vania-janet/multiturn-rag-retrieval-data huggingface dataset:
Don’t waste time trying to create a video on your own. Why do it when you have expert animation video makers by your side? They are skilled in the art and science of creation, copy, edit, and finalization of the video to give you a refined version of your content.
No, it doesn’t.  If I sell my eggs for a dollar each, I made that choice.  Capitalism gives us a mechanism by which to judge whether our deal will be financially lucrative or not.  Capitalism doesn’t set off the new craze for fitbits.  Capitalism shows the trend to allow you to take advantage of the craze.  And if you are saying I shouldn’t speak economics to you, then you are committing the logical fallacy of appeal to authority:  that just because you are an authority in the field, you must be right.  Authority ty is a good fall-back when you have no other methods to verify your decisions by, but authority alone doesn’t hold the reigns of truth.
And at&amp;t's deal with them looks more lucrative now, yet both stocks haven't seen the boost others have been having from positive financials above prediction.  One hypothesis is that people still just don't trust old school tv anymore since everything is moving to the web. What do you guys think?
The worst part of government induced tuition inflation wasn't even the GI Bill. Although I'm sure that started it a bit. It really took off in the late 1970s / 1980 with the establishment of the Department of Education and the Sallie Mae loan clearing house. There's a massive inflection point in historical inflation adjusted tuition prices right around 1980, when those were established. No coincidence.      Also, you know whats worse than the **government** getting in the housing-price-inflation business? The freaking **central bank** getting in on the housing-price-inflation business.      https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/quarterly-balance-sheet-developments-report.htm      https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/files/quarterly_balance_sheet_developments_report_201708.pdf      The federal reserve holds $4.4 T in total assets. That is the sole source of the entire money supply of the United States Dollar. It does not come from anywhere else. Of course, you get money velocity and money multipliers after that, but this is the origin. Of that $4.4 T, they hold $2.4 T in US Treasury securities. Ok, that's fine. That's the whole point of the federal reserve. They control the money supply through buying / selling (letting mature / redeem) US government securities. But wait, hold up, what the heck happened to the other $2.0 T in assets ... um, where did those go? There are some other assets, but the next largest ... the federal reserve owns $1.7 T in mortgage backed securities.      Holy ... effing ... sheeeeeeeet. What in the actual f*** is the central bank doing buying mortgage backed securities? That absolutely, positively, is **NOT** monetary policy. That shit is fiscal policy, which the federal reserved is **NOT** supposed to be engaging in.      And now you know why housing prices are even more effed up than tuition prices.
This!  I went in to try on different sized Apple Watches (don’t hate) and the guy pushed the 3mm because it’s the women’s one.   I mean, I don’t mean to say you must have a tiny dick, but if the size of the watch is determined by gender for you, mr salesman, and not by my preference, then I don’t know where else you got that dumb an expression. Not to mention, I already told him I wanted to try both to see how they *feel.*
"This is the best tl;dr I could make, [original](https://techcrunch.com/2017/07/19/techs-5-biggest-players-now-worth-3-trillion/) reduced by 86%. (I'm a bot) ***** &gt; After a long rally marked recently by sharp share price gains among the largest tech companies, the $3 trillion mark could stand up over time as a good thumb-sized measurement to vet future rallies against.  &gt; In the era of platform players racing to control the digital lives of both consumers and enterprises, it&amp;#039;s perhaps not surprising that the biggest companies are worth so very much; if the tech industry changes, becoming more fractured, that could shift.  &gt; In sum: It&amp;#039;s a big day for tech&amp;#039;s biggest players, even if it isn&amp;#039;t the most intriguing of them all or the simplest to explain.   ***** [**Extended Summary**](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/6os46d/techs_5_biggest_players_now_worth_3_trillion/) | [FAQ](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/31b9fm/faq_autotldr_bot/ ""Version 1.65, ~172685 tl;drs so far."") | [Feedback](http://np.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%23autotldr ""PM's and comments are monitored, constructive feedback is welcome."") | *Top* *keywords*: **tech**^#1 **company**^#2 **rally**^#3 **Big**^#4 **market**^#5"
"&gt; Medicare Part-D is not Trump fault, for, at least, the last 8 years. I never said it was. &gt; Trump wants the national health care system to work, cheaper and better. I never said he didn't. &gt; But, still, you have to be against Trump despite him yet to do anything about this... I never said I was against him because of his inaction on Medicare Part-D. &gt; ...and not able to do anything because of Democrats and some betraying Republicans. I never said his inability to pass a bill was an issue. &gt; Global Warming, is the exact same thing. Not Trump fault. I never said it was. &gt; The Paris Accords are not fair to the USA... I never said they were. &gt; Trump is not against anything that reduce pollution and emissions. I never said he was. &gt; So on one hand you say technology will not stop ""global warming""... That is not what I said. &gt; ...on the other hand you want to use technology to stop ""global warming"". I never said I did. &gt; If global warming is man-made, then technology caused it and technology will solve it. That's just dumb. ""Ice cream made me fat and ice cream will make me skinny again!"" &gt; Trump is against stopping pollution and emissions? I never said he was. &gt; Or, again, you just concentrate on the terrible Paris Accords rejected by Trump? I mentioned them once. You are the one who keeps bringing them back up. Wow, you will toss any claim my direction and totally misrepresent my position in an attempt to defend President Trump. You can not stay on topic to save your life. Let me try using your own discussion tactic to help you.
December, 1, 2011 (03:00pm) :-  China's manufacturing data's are slides to 49 below 50, a signal of contraction by which whole Chinese economy affected.  Due to the European crisis, the global demand is weak which Chinese affected the most because china is the only market which manufactures the product an unbelievable cost.  Global demand still weak this may be continues by next 2 - 3 months.  Base metal prices are higher composed to 2010 levels, the profit levels also drooped by 5% to the manufactures.  Base metals trends looking down in December.  Cooper may be range Rs 370 - Rs 440  Zinc mzy be range Rs 97 - Rs 113.  Nickel may be range Rs 870 - Rs 960.  Lead may be range Rs 98 - Rs 112.
"Sorry, those discussions were regarding current plans, mainly for papers and presentations.  Most of the people I interacted with at a metro/regional/global and above level, had zero sense.  In the words of one friend who was one of their global buyers (paraphrased since this conversation was 18 months or so ago): ""There are people down at the Austin headquarters who don't even realize they're supposed to be selling groceries."""
I would argue that we don’t have a shortage of STEM resources. Immigration policy hasn’t changed a lot either. What percentage of STEM students are from war torn Arab nations (the ones whose immigration policy has changed)  It can’t be more than 10%. As someone who works in the field, it’s largely India and China.  (That said, China is rapidly catching up so there is some truth to that aspect of it)
What concerns me is Japan's lost decade. They pulled the same shit the U.S. did 20 year earlier and they still haven't recovered. Now that our economy is global, Japan can't just start pushing exports to refuel their automotive sector, which in turn refuels their industrial sector etc etc. Once interest rates hit zero there's nothing left to be done. If this had happened to Japan 100 years ago perhaps they would have been able to introduce policies that would help a create a slower but steadier recovery.   Now that our economy is global, Japan has no choice. They have to compete with the rest of the world. QE is our last chance. You can argue over whether it was the right call or not until the sun burns out. It's here now and if investors panic, that's it. There will be no reasonable investment, prompting no recovery. This is our only chance. It's nice that the market saw a huge run up when the Fed was flooding it with money. However, whether or not that decision will prompt a recovery is yet to be seen. Now that the Fed is easing we'll truly see what the last five years have all been for.  edit: I mean, this is it. It will either work or it won't. This is where it all comes together or fails.
It’s not minutia when you’re criticizing the wrong industry. If you thought that Equifax was a tech company and started criticizing “those crooks over in Silicon Valley” it wouldn’t make any sense either. I’m not defending anything, what happened at Equifax was malpractice of the highest degree. They just aren’t Wall Street.
Subsidizing helps both the little and the big guy.  So why is the big guy still able to beat down the competition that tries to form against him?  How is Comcast able to stop competition while also being allowed to provide poor service at bad prices?  Subsidies ease his loss, but don’t enable his legal power to crush us.
How many ways must I point out that though the classical methods accomplish a lot, they are failing now?  The embrace of Capitalism has reached the point where the failings become much more obvious.    This doesn’t mean we throw out the whole thing because part of the model doesn’t work.  Which, by the way, also seems to be the popular response lately!  “Part of it doesn’t work?  Throw the whole damn thing out!”  Surely the fact that this issue is such a sensitive and popular topic points to real issues that haven’t been addressed, yes?  So the current system IS NOT working as we’d like.  No matter how much data you gather, if the information fails to account for the situation we are observing (our unrest, income inequality issues, falling labor worth, rising cost of living), then data is incorrect for the full situation.  If the system refuses to recognized data due to police rival or religious beliefs, or any other ideaology, the system is now at fault for putting the ideaology above reality.  And I have not rebutted anything I felt was fine.  Why would I?  Do you think I disagree with every point you make?  Should I?
One breed of CDOs are on a comeback path of their own, with more investors returning to them during an aging bull market. Many people were “burnt by these acronyms from the crisis,” said Zak Summerscale, head of credit fund management for Europe and Asia Pacific at Intermediate Capital Group . He is currently recommending that clients buy senior CLO tranches over investment-grade bonds. CLOs, like other types of securitizations, have been subject to greater regulation since the financial crisis. That includes forcing funds that manage a CLO to retain 5% of the securities, in an effort to align incentives with investors. That has “attracted additional capital into the market,” said Mike Rosenberg, a principal at alternative investment manager Tetragon. Assets under management in the “loan participation” sector—a proxy for funds that invest in CLOs—have grown 21% this year to $206 billion, according to Thomson Reuters Lipper. The pickup in CLOs has been a boon to banks weathering declines in trading revenues in the current low-volatility environment. Revenue from CLO-related activity at the top 12 global investment banks more than doubled over the first half of 2017 from a year earlier to almost $1 billion, according to financial consultancy Coalition. CLO investors have been handsomely rewarded in recent months. J.P. Morgan strategist Rishad Ahluwalia recommended clients buy CLOs last July as he thought they looked too cheap. Between then and the end of September, BB-rated CLO tranches returned 25.4%, compared with a 25.2% return for the technology-oriented Nasdaq stock index, according to his calculations. “CLOs have been an absolute home run,” said Mr. Ahluwalia, though he added such chunky returns aren’t repeatable. Analysts say CLOs got beaten down last year following a series of troubles in the underlying loan market, including distress in the energy sector. Some analysts think the strong rally in CLO tranches since then should give investors pause; others think the market has further to run. Renaud Champion, head of credit strategies at Paris-based hedge fund La Française Investment Solutions, likes AAA-rated CLO tranches but with a twist: leverage.
Won’t all automakers be regulated into all-electric at some point? There will continue to be performance cars, and electric ones at that. Who knows if they will be called Camaros and Corvettes and Mustangs, etc. But they will still exist, just without gas engines.
Which begs the question how do you weed out those that are poor at handling money or would waste it versus those that know what to do with it? Just throwing it in the wind to anyone seems wasteful. Are there qualifications? I didn’t see that part.
Sorry, you're in /r/business. Please refrain from corking the pitchforks - these important folks have got the whole world figured out already, and coincidentally it all coincides with what they already believed to be true.  Everything is the fault of global financial crises and hysterical predictions about the future are key to our very survival as a society. Nothing could possibly be due to simple, inane market forces.
"When people (even people in the media) say: ""The stock market is up because of X"" or ""The stock market is down because of Y"", they are often engaging in what Nicolas Taleb calls the narrative falacy. They see the market has moved in one direction or another, they open their newspaper, pick a headline that provides a plausible reason for the market to move, and say: ""Oh, that is why the stock market is down"". Very rarely do statements like this actually come from research, asking people why they bought or sold that day. Sometimes they may be right, but it is usually just story telling. In terms of old fashioned logic this is called the ""post hoc, ergo proper hoc"" fallacy. Now all the points people have raised about the US deficit may be valid, and there are plenty of reasons for worrying about the future of the world economy, but they were all known before the S&P report, which didn't really provide the markets with much new information. Note also that the actual bond market didn't move much after hearing the same report, in fact the price of 10 year US Treasury bonds actually rose a tiny bit. Take these simple statements about what makes the market go up or down on any given day with several fistfuls of salt."
&gt;[**Michael Pento – Gold Setting Up for Huge Spike Higher [28:48]**](http://youtu.be/U3qHMPgYy4c)  &gt;&gt;Financial analyst and money manager Michael Pento says, “I think it is setting up for a huge spike higher.  I don’t think the time for that to start is exactly now, but the gold market is catching a bid here.  The big boom in gold and gold mining shares will be when we have a watershed moment, when the market realizes in mass the central banks have lost control of the economy and the money supply.  That is coming very, very soon, no later than the middle of 2018, and it could probably happen this fall, and that is when the market understands that central banks don’t really control interest rates.  They cannot control the long end of the yield curve, and they will destroy economic growth and stock markets across the world.  That is the big moment when you want to pile into gold.  If you don’t have any gold, you should have at least 10% always.  That’s your base level. . . . Hard assets will go through the roof.”  &gt; [*^Greg ^Hunter*](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCG-G8LLr38fQUNZU8K0t-EA) ^in ^News ^&amp; ^Politics  &gt;*^47,716 ^views ^since ^Jul ^2017*  [^bot ^info](/r/youtubefactsbot/wiki/index)
You say “there is no reason” as if the reasons they had for initially choosing uniform pricing and pay meant nothing.  You sound just like those libertarians who want to get rid of all market regulations because free market is more competitive and healthier.  You should NEVER ignore the initial reasons any law or decision is made.  That is a recipe for repeating the issues we have already faced.  Why go through the same struggle twice?
If you are too overwhelmed by all the work, don’t worry, you can always call a close friend or family to save you from the situation and get you some help. And if you don’t want that, then there are cleaning services that can help by lending you a hand.
As we can see, now it’s October and Bitcoin is not 5k. It turned out that it’s a very high psychological point for the holders. Most of them don’t believe in it, that’s why sell. Moreover, that’s the way expert traders use the opportunity, because they understand the mentality of the crowd.
Moreover the fact that they're simply invested in two of the biggest emerging market ETFs which preform well with global stability but are overall kinda risky long term goes to show that it's not some unheard of success. As you said, the proving ground will be whether they can make money in a down economy, where it's much harder to find profitable investments. Perhaps they'll switch to bonds and commodities.
Nope! Taylor has always been super original, I mean she dated another guy named Taylor, hence why t squared. What other pop star did that? None. That's right. How can you say she's not original, she's the best. Popstar? No. She's country. Get your facts straight then maybe I'll listen. Taylor+Taylor forever.
"&gt; but the invasion of Iraq was, by definition, a military venture intended to overthrow their leader and change the regime.  No, it was a government venture using the military as a tool. But even if it were a military venture, you would be right - the invasion was, not the occupation and attempt to stabilize/rebuild. That was a joint venture.  &gt;The US military acts for the US government, as do other departments and to muddle the question by listing departments is to miss the point – which is privatization of government functions, be they military or just involved in military ventures.  Painting the construction of a school, built by Iraqi contractors, directed by the State Department, and funded through USAID as a ""military venture"" is absurd.  &gt;If the contractors weren’t really required but were hired anyway….I don’t know how that’s defended.  Of course that occurred. The government is incredibly wasteful. An example that actually involved security contractors is the one I already gave. 10 Ugandans to stand around a checkpoint (1 or 2 of them lazily checking the drivers credentials or slowly walking around the vehicle pretending they know what they are looking for), another 2 to standby for whatever, and the last 6-7 to literally do nothing. The same job can be done by 2 U.S. personnel.  So you have +8 bodies, +192 manhours per day, but you have a net cost decrease. That's why it was done, and that's why the total personnel count in and of itself does not tell much of a story."
Can you isolate the market impact to just the Fed's quantitative easing?  Can you rule out the future economic predictions of low growth and that there are reasons why the Fed has kept rates low and is trying its best to stimulate the economy?  Just something to consider here. The key is to understand what is the greater picture here as well as the question of which stock market index are you looking at that has done so badly.  Some stocks may be down and others may be up so it isn't necessarily bad for all equally.
At the end of the day - it is not moral to hire someone to put a gun to someone else's head to pay off your debt. The ends should never justify the means if you are an honorable person. I believe in personal responsibility and freedom. Capitalism is the reason why people fled to the US and why t has become the wealthiest country with the best standard of living in history in record time.   Your telling me Europe is doing great right now? Is that a joke? What about socialist countries like Venezuela and Greece?
"&gt; First, you give this gray topic of Medicare Part-D where Trump promised to act upon, but has yet do anything. Am I right? If you think the topic is ""gray"" and the issue is Trump ""has yet do anything"" then you haven't put in the time to understand why I think this is an issue. &gt; Global Warming? It's Trump fault? It appears you didn't put in the time to understand my issue with President Trump and global warming either. &gt; Because the Paris Accords, like the TPP, and like NAFTA, and the Iran Deal, etc, etc, etc, are scams to hurt the USA and make the USA pay more. Nothing else. Oh wow, you have drunk deeply from the Republican cool-aid. For what it is worth, you are being lied to and manipulated. There is a lot more (or less in a few cases) to these deals than you have been told. FYI, when you think the only reason people would be championing a policy you disagree with is that those people are evil, you might want to dig a little deeper. &gt; Since you are an expert with Global Warming... All right. &gt; Who has bigger air pollution, coal power plants, cutting trees, environmental disasters, etc? The USA or China? Currently? China, China, USA, USA Historically? USA, USA, USA, USA &gt; ...is it true that deserts are now becoming green? No, [deserts are growing](http://www.dw.com/en/holding-back-the-growing-desert/a-18620447). A few spots where plants are now growing in the desert does not change the global trend. &gt; Most trees in the world, which are in Russia and not the Amazon, are green longer? It is thought that the warmer temperatures will delay them losing their leaves in fall.
Wearing different kind of shirts, especially T shirts has been in vogue from ages. These T shirts are made of super fine cotton and observe the heat and sweat and make the person feel comfortable in them. The T shirts have fan following across the globe and every day, we can see new kind of T shirts with different cuts, designs, slogans, styles as well as in shapes.