Consumer complaint received 2017-06-27 00:00:00
Product: Mortgage — Conventional home mortgage
Issue: Applying for a mortgage or refinancing an existing mortgage — 
Company: UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION
State: WA

Complaint narrative:
Between XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX, a period of over 3 months, a XXXX XXXX XXXX, mortgage originator, XXXX XXXX, handling a conventional cash out mortgage refinancing, undertook that refinancing at XXXX XXXX. During that time XXXX XXXX, NMLS Number XXXX, made repeated intimation that the mortgage application had been sent to processing, was processed, and all that was waiting was an appraisal. We waited over 2 months subject to such intimations for an appraiser to arrive. Thousands of dollars of cosmetic work was done to the property. Late XX/XX/XXXX, it was disclosed that XXXX. XXXX XXXX did not ever send the request for an appraisal. Then, it was subsequently disclosed by a party purporting to be XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX " supervisor, '' a XXXX. XXXX XXXX, NMLS Number XXXX, that XXXX. XXXX XXXX had n't included XXXX XXXX dollars to XXXX XXXX dollars of oil and gas properties owned by the applicant on the mortgage application, all documented assets owned per XXXX 's, leaving the debt to asset ratio affected, complicating the mortgage application. <P/>During the entire time, the DPOA for the applicant, a political person, one of the largest in the jurisdiction in question, XXXX XXXX, and XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, and the applicant 's son, was repeatedly questioned about his business activites, the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX. XXXX XXXX 's own XXXX  XXXX in Montana, or that of her family, along with his associations with the Donald John Trump Leadership Conference and XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, and the XXXX XXXX of the United States. When XXXX. XXXX XXXX 's conduct came to light and her supervisor 's contact information was requested, XXXX. XXXX XXXX texted from her private cell phone " She just really wanted to find a solution '' to bar involving her supervisor. <P/>Then, in XX/XX/XXXX, someone at the bank reversed a mortgage payment for reasons yet to be disclosed by the bank, seemingly aiming to damaging the applicant 's mortgage application from a malicious impulse rooted in political animosity along with general personal animosity. After the matter was brought to the bank 's attention -- That respective matter was reversed curing that immediate matter. <P/>At this time, the bank in the person of XXXX XXXX, is refusing to account for his colleague 's conduct, the bank 's politically motivated subversion of a standard mortgage application, and is refusing to account for millions of dollars of assets, real property oil and gas interest, which do not appear on the application as processed by XXXX XXXX to the bank 's mortgage processing division. <P/>The applicant 's DPOA has been threatened by XXXX XXXX, hung-up on, and suggested to go XXXX himself : XXXX. XXXX XXXX acting to serve the interests of his colleague as opposed to interests of the bank and the bank 's client subject to the legal rights and protections of the bank 's client.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation