Consumer complaint received 2025-01-07 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: NC

Complaint narrative:
I have been a victim of identity theft, and I sent a request to Suppress the negative account on XX/XX/year> but I have received no reply. I also filed a FTC report that I am including. 

I am a victim of identity theft. The information listed below, which appears on my credit report, does not relate to any transaction ( s ) that I have made. It is the result of identity theft. All of the listed accounts are in Litigation. 

XXXX ) XXXX  XXXX XXXX  acct # XXXX THIS IS NOT MY ACCOUNT. I HAVE SUPPLIED PROOF UNDER THE DOCTRINE OF ESTOPPEL BY SILENCE, XXXXNELHARDT V. GRAVENS ( MO ) 281 SW 715, 719, I MAY PRESUME THAT NO PROOF OF THE ALLEGED DEBT, NOR THEREFORE ANY SUCH DEBT, IN FACT EXSIST. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX acct # XXXX THIS IS NOT MY ACCOUNT. I HAVE SUPPLIED PROOF UNDER THE DOCTRINE OF ESTOPPEL BY SILENCE, ENELHARDT V. GRAVENS ( MO ) 281 SW 715, 719, I MAY PRESUME THAT NO PROOF OF THE ALLEGED DEBT, NOR THEREFORE ANY SUCH DEBT, IN FACT EXSIST. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX acct XXXX XXXX THIS IS NOT MY ACCOUNT. I HAVE SUPPLIED PROOF UNDER THE DOCTRINE OF ESTOPPEL BY SILENCE, ENELHARDT V. GRAVENS ( MO ) 281 SW 715, 719, I MAY PRESUME THAT NO PROOF OF THE ALLEGED DEBT, NOR THEREFORE ANY SUCH DEBT, IN FACT EXSIST. 


XXXX ) XXXX XXXX acct # XXXX THIS IS NOT MY ACCOUNT. I HAVE SUPPLIED PROOF UNDER THE DOCTRINE OF ESTOPPEL BY SILENCE, ENELHARDT V. GRAVENS ( MO ) 281 SW 715, 719, I MAY PRESUME THAT NO PROOF OF THE ALLEGED DEBT, NOR THEREFORE ANY SUCH DEBT, IN FACT EXSIST. 

XXXX ) XXXX XXXX acct # XXXX THIS IS NOT MY ACCOUNT. I HAVE SUPPLIED PROOF UNDER THE DOCTRINE OF ESTOPPEL BY SILENCE, ENELHARDT V. GRAVENS ( MO ) 281 SW 715, 719, I MAY PRESUME THAT NO PROOF OF THE ALLEGED DEBT, NOR THEREFORE ANY SUCH DEBT, IN FACT EXSIST. 


XXXX ) XXXX  XXXX acct # XXXX THIS IS NOT MY ACCOUNT. I HAVE SUPPLIED PROOF UNDER THE DOCTRINE OF ESTOPPEL BY SILENCE, ENELHARDT V. GRAVENS ( MO ) 281 SW 715, 719, I MAY PRESUME THAT NO PROOF OF THE ALLEGED DEBT, NOR THEREFORE ANY SUCH DEBT, IN FACT EXSIST. 

XXXX ) XXXX  ( XXXX AT XXXX XXXX ) acct # XXXX THIS IS NOT MY ACCOUNT. I HAVE SUPPLIED PROOF UNDER THE DOCTRINE OF ESTOPPEL BY SILENCE, ENELHARDT V. GRAVENS ( MO ) 281 SW 715, 719, I MAY PRESUME THAT NO PROOF OF THE ALLEGED DEBT, NOR THEREFORE ANY SUCH DEBT, IN FACT EXSIST. 


XXXX ) XXXX  acct # XXXX THIS IS NOT MY ACCOUNT. I HAVE SUPPLIED PROOF UNDER THE DOCTRINE OF ESTOPPEL BY SILENCE, ENELHARDT V. GRAVENS ( MO ) 281 SW 715, 719, I MAY PRESUME THAT NO PROOF OF THE ALLEGED DEBT, NOR THEREFORE ANY SUCH DEBT, IN FACT EXSIST. 

XXXX ) XXXX XXXX  XXXX acct # XXXX THIS IS NOT MY ACCOUNT. I HAVE SUPPLIED PROOF UNDER THE DOCTRINE OF ESTOPPEL BY SILENCE, ENELHARDT V. GRAVENS ( MO ) 281 SW 715, 719, I MAY PRESUME THAT NO PROOF OF THE ALLEGED DEBT, NOR THEREFORE ANY SUCH DEBT, IN FACT EXSIST. 


XXXX ) XXXX acct # XXXX THIS IS NOT MY ACCOUNT. I HAVE SUPPLIED PROOF UNDER THE DOCTRINE OF ESTOPPEL BY SILENCE, ENELHARDT V. GRAVENS ( MO ) 281 SW 715, 719, I MAY PRESUME THAT NO PROOF OF THE ALLEGED DEBT, NOR THEREFORE ANY SUCH DEBT, IN FACT EXSIST. 

XXXX ) XXXX XXXX ( XXXX XXXX  ) acct # XXXX THIS IS NOT MY ACCOUNT. I HAVE SUPPLIED PROOF UNDER THE DOCTRINE OF ESTOPPEL BY SILENCE, ENELHARDT V. GRAVENS ( MO ) 281 SW 715, 719, I MAY PRESUME THAT NO PROOF OF THE ALLEGED DEBT, NOR THEREFORE ANY SUCH DEBT, IN FACT EXSIST.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief