vania-janet/multiturn-rag-retrieval-data huggingface dataset:
This is going to be a bit of a shameless plug, but I've build a portfolio tracking website to track your portfolio and be able to share it (in read-only mode) as  well. It is at http://frano.carelessmusings.com and currently in beta. Most portfolio trackers are behind a login wall and thus will lack the sharing function you are looking for. Examples of these are: Yahoo Finance, Google Finance, Reuters Portfolios, MorningStart Portfolios, and many others. Another very quick and easy solution (if you are not trading too often) is a shared google docs spreadsheet. Gdocs has integration with google finance and can retrieve prices for stocks by symbol. A spreadsheet can contain the following: Symbol, Quantity, Avg. Buy Price, Price, P/L, P/L% and so on. The current price and P/L data can be functions that use the google finance API. Hope this helps, and if you check out my site please let me know what you think and what I could change.
"I believe you are looking for price forecasts from analysts. Yahoo provides info in the analyst opinions section: here is an example for Apple the price targets are located in the ""Price Target Summary"" section."
Get to now and grab your top picks rapidly! Items have just begun coming up short on stock. What's more, you won't have any desire to in any case make a miss at your end. On the off chance that it is in this way, at that point with no hesitation, be snappy and punch on purchase choice. Men footwear, ladies footwear, attire, home machines and IPHONE 7 SALE are largely accessible online at a reasonable range. Shopallitem.com is one of such online focuses where you can locate the best of items at a decent cost.
If I needed a safe-ish way to bank a lot of cash in vegas I'd exchange for high value chips at the local gambling establishments.  I have to imagine that's being done already for other less than legal enterprises.
Deals Woot i s a good place to find a lot of deals.
&gt; Bernie Sanders This is just one article that I found rather quickly: https://www.vox.com/2016/3/4/11161616/bernie-sanders-tax-policy-center A lot of my income comes from trading stocks, a lot of the times I use options (or as he puts it Wall Street Speculation) The tax that he wants to impose on ""Wall Street Speculation"" was nothing more than fancy double speak for things like stock options/futures. Options are used by most 401(k) managers, pension planers, etc. Those taxes would have hurt everybody. It would have made the stock market less price efficient and less liquid. You know who it wouldn't have hurt? The people he intended to stop in the first place, people like George Soros. I believe it was in just 1 day Soros made over $1 billion by shorting the British Pound back in the 90's. I believe he also made a killing shorting if just before Brexit."
"It sounds like you need an index fund that follows so called Sustainability index. A sustainability index does not simply select ""socially responsible"" industries. It attempts to replicate the target market, in terms of countries, industries, and company sizes, but it also aims to select most ""sustainable"" companies from each category. This document explains how Dow Jones Sustainability World index is constructed (emphasis mine): An example of a fund following such index is iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF, which also excludes ""sin stocks""."
Sure they can (most publicly traded banks at least) - and they do it a lot. Many banks have a proprietary trading desk, or Prop desk, where traders are buying and selling shares of publicly traded companies on behalf of the bank, with the bank's own money. This is as opposed to regular trading desks where the banks trade on behalf of their customers.
What I think was being asked (and so this is how I interpreted it) is not the transition from public to private, but a corporation itself buying all its shares back, and as a result having no shareholders.  In this case we could envision that all outstanding shares would be become treasury stock.  My argument was that this would never happen in a practical setting.  Obviously, if you interpret the question differently, for instance to be about all the shares of firm being purchased by someone else (as in a private equity buyout), you get very different answers about practicality.  So I'm not disagreeing with you at all, I just read the question differently.
A cooperative society means a general public enrolled or considered to be gotten under any law identifying with agreeable orders for the present in power in any State or under the Central demo. Useful societies could be enacted laws by the specific State cooperative Societies Act or by the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002. The societies, whose primary destination is to serve the financial investment in a specific State, are enacted laws by the Cooperative Societies Act of that particular State. While a society whose principle targets are to serve the diversions of its members in even more than one State, are legislated by the Multi State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002.  Address : Crystal Consultancy, Office Number- 204, 45B, 1st Floor, Hasanpur Main Road, Patparganj, I.P. Extension, Delhi- 110092 phone no-011-22235922,9711105597
You need a source of delisted historical data. Such data is typically only available from paid sources. According to my records, AULT (Ault Inc) began as an OTC stock in the 1980s prior it having an official NASDAQ listing.  It was delisted on 27 Jan 2006.  Its final traded price was $2.94.  It was taken over at a price of $2.90 per share by SL Industries. Source: Symbol AULT-200601 within Premium Data US delisted stocks historical price data set available from http://www.premiumdata.net/products/premiumdata/ushistorical.php Disclosure: I am a co-owner of Norgate / Premium Data.
This answer contains three assumptions: New Share Price: Old Share Price * 1.0125 Quarterly Dividend: (New Share Price*0.01) * # of Shares in Previous Quarter Number of Shares: Shares from Previous Quarter + Quarterly Dividend/New Share Price For example, starting from right after Quarter One: New share price: $20 * 1.0125 = 20.25  1000 shares @ $20.25 a share yields $20.25 * 0.01 * 1000 = $202.5 dividend New shares: $202.5/20.25 = 10 shares Quarter Two: New share price: $20.503 1010 shares @ 20.503 yields $20.503*0.01*1010 = $207.082 dividend New shares: $207.082/20.503 = 10.1 shares Repeat over many cycles: 8 Quarters (2 years): 1061.52 shares @ $21.548 a share 20 Quarters (5 years): 1196.15 shares @ $25.012 a share 40 Quarters (10 years): 1459.53 shares @ $32.066 a share Graphically this looks like this:  It's late enough someone may want to check my math ;). But I'd also assert that a 5% growth rate and a 4% dividend rate is pretty optimistic.
There are dividend newsletters that aggregate dividend information for interested investors.  Other than specialized publications, the best sources for info are, in my opinion:
gnasher729, was able to see my problem here. It was a silly oversight. It's not 50p a share, its 0.5p a share. @Bezzzo: The dividend is not 50p per share, it is 0.50p per share -   half a penny per share. Thanks!
Yahoo provides dividend data from their Historical Prices section, and selecting Dividends Only, along with the dates you wish to return data for. Here is an example of BHP's dividends dating back to 1998. Further, you can download directly to *.csv format if you wish: http://real-chart.finance.yahoo.com/table.csv?s=BHP.AX&a=00&b=29&c=1988&d=06&e=6&f=2015&g=v&ignore=.csv
I second @DumbCoder, every company seems to have its own way of displaying the next dividend date and the actual dividend. I keep track of this information and try my best to make it available for free through my little iphone web app here http://divies.nazabe.com
There are some high-yield savings accounts out there that might get you close to 1 percent. Shorter term CDs might also serve you well here- rates are above 1 percent, even with 1-2 year terms: http://www.nerdwallet.com/rates/cds/best-cd-rates/
You can use long-term options called LEAPS to increase dividend yield. Here's how it works: Let's say you buy a dividend-yielding stock for $38 that pays an annual dividend of $2 for a 5.3% yield. Next, you SELL a deep-in-the-money LEAPS options. In this hypothetical we'll sell the $25 call option for $13. That now reduces our cost basis from $38 to $25. Since the dividend remains @ $2, our yield is now $2/$25 = 8%. Now there are issues that may need to be dealt with like early assignment of the option where rolling the option may be necessary.  More details of this strategy can be found on my website.
Depends on if the stock pays a dividend or not. Some companies in their early years may choose to not pay dividends. Your calculations are off as the dividend stated is annual that you'd have to divide by 4 to get what the quarterly amount would be and there can be variances as Ellison's compensation package may well include options so that the number of shares he owns could fluctuate over the course of a year.
I'm trying to think it out, but I feel like it would be hard to justify using potential profit sources as material for dividends. Especially your example of wine. Wouldn't it be counterintuitive to take a hit to sales, while still having the cost of production?
"The fed does charge interest. Like you said, they do give profits to the treasury each year, but not all of their profits are sent back. They also pay dividends to the banks that hold stock in the Fed (I think it is like 7%).  But  yeah, since the fed does pay the rest back to the Treasury any interest it pays is basically moot.  &gt;If you don't already know, this is the modern version of ""printing money"".  This is the larger concern. If they are just buying bonds to implement monetary policy that is one thing. However, if they are financing the government debt because foreign investors are strapped for cash or don't want it, that is a bigger problem. I haven't been following closely enough to know if that is an issue here, but it seems treasury bills are in high demand at the moment so I don't think the fed is actually ""financing"" our budget, just keeping rates low (which does create problems but that's a different conversation)."
If you use Google Finance, you will get incorrect results because Google Finance does not show the dividend history. Since your requirement is that dividends are re-invested, you should use Yahoo Finance instead, downloading the historical 'adjusted' price.
It is very likely that the fund paid out a dividend in the form of reinvested shares.  This happens with many funds, especially as we come to the end of the year. Here's a simplified example of how it works.  Assume you invested $1000 and bought 100 units at $10/unit.  Ignoring the daily price fluctuations, if the fund paid out a 20% dividend, you would get $200 and the unit price would drop to $8/unit.  Assuming you chose to reinvest your dividends, you would automatically purchase another $200 worth of units at the new price (so 25 more units).  You would now have 125 units @ $8/unit = $1000 invested. In your example, notice that you now have more shares than you originally purchased, but that the price dropped significantly.  Your market value is above what you originally invested, so there was probably also a bit of a price increase for the day.  You should see the dividend transaction listed somewhere in your account. Just to confirm, I did a quick search on ICENX and found that they did indeed pay a dividend yesterday.
Check out the NASDAQ and NYSE websites(the exchange in which the stock is listed) for detailed information. Most of the websites which collate dividend payments generally have cash payments history only e.g. Dividata. And because a company has given stock dividends in the past doesn't guarantee such in the future, I believe you already know that.
There is a basis for that if you consider the power of compounding. So, the sooner you re-invest the dividends the sooner the time will give you results (through compounding). There is also the case of the commissions, if they are paid with a percentage of the amount invested they automatically gain more from you. Just my 2cents, though the other answers are probably more complete.
"Here is one study http://rfs.oxfordjournals.org/content/7/4/711.short I quote from the abstract  ""In a variety of tests, marginal price drop is not significantly   different from the dividend amount. Thus, over the last several   decades, one-for-one marginal price drop has been an excellent   (average) rule of thumb."""
The stock will slowly gain that $1 during the year. Suppose we have the highly theoretical situation that a company's stock is worth exactly $10 right after it paid its dividend, its dividend is always $1 per stock, and the company and everything else is so stable that its value never changes. Then the stock value right before the next dividend is paid will be close to $11 -- after all, it's worth a certain $1 dividend the next day, plus the $10 stock. And in between, half a year after the dividend was paid, it will be in between, say $10.50, or actually slightly less than that (because people like to buy in late so they can make money some other way with the money first). But the point holds -- the price decrease on the day that dividend is paid had been building up the whole period before that decrease. So stock dividends do make you money.
Your example shows a 4% dividend.  If we assume the stock continues to yield 4%, the math drops to something simple. Rule of 72 says your shares will double in 18 years. So in 18 years, 1000 shares will be 2000, at whatever price it's trading.  Shares X (1.04)^N years = shares after N years. This is as good an oversimplification as any.
BHP Billiton has room to answer doubters as commodities rout batters debt notes in part: There has been speculation that the company could cut its shareholder   dividend, while Liberum Capital analyst Richard Knights has suggested   BHP might look to raise as much as $US10 billion ($14.3 billion) in   new equity capital. If the dividend is cut, you won't see 11% and the share price may well decline further. There is a possibility of big losses here given the change in the prices of the products the company sells. To add from another source The only reason BHP trades on a yield of more than 8% is because the   market is pricing in a cut to the dividend. According to consensus   earnings estimates for 2016 and 2017, earnings per share will be $0.86   and $1.27 respectively. Dividends per share forecasts are $1.83 and   $1.81 respectively.
Knowing the log return is useful - the log return can help you to work out the annual return over the period it was estimated - and this should be comparable between stocks. One should just be careful with the calculation so that allowance for dividends is made sensibly.
Out of curiosity I went through a couple of prospectuses and all contained various clauses for the event where LIBOR is not published although the language suggests more of anticipation of brief technical difficulties. Some are rather vague and prone to manipulation.
You don't specify in which format are the files you're importing, but if it's .qif then qifqif provides a CLI interface to enter categories as fast as possible (by reusing categories used for similar past transactions).
"The change is generally known as the Options Symbology Initiative (or ""OSI"") and there is a highly comprehensive guide to what occurred here. The basic gist of what occurred was a shift FROM: A coded system in which a shorter (3   to 5 letter symbol) could be used, but   the symbols required a data source to   determine what they meant. MSQ AD   used to be a MSFT Jan 20 option, but   you had to look up MSQ in a table to   know that. TO: A system in which much longer symbols   are needed, but they contain all the   information required to identify a   unique option: DELL 4.000 C 5/16/2010   isn't easy to type, but once you know   how to read it, it's easy to see that   it's an option on DELL, expiring on May 16th 2010, is a call (rather   than a put,) and has a strike price   of 4. As to why they did it, there are a number of benefits, but most important reason is this one:  they were running out of symbols.  The number of permutations of 3-5 letter symbols had been exceeded by the number of options that had been listed, resulting in the need to ""recycle"" symbols.   This meant that a current option symbol would be the same as an old one, in some cases on a different stock, which was wreaking havoc on historical data."
"Thanks for pointing out [the study](http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1748851). It's a slightly different cause than what I was describing when I posted this. Specifically, they show an effect not when the names get confused, but rather when the name similarity simply brings more attention to the stock. I was surprised nobody mentioned that in response to my post.  But also interesting is that they had to control for simple confusion between stock symbols, which implies that ticker confusion has a known effect. So I dug into research on that and quickly found [this study](http://www.efmaefm.org/0EFMAMEETINGS/EFMA%20ANNUAL%20MEETINGS/2010-Aarhus/EFMA2010_0161_fullpaper.pdf) found ""a high positive correlation between returns on two matching stocks with similar ticker symbols""."
"I've bought ISO stock over they years -- in NYSE traded companies.  Every time I've done so, they've done what's called ""sell-to-cover"".  And the gubmint treats the difference between FMV and purchase price as if it's part of your salary.  And for me, they've sold some stock extra to pay estimated taxes. So, if I got this right...  20,000 shares at $3 costs you 60,000 to buy them.  In my sell-to-cover at 5 scenario: did I get that right?  Keeping only 4,000 shares out of 20,000 doesn't feel right.  Maybe because I've always sold at a much ratio between strike price and FMV. Note I made some assumptions:  first is that the company will sell some of the stock to pay the taxes for you.  Second is your marginal tax rate.  Before you do anything check these. Is there some reason to exercise immediately?  I'd wait, personally."
Not sure of the question here if by IPO(initial public offering) you mean private company then:  A company can invest its excess money into other companies, to earn returns.  Also a company that is private can attract private investment if the sector is doing well on publicly traded markets.  Finally a company can diversify away risk, by holding shares of a company that would benefit in the event of a disruption in their own industry.
"Beatrice does a good job of summarizing things.  Tracking the index yourself is expensive (transaction costs) and tedious (number of transactions, keeping up with the changes, etc.)  One of the points of using an index fund is to reduce your workload.  Diversification is another point, though that depends on the indexes that you decide to use.  That said, even with a relatively narrow index you diversify in that segment of the market. A point I'd like to add is that the management which occurs for an index fund is not exactly ""active.""  The decisions on which stocks to select are already made by the maintainers of the index.  Thus, the only management that has to occur involves the trades required to mimic the index."
It's the buying and selling of the stock that causes the fluctuation in prices, not the news. People buy and sell all the time, and not just for newsworthy reasons.  They may have to send a child to college, or fix a roof, etc.  Or they may be technical traders looking for signals.  All kinds of reasons.
The portion of a stock movement not correlated with stocks in general is called Alpha. I don't know of any online tools to graph alpha. Keep in mind that a company like Apple is so huge right now that any properly weighted index will have to correlate with it to some degree.
You need a source of delisted historical data. Such data is typically only available from paid sources. According to my records, Lawson Software Inc listed on the NASDAQ on 7 Dec 2001 and delisted on 6 Jul 2011.  Its final traded price was $11.23.  It was taken over by Infor who bid $11.25 per share. Source: Symbol LWSN-201107 within Premium Data US delisted stocks historical data set available from http://www.premiumdata.net/products/premiumdata/ushistorical.php Disclosure: I am a co-owner of Norgate / Premium Data.
"For a personal finance forum, this is too complicated for sustained use and you should find a simpler solution. For a mathematical exercise, you are missing information required to do the split fairly.  You have to know who overlaps and when to know how to do the splits.   For an extreme example, take your dates given: Considering 100 days of calculation period,  If Roommate D was the only person present for the last 10 days, they should pay 100% of the grocery bill as they are the only one eating.   From your initial data set, you can't know who should be splitting the tab for any given day. To do this mathematically, you'd need:  But don't forget ""In Theory, Theory works.  In Practice, Practice works."" Good theory would say make a large, complicated spreadsheet as described above.   Good practice would be to split up the costs in a much, much simpler way."
Agree to some degree. In actual profitable tradings (HFT mostly), the math part is relatively simple, but the knowledge of exchange API, plumbing and execution speed much harder to come by and multiple order of magnitude harder to get right than the math involved.
Are you interviewing for an internal FP&amp;A role at that company?  If so, then you're in luck. FP&amp;A models are not that difficult to build. Construction is very cyclical and oil &amp; gas is extremely cyclical, so those are the only real challenges.  There are videos online that show you how to build 3 statement model projections.
"The worst part is, it's not even all that much cheaper than a basic O365 subscription!  This is either the boss' stupid idea (""what, you use Excel for something other than tracking your fantasy football league?""), or *someone*'s getting fired a month from now when the OP's office goes back to Office."
I don't completely have GIPS down, risk management still gets me on some questions, and alternative investments is fucking me a bit. Any of the IPS questions will be iffy because I'm not good at paying attention to detail in the prompts.  On the other hand, I memorized the micro and global attribution formulas so I'm hoping for a lot of questions on that shit.
I thought it was somewhat of a dick move to lmgtfy since it is like here since you can't do it for yourself, I'll show you how. I was trying to make a point though. I don't think saying that I don't get why people don't Google simple things is being a dick again.
There's so much wrong in such a small space here...  Why do you think this is a component of working in government? Is it a component of working in the private sector? Non-profits? Military (Which is still government)?  If someone specializes in shale gas extraction commercial rate setting for the purposes of royalty calculation, why do they need to remember what it's like to be Joe Sixpack?  Why do NSA administrators who monitor foreign intelligence channels need to remember what it's like to bargain shop?  The argument is nonsense from the ground up.  At the same time, how is flying coach teaching them this *valuable* lesson? And why do you think they can't remember it without flying coach?  Plus, I'm not sure you understand what forms a bubble. I fly coach. I don't interact with anyone around me. And the government officials we're talking about are not so well compensated they don't have ordinary lives.  Instead, the concern you're really alluding to is that homogenous groups of professionals tend to develop institutional blind spots.  Flying coach won't solve that.