Chair, what I am saying to you is that a proposal was made. Can you make a ruling on that so that if you are rejecting it, then we proceed from that basis? But a point of order through another point of order, on its own, is unparliamentary. We need guidance from you to restore to the point of order that has been raised - it is legitimate. The issue of language is legitimate, but what is a problem now is we are engaged in theatrics of speeches and that is where the problem is. So Chair, please make a ruling so that we engage on the basis of the direction you are pointing to. “Sesiqedelane leligi yethu, sekusele umncintiswano weChampions League. Ngomnyaka odluleyo usehlule umncintiswano lo ngakho sizaqinela ukuthi sedlulele phambili. Ngokuqina langokuzimisela esiyikho khona, sizaloba imbali ngokuba liqembu lakuqala eliphuma eZvishavane ukuthi sifike ku-final yeChampions League. Zoke iinlwana bezikhamba ngammbili. Gade kunendlovu eduna nesikazi, ibhubezi eliduna nelisikazi. Kodwana u-Adamu gade anganaye umlingani. UJehova wabangela u-Adamu bonyana ehlelwe buthongo obukhulu, wakhupha ibambo lakhe. UJehova waberegisa ibambo alithathe ku-Adamu wamenzela umfazi.