Consumer complaint received 2021-10-28 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Conventional home mortgage
Issue: Closing on a mortgage — 
Company: McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC
State: GA

Complaint narrative:
I AM UPLOADING A COPY OF XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX FRAUD LOAN. THIS IS FOR XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX GA XXXX.PLEASE NOT I PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED DOCUMENTATION OF FRAUDULENT LOANS FIRST AND SECOND WITH HOMBANC AND XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX THIS SERVES AS EVIDENCE OF MORTGAGE FRAUD. IT APPEARS THERE WERE 4 FRAUD LOANS IN PROCESS AT THE SAME TIME XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX AS WE CONTINUE TO STATE WE DID NOT SIGN FOR A LOAN., XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX THE CLOSING ATTORNEY COULD NOT CLOSE ON ANY LOANS DUE TO HIS EMBEZZLEMENT. AGAIN, WE WERE NOTIFIED OF THE FRAUD AND WERE MAKING OUR MONTHLY PAYMENTS TO XXXX. MY WIFE SOUGHT OUT THE BRC FOR ASSISTANCE AND WE WERE COTINOUSLY VICTIMIZED. OUR MONEY AND WHAT WE THOUGH WERE OUR HOMES WERE TAKEN, WE HAVE HAD ENOUGH AND BEGAN SPREADING VICTIMIZATION AND SPREADING THE NEWS THROUGH ALL MEDIA PORTS, NO ONE SEEMS TO CARE SO, WE WILL MAKE SURE THE MASSES ARE AWARE OF WHAT'S TAKING PLACE AND ALLOW THEM TO FILE LAWSUITS BY THE MILLIONS. 

LAWFIRMS WHO HAVE STOLEN HOMES FROM OTHERS WHICH, I MENTIONED BEFORE, ALL NAMES WITH DETAILED INFORMATION IS NOW FLOODING THE AIRWAYS! WE ARE TIRED OF THIS MESS! 

XXXX NVT, XXXX GA XXXX HAD A CLOUD OVER PRIOR TO XXXX THINKING WE WERE PURCHASING IT. THIS EXPLAINS WHY ATTACHING THE FIRST PAGE OF XXXX COMPLAINT WHICH WAS IMMEDIATELY DISMISSED BY THE CLERK OF COURT. 

MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF DENIED BY THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE, XXXX XXXX IRONICALLY HE RETIRED AS WE BEGAN TO OPEN THE FLOOD XXXX. XXXX WAS ALREADY SOLD IN XX/XX/XXXX OR PRIOR TO XXXX XXXX WHO IS A WELL KNOWN XXXX FELON. HE WORKS WITH CORRUPT ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES. HE PURCHASED XXXX NVT FOR XXXX AND NOT XXXX. HE DEFAULTED THE XXXX COUNTY COURT AND THE PRESIDING JUDGE WHO APPEARED TO HAVE HAD A RELATIONSHIP WITH XXXX XXXX AND XXXX XXXX HIS ATTORNEY, ATTORNEY XXXX XXXX, WHO THREATNED BOTH MYSELF AND WIFE WHILE IN COURT DIFFENTLY APPEARED TO BE A PART OF A RICO RING. THE GOAL WAS TO STRIPE US OF THE HOME FOR THE XXXX FAMILY WHO OWNED BOTH THE HOME AND THE LAND BASICLLY THE ENTIRE SUBDIVISION, IF YOU WERE ON THEIR PAYROLL MEANING WAORKING WITH THEM TO PUT MONEY IN THEIR POCKETS SUCH AS USING YOUR INFORMATION TO OBTAIN FRAUDULENT MORTGAGES WERE WHERE ALLOWED TO PURCHASED YOU LAND AND HOME AND KEEP IT. IN OUR CASE WE BEGAN REPORTING THE UNCOVERED FRAUD SO, WE WERE A PROBLEM. 

LASTLY, THE AUTOMATIC STAY WAS VIOLATED, XXXX XXXX APPEARED TO HAVE FALSIFIED DOCUMENTS USING THE ATTORNEY NAME XXXX XXXX TO REQUEST THE LIFT OF STAY WHILE I WAS IN THE HOSPITAL ON XX/XX/XXXX. AGAIN.I WAS HELD IN THE HOSPITAL INTENTIONALLY IN ORDER FOR THIS ACTION TO TAKE PLACE, WE WERE NEVER NOTIFIED. AGAIN THE ASSIGNED PHYSICAN STATED SHE DID NOT NO WHY THEY WERE DOING THINGS TO GOOD PEOPLE. MY WIFE KNEW EXACTLY WHAT SHE MEANT. A LES PENDENS WAS FILED ON XXXX NT AS WELL, BUT WAS NOT PAID. AGAIN, EVIDENCE WE RECEIVED NO LOAN. 

THE FEDERAL JUDGE ASSIGNED TO THE RICO CASE WAS XXXX XXXX,. WE WERE TOLD BY A CREDITABLE SOURCE SHE WAS INSTRUCTED TO NOT DEAL WITH OUR CASE WHICH WOULD EXPOSE THE XXXX FAMILY, IF SO, HER HUSBAND K, XXXX WHO IS ALSO A JUDGE WOULD NO LONGER SERVE AS JUDGE DUE TO HIS ENGAGMENT IN ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES REGARING CASES AND MORE.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation