vania-janet/multiturn-rag-retrieval-data huggingface dataset:
Can I apply for limited company now, while fully time employed, and not take any business until I get a contract? Some employment contracts may include non-compete clauses or similar which expressly forbid you engaging in other employment or becoming self-employed while simultaneously working for your current employer. You may want to check this out before making any moves to register as a limited company. You may forfeit long-term benefits (such as a pension) you have built up at your present employer if they catch wind of a conflict of interest. As noted in an earlier answer, the setup process for a limited company is extremely simple in the UK, so there is no reason you need to take these steps in advance of leaving your current employment. During my resignation period scout for contracts... Should I wait weeks before actually deciding to search for contracts? Depending on the type of IT work you intend to be contracting for, you may find yourself shut out from major work if you are not VAT registered. It is a requirement to register for VAT when you breach certain earnings limits (see HMRC's website) but you can voluntarily register with HMRC before these limits if you wish. Being VAT registered increases your bookkeeping and oversight requirements, which makes you appear more attractive to larger enterprises / corporations than a non-VAT registered firm. It also suggests some degree of stability and a plan to stick around for the long haul. This might be a catch-22 situation - if you want to get noticed and land the sizable contracts, you will almost certainly require a VAT registration regardless of your overall yearly earnings. It would be advisable to engage the services of a professional advisor before becoming VAT registered, but this and the subsequent professional advice you may require for putting in VAT claims may not be a fee you wish to pay upfront if you are only attracting a small volume of work.
"I would be inclined to reject 100 percent of the material, refuse payment, and seek out someone else to fulfill your requirements. Just because some of the material ""looks original"" doesn't mean it is and, given the creator's propensity to plagiarize, may have simply been copied from a source you're unable to identify.  Why risk it?  Cut this person loose."
&gt; He's supposed to be grading him as a board member. I dont think that a board member's vote should be seen as a positive or negative when it comes time for their job review.  Being a Trump supporter shows bad judgment. I certainly wouldn't want someone like that to be a board member of my company.
I once turned down a raise because I didn't agree with the employee review that supposedly substantiated the raise.  I felt the review to be superficial and incomplete.   Then I refused to sign it, or take the accompanying raise, due to that fact.
&gt; Back to following me from sub to sub I see....  Sorry - I've been in /r/economy much longer than you and as /u/bashyourscript pointed out, your history if these kind of posts is well established. If you don't want to be called out on woo woo posts, then don't make them.
&gt; ... Illegal activity  I don't know about that. All I can do is give you my general experience from working with a large, healthy company. If he had been turned away by management, and then by HR, and THEN corporate legal, perhaps he should've sought personal legal counsel.   Instead, he chose to write this post and share it openly within the company, resulting in it being shared publicly whole the company is being investigated regarding pay fair. If nothing else, it's just bad timing. Nobody should be overly surprised that they terminated him for this.
"&gt; The company song was a complete shock to me and I found it to be one of the creepiest things ever devised.  Wow, that is creepy.  I'm really shocked that any company would actually do this.  It's like rubbing it in your face - ""We're going to further strip you of your dignity, and crush your soul, and there's nothing you can do about it!""  It's like being asked to attend HS pep-rallies well into adulthood.  Yuck."
"Yes, that's true, but notice what you've done here. You have given two reasons *why* ""management is unable or unwilling to spend on innovation that could generate future earnings to shareholders"". You have expanded on rather than contradicted the statement made by the authors of the article."
"Anyone who has any business looking at growth numbers will know thay are meaningless in the first year,  So all they need to know is that it's the first year.    It's no different than the Billboard music charts' treatment of the ""last week's chart ranking"" and ""movement up/down"" columns.  It will help with visual layout if the figure used is about the same size as a percentage number.   ""New"" fits nicely."
"There's a ""conflict of interest"" in a company suggesting to consumers when its product may not be at its intended quality? Jesus fucking Christ. This independent company you desire is often referred to as ""you"" - your nose, mouth, eyes...are you going to throw something away for no other reason than a date on a label? What the fuck is going on?!?"
I know they were doing bad even back then but it still irks me that he took people's jobs for his own gain instead of trying to revive the company or help them find other work.
"This seems to sum it up: ""But in that unusual moment of candor, Sen. Blumenthal seemed to lay bare his opinions about Internet startups—he thinks of them as unimportant outliers and would prefer that the new law put them out of business."""
"By that vein, air is a product you consume on a daily basis. Should someone work to monetize oxygen now? There must be a rational limit on where you draw the line of short term profit versus long term social sustainability.  I'm all for seeking a profit, but any profit calculations should take into account the full cost to the society before declaring something ""profitable."" The cost of seeking these profits is higher prices for everyone, which in turn reduces the availability of the service. This takes money out of local economies, pools resources in the hands of a small group of corporations that exist solely to sit on large piles of money ""just in case,"" and potentially denies vital care to people who may have potentially netted a huge benefit for society. All this so that someone can see a few points improvement in their portfolio.  Note, this does not mean I'm against insurance as a whole. There are plenty of insurance products that I feel are perfectly valid and reasonable; car, home, corporate and so on are all valid examples of ""luxury"" products that you could technically live without. However the social cost of for profit health care and health insurance is such that I do not see how it can potentially justify the cost to society. So while sure, seeking profit on vital services may not be crazy within your limited view, it is certainly crazy to call something ""profit"" just because your analysis of the situation fails to take into account the huge net negatives of such a practice."
"there's people in Balance sheet substantiation that are the last ones to leave, or ""risk"" after dark when the lights turn off at 7 for this bank I intern for.  Luckily for me I have a front office role as an intern"
Good addition. When learning finance and business, /u/msattam, realize the world does not work cleanly like it does in a textbook. You have added complexity, both systemic and human caused. And that there is a very good reason that we must understand agency issues and how to mitigate those risks.
"&gt;""Also, the social network is testing ways to allow those under 13, currently prohibited, to participate with parental supervision."" Which seems (from a cynical perspective anyway) to be a sign that they are potentially getting ""desperate"" to maintain the purported ""growth"" in number of users.  Exactly what I thought when I read about this in this week's businessweek. That is a huge call of desperation."
"I would want a clause that says you can't endanger my portfolio, but that would never happen I guess. I've just started what I hope to be a long and successful career and I'm considering opting out of the company pension and managing it myself. Some economics people want to make this an ""every man for himself"" situation.   Right now I pay $400 per month into a pension, and at any point it may not exist. I don't think I'm alone in the idea that I can manage my own portfolio at least as well as that, and my own pension will stay with me no matter what, no matter how many companies I work for."
I have been working at a pest control company. I just know that working blue collar jobs is not for me and I should be going back to school. Finance interests me, and I also would like to make a comfortable living :)
I might have been raised jewish, but I support people's right to hold an opinion and I support their right to assemble.  I don't like the precedent this could set.  These companies should not be playing moral gatekeeper, they should be providing a service.  I also believe in public healthcare.  Fuck me, right?
Ah, yeah the way you worded it made me think you were asking the job applicant for their Facebook password. Nevertheless, I think what I wrote could help other employers avoid lawsuits. Ideally, we should pass a law to prevent employers from asking for a Facebook user's password so we can protect employers from discrimination and frivolous lawsuits that could result from a employer asking for a user's Facebook password.   There really can't be that many people who have public profiles, but in that case you are okay as it's fair game with people who have public profiles as it's a sign they have no expectations of privacy.  My facebook profile is friends only and I removed my name/information from the search/cache Facebook has.
"This is a joke article, right?  Besides the fact the author apparently can't use a space bar to save his life, the article is basically saying ""Silly CEO, you expect all these creative free spirits to do actual 'work'?  What's wrong with you, being concerned with things like 'profit'. If you want to hire a bunch of disloyal slackers who will jump ship the second someone else utters the word 'stock options', you're going to have to get over this whole 'work ethic' thing."""
This is perfect for the ELI5 posts that always come up on this topic.  Great article.  I'd be interested in seeing a little more on the regulatory aspects of derivative contracts.  Derivatives are complex because the associated risks are complex.  When banks, insurers, and other entities large enough to have a Chief Risk Officer enter into these contracts, the assumption is that they know what they're doing, so to my knowledge, they're generally lightly regulated.  Additionally, those that understand derivatives enough to regulate them are unlikely to work for the comparatively low wages that they'd get in government. That said, I'd be interested in seeing something discussing the challenges in regulating something like this.  Even before 2008, there were some pretty big failures involving derivatives where risk was not adequately managed that probably wouldn't have been avoided with stronger regulation.
how long have you been there?  what could be interesting - rough it out a bit more - possibly asking for more work, hopefully that will help - but let the relationships and working relationships build a bit more, then ask if you could possibly spend some time shadowing other people, or, under the title of 'learning' or 'gaining experience about the field' get yourself into different parts of the company, etc.  this could add to the learning, and to the possible enjoyment a lot.  also - why did u take this internship? are u perhaps interested in working in big finance later? then this might be something worth holding on for.  *edit- editing occurred
&gt; I don't think you are trying to understand my position  I'm trying to find out if we can agree on truth claims. We (probably) have numerous disagreements. Can we agree that some of the people who do not like the current job market have the option of trying to start a new business?
-Systematisk arbeid gjennom hver funksjon eller en scene av driften og identifisere hvasom kan skje for hver funksjon. -Foreta en gjennomgang av poster og rapporter for å finne ting som har gått galt isiste. -Analysere dine systemer og prosesser for å identifisere kritiske punkter. -Brainstorm med ansatte eller kollegaer. **TRINN 3: RISIKOVURDERING** Dette trinnet omfatter analyse av sannsynlighet og konsekvenser identifiserte risikoerbruker til beskyttelsestiltak. -Se på de eksisterende kontrollene for hver risiko. Identifisere hva din bedrift gjør for åkontrollere denne risikoen. -Sats effektiviteten av eksisterende kontroller i å forebygge risikoen fra ender ellerredusere virkningen skal det skje. Angi om eksisterende kontroller er adekvat, moderateller mangelfulle. Sannsynligheten er en kvalitativ beskrivelse av sannsynlighet og frekvens. Hva ersannsynligheten for at risikoen oppstår? Velg beskrivelsen som best beskriversannsynligheten av risikoen oppstår (med eksisterende kontrolltiltak sted) risiko analyseMatrix. Konsekvensen er resultatet av en hendelse eller situasjon, blir et tap, skade, ulempeeller gevinst. Hva er konsekvensen av hendelsen risiko?
My point was not especially reliant on your personal experience; the point was that for many people it's not as simple a matter as just sucking it up and hiring a lawyer.  It's great that you had the know-how and the funds to defend yourself when you were sued, but for many entrepreneurs this post could not be more relevant.  I don't see a need to scorn an already distressed couple, regardless of what anyone thinks they should or shouldn't have done. Why not post about something that could help them out? After reading their story I can't see what else could be done other than what he is already suggesting. Any ideas?
According to me, to start your networking Social networks are the huge platform. Billions of world population are present and active on social sites. Also, there is no limit of social platforms. You need to understand your business's audience and select platform accordingly.   Social Networks not only provide connections but also help you to find various events, programs running through out the world. To search for a job or provide your services, you can pick up LinkedIn, tweeter. Whereas, go for Facebook to highlight your activities and business. Not only these, but a number of forums are available for particular interests.  Half of the world likes to get full information in short words and save time. which is possible via social networks. For the beginning, you can use social sites to get the revert and interests. Then it will be easy to earn by having a physical place and audience for either job or services.
People will find it difficult to take someone seriously, otherwise, and a poor first impression via text or email can easily cost you whatever it is you're trying to establish, *especially* if you aren't the only person attempting to establish yourself for that position. You have several errors in your post (""I just a question,"" ""approriate,"" ""buisness,"" and a lack of sentence structure and punctuation in general). It may seem silly to concern yourself with typing properly in a post on Reddit, but think of it as practice in a medium (text and typing) where repetition is key. If you're used to typing poorly, it'll take a lot more effort to type well when it counts, and you're more likely to miss an error that could cost you a job or client. Good luck to you! ^^^In ^^^before ^^^mentioning ^^^spelling ^^^/ ^^^grammar ^^^and ^^^missing ^^^something ^^^in ^^^my ^^^own ^^^text."
This course was written by active owners, operators and investors in Group Homes, Halfway Homes, ICF/MR Homes, Disability Homes and other special needs assisted living and care homes in order to personally teach you the strategies and steps to help you start your first Group Home.
Maybe learn some coding at home. Try and get a desk job somewhere and learn on the side. I'm trying to do that on the side to make my skills better. So applicable in so many settings. I'm starting with basic excel vba since most normal people use excel in some form or fashion. Great videos online.
Dalam memulai sebuah usaha diperlukan kerja keras dan membuat suatu persiapan yang matang serat mental yang kuat, jangan asal – asalan dalam memulai sebuah usaha karena nanti yang anda alami tidak sesuai yang anda harapkan. Berikut ini kami akan bagi tips dan langkah – langkah dalam membuka usaha konter pulsa.  1. Modal yang diperlukan dalam usaha konter pulsa Modal merupakan hal utama yang dipersiapkan untuk memulai sebuah usaha agar kita bisa menetukan jumlah besaran modalnya. hal itu untuk menentukan Anda nanti mau buka konter pulsa yang seperti apa, apakah mau jualan pulsa saja atau jualan pulsa aksesoris dan HP?, Saya sarankan bagi pemula yang baru terjun usaha konter pulsa jangan berjulan HP dahulu karena memerlukan modal yang cukup banyak.  Modal awal yang di perlukan untuk membuka konter pulsa antara lain : Tempat, alat untuk berjualan, stok pulsa, alat promosi, dan biaya opresional.
"I saw that page, it's just a **page of text** with some **random buzzwords** and some sentences **bolded at random**  It's a rambling and rather incoherent read and difficult to extract any pertinent information from, but from what I can gather she appears to sell some kind of training materials to freelancers. Well good for her - she can join the countless others who do the same thing but don't brag about it so obnoxiously on interweb message boards and describe themselves as ""bootstrappy""."
I like the one about writing several versions. I think that is key. If I find myself stuck, sometimes I just say to myself “what are you trying to say?” and then I write down the answer. Then I can take that and hone it. Nice article!
"Not really. It will mostly come down to his personality and if he takes it personally. Don't feel bad. If he doesn't have a necessary expertise that you don't, he's not the right partner for you.   Don't delay. It would have been better for you to nip it at the very beginning, but oh well. In the conversation, you'll have to mention his inexperience at some point. Buuuuut, try to make it more about you than him. Don't have the majority of the sentences be ""**You're** not this"" or ""**You** can't this"". Instead, make it about you and frame the reasons as an internal force you're grappling with. One that you can't fully control but must follow. ""**I** have this vision"" and ""**I** have been soul searching and doing research and now realize that **I** need full creative control"". If you've had any disagreements on serious issues about this business, use them. Mention them and talk about how uncertain the market is. That you might have to take an extreme turn, pivot the business, and that you don't want to listen to anybody or be beholden to anybody. Say you're being selfish but that you want to do it now to avoid conflict in the future.   Making the dynamic about you vs. a passionate irresistible drive that you must follow...rather than you vs. him should help a good deal. You want the business for yourself. You are correct in this desire. You can't hide that fact so don't cover up or lie about this point, but make the reasons not necessarily about him.   Mention high profile cases like Facebook and Tesla and how they split friendships up."
