Document: 392 U.S. 647 88 S.Ct. 2277 20 L.Ed.2d 1344 Jack LOPINSONv.PENNSYLVANIA. No. 1133, October Term, 1967. John J. COYLE v. PENNSYLVANIA. 1095, Misc., On Petitions for Writs of Certiorari to the Supreme Court Pennsylvania. Robert Leroy PRUETT OHIO. 1700, Petition Writ Ohio. Lester Schaffer, petitioner Lopinson. Howard M. Nazor and Gordon L. Pruett. Michael Rotko Arlen Specter, respondent Commonwealth Pennsylvania in 1133. Rotko, William H. Wolf, Jr., Misc. Joseph E. Mahoney, State June 17, 1968. PER CURIAM. 1 The motions leave proceed forma pauperis are granted petitions writs certiorari all three cases granted. Without reaching petitioners' other claims, judgments vacated remanded reconsideration light Witherspoon Illinois, 391 510, 1770, 776. 2 Mr. Justice HARLAN dissents reasons stated Black's dissenting opinion 532, 1782, 3 WHITE his 540, 1786, 4 BLACK, dissenting. 5 In these remands state courts on one single constitutional claim petitioners without claims raised by them. result is that after rule remand issue this will undoubtedly be called pass issues which refuses decide. At very least means postponement a final decision year or two years years, unless, is, should, second review, choose once more decide piecemeal. Piecemeal dispositions criminal inevitably cause delays hamper enforcement laws there lot truth old adage delay defendant's best lawyer. See 776, where murder sentence was reversed nine murder. It true under Fay Noia, 372 391, 83 822, 9 837, certain amount inevitable cases, but not squarely presented us here now.

Category: 0