unimelb-nlp/MultiEup-v2 huggingface dataset:
Debate: Strengthening the system for protecting PDO and PGI denominations in the EU after the Prosecco/Prosek case
Date: THURSDAY, 17 FEBRUARY 2022
Speaker: Valter Flego
Political group: Renew
Country: Sweden
Language: HR

Ali, želim ovdje jasno i glasno reći da takozvani slučaj „ I zato poštovana gospođo Bizzotto, tu nema ni konflikta ni standarda, a ne daj Bože ni rata, kako vi kažete. Jer znamo jako dobro da vino treba i mora spajati ljude, a ne razdvajati. I naravno da je važno prošek zaštititi kako bi se spriječila nelojalna praksa za vino koje se prvi put spominje još 1844. godine. Ponavljam, 1844. godine: I kao što smo zaštitili kvalitetne autohtone poljoprivredne proizvode –  maslinovo ulje, istarski teran, pršut – isto želimo učiniti i s prošekom. I ja tu ne vidim problem jer znam, nakon primjera i bitke za naš teran, da pravilnim označavanjem proizvoda ne dolazi do nikakve zabune potrošača. I zato se veselim jačanju oznaka izvornosti i zato sam siguran da će i prošek ponosno nositi u budućnosti tu oznaku.  Poštovana povjerenice, molim vas da vas takva razmišljanja vode pri vašim budućim aktivnostima, kako bi energiju trošili na zaštitu kvalitetnih poljoprivrednih, autohtonih proizvoda, i time pomogli i poljoprivrednicima i potrošačima. Živjeli s prošekom,
Debate: Strengthening the system for protecting PDO and PGI denominations in the EU after the Prosecco/Prosek case
Date: THURSDAY, 17 FEBRUARY 2022
Speaker: Joachim Kuhs
Political group: ID
Country: Greece
Language: DE

Diese Angaben sind ja keine protektionistischen Maßnahmen, wie manche behaupten, sondern eine Art Qualitätssiegel. Das dient übrigens auch dem Schutz der Arbeiter und auch dem Schutz der Verbraucher, damit sie wissen, was sie bekommen. Sie sollten aber darauf achten, liebe Frau Kommissarin, dass Sie über die Ausgestaltung dieser Schutzrechte nicht neue bürokratische Hürden einführen, die den Binnenhandel erschweren und die letztendlich sogar geschäftsschädigend sind für den geschützten Hersteller. Wenn Sie das alles beachten, dann können Sie eigentlich nichts falsch machen. Entscheiden Sie sich für Prosecco. Das ist mein Wunsch, denn ich habe in meinem ganzen Leben noch nie etwas von Prosek gehört. Tut mir leid, das sagen zu müssen, aber Prosecco habe ich schon sehr häufig getrunken. Um einfach diese Verwirrung zu beenden, die damit in Verbindung ist, fordere ich Sie von der Kommission auf, hier Klarheit zu schaffen. Es kann nicht sein, dass diese beiden Begriffe nebeneinander stehen bleiben. Es führt nur zu Verwirrung.
Debate: Strengthening the system for protecting PDO and PGI denominations in the EU after the Prosecco/Prosek case
Date: THURSDAY, 17 FEBRUARY 2022
Speaker: Ladislav Ilčić
Political group: ECR
Country: France
Language: HR

No pogledajmo sad argumente. Prošek, dakle ne „prosek“ nego prošek, vino je koje ne samo, kao što je rekao gospodin Flego, da se spominje 1840. nego čak i u knjizi „Put po Dalmaciji“ koja je objavljena 1774. Dakle, prije 248 godina. Znači nikako nije riječ o novom proizvodu koji bi se htio okoristiti imenom  Prema tome, to su činjenice koje jednostavno daju prošeku sva prava da bude prepoznat, da bude zaštićen, kao i svi drugi autohtoni proizvodi.
Debate: Strengthening the system for protecting PDO and PGI denominations in the EU after the Prosecco/Prosek case
Date: THURSDAY, 17 FEBRUARY 2022
Speaker: Tomislav Sokol
Political group: PPE
Country: Italy
Language: HR

Poštovana predsjedavajuća, povjerenice, kolegice i kolege, rasprava o razlikama i sličnostima hrvatskog prošeka i talijanskog  Talijanske tvrdnje da je prošek novi proizvod, odnosno kopija njihovog  Pozdravljam činjenicu što je Komisija u svom pisanom očitovanju prošle godine zauzela razumno stajalište i dala do znanja da homonimija, odnosno sličnost naziva, nije dovoljna za odbacivanje hrvatskog zahtjeva, te da posebno s obzirom na lokalnu i tradicionalnu uporabu homonimi u tom smislu mogu koegzistirati kao u ovom slučaju. Također, drago mi je da je Komisija nedavno objavila hrvatski zahtjev za zaštitu tradicionalnog izraza prošek u Službenom listu EU-a te traje postupak donošenja konačne odluke.  S obzirom na navedeno, odgovorno tvrdim da hrvatski prošek i talijanski
Debate: Strengthening the system for protecting PDO and PGI denominations in the EU after the Prosecco/Prosek case
Date: THURSDAY, 17 FEBRUARY 2022
Speaker: Helena Dalli
Language: EN

The Commission will base its final decision to protect or reject the term ‘Prosek’, taking into consideration all available information, the EU legislation and the jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice, as well as the interests of all concerned parties. I insist on the fact that geographical indications benefit from a high level of protection at EU and international level. Further enhancing this level of protection is one of the key objectives of the upcoming revision of the system of geographical indications.  The Commission proposal is expected to be adopted in a few weeks, at the beginning of April, and I am sure that this will allow us some time to continue exchanging on this important topic, key to the competitiveness of our agricultural sector and to the capacity of the common agricultural policy to address societal demands on food and health.
Debate: The surge in commodity and input prices in the agricultural sector
Date: THURSDAY, 17 FEBRUARY 2022
Speaker: Carmen Avram
Political group: S-D
Country: Romania
Language: RO

Iată exemplul fermierilor din țara mea: la prețul  În zootehnie, este și mai grav: la noile facturi, se adaugă prețul mărit al furajelor, care reprezintă aproape 70 % din costul de producție. Standardele de bunăstare a animalelor, deci, se mențin din ce în ce mai greu. Dar cel mai afectat este sectorul cărnii de porc, unde situația este catastrofală. Aici au lovit suplimentar pesta porcină africană și reducerea exporturilor către China. În acest domeniu, trăim un paradox: deși avem surplus de carne de porc pe piață, consumatorul european plătește, culmea, mai mult pe kilogram. Per total, marjele de profit ale industriei în Europa au fost la cel mai scăzut nivel din ultimul deceniu.  Și totuși Comisia Europeană continuă să lase în derivă sectorul, spunând - mulți se întreabă de ce cu atâta ușurință - că așteaptă ca piața să se regleze singură. Aceeași inacțiune a Comisiei și în restul sectoarelor din agricultură, unde s-ar putea repara câte ceva prin, de exemplu, eliminarea tarifelor de protecție și a taxelor antidumping pentru unele importuri de îngrășăminte. Fără intervenție, însă, agricultura europeană continuă să se învârtă într-o spirală a scumpirilor care ar putea-o îngenunchea în doar câțiva ani.  Doamnă comisară, este bine că la nivelul Comisiei se cunoaște situația. Totuși, cum se împacă această lipsă de sprijin pentru fermierul european cu pretențiile pe care Comisia le are de la el: de a transforma revoluția verde în realitate și la termen; de a lupta cu fenomenul de abandon al terenurilor și de a reconstrui zona rurală; de a atrage tinerii în agricultură și de a face din politica agricolă comună un
Debate: The surge in commodity and input prices in the agricultural sector
Date: THURSDAY, 17 FEBRUARY 2022
Speaker: Bronis Ropė
Political group: Verts/ALE
Country: Austria
Language: LT

Dar kitas dalykas. Jeigu vienoje šalyje galbūt mažesnis poveikis, tai kitoje šalyje gali būti labai didelis poveikis, nes paramos skirtumas tarp šalių šiandien siekia beveik iki trijų kartų. Tai reikia suprasti tokį dalyką, kad atskirose šalyse, pvz., mano šalyje, Rytų šalyse, išmokos siekia tik apie 70 proc. Europos Sąjungos vidurkio. Jeigu toms šalims, kuriose išmokos du kartus didesnės, sudėtinga, o energetikos kainos visur yra labai panašios, tai toms šalims, kuriose mažos išmokos, problemų dar daugiau. Lygiai taip pat noriu pasakyti, kad mes turime atkreipti dėmesį į tai, kad kiekviena šalis pasigamintų tų būtiniausių maisto produktų, kurių reikia, kad mes jų nevežiotume iš vienos Europos Sąjungos šalies į kitą, kad pirmaeilis apsirūpinimas būtų toje šalyje. Linkiu sėkmės ir laukiam sprendimų.
Debate: The surge in commodity and input prices in the agricultural sector
Date: THURSDAY, 17 FEBRUARY 2022
Speaker: Joachim Kuhs
Political group: ID
Country: Greece
Language: DE

Und dennoch: Wenn jetzt Antworten gesucht werden in die Richtung, Eingriffe in den Markt zu machen, dann kann ich nur davor warnen. Das würde das Problem nicht beseitigen, es würde es vergrößern. Was können wir tun?  Ich möchte an zwei Dinge erinnern: Wir haben eine EZB, die für die Inflationsbekämpfung zuständig ist. Was tut sie dagegen? Frau Lagarde beschwichtigt und sagt: Das ist nur eine Delle. Aber die Landwirte sagen: Das ist keine Delle, das ist ein Berg, das ist ein Himalaya. Und wir brauchen dringend Lösungen. Bitte, Frau Lagarde, bekämpfen Sie die Inflation. Und das Zweite ist: Ich habe gestern einen Brief von meinem Gaslieferanten bekommen. Der Preis des Gases, das ich bekomme, wird um 70 % gesteigert. Was tun wir gegen die Gaspreise? Und da bitte ich, Folgendes zu berücksichtigen: Bitte öffnen Sie Nord Stream 2, damit endlich mehr Gas nach Europa fließen kann und der Preis sinken kann.
Debate: The surge in commodity and input prices in the agricultural sector
Date: THURSDAY, 17 FEBRUARY 2022
Speaker: Clare Daly
Political group: The Left
Country: France
Language: EN

Yes, we’ve had MEP after MEP getting up here yesterday condemning the project. We’ve had the German and French Governments singled out for particular attack for having the good sense to engage in dialogue with our Russian neighbour. Look, I’m against fossil fuels, but until we can transition to renewables, well then Nord Stream 2 is a far better option than filthy, fracked US gas. It has the potential to provide a reliable, relatively clean and inexpensive solution to EU’s energy problems, including those of our farmers, with the added benefit of improving EU-Russian relations, more trade, reduced barriers and more cooperation.  But of course, that then means an end to US bases and an end to NATO, and that’s the reason for the so-called Ukraine crisis. And I would remind colleagues of the words of Victoria Nuland last month, when she said the only way left for US diplomats to block euro purchases is to goad Russia into a military response and then claim that avenging this response outweighed any purely national economic interest.  I think we have to snap out of it. Stop being used as a US pawn. Stand up for our own interests, beneficial cooperation for our farmers and our people, and a peaceful resolution with Russia.
Debate: The surge in commodity and input prices in the agricultural sector
Date: THURSDAY, 17 FEBRUARY 2022
Speaker: Luke Ming Flanagan
Political group: The Left
Country: Germany
Language: EN

Madam President, just reading the text on this, and it says every day the EU’s food supply chain provides 450 million people in the EU with high quality food. But as with everything, the devil is in the detail. In Europe, we import more calories than we export to the world. And still we claim we are feeding the world.  This policy leaves us unnecessarily exposed at times of crisis and bobbing around in an ocean of uncertainty when it comes to input prices. Ireland, which also claims to be feeding the world, can’t even feed itself. We import our main food stuffs: carrots, potatoes, wheat, sugar – I could go on. The value of Ireland’s food energy net importing calories has at times exceeded the equivalent of the calorie intake of two and a half million people. We can’t even feed the type of livestock that we produce, so we import proteins. There’s talk, and that’s all it is, that we should produce our proteins in Europe. Only last week I noticed another tillage farm in Ireland converting to dairy, a dairy farm that will require imported protein. What could go wrong?  We’ve also created a system whereby those that produce the food get nothing whereas those companies that process it and sell it take all the profit. Even at that, their greed isn’t satiated. Even then, they move these companies to places like Luxembourg in order to avoid paying tax. The money never gets back to the community it was created in and as a result we have a broken system. Thanks for nothing Glanbia!  The system is broken. Not for the rich though, and that’s why it will never be bloody well fixed.
Debate: The surge in commodity and input prices in the agricultural sector
Date: THURSDAY, 17 FEBRUARY 2022
Speaker: Helena Dalli
Language: EN

The prevention of and response to market crises and negative impacts of the current input price on consumers, agriculture and the food sector requires both short-term and long-term solutions. The Commission and the Member States have several measures in our respective toolboxes, and the Commission will closely monitor the evolvement of energy, commodity and food prices in the coming months.
Debate: The surge in commodity and input prices in the agricultural sector
Date: THURSDAY, 17 FEBRUARY 2022
Speaker: Angel Dzhambazki
Political group: ECR
Country: Germany
Language: BG

Достигнахме до там, че в България в момента е лукс да си направиш салата от домати и краставици, тъй като цената им се конкурира с цената на месото, например. Всичко това обаче е вследствие на безумните „зелени“ политики, неописуемия лобизъм и грешните решения, вземани години наред. Само преди месец-два, отново в тази зала, коментирахме въпроса за транспорта на животните и вие се надпреварвахте да говорите за нуждата от нови и нови регламенти, директиви и прочее, които ще допринесат за повишаване на цените на крайния продукт на селскостопанските производители. Вече половин година цените на енергията летят, бизнеси затварят, чакайки по-добри времена, а отговор от страна на Комисията липсва. Не вярвам, че тази Европейска комисия може да представи разумно политическо решение на поставените въпроси.
Debate: Approval of the minutes of the part-session and forwarding of texts adopted
Date: THURSDAY, 17 FEBRUARY 2022
Speaker: Dita Charanzová
Country: France
Language: EN

The minutes of the sittings of 14 to 17 February will be submitted to Parliament for its approval at the beginning of its next sitting.  If there are no objections, I shall forward forthwith the resolutions adopted at these sittings to the persons and bodies named in the resolutions.
Debate: Russian aggression against Ukraine
Date: TUESDAY, 1 MARCH 2022
Speaker: Iratxe García Pérez
Political group: S-D
Country: Germany
Language: ES

Las democracias occidentales hemos logrado una admirable unidad para hacer frente a este desafío y es fundamental que mantengamos la unidad ante los graves retos que tendremos que seguir afrontando. Los cuatro paquetes de sanciones liderados por el señor Borrell son un primer paso ante una larga crisis que planteará nuevos dilemas; entre ellos, cómo seguir apoyando a Ucrania o cómo reaccionar a probables represalias rusas. La unidad requiere valor y sacrificio. Solo con valor y sacrificio alcanzaremos la autonomía energética para doblegar a Putin. Nuestro compromiso irrenunciable con un orden energético mundial cimentado en las energías renovables a largo plazo debe complementarse con la creación de reservas estratégicas de gas a corto plazo. Y también necesitamos valor y sacrificio para acoger a todos los refugiados que huyen de la guerra con un esfuerzo de responsabilidad compartida. El cobarde ataque de Putin muestra su verdadero temor: la democracia. Una exitosa transición democrática en Ucrania debe servir de inspiración a quienes valientemente hoy también han salido a las calles en Rusia. La lucha por la paz y la libertad de los pueblos ruso y ucraniano requiere nuestro compromiso. No descansaremos hasta conseguir que Putin sea juzgado como criminal de guerra por la Corte Penal Internacional. La agresión de Putin también desenmascara a sus cómplices de extrema derecha y a un modelo de convivencia que reprime a los opositores, censura a medios de comunicación y niega derechos individuales. A esta hora, en las ciudades y en los pueblos de Ucrania no solo están en juego la seguridad y la integridad territorial de este país, sino también el mundo en el que queremos vivir. Puede ser uno democrático, apoyado en el Derecho internacional, la diplomacia y los derechos humanos; o puede ser otro, fundado en la fuerza bruta, en las esferas de influencia y en la violación de los derechos que deben de ser universales.  Ningún tirano nos hará renunciar a nuestro deseo de forjar alianzas en torno a un proyecto de paz que protege la soberanía de las naciones, el progreso y la libertad de los pueblos y la integridad de las fronteras. La historia nunca se equivoca. No podemos dejar atrás a los ucranianos, solos, como nos sentimos en su momento los españoles en la primera mitad del siglo XX en la lucha entre el fascismo y la democracia. La resistencia del heroico pueblo ucraniano será el triunfo de las democracias occidentales. Y déjenme formular una última reflexión personal: me siento orgullosa de Europa, de la Europa de hoy, de la Europa que no se rinde y no se resigna, de la Europa que mira atrás para aprender de la historia, pero, sobre todo, mira hacia delante para seguir defendiendo lo más preciado: la democracia y la paz.
Debate: Russian aggression against Ukraine
Date: TUESDAY, 1 MARCH 2022
Speaker: Stéphane Séjourné
Political group: Renew
Country: Slovakia
Language: FR

Sur toutes les décisions prises cette semaine, Madame la Présidente, Monsieur le Président, je vous garantis le soutien absolu de mon groupe politique. Nous mesurons le travail énorme qui a été fait par les institutions européennes pour prendre et rendre opérationnelles les sanctions et les mesures de soutien à l’Ukraine. Si nous avions été seuls ou divisés, je n’ose imaginer ce que Poutine aurait fait de notre continent. Vous avez été, en quelque sorte, à la hauteur de l’histoire. Permettez-moi d’appeler à aller un cran plus loin, notamment sur la mesure de soutien à l’Ukraine. L’octroi du statut de candidat à l’adhésion a son importance. L’Ukraine ne rejoindra pas l’Union européenne avant quelques années avec un processus rigoureux, mais il est temps que nous reconnaissions que les Ukrainiens, par le sang versé au nom de la liberté et de la démocratie, sont déjà membres de notre communauté de destin. Le statut de candidat est, en ce sens, une juste reconnaissance. Nous attendons également des sanctions fortes avec un objectif: assécher les financements de la guerre du clan Poutine, pour mettre fin à son régime et à la guerre. Embargo commercial sur les technologies, le pétrole et le gaz, saisie des propriétés des oligarques et des passeports dorés, fin des droits de résidence – vous l’avez mentionné, Madame la Présidente – toutes ces sanctions doivent être activées le plus rapidement possible. Nous espérons que ces mesures permettront le sursaut du peuple russe, majoritairement opposé – il faut le rappeler – à la guerre. Le courage des manifestants, notamment ceux d’opposition en Russie, doit être aussi salué dans cet hémicycle. Ces mesures ont un coût pour nos économies. Nous invitons donc l’Europe à mutualiser au niveau européen ces coûts pour les pays et les entreprises les plus exposés. Je terminerai peut-être par un élément, Monsieur le Président, Madame la Présidente, pour rappeler que cette crise démontre que l’Europe a encore du chemin à parcourir pour garantir sa souveraineté. Ce travail de long terme vers notre autonomie stratégique doit se conclure et inclure une révision des budgets de défense, au niveau national comme au niveau européen, ainsi qu’une stratégie d’autonomie énergétique. Chers collègues, la protection de notre modèle européen a certes un prix. Mon groupe politique, pour lequel la liberté est une valeur cardinale et fondatrice, répond sans trembler: nous sommes prêts à assumer le coût, tant dans les conséquences et les sanctions que dans les investissements massifs dans les outils de souveraineté européenne. Nous serons à la hauteur du sacrifice du peuple européen, mais aussi du sacrifice de millions d’Européens avant nous, qui ont fait du peuple européen le plus libre du monde.
Debate: Russian aggression against Ukraine
Date: TUESDAY, 1 MARCH 2022
Speaker: Ryszard Antoni Legutko
Political group: ECR
Country: Germany
Language: EN

Once Putin decided to go ahead with the invasion, it became clear he’s determined to subdue Ukraine and will not hesitate to resort to extreme measures. It was he who once said, let me remind you, that the collapse of the Soviet Union had been the greatest geopolitical tragedy of the century. So there should be no misunderstanding as to his intentions. He plans to create what was once the Soviet empire – perhaps not with one stroke, but that is definitely his final objective. Moreover, he has been more or less open about it all along.  The Ukrainian army and the Ukrainian people are opposing the invaders, and they desperately need some military back—up, arms and other tools of defence. Fortunately, after the initial opposition from some countries, it is now about 20 governments I think, which have started helping the Ukrainians. It’s very good that some time ago, in the Council, the Member States decided to create a European Peace Facility and that these funds can now be used to help Ukraine. I’m proud to say that it is my government that was first to propose, as early as Thursday morning, to activate the European Peace Facility.  So, the flow of arms, the flow of necessary technology and other means of defence must continue. Whatever the effects of the sanctions, who wins the war will ultimately be decided on the battlefield.  Finally – and I must say this, I’m sorry, because as usual, the EU with its narcissistic and self—congratulatory proclivities likes to escape responsibility – Putin made his decision because he was induced by the weakness of the West. Let us be frank. He did not think much of the Western leaders, and it showed. He didn’t hide it. In a way, he was right, having been for a long time pampered by the French and German Governments, by some American administrations, and also by the European Commission that was both unable and unwilling to stymie the Nord Stream projects.  So to those Western leaders and governments that took upon themselves the job of dealing with Russia, and particularly to the German politicians – but not only to them – we must say today, ladies and gentlemen: you blew it and your leadership credibility is gone. It’s time for a reset, and let us start by enabling Ukraine to join the European Union.
Debate: Russian aggression against Ukraine
Date: TUESDAY, 1 MARCH 2022
Speaker: Kinga Gál
Political group: NI
Country: Spain
Language: HU

Elnök Asszony, Főképviselő Úr! Magyarországra tegnap estig több mint 90 ezer menekült érkezett. A magyar történelem egyik legnagyobb humanitárius programja zajlik éppen, a hazánkba érkező menekültek, illetve az Ukrajnába küldendő segély tekintetében. Mindenkit befogadunk, ellátunk, függetlenül attól, Ukrajna melyik részéről menekül, vagy milyen etnikumú. Az egész ország egy emberként segít. Teljes mértékben elítéljük az orosz katonai agressziót, és kiállunk Ukrajna területi integritása és szuverenitása mellett. Magyarország az egységes európai fellépést kulcsfontosságúnak tartja, támogatja Ukrajna tagjelölti státuszát, s minden rosszindulatú álhírrel, dezinformációval ellentétben, a magyar kormány támogat minden közös szankciót, egységes döntést, ideértve az európai békekeret aktiválását is. Nem engedhetjük, hogy belerángassanak a szomszédban zajló tragikus háborúba. Az emberek békét akarnak! Háborús helyzetben a nemzeti kisebbségek még kiszolgáltatottabbak, még kitettebbek az álhíreknek, dezinformációnak, így oda kell figyelnünk a kárpátaljai magyar közösség biztonságára is. Most stratégiai nyugalomra van szükség, hogy az erőszak és a fegyverek térfeléről visszatérjenek a felek a tárgyalásokhoz, a diplomáciai megoldásokhoz. A béke helyreállításán kell dolgoznunk, a szomszédságban és a térségben egyaránt, és ehhez minden segítséget meg kell adnunk Ukrajnának.