vivekkopthsd/cfpb-consumer-complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02 00:00:00
Product: Checking or savings account — Checking account
Issue: Managing an account — Problem using a debit or ATM card
Company: JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
State: TX

Complaint narrative:
On XX/XX/2022, my Chase Bank debit card was stolen along with my phone and drivers license. They withdrew money from two of my accounts at two different Chase ATMs for a total of {$4000.00}. They withdrew {$1000.00} from one account and {$3000.00} from my second account. They were able to withdraw from both accounts because my debit card is linked to both accounts and they can pull up my balance for both. The transactions online have the ATM addresses on them. I called Chase to freeze my account and to open a dispute for the fraudulent charges. Chase froze and locked my account that day. I also filed a police report with the local police department and a detective is on my case. On XX/XX/2022, Chase sent temporary credit for my first account for {$1000.00}. On XXXX XXXX, Chase finished their investigation and agreed it was a fraudulent charge and let me keep the credit. On XX/XX/2022, Chase sent temporary credit for my second account for {$3000.00}. On XX/XX/2022, Chase closed the investigation and said the charges were authorized and they are taking the {$3000.00} back on or after XX/XX/2022.

Company response to consumer: Closed with monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02 00:00:00
Product: Vehicle loan or lease — Loan
Issue: Managing the loan or lease — Billing problem
Company: TRUIST FINANCIAL CORPORATION
State: PA

Complaint narrative:
ITs incredible simple, The bank Suntrust changed to truist. They refuse to let you pay online without a checking account, I have several checking accounts and am not opening another one. So I had a payment book, they sent a 1 year payment book and at the end of it with every payment being made on time, I have been waiting for 2 months since my last payment was made and they DO NOT have any customer service reps available to help me. Phone support has had me on hold for over 4 hours at 2 consecutive intervals. They changed phone menu so I can not pay over the phone. I've never had a bank send me a 1 year payment book for a 5 year loan, that already makes no sense. Then I've never had a bank just outright never send a payment book and have the audacity to charge me late fees. Its like they are using a tactic to repo my vehicle so they can sell it at inflated current prices.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — I do not know
Issue: Written notification about debt — Didn't receive notice of right to dispute
Company: HCFS Healthcare Financial Services of TeamHealth
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
Debt just appeared on my credit. Never got an email or letter mailed from anyone.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: MS

Complaint narrative:
This consumer reporting agency as defined by law has violated my rights under the FCRA for not assuring me 100 % possible maximum accuracy. Every automated complaint that comes back says items are verified when they have not done a reasonable investigation of the items in question Pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1681e - Compliance procedures section ( b ) says whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it follows reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates. To my understanding, the only investigation that credit reporting agencies do is a simple communication with the E oscar system to request verification. Verification could be as simple as a phone number address and name all of which are public information and is not the maximum possible accuracy which would mean that you are in violation of the FCRA. 
These are the Inaccurate tradelines that I disputed that have not been removed or investigated properly. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: MS

Complaint narrative:
This consumer reporting agency as defined by law has violated my rights under the FCRA for not assuring me 100 % possible maximum accuracy. Every automated complaint that comes back says items are verified when they have not done a reasonable investigation of the items in question Pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1681e - Compliance procedures section ( b ) says whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it follows reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates. To my understanding, the only investigation that credit reporting agencies do is a simple communication with the E oscar system to request verification. Verification could be as simple as a phone number address and name all of which are public information and is not the maximum possible accuracy which would mean that you are in violation of the FCRA. 
These are the Inaccurate tradelines that I disputed that have not been removed or investigated properly. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: MS

Complaint narrative:
This consumer reporting agency as defined by law has violated my rights under the FCRA for not assuring me 100 % possible maximum accuracy. Every automated complaint that comes back says items are verified when they have not done a reasonable investigation of the items in question Pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1681e - Compliance procedures section ( b ) says whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it follows reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates. To my understanding, the only investigation that credit reporting agencies do is a simple communication with the E oscar system to request verification. Verification could be as simple as a phone number address and name all of which are public information and is not the maximum possible accuracy which would mean that you are in violation of the FCRA.

These are the Inaccurate tradelines that I disputed that have not been removed or investigated properly. 



XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX ) XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX ) XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: MS

Complaint narrative:
This consumer reporting agency as defined by law has violated my rights under the FCRA for not assuring me 100 % possible maximum accuracy. Every automated complaint that comes back says items are verified when they have not done a reasonable investigation of the items in question Pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1681e - Compliance procedures section ( b ) says whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it follows reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates. To my understanding, the only investigation that credit reporting agencies do is a simple communication with the E oscar system to request verification. Verification could be as simple as a phone number address and name all of which are public information and is not the maximum possible accuracy which would mean that you are in violation of the FCRA. 
These are the Inaccurate tradelines that I disputed that have not been removed or investigated properly. 



XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX XXXX XXXX  ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  ) XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX  ( Original Creditor : XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX ) XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX ) XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: IL

Complaint narrative:
This consumer reporting agency as defined by law has violated my rights under the FCRA for not assuring me 100 % possible maximum accuracy. Every automated complaint that comes back says items are verified when they have not done a reasonable investigation of the items in question Pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1681e - Compliance procedures section ( b ) says whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it follows reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates. To my understanding, the only investigation that credit reporting agencies do is a simple communication with the E oscar system to request verification. Verification could be as simple as a phone number address and name all of which are public information and is not the maximum possible accuracy which would mean that you are in violation of the FCRA. 
These are the Inaccurate tradelines that I disputed that have not been removed or investigated properly. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX DEPTEDXXXX XXXXXXXX DEPTEDXXXX XXXXXXXX DEPTEDXXXX XXXXXXXX DEPTEDXXXX XXXXXXXX DEPTEDXXXX XXXXXXXX DEPTEDXXXX XXXXXXXX DEPTEDXXXX XXXXXXXX DEPTEDXXXX XXXXXXXX DEPTEDXXXX XXXXXXXX DEPTEDXXXX XXXXXXXX DEPTEDXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  ( Original Creditor : XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX ) XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Account status incorrect
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: GA

Complaint narrative:
I have a XXXX XXXX XXXX with XXXX University who decided in XX/XX/XXXX to switch their accounting to the Department of Education ( DOE ). Prior to this switch, they had XXXX  XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) as their accounting service. They did switch and per the DOE 's website, my payment had a due date of XX/XX/XXXX. The last statement I rec 'd from XXXX was in XX/XX/XXXX, which had a due date of XX/XX/XXXX. That was paid and I even did due diligence and paid an addtl payment at the end of XX/XX/XXXX, even though I had no addtl statements from XXXX. I took a screenshot of their website on XX/XX/XXXX and it reflected their wasnt anything due and my last login prior to the XX/XX/XXXX login was XX/XX/XXXX. I received a notice from XXXX University at the beginning of XX/XX/XXXX stating they decided to not use the DOE for accounting and would continue with XXXX. I received a call from a XXXX rep on XX/XX/XXXX stating my account was 100 days past due. I still had no addtl statements or correspondence from XXXX  after the XX/XX/XXXX statement, which I explained to the rep. I also explained to her that XXXX decided to use DOE for accounting and then changed its mind. She said she understood and would have someone look into in to it. I checked XXXXXXXX XXXX website while on the phone with the rep ( XX/XX/XXXX ), and it reflected an amount due of {$58.00}, but had a due date of XX/XX/XXXX. When I went to pay it, it showed it as a past due balance, which was erroneous. I paid an amount of {$130.00} that day ( XX/XX/XXXX ), just to even one of my bank accounts. Mind you, nothing was due XXXX. On XX/XX/XXXX, I received an email from XXXX stating there were documents on my account. I checked my account portal and behold, there was a past due notice ... .again, still no statement generated from XXXX after XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX, their website reflected an amount due of {$170.00}, but with a due date of XXXX. Remember, there was only an erroneous past due balance on XXXX. 
I filed a complaint with the XXXX  on XX/XX/XXXX with the above details, along with screenshots of their website, etc., and received a response from XXXX stating my account would be corrected and that nothing was reported past due. 
I received a credit alert on XX/XX/XXXX regarding a delinquency on my credit file. Behold, its regarding this particular student loan and showing that it was 60 days past due as of XX/XX/XXXX. This is incorrect. Look at the screenshot dates versus the conflicting/erroneous information on XXXX 's website, as well as the screenshot from the DOE 's website with the XXXX due date.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
This consumer reporting agency as defined by law has violated my rights under the FCRA for not assuring me 100 % possible maximum accuracy. Every automated complaint that comes back says items are verified when they have not done a reasonable investigation of the items in question Pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1681e - Compliance procedures section ( b ) says whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it follows reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates. To my understanding, the only investigation that credit reporting agencies do is a simple communication with the E oscar system to request verification. Verification could be as simple as a phone number address and name all of which are public information and is not the maximum possible accuracy which would mean that you are in violation of the FCRA. 
These are the Inaccurate tradelines that I disputed that have not been removed or investigated properly. 


XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
This consumer reporting agency as defined by law has violated my rights under the FCRA for not assuring me 100 % possible maximum accuracy. Every automated complaint that comes back says items are verified when they have not done a reasonable investigation of the items in question Pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1681e - Compliance procedures section ( b ) says whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it follows reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates. To my understanding, the only investigation that credit reporting agencies do is a simple communication with the XXXX XXXX system to request verification. Verification could be as simple as a phone number address and name all of which are public information and is not the maximum possible accuracy which would mean that you are in violation of the FCRA. 
These are the Inaccurate tradelines that I disputed that have not been removed or investigated properly. 


XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
This consumer reporting agency as defined by law has violated my rights under the FCRA for not assuring me 100 % possible maximum accuracy. Every automated complaint that comes back says items are verified when they have not done a reasonable investigation of the items in question Pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1681e - Compliance procedures section ( b ) says whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it follows reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates. To my understanding, the only investigation that credit reporting agencies do is a simple communication with the XXXX XXXX system to request verification. Verification could be as simple as a phone number address and name all of which are public information and is not the maximum possible accuracy which would mean that you are in violation of the FCRA. 
These are the Inaccurate tradelines that I disputed that have not been removed or investigated properly. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — Medical debt
Issue: Written notification about debt — Didn't receive notice of right to dispute
Company: Nationwide Recovery Systems, Ltd
State: VA

Complaint narrative:
On XX/XX/2022, I received a notice from my credit monitoring agency that there was a bill in collections from the business XXXX XXXX located at XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXXXXXX. I immediately got concerned since I have never made a late payment and pay all my bills on time ( this was the only negative on my credit report ). However, when I looked online directly at the XXXX website, it said that I owed a balance of {XXXX}. I immediately paid that balance in full ( transaction number XXXX ; account number XXXX ) and called XXXX XXXX to let them know that I never got a notice of a balance due or even a letter saying they would put my account into collections. I left a voicemail as instructed with my account number and telephone number. I did not get a phone call back or any resolution. This is absolutely ridiculous that this company without put my account into collections as I have not even heard a single thing from them until my credit monitoring agency notified me. Furthermore, I have even received notifications from XXXX XXXX about my XXXX  machine having a recall issued on it. The company obviously has my correct email address. No notice was given.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
This consumer reporting agency as defined by law has violated my rights under the FCRA for not assuring me 100 % possible maximum accuracy. Every automated complaint that comes back says items are verified when they have not done a reasonable investigation of the items in question Pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1681e - Compliance procedures section ( b ) says whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it follows reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates. To my understanding, the only investigation that credit reporting agencies do is a simple communication with the XXXX XXXX system to request verification. Verification could be as simple as a phone number address and name all of which are public information and is not the maximum possible accuracy which would mean that you are in violation of the FCRA. 
These are the Inaccurate tradelines that I disputed that have not been removed or investigated properly. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation