Legal Document

393 U.S. 83 89 Supreme Court Reporter 60 21 United States Reports Lawyer’s Edition 2d Series KF101.8 U54 215 Velma L. MENGELKOCH et al.v.INDUSTRIAL WELFARE COMMISSION al. Number 375. Oct. 28, 1968. Rehearing Denied Dec. 9, See 993, 443. Marguerite Rawalt, for appellants. Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, and Edward M. Belasco, Jay Linderman William Zessar, Deputy Attys. Gen., appellees. PER CURIAM. 1 A three-judge federal court, convened pursuant to 28 Code KF62 § 2281, determined that 'there is no jurisdiction a court' entered an order dissolving itself. 284 F.Supp. 950, 956. The single district judge in whose court the case was originally filed considered further dismissed without prejudice under doctrine abstention, stating his memorandum opinion '(t)he incorporated this by reference.' 956, 957. Appellants appeal from both judgments. In these circumstances, we have entertain direct decision judge; such possessed only appropriate Appeals. 1291. Moreover, held when, as here, dissolves itself want jurisdiction, lies Appeals not Court. Wilson versus City Port Lavaca, 391 352, 88 1502, 20 636.* 2 Although appellants lodged Ninth Circuit protective judge, it does appear record has been with respect order. Therefore, vacate remand District so timely may be taken supra; Pennsylvania Public Utility commission R. Co., 382 281, 282, 86 423, 15 324. jurisdiction. 3 It ordered. 4 Order vacated remanded; dismissed. * We think makes difference principle Lavaca actually adopted own.

Classification Label: 8