before the High Court. SUBMISSIONS 6. Mr Rauf Rahim, the learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant, has made submissions on the power of the State Government to impose conditions while granting remission. He submits that the impugned conditions defeat the very object of the grant of remission. He submitted that the word “decently” Criminal Appeal @ Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.6166 of 2023 Page 3 of 17used in condition no.1 is vague. The concept of decency differs from person to person. Therefore, putting such a condition of maintaining decent behaviour is completely violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India being manifestly arbitrary. It is submitted that putting such a condition confers arbitrary power on the State Government to cancel the remission order. Hence, the condition violates Article 21 of the Constitution of India. 7. Regarding condition no.2, the learned senior counsel submitted that even if a false allegation is made against the appellant of