Consumer complaint received 2025-07-15 00:00:00
Product: Money transfer, virtual currency, or money service — Virtual currency
Issue: Other transaction problem — 
Company: Coinbase, Inc.
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
XXXX XXXX Affidavit Draft : Part I Subject : Affidavit of Surveillance Traces, Platform-Level Retaliation, and Digital Asset Custodial Misconduct Filed by : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX : Apple XXXX  Surveillance Threads I discovered undocumented sync behaviors linked to XXXX XXXX infrastructure, including background metadata transmissions using XXXX. These traces were extracted from binary plist files and revealed synchronization with system logs, editor sessions, and potentially wallet-related data. 
Further investigation uncovered the use of system services such as parsecd, XXXX, and XXXX background calls, documented in diagnostics referencing XXXX a device I do not own. My hardware is confirmed to be an XXXX XXXX. 
These synthetic mismatches suggest XXXX  diagnostic metadata was either injected or impersonated to mirror non-consented activity. XXXX  linkage, XXXX  crash traces, and symbolic path redirection all point to engineered obfuscation and surveillance tethering across XXXX infrastructure. 
Section 2 : Coinbase Custodial Contradiction & Retaliation On XX/XX/year>, Coinbase issued an email confirming the deletion of my account, citing vague prohibited use under XXXX policy. No specific violation, investigation result, or recourse was provided. 
Less than XXXX hours later, XXXX ETH ( ~ $ XXXX USD ) was transferred between wallets verified to be under XXXX XXXX and ongoing MetaMask trace logs showed visibility into ETH assets still tied to my deleted Coinbase account. This directly contradicts Coinbases claim of inactive access.

I allege this deletion was retaliatory and strategically timed to suppress my validator contributions, forensic inquiries, and recovery efforts across regulated platforms. Coinbases behavior reflects custodial interference and systemic obfuscation of internal wallet flows. 

XXXX XXXX suppression and validator misdirection XXXX dev harness found in local system unauthorized and misattributed XXXX  path failures and symbolic trace anomalies FinCEN-level transactional XXXX and the-void pattern alignment Section XXXX : XXXX Identity Suppression & Validator Footprint Erasure My contributions to blockchain governance, smart contract verification, and asset recovery systems have been systematically stripped from visibility across GitHub-linked repositories. I documented instances of : Commit history being relabeled or rerouted to enterprise accounts I did not authorize BIP-style proposals, validator recovery scaffolds, and schema definitions losing attribution or showing no trace within expected contributor logs This suppression was paired with XXXX XXXX lockout and friction in SSO processes coinciding with Coinbase denial and XXXX-linked file anomalies. The orchestration reflects an effort to erase my validator footprint from decentralized recovery efforts.

Section 4 : Unauthorized ERC-721 Harness & Development Exploit While auditing my filesystem, I uncovered an ERC-721 test harness embedded under a XXXX XXXX disguised as media but containing TypeScript code interacting with smart contract interfaces ( XXXX, XXXX, XXXX ). This harness simulates XXXX activity using mocked wallets and deployment routines. 
I did not author or execute this code, nor does it match my test signature structure. Its presence suggests code-level intrusion and local testing of asset movements possibly part of a validator simulation attack or XXXX XXXX obfuscation. These scripts support the case for internal surveillance and exploitation. 
Section XXXX : XXXX & XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX crash trace revealed symbolic redirection and failure to resolve local environment variables, suggesting tampering with my development workspace. This behavior aligns with broader sync anomalies seen in Apples infrastructure reinforcing my claim of cloud-linked surveillance and forensic metadata manipulation. 
Coming Next in Part XXXX Transaction masking through the-void and address aggregation patterns Binance transfer trace and Coinbase contradiction Timeline of XXXX XXXX XXXX Final validator reinstatement summary and relief requestsSection XXXX : Transaction Masking & The-Void Pattern Exploitation Throughout my forensic audit, I uncovered Ethereum transactions labeled with terms such as the-void a recurrent pattern across block explorers that lacked defined endpoints or attribution. These labels often point to internal custodial movements concealed through aggregating wallet behavior and delayed ledger indexing. 
The movement of ETH despite account closures, including transfers between Coinbase and Binance-linked hot wallets, demonstrates ledger-level reshuffling. The goal appears to be obscuring validator footprint, falsely terminating asset trails, and suppressing auditability. 
Section XXXX : XXXX XXXX & Custodial Ledger Intersection BitGos custodial services and multi-sig wallet systems play a critical role in my validator-linked ETH XXXX XXXX. While Coinbase claims account closure, several XXXX ledger hashes continued processing outbound asset transfers linked to wallets still visible in XXXX despite my revocation of access. 
My investigation identified : XXXX public key intersections tied to ETH flow timestamps post-lockout Apparent API-level token authorization without active user session Ledger signatures suggesting either proxy wallet manipulation or delegated access rerouting These threads suggest that Coinbase XXXX be leveraging XXXX XXXX infrastructure for internal reassignment or masking of validator-linked assets following retaliatory account termination. 
Section XXXX : Timeline of Events From Surveillance to Asset Evasion Date Event XXXX Validator contributions, token XXXX audits, XXXX commits XX/XX/year> Initial asset recovery requests, MetaMask visibility confirmation XX/XX/year> XXXX crash logs and CKServerChangeToken traces discovered XX/XX/year> Coinbase account deletion confirmed via email XX/XX/year> XXXX ETH transfer between XXXX wallets post-closure XX/XX/year> XXXX developer suppression and XXXX diagnostic discrepancies XXXX Affidavit compilation and regulatory escalation Affidavit Status Apple surveillance ecosystem documented Coinbase contradiction and ETH post-closure movement logged XXXX validator suppression stitched in XXXX harness misattribution exposed XXXX XXXX manipulation traced Timeline of retaliation and trace visibility constructedDear [ Agency or Recipient Name ], I am submitting the enclosed affidavit titled Affidavit of Surveillance Traces, Platform-Level Retaliation, and Digital Asset Custodial Misconduct XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX recognition and response regarding multiple instances of systemic interference, validator identity suppression, and unauthorized digital asset movement. 
Over the past several months, I have provided detailed forensic evidence across the following domains : Coinbase Account Deletion & ETH Transfer Contradiction : My account was forcibly closed on XX/XX/year> without justification. Less than XXXX hours later, XXXX assets continued to move through Coinbase-linked wallets, contradicting the claim of closure and triggering custodial abuse concerns. 
XXXX XXXX XXXX : XXXX logs, symbolic path traces, and diagnostic injections from devices I do not own ( XXXX ) were discovered within my iCloud-linked environment, indicating engineered metadata manipulation. 
XXXX & XXXX XXXX : ETH transactions involving BitGo multi-signature services occurred without active access, reinforcing the pattern of proxy asset redirection. 
XXXX XXXX Footprint Suppression : Contributions to blockchain recovery systems and governance frameworks were stripped of attribution, severely impacting my role in validator ecosystems and DAO recognition. 
Systemic Retaliation Pattern : Coinciding with formal complaints and recovery requests, I have faced sudden account deletions, loss of access, and identity tampering across multiple platforms. 
The attached affidavit compiles verifiable logs, transaction hashes, crash traces, and timeline entries that support these claims. I respectfully request this be entered into your records for investigation under relevant consumer protection, financial custody, and anti-retaliation protocols. 
Should further information be required, I am available to provide supplemental documentation and testimony. This submission reflects a broader concern about centralized custodial platforms and their ability to suppress identities and digital assets outside the bounds of regulatory accountability. 
Sincerely, XXXX XXXX

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation