vivekkopthsd/cfpb-consumer-complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint received 2025-04-22 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a company's investigation into an existing problem — Was not notified of investigation status or results
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
My account was never late! I have had exceptional payment history all payments were placed on Autopay. This late payment that is reporting is a result on a systematic error on their end processing my payment.

This was clearly a billing error made my the company and is not a reflection of my payment experience which violates USC Code 1681eb. This error has caused severe hard to my reputation, my character, my mode of living and to my family!

I demand the late payment to be updated.

They are not in compliance with the following law. 15 USC 1666b and its requirements set the standards and the guidance for a creditor to treat a payment as late, yet they are reporting a payment as late and they did not comply with the law!

15 USC 1666b ( a ) Time to make payments A creditor may not treat a payment on a credit card account under an open end consumer credit plan as late for any purpose, unless the creditor has adopted reasonable procedures designed to ensure that each periodic statement including the information required by section 1637 ( b ) of this title is mailed or delivered to the consumer not later than 21 days before the payment due date.

Never Sent the periodic statement along with the disclosures from section 1637 ( b ).

I have requested proof that this information was mailed or delivered 21 days before the payment due date and this information was requested in good faith pursuant rule 1002 and It was never provided.

This is unfair, illegal, fraudulent, and not equitable to me as a consumer!

Update the late payments from my consumer reports

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2025-04-22 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a company's investigation into an existing problem — Was not notified of investigation status or results
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
My account was never late! I have had exceptional payment history all payments were placed on Autopay. This late payment that is reporting is a result on a systematic error on their end processing my payment.

This was clearly a billing error made my the company and is not a reflection of my payment experience which violates USC Code 1681eb. This error has caused severe hard to my reputation, my character, my mode of living and to my family!

I demand the late payment to be updated.

They are not in compliance with the following law. 15 USC 1666b and its requirements set the standards and the guidance for a creditor to treat a payment as late, yet they are reporting a payment as late and they did not comply with the law!

15 USC 1666b ( a ) Time to make payments A creditor may not treat a payment on a credit card account under an open end consumer credit plan as late for any purpose, unless the creditor has adopted reasonable procedures designed to ensure that each periodic statement including the information required by section 1637 ( b ) of this title is mailed or delivered to the consumer not later than 21 days before the payment due date.

Never Sent the periodic statement along with the disclosures from section 1637 ( b ).

I have requested proof that this information was mailed or delivered 21 days before the payment due date and this information was requested in good faith pursuant rule 1002 and It was never provided.

This is unfair, illegal, fraudulent, and not equitable to me as a consumer!

Update the late payments from my consumer reports

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2025-04-21 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — I do not know
Issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed — Debt is not yours
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: MS

Complaint narrative:
I want to stress that I did not give written permission for these specific transactions to be included in my consumer report. At no point did I authorize these entries, and their presence on my report is unwarranted. Consequently, I am formally requesting that these accounts be blocked and removed from my report immediately. It is important to clarify that this request is not due to any error or negligence on my part. There has been no oversight or misunderstanding on my end. Instead, this issue arises solely from the fact that I did not explicitly authorize the inclusion of these transactions in my report. I am diligent about maintaining the accuracy and privacy of my financial records, and these unauthorized entries compromise that integrity. I trust that you will handle this matter with the urgency and seriousness it deserves. Please confirm the removal of these transactions from my report as soon as possible. Thank you for your prompt attention to this issue.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2025-04-22 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: TX

Complaint narrative:
The Fair Credit Reporting Act ( 15 U.S. Code 1681 ) says ( 1 ) The banking system is dependent upon fair and accurate credit reporting. Inaccurate credit reports directly impair the efficiency of the banking system, and unfair credit reporting methods undermine the public confidence which is essential to the continued functioning of the banking system.

So whenever there is a violation under the FCRA, it impairs the efficiency of the banking system. This is a violation of my privacy with my consumer report, since I control what is listed and what is not. In the event that any accounts are reported without my written consent, that is considered identity theft.

This is a violation of both 15 U.S. Code 1681b ( 2 ) and 15 U.S. Code 1681c-2. This leads way to civil liability against the credit reporting agency for negligent and willful noncompliance under 15 U.S. Code 1681n, which allows for {$1000.00} per violation, for account listed without my expressed written consent.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2025-04-21 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
I have not supplied proof under the doctrine of estoppel by silence, XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. I pressume that no proof of the alleged debt, nor therefore any such debt, in fact therefore exist.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2025-04-22 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: VA

Complaint narrative:
I have not supplied proof under the doctrine of estoppel by silence, Engelhardt V. Gravens ( MO ) 281 SW 715.719. I pressume that no proof of the alleged debt, nor therefore any such debt, in fact therefore exist.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2025-04-21 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: TX

