Consumer complaint received 2016-11-15 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Other mortgage
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account — 
Company: Community Loan Servicing, LLC (formerly known as Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC)
State: NY

Complaint narrative:
I have made two previous complains regarding Bayview Loan Servicing attempting to charge me for a major mistake they made in paying a cooperative which attempted a non judicial foreclosure against me. 
They were given notice in XXXX 2016 by the cooperative ( notice of default ) Bayview said, and did nothing They were given immediately responses from me denying that I owed the cooperative the money they sought. 
Bayview said, and did nothing They were then given two different notices of termination letters from the cooperative for each unit. 
Bayview said, and did nothing In XXXX Bayview received two notices of public foreclosure Bayview for the first time contacted me via XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ), who basically asks me : a ) if I was aware of the actions being taken by the cooperative, and b ) what I was doing about same. 
I informed him then that I was aware of same, and that I was filing legal papers to combat their claim, and further that I did not owe them anything of what they were stating. When I asked him what the bank was doing he informed me " the bank does not get involved with these type of issues '' and that I needed to deal with it. 
On XXXX XXXX I obtained a XXXX from supreme court staying the foreclosure. 
On XXXX XXXX the bank paid the cooperative an amount of money never requested of me. 
The bank at no time told me they changed their mind, or even informed me that they paid after the fact. 
It was not till XXXX XXXX that I found out the bank had paid an innocuous amount of money that had never been requested of me by notice or verbally. 

The bank has refused to provide me with certain information and has stated it provided information but failed to submit it. Proof is in Case number : XXXX and XXXX. 

They have tacitly admitted that there was a breakdown in communications between XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX XXXX XXXX ), and XXXX XXXX ( attorney ) in XXXX 2016 however it does not make sense that they would wait till XXXX when they were on notice in XXXX of the claim by the cooperative and my response which disputed the matter. 
They continuously state that all negotiations must be done between the Bank but stated clearly by XXXX XXXX XXXX ... '' they do n't get involved with these issues '' It makes no sense. 

I have attached a copy of the assignment of collateral document. It seems to make no sense and looks like someone just made it up. It does not comport to any of the XXXX which clearly depict XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX as previous secured parties to Bayview and nowhere is XXXX referenced. 
Their information does not match, they fail to provide information requested twice previously which the documents seem to indicate they will provide but no reference to them is made nor attached ( e.g. leases for both apartments, stock share for XXXX, and XXXX is not clearly readable, recognition agreements for both units, full proof of succession for both units, etc.. ) The bank made a mistake and now wants me to pay for it.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation