Consumer complaint received 2024-12-26 00:00:00
Product: Student loan — Private student loan
Issue: Getting a loan — Confusing or misleading advertising
Company: SLM CORPORATION
State: NC

Complaint narrative:
Thousands of students were scammed by XXXX and Sallie Mae into taking out predatory private loans to attend for profit online schools such as the one I attended, XXXX XXXX XXXX  XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX. As a matter of fact, all of these schools I went to were investigated by Department of Education and found guilty!! Because of the numerous claims of fraud and misconduct perpetrated by these online for profit schools, such as XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, I was able to file a Borrower Defense claim with the Dept. of Education against XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and my Fed. loans of approximately {$80000.00} were discharged and my credit repaired. My Borrower Defense Claim was also part of the XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX settlement for which I was a full class member. I am aware that XXXX and Sallie Mae was sued by 39 state AGs regarding their predatory loans to attend these online for-profit schools and that Sallie MaeXXXX were a " preferred '' lending company in a " deal '' with these schools during the early XXXX XXXX. These private loans with a high risk of default were part of a package deal offered to " for profit online schools ''. But loans made to students in states outside of the agreement, or those who were not in default for 7 months or more during a " specific '' time frame, were excluded. I am sure this was a big win for XXXXSallie Mae , but what a sham of a settlement deal for the rest of borrowers scammed into taking loans to at least XXXX for profit online schools. After the AG settlement, didn't XXXXSallie Mae also get out of the Federal student loan business due to scrutiny from lawmakers and borrower advocates? Didn't XXXXSallie Mae have to pay restitution to the Federal student loan borrowers for not informing students of IDR/IBR payments students could have enrolled in, but instead steered toward forbearance? Furthermore, hasn't XXXXSallie Mae been sued at least a half dozen times for other predatory loan practices and illegal collection practices? I am also aware of a " pilot '' program by which XXXXSallie Mae is sending out " applications '' to select students who may have filed XXXX XXXX claims against their schools and were approved. This application is a sham. Why do we need to prove anything? XXXXSallie Mae knows who we are. Under the FTC " Holder Rule '' XXXXSallie Mae is liable for giving predatory loans in connection with online for-profit schools. Time is running out for XXXXsallie Mae to do right by students who were scammed into taking out private loans to attend online for profit colleges who have committed misconduct and misrepresented themselves to the public to entice students to enroll. Senator XXXX XXXX has sent a letter to XXXX 's CEO asking to discharge these loans NOW! It's time XXXXSallie Mae do the right thing and discharge all these predatory private loans made to attend online for profit schools NOW! My private loans are impacting my ability to purchase a home and this needs to change. Please authorize private loan discharge for my just shy of {$12000.00} loan.

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation