Document: 441 U.S. 380 99 S.Ct. 1760 60 L.Ed.2d 297 Abdiel CABAN, Appellant,v.Kazim MOHAMMED and Maria Mohammed. No. 77-6431. Argued Nov. 6, 1978. Decided April 24, 1979. Syllabus Appellant appellee Mohammed lived together out of wedlock for several years in New York City, during which time two children were born. Appellant, who was identified as the father on birth certificates, contributed to children's support. After couple separated, took married her present husband (also an appellee). During next appellant frequently saw or otherwise maintained contact with children. Appellees subsequently petitioned adoption children, filed a cross-petition. The Surrogate granted appellees' petition under § 111 Domestic Relations Law, permits unwed mother, but not father, block their child simply by withholding consent. Rejecting appellant's contention that is unconstitutional, state appellate courts affirmed basis In re Malpica-Orsini, 36 N.Y.2d 568, 370 N.Y.S.2d 511, 331 N.E.2d 486. case Court Appeals held furthered interests illegitimate whom often best course, reasoning people wishing adopt born would be discouraged if natural could prevent merely his Moreover, court suggested consent required, adoptions jeopardized because unavailability. Held: 1. Contrary contention, it clear treats unmarried parents differently according sex. section's requirement no mere formality, since Courts have question whether required entirely separate from consideration child. this very case, impermissible absent Maria's consent, whereas prevented only he show such interests. Pp. 387-388. 2. sex-based distinction between mothers fathers violates Equal Protection Clause Fourteenth Amendment bears substantial relation any important interest. 388-394. (a) Maternal paternal roles are invariably different importance. Even class closer than newborn infants, generalization concerning parent-child relations become less acceptable support legislative distinctions child's age increased. P. 389. (b) Unwed more likely oppose mothers. 391-392. (c) special difficulties locating identifying at warranted newborns, need persist past infancy; those instances where, unlike has participated rearing child, nothing precludes State him privilege vetoing 392-393. 43 708, 401 208, 372 42, reversed. Robert H. Silk, appellant. Morris Schulslaper, Brooklyn, N.Y., appellees. Irwin M. Strum, Asst. Atty. Gen., Attorney General York, amicus curiae, leave Court. Mr. Justice POWELL delivered opinion 1 appellant, Caban, challenges constitutionality Law (McKinney 1977), adopted mother stepfather without We find statute makes rights been shown substantially related 2 * Caban City September 1968 until end 1973. represented themselves being wife, although they never legally married. Indeed, 1974 another woman, separated. While living gave children: David Andrew July 16, 1969, Denise March 12, 1971. each certificate, Together Mohammed, family. 3 December 1973, left take up residence Kazim she January 30, 1974. For nine months, weekend visit Delores Gonzales, one floor above Caban. Because friendship able see week when came grandmother. 4 1974, Gonzales native Puerto Rico. At Mohammeds' request, grandmother her. According appellees, planned join Rico soon had saved enough money start business there. stay grandmother, Mrs. kept touch mail; communicated through parents, also resided November 1975, went Rico, where willingly surrendered understanding returned after few days. however, When learned Caban's custody, attempted retrieve them aid police officer. attempt failed, appellees instituted custody proceedings Family Court, placed temporary Mohammeds new Nina, visiting rights. 5 1976, 110 Denise.1 March, Cabans cross-petitioned adoption. stayed suit pending outcome proceedings, hearing cross before Assistant Kings County, N.Y. hearing, both counsel permitted cross-examine witnesses. 6 thereby cutting off all parental obligations.2 opinion, noted limited right law proceedings: "Although putative father's legal necessity, entitled opportunity heard opposition proposed adoption." stated foreclosed adopting Denise, withheld Thus, considered evidence presented insofar reflected upon qualifications prospective parents. found well qualified petition. 7 Supreme Appellate Division, affirmed. It constitutional challenge Appeals' decision 486 (1975), appeal dism'd want federal sub nom. Orsini v. Blasi, 423 1042, 96 765, 46 642 (1976). C. 56 A.D.2d 627, 391 846 (1977). dismissed memorandum based supra. A. C., 42 8 On presses claims. First, argues drawn other Amendment. Second, contends Court's Quilloin Walcott, 434 246, 98 549, 54 511 (1978), recognized due process maintain relationship finding unfit parents.3 II 9 Section N.Y.Dom.Rel.Law 1977) provides part 10 "CONSENT TO ADOPTION SHALL BE REQUIRED AS FOLLOWS: . surviving parent, adult infant, wedlock; [and] Of wedlock. ." 11 unnecessary, certain cases, including parent abandoned relinquished adjudicated incompetent care child.4 Absent these circumstances, authority similar control over fate even substantial—as case. He may termination showing permit petitioning couple. 12 Despite plain wording statute, argue treated formal requirement, lacking substance, unnecessary whenever always determine contend fathers, subject same standard. 13 Appellees' interpretation finds law. contrary, unequivocally child.5 Surrogate's Appeals, assumption there distinctive difference Adoption absence Accordingly, sex.6 III 14 Gender-based "must serve governmental objectives must achievement objectives" order withstand judicial scrutiny Clause. Craig Boren, 429 190, 197, 97 451, 457, 50 397 See Reed Reed, 404 71, 92 251, 30 225 (1971). us, therefore, some assert justified fundamental maternal relations—that "a does." Tr. Oral Arg. 41. 15 contrary argument apparent presumption underlying 111, demonstrates fully comparable mother. family years. As members family, children.7 There reason believe aged proceedings—had unrivaled affection concern father. reject, claim broad, gender-based universal every phase development. 16 alternative justification State's interest promoting Although history sparse,8 legislature's purpose enacting furthering course.9 concluded: 17 "require , them, overall effect denying homes homeless depriving innocent blessings cruel undeserved out-of-wedlock stigma continue its visitations. least, worthy severely impeded." N.Y.2d, 572, N.Y.S.2d, 516, N.E.2d, 489. 18 reasoned so far suggest "[m]arriages reluctance husbands involve situation might foster mother's offspring." Id., 573, 517, 490. Finally, fathers' place, many delayed eliminated altogether, unavailability father.10 19 providing well-being one. do require into families will give stability normal, two-parent home. remove suffer. But unquestioned further desirable ends legislation itself sufficient justify 111. Rather, relevant cases applying structured reasonably ends. we repeated U.S., 76, S.Ct., 254, statutory "classification 'must reasonable, arbitrary, rest ground having fair object legislation, persons similarly circumstanced shall alike.' Royster Guano Co. Virginia, 253 412, 415, [40 560, 561, 64 L.Ed. 989] (1920)." 20 illustrated does bear adoptive that, given opportunity, This impediment usually result shared genders alike; manifestation profound Neither nor argued mothers; self-evident why be. 21 supra, requiring pose strong impossible locate brought, remain attendant newborns,11 infancy. older sought, proceeding can protected means draw inflexible made 111.12 come forward participate now stands surrogate proceed whose child.13 See, e. g., Orlando F., 40 103, 386 64, 351 711 this, established admitted paternity,14 should difficulty wedlock.15 treatment afforded proclaimed 22 sum, example "overbroad generalizations" classifications. Califano Goldfarb, 430 199, 211, 1021, 1029, 51 270 (1977); Stanton Stanton, 421 7, 14-15, 95 1373, 1377-1378, 688 (1975). York's classification discriminate against identity known manifested significant facts illustrate harshness classifying exercise concerned judgment excludes loving full participation and, time, enables alienated arbitrarily cut fathers. conclude undifferentiated applicable circumstances theirs issue, asserted interests.16 23 24 Reversed. 25 STEWART, dissenting. 26 reasons expressed dissenting STEVENS, I agree 111(1)(c) constitutionally infirm. welfare greater importance suggest. Unlike begin life formidable handicaps. They typically depend economic parent—usually And, era changing mores, still face obstacles illegitimate. perhaps most generally available way removing Clark, 177 (1968). Most significantly, legitimate—a fact today barely acknowledges. 27 reflects facilitate ameliorative change status, ordinarily chosen indispensable. A choice defy common sense. lawful custodian consent.* denied proceeding. His terminated determines These represent, think, careful accommodation competing stake close goal my view, Constitution requires more. 28 granting grant discriminating gender. And withholds substantive classes Due Process latter troublesome Brother ultimate merit former. 29 relies primarily Stanley Illinois, 405 645, 1208, 31 551, advancing second above. obvious principle offended Illinois invalidated employed stark absolute fit parent. Upon death declared wards Stanley's removed demonstration Custody taken stranger State—the then transferred strangers. Stanley, three period years, object. purported promote served. Here, sharp contrast, alive, married, voluntarily initiated accorded unconstitutionally Stanley. coextensive legitimate setting, tie valid distinction. withhold power veto reflect benefit legitimacy 32 assumed divorce relationship, cf. Smith Organization Foster Families, 431 816, 862-863, 2094, 2119, 53 (opinion concurring judgment), follows right. Parental spring full-blown biological connection relationships enduring. carries sense clear. validity claims gauged measures. By tradition, primary measure familial creates marriage definition, us arise place. actual suffice create Cf. here wishes conflict, served resolution favor seems me appropriately place limit whatever exist virtue B 33 equal protection substantial. Gender, like race, highly visible immutable characteristic historically touchstone pervasive subtle discrimination. analogy race perfect inquiry therefore somewhat different, classifications deserve examination operate perpetuate mythical stereotyped assumptions about proper relative capabilities men women unrelated inherent differences sexes. Orr Orr, 440 268, 1102, 59 306. Sex-based settings invidious relegate person set aside group attribute cannot change. 225; 688; Frontiero Richardson, 411 677, 93 1764, 583; Weinberger Wiesenfeld, 420 636, 1225, 514; Such laws defended, bulk fill books, generalizations true majority class, ring false work discrimination individual invidious. Nonetheless, invalid. situated area covered question, violated. Schlesinger Ballard, 419 498, 610. San Antonio Independent School Dist. Rodriguez, 1, 59, 1278, 1310, (concurring opinion). 34 falls category. With respect large adoptions—those infants—unwed situated, STEVENS demonstrated. Our precisely vast unknown, unavailable, uninterested. 176-177 (1968); Krause, Illegitimacy: Social Policy 29-32 custodial preference carried correlative so. 35 States incorporated basic common-law rules statutes requisite Note, Va.L.Rev. 517 (1973); Comment, 70 Mich.L.Rev. 1581 (1972). physical reality gives undeniable social identifiable child—until unless intervenes. marrying total point view. understand pragmatic differences. ante, 392. An plainly mother's. clearly basis, view violate unwilling unidentified instead thus deserving consequently discriminates gender lightly dismissed. post, 412-413, believe, applied 37 remembered two, stake: mother's, father's, children's. Concerns humane practical abundantly provision though already legitimate. If Viewed terms then, select apply rule constitutes 38 powerful instance observed, sex-neutral rule—assuming free child—the same. Implicit well-being—a obligated accept. 39 That permit—in context—the thwart caring invalidate statute—to involved—has indeed fairly classification. Unless defective, nobody argued, sufficiently overcome invidiously discriminated male. retroactive application untold harm, subscribe Part STEVENS' dissent. 41 THE CHIEF JUSTICE REHNQUIST join, Under mother; "lawful custody." n. 4. noncustodial school-age wedlock,1 allows Appellant's objection unconsented-to proof unfitness component Secondarily, attacks 111(1)(c)'s disparate violation disposition, discuss commenting contention. indicate think holding erroneous, effect. concerns affecting status thousands day.2 All acquiring legitimacy; great opportunities denied; necessities stake. facilitating appropriate strong—perhaps "compelling."3 44 Nevertheless, draws gender-based4 citizens impartial government, necessary provide treating differently.5 determination recognizing society traditionally differently.6 analysis goes beyond reflexive rejection distinctions. 45 Men exclusive infants young children,7 outset focus significance cases. Both equally responsible conception wedlock.8 pregnancy infancy, male female impact destiny. Only child; decide not.9 knows sired within fact, pregnancy, person. marry partner, born, know "rights" affected. hand, agrees latter's actions positive partner negative, likelihood lessened. 47 immediately thereafter. period, together;10 certainty. present; unknown world uncertain mother.11 make probable infant.12 48 short, virtually inevitable infancy constantly faced decisions how much confronted problems. doubt parties voice sort decision.13 matter analysis, perfectly wedlock, differential process. 49 particularly, infant sole charge anyway, maximum flexibility deciding incentive mother,14 adverse disinterested facilitates public streamlining traumatic allowing prompt, complete, reliable integration satisfactory home feasible.15 Put simply, interested burdening attractiveness potential destroyed. conclusion borne considering kind explain either's unobtainable,16 unquestionably complicate delay importantly, freedom own behalf relieving unshakable responsibility Furthermore, questions relating adequacy notice invade privacy,17 cause reliability add expense what simple process.18 irrational costs incurred protect nevertheless costs, largely establish imposing sexes type situation. disagree; confines hand involving previously admits paternity. Ante, conclude, drown suspect burden holds disadvantaged rule. indeterminately small whole, 393, invalid applies subclass. disagree. 52 assume, surely must, characteristics possessed "gender-based distinction," 389, not, rise impartiality embodied violated.19 undisputed frequent application—cases mothers, nn. supra —we presume challenger demonstrate unjust applications numerous serious render showing; unfairness, assuming one, extends himself implication number just him. Further, while did inform size subclass degree disadvantage 111(1)(c), concluded insignificant comparison benefits stands.20 general appears arbitrary isolated invalidating entire rule.21 Nor, indeed, concluding hard principles.22 test conformance equality reference exceptional 55 am sure viewed solely light presently involves dispute veto, requires, neither If, distinction, prevail court.23 Whether wise devise wants record knowing disputes "has [is willing admit] paternity," steps relationship. inclined relatively rare. valid, surer situations, more, only, constitute hindrance amply normal application, party challenging unfairness situations attributed "stereotyped reaction" unquestionably, justifiably, 57 issue troublesome,24 briefly reject it. 58 assume develops,25 action 651, 1212, 551.26 decided official caprice,27 indicated decree terminates mistreated id., 652, 1213. least unit destroyed, deprive child—and State—of legitimation.28 policy, standing alone insufficient sever bonds developed avoids recesses reason, judge accept legislator. risk arguments advances dissent broader reading appropriate. especially grave embarking course threatens interfere arrangements use long periods time. consider currently embarked potentially serious, regard quite narrow. decrees entered millions. financial reliance decrees. crossed frontier today's decision, foreclose ruling. Chevron Oil Huson, 97, 106-107, 349, 355-356, 296. Families include security. 61 Nor affect processing future adoptions. unusual unconstitutional grounds necessarily eliminate action. procedure followed mothers—whether jointly agencies adoption, unaffected reasoning. read enforced usual "the sought," 392, paternity." 393. legislatures promptly revise comply prepared construe existing contain "in this," ibid., enter countless routine amended.29 62 typical tiny fraction rewritten. disagreement small, confident wisdom judges forestall widespread harm. 63 respectfully part: "An minor wife either spouse." Anonymous Adoption, Misc. 683, 595 (Surr.Ct.1941). 117 provides, part, "After making relieved duties toward responsibilities property descent succession, except hereinafter stated." exception rule, "When remarried consents stepmother relieve consenting duty spouse inherit kindred addition, 117(2) distribution parents' will. procedural 551 Surrogate, amended 1975 N.Y.Laws, chs. 246 704, provided: "Subject limitations forth follows: "1. fourteen age, discretion dispenses consent; "2. "3. "4. authorized agency "The provisions services guardian appointed section hundred eighty-four deprived civil insane judicially mentally retarded defined Mental Hygiene adjudged habitual drunkard account cruelty neglect, pursuant permanently neglected six eleven act York; manner direct thereon orders. Notwithstanding law, name seeking purposes section, insubstantial infrequent contacts itself, preclude "Where eighteen specified subdivisions subdivision four moral temporal promoted obtained. once lawfully readopted directly prescribe." Corey L. Martin L., 383, 391, 408 439, 442, 266, (1978): "Absent first abandonment decisional bring someone else rear fashion .. Abandonment, pertains relates conduct evinces purposeful ridding obligations foregoing rights—a interest, presence, affection, such, ingredient involved threshold question. promotion essential approval substitute abandonment." (Citations omitted.) dissents speculate obtain 395, 23. ruled. 111(4) giving guardians dead. Mendelsohn's 180 147, 149, 384, (Surr.Ct.1943). overlook, courts' 111(3) whether, sought obtained rejecting emphasized failure noting exercised shouldered daily supervision, education, protection, complain exemption seek child." 256, 555. Quilloin, expressly reserved Georgia distinguished gender, properly presented. 13, 554. Consent late 19th century. 1896 Laws, ch. 272. reports setting Legislature excepted (1976), ordered dismissing appeal, lacking. ruling merits, precedential weight. Hicks Miranda, 422 332, 344, 2281, 2289, 223 our review Blasi deference briefing, argument, written opinion. Edelman Jordan, 415 671, 94 1347, 1359, 662 (1974). Insofar inconsistent dismissal Orsini, overrule prior decision. brief echoes exposition Malpica-Orsini 111's Brief General, Amicus Curiae 16-20. express addressed particularly adoptions, stringent requirements acknowledgment paternity stricter definition abandonment. emerging Constitutional Putative Father's Rights, 1581, 1590 correct desert (a question), little threat ability done portion 111: suggest, mechanism consulted. reviewing classifications, "it function 'to hypothesize independently desirability feasibility possible alternative[s]' scheme formulated [the State]." Lalli Lalli, 439 259, 274, 518, 528, 503 (1978) (quoting Mathews Lucas, 427 495, 515, 2755, 2767, 651 (1976)). note alternatives emphasize mechanisms closely attuned exists conditioned 268-269, 524-525. import here. paternity, Act §§ 571 Supp. 1978-1979), determined resolved Clause, additional (1972) (semble). ruled barred ordering unfit. Dom.Rel. 111(1)(d) "any old. 6. Illegitimate births accounted estimated 14.7% 15.5% United 1976 1977, respectively. Dept. HEW, National Center Health Statistics, Vital Statistics Report, 11, p. (1979); (1978). births, represents 468,100 515,700 statistics available, problem illegitimacy severe urban areas. example, 50% District Columbia Hew, States, (Natality), solution illegitimacy. 70% reporting HEW figure 78%. Adoptions (1977) (hereinafter 1975). say "perhaps" word "compelling" understood ways. describes "compels" intended automatically constitutional, description. compels court, thoughtful attention compelling. 844, 51, 2110, 14, 861-862, 2118-2119 (STEWART, J., judgment); Weber Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 406 164, 175, 1400, 1406, 768; 1213, 551; 571-574, 514-518, 486, 488-491 included 111(1)(b) rights, nonetheless disadvantaged. Hence, avoid Los Angeles Water Power Manhart, 435 702, 711, 1370, 1377, 657. ones former, latter, challenged behalf, difficult raised challenge, compare 503, Trimble Gordon, 762, 1459, 31, us. "For traditional used pausing newly created Habit, rather seem distinguish female, alien citizen, illegitimate; too inertia distinguishing black white. reaction rational relationship—other pure prejudicial discrimination—to made." 520-521, 2769, (STEVENS, dissenting). complete. comprehensive 1975. none breakdown (New parents—including relatives step-parent—accounted half 1975.) respectively, 66% 62% year old, 90% 88% moreover, median months; figures appear obtaining nationally. pp. 15-16 (1976); 15. probably responsible, woman aggressor man. doubted consequences cautious her, reinforces text. Planned Parenthood Central Missouri Danforth, 428 52, 67-75, 2831, 2840-2844, 788. sociological anthropological research indicating symbiotic initial psychological bond develops E. J. Bowlby, Attachment Loss (1969, 1973); Mahler, Psychological Birth Human Infant proving 770-771, 1465; Gomez Perez, 409 535, 538, 872, 875, 56. problems relied Parham Hughes, 347, 357-358, 1742, 1748-1749, 269 (plurality opinion) 524-525 area, proposition text logical matter. "relinquishment adoptions" California signed "relinquishment" documents—papers release parent(s) neglect custody—in 69% 36% 28% relinquishment apparently 3.5%. Welfare Agency, Characteristics Relinquishment California, 1970-1975 Tables II, infra. ample proceedings. appeared counsel, testimony, allowed witnesses offered N.Y.Dom.Rel.L. 111-a 1977 1978-1979); App. 27; 383. matter, demonstrate, unsuccessfully tried preservation Had demonstration, mandated insistence circumstances: step-parent; (e. visitation); intermittent, fell short (whether measured amount spent resources expended them), judging marriage, real possibility counted continued source friction husband. 22, 25; 4-7, 12-20, 36, 50, (Mar. 19, 1976); 130-135, 156-157, 162-163 (Apr. 1976). conclusion, coupled "solid permanent" "well cared healthy" justifies gained outweighed loss (and appellant's) 28: "Whatever motive [appellant's] same—harassment embarrassment children] supported school elsewhere name." Marrying assure 1977). idle survey registered Exchange showed 75% preferred old; Department Services, (Program Analysis Report nature, expeditious accommodate needs concerned. 61% fiscal 1972-1973 disposed 90 Nineteenth Annual Judicial Conference Governor 352 (Legislative Doc. 90, 1974). develop approaches, endorses described 392-393, 393 13. To effective, identify further, address. placement in, newspaper, discreet tastefully chosen, inevitably announcement maternity. announcements, forced (or fathers)—despite desire keep secret. "trauma" added "unpleasant envision." 574, 20, Webster, 313, 1192, 360; "To impeded. "Great encountered, instances, ascertain willingness Frequently, unlocatable unknown. Paternity admitted. Some certificates names reputed others not. "Couples dissuaded fear subsequent annoyance entanglements. 1961 study Florida 500 independent 16% couples reported harassment, compared 2% (Isaac, Adopting Child Today, 38, 116). charitable oppressive. placements, baby five days months (p. 88). Early private placements variety reasons, decrease trauma separation conceal birth. unlikely early birth, couples, advised, available. Institutions foundling nurture afford maintenance, desirable, unobtainable unplaceable. philanthropic reluctant bargain trouble tense drain treasury immeasurably institutions agencies. "Some ugliest disclosures marketing One clairvoyant predict fertile field extortion. filiation compulsory experienced instigated authorities, anxious purse (see Schaschlo Taishoff, 408, [161 48, 141 562, 563]). appear, blush, wish support, interpret chance revenge recoup 'losses.' "Marriages offspring. "We mindful jeopardy subjected resulting chaos unadulterated declaration unconstitutionality. nonretroactivity, ago, longer, awaiting institution completion seriously unpleasant 572-574, 516-517, 488-490. extent takes cognizance findings conclusions, them. Instead, states "need not" situations), compelled marshals bit bolster empirical facing exemplary admitting establishing mind, thereafter—the retain upbringing Vance Bradley, 93, 108, 939, 949, 171; Jobst, 47, 56-58, 95, 100-102, 228; Dandridge Williams, 471, 485, 1153, 1161, 491. exclusive-consent occasional better irresponsible veto. understands turn custody. occasion interpreted "legal custody" flexible dependent actually acting Erhardt, 836, 277 734 (1967). Uniform Act, patterned, drafters 5(a)(3), Commissioners' U.L.A. (1973). light, allegedly improper attenuated disqualifies 23, troublesome. 551. 511. 2110. 842-847, 2109-2112; Armstrong Manzo, 545, 85 1187, 62; Meyer Nebraska, 262 390, 399-401, 625, 626-627, 67 1042. Members "private realm life," Prince Massachusetts, 321 158, 166, 438, 88 645 (emphasis added), Moore East Cleveland, 494, 1932, 531 opinion), fall surrounded dissolved fault State's. State, rely attempting establishment privacy families. 353, 1746. 255, 555, quoting 2119 judgment). Lucas Colorado Assembly, 377 713, 739, 84 1475, 632; Roman Sincock, 695, 711-712, 1449, 1458-1459, 620; WMCA, Inc. Lomenzo, 633, 655, 1418, 1429, 568; Reynolds Sims, 533, 585, 1362, 1393, 506 (valid elections go violating one-person, one-vote impending election imminent machinery progress).

Category: 1