Legal Document

350 U.S. 356 76 Supreme Court Reporter 366 100 L.Ed. 395 Victor D. GIBSON, Petitioner,v.LOCKHEED AIRCRAFT SERVICE, Incorporated Number 42. Argued Dec. 5, 6, 1955. Decided Feb. 27, 1956. Rehearing Denied April 9, See 1016, 656. Mr. G. C. Spillers, Jr., Tulsa, Okl., for petitioner. Messrs. Emory Atlantic Cantey, and R. K. Hanger, Fort Worth, Tex., respondent. PER CURIAM. 1 Petitioner Gibson recovered judgment in a personal injuries action against the lockheed Company United States District Court. The of Appeals Fifth Circuit reversed remanded new trial on ground that four instructions requested by Lockheed refused court should have been given. 217 Federal Reporter, 2nd Series 730. We granted certiorari, 349 943, 75 871, 99 1270, to consider following questions: 2 (1) Whether Lockheed's objection court's refusal give its complied with Rule 51 Rules Civil Procedure, 28 Code Annotated KF65 U5 3 (2) charge as respondent was prejudicial error requiring reversal. 4 A thorough consideration record convinces us given both complete correct. Cf. Columbia versus Woodbury, 136 450, 466, 10 990, 996, 34 472. There no refusing instructions. this be case where, exercise our supervisory powers over lower federal courts, interests justice, reinstated. Accordingly, we find it unnecessary question presented 51. 5 Reversed. 6 Justice FRANKFURTER, concurring. 7 controlling claim which petitioner sought certiorari decision disclosed conflict confusion among circuits application Procedure. petition. critical examination 118 decisions relied his regarding me there such confusion. Therefore, reasons set forth Chief Taft behalf Layne & Bowler Corporation Western Well Works, Inc., 261 387, 43 422, 67 712, writ dismissed improvidently even though full argument has had. But my brethren certain rulings involving ordinary questions law negligence, themselves never would warranted granting writ, are so obviously injuriously erroneous, 'as call an power supervision.' This is course one considerations within governing review certiorari. 19(1)(b), N Immigration Nationality Decisions accept their reading therefore join

Classification Label: 0