vania-janet/multiturn-rag-retrieval-data huggingface dataset:
Regulatory Agenda - NYSDEC
Please include “Subpart 352-4” in the subject line when emailing.6 NYCRR Subpart 352-5, Content standards for mercury-added lamps. ECL Article 27, Section 27-2107 was amended to add two new subdivisions, 11 and 12. The amended law prohibits producers of mercury-added lamps, after January 1, 2021, from selling, offering for sale, or distributing such lamps that fail to meet mercury content standards adopted by the department pursuant to rules and regulations. Further, the law states that such standards shall include what, if any, allowance should be granted for slight variations in the amount of mercury resulting from production variances, and that on or before December 31, 2026, mercury content standards established in accordance with this section shall not apply to special purpose lights. The rulemaking will add a new Subpart 352-5 and will adopt mercury content standards applicable to mercury-added lamps not already addressed in ECL 27-2107(11), establish definitions for the special purpose lights identified in ECL 27-2101(33), and adopt content standards for mercury in special purpose lights that will take effect in 2027. This rulemaking will require a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis for Small Businesses and Local Governments, and a Rural Area Flexibility Analysis. Contact: Katie Kidalowski, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, 625 Broadway, Albany, NY 12233-7253. Telephone: 518-402-8706. Email:[email protected]. Please include “Subpart 352-5” in the subject line when emailing.6 NYCRR Subpart 352-6, Prohibition against the use of PFAS in apparel. ECL Article 37 was amended to add a new Section 37-0121: Prohibition against the use of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances in apparel and outdoor apparel for severe wet conditions. As enacted, the Law prohibits, after January 1, 2025, the sale or offering for sale of any new, not previously used, apparel containing PFAS as intentionally added chemicals.
April 11, 2023 Bill Hearing | Senate Judiciary Committee
, 2021 Hearing June 15, 2021 Hearing June 8, 2021 Hearing May 4, 2021 Hearing April 27, 2021 Hearing April 20, 2021 Hearing April 13, 2021 Hearing April 6, 2021 Hearing March 23, 2021 Hearing March 16, 2021 Hearing March 9, 2021 Hearing 2020 Bill Hearings August 29, 2020 Hearing August 18, 2020 Hearing August 13, 2020 Hearing July 30, 2020 Hearing May 22, 2020 Hearing Committee StaffChief Counsel Margie Estrada Deputy Chief Counsel Christian Kurpiewski Counsel Ian Dougherty Amanda Mattson Allison Whitt Meredith Committee Assistant Erica Porter Margaret Buxton Committee Information Senate Judiciary Committee 1021 O Street, Room 3240 Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: (916) 651-4113 Fax: (916) 403-7394 WAS User Menu Breadcrumb Home Bill Hearings 2023 Bill Hearings April 11, 2023 Bill Hearing April 11, 2023 Bill Hearing This hearing will take place at 1:30 p.m. in Room 2100 of the 1021 O St. Building.April 11, 2023 Agenda [pdf]April 11, 2023 Consent Calendar [pdf]Bills are heard in file order.Letters for this hearing are due Tuesday, April 4th at 12 p.m.Watch the April 11, 2023 hearing here.April 11, 2023 hearing results [pdf]Agenda1.SB 855ArchuletaFair Employment and Housing Act: veterans. [pdf] This bill was pulled by the author.2.SB 700BradfordEmployment discrimination: cannabis use. [pdf]3.SB 69CorteseCalifornia Environmental Quality Act: judicial and administrative proceedings: limitations. [pdf]4.SB 642CorteseHazardous materials: enforcement: county counsel. [pdf]5.SB 244EggmanRight to Repair Act. [pdf]6.SB 363EggmanFacilities for inpatient and residential mental health and substance use disorder: database. [pdf]7.SB 33GlazerCommercial financing: disclosures. [pdf]8.SB 644GlazerHotel and private residence rental reservations: cancellation: refunds. [pdf]9.SB 683GlazerHotels and short-term rentals: advertised rates: mandatory fees.
The 2024-25 Budget: California State University
(CSU intends to issue additional bonds in summer 2024 to cover any remaining costs for these projects as well as the costs of the other three projects.) Whereas CSU typically issues bonds as projects are beginning the construction phase, it chose to instead issue bonds for these projects while many of them were still in earlier stages. CSU indicates it took this approach because some campuses had already begun to spend the cash they had initially received for these projects on planning and design costs, and they were awaiting bond proceeds to cover those costs after the state reverted the cash. As Figure 16 shows, many of these projects remain in planning and design phases as of January 1, 2024. Whereas the state typically has the ability to pause and remove funding for projects that remain in early stages, CSU indicates that doing so for these projects after the bonds have already been issued would have negative consequences for its bond program, possibly including harm to its perceived credit quality. 

Figure 16
Many Debt‑Financed Capital Projects at CSU Remain in Early Phases
(In Millions)

Project

Project Costa

Bond Issuedb

Current Phasec

Student Housing Projectsd

San Francisco 

$116.3

Yes

C

San Marcos 

91.0

Yes

C

San Jose

89.1

No

P

Fullerton 

88.9

Yes

P

Long Beach 

53.3

Yes

W

Dominguez Hills 

48.8

Yes

W

Sacramento

41.3

No

P

Northridge 

37.5

Yes

C

Fresno 

31.1

Yes

P

Humboldt 

27.1

Yes

C

Stanislaus

18.9

No

P

San Diego/Imperial Valley College

4.6

Yes

P

 Subtotal

($647.8)

Other Projects

Humboldt Housing, Health Care, and Dining Facility

$101.0

Yes

P

Humboldt Engineering and Technology Commons

100.0

Yes

W

Bakersfield Energy Innovation Center
Bill Text - SB-375 Transportation planning: travel demand models: sustainable communities strategy: environmental review.
(B) The analysis shall estimate the total cost of producing new rental housing that is comparable in size and rent levels, to replace the units that could change from low-income use, and an estimated cost of preserving the assisted housing developments. This cost analysis for replacement housing may be done aggregately for each five-year period and does not have to contain a project-by-project cost estimate.(C) The analysis shall identify public and private nonprofit corporations known to the local government which have legal and managerial capacity to acquire and manage these housing developments.(D) The analysis shall identify and consider the use of all federal, state, and local financing and
	 subsidy programs which can be used to preserve, for lower income households, the assisted housing developments, identified in this paragraph, including, but not limited to, federal Community Development Block Grant Program funds, tax increment funds received by a redevelopment agency of the community, and administrative fees received by a housing authority operating within the community. In considering the use of these financing and subsidy programs, the analysis shall identify the amounts of funds under each available program which have not been legally obligated for other purposes and which could be available for use in preserving assisted housing developments.(b) (1) A statement of the community’s goals, quantified objectives, and policies relative to the maintenance, preservation, improvement, and development of housing.(2) It is recognized that the
	 total housing needs identified pursuant to subdivision (a) may exceed available resources and the community’s ability to satisfy this need within the content of the general plan requirements outlined in Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300). Under these circumstances, the quantified objectives need not be identical to the total housing needs. The quantified objectives shall establish the maximum number of housing units by income category, including extremely low income, that can be constructed, rehabilitated, and conserved over a five-year time period.(c) A program which sets forth a schedule of actions during the planning period, each with a timeline for implementation, which may recognize that certain programs are ongoing, such that there will be beneficial impacts of the programs within the planning period, that the local government is undertaking or intends to undertake to implement the policies and achieve the goals and objectives of
Housing | City of Morgan Hill, CA - Official Website


Housing | City of Morgan Hill, CA - Official Website

 

Skip to Main Content

Create a Website Account - Manage notification subscriptions, save form progress and more.   

Website Sign In

CommunityDoing BusinessParks & RecreationCity GovernmentSitio en Español

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Search

 
 
 

Housing Search

Current BMR Homeowners

Housing Rehabilitation

Tenant & Landlord Resources

Rental Search

Ownership Opportunities

Unhoused Resources

Homeless Response & Encampments

Developer Resources

Resource Library

 

 
HomeCity GovernmentDepartmentsDevelopment ServicesHousing



Housing	

Housing Search

Developers

Unhoused Resources

 
 
 

Your Housing ConnectionThe City of Morgan Hill is committed to ensuring that its current and future residents have access to diverse housing options. The Housing Division's mission is to improve, preserve, and create safe, quality housing for residents at all income levels and provide rental and ownership opportunities. View an informational map locating upcoming housing developments along with housing project updates.The Housing staff values your comments and input. If you have comments, please use the submit a Housing Comment Form. Engage with Us! Communications & Engagement is very important to the City of Morgan Hill.

 
 
 

 

Contact Us


	Rebecca Garcia
	
	
Housing Director
Email Rebecca Garcia 
Phone: 408-310-4637


	Brian Malicdem
	
	
Unhoused Specialist
Email Brian Malicdem 
Phone: 669-286-0585

Physical Address

17575 Peak Avenue
Morgan Hill, CA 95037

Phone: 408-778-6480

HoursMonday - Friday8 a.m. - 5 p.m.

  
 
 

 

Agendas & Minutes

Recreation

 
 

Water Billing

Construction 

 
 

Housing

City Events

 
 
 

 

 

  
 

  
 

Contact Us

17575 Peak AvenueMorgan Hill, CA 95037Phone: 408-779-7271
 

  
 

  
 

Quick Links

El Sitio Web en Español

City Council

Departments

Notify Me

Sign Up for Email Updates

/QuickLinks.aspx

 
 

  
 

Site Links

Phone Directory

Site Map

Accessibility

Copyright Notices

/QuickLinks.aspx

 
 
 

 

Government Websites by CivicPlus®

 
 
 

Loading


	Loading
	

Do Not Show Again
Close

Arrow Left

Arrow Right

[]

Slideshow Left Arrow

Slideshow Right Arrow
Mobile Equipment | CAL FIRE
The bulldozer fleet has also undergone change. Enclosed, air conditioned cabs on bulldozers protect the operators from heat, dust and noise and provide a better environment from which to do their fire fighting work. CAL FIRE's dozer/transport fleet has seen minor upgrades from Caterpillar D6C dozers built in the 1960s to later model Caterpillar D6XL and D6M series high-track dozers with enclosed cabs. These upgrades have been accomplished through the timely purchase of low hour, used equipment and a number of new, higher horsepower, air conditioned transports.
Entering the new millennium, two-stage, 500 GPM, PTO operated fire pumps with 180 GPM diesel powered auxiliary pumps are being designed for fire apparatus and are currently built according to NFPA guidelines. The current fleet consists of over 2,800 vehicles which includes 383 front line fire engines in 12 different models, 237 crew buses and 58 bulldozers.


 Federal Excess Property
 

The Federal Excess Personal Property Program was enacted by Congress under the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 and the Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978. The Act directs the Secretary of Agriculture to encourage the use of FEPP to assist in reducing state fire budgets by loaning federal-owned property to state foresters and their cooperators. To qualify for this program, a fire department must meet a number of requirements, one being a responsibility for providing fire protection on wildlands within the department's jurisdiction. The U.S. Forest Service monitors the use of loaned property to ensure that all FEPP acquired is used 90 percent for fire protection support and only 10 percent for other support.
The FEPP Program enables the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) to acquire, "on loan" from the federal government, property that assists the Department in fulfilling its emergency response mission. That property includes such items as trucks, fire tools, hoses, vehicle parts, nozzles, generators, air compressors, fire protection clothing, aircraft, and aircraft parts.
CAL FIRE acquires approximately one-third of all FEPP nationwide with acquisitions exceeding over $200 million since 1978. FEPP is used to support Department units and programs statewide.
2001 Budget Analysis: Housing and Community Development (2240)
2001 Budget Analysis: Housing and Community Development (2240)

Legislative Analyst's Office
Analysis of the 2001-02 Budget Bill

Housing and Community Development (2240) 
The mission of the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) is to help promote and expand housing
opportunities for all Californians. As part of this mission, the department is responsible for implementing and enforcing building
standards. The department also administers a variety of housing finance, economic development, and rehabilitation programs. In
addition, the department provides policy advice and statewide guidance on housing issues.
The budget proposes expenditures of $531 million for 2001-02. This is a 6 percent increase from estimated current-year
expenditures. The proposed General Fund expenditures of $317 million account for 60 percent of the department's proposed
funding. Included within this total is $220 million for one-time spending on new proposals for expanding incentive payments to local
governments and a new Central Valley infrastructure program. Federal funds account for $107 million of the proposed budget-year
expenditures, primarily for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and Home Investment Partnership Act programs. A
number of state special funds provide the remainder of HCD's funding. The department has a proposed staffing level of 497
personnel-years.
The department also received a large one-time appropriation for nearly $500 million in the current year for a variety of programs.
The budget proposes to expend these funds over 2000-01 and 2001-02. Below, we review the implementation of the
current-year's housing funding package and analyze the Governor's new proposals.
Implementation of the 2000-01 Housing Package 
The 2000-01 Budget Act included a substantial increase in the department's General Fund support, largely on a one-time basis. In
addition to augmenting funding for existing programs, the budget and accompanying legislation also created a number of new
department programs. Figure 1 summarizes the allocation of the more than $500 million housing package, as well as the proposed
spending in these programs in 2001-02. We discuss the status of the various programs below.
History of the California State Library - California State Library
Our exhibits feature historic and contemporary works from our vast collections.
Tours
The State Library offers self-guided and virtual tours of our historic building.
Policies
Learn more about the State Library’s policies.

Ask a Librarian
 

Search area: 
 Website
 Catalog
 Braille and Talking Books

Search this site: 

 
 

WebOPAC Search: 

Home | About the Library | History of the California State Library

History of the California State Library 
Nearly a year before California was admitted as the 31st state, its citizens were working hard to build a government that could meet the needs of the rapidly growing population. One of the first actions taken by the State Senate was to appoint a “Committee on State Library” to investigate the best way to organize and preserve the collection of books, maps and documents that were being used as reference materials by the new lawmakers.
“The Committee on State Library beg leave to report, that through the liberality of some distinguished citizens, the State is in possession of a number of volumes of very valuable work. The Committee have been informed that it is the intention of other citizens to make donations also, and there is a probability that in a short time the State will be in possession of a large number of works.”State Senator Alexander W. Hope, December 28, 1850
By the end of the following month, Governor Peter Burnett had signed a bill establishing the State Librarian and assigning the duty to maintain the Library to the Secretary of State. The Secretary of State continued to serve as the State Librarian in an ex-officio capacity until 1861. In 1855, under the administration of James W. Denver, the legislature approved the expenditure of $17,250 to purchase the San Francisco Law Library. In 1860, the collection grew again as the Library received authorization to purchase newspaper files.
William Van Voorhies1850–1853James W. Denver1853–1855Charles H. Hempstead1855–1856David F. Douglass1856–1858Ferris Forman1858–1860Johnson Price1860–1861
On March 8, 1861, legislation was enacted that removed responsibility for the State Library from the Secretary of State and assigned it to the newly created five-member State Library Board of Trustees.
The 2023-24 California Spending Plan: Judiciary and Criminal Justice
The budget provides $1.3 billion for the Department of Justice (DOJ) in 2023-24—an increase of $32 million (3 percent) from the revised 2022-23 level. This amount includes $490 million from the General Fund—a net increase of $8 million (2 percent). (The net increase does not reflect changes in employee compensation costs in 2023-24 because such costs are accounted for elsewhere in the budget.)
Bureau of Forensic Services (BFS). The budget includes $54.9 million General Fund in 2023-24 (decreasing to $47.6 million in 2024-25 and 2025-26) to maintain BFS service levels. This amount consists of (1) $46.1 million annually for three years to backfill a decline in criminal fine and fee revenue deposited into the DNA Identification Fund used to support BFS, (2) $7.3 million one time for equipment purchase and replacement, and (3) $1.5 million annually for three years to maintain Missing Persons DNA Program service levels (rather than increasing the existing death certificate fee used to support such workload). The budget authorizes the Director of the Department of Finance, 30 days after notifying the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, to augment the $46.1 million backfill if additional monies are needed to maintain BFS operations.
In addition, the budget includes a $10 million increase in DNA Identification Fund expenditure authority annually for three years to restore historical expenditure levels from the fund. (This was reduced in prior years when the budget partially addressed the fund’s insolvency by temporarily redirecting General Fund support from another DOJ program to support BFS instead.)
Legal Resources. The budget includes a net $28.8 million augmentation in 2023-24 (decreasing to $20.6 million annually beginning in 2027-28) from the General Fund and various special funds for additional legal resources. Of this amount, $11 million General Fund in 2023-24 (declining to $10.4 million annually beginning in 2027-28) is to implement recently enacted legislation.
FAQs • Development Services - Magee Ranch Development Page
The hydrologic analysis that was prepared for the project and described in detail within Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) concluded that the project would mitigate potential hydrologic impacts related to increases in peak flow rates by installing a detention basin that would maintain post-project peak flows at pre-project levels. As a result, the project would not result in an increase in peak flows in the creek. 

13.
Would the development impair the ability for police and fire to respond?

The Draft EIR includes an analysis of the proposed development’s potential impact on public services, including police and fire. The analysis included interviews with both appropriate police and fire personnel. The analysis concludes that, while the development would incrementally increase demands on services, the development would not adversely impact response times, and would be considered less than significant. 

14.
Has this project been proposed before?

Yes.  In 2010, SummerHill Homes submitted a development application for 85 homes.  Through the environmental review process, the proposal was reduced to 78 homes in 2011 and subsequently to 70 homes by late 2012.  In response to comments that surfaced through the Draft EIR prepared for the original project, the unit count was reduced further to 69 homes.   After holding four public hearings to consider the development proposal, the Town of Danville approved the 69-unit project in July 2013.   

15.
Was there a lawsuit filed against the original project?

Yes.  A lawsuit was filed in July 2013 to challenge the project approvals, alleging that the Final EIR inadequately addressed project impacts and that the project was inconsistent with the Town’s General Plan. The Trial Court rejected the majority of these claims and the Court of Appeal rejected all allegations except the claim that the EIR did not adequately address potential impacts to bicycle safety.  Specifically, additional environmental analysis on bicycle safety is required before the Town considers approval of the proposed project.Factual documents related to lawsuit  o          2013 Contra Costa County Trial Court Decisiono          2015 California Court of Appeal Decision 

16.
What was the outcome of the lawsuit on the SummerHill development proposal?

The Superior Court rejected most of these claims and the Court of Appeal rejected all allegations except the claim that the EIR did not adequately address impacts to bicycle safety.
Town Council | Danville, CA
In addition, the Town Council appoints commissions, committee and board members, who advise the Council in different program areas such as planning, arts, parks and leisure services, and design review. Council members also represent Danville in multiple capacities through participation in local, regional and state organizations.

 
 
 

 

Contact Us


	Cat Bravo
	
	
Management Analyst
Email Cat Bravo 
Phone: 925-314-3377
More Information

Town Council

Physical Address

500 La Gonda Way
Danville, CA 94526

Directory

 
 
 

Town Council AssignmentsMembers of the Town Council serve on various regional agencies and committees, including County Connection, RecycleSmart, MCE Clean Energy and the Contra Costa Transportation Commission.  View the current list of Town Council Assignments (PDF).

 
 
 

Appointment Of Council Members To Compensated Positions The FPPC requires each agency to post a single Form 806 reporting additional compensation that officials receive when appointing themselves to positions on other boards, commissions or committees of a public agency, special district, and joint power agency / authorities. Each agency must post a single Form 806 listing all paid appointed positions including the date appointed, length of term and stipend amounts. View the current Form 806 (PDF).

 
 
 

Related Documents

Comprehensive Annual Financial Report

Operating Budget

View All

/QuickLinks.aspx

 
 
 

Quick Links

Executive Team Organization Chart (PDF)

2024 Official Town Holidays & Closures (PDF)

Town of Danville Organizational Chart (PDF)

View All

/QuickLinks.aspx

 
 
 

 

Understanding the Town Council Agenda

Legislative Advocacy

State Legislative Resources

State Housing Legislation 

2021 Legislation Watch

Appointing Representatives

Proclamations

 

 

Agendas & Minutes

Sign Up for Notifications

 
 

Report a Concern

Jobs & Volunteer

 
 

Programs and Classes

Rent a Facility

 
 
 

 

 

 
 

 
 

Contact Us

Danville Town Office

500 La Gonda Way

Danville, CA 94526
 

Agency Directory

© 2022 Town of Danville, California
 

 
 

Follow Us

 

 
 

 
 

Helpful Links

Agendas & Minutes

Community Facilities / Rentals

Danville Connect

Municipal Code

Town Council

Stay Connected