Sabinet | Volume 1968, Issue 6
Issue 6, 1968 De Rebus - Volume 1968,
Issue 6, 1968 Navigate this Journal About Current issue Previous issues Submit a paper Contact the editor OA African Journal Archive Volumes & issues
n Ou twisappel, naamlik die behoud of afskaffing van Latyn as voorvereiste vir regstudie, het weer sy verskyning gemaak - hierdie keer in die vorm van &apos;n aanbeveling vir die afskaffing daarvan deur die Sekretaris van Justisie in sy jongste Jaarverslag wat onlangs in die Parlement ter tafel gelê is. Die argumente wat aangevoer word ter ondersteuning van die aanbeveling is nie nuut nie en sal Latiniste ook nie oortuig nie. Wat wel van belang is, is die erns en nadruk waarmee die saak aangevoer word en die feit dat die aanbeveling kom van &apos;n persoon met soveel invloed en gesag as die Sekretaris van Justisie. Daar kan stellig verwag word dat sy pleidooi nie op dowe ore sal val nie en dat dit &apos;n sterk stoot sal gee aan die ywer van diegene wat ten gunste is van die afskaffing van Latyn. Add to my favourites
Lastige punte i.v.m. invorderingskoste
De Rebus 1968, pp 5 –6 (1968)
Die vraag word dikwels gestel of dit toelaatbaar is om invorderingskoste te vra op koste en of invorderingskoste net op die kapitale bedrag van die skuldeiser se eis, gehef kan word. Indien hierdie vraag suiwer deurdink word en indien die posisie goed oorweeg word, is dit heeltemal duidelik dat invorderingskoste gevra kan en moet word ook op alle kostes wat aangegaan is.
Maintenance of children and medical expenses
The Commissioner for Child Welfare has recently drawn attention to the fact that frequently, when an order for maintenance of children is made, either by the Court granting the divorce or by a Magistrate on the application of the custodian mother, no mention is made of liability for medical expenses incurred in respect of such child or children.
S.N. Van Rhyn, J.N.R. & Harris
De Rebus 1968, pp 9 –12 (1968)
At the request of the Association of Law Societies, Prof. J. N. R. van Rhyn assisted by Dr. S. N. Harris, both of the University of the O.F.S., drafted the replies to the questionnaire on this topic. The following is a summary of the first part of their report. Further parts will appear in future issues of De Rebus Procuratoriis.
Lesing oor boedelbereddering
De Rebus 1968, pp 13 –17 (1968)
""Die nuwe Boedelwet (Wet 66 van 1965) plaas die inisiatief vir die behoorlike en spoedige bereddering van bestorwe boedels ten volle op die skouers van eksekuteurs. In die vervolg sal die Meester van die Hooggeregshof nie meer die leiding neem by die bereddering van &apos;n boedel nie. Hy sal bloot kontroleer dat die eksekuteurs hulle pligte in ooreenstemming met die bepalings van die Wet, nakom.""
Beroepsmanne moet leiding neem
De Rebus 1968, pp 17 –21 (1968)
You will see that the sub-section precludes any person not registered as a patent agent from descriptionbing himself as a patent attorney or patent agent. Attorneys are entitled to practice as patent agents in terms of &apos;Section 90 of the Act but unless they are registered as patent agents they cannot use the titles mentioned in sub-section 3 of Section 93. My Council is aware of at least one instance where a firm of attorneys unjustifiably descriptionbe themselves as ""Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys."" If only for the purpose of alerting your members to the penalties set out in Sub-Section 4 of Section 90 my Council feels justified in bringing this matter to your attention.
The preparation for and writing of the attorneys&apos; examination
De Rebus 1968, pp 22 –24 (1968)
One of the requirements for admission as an Attorney is that the applicant must produce to the Court a certificate of proficiency furnished by the examiners in an examination :- (i) in the Practice and Procedure of the Supreme Court of South Africa and of the Magistrates&apos; Courts established under the Magistrates Courts&apos; Act of 1944
Nou gaan ek ook
De Rebus 1968, pp 25 –28 (1968)
De Rebus 1968, pp 29 –31 (1968)
De Rebus 1968, pp 32 –34 (1968)
Incorporated law society of Natal
De Rebus 1968, pp 36 –37 (1968)