A Novel Visual Odometer Assisted Pose Tracking Method for Mobile Robots Pose tracking is very crucial for robotxe2x80x99s autonomous navigation. LIDAR based pose tracking algorithms are widely used due to its high costeffective advantage. However these methods are likely to give back wrong result if the environment is blocked by the obstacles. In this paper, a visual odometer assisted pose tracking method is proposed to increase the robustness of pose tracking. Statistical index is introduced to evaluate the samplesxe2x80x99 score of LIDAR based pose tracking. If the result is not credible, the result of visual odometer will compensate the error along the maximum error direction. The experiment shows that the proposed method is able to track the robot correctly if the environment is blocked by obstacles.

A VisionBased Odometer for Localization of Omnidirectional Indoor Robots In this paper we tackle the problem of indoor robot localization by using a visionbased approach. Specifically, we propose a visual odometer able to give back the relative pose of an omnidirectional automatic guided vehicle (AGV) that moves inside an indoor industrial environment. A monocular downwardlooking camera having the optical axis nearly perpendicular to the ground floor, is used for collecting floor images. After a preliminary analysis of images aimed at detecting robust point features (keypoints) takes place, specific descriptors associated to the keypoints enable to match the detected points to their consecutive frames. A robust correspondence feature filter based on statistical and geometrical information is devised for rejecting those incorrect matchings, thus delivering better pose estimations. A camera pose compensation is further introduced for ensuring better positioning accuracy. The effectiveness of proposed methodology has been proven through several experiments, in laboratory as well as in an industrial setting. Both quantitative and qualitative evaluations have been made. Outcomes have shown that the method provides a final positioning percentage error of 0.21% on an average distance of 17.2 m. A longer run in an industrial context has provided comparable results (a percentage error of 0.94% after about 80 m). The average relative positioning error is about 3%, which is still in good agreement with current state of the art.