Document: 360 U.S. 622 79 S.Ct. 1376 3 L.Ed.2d 1473 Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings against Harriet Bouslog SAWYER, Petitioner. No. 326. Arued May 19, 20, 1959. Decided June 29, Mr. John T. McTernan, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. A. William Barlow, Honolulu, Hawaii, respondent. Justice BRENNAN announced the judgment Court, and delivered an opinion, in which The CHIEF JUSTICE, BLACK, DOUGLAS join. This case is here on writ certiorari, 358 892, 153, 119, to review petitioner's suspension from practice law one year, ordered by Supreme Court Territory 41 Haw. 403, affirmed appeal Appeals Ninth Circuit, 260 F.2d 189.1 Petitioner has been a member Territorial Bar Hawaii since 1941. For many months beginning late 1952 she participated, United States District at as defense counsel trial indictment number defendants conspiracy under Smith Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2385, U.S.C.A. 2385. was before Federal Judge Jon Wiig jury. v. Fujimoto, D.C., 107 F.Supp. 865. Both disciplinary charges petitioner had do with Act trial. One charge related speech made about six weeks after began. Island Honokaa, village some 182 miles Oahu, Sunday morning. other interviews jurors concluded. Association preferred charges2 were referred Association's Legal Ethics Committee investigation. prosecutor who represented Government conducted investigation presented evidence Committee. submitted record findings Court. Because seems us depend it, see 1384, infra, we deal first relating speech. gist Committee's that reflected adversely upon Wiig's impartiality fairness conduct impugned his judicial integrity. concluded 'in imputing unfairness trial, impugning integrity local courts comments guilty violation Canons 1 22 Professional American Association3 should be disciplined same.' held '* * engaged participated willful oral attack administration justice said direct statement implication judge presiding therein thus tended also create disrespect officers generally *. She committed what this court considers gross misconduct.' pages 422—423. We think our may limited narrow question whether facts adduced are capable supporting conducting dispensation case. Court's findings, not 'misconduct' abstract. Although opinions argument have varying degrees treat disciplie i mposed obstructing or attempting obstruct justice, way embarrass influence tribunal trying case, such neither nor finding professional misconduct based. Since no obstruction attempt charged, it clear rests supportable adduced, occasion consider applicability Bridges California, 314 252, 62 190, 86 L.Ed. 192; Pennekamp Florida, 328 331, 66 1029, 90 1295; Craig Harney, 331 367, 67 1249, 91 1546, extensively discussed briefs. reach intimate any conclusion constitutional issues presented. 2 Petitioner's clients included labor unions, among them International Longshoremen's Warehousemen's Union. Some members union their being supported union. meeting Honokaa sponsored ILWU attended large part its members. spoke extemporaneously transcript recording her Precisely did say matter dispute. Neither saw witness, but both courts, reading record, resolved matters evidentiary conflict fashion least favorable purposes here, same. version principally relied Appeals, 197—198, derived notes newspaper reporter, Matsuoka, heard said. These Matsuoka's original originals lost—but expanded prepared him direction superiors interest aroused account newspaper.4 set forth full Appendix summarize summary will illumine basis without support. fact below does remove duty examining furnishes rational characterization put lower courts. See Fiske Kansas, 274 380, 47 655, 71 1108. Speculation cannot take over where proofs fail. conclude there support further factual inference than voicing strong criticism cases Government's manner proving them, references happenings Honolulu illustrative this, reflection wise personally really effort get ILWU. wanted tell 'rather shocking horrible things go trial.' defendants, said, tried books written they born. Jack Hall, because he read Communist Manifesto. nature criminal prosecutions, charged when enough 'it lumps together says agreed something.' 'Conspiracy means lot people agreeing something you never done.' attacked FBI, saying spent too much time investigating people's minds, next dwelt remoteness extreme youth directly related. 'no memory good, yet use kind testimony. Why? anything everything necessary convict.' propaganda carried 10 years entered box, 'enough person communist cook goose.' witnesses given prior inconsistent testimony went ahead 'say order 'Witnesses testify tells to.' Government, claimed, two days once seen duffel bag. Unless informed FBI would try make lose jobs. 