Consumer complaint received 2024-10-18 00:00:00
Product: Debt collection — Credit card debt
Issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed — Debt was result of identity theft
Company: JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX reporting Problem with a company 's investigation into an existing problem XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXX/XX/XXXX Open Sent to company XXXX XXXX XXXX Credit reporting Problem with a company 's investigation into an existing problem XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX Open Sent to company XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX reporting Incorrect information on your reporXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXX/XX/XXXX Open Company XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX reporting Problem with a company 's investigation into an existing problem XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXX/XX/XXXX Closed Company responde To Whom It May Concern : Your company have violated the provisions of section 605B, 623 ( a ) ( 6 ), or 615 ( f ), You have no proofs to offer to support a dispute, and thus your assertion in the form of a policy report is being used to obtain blockage, not contest the accuracy of its reporting Stating that I have hire a credit repair company have no merit respond to my issue it is sad that your company will try to used way not to fallow the law keep in mind every information stated here will be latter requested if a lawsuit is filled against your company please govern by the law as to my issue you have no reason to determine that you have made a misrepresentation of material fact relevant to the request to block ; c ) XXXX has reason to determine that you obtained possession of goods You have no way to ascertain the legitimacy of my action without investigating the items in question Since youve obviously neglected to investigate this account thoroughly I am demanding you remove this account off my profile. It is at this time that I will point out the in Cushman v TransUnion, Stevenson v. TRW ( XXXX  ), and Richardson v. Fleet, Equifax et, the courts ruled each and every time that the CRA couldnt merely Parrot information from the creditors and collection agencies that they have conduct an independent REASONABLE investigation to ensure the validity of the debt and honesty/integrity of the creditors/CA in question. Sending out a generic form through the e-Oscar system that doesnt even contain my reasons for the dispute is not reasonable. 
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Please send me all document regarding such record, court documents ] supporting my position. ] Please reinvestigate [ this/these matter ( s ) ] and [ delete or correct ] the disputed item ( s ) as soon as possible stating that I have hire a credit repair company to resolve my issue is a insult Thank you. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX YOU HAVE CONTINUED TO IGNORE EACH DISPUTE AND CLAIM I HAVE BEEN USING A CREDIT REPAIR COMPANY.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation