vivekkopthsd/cfpb-consumer-complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint received 2020-01-05 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Account status incorrect
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: MA

Complaint narrative:
CREDITOR DISPUTE CREDIT INFORMATION XXXX XXXX  XXXX I, XXXX XXXX, believes that the account I had with the determined creditor was posted as either a charge off, or has excessive late payments that were deliberately placed after I got involved with XXXX XXXX XXXX. What happened is that XXXX XXXX XXXX let these accounts go into a charge off status before they came up with a settlement arrangement. Therefore, the charge off status on these accounts were caused from a pre-arranged relationship with XXXX XXXX XXXX and the original creditor and/or debt buyer. This is a collusion business practice where the consumer can not successfully negotiate herself out of debt without a long-term derogatory statement on her credit report. Accordingly, I believe that each creditor must fulfill a fair solution to the creditor arrangement now posted on XXXX, Experian and XXXX XXXX respectively.

1 ) The original creditor must delete the prior-payment history completely.

2 ) A date certain must be stated as to when the credit tradeline can be removed.

3 ) The charge-off status must be deleted permanently. 
All creditors maintain a subscriber agreement with the credit reporting agencies. These creditors must comply with all legal guidelines of the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act pertaining to credit reporting on all consumers. However, the charge off status was forced by the debt negotiations company, and the late payment excessiveness was by design, not by any action from me personally. Accordingly, I believe the following actions by the original creditor on all credit updates will be fair under the circumstances : 4 ) The original creditor must delete the prior-payment history completely.

5 ) A date certain must be stated as to when the credit tradeline can be removed.

6 ) The charge-off status must be deleted permanently. 
XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2020-01-05 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — Other debt
Issue: False statements or representation — Attempted to collect wrong amount
Company: Franklin Collection Service, Inc.
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
Starting XX/XX/XXXX, my credit report received a notice of a NON PAID DEBT currently in " Collections '' from a Company called Franklin Collections in XXXX, Mississippi which they reported as a " DEBT '' Owed XXXX XXXX XXXX. I have never lived in Mississippi. NOW, Franklin Collections is sending adverse information every 2 days to the Credit Reporting Bureaus in violation of Federal law related to " harassments ''. I filed a dispute with the Credit Reporting Bureaus requesting proof of debt, date debt was incurred and any other information related to this debt. Franklin Collections filed a false " certification '' of the debt to the collection bureaus and did not provide a copy of he " proof ''. XXXX XXXX XXXX does not have authority to even operate in Mississippi according to he Mississippi Public Service Commission. I am not aware of any amount due to XXXX XXXX XXXX. Company : Franklin Collections SV, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, Mississippi XXXX. TEL : XXXX. There are numerous of Federal Law and I request you take federal ( Fair Credit Reporting Act ) action against this company as Congress has given you enforcement authority. The date of the debt is wrong as it shows the debt was incurred in XX/XX/2019 which is false and proof that the company violated federal law! There is no collection.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2020-01-05 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Account status incorrect
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: MA

Complaint narrative:
CREDITOR DISPUTE CREDIT INFORMATION XXXX XXXX  XXXX I, XXXX XXXX, believes that the account I had with the determined creditor was posted as either a charge off, or has excessive late payments that were deliberately placed after I got involved with XXXX XXXX XXXX. What happened is that XXXX XXXX XXXX let these accounts go into a charge off status before they came up with a settlement arrangement. Therefore, the charge off status on these accounts were caused from a pre-arranged relationship with XXXX XXXX XXXX and the original creditor and/or debt buyer. This is a collusion business practice where the consumer can not successfully negotiate herself out of debt without a long-term derogatory statement on her credit report. Accordingly, I believe that each creditor must fulfill a fair solution to the creditor arrangement now posted on XXXX, XXXX and Trans Union respectively.

1 ) The original creditor must delete the prior-payment history completely.

2 ) A date certain must be stated as to when the credit tradeline can be removed.

3 ) The charge-off status must be deleted permanently.

All creditors maintain a subscriber agreement with the credit reporting agencies. These creditors must comply with all legal guidelines of the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act pertaining to credit reporting on all consumers. However, the charge off status was forced by the debt negotiations company, and the late payment excessiveness was by design, not by any action from me personally. Accordingly, I believe the following actions by the original creditor on all credit updates will be fair under the circumstances : 4 ) The original creditor must delete the prior-payment history completely.

5 ) A date certain must be stated as to when the credit tradeline can be removed.

6 ) The charge-off status must be deleted permanently. 
XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2020-01-05 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Account status incorrect
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: MA

Complaint narrative:
CREDITOR DISPUTE CREDIT INFORMATION XXXX XXXX  XXXX I, XXXX XXXX, believes that the account I had with the determined creditor was posted as either a charge off, or has excessive late payments that were deliberately placed after I got involved with XXXX XXXX XXXX. What happened is that XXXX XXXX XXXX let these accounts go into a charge off status before they came up with a settlement arrangement. Therefore, the charge off status on these accounts were caused from a pre-arranged relationship with XXXX XXXX XXXX and the original creditor and/or debt buyer. This is a collusion business practice where the consumer can not successfully negotiate herself out of debt without a long-term derogatory statement on her credit report. Accordingly, I believe that each creditor must fulfill a fair solution to the creditor arrangement now posted on Equifax, XXXX and XXXX XXXX respectively.

1 ) The original creditor must delete the prior-payment history completely.

2 ) A date certain must be stated as to when the credit tradeline can be removed.

3 ) The charge-off status must be deleted permanently.

All creditors maintain a subscriber agreement with the credit reporting agencies. These creditors must comply with all legal guidelines of the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act pertaining to credit reporting on all consumers. However, the charge off status was forced by the debt negotiations company, and the late payment excessiveness was by design, not by any action from me personally. Accordingly, I believe the following actions by the original creditor on all credit updates will be fair under the circumstances : 4 ) The original creditor must delete the prior-payment history completely.

5 ) A date certain must be stated as to when the credit tradeline can be removed.

6 ) The charge-off status must be deleted permanently. 
XXXX XXXX

Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2020-01-05 00:00:00
Product: Checking or savings account — Checking account
Issue: Problem with a lender or other company charging your account — Transaction was not authorized
Company: JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
On XX/XX/2019, in my bank account in Chase, there was an unauthorized transaction of {$400.00} through XXXX. I called as soon as I saw the notification on my phone saying I had sent all my money that was in my bank account to a stranger. I filed a fraud claim to the Chase Fraud Department  and they said I would get my money back through a check. Weeks go by and I hear nothing. I call in to see what is happening, and they say that my claim was denied. They said they had no proof or evidence that it wasn't me. At this point I was really stressed and frustrated to see that their security had failed to recognize any type of evidence that it wasn't me, because I knew that I had never done such a transaction, who would send all the money in their bank account to someone they don't know? They said there was NOTHING I could do. How frustrating is that? I went to the police station, I filed a police report because clearly someone had my information and was gaining access to my bank account to even be able to do that transaction. With this, I was hoping for them to be able to re-open my claim and allow me to get my money back. I called and I told them that I filed a police report and if I was able to fight for the claim to re-open, they said no. That left me with nothing else I could do but to write a report here.

Company response to consumer: Closed with monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2020-01-05 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Account status incorrect
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: MA

Complaint narrative:
CREDITOR DISPUTE CREDIT INFORMATION XXXX XXXX CARD I, XXXX XXXX, believes that the account I had with the determined creditor was posted as either a charge off, or has excessive late payments that were deliberately placed after I got involved with XXXX XXXX   XXXX. What happened is that XXXX XXXX XXXX let these accounts go into a charge off status before they came up with a settlement arrangement. Therefore, the charge off status on these accounts were caused from a pre-arranged relationship with XXXX XXXX XXXX and the original creditor and/or debt buyer. This is a collusion business practice where the consumer can not successfully negotiate herself out of debt without a long-term derogatory statement on her credit report. Accordingly, I believe that each creditor must fulfill a fair solution to the creditor arrangement now posted on XXXX, Experian and XXXX XXXX respectively.

