Document: 371 U.S. 18 83 S.Ct. 11 9 L.Ed.2d 1 UNITED STATESv.Evetts HALEY, Jr. STATES v. DISTRICT COURT FOR the NORTHERN OF TEXAS. Nos. 148, 139, Misc. Oct. 15, 1962. PER CURIAM. The order of District Court, dated February 26, 1962, denying motion United States for judgment in this action evidently rested on a misconception scope and effect Court's per curiam opinion Government's earlier appeal, 358 644, 79 537, 3 567, its issued 24, 1959. In light issues tendered papers filed that appeal there can be no doubt finally established right to relief sought action, subject only resolution Haley's procedural defense, still unadjudicated, Government had failed comply with conditions requisite effective establishment wheat acreage allotment Haley. See Jurisdictional Statement Appellee's Opposing Jurisdiction Motion Dismiss or Affirm No. 587, October Term, 1958; Vacate Judgment 1959, denied April 27, 359 977, 896, 927; Rehearing, 981, 931. 2 More particularly, Court then necessarily decided (1) it jurisdiction over such appeal; (2) relevant provisions Agricultural Adjustment Act 1938, 52 Stat. 31, as amended, 7 U.S.C. § 1281 et seq., U.S.C.A. embraced conduct Haley complained action; (3) was constitutional applied premises. Under remand ordered by thus left open adjudication above-mentioned defense. erred believing not foreclosed from inquiring into reinstating own original case, which appears have been denial following remand. re Sanford Fork & Tool Co., 160 247, 255, 16 291, 293, 40 L.Ed. 414. error should rectified without delay, we think proper means accomplishing is mandamus. 28 1651, 1651; see Potts, 166 263, 17 520, 41 994; 334 258, 264, 68 1035, 1037, 92 1351. Accordingly, Misc., leave file petition writ mandamus, are granted. 4 We shall not, however, issue formal at time, since confident once our has called attention, will promptly take steps set aside judgment; proceed resolve aforesaid defense; if defense found insufficient, enter final favor States; (4) sufficient, accordingly. Cf. Ex parte Northern Pac. R. 280 142, 530, 50 70, 157, 74 233. 5 view disposition becomes unnecessary consider whether dismiss case accordingly granted dismissed. It so ordered. 6 139 Misc.; 148 Mr. Justice GOLDBERG took part consideration decision these cases.

Category: 8