vania-janet/multiturn-rag-retrieval-data huggingface dataset:
Google Finance and Yahoo Finance have been transitioning their API (data interface) over the last 3 months. They are currently unreliable. If you're just interested in historical price data, I would recommend either Quandl or Tiingo (I am not affiliated with either, but I use them as data sources). Both have the same historical data (open, close, high, low, dividends, etc.) on a daily closing for thousands of Ticker symbols. Each service requires you to register and get a unique token. For basic historical data, there is no charge. I've been using both for many months and the data quality has been excellent and API (at least for python) is very easy! If you have an inclination for python software development, you can read about the drama with Google and Yahoo finance at the pandas-datareader group at https://github.com/pydata/pandas-datareader.
Worst case they'll be able to throw a ton of capital towards mining and start grabbing money that's currently going to other people. They see a stream of revenue and work towards capturing as much of it as possible. It's as reliable as gravity. Plan accordingly.
Million of people uses computer a day. In those of people, few are knows how to keep their computers smooth, fast and reliable. For these reason they daily open their pc and annoys on it that why it is so slow?
I'd probably off myself if I had to drive a Camry or Corolla though. Unreliable as they may be, I'd much rather drive a Challenger or a charger. At least they have character. Camrys are appliances. Bulletproof and a great value, yes, but soulless as well.
The answer is simple. People are sheep and creatures of habit. Apple has maintained a simple design and marketing ethos for a long time and over time they have convinced people that their phones are superior in quality and reliability. They have been endorsed in mainstream media over the decades as top of the line. Apple phones and products are not immune to software failure and don't have the best build quality. Trust me as a “nondenominational” repair technician I see more broken iPhones then anything else. Personally I find the iPhone to be an enigma of social engineering. Dell computers are another example of tech that is widely considered to be the best among pc manufacturers when msi can deliver an outstanding product as well. Dell built their brand to make people excited to get one. DUDE your getting a DELL!? When you buy an iPhone you are not buying the hardware you are buying their product which includes their name and ecosystem. Unfortunately for Apple fans it comes at a premium.
"While you would probably not use your ATM card to buy a $1M worth mansion, I've heard urban legends about people who bought a house on a credit card. While can't say its reliable, I wouldn't be surprised that some have actual factual basis. I myself had put a car down-payment on my credit card, and had I paid the sticker price, the dealer would definitely have no problem with putting the whole car on the credit card (and my limits would allow it, even for a luxury brand). The instruments are the same. There's nothing special you need to have to pay a million dollars. You just write a lot of zeroes on your check, but you don't need a special check for that. Large amounts of money are transferred electronically (wire-transfers), which is also something that ""regular"" people do once or twice in their lives. What might be different is the way these purchases are financed. Rich people are not necessarily rich with cash. Most likely, they're rich with equity: own something that's worth a lot. In this case, instead of a mortgage secured by the house, they can take a loan secured by the stocks they own. This way, they don't actually cash out of the investment, yet get cash from its value. It is similarly to what we, regular mortals, do with our equity in primary residence and HELOCs. So it is not at all uncommon that a billionaire will in fact have tons of money owed in loans. Why? Because the billions owned are owned through stock valuation, and the cash used is basically a loan secured by these stocks. It might happen that the stocks securing the loans become worthless, and that will definitely be a problem both to the (now ex-)billionaire and the bank. But until then, they can get cash from their investment without cashing out and without paying taxes. And if they're lucky enough to die before they need to repay the loans - they saved tons on money on taxes."
But it isn't creating energy 17 times faster than conventional / reliable power sources, so these jobs are evidence of waste and inefficiency, not promise.  It's also proof that subsidies and mandates can in fact shape market results.
"This is the best tl;dr I could make, [original](https://qz.com/1055287/an-error-made-in-1925-led-to-a-crisis-in-modern-science-now-researchers-are-joining-to-fix-it/) reduced by 85%. (I'm a bot) ***** &gt; Fast forward more than a century later, and many researchers believe Fisher&amp;#039;s choice of.05 has led to a crisis in science.  &gt; What&amp;#039;s to be done? A new proposal, authored by 72 prominent statisticians, economists, psychologists and medical researchers, offers a simple answer: Use.005 instead. &amp;quot;This is an idea whose time has come,&amp;quot; the University of Southern California behavioral economist Daniel Benjamin, a lead author of the paper, told Quartz.  &gt; Benjamin points out that in two fields in which the p-value threshold was reduced, genetics and high energy physics, the change emerged from researchers who thought it was necessary for the maintaining the reliability of findings.   ***** [**Extended Summary**](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/6v73kx/an_error_made_in_1925_led_to_a_crisis_in_modern/) | [FAQ](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/31b9fm/faq_autotldr_bot/ ""Version 1.65, ~195821 tl;drs so far."") | [Feedback](http://np.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%23autotldr ""PM's and comments are monitored, constructive feedback is welcome."") | *Top* *keywords*: **research**^#1 **finding**^#2 **published**^#3 **new**^#4 **Fisher**^#5"
I hope that there are no significant differences between the things you list once the formulas for compounding interest are understood. I will, again, lay out these formulas below.  First, definition of the variables: R means Total Return ratio. The sum of all money you get, both dividends (or interest payments) and return of initial capital.  I is a ratio. It is the percent (10.4%) divided by 100 (0.104) then added to one (1.104). P means the number of periods in which the interest rate is paid and compounded.  R = I^P I = R^(1/P) P = log(R) / log(I)  Once you have R you multiply it by the amount of your initial investment to find out how much total money is returned.  For simplicity the following amounts are approximate: 2 = 1.104^7 1.104 = 2^(1/7) 7 = log(2) / log(1.104)  So to double your money in seven years you need a yearly interest rate of 10.4, if compounded yearly.
This could also be solved thanks to an idea Tesla had at the beginning of the Roadster era, but never went through it because they could never get it reliable enough. If you can build a transmission that can stand up to the high torque from no RPM that an electric motor provides, then that solves the problem. Obviously easier said than done, but it's not a fault with an electric motor itself, it's that they're all running on a 1 speed transmission
If you are looking for a durable fibreglass mesh for plastering a wall, choose Stucco Veneziano for the most reliable products. With over 7 years in the plastering business, we offer exclusive imported products to architects and interior designers across the UK and Europe.
Toyota has some of the ugliest cars around. They are so ugly that it seems like their designers spare extra effort to see who can come up with the ugliest look. They are reliable and less fun to drive.  If I am in that segments I would rather go with a Honda or a Mazda. Equally reliable and lot more fun to drive, specially the Mazda.
Prior to having children we did exactly what you describe.  We would visit my mother in law about four to six times a year, a 350-mile-each-way trip for a weekend.  We'd simply rent a car, drive down, drive back, return it, out $150 or so for the weekend, a total of under $1000 a year; far cheaper than owning. You should factor in whether you will save money, though, on things you might not immediately consider.  Will you spend less on groceries, in particular, if you can drive to Costco or Sam's Club (or even just to a regular grocery store)?  I doubt you'll save the cost of the car ($2000/year as you say), but it's possible it will factor into the mix. I definitely would discourage purchasing a new car, if you're considering the financial side primarily.  I suspect you can get a used car - maybe the $10k car you would've sold - and spend more like $1000 a year on it, or less.  I don't know if I'd go to the $5000 level as those in comments suggested, as if you're doing long trips you want something with higher than average reliability; but even a car like a 5 year old mid-level sedan, easily costing you less than $10k, would be fine and likely sell in 5 years for $5k itself while hopefully not having too much maintenance (especially if you choose something with lower mileage; shop around!).  But even with those assumptions, 20 days a year of rental which you can probably get less than $50 rates on (particularly if you look at some of the car sharing options, Zipcar and Enterprise both allow you to do longer term rentals for reasonable prices) seems like a fine deal compared to the hassle of owning.
"First of all, I said they aren't as good compared to other options, so I am 100% correct. Second, they are shit and your ""if"" is simply not true.  Even when considering the brand as a whole, they aren't great:  https://www.consumerreports.org/cars-which-car-brands-make-the-best-vehicles-2017/  http://clark.com/cars/most-least-reliable-cars-consumer-reports/"
Exactly.  A minimum wage increase, or a decrease in tax burden on the lowest wage earners, or an increase in available wages for the economically disadvantaged (through government jobs) are the most reliable ways for a government to increase demand (aka: grow an economy aka: create new jobs) by putting more money in to the hands of the people who are going to spend it.  Much better than the gilding the parachutes of the super wealthy (aka: republican policy).
No.  It's not.  It's lots of changed interface items that require lots of learning for the users (who are often sketchy, at best, with their familiarity in setting up and using computers), which is frustrating when said users are faced with deadlines that must be met.  The original release of Windows 8 was buggy as hell, proving unreliable and untrustworthy for those who actually had to get things done.  Many of these users couldn't figure out how to upgrade to 8.1, and I've dealt with several such users whose update actually failed when attempted.  I'm not saying this cannot be salvaged.  I'm saying it's not remotely worth the pain--as a user--of switching/upgrading from Windows 7.
This essentially depends on how you prefer to measure your performance. I will just give a few simple examples to start. Let me know if you're looking for something more. If you just want to achieve maximum $ return, then you should always use maximum margin, so long as your expected return (%) is higher than your cost to borrow. For example, suppose you can use margin to double your investment, and the cost to borrow is 7%. If you're investing in some security that expects to return 10%, then your annual return on an account opened with $100 is: (2 * $100 * 10% - $100 * 7%) / $100 = 13% So, you see the expected return, amount of leverage, and cost to borrow will all factor in to your return. Suppose you want to also account for the additional risk you're incurring. Then you could use the Sharpe Ratio. For example, suppose the same security has volatility of 20%, and the risk free rate is 5%. Then the Sharpe Ratio without leverage is: (10% - 5%) / 20% = 0.25 The Sharpe Ratio using maximum margin is then: (13% - 5%) / (2 * 20%) = 0.2, where the 13% comes from the above formula. So on a risk-adjusted basis, it's better not to utilize margin in this particular example.
"&gt; Soon, you will be able to choose poverty just by deciding to not getting enhanced.  Do the Amish live in poverty?  &gt; A lot of these arguments seem to be, ""Well, it might be better, therefore it *will* be better.""  We cannot know what will work unless we explore the potential space of that which *might* work. Demanding perfect solutions before researching solutions is just retarded.  &gt; Right now genetic variability is what gives us long term viability. Will enhancements reduce both?  No. Genetic variability is *not* what gives us ""long term viability"". We actually are already losing that as it stands over time, just from globalization and the mathematical principle of reversion to the mean.  ""Will we all become super susceptible to the same disease?"" -- That's simply acetious. The entire point of 'enhancement' is that we find strategies for actually improving upon the innate qualities of human existence. The thing about technological solutions to problems is that they produce superior outcomes but require more technical knowledge to achieve. Sure, we might have new diseases -- software bugs, and so on -- but we'll also be more robustly tolerant against traditional diseases.   Also -- what exactly do you think all these enhanced people are going to be doing? Keeping things the same?   If the concern is about only the rich getting access to enhancements... consider how much more towards charity work an amplified-intellect would achieve over traditional intellect. And so on.  Early on, I'm sure that only ""the 1%"" will have access to anything resembling realistic improvements. But the thing about such a condition is that it's inherently oly metastable *at most*. Technologies improve over time and become cheaper, more stable. Let the richest and wealthiest be the ones who have the access to it when it's unstable/unreliable.  Once it becomes like owning a smartphone, *that* is when it'll spread to everyone."
"Forecasts of stock market direction are not reliable, so you shouldn't be putting much weight on them.  Long term, you can expect to do better in stocks, but obtaining this better expected return has the danger of ""buying in"" to the market at a particularly bad moment, leading to a substantially lower return.  So mitigate that risk while moving in a big piece of cash by ""dollar cost averaging"".  An example would be to divide your cash hoard (conceptually) into say six pieces, and invest each piece in the index fund two months apart.  After a year you will have invested the whole sum at about the average of the index for the year."
I believe the following formula provides a reasonable approximation. You need to fill in the following variables: The average annual return you need on investing the 15% =  (((MP5 - MP20) * 12) + (.0326 * .95 * PP / Y)) / (PP *.15) Example assuming an interest rate of 4% on a 100K home: If you invest the $15K you'll break even if you make a 9.86% return per year on average. Here's the breakdown per year using these example numbers: Note this does not consider taxes.
We produce sheet metal products from simple bending to precision complex mechanical assemblies. Uidea has created our services for prototyping and low volume production and mass production with high quality, competitive pricing and short lead time. We have been dedicated to being the most reliable source in China for custom sheet metal fabrication from all over the world.
I justed rented a new house, and they ran my credit to see if I am a reliable person.
Welcome to Get Local Clout, We are an independent news site that has a goal of creating a reliable content for all the business minded folks out there. If it happens that you finally realized that you want to achieve the financial freedom “status,” then visit our site often and try to absorb all the content that you read here, the last thing that you will know is that you are already a financially literate person. We provide an original content about business, money tips, and news. All written by a professional and person that know their stuff really well, and will surely help you and your business.
"I have actual scientifically rigorous sources on my side. You have... ""power line blog dot com"".  https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/04/the-economics-of-energy-generation-are-changing-more-metrics-favor-solar-wind/  https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/07/report-draft-of-doe-baseload-study-says-wind-solar-dont-threaten-reliability/  https://arstechnica.com/science/2017/08/energy-departments-contentious-baseload-study-is-out/  Natural gas is pretty much better in every way but one than coal. It's much cheaper, far better for the environment (in both extraction and greenhouse gases), easier to extract, more energy dense, easier to control the production of energy in response to demand with... its only loss to coal is ease of storage.  It doesn't matter if we have a lot of it if using alternative options is a superior option. Just because we have it doesn't mean it's worth extracting or using."
If you are using an Excel, the Function PV should be able to easily calculate this. Excel Formulae PV = (Rate,Nper,Pmt,Fv,Type)   Where Rate: Rate of return. In this case you can use Inflation or assumed rate that would cost you. Say 3-5%. Note the Rate has to be for Nper. i.e. in Nper if you are counting yearly payments, then rate is yearly, if you are counting as monthly, then the rate should be monthly.   NPer: Number of periods. If yearly in your case it would be 20. If Monthly 20*12, if Quarterly 20*4 etc.   Pmt: Expected Payments for Nper. If you are saying 20 million over 20 years, it would be 1 million per year. Fv and Type can be blank So assuming a rate of 3%, and yearly payments of 1 million over 20 years. PV = $14,877,474.86 [It would show negative, just ignore the sign]
Centre For Laptops offer very reliable laptop services for all types of brands of laptops and computers by the trained personnel. Centre For Laptops provides best Lenovo Laptops Repairs In Gurugram. Centre For Laptops use the latest methods of diagnosing to find the hardware and software issues. For more details, Visit: http://centreforlaptops.com/
"Bad plan. This seems like a recipe for having your money taken away from you by CBP.  Let me explain the biases which make it so.  US banking is reliable enough for the common citizen, that everyone simply uses banks.  To elaborate, Americans who are unbanked either can't produce simple identity paperwork; or they got an account but then got blacklisted for overdrawing it. These are problems of the poor, not millionaires.  Outside of determined ""off the grid"" folks with political reasons to not be in the banking and credit systsm, anyone with money uses the banking system.  Who's not a criminal, anyway.  We also have strong laws against money laundering: turning cash (of questionable origin) into ""sanitized"" cash on deposit in a bank.  The most obvious trick is deposit $5000/day for 200 days. Nope, that's Structuring: yeah, we have a word for that.  A guy with $1 million cash, it is presumed he has no choice: he can't convert it into a bank deposit, as in this problem - note where she says she can't launder it.  If it's normal for people in your country to haul around cash, due to a defective banking system, you're not the only one with that problem, and nearby there'll be a country with a good banking system who understands your situation.  Deposit it there.  Then retain a US lawyer who specializes in this, and follow his advice about moving the money to the US via funds transfer. Even then, you may have some explaining to do; but far less than with cash.  (And keep in mind for those politically motivated off-the-financial-grid types, they're a bit crazy but definitely not stupid, live a cash life everyday, and know the law better than anybody. They would definitely consider using banks and funds transfers for the border crossing proper, because of Customs.  Then they'll turn it into cash domestically and close the accounts.)"
&gt;Money is accumulated work, not debt.  I think you're slightly missing the point, but I do think the post does deal with that indirectly. Loddars are a store of value (they store current and future value of work). By promising to pay X loddars I've promised to do X amount of work. Similarly, the number of loddars I have is proportional to the amount of work I have done, or am expected to be able to do.  Which is why  &gt;The economy functions on work, not promises. The farmer may promise a million bushels of apples and the hunter may promise a million deer, but that's just fantasy.  Slightly misses the point. The farmer, the hunter, and the cooper can promise the sky and that's fantasy. But that's not really a criticism because it's not a realistic possibility.   The farmer, hunter, and cooper can also promise feasible things, like 10 sacks of potatoes, 5 deer skins, and 12 barrels to be delivered ten days from today. Because these promises are feasible (barring someone doesn't die) and because they've reliably delivered in the past, we can assume that their promises are good. Their promises are valuable because they are reliable producers.  And if a meteorite falls out of the sky to strike the hunter dead, we can actually measure the impact of his death and price it. If we know the hunter produces ~100 deer skins per year, and he dies suddenly, we could actually have planned ahead for such an eventuality. On the basis of their past performance, we can reliably price the value of their future promises. And if they don't perform, we can price that too.  How would we do that? Maybe each producer pays, as a premium, a part of their output into a central pot that they/their heirs/society can draw from if one of them dies, or under-produces. We can value this pot in loddars, and maybe this pot can even underwrite a few loans of loddars to others.   That being said I'm not sure I understand your bit about Krugman and how it relates?
You can average the betas across the different cross listings.  EX:   Exchange 1 - Beta .8  Exchange 2 - Beta .6  Exchange 3 - Beta .7  (.8 + .6 + .7) / 3 =  avg Beta .7  You can do simple average as based above or you can do a weighted average and take into account other factors.
It is no easy task to select the best page to buy trailers, because you have no idea which side is trustworthy or not. Once you are satisfied or confirmed about the reliability of the successor supplier, the next step is to review the price packages they provide.  Buying Instagram Pendant is fairly easy if you are careful enough and if you can easily qualify or make the difference between the services provided by different websites on the internet. At Followres24Hour.com we proudly announce the most appropriate and authenticated services to its customers. We facilitate all types of users, owners of large empire companies as well as individual account holders of Instagram who want to gain publicity and fan after buying actively active supporters of Instagram.