vania-janet/multiturn-rag-retrieval-data huggingface dataset:
Panama offers global businessman the chance to get residency, citizenship, and a Panama international ID by making ventures. This is known as the Panama self-monetary solvency visa. It offers three diverse speculation alternatives to meet all requirements for Panama residency. Kraemer &amp; Kraemer provide you the self solvency visa without hassle free at an affordable price. Some easy options require for each additional dependent that applies for residency, the primary applicant.
Its late for summers yeah, but I think SocGen are open now for off-cycle internships - the others will be open soon.  I decided late into my masters that I wanted to do banking, so had to cold call botiques until one caved and is taking me for the summer while I do my thesis, so don't be afraid to cold call.  WSO is also probably your best bet for help you'd actually recieve alot of feedback.
El BOEX es esa plataforma para usted donde usted puede estudiar y obtener visa a un precio muy asequible. Hay miles de cursos ofrecidos, y tenemos la guía número uno para ayudarle desde el principio hasta el final. Nuestra búsqueda de escuela en Australia puede ayudarle a encontrar la escuela adecuada, nuestras páginas de recursos le ayudarán a estudiar, trabajar y vivir en Australia, e incluso tenemos información sobre qué esperar después de la graduación. Como estudiar inglés en Australia los programas y todo tipo de herramientas útiles, es fácil convertir sus estudios en el extranjero sueños en realidad. Si usted está interesado en estudiar en Australia - usted está en el lugar correcto! El BOEX está diseñado para ayudarlo a tener éxito. Stick con nosotros para bajar bajo.
When researchers analyze welfare participation and costs, their dataset of choice has traditionally been the Annual Social and Economic Supplement (ASEC) of the Current Population Survey. While the ASEC is certainly useful — CIS uses it frequently — it substantially undercounts welfare participation. For that reason, CIS turned to the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP), a more complex dataset developed by the Census Bureau specifically to analyze welfare use. CIS's analysis of the SIPP has now generated two major studies. The first study, published in September 2015, measured welfare participation rates. It showed that 51 percent of immigrant-headed households used some form of welfare, compared to 30 percent of native households.17 This second study extends the SIPP analysis by moving from rates to costs. It finds that immigrant-headed households consume an average of $6,234 in welfare spending, compared to $4,431 for native households. The highest-cost immigrant households tend to be those headed by a person from Latin America, while the lowest-cost households are headed by people from Europe and Asia.  https://cis.org/Report/Cost-Welfare-Use-Immigrant-and-Native-Households
First, the SSN isn't an issue. She will need to apply for an ITIN together with tax filing, in order to file taxes as Married Filing Jointly anyway. I think you (or both of you in the joint case) probably qualify for the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion, if you've been outside the US for almost the whole year, in which cases both of you should have all of your income excluded anyway, so I'm not sure why you're getting that one is better. As for Self-Employment Tax, I suspect that she doesn't have to pay it in either case, because there is a sentence in your linked page for Nonresident Spouse Treated as a Resident that says However, you may still be treated as a nonresident alien for the   purpose of withholding Social Security and Medicare tax. and since Self-Employment Tax is just Social Security and Medicare tax in another form, she shouldn't have to pay it if treated as resident, if she didn't have to pay it as nonresident. From the law, I believe Nonresident Spouse Treated as a Resident is described in IRC 6013(g), which says the person is treated as a resident for the purposes of chapters 1 and 24, but self-employment tax is from chapter 2, so I don't think self-employment tax is affected by this election.
"Salut, c'est Vincent. La recherche d'efficacité couplée à l'esprit de compétition est la pire des choses qui puisse exister. Et pourtant c'est ce que nous apprenons à l'école, et de nos parents... En fait tu dois comprendre que cette manière de penser est le pilier principal du fonctionnement de notre économie. Tout le monde veut toujours plus et de plus en plus vite. Il te suffit de regarder comment ton patron se comporte lol ! Or il y a moyen de ""renverser la vapeur"", de faire autrement. Il y a moyen de faire autrement et d'une façon beaucoup plus respectueuse. Une façon respectueuse pour toi, pour les autres, pour tout le monde. C'est le concept de l'économie de partage. C'est à cette économie de partage que je t'introduis ici ! N'hésite pas à me contacter pour participer activement à cette économie de partage et recevoir ce à quoi tu as toujours eu droit. vincentmusschoot@gmail.com Skype ID: vi_mu_1 http://vincentmusschoot.com"
More precisely North American.  When somebody says American, most likely they mean of or about the USA.  It's the colloquialism that has persisted that made me respond that way.  Yeah, it's just starting to catch on even though these websites have been up and running for a few years now.  I think that the overall global financial crisis impeded or at the very least delayed the popular discovery and utilization of this type of funding paradigm.  There's always http://www.kickstarter.com/ though!
It all stems from the Olympics trying to clean up its sports, so they required all of the governing bodies for the sports under their umbrella to begone signatories to the WADA code which, in an effort to harmonize and strengthen enforcement put a mutual recognition clause in their Code.  This way, say a French athlete is found to have doped at a US event, he wouldn't still be allowed to compete in France or in some other sport.  But the Pro Bowler's Association is not a WADA signatory, so you can dope and still bowl there.  Just don't be a member of the Fédération internationale des quilleurs.
"This is the best tl;dr I could make, [original](https://www.cnbc.com/2017/10/20/france-emmanuel-macron-theresa-may-problem-nobody-explained-brexit-consequences-british.html) reduced by 57%. (I'm a bot) ***** &gt; French President Emmanuel Macron told CNBC Friday that the problem that U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May has is that nobody explained to the British people the consequences of a Brexit vote.  &gt; When asked if the European Union would be able to make some verbal concessions to allow May to sell a Brexit deal at home, Macron told CNBC that there&amp;#039;s no room for such unofficial compromises.  &gt; &amp;quot;The objectives are fixed, they&amp;#039;re conducted from the European side by Michel Barnier, and we have to respect that,&amp;quot; Macron told CNBC, referring to the EU&amp;#039;s approach of discussing citizens&amp;#039; rights, financial settlement and the Irish border, before moving on to talks on trade.   ***** [**Extended Summary**](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/77pzsw/nobody_explained_the_consequences_of_brexit_to/) | [FAQ](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/31b9fm/faq_autotldr_bot/ ""Version 1.65, ~232167 tl;drs so far."") | [Feedback](http://np.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%23autotldr ""PM's and comments are monitored, constructive feedback is welcome."") | *Top* *keywords*: **European**^#1 **told**^#2 **Brexit**^#3 **U.K.**^#4 **Macron**^#5"
"http://annualcreditreport.com gives you free access to your 3 credit bureau records. (Annual, not ""free"". The ""free"" guys will try to sell you something.)"
A more updated answer: USAA is an American bank offering chip and pin credit cards to US customers.  USAA membership is restricted to military service members and their relatives, but according to this Los Angeles Times article, you do not need to be a USAA member to get a USAA chip and pin credit card. I'm a USAA member and can testify that my USAA chip and pin MasterCard worked in Europe, so assuming nonmembers get the same kind of card, it will work.  However, it's worth noting that for it to work, the place still has to accept MasterCard, which seems somewhat less common in Europe than in the USA.  (In Germany in particular, I was rather baffled to find that many places only accept some other European bank cards but not MasterCard/VISA.)
