Document: 391 U.S. 308 88 S.Ct. 1601 20 L.Ed.2d 603 AMALGAMATED FOOD EMPLOYEES UNION LOCAL 590 et al., Petitioners,v.LOGAN VALLEY PLAZA, INC., al. No. 478. Argued March 14, 1968. Decided May 20, Bernard Dunau, Washington, D.C., for petitioners. Robert Lewis, New York City, respondents. Mr. Justice MARSHALL delivered the opinion of Court. 1 This case presents question whether peaceful picketing a business enterprise located within shopping center can be enjoined on ground that it constitutes an unconsented invasion property rights owners land which is situated. We granted certiorari to consider petitioners' contentions decisions state courts enjoining their as trespass are violative under First and Fourteenth Amendments United States Constitution. 389 911, 240, 19 258 (1967).1 reverse. 2 Logan Valley Plaza, Inc. (Logan), one two respondents herein, owns large, newly developed complex, known Mall, near City Altoona, Pennsylvania. The situated at intersection Plank Road, east center, Good's Lane, south. also Route 220, heavily traveled highway along traffic moves fairly high rate speed. There five entrance roads into three from Road Lane. Aside these entrances, totally separated adjoining by earthen berms. berms 15 feet wide Lane 12 Road. 3 At time events in this case, Mall was occupied businesses, Weis Markets, (Weis), other respondent Sears, Roebuck Co. (Sears), although enterprises were then expected have since moved center. operates supermarket Sears both department store automobile service consists enclosed building, open but covered porch front approximately five-foot-wide parcel pickup zone runs 30 40 porch. functions sidewalk building used temporary parking place loading purchases customers' cars employees. 4 Between extensive macadam lots with spaces driveways lined off thereon. These areas, retains title, provide common facilities all businesses distance across entrances 350 400 500 feet. Plant farthest main whole regularly customers Weis. nearest almost exclusively patrons station leads directly. 5 On December 8, 1965, opened business, employing wholly nonunion staff A few days after posted sign exterior its prohibiting trespassing or soliciting anyone than employees lot. 17, members Amalgamated Food Employees Union, Local 590, began They carried signs stating market not 'receiving union wages benefits.' pickets did include any Weis, rather competitors continued until 27, during number varied between four 13 averaged around six. out entirely area portion lot immediately adjacent thereto. Although some congestion occurred, such sporadic infrequent.2 times unaccompanied either threats violence. 6 instituted action equity Court Common Pleas Blair County, court issued ex parte order petitioners3 from, inter alia, '(p)icketing upon * (Weis) storeroom, pick-up (and) (Logan) exits leading said area.'4 effect require beside public outside Picketing and, addition, handbills asking patronize because distributed, while petitioners contested validity injunction. After evidentiary hearing, resulted establishment facts set forth above, indefinitely original injunction without modification.5 7 That explicitly rejected claim Amendment they entitled picket confines contention suit primary jurisdiction NLRB. trial judge held justified protect respondents' unlawfully aimed coercing compel join union. appeal Pennsylvania Supreme Court, Justices dissenting, affirmed issuance sole conduct constituted property.6 8 start premise location generally is, absent factors involving purpose manner picketing, protected Amendment. Thornhill v. State Alabama, 310 88, 60 736, 84 L.Ed. 1093 (1940); AFL Swing, 312 321, 61 568, 85 855 (1941); Bakery Pastry Drivers Helpers, 802 Wohl, 315 769, 62 816, 86 1178 (1942); Chauffeurs, Teamsters Helpers Union 795 Newell, 356 341, 78 779, 809 (1958). To sure, has noted involves elements speech conduct, i.e., patrolling, indicated intermingling unprotected elements, subjected controls would constitutionally permissible pure speech. See, e.g., Hughes Superior California Contra Costa 339 460, 70 718, 94 985 (1950); International Brotherhood 695 Vogt, Inc., 354 284, 77 1166, 1347 (1957); Cox Louisiana, 379 559, 476, 487 (1965); Cameron Johnson, 390 611, 1335, 182. Nevertheless, no decided found support proposition nonspeech aspects so great render provisions inapplicable altogether. 9 majority cases relied respondents, blanket prohibition instances States, involved been directed illegal end, Giboney Empire Storage & Ice Co., 336 490, 69 684, 93 834 (1949); Building Service 262 Gazzam, 532, 784, 1045 10 Ass'n Journeymen, Plumbers Steamfitters Graham, 345 192, 73 585, 97 946 (1953), decision employer which, itself legal, could validly required left employer's free choice, Carpenters Joiners America, 213 Ritter's Cafe, 722, 807, 1143 (1942) (secondary boycott); Teamsters, Warehousemen 309 Hanke, 470, 773, 995 (1950) (self-employer shop). Compare NLRB Denver Bldg. Const. Trades Council, 341 675, 71 943, 95 1284 (1951), Electrical Workers, 501 NLRB, 694, 954, 1299 (1951). Those applicable here turned on, location. In specifically disavowed reliance finding unlawful alternatively based injunction.7 It emphasize discouraging patronizing market. However, those way independent basis previously cannot prohibited conducted persons whose discourage patronage business. (1941). (1942). Rather, merely supported court's demonstrating took consent, against will, 11 squarely presents, therefore, Pennsylvania's valid rules private applied circumstances bar premises. clear if premises privately owned instead municipality, large extent resemble, barred exercising there title municipality. Lovell Griffin, 303 444, 58 666, 82 949 (1938); Hague CIO, 307 496, 59 83 1423 (1939); Schneider Jersey, 147, 146, 155 Jamison Texas, 318 413, 63 669, 87 869 (1943). essence opinions streets, sidewalks, parks, similar places historically associated exercise access them denied broadly absolutely. fact Lovell, Schneider, concerned handbilling immaterial far solely right expression views. Handbilling, like speech, namely, physical presence person distributing leaflets municipal property. If standing alone, insufficient entry onto printed matter, likewise carrying informational placard. While patrolling may constitute interference use greater produced handbilling, converse true. Obviously, walking slowly back holding placards less obstructive of, example, numerous milling handing leaflets. regulated does mean publicly simply recourse traditional concepts law concerning incidents ownership real held, Marsh 326 501, 66 276, 90 265 (1946), may, least purposes, treated though held. Marsh, appellant, Jehovah's Witness, had undertaken distribute religious literature district Chickasaw, Alabama. so-called company town, Gulf Shipbuilding Corporation. 'The residential buildings, system sewers, sewage disposal plant 'business block' (T)he residents block regular do so, now, many years, make company-owned paved street alongside fronts enter leave stores post office. Intersecting each end lead four-lane parallel thirty nothing stop coming arrival traveler available there. short town accessible freely general distinguish except belongs corporation.' U.S., 502—503, 277. 14 corporation notices solicitation kind written permission permitted. Appellant told she must permit her her. When declared rule utilized prevent constitutional Amendment, ordered Chickasaw. She refused arrested violating Alabama's criminal statute. reversing conviction statute, appellant sought ejected justify infringement appellant's occasioned thereby. Likewise herself resident considered material. similarities present striking. perimeter little 1.1 miles. Inside mall situated, trial, substantial commercial others soon follow.8 Immediately roads, directly mall. Adjoining buildings middle sidewalks pedestrians going building. roadways vehicular entering leaving clearly marked out. unrestricted functional equivalent Chickasaw Marsh. 16 true that, unlike own surrounding services therefore. Presumably, canvass neighborhood message about status Market, just permitted Thus, situation power part community serves district. fact, however, determinative. precise issue presented therein right, pass district, showing made corporate owner distribution areas town. probable claimed encompassed incursion specific purposes. 17 see reason why should required, same functioning limited district' ownership. Here provided movement equivalents streets normal So determined, distinction practice stand, who contrary wishes prevented doing. 18 Such be, course, traditionally And well gives various rights, laws Pennsylvania, limit All we decide 'and people passing through,' 508, 279, delegate power, through laws, exclude wishing consonant actually put.9 hold behest State, reasonable regulations governing Certainly very co-extensive powers possessed municipalities, recognized control Thus where ordinarily public, See Adderley Florida, 385 39, 242, 149 (1966). Even generally, put State. upheld statute 'in obstruct unreasonably interfere ingress egress county courthouses.' 616, 1338. near' 'with intent interfering with, obstructing, impeding administration justice.' (1965). will unduly equal it. desiring parade city secure authorities able amount regulating time, place, parade. Hampshire, 569, 762, 1049 Poulos 395, 760, 1105 (1953). Kovacs Cooper, 77, 448, 513 (1949) (use sound trucks making 'loud raucous noises' prohibited). 21 none case. Because 'picketing trespassing' absolutely premises, occasion lot.10 Likewise, furnishes below virtually here. Respondents seek defend obtained characterizing requirement regulation suppression Accepting arguendo characterization, remains, regulation. 22 Petitioners' away store. appears, vehicle run. bearing communicate read whom indecipherable—where already mall—or prospective reader moving car via ways cut placed danger being forced walk constantly rates speed varying moderate high. task automobiles vastly (and more hazardous) pedestrians.11 Finally, take renders difficult only.12 23 therefore restraints approved substantially hinder communication ideas express activity rendered effective particularly compelling light absence showing, thereon, accompanying significantly public.13 As observed earlier, mere accompanied suppressed guise conduct. perfectly object. Yet stated years ago, '(O)ne his liberty appropriate abridged plea exercised place.' 163, 151 (1939). 24 justification offered effectiveness promulgate views absolute prohibit consent. person's home, meaningful protection privacy advanced Nor significant operation raised. Naked essentially issue. 25 economic development last reinforces our correctness approach taken largescale country's population cities suburbs advent suburban typically cluster individual retail units single tract. estimated 1966 10,000 11,000 centers Canada, accounting 37% total sales countries.14 26 figures illustrate consequences workers seeking challenge substandard working conditions, consumers protesting shoddy overpriced merchandise, minority groups nondiscriminatory hiring policies have. Business downtown subject on-the-spot criticism practices, largely immunize themselves creating cordon sanitaire stores. Neither precedent nor policy compels result variance goal heart 27 Therefore, sufficiency petitioners, repeat what 506, 278, 'Ownership always dominion. owner, advantage, opens up general, become circumscribed statutory it.' purposes manner.15 28 judgment reversed remanded further proceedings inconsistent opinion. ordered. 29 DOUGLAS, concurring. walkways different one's home dedicated degree 'company town' 265, uses. 'public' attracting facilitating delivery merchandise. regard labor conditions Supermarket related Why avoid incidence name 'private property'? me not, when respecting 31 plus, plus implicate matters. Hence latter regulated. 776 777, 819—820, (concurring opinion); 464—465, 720—721, 985; 536—537, 786—787, 1045. picketers employees, deliverymen, proper. banished berms, several hundred target criticism. But property' sanctuary excluded espouse. covers acres small. surely capable fashioning decree ensure noninterference enabling assemble sufficiently close Weis' rights. 32 BLACK, dissenting. 33 I accept factual background Court's opinion, think important focus taking place. following extract 'Findings Fact':1 34 '(7) 35 '(a) small men women wearing walked supermarket, (emphasis added); 36 '(b) occasional above described added)'; 37 Respondent owner-occupant picketed, contructed store, porch, zone. including 38 Anyone familiar operations modern-day knows importance 'pick-up zone' frequently bags groceries bought loaded conveniently cars. phenomenon combined widespread refrigeration purchase quantities trip occurrence country. line trend furnish adequate instances, extra assist typical type provided: wide, length, bold double yellow lines; words 'Parcel Pick-Up' letters Testimony showed 'strictly come pick parcels purchased. drive particular area, (Weis employees) duty.' 39 seems me, customary supermarkets now operate, zones much inside counters select goods check-out bagging sections paid for. conceive how zone, even wildest stretching S.Ct ever pickets. first section recognizes only protecting separately enjoins from: plaintiff Store 40, area.' 41 language indicates still regulate property,2 sufficient. declare unequivocally Section (a) lower cannot, picketing.3 sensible allow stand counters, thus wish pay goods, approve interferes least, severable really since, admits, '(t)he thereto.' 42 go further, entire valid.4 With exception mentioned (composed now) improved putting shops thereon customers. Now contend Logan's refuse asked, keep affirms contentions. them, believe likes Constitution supports concept Fifth provides '(n)o shall deprived life, liberty, property, due process law; use, compensation.' means another try convert means, think, arrogate act Government's agent give award compensation taken. 43 affirming relies supra, holds transformed never intended apply situation. dealt special complete alleys stores, residences, everything else goes 'is Corporation characteristics American situated.' 502, Again toward emphasized 'the function differently town.' 279. fair say rested practical town; attributes exactly find resemblance homes, plant, office considers 'town.'5 Indeed, issued, supposed conceded 'commercial establishments.' remainder laid individually sounds strange 'town' me. 44 problem trying draw too analogy faces dilemma possible authority treating admittedly does. concedes therefor.' crucial, according majority, petitioner concludes given respectfully suggest reasoning completely misreads begs question. Under public? answer 'residential features present, sufficient confiscate owner's want 45 allowing here, invited center's statement sense. Of course implicit invitation wanted park Is together aside owners? compelled supply create court-made disregarding rests such. 834; California, 985. speak refusal hire labor, 487; 149; 46 For reasons dissent. 47 HARLAN, 48 argue reversal separate grounds: first, injunctive kind; second, strayed sphere initial reserved federal National Labor Relations Board. available, second 'pre-emption' plainly preferable decision. pre-emption invoke Constitution's Supremacy Clause, interpretation itself, necessary Zschernig Miller, 429, 443, 444—445, 664, 672—673, 683 (opinion writer concurring result). Dependence assure disrupt scheme established Congress, point return. 49 merits, ante, 310—312, past decisions1 claim. examination record reluctantly conclusion precluded reaching merits failure raise review issues discretionary jurisdictional. 1257 Title 28, defines jurisdiction, states: 50 'Final judgments decrees highest had, reviewed (b)y writ certiorari, privilege immunity specially Constitution, treaties statutes States.' 51 Since advert issue,2 determine 'specially claimed' meaning § 1257. deciding question, relevant usually ask satisfied presentation issues. Beck 369 541, 549—554, 955, 959 963, 98; Wolfe North Carolina, 364 177, 195, 80 1482, 1492, 1650; John Paullin, 231 583, 178, 179, 381.3 Rule provides: 52 (appellant's) questions separately, briefest most terms *. mandatory, admitting exception; necessarily suggested involved.' 53 consistently points prescribed rule, regarded abandoned waived.4 refer possibility pre-emption,5 mention either. Washington defendant failed comply argument entertained unbroken precedent. E.g., Ferguson Georgia, 365 570, 572, 81 756, 783 (1961); Capital Dairy Ohio, 183 238, 248, 120, 171 (1902).' 553—554, 962.6 am led conclude pre-emption.7 54 Turning decide. controversy arose union's efforts achieve goals picketing. properly before us, notice Congress enacted detailed legislation, U.S.C. 158(b)(7)(C), administrative agency resolve disputes instance. deemed fashion doctrine intolerably disruptive interpreted courts. Garner Chauffeurs 776, 346 485, 490—491, 74 161, 165—166, 98 228; San Diego Millmen's 2020 Garmon, 359 236, 242—245, 79 778 780, 775. objection applies resolution resort rigid field attempted strike delicate balance competing forces, know settled Congress' chosen instrument, considerable effect. discretion reach issue, dismiss improvidently granted. disposition unfair bring us own. 55 WHITE, 56 unions normally occurs variety public. businessman pickets' he circumstances; Government behalf, obstruction, violence, justification, forbids official abridgment 57 state-created municipality effectively context ordinary stood shoes attempting used. starkly different. BLACK shows, Plaza collection sense parts occupants powers. maintain establishments shop products sold. lot, adjunct shopping. No elsewhere work. lanes auto thoroughfares another. parades, meetings, activities convenient get another, purpose. nevertheless uses others; neither designed communicative activities. shop, fronted area. streets. bounded sidewalk. rationale, nonobstructive communciative matter not. Nonobstructive political campaigning, protests government policies—the apparently Valley's connection whatsoever Plaza's businesses. Furthermore, my Brother correct saying actual quietly marching back. might 'shopping centers' Any invites interested products. fearful today license carry long obstructive. agree him impliedly dedicates well. bars interferences reach. ran devolved functions. 'streets' streets; travel point, parking, Easter parades. shown thought national Commerce Clause implement enforce quite proceeds, Petitioners (1) exclusive Board, Meat Cutters Butcher Workmen America 427 Fairlawn Meats, 353 604, 613 (1957), (2) herein 'concerted activit(y) mutual aid protection' Act, amended, Stat. 452, 157. contention. portions challenged. n. 4, infra. addition officials local engaged blocking using violence customers, suppliers physically performance duties. appears subsequent violation provisions. directs '—- inserted blank space limitation imposed. need concern ourselves characterized permanent temporary. remain modification indication affecting presently forthcoming future, upholding final 438 Construction General Laborers' Curry, 371 542, 531, 514 (1963). preemption brief accordingly, appear passed them. Needless say, illegal, presented. Hotel 255 Sax Enterprises, 358 270, 273, 289 (1959). informed Market conveyed operated. are, called could, put. supra; supra. injunction, accomplish precisely involve handbills, notwithstanding provision seem encompass leaflets, Similarly relates occurred prior reject notion prohibits reading broader required. operative limiting construction cited contempt violated plain whatever relationship previous be. reveals prepared enjoin requested. Given suggestion untenable. treat obviously extends conceivably charged conducting secondary boycott down situs 761, Electrical, Radio Machine Workers 366 667, 1285, 592 (1961). Moreover, went towards preventing interference. Kaylin, Profile Shopping Center Industry, Chain Age, 1966, 17. reached conclusions centers. Schwartz-Torrance Investment Corp. Confectionery 31, Cal.2d 766, Cal.Rptr. 233, 394 P.2d 921 (1964), cert. denied, 380 906, 888, 794 Moreland Retail Wis.2d 499, 114 N.W.2d 876 (1962). Clothing Wonderland Center, 370 Mich. 547, 122 785 (1963) (affirming four-to-four Amendment). dated February unreported. contains statement: 'Because lot.' Ante, 321. ignores designated easily divisible. 141 seq., I. My declaration Amendments. importantly (a), violates 3, deputy Mobile County Sheriff, company, served town's policeman. 546—548, 534—536, 514; 289; Youngdahl Rainfair 355 131, 139, 206, 211, 151; Babcock Wilcox 351 105, 112—114, 76 679, 684—685, 100 975; Stowe Spinning 226, 229—232, 542—544, 638; cf. 24—25, 606, 613. Marshall Field N.L.R.B. 93, enforced modified sub nom. Cir., 200 F.2d 375, 380. Where ruled proper raising disappears. Raley 360 423, 436, 1257, 1265, 1344; Whitney People 274 357, 361, 641, 642—643, 1095; Manhattan Life Ins. Cohen, 234 123, 134, 874, 877, 1245. despite State's afford opportunity hearing see, Central Tel. Edwardsville, 269 190, 194—195, 90, 91, 229, discriminatory evade claim, Hartford 249 493, 336, 337, 722. allegation Dunmore McMillan, 396 Pa. 472, 152 A.2d 708; Kuhns Brugger, 331, 135 68 A.L.R.2d 761; Kerr O'Donovan, 614, 134 213. was: 'Did err granting Preliminary Injunction tenants appellant-union peacefully picketed tenant's center; tenants; inform dispute?' Parker Illinois, 333 571, 708, 92 886; CIO McAdory, 325 477, 65 1395, 1398, 89 1741. below, 'subject jurisdiction.' implied Seaboard Air Line R. Daniel, 118, 122—123, 426, 428—429, 580, unable perceive nature affect contained

Category: 2