.325 Short Mag. RCBS 2- Die Set | Bid-N-Buy Realty & Auctions, Inc.
Back to Catalog Result: 1222 of 1853
Lot # : 8604 - .325 Short Mag. RCBS 2- Die Set Die ekologiese krisis en wat is die Missie van die Kerk ? | Pro Regno
Posted by: proregno | January 19, 2012
“Both DeYoung and Gilbert are highly respected by the young, Reformed, and restless crowd that is most likely to swallow the missional agenda without much reflection. If nothing else, What Is the Mission of the Church? should give evangelical Christians reasons to pause and reconsider where they are headed.”
Tydens GKSA Sinode 2012 is daar ‘n beskrywingspunt aanvaar aangaande die ‘Openbare getuienis oor die ekologiese krisis’. Dit was artikel 25.5 in die Agenda.
Tydens die bespreking het slegs een predikant daarmee ‘n probleem gehad, ds. Victor Correia (GK Phalaborwa), wat gemeen het volgens art.30 KO die saak by Christelike wetenskap hoort nie op die kerk se tafel nie, die taak van die Kerk is om die Evangelie te verkondig. Let wel: dit gaan nie oor of ekologie ‘n belangrike saak is nie, maar of dit die kerk se taak is om aan te spreek, moet dit die kerk se fokus wees, al die ‘sosiale sake’ ?
Hierdie opmerking deur ds. Correia het heelwat verontwaardiging by baie afgevaardiges tot gevolg gehad. Gelukkig het die voorsitter, ds. Danie Snyman, sy reg om te verskil met die res van die sinode verdedig.
Hierdie enkele getuienis tussen die hele skare, is egter belangriker as wat baie mense dink. Hier is ‘n paar sake van die Openbare Getuienis wat die sinode met groot meerderheid aanvaar het, wat meer klink soos ‘n sosio-politieke manifes van ‘n politieke party as ‘n kerklik-profetiese getuienis oor die belangrike saak:
“1. die ongebreidelde bevolkingsaanwas van baie volkere op aarde wat toenemende en onhoudbare druk op die aarde se beperkte hulpbronne en lewensonderhoudstelsels plaas
4. die uiters oneweredige verspreiding van welvaart op aarde, sodat sommige mense in ellende en hongersnood verkeer terwyl andere in oorvloed en oordaad lewe.
7. die skynbare onvermoë van leiers om die onvolhoubare gaping tussen ryk en arm te verklein.”
10. om gesinsbeplanning op verantwoordelike wyse aan te pak en dat leiers hierin duidelike leiding sal gee.”
Juis omdat hierdie sake nou al meer op die tafel van die kerke kom, sal dit goed wees om die volgende boek te bestudeer:
What is the Mission of the Church?: Making sense of Social Justice, Shalom, and the Great Commission, by Kevin DeYoung, Greg Gilbert
Ek wag nog vir my kopie, maar terwyl ek wag gee ek solank vir u die resensie hier onder as inleiding.
Ek wil ook die volgende aanbod maak aan enige persoon wat hier lees en belangstel:
doen ‘n resensie van hierdie boek (minimum 5 bladsye, A4 12 spasiëring) vir die Pro Regno blog, dan ontvang u die boek gratis. Kontak my by proregno@gmail.com as u belangstel in hierdie aanbod.
Let wel: ek stem nie met elke detail aspek van die boek of die resensent saam (soos hier onder uiteengesit) nie, en noem dit kortliks aan die einde van die resensie, maar ek dink die boek se onderwerp as sulks is baie belangrik om van kennis te neem, veral ook in die lig van die GKSA se oproep via die ‘Omkeerstrategie’ en die ‘Ordevoorstel’.
What Is the Mission of the Church? Making Sense of Social Justice, Shalom and the Great Commission by Kevin DeYoung and Greg Gilbert (Wheaton: Crossway, 2011), pp. 283, review by Gary Gilley.
