Document: 356 U.S. 269 78 S.Ct. 690 2 L.Ed.2d 751 Gerys DESSALERNOS, Petitioner,v.Joseph SAVORETTI, District Director of the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, Miami, Florida. No. 287. Argued April 3, 1958. Decided 14, Mr. David W. Walters, Fla., for petitioner. Maurice A. Roberts, Washington, D.C., respondent. PER CURIAM. 1 It was stipulated by parties in Court that sole question decision is whether petitioner entitled to have his application suspension deportation considered under § 244(a)(1) Nationality Act 1952 (66 Stat. 163, 214; 8 U.S.C. 1254(a)(1), U.S.C.A. 1254(a)(1)). We hold so entitled. The judgment Appeals (244 F.2d 178) therefore vacated cause remanded with directions enter an appropriate declaring Service 244(a)(1). So ordered. 3 Justice HARLAN, whom CLARK joins, would dismiss writ lack jurisdiction. In view record fails disclose a justiciable case or controversy because (1) undisturbed administrative finding 'does not meet requirement (would) result exceptional extremely unusual hardship himself,' establishes either subdivision (a)(1) (a)(5) 244 1952; (2) parties' stipulation ineffective confer jurisdiction on this decide sought be presented. See Swift & Co. v. Hocking Valley R. Co., 243 281, 289, 37 287, 61 L.Ed. 722; Aetna Life Ins. Hartford, Conn. Haworth, 300 227, 240 241, 57 461, 463—464, 81 617. holding governs petitioner's has, view, rendered what effect advisory opinion. 4 FRANKFURTER join HARLAN if he read as clear latter finds it be. Being sufficient doubt about scope meaning stipulation, joins Court's This leaves open, remand, determination issues

Category: 1