Document: 336 U.S. 804 69 S.Ct. 840 93 L.Ed. 1052 UNITED STATESv.URBUTEIT. No. 640. On Petition for Certiorari Distributed April 15, 1949. Decided May 2, Mr. Philip B. Perlman, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., petitioner. H. O. Pemberton, Tallahassee, Fla., respondent. PER CURIAM. 1 The question presented by this petition is whether the Court Appeals followed our mandate on remand cause in 335 355, 112. 2 case when it was here earlier Term appeared following posture: 3 A condemnation proceeding instituted United States under Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 52 Stat. 1044, 21 U.S.C. § 334, U.S.C.A. 334. Sixteen machines with alleged diagnostic curative capabilities had been shipped interstate commerce. Leaflets describing uses machine at a separate time. Appeals, 164 F.2d 245, held that shipments d leaflets precluded conclusion accompanied device commerce, therefore transaction outside reach Act. We reversed shipment constituted single interrelated activity. 4 172 386, concluded because there were several advertising matter, not clear which might be considered Therefore, remanded to District determination fact. 5 When before, we decided fact immaterial. controlling factors designed use they so used. Since function purpose their established, nothing more needed show movements Moreover, complicated different persons. One Kelsch recipient both. 6 adhered its former ruling erroneously excluded evidence as therapeutic or value machines. before did disturb ruling. But leave consideration further question—whether respects falsity adequate sustain even though error exclusion other conceded. entitled hearing question. 7 certiorari granted judgment reversed. 8 Reversed.

Category: 8