You should have a partnership agreement of some sort.  The reason partnership agreements exist is so nobody can change the game because of the outcome.   I'd say the most typical partnership agreement is that everyone gets an equal cut, meaning that everyone also makes an equal contribution.  If you have start up expenses of $10,000, you'd each contribute $5,000.  Separately, you can determine ownership share by contribution amounts, maybe one of you contributed $2,000 and the other $8,000; this would be an 80/20 split. The performance of the operation doesn't have anything to do with determining how to divide the pie, your partnership agreement determines that.  How much have you each contributed and what agreement did you make before you decided to be partners? If you have a poor performing business segment, then the partnership should get together and consider adjusting or stopping that line of business.  But you don't change how the pie is divided because of it; unless your partnership agreement says you do.
"No idea if Linkedin will be helpful but seek and you will find.     Of all the most ""successful"" people I've wanted to learn from and have reached out to, all have been willing to help. Offer to buy them lunch/dinner etc. Go somewhere nice. Draw it out. You'll learn a lot."
You're using WIX, that's your first problem...but too late for that.  Then you've got to look at the basics of SEO. There are a lot of fundamental things missing, such as content and backlinks.  For content, your products need unique descriptions, for links, try to work with influencers that have blogs (that would be willing to showcase your products).  For a new clothing start-up, your best bet to grow your business from the ground is going to be FB and Instagram ads.  As far as SEO, have you done any research to determine how competitive the market is in regards to organic search?
I agree... r/economics has become a type of subreddit that these posts are frequented in. I'd prefer to see some more thought provoking posts on this board. Not to mention news, rather than information that has been known for a long time now.
Have you tried others on Wikipedia's list?
"I invested a small amount of money with Prosper, and later with Lending Club. I don't know why there is such a discrepancy, but over half of my Prosper loans defaulted, while only 1 of my Lending Club loans has defaulted so far. I think that P2P lending is for ""early adopters"" right now. There are regulation issues, transparency issues, legal issues, etc. Once all of those issues get worked out, I think that P2P lending will eventually overtake conventional lending, and it will be more profitable for both the lender and the borrower. The Internet is simply eroding the value that banks are adding to the process (primarily aggregation of funds), and the system has to change."
This is a good example of why it's in the public interest to prevent companies like Apple and Google from both hoarding cash and using it to payback investors, rather than use it for R&amp;D and capital improvements. While the mechanism can be argued, we need a way to prevent this accumulation of wealth from sitting idle, or remain with a select few.
For some reason I really see people being more comfortable going the way of [harrison bergeron](http://www.tnellen.com/cybereng/harrison.html).  While I'm for the abilty to enhance people, sadly I feel it'd become a much more desisive way to divide the population of haves and have-nots. You can try to sugar coat it as much as you want saying it won't happen.  Company A patents Process A. Company B patents Process B and does something like Process A. Company A sues Company B and wins. Company B's product now raises in cost due to royalty payments. Both companies feel the need to keep massive war chests of money to fight over stupid shit while people suffer. Think Software Patents only in your body.  Yeah, I'd love to have some enhancements. But I don't think businesses are the ones that should develop them. WELL WHO SHOULD THEN! I don't know...
Call me old fashioned, but that sounds less like a marriage and more like a business partnership. Maybe there are business tools that would be useful.
You admire people who inherited large sums of money, hasn't even beaten inflation with it, and has a record of starting projects with investor money then declaring bankruptcy? You should probably realign your priorities. Anyone could be worth as much as Donald Trump with the same headstart.
"There are only three circumstances where building your own ""index"" portfolio make sense, in my opinion."