Legal Document

379 U.S. 199 85 Supreme Court Reporter 307 13 United States Reports Lawyer’s Edition 2d Series KF101.8 U54 338 RAILWAY LABOR EXECUTIVES' ASSOCIATION et al.v.UNITED STATES al. Number 130. Dec. 7, 1964. Clarence M. Mulholland, Edward Judge Hickery, Jr., James L. Highsaw, William G. Mahoney and or Haw. Hawai‘i KFH45 A2 King, for appellants. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney Orrick, Philip baron Heymann, Robert Hummel Elliott Moyer, the States. W. Ginnane Leonard S. Goodman, Interstate Commerce Commission. Hugh Graham Claytor, Richard Arnold, Southern Railway company others. PER CURIAM. 1 This appeal is from a judgment of three-judge District Court, 226 F.Supp. 521, dismissing appellants' complaint to set aside orders Commission, 317 I.C.C. 557, 729, relating Company's acquisition control through stock ownership Central Georgia Company. Appellants, representing railway employees, object that under Commission's orders, employees are not protected as provided by §§ 4, 5, 9 Washington Job Protection Agreement. We agree with suggestion this case should be remanded Commission clarification its insofar they relate agreement. For reason, motion affirm denied. The intervenor-appellees Company defer consideration jurisdictional statement Appellants' limit questions related § Agreement granted. vacated it relates Agreement, court instructions remand amend reports necessary deal request included protective conditions, specifically indicating why each these provisions either omitted included. See versus Chicago, M., St. Pacific KF135 P2 & Pac. R. Co., 294 499, 511, 55 462, 467, 79 L.Ed. 1023. 2 Vacated remanded.

Classification Label: 8