Legal Document

336 U.S. 804 69 Supreme Court Reporter 840 93 L.Ed. 1052 UNITED STATESv.URBUTEIT. Number 640. On Petition for Certiorari Distributed April 15, 1949. Decided May 2, Mr. Philip baron Perlman, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., petitioner. or Haw. Hawai‘i Reports KFH45 A2 O. Pemberton, Tallahassee, Fla., respondent. PER CURIAM. 1 The question presented by this petition is whether the Appeals followed our mandate on remand cause in 335 355, 112. 2 case when it was here earlier Term appeared following posture: 3 A condemnation proceeding instituted United States under Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 52 Statutes-at-Large 1044, 21 Code KF62 § 334, Annotated KF65 U5 334. Sixteen machines with alleged diagnostic curative capabilities had been shipped interstate commerce. Leaflets describing uses machine at a separate time. Appeals, 164 Reporter, 2nd Series 245, held that shipments d leaflets precluded conclusion accompanied device commerce, therefore transaction outside reach Act. We reversed shipment constituted single interrelated activity. 4 172 386, concluded because there were several advertising matter, not clear which might be considered Therefore, remanded to District determination fact. 5 When before, we decided fact immaterial. controlling factors designed use they so used. Since function purpose their established, nothing more needed show movements Moreover, complicated different persons. One Kelsch recipient both. 6 adhered its former ruling erroneously excluded evidence as therapeutic value machines. before did disturb ruling. But leave consideration further question—whether respects falsity adequate sustain even though error exclusion other conceded. entitled hearing question. 7 certiorari granted judgment reversed. 8 Reversed.

Classification Label: 8