Document: 468 U.S. 491 104 S.Ct. 3179 82 L.Ed.2d 373 G. Michael BROWN, etc., et al.v.HOTEL AND RESTAURANT EMPLOYEES BARTENDERS INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 54 al. Martin DANZIGER, v. HOTEL Nos. 83-498, 83-573. Supreme Court of the United States Argued March 26, 1984. Decided July 2, Syllabus Section 93 New Jersey Casino Control Act requires annual registration unions representing persons employed in casinos or casino hotels, and provides that a union may be prohibited from receiving dues such employees administering any pension welfare funds if officer is disqualified under criteria contained § 86 for licensing various entities persons. Those include convictions enumerated offenses, other offenses indicating licensure would inimical to Act's policy, association with criminal offenders. Appellees, whose membership includes hotels Atlantic City union's president, instituted an action against certain state agencies officials Federal District Court, seeking declaratory injunctive relief after administrative proceedings had been begun determine whether officers were 86. The court denied appellees' motion preliminary injunction proceedings, concluding appellees unlikely succeed on merits their claims, which included claim §§ pre-empted by National Labor Relations (NLRA). resulted finding 86, order not removed office barred collecting its members who hotel licensed registered Act. agency also concluded it unnecessary invoke additional sanction prohibiting funds. Thereafter, Appeals held, inter alia, erred refusing grant injunction, 93, insofar as authorizes disqualification elected officials, 7 NLRA. Held: 1. so-called "local interests" exception pre-emption doctrine does apply law regulates conduct actually protected federal law. Where, here, issue one asserted substantive conflict enactment, then relative importance State material, since must prevail direct operation Supremacy Clause Constitution. Pp. 500-503. 2. Act, extent qualifications industry NLRA—which neither contains explicit preemptive language nor otherwise indicates congressional intent usurp entire field labor-management relations—and thus 7. Although 1945 decision Hill Florida, 325 538, 65 1373, 89 L.Ed. 1782, interpreted 7's express guarantee right choose bargaining representative conferring unfettered representative, Congress has subsequently disclaimed pre-empt all regulation touches upon specific decide individuals will serve representatives. Specifically, 504(a) Labor-Management Reporting Disclosure 1959 generally prohibits convicted specified crimes serving officers, 603(a) disclaimer laws regulating officials' responsibilities except where expressly provided. Moreover, approving compact between York Jersey, implicitly approved York's restrictions (similar those involved here) waterfront employees, upheld challenge based NLRA De Veau Braisted, 363 144, 80 1146, 4 1109. Thus, apparently that, at least are confronted public evils crime, corruption, racketeering, more stringent incompatible national labor policy embodied 503-510. 3. collection authorized effect removal abridges employees' separate rights organize, pre-empted, cannot decided now because procedural posture this litigation. Appellees' factual allegations never addressed courts below. On remand, should make requisite findings fact imposition ban so incapacitate appellee prevent performing functions chosen agent. Also, validity 93's second sanction—prohibition administration funds—cannot now, despite Appeals' holding provisions Employee Retirement Income Security Because imposed union, no concrete application presented, hence ripe review. 510-512. 709 F.2d 815 (CA3 1983), vacated remanded. Anthony J. Parrillo, Trenton, N.J., appellants. Laurence Gold, Washington, D.C., appellees. Justice O'CONNOR delivered opinion Court. 1 In 1976, citizens amended Constitution permit legislative authorization gambling within municipality City.1 Determined infiltration organized crime into nascent assure trust industry's integrity, Legislature enacted (Act), N.J.Stat.Ann. 5:12-1 seq. (West Supp.1983-1984), comprehensive gambling, including employees. Sections specifically impose qualification organizations found meet these standards principal question presented cases (NLRA), amended, 29 U.S.C. 141 seq., precludes imposing whom select We hold not. 2 * A. 3 advent was heralded great expectations economic revitalization region, but equally fears potential crime. legislature conducted extensive hearings and, cooperation Governor, commissioned numerous studies how best industry.2 These confirmed vast amount money flows daily through large number unrecorded transactions particularly attractive vulnerable target Commission Investigation (NJCI), example, there "well-organized highly functional network [New Jersey]" become interested investing legitimate enterprises.3 NJCI feared incursion might accompanied extortion, loansharking, commercial bribery, tax antitrust violations. It basis empirical finally adopted statutory scheme establishes rigorous system industry. promote "public confidence credibility integrity regulatory process operations," "extend[s] strict persons, locations, practices associations related enterprises service industries." 5:12-1(b)(6) Supp.1983-1984). (Commission), independent body, possesses broad authority over industries, 5:12-63 5:12-75. Division Gaming Enforcement (Division), part Attorney General's Office, charged responsibility investigating license applicants prosecuting violators 5:12-76 5:12-79. 5 imposes requirements business own operate hotel, 5:12-84(a)-(c); suppliers goods services 5:12-12, 5:12-92; supervisory operations, 5:12-9, 5:12-89; access floor, 5:12-7, 5:12-90. registration, rather than licensing, hotels. "service custodial duties directly operations casino, including, without limitation, bartenders, waiters, waitresses, maintenance personnel, kitchen staff, employment do require authorize casino." 5:12-8. Most relevant litigation, 93(a) represent seek register annually Commission, 5:12-93(a). 6 All required subject set forth lists licensees. revoke, suspend, limit, restrict employee license. 5:12-86, 5:12-91(b) industries offering 5:12-92. 93(b) subjects two penalties noncompliance: 8 "No organization, affiliate pursuant section act receive licensee agent, administer funds, officer, accordance act. commission purposes subsection waive criterion consistent interests justice require." 9 referred list "any offense applicant operations." 5:12-86(c)(4) Disqualification result individual identified "as career offender member cartel associate manner creates reasonable belief nature gaming 5:12-86(f).4 B 10 Appellee Hotel Restaurant Employees Bartenders International Union Local (Local 54) unincorporated organization meaning 2(5) NLRA, 152(5). represents collective approximately 12,000 8,000 City. 54's work traditional restaurant service-related positions; none operations. Frank Gerace president 54. 11 1978, began filing statement Following lengthy investigation, 1981 reported view, President Gerace, Secretary-Treasurer Robert Lumio, Grievance Manager Materio Pursuant section, scheduled hearing Division's allegations. When raised objections constitutionality ruled lacked consider challenges enabling statute. response, filed complaint Court,5 grounds impermissibly regulate areas (ERISA), 1001 (LMRDA), 401 86(f) violates both overbroad vague. Appellees alleging irreparable injury being forced participate further proceedings. 12 After hearing, claims.6 536 F.Supp. 317 (NJ 1982). Since entered, went forward hearing. they associated Business Agent, Karlos LaSane, held 86(c) he 1973 extortion doing while Commissioner.7 findings, ordered agents, 54, failing See App. Juris. Statements 206a-207a. later issued supplemental decision, determining prohibition suffice effectuate three therefore Id., 208a-215a. 13 Subsequent Commission's divided panel Third Circuit ruling injunction. (1983). Reaching underlying complaint, empowers disqualify ERISA prohibit funds.8 14 noted probable jurisdiction, consolidated appeals issue, 464 990, 479, 78 677 (1983).9 II 15 invoked directive Clause, falls examine presumed Congress. Fidelity Savings & Loan Assn. la Cuesta, 458 141, 152-153, 102 3014, 3022, 73 664 (1982). Our task quite simple if, explicitly mandated law, see Shaw Delta Air Lines, Inc., 462 85, 95-100, 103 2890, 2900-2901, 77 490 (1983), adequately indicated occupy regulation, thereby displacing same subject, Rice Santa Fe Elevator Corp., 331 218, 230, 67 1152, 91 1447 (1947). Even absence implied field, we nevertheless find displaced conflicts Such actual exists when "compliance regulations physical impossibility," Florida Lime Avocado Growers, Inc. Paul, 132, 142-143, 83 1210, 1217, 248 (1963), "stands obstacle accomplishment execution full objectives Congress," Hines Davidowitz, 312 52, 67, 61 399, 404, 85 581 (1941). Michigan Canners Freezers Assn., Agricultural Marketing Bargaining Board, 467 461, 469, 2518, 2523, 81 399 (1984); supra. 16 principles less applicable 49 Stat. 452, 157, provision case, pre-emptive relations. Telephone Co. Dept. Labor, 440 519, 540, 99 1328, 1341, 59 553 (1979); Garner Teamsters, 346 485, 488, 74 161, 164, 98 228 (1953) ("The . leaves much states, though refrained telling us much"). has, however, frequently applied If 7, interferes exercise federally Clause. See, e.g., Nash Industrial Comm'n, 389 235, 239-240, 88 362, 366, 19 438 (1967) (invalidating unemployment compensation law); Bus Missouri, 374 74, 81-82, 1657, 1661-1662, 763 (1963) (striking down statute peaceful strikes utilities); Wisconsin 340 383, 394, 71 359, 365, 95 364 (1951) (same); Automobile Workers O'Brien, 339 454, 458-459, 70 781, 783-784, 94 978 (1950) "strike-vote" legislation). 17 Appellants argue appropriate framework analysis balancing test fall first San Diego Building Trades Council Garmon, 359 236, 243-244, 79 773, 778-779, 775 (1959). They contend Jersey's interest control "so deeply rooted local feeling responsibility," ibid., yet sustained long magnitude State's enactment outweighs resulting interference rights. Operating Engineers Jones, 460 669, 683, 1453, 1462, 75 368 This argument, confuses protection primary jurisdiction Board (NLRB). Railroad Trainmen Terminal Co., 394 369, n. 19, 1109, 1118, 22 344 (1969). latter situation, presumption applies even only arguably rule avoids jurisdictional NLRB ensuring interpreting applying body remains NLRB. Motor Coach Lockridge, 403 274, 286-289, 1909, 1917-1919, 473 (1971); supra, 459 U.S., 244-245, S.Ct., 779-780. pre-emption, rationale, properly admits unusually "deeply rooted" stake. cases, consideration vitality our rational allocation belies easy inference intended deprive ability retain matters. have, therefore, pre-empts breach contract actions strike replacements, Belknap, Hale, 463 491, 3172, 798 trespass actions, Sears, Roebuck Carpenters, 436 180, 1745, 56 209 (1978), tort remedies intentional infliction emotional distress, Farmer 430 290, 97 1056, 51 338 (1977). 18 follows matter protecting right. "[t] material Framers provided prevail." Free Bland, 369 663, 666, 1089, 1092, 180 (1962). turn, III guarantees rights, among them "to bargain collectively representatives choosing." 157. straightforward analysis, collective-bargaining encompasses unqualified selecting criteria, determined clearly preempted. 20 relied heavily Court's ex rel. Watson, 1782 (1945), support threshold proposition confers agents years, felony, "good moral character." file reports. General obtained injunctions restraining functioning until complied 21 review, Florida's conflicted explaining: "The declared purpose Wagner shown encourage bargaining, protect 'full freedom' workers selection choice. To end made illegal employer interfere with, restrain coerce attached conditions whatsoever freedom choice respect. Their judgment, someone else, guide. 'Full agent means pass agent's qualifications." 541, 1374. 23 present As originally enacted, Hill, 1959, designed address growing problems corruption movement. S.Rep. No. 187, 86th Cong., 1st Sess., 12-16 (1959); H.R.Rep. 741, 9-12 (1959), U.S.Code Cong. Admin.News p. 2318. Title V LMRDA defines them. pertinent part: 24 person of, served prison term his conviction [a series crimes] shall director, trustee, executive board similar governing manager, organizer five years imprisonment. ." 25 By enacting 504(a), unmistakably absolute necessarily some exception. Of course, strong counter-argument can very measure exception, cutting back more. certainly conceivable reading intent, are, persuaded it. 26 already recognized, another LMRDA, 603(a),10 "an 1153, 1109 (1960) (plurality opinion); id., 160-161, 1154-1155 (BRENNAN, J., concurring judgment) (LMRDA "explicitly displace legislation States").11 affirmatively preserving laws, preserve room concerning officials. 504 itself makes clear did uniform standard An crimes. His eligibility restored earlier depending providing restoration citizen felons. Cong.Rec. 10991-10994 (1958) (remarks Sen. McNamara). law's themselves premised course vary throughout Nation. Finally, conclusion view interfering buttressed concerns led enact place. prompted take governmental machinery "effective policing abuses level" "stamp[ing] out [in unions]." 6, 2322. Consistent overreaching purpose, readily presume allow adopt different important goal. 27 squarely post-Hill context Waterfront felony pardoned cleared parole board. furtherance interstate establishing bistate combat States' mutual waterfront. Art. I, 10, argument urged conflicting Hill's "complete [waterfront employees'] representatives." 152, 1150. four-Justice plurality, Frankfurter rejected challenged 28 plurality noting "does exclude every complete group designate 'representatives choosing.' " Ibid. reasoned: "It misconceive constitutional pre-emption—of exclusion what conceded power—to case mechanically concept free heedless light shed guidance. fairly infer narrow historically explained Would Congress, lively regard true, real frustration, however dialetically plausible, policy?" 153, 1151 (emphasis added). 30 framing inquiry, need "imaginatively summon" hypothetical response since, Congress' approval compact, could found. 31 Veau's relevance lies approach scope focus indicia garnered compact. At hearings, testified compact's ratification ground appear restrictions. 151, 1150 (citing testimony Longshoremen's Association). objections, evils"12 "crime, racketeering,"13 7.14 32 short, given expressed Veau, longer maintained obviously Nor way Congress." 404. awareness comparable have compatible true identical motivated Congress: Both statutes form programs "vindicate compelling interest, namely, combating infesting particular industry." 155, 1152. contrary, conclude preempted 33 emphasize implicate subsidiary organization. While assumed undifferentiated protected, subsequent distinguished accorded instance simply affected IV 34 preclude 93(b)'s officials,15 provision's positions. noncompliance valid must, preemption purposes, assessed independently terms enactment. requirement, unobjectionable, enforced "functioning union" contravening 543, 1375. vigorously similarly abridging organize collectively. According affidavits submitted 85% monthly income comes paid Without payments, claims grievances, agreements, new unorganized, perform Brief 23-24, 11. 35 Unfortunately, issue. Appeals. situation Alabama Federation McAdory, 450, 1384, 1725 declined requirement "construed penal sanctions .. [the unions] non-compliance 466, 1392. follow remand 36 observe imply enforceable Commission. grants powers limit organization's registration. 5:12-64 "may proper power necessary assigned law," "no enumeration read act." construed granting fashion severe 93(b). 206a; F.Supp., 330. correctly decide, enforce means. 37 decline reach funds—despite unanimous 514(a) ERISA, 1144(a). general but, exercising discretion, chose time. That rested assumption alone ensure compliance determination adequate information administers well impact membership. 214a; 499. vacated. Longshoremen Boyd, 347 222, 224, 447, 448, 650 (1954). 38 limitations effectively members. judgment vacated, remanded instructions opinion. 39 ordered. 40 BRENNAN MARSHALL took cases. 41 WHITE, POWELL STEVENS join, dissenting. 42 restricts activities particular, collect purports save portion statute1 restricting class I agree resolution because, amply demonstrates, indicate types officials.2 However, directed doing, infringes 43 covered 157.3 A achieves status "designated selected majority unit purposes." 159(a). employer, 158(a)(1), 158(b)(1), state, interference. exercised representative.4 State, acting 93(b), sought preventing carrying function nullifying 44 enforcing permissible use "from union." Allowing choosing prevents occur enjoin sustain financially engage behalf Unlike whether, matter, dependent prevented source revenue cut off. am willing like members, impairs refuses ground, respectfully dissent. amendment lawful establishment operation, houses boundaries, heretofore established, city City, equipment used connection therewith. Any authorizing establishments provide revenues derived therefrom solely reductions property taxes, rentals, telephone, gas, electric, municipal utilities charges eligible senior disabled residents State. N.J. Const., 4, ¶ 2D. permits health transportation benefits residents. Cohen, Act: Creation Regulatory System, Seton Hall Legis.J. 2-5 (1982); Note, Gambling's Past Future, Rutgers-Camden L.J. 279 (1979). NJCI, Report Recommendations Gambling 1C-2C study noted: "[E]xperience collected intelligence regarding strongly suggests [sic] few better vehicles utilized gain stranglehold racketeering. Organized often businessmen employ pay extra homage underworld. Moreover ready cash coffers financing sorts illicit ventures." 1-H. "career offender," defined behavior pursued occupational gain, utilizing methods deemed violations State." 5:12-86(f) Defendants action, appellants before Brown, Director Department Law Public Safety, Enforcement; itself; Thomas Kean, Governor Jersey. appeal appellant Division. Also defendants below Danziger, Acting Chairman along constituting appeal, 83-573, 83-498. turn moved dismiss abstention grounds, relying strands enunciated Comm'n Texas Pullman 496, 643, 971 (1941); Burford Sun Oil 319 315, 63 1098, 87 1424 (1943); Younger Harris, 37, 746, 669 (1971). doctrines case. 317, 324-325 One report, died June 1981, prior decision. correct declining abstain. issues sufficed dispose occasion overbreadth vagueness contentions, we. note contention below, still dismissed General—representing Division, Director, Governor—does not, press instead submits obtain expeditious final Appellant 14, 6. agreed adjudication controversy, considerations comity implicated, claim. Ohio Bureau Employment Services Hodory, 431 471, 480, 1898, 1904, 52 513 603(a), 523(a), provides: "Except nothing chapter reduce away bar remedy entitled 524 (separate "saving clause" preserves laws). instant LMRDA. 326-328. contention. 998, 83d (1953). 583, 1-2 recommending House Judiciary Committee relations entirely problems: committee here recommends consent sense antilabor legislation, rather, antiracketeering legislation." 93(a)'s each annually, disclose names affiliated organizations, burden Indeed, concede standing presents Watson. 1375 (finding "in itself" NLRA). 20-21. upholds fund valid. terms, mechanism disqualifying officer. Therefore, appears holds itself, anything enables that. limits individual, example fines disqualified, could. purport asked recognizes fundamental difference workings most realize coextensive. For nonunion shop retains say him decisions only. Similarly, empowered unit, electing possible substantial vote official eventually elected. unable situations, somehow interfered Under exclusive representative. 152(4). Louisville Sanitary Wiper N.L.R.B. (1945); Robinson-Ransbottom Pottery 1093 (1940). stake 54),

Category: 9