Consumer complaint received 2025-01-30 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: GA

Complaint narrative:
I have been complaining about EXPERIANS policy and how they perform their investigations for years at least 10 years. I have asked them to remove errors, and contact my credit granters. EXPERIAN has continued to be the lowest credit reporting of all 3 privately owned credit reporting agencies.

I am alleging that I have been part of EXPERIANS years of violating my Rights. I will like to be part of all CLASS ACTION LAWUITS against EXPERIANS unlawful acts. 

EXPERIAN unlawfully failed to properly investigate consumer disputes. I am alleging that Experian does not take sufficient steps to intake, process, investigate, and notify consumers about consumer disputes, resulting in the inclusion of incorrect information on credit reports. Inaccurate or false information on consumer reports can threaten consumers access to credit, employment, and housing. 

When consumers disputed errors on their credit reports, Experian conducted sham investigations rather than properly reviewing the disputes as required by federal law, said CFPB Director XXXX XXXX. Credit reporting errors can have serious consequences for a familys finances, and it is critical that credit reporting giants follow the law. 

Experian, based in XXXX XXXX, California, is one of the nations three largest credit reporting conglomerates. Experian is a subsidiary of Experian plc ( LSE : EXPN ), a global data broker and analytics company headquartered in XXXX. 

Experian maintains information on most families in America. Experian markets, advertises, sells, offers, and provides credit scores, credit reports, credit monitoring, and other related products to consumers and third parties. Information in consumer reports is provided to Experian by data furnishers, including banks, credit card companies, and debt collectors.

The consumer reporting agency sells its consumer reports to creditors and businesses who are evaluating whether to offer a consumer various products, services, and opportunitiessuch as a loan, employment, or housing. 

The Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ) requires that consumer reporting agencies take steps to ensure consumer reports are accurate and to conduct investigations of information disputed by consumers. 

The FCRA provides people multiple ways to dispute inaccurate information on their consumer reports, including by contacting consumer reporting agencies directly. The FCRA also requires that consumer reporting agencies follow certain procedures before reinserting into consumer reports information that has previously been removed as the result of a dispute. 
The CFPB alleges that Experian has violated the FCRAs requirements for handling consumer disputes in numerous ways. Specifically, the CFPB alleges that Experian is harming consumers by : Conducting sham investigations that fail to properly address consumer disputes : When handling disputes, Experian uses faulty intake procedures and does not accurately convey all relevant information about disputes to the original furnisher. Experian routinely and uncritically accepts the original furnishers response to the disputed information, even when that response was improbable or illogical on its face, or when Experian has other information available that suggests the furnisher is unreliable. At the conclusion of the investigation, Experian sends consumers notices that fail to inform them of the investigation results, and instead provides information that is confusing, ambiguous, incorrect, or internally inconsistent. 
Improperly reinserting inaccurate information on consumer reports : Experian has failed to implement basic matching tools that prevent or greatly reduce the likelihood of reinsertion by a new furnisher of a previously deleted tradeline. Instead, Experian improperly reinserts inaccurate information into consumer reports because it fails to match newly reported information with records of previously deleted information. Consumers who have disputed the accuracy of an account and thought that their consumer report had been corrected, instead see the same inaccurate information reappear on their consumer report without explanation under the name of a new furnisher. 
In addition to alleging violations of the FCRAs requirements, the CFPB alleges that Experians faulty dispute intake procedures and failure to provide furnishers with consumer-submitted documentation, uncritical deference to furnishers responses to disputed information, and failure to prevent improper tradeline reinsertions also violate the Consumer Financial Protection Acts prohibition on unfair acts or practices. 
Enforcement Action Under the Consumer Financial Protection Act, the CFPB has the authority to take action against institutions violating consumer financial protection laws, including the FCRA and the prohibitions on unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices in the CFPA. The CFPBs lawsuit seeks to stop the companys unlawful conduct, to provide redress for harmed consumers, and the imposition of a civil money penalty, which would be paid into the CFPBs victims relief fund.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation