Counterfactual Attention Supervision Neural attention mechanism has been used as a form of explanation for model behavior. Users can either passively consume explanation, or actively disagree with explanation then supervise attention into more proper values (attention supervision). Though attention supervision was shown to be effective in some tasks, we find the existing attention supervision is biased, for which we propose to augment counterfactual observations to debias and contribute to accuracy gains. To this end, we propose a counterfactual method to estimate such missing observations and debias the existing supervisions. We validate the effectiveness of our counterfactual supervision on widely adopted image benchmark datasets: CUFED and PEC.

Evaluating Saliency Map Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networks: A User Study. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) offer great machine learning performance over a range of applications, but their operation is hard to interpret, even for experts. Various explanation algorithms have been proposed to address this issue, yet limited research effort has been reported concerning their user evaluation. In this paper, we report on an online betweengroup user study designed to evaluate the performance of saliency maps  a popular explanation algorithm for image classification applications of CNNs. Our results indicate that saliency maps produced by the LRP algorithm helped participants to learn about some specific image features the system is sensitive to. However, the maps seem to provide very limited help for participants to anticipate the networku0027s output for new images. Drawing on our findings, we highlight implications for design and further research on explainable AI. In particular, we argue the HCI and AI communities should look beyond instancelevel explanations.