Legal Document

439 U.S. 461 99 Supreme Court Reporter 710 58 United States Reports Lawyer’s Edition 2d Series KF101.8 U54 736 Vincent X. LEEv.State of MISSOURI. Eugene MINOR versus State William ARRINGTON Herbert BURNFIN Clifford R. COMBS Nos. 77-6066, 77-6068, 77-6553, 77-6701, and 77-7012. Jan. 15, 1979. PER CURIAM. 1 The motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are granted. In each these cases, the trial court denied a timely motion quash petit jury panel. On appeal, convictions were affirmed on basis Duren, 556 South Western Reporter, 2nd 11 (Mo.1977). Lee, 25 (Mo.1977); Minor, 35 Arrington, 559 749 (Mo.1978); Burnfin, 560 283 (Mo.App.1977); Combs, 564 328 (Mo.App.1978). 2 We reversed decision below Duren because inconsistency with principles enunciated Taylor Louisiana, 419 522, 95 692, 42 690 (1975). 357, 664, 579. Missouri has urged that our not be applied retroactively petitioners or appellants other than himself. However, does announce any "new standards" constitutional law evident from considerations have led us cases depart full retroactive application holdings, see, e. g., Stovall Denno, 388 293, 297, 87 1967, 1970, 18 1199 (1967), inapplicable juries sworn after Louisiana. Compare Daniel 420 31, 704, 790 (1975), holding Louisiana which was prior date decision. 3 note case subsequent fair-cross-section claim based exclusion women rejected direct review state collateral proceedings defendant's failure assert fashion, relief is unavailable under 28 Code KF62 § 2254 unless petitioner can show cause having failed raise his properly courts. See Wainwright Sykes, 433 72, 97 2497, 53 594 (1977). 4 petitions certiorari 77-7012 judgments those together Number vacated, remanded reconsideration light Missouri, 5 So ordered. 6 Mr. Justice REHNQUIST dissents.

Classification Label: 0