Document: 514 U.S. 476115 S.Ct. 1585131 L.Ed.2d 532 Robert E. RUBIN, Secretary of the Treasury, Petitionerv.COORS BREWING COMPANY, Respondent. No. 93-1631. Supreme Court United States Argued Nov. 30, 1994. Decided April 19, 1995. Syllabus * Because § 5(e)(2) Federal Alcohol Administration Act (FAAA or Act) prohibits beer labels from displaying alcohol content, federal Bureau Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (BATF) rejected respondent brewer's application for approval proposed that disclosed such content. Respondent filed suit relief on ground relevant provisions violated First Amendment's protection commercial speech. The Government argued labeling ban was necessary to suppress threat "strength wars" among brewers, who, without regulation, would seek compete in marketplace based potency their beer. District invalidated ban, Appeals affirmed. Although latter court found Government's interest suppressing "substantial" under test set out Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Serv. Comm'n N.Y., 447 557, 100 2343, 65 341, held violates Amendment because it fails advance a direct material way. Held: Section Pp. __. (a) In scrutinizing regulation speech concerns lawful activity is not misleading, must consider whether governmental asserted support "substantial." If case, also determine directly advances no more extensive than serve interest. Hudson, supra, at 566, S.Ct., 2351. Here, seeks disclose only truthful, verifiable, nonmisleading factual information concerning (b) curbing sufficiently satisfy Hudson. has significant protecting health, safety, welfare its citizens by preventing brewers competing basis strength, which could lead greater alcoholism attendant social costs. Cf. Posadas de Puerto Rico Associates Tourism Co. Rico, 478 328, 106 2968, 2976, 92 266. There reason think strength wars, if they were occur, produce type harm hopes prevent. However, additional "facilitat[ing]" state efforts regulate Twenty-first substantial meet Hudson's requirement. Even possessed authority facilitate powers, offered nothing suggest are need assistance this regard. Edge Broadcasting Co., --- ----, 113 2696, 125 345, distinguished. (c) 205(e)(2) requirement measure government cannot be said wars other FAAA implementing regulations prevent furthering fashion. advertising seem constitute influential weapon any war labels, BATF governing prohibit statements content affirmatively advertisements. permit identification certain beers with high as "malt liquors," require disclosure wines spirits. little chance can materially aim, while same undermine counteract effects. (d) necessary, since available alternatives ban—including limiting beers, prohibiting marketing emphasizing malt liquors, segment market allegedly threatened war—would prove less intrusive protections 2 F.3d 355 (C.A.10 1993), THOMAS, J., delivered opinion Court, REHNQUIST, C.J., O'CONNOR, SCALIA, KENNEDY, SOUTER, GINSBURG, BREYER, JJ., joined. STEVENS, an concurring judgment. Edwin S. Kneedler, Washington, DC, petitioner. Bruce J. Ennis, Jr., respondent. Justice THOMAS Court. 1 1935 We granted certiorari case review Tenth Circuit's holding inconsistent Amendment, we affirm. brews 1987, applied (BATF), agency Department advertisements Act), 49 Stat. 977, 27 U.S.C. 201 et seq., prohibited advertising. then Colorado seeking declaratory judgment Amendment; sought injunctive barring enforcement these provisions. took position 3 sought, but panel Circuit reversed remanded. Adolph Coors Brady, 944 F.2d 1543 (1991). Applying framework 341 (1980), alcoholic 1547-1549. It further held, however, record provided insufficient evidence FAAA's "directly advanced" Id., 1549-1551. remanded proceedings ascertain " 'reasonable fit' existed between goal avoiding wars. 1554. 4 After factfinding, upheld labels. asked invalidation did appeal court's decision sustaining ban. On case's second appeal, affirmed Bentsen, (1993). Following our recent Edenfield Fane, 507 1792, 123 543 (1993), had shown 'challenged [the government's] interests way.' F.3d, 357 (quoting Edenfield, U.S., ---- - 1798). reviewing record, concluded failed demonstrate prohibition way prevented there relationship publication regarding competition 358-359. 