R20000 fine for Reitz four! - Stormfront
R20000 fine for Reitz four!
Reitz four were today given a fine of R20000 each and a 5 year suspended sentence for humiliating university workers by performing an initiation ceremony on them in 2007.
This in contrast to the R10000 fine multi-millionaire Julius Malema received for public inciting the murder of whites recently, which many suspect led the the increase in farm attacks
Reitz Four fined R20 000 each - Mail & Guardian Online: The smart news source
07-30-2010, 04:35 PM #2
Re: R20000 fine for Reitz four!
Humiliating a nog is the cardinal sin. I remember back in the late 80`s Kovsie students torching a red carpet that was laid out for race traitor de klerk ... students from the agriculture faculty. Needless to say, the asshole never spoke that night
The facts are that these nogs knew that a video was being made. On the video they laugh about what happened ... crimen iniuria not if you willingly participate ... give me a break. What condemned the 4 was white guilt, pressurized from university forces. This sealed their fate in court. Now every nog wants a million, fostering more white guilt. The truth is that the White Race needs not feel guilty about anything, if anything the nog must bear the guilt for living of the White Man. No excuse of the 4 would do for the communist, which ultimate aim is to destroy the White Race, here and world wide. Whats happening here is happening world wide - the White Race is under attack as never before. Just another "truth and reconciliation" case, similar to the Nuremburg trails.
07-30-2010, 04:40 PM #3
Yes, it becomes more obvious every day.
The news has been covering this thing for over 3 years, but farm murders get virtually no media attention.
Daar word ‘n beroep op oud-Reitzies sowel as almal wat hulle harte oopstel vir die Reitz-4 seuns wat elk met R20 000 beboet is en ‘n eis van R1 miljoen teen elk vir regskoste, om enige bydrae te lewer. Lees asb hierdie brief van Robbie Dennis.
Uit al die berigte wat Hennie Pienaar vir ons saamgestel het en ook die berigte in die nuus, het julle seker van die Reitz-4 se vonnis verneem. In die Volksblad van 27 Julie word die manne se huidige inkomste aangedui. Dit wissel tussen R 3500 en R 4800 per maand. Die boete wat hulle moet betaal is 'n bedrag van R 20 000 elk. Dan is daar nog die regskoste en ook die eis van R1 milj teen elk van hulle, wat nog in die Gelykheidshof betwis moet word. Met behulp van Christo Dippenaar Prokureurs en NUOR is 'n soort van 'n "Trust" vir die Reitz-4 tot stand gebring om fondse in te samel om die manne tegemoet te kom.
Die NUOR doen 'n beroep op elke Reitzman om 'n bydrae tot die fonds te maak. As u wil help moet nie dink "R50 sal tog nie help nie". Elke Rand wat u bydrae sal sinvol vir die Reitz-4 aangewend word. Reitzers kom elkeen van ons stort ten minste 'n R50.00 in die fonds om die manne te ondersteun. Hulle is soos ons Reitzmanne. Dit is werklik jammer dat studentepret tot dié situasie gelei het. Niemand wat vir die 6 maande vanaf Augustus 2007 tot Februarie 2008 na die video gekyk en dit geniet het sou ooit kon droom dat hierdie vonnis die uiteinde daarvan sou wees.
Die Bankbesonderhede vir die Reitz-4 Fonds is :
Eerste Nasionale Bank : Rek Nr 62205207980
Takkode : 230534 Verw. MD2178
Dit sal waardeer word as 'n skenker sy Van en Voorletters na die verwysings nr aanbring.
Dankie dat die NUOR op u kan staatmaak.
HELP ASB REITZ-4 BLANKE SLAGOFFERS VAN RASSISME
I contributed my part.
This is after the prosecutor and the defence agreed that R10K would be appropriate... typical magistrate deciding to be cool for the media and cracking under media pressure or rather wanting to catch a cool ray of media spotlight...
I recall when old Billy Rautenbach's empire cracked the "Scorpions" just like their FBI mates in America decided to be clever and arrest Billy's attorney. It was just a ruse against her and she had a hotshot advocate quickly shrivel the penis of the arrogant little black pratt the Scorpions sent and her bail was agreed at R10K... unfortunately however the Magistrate was a media hound of her own and decided it'd be cool to be better than that so she then decided to set bail at R20K so the lawyer had to go into the cells for a few hours... while her family ran to fetch the remainder. Value in this for prosecution = ZERO. For Magistrate = ZERO. For Defence = an hour of discomfort at the most....
Theresa Poirier = what a pratt
Sounds like this magistrate was of the same ilk.
I have made a contribution to undermine the injustice system.
A recent video of black students brutally initiating white students in another hostel at the same university has been rejected as being "not racist"... in fact had it not been for it being in the smalls of The Star last night I would have missed it...
Last edited by Vry Burgher; 08-04-2010 at 09:20 AM.
08-04-2010, 08:52 AM #6
Die boete wat hulle moet betaal is 'n bedrag van R 20 000 elk. Dan is daar nog die regskoste en ook die eis van R1 milj teen elk
It's a pity we don't have access to that video!
Otherwise we could circulate it on You-tube and to everyone we know in SA.
We could watch government squirm as they try to explain why this was swept under the rug while courts and media went for overkill on the Reitz four!
Censorbugbear reports...: Black OFS students not punished for humiliation of Afrikaner youths at Villa Bravado hostel
Thanks, but You-tube has removed it!
The picture seems to jam 6 seconds in
The Afrikaans students were forced to 'make an oath' while contorting their bodies in humiliating postures, they were dragged by their arms and legs around the floor and some black students delivered fierce kicks during this process which left the Afrikaners
There were no bleeding blacks in the case where the whites were charged.
Wouter Wessel local youth leader of the Freedom Front Plus opposition party, has accused the University of the Free State’s management of maintaining double-standards: they take action against white students for initiations perceived as ‘racist’, – while totally ignoring identical events which also are being perpetuated by black students against Afrikaner youths.
Well, I wouldn't quite call them identical incidents, since no-one was hurt in 2008, as opposed to this incident that they are covering up!
A 3 year media circus over a supposed crimen injuria case, but when it comes to assault they cover it up.
And that goes for You-tube too!
Last edited by Trotis; 08-04-2010 at 12:06 PM.
08-05-2010, 05:30 AM #9
That was it; I`m sorry I did not download it to my computer
Na aanleiding van die Reitz-4 se skulderkenning in die hof in Bloemfontein is daar heelwat navrae aan die regspan gerig oor waarom en waarop die vier seuns dan skuldig sou pleit. Hulle prokureur, mnr Christo Dippenaar, het dit goedgedunk om 'n verklaring daaroor uit te reik wat ons hier plaas :
CHRISTO DIPPENAAR PROKUREURS
PER: C J Dippenaar/zh/MD2178
Reid Plaza Suite 2, Reidstraat 21
TEL: 051 430 2370
FAKS: 051 430 2664
Ter verduideliking van die pleit van skuldig:
Alvorens ek handel met die regsmeriete is daar sekere aspekte wat ek moet uitlig:
1. Waarop ons nou gepleit het, verskil geensins van dit wat ons die heeltyd erken het nie, nl :
1.1 Dat ons die video gemaak het;
1.2 Dat 'n persoon wat die tradisies en rituele van die koshuis nie ken nie en die video sien - moontlik kan dink dat die werknemers verneder is;
1.3 Dat die video aan metgeselle van koshuislede gewys is tydens die kultuuraand - en dat hulle nie begrip daarvoor kan hê nie;
1.4 Dat veral die urine toneel aan buitestaanders aanstoot kan gee, indien hulle onbewus is dat dit 'n simulasie is.
2. Wat ons ontken het en dit is ook so deur die staat aanvaar. Ons het ontken dat :
2.1 Dat die werknemers gedwing was om deel te neem;
2.2 Dat die studente opset gehad het om die werknemers te verneder;
2.3 Dat dit rassisties gegrond was;
2.4 Dat daar urine in die brousel was;
2.5 Dat Sefebe gebruik is as vloekwoord vir die swart werknemers.
Hierdie erkennings en ontkennings is so aanvaar deur die staat en is die klagstaat dienooreenkomstig gewysig.
