vivekkopthsd/cfpb-consumer-complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint received 2025-06-25 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report — Reporting company used your report improperly
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: RI

Complaint narrative:
I am concerned about the validity and accuracy of your recent investigation of these accounts that are reporting on my credit report. Last month I requested an investigation because I felt the item was not being reported legally. Couple of days ago I received a letter stating that you have ceased investigation of my credit reports because, in your opinion, you believe that I have used a third party credit repair agency. Not only do I believe this to be a stall tactic on your part to grant you an additional 30 days to comply with my original request, but I believe it to be a blatant violation of the FCRA. 

I have attached a copy of my government issued ID as well as mail showing proof of address. So, there shouldnt be any confusion or stall tactics on your end. I have maintained a careful record of my communications with you for the purpose of filing a complaint with the FTC should you continue in your non-compliance.

Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2025-06-25 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1681g ( a ) ( 1 ) and 1681i, I request that you provide a complete copy of the original signed consumer contract with a wetink signaturea Verifiable, Validated Proofthat you claim to possess for the above-referenced account. Copies of copies are insufficient by law.

Under FCRA 609 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ), you are legally obligated to verify any account before reporting it on my credit file. If you are unable to provide such proof within 30 calendar days of receipt of this letter, you must immediately delete the account from all credit reports.

FCRA 623 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ) requires furnishers to promptly remove unverifiable information. Under 617 ( 15 U.S.C. 1681o ), negligent noncompliance exposes entities to actual damages, attorneys fees, and costs ; willful noncompliance under 1681n exposes entities to statutory/punitive damages ( {>= $1,000,000} + punitive ). 

Case law strongly supports my position : - Negligent/willful failures to remove unverifiable or inaccurate information have resulted in XXXX dollar awards ( e.g., XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX. 
- CFPB enforcement actions support similar resultsmost recently, a $ XXXX settlement following procedural failures. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX

Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2025-06-25 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Account information incorrect
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: IL

Complaint narrative:
This CFPB complaint has been filed to request pursuant to FCRA 605B ( 15 U.S.C. 1681c-2 ) that you the TransUnion credit reporting agency , block information appearing on my consumer credit report that is the result of identity theft and fraud within 4 business days of you receiving this complaint. These fraudulent accounts consist of an account opened at XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXulent collections appearing on my consumer XXXX credit report. I've attached a list of the hard inquiries in question as well as a copy of the consumer XXXX  credit report maintained by you which shows the aforementioned fraudulent items. I do not recognize the aforementioned accounts, collections, or hard Inquiries as reported. The aforementioned accounts, collections, and hard inquiries appearing on my consumer credit report maintained by you were not opened, made, or initiated by me. All of the aforementioned accounts, collections, and hard inquiries are the result of identity theft and fraud. I have attached a copy of FTC Identity Theft Criminal Complaint as proof from the US Federal Trade Commission that all of the aforementioned consumer credit accounts, collections, and hard inquiries are the result of identity theft and fraud.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2025-06-25 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1681g ( a ) ( 1 ) and 1681i, I request that you provide a complete copy of the original signed consumer contract with a wetink signaturea Verifiable, Validated Proofthat you claim to possess for the above-referenced account. Copies of copies are insufficient by law.

Under FCRA 609 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ), you are legally obligated to verify any account before reporting it on my credit file. If you are unable to provide such proof within 30 calendar days of receipt of this letter, you must immediately delete the account from all credit reports.

FCRA 623 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ) requires furnishers to promptly remove unverifiable information. Under 617 ( 15 U.S.C. 1681o ), negligent noncompliance exposes entities to actual damages, attorneys fees, and costs ; willful noncompliance under 1681n exposes entities to statutory/punitive damages ( {>= $1,000,000} + punitive ).

Case law strongly supports my position : - Negligent/willful failures to remove unverifiable or inaccurate information have resulted in XXXX dollar awards ( e.g., XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 
- CFPB enforcement actions support similar resultsmost recently, a $ XXXX settlement following procedural failures. 

XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2025-06-25 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report — Reporting company used your report improperly
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: AZ

Complaint narrative:
Recently I did an investigation on my credit report and found several items on there to be inaccurate.

Under 15 U.S. Code 1681e ( b ) Accuracy of report Whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report, it shall follow reasonable procedures to assure the maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates.

15 U.S. Code 1681i ( 5 ) Treatment of inaccurate or unverifiable information ( A ) In general if, after any reinvestigation under paragraph ( 1 ) of any information disputed by a consumer, an item of the information is found to be inaccurate or incomplete or can not be verified, the consumer reporting agency shalli ) promptly delete that item of information from the file of the consumer, or modify that item of information, as appropriate, based on the results of the reinvestigation; and ( ii ) promptly notify the furnisher of that information that the information has been modified or deleted from the file of the consumer. 

