vania-janet/multiturn-rag-retrieval-data huggingface dataset:
2001 Budget Analysis:California Spending on Long-Term Care Services
The second federal grant program announced by HCFA would award $50 million to states over three years, with
individual state grants ranging from $250,000 to $2.5 million for the project period. These so-called "real choice systems change" grants are to support state
programs that generally create improvements in community living for people with disabilities.
Our analysis indicates that this second federal grant program could assist the Governor's budget proposal for pilot projects to expand community options for
long-term care. Federal grant funds probably could not be used in place of the proposed General Fund appropriation during 2001-02. That is because the initial
state funding would be used to develop an assessment tool to identify persons currently residing in nursing homes who could be placed in the community, not
for actually testing any new programs to support successful community placement. However, we believe that these federal grant funds could be used as an
extension of the pilot projects to begin expanding these community options. If a grant application were successful, the state could receive up to $833,000 during
2001-02, and again in the two subsequent years, to follow through on the Governor's pilot projects.
Analyst Recommendations. For these reasons, we recommend a $333,000 reduction from the General Fund and a corresponding increase in federal funds for
the IMDs transition pilot project. We further recommend that the Legislature adopt budget bill language authorizing DMH to submit a Section 27.00 letter for
additional General Fund resources if the state is unsuccessful in a federal grant application. These actions would give DMH federal spending authority if the
state is awarded grant funding but would also ensure the availability of General Fund support in the event that federal funding is not provided.
We further recommend that $833,000 in additional federal spending authority be provided to DHS in the event it is successful in obtaining federal grant funding
to expand the pilot projects to expand community options for long-term care. Finally, we recommend that HHSA report during budget hearings on efforts to
apply for federal grants for these projects.
Staffing Level of New Nursing Home
Complaint Unit Not Justified
The 2024-25 Budget: Child Welfare
Figure 3 provides a high-level overview of the child welfare programs that are proposed for funding elimination or delay. The descriptions in the figure include information about who is served as well as program outcomes and expenditures, where information is available.

Figure 3
Program Snapshots

Family Urgent Response System (FURS)

Types of services provided: Statewide hotline and in‑person local response units offer immediate supports to current and former foster youth and their caregivers who are experiencing interpersonal conflict or other behavioral challenges.

Status: Implementation began in 2019‑20.

General Fund allocations: Around $30 million annually.

Expenditures: Around $13 million expended and encumbered in 2022‑23.

Total families served in 2022‑23: Around 5,000 contacts. Stakeholders estimate 87 percent of FURS contacts result in successful placement stabilization and ongoing supports for the youth and/or caregiver.

Supervised Independent Living Placement (SILP) Housing Supplement

Types of services provided: The supplement is intended to provide additional housing funds, in line with federal Fair Market Rents, for foster youth placed in SILPs.

Status: Not yet implemented (anticipated that eligible youth in SILPs will begin receiving supplemental housing funding in 2025‑26).

General Fund allocations: $18.8 million annually at full implementation.

Expenditures: None to date.

Total youth in SILPs: Around 3,000 youth placed in SILPs as of October 2023.

Los Angeles County Public Health Nurse Early Intervention Pilot

Types of services provided: The pilot is intended to be an early intervention program providing preventative services to children and families at imminent risk of entering or re‑entering the child welfare system, but currently not served by other public health nurse programs.

Status: Delayed due to COVID‑19. Not yet implemented (anticipated for April/May 2024).

General Fund allocations: $8.25 million allocated annually since 2019‑20, but funds were not disbursed to Los Angeles County until 2022‑23 due to pandemic delays.

Expenditures: Around $200,000 as of November 2023.

Total families served: None to date.

