vania-janet/multiturn-rag-retrieval-data huggingface dataset:
May 19-20, 2022 Board Meeting Agenda | California Air Resources Board
More InformationAnnual Update on AB 617 ImplementationPublic Meeting NoticeItem SummaryMeeting PresentationSubmit Written CommentsView Public CommentsFriday, May 20, 2022 @ 9:00 a.m. Discussion Items:The following agenda items may be heard in a different order at the Board Meeting.Hardcopies of the Public Agenda and Proposed Resolutions (when applicable) will be provided at the meeting; all other documents linked below will only be available upon request. 22-7-3: 2020-2021 Haagen-Smit Clean Air AwardsThe Board will present the 2020-2021 Haagen-Smit Clean Air Awards, considered the "Nobel Prize" in air quality achievement. These awards recognize extraordinary individuals who have made significant and lifetime contributions in air quality and climate change science.More InformationItem SummarySubmit Written CommentsView Public Comments22-7-4: Public Meeting to Hear an Informational Update on the California Air Resources Board’s Academic Memorandums of Understanding with Educational Institutions The Board will hear an update on Memorandums of Understanding between CARB and educational institutions. In developing the state-of-the-art laboratory and relocation to Riverside, CARB signed academic memorandums to facilitate highly cooperative educational and workforce development opportunities and is currently expanding these efforts.Item SummaryMeeting PresentationSubmit Written CommentsView Public CommentsClosed SessionThe Board may hold a closed session, as authorized by Government Code section 11126(a)(1), and as authorized by Government Code section 11126(e), to confer with, and receive advice from, its legal counsel regarding the following pending or potential litigation: Alliance for California Business v. California State Transportation Agency, et al., Sacramento County Superior Court, Case No. 34-2016-80002491.American Lung Association, et al. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, et al. (D.C. Cir. 2021) 985 F.3d 914, cert. granted sub nom. Westmoreland Mining Holdings v. EPA (U.S., Oct. 29, 2021, No. 20-1778). Best Energy Solutions & Technology Corp., et al v.
NASA's Boeing Crew Flight Test -
Ken Bowersox, associate administrator, NASA’s Space Operations Mission Directorate
Steve Stich, manager, NASA’s Commercial Crew Program
Dana Weigel, manager, International Space Station Program at NASA
Mark Nappi, vice president and program manager, Commercial Crew Program, Boeing
Tory Bruno, president and CEO, United Launch Alliance

Learn more about NASA’s Boeing Crew Flight Test by following the mission blog, the commercial crew blog, @commercial_crew on X, and commercial crew on Facebook.
 

Author Elyna Niles-CarnesPosted on May 6, 2024May 6, 2024Categories Boeing, Boeing Crew Flight Test, Commercial Crew, Commercial Crew Program, Commercial Spaceflight, Crew Flight Test, Expedition 71, International Space Station, Kennedy Space Center, NASA, NASA Astronauts, United Launch AllianceTags Atlas V, Boeing, Butch Wilmore, Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, CCSFS, CFT, Crew Flight Test, Expedition 71, International Space Station, NASA, NASA astronauts, SLC-41, Space Launch Complex 41, Starliner, Suni Williams, ULA, United Launch Alliance 

NASA’s Boeing Crew Flight Test Scrubbed 

Boeing’s Starliner spacecraft atop the United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket is seen on the launch pad of Space Launch Complex-41 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida on Monday, May 6, 2024. Photo credit: NASA
NASA, Boeing, and United Launch Alliance scrubbed the launch opportunity on Monday, May 6 for the agency’s Boeing Crew Flight Test to the International Space Station due to a faulty oxygen relief valve observation on the United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket Centaur second stage.
NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams exited the Starliner spacecraft at Space Launch Complex-41 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida and will return to astronaut crew quarters.
NASA’s coverage continues on NASA+, NASA Television, the NASA app, YouTube, and the agency’s website. Learn how to stream NASA TV through a variety of platforms including social media.
Learn more about NASA’s Boeing Crew Flight Test by following the mission blog, the commercial crew blog, @commercial_crew on X, and commercial crew on Facebook.
Records Request Form | Superior Court of California | County of Tulare
Please read the following before submitting a request:
Requests that do not include all necessary fields (marked by red asterisk) will be ignored
Please note that all confidential requests will be denied.

Request Type
- Select -General Records RequestSchedule an Appointment

Case Number

Case Name

Requestor's Information

First Name

Last Name

Requestor's Address

Address

Address 2

City/Town

State/Province
- Select -AlabamaAlaskaAmerican SamoaArizonaArkansasArmed Forces (Canada, Europe, Africa, or Middle East)Armed Forces AmericasArmed Forces PacificCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFederated States of MicronesiaFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarshall IslandsMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaNorthern Mariana IslandsOhioOklahomaOregonPalauPennsylvaniaPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirgin IslandsVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyomingAlbertaBritish ColumbiaManitobaNew BrunswickNewfoundland and LabradorNova ScotiaNorthwest TerritoriesNunavutOntarioPrince Edward IslandQuebecSaskatchewanYukon

ZIP/Postal Code

Driver's License Number

Telephone Number

Email Address

Additional Information

If you know which documents you wish to purchase, list them here; or add additional information for the clerk.

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Leave this field blank

 

 Was this helpful?
 

Yes

No

Yes

No

Any additional feedback?

Email (optional)

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Leave this field blank

Was this helpful?
 

Public Resources
GCC : Mammoth Lakes (2013) << Cities

Vallejo
Vernon
Victorville
Villa Park
Visalia
Vista
Walnut
Walnut Creek
Wasco
Waterford
Watsonville
Weed
West Covina
West Hollywood
West Sacramento
Westlake Village
Westminster
Westmorland
Wheatland
Whittier
Wildomar
Williams
Willits
Willows
Windsor
Winters
Woodlake
Woodland
Woodside
Yorba Linda
Yountville
Yreka
Yuba City
Yucaipa
Yucca Valley

View Details

Mammoth Lakes

Year:

2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009

County:
Mono County


 Download all employee information for this city: 
 CSV

City Employees

133

Population
8,098

Total Wages

$6,598,268

Total Retirement & Health Contribution

$1,958,094

For more information visit 
 https://www.townofmammothlakes.ca.gov/208/Human-Resources
this employer's website

Last Updated: 6/15/2016


 Employees
 


 Highest Paid Employees
 


 Elected Officials
 


 Departments
 


 Summary
 


 Averages
 


 Historical Trending
 

Report: Employees

 Download employee information using the CSV link above
 

Filter by:

Total Wages
Total Retirement & Health Contribution

Min:

Max:

Position
City
Department
Total Wages
Total Retirement & Health Contribution

The information presented is posted as submitted by each reporting public employer. 
The State Controller's Office is not responsible for the accuracy of this information. 
If you have any questions, please contact that public employer.


 © 2024 State of California - State Controller's Office
 

Privacy Policy
|
Accessibility

|
Back to Top
The 2024-25 Budget: Proposition 2 Debt Payment Proposals
That is because the payment would supplant, not supplement, what the state would otherwise provide to CalPERS in 2024‑25.
This Report Offers Some Alternatives. Given that the Governor’s proposal appears unconstitutional, we outline some alternatives for the Legislature. All of these options involve trade‑offs. The first set of options would maximize savings in the budget window, but result in lower savings for future years. The second option results in more savings in the multiyear window, but lower savings for the long term. The final option includes essentially no short‑term budgetary savings, but would improve the condition of the state’s budget over the very long term.
Balancing Trade‑Offs. Given this year’s significant budget problem, as well as some specific conditions related to the state’s CalSTRS contributions for this year, we think there is a policy argument for the Legislature to use Proposition 2 to achieve budget savings in both 2024‑25 and 2025‑26. (Relative to the Governor’s budget, these alternatives would yield similar savings in 2024‑25 and additional savings in 2025‑26. Like the Governor’s proposal, both of these alternatives would result in less long‑term savings for the state.) However, after the state emerges from this period of more acute budget problems, we would urge the Legislature to return to its longstanding policy of maximizing long‑term benefits associated with Proposition 2.
Introduction
This report evaluates the Governor’s Proposition 2‑related debt and liabilities payment proposals. First, we provide background on: (1) some of the state’s pension systems and retirement‑related liabilities; (2) Proposition 2; and (3) how supplemental pension payments work, including those that have been made under Proposition 2 requirements in recent years. Second, we describe the Governor’s Proposition 2 debt‑related proposals. Third, we provide an assessment of these proposals. Finally, because this proposal appears to be unconstitutional, we outline some alternatives for the Legislature to consider.
Background
State Pension Systems
CalPERS
CalPERS administers pension benefits for more than 900,000 active employees and nearly 700,000 retired members.
Nimbus Fish Hatchery

Download
 School Tour

Download
 Public View of Manual Spawning

Download
 Fish Hatching Jar

Download
 Indoor Fish Raceways

Download

Fisheries Branch
1010 Riverside Parkway, West Sacramento, CA 95605 | Fisheries@wildlife.ca.gov

Fishing Directory
Ocean Sport Fishing
Inland Sport Fishing
Commercial Fishing
Licenses and Report Cards
Regulations
Fishing & Diving Records
Fishing Passport
Fish Hatcheries, Stocking

Hunting Directory
Deer
Bear
Upland Game Birds
Waterfowl
Elk
Pronghorn
Wild Pig
Small Mammals
Hunter Education
Licenses & Tags
Regulations

Licensing Information
Fishing Licenses
Hunting Licenses
Purchase a License / Register for GO ID
License Agent Support
License & Permit Directory

Conservation Directory
Species Management / Data
Threatened and Endangered Species
Environmental Review
CDFW Lands
Grant Opportunities
Landscape Conservation Planning
Marine Resources
Spill Response
Water & Watersheds

Learning Directory
Classroom Aquarium
Fishing in the City
Hunter Education
Living with Wildlife
Publications

About CDFW

Budget
Justice, Equity, Diversity, Inclusion
Law Enforcement
Organizational Structure
Strategic Vision
Tribal Affairs 

Opportunities

Employment
Grants 
Public Meetings and Notices 
Vendors/Contractors
Volunteer 

Get in Touch

Contact CDFW
News Room
Public Records Act Requests
Regions

Related Agencies

Fish and Game Commission(opens in new tab)
Wildlife Conservation Board(opens in new tab)

Register to Vote(opens in new tab)
 Accessibility
Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Site Map
Contact Us

Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Blogs
Flickr

© 2024 State of California
2001 Budget Analysis:California Spending on Long-Term Care Services
Because institutional care generally involves higher levels of care and
supervision, it costs the most—on average $50,000 per case annually. In comparison, the annual cost of providing in-home care averages no more than $8,000
per case. Although a meaningful average for community-based care cannot be computed, the average costs of the individual programs also remain well
below the cost of institutional care. 
The General Fund Accounts for More Than Half of Long-Term Care Spending. The major long-term care programs, including nursing facilities, services
for the developmentally disabled, and IHSS, are funded by Medi-Cal. The state receives matching federal dollars for most of the services provided under
these programs. The federal government, therefore, shares a significant portion of state long-term care costs. On balance, however, the General Fund is the
primary source of long-term care services, accounting for more than half of the total.

Long-Term Care Spending Is Increasing 
Growth in Spending Over Three Years. As Figure 3 shows, spending on state-funded long-term care services grew from nearly $7 billion in
1998-99 to $7.7 billion in 1999-00, and is estimated to reach $9.1 billion in 2000-01. During this period, the General Fund portion of these costs was
$3.7 billion in 1998-99, $4.2 billion in 1999-00, and will be an estimated $5 billion in 2000-01.
 
An increase of $1.3 billion in General Fund spending from 1998-99 through 2000-01 may be attributed in part to the expansion of services not covered by
Medi-Cal and, therefore, not eligible for federal funding support. Also, there has been a reduction in federal funding for two programs. Specifically, two
developmental centers lost federal funding due to noncompliance with federal requirements, and the General Fund compensated for that loss. Efforts are under
way that would allow restoration of federal funding by 2001-02.
Increases in spending occurred across all three settings for long-term care. However, the rates of increase and, therefore, the relative shares that each of these
NASA's Boeing Crew Flight Test -
Liftoff is scheduled for 12:25 p.m. Saturday, June 1, from Space Launch Complex-41 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida. After successful completion of the flight test, NASA will begin the final process of certifying Starliner and its systems for crewed rotation missions to the space station. 
Learn more about NASA’s Boeing Crew Flight Test by following the mission blog, the commercial crew blog, @commercial_crew on X, and commercial crew on Facebook. 
 

Author Elyna Niles-CarnesPosted on May 24, 2024Categories Boeing, Boeing Crew Flight Test, Commercial Crew, Commercial Crew Program, Commercial Spaceflight, Crew Flight Test, Expedition 71, International Space Station, Kennedy Space Center, Kennedy Space Center, NASA, NASA Astronauts, United Launch AllianceTags Atlas V, Boeing, Butch Wilmore, Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, CCSFS, CFT, Crew Flight Test, International Space Station, NASA, NASA astronauts, SLC-41, Space Launch Complex 41, Starliner, Suni Williams, ULA, United Launch Alliance 

NASA, Mission Partners Hold Teleconference Ahead of Starliner Launch 

A United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket with Boeing’s Starliner spacecraft aboard is seen on the launch pad at Space Launch Complex 41 ON Sunday, May 5, 2024 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida. Photo Credit: NASA/Joel Kowsky
NASA, Boeing, and ULA (United Launch Alliance) will discuss updates regarding ongoing work for the agency’s Boeing Crew Flight Test, which will send NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams to the International Space Station on Boeing’s Starliner spacecraft. 
At 11 a.m. EDT, NASA will host a media teleconference with the following participants: 

Jim Free, NASA associate administrator 
Ken Bowersox, associate administrator, NASA’s Space Operations Mission Directorate
Steve Stich, manager, NASA’s Commercial Crew Program 
Dana Weigel, manager, NASA’s International Space Station Program 
Mark Nappi, vice president and program manager, Boeing Commercial Crew Program 
Gary Wentz, vice president, Government and Commercial Programs, ULA 

Audio of the teleconference will stream live on the agency’s website.
Future Parks
The 1,192-acre future regional park is located near Mark West Springs and Porter Creek roads in the southern part of the Mayacamas Mountains above Santa Rosa. Its boundaries encompass Mill and Porter creeks, which both feed into Mark West Creek, a significant tributary of the Russian River, which is designated as critical habitat for endangered species such as steelhead trout and spawning coho salmon.

Monte Rio Redwoods Regional Park and Open Space Preserve
This 515-acre future park is located at the southern edge of Monte Rio, and will be the first regional park in this part of the county. The park will create hiking, biking and outdoor education opportunities for Monte Rio and nearby Bohemian Highway communities like Camp Meeker, Tyrone and Occidental, and serve to preserve important habitat such as the creeks and streams that flow into Dutch Bill Creek, a major tributary of the Russian River.

Russian River Parkway
The Russian River Parkway aims to provide safe, welcoming and environmentally friendly river access for fishing, picnicking, paddling, and other water activities near the city of Cloverdale. All three river access points will include parking improvements, miles of new access trails, and amenities like restrooms, picnic tables, benches and scenic viewing areas.

Wright Hill Regional Park and Open Space Preserve
This expansive 1,236-acre coastal property is  a mosaic of coastal grasslands, wildflowers, rock outcrops, bay-oak woodlands and redwood-Douglas fir forests, and supports special status species such as Townsend’s big-eared bat and American badger. Adjacent to thousands of acres of Sonoma Coast State Park on one side and protected private lands on the other, the Wright Hill property is a key piece in the ongoing efforts to protect lands stretching from Bodega Bay to the Jenner Headlands.

View Active Planning Project Directory

 

Learn

Home
Find a Park
Find a Campsite
Become a Member
Subscribe to our Newsletter
Planning Projects
Public Meetings

Contact Us Main Office: (707) 565-2041Hours: Mon-Fri, 8 a.m. - 5 p.m.

Address2300 County Center DriveSuite A120Santa Rosa, CA 95403
2001 Budget Analysis:State Data Centers
Data center rates for nonmainframe activities are difficult to calculate
State has a staff recruitment and retention problem for information
technology classifications
Stephen P. Teale Data Center (TDC) may lose specialized skills as older
workforce retires
Health and Human Services Agency Data Center and TDC perform
identical functions
More options may be available to contract with private business for
specific functions