Complaint narrative:
I have not supplied proof under the doctrine of estoppel by silence, XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX. I pressume that no proof of the alleged debt, nor therefore any such debt, in fact therefore exist.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2025-04-21 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: TX

Complaint narrative:
I have not supplied proof under the doctrine of estoppel by silence, XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX. I pressume that no proof of the alleged debt, nor therefore any such debt, in fact therefore exist.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2025-04-22 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: KY

Complaint narrative:
I am writing to formally request the blocking and deletion of all accounts associated with my personal information due to the recent data breach. Accounts in Question : XXXX XXXX XXXX Account Number : XXXX This request is made in accordance with several provisions of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ) : 1. 15 USC 1681c-2 ( a ) : This statute requires consumer reporting agencies to block information resulting from identity theft. I request that all accounts fraudulently opened in my name be blocked immediately. 2. 15 USC 1681i : Under this section, I am entitled to dispute and request the deletion of any inaccurate or unverifiable information on my credit report. Please investigate and delete any such information linked to this breach. 3. 15 USC 1681e ( b ) : This provision mandates that consumer reporting agencies maintain reasonable procedures to ensure the accuracy of information. Given the breach, I request a thorough review of my credit report to identify and rectify any inaccuracies. 4. 15 USC 1681g ( a ) : I request access to my complete consumer report, as I have the right to understand what information is being reported and to identify potential inaccuracies resulting from this breach. 5. 15 USC 1681m : As required by this statute, please ensure that any negative information resulting from the breach is not reported inappropriately. 6. 15 USC 1681n : I reserve the right to seek damages for any violations of the FCRA resulting from this breach, should you fail to comply with my requests. Please confirm the receipt of this letter and provide written confirmation of the actions taken regarding my accounts. Additionally, I would appreciate an update on any measures you are implementing to protect my personal information. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. I look forward to your immediate response in 4 days!

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2025-04-21 00:00:00
Product: Checking or savings account — Checking account
Issue: Problem with a lender or other company charging your account — Transaction was not authorized
Company: JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
State: TX

Complaint narrative:
On XX/XX/XXXX a fraudulent transaction was made onto my account without my authorization. On XX/XX/XXXX I took note of this charge and filed for a claim, changing my card information and resetting my XXXX XXXX A claim refund was made to the account while the fraudulent charge was still pending and they advised me that they would only do a reversal if the pending charge was refunded. The pending charge was not refunded and went through, so it was to my knowledge that the refund would remain. Today XX/XX/XXXX true refund was reversed in my checking account. No notice was given nor documentation over why this occurred. I called the claims department of Chase and they redirected me towards the Fraudulent Charge department. After asking they let me know that my claim was denied. I asked why and they simply explained that not enough information was provided to back my claim. I asked for documentation that showed why my claim was denied but they did not provide me with any documentation or information. All they stated was that I could re open the claim with new documents but also stated they did not know what documents to provide.

Company response to consumer: Closed with monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2025-04-22 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: Simon's Agency, Inc.
State: NY

Complaint narrative:
This notice constitutes a formal dispute of the debt of record with your file number XXXX, supposedly amounting to {$1100.00}. This debt is being misrepresented to the credit bureaus. 

I once had an account with XXXX XXXX, XXXX, Account # XXXX, for products I selected through XXXX XXXX XXXX. The account was fully paid. I have submitted documentation as proof of this payment. 

Your company 's attempt to recover this debt is illegal and fraudulent. The original creditor, XXXX XXXX XXXX, sold a debt that had already been paid. Your collections and the adverse credit reporting to credit bureaus are in contravention of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( FDCPA ), which prohibits the collection of debts not rightfully owed.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2025-04-22 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
I am writing to formally address the ongoing noncompliance of your agency in relation to my identity theft report, which I previously submitted in accordance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ). Despite having sent several letters, your agency has repeatedly rejected my identity theft report on the grounds that it was not filed by a law enforcement agency. This decision is not in compliance with the FCRA and fails to recognize the guidance provided by XXXX as mandated by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ( CFPB ). 

As you are aware, the FCRA at Section 605B and the guidance provided by the CFPB under XXXX clearly outline the process for filing an identity theft report. The CFPB specifically states that victims of identity theft can file a report directly through XXXX, which then becomes a valid identity theft report under the FCRA. Nowhere does the FCRA require this report to be submitted by law enforcement for it to be valid. 

Furthermore, under FCRA Section 617, your agency is legally required to investigate and resolve any identity theft dispute in a timely manner, and you are prohibited from deciding unilaterally what is valid or invalid when it comes to an identity theft report that has been properly filed. Your refusal to acknowledge this report based on your own standardsrather than what is set forth in federal lawis a clear violation of the FCRA. 

Legal Precedent : XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX ) : This case underscores the importance of proper handling of disputes related to credit reporting and emphasizes that credit reporting agencies can not disregard information simply based on their own internal policies when federal law mandates a specific process. 
XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX ) : This case reinforced that credit reporting agencies must follow FCRA regulations, including investigating claims of identity theft in accordance with the law, and can not arbitrarily determine what constitutes an acceptable identity theft report. 
XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX ) : This decision clarified that a credit reporting agency is obligated to accept documents submitted by the consumer, as long as they meet the legal requirements for disputing inaccurate information under the FCRA. 
XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2025-04-21 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
In XX/XX/XXXX, I identified an unfamiliar account on my credit report that I did not authorize or open. 

The account in question is : - XXXX XXXX Opened on XX/XX/XXXXXXXX  This account does not belong to me and appears to be linked to identity theft.

Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2025-04-22 00:00:00
Product: Credit card — General-purpose credit card or charge card
Issue: Problem with a purchase shown on your statement — Credit card company isn't resolving a dispute about a purchase on your statement
Company: CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
State: TX

Complaint narrative:
Capital One opened a case under reference number XXXX but dismissed the matter without a fraud investigation, despite clear evidence of emotional coercion, masked billing paths, and Regulation Z violations. 

Between XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX, I was charged {$6100.00} plus related interest on my Capital One credit card for services from XXXX  XXXX, a vendor that processed payments through a hidden XXXX autoload function via XXXX. Although these transactions were technically authorized, they were the result of psychological coercion, spiritual manipulation, and deceptive business practicesqualifying this case as authorized fraud under Regulation Z ( 12 CFR 1026.13 ) and the Fair Credit Billing Act ( 15 U.S.C. 1666 ). 

The vendor used persistent emotional tactics to manipulate consent, including fabricated soulmate narratives, spiritual fear tactics, and false promises of divine outcomesultimately prolonging financial engagement and creating emotional dependency. XXXX XXXX advertised its services as accurate, divine, and life-changingwhile hiding behind a small-print entertainment only disclaimer. This bait-and-switch model invalidates any suggestion of informed consent and constitutes deception under the FTC Act ( 15 U.S.C. 45 ). 

When I reported the fraud to Capital One on XX/XX/XXXX, the fraud specialist had difficulty identifying the source of the transactions because they were labeled as XXXX. She admitted, " I dont know how this merchant went through us, '' underscoring how opaque and misleading the billing process was. This internal confusion highlights that the fault lies not with the consumerbut with the lack of transparency and internal merchant controls. 

I was then instructed to contact XXXX, which responded that their XXXX limit precluded any action. On XX/XX/XXXX, I called Capital One again and gave a full explanation of the coercive tactics involved. On XX/XX/XXXX, I received XXXX denial letters. XXXX of them cited the age of the charges, and the third stated there was " insufficient evidence of fraud, '' dismissing the emotional abuse and psychological coercion I described. 

This merchant has been reported by other victims using nearly identical patterns of deception. Online complaints on XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, and complaint boards describe emotional coercion, soulmate scams, billing confusion, and spiritual manipulation. My case is not an isolated incidentit is part of a coordinated, widespread consumer fraud scheme. 

Capital One failed to investigate this as authorized fraud, instead classifying it as a routine billing dispute. This misclassification denied me a fair review and exposed systemic gaps in Capital Ones fraud prevention and consumer protection processes.

Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2025-04-21 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: NY

Complaint narrative:
This letter serves as a formal follow-up to my previous correspondence regarding your agency 's ongoing refusal to comply with the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ), specifically in connection with my properly filed identity theft report submitted through XXXX. 

To date, your agency has not provided any satisfactory justification for rejecting this report, nor have you taken the necessary steps to investigate or remove the clearly fraudulent accounts listed below from my credit file. As reiterated in my prior letter, federal lawincluding FCRA Section 605B and Section 617requires you to accept valid identity theft reports from consumers, including those submitted through the Federal Trade Commissions IdentityTheft.gov platform. Nowhere does the law require that such reports originate solely from a law enforcement agency. 

Your continued rejection of my legally sufficient identity theft affidavit is not only unsupported by federal law but also constitutes willful noncompliance with the FCRA. This failure to act in accordance with clearly established legal procedures and CFPB guidance reflects blatant disregard for my rights as a consumer and victim of identity theft. 
Let me be clear : This is your final notice. You are in violation of federal law by continuing to report and verify accounts that were opened fraudulently and which I have already disputed with appropriate documentation. 

If I do not receive confirmation within 15 calendar days that these accounts have been permanently removed and that my credit file has been updated to reflect the resolution of this matter, I will proceed to : 1.File formal complaints with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ( CFPB ), Federal Trade Commission ( FTC ), and my State Attorney General.

2.Initiate legal action for your violations of FCRA Section 617 and for any damages sustained as a result of your unlawful reporting and failure to investigate. 


XXXX - CARD SERVICE XXXX, XXXX XXXX CARD SERVICE XXXX & XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief