Document: 381 U.S. 414 85 S.Ct. 1575 14 L.Ed.2d 692 KENNECOTT COPPER CORP.v.UNITED STATES. No. 995. Supreme Court of the United States June 1, 1965 Arthur H. Dean and Howard T. Milman, for appellant. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Jerome S. Wagshal Donald L. Hardison, States. PER CURIAM. 1 The motion to affirm is granted judgment affirmed. Brown Shoe Co. v. States, 370 294, 82 1502, 8 510 Aluminum America, 377 271, 84 1283, 12 314. 2 Mr. Justice HARLAN GOLDBERG, dissenting. 3 We would note probable jurisdiction set case argument. In so voting, we indicate no opinion on merits. Under Expediting Act, 32 Stat. 823, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 29 (1964 ed.), this appellant's first only appeal. So long statute remains books Congress provides intermediate review, see Singer Mfg. Co., 374 174, 175, 83 1773, 1774, 10 it our view that policy Act is, in general, best served by plenary rather than summary dispositions such appeals. Ibid. Of course, if question presented an appeal plainly insubstantial or directly governed a controlling decision Court, disposition still be appropriate. Since do not believe can said case, give consideration

Category: 7