vania-janet/multiturn-rag-retrieval-data huggingface dataset:
Home Ownership Opportunities | Placer County, CA
Home Ownership Opportunities | Placer County, CA

 

Skip to Main Content

Event


	Discover and Discuss: Projects and Programs Shaping the Future of North Lake Tahoe
	Read On...

 

 
 
 

Community ServicesHousingRecreationPlanning & ProjectsTransportation

 

 
ServicesNorth Lake TahoeHousingHome Ownership Opportunities



Home Ownership Opportunities	

9
1
2
2

Lease to Locals

Placer County has teamed up with Placemate to help bridge the gap in affordable housing in East Placer County. Find available housing at a fixed cost through the Placemate website. 
 

Workforce Housing Preservation Program

Placer County offers up to 16% of the purchase price or $150,000 for local workers to buy a home or make renovations in North Lake Tahoe in exchange for a deed restriction. Learn more about the Workforce Housing Preservation program here. 
 

Workforce Housing Assistance Resources

To help house the local workforce and permanent residents in the East Placer/North Lake Tahoe area, Placer County is working to increase the availability of housing for a variety of income types. View this page for more information on all relevant initiatives.
 

First Time Homebuyer Assistance Program

This program provides flexible second mortgages to help families purchase their first home in the unincorporated areas of Placer County. The First Time Homebuyer Assistance Program loan can help make mortgage payments more affordable. 
 

Martis Fund Down Payment Assistance Program

Martis Fund’s Homebuyer Down Payment Assistance Program provides down payment assistance for median income Tahoe/Truckee locals.
 

Hopkins Village

Hopkins Village, a new for-sale housing development located in Martis Valley, will sell to the Tahoe-Truckee workforce. Forty units (20 half-plexes), each containing 3 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, and a garage, will be constructed and sold entirely to local workers with a household income of 180% area median income or less.
 

Dollar Creek Crossing

Placer County purchased an 11-acre property near Tahoe City in 2019 to produce a mix of achievable housing for the local workforce in North Lake Tahoe. The Dollar Creek Crossing development is in planning stages.
 

 
 
 

 

 

Lease to Locals

Workforce Housing Preservation Program

Workforce Housing Assistance Resources
Initiative Analyses
This measure defines biological sex; requires schools notify parents and legal guardians if a student requests to be treated as a gender different from official school records; prohibits transgender female students from participating in athletic programs or activities designated for biological female students; requires sex-segregated facilities on school, college, and university campuses be segregated based on biological sex; eliminates requirement to allow gender nonbinary and transgender students to participate in either girls state or boys state conferences; and prohibits providing certain medical treatments that affirm a different gender than biological sex for youth (Amendment #2).

 Format:  
 PDF
HTML

November 2
A.G. File No. 2023-026 
Funding for students attending private schools.
This measure establishes a program that would provide $17,000 in state funding for each K-12 student attending a participating private school. Students could use these funds to pay for private school tuition and purchase educational services from approved vendors. Any funds not used for these purposes could be saved and used for postsecondary education expenses. The program would begin in 2025-26 (Amendment #1).

 Format:  
 PDF
HTML

October 27
A.G. File No. 2023-025 
Homeownership affordability.
This measure prohibits the general public from filing lawsuits alleging noncompliance with the California Environmental Quality Act for housing and related infrastructure, utility, and public service projects and sets a cap on development fees levied by local entities on new housing and state agencies on housing, infrastructure, utility, or public service project (Amendment #1).

 Format:  
 PDF
HTML

October 27
A.G. File No. 2023-024 
Managed care organization tax.
The measure would add provisions to California law permanently establishing an MCO tax (Amendment #1).

 Format:  
 PDF
HTML

October 25
A.G. File No. 2023-023 
Drug crimes.
2001 Budget Analysis: P&I, Part 1
another funding source will need to be found.

One-Time Spending
As shown in Figure 7, the budget is proposing about $3.3 billion in new one-time programmatic spending in 2001-02 (this one-time
amount excludes the $2.4 billion noted earlier that is allocated to reserves). This includes the $1 billion set-aside for various energy
initiatives and $772 million in direct appropriations for capital outlay. The budget also includes significant one-time funds for local
fiscal relief, new housing initiatives, and various environmental and resources-related purposes.