Technology Has Shifted From Mainframe to Midrange Systems. Technology has dramatically changed since the
establishment of the data centers in 1972. At that time, mainframes were the only computers available for processing large volumes
of data. Now, midrange systems provide computing power on par with earlier mainframes. The DOIT's 1997 report focused
almost exclusively on mainframe systems.
In 1997, DOIT reported to the Legislature that it intended to consolidate the existing IBM-compatible mainframe operations at
FTB, BOE, State Controller's Office (SCO), Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS), California State Lottery, and State
Treasurer's Office (STO) into TDC. During our review, we found that BOE, STO, and SCO have consolidated all of their
mainframe operations into TDC. The administration does not have statutory authority to implement consolidation at PERS and the
California State Lottery. At this point it is unlikely that the state would achieve much additional benefit from mainframe consolidation
because mainframes are no longer as prevalent as they were in 1997.
The DOIT's 1997 report gave little attention to nonmainframe systems. Since that time, both HHSDC and TDC have experienced
tremendous growth (over 400 percent) in midrange systems. As a result of these changes, earlier consolidation recommendations
may not address current circumstances and therefore are of limited value.
Network Technology Has Become More Complex. As the state has shifted from mainframe to midrange systems, the data
communications networks have also changed. Mainframe communications networks used to allow only one type of data
communications signal to transmit through the networks. Now, data networks allow multiple communication signals to transmit
The 2024-25 Budget: California State University
CSU Also Plans to Reallocate Existing Enrollment Funding Among Campuses. In addition to providing new enrollment growth funding, CSU plans to reallocate some existing enrollment funding among campuses in 2024‑25. Eight campuses are currently more than 10 percent below their enrollment target. For each of these campuses, CSU plans to reduce its enrollment target and associated funding by 3 percent in 2024‑25 and reallocate those amounts to campuses currently at or above their target. (These reallocated funds would be in addition to any funds the campus receives from the new $38 million for enrollment growth in 2024‑25.) CSU also intends to repeat a similar reallocation process in 2025‑26 and 2026‑27. 
Assessment
CSU’s Actual Enrollment Level Is Notably Below Its Funded Enrollment Target. In 2023‑24, CSU’s estimated enrollment level of 368,042 resident FTE students is 19,072 students (4.9 percent) below its enrollment target. This target reflects the number of students for which CSU has previously received ongoing state support, either directly or from within its base funding. Given that CSU is notably below its target, it could add many more students before it needs to allocate new funding for enrollment growth, indicating new funding for enrollment growth is unwarranted at this time. New funding is particularly unwarranted if those funds are to come from CSU’s reserves, as they likely would under the Governor’s budget. It would be more prudent to use those reserves to temporarily cover operating costs that cannot be avoided. 
Enrollment Growth in 2023‑24 Is Overstated Due to Shift in Summer Courses. When the Legislature sets enrollment growth expectations for CSU in the state budget, it intends for CSU to add more students. The majority of the increase in FTE students that CSU is reporting in 2023‑24 is unrelated to adding more students and instead stems from shifting summer courses from self‑supported to state‑supported. This approach to enrollment growth does not appear to align with legislative intent. Moreover, given the state’s projected budget deficits, the state likely cannot afford to begin supporting activities that were previously self‑supported.
California Fish and Wildlife Journal - Contents

An investigation of the California sand dab, Citharichthys sordidus (Girard). H. L. Arora
Some deer range survey methods. W. P. Dasmann
An easy method of separating king and silver salmon. F. B. Hagerman
Notes on the squaretail, Tetragonurus cuvieri. J. E. Fitch
The brown shark, Apristurus brunneus, in California. P. M. Roedel
The sea lion population of Santa Barbara Island, California, in the 1950 breeding season. G. A. Bartholomew, Jr., R. D. Collyer, and W. R. Dawson
California state-wide angling catch estimates for 1949. A. J. Calhoun
The 1948 surveys of California's hunting take and their significance. H. A. Hjersman
In Memoriam—Frank Schulmeyer
Retirement—Alice M. Rankin
Retirement—Ross A. McCloud
The Angler's Handbook (Book Review). W. A. Dill
Trout Waters and How to Fish Them (Book Review). W. A. Dill
Trout Fishing (Book Review). W. A. Dill
The Complete Fly Tier (Book Review). W. A. Dill
Birds of the West (Book Review). P. M. Roedel
Black Bass (Book Review). C. K. Fisher
Tracks and Trailcraft (Book Review). A. A. Hightower
The Quails (Book Review). F. L. Jones
A Sand County Almanac (Book Review). F. L. Jones
Doves and Dove Shooting (Book Review). F. L. Jones
The Sea Fishes of Southern Africa (Book Review). J. E. Fitch
Wildlife Management Bulletins (Book Review). F. M. Kozlik
Raising Game Birds in Captivity (Book Review). F. W. Hein
North American Waterfowl (Book Review). F. L. Jones