Consumer complaint received 2015-06-16 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Other mortgage
Issue: Application, originator, mortgage broker — 
Company: WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
My personal Social Security has been used with " Unauthorized-Loans '' against my private home. This case has been reported to the XXXX XXXX Sheriff 's Department, Federal Trade Commission, XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX and Internal Revenue Service whereas " Genuine-Issues-of-Material Fact '' have been proven that I am a victim of " Identity Theft. " [ XXXX XXXX ]. The parties involved in this matter created " Forged Notes '' and used my property as " Collateral '' for self enrichment. Loan docs have been altered, forged and conveyed to various other banking institutes which evidence can be proven. The last known bank ( WELLS FARGO N.A., Trustee XXXX XXXX XXXX ) who has continued the constructive fraud by 1 ) uttering altered, and false legal docs to the Superior Court, Appeals, and Bk Courts, 2 ) failed to respond properly to the Qualified Written Request by providing " Authentic '' evidence of entitlement of a " Note '' or other required and pertinent documents which must be examined. WFB is complicit to activity which involve violations of the " FDCPA '' including but not limited to false filing of tax " XXXX Mortgage Interest Statement ( s ) '' unbeknownst to me, including but not limited to a " FORGED POWER-OF-ATTORNEY '' which allowed unknown parties to sign, pledge and use my personal property as collateral which those parties " STRIPPED THE EQUITY '' from my home of twenty-three years. Currently the home is in " FORECLOSURE-STATUS '' do to the illegal-acts of their associate-brokers who have allowed the property to go into default after equity-stripping. XXXX ( XXXX ) has aggressively conspired with the bank ( s ) and their attorneys by concealing material-facts re- the case, and has chose to suppress the issue ( s ) of " Identity Theft '' which was caused by internal misconduct within their banking institute ( s ). ALL PARTIES have knowledge of unfair business violation ( XXXX. XXXX. XXXX ), and have admitted in the " CFPB CONSENT ORDERS '' which was signed and filed in Case XXXX Document XXXX ; XX/XX/XXXX ; Page XXXX agreeing to resolve their claims without the need for litigation ; to consent to entry of the " Consent Judgment : without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law and to waive any appeal if the Consent Judgment is entered as submitted by the parties. 
It is evident WFB has no intention or interest in following the " Consent Order '' and is making a public mockery by signing the order which the State of California Senior Assistant Attorney General, XXXX XXXX XXXX also signed. 
As a homeowner over thirty-years, I ca n't begin to express my concern and disapproval of the banking industries acts against law-abiding citizens who have been lied too while we watched the " Servicers/Trustee 's '' pillage our hard earn wealth into their pockets. 
As a member of the United States XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, I would never imagine having had my entire life saving, stocks and assets stolen through such abusive and corrupt Predatory Lending '' which I 've been accused of wrong-doing. I can only hope the truth will unveil the inside trading of XXXX XXXX debacle, which ruined innocent homeowners that were deprived of their " Due Process '' because the evidence of thievery was strong enough to prosecute. Denying me the right to enter evidence into records is an admission of guilt which those parties knew or should have known to rescind business induced in " Bad Faith '' to deceive and defraud. I have been instructed to refile this case, which " Virginia '' stated the case was closed. CFPB Case No. XXXX was never answered by the banks and they lied that there is active litigation. I 've attached the " Order and Notice of Dismissal '' which the " Bankruptcy Court '' dismissed the case XX/XX/XXXX. XXXX uttered a " Motion to Dismiss '' which it purports a scheduled XX/XX/XXXX hearing, however the case is moot, and used to avoid answering the issues with the facts in this complaint.

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation