vivekkopthsd/cfpb-consumer-complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint received 2025-05-01 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
This correspondence serves as a formal follow-up and final notice regarding your continued noncompliance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ), despite my previous dispute dated XX/XX/XXXX. To date, you have failed to conduct a proper reinvestigation of the disputed accounts listed below, nor has you provided the legally required verification documentation in response to my demand under FCRA 611 ( a ).

Let me remind you that under FCRA 611 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ) and 611 ( a ) ( 5 ), you are obligated to complete a reasonable reinvestigation of disputed information and to delete or modify any unverifiable data. Additionally, under FCRA 623 ( b ), data furnishers must investigate and report the results of the reinvestigation to the credit reporting agency in a timely and accurate manner. Your failure to do so not only undermines the integrity of the credit reporting system but also exposes your organization to significant legal liability under FCRA 617 for damages resulting from your willful or negligent noncompliance.

Documentation Still Required : Despite my prior request, you have not produced any of the following : 1. A copy of the original creditor agreement bearing my signature ( if applicable ) ; 2. Records or communications used to verify the accuracy of the disputed information ; 3. Documentation outlining your reinvestigation procedure and final findings.

Without this verification, continued reporting of inaccurate information violates FCRA 611 ( a ) ( 5 ) ( A ), which explicitly requires deletion if information can not be verified.

Continued Noncompliance Legal Implications You are now in a clear pattern of willful noncompliance. I remind you of the precedent set in : XXXX XXXX TransUnion XXXX, XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX ) where failure to conduct a reasonable reinvestigation was held as willful noncompliance ; XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX ) where damages were awarded due to inaccurate reporting and failure to properly reinvestigate. 

I reserve all rights to pursue monetary damages, including : Statutory damages up to {$1000.00} per violation ; Punitive damages for willful noncompliance ; Compensation for actual damages, including emotional distress and credit denials ; Legal fees and court costs, if litigation becomes necessary. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2025-05-01 00:00:00
Product: Checking or savings account — Checking account
Issue: Problem with a lender or other company charging your account — Money was taken from your account on the wrong day or for the wrong amount
Company: JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
State: CO

Complaint narrative:
I disputed a {$2500.00} charge from a salon ( XXXX XXXX XXXX ) involving the misuse of my deposit ( per their own policies, ) overcharging for time not rendered, and services performed without informed consent. The charge also involved hair extensionstangible goods that were misrepresented in quality and altered without approval through overtoning and improper installation. I submitted photo evidence, receipts, and a written account. Chase denied the dispute, stating it was an in-person service issue. 

I explained this was not just dissatisfactionit involved tangible goods, lack of informed consent, overbilling, contract violations, and unauthorized image use. I requested a review of my documentation and asked for the merchants submitted evidence. The rep initially misunderstood and read the banks own denial reasoning. After clarification, he claimed he submitted a request to send it. The supervisor then told me I should already see it, but no documentation was provided under Notices, email, or secure messages. 

Chase also filed the dispute for the wrong amount and never corrected it, despite me pointing this out. I was repeatedly told no further action could be taken unless I submitted a letter from a second stylist. My documentation was ignored, and the bank refused to provide a fair, informed review of my case.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2025-05-01 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: PA

Complaint narrative:
I seek your assistance in investigating accounts that have been wrongly reported with late payments. I carefully reviewed my credit report and found some accounts showing incorrect late payment entries. These accounts should not have any late payment remarks. Kindly remove the late notations and update the accounts as paid and positive.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2025-05-01 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: NC

Complaint narrative:
I Kindly review the attached documentation related to the Equifax data breach.

Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2025-05-01 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Conventional home mortgage
Issue: Closing on a mortgage — Setting up an escrow account for taxes and insurance
Company: CMG Financial Services, Inc.
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
CMG would not release my escrow funds on the payoff statement when re-financing with another lender. I called multiple times and sent written requests, but they still failed to make accurate changes including the escrow balances that I needed to close on the loan over an entire month. I also called and requested that they did not home insurance policy prior to closing, but they paid it anyways making the escrow balance go negative. All of this contributed to having to pay a very large sum of money out of pocket during closing causing significant financial harm to me. I called them about 10 times and submitted written requests over the month prior to closing. They would tell me things would be fixed but it never occurred as they claimed it would.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2025-05-01 00:00:00
Product: Credit card — General-purpose credit card or charge card
Issue: Problem with a purchase shown on your statement — Card was charged for something you did not purchase with the card
Company: SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL
State: TX

Complaint narrative:
XX/XX/XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, Texas XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX for Payment Security ( payment protection insurance Attn : Billing Inquiries Payment Security, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, GA XXXX Re : Notice of disputed charge to Account XXXX. Pay Pal Account ( XXXX ) Dear Resolutions Department/Billing Inquiries Division : I am writing to dispute a charge to my credit card account starting on XX/XX/XXXX, got Insurance charges for loss of employment that I did not authorize to Optional Payment security program. I have contacted the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, and they have agreed to give me back the last 12 months. I never agreed with them to charge me for this in the first place. I never noticed it because I always just paid the minimum due until I noticed that my account never went down. I have been paying for this insurance and on top of it interest charges on it. I am distraught about the whole situation and these are fraudulent charges. I have attempted to leave messages for the escalations department and have yet to receive a phone call back. I have been provided with 2 different Confirmation numbers of XXXX and XXXX. I was informed by the agents who spoke to me that they are only allowed to do it for one year and anything else would need to be approved by resolutions department. This XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX should require some type of signature or my voice acknowledging these charges. I request my money back since these fraudulent charges started. I have a stable job and do not intend to use it for loss of employment or anything else. 
I am requesting that the error be corrected, that any finance or other charges related to the disputed amount be credited to my account, and that I get an accurate statement. 
Please correct the error on my account promptly. 
Sincerely, XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2025-05-01 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: NC

Complaint narrative:
I am writing to formally dispute inaccuracies on my credit report related to identity theft. I submitted my initial dispute on XX/XX/XXXX, along with a Federal Trade Commission ( FTC ) Identity Theft Report and additional documentation supporting my claim. However, your agency has failed to meet its obligations under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ). Violations of the FCRA XXXX.Failure to Conduct a Reasonable Investigation ( 15 U.S.C. 1681i ( a ) ( 1 ) ) Under the FCRA, credit reporting agencies are required to conduct a reasonable investigation upon receiving a dispute. Despite providing a comprehensive FTC Identity Theft Report and detailed supporting evidence, I have not received confirmation of any substantive investigation into the disputed items. 
XXXXFailure to Notify Me of Investigation Results ( 15 U.S.C. 1681i ( a ) ( 6 ) ) The FCRA mandates that consumers be notified of the results of an investigation within 30 days of submitting a dispute. To date, I have not received any such notification, nor have I been informed of the outcome of your review or the process by which my dispute was evaluated. 
XXXXFailure to Block Inaccurate Information Promptly ( 15 U.S.C. 1681c-2 ) The FCRA requires credit reporting agencies to block information resulting from identity theft upon receipt of appropriate documentation, such as an FTC Identity Theft Report. This has not occurred in my case. 

Precedent Cases Supporting My Position Your failure to comply with FCRA requirements is not only a violation of my rights but also exposes your agency to liability, as demonstrated in precedent cases : XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  ) : This case emphasized that credit reporting agencies have a duty to conduct reasonable investigations beyond relying on the data provided by furnishers. 
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX : The Supreme Court upheld consumer rights in disputes related to credit reporting inaccuracies, reinforcing the accountability of credit bureaus under the FCRA. 

Requested Resolution To resolve this matter, I demand the following actions : XXXXConduct a reasonable and thorough reinvestigation of the disputed accounts and transactions associated with my identity theft. 
XXXXProvide a detailed written summary of your investigation, including the steps taken and evidence reviewed. 
XXXXImmediately block or remove all inaccurate information resulting from the identity theft. 

If this matter is not resolved promptly, I will have no choice but to escalate my complaint by filing with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ( CFPB ), the Federal Trade Commission ( FTC ), and potentially pursuing legal remedies. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2025-05-01 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report — Reporting company used your report improperly
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: PA

Complaint narrative:
I am writing to formally dispute and request the removal of unauthorized inquiries that appear on my credit report. Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( 15 U.S.C. 1681b ( c ) ), credit inquiries may only be made with my explicit written consent or under permissible purposes as defined by federal law. 

Upon reviewing my credit file, I identified the following inquiries which I did not authorize and for which I did not apply for credit, services, or give permission to access my credit report : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXX/XX/XXXX These inquiries are a violation of my right to privacy and may negatively affect my credit score. Please consider this letter as my formal demand for an immediate investigation and removal of these inquiries from my credit file, in accordance with 15 U.S.C. 1681i.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2025-05-01 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report — Reporting company used your report improperly
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: PA

Complaint narrative:
I am writing to formally dispute and request the removal of unauthorized inquiries that appear on my credit report. Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( 15 U.S.C. 1681b ( c ) ), credit inquiries may only be made with my explicit written consent or under permissible purposes as defined by federal law. 

Upon reviewing my credit file, I identified the following inquiries which I did not authorize and for which I did not apply for credit, services, or give permission to access my credit report : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXX/XX/XXXX These inquiries are a violation of my right to privacy and may negatively affect my credit score. Please consider this letter as my formal demand for an immediate investigation and removal of these inquiries from my credit file, in accordance with 15 U.S.C. 1681i.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2025-05-01 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: MI

Complaint narrative:
The Fair Credit Reporting Act ( 15 U.S. Code 1681 ) says ( 1 ) The banking system is dependent upon fair and accurate credit reporting. Inaccurate credit reports directly impair the efficiency of the banking system, and unfair credit reporting methods undermine the public confidence which is essential to the continued functioning of the banking system.

So whenever there is a violation under the FCRA, it impairs the efficiency of the banking system. This is a violation of my privacy with my consumer report, since I control what is listed and what is not. In the event that any accounts are reported without my written consent, that is considered identity theft.

This is a violation of both 15 U.S. Code 1681b ( 2 ) and 15 U.S. Code 1681c-2. This leads way to civil liability against the credit reporting agency for negligent and willful noncompliance under 15 U.S. Code 1681n, which allows for {$1000.00} per violation, for account listed without my expressed written consent.

Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2025-05-01 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: TX

Complaint narrative:
The Fair Credit Reporting Act ( 15 U.S. Code 1681 ) says ( 1 ) The banking system is dependent upon fair and accurate credit reporting. Inaccurate credit reports directly impair the efficiency of the banking system, and unfair credit reporting methods undermine the public confidence which is essential to the continued functioning of the banking system.

So whenever there is a violation under the FCRA, it impairs the efficiency of the banking system. This is a violation of my privacy with my consumer report, since I control what is listed and what is not. In the event that any accounts are reported without my written consent, that is considered identity theft.

This is a violation of both 15 U.S. Code 1681b ( 2 ) and 15 U.S. Code 1681c-2. This leads way to civil liability against the credit reporting agency for negligent and willful noncompliance under 15 U.S. Code 1681n, which allows for {$1000.00} per violation, for account listed without my expressed written consent.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2025-05-01 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: TX

Complaint narrative:
The Fair Credit Reporting Act ( 15 U.S. Code 1681 ) says ( 1 ) The banking system is dependent upon fair and accurate credit reporting. Inaccurate credit reports directly impair the efficiency of the banking system, and unfair credit reporting methods undermine the public confidence which is essential to the continued functioning of the banking system.

So whenever there is a violation under the FCRA, it impairs the efficiency of the banking system. This is a violation of my privacy with my consumer report, since I control what is listed and what is not. In the event that any accounts are reported without my written consent, that is considered identity theft.

This is a violation of both 15 U.S. Code 1681b ( 2 ) and 15 U.S. Code 1681c-2. This leads way to civil liability against the credit reporting agency for negligent and willful noncompliance under 15 U.S. Code 1681n, which allows for {$1000.00} per violation, for account listed without my expressed written consent.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2025-05-01 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: IL

Complaint narrative:
I recently received a copy of my credit report, and I noticed some accounts on my consumer report that should not be on there. Please help me to validate the misreporting on my credit report and remove the inaccurate information found in my credit file.

Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2025-05-01 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: IL

Complaint narrative:
I recently received a copy of my credit report, and I noticed some accounts on my consumer report that should not be on there. Please help me to validate the misreporting on my credit report and remove the inaccurate information found in my credit file.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2025-05-01 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
This correspondence serves as a formal follow-up and final notice regarding your continued noncompliance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ), despite my previous dispute dated XX/XX/XXXX. To date, you have failed to conduct a proper reinvestigation of the disputed account listed below, nor have you provided the legally required verification documentation in response to my demand under FCRA 611 ( a ).

Let me remind you that under FCRA 611 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ) and 611 ( a ) ( 5 ), you are obligated to complete a reasonable reinvestigation of disputed information and to delete or modify any unverifiable data. Additionally, under FCRA 623 ( b ), data furnishers must investigate and report the results of the reinvestigation to the credit reporting agency in a timely and accurate manner. Your failure to do so not only undermines the integrity of the credit reporting system but also exposes your organization to significant legal liability under FCRA 617 for damages resulting from your willful or negligent noncompliance. Despite my prior request, you have not produced any of the following : 1.A copy of the original creditor agreement bearing my signature ( if applicable ) ; 2.Records or communications used to verify the accuracy of the disputed information ; 3.Documentation outlining your reinvestigation procedure and final findings.

Without this verification, continued reporting of inaccurate information violates FCRA 611 ( a ) ( 5 ) ( A ), which explicitly requires deletion if information can not be verified. 

Continued Noncompliance Legal Implications You are now in a clear pattern of willful noncompliance. I remind you of the precedent set in : Cushman v. TransUnion Corp., 115 F.3d 220 ( 3rd Cir. 1997 ) where failure to conduct a reasonable reinvestigation was held as willful noncompliance ; Dennis v. BEH-1, LLC, 520 F.3d 1066 ( 9th Cir. 2008 ) where damages were awarded due to inaccurate reporting and failure to properly reinvestigate.

I reserve all rights to pursue monetary damages, including : Statutory damages up to {$1000.00} per violation ; Punitive damages for willful noncompliance ; Compensation for actual damages, including emotional distress and credit denials ; Legal fees and court costs, if litigation becomes necessary. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2025-05-01 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — I do not know
Issue: Took or threatened to take negative or legal action — Threatened or suggested your credit would be damaged
Company: ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP INC.
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
This company is violating my rights they have not provided validation Information Under 12 CFR 1006.34 ( b ) ( 5 ) yet they have placed a collection on your consumer report recently.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2025-05-01 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: TN

Complaint narrative:
ALL REPORTED DATA MUST BE COMPLETE, CORRECT, AND PROVEN IF CHALLENGED. I DO NOT GRANT YOUR AUTHORITY TO REPORT VERSUS ME WITHOUT ADEQUATE COMPLIANCE OF STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS BEING APPLICABLE THROUGHOUT. AS SUCH I DEMAND DELETION IMMEDIATELY OF YOUR DECLARED CLAIMS AGAINST ME. PER COMMON LAW, YOU ARE DEMANDED TO DEMONSTRATE THAT YOU CAN AND HAVE WILLINGNESS TO ABSOLUTELY VERIFY AND VALIDATE ( OR JUST SAY " CERTIFICATE '' ) EVERY AND ONE EVEN EACH ANY AND OR ALL ALLEGATIONS YET PHYSICALLY DEFICIENT OR ALL ALLEGATIONS YET PHYSICALLY DEFICIENT OR UNPROVEN MINE, CHALLENGED OR NOT.

Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief