was filed by the complainant-respondent no.2 stating that aggrieved by the orders dated 14.09.2020 and 15.09.2020 she had preferred CRR No.1357/2020 and CRAN No.1/2020 which is likely to be taken up on 23.09.2020, as such the matter be adjourned for two more weeks. Respondent no.2 further filed an application for offences under Section 354 and 354B of the IPC which required to be added along with existing sections. Once again PWs 1 and 3 were present SLP(Crl.) No.12292 of 2022 Page 6 of 14but the counsel for the complainant again insisted that they are ready to face the cross- examination, however, the application under section 319 CrPC may be disposed of first. 9. The Trial Court recorded their stand that they would not face cross-examination until the application under Section 319 CrPC is decided. The counsel for the accused-appellant was ready to cross-examine but could not proceed as the prosecution witnesses did not agree and continued to insist that the application under section