vania-janet/multiturn-rag-retrieval-data huggingface dataset:
It is also possible that the settlement company didn't tell the local government where to send the new tax bill. This would worry me because what else was missed regarding filing the proper documents with the lenders and the local government. It could also be a problem with the local government. Contact the settlement company or your attorney to get the issue resolved. If you owe the money you want to know; if the new owner owes the money they don't want to face a tax lien because the settlement company made a mistake. Generally this is split between the parties based on the number of days each will own the home. At settlement the money should move from one party to the other based on what has been deposited into escrow and when the actual bills are due. For example the payment for the first half of the year due July 1st may be sent in June. If the settlement was in June The new owner would give money to the old owner. But if settlement was in early July Money would move the other way.
The simple truth is, that the one that had to the most to gain is the one responsible and all else is misdirection.   So who gained the most and who actually had the ability and motivation to pull it off?  Lets see . .Zukerberg runs face books . . . he is a jew  Donald Trump's bankrupt son in law, kushner, is now in the White house call he shots in the middle east deal and his family making money from the influence . .they are jews  Israel is happy with their new F-35s, a promise to relocate the US embassy to Jerusalem, a hard line against Iran, that Nathanyahu keeps grinning like a jack ass . .they are jews  The Jews long lost calf worshiping Indian cousins are now the darling of America.  So getting this imbecile Donald trump in the White house has benefited the Jews the most and he has been bankrupt a number of times so he is surely their bitch on a long term basis.  They have control of the media as well as the Fed and the Treasury.  So the had the means, the motivation, benefited from it and put the blame of putting the biggest monkey that America could find in the White house on Russia, which never had the means to rig the election.  In reality, Facebook is a fucking blog page that has been over marketed to the extent that web pages are worth billions . .its a fucking dot.com scam
I don't think the skeptical position is fairly represented most of the time.  Few people doubt that CO2 is a greenhouse gas, and that man contributes to it's increase. What appears to be increasingly doubtful is the positive feedback postulated by the climate models. The simple explanation is probably the correct one. The models are significantly overestimating future temperature increases.
Ok, but I wasn't trying to validate the Bible, merely pointing out OP's mischaracterization of Christian values in regards to what constitutes charity.   It's almost as if you have a bone to pick with religion in general. Talk about dogmatic responses!
If they are a debt collector, they must follow the requirements of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. In particular, they must provide you with verification of the debt at your written request. If they won't give you a way to do this, they are in violation of the law, and you should contact proper authorities. If they are not a debt collection agency, it does sound like a scam, in which case you should also contact the appropriate law enforcement agency.
Sorry, but whether or not you drive in New York, the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles requires you to get a license in New York and surrender your California license. According to their website: If you become a   resident   of NYS, you must get a NYS driver   license within 30 days and surrender   your out-of-state driver license.   Normally, you cannot have a NYS driver   license and a driver license from   another state, but there are   exceptions. It is a violation of   Federal law to hold more than one   commercial driver license (CDL).
Cash should never have been placed in the mailbox in the first place; this is what checks are for. I would be a bit surprised if that constitutes your accepting payment, but I Am Not A Lawyer. You need local legal advice; this is the sort of thing where local rulings matter. Definitely report the missing money to the police, no matter what else you do. You do not have to give them an opinion on whether this was a theft or an attempted fraud; just give them the facts that the tenant says they left money in the box but you didn't find it there.
PPC, better known as pay-per-click, is a web model wherein the advertisers pay a certain fees to the firm, every time their ad is clicked. PPC services, Noida, constitutes a major part of digital marketing services. If you are looking forward to book PPC services Noida, you must look for the above-mentioned advantages in order to hire the best firm like http://www.redwebraising.com/payper-click.php.
"mhoran_psprep has answered the question well about ""shorting"" e.g. making a profit if the stock price goes down. However a CEO can take out insurance (called hedging) against the stock price going down in relation to stocks they already own in some cases.    But is must be disclosed in public filings etc. This may be done for example if most of the CEO’s money is in the stock of the company and they can’t sell for tax reasons.    Normally it would only be done for part of the CEO’s holding."
About two years ago I went to BB giving them the benefit of the doubt.  They refused to price match another local retailer on the grounds they weren't local and BB gets to decide what constitutes local.  It will take a miracle to get me back in their store.  Incidentally the other retailer has big prominent signs outside, inside and on its ads saying it will price match including online retailers.
Here is a list of threads in other subreddits about the same content: * [U.S. Homeland Security found SEC had 'critical' cyber weaknesses in January](https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/71k03n/us_homeland_security_found_sec_had_critical_cyber/) on /r/politics with 65 karma (created at 2017-09-21 19:46:08 by /u/pipsdontsqueak) * [U.S. Homeland Security found SEC had 'critical' cyber weaknesses in January](https://www.reddit.com/r/Economics/comments/71k06c/us_homeland_security_found_sec_had_critical_cyber/) on /r/Economics with 8 karma (created at 2017-09-21 19:46:25 by /u/pipsdontsqueak) * [U.S. Homeland Security found SEC had 'critical' cyber weaknesses in January](https://www.reddit.com/r/news/comments/71k01m/us_homeland_security_found_sec_had_critical_cyber/) on /r/news with 11 karma (
&gt; &gt; &gt; By choosing to occupy the territory ruled by your state, despite being fully informed about the implications of doing so, and having been made informed well before you had an obligation to start paying. &gt; &gt; That's not an agreement. &gt; Let's say I walk into a shop, say ""I'll have a medium coke please,"" they hand me one, I walk out of the building. Am I stealing? Well, I didn't specifically agree to pay for it, did I? But that argument wouldn't hold much weight in an actual legal dispute, because obviously I understand that when you ask for an item in a shop you're implicitly agreeing to pay for it at some point. &gt; &gt; But what about some less ""obvious"" cases? If a shopowner put a small sign near the entryway that said ""entry fee ten dollars, entering the store constitutes agreement to pay,"" you could reasonably argue this is invalid because you walked into the store without noticing the sign and the practice is quite unusual. But if instead of a shop it were a theater performance you walked into, maybe that argument wouldn't hold up, because you should be expected to understand there's an entry fee at a theater. And maybe if you were from a country that doesn't have theaters and you were thus genuinely unaware of this particular social custom they would make an exception and you'd get away with it. This is the kind of problem a judicial system exists for, to take social context into account. &gt; &gt; The point is, whether something constitutes agreement or not, and thus what are the legal repercussions to your actions, is a matter of opinion, and in this case I don't see any particular reason to think that your opinion about the government ought to overrule that of the rest of society. Your actions are interpreted as indicating consent for the system you're acting in, and this being so if you took the government to court on the charge that it's stealing from you you would obviously lose. So how is it an argument to just say ""but that's not an agreement in my opinion""?
Only in terms of inflation Because of inflation, €300 would be worth less in December 2011 than it was in January 2010.  Thus, it's to your benefit to pay in monthly installments rather than up-front. Now to calculate the difference in monthly payments of 300 euro using the above webpage what should I do? You'd need to calculate 23 different values: But this is a pointless exercise, since you'd have signed a 24 month lease at a fixed price.  Hence, my original comment.
&gt; I insist that their real wealth situation is better than ours because of the consistent positive infusion of foreign wealth from superior physical exports  Yes, let's talk real wealth. In real terms, being a net exporter means you work and use real resources to make real goods which you then ship away to improve someone else's standard of living. In return, you get a *smaller* pile of real goods that contribute to your standard of living plus a pile of foreign currency to make up the difference. ...hooray? You're coming out ahead in financial terms but in real terms of trade you're losing.  &gt;That's the argument you've been supporting this entire time!!! Nice pivot, man &gt;: [  Not a pivot at all. Emphasizing the bottom line, which is *real* constraints as opposed to financial. Saying we can't run out of dollars isn't the same thing as saying we can't run *into* other limits. I want to make clear what those limits are.  The fact you called it a pivot confirms the need for me to spell it out.
"This is an unrelated subreddit, so I want to avoid starting unwanted discussion out of common courtesy. I am merely trying to reach out. But a joke among firearms enthusiasts goes thusly:  &gt; *Guy: ""Look, not only are you losing the arguments on home defense and hunting, but even if you weren't, the Second Amendment isn't about those things, it's about the ability to rebel against tyranny.""*  &gt; *Narrator: ""That's paranoid and insane. A government will never become tyrannical!""*  &gt; *Guy: ""What do you think of Donald Trump.""*  &gt; *Narrator: ""He's literally Hitler. He wants to put Muslims and Women in FEMA camps.""*  Also just a friendly tip, publicly advocating for violent overthrow is a prohibiting offense. You can never purchase a firearm from the closest thing we have to ""militia"" stock. Please consider what you have just posted to social media. *(Also consider these have been continually expanded to include ""feel good"" restrictions. [Such as calling someone the wrong gender pronoun. (1)](http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2017/06/05/hate-crime-guns-california/) [(2)](http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/09/new-california-law-allows-jail-time-for-using-wrong-gender-pronoun-sponsor-denies-that-would-happen.html))*  &gt; *K. will not be in violation, by reason of my receipt or possession of a rifle, of any state law or published ordinance applicable where I reside;*  &gt; *L. have not been convicted of any federal or state felony or violation 18 U.S.C. §922, and am not a member of any organization that advocates the violent overthrow of the United states government.*  Sorry for the threadjack. I just wanted to point out certain groups have thrown away the ability to ""#Resist"", in the morbid hypothetical you point out."
&gt; so just imagine what that implies in terms of quality of life.  Money wise sure. You are still missing out on all the things a city has to offer. That's a totally reasonable trade for many people, especially with all that extra disposable income. There is also a reason so many people want to live in a major metro area.
Ultrasound machines have enhanced extremely in terms of ultrasound imaging resolution, digital capabilities and ease of use. We can now clearly visualize small structures that we were unable to visualize ten years ago. The reason behind is that computers and ultrasound machines have followed a similar trend in terms of decreasing in size at the same time as increasing in power.
CD's are not compressed. Later specifications added surround sound encoding, higher sampling rates and bit depths. Compression, especially lossy compression, is a different animal and some later formats may use some form of compression but the CD version of PCM encoding is not considered compression.  The spec was designed to exceed the range of normal human hearing and if properly implemented it's suitable for that purpose. There are a lot variations in terms of recording, mastering and playback in terms of the quality of the gear involved and the techniques used which is probably what the sentence you quoted meant (I.e.  CD Recorded on a cheap setup using default settings and playing it back on a budget consumer player might not sound as good as a vinyl record mastered by a pro and played back on a high quality pickup connected to an audiophile grade amplifier and speakers; and vice versa)
Just a quick reminder to everyone.   Infant mortality rates are actually measured differently from country to country, and by measured I mean they have different metrics as to what constitutes as infant mortality.   America has the highest degree of scrutiny, wherein once the baby is out of the womb it is now eligible to be counted if it passes (dies). In almost every other country (perhaps all), the metrics are given a leeway such as hours, days, or weeks after.  Comparing country to country is disingenuous unless you look at how they are actually measured. Essentially, the data would be similar to looking at amount of deaths per county but not taking the per capita, so the more populous county looks more dangerous.
If you leave your employer at age 55 or older, you can withdraw with no penalty. Mandatory 20% withholding, but no penalty. You reconcile in April, and may get it all back. If you are sub 55, the option is a Sec 72t withdrawal. The author of the article got it right. I am a fan of his.
This answers what actually happened in the transaction; as far as my cost basis in the new JCI, it's a little more obscure; on page II-7 it says: For pro forma purposes, the valuation of consideration transferred is based on, amongst other things, the adjusted share price of Johnson Controls on September 2, 2016 of $47.67 per share and on page II-8: Johnson Controls adjusted share price as of September 2, 2016 (2): $47.67 (2) Amount equals Johnson Control closing share price and market capitalization at September 2, 2016 ($45.45 and $29,012 million, respectively) adjusted for the Tyco $3,864 million cash contribution used to purchase 110.8 million shares of Johnson Controls stock for $34.88 per share. and both agree with the information posted at http://www.secinfo.com/dpdtb.w6n.2n.htm#1stPage (R66 Merger Transaction Fair Value of Consideration Transferred (Details)) which I can't seem to find on an ""official"" website but it purports to post from the SEC EDGAR database. So for each share of JCI, it had a fair value of $47.67 prior to the acquisition, and transformed into $5.7293 in cash, plus 0.8357 of ""new"" JCI shares with a basis of $47.67 - $5.7293 = $41.9407. Stated in terms of ""new"" JCI shares, this is $50.1863 (=$41.9407/0.8357) per ""new"" JCI share. (I'm not really 100% sure of this calculation though.) I also found JCI's Form 8937 which states Fair market value generally is the price at which property would change hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller, neither being under any compulsion to buy or sell and both having reasonable knowledge of the facts. U.S. federal income tax law does not specifically prescribe how former JCI shareholders should determine the fair market value of the Tyco ordinary shares received in the merger.
One possibility would be to invest in a crude oil ETF (or maybe technically they're an ETP), which should be easily accessible through any stock trading platform.  In theory, the value of these investments is directly tied to the oil price.  There's a list of such ETFs and some comments here.  But see also here about some of the problems with such things in practice, and some other products aiming to avoid those issues.  Personally I find the idea of putting all my savings into such a vehicle absolutely horrifying; I wouldn't contemplate having more than a small percentage of a much more well diversified portfolio invested in something like that myself, and IMHO it's a completely unsuitable investment for a novice investor.  I strongly suggest you read up on topics like portfolio construction and asset allocation (nice introductory article here and here, although maybe UK oriented; US SEC has some dry info here) before proceeding further and putting your savings at risk.
"Socialism at work ...  &gt;*CARACAS, VENEZUELA –  Venezuela's food shortage is so bad the country is mandating that people scan their fingerprints at grocery stores in order to keep people from buying too much of a single item.*  &gt;*President Nicolas Maduro says a mandatory fingerprinting system is being implemented at grocery stores to combat food shortages. He calls it an ""anti-fraud system"" like the fingerprint scan the country uses for voting.*  &gt;*In announcing the plan late Wednesday, Maduro did not say when the system would take effect, but other administration officials suggested it could be in place by December or January.*  &gt;*The move was met with skepticism. Critics said the new system is tantamount to rationing and constitutes a breach of privacy. Others simply wondered if anything short of a systemic overhaul of the economy could help the socialist South American country's chronically bare shelves.*  &gt;*Venezuela has been grappling with shortages of basic goods like cooking oil and flour for more than a year. In the spring, the administration tried out a similar system in government-run supermarkets on a voluntary basis.*  &gt;*Rigid currency controls and a shortage of U.S. dollars have made it increasingly difficult for Venezuelans to find imported products. Price controls don't help either, with producers complaining that some goods are priced too low to make a profit and justify production.*  Cross-post from /r/MAConservative"
IMO ebooks really only seem to work in the simplest of cases.  I have made several attempts to read several non-fiction e-books and in each case have failed miserably. I think the problem is design related more than anything. An ebook try to copy the form of a book w/o adequately copying the form of the book. So either (1) design ebooks in terms of what they will be read with or (2) design eReaders to be more like books.  For example, foot notes that appear on the bottom of the page are always a mess on any eReader. Solution (1) means making a footnote be more like a pop-up. Method (2) means making a format the can accurately (and logically) display footnotes.
&gt; In fact, a part of me is ready to accept America becoming what France and the UK are now, still having relatively good standards of living but nowhere near the height of their historical powers.  Problem will be maintaining that lifestyle without that power level.   The rest of the western world has a high standard of living in stable, safe conditions in at least some significant part because they live under the US security umbrella, and we win the ability to dictate terms in a lot of situations by virtue of being able to back up our policies militarily.       We don't have anyone else to benefit from the strength of the way France &amp; the UK benefited from us; it's not hugely likely there'll be the sort of bipolar or monopolar world after the US decline, but the lack of a single heavyweight might bode poorly for international security.
Content is considered as the king of the digital marketing strategies, as content can attract a lot of people with the help of best local seo in Dubai and can make them stay on the website for a long time. Just like communication can help you in terms of digital marketing agency uae, content helps you grasp many people in the digital marketing world. To be a king of this world, you need to be updated on the current trends and SEO daddy loves the updates on digital marketing.
"According to [AppData](http://www.appdata.com/) a quarter of a billion people play Zynga games per month. Not exactly sure how that constitutes ""waning.""   The reason these games are popular is that they are basic and easy to understand and progress. The reason your walls are polluted with Farmville posts is the very reason social gaming is real-- people who play are addicted as smokers. You'll see more and more in game advertising happen for a few reasons: It's easy to track, the audience is captive (can't DVR and fast forward through ads), and it's easy to microtarget your intended audience.  Plus once real money online gaming comes (and it's only a matter of time) ZNGA will be the go to company. Don't get caught in the negative hype."
Hasbro is also in this mindset with a lot of their properties.  Look at how they handle the MyLittlePony thing going on. Every single episode of that cartoon is on YouTube in full 1080p, but Hasbro doesn't really care. They don't make money off the episodes, they make money off the merchandise so they let the episodes stay online.   Same thing with custom pony models and plushies, these things [sell on eBay for over $2000 using Hasbro's IPs](http://www.ebay.com/itm/Fluttershy-Galloping-Gala-Custom-Plush-My-Little-Pony-Friendship-is-Magic-/120792470190?nma=true&amp;si=lA3t7kbBPFukGe0nnpU9m4g7c7Y%3D&amp;orig_cvip=true&amp;rt=nc&amp;_trksid=p2047675.l2557). Yet even though all these things are a clear violation of their copyright, Hasbro just stands back and lets it run. That's one of the reasons the brony thing spread so fast as it did.
"Sure my dude. I'm not disagreeing with them being irrelevant outliers in terms of this data, I'm just disagreeing with you saying ""lottery"" like they didn't have to put any effort in. Becoming a pro athlete is a shit ton of work"
I would always presume that given a choice of doing what is in its own self interest verses in the customer's interest, a bank will ALWAYS do the former rather than the latter. Banks are in the business of making money, always presume that their policies, processes and contractual terms will be slanted to maximize their ability to make money.  It's not being evil or anything, it's just business, they are under no obligation to be altruistic or do what's best for you at the expense of their profits. So, especially since it's not exactly a hardship, I would always make extra principal payments using a separate check and clearly mark it as an extra principal payment.