Abstraktes Bild (809-1)
Abstraktes Bild (809-1) is a 1994 painting by the Dresden-born artist Gerhard Richter. In the top-ten list of the most expensive paintings by Richter it occupied 6th place in 2013. "Abstraktes Bild (809-1)" is the first from a series of four paintings. "Abstraktes Bild (809-3)" is in the collection of the Tate Gallery. When Eric Clapton brought "Abstraktes Bild (809-4)" to auction at Christie's in 2013, it sold for At the same auction, "Abstraktes Bild (809-2)" sold for . Provenance. The painting was first shown at the exhibition "Gerhard  Richter: Painting in the Nineties" at the Anthony d’Offay Gallery in London where it was purchased by . It was exhibited from June to August 2000 in the Dresden castle at the exhibition "Dalí, Miró, Picasso… Sammlung Ulla und Heiner Pietzsch, Juni-August 2000". In 2001, Ulla and Heiner Pietzsch brought the painting to auction at Sotheby’s in New York where Eric Clapton bought it together with two other Richters for a total of . Christie's auctioned "Abstraktes Bild (809-1)" on November 12, 2013 where it fetched . Description. The abstract painting is painted in the fall colours scarlet, emerald  green, gold- end lemon yellow with spots of violet and Prussian blue. The complicated and tedious, repeatedly interrupted process of its creation remains visible in the picture. The paint stripes or stains, which are quickly and randomly applied with a brush, are drawn down to the lower edge of the picture with the aid of a squeegee on the canvas, they dry, layers of other colours are applied here and there. Again, distributed with the squeegee randomly, they dry again, colour layers are here and there scraped off to the ground. These processes are repeated until the painter considers the  painting as completed. The vertical and horizontal lines created by the movement of the board seem to give the picture, with its abundance of colours, a certain structure and convey a certain aspect of calm and harmony. Its creation process remains recognizable in the painting, but at the same time remains "veiled". According to the artist, these paintings are to a considerable extent dependent on chance and often contradict in their final version of his initial image idea. The painting is signed, numbered and dated on the reverse.