Document: 362 U.S. 600 80 S.Ct. 960 4 L.Ed.2d 980 Harry NEEDELMAN, petitioner,v.UNITED STATES of America. No. 278. Supreme Court the United States October Term, 1959. May 16, 1960 Rehearing Denied June 27, 1960. See 363 858, 1606. Herbert A. Warren, Jr., Miami, Fla., for petitioner. Oscar H. Davis, Washington, D. C., respondent. On writ certiorari to Appeals Fifth Circuit. PER CURIAM. 1 After hearing oral argument, and further study record, we conclude that record does not adequately present questions tendered in petition. Accordingly is dismissed as improvidently granted. 2 Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER, whom CLARK HARLAN join. 3 Considering volume cases which invoke Court's discretionary jurisdiction—as today 1,092 such have been passed on during this Term—it would be indeed surprising if each Term there were two or three instances petitions which, after passing through preliminary sifting process, did survive scrutiny argument. collected Rice v. Sioux City Cemetery, 349 70, 77-78, 75 614, 99 L.Ed. 897, and, more recently, Triplett Iowa, 357 217, 78 1358, 1361; Joseph Indiana, 359 117, 79 720, 673; Phillips New York, 456, 874. But one them. The specific presented by petition are now found frivolous nor do they raise disputed fact, otherwise appropriately preclude answers In my view call against claims petitioner I therefore affirm judgment. disposition case elaboration called for.

Category: 8