Document: 510 U.S. 4 IN RE SASSOWER No. 92-8933. Supreme Court of United States. Decided October 12, 1993.* In the three years prior to this Term, pro se petitioner Sassower had filed 11 petitions. However, in last four months, he has suddenly increased his filings and now 10 petitions pending before Court, all them patently frivolous. Held: is denied leave proceed forma pauperis instant cases, pursuant Court's Rule 39.8, Clerk directed not accept any further for certiorari nor extraordinary writs from him noncriminal matters, unless pays required docketing fee submits petition compliance with 33. For important reasons discussed Martin v. District Columbia Appeals, 506 U. S. 1, re Sindram, 498 177, McDonald, 489 180, feels compelled enter order, which will allow devote its limited resources claims petitioners who, unlike Sassower, have abused process. Motions denied. ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED FORMA PAUPERIS PER CURIAM. 1 Pro George requests under 39 Court. We deny request 39.8. allowed until November 2, 1993, within pay fees by 38 submit explained below, we also direct matters 2 Prior over years. Although was granted status file these petitions, were without recorded dissent.* During filings. He currently Court—all 3 previously think it appropriate an order (1992). both 177 (1991) (per curiam), 180 (1989) entered orders similar one having petitioners' motions Martin, feel today barring prospective Sassower. Sassower's abuse writ been so limit our sanction accordingly. The therefore prevent petitioning challenge criminal sanctions might be imposed on him. however, who 5 It ordered. 6 JUSTICE THOMAS GINSBURG took no part consideration or decision motion 93-5252. Notes: * Together 92-8934,Sassower Mead Data Central Inc. et al., 92-9228, Crites 93-5045, Kriendler & Relkin 93-5127, Feltman 93-5128, Puccini Clothes 93-5129, A. R. Fuels, Inc., 93-5252, Reno, 93-5358, Abrams, Attorney General New York, 93-5596, pauperis. SeeSassower 499 966 (certiorari); 935 (mandamus/prohibition); Mahoney, 1108 (1991); 904 1081 (habeas corpus); States Appeals D. C. Cir., 1094 Brieant, Thornburgh, 1036 Dillon, 493 979 (certiorari).

Category: 1