Consumer complaint received 2016-09-19 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting — 
Issue: Incorrect information on credit report — Public record
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: NY

Complaint narrative:
This is an Identity Theft reporting issue about CREDIT REPORTING AGENCIES ( CRA ). In particular, Experian.com of XXXX XXXX and their ID Theft supervisor, XXXX at ext. XXXX. 
I spoke with a Experian credit Dispute Identity Theft supervisor named XXXX in early XXXX XXXX. My concern was as a victim of I D Theft, there should be a FCRA block under sec 605B to allow victims the right to rebuild their credit. I had XXXX item in public records that was negative : and due for removal XXXX XXXX XXXX, and despite all efforts is still there. as is the other Judgement ( not mine ) in my name while and Identified by XXXX ereports as IDdentity theft, see attached and should be blocked under FCRA Sec. 605B. 
Experian supervisor XXXX stated I should pay a lawyer to remove filing by vacating it. That cost too much money & I was an Identity theft victim entitled to mandate Experian to block negative inaccurate items from my CR under FCRA sec 605B. Experian supervisor XXXX advised me that the cheapest way to remove the one remaining NEGATIVE item on my CR was to contact the the XXXX warehouse and public records manager for Experian and ask for it to be removed. XXXX promised me that if I convinced Experian 's subcontractor, XXXX, to remove these judgments filing as a mistake due to I D theft or for any reason, XXXX would delete the filing under FCRA sec XXXX. So I did. and XXXX XXXX did indeed removeall refrences, see attched. I faxed the XXXX/XXXX/XXXX XXXX report letter from XXXX to XXXX twice during XXXX XXXX. XXXX is the consumer reporting arm of XXXX. XXXX reviewed my request and agreed to delete the Judgements from their data base and the personal report they did on me. I was very happy XXXX XXXX was helpful and aware of the damage that an Identity Theft issue could do to my personal credit report with all XXXX CRAs. As you know, XXXX is the GATEKEEPER of data for all public records reporting in America for ALL XXXX CRAs! 
Incredibly, Transunion has also refused to remove XXXX public Judgement for XXXX $ ( meaning there is no monetary value to the judgment ) involving Identity theft from my Transunion and Equifax reports, So I checked with the XXXX about why CRAs violate the FCRA law. XXXX sued all three CRAs in XX/XX/XXXX, forcing each of them to sign a Consent Agreement on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX that mandates them to give their workers the discretion to remove any Identity Theft related content or credit inquiries or credit files immediately. The CRAs agreed in the Consent Agreement with XXXX to delete these inaccurate items related to ID theft immediately or suffer additional fines and penalties. The CFPB must order Experian, XXXX, and XXXX to delete this Public Records based on identity theft content from my file. Experian supervisor XXXX said Door to Door Sales Act would allow him to delete this public record :

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief