Blog aangaande Spiritualiteit en Gnostisisme | Spiritualiteit – Gnostisisme – Filosofie – die wetenskap
Hoe behoort ons te dink en op te tree: vier moontlike kategorieë
Posted on Januarie 26, 2018	by Jaco Steyn
Vervolgens verduidelik ek my verstaan van die verskille tussen die linkerhand en regterhand paaie, as twee wyd uiteenlopende waardestelsels. Indien ons die verhouding tussen ‘n mens en ‘n moontlike God/Goddelike Werklikheid as vertrekpunt sou neem, kan ons ‘n beter begrip kry van verskillende waardestelsels wat deur die jare deur mense gevolg is. Ondersteuners van die regterhand pad glo dat die eintlike doel van hul lewens is om hulleself te onderwerp aan óf die gesag van ‘n Persoonlike God, óf om uiteindelik een te word met ‘n onpersoonlike Goddelike Werklikheid. Vir ondersteuners van die linkerhand pad is die hoogste prioriteit die bevordering van die mag/belange/plesier van hulle unieke self/ego/bewussyn/siel – dikwels ten koste van die belange van andere.
Binne die regterhand pad onderskei ek tussen die godsdienstige en spirituele waardestelsel. Die godsdienstige mens glo dikwels dat ‘n Persoonlike Skeppergod sekere verordeninge en opdragte met mense gedeel het d.m.v. die een of ander goddelik-geïnspireerde geskrif. Diegene wat hierdie riglyne sou gehoorsaam en respekteer, het ‘n groter kans om die ewige lewe te beërwe, as ‘n “halsstarrige ongelowige” wat dit sou durf waag om die geldigheid van die veronderstelde goddelik-geïnspireerde geskrif te bevraagteken. Die spirituele mens glo in die werklikheid van ‘n onpersoonlike Goddelike waaruit alle bestaande dinge geëmaneer het en dat dit sy/haar lewensdoel of bestemming is om uiteindelik een te word met die Goddelike.
Binne die linkerhand pad onderskei ek tussen diegene wat glo in die voortbestaan van die bewussyn na die afsterwe van die fisiese liggaam en diegene wat nié daarin glo nie. Eersgenoemde is ondersteuners van die “transendente linkerhand pad”, terwyl laasgenoemde die “immanente linkerhand pad” ondersteun. ‘n Goeie voorbeeld hiervan is die verskille tussen die Kerk van Satan wat in 1966 deur Anton LaVey gestig is in San Fransisco en die Temple of Set wat lateraan deur Michael Aquino gestig is. Anton LaVey het gefokus op die “hier-en-nou” materiële behoeftes van die individu, terwyl Michael Aquino geglo het in die verdere evolusie van (ten minste sommige) mense se siele na die dood van die fisiese brein.
Dit gebeur dikwels dat sommige mense besluit om ‘n spesifieke waardestelsel aan te beveel vir diegene vir wie hulle omgee, terwyl hulle ‘n ander waardestelsel propageer vir andere wat deur hulle onderdruk en mislei word. Sodoende is godsdienstige waardestelsels vir baie jare gepropageer om miljoene gelowiges se denke en gedrag te reguleer wat dan kwansuis in ooreenstemming was met die verordeninge van die een of ander vreesaanjaende god. Bybelgedeeltes wat verwys na owerhede wat deur God aangestel is, is gebruik om dikwels die heerskappy van korrupte regimes mee te regverdig. Deesdae word veral die politieke ideologie waarvolgens alle mense gelyk gebore is en hulle daarom gelyke stemreg behoort te hê, gebruik om die belange van super ryk besigheidsmense en eienaars van die hoofstroommedia, te bevorder. Baie lede van die super ryk elite is egter deeglik bewus van die wesenlike oorgeërfde genetiese verskille tussen mense wat ‘n bepalende invloed het op hulle intelligensie- en skeppingsvermoëns. Opportunistiese mense gee dus dikwels voor dat hulle ywerige navolgers is van die een of ander mooiklinkende, emosiebelaaide waardestelsel. In hierdie artikel het ek die eienskappe van waardestelsels meer breedvoerig bespreek.
New book about the motivations and background of Vladimir Putin
Posted on Julie 4, 2017	by Jaco Steyn
The insightful book, “Putin’s Reign of Terror the Permanent Revolution in Our Time”, written by Christopher Jon Bjerknes, was published recently and can be purchased from Amazon at https://www.amazon.com/dp/1548248533.
Here is a summary of the contents of this book:
On 16 August 1999, the Duma elected Vladimir Putin Prime Minister of Russia. He faced enormous opposition to his rule. On 26 August 1999, Putin began to attack the Chechen People on the pretext of suppressing the activities of the Islamic International Brigade and in response to the “Apartment Bombings” which Putin blamed on the Chechens, but which were in fact the work of the KGB/FSB. These international terrorists were working for Putin, not against him. Putin rapidly gained the popularity he was initially wanting and used it to elevate himself onto the lofty throne of a new Russian dictatorship. His feet barely reached the ground. Vladimir Putin quickly restored the communist dictatorship of the Soviet Union with covert State sponsored terrorism which provided a pretext for ever expanding State powers. Putin took over control of the media and persecuted dissenting journalists, thereby insulating his communist kleptocracy from public scrutiny. Vladimir Putin has used Chechen terrorists as a pretext to invade Chechnya, Georgia and Syria. In Chechnya, Ukraine and Syria, Putin has pitted Chechens against Chechens to intensify the fighting and amplify the destruction. Where the Chechen terrorists go, Putin and the Russian military follow, and occupy. Reconstructing and expanding the Soviet Union as he goes, Putin has since followed the Chechen shock troops he commands all the way to Syria, where they lead ISIS. These same terrorists strike around the world at key moments in the election cycle of Putin’s favored political candidates abroad, candidates who run on an anti-terrorism platform and benefit politically from the terrorism they ostensibly oppose. It is a generally unacknowledged fact that ISIS strikes in regions and at times which benefit Putin’s preferred politicians abroad and at home. This cannot be a coincidence, given the numbers of attacks and their predictable effects on elections. But the author is alone in reporting this obvious fact to the world. Putin and Trump are colluding to subvert and co-opt NATO and change its mission from defending Europe from Russia, to fighting self consuming wars against Muslims — destroying their countries and the West for the benefit of Russia and Israel. The book exposes the hypocritical role neonazis play in undermining NATO and promoting KGB communist Vladimir Putin, and Putin’s hypocrisy in supporting “fascists” abroad while outlawing Nationalism and anti-Semitism in Russia. It provides a history of the controlled opposition of Libertarianism to Communism, as well as Murray Rothbard’s anti-American Soviet apologetics and Ron Paul’s revealing Russian apologetics. Ayn Rand is exposed as a communist and zionist subversive, and member of the Soviet “Trust”. Trotskyite neoconservatives commandeered the Republican Party, and in collusion with Russia and Israel have forwarded the Marxist permanent revolution worldwide with false flag terrorism and endless wars. Given Americans’ reluctance to fight more self-defeating wars against Islam, Putin now carries the torch of Trotsky’s permanent revolution and engages in relentless false flag terrorism. He seeks to turn all of Europe into vassal States serving a new and enlarged Eurasian Soviet Union. The communists are staging conflicts between bolshevik antifa and their neonazi twins so as to destabilize the West to the point of a crisis, at which point the communists will instigate civil wars and invade. The communists never stopped fighting WW II and seek to genocide the German People as an act of revenge and a means to prevent another counter-revolutionary war against Russian bolshevism. There is a large section on the British 2017 general election and the spate of terrorism that took place leading up to it. The Soviets created the modern anti-zionist movement and are using it to promote Muslim immigration to Europe and America, and to drive a wedge between the North Atlantic alliance and Israel, in favor of a Russian-Israeli alliance.
Posted in Uncategorized	| 10 Kommentaar