Variable Impedance Control in EndEffector Space: An Action Space for Reinforcement Learning in ContactRich Tasks Reinforcement Learning (RL) of contactrich manipulation tasks has yielded impressive results in recent years. While many studies in RL focus on varying the observation space or reward model, few efforts focused on the choice of action space (e.g. joint or endeffector space, position, velocity, etc.). However, studies in robot motion control indicate that choosing an action space that conforms to the characteristics of the task can simplify exploration and improve robustness to disturbances. This paper studies the effect of different action spaces in deep RL and advocates for variable impedance control in endeffector space (VICES) as an advantageous action space for constrained and contactrich tasks. We evaluate multiple action spaces on three prototypical manipulation tasks: Path Following (task with no contact), Door Opening (task with kinematic constraints), and Surface Wiping (task with continuous contact). We show that VICES improves sample efficiency, maintains low energy consumption, and ensures safety across all three experimental setups. Further, RL policies learned with VICES can transfer across different robot models in simulation, and from simulation to real for the same robot. Further information is available at https:stanfordvl.github.iovices.

A Comparison of Action Spaces for Learning Manipulation Tasks Designing reinforcement learning (RL) problems that can produce delicate and precise manipulation policies requires careful choice of the reward function, state, and action spaces. Much prior work on applying RL to manipulation tasks has defined the action space in terms of direct joint torques or reference positions for a jointspace proportional derivative (PD) controller. In practice, it is often possible to add additional structure by taking advantage of modelbased controllers that support both accurate positioning and control of the dynamic response of the manipulator. In this paper, we evaluate how the choice of action space for dynamic manipulation tasks affects the sample complexity as well as the final quality of learned policies. We compare learning performance across three tasks (peg insertion, hammering, and pushing), four action spaces (torque, joint PD, inverse dynamics, and impedance control), and using two modern reinforcement learning algorithms (Proximal Policy optimization and Soft ActorCritic). Our results lend support to the hypothesis that learning references for a taskspace impedance controller significantly reduces the number of samples needed to achieve good performance across all tasks and algorithms.