Section 482 CrPC it was, inter alia, alleged that no agreement was executed; that appellant intended to let out his Truck parked inside Tata Steel Factory, but, despite payment of advance rent of one month, necessary papers concerning the Truck were not provided, therefore, no agreement was executed; and even if it is taken that agreement 4 Non-bailable Warrant 5 First Information Report Page 3 of 11was executed, no offence punishable under Sections 406 and 420 IPC is made out. 8. While the application under Section 482 CrPC was pending before the High Court, on a police report, cognizance was taken by CJM on 20.02.2020 and processes were issued under Section 204 CrPC. Consequently, respondent nos. 2 and 3 (original accused) sought amendment in their prayer before the High Court so as to include the prayer to quash the cognizance order. 9. The High Court vide impugned order quashed the order of cognizance and all further proceedings in the case concerned while leaving it open to the