vivekkopthsd/cfpb-consumer-complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint received 2025-08-06 00:00:00
Product: Credit card — General-purpose credit card or charge card
Issue: Problem with a purchase shown on your statement — Card was charged for something you did not purchase with the card
Company: CITIBANK, N.A.
State: CA

Complaint narrative:
An unauthorized purchase was made with stolen information of {$990.00} on XX/XX/XXXX. I have called the bank on multiple occasions and the issues has not been resolved. The bank states I am responsible for the charge even though I did not make the purchase and I don't have the purchased device in my possession. Either my credit card was stolen or my information was duplicated even though that bank states that is impossible, it is possible, it has happened with my bank card in the past. Around the time of this incident, my car was broken into but I did not notice anything of value missing at that time. I reported the fraudulent transaction as soon as I learned about it which was XX/XX/XXXX. At the time of this purchase I did not have available balance to make a purchase that big but the bank still authorized it, not sure why. At that time my card balance was about XXXXXXXX XXXX  and I only have a total available credit of XXXXXXXX XXXX  which means I probably only had about XXXXXXXX XXXX  of available credit at the time. Not once did I get a call from the bank asking if I was making this suspicious purchase. I have called the bank, submitted the police report and yet nothing has been resolved. My ATM card was also used that same day, XXXX XXXX took care of the problem the same day.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2025-08-06 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Account status incorrect
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: NJ

Complaint narrative:
I am disputing inaccuracies on my credit report and requesting the immediate removal of specific accounts and items. These inaccuracies include unauthorized negative entries, incorrect addresses, and XXXX  inquiries reported without my consent. These actions violate the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) and the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  ), particularly XXXX XXXX. XXXX, which requires consumer reporting agencies to block or delete information reported without written consent. You have failed to ensure maximum possible accuracy, as required under XXXX XXXX. XXXX ( b ). The reporting of unauthorized data also breaches XXXX XXXX. XXXX, which governs permissible purposes for obtaining and reporting consumer data. The inaccuracies have caused harm to my creditworthiness, and despite providing documentation, these errors remain uncorrected.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2025-08-06 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Account information incorrect
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: TX

Complaint narrative:
I just applied for a credit card and was shocked to learn that I had been denied credit. When I pulled my credit report, I found some of the information very confusing. I want to make sure that everything is accurate, therefore I want you to look into it for me. I am the primary consumer of the complaint and there is no third party involved. This complaint was not submitted in error. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2025-08-06 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Account information incorrect
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: TX

Complaint narrative:
I just applied for a credit card and was shocked to learn that I had been denied credit. When I pulled my credit report, I found some of the information very confusing. I want to make sure that everything is accurate, therefore I want you to look into it for me. I am the primary consumer of the complaint and there is no third party involved. This complaint was not submitted in error. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2025-08-06 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report — Reporting company used your report improperly
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: IL

Complaint narrative:
This CFPB complaint has been filed to request pursuant to FCRA XXXX ( XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX ) that you -- credit reporting agency, block information appearing on my consumer credit report that is the result of identity theft and fraud within XXXX business days of you receiving this complaint. I am concerned about the validity and accuracy of your recent investigation of these accounts that are reporting on my credit report. Last month I requested an investigation because I felt the item was not being reported legally. Couple of days ago I received a letter stating that you have ceased investigation of my credit reports because, in your opinion, you believe that I have used a XXXX XXXX  credit repair agency. Not only do I believe this to be a stall tactic on your part to XXXX you an additional XXXX  days to comply with my original request, but I believe it to be a blatant violation of the FCRA. 

I have attached a copy of my government issued ID as well as mail showing proof of address. So, there shouldnt be any confusion or stall tactics on your end. I have maintained a careful record of my communications with you for the purpose of filing a complaint with the FTC should you continue in your non-compliance.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2025-08-06 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Account status incorrect
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: GA

Complaint narrative:
I am writing to formally file a complaint regarding unauthorized accounts that persist on my credit report despite my repeated efforts to have them removed. These accounts are causing significant damage to my financial reputation and overall well-being. It is evident that the inclusion of these fraudulent items violates XXXX XXXX XXXX regarding permissible purposes, as the credit bureaus have no legitimate reason to report them without my explicit consent. Please refer to the attached file detailing these items I am disputing. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) says ( XXXX ) The banking system is dependent upon fair and accurate credit reporting. Inaccurate credit reports directly impair the efficiency of the banking system, and unfair credit reporting methods undermine the public confidence, which is essential to the continued functioning of the banking system. So whenever there is a violation under the XXXX, it impairs the efficiency of the banking system. This is a violation of my privacy with my consumer report, since I control what is listed and what is not. In the event that any accounts are reported without my written consent, that is considered identity theft.

Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2025-08-06 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Conventional home mortgage
Issue: Trouble during payment process — Payment process
Company: Mr. Cooper Group Inc.
State: MN

Complaint narrative:
I am filing this complaint regarding Mr. Cooper 's mishandling of a mortgage recast request, which has resulted in unnecessary financial harm and raises questions about their business practices. 
After selling my other home, I contacted Mr. Cooper in early XX/XX/year> to request a recast of my mortgage using the proceeds from that sale. On XX/XX/year>, Mr. Cooper confirmed receipt of all necessary materials : My formal recast request The required recast processing fee A {$300000.00} principal payment intended for the recast Despite having everything needed to proceed, Mr. Cooper did not take timely action. On XX/XX/year>, I followed up via their customer service chat, concerned that delays would result in additional interest chargesdespite the principal payment already being in their possession. 
On XX/XX/year>, Mr. Cooper sent me a recast agreement indicating the new loan terms would not take effect until XX/XX/year>. This delay means I am required to make XXXX additional full monthly payments at the higher original amount, including interest on the principal that has already been applied. In effect, I am paying interest on funds that have already been used to reduce my loan balance. 
I immediately called to express concern and requested that the recast be made effective as of XX/XX/year>, which I believe is a fair and reasonable compromise given that all documentation and funds were submitted by XXXX. My request was denied, and the representative was unable to provide any substantive justification for the XX/XX/XXXX effective date. 
I believe this delay is financially punitive to borrowers and disproportionately benefits the servicer by allowing them to collect interest unnecessarily. Mr. Cooper 's actions demonstrate, at minimum, a lack of transparency and urgency in servicing customer requests, and at worst, a conflict of interest in retaining interest income at the borrowers expense. 
I am requesting that this matter be investigated and that Mr. Cooper be held accountable for their practices in handling mortgage recast requests. I am also seeking reimbursement or credit for the additional interest charged as a result of the delayed effective date.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2025-08-06 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: MS

Complaint narrative:
On XX/XX/year>2025 I sent a letter regarding inaccurate and unknown things on my credit report to this day over 60 days later, I have not received a response yet.

I feel like Im being taken advantage of and being ignored for my disputes.

Section 611 ( a ), it is plainly stated that a failure to investigate these items within 30 days gives a reason to immediately remove those items from my credit report. It has been 60 days so they should be deleted promptly. I demand these accounts be deleted immediately or I will file for litigation due to the stress you caused me. My information was also impacted by the Equifax data breach and they have got into the hands of the wrong person.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2025-08-06 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: MS

Complaint narrative:
On XX/XX/year>2025 I sent a letter regarding inaccurate and unknown things on my credit report to this day over 60 days later, I have not received a response yet.

I feel like Im being taken advantage of and being ignored for my disputes.

Section 611 ( a ), it is plainly stated that a failure to investigate these items within 30 days gives a reason to immediately remove those items from my credit report. It has been 60 days so they should be deleted promptly. I demand these accounts be deleted immediately or I will file for litigation due to the stress you caused me. My information was also impacted by the Equifax data breach and they have got into the hands of the wrong person.

Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2025-08-06 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — I do not know
Issue: Communication tactics — You told them to stop contacting you, but they keep trying
Company: Kriya Capital, LLC
State: TX

Complaint narrative:
XXXX XXXX XXXX I'm refusing to pay the debt and they must cease all communication with me.

Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2025-08-06 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
State: GA

Complaint narrative:
I respectfully disagree with Navy Federals response. While they acknowledge that a {$3500.00} charge posted to my secured credit card ( limit {$500.00} ), they failed to address how such a charge was allowed on a secured credit card account, which is supposed to be backed by a cash deposit specifically to prevent over-limit exposure. 

I never opted into any over-limit protection, nor was I informed or given the opportunity to approve such a charge in advance. Under the Truth in Lending Act ( 15 U.S.C. 1666i ( b ) ), a creditor may not approve over-the-limit transactions unless the cardholder affirmatively opts in. No such authorization exists in my case.

Navy Federals decision to allow a {$3500.00} charge on a {$500.00} secured credit limitwithout consenteffectively converted a secured credit line into an unsecured one, without agreement or disclosure. This is improper and undermines the very purpose of a secured credit card. 

Furthermore, Navy Federal confirmed that they are reporting this inflated over-limit balance to credit bureaus. If this reporting fails to note the account as secured, or mischaracterizes the nature of the debt and how it accrued, it may violate the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 and 1681e ( b ) ).

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2025-08-06 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a company's investigation into an existing problem — Problem with personal statement of dispute
Company: SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL
State: MI

Complaint narrative:
I opened up a Synchrony XXXX XXXX XXXX credit card after the sales woman told me I could get XXXX  years no interest once I picked up the furniture. I was out of town so scheduled delivery. She then told me I could not pay for it with the card because the furniture was already delivered. So she lied to me. I had to pay for the furniture with cash. I then cancelled the card. I requested XXXX XXXX remove the card from my credit report but they refused. I then asked Synchrony to remove it but they refused as well. So I am reporting this to the CFPB as I was coerced into applying for the card under false pretenses. I never used this card at all.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2025-08-06 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — Other debt
Issue: Written notification about debt — Notification didn't disclose it was an attempt to collect a debt
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: MI

Complaint narrative:
There are collection accounts on my report that I believe contain inaccurate information. Under my rights pursuant to 15 USC 1681e ( b ) and 15 USC 1681i, I am entitled to an accurate credit report. I request a review of these entries, and if they can not be verified as accurate, I ask that they be removed.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2025-08-06 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report — Reporting company used your report improperly
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: SC

Complaint narrative:
I constantly check my credit report and notice that the errors and false misleading information for individuals accounts didnt quite meet the credit reporting standards of being 100 % accurate. This has damaged me and held me back from some time now. My life has been affected a lot from this false information, Im demanding CFPB to enforce the correction and or deletion of these items.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2025-08-06 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report — Reporting company used your report improperly
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
This CFPB complaint has been filed to request pursuant to FCRA 605B ( 15 U.S.C. 1681c-2 ) that you -- credit reporting agency, block information appearing on my consumer credit report that is the result of identity theft and fraud within XXXX business days of you receiving this complaint. I am concerned about the validity and accuracy of your recent investigation of these accounts that are reporting on my credit report. Last month I requested an investigation because I felt the item was not being reported legally. Couple of days ago I received a letter stating that you have ceased investigation of my credit reports because, in your opinion, you believe that I have used a third party credit repair agency. Not only do I believe this to be a stall tactic on your part to grant you an additional XXXX  days to comply with my original request, but I believe it to be a blatant violation of the FCRA. 

I have attached a copy of my government issued ID as well as mail showing proof of address. So, there shouldnt be any confusion or stall tactics on your end. I have maintained a careful record of my communications with you for the purpose of filing a complaint with the FTC should you continue in your non-compliance.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2025-08-06 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report — Reporting company used your report improperly
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
This CFPB complaint has been filed to request pursuant to FCRA 605B ( 15 U.S.C. 1681c-2 ) that you -- credit reporting agency, block information appearing on my consumer credit report that is the result of identity theft and fraud within XXXX business days of you receiving this complaint. I am concerned about the validity and accuracy of your recent investigation of these accounts that are reporting on my credit report. Last month I requested an investigation because I felt the item was not being reported legally. Couple of days ago I received a letter stating that you have ceased investigation of my credit reports because, in your opinion, you believe that I have used a third party credit repair agency. Not only do I believe this to be a stall tactic on your part to grant you an additional XXXX  days to comply with my original request, but I believe it to be a blatant violation of the FCRA. 

I have attached a copy of my government issued ID as well as mail showing proof of address. So, there shouldnt be any confusion or stall tactics on your end. I have maintained a careful record of my communications with you for the purpose of filing a complaint with the FTC should you continue in your non-compliance.

Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2025-08-06 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report — Reporting company used your report improperly
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: TX

Complaint narrative:
List of accounts below has violated my federally protected consumer rights to privacy and confidentiality under 15 USC 1681. 

I looked at my XXXX, Equifax & XXXXXXXX  credit report on XX/XX/year>, and noticed some things are incomplete and not accurate. And according to the fair credit reporting act Whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it shall follow reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates according to 15 USC 1681 ( e ) ( b ).

And according to 15 USC 1681 5 they are suppose to do this ( 5 ) Treatment of inaccurate or unverifiable information ( A ) In generallf, after any reinvestigation under paragraph ( 1 ) of any information disputed by a consumer, an item of the information is found to be inaccurate or incomplete or can not be verified, the consumer reporting agency shall ( i ) promptly delete that item of information from the file of the consumer, or modify that item of information, as appropriate, based on the results of the reinvestigation; and ( ii ) promptly notify the furnisher of that information that the information has been modified or deleted from the file of the consumer.

And according to 15 USC 1681s-2 they are suppose to not furnish any information relating to a consumer to any consumer reporting agency if the person knows or has reasonable cause to believe that the information is inaccurate.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation