Document: 465 U.S. 870 104 S.Ct. 1532 79 L.Ed.2d 878 Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Petitioner,v.Mildred EDWARDS etc. No. 82-874. Argued Nov. 30, 1983. Decided March 21, 1984. Syllabus Title 28 U.S.C. § 1291 grants federal courts appeals jurisdiction over from all final decisions district courts, "except where a direct review may be had in the Supreme Court." 1252 provides its first paragraph for such appeal court judgment holding an Act Congress unconstitutional any civil action to which United States or agencies, officer employee thereof, is party. Section further second that party who has received notice under section shall take subsequent Court taken other prior treated as directly Court. Respondent filed class Federal District against petitioner challenging constitutionality 211(a)(5)(A) Social Security Act, gross income deductions derived family business community property attributed husband unless wife can establish she exercised substantially management control business, case would wife's. Although conceded unconstitutionality 211(a)(5)(A)'s gener-based presumption, nevertheless rejected petitioner's claim mootness, held statute unconstitutional, granted respondent's motion summary judgment. The then found respondent entitled retroactively allocation coproprietor between spouses' earnings accounts on basis labor contributed by each. Petitioner appealed Appeals, only Court's remedy. Appeals dismiss lack 1291, because could this pursuant 1252. Held: A does not have right court's statutory issue, hence here improperly dismissed jurisdiction, since remedy was challenged. Pp. 876-885. (a) While literal reading seem give circumstances case, natural sense unconstitutionality, issues attorney's fees, remedy, related state-law claims, what wished instance. 877-879. (b) 1252's structure supports view. conclusion inherent been must Court, necessary corollary being absence will follow normal route appellate review. Because linked logical test brought which, standing alone, review, whether issue unconstitutionality. 879-880. (c) legislative history also view considered jurisdictional predicate mandatory constitutional holding. Congress' concerns enacting predecessor about separation powers need certainty uniformity administration law are implicated cases Government concedes decision aspect justification exerting might considerable ramifications orders, but serious consequences alone cannot support exercise jurisdiction. remedial aspects important, touchstone party's own significance decision. In mandated simply with impact rather whose predicated upon potentially incorrect judicial construction require collateral independent matters, than pendent undermine effectiveness provision. 880-885. Vacated remanded. John H. Garvey, petitioner. Neal S. Dudovitz, Los Angeles, Cal., respondent. Justice MARSHALL delivered opinion 1 This raises concerning 1291. judgment, proceeding party, unconstitutional. before us properly Secretary's declared challenged 2 * suit Services Northern California October 1980. On behalf nationwide applicants recipients, 42 411(a)(5)(A), established gender-based presumption businesses states.1 pretrial proceedings, argued ruling sought unnecessary acquiesced precedents provision unconstitutional.2 Indeed, shortly after complaint filed, Attorney General formally notified Executive defend section.3 judgment.4 According although "essentially 411(a)(5)(A)," merits Department still applying section.5 3 Having turned relief. provided nonpartnership trade jurisdictions should struck down co-proprietor relative amount Finding retroactive application appropriate tests Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson, 404 97, 106-107, 92 349, 355, 30 296 (1971), members "are recomputation their records, extending back beginning if necessary." Edwards Schweiker, C-80-3959 (ND Jan. 22, 1982). entered 23, 1982. 4 following week Ninth Circuit.6 docketing statement, May 5, 1982, listed matters ordered court, noting statute.7 Respondents appeal, contending did "where 1252, one sentence order dated July 27, Circuit respondents' citing Donovan Richland County Assn. Retarded Citizens, 454 389, 102 713, 70 570 (1982) (per curiam). timely petition certiorari seeking our dismissal. raised important question docket, we certiorari. --- ----, 103 1182, 75 430 (1983). We conclude issue. therefore vacate remand reinstatement appeal. II 5 course, dissatisfied writ Recourse matter right, 1291; writs at discretion 1254(a). general rule discretionary without exceptions. minimized through legislation Judge's Bill 19258 1976 repeal most Three Judge Act,9 identified narrow group merit immediate attention 6 When pursue blocked, supra, U.S., 389-390, S.Ct., 713-14. Thus, consequence erroneous choice forum preclude time discovers error, correct untimely. To avoid consequence, litigants ought able apply clear determine whether, exception they perfect Such test, crafted "with precision fidelity terms expressed wishes" statute. Cheng Fan Kwok INS, 392 206, 212, 88 1970, 1974, 20 1037 (1968). 7 offer different tests. Respondent's position when "literal requirements satisfied," Williams Zbaraz, 448 358, 366, 100 2694, 2699, 65 831 (1980); see INS Chadha, 2764, 2773, 77 317 (1983) ("express requisites . met"). establishes four prerequisites Court: enumerated court; agency party; civil; hold Those met present case. Therefore, argues, sole avenue file within days order, 2101(a), contends lost her orders. 8 claims available correctness She argues close examination enactment merely decided below, invoke Under reading, proper scope ruling. reasoning, 9 articulate resolve dispute provide guidance future cases, begin language itself. 10 "Any interlocutory decree States, Canal Zone, Guam Virgin Islands record Puerto Rico, action, suit, employee, 11 "A cross All 12 tells parties "judgment, order," "holding unconstitutional." language, contesting required proceed That gains fact limited asserted whole come us.10 13 however, presents "to surface meaning consistent 'sense thing' confer beyond 'naturally belongs it.' "11 created exceptional bypass appeals, it lower invalidation Congress. nature controversies address constitutionality, well, state these issues, loggerheads. 14 helps tension, leads towards common-sense lie. unconstitutional; brings including appeal.12 implication lodged filing. Only here. notice, 15 predecessor13 guides holding.14 interrelated justifications expediting determinations statutes recur discussions First, judge strikes act coequal branch government, implicates powers,15 original hear By mandating prerogative define category free ignore.16 Second, justified imposing government It significant authorizes actions party"; no lies there non-federal suit. reveals congressional purpose assure expeditious means affirming removing restraint government's bound unconstitutional.17 16 Finally, declarations interests particular For reason, intervention private drawn into question,18 well Senate Report emphasized "decision affect public large, respect Constitution entrusted care Nation, Nation owes duty citizens securing them common rights." S.Rep. 996, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. (1937).19 17 two raise nor do implicate law. example, General, charged enforcing laws, informed agreed unconstitutional.20 Furthermore, enforce anywhere effect nationwide. obviously intended bind Act. affected reach same conclusion, resort effort remove binding Branch's 18 orders; here, relief nation-wide class. believe enact open-ended "impact" determining grant criminal before, after, rendition 1254(1); Rule 18. impact, See, nn. 15-16. 19 Not Congress's creating expedited method this, coming If were adopt precedence outside definition importance. would, obliged crowd docket concerned solely fee awards arising law—matters typically fail meet criteria See 17. sort almost certainly better handled lie interpretation today. III conclude, therefore, warrant raising met, seeks contest another portion appeals. formal belonged instance vacated cause remanded 21 so ordered. certified "[a]ll recipients Old Age, Survivors Disability Insurance benefits, 401 et seq., wage earners applications denied whom monthly benefit reduced due omission records earned while married operating state, 411(a)(5)(A)." 1981). 60 filing lawsuit thereafter. Mar. 19, latter half 1980, several violated Equal Protection element Due Process Clause. Hester Harris, 631 F.2d 53, 55-56 (CA5 1980); Carrasco Secretary, 628 624, 627-631 (CA1 Becker 493 F.Supp. 991, 994-996 (ED Cal.1980). These formulate new standards crediting self-employment states. F.2d, 56-57; 631; F.Supp., 997. eligibility requirement, constitutionally-suspect classification based gender, Solicitor later concluded defended announced Califano Westcott, 443 76, 99 2655, 61 382 (1979) (provision rests stereotypical gender presumptions, more, violates process), Goldfarb, 199, 97 1021, 51 270 (1977) (classification serve governmental objectives). Communication 4772, 126 Cong.Rec. S14343 (Nov. 12, 1980) (notice supra ); 5587, H10562 (daily ed. (same). notify both Houses considers enacted law, 519 note (Supp. V). 1981, agency's concession published Ruling 81-17c, 40 (cum. 1981) (acquiescing supra). "Once published, components Administration accordance [20 CFR Part 422]. Rulings force regulations relied facts basically same. superseded, modified, revoked legislation, regulations, rulings." Id., iii. Neither modified implementing argued. permits, require, 1252; Clark, 445 26-27 n. 2, 895, 899 63 171 (1980) (Government entered). C-80-3959, slip op. 1982) (referring Order Notice Appeal ground function so. Fed.Rule App.Proc. 3(c). relevant Docketing Statement provided: "H. Brief Description Nature Action Result Below: Plaintiffs requires worked State, allocated husband. statute's remaining relief, particular, standard place invalid standard. recompute benefits principle split amounts labor. "I. Issues Appeal: include: (1) applied true partnership spouses; (2) error dating program; (3) individual lose result order; (4) sent potential appropriate." Feb. 13, 1925, 43 Stat. 936. Gonzalez Automatic Employees Credit Union, 419 90, 98, 16, 95 289, 294, 249 (1980). Aug. 1976, Pub.L. 94-381, §§ 1, 90 1119 (repealing 2281-2282 (1970), amending id. 2284, 2403). discussion classes removed 1971, Tushnet, Mandatory Jurisdiction Court—Some Recent Developments, 46 U.Cinn.L.Rev. 347, 359 (1977). Cf. 1254(2) (party State grounds, "shall restricted questions presented"). Florida Lime Growers Jacobsen, 362 73, 94, 80 568, 580, 568 (1960) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting) (quoting American & Trust Columbia, 224 491, 495, 32 553, 554, 56 L.Ed. 856 (1912)). discussing Friends Service Committee, 7, (1974) curiam); Raines, 17, 27 519, 526, 524 (1960). consider intent exercising administer caseload secure just, speedy, inexpensive determination actions. Civ.Proc. 1. But neither play 24, 1937, ch. 754, 50 752, "In intervened become Congress, ." As current version, order. heard earliest possible like character." Ibid. thrust bill focus special importance invalidations statutes. Floor debate affirms understood seek bill's sponsor, Representative Sumners, explicated mean "may expedite question." 81 3272 (1937); id., 3260 (remarks Rep. Sumners) (case up just constitutionality); 3257 Michener) (bill affects questions); 3256 Brewster) eliminates delays question). sponsor "good, practical sense" having "just little delay [of constitutionality] arranged." 3268 Sumners). impetus mid-1930's holdings courts' response much New Deal enjoining operation newly-created Tennessee Valley Authority. e.g., Courts, Hearings Sen. Comm. Judiciary 2176, 74th Sess., 13-16 (1935). Senator Hugo L. Black, injunctions preventing effectuation Acts explained: "I reason why say '. you not. primarily country closer contact necessity speedy your room, determined great national moment once.' " 20. One commentator suggests existence policy powers. Cinn.L.Rev., 358-365. Congressional provisions incorporates author refers "importance" regarding recognized particularly broad impact. e.g. McLucas DeChamplain, 421 31, 1365, 1371, 699 (1975) (§ permits participated litigation "and thus unconstitutionality"). 1937 "whenever affecting interest question," "for presentation evidence argument Act." 751. version appears 2403(a). (1937) ("If," "when," "[w]here Congress] questioned, more rights involved. people laws involved, essence many Court."); 3265 Fred Vinson) (When question, "affects others. interest.") 4, supra. concurrence views Branch necessarily controversy (1983), contested one-house veto squarely presented situation

Category: 8