Combined Task and Action Learning from Human Demonstrations for Mobile Manipulation Applications Learning from demonstrations is a promising paradigm for transferring knowledge to robots. However, learning mobile manipulation tasks directly from a human teacher is a complex problem as it requires learning models of both the overall task goal and of the underlying actions. Additionally, learning from a small number of demonstrations often introduces ambiguity with respect to the intention of the teacher, making it challenging to commit to one model for generalizing the task to new settings. In this paper, we present an approach to learning flexible mobile manipulation action models and task goal representations from teacher demonstrations. Our action models enable the robot to consider different likely outcomes of each action and to generate feasible trajectories for achieving them. Accordingly, we leverage a probabilistic framework based on Monte Carlo tree search to compute sequences of feasible actions imitating the teacher intention in new settings without requiring the teacher to specify an explicit goal state. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in complex tasks carried out in realworld settings.

A Comparison of Action Spaces for Learning Manipulation Tasks Designing reinforcement learning (RL) problems that can produce delicate and precise manipulation policies requires careful choice of the reward function, state, and action spaces. Much prior work on applying RL to manipulation tasks has defined the action space in terms of direct joint torques or reference positions for a jointspace proportional derivative (PD) controller. In practice, it is often possible to add additional structure by taking advantage of modelbased controllers that support both accurate positioning and control of the dynamic response of the manipulator. In this paper, we evaluate how the choice of action space for dynamic manipulation tasks affects the sample complexity as well as the final quality of learned policies. We compare learning performance across three tasks (peg insertion, hammering, and pushing), four action spaces (torque, joint PD, inverse dynamics, and impedance control), and using two modern reinforcement learning algorithms (Proximal Policy optimization and Soft ActorCritic). Our results lend support to the hypothesis that learning references for a taskspace impedance controller significantly reduces the number of samples needed to achieve good performance across all tasks and algorithms.