Document: 391 U.S. 352 88 S.Ct. 1502 20 L.Ed.2d 636 Willett WILSONv.CITY OF PORT LAVACA, TEXAS et al. No. 1238. Decided May 20, 1968. Wilson, pro se. PER CURIAM. 1 A three-judge federal court, convened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2281, determined that plaintiff's claim was not 'one which must be heard by a court.' 285 F.Supp. 85, 87. It also ruled the relief sought plaintiff warranted. The district judge in whose court case originally filed adopted action of as his own. resulting situation is similar, we think, results when single declines convene and denies relief: an appeal lies appropriate United States Court Appeals, this Court. Schackman v. Arnebergh, 387 427, 87 1622, 18 865. does appear from record protective lodged time do so may have expired. Therefore, vacate judgment below remand District it enter fresh decree timely taken Appeals. Pennsylvania Public Utility Comm. R. Co., 382 281, 282, 86 423, 15 324. 2 ordered. 3 Judgment vacated remanded.

Category: 8