Home page III - Tres Jolie Merelbeke
Name of PersonJoe Emeliah - 1.00€William Hanna - 2.00€John Andrews - 2.00€Paul Gabriella - 100.00€Gu jun pyo - 10.00€
12:00 am 1:00 am2:00 am3:00 am4:00 am5:00 am6:00 am7:00 am8:00 am9:00 am10:00 am11:00 am12:00 pm1:00 pm2:00 pm3:00 pm4:00 pm5:00 pm6:00 pm7:00 pm8:00 pm9:00 pm10:00 pm11:00 pm
9:00 am 10:00 am11:00 am12:00 pm1:00 pm2:00 pm3:00 pm4:00 pm5:00 pm6:00 pm7:00 pm8:00 pm9:00 pm10:00 pm11:00 pm12:00 am Die EU se roekelose uitbreiding	Timosjenko voer Soros se rewolusie
Skrywer Karin RoodtGepubliseer op 3 Desember 20133 Desember 2013Kategorieë Karin Roodt, Rubrieke	Johann Theron
Poetin weet dat Amerika kompeteer en as vorige intelligensie offisier weet hy maar al te goed wat dit beteken. Ons samewerking met Rusland na die Angolese oorlog was redelik goed dmv militere en kern projekte. As mens die langtermyn beskou is Rusland minder liberaal en meer versoenbaar met die afrikaner. Die hedendaagse polisie vergelyk selfs ons misdaad syfers met Rusland (agv die wit sterftes). Die probleem is egter nog ons westerse doktrines wat moeilik veranderbaar is en waarvoor ons deur die VV betaal word as ons vredeswerk doen in Afrika. Nou ja – ek raai eintlik maar net.
Kommunisme mag dalk dood wees in naam maar leef nog voort in baie mense in rusland se denke en harte. Daar is baie van hulle wat terugverlang na kommunisme – dit is die een ding wat teen hulle tel.
Putin is ‘n Marxis in murg en been.
Weliswaar ‘n nuwe opgedateerde kommunis wat meer modern voorkom as sy voorgangers wat hul Perestroika te laat in werking gestel het.
In daardie opsig is daar seker ooreenkomste tussen ons en die Russe, maar ek weet nie of dit iets is om op trots te wees nie.
Ons werk lekker saam met hulle. Die verskille tot dusver is dat hulle swart boekies in hulle agtersakke gebruik om wiskunde te doen en dus min papierwerk het en natuurlik die geloofskonflik wat miskien die moeilikste aspek is. Maar hulle vier ook Kersfees en het groot kapitaliste. Ek weet nie, maar dit voel vir my ons kan saamwerk – los net die meisies uit.
Jou “ons” verwys seker na die SAKP en die ANC?
‘n Ou wat vanaf sy studente dae, iewers in die vroeë sewentigers as lid van die Kommuniste Party aanvaar is en tot met die ontbinding van die Party gedurende 1991 lid gebly het, is ‘n jakkals wat nie maklik van haar verander nie.
Dan was hy ook ‘n hogere piet (Kolonel) binne die baie eksklusiewe Eerste Direktoraat van die KGB tot in 1991.
Hoe ookal. Hulle meisies is wragtag pragtag.
Net jammer dat die Russe so bang vir seep en water is.
Omdat jou belangstelling duidelik in ingewikkelde kwessies soos seep en water is, moet jy vir ons verduidelik hoekom al die ANC se raadgewers oor ongelykheid en klasseverskille wit en Brits is?
Weet nie van die blankes persy nie maar die Britte is is bang vir water en seep – dit is n bekende feit.
Sokkol antie met oompie Persy?
Ja maar hy wil nie byt nie –
Gassie ou teppit
Dat seep en water jou belangstelling sodanig prikkel en jy boonop een of ander fobie vertroetel oor ANC raadgewers (alweer daai blerrie Huddleston!!! 🙂 wat wit en Brits sou wees!
Krap vir jouself ‘n rubriek uit oor daai onderwerp ou biepbap. Dan hoef jy nie jouself so met ‘n plank te kom wetter onder ‘n tiettil wat oor die Russki’s handel nie.
Mmm, ek sien die minderwaardigheid het weer die oorhand gekry. Gaan kommunisme nie oor klasseverskille nie? As ek reg onthou het jy ons weer kom bang praat oor die Rooi Gevaar. Kom oor jou bomskok poepies
Van minderwaardigheid gepraat…Jou eerste poging tot gesprekvoering, is ‘n uitstekende voorbeeld van dit waarvan jy andere beskuldig. Of gaan jy dit vinnig uitvee?
Jou ‘poepies’ is net so flou soos jou aandag soekery.
Ek sien, jy het jouself nou dieper in jou kommunistiese gat ingespit want jy het begin teem oor die euwels van kommunisme. Van aandag soek gepraat. Moet jy nie die oom Apies met die pyp op die stoep impersonation vaarwel roep nie? Jy lyk net agterlik. O ekskuus, jy is
Snik oompie AB.
Sommer nog enetjie – snik!
My buurvrou het n baie bekende seun wat met n
Russiese vrou getroud is – sy is werklik mooier as n mens EN sy is pynlik netjies in haar huis met uitstekende smaak wat haar komposisies in haar huis betref.
So is daar gelukkig uitsonderings vir elke reël.
Daarom glo ek dat Dawie Roodt heel gelukkig met sy Russiese Katuschka is.
Sjertjie jy weet mos nou al by die tyd ek laat my nie so maklik uitlok nie. 😉
Get back to reality old chap. This Kim Wale looks British to me, not Russian. http://praag.org/?p=12192
Putin is alles behalwe ‘n Marxis. Ek plaas nou maar hierdie fototjie weer sodat almal dit weereens kan sien
Putin se agtergrond stem ooreen met die van ‘n bevoorregte lid van die USSR. Sy Pa was ‘n NKVD lid, sy Oupa ‘n kok vir Lenin en ook vir Stalin, wat impliseer dat die ou man veral in die neurotiese Stalin se geval, groot vertroue geniet het. Met
Word lid van die KP (Russiese antwoord vir die AB) in sy vroeë twintigers.
Almiskie is hy nie meer ‘n Marxis nie en het hy miskien ‘n Damaskus ervaring beleef, nadat die KP ontbind het? Wie sou dit nou weet?
In 2007 sê hy: “The fall of the Soviet Union was the biggest geopolitical catastrophe of the last century.” Let wel – Soviet Union – nie Russia nie.
Wat natuurlik op verskillende wyses deur verskillende siele vertolk kan word.
Hy mag ‘n baie oulike nuwe pel van die meerderheid in hierdie droewe land wees, maar ek het geen rede om te vermoed dat hy van enige nut vir my of my pelle, familie, of ons osse of ons esels of iets wat in ons besit is, sal wees nie.
Ek kry die indruk Praag, van alle instellings, is pro Israel. Israel, unlike Iran have been engaged in acts of terrorism and been in constant wars before, during and after its creation in 1948 and continues to day. Israel engaged in acts that are in the least could be and should be classified as “acts against humanity” from ethnic cleansing and exiling of Palestinians to “transfer of population” to destruction of villages, land theft, kidnapping, arrest and jailing without trial. Have engaged in assassinations in Paris, Iran, Syria, Jordan, Iraq, Egypt, Palestine, Dubai, Malta among many other places and yet it is not a “rogue state”.
Simply put, Iran would never have come to the table in Geneva unless it had no nuclear weapons program. This simple fact was confirmed by the Central Intelligence Agency in their 2007 National Intelligence Estimate.
Bastin confirmed that Iran neither possessed nor were they likely ever to possess necessary technology to convert twenty percent enriched uranium gas to weapons grade material. Netanyahu, in his response, thanked Bastin and acknowledged receipt of this information from the highest-level source available.
Clinton Bastin – VT nuclear expert
Later, more serious stories would come to light, NSA revelations from Edward Snowden, packaged for the mainstream media and more serious allegations, evidence of nuclear weapon use in Iraq discovered by Dr. Christopher Busby.
Or, more recently, evidence of a series of bio-chem warfare facilities brought to light by Jeffrey Silverman, just released from hospital in the Republic of Georgia after being attacked by what police claim were American security contractors.
Franklin Lamb got a good Press TV interview about General Hayden’s Sunday talk show where he flanked the Israelis to let them know that Israel with all of it’s WMDs is hardly the entity to make the rules for everybody else.
The U.S. is finally moving past the ‘all options are on the table’ silliness which made us look like a loud mouth, aging, bullying boxer.
George Bush – Who never could find his National Guard unit
I am absolutely sure that historians will look back on the Bush regime’s telling the moderate Iranian regime of Mr. 43′s first term to ‘take a hike’ when they reached out to normalize relations.
This was a terrible injustice to the American people, an abject betrayal. His public events should be empty for the rest of his life if more Americans had some pride.
But as Gordon Duff has sometimes pointed out, we have Americans who see dogs eating their own vomit and then say “Hey, I never thought of doing that…getting to eat it twice.” Such people are held in utter contempt by the elites, but serve them none the less as ‘useful idiots’.
Bibi has acknowledged the failure of his attempt to make us all slaves of Zionist foreign policy.
“As we have warned, and I say this with regret, the sanctions regime has started to weaken and very quickly,” said Netanyahu on Sunday during his visit to Italy. “If tangible steps are not taken soon, it is liable to collapse and the efforts of years will vanish without anything in exchange.”
As we stated in last weeks columns, now is the time to counter attack on the subversive Zionist lobby here and everyone who has supported them against their own country. We have the rest of our lives to make them pay for the suffering they caused so many people
After World War II America quickly disarmed, later blaming communist influence in government. Similarly, the popular uprising against American involvement in Vietnam led to a similar humiliation, particularly when North Vietnamese troops moved into Saigon, now Ho Chi Minh City, in 1975.
Matt moet jou tog asseblief nie al ewig soos n swarte gedra wat hulleself so in jou gesig afdwing nie – plaas n skakel dat mens tog n keuse het om dit te lees aldan nie.
Regtig Matt jy raak erg irriterend. Ek glo nie iemand lees wat jy spoeg en plak nie.
Matt, as die kennis in jou kop ontplof sal jou kuif nie eers roer nie. Hoe gaan dit met die boot waarop jy gewees het toe jy nog ‘n vlotie was?
‘n Mens voel amper of die aarde se tektoniese plate drasties moet skuif en ‘n nuwe landmassa vorm, voor jy wil waag om kommentaar te lewer op verwikkelinge in sentraal en Oos-Europa, die plek is dan so ver! Zuma het deur sy Brics-verbintenis – met Rusland ‘n sentrale rol in daardie alliansie – vir Poetien en Rusland effens nader aan ons gebring. En dalk ook Poetien en Rusland se vraagstukke. Daar is seker veel gemeen met ons en ook tussen ons en Rusland se Kaukasiese bure. Daardie streek is ook die afgelope 20 jaar deur ‘n ingrypende politieke herskikking met ‘n nuwe (?, met Poetien steeds daar???), regerings- en ‘n vergrote besitterselite (dié wás daar in die ou Sowjet-Unie; hierdie “kommunistiese” land het heelwat stinkryk miljoenêrs gehad). Maar vele godsdiens- en kultuur-“ongelykhede” binnenslands en aan sy grense en in sy invloedsfeer. Elke nag is gewis ‘n slaaplose nag vir Poetien met Rooi Sjina en sy menigtes en militêre grofgeskut sommer so in sy agterplaas, dis verseker. Maar een belangrike saak het ons gemeen: George Soros en sy nasie se sug na politieke, godsdienstige en ideologiese mag langs die weg van hulpbronne-, ekonomiese en industriële beheer en daarom met hul neuse (met behulp nro’s en die “Open Society”), in die Afrikanervolk se private sake.
Thanks for the link. Het gekyk. Daardie is ‘n militêre reus.
Prospects for the American regime to create disturbances and troubles in the Eurasian Balkans are dim and getting yet dimmer.
Rusland het beslis nie slapelose nagte oor Sjina nie. Hulle is ten volle bewus van China se plan met Afrika. Binne ‘n paar jaar sal die swartes wat nou so Sjina se lof besing agterkom, dat al die “gratis” goedjies wat hulle van ouboet gekry het, nie werkilk gratis was nie. Reuse “compounds” met honderde Sjinese spring oral oor Afrika op en hulle beplande oorname van Afrika is goed op dreef.
Skielik sal swart boetie en sussie agterkom dat die miljoene Sjinese wat “op uitnodiging” in Afrika aanland almal grade en ambagte het en die swartes is weereens uitgesluit van alles deur hul eie onnoselheid.
Alles draai om geld en mag in die politiek!!
Die term ‘oligarg’ is dikwels gebesig na die ineenstorting van die Sowjet-Unie toe verskillende topmense uit die Russiese sakewêreld noue bande met die politiek gehandhaaf het om so hul invloed te kon aanwend by politieke besluitneming. Maar ook in die Verenigde State van Amerika kan mens praat van ŉ oligargiese invloed van groot multinasionale maatskappye en banke op die politiek.
Yes,& we all know who owns most of the multi nationals & conglomerates.
Russian gambit all about cash
By Mikhail A Molchanov After Ukraine’s pro-European protesters took to the streets to denounce the
government’s backtracking on the European Union Association Agreement, things
went south for both the protesters and the government. While protesters were beaten up by the police, the government endured a siege
of both the Cabinet of Minsters and the president’s offices. The enraged crowd
occupied municipal offices of the City of Kiev. Protesters demand resignation
of President Viktor Yanukovych and his government and the signing of the treaty
with the European Union. Russia’s President Vladimir Putin says it was all
orchestrated from the West. Only few days back, it seems Ukraine was well on its way to Europe, leaving
Russia and its Customs Union out in the cold. The EU Vilnius summit was meant
to bring Ukraine into the European Union fold, thus humiliating Russia and its
designs for the rival regional association. However, the Vilnius summit ended with disappointing results. Ukraine had
suddenly announced that it was putting the process on the back burner until
“effective sales markets for the Ukrainian goods can be found”. Parallel
to that, Ukraine’s diplomats gave another reason for ending the talks –
“national security”. That was a code word for Russia’s pressure. In July, Moscow had subjected
Ukrainian exports to new customs procedures, which lengthened the clearance
time 10-fold and more. By mid-August, 900 freight train cars and 1,000 cargo
trucks were stuck on the border. Trade losses averaged 20-25% of the total
sales value. Ukraine could have lost up to US$2.5 billion in trade by the end
of the year if the draconian customs measures had been kept in place. Putin’s adviser on regional integration matters, Sergei Glaziev, declared that
that was a taste of things to come should Ukraine continue steering way from
the Russia-led Customs Union. “We are preparing to tighten the customs regime just in case Ukraine takes
the suicidal step of signing an agreement of association with the EU,” he
said. However, were Ukraine to backtrack on its European commitments, Moscow
would drop the price of its gas twofold or more. As Ukraine pays more for its
gas than anyone else in Europe, Moscow was confident that its offer would not
pass unnoticed. Immediately after the decision to delay the signing of the EU Association
Agreement, mass protests erupted. Last Sunday, more than 300,000 protesters
took to the streets in Kiev alone. A repetition of the “orange
revolution” of 2004 seemed to be in the offing. Protesters adopted a
resolution demanding the resignation of President Yanukovych. Meanwhile, the pro-government demonstrations were also gaining strength. A
meeting of 20,000 people was called by the Party of the Regions on Friday.
Prime Minister Mykola Azarov opined that, in addition to anti-government
demonstrations, “there was a lot of events to support the decision of the government”.
The general public is split in half. If in July pro-Western sympathizers were
in the majority (55%), an October poll saw their numbers shrunk by 5%. Support
of membership in the Customs Union is almost as high as that of the association
with the EU. This may all change, however, should the government’s opportunism come to be
perceived as incompetence. “Once again, I say that the decision was
forced, we had no other choice, and the time, of course, will prove us
true,” Azarov said. Perhaps. Ukraine’s East may still believe that the government’s actions were
dictated by its concern over the well-being of the people. Ukraine’s West,
however, want nothing less than the downfall of the government, which it
perceives as being too cozy to the Kremlin. In truth, the benefits that Ukraine might gain from the Association Agreement
with the EU, apart from freedom of the movement for Ukraine’s potential labor
migrants, are few. It is unrealistic to believe that the EU will come up with anything similar to
a pre-accession package that East Central Europeans used to enjoy. It is naive
to lobby for market-access guarantees. An association agreement with Europe
would bring little more than free trade and free travel – enough to make labor
migrants happy, but hardly enough to guarantee jobs domestically. The EU insists on Ukraine’s progress on the issue of selective justice, which
the detention of former prime minister Yulia Tymoshenko best exemplifies. Yet,
the prospect of Tymoshenko’s release horrifies Yanukovych. There is no one else
more capable to present a unified opposition to him and his government.
Besides, the rule of law is not the first priority of Ukraine’s elite. European-style laws ensure transparent business practices, which might be
applauded by many. Unfortunately for Ukraine’s oligarchs, these practices also
would weaken the political bases of their control of the country’s economy. Speaking at the Vilnius summit, Yanukovych reaffirmed Ukraine’s commitment to
sign the EU document. However, he failed to convince European leaders. While
many expected an idealistic “leap of faith”, Kiev demanded at least
20 billion euros (US$27 billion) a year in financial aid. [Yanukovich is now
visiting China, where is due to stay until December 6, seeking loans and
investment to head off a debt crisis, according to Reuters.] Still slow on reforms, Ukraine insisted on EU help in softening International
Monetary Fund loan terms. Yanukovych, who himself comes from Ukraine’s
Russian-speaking east, also proposed bringing Russia on board in Ukraine’s
negotiations with Brussels. Overall, the message that the government sent to the EU was not that different
from the one heard before: what we need is money, not the human rights sermon.
If a hefty handout from Europe was not guaranteed, Ukraine would throw its lot
in with Eurasia, specifically, the Eurasian Union built by Russia, Kazakhstan,
and Belarus as a geopolitical alternative to the European Union. For Ukraine’s elite, this tug-of-war between Europe and Eurasia is really not
about values, nor is it about identity. In the end, it’s all about money. Mikhail A Molchanov, of St Thomas University, Canada is the
author of Political Culture and National Identity in Russian-Ukrainian
Relations (Texas A&M University Press, 2002).
Die Europese Unie sal nooit werk nie. Die verskille in Europa is simpelweg te groot. Hoekom moet lande as Duitsland en Nederland opgeskeep word met Roemene en Bulgare? Die linkse illusie dat ‘almal dieselfde is’ is een groot klomp stront. ‘n Duitser is geen Griek nie. Die verskil is amper soos tussen ‘n Boer en ‘n Sotho.
Dit sal beter wees om die EU te verdeel in ‘n sogenoemde West – Europese Unie met daarin die Germaanse lande, ‘n Oos-Europese unie met die Slawiese volkere, en ‘n Suid-Europese Unie met die Romaanse volkere (Franse, Spanjaarde, Italiane, dalk Grieke). Daardie lande het dieselfde mentaliteit. Moenie die hardwerkende Duitser, Nederlander, Vlaming, etc. in ‘n selfde klomp gemors gooi as die Grieke wat nie wil werk nie.
Shavuit, ek stem 100%. Stig ‘n Germaanse Koalisie en verander die wereld.
Die Germane is so vining besig om te verbaster en om “wereldburgerskap” na te jaag, dat ek moeilik sien hoe dit sal kan gebeur. Hulle is oorsensitief en oorversigtig na Hitler se eskapades.
Vorige Vorige artikel: Agt mites oor e-tolVolgende Volgende artikel: Ramptoestand in Pretoria afgekondig