Die Skuldigpleit op dolus eventualis (moontlikheidsbewussyn) word nie gesien as 'n ernstige misdryf nie.
By alle misdrywe moet daar skuld (dolus) bewys word as element. Skuld kan of direk (directus) of indirek (eventualis) wees en waarby laasgenoemde, die beskuldigde net die moontlikheid moet kan voorsien - dit wel aan die element sal voldoen van skuld met 'n moontlikheidsbewussyn (dolus eventualis).
Dit kan ook aan die hand van die volgende verduidelik word:
1. As ek op 'n bok mik en ek skiet hom raak
1.1 Het ek bedoel om die bok te skiet Dit is dus dolus directus - oogmerk opset
2. As ek skyf skiet op 'n klip en die koeël skrum weg en die koeël tref die bok en hy is dood.
2.1 Ek kan die moontlikheid voorsien het dat iets anders getref kon word as die koeël wegskrum. Dit is dus dolus eventualis (Moontlikheidsbewussyn)
Ons pleit is dus skuldig gegrond op dolus eventuaris. Alhoewel ons hierdie feite alreeds by die aanvang van die klag aan die staat geopenbaar het, het hulle nie die klagstaat gewysig soos wat gedoen is Maandag nie, of kans gesien om so 'n Pleit te aanvaar nie. Die nuwe aanklaer wat eers verlede Vrydag op die toneel verskyn het, het die pleit verstaan en dit so aanvaar. Hoe dit ookal sy daar is nie handdoek inggegooi nie, maar slegs gepleit op wat ons van die begin af erken het. Dit is ook nie by wyse van pleitooreenkoms gedoen nie alhoewel daar ooreengekom is op die feite soos hierbo uiteengesit.
VERKLARING OOR SKULDERKENNING VAN REITZ-4
Its clear that this incident was used to discredit the White Man in South Africa further as the "racist oppressor", thus fueling black racism, and bleeding the White Man dry financially
08-05-2010, 06:57 AM #10
Let me just explain this intent thing properly because the damn lawyers are just too awful at it... I should know ... I used to be one.
The situation of dolus eventualis is more than just a question of I foresee an outcome. That is simplistic. If I should have foreseen an outcome but did not then that is negligence not intent. Dolus eventualis requires much more.
In a dolus eventualis for instance one must foresee the possible outcome and make peace with it.
There is a bird sitting on the fence next to a nursery school playground. I am not the brightest so I take aim with my .22. There are kids playing but I make peace with the possibility I could shoot one of them and continue with shooting at the bird. I miss. A kid is killed. I am guilty of murder.
This was often used as the rationale in the common purpose necklacing cases the leftist media never unbderstood in the 80's and then shut up about in the 90's when someone explained it to them. The crowd swarm around some idiot, drag a tyre round his neck, set him alight and stab him... the whole crowd is guilty of murder even though not all of them actually partook of the murder... hence the Sharpville Six who were saved from a date with a length of rope in Pretoria by mere hours because FW DE Klerk was a chicken...
Two robbers go to rob a convenience store. Only one has a gun. He shoots and kills the clerk. BOTH robbers are guilty of murder because the unarmed one foresaw the possibility but made peace with it and joined the enterprise.
So what the attorney is saying is not 100% accurate. In fact what has happened is that the boys foresaw that the dignity of the workers would be negatively affected, but made peace with that and continued. What is clear though is that the court case indicates that the court accepted (or must have accepted as fact) that the motive was not racial... and yet guess what has come out?
And then despite there being a set of agreed facts before the magistrate the lackey still chose to use the media hype to affect his/her judgment....
Wonderful place we live in...
Axel Reitz zur Festnahme von Dr. Duke am 25.11.2011 StAloysius European News 0 11-28-2011 10:50 AM
Reitz Racist Video Bloemfontein Ian Smith SA General Forum 0 08-24-2010 08:36 AM
One Fine Armageddon suepeace Newslinks & Articles 9 07-24-2006 08:21 PM
Page generated in 0.59850 seconds with 11 queries