Legal Document

362 U.S. 600 80 Supreme Court Reporter 960 4 United States Reports Lawyer’s Edition 2d Series KF101.8 U54 980 Harry NEEDELMAN, petitioner,v.UNITED STATES of America. Number 278. the October Term, 1959. May 16, 1960 Rehearing Denied June 27, 1960. See 363 858, 1606. Herbert Atlantic Warren, Jr., Miami, Fla., for petitioner. Oscar or Haw. Hawai‘i KFH45 A2 Davis, Washington, D. C., respondent. On writ certiorari to Appeals Fifth Circuit. PER CURIAM. 1 After hearing oral argument, and further study record, we conclude that record does not adequately present questions tendered in petition. Accordingly is dismissed as improvidently granted. 2 Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER, whom CLARK HARLAN join. 3 Considering volume cases which invoke Court's discretionary jurisdiction—as today 1,092 such have been passed on during this Term—it would be indeed surprising if each Term there were two three instances petitions which, after passing through preliminary sifting process, did survive scrutiny argument. collected Rice versus Sioux City Cemetery, 349 70, 77-78, 75 614, 99 L.Ed. 897, and, more recently, Triplett Iowa, 357 217, 78 1358, 1361; Joseph Indiana, 359 117, 79 720, 673; Phillips New York, 456, 874. But one them. The specific presented by petition are now found frivolous nor do they raise disputed fact, otherwise appropriately preclude answers In my view call against claims petitioner & N Dec. Immigration Nationality Decisions therefore affirm judgment. disposition case elaboration called for.

Classification Label: 8