1 ) The original creditor must delete the prior-payment history completely.

2 ) A date certain must be stated as to when the credit tradeline can be removed.

3 ) The charge-off status must be deleted permanently.

All creditors maintain a subscriber agreement with the credit reporting agencies. These creditors must comply with all legal guidelines of the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act pertaining to credit reporting on all consumers. However, the charge off status was forced by the debt negotiations company, and the late payment excessiveness was by design, not by any action from me personally. Accordingly, I believe the following actions by the original creditor on all credit updates will be fair under the circumstances : 4 ) The original creditor must delete the prior-payment history completely.

5 ) A date certain must be stated as to when the credit tradeline can be removed.

6 ) The charge-off status must be deleted permanently. 
XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2020-01-05 00:00:00
Product: Credit card or prepaid card — General-purpose credit card or charge card
Issue: Fees or interest — Problem with fees
Company: JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
State: OH

Complaint narrative:
Chase is charging me interest on new purchases that I paid in full. I had signed up for a 0 % balance transfer option for the amount of {$1700.00}. I had new purchases totaling {$1500.00} as I was waiting for the transfer to " complete ''. I always pay my balance in full to avoid charges. I made a payment of {$1500.00}. When I called Chase XX/XX/20, I was told that they applied half of my payment to the new charges, and the other half to the balance transfer. I advised that I was not given an option on how to have my payment applied, which most companies do. I also reminded them of the law that payments are to be applied to higher APR balances FIRST. I ended up speaking to a supervisor, as the rep was not understanding my questions and just kept repeating herself. The supervisor stated that since I still had a balance on my account ( I verified that he was speaking about my balance transfer ), that my account was subject to interest, even though I paid the new purchases in full. I reminded him that the balance transfer promotion is 0 % and he stated that did not matter. I advised him that I've done balance transfers with other companies, and none of them perform like this. He stated it's in the balance transfer agreement, so they're allowed to do that. I told him that they do not supersede the law, and have to apply my payments accordingly. He stated they're not superseding the law and they can charge me fees even though I have a 0 % promotion. I notified him that I am going to file a report and I will be closing all of my accounts with Chase. He said that's fine, and to have my attorney file charges.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2020-01-05 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Account status incorrect
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: MA

Complaint narrative:
CREDITOR DISPUTE CREDIT INFORMATION XXXX XXXX CARD I, XXXX XXXX, believes that the account I had with the determined creditor was posted as either a charge off, or has excessive late payments that were deliberately placed after I got involved with XXXX XXXX   XXXX. What happened is that XXXX XXXX XXXX let these accounts go into a charge off status before they came up with a settlement arrangement. Therefore, the charge off status on these accounts were caused from a pre-arranged relationship with XXXX XXXX XXXX and the original creditor and/or debt buyer. This is a collusion business practice where the consumer can not successfully negotiate herself out of debt without a long-term derogatory statement on her credit report. Accordingly, I believe that each creditor must fulfill a fair solution to the creditor arrangement now posted on XXXX, XXXX  and Trans Union respectively.

1 ) The original creditor must delete the prior-payment history completely.

2 ) A date certain must be stated as to when the credit tradeline can be removed.

3 ) The charge-off status must be deleted permanently.

All creditors maintain a subscriber agreement with the credit reporting agencies. These creditors must comply with all legal guidelines of the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act pertaining to credit reporting on all consumers. However, the charge off status was forced by the debt negotiations company, and the late payment excessiveness was by design, not by any action from me personally. Accordingly, I believe the following actions by the original creditor on all credit updates will be fair under the circumstances : 4 ) The original creditor must delete the prior-payment history completely.

5 ) A date certain must be stated as to when the credit tradeline can be removed.

6 ) The charge-off status must be deleted permanently. 
XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2020-01-05 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Account status incorrect
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: MA

Complaint narrative:
CREDITOR DISPUTE CREDIT INFORMATION XXXX XXXX CARD I, XXXX XXXX, believes that the account I had with the determined creditor was posted as either a charge off, or has excessive late payments that were deliberately placed after I got involved with XXXX XXXX   XXXX. What happened is that XXXX XXXX XXXX let these accounts go into a charge off status before they came up with a settlement arrangement. Therefore, the charge off status on these accounts were caused from a pre-arranged relationship with XXXX XXXX XXXX and the original creditor and/or debt buyer. This is a collusion business practice where the consumer can not successfully negotiate herself out of debt without a long-term derogatory statement on her credit report. Accordingly, I believe that each creditor must fulfill a fair solution to the creditor arrangement now posted on Equifax, XXXX  and XXXX XXXX respectively.

1 ) The original creditor must delete the prior-payment history completely.

2 ) A date certain must be stated as to when the credit tradeline can be removed.

3 ) The charge-off status must be deleted permanently.

All creditors maintain a subscriber agreement with the credit reporting agencies. These creditors must comply with all legal guidelines of the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act pertaining to credit reporting on all consumers. However, the charge off status was forced by the debt negotiations company, and the late payment excessiveness was by design, not by any action from me personally. Accordingly, I believe the following actions by the original creditor on all credit updates will be fair under the circumstances : 4 ) The original creditor must delete the prior-payment history completely.

5 ) A date certain must be stated as to when the credit tradeline can be removed.

6 ) The charge-off status must be deleted permanently. 
XXXX XXXX

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2020-01-05 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — I do not know
Issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed — Debt is not yours
Company: I.C. System, Inc.
State: NY

Complaint narrative:
In XX/XX/XXXX I saw a collection attempt by IC System in my XXXX XXXX credit score report for the sum of {$140.00}. 

I have never heard of this company, I never owed this amount to anyone, and I've never been notified in any way shape or form about this debt by anyone. 

I disputed the claim in XXXX through XXXX XXXX 's system and won, the claim was thrown out. Now In XX/XX/XXXX I see the same company ( IC System ) making the same claim for the same amount I don't own on my credit score report. 

This company appears to be a mob style racket or scam attempting to bully people into paying for debt they don't owe.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2020-01-05 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
Please be advised that under Section 611 ( 5 ) ( A ) of the FCRA you are required to promptly DELETE all information which can not be verfied. The law is very clear as to the Civil liability and the remedy available to me ( Section 616 & 617 ) if you fail to comply with Federal Law. I am a litigious consumer and fully intend on pursuing litigation in this matter to enforce my rights under the FCRA.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2020-01-05 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Account status incorrect
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: MA

Complaint narrative:
CREDITOR DISPUTE CREDIT INFORMATION XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  I, XXXX XXXX, believes that the account I had with the determined creditor was posted as either a charge off, or has excessive late payments that were deliberately placed after I got involved with XXXX XXXX XXXX. What happened is that XXXX XXXX XXXX let these accounts go into a charge off status before they came up with a settlement arrangement. Therefore, the charge off status on these accounts were caused from a pre-arranged relationship with XXXX XXXX XXXX and the original creditor and/or debt buyer. This is a collusion business practice where the consumer can not successfully negotiate herself out of debt without a long-term derogatory statement on her credit report. Accordingly, I believe that each creditor must fulfill a fair solution to the creditor arrangement now posted on XXXX, Experian and XXXX XXXX respectively.

1 ) The original creditor must delete the prior-payment history completely.

2 ) A date certain must be stated as to when the credit tradeline can be removed.

3 ) The charge-off status must be deleted permanently.

All creditors maintain a subscriber agreement with the credit reporting agencies. These creditors must comply with all legal guidelines of the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act pertaining to credit reporting on all consumers. However, the charge off status was forced by the debt negotiations company, and the late payment excessiveness was by design, not by any action from me personally. Accordingly, I believe the following actions by the original creditor on all credit updates will be fair under the circumstances : 4 ) The original creditor must delete the prior-payment history completely.

5 ) A date certain must be stated as to when the credit tradeline can be removed.

6 ) The charge-off status must be deleted permanently. 
XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation