vania-janet/multiturn-rag-retrieval-data huggingface dataset:
Community Care | VA Minneapolis Health Care | Veterans Affairs
Call for community care appointment scheduling, weekdays, 8:30 a.m.-3:30 p.m.Learn how to schedule appointmentsEmergency medical careIf you receive emergency care in the community, you or your family member/caregiver must report it within 72 hours of being seen by a community emergency care facility for the claim to be considered. You must also report when transferred to any new emergency care facility.Please note, Veterans must have been seen in the VA system, or by an approved in-network VA community care provider, within the last 24 months in order to be eligible for this benefit. For emergency ambulance claims to be considered, a Veteran must meet VA travel eligibility criteria.Learn more about emergency medical care in the communityHow to report emergency care in the communityYou can report online using the web portal, or by calling the hotline or by emailing:VA Emergency Care Reporting portalVA 72-Hour Notification Hotline: Email VHAEmergencyNotification@va.govUrgent and walk-in careYour VA health care includes new urgent care access through a network of walk-in retail health clinics and urgent care facilities.Veterans must have been seen in the VA system, or by a VA community care provider, within the last 24 months in order to use this benefit. If a Veteran arrives at an urgent care location and has any difficulty receiving care, they can call 1-.Learn about your urgent care benefitsDownload the urgent care billing information sheetCommunity care billingCall 1- with community care billing questions.How copays and insurance work with VAThe MISSION Act improves information sharing with community providers.Learn about copay and insurance changesImportant contact information

 VA notification contacts 
 

Notify the VA within 72 hours of an Emergency Department visit, call 1- or email VHAEmergencyNotification@va.govNotify the VA of an unscheduled inpatient admission, call 1- or email VHAEmergencyNotification@va.gov

 Request to transfer a patient 
 

Request to transfer a patient to the Minneapolis VA Medical Center, call .

 Billing contacts
Grand Jury | Superior Court of California | County of Tuolumne
The Tuolumne County Grand Jury issues its final Report each year in late June. The Report is available to all county residents, and is delivered to the news media and to heads of affected governmental agencies. Affected agencies are required to respond to the findings and recommendations within 60 to 90 days. The Tuolumne County Board of Supervisors must comment on the Jury’s recommendations within 90 days. The responses of the affected agencies are also available to the public. Current and recent Grand Jury Reports and responses are available on Tuolumne County's Web site at www.tuolumnecounty.ca.gov/386/Grand-Jury.
The Complaint Process
The Tuolumne County Grand Jury is responsive to the suggestions and complaints from citizens about issues the Jury should investigate. Each suggestion or complaint is reviewed by the full Grand Jury, or assigned to one of the Jury’s committees for consideration. Though the Grand Jury cannot investigate every issue, each suggestion or complaint is duly considered. All complaints received by the Grand Jury are treated confidentially. The Grand Jury’s records may not be inspected nor subpoenaed. All Grand Jury investigations and interviews are kept confidential.
Submitting a Complaint
How to submit a complaint for investigation by the Tuolumne County Grand Jury:

Download the complaint form.

Complete and return the form. You may print and mail the completed document to the address below, or you may email it to tcgjforeperson@tuolumne.courts.ca.gov. 

Tuolumne County Grand Jury
12855 Justice Center Drive
Sonora, CA 95370

Latest Reports & Responses
Reports
2022-2023 Report Introduction
2022-2023 Grand Jury Report Index
2022-2023 Continuity Report
2022-2023 Airports Report
2022-2023 Elections Report
2022-2023 Jail and Prison Facilities Report
2022-2023 School Safety 
Previous
2020-2022 Final Report Summaries
2020-2022 BOS Employee Public Safety Report
2020-2022 TUD Water is Life Report
2020-2022 Adult Protective Services Report
The 2024-25 Budget: County Probation Grants to Support Temporary Increase in the Supervision Population
result in people being released to PRCS early, there has been a
temporary increase in the PRCS population.
Expansion of Parole
Consideration. Proposition 57 made people not convicted of
violent crimes eligible to be considered by the Board of Parole Hearings
for release from prison earlier than otherwise. The initial
implementation of this process, as well as expansions to it over the
years, have also caused temporary increases in the PRCS
population.

Since implementation of Proposition 57 began in 2017, the prison
population has declined by about 37,500 people (29 percent)—from 131,300
on June 30, 2017 to 93,700 as of January 31, 2024. We note that while
Proposition 57 has been a significant driver of this decline, various
other sentencing changes have also contributed.
State Has Provided Funding to Probation Departments for
Temporary Increases in PRCS Population. As discussed
above, the temporary increases in the PRCS population are not an
increase in the overall number of people who will be supervised by
probation departments. Rather, they are the product of some people
starting their supervision terms earlier than otherwise. While counties
receive realigned sales tax revenue to support the PRCS population, this
funding does not get moved forward in time to reflect people starting
their supervision terms earlier. Accordingly, there were concerns that
counties could face cash-flow problems when temporary increases in the
PRCS population occur. In light of these concerns, the state has
provided a series of one-time augmentations associated with
Proposition 57—totaling $121 million from 2017‑18 through 2023‑24—to the
Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC) to distribute to
probation departments. (BSCC is broadly responsible for providing
statewide leadership, coordination, and technical assistance to promote
effective state and local efforts in California’s adult and juvenile
justice systems, including administering various grant programs.) These
augmentations were based on estimates of the average daily population
increase in the PRCS population caused by Proposition 57 and funded at a
USA.gov accessibility policy | USAGov
Links make sense by themselves (no links that say "click here" or "more...").
 

 Tables are used for laying out tabular information and have proper headings and summaries.
 

 Lists items are defined as HTML bulleted lists to present items of equal status or value and as numbered lists if a particular order to the items is appropriate.
 

 The content is fully accessible and operable with keyboard navigation only.
 

We aim for A and AA compliance across our site. We also look for opportunities to meet AAA compliance.Report a problemIf you have a problem using our site, you can report the issue to us online, or by calling us at 1-844-872-4681.We will try to fix the issue, and we'll attempt to provide the information you're seeking in a format accessible to you.Where to find accessibility toolsIf you have any type of disability, we recommend that you visit the FCC Accessibility Clearinghouse and the Access Board website. You'll find expert advice such as alternative screen readers, screen magnifiers and other devices that can make using a computer easier and more enjoyable.We also recommend that you visit AbilityNet's My Computer My Way, which provides advice on making your computer accessible.

LAST UPDATED: 
	 March 14, 2024

	

SHARE THIS PAGE:

 Have a question?
 
Ask a real person any government-related question for free. They will get you the answer or let you know where to find it.

 Call USAGov
 

 Chat with USAGov
 

	Top
	

	Government information
	

	All topics and services
	

	Directory of U.S. government agencies and departments
	

	Branches of government
	

	About us
	

	About USAGov
	

	Privacy and security policies
	

	Accessibility policy
	

	Report a website issue
	

	Website usage data
	

	For federal agencies
	

	Partner with us
	

	Read our blog
	

	For media
	

	USAGov Outreach
	

	Feature articles
	

	Sign up to receive email updates
	

	Enter your email
	

	Sign up
	

	USAGov Contact Center
	

	Ask USA.gov a question at
	

	1-844-USAGOV1 (1-844-872-4681)
	

	Find us on social media
	

Facebook

Twitter
Office of Special Investigation | New York State Attorney General
File a Complaint

How can we help you?

I Want To...

Appeal a background check

Apply for a Job/Internship

Do Business with the OAG

File a Complaint

Find Legal Services

Know My Rights

Make a FOIL Request

Register/Submit a Filing

Report a Data Breach

Request a Publication

Serve Papers on OAG

Use the Whistleblower Portal

Home

 Office of Special Investigation
 

Office of Special Investigation

The Office of Special Investigation (OSI) investigates deaths caused by police officers or peace officers, including corrections officers. When OSI’s investigation shows that a crime was committed, OSI presents evidence to a grand jury. If the grand jury returns an indictment, OSI prosecutes the case. When OSI’s investigation shows that an officer caused a death, but that a crime cannot be proved beyond a reasonable doubt, OSI publishes a report on our website detailing the facts disclosed by the investigation and explaining why the evidence would not demonstrate proof beyond a reasonable doubt. 
OSI also makes recommendations for improvements to policing and corrections in its published investigative reports. 
OSI is staffed by attorneys, investigators, analysts, and family and community liaisons. OSI conducts over 200 investigations annually and publishes an annual report on its work every October 1. The annual report summarizes the indictments OSI is prosecuting and the investigative reports it has published. The annual report also contains OSI’s recommendations for improvements in policing and corrections, and provides comprehensive demographic and other data on all the matters OSI investigates, including deaths at the state’s prisons and jails, including Rikers Island.
OSI’s authority comes from Section 70-b of New York’s Executive Law (Section 70-b), which went into effect on April 1, 2021. Before April 1, 2021, OSI’s predecessor unit, the Special Investigations and Prosecution Unit (SIPU), conducted investigations and prosecutions under an executive order issued in 2015 by the governor.

Topics covered

Annual reports 

Investigative reports 

Police camera footage and release policy 

News

Press releases

May 22, 2024
FTB Publication 1017 | FTB.ca.gov
A bank or corporation is taxed on its distributive share of income if it participates in the management of the investment activities or is engaged in a unitary business with another taxpayer that participates in managing the investment activities or has income from California sources. An investment partnership is a partnership that meets the following two criteria:
 
No less than 90 percent of the cost of the partnershipâs assets consists of:
 
Qualifying investment securities.
Deposits at banks or other financial institutions.
Oï¬ice equipment and oï¬ice space reasonably necessary to carry on the activities of an investment partnership.

No less than 90 percent of the partnershipâs gross income is from interest, dividends, and gains from the sale or exchange of qualifying investment securities. Qualifying investment securities include:
 
Common and preferred corporate stock, as well as debt securities, convertible into common stock.
Bonds, debentures, and other debt instruments.
Foreign and domestic currency deposits or equivalents and securities convertible into foreign securities.
Mortgage or asset-backed securities secured by government agencies. 
Repurchase agreements and loan participations.
Foreign currency exchange contracts.
Forward and futures contracts on foreign currencies.
Stock and bond index securities and futures contracts and other similar securities.
Regulated futures contracts.
Options to purchase or sell any of the preceding qualified investment securities, except regulated futures contracts. Qualifying investment securities do not include an interest in a partnership unless such partnership qualifies as an investment partnership.

104. How is current year income subject to withholding determined before the end of the year?
The partnership must make a good faith eï¬ort to estimate the total amount of California source income for the current year. Where it is impractical or impossible to estimate, use the amount of California source income recognized as of the date of the distribution.
105. Are guaranteed payments to partners subject to withholding?
Yes. If the guaranteed payments represent income from California sources and are not subject to wage withholding through EDD, the payments are subject to withholding.
106. Are distributions of property subject to withholding?
Yes.
Investor protection FAQs | New York State Attorney General
Arbiters are more strictly bound by the rules of law and equity than are arbitrators, who have more latitude to use their discretion in judgments. During the proceeding, the arbitrator or panel will hold a hearing, listen to oral testimony, review the evidence, and render a decision.
How are cases settled?
Arbitration hearings can be held at almost any location convenient to the parties.
Arbitrators usually are required to make a decision in 30 business days.
Arbitrators are not required to provide reasons for their decisions. Therefore, an investor can lose a decision with little or no explanation as to why and be unable to appeal to the court system for relief.
The arbitration procedure is final and binding, with very limited review. Consult with legal counsel before arbitrating a dispute.

Regulatory and self-regulatory organizations
American Stock Exchange (AMEX)
Regulation Department
86 Trinity Place
New York NY 10006
212-306-1000
https://www.amex.com
The Regulation Department of the American Stock Exchange handles enforcement of Exchange rules and investigates customer complaints.
Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)        
3 Lafayette Center
1155 21st Street NW
Washington DC 20581
Information: 202-418-5000
Enforcement: 202-418-5320
Hearing/voice impaired: 202-418-5514
https://www.cftc.gov
CFTC is an independent agency that regulates commodity futures and option markets in the United States.  
Federal Trade Commission (FTC)  
1 Bowling Green, Suite 318
New York NY 10004-1415
Information: 1-877-382-4357 
https://www.ftc.gov
FTC seeks to ensure that the markets function competitively by eliminating unfair or deceptive business acts and practices.
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA)
9509 Key West Avenue
Rockville MD 20850
301-590-6500
https://www.finra.org
FINRA is responsible for regulating the securities industry and conducting arbitration matters. You can request CRD information from this agency.
Office of the Patient Advocate - State of California


Ruben Mejia is the research lead for OPA’s Health Care Quality Report Cards and has been implementing ways to make them more useful and easier to navigate by consumers.
Prior to working at OPA, Ruben conducted financial research for capitation rate setting at the Department of Health Care Services and cost efficiency studies for Offender Substance Abuse Treatment Programs at the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

Allison Barry, Staff Services Manager I

Allison Barry manages OPA’s public reporting initiative for the annual Complaint Data Report and coordinates OPA program activities for fiscal, budget, and contract administration. She has served OPA in various roles since 2010, including as a consumer education and health care policy analyst, legislative coordinator, website manager, and events outreach manager.​
Before joining OPA, Allison served two Lieutenant Governors as a communications and policy analyst and the Governor of California as an executive writer. She also has private sector experience working for corporate management of skilled nursing and assisted living facilities.
Allison earned a B.A. in Economics from the University of California, San Diego.​
​​​

Barbara Clopton, Staff Services Manager I

Barbara Clopton manages OPA’s website and is dedicated to improving consumer access to OPA products. She also assists in preparing public reporting projects.
Prior to joining OPA, Barbara worked as a television production assistant for the Sacramento Cable Commission and as a technical director for Cosumnes River College’s Distance Learning Program. She has experience in creating, maintaining and providing written and graphic content for multiple web and blog sites. She previously served as an appointed member on the City of Toronto’s Public Advisory Committee where she analyzed rezoning applications and made recommendations to the Planning Department for Canada’s largest city. At that time, she also worked as a Client Service Coordinator for an advertising agency where she executed the details of national print advertising campaigns.
Barbara earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Public Affairs from the University of Southern California.

​​
​​​​​​​​​​​​​

About OPA
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Staff
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 




	Strategic Plan 
 
 
 
 
 
 



	News and Media
 
 
 
 
 
 


 Research and Reports
 
 
 
 
 
 

Contact Us
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Health Care Quality
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Health Plan Report Card
 
 
 
 
 


Commercial Medical Group Report Card
 
 
 
 
 


Medicare Medical Group Report Card
 
 
 
 
 

Complaint Data Reports

Other Resources

How to File a Complaint

Know Your Rights
2024 Public Comments to Preliminary Applications
There will be no arguable case against USFS seasonal closures, travel management plan or the like. This is in no way beneficial to Rubicon and or it’s users. I personally feel this is nothing more than a power grab by the Tahoe National Forest to gain control over a section of Rubicon that will garner the ability to further limit access under the guise of working with the OHV community. We need look no further than a few miles down the road to see the result of such a situation. That being Barrett Lake Jeep trail that in recent years has seen millions of dollars spent in bridge building and re routes. While some may tout this situation as “Working with” the OHV community the results speak for themselves clearly. Barrett lake Jeep trail has fallen victim to excessive closures and control by the USFS. With the announcement just last week that the trail will be lucky to be open by early August, the resulting effect being a trail that is open for 90 days out of the year at best. I’m sorry to say that promises and handshakes from the “Trails/recreation Specialist, USFS” for this project carry no weight at all when we look back to prior promises from such folks. Property owners, trail users, community and OHV as whole have seen nothing but access losses due to such “Relationships and trust”. Rubicon is now and always just one bad decision or empty promise away from closure and this proposed grant and re route as currently written put us that much closer to losing it all. Having worked on Rubicon and been involved in some very in depth volunteer projects over the past 29 years, it is clear to me without question, the need for EVERY t to be crossed and I dotted when undertaking a project such as this. It is painfully apparent when looking at the points system for this grant application that such due diligence has been completely ignored and circumvented. Our trail is under a continual microscope, with any and all projects needing to be done with complete attention to detail given the level of Government oversight. Being an “OHV Enthusiast” in this situation in no way qualifies or guarantees any success or protections for the trail. Neither does it qualify one to complete the work.
Bill Text - AB-132 Postsecondary education trailer bill.
(t) To provide the State Board of Equalization with employment tax information that will assist in the administration of tax programs. The information shall be limited to the exchange of employment tax information essential for tax administration purposes to the extent permitted by federal law and regulations.(u) This section shall not be construed to authorize or permit the use of information obtained in the administration of this code by any private collection agency.(v) The disclosure of the name
	and address of an individual or business entity that was issued an assessment that included penalties under Section 1128 or 1128.1 shall not be in violation of Section 1094 if the assessment is final. The disclosure may also include any of the following:(1) The total amount of the assessment.(2) The amount of the penalty imposed under Section 1128 or 1128.1 that is included in the assessment.(3) The facts that resulted in the charging of the penalty under Section 1128 or 1128.1.(w) To enable the Contractors State License Board to verify the
	employment history of an individual applying for licensure pursuant to Section 7068 of the Business and Professions Code.(x) To provide any peace officer with the Division of Investigation in the Department of Consumer Affairs information pursuant to subdivision (i) when the requesting peace officer has been designated by the chief of the Division of Investigation and requests this information in the course of and as part of an investigation into the commission of a crime or other unlawful act when there is reasonable suspicion to believe that the crime or act may be connected to the information requested and would lead to relevant information regarding the crime or unlawful act.(y) To enable the Labor Commissioner of the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement in the Department of Industrial Relations to identify, pursuant to Section 90.3 of the Labor Code, unlawfully uninsured
	employers. The information shall be provided to the extent permitted by federal law and regulations.
2001 Budget Analysis Office of Criminal Justice Planning (8100)
this program would provide a stronger foundation for expansion to cover a wider array of criminal justice topics.
Second, DOJ currently houses and analyzes all of the state's crime data, and publishes the most comprehensive reports on crime in California through its
Criminal Justice Statistics Center (CJSC). Coordination between the CJSC and the proposed information clearinghouse would amplify the value of this
resource to the public and other governmental agencies. Finally, the proposal submitted by DOJ has a more realistic commitment of resources (DOJ proposes
adding 4.5 positions to establish its clearinghouse, while OCJP proposes only 1 position) and clearer goals and objectives than the OCJP proposal.
One Centralized Clearinghouse Would Avoid Fragmentation. The OCJP and DOJ have emphasized different kinds of criminal justice topics in describing
their proposed clearinghouses. The OCJP refers to public safety and victims services and DOJ to crime prevention and community policing. However, the kinds
of tasks that each department proposes to undertake are very similar, such as identifying best practices, gathering relevant research, and identifying funding
resources for local governments and community-based organizations. Given this similarity, it seems likely that establishment of two offices would result in
significant duplication of effort. Because of the relative advantages of the DOJ proposal, we recommend deleting the $106,000 proposed for the OCJP
clearinghouse.

Return to Criminal Justice Table of Contents,
2001-02 Budget Analysis