Reusing Static Analysis across Different DomainSpecific Languages using Reference Attribute Grammars. Context: Domainspecific languages (DSLs) enable domain experts to specify tasks and problems themselves, while enabling static analysis to elucidate issues in the modelled domain early. Although language workbenches have simplified the design of DSLs and extensions to general purpose languages, static analyses must still be implemented manually.  Inquiry: Moreover, static analyses, e.g., complexity metrics, dependency analysis, and declarationuse analysis, are usually domaindependent and cannot be easily reused. Therefore, transferring existing static analyses to another DSL incurs a huge implementation overhead. However, this overhead is not always intrinsically necessary: in many cases, while the concepts of the DSL on which a static analysis is performed are domainspecific, the underlying algorithm employed in the analysis is actually domainindependent and thus can be reused in principle, depending on how it is specified. While current approaches either implement static analyses internally or with an external Visitor, the implementation is tied to the languageu0027s grammar and cannot be reused easily. Thus far, a commonly used approach that achieves reusable static analysis relies on the transformation into an intermediate representation upon which the analysis is performed. This, however, entails a considerable additional implementation effort.  Approach: To remedy this, it has been proposed to map the necessary domainspecific concepts to the algorithmu0027s domainindependent data structures, yet without a practical implementation and the demonstration of reuse. Thus, to make static analysis reusable again, we employ relational Reference Attribute Grammars (RAGs) by creating such a mapping to a domainindependent overlay structure using higherorder attributes.  Knowledge: We describe how static analysis can be specified on analysisspecific data structures, how relational RAGs can help with the specification, and how a mapping from the domainspecific language can be performed. Furthermore, we demonstrate how a static analysis for a DSL can be externalized and reused in another general purpose language.  Grounding: The approach was evaluated using the RAG system JastAdd. To illustrate reusability, we implemented two analyses with two addressed languages each: a cycle detection analysis used in a small state machine DSL and for detecting circular dependencies in Java types and packages, and an analysis of variable shadowing, applied to both Java and the Modelica modelling language. Thereby, we demonstrate the reuse of two analysis algorithms in three completely different domains. Additionally, we use the cycle detection analysis to evaluate the efficiency by comparing our external analysis to an internal reference implementation analysing all Java programs in the Qualitas Corpus and thereby are able to show that an externalized analysis incurs only minimal overhead.  Importance: We make static analysis reusable, again, showing the practicality and efficiency of externalizing static analysis for both DSLs and general purpose languages using relational RAGs.

From CIL to Java bytecode: Semanticsbased translation for static analysis leveraging Abstract   A formal translation of CIL (i.e., .Net) bytecode into Java bytecode is introduced and proved sound with respect to the language semantics. The resulting code is then analyzed with Julia, an industrial static analyzer of Java bytecode. The overall process of translation and analysis is fast, scales to industrial programs, and introduces a negligible number of false alarms. The main contribution of this work is to leverage existing, mature, and sound analyzers for Java bytecode by applying them also to the wide range of .Net software systems. Experimental results show the actual effectiveness of this approach when applied to all the system libraries of the Microsoft .Net framework version 4.0.30319 (about 5MLOCs).