Consumer complaint received 2018-09-17 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Conventional home mortgage
Issue: Closing on a mortgage — 
Company: JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
State: NV

Complaint narrative:
JP Morgan Chase Bank has maintained and controlled an illegal enterprise ( 18 U.S.C. 1962 ) that has in our case, culminated with the taking of our home by that bank, under circumstances of extortion, attempt to extort and conspiracy. ( 18 U.S.C. 1951 ) The associations in fact consists of private foreclosure facilitating concerns, private counsels, certain judicial members of Federal and State courts, and the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The scheme was carried out through the recordings of documents as liens and encumbrances against our property, with the ulterior purpose to instill and maintain fear of economic harm associated with foreclosure. Then, when the extortion by threat of foreclosure did not work, the association instituted to completion, the foreclosure sale of our home. Complicity of certain judicial officers in the scheme goes back to the year XX/XX/XXXX. By Judgment shown to be void under 12 U.S.C. 1821 ( d ) ( 13 ) ( D ), Chase Bank managed to secure a Judgment declaring its right to payment of our mortgage notes, by litigation falsely identifying itself as the servicer and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as the Note 's owner by virtue of receivership. A determination that under the just cited statute, could not have been adjudged by a Court. Fast forward to what has taken place over the past two years concerning this controversy. On or about XX/XX/XXXX, it was necessary for us to re-appear before the D.C.  Circuit by Petition for an XXXX XXXX rehearing of our appeal. A close reading of the rehearing brief, places in context precisely how Chase Bank carried out the extortion scheme with the full complicity of the FDIC. The rehearing Petition demonstrates precisely how the concerned Federal Judge, carried out a conspiracy with members of the office of the United States Attorney, to obstruct the due adminstration of justice due, on behalf of ourselves, who had submitted and administrative complaint to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. XXXX v. United States of America, XXXX Cir. XXXX. The FDIC is shown by the rehearing Petition to have made a conscious decision not to respond to our claims of conspiracy against the FDIC and associate JP Morgan Chase Bank. The rehearing Petition demonstrates also how the Federal District Judge made an Order that precluded our CIVIL RIGHT to court access to repudiate the FDIC 's failure to respond to our administrative claims. How the District Judge ultimately ratified by an Appeals Panel of the XXXX. Circuit, VIOLATED OUR CIVIL RIGHTS by court actions that covered and concealed the EVIDENCE of FDIC collusion with JP Morgan Chase Bank in the fraudulent taking of our home under guise of a legitimate foreclosure. The gravamen of our consumer claims continue to be against JP Morgan Chase Bank, and the taking of our home, under guise of a valid foreclosure. The Case just concluded but pending on our appeal, is simply the culmination of the association in fact enterprise and the carrying out of the Extortionate scheme, the result of which was the illegal foreclosure of our mortgage Note and the taking of our home. Finally, we have presented the claim to the CFPB several times in the past that was assigned at least three prior case numbers. Persons similarly situated are numbered in the thousands in States all over the United States. JP Morgan Chase Bank simply did not purchase Notes belonging to Washington Mutual Bank from the FDIC when the latter closed Washington Mutual Bank. Our case and the voluminous record made over the years, presents a virtual road map of the Chase Bank extortionate scheme. We can be contacted at XXXX. There is in fact a class action regarding this before the United States District Court in the XXXX  district of New York.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation