← Sarah Miles
Vertoon wysigings vanaf 17 Februarie 2020 05:23
Ontsluit van "https://af.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spesiaal:OnlangseVeranderingsMetSkakels/Sarah_Miles" Farms ruined - now they dont want to farm anymore - Page 3 - Stormfront
Farms ruined - now they dont want to farm anymore
06-11-2005, 07:18 PM #21
Re: Farms ruined - now they dont want to farm anymore
Modderklip – skade word nou bepaal
Twee onafhanklike waardeerders vir die staat het verlede week die plaas Modderklip aan die Oos-Rand besoek om die skade en verliese wat die eienaar die afgelope vyf jaar gelei het, te bepaal.
Die vergoeding wat aan die eienaar, Braam Duvenage, betaal moet word, behoort ’n redelike groot bedrag te wees. Dit word bereken volgens behuisingspotensiaal en nie as landbougrond wat verhuur is nie.
Vyf jaar gelede het duisende plakkers 50 ha van die plaas onwettig beset. Die getalle beloop na beraming nou tussen 40 000 en 60 000 mense wat daar huis opgesit het.
’n Teerpad is ook van die hoofweg na die plakkers aangelê. Ook hiervoor is geen vergoeding aan Duvenage betaal nie en sy toestemming is ook nooit gevra nie. Intussen is watertenks ook by die plakkerskamp aangebring. Daar was selfs sprake van ’n treinstasie.
Die grondwetlike hof het op 13 Mei vanjaar eenparig beslis die eienaar moet vergoed word vir verliese wat die afgelope vyf jaar gelei is.
Twee onafhanklike waardeerders vir die staat het opdrag gekry om die skade te bepaal ingevolge die Onteieningswet, 63 van 1975 (soos gewysig)). Kompensasie moet bepaal word vir die huur van die grond van 31 Mei 2000 tot Mei 2005.
“Die Wet bepaal dat twee waardeerders aangestel moet word om na kompensasie te kyk. As daar ’n verskil groter as 10% tussen die twee waardeerders voorkom, kan ’n derde waardeerder aangestel word,” sê Niel de Klerk van Vanderbijlpark.
“Dis is ’n baie moeilike saak om te hanteer.
“Die vergoeding vir werklike skade wat gelei is, moet absoluut volgens erkende tegniese en finansiële metodes bepaal word,” sê De Klerk.
Vyf jaar gelede is grond in die omgewing vir tussen R25 000 en R30 000 per ha verkoop. Die kompensasie wat aan Duvenage betaal moet word, word teruggewerk. Grond vir behuising word vandag teen ongeveer R30 000 per ha verkoop.
“Ons kan op hierdie stadium geen bedrag noem nie. Maar dit lyk of die bedrag aansienlik kan wees,” het nog ’n waardeerder, Jan Janse van Rensburg van Germiston, gesê.
“Ek is net dankbaar daar is ’n positiewe roering aan die gang en dat dinge so gou begin gebeur het ná die uitspraak van die hof,” sê die eienaar, Braam Duvenage.
“Ek wil eerder die hele plaas van 2 300 ha verkoop. Dan kan die staat bestaansboerdery toepas,” sê hy.
“Ons kan dan wegtrek en ’n ander plaas koop. Ek wil nie baklei nie, ek wil net hê die probleem moet opgelos word en dat almal gelukkig is,” het hy gesê.
Volgens sy seun, Daan, is hulle al van 2000 gewillige verkopers. “Dit help nie dat net ’n deel van die plaas verkoop word nie. Oor ’n paar jaar sit ons dan met dieselfde probleem op die res van die grond. Ons stel voor dat die staat al die grond by ons koop want daar is reeds natuurlike grense soos paaie en spruite,” sê Daan.
“Die besette grond kan nooit weer as landbougrond gebruik word nie – dit is as die staat nie die grond gaan koop en die plakkers gaan verwyder nie,” is sy mening.
Die Duvenages moet wetlik nou vir 50 ha landbougrond wat as behuising gebruik is, vergoed word.
Nadat hulle vergoed is, kan onderhandelinge begin vir die verkoop van die grond. Die huidige markprys vir landbougrond is R12 500 per hektaar.
06-11-2005, 10:36 PM #22
This is my first ever post at Stormfront. Since I view our plight in a global context, I think that it's only fitting that I start by expressing my sorrow and anger at the South African genocide against Whites. The genocide that the American media completely ignores. In addition, the social constructs that the Black Communists have put in place, like the "Black Empowerment Program," where hard working Whites must "share" 50% of their business ownership with undeserving Blacks. 50% of their livelihood, creativity, and honest toil in establishing those businesses over generations. They probably reason that it's "50-50," it's only fair. Under Apartheid, the Blacks benefitted greatly compared to what they were, which explains why South Africa had one of the worst illegal immigration problems in the world during Apartheid. Never lose faith, the global race struggle is now only just beginning.
06-12-2005, 06:34 AM #23
Warm Welcome to you my friend!!
06-12-2005, 12:25 PM #24
South Africa expropriates Afrikaner-owned farm
Comment: Let this be a warning to all foreign investors to stay away from South Africa - because anyone's property - any urban, suburban and agricultural land -- can be seized under this new expropriation law...
June 8 2005 - SA's land minister is all set to approve the country's first forced expropriation order.
The expropriation order for the highly-productive farm of Afrikaner farmer Mr F Visser of Delarey - it is expected to be signed by the minister by the end of the week or early next week -- is rekindling fears that expropriations in which farmers will be 'compensated' with useless government bonds, will become the norm instead of the exception.
The department's financial directorate would this week "finalise the amount of compensation to be paid" to the farmer before the order is signed.However, it's all a totally meaningless spindoctoring exercise: whatever 'compensation' is received by Mr Visser, will be in the form of government bonds... which he won't be able to cash in, if at all, for several years...Essentially, farmer Visser is going to be "paid" for his valuable, productive and much-improved farm with a useless bit of printed paper.And under this new law, the only thing he can still legally argue about is the amount of 'compensation' filled on on those government bonds...
Farmer Visser has become an illegal squatter on his own farm:As a matter of fact right now, farmer Visser can be thrown off his farm as an illegal squatter, together with his family and his workers -- because he is already considered a 'former owner' with no rights on his own property any longer.
And all this can be done legally in South Africa now, under the new "Restitution of Land Rights Act" - which allows the individual minister to expropriate any land anywhere at her own pleasure, and without any court order - and under the stipulations of this law, this includes not only farm land which had been 'stolen from blacks after 1913' -- but also any other privately-held property owned by paler-skinned people in urban and suburban areas of South Africa.
Farmers' unions expressed deep disappointment yesterday at the minister's decision - pointing at that at the time the law was signed, the ANC-regime had assured everyone concerned that this law would only be used in 'extreme circumstances.'
Laurie Bosman, president of the pro-ANC farmers' union AgriSA, was whimpish about the land-theft, merely saying that this expropriation "sends the wrong message to the outside world for investment and property rights in SA."
Chris Jordaan, president of the Transvaal Agricultural Union, said the move signalled the start of state-sanctioned land grabs.
"The only difference between SA and Zimbabwe is that the minister does it here through racist legislation."
Visser in the Delareyville district of North West had initially wanted R6m (a mere $600,000) before lowering his price to R3m. However, a government-appointed valuer then revalued his very productive farm downward to a mere R1,7million, ($170,000) but the farmer said the land was highly fertile, his homestead and outbuildings were much more valuable then that and he refused to budge.Yet all this wrangle is meaningless because they are getting 'paid' in government bonds, in other words the land is simply being stolen from them.
Visser was among five Afrikaner farmers in Gauteng, Limpopo, Mpumalanga and North West province who faced expropriation last year when "price negotiations" deadlocked.
They "agreed to resume talks" after they were forced into it when threatened with expropriation.
06-12-2005, 12:28 PM #25
Sommer uit die perd se bek!!!!!
Farmers' unions expressed disappointment yesterday at the minister's decision, but land activists welcomed it.
"All other avenues should be exhausted before this extreme measure is taken," said Laurie Bosman, president of farmers' union AgriSA. "It sends the wrong message to the outside world for investment and property rights in SA."
Chris Jordaan, president of the Transvaal Agricultural Union, said the move signalled the start of state-sanctioned land grabs. "The only difference between SA and Zimbabwe is that the minister does it here through legislation."
"There are still farmers who feel they can resist restitution, but they are not in the majority," he said.
He denied the move would scare off investors. "Expropriation is not the main vehicle for land delivery," he said. "It is only done in extreme cases and having due regard for the rights of the owner."
06-12-2005, 02:13 PM #26
ek het die draad gelees, en wil a ander sy van die storie gee. die vyand het nou gesien dat om plaase te vat werk nie, hulle sien dit in die res van afrika, nou verander hulle taktiek ons moet pasop dat dit nie ons ontkant vang nie, want nou gaan hulle vir die stede in sa, dit maak die nag van verskriking net nog moontliker. ons sal moet katvoet loop.
ek het nog nooit van a swart boer gehoor wat suksesfol was nie. akrika is a bewys daarvan.
06-12-2005, 04:30 PM #27
Piet, ek het 'n artikel wat ek sal gaan soek, waar die swart boere kla hulle kan nie oorleef nie, dit nadat hulle alles verniet gekry het, of op regering skuld, en nou is daar niks op die plase oor nie. Ek se weer dit is soos 'n klomp springkane, verwoes alles, hulle het nie eers respek vir die bome op die plaas nie, die word gebruik vir brand hout.
Why dont we dance anymore? krom Culture and Customs 89 04-10-2006 06:21 AM