vania-janet/multiturn-rag-retrieval-data huggingface dataset:
2001 Budget Analysis: P&I, Part 5b
Unpreparedness Rate Has Increased Significantly at CSU
As described earlier, CSU requires all first-time freshmen to demonstrate readiness for college-level reading, writing, and
mathematics.
Almost Half of Regularly Admitted CSU Students Arrive Unprepared in Reading and Writing. Figure 2 shows the
unpreparedness rate in reading and writing for regularly admitted freshmen over the last decade. In fall 1989, 38 percent of
regularly admitted freshmen were unprepared for college-level reading and writing. By fall 2000, the unpreparedness rate had
increased by more than a fifth—to 46 percent of regularly admitted freshmen. In recent years, many students have not passed the
EPT because they have been unable to complete the reading portion of the exam successfully. Of regularly admitted freshmen taking
the EPT in June 1997, 78 percent failed the reading component of the exam. (The combined reading and writing failure rate is lower
because students can score sufficiently high in the writing section to pass the exam even if they fail the reading section.)

Almost Half of Regularly Admitted CSU Students Arrive Unprepared in Mathematics. Figure 2 also shows the
unpreparedness rate in mathematics for regularly admitted freshmen. In fall 1989, 23 percent of regularly admitted freshmen were
unprepared for college-level work. In 1992, CSU increased its admission standards to require three years of college preparatory
mathematics. To reflect this change, CSU made the ELM more difficult by including questions on data interpretation, counting,
probability, and statistics. Likely as a result of these changes, the number of regularly admitted students needing remedial classes in
mathematics jumped from 26 percent in fall 1991 to almost 40 percent in fall 1992. From 1992 to 1998, the unpreparedness rate
continued to climb, reaching 54 percent in fall 1998. The rate of unpreparedness fell in 1999 to 48 percent of entering freshmen
(when the CSU allowed students for the first time to use calculators while taking the test). In fall 2000, the rate dropped further to
45 percent.
The 2024-25 Budget: Proposition 2 Debt Payment Proposals
In 2023‑24, the CalSTRS Board set the state’s supplemental rate to 6.311 percent (the same rate the state has paid for the past few years), while the “unconstrained” actuarially required rate—what the CalSTRS Board could set as the state’s rate if it had full rate‑setting authority to meet the goal of eliminating unfunded liabilities by 2046—would be around 3.5 percent according to CalSTRS’ most recent actuarial valuation. 
Supplemental Pensions Payments
Employers May Contribute Any Amount of Money Above What Is Required. Pension boards determine—either according to actuarial standards or statutory requirements—how much money employers must contribute to the pension system each year to address any existing unfunded liabilities. These annual employer contributions are the net effect of actuarial gains and losses amortized over time in order to pay off the entire unfunded liability over time. For some pension plans, such as CalSTRS’ Defined Benefit Program and CalPERS’ School Pool, assets and liabilities from multiple employers are aggregated together and employers pay toward the collective unfunded liabilities. Other plans—for example the pensions earned by state employees—comprise assets and liabilities accrued by a single employer. While employers, like the state, generally are required to pay the amount specified by pension boards to address unfunded liabilities, in some cases employers can choose to pay more than what is required in any given year. These supplemental payments are used to directly pay down existing unfunded liabilities above what otherwise would be required. 
Depending on Application of Supplemental Pension Payments, Short‑ or Long‑Term Budgetary Benefits Accrue. A supplemental pension payment can benefit an employer over the short‑ or long‑term, depending on how the payment is applied to the employer’s unfunded liability. Often, actuaries amortize a new unfunded liability over decades. Over the course of the amortization period, employers pay down the principal of the unfunded liability as well as interest on the unfunded liability.
The 2024-25 Budget: Supplemental Security Income/State Supplementary Payment (SSI/SSP) Program
Statute required the Department of Finance to estimate what grant increase could be supported by a half-year cost of $291 million in 2021-22 (estimated to be about $580 million in 2022-23), a half-year cost of $150 million in 2022-23 (estimated to be about $300 million in 2023-24), and a half-year of cost of $146 million in 2023-24 (estimated to be about $292 million in 2024-25). Based on these calculations, SSP grants increased by 23.95 percent on January 1, 2022 (increasing grants by $39 for individuals and $98 for couples), by 10.3 percent on January 1, 2023 (increasing grants by about $21 for individuals and $52 for couples) and by 9.2 percent on January 1, 2024 (increasing grants by about $20 for individuals and $51 for couples).
Governor’s Budget Assumptions
Governor’s January Budget Assumes SSI/SSP Caseload Continues to Decline. The SSI/SSP caseload grew at a rate of less than 1 percent each year between 2011-12 and 2014-15. Beginning in 2015-16, however, SSI/SSP caseload began to decline slowly at an average rate of 1.7 percent each year. As shown in Figure 2, the Governor’s budget projects that caseload will decrease by 1.4 percent in 2023-24 and 1.5 percent in 2024-25, which is in line with past caseload trends. The Department of Social Services recently stated that the primary drivers of this steady caseload decline are (1) overall program attrition from the disabled population and (2) slower caseload growth due to fewer individuals meeting income and asset eligibility thresholds. To further understand these potential drivers, we have reached out to the department to ask for data regarding the average number of applicants, average applicant processing time, most common reasons for applicant denials, and other factors. We will provide further comments at the time of the May Revision if necessary.

Governor’s January Budget Includes Federal SSI COLA Estimates and Holds 2024-25 SSP Grants Unchanged.
Earth Observation With Satellite | Terra
By contrast, your gauge measures rainfall totals, the amount of rain that fell in a 24-hour period. In theory, the rain rate multiplied by 24 should match the 24-hour rainfall total. In practice, however, this is seldom true because rain does not fall at the same rate over 24 hours.

Compare the graph of the satellite data to a graph of the CoCoRaHS data from Stations IN-MN-14 and IN-MG-14 during the same time period. Note that the gauges both recorded a large amount of rain on the same date that the satellites recorded a heavy rainfall rate.

Step 2. Mapping the Satellite Data.
While rate versus time is one way to analyze data for several gauges, a broader way to look at rainfall rates across a larger area is on a map. In this example you will plot rainfall rates for this time period on a map for the area. The resulting map will help you to understand where the rainfall was the greatest, allowing you to relate this information to other geographic information such as topographic features and urban areas. In this example, we are going use the rain gauge and TOVAS satellite data for the state of Indiana.

Return to the Giovanni TRMM TOVAS site by clicking the back button from your results window.
Use the same coordinates as in the previous example. Choose the time period June 2-12, 2008.
This time change the parameter,setting to generate a map. Choose “Lat-Lon map, time-averaged” as your visualization.
Click the “generate visualization” button.
The computer will generate a map of the precipitation over the area and time that you have specified. This will appear as an image.
You can also download this map to view in Google Earth.

Click on the “download results” tab at the top of the page.
Scroll down to the button of the page.
Under the heading “Output Files”, click the radio button next to the KMZ icon to select this option.
Then click the KMZ icon. It will download to your computer and, depending on your settings, launch Google Earth.

Once Google Earth has loaded, the file you will be able to see the precipitation pattern over the region that you selected.
The 2024-25 Budget: California State University
Moreover, CSU’s plan to reallocate existing enrollment targets among campuses can help expand capacity at those campuses that continue to have unmet enrollment demand without requiring additional state funds.
Budget Options
As Starting Point, Hold CSU’s Funded Enrollment Target Flat for 2024‑25. Consistent with our recommendation in the previous section to hold state funding for CSU flat, we recommend holding CSU’s enrollment target flat at the current level of 387,114 resident FTE students. CSU is 19,072 FTE students (4.9 percent) below this current target, meaning the system could add that many more students without additional funding. Given the relatively low enrollment growth expected in 2024‑25 and the out‑years, CSU is likely to remain below its current funded target for at least a couple more years. We see no rationale for increasing the target by 1 percent annually as the compact proposes, particularly if CSU would draw down its reserves for this purpose. 
If More Budget Solution Is Needed, Consider Aligning CSU Funding With Its Actual Enrollment. One of the first options the state tends to consider when facing budget deficits is aligning funding with actual caseload. This is an approach the state has used across sectors of its budget—from education programs to health and social service programs. Given CSU’s funded enrollment target is substantially higher than its actual enrollment level, the Legislature could achieve notable budget savings using this approach. We estimate it could achieve $239 million in ongoing General Fund savings if it reset CSU’s funded enrollment target at 363,337 FTE students—reflecting its estimated 2023‑24 enrollment level, adjusted to remove the estimated number of students shifted from self‑supported courses. (It could set the enrollment target at a higher level for less corresponding savings.) Depending on the severity of the state budget condition, the Legislature could apply such a reduction retroactively to 2023‑24 or beginning in 2024‑25. This option is unlikely to have a direct impact on student access, as the new target would be based on the number of students CSU currently enrolls. It could, however, impact CSU operations, as it would reduce the amount of funding available for its operating costs.
2001 Budget Analysis California Highway Patrol (2720)
stopped primarily on the basis of their race or ethnicity and, if so, to what extent. This practice, known as "racial profiling," was
prohibited by Chapter 684, Statutes of 2000 (SB 1102, Murray).
Racial Profiling Study to Be Conducted. Chapter 684 also requires that our office study data voluntarily provided by local law
enforcement agencies with regard to racial profiling. We are required to provide our findings and recommendations to the
Legislature by July 1, 2002. Currently, we are working with CHP to ensure that reliable data can be voluntarily provided by the
largest possible number of local agencies.
Local Data Collection Requested. The Governor directed CHP to collect racial data for three years (calendar years 2000
through 2002). Data from local law enforcement agencies were to be reported voluntarily to CHP. In the first year of data
collection, only 16 of the state's approximately 375 law enforcement agencies chose to participate.
Grants Offered to Encourage Local Participation. To encourage greater participation by local agencies, the Legislature
appropriated $5 million to CHP in 2000-01 for grants to local law enforcement agencies that agreed to provide data using specified
standards. The CHP solicited applications from all local police and sheriff departments, offering grants between $5,000 and
$100,000 for the year, depending on the number of sworn officers in each department. As of January 2001, 30 police departments
and 11 sheriff's departments were awarded grants, totaling $1.1 million. (Half of the original participants from 2000 are included in
the grant program.)
Local Participation Is Limited. Although CHP has sent another letter extending the grant program to nonparticipating agencies,
it is unknown whether any additional agencies will in fact voluntarily participate. Local agencies choose not to participate for a
variety of reasons, including unwillingness to share sensitive information with the state, disagreement with CHP's methodology, and
concern that data collection could interfere with officers' other duties.
Current Funding Adequate for Projected Needs. After disbursing grants to the agencies currently participating in the data
Spring hikes in Petaluma's Helen Putnam Regional Park 
Stay on the paved Ridge Trail for another .3 miles until reaching Wildflower Junction, where the South Loop, Panorama and Pomo trails intersect. Take the Pomo Trail from here, which curves westward into the park's interior.
After .65 miles of gnarled oaks and bays, and past an intersection with Filaree Trail, you'll reach the intersection with Panorama Trail at Hollow Oak Junction. Here, you'll emerge from the forest to unbelievable views of the countryside to the south and west.
Take Panorama Trail to the right, passing an old oak with low branches perfect for kids who love to climb. Take the Panorama Steps - a 121-step staircase and enjoy the incredible views of the Sonoma-Marin countryside descending to the Arroyo Trail and the parking lot.
This hike is only 2.2 miles, but it is not short on spring scenery. 
Know before you go

This park has two entrances - one on Chileno Valley Road and one on Windsor Drive. 
Dogs on leash are allowed.
Parking is $7 or free for Regional Parks members.

Note: This post was originally published in 2017 and updated in 2024 to clarify trail directions.

Share this:

 

Learn

Home
Find a Park
Find a Campsite
Become a Member
Subscribe to our Newsletter
Planning Projects
Public Meetings

Contact Us Main Office: (707) 565-2041Hours: Mon-Fri, 8 a.m. - 5 p.m.

Address2300 County Center DriveSuite A120Santa Rosa, CA 95403
Crisis Resolution Center boasts success | Placer County, CA
Crisis Resolution Center boasts success | Placer County, CA

 

Skip to Main Content

 

 
 
 

News ReleasesFeatured ArticlesVideo LibraryPodcastsAbout

 

 
GovernmentCommunications & Public AffairsNews Releases2024MayCrisis Resolution Center boasts success

Crisis Resolution Center boasts successful discharge rate over 80% for at-risk youthPublished May 20, 2024As Placer County continues to promote its crisis services throughout Mental Health Matters Month in May, leaders are spotlighting Placer County’s Crisis Resolution Center, a unique public-private partnership with a local nonprofit now in its third decade. Last year, the CRC provided 564 days of care to 41 vulnerable youth aged 12-17 at its residential facility. Staff at the CRC provided nearly 160 hours of intervention services, including family counseling and parent education, with a successful youth discharge rate of over 80%.Youth staying at the CRC – whether for a few days or more than a month – might be runaways, truant, beyond control of their parents, or at risk of committing crimes that could result in incarceration or costly out-of-home placements. The goal of the CRC is to avoid more serious outcomes and work with youth and families to safely reunify.“Placer has supported CRC for many years. The goal of the CRC is to do more on the front end so that these kids don’t end up in the criminal justice system,” said Chief Probation Officer Marshall Hopper. “The CRC is a valuable community program that redirects children and families in crisis with services so that these children return home to a more stable environment, where children and families can thrive. This in turn alleviates unnecessary added pressure on the justice system and is good for families.”The Crisis Resolution Center, located in Loomis and operated by Koinonia Family Services, is a six-bed co-ed facility with professional counseling services, conflict resolution, parent-child training and referral services.
2001 Budget Analysis:State Treasurer
resources are needed in that area. At this time, however, we recommend the Legislature delete $244,000 in Item 0950-001-0001.
Modified Workload Does Not Justify More Staff 
We recommend the Legislature delete $351,000 in Item 0950-001-0001 because the office has not justified an increase in workload. (Delete $351,000 in
Item 0950-001-0001.) 
The Governor's budget includes a request for $351,000 from the General Fund and four new positions to manage a variable interest rate general obligation bond
program as authorized by Chapter 522, Statutes of 1999 (SB 997, Brulte). The program is an alternative financing option instead of the traditional fixed interest
rate program. The Treasurer indicates a need for additional staff in order to administer the program. However, it is not clear that additional workload will be
generated or that additional resources are necessary. The Treasurer will not be issuing a significantly larger amount of bonds. As variable rate bonds are issued,
fixed rate bond issuance will decrease, resulting in minimal, if any, increase in workload. Consequently, some of the resources currently directed to the fixed
rate program can be used for the variable rate program. Therefore, we recommend the Legislature delete $351,000 in Item 0950-001-0001.

Return to General Government Table of Contents,
2001-02 Budget Analysis
FTB 1131 VRC Franchise Tax Board Privacy Notice on Collection | FTB.ca.gov
FTB 1131 VRC Franchise Tax Board Privacy Notice on Collection | FTB.ca.gov

Skip to Main Content

News
Filing and payment due dates for San Diego County flood victims extended to June 17, 2024. Visit San Diego County flood relief for more information.x

News If you received a 2022 LLC penalty notice, please refer to Q&A #24 and #25 on the Help with California winter storms page to view the list of tax returns and payments that qualify for the disaster postponement. x

 

 MyFTB account
Tax Pros
Help
Translate

 
 

Search

Menu

 

File
Forms
Pay
Refund

 

Custom Google Search

Submit

Close Search

Breadcrumbs: 

Home

FTB 1131 VRC Franchise Tax Board Privacy Notice on Collection Revised: 01/2021

 
The privacy and security of your personal information is of the utmost importance to us. We want you to have the highest confidence in the integrity, efficiency, and fairness of our state tax and non-tax debt collection system.
Your Rights and Responsibilities
You have a right to know what types of information we gather, how we use it, and to whom we may provide it. Information collected is subject to the California Information Practices Act, Civil Code Sections 1798-1798.78. When notice of an amount due, including any interest, is issued to you, you must timely pay the amount due to avoid further interest from accruing on the debt. You must provide your social security number or other identifying number on related documents for identification. (Revenue and Taxation Code (R&TC) Sections 10878, and 18621, 18624, and 19005)
Reason for Information Requests
We may request your personal information to resolve your delinquent debt owed to the Department of Motor Vehicles. (R&TC Section 10878) You must provide all requested information, unless indicated as âoptional.â
Consequences of Noncompliance
If you fail to comply with our request for information or payment, we may take legal action to obtain the information and collect the debt.
Property Tax Division | Placer County, CA
Property Tax Division | Placer County, CA

 

Skip to Main Content

 

 
 
 

GovernmentServicesBusinessExperience PlacerI Want To...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
HomeGovernmentDepartments A - DAuditor-ControllerProperty Tax Division



Property Tax Division	

The Property Tax Division prepares the levy for all taxable properties in the County. To create this, we administer the tax rates for voter approved debt, multiply these rates times the assessed values and add any direct charges sent to us by taxing entities. This levy is used to create the tax bills mailed by the Tax Collector. The Division also distributes those taxes to cities, schools, special districts, and the County and processes corrections to the levies.Assessed ValuesAssessed Values by Tax Rate Area (TRA)Assessed Values by Taxing EntityAssessed Values by TRA within Taxing EntityList of Direct ChargesContacts for the 2023 to 2024 Property Tax Roll (PDF)Tax Rate ScheduleAccess current and archived tax rate schedules.Maturity Dates for Voter Approved General Obligation BondsLearn about Maturity Dates for Voter Approved General Obligation Bonds (PDF).1% Property Tax Rate Allocation to Taxing Entities (AB8)This schedule shows the 1% property tax allocation, as well as the adjustments for ERAF and redevelopment, by taxing entity.AB8 Tax Increment by Taxing Entity within TRA Pre-ERAFThis schedule shows the calculation of the 1% property tax allocation (base revenue, increment and increment percentage) by taxing entity within TRA, Pre-ERAF/Pre-RDA.AB8 Tax Increment by Taxing Entity within TRA Post-ERAFThis schedule shows the calculation of the 1% property tax allocation (base revenue, increment and increment percentage) by taxing entity within TRA, adjusted for ERAF.
2001 Budget Analysis: P&I, Part 5b
satisfactorily on placement tests developed and administered by the universities. The UC administers its placement exam—the
Universitywide Subject A Examination—the first Saturday in May each year, whereas CSU offers its placement exams—the English
Placement Test (EPT) and the Entry-Level Mathematics (ELM) test—several times throughout the year.
Finally, students who do not score sufficiently high on college admissions or placement exams must enroll in a precollegiate course.
Typically, students take these courses on campus in their first year of college. These students demonstrate proficiency by passing
the precollegiate course with either a credit (CR) grade or a D- or better.
The segments do not use the same standard for defining unpreparedness. As a result, students UC defines as unprepared in reading
and writing (because they fail the Subject A exam) might be considered prepared by CSU standards (because they pass the EPT).
Similarly, students CSU defines as unprepared in reading, writing, or mathematics might be considered prepared by a community
college.
Unpreparedness Is Persistent and Pervasive
Based on the segments' standards, available data suggest many students entering California's public colleges and universities do not
have the requisite skills to engage in college-level work. Below, we track unpreparedness rates at CSU and UC over the last
decade. We do not track unpreparedness rates at the community colleges because they do not require students to take admissions
tests (such as the SAT) or placement tests (such as the EPT). Consequently, the community colleges could not provide data on their
students' level of preparedness for college-level studies.
Unpreparedness Rate Has Increased Significantly at CSU
As described earlier, CSU requires all first-time freshmen to demonstrate readiness for college-level reading, writing, and
mathematics.
Almost Half of Regularly Admitted CSU Students Arrive Unprepared in Reading and Writing. Figure 2 shows the
unpreparedness rate in reading and writing for regularly admitted freshmen over the last decade. In fall 1989, 38 percent of