Consumer complaint received 2024-03-21 00:00:00
Product: Checking or savings account — Checking account
Issue: Managing an account — Problem using a debit or ATM card
Company: KEYCORP
State: OH

Complaint narrative:
KEYBANK is in cahoots with merchants to deprive XXXX of their liberties under the US Constitution. This is based on the fact that o gave KEYBANK pertinent info that unquestionably showed that XXXX XXXX XXXX had no right to take money from my account fir a repair that paperwork from XXXX own confession proves XXXX lied about me needing to replace struts on XXXX. KEYBANK also violated my liberties to be free of a locksmith who had no legal right to state he programmed a key fob for my XXXX XXXX  lt car on XX/XX/XXXX when paperwork clearly shows according to XXXX, the key fob in question that I bought to be programmed had no electronics on inside which would make XXXX XXXX to program the key fob impossible. The receipts I gave KEYBANK which both issues with XXXX XXXX and locksmith XXXX XXXX involve my XXXX XXXX have never been responded to from big merchants therefore affirming that merchants lack of evidence and guilt by silence to my claims of deception, fraud and unjust withdrawal of my account lean more to both merchants having no standing to get funds from my account especially when XXXX also showed a clear pattern of fraud by forging a document dated XXXX. XXXX service report on XXXX near bottom of page unquestionably shows that XXXX  violated mt right to know my struts were good and didnt warrant replacement based on fact that XXXX never mentioned to the XXXX XXXX XXXX nor the Ohio attorney general that XXXX  stating my struts were good was in error. This is another affirmation that what XXXX did was conceal evidence on XXXX ( service report of XXXX saying my struts were good ) in order to retrieve funds from my account wrongfully. KEYBANK has pertinent info to me being Violated by both merchants but because of the continuance denial of minoritiess liberties including loans and access to fair treatment as a bank client, KEYBANK again chose to hold onto a lie that KEYBANK did nothing wrong when history clearly shows KEYBANK indulges in denying minorities the proper treatment involving banking disputes. KEYBANK also uses its own well known response to clientd complaints that had no individual basis to it at all by stating quote : the transaction was properly processed, however, before the truth can be properly ascertained and confirm to any dispute, no client should lose funds if direct evidence clearly shows the merchant engaged in an unjustified transaction which shows theft, deception, fraud, withholding of facts that are favorable to a bank client. KEYBANK in cahoots with both merchants clearly withheld facts that evidence is more favorable to XXXX XXXX XXXX being taken advantage of by all XXXX parties ( KEYBANK, XXXX XXXX and locksmith XXXX XXXX. KEYBANK made no confession that KEYBANK excluded the fact KEYBANK never obtained any info favorable to both XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX to side with the merchants because a XXXX  was involved which assets XXXX by KEYBANKs denial of XXXX XXXX XXXX liberties under the bill of rights under the right to be informed and the right to properly redress an issue

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation