Document: 522 U.S. 446118 S. Ct. 903139 L. Ed. 2d 892 LORENZO ARTEAGA v.UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT; ARTEAGA, PETITIONER v.PETE WILSON, GOVERNOR CALIFORNIA, ET AL No. 97-6749 SUPREME UNITED February 23, 1998, Decided ON MOTION LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS PER CURIAM. 1 Pro se petitioner Lorenzo Arteaga seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis file a petition for writ of certiorari the Ninth Circuit. The Circuit affirmed District Court's dismissal with prejudice petitioner's complaint failure amend his complaints pursuant instructions. 2 We deny pauperis. He is allowed until March 16, within which pay docketing fee required by Rule 38 and submit compliance 33.1. For reasons discussed below, we also direct Clerk Court not accept any further petitions noncriminal matters from unless he first pays submits 3 Petitioner has filed 20 this Court, 16 past two Terms. All have been denied without recorded dissent. In 1997, invoked 39.8 status. v. California, 118 42, 139 9 (1997). nevertheless another frivolous Court. supplemental petition, appears assert that an innocent person falsely imprisoned allege numerous constitutional violations conspiracies among prison, court, government officials. does address dismissal. 4 Accordingly, enter order barring prospective filings cases Martin Columbia Appeals, 506 1, 121 305, 113 397 (1992). 5 It so ordered. 6 JUSTICE STEVENS, dissenting. 7 previously stated, see 4, (1992), cited, I respectfully

Category: 1