Legal Document

385 U.S. 94 87 Supreme Court Reporter 254 17 United States Reports Lawyer’s Edition 2d Series KF101.8 U54 192 UNITED STATES et al.v.SASKATCHEWAN MINERALS. GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY al. versus SASKATCHEWAN Nos. 525, 526. Nov. 14, 1966. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane, Fritz R. Kahn and Betty Jo Christian, for the others in Number 525. Charles Burkett, Harney Wilson, Arthur Atlantic Arsham Willard Pacific KF135 P2 Scott, appellants Wayne Wright, appellee both cases. PER CURIAM. 1 These appeals are from an amended judgment of a three-judge district court, 253 F.Supp. 504, which set aside order Interstate Commerce Commission dismissing appellee's complaint, 325 I.C.C. 621, remanded case to 'for further proceedings with instructions grant relief' 'in accordance opinion heretofore entered by this court on December 8, 1965, Supplemental Memorandum Decision March 3, 1966.' Accepting District Court's decision Commission's merits, challenge that portion instructs relief precludes reopening receipt additional evidence relevant question whether rates challenged fact unreasonably preferential violation § 3(1) Act, 49 Code KF62 3(1). We agree that, under circumstances present here, restriction is improper limitation duty reconsider entire case. Arrow Transp. company Cincinnati, N.O. & T.P.R. Co., 379 642, 85 610, 13 550. Accordingly, vacated cases enter remanding consistent 1965. It so ordered. 2 Judgment remanded.

Classification Label: 8