 Figure 7
 Key One-Time Commitments
Proposed in the 2001-02 Budget
 (In Millions)
 Purpose
 Amount
Energy initiatives set-aside

$1,000
Capital outlay

772
Local government fiscal relief

250
New housing initiatives

220
Diesel replacement

100
Clean beaches

100
Law enforcement technology grants

75
Flood control subventions

74
River parkway initiative

70
Prison electromechanical doors

58
Zero-emission vehicle subsidies

50
Touch screen voting pilot project

40
Other

505
 Total
 $3,314

The Budget's Economic and Revenue Outlook 
The budget's economic forecast assumes that after a very strong year in 2000, the California economy will slow in line with the
national economy during 2001. Accordingly, strong current-year revenue performance will be followed by more-modest gains in
2001-02. Specifically, the budget forecasts that:

In the current year, General Fund revenues will increase by $5 billion (6.9 percent), reflecting strong collections attributable to
2000 economic activity and an assumed 30 percent increase in combined capital gains and stock options reported on personal
income tax returns.
In the budget year, revenue growth will subside to $2.5 billion (3.3 percent), reflecting the anticipated slower growth in
economic activity and a 10 percent decline in capital gains and stock options-related income in 2001.

The LAO's Outlook for the Budget
Planning Commission zoning public hearing Jan 2023 - City of Piedmont

The proposed Zoning Ordinance update would create Piedmont-specific development standards for such lot splits.

New ADU requirements: When constructing a new home on properties over 5,000 square feet, an ADU or JADU would be required as part of the project. This requirement would also apply to remodel projects that demolish 70% or more of the existing residence, subject to exceptions for rebuilding after a disaster. This measure implements Housing Element Program 1.E.

Revised development standards for multi-family residential: This proposal would revise rules around setbacks, parking, density, and lot coverage for multi-family residential developments in areas where multi-family housing is already allowed. The new standards would permit heights up to 4 stories. This measure implements Housing Element Programs 1.D, 1.F, 1.G, 1.H, and others.

For a detailed description of proposed amendments to the Piedmont General Plan and Zoning Code, see the presentation Planning staff delivered at a City Council study session on December 18, 2023:

Staff report
Presentation
Meeting video

The public hearing on January 29, 2024, follows months of dialogue and six public meetings. The Planning Commission held their first discussion of the implementation measures in October 2023, and continued the discussions at their November, December, and January 2024 meetings. The City Council has discussed the proposed measures at their November 20 and December 18, 2023 City Council meetings.
The City Council will hold a public hearing to consider adopting these measures at their February 20, 2024 meeting.
Watch and comment in person or online via Zoom
Community members can watch and provide comment in-person or via Zoom:
Planning Commission: Monday, January 29h, 5:30pm (Agenda | Staff Report)
Piedmont City Hall, 120 Vista Avenue
Zoom: piedmont-ca-gov.zoom.us/j/86798306698
Each participant will have the opportunity to speak once on the public hearing after the presentation and before the discussion. The meeting chair will set a time limit for individual comments based on the number of participants.
Written comments can be submitted to the City of Piedmont via email to [email protected].
About the 6th Cycle Housing Element
Internal Revenue Bulletin: 2008-12 | Internal Revenue Service
Thus, the standard for the establishment of mortality tables that are permitted to be used with respect to individuals who are entitled to benefits under the plan on account of disability is the same under § 430(h)(3)(D) as the standard that previously applied under § 412(l)(7)(C)(iii). Section 431 specifies the minimum funding requirements that apply to multiemployer plans. Under § 431(c)(6)(B), a plan’s full funding limitation cannot be less than the excess (if any) of 90 percent of the current liability of the plan (including the expected increase in current liability due to benefits accruing during the plan year) over the value of the plan’s assets. Section 431(c)(6)(D)(iv), (v), and (vi) provide rules regarding the mortality tables to be used in determining a plan’s current liability for this purpose. Section 431(c)(6)(D)(v)(I) provides that, for purposes of determining a plan’s current liability, the Secretary is to establish mortality tables that may be used, in lieu of the tables that apply generally under § 431(c)(6)(D)(iv), for individuals who are entitled to benefits under the plan on account of disability. The Secretary is to establish separate tables for individuals whose disabilities occurred in plan years beginning before January 1, 1995, and for individuals whose disabilities occur in plan years beginning after December 31, 1994. Under § 431(c)(6)(D)(v)(II), the mortality table for individuals whose disabilities occur in plan years beginning after December 31, 1994, applies only with respect to individuals who are disabled within the meaning of title II of the Social Security Act and the regulations thereunder.
SENATOR WIENER’S WORK ON TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING | Senator Scott Wiener
He was a co-author of SB 9, streamlining the process so homeowners can create a duplex or subdivide their existing property up to four units and thus effectively ending single family zoning in California. 
In 2022, he passed SB 886 to streamline and accelerate student housing production across the state.
Before his election to the Senate, as a member of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, Senator Wiener authored legislation to allow for new in-law units, allow for new rent-controlled units, increase housing density along transit corridors, generate more student housing, allow the construction of micro-units, and protect tenants at risk of eviction. He authored a ballot measure to tie funding for public transportation and bike and pedestrian improvements to population growth, generating tens of millions of new dollars for these critical projects. He also expanded San Francisco’s Transportation Development Impact Fee, thus requiring new developments to pay into the city’s transportation infrastructure fund.
Senator Wiener, while in local government, served as Chairman of the San Francisco County Transportation Authority and represented San Francisco on the regional Metropolitan Transportation Commission and Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District Board of Directors.

Biography
FullCondensed
Current Work
Climate Change and the EnvironmentTransportation & HousingLGBTQ Issues

Office Information

Capitol Office
1021 O Street, Suite 8620
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: (916) 651-4011

San Francisco455 Golden Gate AvenueSuite 14800San Francisco, CA 94102Phone: (415) 557-1300

Contact Our OfficeStaffEmail SenatorSign Up for Updates

California State Senate | Democratic Caucus © 2024
 | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement | Register to Vote
2001 Budget Analysis: Housing and Community Development (2240)
The requested funds would allow
about 350 plan checks to be performed annually.
General Fund Commitment Creates Wrong Incentives. We agree with Chapter 702's intent to prevent the unnecessary delay
in the approval of farmworker housing projects. By granting the department's funding request, however, the state would create a
fiscal incentive for some communities not to act on permit applications. Under current law and with the approval of HCD's funding
proposal, the local department would be able to keep the fees collected for plan checks (generally several hundred dollars) without
performing the associated work—by simply deferring to HCD's evaluation after 60 days. Chapter 702 gives no authority for HCD
to collect the fees paid by an applicant to the local building department for the plan check. The Governor's proposal, in essence
then, requests that the plan check be paid for twice—once by the applicant and once by the state's General Fund.
Recommend Allowing Department to Recover Costs From Local Governments. We recommend that the department, by
amending the EHA, be given the authority to collect the already paid plan-check fees from local governments for any plan checks
that HCD performs. This would both prevent local governments from keeping the fees for services that they did not provide and
allow the requested $50,000 to be deleted from the budget.
Return to General Government Table of Contents,
2001-02 Budget Analysis
Roosevelt Island Operating Corporation History | Roosevelt Island Operating Corporation of the State of New York
Development of this “new” community was authorized by the 99-year ground lease and accompanying General Development Plan (GDP) entered into in 1969, by New York City and New York State.General Development PlanThe GDP, which has been amended from time to time, provides for the development of housing, shops and community facilities for a mixed income, handicap accessible, residential neighborhood. As an island community, Roosevelt Island requires specialized operations and capital infrastructure maintenance such as an aerial tramway, underground pneumatic tube garbage collection system and seawall improvements. RIOC supplements the basic services provided by the City of New York, and provides specialized operations and capital improvements.CommunityToday, RIOC manages a mixed income community with about 12,000 to 14,000 residents, public open spaces, recreation facilities and six (6) New York City designated landmark buildings. Its waterfront promenade encircles the Island and provides extraordinary 360 degree views of New York City icons such as the United Nations, the Empire State building, the Chrysler building, the Queensboro Bridge and the landmarked Pepsi Cola sign in Queens.More DevelopmentIn the past five years, the island has experienced a dramatic increase in island greenspace with the openings of Southpoint Park in 2011 and Four Freedoms Memorial Park in 2013. With the vast amenities and attractions for islanders and tourist alike the island continues flourish. At the southern end of the island, on the former site of Goldwater Hospital, is the newly built Cornell Tech applied science campus. The campus construction is divided into three phases which are scheduled to be completed by 2043 with the total construction of 2 million square feet and 2.5 acres of public open space. With construction soon underway on the last two of nine designated residential buildings at Southtown, the island’s plan is close to completion.

 
 
 

 

Island History

Roosevelt Island Operating Corporation History

Tram History

News Articles- Development History 

 

 

 

 

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

INSTAGRAM

RSS FEED

 
 
 

 

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS feed

 
 
 

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Delicious
Blogger
LinkedIn

 
 

Home
My Account
Printer Friendly
Email Page
Contact Us
RSS
Site Map
Translate Page
Notifications
Documents
Bill Text - SB-375 Transportation planning: travel demand models: sustainable communities strategy: environmental review.
(d) (1) After consultation with the council of governments, the department shall make a determination of the region’s existing and projected housing need based upon the assumptions and methodology determined pursuant to subdivision (c). The region’s existing and projected housing need shall reflect the achievement of a feasible balance between jobs and housing within the region using the regional employment projections in the applicable regional transportation plan. Within 30 days following notice of the determination from the department, the council of governments may file an objection to the department’s determination of the region’s existing and projected housing need with the department.(2) The objection shall be based on and substantiate
	 either of the following:(A) The department failed to base its determination on the population projection for the region established pursuant to subdivision (b), and shall identify the population projection which the council of governments believes should instead be used for the determination and explain the basis for its rationale.(B) The regional housing need determined by the department is not a reasonable application of the methodology and assumptions determined pursuant to subdivision (c). The objection shall include a proposed alternative determination of its regional housing need based upon the determinations made in subdivision (c), including analysis of why the proposed alternative would be a more reasonable application of the methodology and assumptions determined pursuant to subdivision (c).(3) If a
	 council of governments files an objection pursuant to this subdivision and includes with the objection a proposed alternative determination of its regional housing need, it shall also include documentation of its basis for the alternative determination. Within 45 days of receiving an objection filed pursuant to this section, the department shall consider the objection and make a final written determination of the region’s existing and projected housing need that includes an explanation of the information upon which the determination was made.SEC. 9. Section 65584.02 of the Government Code is amended to read:65584.02.
Regional Early Action Planning (REAP) Grants of 2021 | California Department of Housing and Community Development
In turn, the state will post annual reports with supplemental information.

REAP 2.0 Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Awards:$510,000,000 in non-competitive funding is available to the state’s Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) for planning and implementation activities that support REAP 2.0’s goals and objectives.MPO Awards as of October 10, 2023:Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments (AMBAG): $9.13 million to establish a competitive grant suballocation to local jurisdictions, a non-competitive RHNA-based local suballocation, SCS implementation, and local TA.Butte County Association of Governments (BCAG): $2.65 million to construct pedestrian and bicycle improvements in the City of Biggs; facilitate complete street improvements in a low-income area of the City of Chico; construct pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure along the Highway 99 corridor in the City of Gridley; facilitate active transportation connections between important activity centers and destinations in the downtown area of the City of Oroville; establish a Sewer Service Overlay Zone along main commercial arterials in the Town of Paradise; and fund predevelopment work for affordable multifamily housing in the Town of Magalia.Fresno Council of Governments (FCOG): $13 million to suballocate to local jurisdictions to fund projects that accelerate infill housing development, affirmatively further fair housing, and reduce VMTMadera County Transportation Commission (MCTC): $2.18 million to fund transformative projects that will support disadvantaged communities, regional connectivity, and infill affordable housing along multimodal corridors.Merced County Association of Governments (MCAG): $3.62 million to suballocate through two programs – one non-competitive RHNA-based suballocation for local jurisdictions to utilize for eligible planning activities and one competitive suballocation to be used for transformative capital improvement projects.Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG): $31.83 million to fund the Green Means Go program, which will award one-time funding through planning and capital infrastructure investments for non-transportation projects in locally adopted Green Zones (priority growth areas) that improve housing affordability.San Diego Association of Governments
Sierra County, CA - Official Website | Official Website
Sierra County, CA - Official Website | Official Website

 

Skip to Main Content

 

Search

 
 
 

Your GovernmentCommunityCounty DepartmentsHow Do I

 

 

 

 

 

Sierra Valley
Mule Deer in the Fall

Highway 49
Winter driving conditions

Sierra Buttes
Crossing the Pacific Crest Trail (PCT)

Sierra Valley
Rainbow in Sierraville

Downtown Downieville
Logging Truck and Bell Tower/Town Siren

Town of Alleghany
Museum and Post Office

Lakes Basin Recreation Area
Near Gold Lake

Sierra Buttes Lookout
Only 176 Steps To The Top

Sierra Buttes
Sardine Lake Resort

Lakes Basin Recreation Area
Cub Lake

Forest City
Dance Hall and Saloon

Sierra Valley
Beckwourth Peak Moonset

Lakes Basin Recreation Area
Packer Lake

Downtown City of Loyalton
Timberfest Parade

Highway 49 
Sierra Valley Sunset

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

 
 
 

 

EmergencyInformation

OnlinePayments

 
 

Agendas& Minutes

CountyOrdinance Code

 
 

Jobs

View PropertyTax bills

 
 
 

 

Community NewsStay up to date
 

 
 

Sierra County Housing Element 2024-29 Public Draft Now Available 


Sierra County is conducting an update to the 2019-2024 Housing Element. The Housing Element, part of the County’s General Plan, is a policy document that addresses existing and future housing needs for all Sierra County residents and economic groups.	Read on...

Sierra County (Calpine) Waterworks District #1 Vacancy 


Two vacancies on the Sierra County (Calpine) Waterworks District #1.	Additional Info...

Gold Lake Road is Open 

Read on...

Understanding Emergency Alerts 


There are many ways to stay in the know during an emergency. Check out this handy chart about the options in Sierra County.	Read on...

We all have a responsibility to be BearWise 


A fed bear is eventually a dead bear.	Read on...