vania-janet/multiturn-rag-retrieval-data huggingface dataset:
I was looking at NAT and NAO, NAT owns 20% of NAO.  They trade opposite each other on the price of oil, low is good for NAT, bad for NAO.  In bad times the other company's stock would probably rise, so they could trim excess shares to keep a stable monetary holding.  This would create cash in bad times, in good times they could buy more, creating a floor as well for the other.
For Vanguard: Vanguard does compare its fees with similar funds from its competitors on this tab, but then again, this is Vanguard giving you this information, so take with a grain of salt.
Businessweek is a magazine. The Atlantic is a magazine. They publish articles, while Vice is an investigative news outlet. So, you're comparing apples to oranges, even if you don't understand that they're not equivalent organizations.  You don't even seem understand how Vice's business works. They're not focused on ad revenue through clickbait. They're focused on content creation for lucrative media deals, which has accelerated Vice's value far faster than the other outlets you mentioned.  Everything you are saying is light on analytical reason, but very heavy on definitive provocative statements. Essentially, you are replying with very low quality posting. So, I'm probably going to stop engaging you; because whether you're a troll or just heavily breathing from the mouth, I suspect that further attempts at reasonable dialogue with you is a waste of my time. Toodles.
Did you see the I don't know part, as in, I don't know what the right solution?    The ups were probably from people like me, who aren't experts in the market either, but still see a fundamental disconnect between what's happening now and what the presumed purpose of the market was claimed to be - a funds raising mechanism for companies.
"The difference it that the headline I suggested removes the editorialization of the news. It is one thing to not have space for all the info. It is another to edit your headline to alter the meaning of your point.  Someone dismissing a headline because it lacks a source is one thing (and with the words ""survey"" you at least expect to find the source in the article). Someone walking away from a headline wrongly assuming that ALL of the CEO's in the US got at least a 27% raise last year is another.  I mean, this is the HuffPo. They ALL CAPS at least one word in every headline that is an action as a not so subtle demand on what you should do."
Wealth is not what you earn, nor is it what you spend. It's the difference between those two.
1.) There is no logic in this question, because when there is an increase in net income for the year it will be in the form of something, ie it can be cash and cash equivalent like cash in hand or cash at bank. So as your ques says if there is increase in net income of 20 then asset side also increase by 20(cash) which makes the equation  Asset = liability + share capital tally 2.) Balance sheet is a statement of assets, liabilities, and capital of a business or other organization. Expenditure or income related items wont come under balance sheet it comes under profit and loss account 3.) Stockholders' equity can increase just as easy. When a firm issues bonus to the existing share holders from free reserve a/c or capital redemption reserve a/c or security premium this will increase the share holders equity and also decreases the reserve a/c
Obama was seeing growth after a massive recession  while pumping trillions into the market . Trump pushed the market to all time highs . Not saying one is harder than the other , just that the circumstances are vastly different
If you RTFA it discusses the difference in REAL GDP. While it's clear that no single politician controls the economy, at least read the shit before you try to sound all high and mighty.   Do you know what real GDP growth is?
A single percentage figure makes little sense here as you are asking for a bunch of different things:
"NASDAQ OMX Group owns NASDAQ, a stock exchange. It is a corporation, and is listed on the NASDAQ as NDAQ. It makes money by: source NASDAQ also charges for market data services, found in the NASDAQ ""Datastore"". Other information about the fees charged by NYSE and NASDAQ may be found in the Investopedia article The NYSE And Nasdaq: How They Work."
"No our fiscal cliff is the result of, in part, a terrific degree of uncertainty of the market in 2013. The analogy would be more like ""we know the guy who has been taking our milk money might want to take our lunch money next week."" So businesses across the board are being more cautious."
The difference is that Yahoo is showing the unadjusted price that the security traded for on that date, while google is adjusting for price splits. This means that Google is showing how much you would have had to pay to get what is now one share. Since 1979, JNJ has split 3-for-1 once, and 2-for-1 four times. 3x2x2x2x2 = 48. If you bought 1 share at that time, you would now have 48 shares today. Yahoo is showing a price of $66 for what was then 1 share. $66/48 = 1.375, which Google rounds to 1.38. You can see this if you get the prices from May 14-21, 1981. The stock split 3-for-1, and the price dropped from 108 to 36.38. Yahoo's adjusted close column has not been accurate since they re-wrote the Finance website. It now just represents the closing price. The other relevant field on Yahoo is the Adj. Close. This adjusts for splits, but also adjusts for dividends. Hence why this doesn't match either the Google or Yahoo numbers.
Wasn't trying to be combative. Apparently I came off that way unintentionally, I think there is a distinction between a real monopoly and what amazon is/is becoming that is important to distinguish.   I can respect choosing other options because you think they are effecting the marketplace too heavily, just wanted to point out a monopoly would be a different problem.
I don't get that comparison at all. The guy still gets his. Business profits go up and down. Real CEO's figure out how to make more profits under given circumstances. Whiny children complain about it not being fair and fire all their staff out of spite.  If I was a shareholder I'd be worried. Not about Obama but about the loose cannon CEO that is threatening to devalue my stock out of spite because he doesn't know how to run a business properly.
Yea that example is a little skewed when you made the aum differ by 200%. Those two candidates would never apply for the same role.  Networking is essential to get you looked at but at the end of the day it is still all about risk adjusted pnl.  Not to mention that pnl is really all you have to judge a trader
"OK boss, I'll play along.  First of all, which original comment did I edit? Here's a tip, you can see which comments have been editted because they have little *'s beside them. I'd think you'd know that given that you're a mod here.  Secondly, once you're done looking for it and can't find it, cause I didn't edit any of them, explain to me how in my original comment, pointing out a difference between ""making money"" and ""turning a profit"" displays my ignorance of the distinction between revenue and profit."
"Because they don't leverage using credit but by shorting stocks. eg they short $400 of microsoft, and use the proceed to buy $400 of Apple. That's a 4x ""leverage"". It's one of the main characteristics of hedge fund vs traditional fund, they can short while your vanilla long only mutual fund cannot.  And they limit capital from outside investors due to decreasing marginal return and liquidity consideration."
"Yes, but it's also this. ""Investors in stocks these days are expecting far too much, and I'm going to explain why. That will inevitably set me to talking about the general stock market, a subject I'm usually unwilling to discuss. But I want to make one thing clear going in: Though I will be talking about the level of the market, I will not be predicting its next moves"". He can, and does, make two unrelated points"
Sums up in a nutshell how I've looked at the income gap. It's not that the wealthy are necessarily hoarding on the rest of us; it's just that the wealthier folks will have a far greater variety of options to increase their wealth than Joe Schmuck. Of course, it doesn't help that the wealth is exactly what most investing firms look at and drool over, which leads to clamoring over top-dollar investors and ignoring everyone else. At least, that's how I've felt.
"This is the best tl;dr I could make, [original](https://promarket.org/rise-market-power-decline-labors-share/) reduced by 90%. (I'm a bot) ***** &gt; A new paper argues that the decline of both the labor and capital shares, as well as the decline in low-skilled wages and other economic trends, have been aided by a significant increase in markups and market power.  &gt; A new paper by Jan De Loecker and Jan Eeckhout echoes these results, arguing that the decline of both the labor and capital shares, as well as the decline in low-skilled wages and other economic trends, have been aided by a significant increase in markups and market power.  &gt; In recent years, a growing body of literature has linked the rise of market power to several adverse economic trends, such as the decline in new business start-ups, diminishing competition, and rising income inequality.   ***** [**Extended Summary**](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/6u9l6e/the_rise_of_market_power_and_the_decline_of/) | [FAQ](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/31b9fm/faq_autotldr_bot/ ""Version 1.65, ~192969 tl;drs so far."") | [Feedback](http://np.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%23autotldr ""PM's and comments are monitored, constructive feedback is welcome."") | *Top* *keywords*: **Markup**^#1 **Loecker**^#2 **market**^#3 **increase**^#4 **decline**^#5"
I also think Benchmark knows the business model isn't sustainable at this point - their goal is to IPO as quickly as possible and get the fuck out before the whole thing tanks. They need Travis out to beat it into IPO-able shape.
They do pitchdecks every week with the industry coverage groups presenting biweekly. Fundamental analysis included industry overview/company overview/investment rationale/valuation (usually DCF or public comps)/risk. PM then uses pitchdeck and technical analysis to set orders but buys the stock for the long run and makes and monitors it daily. 21% in a year and high growth picks by the OC for industries in tech usually are high growth so cap gains there are evn higher  U probably went to some retard school. I said back office bc I highly doubt your dumb ass works in IB based on how socially incompetent and arrogant u sound.
YNAB runs on Mac, Win, and Linux.
Check out WorldCap.org. They provide fundamental data for Hong Kong stocks in combination with an iPad app. Disclosure: I am affiliated with WorldCap.
I can't understand online wine sales.  The market for wine clubs are so saturated.  A lot of liquor stores put on wine tasting since wine has the highest markup next to beer and booze.  Taste it, buy it.  Not see it online, buy it.
I'm a bot, *bleep*, *bloop*. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:  - [/r/talkbusiness] [Weekly Stock Market Review](https://np.reddit.com/r/talkbusiness/comments/787ys8/weekly_stock_market_review/)  [](#footer)*^(If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads.) ^\([Info](/r/TotesMessenger) ^/ ^[Contact](/message/compose?to=/r/TotesMessenger))*  [](#bot)
+1 for YNAB. I used to use MS Money until it was decommissioned. I used that to historically record my spending and investing, and plot my net worth. Whilst YNAB will do that, it is actually geared towards forward planning much more so. In this area, it is fantastic. I like that there are mobile apps for it too.
Like an MBA it teaches everyone how to do the same type of analysis, too (another reason the title means less and less). Last weekend I had a conversation with a friend of a friend about this very thing! He's sitting for L3 CFA, works back office at a very notable HF, and expects to be moved up (without any indication that he will) to research when he's done. I asked his opinions about things like the European situation, fiscal cliff, and a hard landing in china. Not only was he not familiar these concepts he didn't even know what HFT was. The CFA gives you the tools to analyze the impacts of pension liabilities on EPS, but it still takes a passion about the markets, as well as creative/analytical judgement, to make it to ER. My only point is an MBA and CFA are very similar in many ways. Both tend to hold their noses way to high, too. It's about what you chose to get out of it and too often people care more about the title than the process, which is why they are still stuck in mediocrity after completing the designations. Go through a list of the biggest PMs in the business, most don't have either MBAs or CFAs! They achieved alpha by not following standard quantitative models but exploring creative and strategic avenues others undervalue while maintaining strict discipline. A model is a tool to better describe behavior and understanding of markets, it's not a solution."
I'm a bot, *bleep*, *bloop*. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:  - [/r/talkbusiness] [Weekly Stock Market Review](https://www.reddit.com/r/talkbusiness/comments/79y9iv/weekly_stock_market_review/)  &amp;nbsp;*^(If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads.) ^\([Info](/r/TotesMessenger) ^/ ^[Contact](/message/compose?to=/r/TotesMessenger))*
Apparent data-feed issues coming out of NASDAQ in the after hours market. Look at MSFT, AMZN, AAPL, heck even Sears.      Funny thing though, is that you see traces of irregular prices during the active session around 10:20am on stocks like GOOG.
Its more important to me that people who make more than me are villianized than to do some simple math and see that articles decrying executive pay is a red herring designed to pit the rich, middle class, and poor against each other.
"Spoken like a true non-business person.  I'm an engineer that now has an MBA. It's not ""fluff"", far from it. In fact, I'm doing more quantitative work now than I did as an engineer. I use MATLAB and Excel more than I ever did before. And I'm in marketing, one of the less quantitative MBA jobs."
"This is the best tl;dr I could make, [original](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-07-27/bezos-surpasses-gates-as-world-s-richest-ahead-of-amazon-results) reduced by 72%. (I'm a bot) ***** &gt; 92 at 10:10 a.m. in New York, giving Bezos a net worth of $90.9 billion, versus $90.7 billion for Gates.  &gt; Amazon leads the cloud-computing industry, but faces increasing competition from Microsoft and Google parent Alphabet Inc. Amazon is expected to post quarterly revenue of $37.2 billion, a 22 percent jump from a year earlier, according to the average estimate of 34 analysts surveyed by Bloomberg, and earnings per share of $1.42.  &gt; Bezos owns about 17 percent of Seattle-based Amazon, which has surged 40 percent this year through Wednesday, helping to add $24.5 billion to his net worth.   ***** [**Extended Summary**](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/6pxpl4/jeff_bezos_surpasses_bill_gates_as_worlds_richest/) | [FAQ](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/31b9fm/faq_autotldr_bot/ ""Version 1.65, ~177112 tl;drs so far."") | [Feedback](http://np.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%23autotldr ""PM's and comments are monitored, constructive feedback is welcome."") | *Top* *keywords*: **Amazon**^#1 **billion**^#2 **percent**^#3 **retail**^#4 **Inc.**^#5"
I see your point and I agree with your ideology, but, this is afterall /r/finance, and the record labels are undoubtedly shareholder value -wise much better off just the way they are operating. why allow the market become fragmented by supporting new disruptive players if you can rake it all home in a monopolistic market.
"There tends to be high volume around big changes in stock price. The volume of a stock does not remain constant and the term ""fat fingers"" can influence price.--> http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-10-01/that-japanese-fat-finger-can-absolutely-happen-in-u-s-.html That being said keshlam is 99% right when it comes to a stock moving when their is no news or earnings announcements. Check out these papers. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1475-6803.2010.01285.x/full They do a time series analysis to try and predict future prices off of past demand during news events. They forecast using auto-regressive models.  google ""forecasting autoregressive model"" and the upenn lecture will be helpful. I would post another link but I cannot because I do not have enough rep/ This is more of a quant question. Hope this helps. JL"
"Thanks for quoting the ""meat"" of the article (I agree with the GP, *I* didn't have the patience to make it to page 2), but this ""meat"" is still textured flavored soy protein...  &gt; Well, one of the reasons there's no place to invest the cash is that wages as a percentage of GDP have fallen by so much that workers can't afford to buy anything any more.  *What*???  This manages to be both circular *and* wrong on multiple levels!  ""Our workers can't afford our product so we can't spend all this cash rolling in on them"".  &gt; We kept profits to a minimum, because if we had high profits, we would have to pay high taxes. So at every opportunity, we bought another machine or we opened another plant or we hired more people, to try to build long term value through expansion because that was the way you avoided tax.  Ah, ""Daddy had the luxury of operating in a non-saturated market"".  Meanwhile, Google, Apple, and Microsoft piss away money as fast as they can on all sorts of basic research, and yet *still* have massive stockpiles.  But then, I think that touches on the *real* problem with Hanauer's point - It's just plain *false*.  We live in a world where the governments have become so dysfunctional that private industry is now funding things like space exploration, energy policy, education, transportation."
**Here's a sneak peek of /r/LateStageCapitalism using the [top posts](https://np.reddit.com/r/LateStageCapitalism/top/?sort=top&amp;t=all) of all time!**  \#1: [The Internet if the FCC win:](https://cdn1.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/4252153/what-is-net-neutrality-isp-package-diagram.0.jpg) | [2187 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/LateStageCapitalism/comments/6mtjaw/the_internet_if_the_fcc_win/)   \#2: [cool](https://i.redd.it/yqd0bllv5n1z.png) | [432 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/LateStageCapitalism/comments/6f7ore/cool/)   \#3: [No words describe this](https://i.redd.it/xg2iiu1tyiiz.png) | [1882 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/LateStageCapitalism/comments/6wlhoc/no_words_describe_this/)  ---- ^^I'm ^^a ^^bot, ^^beep ^^boop ^^| ^^Downvote ^^to ^^remove ^^| [^^Contact ^^me](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=sneakpeekbot) ^^| [^^Info](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/) ^^| [^^Opt-out](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/comments/6l7i0m/blacklist/)
"Is there any particular area of business that you have interest? What free resources do you currently use (general web browsing)? Here are some magazines out there that I find interesting: * **Fast Company** - $12.99 / Year / 10 Issues - Magazine focused on tech, innovation, leadership and design. I don't subscribe, but I regularly purchase Fast Company, Entrepreneur,and Inc. when I am traveling. They make for a perfect airplane read and I typically find great takeaways or clip articles from it. * **Entrepreneur** - $11.97 / Year / 12 Issues - Obviously by the title this is catered to the entrepreneurial mindset. It provides informational and inspirational stories from entrepreneurs and for entrepreneurs. I enjoy reading this and probably read 3 or 4 issues per year. I'm not a regular reader, but at times I have felt like content may run lean at times. * **Inc** - $12.99 / Year / 10 Issues - Inc. feels like a blend of Fast Company and Entrepreneur. The articles are aimed at the business owner for starting and running operations. * **Businessweek** - $5 / Year / 12 Issues - I regularly read Businessweek, but primarily on their website. I have picked up issues occasionally which are great, but their web provides a fair amount of access. They seem to have a nice blend of news and unique stories about specific companies, products, and investment. Recently they had interesting articles with fair depth on the CEO of Burger King, and the history of Sriracha. * **Forbes** - $24.99 / Year / 26 Issues - I love the volume of content that Forbes provides and they seem to have a nice mix on a variety of subjects. I use Forbes as my frontpage of the internet for business in conjunction with several others. I actually feel like Forbes and Businessweek provide a perfect blend of business news with shocking little redundancy. * **Harvard Business Review** - Wasn't able to quickly see a price. I reference HBR a fair amount in regards to business discussions and think they provide excellent research material and information.
"It's like yelp has and has marketing value for some businesses.  Business isn't one size fits all.  If a customer asks ""What's your BBB rating"" then it has merit.  You don't' want to insult the customer and have to educate them especially if they're older.  That being said, being part of a Chamber or Rotary has value for some select businesses too but not all.  Some people put weight in JD Power ratings.  Those are worthless too but guess what, it's still a great marketing badge so it has value."
He wasn't complaining about it he was exemplifying it. He doesn't care how much of the bussiness's funds he takes advantage of in order to stroke his ego. That extreme level of entitlement, while trying to claim he's not snobbish, exemplified huge amount decadence, selfishness, greed, and carelessness.
"This is the best tl;dr I could make, [original](https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/intellectual-property-21st-century-economy-by-joseph-e--stiglitz-et-al-2017-10) reduced by 94%. (I'm a bot) ***** &gt; The prize impedes the flow of knowledge, reduces the benefits derived from it, and distorts the economy.  &gt; The powerful advanced-economy lobbies that have shaped that regime clearly put the latter first, reflected in their opposition to provisions recognizing intellectual property rights associated with traditional knowledge or biodiversity.  &gt; Second, the &amp;quot;Weightless economy&amp;quot; - the economy of ideas, knowledge, and information - will account for a growing share of output, in developed and developing economies alike.   ***** [**Extended Summary**](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/77uff7/intellectual_property_for_the_twentyfirstcentury/) | [FAQ](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/31b9fm/faq_autotldr_bot/ ""Version 1.65, ~232587 tl;drs so far."") | [Feedback](http://np.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%23autotldr ""PM's and comments are monitored, constructive feedback is welcome."") | *Top* *keywords*: **knowledge**^#1 **country**^#2 **economy**^#3 **developed**^#4 **Patent**^#5"
"&gt; excel  Ok, my point still stands. Are we going to make rules around excels? Its heavy ""abuse"" takes jobs away.   Let me make this clear, you are not entitle to be paid for something that someone else can do for fraction of cost.  If you think your time is worth more, then you should have no problem convincing employer of just that."