Please remove the following items from my credit report, immediately : TRANSUNION XXXX XXXX XXXX Data Reporter Name : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXX/XX/XXXX Account Status Code : Closed Account Credit Limit : {$1700.00} Account Condition : Derogatory EQUIFAX XXXX XXXX XXXX  Data Reporter Name : XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXX/XX/XXXX Account Status Code : Closed Account Rating : Derogatory Account Credit Limit : -- EXPERIAN XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX Account Number : XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  Account Credit Limit : {$1700.00} Account Condition : Derogatory Account Status Code : Closed Account 's Date Opened : XX/XX/XXXX Additionally, I have reported unauthorized hard inquiries from the following : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2025-06-25 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report — Reporting company used your report improperly
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: RI

Complaint narrative:
The Fair Credit Reporting Act ( 15 U.S. Code 1681 ) says ( 1 ) The banking system is dependent upon fair and accurate credit reporting. Inaccurate credit reports directly impair the efficiency of the banking system, and unfair credit reporting methods undermine the public confidence which is essential to the continued functioning of the banking system. So whenever there is a violation under the FCRA, it impairs the efficiency of the banking system. This is a violation of TILA US Code 1666B since I was never late. " I recently reviewed my consumer report and noticed an incorrect late payment record. I have always maintained timely payments on this account. Under the Fair Credit Billing Act ( FCBA ) and the Truth in Lending Act ( TILA ), creditors are required to accurately report consumer transactions and provide a mechanism for correcting errors in a timely manner. Please conduct an investigation into this matter, and if you can not provide documentary evidence of these supposed late payments, I demand these payments to be updated to on time as they should be as I was NEVER late. I expect these updates to be made promptly, in compliance with the law.

Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2025-06-25 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1681g ( a ) ( 1 ) and 1681i, I request that you provide a complete copy of the original signed consumer contract with a wetink signaturea Verifiable, Validated Proofthat you claim to possess for the above-referenced account. Copies of copies are insufficient by law.

Under FCRA 609 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ), you are legally obligated to verify any account before reporting it on my credit file. If you are unable to provide such proof within 30 calendar days of receipt of this letter, you must immediately delete the account from all credit reports.

FCRA 623 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ) requires furnishers to promptly remove unverifiable information. Under 617 ( 15 U.S.C. 1681o ), negligent noncompliance exposes entities to actual damages, attorneys fees, and costs ; willful noncompliance under 1681n exposes entities to statutory/punitive damages ( {>= $1,000,000} + punitive ). 

Case law strongly supports my position : - Negligent/willful failures to remove unverifiable or inaccurate information have resulted in XXXX dollar awards ( e.g., XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. 
- CFPB enforcement actions support similar resultsmost recently, a $ XXXX settlement following procedural failures. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2025-06-25 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Account information incorrect
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
I am very concerned because my credit reports are showing discrepancies. I am a very concerned consumer and want only true information about me reporting. I have highlighted all the discrepancies. Please remove the inaccurate information as you are in violation.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2025-06-25 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report — Reporting company used your report improperly
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: MA

Complaint narrative:
The Fair Credit Reporting Act ( 15 U.S. Code 1681 ) says ( 1 ) The banking system is dependent upon fair and accurate credit reporting. Inaccurate credit reports directly impair the efficiency of the banking system, and unfair credit reporting methods undermine the public confidence which is essential to the continued functioning of the banking system. So whenever there is a violation under the FCRA, it impairs the efficiency of the banking system. This is a violation of TILA US Code 1666B since I was never late. " I recently reviewed my consumer report and noticed an incorrect late payment record. I have always maintained timely payments on this account. Under the Fair Credit Billing Act ( FCBA ) and the Truth in Lending Act ( TILA ), creditors are required to accurately report consumer transactions and provide a mechanism for correcting errors in a timely manner. Please conduct an investigation into this matter, and if you can not provide documentary evidence of these supposed late payments, I demand these payments to be updated to on time as they should be as I was NEVER late. I expect these updates to be made promptly, in compliance with the law.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2025-06-25 00:00:00
Product: Student loan — Federal student loan servicing
Issue: Struggling to repay your loan — Problem with forgiveness, cancellation, or discharge
Company: Nelnet, Inc.
State: TX

Complaint narrative:
I am filing a complaint against Nelnet for mishandling my federal student loan. They placed my loan into forbearance without my authorization, despite my qualification for the SAVE plan. This disrupted my repayment progress and caused added interest and confusion. I am seeking restoration of repayment benefits and correction of any accrued interest and delays

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2025-06-25 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: MA

Complaint narrative:
I DON'T RECOGNIZE THE ADDRESS PLEASE REMOVE THANK YOU.

Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2025-06-25 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: MA

Complaint narrative:
I DON'T RECOGNIZE THE ADDRESS PLEASE REMOVE THANK YOU.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2025-06-25 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Account status incorrect
Company: Possible Financial Inc
State: OH

Complaint narrative:
This account is currently being reported as a charge-off, yet I am still receiving active collection attempts regarding the same debt. This raises serious concerns under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ) and Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( FDCPA ).

Company public response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2025-06-25 00:00:00
Product: Credit card — General-purpose credit card or charge card
Issue: Other features, terms, or problems — Problem with rewards from credit card
Company: U.S. BANCORP
State: TX

Complaint narrative:
Hello, On XXXX US Bank shut down my credit card and are not telling me the reason for my shutdown or allowing me to use my remaining points ( XXXX Points Accrued on attached screenshot ). I also had some additional transactions that hadn't settled when US Bank shut down my account and they will not tell me the points earned for those transactions. 

They have also not refunded the card 's annual fee ( {$400.00} ). 

Us Banks own terms state that they will provide XXXX  days notice and I received none. I fact, I only received the letter giving notice of my account shutdown on XX/XX/XXXX ( Attached informed delivery screenshot. US Bank does not appear to be acting in good faith and I believe I was shutdown for them to avoid payment on earned rewards.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2025-06-25 00:00:00
Product: Checking or savings account — Checking account
Issue: Problem with a lender or other company charging your account — Transaction was not authorized
Company: FourLeaf Federal Credit Union
State: NY

Complaint narrative:
On XXXX XXXX my checking account was charged XXXX different times and I did not authorize these charges. My bank Bethpage Federal Credit Union now known as FourLeaf Federal Credit Union failed to protect my account or to even notify me and stop these suspicious charges, the charges were made from XXXX, a company I have never even heard of. My account was charged the following amounts {$270.00}, {$270.00}, {$270.00}, {$200.00} for a total of {$1000.00}. When I realized the following day these charges were made I personally went to the bank immediately and spoke to a bank employee and they said they would forward all the info to the fraud department. They mentioned that lately these were common scams and that they would investigate further and that in the meantime they would credit my account the {$1000.00}. On XX/XX/year> my account was credited the full amount of {$1000.00}. I didnt hear back from Bethpage Federal Credit Union for almost 3 months so I figured they had done their investigation and figured everything out. On XX/XX/year> the credit ( {$1000.00} ) amount was taken back by Bethpage Federal Credit Union they didnt call me to let me know so I went back to the bank to see what had happened. At the bank they insisted that I had made the charges with my information that my name and phone number and card number was used that is what they came up with in their investigation. I insisted that this was either a identity fraud or something bigger because I would never make such purchase. So they said that they would further investigate. I receive a call about a week later and they said that they couldnt find the source or location of the fraud. They asked for any suspicious phone numbers or messages around the time that the transaction was made so I provided them with phone numbers that said scam likely on the caller id and messages with links that were sent around that time. I didnt hear from them again for a while so I called them back and they said that they currently havent found the location or source regarding the information provided about this case and that they can not return the money. I am now out {$1000.00} because my bank failed to protect my money and they will not do anything about it.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2025-06-25 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: TX

Complaint narrative:
This formal complaint concerns unauthorized inquiries appearing on my credit report, made without my consent and lacking a permissible purpose under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ). These inquiries are negatively impacting my credit profile and do not meet the FCRAs requirements for accessing a consumers credit report without express authorization. 
Details of Disputed Inquiries : The following inquiries are disputed, as verified by the creditors, who confirmed they were conducted without my knowledge or authorization : XXXX XX/XX/XXXX Equifax XXXX XXXXXX/XX/XXXX Equifax Legal Basis for Removal : Under the FCRA, specifically Section 604 ( 15 U.S.C. 1681b ), access to a credit report is only permissible when explicit consumer consent or a clearly permissible purpose exists. The listed inquiries do not meet these legal requirements. Additionally, under Section 611 ( a ) ( 5 ) ( 15 U.S.C. 1681i ( a ) ( 5 ) ), any unverifiable information must be promptly removed from the credit report. 
I have attempted to resolve this matter directly with the credit bureau by submitting a formal dispute letter on XX/XX/XXXX. However, I have not received an adequate response or the removal of the unauthorized inquiries, which I believe constitutes noncompliance with FCRA provisions. 
Supporting Case Law for Removal : Legal precedents reinforce the need for removal of unauthorized inquiries in the absence of a permissible purpose. In Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Association ( 9th Cir. 2010 ), the Ninth Circuit ruled that accessing a credit report without explicit consumer consent or a legitimate purpose constitutes a violation of the FCRA. Furthermore, Dennis v. BEH-1, LLC ( 9th Cir. 2002 ) reaffirms that credit bureaus are obligated to remove all inaccurate or unverifiable information.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation