Document: 369 U.S. 654 82 S.Ct. 993 8 L.Ed.2d 176 UNITED STATES, Appellant,v.DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED. No. 286. Argued April 23, 1962. Decided May 14, Daniel M. Friedman, Washington, D.C., for the appellant. William L. McGovern, appellee. PER CURIAM. 1 This is a civil antitrust suit by Government challenging Diebold's acquisition of assets Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Company as being violative § 7 Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.A. 18. On motion Diebold District Court entered summary judgment against on ground that acquired firm was 'failing company' under doctrine International Shoe Co. v. Federal Trade Comm'n, 280 291, 50 89, 74 L.Ed. 431 (1930). The case here direct appeal. 368 894, 171, 91. 2 In determining not violation 7, acted upon its findings 'HHM hopelessly insolvent and faced with imminent receivership' 'Diebold only bona fide prospective purchaser HHM's business.' latter finding represents at least in part resolution head-on factual controversy revealed materials before whether other offers or business were actually made. any event both represent choice inferences to be drawn from subsidiary facts contained affidavits, attached exhibits, depositions submitted below. underlying such must viewed light most favorable party opposing motion. A study record this leads us believe contrary those trial court might permissible. having thus raised genuine issue ultimate material rule it improper decide applicability judgment. Fed.Rules Civ.Proc., 56(c), 28 3 Reversed remanded. 4 Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER took no consideration decision case.

Category: 8