vania-janet/multiturn-rag-retrieval-data huggingface dataset:
Local Government Records Law ARTICLE 57-A, ARTS & CULTURAL AFFAIRS LAW | New York State Archives
It shall be the responsibility of the commissioner of education to advise local governments on planning and administering programs for the creation, maintenance, preservation, reproduction, retention, and disposition of their records; to advise local governments on the development of micrographics systems, automated data processing systems, and other systems that rely on technology to create, store, manage, and reproduce information or records; and to advise local governments on the preservation and use of vital records and records with enduring value for historical or other research purposes.
2. The commissioner of education is authorized to establish requirements for the proper creation, preservation, management and protection of records, and shall develop statewide plans to ensure preservation of adequate documentation of the functions, services, and historical development of local governments.
3. The commissioner of education is authorized to promulgate regulations to implement the provisions of this article with advice from the local government records advisory council.
§ 57.25. Records retention and disposition.
1. It shall be the responsibility of every local officer to maintain records to adequately document the transaction of public business and the services and programs for which such officer is responsible; to retain and have custody of such records for so long as the records are needed for the conduct of the business of the office; to adequately protect such records; to cooperate with the local government`s records management officer on programs for the orderly and efficient management of records including identification and management of inactive records and identification and preservation of records of enduring value; to dispose of records in accordance with legal requirements; and to pass on to his successor records needed for the continuing conduct of business of the office. In towns, records no longer needed for the conduct of the business of the office shall be transferred to the custody of the town clerk for their safekeeping and ultimate disposal.
2. No local officer shall destroy, sell or otherwise dispose of any public record without the consent of the commissioner of education. The commissioner of education shall, after consultation with other state agencies and with local government officers, determine the minimum length of time that records need to be retained. Such commissioner is authorized to develop, adopt by regulation, issue and distribute to local governments records retention and disposition schedules establishing minimum legal retention periods.
Terms of Use - CA_courts
You agree to: (i) log out from your account at the end of each session; and (ii) immediately notify websitefeedback@jud.ca.gov of any unauthorized use of your password or user ID or any other breach of security. 
You are responsible for all content that you transmit or otherwise make available to this Website. Your access to and use of this Website may be monitored, including but not limited to, for the purpose of identifying illegal or unauthorized activities.
Disclaimers and Limitation of Liability
THIS WEBSITE AND THE CONTENT ARE PROVIDED ON AN "AS IS," "AS AVAILABLE" BASIS, AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO ERRORS, INACCURACIES OR OMISSIONS.
THE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY SUPERIOR COURT, ANY COURT OF APPEAL, THE SUPREME COURT, THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA, AND THEIR OFFICIALS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, CONTRACTORS AND AGENTS (COLLECTIVELY, THE "JUDICIAL BRANCH ENTITIES") MAKE NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES REGARDING THIS WEBSITE OR THE CONTENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THEIR COMPLETENESS, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, NON-INFRINGEMENT OF THIRD-PARTY RIGHTS, OR FREEDOM FROM COMPUTER VIRUSES. YOUR ACCESS TO AND USE OF THIS WEBSITE AND THE CONTENT ARE AT YOUR SOLE RISK. THE JUDICIAL BRANCH ENTITIES ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES), LOSSES, CLAIMS OR LIABILITY, KNOWN OR UNKNOWN (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE OR DATA), ARISING OUT OF THE USE OF (OR INABILITY TO USE) THIS WEBSITE, THE CONTENT, ANY THIRD-PARTY SITE LINKED TO THIS WEBSITE, OR ANY ERROR, OMISSION, INTERRUPTION, DEFECT, DELAY, COMPUTER VIRUS, THEFT, DESTRUCTION, DAMAGE TO COMPUTER SYSTEMS, OR UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS.  
Linking and Third Parties 
This Website may include links to third-party sites, such as social media and file-sharing sites to distribute our content. When you access these sites, you are subject to third-party terms of use and privacy/security policies, which we recommend that you review. The Judicial Branch Entities are not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, legality, practices, or availability of linked sites (including any related services, content, software applications, and other technologies).
NPR 2800.2A - main


NPR 2800.2A - main


	 | NODIS Library | Legal Policies(2000s) | Search | 
	

NASAProceduralRequirements

NPR 2800.2A
Effective Date: August 05, 2020
	Expiration Date: August 05, 2025

COMPLIANCE IS MANDATORY FOR NASA EMPLOYEES

Subject: Information and Communication Technology Accessibility
Responsible Office: Office of the Chief Information Officer

View all pages in PDF

Table of Contents
Preface

P.1 Purpose
P.2 Applicability
P.3 Authorities
P.4 Applicable Documents and Forms
P.5 Measurement/Verification
P.6 Cancellation

Chapter 1. Overview of Section 508 Accessible Information and Communication Technology

1.1 Background
1.2 Scope

Chapter 2. Requirements

2.1 Procurement of ICT
2.2 Technical and Functional Criteria for Compliance with Section 508 of ICT Developed, Maintained, and Used by NASA
2.3 Special Topics
2.4 Applicability and Exceptions
2.5 Requesting Exceptions to Technical Standards

Chapter 3. Roles and Responsibilities

3.1 Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO)
3.2 Agency Section 508 Program Manager
3.3 Center Directors
3.4 Officials-In-Charge of Headquarters Offices and Managers of NASA Center Directorates and Program/Project Managers
3.5 Center Chief Information Officers
3.6 Center Section 508 Program Managers
3.7 Agency and Center Offices of Procurement
3.8 Agency Office of Diversity and Equal Opportunity and Center offices responsible for Equal Opportunity Programs
3.9 Agency Office of General Counsel and Center offices of Chief Counsel
3.10 Requiring Office

Appendix A. Definitions 
Appendix B. Acronyms

DISTRIBUTION:
NODIS



	This document does not bind the public, except as authorized by law or as
	incorporated into a contract. This document is uncontrolled when printed.
	Check the NASA Online Directives Information System (NODIS) Library to
	verify that this is the correct version before use:
	https://nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov.
The 2024-25 Budget: Department of Cannabis Control—Legal and Administrative Hearing Costs
The Governor’s budget proposes $8.2 million from the Cannabis Control Fund (decreasing to $8.1 million in 2025-26 and 2026-27 and $1.3 million ongoing beginning in 2027-28) and seven positions to support DCC workload and DOJ and OAH costs. This includes $1.4 million in 2024-25 (decreasing to $1.3 million beginning in 2025-26 and ongoing) and seven positions to support additional workload in DCC’s laboratory services and legal affairs divisions. It also includes $2.7 million for DOJ costs and $4.1 million for OAH costs annually in 2024-25 through 2026-27. The 2021-22 Budget Act initially provided DCC with three years of funding for its DOJ and OAH costs. Accordingly, this proposal would continue to provide funding for an additional three years to give the department more time to evaluate ongoing funding needs.
Provisional Language Authorizing Increase in Budget for Litigation and Administrative Hearing Costs. The Governor also proposes provisional language allowing the Department of Finance (DOF) to augment DCC’s budget from the Cannabis Control Fund for litigation and administrative hearings costs. The language specifies that DCC must demonstrate to DOF a need for additional resources and that the augmentation shall be authorized no sooner than 30 days after notification to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee. DCC indicates that the provisional language would give the department flexibility should additional DOJ or OAH costs materialize, as the department indicates there is uncertainty over the level of these costs it will incur in the near term.
Assessment
Resources Proposed for DCC Laboratory Services and Legal Affairs Divisions Appear Reasonable. We find that the proposed funding and positions for the laboratory services and legal affairs divisions appear reasonable. These resources would address workload associated with DCC’s oversight of cannabis testing laboratories and legal services to carry out the department’s responsibilities.
Proposed DOJ and OAH Funding Significantly Higher Than Past Expenditures. As shown in Figure 1, the Governor’s proposal for DOJ and OAH costs is significantly higher than DCC’s expenditures on these services in 2021-22 and 2022-23.

Figure 1
Terms of Use - CA_courts
This Website may include links to third-party sites, such as social media and file-sharing sites to distribute our content. When you access these sites, you are subject to third-party terms of use and privacy/security policies, which we recommend that you review. The Judicial Branch Entities are not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, legality, practices, or availability of linked sites (including any related services, content, software applications, and other technologies). In addition, the Judicial Branch Entities are not responsible for any interruption of services, malfunctions, or security breaches involving these third-party sites. References or links in this Website to any commercial products or services, or the use of any trade, firm or corporation name do not constitute endorsement by any Judicial Branch Entity. As a general practice, we do not allow placement of links on this website to commercial (e.g., .com) entities.
General
These Terms of Use constitute the entire agreement with respect to your access to and use of this Website and the Content. If any provision of these Terms of Use is unlawful, void or unenforceable, then that provision will be deemed severable from the remaining provisions and will not affect their validity and enforceability. The failure by a Judicial Branch Entity to enforce any provision in these Terms of Use will not constitute or be construed as a waiver of such provision or of the right to enforce it at a later time. California law, without regard to conflict of laws provisions, will govern these Terms of Use and any matter or dispute arising out of this Website or the Content. The state and federal courts located in San Francisco, California will have exclusive jurisdiction over any dispute relating to these Terms of Use, this Website or the Content. The Judicial Council of California may change these Terms of Use from time to time by posting a new version on this Website. Your continued use of or access to this Website after such changes constitutes acceptance of such changes. The Judicial Branch Entities will have the right to use for any purpose, free of charge, all information or content submitted via this site except those submissions made under separate legal contract. This Website and the Content do not constitute legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is formed.
Electronic Filing Service Provider | Superior Court of California | County of Tulare
It is the responsibility of the submitting party to include all necessary information and documentation to avoid a rejection by the Court.

Journal Technologies
1 eFile
123 E-Filing
A&A Legal Service
A&M Attorney Services
A2Z Attorney Service
AAA E-Filing (On Call Legal)
Action Serv LLC
Accurate Document Imaging
Ace Attorney Service
Action Attorney Service
Advanced Attorney Services
Advanced Microsystems Group Inc
AE Attorney Service
ALL-N-ONE Legal Support
AmericanLegalNet
Amstar Express
Angeles Legal Services
Apex Legal
AlphaDox
ASAP LEGAL
Attorney Service
Attorney Service of San Dimas
Attorney’s Certified Services
 
Battle Attorney Service Inc
Bay Area File
Benders Legal Service
Beyond eFile
Beyond e-Discovery LLC
BFRM Legal Support Services
Bosco Legal Services
By the Book
Cal West Attorney Services Inc
California Civil Process
California Court Filing
CI&S Investigation 
 
Class Action Research and Litigation Support Inc
CM Courier Service
Commercial Process Serving
Countrywide Process
Cookie’s Court Support
 
County Legal Service Inc.
County Process Servers
Court Connection
Court Link
Creekside E-Filing
D&T Legal Services
DDS Legal
Direct Legal Support
East Bay Messenger and Attorney Service
Eddings Attorney Service
e-Legal Services Inc.
Envoy Attorney Support
 
Express Network
First Legal
Flat Rate Process Service
Golden State Attorney Service
Golden State Legal Inc
Green Filing
Hastings Legal Services
I Serve Legal Support LLC
InfoTrack
Interceptor Legal Support Service Inc.
Janney and Janney
Laguna Legal Inc.
Law Help Interactive
Legal Document Server Inc.
Legal Eagle Document Retrieval
Legal Document Specialist
Legal e-File
Legalese Attorney Service
Legal Lawgic Inc
Legalex Litigation Support Services
 
Legal Photocopy Service
LegalConnect
Legal Fleet
Legend Legal Services
Litigati 
LSS Legal Services
The 2024-25 Budget: Department of Cannabis Control—Legal and Administrative Hearing Costs
We find that the proposed funding and positions for the laboratory services and legal affairs divisions appear reasonable. These resources would address workload associated with DCC’s oversight of cannabis testing laboratories and legal services to carry out the department’s responsibilities.
Proposed DOJ and OAH Funding Significantly Higher Than Past Expenditures. As shown in Figure 1, the Governor’s proposal for DOJ and OAH costs is significantly higher than DCC’s expenditures on these services in 2021-22 and 2022-23.

Figure 1
Governor’s Proposal for DOJ and OAH Costs Significantly Higher Than Past Expenditures

2021‑22 Actuals

2022‑23 Actuals

Average from 2021‑22 to 2022‑23

2024‑25 Governor’s Proposal

DOJ

$773,079 

$529,791 

$651,435 

$2,700,000 

OAH

14,907 

4,506 

9,707 

4,100,000 

DOJ = Department of Justice and OAH = Office of Administrative Hearings

Additional Costs May Materialize, but Amount Is Uncertain. On the one hand, it is reasonable to expect that DCC’s DOJ and OAH costs may increase over time. For example, DCC anticipates taking additional enforcement actions, which may lead to an increase in legal actions that would require representation and support from DOJ. In addition, the department anticipates that its DOJ and OAH costs may increase as more provisional licenses transition into annual licenses, as annual licensees have the ability to appeal DCC decisions to OAH. On the other hand, the department’s DOJ and OAH expenditures have decreased over time, despite the department issuing more annual licenses. As shown in Figure 1 above, these costs decreased from 2021-22 to 2022-23. Moreover, year-to-date expenditures for DOJ and OAH costs in 2023-24 were lower than the same period a year earlier in 2022-23, further suggesting that expenditures may not necessarily increase in the near term.
Initiatives - Active Measures | State of California - Department of Justice - Office of the Attorney General
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
YouTube

Careers

Career Opportunities

How to Apply
Assessments
Job Vacancies
Internships & Student Positions
Become a Special Agent
Become a Deputy Attorney General

Organization of the Office

About the Office
Legal Services Divisions
Division of Law Enforcement
California Justice Information Services (CJIS)
Administration

AG Honors Program & Geoffrey Wright Solicitor General Fellowship

Attorney General's Honors Program
Geoffrey Wright Solicitor General Fellowship

Regulations

Resources

For Businesses

Submit Data Security Breach
Privacy Resources
SB 487- Hidden Fees

Service on the Attorney General

Office Locations / Status Updates
Laws Requiring Service on the AG

Open Government

Overview
Ballot Initiatives
Conflicts of Interest
Criminal Justice Statistics
Public Records
Publications

Grants

Grant Opportunities

Programs

Programs

See All Programs

Most Popular

Charities
Megan's Law
CURES
Service on the Attorney General
Division of Medi-Cal Fraud & Elder Abuse

  Most Popular

Permits & Registrations
Prop 65 – Safe Drinking Water
Missing Persons
Data Security Breach
Human Trafficking

Appointments
Contact

Contact Us
Contact Us - En español
Contáctenos/Formularios
Service on the Attorney General

 

Initiatives - Active Measures

You can download a document by selecting the proposed initiative's tracking number. Submitted proposed initiatives may appear below with an unofficial title submitted by the proponent(s) or developed by the Attorney General's Initiative Coordinator. These unofficial titles are for identification purposes only.
Please note that proposed initiatives are posted as submitted by the proponent(s). The initiative proponent(s) may submit a proposed title and summary. Such titles and summaries are not official and will likely differ from the official title and ultimately prepared by the Attorney General. The Attorney General makes no comment on the accuracy of any statements made in the proposed initiatives.
You can comment on a proposed initiative by selecting the “submit comment” button located next to the proposed initiative.
Administration | Superior Court of California | County of Tuolumne
Acting at the direction of the Presiding Judge, Court Administration is responsible for the management and administration of the non-judicial operations of the court. 
Court Administration's areas of responsibility are broad and diverse, including:

Clerk's offices for criminal, traffic, civil, small claims, family law, probate and juvenile matters;

Courtroom support, including courtroom staff, legal research, and interpreters;

Records management;

Jury services;

Human resources for all court employees, including training and professional development, and ADA accommodations for individuals with disabilities;

Finance, including budget preparation, financial and grant reporting, accounts receivable, accounts payable, payroll, fund reconciliation, procurement, court collections, and facilities management ;

Information technology, including network services, telecommunications, software deployment, disaster recovery, and application management;

Family court services, including child custody, juvenile dependency, mediation, conservatorship and guardianship investigations;

Court security, including courtroom and perimeter services;

Staffing of court-appointed committees and commissions; and

Public information distribution and press releases.

Facilitates Grand Jury selection, training, and general support.

In addition to these duties, Court Administration also serves as liaison between the court and the Judicial Council of California, which provides direction and assistance to all California courts through its agency, the Judicial Council of California. The Court Executive Officer serves on several advisory committees and working groups that provide input to the Judicial Council of California in developing branch-wide policies to improve the administration of justice in California.
Request for public access to judicial administrative records.

Contact Information
Court Executive Office
12855 Justice Center Drive
Sonora, CA 95370
Phone: (209) 533-5650
The Court Administration Office is located on the 2nd floor of the Justice Center Courthouse.

 

 Was this helpful?
 

Yes

No

Yes

No

Any additional feedback?

Email (optional)

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Leave this field blank

Was this helpful?
 

Administrative

ADA Information

Employment

Location & Contact Info

Attorney Resources

Local Forms

Local Rules

California Court
College Equivalency Education

Pro Bono Directory

Central Coast Area

Central Valley Area

Los Angeles Area

Sacramento and Northern California

San Diego and Imperial Valley

San Francisco Area

Statewide

Pro Bono Practice Program

Volunteer After a Disaster

Volunteer Opportunities to Assist Veterans and Service Members

FAQ

Grants

Legal Aid Funding

Justice Gap Fund

2024 Grant Recipients

Diversity & Inclusion

Lawyer Referral Services

Financial Institutions

IOLTA-Eligible Financial Institutions

Search

Search Website

Pre-Legal Education

College Equivalency Education

Legal Education

Fixed Facility

Correspondence or Distance Learning

Law Office or Judge's Chamber

Foreign Education

Foreign Law Degree

Legal Education Evaluation

College Equivalency Education

Applicants who have not completed at least two years of college work in accordance with Rule 4.25(A) of the Admissions Rules and Section 6060(c)(1) of the California Business and Professions Code must satisfy the general education requirements prior to beginning law study by attaining a score of 50 or higher on the following College-Level Examination Program (CLEP) examinations which are administered by the College Board:

Under Composition and Literature categoryCollege Composition
	and
Two other examinations, each designed to correspond to full-year courses (six semester hours each*) or four other examinations, each designed to correspond to semester courses (three semester hours each*) that can be selected from any of the following subjects:
	
Composition and Literature (Humanities examination only)
Foreign Languages
History and Social Sciences
Science and Mathematics
Business

Sending scores to law schools
Applicants must also register to take the CLEP examinations directly with the College Board and request that score reports be forwarded by the College Board to the prospective law schools to which they seek admission. 

Applicants who request a general education evaluation or pursue law study under the Committee of Bar Examiners’ Law Office Study program must have the College Board send official score reports to the State Bar’s Office of Admissions in Los Angeles; 845 S. Figueroa St., Los Angeles, CA 90017-2515. 

The score recipient code for the State Bar Office of Admissions is: 7165.