Document: 517 U.S. 748116 S.Ct. 1737135 L.Ed.2d 36 LOVINGv.UNITED STATESCertiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for Armed Forces. No. 94-1966. Supreme Syllabus * Argued January 9, 1996 Decided June 3, A general court-martial found petitioner Loving, an Army private, guilty both premeditated murder and felony under Article 118 Uniform Code Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U. S. C. Section(s) 918(1), (4). Finding three aggravating factors-(1) that was committed during a robbery, Rule Courts-Martial (RCM) murder, had second also proved at his single trial, RCM 1004(c)(7)(J)-the sentenced Loving death. The commander who convened approved findings sentence. Review Forces affirmed, rejecting Loving's attack on promulgation by Executive Order factors in 1004. He contends Eighth Amendment separation-of-powers doctrine require Congress, not President, make fundamental policy determination respecting warrant death penalty. Held: 1. On assumption Furman v. Georgia, 408 238, subsequent cases apply this crime sentence, Constitution requires challenges. Under Amendment, military capital sentencing scheme must genuinely narrow class persons eligible penalty reasonably justify imposition more severe sentence accused compared others see, e.g., Lowenfield Phelps, 484 231, 244. That narrowing is achieved statute. authorizes but two four types therein specified, (4), whereas intentional without premeditation resulting from wanton dangerous conduct are punishable death, 918(2), (3). Moreover, 118(4) its terms permits even if no intent kill did do killing himself. Because does permit be imposed those circumstances, Enmund Florida, 458 782, 801, additional establishing higher culpability necessary 118's constitutional validity, Lowenfield, supra, Pp. 5-6. 2. President's prescription challenged violate principle. 6-25. (a) precept delegation doctrine, strand Court's jurisprudence, lawmaking function belongs Const., Art. I, 1, may conveyed another branch or entity, Field Clark, 143 649, 692. This principle mean, however, only Congress can rule prospective force. Although it delegate power law, which necessarily involves discretion as what law shall be, authority execute pursuance terms. Id., 693-694. 6-10. (b) rejects argument lacks President prescribe cases. An analysis English history historical necessities events instructed Framers demonstrates 8, cl. 14-which empowers "[t]o Rules Government Regulation land naval forces"-does grant exclusive, nondelegable determine punishments, gives such flexibility exercise share times might demand. And would contrary respect owed Commander Chief hold he given wide authority. Thus, circumstances presented here, define statutory penalty, with regulations providing death-eligible requires. 10-19. (c) Also rejected contention that, factors, so implicit explicit action instance. In fact, exercised 1950, when enacted Articles 18, 56, 36(a) UCMJ, 818 (A "may, limitations prescribe, adjudge any punishment forbidden [the UCMJ], including specifically authorized"), 856 ("The direct . exceed limits offense"), 836(a) (which procedural rules courtsmartial, identified 1985 source Presidential provide factors). Together, these give clear promulgate 20-22. (d) final assertion-that construed delegations, they lack intelligible guide discretion-is rejected. Had delegations here called judgment lies beyond traditional authority, have weight. However, because duties him take responsible continuing superintend military, courts-martial, delegated duty interlinked already assigned Constitution's express same where entity exercising possesses independent over subject matter. See, Mazurie, 419 544, 556-557. 22-25. 41 M. J. 213, affirmed. Kennedy, J., delivered opinion Court, Rehnquist, Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer, JJ., joined, all Part IV-A O'Connor Scalia, joined. filed concurring opinion, part judgment, O'Connor, Thomas, judgment. Kennedy Court. 1 case before us concerns our system separated powers, impose upon member armed forces convicted murder. I. 2 December 12, 1988, Dwight private stationed Fort Hood, Texas, murdered taxicab drivers nearby town Killeen. attempted third, driver disarmed escaped. Civilian authorities arrested next afternoon. confessed. 3 After eight-member of, among other offenses, phase factors: (1) course 1004(c)(7)(B); (2) acted triggerman first driver, proven Cf. 860. (formerly (CMA)) relying Curtis, 32 252 (CMA), cert. denied, 502 952 (1991), reject claims lacked enabled We granted certiorari. 515 ___ (1995). II. 4 American courts-martial their inception decree punishment, long try members peacetime. early days Republic powers were fixed War. 1789 adopting full promulgated 1775 (and revised 1776) Continental Congress. Act Sept. 29, 1789, ch. 25, 4, Stat. 96. (Congress reenacted 1790 "as far applicable constitution States," Apr. 30, 1790, 10, 13, 121). adopted First placed significant restrictions jurisdiction offenses. authorized 14 War 1776, reprinted W. Winthrop, Law Precedents 961 (reprint 2d ed. 1920) (hereinafter Winthrop); Allred, Comment, Rocks Shoals Sea Otherwise Deep Commitment: General Court-Martial Size Voting Requirements, 35 Nav. L. Rev. 153, 156-158 (1986), followed British example ensuring supremacy civil court ordinary crimes special 1776 Articles, Winthrop 964 (requiring commanders, application, exert utmost effort turn offender authorities). 1765, 11, 937 (same). provision deemed protection enough soldiers, 1806 debated proposal remove jurisdiction. Wiener, Bill Rights: Original Practice 72 Harv. 20-21 (1958). 5 Over centuries, expanded 1863, concerned courts could places hostilities, common-law wartime. Mar. 12 736, 1342, 58 (1875); Coleman Tennessee, 97 509, 514 (1879). 1916, felonies service members, except rape within continental 418, Arts. 92-93, 39 664. Persons latter turned civilian authorities. 74, 662. passage lifted restriction. UCMJ describes jurisdiction, death: 6 "Any person chapter who, justification excuse, unlawfully kills human being, he- 7 "(1) has design kill; 8 "(2) intends inflict great bodily harm; "(3) engaged act inherently evinces disregard life; 9 "(4) perpetration burglary, sodomy, rape, aggravated arson; "is suffer direct, clause imprisonment life direct." 918. 11 So matters stood until 1983, CMA confronted challenge constitutionality light 238 (1972), ensuing jurisprudence. held valid most procedures one defect: failure either "specifically identify relied choosing penalty." Matthews, 16 354, 379. reversed Matthews' ruled remedy defect new applied retroactively. 380-382. responded Matthews 1984 promulgating conformity 852(a)(1), Rule, amended, unanimous finding offense imposed, 1004(a)(2). least factor present extenuating mitigating substantially outweighed admissible 1004(b). 1004(c) enumerates categories sufficient provides "broad latitude evidence extenuation mitigation," 1004(b)(3), entitled consider deciding 1004(b)(6). 13 attacks unconstitutional. separation III. preliminary question whether contest application jurisprudence context conviction peacetime States, we assume question. Trop Dulles, 356 86 (1958) (analyzing punishments Amendment). requires, things, "a `genuinely defendant murder.'" 244 (1988) (quoting Zant Stephens, 462 862, 877 (1983)). Some schemes accomplish requiring sentencer find circumstance. Ibid. achieved, definition offense, circumstance requirement "find existence addition constitutionally required process." 246. 15 suggests contrary, Brief n. 6, agree applies case, validity capital-punishment now enacted. specified: not, statute's selection way consistent circumstances. 801 (1982). As result, save 118. violated Amendment. IV. Even birth country, known defense against tyranny. Montesquieu, Spirit Laws 151-152 (T. Nugent trans. 1949); Blackstone, Commentaries *146-*147, *269-*270. Though faithful freedom imperiled whole legislative, executive, judicial hands, Federalist 47, pp. 325-326 (J. Madison) Cooke 1961), understood "hermetic sealing off branches preclude establishment Nation capable governing itself effectively," Buckley Valeo, 424 120-121 (1976) (per curiam). 17 "While diffuses better secure liberty, contemplates practice will integrate dispersed into workable government. It enjoins separateness interdependence, autonomy reciprocity." Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. Sawyer, 343 579, 635 (1952) (Jackson, concurring). 18 "`d[oes] mean [three] departments ought partial agency in, controul acts each other,'" Mistretta 488 361, 380-381 (1989) (emphasis deleted)), remains basic intrude central prerogatives another. See Plaut Spendthrift Farms, ___, (1995) (slip op., 14-15) revise determinations retroactive legislation reopening judgments); Bowsher Synar, 478 714, 726 (1986) executive officers impeachment); INS Chadha, 919, 954-955 (1983) enact laws bicameral presentment bill President); Klein, Wall. 128, 147 (1872) deprive based outcome undo pardon). arrogate itself, moreover, impair performance duties. 397-408 (examining statute participation III judges Sentencing Commission threatened integrity Judicial Branch); Nixon Administrator Services, 433 425, 445 (1977) control papers disrupted functioning Executive). 19 Deterrence arbitrary tyrannical sole reason dispersing federal branches, however. <I><B>By allocating specific responsibilities fitted </B></I>the task, created National effective accountable. I's precise representation, qualifications, bicameralism, voting procedure responsive deliberative lawmaking. 951. Ill suited task Presidency, designed prompt execution own legitimate Judiciary, tenure electoral control. assignment branch, furthermore, allows citizen know answer making, delicate decisions essential governance. 20 Another developed prevent forsaking invokes entity. 692 (1892). To burden rulemaking divert pressing issues, defeat Framers' Government. Thomas Jefferson observed, "Nothing embarrassing nor mischievous assembly details execution." Works 319 (P. Ford 1904) (Letter E. Carrington, Aug. 1787). A. Schechter Poultry Corp. 295 495, 529-530 (1935) (recognizing "the necessity adapting complex conditions involving host national legislature cannot deal directly"). established ago permitted some itself. Wayman Southard, Wheat. 42 (1825). 21 "`The true distinction between conferring execution, law. done; objection made.'" Field, 693-694, quoting Cincinnati, Z. R. Commissioners Clinton County, Ohio St. 77, 88-89 (1852). 22 1004 observe doctrine. presses fronts. First, argues Second, can, action. Third, believes certain provisions discretion. Were premises accepted, 1004, 23 allow inconsistent decision vest "To forces." 14. At crimes, implicates contends. view, quintessential legislature, England America refutes interpretation. asserts tried throughout history. exclusion urges, inform understanding Clause reserves warrants authorize crimes. Petitioner 42-43; Navy-Marine Corps Appellate Defense Division Amicus Curiae 7-12, 19-26. Mindful dangers autocratic justice Parliament set Mutiny Act, Wm. Mary, (1689), having experienced excesses Crown colonial America, harbored deep distrust tribunals. Reid Covert, 354 23-24 (1957) (plurality); Lee Madigan, 358 228, 232 (1959). follows, says, intended alone should possess decide 24 undertaken before, resolving difficult interpreting drawing Reid, 23-30; O'Callahan Parker, 395 258, 268-272 (1969) (determining service-connected crimes); Solorio 483 435, 442-446 (1987) (overruling taking issue analysis). Doing although there grain truth arguments, struggle tribunals lessons drew than suggests. read granting punishments. If anything, appears security divided ceding fixing From experience balancing efficient discipline, popular standing army, rights soldiers; perceived risks inherent assigning government another; knew parliamentary delegation. choice 25 after Norman Conquest, matter royal prerogative. rudiments seen written orders issued King various expeditions. 17-18. For example, 1190 Richard I ordinance outlining six offenses crusaders subject, "Whoever slay man ship-board, bound dead thrown sea. buried earth." Ordinance I-A.D. 1190, id., 903. comprehensive articles war declared II Durham 1385 Henry V Mantes 1419, decreed served discipline protected foreign noncombatants ravages war. T. Meron, Henry's Wars Shakespeare's Laws: Perspectives Later Middle Ages 91-93 (1993). War, sometimes commanders acting commission 19, codes, through 17th century; rather, "each war, expedition, edict," lost force cessation hostilities disbanding army been formed. Pipon Collier, Manual (3d rev. 1863). 26 ordinances governed common countenance enforcement peace "when king's [were] open receive according land." Blackstone's *413. Hale, History Common 25-27 (C. Gray 1971) (describing efforts limit Courts Constable Marshal). 27 "The made soldiers civilians time peace. All subjects alike courts, `if life-guardsman deserted, sued breach contract, struck officer liable indictment battery.'" 26, 44 Campbell, Lives Justices 91 (1849)). 28 Macaulay, 272 Macaulay). 29 triumph absolute, political disorders century ushered periods harsh justice, rebels punished, put summary decrees courts-martial. Clode, Administration Martial 20-42 Clode). Petition Right 1627, Car. (protesting abuses). brought 1689, William Mary accepted Rights Parliament's consent raising keeping armies. "noe Man forejudged Life Limbe subjected kinde Martiall manner then Judgment Peeres knowne Established Realme," "Soldiers stirr up Sedition desert Their Majestyes Service Exemplary speedy Punishment usuall Forms allow," "shall Death Court-Martiall Inflicted." 5. 30 sense, wants suggest, sparing since serious domestic capital, militia exempted. Solorio, 442. misunderstands arguing bespeaks solicitude desire exclude punishment. 31 name suggests, came heels mutiny Scottish troops loyal James Macaulay 45-49. occurred watershed time. Menaced come grudging recognition decried instrument despotism, maintained soil. cast high relief polity bad. sentiment time: "There regular and, indispensable, efficiency, every class, kept strict discipline. ill disciplined [is] formidable country paid defend. strong line demarcation therefore drawn rest community. sake public freedom, must, midst despotic rule. They sharper penal code, stringent code procedure, administered tribunals." 50. 33 then, measure leniency soldiers. With passage, severer predecessors Prerogative Crown. displacing Tribunals hitherto governed, gave sanction infliction Capital Punishments offences rather Political Military, rarely punished authority." Clode 9-10. Duke Vogel, Standing Army: Problem Jurisdiction, Vand. 443, 40 (1960) (noting 1662 1686 prohibited costing limb). Indeed, later tempered wielding stipulating remained prerogative) sentences sent revision approval. 34 Popular suspicion persisted, 253-273, 393, Acts months year, 51-53. But renewed again, alter century. withdrew altogether 1713, Anne, regret absence rebellion 1715, 49. third 1715 soldier array related disorder troop And, short 18th century, allowed invest criminal home, placing substantive penalties imposed; 1718, superior courts. 52-53. propriety kingdom questioned, withdrawn 1749. 53. Nevertheless, continued adjust scope entrusted broad punish abroad. Crown's longstanding issuing limiting kind "erect constitute Power hear Crime Offence Penalties Sentence Judgement Her Majesties Dominions Seas elsewhere (except Kingdom Ireland) done Authority Time War." 43; 20. 444 1803 well). S., 442 (discussing 1774 soldiers). contends, explained elsewhere, well history, encountered firsthand abuses colonies. 27-28. many themselves veterans Revolutionary imperatives What distrusted per se, dispensed unchecked proceedings lawless. evil caused Blackstone declare "martial law" -- he, observing modern martial meant disciplining wartime built settled principles, entirely decisions, [and] is, Sir Matthew Hale observes, reality something indulged law." England, 26-27; (military seventeenth amounted right destroy, legal assumed delinquent"). Englishmen won abuse 1689 Parliament, preeminent guardian constitution, primacy fact legislature's exclusive. Acts, designate deserved death; devise received concomitant responsibility prudent exercise. lesson primary regulate inconsistent, further divide warrant. Far attempting replicate system, course, Federal avoid thought latent inevitable structure. experience, though, familiar them purpose meaning provisions. observed consult elected "freeze usage particular time" ages following, 446, services governance words Alexander Hamilton, forces, like defense, 37 "without limitation: impossible foresee extent variety exigencies, corresponding means satisfy them. endanger safety nations infinite, shackles wisely care committed. coextensive possible combinations circumstances; direction councils, appointed preside defence." Federalist, 23, omitted). 38 later-added limited degree, cf. Burns Wilson, 346 137, 140 (1953) (plurality opinion); Chappell Wallace, 296, 300 (1983), allocation "primary servicemen needs military," 447-448. 14, exercises precedence over, Eliason, Pet. 291, 301 (1842) establish undoubted"). less plenary 441, discern reasons why capacity measured appropriate other, see Skinner Mid-America Pipeline Co., 490 212, 220-221 taxing power); Lichter 334 742, 778 (1948) (general "[a] implies effect purposes") deleted). precedent tradition limitation power, highest deference ordering affairs. Rostker Goldberg, 453 57, 64-65 (1981). decline import restrictive nondelegation left out. There absolute rule, Congress' upheld whereby defines regulation criminal, makes violation fixes "confin[e] field covered statute." Grimaud, 220 506, 518 (1911). Touby 500 160 (1991). supply notice defendants Kraus Bros., Inc. 327 614, 622 (1946). too problem colossal size, bases instances small societies unto themselves. confident protections 450-451 extend period service). commit court-martial. nothing traditions prohibit delegating proper implementation Chief. B. Having delegation, 56 UCMJ. specifies "[t]he offense." 856. states by" Code. 818. pointed out decades used increase noncapital present. regulation, deserters apprehended severely surrender; drunk harsher fate cause accident victim; thieves graded value stolen goods. 261. thus provided precision statute, while remaining bounds. past support restrict murders established. 43 yet indicative congressional President. provides: "Pretrial, post-trial procedures, modes proof, [courts martial] prescribed shall, considers practicable, principles generally recognized trial district chapter." 836(a). 45 language seems afield factors. 1985, 106(a) 906a, espionage. "[a]ny section 836 title (article 36)." 906(a)(c)(4). 106a premised "`[s]ubsequent declaring earlier weight construction.'" Consumer Product Safety Comm'n GTE Sylvania, Inc., 447 102, 118, (1980), Red Lion Broadcasting FCC, 367, (1969). Whether stand 36, together 46 points need eliminating followed. (Slight amendments relevant here.) argues, giving bring otherwise invalid strictures. Perhaps so, somehow prior become thereafter, 5-6, resided 1950. 47 suffice say announced "lay down legislative body [act] directed conform." Hampton, Jr., 276 394, 409 (1928); Touby, 165. intelligible-principle seeks enforce policies implement statutes. 1935 principle, Schecter 495 (1935), Panama Refining Ryan, 293 388 upheld, exception, standards phrased sweeping 190, 216-217, 225-226 (1943) (upholding Communications radio broadcasting "public interest, convenience, necessity"). last failed guiding fault, case. 48 discerned 36: namely, directive prescribes "apply chapter," think, asked telling how select guidance needed, nature boundaries exceed. role newly area. Mistretta, 374-379 detailed directives channeling discretion). Chief, duty, Constitution, "where matter," 556-557 (1975). Curtiss-Wright Export Corp., 299 304, 319-322 (1936). Swaim 165 553, 557-558 (1897) (President convene courts-martial). Like Appeals, 263, Once office undoubted competency guidance. constitutes specialized community separate civilian," Orloff Willoughby, 345 83, 94 (1953), best preserve 49 hard deem lawless subject. Republic, authorization intervene 1806, 65, 976, 982. contradictory empower courtsmartial Specific contributes towards principled uniform regimes case-by-case intervention, greater opportunity oversight revision. 50 Separation-of-powers vindicated, disserved, cooperation Government, contributing lawful objective processes. respects precepts, lawful, 51 ordered. 52 djq whom Breyer join, concurring. 53 Scalia correctly out, tribunal offense. Post, important add observation petitioner's victim active retired serviceman ride barracks night killing. facts, appear appropriately raised holding 435 (1987), extended reach "service connection" change effected 451 (Stevens, judgment). 54 obtain Solorio's review materials seem undermine tribunal's non-capital ones. 442-446. substantial because, ensure men women serving civilians. 55 consequence my conclusion satisfied join issue, disposition joining thereby accept </B></I>proposition Nor understand so. question, explained, decided. joins, 57 IV thereof subparts B discussion features prominently Congress's view irrelevant. sure, ample looking sort today. surveyed permissible classes (1987); (1959); 23-27 Parker Levy, 417 733, 745 (1974). assert establishes nature, historically incapable adjudicating His arguments different: "aggravating factors" carry (we assume) sentence; perform function, statutes relies. 59 consideration profits sharing throne. Mary's acceptance Rights, enactment ante, 13-16, presumably occurrences students unwritten constitution. Our trace history; provides, straightforward fashion, forces," notes, forth implementing pursuant power. extraordinary simply infer tasks clearly extensive. 60 drafting seeking England; indeed, plan writing ways different replaced. acknowledges this, 17, nonetheless goes treat form determining 14's leave aside. While true, demonstrates, conforms practices, conformity, seemed good arrangement well. 61 point conceptualization, portions opinions refer "unconstitutional authority" versus "lawful authority," category exist. Legislative nondelegable. "delegate" committees. assign Executive; undertakes acts, agent People. extensive unconstrained power; excess reached exists, "lawful" all. 62 63 me prosecution cases, proof prosecutions 300-302 never held, Schick Reed, 256, 260 (1974).1 am raises surely claim afforded entitled. 64 majority, conclude prevails assume, deciding, context. abundant affairs uphold resort nonmilitary "delegation doctrine" reaching conclusion. write separately explain position outside 65 Forces, unique military's mission, unparalleled degree military. "[I]t business armies navies fight ready wars occasion arise," ex rel. Toth Quarles, 350 (1955), competence advancing core Gilligan Morgan, 413 (1973). "differentiate society society," concluded "to legislate breadth prescribing former latter." 756 heightened extends virtue Const, II, 2, shared Schlesinger Ballard, 498, 510 (1975) attend th[e] [of fighting preparing wars] rests President") (citations Brown Glines, 348, 360 (1980) ("Both character accord dealing affect internal morale. construing touches matters, therefore, careful `circumscribe Congress'") similar reviewing created, unassailable. 66 point, majority's division regard 10-17, relevance frequently content provisions, majority fails cite structure governmental erected Constitution. evidence, debates, Papers, source, sought embrace, actively considered, basis conducting inquiry does, willing analysis. Instead, repeatedly substitutes ipse dixit evidence. ("From delegation" power"); ("the history"); Framers] provisions"). doubt versed simplistic purposes draw conclusions about author-ity mere speculation familiarity significance attached it. syllabus prepared Reporter Decisions convenience reader. Detroit Lumber 200 321, 337. applicability progeny surprisingly exempt byzantine administration

Category: 1