ekugcineni ngingathanda ukuphawula ukuthi into esemqoka ayesabi ukukhuluma nokuveza umbono wakho siqu, ngoba abantu abakwazi ukuvumelana nabanye abakaze bathande, futhi ngeke bathande. ngisho noma umbono wakho uphambene ngokuphelele nemicabango yabanye -- veza konke njengoba ucabanga, bese--ke uzobe uhlonishwa ngenxa yesibindi sakho sokulwa nabanye, futhi uma ""ubonisa"" umbono wakho ophikisanayo ngosizo lwenkulumo ekhulunywe ngokuphawulekayo, khona--ke abakwa--interlocutors ngeke basho lutho olubi nakancane, kodwa ngiyabonga ngezikhathi ezimangalisayo lapho belalela khona inkulumo enhle kakhulu, ehlakaniphile. “I feel like you were attacking someone”. I know how I came across and I didn’t attack Jonathan at all. Our opinions differ and neither of us are changing our points of view, but we still conversed. Speaking of bias, yours is also very apparent. What does George Zimmerman’s being hispanic have to do with proving that this was not about race? Is an incident not based on race if it doesn’t occur between a member of the black and white race? What does President Obama’s heritage have to do with this thread? I’ve always acknowledged his ethnic makeup for what it is. Ngokudabukisayo, there are those who would consider him black just because of the color of his skin. Yebo, I said George Zimmerman was a liar and a murderer, both true statements. Just because the jury acquitted him doesn’t make either one false. At the end of the day, exactly what is the point that you are trying to hammer home? I’m sorry if you feel as though I am attacking anyone. Am I not allowed to speak my opinion just as everyone else on this thread has without being blamed for being something that I know I am not?