5 certiorari, 512 114 2671, 129 807 (1994), Amendment. conclude infringes respondent's freedom speech, therefore II A. 6 Soon after ratification repealed Eighteenth ended Nation's experiment Prohibition, Congress enacted FAAA. statute establishes national rules distribution, production, importation established implement rules. producer, importer, wholesaler, bottler beverages selling, shipping, delivering interstate foreign commerce beverages, distilled spirits, bottles 7 "unless products bottled, packaged, labeled conformity regulations, prescribed respect packaging, marking, branding, size fill container . will provide consumer adequate identity quality products, thereof (except of, likely considered unless required State law except that, wines, shall containing 14 per centum volume), net contents package, manufacturer importer product." (emphasis added). 8 defines 'malt beverage[s]' include all ales. 211(a)(7). 9 Implementing promulgated (under delegation Treasury) CFR 7.26(a) (1994).1 addition numerical indications proscribe descriptive terms "strong," "full strength," "extra "high test," proof," "pre-war oldtime strength." 7.29(f). prohibitions do preclude identifying "low alcohol," "reduced "non-alcoholic," "alcohol-free." Ibid.; see 7.26(b)-(d). By give requires B 10 Both parties agree constitutes Though once does protect Valentine Chrestensen, 316 52, 62 920, 86 L.Ed. 1262 (1942), repudiated Virginia Bd. Pharmacy Citizens Consumer Council, Inc., 425 748, 96 1817, 48 346 (1976). noted free flow "indispensable proper allocation resources enterprise system" informs numerous private decisions drive system. 765, 1827. Indeed, observed "particular consumer's may keen, keener far, his day's most urgent political debate." 763, 1826. 11 Still, Board suggested types restrictions might tolerated area nature See id., 771-772, n. 24, 1830-1831, 24. later gradually articulated 'the "commonsense" distinction proposing transaction, occurs traditionally subject varieties speech.' 562, 2349, (1980) Ohralik Ohio Bar Assn., 436 447, 455-456, 98 1912, 1918-1919, 56 444 (1978)). identified several factors courts should determining survives scrutiny: 12 "For come within Amendment], least concern misleading. Next, ask substantial. both inquiries yield positive answers, asserted, interest." 13 now apply 205(e)(2).2 III lower about Thus, analysis focuses substantiality behind bears acceptable fit goal. A careful consideration indicates 15 identifies two considers justify 205(e)(2)'s First, contends Congress' who customers According Government, restriction prevents particular drinker—one selects beverage potency—from choosing solely view, restricting product characteristic decrease extent consumers select characteristic. 16 counters actually intended achieve far different purpose making inaccurate claims respondent, when passed 1935, have technology levels predictable tolerances—a skill modern producers possess. Further, argues true policy guiding aimed goal, pursue opposite promulgate orders 4.36 (1994) (wines); 5.37 (distilled spirits). 17 Rather wine spirits markets, control monitoring distillers' promotions marketing. quite correctly notes general thrust appears favor information, rather less. This seems trend well. See, e.g., Nutrition Labeling Education 1990, Pub.L. 101-535, 104 2353, amended (requiring food sold display nutritional information). 18 offers plausible reading 205(e)(2), prevention misleading exclusive served 205(e)(2). 266 (1986), Legislature's promoting reducing demand gambling So too here panels heard constituted interest, say conclusion erroneous. 19 attempts bolster arguing curbs "facilitates" Solicitor General directs us 509 345 lottery radio stations located operate lotteries. That involved station North Carolina (a nonlottery state) broadcast primarily into lottery). against challenge part supported Carolina's antigambling unduly interfering sponsored ----. (slip op., 12-15). mirrors information. saves wish trouble enacting own legislation, discourages drinkers crossing lines buy believe stronger. 20 preserving requirements broad suggests assistance. clearly possess ample content—subject, course, Government. Unlike situation Broadcasting, policies some neighboring pursuing alcohol-related respective borders. One State's effectively banning 21 remaining valid "[t]he last steps basically involve 'fit' legislature's ends means chosen accomplish those ends." Posadas, 2977. agree. 22 Just Terms ago, Edenfeld occasion explain factor asserted." decided carries burden showing challenged "in way." 1798. "is satisfied mere speculation conjecture; rather, body sustain harms recites real fact alleviate them degree." 1800. cautioned critical; otherwise, "a ease restrict service objectives themselves expression." Ibid. 23 pointing current developments market. already liquor" market.3 show threatens spread rest directing attention motives bringing litigation. suffers misperceptions contain brands. gains use overcome handicap. 24 Under theory, suppresses assuredly matter "common sense," Brief Petitioner 27, trait. common sense, urges turn history guide. time FAAA, helped war. relieved competitive pressures resulting over long term levels. 25 overall irrationality regulatory scheme. While laws law, contrary 205(f)(2); 7.50 (1994). Like advertising, but, unlike As best advertisements, App. 1a-12a, remain much country. failure makes rational sense government's aim 26 Other similarly bans allows exact disclosures percent alcohol, combatting assume strongest well weakest ones. permits signal through liquor." proscribed various colorful suggesting levels, 7.29(f) manufacturers still distinguish class stronger liquors. indicating higher using terms. mindful appealed constitutionality exemptions inconsistencies bring question labelling To sure, remains But unique puzzling ensures fail end. act 28 explains findings below. present credible promote Court's words, "none witnesses, none depositions I read, heard, lead[s] me giving wars." Pet. Cert. A-38. 359. "[p]rohibiting little, anything, promotes A-36.4 exceptions counteracted effect exerted, surprising find suppressed 29 brief submits anecdotal educated guesses occurring today constrained otherwise burst control. These tidbits, scheme weight record. offer convincing inhibited not, light absence past six decades resulted number factors. 30 Nor litigating positions used proof necessary. wishes disseminate intends Brewers many reasons—only one desire wage war—why beverages. 31 standard, survive scrutiny tailored sufficient "fit" exists applies content—it involving response, alternatives, (which apparently Western nations), availability options, manner rights, IV 32 sum, although market, countervailing defects highlighted test, affirm 33 so ordered. 34 35 persuasive demonstration purported wars," write separately am convinced constitutional infirmity patent indicates. Instead relying formulaic approach announced Elec. justification allowing unusual statute. 36 my "commercial doctrine" unsuited (FAAA) neither nor protects dangers incomplete truthful statement receive full context; special character able merely happens appear label sale. 37 generally right speak speak. McIntyre Elections Comm'n, 115 1511, (1995) 7); Miami Herald Publishing Tornillo, 418 241, 94 2831, 41 730 (1974); cf. Wallace Jaffree, 472 38, 51-52, 105 2479, 2486-2487, (1985). context, permitted protected contexts, (1976), often affirmative speaker make voluntarily.1 before curious blend requirements. requiring vintage wines. former just unacceptable context rationales treating differently Amendment: is, importance deception realm accuracy ascertainable speaker. 38 willing harmful consequences so-called explaining risks associated consumption Such justified ensure led, purchase knew truth them. basis, upholding dissemination message propounded context. 39 continued reliance misguided adopted difficult is. categorically distinct 561-566 5, 2348-2351 5. Defining speech," alternatively, "expression related economic audience," 561, 2348, 'speech transaction,' quoting (1978), much-quoted four-part abridge expression. borders category nearly clear assumed, reasons 579-582, 2358-2360 (STEVENS, judgment). 40 aptly demonstrates artificiality rigid commercial/noncommercial distinction. issue unadorned, accurate statement, bottle beer, contained therein. This, majority finds, ante, __, speech." why words "4.73% volume"2 commercial. Presumably, nonprofit group publish identical "Coors 4.73% volume," cover magazine, "commercial." thus appears, facts "commercial" then, suppose (as ) motivation sell product, tends induce product.3 Yet, impact alone deserving protection, else authors artists works correspondingly disadvantaged. Neither value diminished placement product. Surely piece newsworthy book back book's dust jacket, entitled protection. description identify relate permitting broader regulation: namely, speech's potential mislead. Pharmacy, 1830-1831; Bates, 433 383-384, 97 2708-2709; Bolger Youngs Drug Products Corp., 463 60, 81-83, 103 2875, 2888-2889, 77 469 (1983) judgment); Cincinnati Discovery Network, 1505, 99 (1993) 15) (city's bore protection). false realm, see, Gertz Welch, 323, 2997, 789 New York Times Sullivan, 376 254, 84 710, 686 (1964), expression justifies elsewhere. Stewart explained, 42 "In contrast press, attempt assemble sketchy sometimes conflicting sources pressure deadlines, advertiser knows he verify representations disseminates advertiser's access price substantially eliminates danger chill nondeceptive therefore, sanction 'some falsehood order matters.' 777-778 [96 1833-1834] (Stewart, concurring), [94 3007].4 383, 2708. 43 Not exclude lacks inheres Transaction-driven usually touch public debate, unlikely engender beneficial discourse flows controversy. Moreover, particularly severe: investors lose savings, dangerous work advertised. Finally, place sale, respond reflection minimize being misled. Ohralik, 457-458, 1919-1920 (distinguishing in-person attorney solicitation clients written solicitation). evils immediate transactions, together ability purveyors falsehoods, tolerate 44 informative here. (say, visible specific comparative purposes) case. absent concern, produces. disseminated diminish contrary, subjected stringent content-based abridgment 45 Whatever standard applied, merit whatsoever assertion restraining statutory Any "interest" perceived knowledge anathema better-informed citizenry central goals Free Speech Clause. Accordingly, Constitution skeptical supposed keep people dark what believes good. 769-770, 1829-1830; 374-375, 2704-2705. vagaries speech" doctrine form takes paternalistic seriously. 2-3) dissenting); 358, 2985, (1986) (Brennan, dissenting). 46 opinion, misled uninformed suffice "exacting scrutiny" standard. concerned increases may, take combat problem running afoul Amendment—for example, limit ignorance, expense free-speech rights sellers purchasers. 756-757, 1822-1823. varying strengths lawful, advise stronger—or weaker —than products. 47 unconstitutional because, regardless review, mandates rejection proffered restriction. increase awareness entirely proper, provision blindfold public. concur syllabus been prepared Reporter Decisions convenience reader. Detroit Lumber 200 321, 337, 282, 287, 50 499. suspended 7.26 comply enjoining provision. 58 Fed.Reg. 21228 Pending final disposition interim 7.71 imposes strict adopt instead deferential alcohol. Relying legislatures latitude socially activities, consumption, principle California LaRue, 409 109, 138, 93 390, 407, 342 (1972) (holding nude dancing bars nightclubs liquor). compels craft exception cases analysis. specifically avoided reaching argument muster 7). Rican promotional casino altogether. 346, 2979. reached survived test. 340-344, 2976-2978. raised point response alternative claim Rico's Carey Population Services Int'l, 431 678, 2010, 52 675 (1977), Bigelow Virginia, 421 809, 95 2222, 600 (1975). 345-346, LaRue position. places where served. 114, 395. 'Malt liquor' designate highest Malt liquors represent approximately three market." 355, (CA10 1993). American intend vast taste calories—both adversely affected increased 359; accord, A-37. re R.M.J., 455 191, 201, 102 929, 936, 71 64 (1982) ("a warning disclaimer appropriately dissipate possibility confusion deception"), citing Bates Arizona, 350, 375, 2691, 2704, 53 810 (1977); 1333 "Surgeon General's Warning" cigarettes); 343 (1988 ed. Supp. V) (setting products); 352 drug 77e registration selling securities). 4.73 figure comes "independent laboratory analysis" cited advertisement. 65. inducement rationale publication, newsrack, learn Stewart's reasoning scholarly criticism, surrounding transaction readily easily verifiable Farber, Commercial Theory, 74 Nw.U.L.Rev. 372, 385-386 (1979). extend every instance expression, theory good rule. Most time, seller representing prediction know correct hand, purveyor (though concededly always) observer poor truth. paradigm example phenomenon journalist rely confidential

Category: 2