Consumer complaint received 2020-02-17 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: LEXISNEXIS
State: NV

Complaint narrative:
I have been trying to resolve this unverified bankruptcy entry with XXXX, starting with my correspondence starting from XX/XX/XXXX till XX/XX/XXXX to no available remedy from XXXX. 
XXXX  has made claims several claims that this information has been verified by its 3rd party vendor LexisNexis, with no other details provided to me. With that response from XXXX, I contacted LexisNexis and asked them to verify this information, by obtaining the records this vendor had. LexisNexis could not show or prove that XXXX  had contacted them or verified this bankruptcy as XXXX  has claimed. Bankruptcy information was never found in my consumer disclosure report that LexisNexis maintains. 

LexisNexis conducted their OWN independent 30-day investigation, sent the information of their finds as a dispute on my behalf to ALL 3 credit reporting agencies. XXXX, did not respond, but removed the information, XXXX, responded with documentation to LexisNexis stating a removal of the bankruptcy, XXXX  did not respond to me nor LexisNexis. 

Despite this information FROM LexisNexis and additional information provided to XXXX  by their third-party vendor, the unverifiable information remained. 

XXXX, did not properly take the correct steps to verify and correct the information, which they are reporting pursuant to it obligations under the FCRA. Under the FCRA, the investigation. a credit reporting agency undertakes must be a reasonable one. 
Per the Federal Credit Reporting Act, Section 609 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( a ), XXXX   was required by federal law to verify through physical verification of the original signed consumer contract and/or judgment ( s ) all accounts and public information that you post on anyones credit report. Otherwise, anyone paying for your reporting services could fax, mail, email in fraudulent and erroneous account information. 

According to XXXX  " verified '' means that the company, ( in this case vendor ) that reports the information to XXXX  has certified it reported accurately. However, this is not the case, LexisNexis DID not verify to XXXX that this information was verified. 

A letter was sent to XXXX  on XXXX XXXX requested their Method of Verification, which by law I am obligated to ask for and shouldve received, since XXXX  verified with LexisNexis . That information as not provided to me, I was told to look in the Public Records section of my credit report and find that information. This DOES NOT constitute as proper Method of Verification according to the FCRA. Also XXXX sent another letter in the same envelope that they couldnt verify my identity to provide me the information that I was requesting, so why did XXXX  instruct me to look at my Personal Records section of my credit report and state they would not reinvestigate this information, which was NEVER investigated to begin with?

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation