Document: 439 U.S. 419 99 S.Ct. 995 58 L.Ed.2d 627 State of ARIZONA, Plaintiff,v.State CALIFORNIA et al. No. 8, Orig. Supreme Court the United States January 9, 1979. 1 PER CURIAM and SUPPLEMENTAL DECREE. 2 The America, Intervenor, Arizona, Complainant, California Defendants (State California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Coachella Valley County Water Metropolitan District Southern City Los Angeles, San Diego, Diego), Nevada, pursuant to Art. VI Decree entered in case on March 1964, at 376 340, 84 755, 11 757, amended February 28, 1966, 383 268, 86 924, 15 743, have agreed present perfected rights use mainstream water each their priority dates as set forth herein. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that joint motion States, Defendants, Nevada enter a supplement decree granted said are determined be below, subject following: 3 (1) following listed relate quantity which may used by claimant list not intended limit or redefine type otherwise Decree. 4 (2) This determination shall no way affect future adjustments resulting from determinations relating settlement Indian reservation boundaries referred II(D)(5) 5 (3) Article IX affected this 6 rights. 7 (4) Any right herein exercised only for beneficial uses. 8 (5) In event insufficient satisfy II(B)(3) Decree, Secretary Interior shall, before providing satisfaction any other except those "MISCELLANEOUS PRESENT PERFECTED RIGHTS" (rights numbered 7-21 29-80 below) order without regard lines, first provide full all Chemehuevi Reservation, Cocopah Fort Yuma Colorado River Mojave Reservation II(D)(1)-(5) provided quantities fixed paragraphs through II(D) continue appropriate adjustment agreement respective reservations finally determined. Additional so adjudicated such annual exceed necessary supply consumptive required irrigation practicably irrigable acres included within area final boundary related diversions computed determining net additional using methods Special Master his Report dated December 5, 1960, applying unit diversion thereto, below: Unit Diversion Quantity Acre-Feet 9 Per Irrigable Acre 6.37 6.67 5.97 Ft. 6.46 10 foregoing reference irrigation, provision constitute means but restriction usage them agricultural application. If part five Reservations than application, total use, term defined I(A) would resulted if subparagraph (i) equivalent portions thereto had been number specified Effect given paragraph notwithstanding below. However, nothing below (numbered satisfied. Furthermore, construed determine satisfying claims specified. Table * ARIZONA 12 A. Federal Establishments' Present Perfected Rights 13 establishments named II, subdivision (D), (2), (4), case, having decreed II: Annual Diversions Net Priority 14 Defined Area Land (acre-feet)5 Acres5 Date 1) 2744 431 Sept. 27, 1917 16 2) 358,400 53,768 Mar. 3, 1865 17 252,016 37308 Nov. 22, 1873 18 51,986 7,79 16, 1874 19 3) 68,447 10,589 Feb. 2, 1911 B. Projects' 20 Division, Project 254,200 acre-feet (ii) 43,562 uses, whichever less, with date 1901. 21 Auxiliary Project, B 6,800 1,225 July 1905. 22 (6) North Gila Unit, Mesa 24,500 4,030 C. Miscellaneous 23 1. miscellaneous Arizona uses land described listed: 24 (acre-feet) 25 ----------------- ----------- 26 7) 27 160 Lots 21, 24, 25, Sec. 29 960 1915 28 15, 18, SW1/4 SE1/4, 30, T.16S., R22E., Bernardino 30 Base Meridian, County, Arizona.(Powers)2 31 8) 32 11, 12, 19, 20, S1/2 SW1/4, 1,140 Berardino 33 Arizona. (United States)3 34 NOTE: Footnotes table items p. 428 35 36 ---------------- 37 9) 38 60 Lot2, 360 1902 T.10N., R.19W, G&SRBM. (Graham)2 10) 39 180 N1/2 40 1,080 41 NE1/4 14, T.18., R.22W., G&SRBM.(Hulet)2 11) 42 45 SW1/14, theSW1/4 SE1/4 43 sec. T.18N., 44 80 n1/2 1,050 11.T.18N.,r22W.,G&SRBM. NW1/4 46 G & SRBM. 47 (Hurschler)2 48 12) 13, T.17N., 240 49 (Miller)2 50 13) 120 R.21W., 51 NW1/4, 23, 810 52 (McKellips Granite Reef Farms)4 53 14) NE1/4, 54 55 56 57 31, (Sherrill Lafollette)4 59 --------------- 61 15) 53.89 follows: 318 1928 62 Beginning point 995.1 feet easterly 63 NW corner 10, T.8S., 64 Salt Meridian; 65 northerly 66 true beginning, then 67 southerly direction 68 991.2 E. SW 69 thence along S. line 70 distance 807.3 point, N. 71 0x7' W., 768.8 124.0 0x 72 14' 1,067.6 73 130 0x20' 74 405.2 63x 75 10' 506.0 90x 15' 562.9 76 77 78 116.6 79 beginning containing acres. All more particularly 81 survey executed Thomas Yowell, Surveyor June 1969. (Molina)4 82 16) 83 north half 85 780 1925 W1/2 (Sturges)4 87 17)120 88 Section (Zozaya)4 720 1912 89 90 ------------- 18) 91 92 93 E1/2 94 comprising 95 Township North, Range West (Swan)4 19) 96 East 300 Lot 97 (Lot 1, being less), 98 South, East, lying Bureau 100 Reclamation levee way. EXCEPT 101 portion conveyed America 102 instrument recorded Docket 417, page 150 EXCEPTING natural bed 103 ordinary high 104 also artificial accretions 105 waterward water, 106 comprises approximately seven (7) 107 (Milton Jean Phillips)4 1900 108 2. domestic, municipal, industrial purposes Consumptive Use 109 110 20) Parker2 630 400 1905 21) Yuma2 2,333 1,478 1893 II 111 112 federal (1), (3), 113 22) 114 11,340 1,900 1907 23) 115 51,616 7,743 Jan. 9,1884 24) 116 10,745 1,612 40,241 6,037 3,760 564 May 1876 25) 117 13,698 2,119 1890 118 Districts' 26) 119 219,780 33,604 1877. 27) 2,600,000 424,145 28) 121 (non-Indian portion) 38,270 6,294 122 123 124 (acre feet) 29) 125 126 R.22E., S.B.B. M (Wavers) 6780 1856 NOTE:Footnotes 435 30) W1/2, T.9N., M. (Stephenson)6 1923 31) T.13S., R.23E., (Mendivil)6 32) T.9S., R.21E., (Grannis)6 33) 6, 5; NE 1/4, (Morgan)6 1913 34) T.10S., (Milpitas)6 1918 35) T. N., R. E., (Simons)6 1889 36) (Colo.R. Sportsmen's League)6 1921 37) 1914 38) (Andrade)6 39) (Reynolds)6 1904 40) (Cooper)6 41) 8), (Chagnon)7 42) (Lawrence)7 Acres 81) 12,5348 1,9398 82) Lake Mead National Recreation 500 3009 192910 (The Overton N.R.A. Executive Order 5105) It ordered Judge Elbert P. Tuttle appointed authority fix time conditions filing Rights—Continued pleadings direct subsequent proceedings, summon witnesses, issue subpoenas, take evidence introduced he deem call for. directed submit reports appropriate. allowed actual expenses. allowances him, compensation paid technical, stenographic, clerical assistants, cost printing report, proper expenses charged against borne parties proportion hereafter direct. further position becomes vacant during recess Court, THE CHIEF JUSTICE make new designation same effect originally made Court. Tribe leave intervene, insofar seeks intervention oppose entry supplemental decree, denied. respects, Tribes intervene Master. Mr. Justice MARSHALL took consideration decision case. instance measured acreage less. names parentheses description "Defined Land" identification only; name appearing Claimants identified parcel Arizona's 1967 submitted Included Powers' claim Subsequently, Powers Stipulation Settlement ownership whereby title property was quieted favor States. claimants, added since list, upon whose these predicated. 43) Needles 1,500 950 1885 44) Portions of: Secs. T.7N., R.24E.; R.23E.;Secs. 4, 26, 35, 36, T.8N., R.23E.; 29, 33, (Atchison, Topeka Santa Fe Railway Co.)6 1,260 273 1896 45) (Conger) 1.0 0.6 46) 32, T.11S., (G. Draper)7 47) T.11s., (McDonough)7 1919 48) (Faubion) 49) (Dudley) 1922 50) (Douglas)7 1916 51) 7, (Beauchamp)7 1924 52) (Clark)7 53) 54) (J. Graham)7 55) (Geiger) 1910 56) Fractional 6) (Schneider)7 57) 15; 14; 23; (Martinez)7 1895 58) (Earle) 59) (Diehl)7 60) (Reid)7 61) (Graham)7 62) (Cate) 63) (McGee)71.0 64) 26; (Stallard) 65) (Randolph)7 1926 66) (Stallard)7 67) 24; (Keefe)7 68) (C. Ferguson)7 1903 69) 6; 7; T.14S., R.24E., (W. 70) T.12S., (Vaulin)7 1920 71) (Salisbury)7 72) 22; (Hadlock)71.0 73) (Streeter)7 74) 8; 18; Draper) 75) (Fitz) 71.0 76) (Williams)71.0 1909 77) (Estrada)7 78) frac. (Whittle)71.0 79) 25; (Corington) 80) (Tolliver)7 III NEVADA ---------- California's parenthesis homesteaders rights, Refers (D)(6) specifies 1929. 5105 1929 (see. C.F.R.1964 Cumulative Pocket Supplement, 276, Findings Fact Conclusions Law Master's pp. 294-295).

Category: 10