Document: 393 U.S. 79 89 S.Ct. 233 21 L.Ed.2d 61 CONTINENTAL OIL CO.v.UNITED STATES. No. 206. Supreme Court of the United States October 21, 1968 David T. Searls, Harry M. Reasoner and Lloyd F. Thanhouser, for appellant. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney Zimmerman Lawrence W. Somerville, States. PER CURIAM. 1 Being convinced on record before us that Malco Refineries, Inc., was not a 'failing company,' v. Third National Bank, 390 171, 183, 88 882, 19 1015 (1968); International Shoe Co. FTC, 280 291, 50 89, 74 L.Ed. 431 (1930), otherwise supports decree, Pabst Brewing Co., 384 546, 86 1665, 16 765 (1966), we affirm judgment District Court. 2 Mr. Justice HARLAN, believing this case involves issues fact law which should be decided without plenary consideration, would note probable jurisdiction set argument. 3 MARSHALL took no part in consideration or decision case.

Category: 7