The authors contend that determining the mission of the church “is the most confusing, most discussed, most energizing, and most potentially divisive issue in the evangelical church today” (p. 25). Scot McKnight claims that recent interest in social justice, or what he calls missional “represents the biggest shift in evangelicalism in the last century” (p. 142). I believe these men are correct. Much ink has been spilled of late promoting the social agenda and a good book challenging missional thinking—drawing us back to Scripture to carefully analyze such thinking—was needed. This is that book. It is well done, carefully researched, scripturally based and extremely practical. It is also written by the right men. Both DeYoung and Gilbert are highly respected by the young, Reformed, and restless crowd that is most likely to swallow the missional agenda without much reflection. If nothing else, What Is the Mission of the Church? should give evangelical Christians reasons to pause and reconsider where they are headed.
Specifically, the authors are addressing whether the “mission of the church is discipleship or good deeds or both” (p. 16). They also want to consider the role of the church in pursuing social justice and building the kingdom of God on earth (p. 16). Their thesis, often stated and defended throughout, is that the church’s mission “is to go into the world and make disciples by declaring the gospel of Jesus Christ in the power of the Spirit and gathering these disciples into churches, that they might worship the Lord and obey His commands now and in eternity to the glory of God the Father” (p. 62) (see also pp. 231-239; 241-242; 245-247). They do not want to be misunderstood to say that Christians should be indifferent to suffering in the world (pp. 22-23), just that alleviation of suffering is not the mandate for the church—making disciples is.
Having said this, DeYoung and Gilbert know they are swimming against the current of recent popular evangelical thinking. Discounting emergent leaders, such as Brian McLaren, who frame the church’s mission in purely social terms, nevertheless mainstream evangelicals are adopting much the same program. The difference so far is that thinkers such as Scot McKnight and Christopher Wright are not abandoning the Great Commission, they are merely adding the social schema and elevating it to equal status with the Great Commission. John R. W. Stott, an early leader in this approach wrote, “Evangelism and social action, therefore, are full partners in Christian mission” (p. 54). Although not mentioned in the book, authors from Francis Chan to David Platt would define the mission of the church as including environmental stewardship, poverty relief, digging wells, working for social justice and medical attention to the needy. In other words, the mission of the church is being broadened far beyond the Great Commission. DeYoung and Gilbert argue that the believer will involve himself in social issues by virtue of his love for his neighbors, but there is nothing particularly Christian about humanitarian work (pp. 231-239). Christians can lock arms with non-Christians over social concerns, and they should, but they should not confuse this action with the unique mission of the church—to proclaim the gospel and make disciples (pp. 224-229). “We are not called,” they write, “to bring a broken planet back to its created glory. But we are to call broken people back to the creator” (p. 248).
Leviticus 19:9-18 (pp. 143-147) Leviticus 25 (pp. 147-153) Isaiah 1 (pp. 153-155) Isaiah 58 (pp. 155-156) Jeremiah 22 (pp. 156-158—good summary) Amos 5 (pp. 158-159) Micah 6:8 (pp. 159-161) Matthew 25:31-46 (pp. 162-165—although their interpretation is out of context) Luke 10:25-37 (pp. 165-166) Luke 16:19-31 (pp. 166-167) 2 Corinthians 8-9 (pp. 168-170) James 1, 2, 5 (pp. 170-171)
Of a more positive nature, the authors provides biblical understanding concerning dealing with the poor (pp. 175-177; 186-192), owning possessions (pp. 177-179), rejecting guilt motivations that are often used (pp. 192-193), the Cultural Mandate (pp. 208-213), continuity issues between the present and new heavens and earth (pp. 213-219), the importance of @#!*% in our understanding of mission (pp. 244-245) and the value of the church realizing that it is a “holy huddle” (p. 264). They also trace God’s commands for social involvement through the Scriptures and determine that the focus of such concern is on the covenantal people not society at large (pp. 184-186). In the book of Acts, for instance, we find no examples of societal renewal on the part of the disciples (p. 49).
The authors are definitely covenantal in their theology, which affects some of their thinking. For example, they accept George Ladd’s “already, not yet” understanding of the kingdom (pp. 49, 99, 112, 117-118, 124-125, 131-132), Jesus is presently on David’s throne (pp. 85-87), confuse the millennium with the eternal kingdom (pp. 88-123), strangely believe that when John proclaimed the kingdom was near that is what he meant, but when Jesus did the same He meant the kingdom was actually here (p. 95), Christians are the Israel of God (p. 201);, and the present heaven and earth will not be destroyed but renewed (pp. 213-219). While I personally disagree with each of these positions none of them appreciatively diminishes the argument of the book, which is that the church’s unique mission is the Great Commission not the Cultural Mandate to fix the planet.
[nota: ek stem hier meer saam met die skrywers, as met die resent, wat bogenoemde paragraaf betref. En, die Evangelie bevestig en handhaaf die Groot Opdrag, vernietig dit nie. Die verskil is of ons ‘n ‘sosiale agenda’ volg a) in die amp van gelowige op elke terrein [dit is nie die primêre taak van die Kerk nie, dit is juis die skrywers se probleem met baie kerke wat nou ‘sosiale agendas’ ontwikkel]; en b. volgens watter standaard werk ons op elke terrein waar die Here ons roep om te arbei en te getuig: God se goeie onfeilbare Woord of die mens se valse onbybelse oplossings soos dit tot uiting kom in die ‘sosiaal-demokratiese menseregte’ bevrydings-utopiese grondwette, getuienisse en verklarings ? – slc)
What Is the Mission of the Church? is a valuable book. I hope many well-meaning missional-leaning believers will read it and consider its thesis. In light of the popularity of the social agenda, and a present confusion over the mission of the church, I would encourage all pastors and Christian leaders to read this work.
Hier is een van die skrywers van die boek, Kevin DeYoung se skrywe oor die boek:
What is the Mission of the Church ?
Hier is besprekings, gesprekke en videos oor die boek:
Nog ‘n resensie van die boek:
Review Of Kevin DeYoung and Greg Gilbert’s ‘What is the Mission of the Church’?
An Evangelical Consensus on the Mission of the Church?
Posted in boekbesprekings, boeke en audios, ekologiese krisis, gksa, gksa sinode 2012, sosiale sake
« Twee jaar oud
Die GKSA en PCA se ekumeniese eenheid en Strategiese Planne »
Verskoon , ek wil nie besprekings hier ontspoor nie, maar terwyl ekologie hier onder andere ter sprake is: waar is die asemrowende blog-foto geneem? (hierdie artikel ag ek so belangrik dat ek ‘n skakel aan ‘n hele paar mense gestuur het).
By: Henrietta Klaasing on January 20, 2012
Sjoe! Hierdie boek is ‘n mondvol. ‘n Baie tydige boek, ek stem ook meer met die skrywers se siening in die laaste paragraaf saam as met die van die resent. Die boek is tydig omdat al meer kerke hulle uitsluitlik begin toespits op die “social gospel”. Die taak van die kerk is om die evangelie te verkondig en om na die gemeente om te sien. Baie het die verkeerde siening dat hulle die wereld kan verander en daardeur die Koninkryk kan laat kom terwyl Christus gese het hierdie Evangelie moet aan die ganse mensdom verkondig word en dan sal die einde kom. En tog…moet ons as lig van die wereld ‘n balans handhaaf deur ook uit te reik na die nood van diegene buite die kerk, sonder om die mense binne die kerk se welsyn te vergeet.
By: Fanie van Emmenes on January 20, 2012
Henrietta, ja, dit is ‘n pragtige foto, ek weet ongelukkig nie waar die plek is nie, maar dit laat ‘n mens verlang na die hemel ! Die foto kom saam met die ‘wordpress.theme’ wat ek hier gebruik. As iemand weet waar die plek is, laat weet ons asb.
By: proregno on January 20, 2012
Fanie, dan vir die goeie opmerkings.
[…] Die ekologiese krisis en wat is die Missie van die Kerk ? […]
[…] 2. Die ekologiese krisis en wat is die Missie van die Kerk ? […]
By: Die roeping en taak van die Kerk van Christus | Pro Regno on April 22, 2013
[…] The Mission of the Church? Making sense of Social Justice […]