Bringing Families Home (BFH)
2001 Budget Analysis: Housing and Community Development (2240)
undertaking interregional planning for housing and employment issues, with a particular emphasis on improving geographic mapping.
Child Care Facilities. The budget appropriated $16 million for the Child Care Facilities Financing Program. The funds can be
used for either direct loans or loan guarantees for child care facility purchases, expansions, or renovations. In the 2000-01 Analysis,
we reported that the program was having administrative difficulties in distributing $7 million in funds appropriated in the 1997-98
budget. In the past year, the department has made only $485,000 in new direct loans and another $614,000 in loan guarantees. As
a result, $3.7 million of the original 1997 appropriation is still available for loans and guarantees, and the department has yet to use
any of the current-year's appropriation. The 2000-01 budget requires that the department report on the program by March 15,
2001, including a discussion of any impediments to increased participation.
New Housing Proposals 
Payments to Local Governments Unlikely to Change Behavior 
We recommend redirecting the proposed $200 million augmentation for incentive payments to local governments to a
more effective approach to addressing the state's lack of housing development. As a one-time program, the payments
will fail to change the underlying disincentives for local governments to build housing. In the program's place, we
suggest more targeted options for either one-time or ongoing appropriations. (Delete Item 2240-114-0001 and Item
2240-114-3006.)
Background. The current system of local government finance generally does not encourage local governments to approve housing
projects, particularly multifamily and affordable housing developments. The jurisdiction which approves the housing receives a
relatively small share of the property taxes generated from the new development. These revenues, in many cases, are not enough to
pay for the costs of providing services to the new housing.
The state's major oversight of local housing policy is the housing element process. As part of their general plan, cities and counties
Department of Housing and Community Development Archives - California Grants Portal
Deadline

	Active	
Ongoing 

Grant Title

2023 Homekey Tribal NOFA

Open Date
Jul 5, 2023

State Agency / Department
Department of Housing and Community Development

Match Funding?
No

Estimated Total Funding
$75,000,000

Estimated Low/High
Dependent

Funds Disbursement
Advances & Reimbursement(s)

 

	Current as of:	

	August 30, 2023, 9:01 am	

Grantor

	Department of Housing and Community Development	

Grant Program ID

Portal ID
37277

Opportunity Type
 

	
	Grant
	

Purpose
The Department announces the availability of $75 million of Homekey Program grant funding through this Round 3 Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for Tribal Entities. This NOFA aims to sustain and rapidly expand housing for households experiencing homelessness or At Risk of Homelessness, and who are, thereby, inherently impacted by or at increased risk for medical diseases or conditions due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Eligible Applicants
 

	
	Tribal Government
	

Eligible Geographies
Funding under this NOFA is not subject to specific geographic allocations; however, to the extent possible, the Department will distribute funds equitably throughout the state. Applications will be placed within one of three priority pools based upon project readiness and percentage of non-Homekey funding.

	View Full Grant Details: 2023 Homekey Tribal NOFA>/span>	

California Grants Portal

Privacy PolicyUse PolicyDataAccessibility CertificateSubscribe to Updates 

	Follow us on Facebook	
 

	Follow us on Twitter	
 

	Follow us on YouTube	
 

	Copyright © 2024 State of California
You searched for - California Grants Portal
Department of Housing and Community Development

Match Funding?
No

Estimated Total Funding
$0

Estimated Low/High
Dependent

Funds Disbursement
Reimbursement(s)

 

	Current as of:	

	March 27, 2024, 10:26 am	

Grantor

	Department of Housing and Community Development	

Grant Program ID

Portal ID
52152

Opportunity Type
 

	
	Grant
	

Purpose
The purpose of the MIT-RIP program is to assist local Jurisdictions with Mitigation-related infrastructure needs to support risk reduction from the three primary hazards (wildfire, flooding, and earthquake) as established within the Mitigation Needs Assessment (MNA). Projects should be consistent with applicable planning documents (e.g., Local Hazard Mitigation Plan).

Eligible Applicants
 

	
	Public Agency
	

	
	Tribal Government
	

Eligible Geographies
Projects must benefit the area designated by HUD as the Most Impacted and Distressed areas, or “the MID” for the 2017 or the 2018 disasters.

	View Full Grant Details: 2017/2018 CDBG MIT-PPS>/span>	

Deadline

	Active	

	5/29/24 00:00	

Grant Title

Round 3: COVID-19 MITIGATION PROJECT

Open Date
Apr 29, 2024

State Agency / Department
Department of Health Care Services

Match Funding?
No

Estimated Total Funding
$0

Estimated Low/High
$1 – $200,000

Funds Disbursement
Reimbursement(s)

 

	Current as of:	

	May 14, 2024, 10:00 am	

Grantor

	Department of Health Care Services	

Grant Program ID

Portal ID
61200

Opportunity Type
 

	
	Grant
	

Purpose
The COVID-19 Mitigation Project funding opportunity will prevent, prepare for and respond to the COVID-19 public health emergency and ensure the continuity of services to support individuals connected to the behavioral health system. The project will particularly focus on people engaged in mental health or substance use disorder care.

Eligible Applicants
 

	
	Nonprofit
	

	
	Public Agency
	

	
	Tribal Government
	

Eligible Geographies
Analysis TOC

of the 2000-01 Housing Package 
Local 
 Government Incentives 
Homeownership 
 Programs 
Multifamily 
 Housing Programs 
Homeless 
 Programs 
Other 
 Programs 
New 
 Housing Proposals 
Payments 
 to Local Governments Unlikely to Change Behavior 
Infrastructure 
 Program Not Targeted to Problem 
Employee 
 Housing Costs Should Not Be Paid Twice 
California 
 Housing Finance Agency (2260) 
Eliminate 
 Future Appropriations forSchool Facility Fee Reimbursements 
Changes 
 to School Facility Developer Fees 
Single-Family 
 Housing Programs 
Multifamily 
 Housing Program 
Program 
 Funding 
Experience 
 to Date 
Concerns 
 About the Programs 
Recommend 
 Eliminating Future Appropriations 
Department 
 of Managed Health Care (2400) 
Financial 
 Examinations Proposal 
Stephen 
 P. Teale Data Center (2780) 
Permanent 
 Positions Are Needed to Support Various Data Center Activities 
Technology, 
 Trade, and Commerce Agency (2920) 
Vague 
 Proposal for Consultant Funds for Military Base Retention and Reuse 
Augmentation 
 Proposed for the California Technology Investment Partnership (CalTIP) Program Lacks Specifics 
Energy 
 Resources Conservation and Development Commission (3360) 
Petroleum 
 Violation Escrow Account 
Energy-Related 
 Proposals
Additional 
 Resources for Siting Program 
Long 
 Term Energy Baseload Reduction Initiative 
Energy 
 Initiatives (3365) 
General 
 Fund Monies Set Aside For Energy-Related Programs 
Health 
 and Human Services Agency Data Center (4130) 
System 
 Management Services 
Expenditure 
 Authority for Additional Oversight Activities Is Unnecessary 
Software 
 Costs Absorbable Within Current Overhead Rate 
Child 
 Welfare Services/Case Management System Maintenance and Operations Issues

Risk 
 Mitigation Plan Needed for Replacement of CWS/CMS Servers 
Statewide 
 Automated Welfare System (SAWS) 
Background

Need 
 for SAWS Strategic Plan 
The 
 LEADER Has Significant Performance Problems 
Interim 
 SAWS Will Need to Operate for Another Five Years 
Status 
 of Other Projects 
Electronic 
 Benefits Transfer Should Submit Revised Proposal 
California
California’s Child Welfare System: Addressing Disproportionalities and Disparities
Furthermore, the cost of services and supports may vary greatly based on the needs of the individual child and family (and whether the family is participating in Family Maintenance or the child has been placed into foster care). For example, in 2023‑24, the estimated average monthly assistance payment for foster care across all placement types is around $3,000, although for an individual child that payment may range from around $1,200 to more than $16,000 depending on where a child is placed and the level of care needed. In addition to the monthly assistance payment amount, other costs related to the child and parents’ needs may include, for example, Medi‑Cal coverage for behavioral health services. 

Federal Funding. When a family requires child welfare services or foster care, and that family meets federal eligibility standards based on income and other factors, states may claim federal funds for part of the cost of providing care and services for the child and family. State and local governments provide funding for the portion of costs not covered by federal funds, based on cost‑sharing proportions determined by the federal government. These federal funds are provided pursuant to Title IV‑E (related to foster care) and Title IV‑B (related to child welfare) of the Social Security Act. Other federal funding sources that California receives for child welfare purposes include some Temporary Assistance for Needy Families dollars and various federal grants (such as the Child Abuse Prevention Program and Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program). 
2011 Realignment. Until 2011‑12, the state General Fund and counties shared significant portions of the nonfederal costs of administering child welfare programs. In 2011, the state enacted legislation and the voters adopted constitutional amendments (in 2012) known as 2011 realignment, which gave counties fiscal responsibility for child welfare. The legislation also dedicated a portion of the state’s sales and use tax and vehicle license fee revenues—along with a portion of the associated growth in these revenues—to counties to administer these programs (along with some public safety, behavioral health, and adult protective services programs). In addition to dedicated 2011 realignment dollars, counties also may choose to spend other local funds (such as county general fund resources) on child welfare programs.
The 2022-23 Budget: The Governor’s Homelessness Plan
The 2022-23 Budget: The Governor’s Homelessness Plan

Translate Our Website

This Google™ translation feature provided on the Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO) website is for informational purposes only.
The LAO is unable to guarantee the accuracy of this translation and is therefore not liable for any inaccurate information resulting from the translation application tool.

Choose your language:

×

Skip to main content

Policy Areas

Capital Outlay, Infrastructure
Criminal Justice
Economy and Taxes
Education
Environment and Natural Resources
Health and Human Services
Local Government
State Budget Condition
Transportation
Other Government Areas

Publications
The Budget
Propositions and Initiatives
Staff
Careers
About Us

 
Search
 

Tweet

LAO Contact
Lourdes Morales

 See More Publications Like This

 

 Report in PDF

LAO Report
February 9, 2022

The 2022-23 Budget
The Governor’s Homelessness Plan

Background
Update on Major Recent State Actions Addressing Homelessness
Governor’s 2022‑23 Homelessness Proposals
LAO Comments
Conclusion

Summary
Homelessness in California. While homelessness is a complex problem with many causes, the high costs of housing is a significant factor in the state’s homelessness crisis. Rising housing costs that have exceeded growth in wages, particularly for low‑income households, put Californians at risk of housing instability and homelessness. In California, around 2.5 million low‑income households are cost burdened. More people experience homelessness in California than any other state. As of January 2020—the most recent year federal data is available—California had about 161,500 individuals experiencing homelessness. 
Shifting State‑Local Relationship. Historically, local entities have provided most of the homelessness assistance in their jurisdiction, relying in part on federal and state funding. As the homelessness crisis has become more acute, the state has taken a larger role in funding and supporting local governments’ efforts to address homelessness. The state has increased its role in addressing homelessness by providing significant, albeit one‑time and temporary, funding towards infrastructure and flexible aid to local governments in recent years.
Regional Early Action Planning (REAP) Grants of 2021 | California Department of Housing and Community Development
Native Americans and Tribal Members: Begin the survey by selecting one of the following languages:

 California Tribal Communities Needs Assessment Survey 
 Evaluación de necesidades de las comunidades tribales de California

 Begin the survey by selecting one of the following languages:
 

Community Needs Assessment Survey

社区需求评估

커뮤니티는 평가가 필요합니다

Evaluación de las necesidades de la comunidad

Pagtatasa sa Pangangailangan ng Komunidad

Đánh Giá Nhu Cầu Cộng Đồng

Kev Ntsuam Xyuas Cov Kev Xav Tau Hauv Zej Zog

Ok

Top
The 2024-25 Budget: Child Welfare
These initial two appropriations required a dollar-for-dollar match from local recipients, while the two $92.5 million augmentations appropriated in 2021-22 and 2022-23 waive the match requirement. Proposed budget language also would extend expenditure authority and the match waiver period.
Revert One-Time Funds for Los Angeles County Child Welfare Stabilization. We note that the Governor’s budget proposal reverts to the General Fund $100 million provided by the 2023-24 budget to Los Angeles County for child welfare program stabilization. The proposed reversion would help to address the current-year budget deficit. However, the county already has provided an invoice for the full funding amount, meaning the proposed reversion will not be feasible, necessitating that an alternative, like-amount of solutions be found elsewhere in the budget. The administration’s budget documents will reflect this update at May Revision.

Governor’s Budget Also Proposes to Reduce Funding for Foster Youth Housing Program. In addition to the reductions described above, the Governor’s budget proposes to reduce funding for the Housing Navigation and Maintenance Program (HNMP) by $13.7 million General Fund in 2024-25 and ongoing, which would eliminate funding for the program. The program received an ongoing funding augmentation as part of the 2022-23 budget package. This program is implemented by the Department of Housing and Community Development—not DSS—and therefore is not reflected in the summary figures above. The program provides grant funding to local child welfare agencies to serve current and former foster youth with securing and maintaining housing. Notably, counties have indicated they also use HNMP grants to fund federally required case management services for youth who receive various federal housing vouchers.
Figure 3 provides a high-level overview of the child welfare programs that are proposed for funding elimination or delay. The descriptions in the figure include information about who is served as well as program outcomes and expenditures, where information is available.

Figure 3
Program Snapshots

Family Urgent Response System (FURS)

Types of services provided: Statewide hotline and in‑person local response units offer immediate supports to current and former foster youth and their caregivers who are experiencing interpersonal conflict or other behavioral challenges.
Cash-Out Refinance Loan | Veterans Affairs
You may be eligible for this type of loan if you meet all of these requirements.
All of these must be true:

You qualify for a VA-backed home loan Certificate of Eligibility, and
You meet VA’s—and your lender’s—standards for credit, income, and any other requirements, and
You’ll live in the home you’re refinancing with the loan

Find out if you qualify for a VA-backed home loan Certificate of Eligibility (COE)

 Why might I want to get a VA-backed cash-out refinance loan?
 

 A VA-backed cash-out refinance loan may help you to: Take cash out of your home equity to pay off debt, pay for school, make home improvements, or take care of other needs, orRefinance a non-VA loan into a VA-backed loanOn a no-down-payment loan, you can borrow up to the Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac conforming loan limit in most areas—and more in some high-cost counties. You can borrow more than this amount if you want to make a down payment. Learn more about VA home loan limitsYou’ll want to keep closing costs in mind when refinancing a loan, as they can add up to thousands of dollars. Make sure you understand how your new loan amount relates to the value of your home. While your lender can advise you on the costs and benefits of the transaction, you’ll want to be sure you understand what you’re getting into. Learn about the VA funding fee and other closing costs Visit the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau for more information Download the Bureau’s home loan toolkit (PDF)

 How can I get a VA-backed cash-out refinance loan?
 

 Find a lender.
You’ll go through a private bank, mortgage company, or credit union—not directly through us—to get a cash-out refinance loan. Terms and fees may vary, so contact several lenders to check out your options.
Note: Be careful when considering home loan refinance offers.
Tax form changes | FTB.ca.gov
Per AB 80, California law conforms to the federal law regarding the treatment for an emergency Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) grant under the federal CARES Act or a targeted EIDL advance under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021.
6 – 7.
 Taxpayers may elect to include or exclude Medicaid waiver payments or IHSS payments that are nontaxable for federal purposes as wages/CA earned income for purposes of qualifying for CA EITC.

2020
540NR Booklet – Nonresident or Part-Year Resident Booklet, Instructions for Schedule CA (540NR), California Adjustments – Nonresidents or Part-Year Residents, & Instructions for FTB 3514, California Earned Income Tax Credit
05/24/21
PDF

Page 4 of 540NR booklet, column 2, 2020 Tax Law Changes/Whatâs New, Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan forgiveness paragraphs.
Page 4 of 540NR booklet, column 2, 2020 Tax Law Changes/Whatâs New, after PPP loan forgiveness paragraphs.
Page 39 of 540NR booklet/Page 1 of flat Sch. CA (540NR) instructions, column 1, Whatâs New, Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) Loan Forgiveness paragraphs.
Page 39 of 540NR booklet/Page 1 of flat Sch. CA (540NR) instructions, column 1, Whatâs New, after PPP Loan Forgiveness paragraphs.
Page 43 of 540NR booklet/Page 5 of flat Sch. CA (540NR) instructions, column 1, Line 3.
Page 67 of 540NR booklet/Page 3 of flat FTB 3514 instructions, column 2, Step 5, Line 13.
Page 68 of 540NR booklet/Page 4 of flat FTB 3514 instructions, column 1, Step 5, Line 14.

HTML

Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) Loan Forgiveness paragraphs.
Added a new paragraph after PPP Loan Forgiveness paragraphs.
Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) Loan Forgiveness paragraphs.
Added a new paragraph after PPP Loan Forgiveness paragraphs.
Paycheck Protection Program loan forgiveness paragraph.
Line 13, first paragraph.
Line 14, first paragraph.

Modified existing instructions.