You could also try bank records from that time, like if you have a Visa statement showing $276.17 paid to the Nevada Court or something like that. If all else fails, the law allows you to send the collector a letter saying that you refuse to pay the debt. The collection company then legally must stop contacting you unless it's to tell you they are suing you or to tell you they won't contact you again. I strongly advise against this though. Your best bet is going to be speaking with a qualified attorney. Edit: You should also pull your credit reports to make sure this isn't being reported there. Federal law gives you the right to have a free copy of each of your credit reports once every year. If it is being reported, send a certified letter with return receipt to each bureau which is reporting it telling them you dispute the information. They then are required to confirm the information. If they can't confirm it, they must remove it. If they do confirm it, you are legally entitled to put a statement disputing the information next to it on your credit report. I am not an attorney. This is not legal advise. You should consult an attorney who is licensed to practice law in your particular jurisdiction."
Most merchants (also in Europe) are reasonable, and typically are willing to work with you. credit card companies ask if you tried to work with the merchant first, so although they do not enforce it, it should be the first try. I recommend to give it a try and contact them first. If it doesn't work, you can always go to the credit card company and have the charge reversed. None of this has any effect on your credit score (except if you do nothing and then don't pay your credit card bill). For the future: when a transaction supposedly 'doesn't go through', have them write this on the receipt and give it to you. Only then pay cash. I am travelling 100+ days a year in Europe, using my US credit cards all the time, and there were never any issues - this is not a common problem.
I'm sorry but this won't ever happen without regulation from the Feds. I'm a banker and I use the credit agencies daily. We pull credit reports on borrowers and without it, banks won't lend. A credit pull is a huge part of the credit underwriting process. Literally no bank in the US will stop using credit reporting agencies. Sorry to burst your bubble.
"According to the Fair Credit Reporting Act: any consumer reporting agency may furnish a consumer report [...] to a person which it has reason to believe [...] intends to use the information in connection with a credit transaction involving the consumer on whom the information is to be furnished and   involving the extension of credit to, or review or collection of an account of, the consumer See p12 (section 604). The usual interpretation of this that I've heard is that a debt collection agency that owns or has been assigned a debt can make hard pulls on your credit report without your consent. This link seems to support that (and references the same part of the act, among others): According to the Fair Credit Reporting Act, [...], any business can access your credit history without your permission provided the business has a valid ""permissible purpose."" The FCRA notes that one such permissible purpose is to review your credit information in connection with the collection of a debt. Thus, if you owe money to a debt collector, the debt collector has the legal right to pull and review your credit report. If they haven't been assigned the debt or own it outright, I believe you have a legal right to dispute it. Consult a lawyer if this is actually a situation you face.  Once use for this is if the debt collection agency has trouble locating you; since your credit report normally contains current and past addresses, this is one way to locate you."
Reaching the debt ceiling is an admission that the US can't pay its bills as they come due.  Credit rating agencies could cut the US's debt rating, making acquisition of new debt much more difficult.   Creditors could file for involuntary bankruptcy, forcing the government to pay back the debt - which, to be clear, it simply is incapable of doing in any kind of reasonable timeframe.  The loss of confidence in the US's ability to pay its debts...  Given how the US is such a financial and economic center of the world (partially by design, partially by happenstance), it would probably be disastrous worldwide.
You can view Standard & Poor's credit ratings here:  http://www.standardandpoors.com/ratings/en/us/ You have to register with S&P to access the ratings.
Yes, you can keep the accounts.  In fact, I opened my US bank account as a Canadian citizen living in Canada, and still have it after living in the US and returning. American Express offers UK cards and the have an excellent system for transferring the cards.  You should definitely contact them about this, otherwise you will likely have to start building credit from scratch in the UK.  AE Global Card Transfer
"To answer the heart of your question, it would be illegal for any credit bureau or creditor to somehow ""penalize"" you just for trying to make sure that what's being reported about you is accurate.  That's why the Fair Credit Reporting Act exists -- that's where the rights (and mechanisms) come from for letting you learn about and request accurate reporting of your credit history. Every creditor is responsible for reporting its own data to the bureaus, using the format provided by those bureaus for doing so. A creditor may not provide all of the information that can be reported, and it may not report information in as timely a manner as it could or should (e.g., payments made may not show up for weeks or even months after they were made, etc.). The bottom line is that the credit bureaus are not arbiters of the data they report.  They simply report.  They don't draw conclusions, they don't make decisions on what data to report.  If a creditor provides data that is within the parameters of what the bureaus ask to be provided, then the bureaus report precisely that -- nothing more, nothing less. If there is an inaccuracy or mistake on your report, it is the fault (and responsibility) of the creditor, and it is therefore up to the creditor to correct it once it has been brought to their attention.  Federal laws spell out the process that the bureau has to comply with when you file a dispute, and there are strict standards requiring the creditor to promptly verify valid information or remove anything which is not correct. The credit bureaus are simply automated clearinghouses for the information provided by the creditors who choose to subscribe to each bureau's system.  A creditor can choose which (or none) of the bureaus they wish to report to, which is why some accounts show on one bureau's report on you but not another's. What I caution is, just because a credit bureaus reports on your credit doesn't mean they have anything to do with the accuracy or detail of what is being reported.  That's up to the creditors."
Congratulations on completing the GSoC. I think the short answer is No, and you ought to just hang on to the card and gradually spend it down on your day-to-day expenses: you can spend money off a US prepaid card in Australia, or with online US merchants.  That will probably be a better deal than trying to cash it out, unless you really desperately need the cash.
Generally speaking, when you are asked whether you consent to a credit check, what is implied is that your identifying information is shared to enable that check.  Most credit nowadays (credit, mortgage, car lease, even cell phone accounts etc.) is simply unavailable without a credit check.
You cannot open an account in USA unless you have an address to provide to the bank in USA, You need ID, such as US Driver's License.
US bank deposits over $10K only need to be reported to FinCEN (Financial Crimes Enforcement Network- a bureau of the US Department of Treasury) if the deposits are made in cash or other money instruments where the source cannot be traced (money orders, traveler checks, etc). Regular checks and wires don't need to be reported because there is a clear bank trail of where the money came from. If your family member is giving you money personally (not from a business) from a bank account which is outside of the US, then you only need to report it if the amount is over $100K. Note, you would need to report that regardless of whether the money was deposited into your US bank account, or paid directly to your credit cards on your behalf, and there are stiff penalties if you play games to try to avoid reporting requirements. Neither deposit method would trigger any taxable income for the scenario you described.
"There are a number of companies that will issue pre-paid chip and pin Mastercards this is probably the easiest way to deal with the issue. Most of them are limited to UK residents but with a very quick google I found this one http://public.neteller.com/content/en_US/cards_index.htm which seems to be open to US residents. I have no experience of using this company but when I googled ""chip and pin usa pre paid credit card"" they came up."
"You will need to file  a US income tax return, and declare all income world-wide.  Whether this results in any tax owed depends on your particular circumstances, and the effect of any tax treaties between the US and India. There are additional requirements for the filing of information on the amounts in foreign accounts held by ""US tax persons"".  Depending on the nature of these accounts, the complexity of the forms, and the penalties for non-compliance can be quite high... Short version:  Consult a professional well-qualified in US/India tax matters..."
"Yes. The US Mint has a deal where you can buy dollar coins for face value, free shipping and can charge them to your card. They come in small boxes of 10 x $25 rolls of coins. I'm sure your landlord will be happy to accept cash for the rent.  Upon further reflection you spelled it ""cheque"" which means these coins are not legal tender for you. You might want to add your country to the tags.  Note: This 'deal' is no longer available. It was (mis)used to get points/miles on credit cards, and the coins deposited at the bank. There's now a premium to buy the coins on line."
Legally in the US:
Is it possible her husband obtained a card from a bank overseas? Unlikely. A Bank overseas generally will not issue such cards. Is that why she can't find it on the credit report? The data sent to Credit Bureau is periodic and not immediate. At times it may take a month or more for a Bank to start reporting the new card to Credit Agencies. If he got the card recently, she has a freeze in effect and no bank can issue a card in her name without her approval. Possibly timing issue. i.e. the freeze was put after card company pulled the report and approved. It may take sometime to dispatch a new card. So it could be that her husband applied for this card previously before the freeze was put in place.
