vivekkopthsd/cfpb-consumer-complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
This consumer reporting agency as defined by law has violated my rights under the FCRA for not assuring me 100 % possible maximum accuracy. Every automated complaint that comes back says items are verified when they have not done a reasonable investigation of the items in question Pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1681e - Compliance procedures section ( b ) says whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it follows reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates. To my understanding, the only investigation that credit reporting agencies do is a simple communication with the XXXX XXXX system to request verification. Verification could be as simple as a phone number address and name all of which are public information and is not the maximum possible accuracy which would mean that you are in violation of the FCRA. 
These are the Inaccurate tradelines that I disputed that have not been removed or investigated properly. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02 00:00:00
Product: Money transfer, virtual currency, or money service — Mobile or digital wallet
Issue: Unauthorized transactions or other transaction problem — 
Company: Block, Inc.
State: IL

Complaint narrative:
Today is XX/XX/XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX I tried to use my cash app card at a gas station and it was declined however {$71.00} was taken off my card. I contacted support about this and they told me to file a dispute after filing 3 different disputes with evidence that I did not receive fuel and emails with the gas station saying they did not have my funds I was denied by cash app for a refund just losing out on that money. So in short words don't trust cash app they will steal your money.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: VA

Complaint narrative:
his consumer reporting agency as defined by law has violated my rights under the FCRA for not assuring me 100 % possible maximum accuracy. Every automated complaint that comes back says items are verified when they have not done a reasonable investigation of the items in question Pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1681e - Compliance procedures section ( b ) says whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it follows reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates. To my understanding, the only investigation that credit reporting agencies do is a simple communication with the XXXX XXXX system to request verification. Verification could be as simple as a phone number address and name all of which are public information and is not the maximum possible accuracy which would mean that you are in violation of the FCRA. 
These are the Inaccurate tradelines that I disputed that have not been removed or investigated properly. 


XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: VA

Complaint narrative:
his consumer reporting agency as defined by law has violated my rights under the FCRA for not assuring me 100 % possible maximum accuracy. Every automated complaint that comes back says items are verified when they have not done a reasonable investigation of the items in question Pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1681e - Compliance procedures section ( b ) says whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it follows reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates. To my understanding, the only investigation that credit reporting agencies do is a simple communication with the XXXX XXXX system to request verification. Verification could be as simple as a phone number address and name all of which are public information and is not the maximum possible accuracy which would mean that you are in violation of the FCRA. 
These are the Inaccurate tradelines that I disputed that have not been removed or investigated properly. 


XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02 00:00:00
Product: Credit card or prepaid card — Store credit card
Issue: Getting a credit card — Card opened as result of identity theft or fraud
Company: UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
Received a call from XXXX, name of company came up as USAA on my cell phone. Person w/strong foreign accent indicated I had fraudulent charges on my credit card and began to ask if they were accurate. I mentioned they were not correct and then transferred me to the " Fraud Prevention '' department. The next person began asking my questions about my credit card number specifically asking me the number. I hung up and verified w/USAA there were no fraudulent charges that matched their story. About an hr later, they called again and firmly told them to no longer call me.

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report — Reporting company used your report improperly
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
Around XXXX my TransUnion FICO score dropped XXXX points from XXXX to XXXX. The reason given was lack of a non-mortgage loan ( I saved and bought my house, and cars, with cash to avoid interest, and have no need for a loan right now ). I heavily use 5 credit cards, some over XXXX, paying each multiple times per month, and never once in all these years carried a balance forward to the next month. They know this, but somehow, to TransUnion, multiple varying accounts paid multiple times per month is nothing compared to dealing with a single, fixed rate, unchanging, single monthly payment on a loan amount my monthly credit card balances alone would easily exceed, to the extent of suddenly docking my credit score XXXX points. Accordingly, I am led to believe that TransUnion may be gaming the FICO system for the benefit of itself and their bank clients by attacking the credit ratings of banking 's safest customers in an attempt to edge such customers into a safe and profitable loan product for their bank clients. I bring this suspicion to your attention, and that is all. Thank you.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: IL

Complaint narrative:
This consumer reporting agency as defined by law has violated my rights under the FCRA for not assuring me 100 % possible maximum accuracy. Every automated complaint that comes back says items are verified when they have not done a reasonable investigation of the items in question Pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1681e - Compliance procedures section ( b ) says whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it follows reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates. To my understanding, the only investigation that credit reporting agencies do is a simple communication with the XXXX XXXX system to request verification. Verification could be as simple as a phone number address and name all of which are public information and is not the maximum possible accuracy which would mean that you are in violation of the FCRA. 
These are the Inaccurate tradelines that I disputed that have not been removed or investigated properly. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: IL

Complaint narrative:
This consumer reporting agency as defined by law has violated my rights under the FCRA for not assuring me 100 % possible maximum accuracy. Every automated complaint that comes back says items are verified when they have not done a reasonable investigation of the items in question Pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1681e - Compliance procedures section ( b ) says whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it follows reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates. To my understanding, the only investigation that credit reporting agencies do is a simple communication with the XXXX XXXX system to request verification. Verification could be as simple as a phone number address and name all of which are public information and is not the maximum possible accuracy which would mean that you are in violation of the FCRA. 
These are the Inaccurate tradelines that I disputed that have not been removed or investigated properly. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: VA

Complaint narrative:
his consumer reporting agency as defined by law has violated my rights under the FCRA for not assuring me 100 % possible maximum accuracy. Every automated complaint that comes back says items are verified when they have not done a reasonable investigation of the items in question Pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1681e - Compliance procedures section ( b ) says whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it follows reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates. To my understanding, the only investigation that credit reporting agencies do is a simple communication with the XXXX XXXX system to request verification. Verification could be as simple as a phone number address and name all of which are public information and is not the maximum possible accuracy which would mean that you are in violation of the FCRA. 
These are the Inaccurate tradelines that I disputed that have not been removed or investigated properly. 


XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
his consumer reporting agency as defined by law has violated my rights under the FCRA for not assuring me 100 % possible maximum accuracy. Every automated complaint that comes back says items are verified when they have not done a reasonable investigation of the items in question Pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1681e - Compliance procedures section ( b ) says whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it follows reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates. To my understanding, the only investigation that credit reporting agencies do is a simple communication with the E oscar system to request verification. Verification could be as simple as a phone number address and name all of which are public information and is not the maximum possible accuracy which would mean that you are in violation of the FCRA. 
These are the Inaccurate tradelines that I disputed that have not been removed or investigated properly. 

XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX US DEPT ED XXXX US DEPT ED XXXX US DEPT ED XXXX US DEPT ED XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: TN

Complaint narrative:
his consumer reporting agency as defined by law has violated my rights under the FCRA for not assuring me 100 % possible maximum accuracy. Every automated complaint that comes back says items are verified when they have not done a reasonable investigation of the items in question Pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1681e - Compliance procedures section ( b ) says whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it follows reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates. To my understanding, the only investigation that credit reporting agencies do is a simple communication with the E oscar system to request verification. Verification could be as simple as a phone number address and name all of which are public information and is not the maximum possible accuracy which would mean that you are in violation of the FCRA. 
These are the Inaccurate tradelines that I disputed that have not been removed or investigated properly. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX  ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  ) XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02 00:00:00
Product: Credit card or prepaid card — Store credit card
Issue: Fees or interest — Problem with fees
Company: Bread Financial Holdings, Inc.
State: OR

Complaint narrative:
I had a XXXX balance on my XXXX XXXX  store credit card provided by Community Bank. Knowing I hadn't spent anything, I didn't make payments in the subsequent months. 

It turns out, on XX/XX/2022 they charged me a {$1.00} minimum interest fee which they apparently do when you have a XXXX balance. And when I didn't log in to pay the fee I had no knowledge of, on XX/XX/2022 they charged me a {$12.00} late fee. 

I continued to not know these charges were happening, until I ran my credit report just now and it's dropped by over 200 points because this is now a {$13.00} non payment mark on my credit report. 

Having not paid the {$13.00}, I was then charged a {$26.00} late fee on XX/XX/2022. 
This practice is ludicrous and predatory- for what other reason than to trigger late fees/additional profit for Comenity would they do this? This is now going to significantly impact my ability to buy a home.

Company response to consumer: Closed with monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report — Reporting company used your report improperly
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: NJ

Complaint narrative:
In accordance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act XXXX  Account # XXXX, has violated my rights. 

15 U.S.C 1681 section 602 A. States I have the right to privacy.

15 U.S.C 1681 section 604 A Section 2 : It also states a consumer reporting agency can not furnish a account without my written instructions.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02 00:00:00
Product: Credit card or prepaid card — General-purpose credit card or charge card
Issue: Problem with a purchase shown on your statement — Credit card company isn't resolving a dispute about a purchase on your statement
Company: GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA
State: NY

Complaint narrative:
I signed up for an apple Goldman sachs card. I ordered a XXXX XXXX  soon after in order to get the installments to further build credit. The XXXX XXXX never reached me successfully and the order was to be terminated and refunded. That same day XX/XX/2022 I went into a nearby XXXX  location a purchased a XXXX XXXX. I. Ow am being charged for two XXXX XXXX  and my credit card company is giving me the complete runaround about a simple transaction. I really need assistance with this matter

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02 00:00:00
Product: Checking or savings account — Checking account
Issue: Managing an account — Problem accessing account
Company: CITIBANK, N.A.
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
On XX/XX/2022, I successfully opened a Citi Priority account online due to receiving a personalized ad from Citibank offering {$1500.00} bonus for opening account and funding the account with {$200000.00}. I was successfully able to fund the account from my XXXX XXXX  account and Citibank did not require any further verification of identity in order to successfully open and fund the account at that time. By XX/XX/XXXX, the I could see online that my funds became available on my mobile app and web browser. On XX/XX/XXXX, I received a letter from Citibank dated XX/XX/XXXX stating Citibank Fraud Prevention was not able to verify recent activity on my Citibank account and asked to speak to me directly by called the provided number XXXX options 2, 5. When I called this number, the representatives I spoke with were very difficult to understand and sounded as if they operated overseas. After asking all verification questions to access my account they then proceeded to tell me that the account could not be verified and abruptly hung up. 

This occurred repeatedly between the dates XX/XX/XXXX to XX/XX/XXXX. On XX/XX/XXXX, I drove to the closest Citibank Branch and asked to speak with the branch manager to see if he could assist me with accessing my account. I was asked to present my California 's Drivers License, and Citibank Debit card matching my account, which I did. The branch manager then called the same phone number XXXX and let the fraud prevention team know I was trying to access my account and that he had verified my identity by my California 's Drivers License and Citibank Debit card. However despite all of this, Citibank was unable to verify my identity and could not remove the block on my account. 

On XX/XX/XXXX, I visited the Citibank Branch again and spoke with the branch manager, XXXX XXXX. After speaking with the fraud prevention team supervisor on the phone, Citibank announced that they were closing my account on the phone. However, I have not received any letter or written documentation stating this. Citibank is also unwilling/unable to provide any documentation or letter stating that they are closing my account. They keep saying that they are going to close my account within 30-60 days but they can not provide concrete dates of when my account would be closed and when the 30-60 day time period would start or end for me to receive a check in the mail.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation