Manitoba (AG) v Manitoba Egg and Poultry Association
Manitoba (AG) v Manitoba Egg and Poultry Association (the Manitoba Egg Reference)  S.C.R. 689 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the Trade and Commerce power under section 91(2) of the "Constitution Act, 1867". The decision was the result of a growing political debate known as the "chicken and egg war" where Quebec and Ontario enacted protectionist legislation for the egg and poultry industry preventing Manitoba from selling their eggs and poultry products in those provinces. To much of the public's surprise the Court struck down a provincial  statute regulating the marketing of eggs. The case somewhat contradicted the precedent case of "Carnation Co. v. Quebec Agricultural Marketing Board",  S.C.R. 238 which held that provincial law that has an incidental effect on other provinces is still valid. The Court held that even though there was no direct evidence showing that there was extraprovincial effect of the provincial law, the potential effect was sufficient to find the law "ultra vires". The Court found that control of imports was essential to the provincial legislative scheme even though the law made no distinction between eggs produced inside or outside of  the province. The Court distinguished the case from the "Carnation" decision by the fact that the Manitoba regulations intended to provide regulation of inter-provincial trade while in "Carnation" the law only has the "effect" of regulating inter-provincial trade. In the aftermath of the decision, all 11 governments, the 10 governments of the provinces and the federal government, entered an agreement with the federal government which arranged a federal egg marketing scheme which created quotas for each of the provinces, and charged tariffs for eggs sold outside of the province.