(Final shows that D.H. is claiming 1q/4 share in Khasra No.2259. The ¼ share comes to 14 ½ Marlas meaning thereby that whole of Khasra No.2259 is not claimed by the D.H. It is wrong & denied that objector has any right, title or interest in the portion of Khasra No.2259 allotted 5 Annexure P-7 7-SLP(C) 9202-9204 OF 2016to D.H. in partition proceeds through civil court. Moreover Mukand Singh was very much a party to the Civil Court Decree. (ii) Sub Para (ii) is wrong and denied. (iii) Sub Para (iii) is wrong and denied. It is wrong & denied that there was no proper service as alleged of Mukand Singh. Plaintiff filed suit on 11-06-87 which was decreed by way of preliminary decree on 15-10-90. Final decree proceedings initiated on 26-3-91 became final on 4-2-98. The objector has no right, title or interest in the property allotted to D.H. out of Khasra No.2259. (iv) Sub Para (iv) is wrong and denied. Detailed reply has been given above. (v) Sub Para (v) is wrong and denied. Detailed