'There's thing fair All rules scrapped can't case.' how another (in territorial courts) allowed hearsay exonerate defendant representing,5 present 'a federal sitting bench permits Crouch (a witness) 27 ago, then permit witness five old.' declared, They just up along.' gave example New York Medina, Dennis States, 341 494, 857, 95 1137, claimed 'The if so widened including kitchen sink.' 'Unless stop tracks new crime. People knowing ideas.' freedom thought action subverted. urged auditors out explain vicious was. 4 specific utterances found furnishing (which quoted above) 'horrible shockig' trial; impossibility necessity, proved, scrapping evidence; creation crimes unless stopped once. examine these points particular, though course must context whole In doing accept obviously correct ruling remarks mere generalized discourse prosecutions particular going Honolulu. 5 I. start proposition lawyers free criticize state law. Many relative admission statements those alleged co-conspirators overbroad otherwise unfair unwise;6 dangers sort judges protect numerous persons jointly conspiracy;7 apt become ideas.8 Others disagree. But all express views matters, constituted improper enforced presided trials. so, even existence questionable might sense produce trials.9 Such simply equated motivation competence judges. And surely permissible well lay audience professional; oftentimes modified through popular criticism;10 Bentham's strictures common Dickens' novels come mind.11 needless say, lawyer law-enforcement agencies prosecution, extent suggesting wrongdoing part, token judiciary. Simply charge, example, prosecution perjured imply slightest complicity actions. To makes overmuch form bolster weak cases, suggest unseemly judiciary practice.12 6 entirely, reveal more this. trials prosecutions. sure, setting remarks, indicate typical, evils attendant censurable (without bringing inconceivable) taken relate progress. hardly damning themselves, clearly call light examination give them; examined, furnish misconduct. 'horrible' 'shocking' remark, introductory speech, trials, prosecution's conduct. impossible failing do. It occurred immediately FBI's pressuring witnesses. same remark necessity evidence.13 conviction, crimes—those ideas—would created14 could reflect judge's divorced considered. How Wiig, except insofar stature legal system imperfections, shown. 'the ass, idiot' impugn character administer it. prosecutors corrupt unaware able find method restraining them. name mentioned virtually none complaints phrased terms judge' doing. aught appears totally sympathy, personal matter, Smit Ac t, offenses basis, felt bound apply laid down higher courts.15 7 Even passages can far taking erroneous view perhaps comparison between Courts excluded nature, nothing it—we still warranting findings. If wrong law, matter; appellate reviews daily, imputes disgrace. Dissenting reports look like tame stuff indeed. venal stupid incompetent. public attribution honest error cause discipline country. re Ades, 467, 481. infer collusion prejudicing defense. imagine venality collusion, standards reactions. indulge involved speculation guilt reason imaginations others. 8 while proper attorney general during pending verbalization impermissible litigate day castigate night. page 202. line central argument, reasoning below,16 dissent ignore A acquire license presently equally serious currently litigation not. conceive ground whereby pendency attorney's out-of-court censurable, tend justice. Remarks afterwards distinction foreign turn allegation ostr uction found, irrelevant pending. remained protected him, critical cross line. hers done so. Accordingly, order, based stand. 9 II. Committee, misconducted herself interviewing juror shortly completion mentally unsettled, obvious fashion, very rendition verdict apparently result participation point petitioner, having requested sister, serveral times interviewed family. recognized attorneys interrogate verdicts discharges. Nevertheless, versions exactly transpired varied considerably, difficult grasp singled censure pattern Territory.17 While delicacy approaching incompetent admissible impeach jury's mental processes undertaken unusual circumstances, circumstances less justification average interview—which opinion holding future.18 concealment affidavit interview filed motion charges. need explore charge. As rendered suffice.19 insupportable, posture stand, 202, agree. imposing penalty solely juror. believe appropriate finally adjudicate validity interviews. 11 III. expressed doubt jurisdiction hear respondent urges jurisdiction. merits stand fall objections. merit. Circuit appeals final judgments pursuant 28 1293, 'civil value controversy exceeds $5,000, exclusive costs.'20 effect removing uncontroverted annual net income years, continue foreseeably, excess $5,000.21 insisted right reduced monetary terms, 'priceless,' is, speaking; besides aspects status, continuance gainful employment issue, Bradley Fisher, 13 Wall. 335, 355, 20 646, hence jurisdictional amount present. 12 Finally, inhibition scope created sovereignty National O'Donoghue 289 516, 535, 53 740, 744, 77 1356, (once satisfied) reviewing highest State. Of developing principles interpreting legislation. Bonet Texas Co., 308 463, 60 349, 84 401; DeCastro Board Commissioners, 322 451, 454—458, 64 1121, 1122—1125, 88 134. needs elaboration total insufficiency sustain misconduct, backdrop rights speak freely citizen, subsumed headings practice, customs Reversed. 14 APPENDIX TO OPINION OF MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN. 15 Expanded Notes Reporter, Relative Speech. 16 'She followed Samuel M. Bento, good morning Tribune-Herald, pointing toward paper's reporter Hilo correspondent side side. Mrs. Sawyer preceded W. Hall. began speaking a.m. ended 11:30 17 'Notes proceeded: Hall added It's 'Said rather appointed ago (3 ago) defend man money hire own counsel. He pimping procuring. complaining woman business territory reformed repented driven back again into business. turned hotel kept doors unlocked. Likened pukas act. 19 men power jail thoughts. 'One reasons got book, Manifesto, 1898, gleam father's eye. 21 manifesto: spectre haunting Europe; communism. explained ghost. today. conspiracy. noted 1937 filipino brothers. advocate violence sindicalism. agreement. government used hasn't something. advocated overthrow to. done. 23 'touched myth agents fbi. they're supposed extra special. radio programs, movies, publicity wonderful are. hundreds tax fraud spend most minds it's cut size. told honolulu gathering. day? fbi called cops. slogan: away your thoughts cops push around. 24 'paul crouch. understand why he's witness. 1924; guess that's why. testified russia 1927. generals etc. usually chance examined. aileen fujimoto four old then. crouch's galloping plains bearing her. jack hall 13. goes crouch 1927 1941 ever mentioning defendants. 25 'he infiltration armed forces plots idea responsible said—not someone else did. single age talking about. jury pay attention says. smear. sayscro uch (prosecution) party 26 'but box. 'it's goose. agreement violate smith act passed 1940. passed. there. he'd satisfied came later Koji Ariyoshi. recall ago. details. god knows good. 'why? convict. 29 'some differently previously. deliberately izuka reinecke didn't know until party. 30 'witnesses portions leave rest czarist showing dealt russia. 31 'johnson san francisco literature duffle names books. reads dealing johnson showed violated bag overthrowing silly. mine 32 barrage expects hysteria hearing jail. friend worked sears roebuck family three children wife. terrible mistake time. lived house hall. testify. feel finest known. suggested fire wouldn't cooperate government. 33 wasn't fired Angeles Chicago offices convinced fired. refused stool pigeon informer. gets making fear don't wants they'll branded red 34 'there's 35 'referred habeas corpus move palakiko—majors 36 'said report vernon stevens bet confession supreme let deny situation previous life death one. old. 37 along. 1949 york top leaders. contended 1924. medina permitted themselves 1934 on. sink. 38 'unless ideas. 39 'mentioned los angeles instructed 40 there'll only keep learning read. unions destroyed (sic) action. dark ages control won't taverns places. 'she is. ago.' 42 concurring. 43 Assuming purports authorize disbarment her, I agree BRENNAN, gives, proved. My considered however indicating belief valid existed, constitutionally afford drastic punishment inflicted 44 STEWART, concurring result. 45 If, my Brother FRANKFURTER, runs principal intimation invoke immunize himself even-handed proven unethical conduct, belongs profession inherited propriety honor, experience shown calling dedicated accomplishment follow conform standards. 46 Obedience ethical precepts require abstention physician broadcast confidential disclosures patients rely discipline. attempted prejudice due interfering language dissenting largely directed.* disciplined. growing concur judgment. 48 whom CLARK, HARLAN WHITTAKER join, dissenting. 49 suspended year. rde r (1) progress, active defense, (2) juror, terminated guilty. investigate Sawyer's Following investigation, recommendation main, de novo resulting now us. although made, today finds conclusions based, wanting reasonable foundation directs readmit grounded leaves unreviewed interview. When Putting fully record. 50 'We think,' 'that illumined BRENNAN'S opinion. contained drawn led sole verbal content disregard else, issue entirety presents. elsewhere answer problem depends presents put. likely beget answer. 51 formulation restriction misconceive neglect important relevant evidence. result, seriously impairs responsibility bar and, particularly, encouraging hustings press, instead within court-room subject circumscribed safeguards. 52 true perspective, speech: 'It allegations complaint particularly paragraphs 'I,' 'II,' 'III' thereof sustained convincing proof, credible preponderance; licensee, la, d uly licensed admitted did, paragraph II, wit, December 14, 1952, gathering impossible; case; procedure proceeded; certain created. 54 'Upon stated supra, deems generally, contra obligations duties assumed, incident license, every shall issued Hawaii. 421 423. 55 conclusions, essentially adopted Committee,1 rested 'unprejudiced' Association. majority conclusions. 189. instance empowered aside support—that conscientious unreasonably reached strength disclosed inferences fairly 56 Thus, real supports implications actively participating, patently impugned, blatant words, judge, thereby immediate situation, judged conventional standards, reasonably deemed termed 'misconduct.' 57 elements was, doubt, engaged. Surely mean name. Nor mean, assume, consist ultimate question: opinion? 58 By carefully isolating various Matsuoka notes,2 concentrating self-contained, insulated document, labors neutral, indeed innocently attractive, patina remarks. interpreted entirety, distorted exercise disjointed parsing. placed circumstances. others meant hear. emerges abstract analysis dubieties or, events, critics unquestioned make, Dickensian injustices proceedings, plainly conveyed involving whose professionally There ample that, target crowd outside proceeding inside court-room, assault officer understanding bears evenhandedness proceedings—the judge. sight lost power. concerned strike transgresses limits. mind, reminds us, entire 'context' endeavor complete utterance setting, sounded sound 1952. 59 committee Honolulu,3 group publicly advertised topic invited press present, expected speakers highly controversial controversial, obscure, run-of-the-mill receiving front-page weeks.4 platform. Her function 'to prosecution.' Certainly precludes naive delivering dissertation using illustrations merely 'typical examples' enveloping environment talk, intensified evidence, gives substantial discussing attacking condemnations directed toward, designed to, fullest newspaperman covering meeting. notes, contemporaneous, slightly handwritten contemporaneous took news story meeting.5 accurate 'almost everything' significant half contain trial.6 However, cotent Several lends basic intent purport 61 shocking, on, one, around fit situation. That think, trend.' Another 63 brought in, purpose ILWU; rules, along, F.B.I. cops, government—they stressing government—that afraid testify, testify.' Here quotation Hawaiian court: 65 'Q. Will said? Well, What about? Honolulu.' described, papers 'the' notorious, much-exploited 'Hawaii Seven,' escape, determines adjudication, castigating engaged?7 So viewed aura innocence cast 68 announcing (International Union).' 'introductory' 'general' comments, neglecting similarly milieu delivered. 'introductory,' tone temper followed. understood Their justified establishes reasonableness intended understand. remembered audience. 69 'I excellent remember quite several illustrations, but, am sorry, *.' 70 asked responded phrases specifically 'Jack Again, testifying examples things, recall, horrifying theme 'horrifying shocking' forcefully impressed itself strips words neutral interpretation, certainly justifies, compel, formed motif 72 large. reflects permitting participating 'shocking horrible' things; lowest allows drawn, draw inference, reflect. indicting reflecting harangues audience, wholly unskilled drawing subtle distinctions exculpatory purposes, proceeding, inevitably all, excluding we, lawyers, X hospital, speaker assume sad medicine doctors administrators hospital. 73 declared again, ruled evaporating 'obviously materials illustrate unconscionable pointed fact, examples. 'state law,' 'prosecution,' point, draw, rejects force throughout conducted8 disregards, often emphasized, tone, 74 specify sins chaged unfairness, ignoring 'anything broadside attacks compelled ingenuous assumption legitimately attack, midst haranguing takes master psychology discriminate Inevitably accusation covers responsibility. Whatever secret reservations speaks infuse conveys. sophisticated trained withholding heavy repeated impliedly relieved unfairness. 75 More implication. clear. Again 'made up' isolation context. After outlining outrageous proceeded earlier hers, voluntariness accused's (Stevens police officer) (of Hawaii) crouch9 graphic illustration 'federal portion dispels illusions condemnatory inescapably rigors hearsay. prejudicial left up. asking judges, Holmes' 'are naif, simple-minded men.' Holmes, Collected Papers, p. 295. misuse vivid used—and Wiig.10 76 reverse resurrect worst niceties long-interred common-law pleading. inability seventeenth century pleading exclude misinterpretation occurring intelligence desire pervert.' Paraiso 207 368, 372, 127, 129, 249. 'public' meeting, rose level 'gross private conversation friends. Whether uttered. consider, severely aggravating made. such. discussion way. great reported daily front newspapers.11 Oahu place. inaccessible wilds Africa Dr. Livingston, community modern communication transportation, be, transmitted instantaneously radiophone Star Bulletin Dec. 15, 5. newspapers day. Ibid. motions concerning sub judice. fairness, descriptions open receptive media communication, impregnating atmosphere juries, country, subjected. provable desire, intent, affect outcome, required attribute child-like unawareness inevitability jury, did? ame registered powerfully court. replete progress even-handedness, proceedings engaged, inflammatory, reveals, supplemented escaped assailed, conducted? impugns truly embodies guardian glasses, proof conclusive relation 'committed 78 Having arrived conclusion, task end, suspending year affirmed. supportable, unconstitutional. import opinion's lawyer's wisdom Constitution commands. Legislature controlling Territory, State, whole, whatever organ State speaks. Rippey Texas, 193 504, 509, 517, 767; Castillo McConnico, 168 674, 683, 229, 233, 622; Missouri Dockery, 191 165, 171, 53, 54, 133; Iowa-Des Moines Bank Bennett, 284 239, 244, 133, 135, 265; Skiriotes 313 69, 79, 924, 930, 85 1193. (There Congress restricted Hawaii.) raised case—is law?—cannot disposed observations course, play human mind indispensable prerequisite society. meaningless expression. Justices mostly owe shaping protection Holmes Brandeis, erect dogma absolute enforce doctrinaire Time, place determine utterance. First Amendment Fourteenth Amendment, protects exception enunciated Ecclesiastes: 'For season, heaven.' instances enumeraed Preacher controls situation: '(A) silence, speak.' Eccles. 3:1, 7. emotionally lawyer. hampered rulings assailed mass conviction followed, according orderly action, thinkable indeed, stand? 80 Only day, Second (Swan, Madden Hincks, JJ.) reprimanded response invitation alumni school reference 'expatiated menace organized crime.' Stromberg, 268 256. favoring circumstances—an able, fearless, fastidiously impartial competent scrupulous befittingly austere courtroom atmosphere—trial feeling deeply easy accomplishment, experienced knows, regard letter spirit seal courtroom, were, pressures. delicate scales ought willfully agitated participants carries somewhat heavier maintenance difference vast guarded do, bring condign prosecutor. 81 revealed lawyer, applied suspension. addressed court, high probability almost certainty conditions goings-on tempers aroused. obliged hard hold entitled grievances 'Legal trials,' elections, won meeting-hall, radio, newspaper.' 271, 197. 82 absence likelihood Constitution. An tral citizen. trusted essential machinery 'officer court' compelling sense. lack forum failure adhere law; claims litigates. long bred fundamentals tradition, ultimately exercises heeded. 83 not, immune criticism, criticism. Indeed, special fearlessness fiercely participant unfair, lacks integrity, sharpen imparts inflaming warping significance. walks plead travesty, procedures established client sham. society governed role guard champion.' Howell, N.J. 139, 142, 89 A.2d 652, 653 (concurring opinion). No narrowly conceived betrayed maintaining rule last sanction. affirm join add few emphasis. Three different finders, administrative body, Sawyer, chief each Hall's created.' denies saying. violative 87 says, strangely enough, 'capable findings' 'impugned generally.' 422. innocent thereunder. broad brush whitewash thin. unanswerable. At initial 'was talk Now let's fool ourselves that.' talked processes. n t Hawaii's 5,000 away, officials, oath appeal, reach. date second-guessing authorities regular decided contrary, individuals scatters winds sincere preserve respect regret land motion—particularly farthest outpost—when bar, procedure, needed world. affirmance 4—3 vote. en banc retirement another. Attorney General Rules stood, aggrieved file unprofessional attorney. complaint. study wrds President Association: subsequently Executive Association, Bouslog. existence—that complainant. Consequently, amendments Chairman Chief Justice. amendment Rule 19—that conduct—I amended April 1954. 'Thereafter, chairman proposed draft Complaint. studied draft, recommended changes, then, finally, filed, upon, I, president authorized Association.' Canon Duty Lawyer Courts.' reads: maintain towards respectful attitude, sake temporary incumbent office, importance. Judges, peculiarly receive unjust clamor. Whenever officer, submit authorities. otherwise, encouraged protected.' 'Candor Fairness.' characterized candor fairness. candid knowingly misquote contents paper, opposing counsel, decision text-book; knowledge invalidity, cite authority overruled, statute repealed; assert jurisdictions opening closing arguments mislead opponent concealing positions intends rely. dishonorable candidly witnesses, affidavits documents, presentation causes. 'A offer reject, admissibility, address properly determination him. introduce bystanders. 'These kindred practices unworthy aiding justice.' perceive specification occur article, deals follows: 'Mrs. hour, case,' charged. 'All 'They 'just along,' listeners. "Unless here' 'new crime' what's lead 'dark control,' asserted chic attractive 'supposed bag' owned Henry Johnson. listeners 'what is.' Persons 'tried boos w ritten ago' others, said.' Application Palakiko Majors, 167, nom. Harper, Cir., 209 75. application, sought beaten client. lengthy petition, covered question. court's discuss Appeals' affirmance. 102 103. classic Jackson's Krulewitch 336 440, 453, 716, 723, 93 790: 'But sprawling (as conspiracy) control. practical accused confronted hodgepodge acts known about, help persuade itself. proved existed. effects overcome instructions practicing unmitigated fiction.' unavailing protest habit indict lieu prosecuting substantive offense itself, addition thereto, suggests loose constitutes threat interchangeable doctrine civil penal opens danger, absent crimes, sanctions approve lax imported proceedings. (T)he difficulties defending enumerte. '(A survey conducted) accords observation, convince exemplification working process.' Jackson, J., 445 446, 451—452, 454, 719, 722, 723. also. Douglas 581, 583, 903, 904, separate Black Yates 354 298, 343—344, 1064, 1089—1090, 1356. '(L)oose (conspiracy) 719. 'England completed struggle procedural reform, energy public, leadership credit English due.' Sunderland, Struggle Procedural Reform, Harv.L.Rev. 725, 727 (1926). bar. Bentham Lincoln's Inn Dickens Middle Temple. '(I)t scatter gun 452, 722. cf. 453—454, 723: hazard application aggravated institutes trials.' 318, 1076, said: faced prohibits advocacy teaching forcible principle, instigate evil intent. not.' convictions reversed Yates, Fujimoto 251 342. Lower past questioned practice. 1925 Conference Senior Annual Report General, 1925, pp. 5—6; L. Hand, Falcone, 109 579, 581. argued professor Yale criticisms pungent hers. Said uphold Professor Rodell's vantage say. simultaneously harassing unfinished 200. examined pretrial herein, visit David Fuller (the juror) licensee request sister. uncommon, heretofore jurors, decisive reaching verdict. 'However, sister visited Duller, locally, verdict, reliance thereon acceptable excuse visits interrogation affidavit, incorporated bill particulars 423—424. warning future occurrences room peril interrogator. 425. instant hereinbefore order—suspending requiring costs—suffice, deeming interrogations Fuller.' Circuits decisions Puerto Rico respectively Constitution, laws treaties exercised thereunder, costs.' 1293. 'Where controversy, value, satisfactorily ascertained evidence.' 2108, 2108. 'Newspaper publications anticipated interfere Generally condemned. justify anonymously. ex parte beyond records Court; better avoid statement.' Judicial Ethics, 1957. encompassed apprised investigated charges, 19. Charges: Bouslog,' connection P. Fuller, Bill Particulars dated September Facts: appearing defnda nts 'United America, Plaintiff, Charles Kazuyuki et als., Defendants,' Criminal 10495 (107 865); along; 'Conclusions Recommendations: unanimous II III Bouslog, reprinted 205—207. e.g., month December. reported, banner, headline latest developments, occupied days. seq. expansion following colloquy Committee: You transcription notes? Yes. Would article? expanded, like, 'Robert Dodge yesterday,' 'Dodge,' expand understandable reader. expanding, adding toit? No, Or addition, kind, filling indicated, it? That's right, expanding it.' approximately 140 lines introduced above, could, refer regarding meaning now—I speeches implicit Dodge's question; namely Now, that. We're here.' herself, explaining devoted seeking convict *' discloses 'rules along' notorious Any arising Crouch's pursed eventually here. Party Subversive Activities Control Board, 351 115, 663, 100 1003. explanation rationally characterization. refusal admit asked: 'Mr. Barlow: paralleled phrase attributes you: 'With Bench, then'? Witness: Palakiko-Majors contrast allowing right? hadn't yet. case? Yes, Is reporting. audience.' (Emphasis added.) See,

Category: 2