Consumer complaint received 2025-09-22 00:00:00
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report — Reporting company used your report improperly
Company: Self Financial Inc.
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
SELF FINANCIAL INC XXXX XXXX reported with XX/XX/XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and alleged to be XX/XX/XXXX XXXX Alleged is reported in deficiency of reporting mandates and or behaviors therefore the deceptive calumny must be eradicated as is my legally requested resolution, please do so HERE AND NOW! This claim has acclaimed ailments in at least one or more of the following reported data fields jeopardizing its credibility and integrity as reported when reported : In regard to item questioned above, Activity Date for XXXX XXXX, and as reported as XX/XX/XXXX for XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX XX/XX/XXXX for XXXX  and as such is in apparent deviation from the requisite standard ( XXXX ) for certifiably compliant reporting, hence the XXXX of my rightful consumer complaint contesting reporter 's privilege to report this claim unless it accepts and successfully fulfills the challenge to prove indisputably its confirmed and demonstrated adequacy of reporting practices and process to include no less than the full adherence of their required perfection and completeness of the Credit Reporting Industry 's mandatorily utilized XXXX XXXX Format standards. 
With reference to item questioned above, Data Reporter Telephone Number Reporting for XXXX, XXXX for XXXX XXXX, and as reported as Not Not Reporting for XXXX  and as such is one, each or all in aberrancy from the requisite standard ( XXXX ) and or is not proven much less certifiably compliant to its principal mandates as its relevant and consequential for compliant reporting. This field, as reported, is a divergence from the established CDIAs reporting standards and or is reported one or more of being untrue, inaccurate, inconsistent, incomplete, untimely, unverifiable, and or else wise not confirmed certifiably compliant to all mandates for ethical and lawful reporting! Clearly, this field asserts that potentially this item of reporting is or is not yet unproven to be an aberrancy at issue with reporting accuracy and or compliance standards. 
Regarding the item questioned above, Data Reporter Street Address XXXX, reported as Not Reporting for XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX for XXXX XXXX, and as Not Reporting for XXXX  for XXXX  and as such are one or more, according to protocol, deficient of its exigency of reporting obedience! 
In regard to item questioned above, Account Current Balance : Not Reporting for XXXX XXXX, and as reported as Not Reporting for XXXX, Not Reporting for XXXX  and as such is one, each or all in deviation from the requisite standard ( s ) and or is not proven much less certifiably compliant to its regulatory mandates as its a sin XXXX non for compliant reporting and as such are one or more apparently deficient of its exigency of reporting sufficiency and or decree ( XXXX )! 
On the subject of the item questioned above, Account Type : XXXX, reported as Credit line secured for Secured credit card for XXXX XXXX, and as Secured credit card for XXXX  and as such is one, each or all in aberrancy from the requisite standard ( XXXX ) and or is not proven much less certifiably compliant to its principal mandates as its relevant and consequential for compliant reporting acquiescence. This field, as reported, is a divergence from the established CDIAs reporting standards and or is evidently reported one or more of being untrue, inaccurate, inconsistent, incomplete, untimely, unverifiable, and or else wise not confirmed certifiably compliant to all mandates for ethical and lawful reporting proclivity! Clearly, this field asserts that potentially this item of reporting is or is not yet unproven to be an aberrancy at issue with reporting accuracy and or compliance standards. 
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and alleged to be Late1-2 Alleged is reported in deficiency of reporting mandates and or codes therefore the sophism must be eradicated as is my lawfully requested resolution, please do so HERE AND NOW! This claim has hailed ailments in at least one or more of the following reported data fields jeopardizing its credibility and integrity as reported when reported : Bearing attention to the item questioned above, Data Reporter Name reported as Not Reporting for XXXX, XXXX XXXX  XXXX XXXX for XXXX XXXX, and as Not Reporting for XXXX  and as such is in apparent deviation from the requisite standard ( XXXX ) for certifiably compliant reporting, hence the XXXX of my rightful consumer complaint contesting reporter 's privilege to report this claim unless it accepts and successfully fulfills the challenge to prove indisputably its confirmed and demonstrated adequacy of reporting practices and process to include no less than the full adherence of their required perfection and completeness of the Credit Reporting Industry 's mandatorily utilized XXXX XXXX Format standards, and as such are one or more likely deficient of its exigency of reporting edict, and as such are one or more for all intents and purposes deficient of its exigency of reporting Appropriateness! 
With reference to item questioned above, Creditor Type : reported as All Banks for XXXX, Miscellaneous Banks for XXXX XXXX, and as All Banks for XXXX  and as such is one, each or all in aberrancy from the requisite standard ( XXXX ) and or is not proven much less certifiably compliant to its principal mandates as its relevant and consequential for compliant reporting. This field, as reported, is a divergence from the established CDIAs reporting standards and or is reported one or more of being untrue, inaccurate, inconsistent, incomplete, untimely, unverifiable, and or else wise not confirmed certifiably compliant to all mandates for ethical and lawful reporting! Clearly, this field asserts that potentially this item of reporting is or is not yet unproven to be an aberrancy at issue with reporting accuracy and or compliance standards. 
As for the item questioned above, XXXX XXXX : reported as Paid for XXXX, Closed for XXXX XXXX, and as Paid for XXXX are one, two, or each in potential deviation ( XXXX ) from the requisite standard ( XXXX ) for the compliant reporting, thereby making such reported claims a concern due in part to lesser integrity of data as reported ( per XXXX ). As reported, there can be NO deviation from the requisite standard ( XXXX ) for the compliant reporting of Data fields within any XXXX XXXX Field nor else wise in regard to this mandatorily accurately depicted data field, and as such are one or more apparently deficient of its exigency of reporting assent! 
In regard to item questionably reported above, please note that Account Cycle Identifier : is reported as Not Reporting for XXXX, Monthly ( every month ) for XXXX XXXX, and as Not Reporting for XXXX  are one, two, or each apparently in potential deviation from the requisite standard ( XXXX ) for the compliant reporting, thereby making such reported claims a concern due in part to lesser integrity of data as reported ( per XXXX - XXXX ). As reported, there can be NO deviation from the requisite standard ( XXXX ) for the compliant reporting of Data fields within any XXXX XXXX Field nor else wise in regard to this mandatorily accurately depicted data field.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation