vania-janet/multiturn-rag-retrieval-data huggingface dataset:
News Flash • Lighthouse Tower Opens
, said Shelton J. Haynes, President and CEO of the Roosevelt Island Operating Corporation (RIOC). The restoration aspects and new lantern design were approved by the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation and the Landmarks Preservation Commission. “I am thrilled for the community to see the colored up-lighting on the tower and enjoy this space again. The conclusion of this project marks the last phase of our renovations to the northern tip of the Lighthouse Park that began with the renovations of the foot bridges in 2019.”, expressed Prince R. Shah, Assistant Director of Capital Planning and Projects at RIOC.With the implementation of the required design measures, the Lighthouse Tower becomes a transformative symbol that all of New York will be able to identify as Roosevelt Island. “Our goal in the restoration of this historic lighthouse was to balance two factors: The preservation of the original masonry structure and to pay homage to the long-lost unique lantern designed by Renwick and removed sometime in the 1930’s” said Thomas A. Fenniman, Project Architect. “I am extremely proud of the accomplishments and commitment to quality by the entire team in restoring what I believe will be a true beacon at the northern tip of the island.”  The northern end of Lighthouse Park will provide safe outdoor space for all to enjoy for many years to come. 

⇐Previous McManus Welcome Station Opens
FAQs • Danville, CA • CivicEngage
As documented in the development’s Traffic Impact Analysis, the development would add an estimated 841 vehicle trips in a 24-hour period, with 804 originating from the 66 homes entering from the Blackhawk Road access and 37 vehicle trips originating from the 3 homes that that would access from the McCauley Road entry.Specifically, of the 804 vehicle trips that would originate from the Blackhawk Road entry, approximately 93 vehicles (31 inbound and 62 outbound) would be generated during the 7:00 – 9:00 AM peak hour, 83 vehicles (50 inbound and 33 outbound) would be generated during the 2:00 – 4:00 PM (school) peak hour, and 68 vehicles (43 inbound and 25 outbound) would be generated during the 4:00 – 6:00 PM (commute) peak hour.Of the 93 AM peak hour vehicles, 62 vehicles would exit the development on to Blackhawk Road with 40 vehicles traveling west on Diablo Road and 22 vehicles traveling east on Blackhawk Road.Of the 83 school PM peak hour vehicles, 33 vehicles would exit the development on to Blackhawk Road with 20 vehicles traveling west on Diablo Road and 13 vehicles traveling east on Blackhawk Road.Of the 68 commute PM peak hour vehicles, 25 vehicles would exit the development on to Blackhawk Road with 16 vehicles traveling west along Diablo Road and 9 vehicles traveling east along Blackhawk Road.  There would be a total of 43 vehicles coming into the Blackhawk Road project entry with 28 vehicles traveling east on Diablo Road and 15 vehicles traveling west on Blackhawk Road.  

▼
Development Services - Online Permit Center 	

Show All Answers

1.
How do I register for an account to submit a permit application online?

In order to submit a permit online you will have to Register an account with the Online Permit Portal.Step-by-step instructions are also available: Online Permit Portal Help Guide (PDF). 

2.
Why didn’t I receive the confirmation email required to confirm my account registration?

The confirmation email is from munis@danville.ca.gov. If the email does not appear in your inbox, please check if it was sent to your spam inbox or your junk mail inbox. Please note, spam inbox and junk mail inbox may be two separate inboxes. 

3.
Funding Policies and Paylines | National Institute on Aging
These changes are announced in the NIH Guide and listed in the Notices of NIH Policy Changes. Every several years, policy revisions are incorporated into the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
NIH supports safe and respectful work environments that are free from harassment, including sexual harassment, discrimination, or other forms of inappropriate conduct that can result in a hostile work environment. Read more about how the NIH is Supporting a Safe and Respectful Workplace at Institutions that Receive NIH Funding.

NIA Funding Line and Cost Control Policies
NIA Paylines
Paylines are cut-off points for funding applications. NIA funds most applications in order by percentile or overall impact score. Each fiscal year (FY), NIA sets initial paylines conservatively and sets final paylines later in the year.
The links below detail the paylines for relevant grant programs for each fiscal year.

NIA Funding Line Policy for FY 2024
NIA Funding Line Policy for FY 2023
NIA Funding Line Policy for FY 2022
NIA Funding Line Policy for FY 2021
NIA Funding Line Policy for FY 2020
NIA Funding Line Policy for FY 2019

Applications Requesting $500,000 or More in Direct Costs in Any Year
Applications requesting $500,000 or more in direct costs in any year need to obtain approval before submission. Investigators need to contact their Program Officer at least six weeks prior to the planned submission date.
NOTE: It is highly recommended that you contact your Program Officer as early as possible to ensure that your request is processed.
Please see NIA procedures for applications requesting $500,000 or more in direct costs.
NIA Budget Escalation Policy
Inflationary increases for future year commitments are not permitted. NIA does not allow out-year salary escalations for individuals providing the same effort from the previous budget year’s salary request in competing and renewal applications, regardless of the reason for the requested salary increases, e.g., merit-based or cost of living. This applies to other cost categories as well, e.g., supplies, travel, etc. Any non-inflationary, justified reason for year-to-year increases within a budget category should be clearly stated in the budget justification.
Civil Case Coordination - superior_courts
Civil Case Coordination - superior_courts

Skip to main content
Skip to topics menu
Skip to topics menu

Home

 Courts
 

 Self-Help
 

 Forms & Rules
 

 Opinions
 

 Programs
 

 Policy & Administration
 

 News & Reference
 

Cancel
Print

Advanced Search

Courts

Supreme Court
Courts of Appeal
Superior Courts
Jury Service
About California Courts 
Find Your Court
FAQs

Self-Help

Getting Started
Small Claims
Families & Children
Divorce or Separation
Abuse & Harassment
Eviction & Housing
Name Change
Traffic
Seniors & Conservatorship
Problems With Money
Criminal Law
Civil Appeals
Gender Change
Wills, Estates, and Probate
Test Feedback Form (formerly Self-Help Feedback Form)
Self Help A-Z Index

Forms & Rules

Find Your Court Forms
Rules of Court

Opinions

Published / Citable Opinions
Unpublished / Non-Citable Opinions

Programs

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
Collaborative Justice Courts
Criminal Justice Services
Domestic Violence
Equal Access
Families and Children
Judicial Fellowship
JusticeCorps
Language Access Services
Tribal/State Programs

Policy & Administration

Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero
Judicial Council
Budget & Finance
Facilities
Invitations to Comment
Public Records
Governmental Affairs

News & Reference

Reports & Publications
Research & Statistics

Courts>Superior Courts>Civil Case Coordination
 

Civil Case Coordination

	 Topics
	

Superior Courts
Judges Roster
Local Rules
Reduced Court Services
Civil Case Coordination

Print

 
 
 
 
 
 
 Coordination allows two or more civil actions (cases) that share common questions of fact or law and that are pending in different counties to be joined in one court. 

When complex actions are sought to be coordinated, a petition to coordinate the actions is submitted to the Chair of the Judicial Council (the Chief Justice), who assigns a motion judge to decide the merits of the petition. If coordination is granted by the motion judge, the Chief Justice assigns a trial judge.
Capital Planning & Projects | Roosevelt Island Operating Corporation of the State of New York


Capital Planning & Projects | Roosevelt Island Operating Corporation of the State of New York

 

Skip to Main Content

 

 

            Your browser does not support iFrames
        

 
 
 

 

Roosevelt IslandOperating Corporation

 
 
 

 

Search

 
 
 

About RIOCCommunityDoing Business With UsCapital PlanningSafety / PSDTransportation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
HomeCapital Planning



Capital Planning & Projects	

   
 
 
 

RIOC’s Department of Capital Projects and Planning aims to shape the future through progressive and comprehensive planning, design and construction on the urban and natural environment for Roosevelt Island and its residents.ObjectivesImplement sustainable design of new and renovated structures and public spaces/facilitiesPromote growth while improving the existing infrastructure and neighborhood characterFacilitate and manage existing and upcoming projectsCapital Planning & Projects RFPsFor more information on our current RFP's, click here.Capital Projects TrackerFor the latest on all of RIOC's Capital Projects, click here.Capital Projects PresentationsTo see our latest presentations, click here. 

 
 
 

 

Contact Us

Capital Planning & Projects

Physical Address
View Map 
680 Main St.
Roosevelt Island, NY, NY 10044

680 Main St.  Roosevelt Island, NY NY 10044

Directions

Mailing Address
524 Main Street
Roosevelt Island, NY 10044

Phone: 212-832-4540

Hours8 AM - 4 PM

  
 

Quick Links

RFPs & Bids

New York State Services

MWBE

View All

/QuickLinks.aspx

 
 

FAQs

Does the Capital Planning & Projects Department perform the same duties as an Engineering Department?

Where do I submit my construction permit? 

I am interested in a construction / consulting bid opportunity, what is the process?

View All

/FAQ.aspx

 
 
 

Southpoint Park Shoreline Restoration Project 

Capital Projects Presentations

 

 

 

 

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

INSTAGRAM

RSS FEED

 
 
 

 

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS feed

 
 
 

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Delicious
Blogger
LinkedIn

 
 

Home
My Account
Printer Friendly
Email Page
Contact Us
RSS
Site Map
Translate Page
Notifications
Documents

 
 
 

 

            Your browser does not support iFrames
        

 
 
 

 

Loading


	Loading
	

Do Not Show Again
Close

 

Arrow Left

Arrow Right

[]

Slideshow Left Arrow

Slideshow Right Arrow
2024 Public Comments to Preliminary Applications
Thanks Pat Woods - 3/30/2024

The Inyo National Forest (INF) like other agencies has seen a significant increase in recreational users in the last 6 years, most of those users are new to outdoor recreation. As such the impacts are not linear as the time previous and neither can be the efforts to correct. This large influx of users, coupled with a large amount of novice users, has created significant impacts which must be addressed if our much loved outdoor recreation opportunities are to continue. This INF restoration grant should be implemented in full, with staff and resources, to start a long term effort to maintain, restore and educate (yet another program much needed) the ever increasing numbers of recreational users. The restoration grant would help mitigate the past and ongoing impacts so the maintenance aspects can be addressed. And likewise the maintenance aspects need to be addressed otherwise users will create bypasses around impacted areas. The issues are tied at the hip. I fully support the INF efforts in clearly identifying the issues, working with the community and volunteer organizations and making a change benefiting all users. Thank you for your consideration in this application. Michael Lueders - 4/11/2024

Full disclosure, I am directly involved with one of the non-profits mentioned in this grant and our non profit organization also has a GO grant application in this cycle. Having said that I believe I am uniquely qualified to make a statement in support of this grant as I clearly understand the need. The increase in both recreational users and new users needing guidance on sustainable recreation is taking it's toll on public lands. This goes for ALL recreational uses but I will focus on the motorized aspects. The increase in use comes at an unfortunate time when Inyo National Forest (INF) staffing levels are critically low. Our region is more so hampered by a lack of any housing, affordable or otherwise. The need for grant funding for ongoing operations to maintain existing recreational opportunities and protect our public natural resources is, bluntly, required. The INF has made a tremendous effort to tap into volunteers and non profits to help with the ongoing maintenance but much work is needed and without the funding and support we are all just a bunch of passionate recreational users standing around hoping to make a change.
THE CIVIL WAR IN CALIFORNIA
"I have long desired to see California; the production of her gold mines has been a marvel to me, and her stand for the Union, her generous offerings to the Sanitary (Commission), and her loyal representatives have endeared your people to me; and nothing would give me more pleasure than a visit to the Pacific shore, and to say in person to your citizens, ‘God bless you for your devotion to the Union,’ but the unknown is before us. I may say, however, that I have it now in purpose when the railroad is finished, to visit your wonderful state."
~Abraham Lincoln, speaking to his friend Charles Maltby, Superintendent of Indian Affairs for California, on March 25, 1865.
CALIFORNIA IN THE CIVIL WAR?
You may not think of California when you think of the Civil War, but the war deeply divided Californians as it did the rest of the country. Secessionists dominated the Southern half of the state, while Northern California remained predominately pro-Union. Even before the war began, California played an important role in the fight over slavery, as events here helped to set the stage for war.
The financial prowess of the state's rich gold mines and pro-Union business elite would ensure the success of the Northern war effort by keeping it well-funded. Without this steady supply of gold, the outcome of the war might have been very different. Addditionally, California led the nation in contributions to the United States Sanitary Commission, which was the primary organization responsible for the medical treatment of the many military casualties suffered on the Union side.
Like other Northern states, California supplied thousands of soldiers for the Union war effort; California troops were responsible for pushing the Confederate Army out of Arizona and New Mexico in 1862. Additionally, numerous California regiments were organized and joined with state regiments back east. Californians would face the enemy in most of the major battles in the East, including one regiment, organized and commanded by the former California Senator Edward Dickinson Baker (then a Colonel), that defended against Pickett's charge at Gettysburg, arguably the most pivotal military action of the war. In all, over 17,000 Californians would join as soldiers; this is the highest per-capita total for any state in the Union.
California in Time: the Fight over Slavery Through the Civil War
The Superior Court of California - County of Ventura - General Civil Law
Administrative Order 20.34 - September 18, 2020 - Re Implementation of AB3088, the Tenant, the Homeowner, and Small Landlord Relief and Stabilization Act and Center for Disease Control and Prevention Moratorium on Evictions
Notice of Public Access to Scanned Civil Unlimited Complaints

Check back often for updates.

The civil division is the processing unit where all civil matters are filed. A civil matter involves a lawsuit in which one party sues another to recover money, 
 real property or personal property, to enforce a contract or an obligation, to collect damages for injury or to protect some civil right. The court has jurisdiction 
 over all types of civil cases in Ventura County, including those within the jurisdiction of the former municipal court. The jurisdiction of the former municipal 
 court involves all cases at law in which the demand exclusive of interest or the value of the property in controversy amounts to $35,000 or less, these are known 
 as limited civil cases. Ventura County complies with delay reduction through fast track standards and multi-door courthouse processes such as mandatory early 
 settlement conferences, mandatory mediation and arbitration.
General Civil cases are heard at the Ventura Courthouse.
Office and telephone hours are Monday â Friday: 8:30 a.m. â 12:00 p.m. and 1:30 p.m. â 4:00 p.m. (closed 12:00 p.m. â 1:30 p.m.)
Appointment hours are Monday â Friday: 8:30 a.m. -11:30a.m. and 1:30 p.m. â 3:30 p.m. (closed 12:00 p.m. â 1:30 p.m.)
Please read our Limitation on Counter Filings

General filing Information

A Civil Case Cover Sheet is required with all new complaints. The courtroom your case is assigned to can be found on the Notice of Case Assignment that will be 
 provided to you when your case is filed.
Service of ADR Package: Pursuant to California Rule of Court 3.221, in all general civil cases, the plaintiff must serve a copy of the ADR information package on 
 each defendant together with the complaint.
Vexatious Litigant List - news_and_reference
The presiding justice or presiding judge may condition the filing of the litigation upon the furnishing of security for the benefit of the defendants, as provided in Code of Civil Procedure section 391.3. (Code Civ. Proc., § 391.7(b).)
The clerk should not file any litigation presented by a vexatious litigant subject to a prefiling order unless the vexatious litigant first obtains an order from the presiding justice or presiding judge permitting the filing. (Code Civ. Proc., § 391.7(c).)
Under section 391.7(e), the presiding justice or presiding judge of a court may designate a justice or judge of the same court to act on his or her behalf in exercising the authority and responsibilities provided under subdivisions (a) to (c), inclusive.
Under section 391.7(f), the clerk of the court provides to the Judicial Council a copy of any statewide vexatious litigant prefiling orders.
Under section 391.8(a), a vexatious litigant subject to a prefiling order under Section 391.7 may file an application to vacate the prefiling order and remove his or her name from the Judicial Council’s list of vexatious litigants subject to prefiling orders. The application shall be filed in the court that entered the prefiling order, either in the action in which the prefiling order was entered or in conjunction with a request to the presiding justice or presiding judge to file new litigation under Section 391.7. The application shall be made before the justice or judge who entered the order, if that justice or judge is available. If that justice or judge who entered the order is not available, the application shall be made before the presiding justice or presiding judge, or his or her designee.
Under section 391.8(b), a vexatious litigant whose application under subdivision (a)
was denied shall not be permitted to file another application on or before 12 months has elapsed after the date of the denial of the previous application.
Vexatious Litigant List - news_and_reference
This mandatory Judicial Council form is to be used by the courts or a party when declaring a person or organization a vexatious litigant requiring a prefiling order.
VL-110, Request to File New Litigation by Vexatious Litigant
This optional form may be used by an individual that has been determined to be a vexatious litigant and who must obtain prior court approval to file any new litigation in which the vexatious litigant is not represented by an attorney. Filing new litigation means (1) commencing any civil action or proceeding, or (2) filing any petition, application, or motion (except a discovery motion) under the Family or Probate Code in the courts of California.
VL-115, Order to File New Litigation by a Vexatious Litigant
This new optional form is the order portion of Request to File New Litigation by Vexatious Litigant (form MC-701).
VL-120, Application for Order to Vacate Prefiling Order and Remove Plaintiff/Petitioner from Judicial Council Vexatious Litigant List
This new optional form may be used by a vexatious litigant to ask to be removed from the list of vexatious litigants who must obtain prefiling approval.
VL-125, Order on Application to Vacate Prefiling Order and Remove Plaintiff/Petitioner from Judicial Council Vexatious Litigant List
This new optional form is an order to be used to grant or deny the vexatious litigant’s request to be removed from the list.
Contact
If you have any questions about this list, please contact VexatiousLitigantGroup@jud.ca.gov.

Reports & Publications

Historical Archive of Access & Fairness Reports & Publications
Alternative Dispute Resolution Reports & Resources
Audit Reports
Capitol Connection
Civil Fees
Civil Law
Community Outreach
Courts: General
Criminal Law
Fact Sheets
Judges
Legislative Reports
Trial Court Unification
Vexatious Litigant List

© 2024 Judicial Council of California

Site Map 
 | Careers 
 | Contact Us 
 | Accessibility 
 | Public Records 
 | Terms of Use 
 | Privacy
Police Services | Dublin, CA - Official Website
Police Services | Dublin, CA - Official Website

 

Skip to Main Content

Create a Website Account - Manage notification subscriptions, save form progress and more.   

Website Sign In

About UsDivisionsServicesHow Do I...

 

 

 

 

 

Search

 
 
 

 

 
 
 

 

Alameda County Sheriff’s Office

Open Data Portal 

Community Engagement

 
 
 

Crime Prevention

Megan's Law

Annual Report

 
 
 

Contact Us

Nate Schmidt, Police ChiefE-mail Chief SchmidtPatrol Dispatch / Traffic Concerns / (Non-Emergency) Phone: 925-462-1212Crime Tips / Graffiti Hotline / Phone: 925-833-6638Fax: 925-828-2893Emergency: 911Non-Emergency Dispatch: 925-462-1212
 

 
 

Crime Prevention Unit

Sgt. Josh Phillips6361 Clark Avenue Dublin, CA 94568Phone: 925-556-4588 925-833-6677Fax: 925-828-2893
 

 
 

 
 

Return to City of Dublin Website

 
 
 

 

Latest News


	Stay up to date
 

 
 

Reminder: Upcoming Closures of Southbound I-680 in Dublin 


In order to replace a portion of deteriorating roadway on I-680, Caltrans has scheduled two partial closures of southbound Interstate 680 between Alcosta Boulevard in San Ramon and the I-580/I-680 connector in Pleasanton beginning Friday, May 17.	Read on...

Summary of Actions Taken by Dublin City Council on Tuesday, May 21 


At its meeting held on Tuesday, May 21, the Dublin City Council took a number of actions.	Read on...

City of Dublin to Host a Part-Time Hiring Fair 


Are you seeking part-time work in a fun and friendly environment? Join the City of Dublin at a Part-Time Hiring Fair on Tuesday, May 28, 2:00 to 6:00 p.m., at the Dublin Civic Center (100 Civic Plaza).	Read on...

City of Dublin to Host a Pre-Candidate Workshop Ahead of the November 2024 Election 


Are you interested in running for public office?