Consumer complaint received 2019-06-07 00:00:00
Product: Student loan — Federal student loan servicing
Issue: Dealing with your lender or servicer — Received bad information about your loan
Company: Navient Solutions, LLC.
State: FL

Complaint narrative:
As part of my student loan record Navient is listing me as delinquent from XXXX thru XXXX of XXXX. Navient isreporting 90, 120, 150, and 180day delinquencies to the credit bureaus as past due during this  period. Moreover, they allege I owe late fees totaling XXXX XXXX   from these delinquencies. The former isnt possible as there were forbearances in place from XX/XX/XXXX to XX/XX/XXXX ( Sallie Mae ) and from XX/XX/XXXX to XX/XX/XXXX ( Navient ) respectively. Therefore the alleged associated late fees are a fabrication. 

Relevant History On or about XX/XX/XXXX Sallie Mae announced their reorganization and introduced Navient. Knowing I had a forbearance in place that needed to be renewed, I made numerous attempts to contact and register with Navient with no success. There were NO communications from Navient regarding the status of my forbearance, just standardized emails regardless of my many attempts to contact them. In XXXX of XXXX I sent an email to Sallie Mae requesting help, but didnt receive a response. In desperation, I requested help from the Student Assistance Corp, received a response in XXXX of XXXX but unsure I was just walking into another problematic student loan service provider continued to pursue Navient options. 

Navient finally responded to an email that I sent in XXXX of XXXX requesting forms for a deferment, a forbearance renewal, or to apply for an IDR plan. In their response they do mention an IDR option, but their focus is on deferments and forbearances. And their IDR information misrepresents the option and its requirements indicating ; If you meet the federal definition for partial financial hardship, you may qualify for a reduction in your monthly payment under this plan... There is no mention that under an IDR plan the payment could be zero, which is what I needed at the time. Moreover, there is no mention that the IDR option could lead to loan forgiveness. Renewing the forbearance option was pursued, and in XXXX of XXXX Navient sent their Notice of Forbearance Approval. The Forbearance ran from XXXX of XXXX to XXXX of XXXX consecutively from the earlier forbearance. Therefore there couldnt be delinquent payment ( s ) from XXXX to XXXX of XXXX as Navient is reporting to the credit bureaus. This would have been covered by the forbearance or administrative forbearance as indicated in their XX/XX/XXXX email. 

It was through contacting StudentLoans.gov that I learned the real value of an IDR plan. The first IDR plan was applied for, approved, and implemented in XXXX of XXXX. Two years were lost when I could have been on an IDR plan due to Navients negligence and misleading communications. 

In support of my complaint I can send copies of emails to/from the parties confirming my above statements are true. 

P.S. On XXXX a follow up complaint was registered with Navient via email regarding the alleged delinquencies. Typical of Navient ; to date I havent even received an acknowledgement.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation