Document: 329 U.S. 545 67 S.Ct. 451 91 L.Ed. 488 MORRISv.JONES, Director of Insurance I linois. No. 62. Argued Dec. 9, 10, 1946. Decided Jan. 20, 1947. Rehearing Denied March 3, See 330 854, 858. Messrs. Ford W. Thompson and J. L. London, both St. Louis, Mo., for appellant. Mr. Ferre C. Watkins, Chicago, Ill., appellee. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion Court. 1 This case presents a substantial question under Full Faith Credit Clause (Art. IV, § 1) Constitution. 2 Chicago Lloyds, an unincorporated association, was authorized by Illinois to transact insurance business in other States. It qualified do Missouri. In 1934 petitioner sued Lloyds Missouri court malicious prosecution false arrest. 1938, before judgment obtained Missouri, respondent's predecessor appointed as statutory liquidator Lloyds. The fixed time filing claims against issued order staying suits it. Petitioner had notice stay but nevertheless continued prosecute suit. At instance liquidator, however, counsel withdrew from suit did not defend it, stating that liquidation proceedings vested all property liquidator. Thereafter filed exemplified copy it proof his claim proceedings. An disallowing sustained Supreme Court contention its allowance required Clause. People ex rel. Jones v. 391 Ill. 492, 63 N.E.2d 479. 3 brought here appeal. We postponed jurisdiction merits. 66 979. Under rule Roche McDonald, 275 449, 450, 48 142, 72 365, 53 A.L.R. 1141, whether full faith credit should have been given does present ground But treating jurisdictional statement petition certiorari (Judicial Code 237(c), 28 U.S.C. 344(c), U.S.C.A. writ is granted; we come merits controversy. 4 statute which implements (R.S. 905, 687, 687) require judgments courts one State be same another they law or usage rendering them. concluded compliance with mandate precedence decree appointing held title wherever located, liquidator; entitled keep retain possession exclusion process any court; although might give priority creditors debtor located there,1 Clark Williard, 292 112, 54 615, 78 1160, could no respects assets; if judgment, he enforced hands see McDonald Pacific States Life Ins. Co., 344 Mo. 1, 124 S.W.2d 1157; disallow is, therefore, effect would circumstances 5 First. can put side, irrelevant problem at hand, several arguments pressed upon us. are n t dealing debtor. For this proceeding seeking, nor respondent denying him, anything than right prove form. No parity treatment creditors, lack thereof (see Blake McClung, 172 239, 19 165, 43 432), issue. Nor there involved challenge rule, follows Relfe Rundle, 103 222, 26 337, either through attempt obtain lien on otherwise. As pointed out Riehle Margolies, 279 218, 224, 49 310, 312, 73 669, distribution assets among ordinarily has 'two-fold aspect.' deals 'directly property' when fixes manner distribution. part enforce specific except application matters distinct They 'deal directly property'. 'The latter function, spoken claim, strictly personam.' Id., page 313, 669. establishment existence amount way disturbs court, affects property, necessarily involve determination what have. And Title & Trust Co. Fox Theatres Corp., Cir., 69 F.2d 60, 991. 6 One line cases holds where receiver appointed, taking draws unto itself exclusive control over claims.2 notion such necessary protection mistaken one. Beach Errors Connecticut aptly said, simply admissibility evidence; obligation receive evidence more derogatory rem promissory note admissible debt.' Beach, Judgment Claims Receivership Proceedings, 30 Yale Journ. 674, 680. 7 Moreover, situation like Pendleton Russell, 144 640, 12 743, 36 574, sought New York receivership dissolved corporation Tennessee after dissolution. disallowed, dissolution having operated, death, abatement infirmity appears judgment; hold appointment f r operated bring within exception Williams North Carolina, 325 226, 65 1092, 89 1577, 157 1366, rests, challenging parties subject matter. privity between Cf. Ingersoll Coram, 211 335, 362—364, 29 92, 98, 99, 208. There difference cause action, cf. United California Bridge Construction 245 38 91, 62 332, sued. represents liability acts committed those being administered reason discharging responsibility defending pending actions relieving task. supra. 8 Second. 'A matter operates res judicata, absence fraud collusion, even default.' supra, 225, Such sister exceptions relevant here, 317 287, 294, 295, 207, 211, 87 279, 143 1273, State, though underlying forum. Christmas Wall. 290, 18 475; Fauntleroy Lum, 210 230, 641, 52 1039; supra; Titus Wallick, 306 282, 291, 59 557, 562, 83 653. important maintained fact limitations forum barred may defeated virtue able received benefit there, as, example, prior judgment. taken, conditions had. depend presence reciprocal engagements 9 petitioner's final nature claim. Pitts Fugate, 41 405; Central Mobile D'Arcy, 238 676, 142 S.W. 294; Robb Shain, 347 928, 149 812. That conclusive courts. 'Because clause defendant second validity plaintiff's ripened into judgment'. Magnolia Petroleum Hunt, 320 430, 439, 440, 64 208, 214, 88 149, 150 413. established 'throughout federal system salutary principle common litigation once pursued shall rights every rendered'. Riley 315 343, 348, 349, 608, 612, 86 885. etitioner's not, challenged retried 10 decree, notice, only word need said. pages 454, 455, 144, makes plain place raise defense Treinies Sunshine Mining 308 66, 77, 60 44, 50, 84 85. whatever ruling question, preserved resort arbiter questions arising 302, 215, 1273. event judicata defenses raised. Milwaukee County M. E. White 296 268, 275, 56 229, 233, 80 220; 438, 213, 11 finally suggested since Federal Bankruptcy Act provides adjudication bankruptcy court3 excepts companies (§ 4, Stat. 840, 845, 22, 22; Vallely Northern Fire Marine 254 116, 297), state liquidators insolvent has. argue police power determine method proving administrative agencies. doubt so procedure collides Constitution Congress. Broderick Rosner, 294 629, 55 589, 79 1100, 100 1133. collision, action must Supremacy Article VI, 2. collision here. When look general Congress enacted pursuant Clause, find liquidations companies. command State. infirmity, rarely, ever, read constitutional provision involving money rendered civil suits. 413; footnote 6, function resolve controversies policies differ. Its greatly felt situations clash interests argument convenience administration best illustration how enforcement run counter latter's policies. answer conclusive. If situation, fail their greatest. convenience, moreover, proves too much. first place, often equally appealing ividuals corporations engaging multistate activities well prefer home. hardship credits were forced drop litigation, witnesses Illinois, start again. inexorable command; applicability turn balance litigants. Missouri's policy result dismemberment estate go begging, large interest stake prevent 356, 865, 98 347. But, assets. 13 single point our decision conclusively determined relitigated proceedings, appearing lacked suggest form gain relitigate Illinois. And, departs 347; 14 Reversed. 15 FRANKFURTER, whom concur BLACK RUTLEDGE, dissenting. 16 So far us, facts briefly stated. regulating business, formulated liquidating concern falls below requisite standards. To end provided should, approval courts, pass officer known A further defines enforcing thus passed liquidator's hands. proved satisfaction appropriate judicial review determinations. 17 concern, ownership due conformity law. also done license. While Morris, claimant, damages begun while company still solvent. Without substitution administrator appearance Morris Apparently, go. Thereupon judgment-creditor asserted basis declined recognize such, maintaining creditor merits, precisely creditors. Superior Cook disallowed based Disallowance affirmed now failed Constitution, 122, 299, 687. regarding mode court. issue us determined, construction placed spelt unambiguously legislation itself. real this. May provide life can, longer allowed conduct take local fair who defunct concern? policy, announce advance, fairness, previously reduced valid arose, paid proven Illinois? specify apply out-of-State merit preclude them basing merely legally ceased be, liquidator? safe say regulation old pervasive regulatory exercised See, e.g., Osborn Ozlin, 310 53, 758, 1074; Hoopeston Canning Cullen, 318 602, 1722, 145 1113. Not banking which, all, phase, subjected continuous extensive surveillance. increasingly absorbed regulation, reverse true insurance. Indeed, pronouncement partakes commerce States, prompt delegated relegated insurance, exceptions, diverse laws Prudential Benjamin, 328 408, 1142. 20 concerned solely presented State's exercise own creation. remember connections largely dependent procedure. seems, difficult believe domestic confines comes unliquidated pot. assume, course, prescribed consistent requirements process, conflict overriding legislation. affords satisfy these requirements. Standing itself, beyond authority assume lodged foreclosed passes Does cut outside d State? 21 Concededly, open citizen serve assets, secured thought, because deny superior without imply validly procured automatically enforceable another, quite regardless consequences peculiarly control. Alaska Packers Assn. Industrial Accident Commission California, 532, 546, 518, 523, 1044. eat up powers reserved embody absolutist conception mechanical applicability. problems, accommodation struck different provisions frequently becomes necessary, define duty former view regulate affairs. 22 general. Anglo-American Provision Davis 191 373, 24 225. Again, determining will binding controls issues succession Robertson Pickrell, 109 407, 27 1049; Overby Gordon, 177 603, 44 741. Surely, advantage persons dwelling without, justifiably restrict citizens particular fund. accept face value 23 Precedent sustain each claimant share entity doing according fix initiated her 1925. 1928, thereafter renewed annual required. gave entry 1932, later additional one-year periods. Thus, advance fall short standards solvency safety will, seize claimants claims. warned world arose authorization created sort equitable lien, speak freely loosely, become effective insolvency liquidation. deemed protect foreign adequate means contesting. contested Certainly nothing specially assert vesting respect accorded Either not. constitutionally property. Relevant protected himself entering litigant What deem adequately refuse exist, obtained. Due regard relations expressed carefully proper safeguarding disturbed very contingency reality. unfair subordinate primary predominant enter admitting congenital limitations, concerned, came being. so, admitted knowledge exact, trouble extent Of course methods administration, default, side entity, discrimination proof. 25 analysis assumes heavier burden necessary. thereby charged limited affect actual liberty strong thing bound his. Surely bar sifting secure equality impose allow company's party made precise relation legal position asserts reinforces considerations. Lloyds' mere institution greater begun. By attach. unassailable law, These reached him. respect, controlling authoritatively decisively found surety Ewen American Fidelity Company, 261 322, 371, 61 677. action; served; appeared; expressly denied represent bind estate. clothed him contest Company contest, hand enabled recognize, recognized, otherwise command. trustee extinct company, represented conducted business. short, stranger cannot invoked 332; Kersh Lake Drainage Dist. Johnson, 309 485, 881, 128 386. subsequent passage questions. 885; Restatement, Conflict Laws comment d. saved consideration, controlling, countervailing Against set importance unified anywhere resulting hazards fund might, dilute legitimate claimants. Considering adjustment conflicting interests, considering, creature bounds, neither demands fairness requires Constitutional resolution price federalism, small price. calls correction uniform deal Or various devices securing uniformity fact, overtures regard. adopted Uniform Reciprocal Liquidation proposed Commissioners Laws. state'. Ill.Laws 1941, pp. 832—837, replacin ancillary 'reciprocal 1937, 788—790, Smith-Hurd Ann.Stat. c. 73, 833.3. seen fit becoming state' fault word. deciding finality provability passing abstract status ever participate creditor; rejected lower disallowance never questioned thrust opportunity judgment-creditor-claimant compete Neither suggestion exhaust invalid. Whether recovery return reanimated call consideration. affirmed. appear Missouri; Attorney General Council, A.L.H., 196 Mass. 151, 159, 81 N.E. 966, 968 (receivership); Hackett Council Legion Honor, 206 139, 92 133 (receivership). announced instant likewise applicable Evans Surety 319 105, 802. Contra: Pringle Woolworth, 90 N.Y. 502 permits continuance least receiver. Dickinson Universal Service Stations, 753, 757, applying started receivership. collection 96 485. re Paramount Publix 85 42, collected 106 1121 et seq. Robinson Trustees York, N.H. H.R. 121, 593; E.I. Ry. 121 785.

Category: 10