Answer the question from the given passage. Your answer should be directly extracted from the passage, and it should be a single entity, name, or number, not a sentence.

Q: Passage: In particular, this norm gets smaller when a number is multiplied by p, in sharp contrast to the usual absolute value (also referred to as the infinite prime). While completing Q (roughly, filling the gaps) with respect to the absolute value yields the field of real numbers, completing with respect to the p-adic norm |−|p yields the field of p-adic numbers. These are essentially all possible ways to complete Q, by Ostrowski's theorem. Certain arithmetic questions related to Q or more general global fields may be transferred back and forth to the completed (or local) fields. This local-global principle again underlines the importance of primes to number theory. Question: What happens to the norm when a number is multiplied by p?

A: gets smaller
****
Q: Passage: Under the terms of the Scotland Act 1978, an elected assembly would be set up in Edinburgh provided that the majority of the Scottish electorate voted for it in a referendum to be held on 1 March 1979 that represented at least 40% of the total electorate. The 1979 Scottish devolution referendum to establish a devolved Scottish Assembly failed. Although the vote was 51.6% in favour of a Scottish Assembly, this figure did not equal the 40% of the total electorate threshold deemed necessary to pass the measure, as 32.9% of the eligible voting population did not, or had been unable to, vote. Question: Where was an elected assembly to be set up, under the terms of the Scotland Act of 1978?

A: Edinburgh
****
Q: Passage: During the divestment from South Africa movement in the late 1980s, student activists erected a symbolic 'shantytown' on Harvard Yard and blockaded a speech given by South African Vice Consul Duke Kent-Brown. The Harvard Management Company repeatedly refused to divest, stating that 'operating expenses must not be subject to financially unrealistic strictures or carping by the unsophisticated or by special interest groups.' However, the university did eventually reduce its South African holdings by $230 million (out of $400 million) in response to the pressure. Question: When was the divestment from South Africa movement?

A:
late 1980s
****