vania-janet/multiturn-rag-retrieval-data huggingface dataset:
Business Library | Danville, CA
The 2022 Impact Report is available to view.iGATE: Innovation Center dedicated to making the Tri-Valley the best place in the world to start and grow a technology companyInnovation Tri-Valley: Led by business leaders and influencers committed to connecting the businesses, research labs, educational institutions, and civic leaders in the Tri-Valley regionEast Bay Score: East Bay Score offers free business mentoring, low-cost or no-cost business training, and numerous templates and tool to help you start or grow a business.East Bay Small Business Development Center: assists the small businesses in the East Bay region to successfully start, manage and grow their businesses in today's dynamic economy. Economic Development Recovery and Resiliency Playbook prepared by California Association for Local Economic Development. Financing OptionsThe U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) is an independent federal agency that councils, protects, and strengthens small businesses to enhance their growth. The SBA also offers several different loan programs to help start-up businesses.Also, view our Business Funding Support page for more programs.Employment GuidanceBusinesses with questions about employment resources can learn about connecting with employees, job training opportunities, and much more, through a variety of regional agencies.TriValleyConnect.org: job board features an abundance of technology and innovation career opportunities currently available in the region.Cal Jobs: serving employers who want to fill job openings and individuals seeking employment.East Bay Works: a public workforce development networkWorkforce Development Board Contra Costa: Human Resources Hotline for Employers The Workforce Development Board of Contra Costa County (WDB) has partnered with the California Employers Association to provide Contra Costa County businesses with a NO-COST HR HOTLINE! Call 1-888-599-7645 M-F, 8:30 A.M to 5:00 P.M and click here to download the informational flyer.Networking OpportunitiesThe Tri-Valley has many opportunities for small businesses to network and connect. Connect with other businesses as well as your customers in Danville.Danville Area Chamber of Commerce East Bay Economic Development AllianceInnovation Tri-ValleyiGATE

 
 
 

 

Contact Us


	Lianna Adauto
	
	
Economic Development Specialist
Email Lianna Adauto 
Phone: 925-314-3309

 
 
 

Quick Links

Concierge Services

Master Fee Schedule (PDF)

Permit Center
FAQs • San Bruno, CA • CivicEngage
The proposed buildings range in height from one to five stories with the tallest portions at the maximum of 70 feet in height, with many building portions below this maximum.The tallest portions of the buildings would be located along the major corridor streets of El Camino Real and San Bruno Avenue W, transitioning to a one- to three-story building along both White Way and Linden Avenues to address the abutting low-density residential neighborhood to the west.Consistent with the Transit Corridors Plan (TCP), specific items are allowed to exceed the 70-foot maximum height, up to an additional 10 feet. These items include elevator and mechanical equipment enclosures, and parapets to screen the equipment. The buildings are divided into smaller components with articulated building setbacks and stepbacks. The two buildings would be separated by Kains Avenue. 

7.
What is going to happen to White Way and Camino Plaza?

Camino Plaza and White Way are existing streets that are owned in fee title by the two existing property owners (only public easements are owned by the City).A portion of the southern portion of White Way and the Camino Plaza right-of-way would both be abandoned. A new dedication for a White Way connection to El Camino Real and a new dedication to widen White Way at San Bruno Avenue (west) for access to the new adjacent medical office building would be provided. Additional public right-of-way would be dedicated to create a right hand turning lane at the intersection of San Bruno Avenue (west) and El Camino Real. 

8.
Will the development provide affordable housing?

The proposed project was critical in helping San Bruno meet its Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) assigned by the State of California in the Housing Element. The current housing element period covers 8 years from 2015 through 2023. During this period, San Bruno is allocated to issue permits for the construction of 1,155 new housing units. To date, the City has issued permits for the construction of only 119 housing units, leaving a balance of 1,036 housing units to be produced by 2023. Additionally, the City has a remaining RHNA goal of 358 "very low" income units, 136 "low" income units, and 163 "moderate" income units.
Explore Dublin History | Dublin, CA - Official Website
He was one of the largest landowners in the Dublin area when he acquired 17,600-acre Rancho San Ramon land grant in 1835.1846 was a landmark year with the first large movement of United States immigrants coming to the area.  Among others, the Murray, Fallon, Harland, and Donner families left the U.S., intending to travel by wagon train and horse to Mexican California. However, when they arrived, the United States had invaded and annexed California during the Mexican American War (1846-1848).  Among the immigrants in 1846 were Michael Murray and Jeremiah and Eleanor Fallon.  Later, they would later settle in the Dublin area and participate in the area’s development.Gold Rush Adventurers and Early FarmersGold was discovered in the California in January 1849 and the first huge influx of gold seekers arrived in 1849.  Some of them would eventually settle in Dublin.  Jose Maria Amador, Michael Murray, and Jeremiah Fallon would take advantage of being in California to be among the first gold seekers in the Sierra Nevada.  Murray and Fallon found enough gold to each buy several hundred acres from Amador.  James Witt Dougherty arrived in California later and accumulated enough wealth to buy thousands of acres from Amador.More Farmers, the Lincoln Highway, and BootleggersAfter the creation of Alameda County in 1853, a slow, growing number of immigrants to the area bought small farms or set up a few small businesses in Dublin.  In fact, the eastern portion of the county was named Murray Township after Michael Murray.  They and the other residents founded a school, church, a few small hotels, and a general store at the crossroads.  Later, small groups of settlers or workers coming to the area reflected the general nationalities of immigrants coming to California and to America in the 1800s.  Those immigrants included people from Mexico, Ireland, China, Canada, Denmark, Portugal, and Germany.  Native Americans continued to live and work in the area.Faster development took place in Livermore and Pleasanton after the late 1860s with the arrival of the transcontinental railroad.  Dublin continued to be a hub for local freight, mainly agricultural products and cattle going to Hayward, Oakland, and San Francisco.The advent of the automobile and truck started to change the area in the early 1900s.
More than 1,000 Veterans apply for PACT Act benefits - VA News
FacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditTelegramTumblrWhatsAppEmailAppears InHealthPACT Act

Here is one Veteran’s experience at the Colorado Springs PACT Act claims clinic.
During a fishing trip three years ago, Army Veteran David Krall, 75, of Colorado Springs noticed his balance slipping. As a forward observer in Vietnam from 1970 to 1971, the long-term impact of chemical exposures was not often considered.
“I noticed my quality of life going down,” Krall said. He was diagnosed this year with Parkinson’s disease, which VA can presume was caused by his exposure to Agent Orange when determining his eligibility for disability compensation and health care.
Krall was one of more than 1,000 Veterans attending the El Paso County PACT Act claims clinics in early August in Colorado Springs. The three-day event culminated after months of coordination between VA and El Paso County.
“We are a prime example of how partnerships between local and federal agencies can maximize resources and better serve the needs of the Veteran community,” said Marshall Bosworth, El Paso County Veteran service officer, who also coordinated monthly PACT Act briefs with VA support from March to July.
“VA will not rest until every Veteran gets the benefits they deserve.”
The Pikes Peak area is known for military service. It is home to Fort Carson, Peterson Space Force Base, Schriever Space Force Base, Cheyenne Mountain Air Force Station and the Air Force Academy. Of the more than 730,000 people who live in El Paso County, roughly 15% are Veterans.

Army Veteran David Krall completes a toxic-exposure screening with nurse Germaine Franciosi
The PACT Act further expands VA health care eligibility and benefits for Veterans with toxic exposures during the Vietnam, Gulf War and post-9/11 eras. “This law helps us provide generations of Veterans and their survivors with the care and benefits they’ve earned and deserve,” said Michael Kilmer, Eastern Colorado VA director. “VA will not rest until every Veteran gets the toxic exposure-related care and benefits they deserve.”
2001 Budget Analysis Special Transportation Programs (2640)
For example, the Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District (AC Transit) receives the majority of the San
Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District's (BART) STA funds in return for bus transportation services provided for BART
customers. Though infrequent, there may be other cases where agencies share STA funds for mutual benefit.

Huge Variation in Size of STA Allocations. Excluding the 103 agencies that received no STA support, the average STA
allocation in 1998-99 was about $863,000. Allocations, however, are skewed toward large transit operators. As a result, the
median allocation was significantly lower, at about $110,000. Interestingly, the largest and smallest allocations occurred in the same
county for that fiscal year—Los Angeles. The state's largest STA allocation—about $27 million—was provided to the Los Angeles
County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA), and the smallest—$2,950—was allocated to the City of Claremont.
Figure 1 lists the ten largest and smallest STA allocations for 1998-99.
Large Operators Utilize Vast Majority of STA Funds. The ten largest transit operators (based on ridership) transported
79 percent—about 980 million passengers—of the state's total ridership in 1998-99. As shown in Figure 2, these same agencies
received approximately 72 percent ($68 million) of total STA funds. Indeed, 95 percent of all STA funds were utilized by only 51
agencies, which carried 93 percent of the state's total transit ridership. The remaining $5 million was allocated to 58 other transit
operators during that year.
From the TPA perspective, over two-thirds of all STA revenues are shared between two TPAs. In 1999-00, the Metropolitan
Transportation Commission (MTC), the TPA for the nine-county San Francisco Bay Area, was allocated $38.3 million, while
LACMTA was allocated $29.7 million. This finding is not surprising, however, as the largest urban centers and transit operators are
located in their respective jurisdictions.

Figure 1

State Transit Assistance
The 2020-21 Spending Plan — Other Provisions
As part of his January budget proposal, the Governor proposed legislation to change the name of DBO and broaden the department’s authority in various ways, such as by allowing it to regulate certain financial products and services that are not currently regulated. In addition, as part of the May Revision, the Governor proposed provisional language to provide the department with $10.2 million in special fund resources to implement the proposal upon enactment of the legislation. This was to ensure funding would be available to the department if the legislation was enacted after the start of the fiscal year.
While the proposed provisional language was approved as part of the 2020‑21 budget package, the legislation as proposed by the Governor was not. Instead, the Legislature passed Chapter 157 of 2020 (AB 1864, Limón) to implement a modified version of the legislation. The major changes in Chapter 157 include (1) changing DBO’s name to the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI), (2) authorizing DFPI to promulgate regulations requiring a registration process for businesses offering consumer financial products or services that were previously unregulated, (3) providing DFPI additional enforcement authority, (4) reorganizing the department, and (5) establishing the Financial Technology Innovation Office.
Department of Consumer Affairs
The budget provides DCA and its boards and bureaus with $763 million from various special funds supported primarily by license fees. This is an increase of $27.7 million, or about 4 percent, compared to the estimated spending level for 2019‑20. In addition to the augmentations described below, this net increase includes augmentations related to the state’s cannabis programs described in the “Cannabis Regulation” section of this post.
BreEZe and Business Modernization Information Technology (IT) Projects. The budget provides $15.1 million in 2020‑21 and $14.2 million in 2021‑22 from various special funds to continue to operate and maintain the BreEZe IT system, which supports the licensing and enforcement activities of about half of DCA’s boards and bureaus.
Commissioner Biographies
Commissioner Mueller is a long-time resident of Manteca where he lives with his wife Kailyn and two boys Daniel and William.
TOMMY RANDLESan Dimas, CaliforniaCommissioner Randle was appointed by Governor Brown to the California State Parks Commission where he served for 8 years. He was then appointed by Governor Newsome in 2021 when his term with State Parks expired. Open spaces have remained a positive influence in his life. The ability to admire, participate and encourage other to take advantage of all the outdoor activities California has to offer is a passion for Commissioner Randle. He wants to make sure that anyone who wants to take advantage of the many outdoor activities available in California, they can and will be encouraged to do so. Commissioner Randle has the unique background of working in the private and public sectors. After graduating from college, with a BA degree in Sociology, Commissioner Randle was inducted into the military where he received an honorable discharge. He was then hired by IBM in marketing and retired after 25 years. Commissioner Randle worked for the Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, from 1999 to 2003 as a government partnership specialist. He traveled to many cities in the region and spoke to the mayors and council members about the benefits the census would bring to their cities. He was able to get a proclamation of support from every city and unincorporated area that he visited. During the 2010 Decennial he was the initially Partnership Coordinator and his job was to hire and train 120 partnership specialist to educate the public in the Los Angeles Region and the State of Hawaii about the benefits the Census Count would bring to the state, regions, areas and communities. Commissioner Randle constantly informed his team that California was expected to lose two congressional seats in the 2010 Decennial however he would be disappointed if California lost one Congressional seat. The training and dedication of the partnership team paid dividends and California had the best census count in its history and California did not lose a single congressional seat. Commissioner Randle resides in San Dimas California. He has a wife, son, daughter and grandson.
DIANE ROSS-LEECHBerkeley, California
Appointed by Speaker of the Assembly Anthony Rendon in August, 2020, Commissioner Ross-Leech is a native Californian with a passion for environmental stewardship.
Health Services | Danville, CA


Health Services | Danville, CA

 

Skip to Main Content

 

Search

 
 
 

Town GovernmentServicesDoing BusinessLive LocallyHow Do I?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Town of Danville, Calif. – Official WebsiteServicesOther Agency ServicesHealth Services



Health Services	

Contra Costa Health Services is a comprehensive county health system that meets the needs of county residents in a variety of ways. Their mission is to promote and protect the health and well being of the individual, family and community in Contra Costa County. They provide programs, information and services on:

 
 
 

Alcohol and Drug ServicesCommunicable diseaseCommunity Wellness and Prevention ProgramsFamily, Maternal and Child HealthHazardous Materials Monitoring

 
 

Health EmergenciesHomeless ProgramMental HealthPublic Health Outreach and EducationRestaurant Inspections

 
 
 

Additional InformationLooking for more information on local health and social services? 211 is the national, toll-free, three-digit phone number to call for information about local health and social services. Calls are answered 24 hours per day, 365 days per year by trained information and referral specialists at the Contra Costa Crisis Center.or visit the 211 Contra Costa website.

 
 
 

 

Contact Us

Contra Costa Health Services
50 Douglas Drive
Martinez, CA 94553

Telephone Directory
 

  
 
 

 

Animal Services

Fire Services

Library Services

Health Services

Recycling and Solid Waste Services

School District

Utilities

Utilities Resource Directory

Veterans Services

Honors

Mental Health Services

Homeless or Losing your home? Resources

211 Contra Costa - Advice and Help 24/7

 

 

Agendas & Minutes

Sign Up for Notifications

 
 

Report a Concern

Jobs & Volunteer

 
 

Programs and Classes

Rent a Facility

 
 
 

 

 

  
 

  
 

Contact Us

Danville Town Office

500 La Gonda Way

Danville, CA 94526
 

Agency Directory

© 2022 Town of Danville, California
 

  
 

Follow Us

       

 
 

  
 

Helpful Links

Agendas & Minutes

Community Facilities / Rentals

Danville Connect

Municipal Code

Town Council

Stay Connected

/QuickLinks.aspx

 
 

Site Links

Home

Site Map

Staff Directory

Accessibility

Privacy

Copyright Notices

/QuickLinks.aspx

 
 
 

 

Government Websites by CivicPlus®

 
 
 

Loading


	Loading
	

Do Not Show Again
Close

Arrow Left

Arrow Right

[]

Slideshow Left Arrow

Slideshow Right Arrow
LAO Capital Outlay, Infrastructure
Analysis of the 1994-95 Budget Bill, Capital Outlay Chapter
 

Format:
PDF

February 22, 1994 - 
 Analysis of the 1994-95 Budget Bill, Capital Outlay Chapter
 

Report 


 Bonds and the 1994 Ballots
 

Format:
PDF

January 6, 1994 - 
 The Legislature faces important decisions on the bond package to be placed on the 1994 ballots. We urge the Legislature not to use an arbitrary debt-service ratio as the sole or driving factor in making decisions on bonds. The key consideration should be the tradeoff of using state revenues to pay debt service on bonds to develop infrastructure versus using these revenues to support or enhance other state programs. It is critical that the Legislature establish infrastructure priorities and target future state bonds to address these priorities.
 

Report 


 Deferred Maintenance in State Facilities
 

Format:
PDF

March 1, 1993 - 
 This reprint from our Analysis of the 1993-94 Budget Bill discusses the problem of deferred maintenance in state facilities. State agencies that control significant state assets have developed a deferred maintenance backlog totaling $820 million. In general, this backlog has occurred due to the underfunding of ongoing maintenance and special repair projects and the redirection of monies budgeted for maintenance to other activities. Failure to address this backlog will shorten the useful life of state facilities and result in more costly expenditures for renovation or replacement. We make recommendations to prevent any further redirection of maintenance funding and to require the state agencies to prepare multi-year strategies to properly address their maintenance and to eliminate deferred maintenance backlogs.
 

Report 


 Bonds and the 1992 Ballots
 

Format:
PDF

January 1, 1992 - 
 The Legislature faces critical decisions on the bond package to be placed on the 1992 ballots. In this policy brief, we discuss the many considerations involved in making these decisions in light of the large magnitude of the state's infrastructure needs.
 

Report 


 Local Housing Elements and State Housing Bonds:
A Report on Housing Activities in Communities Applying for State Bond Funds
 

Format:
PDF

October 10, 1991 - 
 Local Housing Elements and State Housing Bonds:
A Report on Housing Activities in Communities Applying for State Bond Funds
 

Report 


 State Infrastructure
Internal Revenue Bulletin: 2008-12 | Internal Revenue Service
96-7, 1996-1 C.B. 59, which was effective for plan years beginning after December 31, 1995, set forth the mortality tables that were permitted to be used pursuant to § 412(l)(7)(C)(iii)(I) for disabilities occurring in plan years beginning before January 1, 1995, and for disabilities occurring in plan years beginning after December 31, 1994. Section 430(h)(3) provides rules regarding the mortality tables to be used in determining present values and making other computations under § 430. Section 430(h)(3)(D) provides that, for purposes of determining any present value or making any computation under § 430 for plan years beginning after December 31, 2007, the Secretary is to establish mortality tables that may be used, in lieu of the tables under § 430(h)(3)(A), for individuals who are entitled to benefits under the plan on account of disability. The Secretary is to establish separate tables for individuals whose disabilities occurred in plan years beginning before January 1, 1995, and for individuals whose disabilities occur in plan years beginning after December 31, 1994. Under § 430(h)(3)(D)(ii), the mortality table for individuals whose disabilities occur in plan years beginning after December 31, 1994, applies only with respect to individuals who are disabled within the meaning of title II of the Social Security Act and the regulations thereunder. Thus, the standard for the establishment of mortality tables that are permitted to be used with respect to individuals who are entitled to benefits under the plan on account of disability is the same under § 430(h)(3)(D) as the standard that previously applied under § 412(l)(7)(C)(iii). Section 431 specifies the minimum funding requirements that apply to multiemployer plans. Under § 431(c)(6)(B), a plan’s full funding limitation cannot be less than the excess (if any) of 90 percent of the current liability of the plan (including the expected increase in current liability due to benefits accruing during the plan year) over the value of the plan’s assets.