Sorry for this late reply.  I currently live in Iceland (I am a United Statesian). People here told me they thought checks were just something that were in movies. I was amazed by this. So here are some reasons that I see to being why it works still in the usa. 1. Social Security system. Most Euro, Nordic countries have their lives, bank accounts, ect tied to their 'Social Security' number and that number is not top secret like it is in the USA. In fact here in Iceland you throw your number around to anyone who wants it because they cant do anything with it but pay you money really. 2. Banks. In the USA there are millions, MILLIONS of small town banks. That means that doing direct deposits or transfers is much much harder to achieve. Example: Iceland has two banks. The most common way of loaning a friend money or paying for that hotel room if you forgot to bring cash or your card is to say 'Give me your SSN and I will transfer to you'. It takes about 30 seconds to do a funds transfer. In the USA you can't do that. They would think you are lying or not want to give they bank info or because of the fees from small town banks it would be pointless. Also a lot of these small banks will not accept direct deposit (I had a bank growing up that still does not) These are some of the main reasons that I think cause the flow of checks in the usa.
Incoming is often free except from overseas... I've never found a bank offering free international wire transfers. Is this coming from a foreign country or another part of the USA? If it is from a foreign country, at some banks (HSBC, perhaps) you can get US$ checks for US payments, at a lower cost than a wire transfer but you have to be careful because the exchange rate might be different. If the transfers occur wholly within the USA there is really no good reason to use wire transfer if you can avoid it.  ACH is usually free and is the same way direct deposit works.  Use that, or if it is within a family (like for college) you could even use postdated checks.
It is not delayed and if it didn't show yet - will not show on that agency's credit report. However, you may find it on another agency's report. There are three major agencies, and creditors don't always check all of them (each inquiry costs them money).
it just depends on your situation and sometimes accounting can't fix that.  by mentor pays 35% even though he only goes back to the USA to visit. I go back less than 30 days a year so I can claim I'm a foreign resident but if all my income is in the USA I'm screwed.   I can't even route my income through my wife who has never stepped foot in the USA because we must claim whatever she makes.    US tax laws are so bad that it takes a lot just to get an account with HSBC in Hong Kong
If you read the link that MD-Tech provided, it actually indicates that the foreign companies (mostly banks) are choosing not to work with the United States in their latest answer, so it looks like it's not OkPay, but the financial companies that they use. On further research, the reason that this is banned is to prevent capital flight in the future.  OkPay offers may ways to transfer funds in and out, such as traditional credit cards, like VISA and MasterCard, and other non-traditional ways, such as crypto-coins.   Here is another example of how the US government is limiting what US consumers can do with their money.  Apparently while no one was looking in 2010, they were able to pass some new restrictions.
Our Website : http://www.abcdreamusa.com/f2-visa-guide/ Applying for a visa to a foreign country can be a daunting task. It’s enough to make some of us not want to travel or look at destinations that offer visas on arrival! The United States of America (USA) has a stringent visa application process. ABC Dream USA has a geographical advantage to the general company. It involves many steps but the good news is that it’s not impossible to do if you follow the instructions carefully. We hope to simplify the process for you so here’s your USA visa go-to guide.
"Yes, U.S. currency of any denomination is ""legal tender FOR ALL DEBTS, public and private."" But when you go into a store you (normally) don't owe them anything. In that case, it's more like a barter transaction: Your currency for their soda. Meaning that they can refuse to take ""your currency."" Open an account at the store, and run up a debt. Then you can pay in any denomination."
Does not a reloadable card purchased from a store meet your requirements? Note, however, that my memory is that if you buy such a card in the US it can't be used outside the US--to keep it from being used to take money out of the country.