reporter 's privilege to report this claim unless it accepts and successfully fulfills the challenge to prove indisputably its confirmed and demonstrated adequacy of reporting practices and process to include no less than the full adherence of their required perfection and completeness of the Credit Reporting Industry 's mandatorily utilized XXXX XXXX Format standards. As such, either XXXX or more as a matter of course is not doubt deficient of its exigency of reporting proficiency! 
Against the item questioned above, Account Terms Frequency : reported as Not Reporting for XXXX, Monthly ( every month ) for XXXX XXXX, and as Not Reporting for XXXX  and as such is XXXX, each or all in deviation from the requisite standard ( XXXX ) and or is not proven much less certifiably compliant to its regulatory mandates as its a sin qua non for compliant reporting and as such are XXXX or more apparently deficient of its exigency of reporting sufficiency and or amenability!

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation